http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7702-5028
Figures
Abstract
Introduction
Parents' perception that their child may be vulnerable to serious life-threatening illnesses can have negative effects on how they exercise their parenting. No studies have yet been carried out on parent´s perception of their child’s vulnerability, when the child has not suffered a severe illness. This study tries to analyze the relationship between parent´s perception of their children´s vulnerability and parental competence, and analyzes the mediating role of postnatal depression and parental stress.
Method
The study was carried out on mothers and fathers of full-term infants who did not have any serious illnesses. A total of 965 people (385 fathers and 580 mothers) participated in the study.
Citation: Gordo L, Oliver-Roig A, Martínez-Pampliega A, Iriarte Elejalde L, Fernández-Alcantara M, Richart-Martínez M (2018) Parental perception of child vulnerability and parental competence: The role of postnatal depression and parental stress in fathers and mothers. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0202894. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202894
Editor: JianJun Yang, Jinling Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, CHINA
Received: November 29, 2017; Accepted: August 10, 2018; Published: August 27, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Gordo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was funded by the General Sub-Directorate for Evaluation and Promotion of Research (Institute of Health Carlos III, ISCIII) and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) ``A way to make Europe'' (Project reference PI14/01549). The funders had no part in designing the study, collecting, analyzing, interpreting or influencing the writing of the data or the decision to publish.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Parents' belief that their child may be vulnerable to serious life-threatening illnesses can have negative effects on both parenting and child development [1]. Green & Solnit [2] denominated these parental beliefs "Vulnerable Child Syndrome". These authors observed that in families where children suffered serious illnesses and recovered, parents and, above all, mothers, continued to be anxious about the health of their children, which exacerbated the perception that their child was vulnerable.
This parental anxiety associated with the perception that their children are vulnerable can lead to an increase in difficulties in parent-child interaction and indirectly lead to an increase in difficulties in children, such as sleeping problems or separation anxiety, difficulties in social competence and an increase of both internalizing and externalizing problems [1–5].
Several studies carried out with parents of babies who had recovered from a disease have pointed out the existence of variables linked to parental psychological distress that may be related to perception of child vulnerability. These variables include postnatal depression and parental stress [1,6–8]. However, previous studies have analyzed the perception of child vulnerability only in mothers and fathers of children who previously suffered from a serious illness. This means, as Thomasgard and Metz indicated [9] that at an early age, children do not need to have had a serious illness for parents’ perception of their child’s vulnerability to increase. This subjective concern, therefore, for the health of their children could also generate greater postnatal depression and parental stress and eventually affect parent-child relationships.
A number of studies have pointed out that postnatal depression affects not only the individual parent or child but also affects the quality of the relationship between the two [10,11]. Parents with postnatal depression tend to show less affection and sensitivity to the needs of their children, which can have negative consequences on these children’s development, such as behavioral and cognitive problems, language delays, difficulties in inhibitory control, impulsivity, response to stress, insecure attachment, and difficulties in social-emotional adjustment [12–14]. In studies on gender differences, it was traditionally pointed out that mothers showed higher levels of postnatal depression [15]. However, in recent years more attention has been paid to fathers, and it has been found that fathers also experience postnatal depression since, as for mothers, transition to parenthood can be a complicated period of adaptation to the new role [16,17]. In terms of parental stress, Bloomfield and Kendall [18] analyzed the process through which parental stress may influence children. According to these authors, parental stress negatively influences parental behavior, leading parents to perceive the experience of parenting as problematic [19–23]. Furthermore, there can be additional associated impacts such as an increase in child behavioral difficulties or even the increase or appearance of psychological distress in parents [24,25].
Regarding gender differences in parental stress, existing studies suggest that both mothers and fathers experience parental stress, but they do so differently. Mothers experience stress in relation to the role they need to exercise, and, to a lesser extent, to the social changes brought about by their new role; fathers, on the other hand, experience parental stress, but the reasons are a bit different: less because of the role they must exercise, and more because they feel that becoming parents is alienating them from their social circles [26–29]. Some authors suggest that postnatal depression and parental stress are related, since depressive symptomatology can make parents perceive reality in a more stressful way [30].
