http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8690-2774
Figures
Abstract
Background
In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) and 69th World Health Assembly approved the first global health sector strategy (GHSS) on viral hepatitis with the goal to eliminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections worldwide. The aim is a 90% reduction of new infections and 65% reduction of HCV-related deaths by 2030.
Aim
This study reports on the epidemiology of HCV infections in the Austrian state of Tyrol (total population 750,000) and uses a predictive model to identify how the WHO strategy for elimination of HCV can be achieved.
Methods
We developed a regional disease burden model based on observed local diagnosis data from 2001 to 2016. Scenarios were developed to evaluate the impact of diagnosis and treatment on HCV-related outcomes (viremic prevalence, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related deaths) from 2015 through 2030.
Results
In the last 15 years, 1,721 patients living in Tyrol have been diagnosed with chronic HCV infection. When ageing, mortality and treatment were factored in, there were an estimated 2,043 viremic HCV infections in 2016, of which 1,136 cases had been diagnosed. A baseline model predicts a decrease of 588 HCV cases from 2015 to 2030, which would not translate into the significant reduction of infections needed to achieve WHO global health recommendations. A total of 1,843 infected individuals need to be identified and treated to achieve the WHO goals by 2030 (1,254 averted cases as compared to baseline model). Implementation of this strategy would avoid 523 new HCV infections and decreases HCV-related mortality by 73%.
Conclusion
HCV elimination and >65% reduction of associated mortality are possible for Tyrol, but requires a significant increase in new diagnoses and treatment rate. The model presented in this study could serve as an example for other regions to reliably predict regional disease burden and estimate how WHO goals can be met in the future.
Citation: Schaefer B, Viveiros A, Al-Zoairy R, Blach S, Brandon S, Razavi H, et al. (2018) Disease burden of hepatitis C in the Austrian state of Tyrol – Epidemiological data and model analysis to achieve elimination by 2030. PLoS ONE 13(7): e0200750. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200750
Editor: Yury E. Khudyakov, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, UNITED STATES
Received: April 4, 2018; Accepted: July 1, 2018; Published: July 12, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Schaefer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data of this manuscript are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was supported by Gilead Sciences with an unrestricted grant. BS received a grant from the Verein zur Foerderung der Wissenschaft in Gastroenterologie & Hepatologie and speaker fees from Abbvie. HZ received grants and speaker fees from Abbvie, Gilead, MSD and Roche. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abbreviations: HCV, Hepatitis C; DAAs, direct antiviral agents; GT, genotype; WHO, World Health Organization; GHSS, Global Health Sector Strategy
Introduction
In 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released their first global health sector strategy (GHSS) on viral hepatitis[1]. The strategy lays out an ambitious plan to reduce the incidence of global chronic hepatitis infections from the current 6–10 million cases of chronic infection to 0.9 million cases worldwide, and to reduce the annual deaths from chronic hepatitis from 1.4 million to less than 0.5 million by 2030. Approximately 48% of these numbers are attributed to chronic hepatitis C infections. According to the WHO, their goals can be achieved by a reduction of new infections by at least 30% by 2020 and 90% by 2030. A reduction in HCV-related deaths of 10% and 65%, by 2020 and 2030 respectively, is also targeted[1].
In order to establish strategies towards elimination of chronic hepatitis C and achieve the WHO Targets, it is crucial to understand the epidemiology of the disease specific to each country and region. With stronger knowledge of HCV, policy makers can make better decisions about implementing prevention programs as well as the necessary treatment and diagnosis increases needed to achieve the GHSS goals. Current literature estimates the prevalence of anti-HCV infections in Austria to be 0.46% or 37,900 cases in 2008, while viremic prevalence is estimated to be 0.34% (28,000) cases in the same year.[2] However, these estimates have been reported in high risk or unrepresentative populations, such as blood donors[3].
