http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-1098
Figures
Abstract
In eukaryotes, the modification of an invariant histidine (His-699 in yeast) residue in translation elongation factor 2 (EF2) with diphthamide involves a conserved pathway encoded by the DPH1-DPH7 gene network. Diphthamide is the target for diphtheria toxin and related lethal ADP ribosylases, which collectively kill cells by inactivating the essential translocase function of EF2 during mRNA translation and protein biosynthesis. Although this notion emphasizes the pathological importance of diphthamide, precisely why cells including our own require EF2 to carry it, is unclear. Mining the synthetic genetic array (SGA) landscape from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has revealed negative interactions between EF2 (EFT1-EFT2) and diphthamide (DPH1-DPH7) gene deletions. In line with these correlations, we confirm in here that loss of diphthamide modification (dphΔ) on EF2 combined with EF2 undersupply (eft2Δ) causes synthetic growth phenotypes in the composite mutant (dphΔ eft2Δ). These reflect negative interference with cell performance under standard as well as thermal and/or chemical stress conditions, cell growth rates and doubling times, competitive fitness, cell viability in the presence of TOR inhibitors (rapamycin, caffeine) and translation indicator drugs (hygromycin, anisomycin). Together with significantly suppressed tolerance towards EF2 inhibition by cytotoxic DPH5 overexpression and increased ribosomal -1 frame-shift errors in mutants lacking modifiable pools of EF2 (dphΔ, dphΔ eft2Δ), our data indicate that diphthamide is important for the fidelity of the EF2 translocation function during mRNA translation.
Citation: Hawer H, Ütkür K, Arend M, Mayer K, Adrian L, Brinkmann U, et al. (2018) Importance of diphthamide modified EF2 for translational accuracy and competitive cell growth in yeast. PLoS ONE 13(10): e0205870. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205870
Editor: Thomas Preiss, John Curtin School of Medical Research, AUSTRALIA
Received: August 6, 2018; Accepted: October 2, 2018; Published: October 18, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Hawer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was supported by European regional development funds (EFRE—Europe Funds Saxony) for the Centre for Chemical Microscopy (ProVIS) to Lorenz Adrian; University of Kassel research unit PhosMOrg (P/1082 232) to Raffael Schaffrath; DFG Priority Program 1927 Iron-Sulfur for Life: Cooperative Function of Iron-Sulfur Centers in Assembly, Biosynthesis, Catalysis and Disease to Lorenz Adrian (AD178/7-1) and to Raffael Schaffrath (SCHA750/21-1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: KM and UB are employed by and members of Roche Pharma Research & Early Development. Roche is interested in targeted therapies and diagnostics. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors (HH, KÜ, MA, LA and RS) have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The conversion of a histidine residue to diphthamide is a posttranslational modification unique to translation elongation factor 2 (EF2) [1]. The name refers to the target role diphthamide modified EF2 plays for diphtheria toxin and other lethal ADP ribosylases [2,3]. As a result, diphthamide dependent ADP ribosylation by bacterial toxins inactivates the essential translocase function of EF2 in mRNA translation, blocks protein synthesis and eventually leads to cell death [4,5]. Similarly, diphthamide mediates killing of fungi including the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by sordarin [6,7], an antibiotic which irreversibly locks the modified EF2 on the ribosome [8]. So, diphthamide clearly represents an Achilles heel on EF2 with pathological relevance for cell growth and proliferation control [9–11]. Its physiological role, however, is less clear although diphthamide can be found on archaeal and eukaryal EF2 [10,11].
Indeed, its formation is conserved from archaea to yeast and man and in eukaryotes, involves a multi-step biosynthetic pathway (Fig 1) that is encoded by the DPH1-DPH7 gene network [12–19]. Starting with the addition of a 3-amino-3-carboxypropyl (ACP) radical from S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) to the imidazole ring of the crucial histidine in EF2 (yeast: His-699; humans: His-715), step one of the pathway (Fig 1) engages Fe/S enzyme (Dph1•Dph2) chemistry, electron transfer (Dph3) and a putative J-type chaperone (Dph4) to form ACP-modified EF2 [20–27]. Multiple methylation of this first intermediate by a methylase (Dph5) generates methyl-diphthine [28–31] (Fig 1). Next, the latter is converted to diphthine by a demethylase (Dph7) before an amidase (Dph6) with the use of ATP and ammonium generates the end product diphthamide [17,18,31] (Fig 1). Remarkably, Dph5 binds to unmodified EF2 prior to ACP formation, and its dissociation from methyl-diphthine depends on Dph7 (Fig 1) [19]. Consistently, when diphthamide synthesis is incomplete (dph7Δ) or absent (dph1Δ -dph4Δ), excess Dph5 has been shown to bind EF2 [13,19,24] and in tandem with DPH5 overexpression is cytotoxic due to EF2 inhibition [13,19,24]. Thus, apart from its catalytic activity as a methylase, Dph5 can negatively interfere with EF2 function in the absence of stepwise diphthamide synthesis on EF2 [13,19,24].
In step one (1, black label), Dph1-Dph4 use SAM as amino-carboxyl-propyl (ACP) donor to modify His-699 in EF2 with ACP. Next (2, blue label), Dph5 generates methyl-diphthine using the methyl donor function of SAM. Subsequently (3, green label), this intermediate is converted to diphthine by demethylase Dph7 before finally (4, red label), Dph6 generates diphthamide from diphthine using ammonium and ATP. Diphthamide can be ADP-ribosylated by diphtheria toxin (DT) to inactivate EF2 and cause cell death. Note that prior to ACP formation, Dph5 binds to unmodified EF2 and dissociates from intermediate methyl-diphthine in a fashion licensed by Dph7 [19,50]. The model is derived and up-dated from Schaffrath et al. (2014) [11].
Despite the high degree of conservation in diphthamide synthesis, most yeast dph mutants are viable and grow normally under standard conditions [6,7,32]. In multicellular organisms, however, loss of diphthamide is pleiotropic and has been reported to pre-activate cell death receptor pathways [33] and associate with severe defects or diseases including ovarian and colorectal cancers [34–36], embryonic lethality, neuronal underdevelopment, intellectual disability, polydactyly and cranofacial abnormalities [26,27,37–39]. Clearly, while this emphasizes biomedical importance, it is unknown whether and how diphthamide defects in the above syndromes link up to the biological function of EF2 in mRNA translation. Based on ribosomal frame-shift assays in yeast, diphthamide has been proposed to support the fidelity of translocation by EF2 during mRNA translation [19,32,40]. How this is accomplished, is not entirely clear, and only recently have cryo-EM studies emerged that relate diphthamide modified EF2 in complex with the ribosomal decoding center to accurate mRNA translation [41,42].
