Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Aqueous humor cytokine levels in patients with diabetic macular edema refractory to anti-VEGF treatment

  • Jin-woo Kwon,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Validation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Kyunggi-do, Korea

    ⨯
  • Donghyun Jee

    Roles Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    doj087@mail.harvard.edu

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Kyunggi-do, Korea

    ⨯

Correction

16 Nov 2018: Kwon Jw, Jee D (2018) Correction: Aqueous humor cytokine levels in patients with diabetic macular edema refractory to anti-VEGF treatment. PLOS ONE 13(11): e0207902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207902 View correction

Abstract

Purpose

To determine aqueous cytokines association with response to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection in diabetic macular edema (DME).

Method

We compared the concentrations of IL (interleukin)-1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, placental growth factor (PlGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the aqueous humor of 64 naïve DME patients with those of 13 cataract patients. Factors associated with central subfield thickness (CST) in DME patients were identified. DME patients were then subgrouped in terms of responsiveness to three IVB injections; cytokine concentrations were compared, and factors associated with responsiveness were identified.

Results

Levels of IL-2, IL-8, PlGF, and VEGF were significantly elevated in DME patients (p = 0.007, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.004 respectively). Regression analysis showed that the preoperative CST was associated with the preoperative best-corrected visual acuity and the aqueous IL-10 level (p < 0.001, p = 0.006, respectively). Of the 64 DME patients, 28 (43.75%) exhibited either CST < 300 μm or reduction in CST ≥ 50 μm after three consecutive IVB injections. On sub-group analysis, the mean IL-8 concentration was higher in the refractory group than in the responsive group, and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the IL-8 was the only factor associated with responsiveness (OR = 0.95, p = 0.017).

Conclusions

The IL-8 concentration in the aqueous humor was associated with responsiveness to IVB in DME patients.

Citation: Kwon J-w, Jee D (2018) Aqueous humor cytokine levels in patients with diabetic macular edema refractory to anti-VEGF treatment. PLoS ONE 13(9): e0203408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203408

Editor: Alfred S. Lewin, University of Florida, UNITED STATES

Received: May 31, 2018; Accepted: August 20, 2018; Published: September 11, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Kwon, Jee. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: "Raw data are available from https://figshare.com/s/5b1cac0315ab7079290f."

Funding: This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP), No.NRF- 2016R1D1A1B03932606 (http://www.nrf.re.kr/nrf_tot_cms/index.jsp?pmi-sso-return2=none) to Donghyun Jee. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most significant causes of visual impairment worldwide, despite advances in laser and surgical treatments.[1–5] The visual impairment associated with DR is principally attributable to neovascularization or diabetic macular edema (DME).[5–7] The early pathogenesis of DME features damage to the blood—retina barrier, characterized by loss of pericytes and endothelial tight junctions induced by metabolic alterations and inflammation.[7, 8] DME is affected by not only inflammatory and glial cells but also the expression levels of inflammatory molecules, including interleukins (ILs), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumor necrosis factor-α, transforming growth factor-β, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs).[8–10] Based on fundamental studies of the effects of VEGF and anti-VEGF antibodies, several types of anti-VEGF agents have been shown to effectively treat DME.[11, 12] Recently, intravitreal steroid implants have also been proven to reduce central subfield thickness (CST) and improve visual acuity in DME patients.[13, 14]

Many studies have shown that the aqueous humor of DME patients contains elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and MMPs, associated with retinal status.[15–17] The individual roles played by these factors in pathogenesis remain unclear; many studies have sought to determine the detailed mechanisms of action. We thus compared the levels of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, placental growth factor (PlGF), and VEGF in the aqueous humor of 64 naïve DME patients with those of a control group. We also identified factors associated with responsiveness to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB).

Methods

We compared IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, PlGF, and VEGF levels in the aqueous humor of naïve DME patients with type II diabetes mellitus (DM). We followed all relevant tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review/Ethics Board of the Catholic University of Korea. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations by the protocol. All participants gave written informed consent to the use of their clinical records.