To summarize, studies seem to confirm that perception of child vulnerability may be associated with postnatal depression and parental stress, and that these variables, in turn, affect parent-child relationships [1,6,11]. However, there has been no research to deepen our understanding of parent-child relationships in situations where parents are concerned about the health of their children, though their children have not previously suffered serious illnesses.
A variable that may contribute to understanding these parent-child relationships in situations of perception of child vulnerability is “perceived parental competence”, although there have been no previous studies on this question.
Perceived parental competence is defined as "parents' beliefs or expectations regarding their ability to raise their children successfully and have some control over their child's behavior" [31 p166]. The two dimensions of parental competence are parental satisfaction and parental efficacy. Parental satisfaction is defined as the emotional component and includes frustration, anxiety and motivation associated with parenting, and parental efficacy alludes to a sense of effectiveness in relation to parenting [31].
The fact that a father or mother may have a negative self-perception of their parental competence means that they will show dysfunctional parental cognitive processes in the exercise of their parenting, which will be related to patterns of upbringing and behavioral difficulties in their children [32–34]. Conversely, perception of parental efficacy will be associated with easier transition to parenthood, a lesser tendency to perceive that their children have a difficult temperament and greater satisfaction with the social support they perceive [35,36].
Therefore, it is expected that parents’ perception of child vulnerability be related to perception of parental competence, although no research has been found in the literature on the relationship between these two variables.
The present study
The main objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between parental perception of child vulnerability and self-perception of parental competence in parents of babies aged 6 to 8 months, analyzing the mediating role of postnatal depression and parental stress. The specific hypothesis is that postnatal depression and parental stress function like chained mediators that will mediate the relationship between parental perception of child vulnerability and parental competence. It is expected that the greater the parental perception of the child’s vulnerability, the greater parental depressive symptoms will be, which will be associated with a higher level of stress, which will in turn be linked to negative perception of parental competence.
Method
Participants
The sample was made up of 965 people (385 fathers and 580 mothers). The average age of the mothers was 32.77 (SD = 5.11) and that of the fathers was 35.14 (SD = 5.07). In the case of both the mothers (87.1%) and the fathers (89.4%), almost all were of Spanish nationality. In terms of the level of studies, 38.5% of the mothers and 49.8% of the fathers had primary studies, while 80.8% of the mothers and 81.9% of the fathers were married or were common-law partners. 96.8% of the mothers and 98.2% of the fathers lived with their partner. Finally, regarding the labor situation the week before the postpartum discharge, 32.4% of the mothers had been off work for 3 months or more and 82.8% of the fathers were in active employment (Table 1).
The mean age of infants was 240.13 days (SD = 42.46, range 154–445). Inclusion criteria consisted in being a mother or father of a full-term newborn delivered at a hospital, for whom pregnancy and birth was low to medium risk according to the obstetric risk classification of the Mother Care Program of the Health Department of the Valencian Community, and to speak and read Spanish without difficulty. Exclusion criteria consisted of multiple births, or severe medical maternal or newborn conditions after childbirth (Fig 1).
Procedure
The participants in the sample were recruited on the day of postpartum hospital discharge. After obtaining written informed consent to participate in this study, the participant contact data were recorded and a battery of forms filled out. The questionnaires were the same for both mothers and fathers. Clinical data on birth and postpartum were obtained from their medical history at the moment of postpartum discharge.
Follow-up was conducted using online questionnaires. Between 6 and 11 months postpartum, participants in the study received an email with a direct link to access a self-administered form, which they could fill out using a web browser on a computer or mobile device. The link sent by email contained a unique code for each participant that allowed to interrupt the completion of the questionnaire and continue later, but prevented completing it more than once. Ten days after the email was sent, another email was sent to participants who had not sent a reply, following the same procedure as described above. A third submission was made to participants who had not responded to the questionnaire 10 days after receiving the email. Prior to sending the online questionnaire, brief reminders were sent by SMS. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the American Psychological Association (AP A). The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the General Direction of Public Health and the Higher Public Health Research Centre. This committee reports to the Valencian Health Ministry.