To further study the function of diphthamide for EF2, we mined the yeast synthetic genetic array (SGA) database (TheCellMap.org) [43] and extracted EFT1-EFT2 and DPH1-DPH7 gene correlation profiles for experimental validation of genetic interaction in vivo. We find that the diphthamide modification becomes crucial for yeast cell performance upon EF2 down-regulation (eft2Δ). Thus, diphthamide loss together with EF2 undersupply (dphΔ eft2Δ) cause growth phenotypes induced by stressors including translation indicator drugs and culminate in competitive fitness defects. Furthermore, irrespective of cellular EF2 levels, diphthamide defects (dphΔ, dphΔ eft2Δ) trigger -1 frame-shift errors supporting the view that the modification is physiologically important for translational accuracy and EF2 function.
Results
SGA analysis reveals EF2 and diphthamide gene network correlations
Using high-density arrays of double mutants for systematic mapping of genetic interactions in yeast has enabled global SGA analysis of gene deletion collections [44]. For a given gene, the approach provides a genetic interaction landscape thereby generating phenotypic signatures diagnostic for functions of known genes or unassigned, cryptic ORFs [44]. Consistent with this notion, genes with similar interaction profiles often are functionally related in shared biochemical pathways or protein complexes [45,46].
Therefore, we mined the SGA database update (TheCellMap.org) [43] to examine correlations between the interaction landscapes of EF2 (EFT1-EFT2) and diphthamide (DPH1-DPH7) genes (S1 File). We compared EFT1, EFT2 and DPH1-DPH7 query gene interactions with every array ORF in the database (S1 File) and ranked the similarity between all possible pairwise profiles according to their Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) stringencies (Fig 2A). The survey revealed that with the exception of DPH3/KTI11, for which there are no entries in TheCellMap.org [43], all other DPH genes and EFT2 scored significantly highly among the correlation profiles generated, placing them within a tightly clustered interaction network (Fig 2A). Here, DPH1, DPH2 and DPH6 and to a lesser degree DPH4 and DPH5 were found to correlate with EFT2 (Fig 2A). Based upon a maximum score of negative genetic interaction (-0.768), the two EF2 gene paralogs (EFT1 and EFT2) most strongly relate to one another and to a lesser, yet significant degree to the DPH genes (Fig 2B). Thus, TheCellMap.org [43] provides robust signatures indicating that the EF2 and diphthamide encoding networks correlate genetically and may functionally impact on each other.
(A) Based on Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) of indicated stringencies, each diphthamide query gene (DPH1-DPH7) correlates to other DPH gene members and to a lesser yet significant degree to EF2 (EFT2) in a tightly clustered interaction network. (B) SGA based coefficients of query gene EFT2 identify strongest negative relations with EFT1 and weaker albeit significant ones with diphthamide network genes (DPH1-DPH7). All SGA data were retrieved from TheCellMap.org database [43] (S1 File).
Loss of diphthamide and EF2 undersupply confer synthetic growth phenotypes
In order to validate the SGA correlations above, we tested the functional importance of EF2 and diphthamide interactions in vivo using S. cerevisiae as a model system. We compared growth of wild-type cells with that of mutants lacking (i) diphthamide biosynthesis (dph2Δ), (ii) one of the two EF2 gene copies (eft2Δ) or (iii) both (dph2Δ eft2Δ) under standard laboratory conditions and in response to thermal or chemical stressors.
Relative quantification of EF2 expression levels by mass spectrometry (MS) showed that deleting one of the two EF2 genes (eft2Δ, dph2Δ eft2Δ) reduced EF2 amounts to about ~35% compared to wild-type levels (Fig 3A). The MS data were corroborated by detection of reduced EF2 levels in Western blots using antibody anti-EF2(pan) that was raised against human EF2 [33] and recognizes the counterpart from yeast (Fig 3B). The data imply that EFT1, which becomes essential for eft2Δ cell viability [47], plays a minor role in EF2 supply compared to EFT2. Notably, as judged from MS data and our anti-EF2(pan) Western blots, the diphthamide mutant (dph2Δ) maintaining proper EF2 gene dosage (EFT1, EFT2) produced higher-than-normal levels of EF2 (~1.3 fold) (Fig 3A and 3B). This is in striking contrast to the dph2Δ eft2Δ mutant and suggests that EF2 levels can be upregulated in response to lack of diphthamide synthesis provided both EF2 genes (EFT1, EFT2) are present.
(A) MS based quantification of EF2 levels from yeast mutants (dph2Δ, eft2Δ, dph2Δ eft2Δ) in relation to wild-type (wt) EF2 values (1.0). ** (P ≤ 0.01); **** (P ≤ 0.0001). (B) Western blots using antibodies for global EF2 recognition (anti-EF2(pan), top panel), specific detection of EF2 pools that lack the diphthamide modification (anti-EF2(no diphthamide), middle panel) and for internal protein expression controls (anti-β-Actin and anti-Cdc19, bottom panels). Protein extracts from homozygous (dph2ΔΔ) diphthamide-minus MCF7 [33] cell lines served as internal controls (all panels). (C) Synthetic sick growth phenotypes result from combining EF2 downregulation with loss of diphthamide. Ten-fold serial cell dilutions of yeast strains (as in A & B) were cultivated in the absence (untreated) or presence of various chemical stressors (SDS [0.2% w/v], rapamycin [15 nM] or caffeine [7.5 mM]) or at different temperatures (30°C, 37°C, 39°C or 40°C).
In addition, we validated diphthamide modification states of EF2 using antibody anti-EF2(no diphthamide) recently reported to exclusively detect human EF2 that lacks the modification [33] (Fig 3B). Our Western blots confirm the cross-specificity of the antibody which allows for specific detection of unmodified yeast EF2 in diphthamide mutants (dph2Δ, dph2Δ eft2Δ) (Fig 3B). Moreover, the lack of anti-EF2(no diphthamide) responsive signals from diphthamide proficient (wild-type, eft2Δ) strains (Fig 3B) suggests that EF2 appears to be quantitatively modified in yeast, a scenario similar to near complete diphthamide modification of human EF2 [33]. Hence, use of anti-EF2(no diphthamide) in Western blots provides a facile and alternative means to detect and quantify yeast EF2 modification states.
