Figures
Abstract
Background
Many patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) may require special attention and long-term treatment. Little is known on the efficacy and tolerability of the drugs used in practice.
Material and methods
We retrospectively reviewed the results of therapy of 400 patients with chronic ITP. All Patients were treated at our institution between 1996–2016 under consideration of guidelines, general recommendations, and individual aspects, including gender, age, weight, comorbidity, patient’s medical history and bleeding risk.
Results
Treatment was not required in 25% of patients (n = 100) during observation. In treated patients (n = 300), the rate of patients that responded and tolerated treatment with prednisolone was 59% (52/88), with azathioprine 32% (29/90), with eltrombopag 49% (31/63), with romiplostim 59% 27/45, with IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulines) 75% (94/126), with anti-D 37% (19/52) and with dexamethasone 60% (25/42) patients. Eighteen treated patients (6%) entered sustained remission after treatment with various drugs. Twenty-six patients underwent splenectomy (Splx) resulting in sustained remission in 15 cases (60%). Only two patients remained refractory to Splx and to all used drugs.
Discussion
None of the currently available drugs used in the treatment of ITP are invariably safe and effective. Responses, the duration of response, intolerability, and the course of disease are unpredictable. Although the treatment of ITP has considerably improved in the recent years, the currently available drugs may rarely cure affected patients. The need for safe and effective therapy in ITP is evident. Optimal treatment decisions for each patient remains a challenge in many cases.
Citation: Depré F, Aboud N, Mayer B, Salama A (2018) Efficacy and tolerability of old and new drugs used in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia: Results from a long-term observation in clinical practice. PLoS ONE 13(6): e0198184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198184
Editor: Gualtiero I. Colombo, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, ITALY
Received: July 26, 2017; Accepted: May 15, 2018; Published: June 1, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Depré et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Almost 100 years have passed since the establishment of splenectomy (Splx) as the first and still successfully used therapeutic measure in management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) [1]. The second therapeutic measure available for ITP patients was cortisone, which became available in 1951 [2], and was later on replaced by modified and less toxic steroids [3]. Since the 1960’s, immunosuppressive drugs including azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and vinblastine have been used, but their use remains limited in ITP [4]. A new era in the treatment of ITP was established in 1981 with the observation that intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) resulted in an unexpected increase in platelet counts (plc) in children with ITP [5, 6]. Soon thereafter, a fourth alternative was incorporated into the list of therapeutic options in ITP: anti-D [7]. The late 1990s saw the introduction of rituximab [8], whereas the turn of the new century was influenced by well-designed studies using thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) [9–12]. Although the list of available drugs in the treatment of ITP is growing, there remain several unsatisfactory aspects [13]. These include the results and comments of several reviews and reports dealing with ITP management and outcomes [4, 14–22] and various guidelines on the management of ITP [23–26]. The recommendations are somewhat arbitrary and cannot be applied in many cases [14, 18, 26–29]. In addition, many factors including ethnicity [30, 31], subjective opinion, and conflict of interest may play a role in the management of ITP. Ultimately, there is no specific curative treatment for autoimmune diseases. The present study focuses on the long-term efficacy and safety of drugs used in the treatment of patients with ITP in our institute during the last two decades. The results clearly indicate that the treatment of ITP has improved, but still should be replaced by more specific and safe drugs.