In 2017, Austria took the first step towards HCV elimination by lifting treatment restrictions to allow ≥F0 patients to receive treatment. With free access to DAA therapy and a relatively low prevalence, the ability to cure and eliminate HCV is possible in Austria. Implementation of strategies to achieve these goals requires accurate, regional epidemiological data as a basis for reliable projections of the future disease burden. However, regional estimates of HCV do not exist in the country. In this study, we aimed to first quantify the disease burden of the Austrian state of Tyrol and then develop scenarios to achieve the GHSS goals. We used established, mathematical models to predict the HCV disease burden and interventions needed to achieve the WHO elimination goals, which could also present an example for implementation in other regions with comparable socio-economic status and health systems[4].
Methods
The Austrian state of Tyrol, with a population of 746,100 (in 2016), was the focus of this analysis[5]. Epidemiological data was obtained from the Medical University of Innsbruck, and expert estimates were made when data was unavailable. The chronic HCV prevalence in Tyrol was estimated to be the same as national reported prevalence in Austria of 0.34% in 2008 [4]. This estimate is based on information from blood donors, legally mandated notifications to the Federal Ministry of Health and hospital discharge data[2, 3]. However, a reporting bias has been demonstrated in the available epidemiological data and blood donor screening likely underreports HCV prevalence for persons who inject drugs[3]. The model presented in this study factors in this discrepancy in observed and expected cases. So far, local registers of specialized centres are the most reliable source for data on HCV incidence and prevalence in Austria[6]. The age and gender distribution of HCV prevalence was also assumed to mirror that of Austria and is show in Fig 1A. These estimates are based on previously reported epidemiological and demographic information (S1 Appendix).
Age and gender distribution of chronic HCV infections in Tyrol for (A) 2000 and (B) 2015 based on previously reported data.[2] Prevalence estimates for 2015 are based on diagnosed cases and were adjusted for deaths and cures. (C) Comparison of expected and observed total HCV cases grouped by age in Tyrol.
Since the University Hospital of Innsbruck is the only provider of HCV genotyping in the Austrian state of Tyrol, all patients with suspected HCV infection are referred to this centre for diagnosis. Genotyping was carried out using a validated reversed hybridization assay (Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 LiPA, Siemens, Vienna, Austria). Between January 1st 2001 and December 31st 2016, 1,721 total patients were diagnosed as HCV RNA+ and then were genotyped by the Laboratory of Hepatology, Medical University of Innsbruck. Only minor fluctuations in GT distribution were observed over the last 15 years. GT 1 had the highest prevalence (56.9–67.2%) followed by GT 3 (18.8–37.9%) (Table 1). This hospital data was also used to estimate the total number diagnosed cases in Tyrol. The 1,721 diagnosed HCV RNA+ cases were reported by year, age and gender, and were aged through the model to account for mortality and cures. This resulted in a total of 1,138 living diagnosed cases of chornic HCV in 2016. The HCV prevalence was modelled based on the reported 2008 anti-HCV prevalence estimate of 0.49% (95% CI 0.07; 0.53) and then taking into account the adjusted newly diagnosed chronic HCV infections between 2001 and 2016 (Fig 1B).
Treatment is exclusively available through the centre or the connected State Hospital Hall. This allows for more realistic estimates about the incidence of HCV infections and associated complications for this region and enables more precise predictions than previous models.[7, 8]. From January 2014 to December 2016, a total of 404 Tyrolean patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated with interferon-free regimens (S1 Table). Of these 14 (3%) patients relapsed, of whom 12 achieved sustained virological response after a re-treatment. The centre also carries out all liver transplantations done in the region and tracks those patients that received HCV related transplants. Individuals not living in Tyrol were excluded from this study. This retrospective study was carried out with approval of the local ethics research committee (Mitteilungsblatt der Medizinischen Universitaet Innsbruck, June 3rd 2009) and in accordance with national law (Datenschutzgesetz 2000 § 46 Abs. 5).