Phenotypic assays with these verified strains demonstrate negative synthetic interactions and additive growth defects under standard laboratory and stress conditions. In particular, the composite mutant (dph2Δ eft2Δ) was significantly reduced in growth at elevated cultivation temperatures (39°C, 40°C) and in the presence of two TOR inhibitor drugs [48,49], rapamycin (15 nM) or caffeine (7.5 mM), as well as SDS (0.02% [w/v]) (Fig 3C). This is in contrast to the response of the single mutants (dph2Δ, eft2Δ) cultivated under thermal or chemical stress conditions, which perform very similar to the wild-type (Fig 3C).
To sum up, synthetic sick growth phenotypes as a result of combined EF2 (eft2Δ) and diphthamide (dph2Δ) gene deletions go hand-in-hand with the interaction landscapes predicted from the SGA data (S1 File; Fig 2) revealing that upon EF2 undersupply, yeast cell growth can indeed become dependent on the diphthamide modification (Fig 3). Its requirement for proper EF2 function is furthermore evident from an independent genetic scenario, in which we halved the EF2 gene complement in a DPH4 deletion strain (dph4Δ eft2Δ) lacking Dph4, a J-type chaperone [26,27] cooperating with Dph2 in first step of diphthamide synthesis (Fig 1). The resultant double mutant (dph4Δ eft2Δ) copies the synthetic sick phenotypes (S1 Fig) of our reference mutant (dph2Δ eft2Δ) above (Fig 3C) thus supporting the SGA based predictions (Fig 2) and reinforcing that the EF2 (EFT1-EFT2) and diphthamide (DPH1-DPH7) gene networks are functionally correlated.
Loss of diphthamide and EF2 undersupply interfere with competitive fitness
Although growth performance of the composite mutants (dph2Δ eft2Δ, dph4Δ eft2Δ) clearly is compromised on solid media under thermal/chemical stress (Fig 2; S1 Fig), the single mutants (dph2Δ, dph4Δ, eft2Δ) appear to tolerate these conditions and if any, show milder phenotypes. Similarly, in liquid media and under standard cultivation temperature (30°C), single mutants (dph2Δ, eft2Δ) perform almost like the wild-type, whereas growth of the composite mutant (dph2Δ eft2Δ) is significantly affected (S2 Fig). This phenotype, which results from negative interaction between the dph2Δ and eft2Δ null-alleles, is particularly obvious in delayed onset of the exponential growth phase and associates with slower growth rates and later entry into stationary phase (S2 Fig). Based on OD600 values, cell numbers of the mutant lacking diphthamide and proper pools of EF2 (dph2Δ eft2Δ) eventually become reduced in comparison to wild-type and single mutants (dph2Δ, eft2Δ) (S2 Fig).
To further address the physiological importance of diphthamide modified EF2, we next examined competitive growth between mixed populations of wild-type and mutant (dph2Δ, eft2Δ, dph2Δ eft2Δ) cells (Fig 4A). The approach is based on previous observations that mixed cultures are well suited to detect subtle changes in the growth behaviour and competitive fitness between strains carrying wild-type alleles of non-essential genes and their respective deletions [50]. We found mutant cells that lack the ability to form diphthamide (dph2Δ) or that express reduced amounts of EF2 (eft2Δ) become outcompeted by wild-type cells after two days resulting in very similar cell reductions (dph2Δ: 41.0% ± 6.1%; Fig 4B and eft2Δ: 37.8% ± 8.1%; Fig 4C) after four days. In contrast, cells of the composite mutant (dph2Δ eft2Δ) display an additive fitness defect that is already obvious after one day and results in more drastic cell number reductions (17.3% ± 15.3%) after four days (Fig 4D). In sum, the synthetic fitness defects observed in our competition experiments go hand-in-hand with other growth-related phenotypic studies. They reinforce that subtle or minor traits in the single mutants (dph2Δ or eft2Δ) add up when genetically combined in the double mutant (dph2Δ eft2Δ) and compromise the cell performance as a result of lower-than-normal pools of EF2 that are not modifiable with diphthamide. The data therefore emphasize that diphthamide modified EF2 is important for competitive fitness and healthy yeast cells.
(A) Experimental setup. Equal amounts of wild-type (wt) and mutant (xxxΔ) cells were mixed and grown for 24 h (1 d) and successively passaged three more times for a total period of 96 h (4 d). After each passage, the relative amount (% of cells) of the two cell-types was determined. Growth experiments involving competition between wt and dph2Δ (B), eft2Δ (C) or dph2Δ eft2Δ (D) cells are shown.
Combinined diphthamide and EF2 defects alter growth rates and cell doubling times
To examine whether apart from DPH2, all other diphthamide biosynthesis genes (Fig 1) interact with EFT2, we combined each dphΔ mutant with eft2Δ null-alleles and performed (n = 4) single batch growth experiments for 23 h. The resulting exponential phases from each growth curve (for a representative read-out, see S2 Fig) were used to calculate the doubling times for each strain (Fig 5). Consistent with the predictions from TheCellMap.org [43] that members of the DPH gene network correlate with EFT2, we found that the doubling times in respective composite mutants (dph2Δ eft2Δ, dph3Δ eft2Δ,dph4Δ eft2Δ and dph6Δ eft2Δ) significantly increased in relation to the single mutants (dphΔ and eft2Δ) alone (Fig 5). Furthermore, similar to the strength of negative genetic interaction coefficients extracted from TheCellMap.org (Fig 2B), doubling times of dph2Δ and dph6Δ mutants scored significantly higher in tandem with eft2Δ alleles, while EF2 undersupply reduced the doubling times of DPH1, DPH4, DPH5 and DPH7 deletion strains to a lesser but significant degree (Fig 5).
Doubling times of the indicated strain backgrounds were determined from biological quadruplicates. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed t-test. * (P ≤ 0.05).