Materials and methods
Data from 400 patients (398 adults, and 2 children; 143 males and 257 females) with a mean age of 50.5 years (range, 3–101 years) that were diagnosed with chronic ITP [32], between 1964 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed to assess the efficacy and safety of the used therapies. All patients were treated on an outpatient basis at our institution by a single physician between 1996 and 2016. Standard dose of therapeutic agents was used (Prednisolone 0,5–1 mg/kg/d for 1–3 weeks, ≤ 7,5 mg/d for >3 weeks; Dexamethasone 40 mg/d for 4 days (1–6 cycles every 14–28 days); IVIG 0,4–2 g/kg; Anti-D 50–75 μg/kg; Rituximab 375 mg/m2/week for 4 times; Splx laparoscopic; Azathioprine 1-2mg/kg/d; Eltrombopag 50–75 mg/d; Romiplostim 1–10 μg/kg/week; Dapsone 75–100 mg/d; Cyclophosphamide 1–2 mg/kg/d p.o., 0,3–1 g/m2 i.v. every 2–4 weeks; Ciclosporine A 5 mg/kg/d for 6 days then 2,5–3 mg/kg/d (titration to 100–200 ng/ml blood level); Mycophenolate-mofetil 1000–2000 mg/d; MTX 5–25 mg/week) [22–24]. In short-course treatments (Table 1) (e.g., IVIG, dexamethasone, anti-D, rituximab, Splx), response was defined as an elevation of plc ≥ 30 x 109/L with at least doubling of the baseline value within their individual agent/intervention time to peak response [32]. In patients under continuous treatments (Table 2), response criteria were a sustained elevation of plc ≥ 30 x 109/L with at least doubling of the baseline value and compensated primary hemostasis during treatment observation. Sustained remission was defined as plc ≥ 100 x 109/L without the requirement of further ITP therapy during at least 3 months of further observation (mean 25, months/range 3–108 months). Prior to assessment, all data has been fully anonymized. This study was approved by the institutional ethics review board (EA2/058112) of the Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Results
Prior to consultation at our institution, 257 of 400 patients underwent treatment with therapies that were ineffective and/or intolerable due to side effects (Fig 1). The mean number of previous therapies was two (range 1–6). Prednisolone was the most frequent previously used drug (84%). The vast majority of these patients (88%) discontinued prednisolone due to inefficacy and/or intolerability including weight gain, hypertension, diabetes, osteoporosis, gastric ulceration or depression, resulting in a switch in therapy prior to initial consultation at our institution (Fig 1).
One hundred (25%), including the two children, of the 400 patients did not require any therapeutic intervention during observation due to mild ITP and the absence of any bleeding and/or high bleeding risks. Of these 100 patients, 32 (39%) entered remission, 51 patients (61%) had persistent, but still mild ITP without the need for therapy, and long-term follow-up was absent in 17 patients (Fig 2).
The remaining 300 patients received an average of two treatments (range 1–10) during observation at our institute.
A total of 92 patients (23%) received prednisolone for at least one month (Table 2). Follow-up data were not available in four cases (4%). In the remaining 88 patients, 64 (73%) responded to this treatment. However, only eight (13%) of the responding patients entered sustained remission. Despite low-dose therapy (1–7.5 mg/d; Table 2), 12 (19%) patients developed intolerability during observation. Twenty-four patients (27%) did not respond to treatment.
Azathioprine was used in 96 patients (24%), 82 of those had additional concomitant treatment with low-dose prednisolone (1–7.5 mg/d; Table 2). Six patients (6%) were not evaluated due to lack of follow-up data. In the remaining 90 patients, 49 patients (54%) responded to the treatment and 20 (41%) of those patients discontinued therapy due to adverse reactions, which included diverse gastrointestinal symptoms, hair loss, and drug fever. Two patients (2%) entered sustained remission without the need for further ITP therapy. Forty-one patients (46%) did not respond to the drug.
Forty-four patients (11%) were treated with dexamethasone at least once during observation (Table 1). Two patients (5%) were not evaluated due to lack of follow-up data. Of the remaining 42 patients, 25 (60%) responded to treatment (Table 1). Adverse reactions (headache, insomnia, mood disturbances, agitation, anxiety) were observed irregularly, and were tolerable in most cases. Seventeen patients (40%) did not respond to dexamethasone.
Other immunosuppressive drugs including, cyclophosphamide, ciclosporin, mycophenolate- mofetil and rituximab showed response rates ranging from 10 to 66% (Tables 1 and 2). In addition, combination therapy with the aforementioned drugs and concomitant prednisolone therapy (≤ 7,5 mg/d) was used in some patients (Table 2). Adverse reactions observed during treatment with immunosuppressive drugs were largely in agreement with previously reported data [22–25].
Fifty-two patients (13%) were treated with romiplostim (Table 2). Seven patients (13%) were not evaluated due to lack of follow-up data. Of the remaining 45 patients, 35 patients (78%) responded to the drug. Treatment was discontinued in 8 (23%) of the responding patients due to adverse reactions [33, 34]. None of the patients treated with romiplostim entered sustained remission. A total of 10 patients (22%) did not respond to romiplostim. Eltrombopag was used in 64 patients (16%; Table 1). One patient (2%) was not evaluated due to lack of follow-up data. Of the remaining 63 patients, 45 patients (71%) responded to treatment (Table 2). Four of these patients (9%) entered sustained remission. Fourteen (31%) of the 45 responding patients discontinued treatment due to intolerable adverse reactions [33, 34]. Eighteen patients (29%) did not rspond to eltrombopag.