Statistical analysis
HCV test results and demographic data were incorporated into a Microsoft Excel based disease progression model, as previously described[7–12]. Briefly, the Markov model was calibrated to historical data and used to forecast the current and future incidence, prevalence of HCV infection and associated disease sequelae[8]. The main input variables of interest included viremic HCV prevalence, genotype distribution, diagnosed, and treated patients (see S1 Appendix). When clinical data were not available, published literature and expert consensus were considered. A Delphi process was used to achieve consensus among authors around model inputs and outputs.
Model scenarios
Scenarios were developed to evaluate the impact of interventions (diagnosis and treatment) on HCV-related outcomes (viremic prevalence, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related deaths) from 2015 through 2030. Two primary scenarios were considered– 1) the current treatment paradigm, or “baseline”; and 2) the level of intervention necessary to eliminate HCV as a public health threat, as defined by the GHSS targets (WHO 2030).
Under the baseline scenario, it was assumed that the both number of treated patients and newly diagnosed patients followed a trend of gradual decline. Ninety-five patients were treated and 70 patients were diagnosed in 2017 decreasing to 47 treated patients and 40 diagnosed patients by 2026. Treatment was restricted to patients between the ages of 20 and 74, but open to all fibrotic stages (≥F0). SVR rates went from 95% in 2017 to 98% in 2018 and remained constant.
Under the GHSS targets (WHO 2030) scenario, assumptions for this model use current diagnosis and treatment rates from the baseline scenario and include the minimal gradual increases in diagnosis and treatment rates required to achieve GHSS targets by year 2030 were estimated. Treatment would need to increase to 130 patients annually by 2019 and could decrease to 120 patients annually by 2026. Diagnosis would need to increase to 120 patients annually by 2018. By 2021, treatment should be available to all patients aged 20–19 and all fibrotic stages starting 2017. SVR rates are held constant at 98% starting in 2018.
Results
HCV prevalence
In 2016, the model estimates a total of 2,043 chronic infections in Tyrol. Based on registry data, it was estimated that 46% or 1,136 of the total cases have already been diagnosed (Fig 1C).
Comparison of modelled scenario outcomes
Based on the historical local prevalence, incidence and treatment data two scenarios were generated. The first one corresponds to a baseline scenario where the number of patients available for treatment will gradually decrease due to an expected decline in patients available for diagnosis with current public health strategies (Figs 2 and 3).
Fibrosis stage 0–3: F0-F3; Cirr: cirrhosis; Decomp. cirr.: decompensated cirrhosis; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; OLT: orthotopic liver transplantation.
Black line indicates the baseline scenario, the green line indicates the WHO 2030 model.
Since 2003, a steady decline in the number of total HCV cases has been observed. If no changes in treatment and diagnosis are made, the baseline scenario estimates a decrease of 588 HCV cases from 2015 to 2030. This would result in a failure to achieve the WHO global health strategies by 47% (Fig 2).
The number of new diagnoses, treatments, and reduction in new infections needed to meet the WHO 2030 elimination goals are calculated in the second scenario–the WHO 2030 scenario. To achieve the WHO 2030 elimination targets, an increase in new diagnoses to 120 and treatments to 135 patients yearly by 2019 would be necessary (Fig 3). An impact on clinical endpoints can only be achieved with increased effort in diagnosis, treatment and reduction in new infections. The total number of chronic HCV infections would decrease by 1,843 (90%) individuals between 2015 and 2030, which are 1,254 more averted or cured cases than expected from the baseline model. This would result in a decrease of HCV related mortality by 73% (Fig 4), which corresponds to a total of 48 lives saved. The associated reduction in the total number of HCV related HCC cases would be 35 (62% reduction), 28 for decompensated cirrhosis cases (reduction by 71%) and 8 for HCV related liver transplantations (reduction by 75%, Fig 5). The number of averted new HCV infections would be 573, which corresponds to an incidence reduction of 91% as compared to baseline model (Fig 5).
Numbers in the blue box indicate the total numbers of averted cases.