DPH3, originally identified iso-allelic with KTI11 [51,52], is absent from the gene deletion collection used for SGA assembly of TheCellMap.org [43]. This explains why prior to our study here, no DPH3/KTI11 and EFT2 correlation was reported. Strikingly, reduction in the doubling times of the composite mutant (dph3/kti11Δ eft2Δ) was found to be even stronger than in dph2Δ eft2Δ and dph6Δ eft2Δ (Fig 5) mutants most strongly correlated by the SGA criteria above (Fig 2). Presumably, this is due to roles for DPH3/KTI11 in both diphthamide synthesis and the Elongator pathway for tRNA anticodon modification [6,25,53–55]. In line with such functional difference from other dphΔ mutants, a significant doubling time increase is already observed with the single (dph3/kti11Δ) mutant alone (Fig 5), which is pleiotropic per se due to defects in the diphthamide and tRNA modification pathways [6,53]. Additional EF2 undersupply in the genetic background of the composite (dph3/kti11Δ eft2Δ) mutant may therefore further compromise its translational capacity. Recently, Kti13, another protein involved in the Elongator pathway for tRNA modification [51,55–57] was proposed to play a role in diphthamide synthesis through complex formation with Dph3/Kti11 [6,53,54].
In support of this, we score negative genetic interaction based on significantly reduced cell doubling times upon combining KTI13 and EFT2 deletions, and the effect is similar to most of the bona fide (dphΔ eft2Δ) composite mutants (Fig 5). In sum, our data are in further support that the DPH1-DPH7 and EFT2 gene networks functionally correlate and that combined deletions in the composite mutants (dphΔ eft2Δ) cause synthetic effects. This indicates that under conditions of EF2 undersupply (eft2Δ), either absence (dph1Δ-dph4Δ) or incomplete synthesis (dph5Δ-dph7Δ) of diphthamide on EF2 compromise the essential function of the translation factor and trigger defects in cell growth, viability and fitness.
Loss of diphthamide modifiable EF2 pools confers DPH5 overexpression toxicity
Prior to ACP formation by Dph1-Dph4, the methylase Dph5 uniquely binds to unmodified EF2 and later dissociates from methyl-diphthine (Fig 1) in a Dph7 dependent manner [19,58]. In cells with incomplete (dph7Δ) or absent (dph1Δ-dph4Δ) diphthamide synthesis, excess Dph5 levels were found to accumulate on EF2 (Fig 6A) and in response to upregulated DPH5 gene activation from the strong GAL promoter to inhibit cell growth [13,19,24,58]. To correlate Dph5 levels under wild-type (native DPH5 promoter) and ectopic (GAL promoter) expression regimes, we compared Dph5 production from genomic [13] and plasmid-borne [59] DPH5-HA alleles in Western blots using the anti-HA antibody. As shown in Fig 6B, ectopic Dph5-HA expression in a dph5Δ reporter strain is virtually shut-down by glucose and drastically induced by galactose in comparison to constitutive Dph5-HA levels produced from the wild-type locus and irrespective of carbon source supply. Thus, DPH5 overexpression and production of higher-than-normal Dph5 levels most likely account for the cytotoxicity typically observed with dph1Δ-dph4Δ mutants [13,19,24].
(A) Model depicting that higher-than-normal Dph5 levels interact with EF2 when diphthamide synthesis is absent (dph2Δ) and can become EF2 inhibitory (red bolt) and cytotoxic upon DPH5 overexpression [13,19,24,58]. (B) Expression analysis between Dph5-HA produced from the wild-type genomic locus (DPH5-HA) and a GAL-promoter plasmid (pGAL-DPH5-HA) (in a dph5Δ strain). Protein extracts obtained after growth on glucose (glc) or galactose (gal) medium were analyzed by anti-HA (top panel) or anti-Pfk1 (bottom panel) Western blots to detect Dph5-HA or phosphofructokinase expression levels. Dph5-HA produced from pGAL-DPH5-HA carries additional tags [59] that confer a mobility-shift (*). (C) DPH5 overexpression is toxic for growth of dph2Δ and dph2Δ eft2Δ mutants. The indicated strains were cultivated for 3 days on glc (2% [w/v]) and gal (0.5, 1, 2% [w/v]) medium.
In an attempt to further diagnose synthetic interaction between EF2 and diphthamide defects, we therefore analysed toxicity of overexpression of DPH5 in dph2Δ, eft2Δ and dph2Δ eft2Δ mutants. While the performance of the mutant with reduced EF2 copy number (eft2Δ) hardly differs from the wild-type with a full genetic EF2 complement, DPH5 overexpression inhibits growth of the diphthamide mutant (dph2Δ) alone and even more in combination with EF2 undersupply (dph2Δ eft2Δ) (Fig 6C). Moreover, DPH5 overexpression toxicity is modulated in a galactose dose dependent fashion and strongest in the composite mutant (dph2Δ eft2Δ) lacking modifiable pools of EF2 (Fig 6C). We conclude that rather than EF2 undersupply (eft2Δ), it is loss of diphthamide (dph2Δ) which conditions growth inhibition by excess levels of Dph5 and enhances cytotoxicity in tandem with EF2 undersupply (dph2Δ eft2Δ) (Fig 6C). Again, our data support synthetic negative genetic interactions showing that both EF2 and diphthamide correlate and that the diphthamide modification is critical for full functioning of translation factor EF2.
Elevated -1 frame-shift errors results from loss of diphthamide modified EF2 pools
Our data strongly suggest a physiological role for diphthamide in cell viability, which is likely related to the translation elongation activity of EF2. We therefore studied whether the synthetic phenotypes in mutants with reduced EF2 gene copy number and diphthamide defects (dphΔ eft2Δ) may result from inaccurate or error-prone translation. Growth assays performed in the presence of hygromycin and anisomycin revealed inhibition of two composite mutants (dph2Δ eft2Δ and dph4Δ eft2Δ) in a dose dependent manner by these translation indicator drugs (Fig 7A; S3 Fig).
(A) Serial cell dilutions of the indicated yeast stains were cultivated on media without any drugs (untreated) or supplemented with various doses of anisomycin (10, 20 μg/ml) or hygromycin (40, 80 μg/ml) at 30°C for 2–3 days. (B) Programmed -1 frame-shift assays based on a dual luciferase reporter system (scheme) carrying a viral -1 frame-shift site: 5’-GGGTTTA-3’ [62]. Luminescence based read-outs were statistically analyzed using two-tailed t-test. * (P ≤ 0.05); n.s. (P > 0.05).