IVIG was used in 133 patients (33%) on at least one occasion (Table 1). Seven patients (5%) were not evaluated due to lack of follow-up data. Of the remaining 126 patients, 94 (75%) responded to treatment, and none of the responding patients developed intolerable adverse reactions that contraindicated a re-treatment with IVIG. The observed adverse reactions were usually mild and related to headaches and rarely allergic reactions. Interestingly, four patients (4%) entered sustained remission following IVIG treatment (Table 1). Thirty-two patients (25%) did not respond to IVIG.
Therapy with anti-D was selectively used in 54 Rh(D)-positive patients (14%) with refractory ITP (Table 1). Two patients (4%) were not evaluated due to lack of follow-up data. Nevertheless, of the remaining 52 patients, 19 (37%) responded to anti-D and two patients (4%) had adverse reactions (nausea, fever, headache) 24 h after administration that may be attributed to other origins. Hemolysis was not observed in a single patient. The lack of hemolysis might be explained by the subcutaneous administration [35–38]. Thirty-three patients (63%) did not respond to anti-D.
Splx was performed in 20 patients (5%) prior to consultation at our institute. Of the remaining 380 non-splenectomized patients, 26 (7%) underwent Splx during the observation period (Table 1). One patient (1%) was not evaluated due to lack of follow-up data. Of the remaining 25 patients, 15 (60%) patients entered sustained remission after Splx. One non-responding patient developed postoperative abdominal pain and was diagnosed portal vein thrombosis (Table 1).
Discussion
The present study mainly focused on the efficacy and tolerability of each drug used in practice in the treatment of ITP rather than on patient outcome. While the latter question has been acknowledged by several studies [39–42], the former question has not yet been adequately addressed. The results presented in this study are based on patients treated by one physician who treats ITP patients since the 1980, not only on the basis of general recommendations, but also under individual consideration of each patient’s conditions. These included prior therapy, bleeding risk, plc, gender, age, weight, comorbidity, quality of life and patient’s preference. The importance of the latter point is reflected by the fact that many patients are well-informed on ITP. Based on the aforementioned criteria, at least 25% of patients did not require any treatment during observation (Fig 2). These patients did not have any significant bleeding or bleeding risk due to comorbidities, menstruation, activities/sports associated to injuries or invasive medical interventions. Their plc remained at levels compensating primary hemostasis (≥ 30 x 109/L) during observation. This observation is in agreement with previously published data [23].
Drug-induced thrombocytopenia rather than ITP was suspected in 24 patients. At least nine of these patients (38%) entered sustained remission following discontinuation of the suspected drug.
Unfortunately, many patients (55%) received steroids prior to consultation at our institute, even in cases where steroids should have been avoided, e.g., in patients with obesity, diabetes, and/or hypertension. Based on the aforementioned criteria, treatment with steroids was preferred as first-line therapy in only 31 of 143 patients that had not been treated for ITP prior to admission in our institute. Of these selected patients, 20 (65%) showed long-term beneficial effects that may have been solely attributed to steroids. However, these patients were a selected group of uncomplicated cases, e.g. young individuals with few or no comorbidities, with mild rather than severe ITP, no recognizable contraindication for treatment with steroids, and appeared to have a relatively low risk of developing intolerance. As the majority of such selected patients appeared to respond to steroids, we believe that this supports the notion of retaining steroids as a first-line therapy in ITP, however only in selected patients. In comparison, only (12%) of pretreated patients (27/257), still remained under steroid treatment upon initial presentation at our institute (Fig 1), and this treatment was discontinued in six of these cases during observation. Therefor the number of patients that continued treatment (10%) is primarily in agreement with previous reports [4].
Anti-D was selectively used in 54 Rh(D)-positive patients with severe ITP that were largely refractory to previous medical therapy (Table 1). This may explain the relatively low response rate (37%) compared to unselected patient cohorts [4]. The reason for anti-D being not used in uncomplicated (naïve) patients is related to the fact that this therapeutic option is still not licensed for treatment of ITP in Germany.