Discussion
This analysis presents detailed epidemiological information on HCV prevalence, associated liver disease and strategies to eliminate HCV infections in the Austrian state of Tyrol. In contrast to other regions in Austria, tertiary healthcare, including diagnosis and treatment of HCV, is centralized in the state of Tyrol. This offers a unique opportunity to reliably model HCV disease burden and make future projections for the region. One critical parameter for disease modelling is prevalence of HCV viremia, for which only limited epidemiological data exists in Austria [3, 6, 13, 14].
Our study demonstrates that a significant reduction of liver-related complications and mortality as proposed by the WHO recommendations is a realistic goal. An important step towards achieving HCV elimination is access to treatment for all patients independent of fibrosis stage, which recently has been implemented in Tyrol. Translating the results of this study to increasing the number of new diagnoses will be effective but also the most challenging task. To accomplish a 90% reduction of new infections by 2030 we need to increase diagnoses to more than 120 per year and also treat two-times more HCV infected individuals annually (Fig 3). Even with unlimited and unrestricted access to antiviral HCV therapy, interventions to improve case finding are required[15]. Implementing HCV screening in the high-risk population of people who inject drugs is probably the most cost-effective [16, 17]. The United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommends one-time testing for persons born from 1945–1965[18]. For this high-risk birth cohort in Austria, and in particular in Tyrol, screening colonoscopy is a potential screening opportunity, which has been proven to be acceptable and effective[19, 20]. According to the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), HCV testing should be performed annually in individuals on opiate substitution therapy and in persons with ongoing risk factors (persons who inject drugs and HIV-infected men who have unprotected sex with men)[21, 22]. Oral fluid anti-HCV antibody point-of-care testing could offer a simple tool to preselect patients with poor venous access. In Tyrol, where the care for patients with HCV is highly centralized but prescription of opiate substitution therapy is decentralized, pre-screening for HCV in this high-risk population with salivary HCV antibody tests could be particularly effective and avoid unnecessary blood sampling.
The forecasts presented in this study could be impacted by a number of limitations. The prevalence estimates are based on national blood donor data, and these types of estimates are not able to account for underreporting in higher risk groups (i.e. injection drug user). To date, there has been no national general population prevalence study, nor has there been any regional study of the kind. Another limitation of this study is that rates and routes of HCV transmission are also based on estimates. As it is unlikely that data on exact prevalence and HCV transmission from representative cohorts reflecting the general Tyrolean population will ever become available from prospective studies, epidemiological modelling remains the most effective and powerful tool to predict the effect of certain scenarios on incidence and prevalence of chronic hepatitis C its sequelae.
Increased HCV awareness, education on modes of transmission as well as information on new therapeutic opportunities offered by novel direct-acting antivirals are needed among primary health care professionals and the general population. This study could guide public health decision making not only to eliminate HCV within the next 15 years, but also to reduce the risk of new HCV infections by reducing HCV prevalence.
Supporting information
S1 Appendix. Detailed description of used methods.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200750.s001
(DOCX)
S1 Table. Number of Tyrolean patients treated with direct-acting antivirals since 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200750.s002
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank Ing. Christine Kuntner for her support with the electronic data extraction.
References
- 1.
Organization WH. Global Health Sector Strategy on Viral Hepatitis, 2016–2021. http://wwwwhoint/health-accounts/platform_approach/en/. 2016.
- 2. Hope VD, Eramova I, Capurro D, Donoghoe MC. Prevalence and estimation of hepatitis B and C infections in the WHO European Region: a review of data focusing on the countries outside the European Union and the European Free Trade Association. Epidemiol Infect. 2014;142(2):270–86. pmid:23714072; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3891474.
- 3. Strauss R, Fulop G, Pfeifer C. Hepatitis C in Austria 1993–2000: reporting bias distort HCV epidemiology in Austria. Euro Surveill. 2003;8(5):113–8. pmid:12799478.
- 4.
Statistik Austria. Bevölkerung in Tirol. https://wwwtirolgvat/statistik-budget/statistik/wohnbevoelkerung/. 2016.
- 5.