We enrolled 64 naïve DME eyes (of 64 patients) of CST > 300 μm; 13 diabetes-free patients with cataracts served as controls. The exclusion criteria included glaucoma, retinal degeneration, and macular edema attributable to other causes including an epiretinal membrane or vitreo-macular traction. We excluded eyes with concurrent diseases such as retinal vascular occlusion, and eyes with histories of prior ocular conditions, uveitis, or intraocular surgery that could influence enzyme levels in the aqueous humor.

Every patient underwent a full ophthalmological examination including measurement of visual acuity, refraction, and intraocular pressure (IOP), in addition to a dilated fundus examination. All eyes were classified using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy criteria as having mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), moderate or severe NPDR, or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Macular thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Cirrus High- Definition OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) and axial length employing an IOL Master instrument (Carl Zeiss Meditec).

We classified DME patients as either IVB-responsive or -refractory. Responsiveness was defined as either CST < 300 μm or a CST reduction ≥ 50 μm at 1 month after 3 consecutive monthly injections of IVB.[18, 19]

Assay of cytokines and growth factors

Concentrations of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, PlGF, and VEGF in 75 μL of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber (collected via anterior paracentesis during the first IVB injection or cataract surgery, and were immediately stored at -80°C until analysis) were measured. The assays used human antibodies against IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, PlGF, and VEGF. The antibodies were immobilized on beads; 75-μL humor samples with 75 μL Calibrator Diluent RD6-52 were added to the bead preparations. The samples were incubated for 2 h at room temperature (20–25°C) after bead addition, for a further 1 h at room temperature after the addition of detection antibodies, and for 30 min at room temperature after the addition of streptavidin-phycoerythrin reagent. A Luminex-x-MAP suspension array system (Luminex, Austin, TX, USA) was used for detection; this is a multiplexed, microsphere suspension immunoassay that detects and quantitates spectrally unique microspheres attached to specific antibodies. The technique enables many samples to be analyzed in a single reaction.

The detection limits and dynamic ranges are as follows: 0.8 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 3,950 pg/mL for IL-1β, 1.8 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 8,510 pg/mL for IL-2, 1.8 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 1,140 pg/mL for IL-8, 1.6 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 890 pg/mL for IL-10, 1.8 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 2,090 pg/mL for IL-17, 1.9 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 470 pg/mL for PlGF, and 2.1 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 2,170 pg/mL for VEGF.

Statistical evaluation

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows software (ver. 20.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and R (ver. 3.2.3, 2015-12-10, Platform: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, R Core Team (2015) [R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.URL https://www.R-project.org/.])

We used the t-test, Mann—Whitney U-test, and the chi-squared test to compare the values and the ratio of the participants groups. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare changes in IOP, CST, and BCVA, after placement of intravitreal dexamethasone implants. Linear regression analysis was employed to identify CST-associated factors. Logistic regression was employed to identify factors associated with responsiveness to IVB injection. The statistical significance level was set at p<0.05.

Results

The average age of the cataract patients was 67.92 ± 13.03 years and that of the DME patients was 56.81 ± 7.96 years (p = 0.004). There were 30 males and 34 females in the study group and 8 males and 5 females in the control group. There was no significant difference in either axial length or initial IOP between the study and control groups. Levels of IL-2, IL-8, PlGF, and VEGF were significantly elevated in the DME group (p = 0.007, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.004 respectively) (Table 1).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics of all study participants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203408.t001

In the subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in levels of aqueous cytokines and responsiveness of IVB between PDR and NPDR patients (Table 2).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics of DME patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203408.t002

Preoperative CST was associated with preoperative BCVA and aqueous humor IL-10 level on multivariate regression analysis (p < 0.001, p = 0.006, respectively) (Table 3).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. Variables associated with the preoperative CST of DME patients as revealed by regression analyses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203408.t003