Instruments
Vulnerable Baby Scale (VBS) [5]. It evaluates parental perception of infant vulnerability. It consists of 10 items (“Sometimes I get concerned that my child does not look as healthy as she/he should”) that must be answered on a Likert scale ranging from 1 = "Always" to 5 = "I do not worry". The internal consistency of the original scale was adequate (α = .70). There is no cut-off point defined for this scale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of child vulnerability perceived by the parents. The Spanish version showed an adequate adjustment with an RMSEA of .056 for the model and goodness of fit indexes above .90 (GFI = .97; CFI = .92) (S1 Table). The internal consistency of the Spanish version was .64 (S1 and S2 Files).
Parental Stress Scale (PSS) [20]; Spanish version [22]. This scale evaluates parental stress levels. It has 12 items structured into 2 factors: Parental Rewards (5 items) ("I am happy in my role as a parent") and Parental Stressors (7 items) ("The behaviour of my child(ren) is often embarrassing or stressful to me"). The items must be answered on a Likert scale ranging from 1 = "Strongly Disagree" to 5 = "Strongly Agree". There is no defined cut-off point, the higher the score on this scale, the higher the level of parental stress. The internal consistency of the scale was .77 for the Parental Reward factor and .76 for the Parental Stressors factor.
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) [37]; Spanish version [38]. Parental depressive symptomatology is evaluated through this scale. It consists of 10 items ("I have blamed myself unnecessarily when things went wrong") that parents must answer using a Likert scale that included four levels of answers with varying meanings depending on the item. The items referred to how the parents felt in the past 7 days regarding their ability to enjoy things, optimism about the future, guilt, worry, panic attacks, coping skills, insomnia, sadness, crying and tendency to self-harm. The cut-off point defined for this scale is 10, so scores greater than 10 indicate greater depressive symptomatology. The internal consistency of the scale (α = .83) was adequate.
Parenting Sense of Competence (PSOC) [33]; Spanish version [39]. This scale assesses the feeling of parental competence through 17 items structured into two factors: Parental Efficacy (8 items) ("If anyone can find the answer to what is troubling my child, I am the one") and Parental Satisfaction (9 items) ("Even though being a parent could be rewarding, I am frustrated now while my child is at his / her present age"). The items must be answered on a Likert scale ranging from 1 = "Strongly Disagree" to 6 = "Strongly Agree". This scale does not have a defined cut-off point, the higher the score on this scale, the more positively parents perceived their parental competence. Internal consistency of the scale for the Efficacy subscale (α = .91) and Satisfaction (α = .87) was adequate.
Strategy of analysis
In order to compare the proposed model of relationship between variables, we firstly verified the linear relationships between all variables involved in the model through Pearson correlations (r).
After analyzing the significance of the relations proposed in the model, the structure models corresponding to the hypothesis of the present study were defined for fathers and mothers. The Path Analysis technique and the AMOS 23 program [40], applying the maximum likelihood (ML) method, were used for its analysis. In order to evaluate the level of goodness of fit of the model, we used the Chi square test of equality of matrices (χ2), which should be non-significant or show low values, and the ratio between χ2 and the degrees of freedom of the model (χ2/df), which is recommended to be less than 4. However, χ2 is very sensitive to the size of the sample, so the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) and its 90% confidence interval were used, considering values between .05 and .08 to be acceptable and values lower than .05 to be very good. Furthermore, the Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) and the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) were used, which should both show values higher than .95 [41].
To finish, we developed models based on parent gender and analyzed the significance of the difference of the chi-square values for each particular model. In the same way, we analyzed the specific differences for each of the relations established within the final model through critical ratio indexes.