Prior to admission, 20 patients (5%) of the patient cohort were already splenectomized and four of them did not require any further medication. The other 16 patients required further therapy. During observation, only 26 (11%) of the remaining 284 non splenectomized and treated patients remained refractory to all available drugs, and ultimately underwent Splx. Fifteen of these patients (60%) entered sustained remission, and 10 (40%) required further treatments (Table 1). Of these 10 patients, seven patients responded to treatment with TPO-RA (six patients to romiplostim, one patient to eltrombopag), and the remaining patient responded to azathioprine and prednisolone (≤ 7,5 mg/d). Altogether, the therapies used in 26 splenectomized patients who required further therapy, were more effective than that used prior to Splx (Table 3).
The finding that most therapeutic options were observed to become effective after Splx continues to emphasize the role of this therapeutic measure in the management of ITP as long as there is no specific treatment available. A similar conclusion has been drawn in previous studies [43, 44]. Most intriguingly, the efficacy of splenectomy appears to be independent of previous therapies and may therefore be considered as the ultima ratio therapy in refractory patients. Only two of the treated patients in this study remained refractory to all drugs used, even after splenectomy. One of these, a 53 year old female, who remained refractory to all drugs used (high-dose IVIG, platelet transfusion, eltrombopag, romiplostim, dexamethasone, dapsone and ultimately myeloablative dose cyclophosphamide 4 x 50 mg/kg/d) post-splenectomy. At first admission her blood count revealed only isolated thrombocytopenia and the blood marrow smear and bone marrow aspiration showed no abnormalities. This patient developed acute myeloid leukemia and died several weeks following treatment. The second refractory patient remained at risk of bleeding.
The results obtained using immunosuppressive agents were similar to those reported in previous studies [4]. Interestingly, similar response rates were observed in patients treated with azathioprine and treated with both azathioprine and low-dose (1–7.5 mg/d) prednisolone (50% vs. 51%). Other immunosuppressive drugs including cyclophosphamide, ciclosporin and mycophenolate-mofetil were only used in refractory patients. In most cases, the combination treatment of steroids and other immunosuppressive drugs was required to reduce steroid doses. A small group of 5 patients suffering from rheumatic diseases (3 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 1 patient with systemic lupus erythematodes, 1 patient with psoriasis arthritis) was treated with MTX. None of these patients has been treated with MTX because of ITP. Nevertheless, a therapeutic effect of MTX on ITP, cannot be excluded. Two patients with concomitant prednisolone therapy met the response criteria during this therapy (Table 2).
IVIG was administered to 133 patients, with 94 patients (75%) responding to treatment (Table 3). Thirty-two patients (25%) did not show an increase in plc as defined by the response criteria. In patients with bleeding, bleeding did not progress or was stopped after IVIG administration. We recently demonstrated that high dose IVIG may stop bleeding within 12 h after administration, independent of plc [45]. This phenomenon might be explained by an increased consumption of platelets for normalization of decompensated primary hemostasis in treated patients.
The TPO-RA, romiplostim and eltrombopag are increasingly used in the treatment of ITP. Previous studies have shown both drugs to be generally effective and safe in most ITP patients [9–12, 33, 34, 46–48]. However, in some cases, severe or dangerous adverse reactions including thromboembolic events, arthralgia, increased bone marrow fibrosis and myeloproliferative neoplasias may occur [9–12, 33, 34, 46–48]. Our results indicate that TPO-RAs are less effective and less tolerated (49–59%) than previously reported and may potentially result in an increased number of adverse reactions than previously reported [9–12, 33, 34, 46–48]. Adverse reactions occurred in 33% (romiplostim) and 35% (eltrombopag) of patients, respectively. Of the responding patients, eight (23%) discontinued romiplostim, and 14 (31%) discontinued eltrombopag due to intolerable adverse reactions. Nevertheless, these drugs have not only changed therapeutic treatment options in ITP, but also the outcome of treated patients. Previous studies have shown that approximately one-third of patients remained refractory to conventional treatment [49]. Currently, approximately <10% of patients may remain refractory to treatment [50, 51] and death may occur only in isolated cases [52]. In addition, the use of immunosuppressive drugs can nowadays rarely be justified.
Finally, independent of Splx, 18 patients (6%) entered sustained remission (plc ≥100 x 109/L) due to treatment with various drugs (Tables 1 and 2). It remains unknown whether this phenomenon can only be attributed to the applied drugs mentioned in this study.