Of the 64 DME patients, 28 (43.75%) exhibited either CST < 300 μm or a reduction in CST ≥ 50 μm 1 month after the last IVB injection. On sub-group analysis, the mean IL-8 concentration of the refractory group was higher than that of the responsive group, and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the IL-8 was the only factor associated with responsiveness (OR = 0.95, p = 0.017) (Table 4).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 4. Results of logistic regression, effect on responsiveness to IVB.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203408.t004

Of the 36 refractory patients, 23 received intravitreal dexamethasone implants. Of these, 17 (73.91%) exhibited CST < 300 μm and 20(86.96%) exhibited a CST reduction ≥ 50 μm at the 1-month follow-up. The CST and BCVA of 23 patients improved significantly compared with the values prior to implantation (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Box-and-whisker plots for central subfield thickness (CST), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) changes in patients receiving dexamethasone implants due to poor responsiveness to 3 months of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections.

The circles represent outliers. (A) CST was significantly reduced both after IVB injection and placement of dexamethasone implants. (B) BCVA did not improve significantly after IVB injection, but did upon dexamethasone treatment. (C) The baseline IOP was 15.52 ± 3.23 mmHg, and increased significantly to 16.61 ± 2.21 mmHg after placement of dexamethasone implants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203408.g001

Discussion

Many studies have found that DME is mediated by inflammatory cytokines and VEGFs, the actions of which are interconnected.[8, 20] Analysis of vitreous samples yields valuable information on retinal status,[21] but obtaining such samples is invasive and data quality may be compromised if the samples are contaminated with blood. Other studies have also shown that the aqueous humor reflects retinal status; levels of many cytokines are elevated during retinal hypoxia or inflammation.[17, 22, 23] Most studies on aqueous humor have simply shown that the concentrations of various materials differed between control and DME patients.[15, 24] Few studies have explored the associations between prognosis and individual cytokine levels.[25, 26] We thus sought associations between cytokine and VEGF levels, and responsiveness to anti-VEGF therapy. We first determined that IL-8 concentrations may be associated with anti-VEGF responsiveness.

IL-8 is a well-known pro-inflammatory cytokine that acts as a neutrophil chemoattractant and a T-cell activator.[27] In the eye, hypoxia induces IL-8 synthesis by endothelial and glial cells, associated with neovascularization in patients with ischemic retinal disease.[28, 29] Many studies have shown that elevated IL-8 levels in the aqueous humor of DME patients may be associated with inflammation-induced damage to the blood-retina barrier.[15, 30] One article has suggested that IL-8 may play a role in DME development that is not adequately controlled by anti-VEGF antibodies or steroids.[31] However, another study found that intravitreal triamcinolone was effective in patients unresponsive to IVB, and that the efficacy was associated with the IL-8 level in the aqueous humor.[32] This result matches our study, and we suggest that the DME more related with inflammation could manifest higher aqueous IL-8. This could be a good biomarker to predict responsiveness of therapeutic agents. The response rate of DME patients with IL-8 levels <17.71 pg/mL (the median value of DME patients in this study) was 19/31 (61.28%), but that of patients with IL-8 levels greater than the median value was only 7/31(22.81%). These proportions differed significantly (p = 0.004; odds ratio (OR) 5.429). The role played by IL-8 in DME requires further investigation.

IL-10 produced by activated macrophages and T-cells exerts various effects that are principally anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive in nature.[33] In the eye, IL-10 may be associated with an angiogenetic response to hypoxia, but the details remain unclear.[34, 35] IL-10 levels in aqueous humor are elevated in patients with diabetes, retinal vascular occlusion, or primary intraocular lymphoma.[36–38] However, few IL-10 data are available for DME patients, and the results vary. One study reported that aqueous humor IL-10 levels correlated negatively with VEGF level,[36] and another study found that aqueous humor IL-10 levels were elevated in patients in whom DR progressed.[39] A recent study found that aqueous humor baseline IL-10 levels were negatively associated with BCVA.[17] Our data suggest that IL-10 may be associated with the CST of DME patients. Both BCVA and CST are markers of DME severity and disease progression. Like other studies, we found that CST was significantly associated with BCVA (p < 0.001, Table 3). Thus, IL-10 levels may also be associated with DME severity; more studies are required.