Results
As can be seen in Table 2, the scores on parental perception of their child’s vulnerability, postnatal depression, parental stress and their dimensions were below the mean in both the global sample and when the mothers and fathers were analyzed separately. However, overall scores on the perception of parental competence and its dimensions were above the mean in the total sample and were differentiated by gender. Statistically significant differences were observed as a function of the parents’ gender in postnatal depression, parental rewarding, perception of parental competence, and parental efficacy. The mothers obtained higher scores except for the dimension parental efficacy, in which the fathers obtained higher scores than the mothers. With the exception of the postnatal depression variable, there are no defined cut-off points for any of the variables; so, the clinically high and low cut-off points were calculated in the sample with reference to the percentiles 25 and 75. Regarding postnatal depression, both globally and differentiating between fathers and mothers, the averages were below the reference cut-off point for this variable. So, this population is predominantly healthy in terms of postnatal depression.
The distribution of parental perception of their child’s vulnerability, postnatal depression, parental stress variables and their dimensions, showed positive asymmetry, and most of the scores were located at the lower end. The Parenting Rewards dimension obtained the highest kurtosis value, which reflected data homogeneity for this variable.
Simple relations among the variables were analyzed according to the hypothesis of the present study. Parental perception of their child’s vulnerability was negatively and significantly related to perception of parental competence (r = -.12, p = .00). This association was small. If we analyze this relation according to gender, this association was also observed in mothers. However, in the case of fathers, parental perception of their child’s vulnerability was not significantly associated with perception of parental competence (Table 3).
Postnatal depression, both with the total sample (r = .19, p = .00) and when differentiating the father (r = .23, p = .00) and the mother (r = .17, p = .00) showed a significant and positive correlation with parental perception of their child’s vulnerability, though a small one.
Postnatal depression and parental stress showed a positive and significant correlation in both the sample total (r = .47, p = .00) and in fathers (r = .42, p = .00) and mothers (r = .50, p = .00). This association was small.
Finally, there was a positive and negative association, although a mild one, between postnatal depression and parental competence (r = -46, p = .00) and between parental stress and perception of parental competence (r = -.65, p = .00). This same relationship was also observed both for fathers and for mothers (Table 3).
Finally, the proposed model based on the hypothesis of the present study was evaluated. Table 4 shows the goodness of fit indexes of the gender-differentiated parent model. The results for the father’s model showed adequate goodness of fit in the CFI (.98) and GFI (.99) indexes. However, the RMSEA (.084) index did not reach the recommended cut-off value. Additionally, an adjustment of the data to the model was also observed in the case of mothers (GFI = .99; CFI = 99; RMSEA = .075) (Table 4).
The results presented in Fig 2 show that parental perception of their child’s vulnerability was positively associated with postnatal depression (father: β = .23, p = .00; mother: β = .17, p = .00) and that postnatal depression in turn was significantly and positively related to parental stress (father: β = .42, p = .00; mother: β = .50, p = .00). In the same way, postnatal depression (father: β = -.24, p = .00: mother: β = -.21, p = .00) and parental stress (father: paternal β = -.56, p = . 00; mother: β = -.56, p = .00) were negatively associated with perception of parental competence.
Final model of the study for fathers (left) and mothers (right).
Finally, mother and father models were simultaneously evaluated based on a multigroup analysis. The chi-square difference (χ2) was non-significant (Δχ2(4) = 2,201, p = .70). This means that the model works in the same way regardless of parent gender.
Likewise, the critical ratio index showed an absence of differences between groups, in the specific relationships established in the model.
Discussion
The main objective of the present study was to analyze the relationship between parental perception of child vulnerability in infants and perception of parental competence, taking into account the role that postnatal depression and parental stress exert in that relationship. Results confirmed the initial approach, since it was observed for both fathers and mothers, that when they perceived their child as most vulnerable, they also perceived themselves as less competent as fathers or mothers. This relationship has been linked to the association between parental perception of child vulnerability and increased parental depression and experienced stress. However, it is only possible to speak of real mediation in the case of the mother. In the case of the father, the relationship between parental perception of their child’s vulnerability and parental competence takes place in two steps, showing no direct relationship between parental perception of their child’s vulnerability and parental competence, and an indirect one through the association of both variables with depression and stress.