Conclusions
Although only isolated patients may remain refractory to the currently available treatment options in ITP, there are many aspects that remain evident for the need of alternative drugs including specificity, safety, efficacy, predictability, and costs. In addition, we and others [13, 14, 27] agree with guidelines as a source of basic information, but individualized treatment is needed in many cases.
Limitations of study
As the Dataset, collected retrospectively, does not contain uniquely all parameters for each patient, we prefered to conduct only descriptive instead of inferential statistics. Our retrospective study represents the treatment results in clinical practice. Thus, there was no possibility of monitoring platelet counts at prespecified standardized moments as in prospective trials. Moreover, the time to response is variable and cannot be predicted. It must be emphasized that not all adverse reactions were excluded, e.g. bone marrow fibrosis. In addition, a systemic screening for portal vein thrombosis by ultrasound or CT-scan after Splx was not performed. Furthermore our study presents data collected over a period of 20 years. During this period, therapeutic options as well as treatment recommendations have changed.
Initially, most patients appeared to have isolated ITP. During observation, at least 57% (n = 227) of our patients exhibited other abnormalities e.g., DAT positivity, antibody deficiency, malignancies, or other diseases and abnormalities, Based on our experiences [53], the common classification into a primary and a secondary disease is not certain and variable in many cases. Moreover, the ITP itself might be responsible for the development of associated diseases at least in some cases. This is confirmed by the matter of fact that the manifestation of ITP precedes the manifestation of the associated diseases in some patients. Thus the question which disease is the primary one remains vague.
References
- 1. Whipple A.O. Splenectomy as a therapeutic measure in thrombocytopenic purpura haemorhagica. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics. 1926; 42: 329–341.
- 2. Wintrobe MM, Cartwright GE, Palmer JG, Kuhns WJ, Samuels LT. Effect of corticotrophin and cortisone on the blood in various disorders in man. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1951; 88: 310–36. pmid:14856459
- 3. Burns CM. The History of Cortisone Discovery and Development. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2016; 42: 1–14. pmid:26611547
- 4. Godeau B, Provan D, Bussel J. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura in adults. Curr Opin Hematol. 2007; 14: 535–56. pmid:17934364
- 5. Imbach P, Barandun S, d'Apuzzo V, Baumgartner C, Hirt A, Morell A et al. High-dose intravenous gammaglobulin for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in childhood. Lancet. 1981; 1: 1228–31. pmid:6112565
- 6. Imbach P, Barandun S, Baumgartner C, Hirt A, Hofer F, Wagner HP. High-dose intravenous gammaglobulin therapy of refractory, in particular idiopathic thrombocytopenia in childhood. Helv Paediatr Acta. 1981; 36: 81–6. pmid:6785258
- 7. Salama A, Mueller-Eckhardt C, Kiefel V. Effect of intravenous immunoglobulin in immune thrombocytopenia. Lancet. 1983; 2: 193–5. pmid:6135031
- 8. Saleh MN, Gutheil J, Moore , Bunch PW, Butler J, Kunkel L et al. A pilot study of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in patients with refractory immune thrombocytopenia. Semin Oncol. 2000; 27: 99–103. pmid:11226008
- 9. Cheng G, Saleh MN, Marcher C, Vasey S, Mayer B, Aivado M et al. Eltrombopag for management of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (RAISE): a 6-month, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2011; 377: 393–402. pmid:20739054
- 10. Saleh MN, Bussel JB, Cheng G, Meyer O, Bailey CK, Arning M et al. EXTEND Study Group. Safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia: results of the long-term, open-label EXTEND study. Blood. 2013; 121: 537–45. pmid:23169778
- 11. Kuter DJ, Bussel JB, Lyons RM, Pullarkat V, Gernsheimer TB, Senecal FM et al. Efficacy of romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 371: 395–403. pmid:18242413
- 12. Kuter DJ, Rummel M, Boccia R, Macik BG, Pabinger I, Selleslag D et al. Romiplostim or standard of care in patients with immune thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 1889–99. pmid:21067381
- 13. Salama A. Emerging drugs for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2017; 22: 27–38. pmid:28253829
- 14. Cuker A, Neunert CE. How I treat refractory immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2016; 128: 1547–54. pmid:27053529
- 15. Provan D, Newland AC. Current Management of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia. Adv Ther. 2015; 32: 875–87. pmid:26499177
- 16. Michel M, Suzan F, Adoue D, Bordessoule D, Marolleau JP, Viallard JF et al. Management of immune thrombocytopenia in adults: a population-based analysis of the French hospital discharge database from 2009 to 2012. Br J Haematol. 2015; 170: 218–22. pmid:25824587
- 17. Matzdorff AC, Arnold G, Salama A, Ostermann H, Eberle S, Hummler S. Advances in ITP—therapy and quality of life—a patient survey. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e27350. pmid:22096556
- 18. Salama A. Current treatment options for primary immune thrombocytopenia. Expert Rev Hematol. 2011; 4: 107–18. pmid:21322783
- 19. Weide R, Feiten S, Friesenhahn V, Heymanns J, Kleboth K, Thomalla J et al. Outpatient Management of Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) by Hematologists 1995–2014. Oncol Res Treat. 2016; 39: 41–4.