In the protocol H study of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, mean reduction was 56 μm after two 1.25-mg IVB injections.[40] Although the OCT platforms used differed, we obtained a similar result after three consecutive IVB injections; the mean baseline and postoperative CSTs were 416.03 ± 81.14 and 362.23 ± 95.64 μm respectively; the mean reduction was thus 53.80 ± 63.35 μm. The protocol T study showed that, after 1-year IVB treatment, CST decreased by 101 ± 121 μm on average.[12] However we did not continue IVB until 1year and performed intravitreal dexamethasone implants in some of the refractory patients. The mean CST reduction after implantation, compared with the baseline level, averaged 178.22 ± 107.41 μm, and visual acuity improved significantly (Fig 1). The IOP increment was only 1.09 ± 2.41 mmHg; no patient exhibited IOP > 21 mmHg. However, in the first year of the BEVORDEX study, IOP elevations ≥ 5 mmHg from baseline were evident in 46% of patients, and a two-grade rise in cataract density was reported in 13% of patients receiving dexamethasone implants.[14] Thus, both the IOP and visual acuity require long-term follow-up.

Our study had certain limitations. First, the aqueous levels of only IL-2, IL-8, PlGF, and VEGF were significantly elevated in the DME group. This may be attributable to the small number of control patients, who differed in mean age from the DME group. Also, differences among the characteristics of patients enrolled in other studies may have affected our results. Second, the relationships between biomarker levels and fluorescein angiographic or OCT angiographic images should be studied in terms of DME pathogenesis. We plan a follow-up study along these lines. Third, a 1-month follow-up of patients receiving dexamethasone implants is too short to evaluate drug effects or side-effects. Changes in CST, BCVA, IOP, and cataract progression must be evaluated long-term.

In summary, the aqueous humor concentrations of IL-10 were associated with CST and those of IL-8 levels were associated with IVB responsiveness. Additional studies with more patients are required to confirm our results and to elucidate DME pathogenesis. Such studies may provide the basis for novel therapeutic approaches.