This implies that lack of diphthamide in tandem with EF2 undersupply compromises a cell’s translational capacity and thus enhances its vulnerability to translation elongation targeting antibiotics. In line with this notion, which suggests that diphthamide assists EF2 during mRNA translation, previous studies show that substitutions in EF2 diphthamide acceptor site His-699 or other conserved residues nearby confer problems in reading frame maintenance [32,47,60,61]. Hence, we investigated the propensity of our mutant set (dph2Δ, eft2Δ and dph2Δ eft2Δ) to induce -1 ribosomal frame-shift errors using a plasmid based dual luciferase reporter system previously established by Harger & Dinman (2003) [62]. Monitoring programmed -1 frame-shift errors on the basis of the L-A viral reporter sequence [62], we observed that a deletion of DPH2 alone (dph2Δ) leads to elevated -1 frame-shift errors, while reduced amounts of EF2 as such (eft2Δ) cause no effect on ribosomal accuracy and reading frame maintenance (Fig 7B). Intriguingly, the composite (dph2Δ eft2Δ) mutant is also found to be error-prone with detectable -1 frame-shift frequencies that are similar, if not identical, to the single mutant (dph2Δ) alone (Fig 7B). We conclude that EF2 undersupply alone does not induce -1 frame-shift errors, while loss of diphthamide modification compromises the translational accuracy of EF2. Taken together, our data strongly suggest that the synthetic growth defects typical of the composite mutants (dphΔ eft2Δ) highly likely result from error-prone translation (dphΔ) in combination with reduced translational capacity of EF2 (eft2Δ). This corresponds well with previous observations on translational errors associated with lack of diphthamide [32,47,60,61] and reinforces our view that the modification of EF2 is critical for accurate functioning of the translation factor.
Discussion
Previously, genome-wide approaches based on chemical genomics [FitDB] and SGA [DRYGIN] databases from S. cerevisiae enabled discovery of DPH6 and DPH7 [13,16–19], two hitherto unknown genes of the biosynthetic pathway for modification of EF2 by diphthamide. The approach allowed elucidation of new biochemical activities in the terminal steps of diphthamide synthesis (Fig 1) and provided robust phenotypic signatures indicative for a tightly clustered DPH1-DPH7 network within the genetic interaction landscape of yeast [13,16–19]. The present study further exploits the SGA database update (TheCellMap.org) showing strong correlation between the diphthamide (DPH1-DPH7) and EF2 (EFT1-EFT2) gene networks. Thus, our SGA-prompted study served as a starting point to further delineate the physiological role of diphthamide, which unlike its well-known pathological role as a target for ADP ribosylase toxins [13,14], is less clear.
Our analysis is diagnostic for synthetic genetic interactions in most of the combined EF2 and diphthamide gene deletion strains. With the exception of DPH3/KTI11 (for which there are no SGA database entries), this notion is based on stringent PCC values between pairwise EFT2 and DPH gene deletions (Fig 2A) and strong negative interaction between an EFT2 query gene deletion and DPH1-DPH7 null-alleles from the array collection (Fig 2B). Intriguingly, we find that the EF2 gene EFT1, which is essential for a viable eft2Δ mutant [47], contributes to ~ 35% of total EF2 and thus plays a minor role compared to the EFT2 paralog. Lower EF2 levels produced from EFT1 possibly explain why (among the two EF2 gene copies) EFT2 is stronger correlated with each member of the DPH1-DPH7 gene network (Fig 2A).
Irrespective of differential EF2 levels, the correlation data from SGA imply that the EF2 and diphthamide gene networks are linked to each other in function. This notion is based on synthetic interactions and entirely goes hand-in-hand with previous evidence from co-immune precipitation, pull-down experiments, TAP purification and catalytic studies, which collectively demonstrate biophysical interactions in vivo and in vitro between EF2 and the diphthamide machinery [6,16–25,29,31,52]. In addition, based upon phenotypic, genetic and biochemical criteria, we observe mutual interactions in our experimental assays. Thus, by comparing the performance of mutants with diphthamide defects (dphΔ), EF2 undersupply (eft2Δ) or a combination of both (dphΔ eft2Δ) to cells with proper pools of diphthamide modified EF2, we confirm the above SGA based interactions. While the single mutants (dphΔ, eft2Δ) alone hardly display any growth-related phenotypes, the composite (dphΔ eft2Δ) mutants undergo additive growth defects that specifically arise from combining EF2 undersupply with loss of diphthamide modification. Inappropriate pools of EF2 which are not diphthamide modified in the double mutant (dph2Δ eft2Δ) could be validated by MS measurements and Western blot analysis used to examine both the levels and diphthamide modification states of EF2. Here, anti-EF2(no diphthamide), an antibody previously established [33] to recognize human EF2 that is not diphthamide modified was also found to detect exclusively unmodified EF2 in diphthamide mutants (dph2Δ, dph2Δ eft2Δ) from yeast. Cross-species specificity likely results from conservation of eukaryal EF2, and the peptide sequence derived from human EF2 for antibody generation [33] is indeed identical to the yeast counterpart (see Materials & Methods section). Hence, we consider the anti-EF2(no diphthamide) Western blot provides a facile means to readily detect diphthamide modification states of EF2 and potentially distinguish diphthamide intermediates from individual pathway (Fig 1) mutants.
In addition, our anti-EF2(pan) Western blots and MS data indicate slight but significantly (~1.3 fold) increased EF2 levels in diphthamide (dph2Δ) minus cells. Considering the negative genetic interactions that result from loss of diphthamide and reduced EF2 downregulation, it seems reasonable for us to speculate that EF2 upregulation may be a cellular response to help rescue from phenotypes that become particularly apparent under conditions of EF2 undersupply in diphthamide mutants (dphΔ eft2Δ). Indeed, we present in here a robust body of evidence showing that the latter scenario in the composite mutants (dphΔ eft2Δ) dramatically affects (i) cell performance under standard condition as well as thermal and/or chemical stress, (ii) cellular growth rates, (iii) cell doubling times, (iv) competitive fitness, (v) DPH5 overexpression toxicity and (vi) cell viability in the presence of TOR inhibitor (rapamycin, caffeine) and translation indicator drugs (hygromycin, anisomycin).
This is a plethora of synthetic negative phenotypes indicating that the diphthamide modification on EF2 promotes cell growth and competitive fitness, most likely through effects on mRNA translation. In line with this notion, our data show that it is loss of diphthamide modified EF2 (dph2Δ) rather than reduced levels of the translation factor (eft2Δ), which triggers growth inhibition by higher-than-normal Dph5 levels produced from DPH5 overexpression. With excess levels of Dph5 being previously shown to bind and inhibit EF2, particularly when unmodified [13,19,24,58], cytotoxicity is expected to further increase when EF2 levels become limiting. This is exactly what we see in the composite mutant (dph2Δ eft2Δ), and we therefore speculate that Dph5 –in addition to its catalytic activity as a promiscuous tetra-methylase [63] (Fig 1)–can negatively interfere with EF2 function and cell growth when the stepwise generation of diphthamide on EF2 is absent (dph1Δ-dph4Δ) or incomplete (dph7Δ) [13,19,24,58]. Perhaps, such a regulatory rather than catalytic role for Dph5 involves binding to EF2 in order to exclude the elongation factor from functioning in mRNA translation unless licensed for full modification with diphthamide [11,13].