- 20. Choi PY, Gordon JE, Harvey M, Chong BH. Presentation and outcome of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in a single Australian centre. Intern Med J. 2012; 42: 841–5. pmid:22805691
- 21. Chouhan JD, Herrington JD. Treatment options for chronic refractory idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in adults: focus on romiplostim and eltrombopag. Pharmacotherapy. 2010; 30: 666–83. pmid:20575632
- 22. Vesely SK, Perdue JJ, Rizvi MA, Terrell DR, George JN. Management of adult patients with persistent idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura following splenectomy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140: 112–20. pmid:14734334
- 23. Provan D, Stasi R, Newland AC, Blanchette VS, Bolton-Maggs P, Bussel JB et al. International consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2010; 115: 168–186. pmid:19846889
- 24. Neunert C, Lim W, Crowther M, Cohen A, Solberg L Jr, Crowther MA; American Society of Hematology. The American Society of Hematology 2011 evidence-based practice guideline for immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2011; 117: 4190–4207. pmid:21325604
- 25. Matzdorff A, Eberl W, Giagounidis A, Imbach P, Pabinger I, Wörmann B. Immune thrombocytopenia—onkopedic guidelines update: recommendations of a joint working group of the DGHO, ÖGHO, SGH + SSH and GPOH. Oncol Res Treat. 2010; 37: 6–25.
- 26. Lozano ML, Revilla N, Gonzalez-Lopez TJ, Novelli S, González-Porras JR, Sánchez-Gonzalez B et al. Real-life management of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in adult patients and adherence to practice guidelines. Ann Hematol. 2016; 95: 1089–98. pmid:27098812
- 27. Ghanima W, Godeau B, Cines DB, Bussel JB. How I treat immune thrombocytopenia: the choice between splenectomy or a medical therapy as a second-line treatment. Blood. 2012; 120: 960–9. pmid:22740443
- 28. Rodeghiero F, Besalduch J, Michel M, Provan D, Grotzinger K, Thompson G. Treatment practices in adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia—a European perspective. Eur J Haematol. 2010; 84: 160–8. pmid:19845743
- 29. Witmer CM, Lambert MP, O'Brien SH, Neunert C. Multicenter Cohort Study Comparing U.S. Management of Inpatient Pediatric Immune Thrombocytopenia to Current Treatment Guidelines. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016; 63: 1227–31. pmid:26929009
- 30. Kühne T, Berchtold W, Tran VB, Tran VB, Imbach P. Ethnicity and environment may affect the phenotype of immune thrombocytopenic purpura in children. Pediatr Res. 2000; 48: 374–9. pmid:10960506
- 31. Lee LH, Caguioa P, Chin NS, Chiou TJ, Lee JW, Miyakawa Y et al. Chronic adult primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in the Asia-Pacific region. Int J Hematol. 2011; 94: 142–9. pmid:21766185
- 32. Rodeghiero F, Stasi R, Gernsheimer T, Michel M, Provan D, Arnold et al. Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adultsand children: report from an international working group. Blood. 2009; 113: 2386–93. pmid:19005182
- 33. Depré F, Aboud N, Ringel F, Salama A. Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists Are Often Ineffective in Immune Thrombocytopenia and/or Cause Adverse Reactions: Results from One Hand. Transfus Med Hemother. 2016; 43: 375–379. pmid:27781025
- 34. Depré F, Aboud N, Mayer B, Salama A. Bidirectional inefficacy or intolerability of thrombopoietin receptor agonists: new data and a concise review. Blood Transfus. 2017; 25: 1–6.