References

  1. 1. Zhang X, Saaddine JB, Chou CF, Cotch MF, Cheng YJ, Geiss LS, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United States, 2005–2008. Jama. 2010;304(6):649–56. Epub 2010/08/12. pmid:20699456.
  2. 2. Ting DS, Cheung GC, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy: global prevalence, major risk factors, screening practices and public health challenges: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44(4):260–77. Epub 2015/12/31. pmid:26716602.
  3. 3. Sivaprasad S, Gupta B, Crosby-Nwaobi R, Evans J. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in various ethnic groups: a worldwide perspective. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57(4):347–70. Epub 2012/05/01. pmid:22542913.
  4. 4. Liu L, Wu X, Liu L, Geng J, Yuan Z, Shan Z, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in mainland China: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45264. Epub 2012/10/03. pmid:23028893.
  5. 5. Cheung N, Mitchell P, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet. 2010;376(9735):124–36. Epub 2010/06/29. pmid:20580421.
  6. 6. Hayreh SS. Neovascular glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007;26(5):470–85. Epub 2007/08/11. pmid:17690002.
  7. 7. Das A, McGuire PG, Rangasamy S. Diabetic Macular Edema: Pathophysiology and Novel Therapeutic Targets. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(7):1375–94. Epub 2015/05/04. pmid:25935789.
  8. 8. Tang J, Kern TS. Inflammation in diabetic retinopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2011;30(5):343–58. Epub 2011/06/04. pmid:21635964.
  9. 9. Aveleira CA, Lin CM, Abcouwer SF, Ambrosio AF, Antonetti DA. TNF-alpha signals through PKCzeta/NF-kappaB to alter the tight junction complex and increase retinal endothelial cell permeability. Diabetes. 2010;59(11):2872–82. Epub 2010/08/10. pmid:20693346.
  10. 10. Behzadian MA, Wang XL, Windsor LJ, Ghaly N, Caldwell RB. TGF-beta increases retinal endothelial cell permeability by increasing MMP-9: possible role of glial cells in endothelial barrier function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(3):853–9. Epub 2001/02/27. pmid:11222550.
  11. 11. Aiello LP, Avery RL, Arrigg PG, Keyt BA, Jampel HD, Shah ST, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disorders. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(22):1480–7. Epub 1994/12/01. pmid:7526212.
  12. 12. Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM, Aiello LP, Antoszyk AN, et al. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(13):1193–203. Epub 2015/02/19. pmid:25692915.
  13. 13. Boyer DS, Yoon YH, Belfort R Jr, Bandello F, Maturi RK, Augustin AJ, et al. Three-year, randomized, sham-controlled trial of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(10):1904–14. Epub 2014/06/08. pmid:24907062.
  14. 14. Gillies MC, Lim LL, Campain A, Quin GJ, Salem W, Li J, et al. A randomized clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab versus intravitreal dexamethasone for diabetic macular edema: the BEVORDEX study. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(12):2473–81. Epub 2014/08/27. pmid:25155371.
  15. 15. Jonas JB, Jonas RA, Neumaier M, Findeisen P. Cytokine concentration in aqueous humor of eyes with diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2012;32(10):2150–7. Epub 2012/05/24. pmid:22617833.
  16. 16. Kwon JW, Choi JA, Jee D. Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 in the Aqueous Humor of Diabetic Macular Edema Patients. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159720. Epub 2016/07/29. pmid:27467659.
  17. 17. Hillier RJ, Ojaimi E, Wong DT, Mak MY, Berger AR, Kohly RP, et al. AQUEOUS HUMOR CYTOKINE LEVELS AS BIOMARKERS OF DISEASE SEVERITY IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA. Retina. 2017;37(4):761–9. Epub 2016/07/30. pmid:27471825.
  18. 18. Sugimoto M, Ichio A, Nunome T, Kondo M. Two year result of intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema using treat and extend protocol. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(16):e6406. Epub 2017/04/20. pmid:28422832.
  19. 19. Massin P, Bandello F, Garweg JG, Hansen LL, Harding SP, Larsen M, et al. Safety and efficacy of ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema (RESOLVE Study): a 12-month, randomized, controlled, double-masked, multicenter phase II study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(11):2399–405. Epub 2010/10/29. pmid:20980427.
  20. 20. Wang J, Xu X, Elliott MH, Zhu M, Le YZ. Muller cell-derived VEGF is essential for diabetes-induced retinal inflammation and vascular leakage. Diabetes. 2010;59(9):2297–305. Epub 2010/06/10. pmid:20530741.
  21. 21. Sonoda S, Sakamoto T, Shirasawa M, Yamashita T, Otsuka H, Terasaki H. Correlation between reflectivity of subretinal fluid in OCT images and concentration of intravitreal VEGF in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(8):5367–74. Epub 2013/07/19. pmid:23860753.