Moreover, the diphthamide modification becomes particularly important and even essential for cell viability under conditions that limit EF2 function and as a result, compromise a cell’s translational capacity. Consistently, we find growth inhibition by anisomycin and hygromycin, two aminoglycosidic antibiotics that interfere with eukaryal mRNA translation by inhibiting peptidyl transferase activity, disrupting EF2 dependent translocation and promoting mistranslation [64], is most aggravated in the composite mutants (dph2Δ eft2Δ, dph4Δ eft2Δ) lacking diphthamide and proper levels of EF2. Together with -1 frame-shift data showing that diphthamide modified EF2 significantly contributes to reading frame maintenance and translational accuracy, we propose that the synthetic growth phenotypes typical of the composite mutants (dphΔ eft2Δ) are most likely the result of impaired translational capacity and error-prone translation.
In support of this model, which implies direct or indirect involvement of diphthamide in ribosomal decoding, the location of the diphthamide modification at the tip of anticodon mimicry domain IV in EF2 predicts a potential role in mRNA translation [60]. Consistent with this are structure-function studies showing that domain IV may be sufficiently close to interact with tRNA in the ribosomal P-site [60]. In addition, substitutions of highly conserved tip residues in domain IV, including diphthamide acceptor site His-699 and critical mutations nearby (H694N, I698A, P580H) were shown to trigger -1 frame-shifts in yeast [32,40,61].
Although these studies cannot clarify whether reading frame maintenance is a general function of EF2 or specific to its diphthamide modified tip, there is recent structural evidence showing that the modification links up with mRNA and rRNA in the ribosomal decoding centre [41]. Solving the structure at near atomic resolution, the report [41] concludes that through ensuring reading frame maintenance, diphthamide plays a role in ribosomal translocation during the elongation phase of mRNA translation. Similarly, cryo-EM based structural studies have emerged suggesting that diphthamide may stabilize the interaction of the codon-anticodon duplex and thereby prevent from reverse translocation activity of EF2 [42]. Interestingly, reducing the interactions of the anticodon mimicry domain IV on EF2 with the codon-anticodon helix by loss of diphthamide [42,65,66] could explain the increase in -1 frame-shift errors that research groups including our own have observed in mutants that lack diphthamide modified EF2 or fail to complete diphthamide synthesis [19,32,40,61,67]. Interestingly, a neurological disorder in humans (SCA26) was found to result from a mutation in EF2 that affects a residue close to the diphthamide modified histidine in the 3D structure of EF2 and also induces -1 frameshifting [67]. In sum, our in vivo experiments together with recent structural and biochemical studies strongly suggest that the role of the diphthamide modification in EF2 is to optimize the efficiency and accuracy of EF2 in ribosomal translation [41,42,68].
With dual functions of DPH3/KTI11 in diphthamide modification of EF2 [6,15,25] and Elongator dependent tRNA modification [53–55], it will be important to test whether both pathways cooperate with one another as has been suggested in previous studies on telomere biology and stress responses [69,70]. The latter includes shared sensitivity to TOR inhibitor drugs (rapamycin, caffeine) of Elongator mutants [71] and our composite mutants (dph2Δ eft2Δ, dph4Δ eft2Δ) (Fig 3C and S1 Fig). As for the Elongator pathway, there is evidence for tRNA modification cross-talk that promotes proper codon translation rates and reading frame maintenance [72–77] similar to our data in here indicating that translational fidelity and efficiency are supported by diphthamide modified EF2.
Materials and methods
Strains, media, growth conditions and assays
Yeast strains used and generated in this study are listed in S1 Table. Cultures were grown in complete (YPD) or minimal (SD) media [78] at 30°C unless otherwise stated.
For phenotypic analysis, cell solutions (OD600 of 1.5) were ten-fold serially diluted and spotted onto YPD plates [78] containing SDS [0.2% w/v], rapamycin [15–30 nM], caffeine [7.5–10 mM], anisomycin [10–20 μg/ml], hygromycin [40–80 μg/ml] or no drug, respectively, and incubated at 30°C for 2–3 days. Thermal stress tolerance was tested by incubating plates under conditions of elevated temperature cultivation (37°C, 39°C and 40°C). DPH5 overexpression cytotoxicity assays utilized the galactose inducible plasmid pGAL-DPH5-HA from the mORF overexpression library [59]. pGAL-DPH5-HA carrying yeast strains were selected following transformation with the lithium acetate protocol [79] on SD medium lacking uracil, and growth assays were conducted on the same medium containing glucose (2% [w/v]) or galactose (0.5, 1, 2% [w/v]) essentially as described [19].
Generation of yeast gene deletion strains and growth competition assays
Yeast strains carrying single or double DPH1-DPH7 and EFT2 gene deletions were constructed using plasmid (pUG, YDp) based PCR knock-out cartridges [80, 81] and primer pairs specific for each genomic manipulation listed in S2 Table. All gene deletions were confirmed via diagnostic PCR on genomic DNA preparations using target gene specific primer pairs (S2 Table). For the growth competition experiments (Fig 4), yeast cells were pre-grown in single batch liquid YPD medium for one day at 30°C before mixtures of equal amounts (OD600 = 0.1) of wild-type control and mutants (dph2Δ, eft2Δ and dph2Δ eft2Δ) were used to inoculate the main cultures. These were grown for 24 h before a portion (1:1000) was transferred into fresh medium. This process was repeated four times and every day, a portion (1:100,000) of the cells was plated on YPD medium and YPD containing 400 μg/ml of the antibiotic G418. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 2 days to select for and differentiate between wild-type and mutant cells. The resulting relative ratios of wild-type and mutant cells were progressively monitored over a total of four days.
Dual-luciferase -1 frame-shift assay
Using the lithium acetate protocol [79], yeast cells were transformed with dual-luciferase control (pJD375) and -1 frame-shift reporter (pJD376) plasmids [62] and grown overnight in SD medium lacking uracil. After cell lysis, analysis of luciferase activities involved the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega; cat. no. E1910) and measurements with a luminometer (GloMax Explorer Multimode Microplate Reader - Promega; cat. no. GM3500). At least 13 individual biological replicates were used for frame-shift analysis of each strain. Frame-shift error percentages were calculated in relation to control strains carrying pJD375. Frame-shift rates were normalized to wild-type levels and statistical significance was verified by using the two-tail t-test.