The present study articulates four relevant findings. First, the existence of an association between parental perception of child’s vulnerability and parental competence was confirmed. This result was observed for the whole sample, and was not confirmed in the case of fathers, for whom perceiving that their child could be seriously ill, did not diminish their perception of parental competence. The relationship observed between these two variables in the present study was limited, but there are no previous studies that have analyzed this relationship and with which these results can be compared. The difference in the results from the mothers and fathers may be due to gender differences in the perception of parental competence. Mothers who perceive themselves to be less competent at the parental level (less satisfaction and less self-efficacy) tend to perceive a greater vulnerability of their children to disease; this relationship is not the same in the case of the fathers. Perhaps, the results in the present study reflect the traditional roles in the distribution of family care (mothers being more focused on the care and fathers on the provision) and the emotional implications according to the gender of the parents. This is in line with the study of Moon and Hoffman [42], in which the mothers obtained higher scores than the fathers in the organization of the physical care of the children and in their emotional support.
Second, postnatal depression was associated with parental perception of child’s vulnerability, that is, parents who perceived their child most vulnerable to illness also tended to present greater depressive symptomatology. This data is in line with findings from previous research [5,43]. It should be noted that the studies that have examined these relationships were centered on the parents of babies who had recovered from an illness and not on the general population.
Third, it was observed that the existence of depressive symptoms in parents was associated with greater stress in the exercise of their parenting. That is, the greater the postnatal depression, the higher the stress levels, that is, the number of perceived stressors on the part of the parents was greater. This result also confirmed findings from other recent studies [30,44].
To finish, the study confirms the significant role of postnatal depression and parental stress in understanding lower values of parental competence with regard to parental perception of their child’s vulnerability. This is in line with other studies that found that postnatal depression causes quality of child raising to come down; that parents show less sensitivity to the needs of their children; and this in turn inevitably affects the quality of the relationship between parents and their children [11,22,45–47]. Regarding parental stress, Bloomfiel and Kendall [18] found that parents who perceived parental stress tended to be harder and more rigorous in their role as fathers or mothers, offer less support to their children, and that parent-child interaction was more conflictive.
In conclusion, it seems relevant to analyze parental perception of child’s vulnerability at the clinical level since results of this study have shown that it is associated with other variables related to parental psychological distress, which in turn affects the perception that parents have of their ability to raise their children successfully and to be able to control the behavior of their child. However, results of the present study suggest the need to continue to examine the bi-directionality of the data.
There were several limitations to this study. First, participation of fathers in the study was lower than participation of mothers. Second, the study was based on a single information source, that of fathers and mothers. Third, the internal consistency of the scale of Perception of child vulnerability is low, so future studies should continue working on its psychometric adequacy. Likewise, future studies should incorporate medical and nursing staff information. Using multi-method and longitudinal designs in data collection would also contribute to understanding causal relationships. Also, it would be interesting to increase the sample and continue the detailed analyses, studying the association between the variables considered in the present study and the parents' sociodemographic variables such as age and educational level, families in which the parents live together in the same home and families that do not, or analyzing father-mother or mother/father-baby dyads.
Supporting information
S2 File. English translation of Spanish version (VBS).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202894.s002
(PDF)
S3 File. Base Perception of child vulnerability.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202894.s003
(SAV)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Alejandro Cerezo Munuera for his collaboration in the translating process of the scale.
References
- 1. Forsyth BWC, Horwitz SMC, Leventhal JM, Burger J, Leaf PJ. The child vulnerability scale: An instrument to measure parental perceptions of child vulnerability. J Pediatr Psychol 1996;21(1):89–101. pmid:8820075
- 2. Green M, Solnit AJ. Reactions to the threatened loss of a child: a vulnerable child syndrome. Pediatrics 1964;34(1):58–66 pmid:9651442
- 3. Allen EC, Manuel JC, Legault C, Naughton MJ, Pivor C, O’Shea TM. Perception of child vulnerability among mothers of former premature infants. Pediatrics 2004;113(2):267–73. pmid:14754937
- 4. Karam F, Sheehy O, Huneau MC, Chambers C, Fraser WD, Johnson D, et al. Impact of maternal prenatal and parental postnatal stress on 1-year-old child development: results from the OTIS antidepressants in pregnancy study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19(5):835–43. pmid:26957509
- 5. Kerruish NJ, Settle K, Campbell-Stokes P, Taylor BJ. Vulnerable Baby Scale: Development and piloting of a questionnaire to measure maternal perceptions of their baby’s vulnerability. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005;41(8):419–23. pmid:16101975
- 6. Anthony KK, Bromberg MH, Gil KM, Schanberg LE. Parental perceptions of child vulnerability and parent stress as predictors of pain and adjustment in children with chronic arthritis. Child Heal Care. 2011;40(1):53–69.