- 35. Meyer O, Kiesewetter H, Hermsen M, Petriedes P, Rose M, Seibt H et al. Replacement of intravenous administration of anti-D by subcutaneous administration in patients with autoimmune thrombocytopenia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006; 47: 721–2. pmid:16933269
- 36. Meyer O, Kiesewetter H, Hermsen M, Salama A. Efficacy and safety of anti-D given by subcutaneous injection to patients with autoimmune thrombocytopenia. Eur J Haematol. 2004; 73: 71–2. pmid:15182342
- 37. Kjaersgaard M, Edslev PW, Hasle H. Subcutaneous anti-D treatment of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009; 53: 1315–7. pmid:19722275
- 38. Scaradavou A, Woo B, Woloski BM, Cunningham-Rundles S, Ettinger LJ, Aledort LM et al. Intravenous anti-D treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura: experience in 272 patients. Blood. 1997; 89: 2689–700. pmid:9108386
- 39. Mahévas M, Gerfaud-Valentin M, Moulis G, Terriou L, Audia S, Guenin S et al. Characteristics, outcome, and response to therapy of multirefractory chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2016; 128: 1625–30. pmid:27354722
- 40. Nørgaard M, Jensen AØ, Engebjerg MC, Farkas DK, Thomsen RW, Cha S et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of patients with primary chronic immune thrombocytopenia: a Danish population-based cohort study. Blood. 2011; 117: 3514–20. pmid:21263148
- 41. Stasi R, Stipa E, Masi M, Cecconi M, Scimò MT, Oliva F et al. Long-term observation of 208 adults with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Am J Med. 1995; 98: 436–42. pmid:7733121
- 42. Cuker A, Prak , Cines DB. Can immune thrombocytopenia be cured with medical therapy? Semin Thromb Hemost. 2015; 41: 395–404. pmid:25793364
- 43. Vesely SK, Perdue JJ, Rizvi MA, Terrell DR, George JN. Management of adult patients with persistent idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura following splenectomy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140: 112–20. pmid:14734334
- 44. Vianelli N, Palandri F, Polverelli N, Stasi R, Joelsson J, Johansson E et al. Splenectomy as a curative treatment for immune thrombocytopenia: a retrospective analysis of 233 patients with a minimum follow up of 10 years. Haematologica. 2013; 98: 875–80. pmid:23144195
- 45. Mayer B, Depré F, Ringel F, Salama A. New aspects on the efficacy of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins in patients with autoimmune thrombocytopenia. Vox Sang. 2017; 112: 64–69. pmid:28001314
- 46. Khellaff M, Michel M, Quittet P, Viallard JF, Alexis M, Roudot-Thoraval F et al. Romiplostim safety and efficacy for immune thrombocytopenia in clinical practice: 2-year results of 72 adults in aromiplostim compassionate-use program. Blood. 2011; 118: 4338–45. pmid:21832276
- 47. Bussell JB, Buchanan GR, Nugent DJ, Gnarra DJ, Bomgaars LR, Blanchette VS et al. A randomized, double-blind study of romiplostim to determine its safety and efficacy in children with immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2011; 118: 28–36. pmid:21502541
- 48. Kuter DJ, Bussel JB, Newland A, Baker RI, Lyons RM, Wasser J et al. Long-term treatment with romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: safety and efficacy. Br J Haematol. 2013; 161: 411–23. pmid:23432528
- 49. McMillan R. Therapy for Adults with Refractory Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126: 307–314 pmid:9036803
- 50. Psaila B, Bussel JB. Refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura: current strategies for investigation and management. Br J Haematol. 2008; 143: 16–26. pmid:18573111
- 51. George JN. Management of patients with refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura. J Thromb Haemost. 2006; 4: 1664–72. pmid:16879206
- 52. Portielje JE, Westendorp RG, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Brand A. Morbidity and mortality in adults with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood. 2001; 97: 2549–2554. pmid:11313240
- 53. Aboud N, Depré F, Salama A. Is Autoimmune Thrombocytopenia Itself the Primary Disease in the Presence of Second Diseases Data from a Long-Term Observation. Transfus Med Hemother. 2017;44:23–28. pmid:28275330