Epitope-tagging and protein detection by Western blots
C-terminal HA-tagging of DPH5 was performed according to previously published in vivo PCR based manipulation protocols [6,19]. The tagged gene (DPH5-HA) and its product (Dph5-HA) were confirmed respectively, by diagnostic PCR and Western blots using the anti-HA antibody A-14 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Detection of global EF2 irrespective of its diphthamide modification state, used Western blots with antibody anti-EF2(pan) (3C2) while immune blots with the antibody anti-EF2(no diphthamide) (10G8) [33] solely detected pools of EF2 without the diphthamide modification. Antibodies 3C2 and 10G8 were previously generated to detect human EF2 [33]. Since the sequence recognized by 10G8 is identical between human (708TLHADAIHRGGGQIIPT724) and fungal (692TLHADAIHRGGGQIIPT708) EF2 [33], it can also be applied to differentiate diphthamide modification states of EF2 from yeast. Total cell extracts were generated from human MCF7 DPH2 knock-out cell-lines (dph2ΔΔ: Western blot control) by lysing 4.5x 105 cells on ice in 150μl RIPA buffer (Sigma, cat. no. R0278) containing protease inhibitor ‘complete’ (Roche; cat. no. 11697498001; 1 tablet/10ml buffer). Total yeast cell extracts were generated from strains grown to OD600 of 1, isolated via glass bead lysis [82] and protein concentrations were determined by Bradford assay [83]. 7.5μl of MCF7 or yeast extracts (including loading buffer) were subsequently subjected to reducing SDS-PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membranes (Merck/Millipore; cat. no. IPVH07850). The membranes were probed overnight at 4°C with antibodies 3C2 or 10G8 [33] and detected/visualized with anti-rabbit secondary antibody HRP-conjugate (Dako; cat. no. P0217 –working conc. 1:2000) and Lumi-Light Western blotting substrate (Roche; cat. no. 12015200001) as previously described [33]. For MCF7 cells, protein loading was controlled in Western blots with an antibody against β-actin (Sigma; cat. no. A2228 –working conc. 1:1500). For yeast, this utilized anti-Pfk1 or anti-Cdc19 antibodies kindly donated by Jürgen Heinisch (University of Osnabrück, Germany) and Jeremy Thorner (University of California, USA), respectively.
Protein identification and quantification by mass spectrometry
Gel pieces containing 40 μg of whole protein extracts from the respective mutants were first amended with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAP-DH) of Staphylococcus aureus as an internal standard. Then the gel-fixed proteins were reduced with dithiothreitol, sulfhydryl-groups were derivatized with iodoacetamide and proteins were digested with trypsin as described [84]. The resulting peptide mixtures were desalted with ZipTip-μC18 material (Merck Millipore) and analyzed with an Ultimate 3000 nanoRSLC instrument (Thermo Scientific, Germering, Germany) coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) via a TriVersa NanoMate (Advion, Ltd., Harlow, UK) as described previously [85]. Proteins were identified by matching precursor and fragment mass spectra against the NCBI protein database of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain S288C using SequestHT as a built-in search engine of ProteomeDiscoverer version 2.2 (Thermo). For identification, a mass tolerance of 3 ppm for precursor ions and 0.1 Da for fragment ions was set. Elongation factor 2 (EF2) was detected in all analyzed samples with an average coverage of almost 80%. EF2 quantification was done on the basis of intensity values that were normalized against the internal standard.
Supporting information
S1 File. SGA data for DPH1-DPH7 and EFT1-EFT2 query genes based on TheCellMap.org database mining.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205870.s001
(XLS)
S1 Fig. Synthetic sick growth phenotypes result from combining EF2 downregulation with loss of diphthamide.
Ten-fold serial cell dilutions of wild-type (wt), single (dph4Δ and eft2Δ) and composite (dph4Δ eft2Δ) mutants were cultivated at different temperatures (30°C, 37°C, 39°C or 40°C) or incubated in the absence (untreated) or presence of various chemical stressors (rapamycin [15–30 nM] or caffeine [7.5–10 mM]).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205870.s002
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Negative interactions between EF2 and diphthamide gene deletions in composite mutant (dph2Δeft2Δ) reduce growth and doubling times.
Shown are growth curves of wild-type (wt), single (dph2Δ and eft2Δ) and double mutant (dph2Δ eft2Δ) cells monitored over a period of 23 h in liquid rich (YPD) medium. Cells were cultivated in single batches of 50 ml medium and optical densities were measured at OD600 nm every hour. While dph2Δ or eft2Δ cells hardly differ in relation to wt cells, the double dph2Δ eft2Δ mutant is significantly reduced in growth.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205870.s003
(TIF)
S3 Fig. Hygromycin phenotypes of mutants lacking diphthamide and/or proper EF2 supply.
Serial cell dilutions of the indicated yeast stains were cultivated on media without (untreated) or supplemented with various hygromycin doses (40, 80 μg/ml) at 30°C for 2–3 days.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205870.s004
(TIF)
S1 Table. Yeast strains used or generated for this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205870.s005
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank Viktor Scheidt for technical assistance, Benjamin Scheer for his help with mass spectrometric measurements, Jonathan Dinman for providing plasmids essential for the frame-shift assays, Jürgen Heinisch and Jeremy Thorner for kind donations of anti-Pfk1 and anti-Cdc19 antibodies and Roland Klassen for inspirations, discussions and critically reading the manuscript.