- 7. Field T, Estroff DB, Yando R, Del Valle C, Malphurs J, Hart S. " Depressed " Mothers ‘ perceptions of infant vulnerability are related to later development. Child Psychaiatry Hum Dev. 1996;27(1):43–53. pmid:8810115
- 8. Teti DM, Hess CR, O’Connell M. Parental perceptions of infant vulnerability in a preterm sample: Prediction from maternal adaptation to parenthood during the neonatal period. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005;26(4):283–92. pmid:16100501
- 9. Thomasgard M, Metz WP. The vulnerable child syndrome revisited. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1995;16(1):47–53. pmid:7730457
- 10. Goecke TW, Voigt F, Faschingbauer F, Spangler G, Beckmann MW, Beetz A. The association of prenatal attachment and perinatal factors with pre- and postpartum depression in first-time mothers. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(2):309–16. pmid:22437190
- 11. Stuart S, Clark E. The treatment of postpartum depression with interpersonal psychotherapy and interpersonal counseling. Sante Ment Que. 2007;33(2):87–104. pmid:19370259
- 12. Doyle M, Carballedo A, O’Keane V. Perinatal depression and psychosis: an update. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2015;21(1):5–14.
- 13. Righetti-Veltema M, Bousquet A, Manzano J. Impact of postpartum depressive symptoms on mother and her 18-month-old infant. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003;12(2):75–83. pmid:12664271
- 14. Saligheh M, Rooney RM, McNamara B, Kane RT. The relationship between postnatal depression, sociodemographic factors, levels of partner support, and levels of physical activity. Front Psychol. 2014;5: 597 pmid:25071618
- 15. Perren S, Von Wyl A, Bürgin D, Simoni H, Von Klitzing K. Depressive symptoms and psychosocial stress across the transition to parenthood: Associations with parental psychopathology and child difficulty. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(3):173–83. pmid:16295515
- 16. Wilson S, Durbin CE. Effects of paternal depression on fathers’ parenting behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30(2):167–80. pmid:19926376
- 17. Figueiredo B, Conde A. Anxiety and depression in women and men from early pregnancy to 3-months postpartum. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2011;14(3):247–55. pmid:21479759
- 18. Bloomfield L, Kendall S. Parenting self-efficacy, parenting stress and child behaviour before and after a parenting programme. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012;13(4):364–72. pmid:22464178
- 19. Belsky J, Lang ME, Rovine M. Stability and change in marriage across the transition to parenthood. J Marriage Fam. 1985;47(4):855–65.
- 20. Berry JO, Jones WH. The Parental Stress Scale: Initial Psychometric Evidence. J Soc Pers Relat. 1995;12(3):463–72.
- 21. Coltrane S. Research on Household Labor: Modeling and Measuring the Social Embeddedness of Routine Family Work. J Marriage Fam. 2000;62(4):1208–33.
- 22. Oronoz B, Alonso-Arbiol I, Balluerka N. A Spanish adaptation of the Parental Stress Scale. Psicothema 2007;19(4):687–92 pmid:17959127
- 23. Yogev S. Relationships between stress and marital satisfaction among dual-earner couples. Woman Ther. 1986;5(2–3):313–30.
- 24. Cousino MK, Hazen RA. Parenting Stress Among Caregivers of Children With Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review. 2013;38(8):809–28 pmid:23843630
- 25. Henninger WR, Luze G. Poverty, caregiver depression and stress as predictors of children’s externalizing behaviours in a low-income sample. Child Fam Soc Work. 2014;19(4):467–79.