  22. 22. Jung SH, Kim KA, Sohn SW, Yang SJ. Association of aqueous humor cytokines with the development of retinal ischemia and recurrent macular edema in retinal vein occlusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(4):2290–6. Epub 2014/01/09. pmid:24398091.
  23. 23. Feng J, Zhao T, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Jiang Y. Differences in aqueous concentrations of cytokines in macular edema secondary to branch and central retinal vein occlusion. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e68149. Epub 2013/07/19. pmid:23861862.
  24. 24. Dong N, Xu B, Chu L, Tang X. Study of 27 Aqueous Humor Cytokines in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with or without Macular Edema. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0125329. Epub 2015/04/30. pmid:25923230.
  25. 25. Campochiaro PA, Hafiz G, Mir TA, Scott AW, Zimmer-Galler I, Shah SM, et al. Pro-permeability Factors in Diabetic Macular Edema; the Diabetic Macular Edema Treated With Ozurdex Trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;168:13–23. Epub 2016/05/01. pmid:27130369.
  26. 26. Rezar-Dreindl S, Eibenberger K, Pollreisz A, Buhl W, Georgopoulos M, Krall C, et al. Effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implant on intra-ocular cytokines and chemokines in eyes with retinal vein occlusion. Acta ophthalmologica. 2017;95(2):e119–e27. Epub 2016/07/16. pmid:27417275.
  27. 27. Petering H, Gotze O, Kimmig D, Smolarski R, Kapp A, Elsner J. The biologic role of interleukin-8: functional analysis and expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2 on human eosinophils. Blood. 1999;93(2):694–702. Epub 1999/01/13. pmid:9885232.
  28. 28. Yoshida A, Yoshida S, Khalil AK, Ishibashi T, Inomata H. Role of NF-kappaB-mediated interleukin-8 expression in intraocular neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39(7):1097–106. Epub 1998/06/10. pmid:9620068.
  29. 29. Koch AE, Polverini PJ, Kunkel SL, Harlow LA, DiPietro LA, Elner VM, et al. Interleukin-8 as a macrophage-derived mediator of angiogenesis. Science. 1992;258(5089):1798–801. Epub 1992/12/11. pmid:1281554.
  30. 30. Roh MI, Kim HS, Song JH, Lim JB, Kwon OW. Effect of intravitreal bevacizumab injection on aqueous humor cytokine levels in clinically significant macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(1):80–6. Epub 2009/01/03. pmid:19118699.
  31. 31. Owen LA, Hartnett ME. Soluble mediators of diabetic macular edema: the diagnostic role of aqueous VEGF and cytokine levels in diabetic macular edema. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(4):476–80. Epub 2013/05/08. pmid:23649946.
  32. 32. Jeon S, Lee WK. Effect of intravitreal triamcinolone in diabetic macular edema unresponsive to intravitreal bevacizumab. Retina. 2014;34(8):1606–11. Epub 2014/02/21. pmid:24553409.
  33. 33. Sabat R, Grutz G, Warszawska K, Kirsch S, Witte E, Wolk K, et al. Biology of interleukin-10. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010;21(5):331–44. Epub 2010/12/01. pmid:21115385.
  34. 34. Ghasemi H, Ghazanfari T, Yaraee R, Owlia P, Hassan ZM, Faghihzadeh S. Roles of IL-10 in ocular inflammations: a review. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2012;20(6):406–18. Epub 2012/11/21. pmid:23163602.
  35. 35. Dace DS, Khan AA, Kelly J, Apte RS. Interleukin-10 promotes pathological angiogenesis by regulating macrophage response to hypoxia during development. PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3381. Epub 2008/10/15. pmid:18852882.
  36. 36. Mitrovic S, Kelava T, Sucur A, Grcevic D. Levels of Selected Aqueous Humor Mediators (IL-10, IL-17, CCL2, VEGF, FasL) in Diabetic Cataract. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2016;24(2):159–66. Epub 2014/10/15. pmid:25314260.
  37. 37. Kaneda S, Miyazaki D, Sasaki S, Yakura K, Terasaka Y, Miyake K, et al. Multivariate analyses of inflammatory cytokines in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion: relationships to bevacizumab treatment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(6):2982–8. Epub 2011/01/29. pmid:21273540.
  38. 38. Cassoux N, Giron A, Bodaghi B, Tran TH, Baudet S, Davy F, et al. IL-10 measurement in aqueous humor for screening patients with suspicion of primary intraocular lymphoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(7):3253–9. Epub 2007/06/27. pmid:17591896.
  39. 39. Wu H, Hwang D-K, Song X, Tao Y. Association between Aqueous Cytokines and Diabetic Retinopathy Stage. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017;2017:8. pmid:28680705
  40. 40. Scott IU, Edwards AR, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Chan CK, Elman MJ, et al. A phase II randomized clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(10):1860–7. Epub 2007/08/19. pmid:17698196.