Dobler R, Kaiser M. Demographische Daten Tirol 2016 Innsbruck: Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung; 2017 [cited 2018 08.06.2018]. Available from: https://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/themen/statistik-budget/statistik/downloads/BEV2016.pdf.
- 6. Maieron A, Metz-Gercek S, Hackl F, Luger C, Ziachehabi A, Strauss R, et al. Chronic hepatitis C in Austria, 1992–2006: genotype distribution and demographic factors. Euro Surveill. 2010;15(8):19492. pmid:20197021.
- 7. Razavi H, Robbins S, Zeuzem S, Negro F, Buti M, Duberg A-S, et al. Hepatitis C virus prevalence and level of intervention required to achieve the WHO targets for elimination in the European Union by 2030: a modelling study. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2(5):325–36.
- 8. Polaris Observatory HCVC. Global prevalence and genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus infection in 2015: a modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(3):161–76. pmid:28404132.
- 9. Soipe AI, Razavi H, Razavi-Shearer D, GalÁRraga O, Taylor LE, Marshall BDL. Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) burden in Rhode Island: modelling treatment scale-up and elimination. Epidemiology and Infection. 2016;144(16):3376–86. Epub 08/05. pmid:27492142
- 10. Bourgeois S, Blach S, Blach C, Laleman W, Mathei C, Mulkay JP, et al. Achieving WHO recommendations for Hepatitis C Virus Elimination in Belgium. Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica. 2016;79(2):222–6. Epub 2016/07/08. pmid:27382942.
- 11. Gane E, Kershenobich D, Seguin-Devaux C, Kristian P, Aho I, Dalgard O, et al. Strategies to manage hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection disease burden—volume 2. J Viral Hepat. 2015;22 Suppl 1:46–73. pmid:25560841.
- 12. Razavi H, Waked I, Sarrazin C, Myers RP, Idilman R, Calinas F, et al. The present and future disease burden of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with today's treatment paradigm. J Viral Hepat. 2014;21 Suppl 1:34–59. pmid:24713005.
- 13. Desenclos JC. The challenge of hepatitis C surveillance in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2003;8(5):99–100. Epub 2003/06/12. pmid:12799475.
- 14. Mandorfer M, Schwabl P, Steiner S, Reiberger T, Peck-Radosavljevic M. Advances in the management of HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatol Int. 2016;10(3):424–35. Epub 2016/01/14. pmid:26758592.
- 15. Scott N, Doyle JS, Wilson DP, Wade A, Howell J, Pedrana A, et al. Reaching hepatitis C virus elimination targets requires health system interventions to enhance the care cascade. Int J Drug Policy. 2017;47:107–16. Epub 2017/08/12. pmid:28797497.
- 16. Helsper CW, Janssen MP, van Essen GA, Croes EA, van der Veen C, de Wit AG, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of nationwide campaigns for awareness and case finding of hepatitis C targeted at people who inject drugs and the general population in the Netherlands. Int J Drug Policy. 2017;47:117–25. Epub 2017/08/23. pmid:28826994.
- 17. Grebely J, Hajarizadeh B, Dore GJ. Direct-acting antiviral agents for HCV infection affecting people who inject drugs. Nature reviews Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2017;14(11):641–51. pmid:28831184.
- 18.
Services USDoHH. Know More Hepatitis Atlanta, GA National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention; 2015 [cited 2018 08.06.2018]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/knowmorehepatitis/.
- 19. Torres DM, Harrison SA. Killing two birds with one stone: screening for chronic hepatitis C at the time of colonoscopy in the baby boomer cohort. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(6):990–2. Epub 2013/06/06. pmid:23735918.
- 20. Sears DM, Cohen DC, Ackerman K, Ma JE, Song J. Birth cohort screening for chronic hepatitis during colonoscopy appointments. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(6):981–9. Epub 2013/03/21. pmid:23511461.
- 21.
AASLD-IDSA. Recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C 2017 [cited 2018 08.06.2018]. Available from: http://www.hcvguidelines.org.
- 22. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2018. Journal of hepatology. 2018. pmid:29650333.