- 26. Jackson K, Ternestedt BM, Magnuson A, Schollin J. Parental stress and toddler behavior at age 18 months after pre-term birth. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(2):227–32. pmid:17429910
- 27. Skreden M, Skari H, Malt UF, Pripp AH, Björk MD, Faugli A, et al. Parenting stress and emotional wellbeing in mothers and fathers of preschool children. Scand J Soc Med. 2012;40(7):596–604. pmid:23042456
- 28. Tommiska V, Östberg M, Fellman V. Parental stress in families of 2 year old extremely low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002;86(3):161F–164. pmid:11978745
- 29. Widarsson M, Engström G, Rosenblad A, Kerstis B, Edlund B, Lundberg P. Parental stress in early parenthood among mothers and fathers in Sweden. J Caring Sci. 2013;27(4):839–47. pmid:23067055
- 30. Pérez-Padilla J, Menéndez S. El estrés parental como predictor de la sintomatología psicológica en madres de familias en riesgo. Behav Psychol. 2016;24(1):51–71
- 31.
Caballero-Peláez C, Sierra P, Sánchez-Reales S. Sentirse inseguro como hijo y como padre: la percepción de competencia parental y el ajuste psicológico infantil. In: Ferrer L, editor. Libro de capítulos del X Simposio Nacional de Casos Clínicos de Trastornos Psicopatológicos, Granada; Instituto Superior de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud (ISPCS); 2014. p. 164–74
- 32. Farkas-Klein C. Escala de evaluación parental (EEP): Desarrollo, propiedades psicométricas y aplicaciones. Univ Psychol 2008;7(2):457–67.
- 33. Johnston C, Mash EJ. A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. J Clin Child Psychol 1989;18(2):167–175
- 34. Ohan JL, Leung DW, Johnston C. The parenting sense of competence scale: Evidence of a stable factor structure and validity. Can J Behav Sci.2000;32(4):251–61.
- 35. Hess CR, Teti DM, Hussey-Gardner B. Self-efficacy and parenting of high-risk infants: The moderating role of parent knowledge of infant development. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2004;25(4):423–37.
- 36. Jones TL, Prinz RJ. Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005;25(3):341–63. pmid:15792853
- 37. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150(6):782–6. pmid:3651732
- 38. Garcia-Esteve L, Ascaso C, Ojuel J, Navarro P. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in Spanish mothers. J Affect Disord. 2003;75(1):71–6. pmid:12781353
- 39.
Oltra P. Versión española de la escala Parental Sense Of Competence (PSOC). Evidencias de fiabilidad y validez. [Master Thesis]. Univ Alicant 2016
- 40.
Arbuckle JL. IBM® SPSS® AmosTM 23 User’s Guide. 2014:1–702. 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.10.016
- 41. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6:1–55.
- 42. Moon M, Hoffman CD. Mothers’ and fathers’ differential expectancies and behaviors: parent x child gender effects. J Genet Psychol Res Theory Hum Dev. 2008;169:261–80
- 43. Horwitz SM, Leibovitz A, Lilo E, Jo B, Debattista A, John N St., et al. Does an intervention to reduce maternal anxiety, depression and trauma also improve mothers’ perceptions of their preterm infants’ vulnerability? Infant Ment Health J. 2015;36:42–52. pmid:25452159
- 44. Kamalifard M, Hasanpoor S, Babapour Kheiroddin J, Panahi S, Bayati Payan S. Relationship between Fathers’ Depression and Perceived Social Support and Stress in Postpartum Period. J Caring Sci. 2014;3:57–66. pmid:25276749
- 45. Epifanio MS, Genna V, De Luca C, Roccella M, La Grutta S. Paternal and maternal transition to parenthood: The risk of postpartum depression and parenting stress. Pediatr Rep. 2015;7:38–44. pmid:26266033
- 46. Goodman SH, Rouse MH, Connell AM, Broth MR, Hall CM, Heyward D. Maternal Depression and Child Psychopathology: A Meta-Analytic Review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2011;14:1–27. pmid:21052833
- 47. Lovejoy MC, Graczyk PA, O’Hare E, Neuman G. Maternal depression and parenting behavior: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2000;20:561–92. pmid:10860167