References
- 1. Greganova E, Altmann M, Butikofer P (2011) Unique modifications of translation elongation factors. FEBS J 278: 2613–2624. pmid:21624055
- 2. Pappenheimer AM Jr (1977) Diphtheria toxin. Annu Rev Biochem 46: 69–94. pmid:20040
- 3. Deng Q, Barbieri JT (2008) Molecular mechanisms of the cytotoxicity of ADP-ribosylating toxins. Annu Rev Microbiol 62: 271–288. pmid:18785839
- 4. Mateyak MK, Kinzy TG (2013) ADP-ribosylation of translation elongation factor 2 by diphtheria toxin in yeast inhibits translation and cell separation. J Biol Chem 288: 24647–24655. pmid:23853096
- 5. Van Ness BG, Howard JB, Bodley JW (1980) ADP-ribosylation of elongation factor 2 by diphtheria toxin. NMR spectra and proposed structures of ribosyl-diphthamide and its hydrolysis products. J Biol Chem 255: 10710–10716. pmid:7430147
- 6. Bär C, Zabel R, Liu S, Stark MJ, Schaffrath R (2008) A versatile partner of eukaryotic protein complexes that is involved in multiple biological processes: Kti11/Dph3. Mol Microbiol 69: 1221–1233. pmid:18627462
- 7. Botet J, Rodriguez-Mateos M, Ballesta JP, Revuelta JL, Remacha M (2008) A chemical genomic screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a role for diphthamidation of translation elongation factor 2 in inhibition of protein synthesis by sordarin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 1623–1629. pmid:18285480
- 8. Domínguez JM, Gómez-Lorenzo MG, Martín JJ (1999) Sordarin inhibits fungal protein synthesis by blocking translocation differently to fusidic acid. J Biol Chem 274: 22423–22427. pmid:10428815
- 9.
Uthman S, Kheir E, Bär C, Jablonowski D, Schaffrath R (2011) Growth inhibition strategies based on antimicrobial microbes/toxins. In: Mendez-Vilas A, editor. Science against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances. Badajoz: Formatex Research Center, Vol 2, pp. 1321–1329.
- 10. Su X, Lin Z, Lin H (2013) The biosynthesis and biological function of diphthamide. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 48: 515–521. pmid:23971743
- 11. Schaffrath R, Abdel-Fattah W, Klassen R, Stark MJR (2014) The diphthamide modification pathway from Saccharomyces cerevisiae–Revisited. Mol Microbiol 94: 1213–1226. pmid:25352115
- 12. Chen JY, Bodley JW (1988) Biosynthesis of diphthamide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Partial purification and characterization of a specific S-adenosylmethionine:elongation factor 2 methyltransferase. J Biol Chem 263: 11692–11696. pmid:3042777
- 13. Schaffrath R, Stark MJR (2014) Decoding the biosynthesis and function of diphthamide, an enigmatic modification of translation elongation factor 2 (EF2). Microb Cell 1: 203–205. pmid:28357244
- 14. Chen JY, Bodley JW, Livingston DM (1985) Diphtheria toxin-resistant mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 5: 3357–3360. pmid:3915773
- 15. Liu S, Milne GT, Kuremsky JG, Fink GR, Leppla SH (2004) Identification of the proteins required for biosynthesis of diphthamide, the target of bacterial ADP-ribosylating toxins on translation elongation factor 2. Mol Cell Biol 24: 9487–9497. pmid:15485916
- 16. Su X, Chen W, Lee W, Jiang H, Zhang S, Lin H (2012) YBR246W is required for the third step of diphthamide biosynthesis. J Am Chem Soc 134: 773–776. pmid:22188241
- 17. Su X, Lin Z, Chen W, Jiang H, Zhang S, Lin H (2012) Chemogenomic approach identified yeast YLR143W as diphthamide synthetase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 19983–19987. pmid:23169644
- 18.
Uthman S, Liu S, Giorgini F, Stark MJR, Costanzo M, Schaffrath R (2012) Diphtheria disease and genes involved in formation of diphthamide, key effector of the diphtheria toxin. In: Roy PK, editor. Insight and Control of Infectious Disease in Global Scenario. Rijeka: InTech. pp. 333–356.
- 19. Uthman S, Bär C, Scheidt V, Liu S, ten Have S, Giorgini F, et al. (2013) The amidation step of diphthamide biosynthesis in yeast requires DPH6, a gene identified through mining the DPH1-DPH5 interaction network. PLoS Genet 9: e1003334. pmid:23468660
- 20. Dong M, Horitani M, Dzikovski B, Freed JH, Ealick SE, Hoffman BM, et al. (2017) Substrate-Dependent cleavage site selection by unconventional radical S-adenosylmethionine enzymes in diphthamide biosynthesis. J Am Chem Soc 139: 5680–5683. pmid:28383907
- 21. Dong M, Kathiresan V, Fenwick MK, Torelli AT, Zhang Y, Caranto JD, et al. (2018) Organometallic and radical intermediates reveal mechanism of diphthamide biosynthesis. Science 359: 1247–1250. pmid:29590073
- 22. Zhang Y, Zhu X, Torelli AT, Lee M, Dzikovski B, Koralewski RM, et al. (2010) Diphthamide biosynthesis requires an organic radical generated by an iron-sulphur enzyme. Nature 465: 891–896. pmid:20559380
- 23. Zhu X, Dzikovski B, Su X, Torelli AT, Zhang Y, Ealick SE, et al. (2011) Mechanistic understanding of Pyrococcus horikoshii Dph2, a [4Fe-4S] enzyme required for diphthamide biosynthesis. Mol Biosyst 7: 74–81. pmid:20931132
- 24. Abdel-Fattah W, Scheidt V, Uthman S, Stark MJ, Schaffrath, R (2013) Insights into diphthamide, key diphtheria toxin effector. Toxins 5: 958–968. pmid:23645155
- 25. Dong M, Su X, Dzikovski B, Dando EE, Zhu X, Du J, et al. (2014) Dph3 is an electron donor for Dph1-Dph2 in the first step of eukaryotic diphthamide biosynthesis. J Am Chem Soc 136: 1754–1757. pmid:24422557
- 26. Webb TR, Cross SH, McKie L, Edgar R, Vizor L, Harrison J, et al. (2008) Diphthamide modification of eEF2 requires a J-domain protein and is essential for normal development. J Cell Sci 121: 3140–3145. pmid:18765564
- 27. Thakur A, Chitoor B, Goswami AV, Pareek G, Atreya HS, D'Silva P (2012) Structure and mechanistic insights into novel iron-mediated moonlighting functions of human J-protein cochaperone, Dph4. J Biol Chem 287: 13194–13205. pmid:22367199
- 28. Mattheakis LC, Shen WH, Collier RJ (1992) DPH5, a methyltransferase gene required for diphthamide biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 12: 4026–4037. pmid:1508200
- 29. Zhu X, Kim J, Su X, Lin H (2010) Reconstitution of diphthine synthase activity in vitro. Biochemistry 49: 9649–9657. pmid:20873788
- 30. Wei H, Bera TK, Wayne AS, Xiang L, Colantonio S, Chertov O, et al. (2013) A modified form of diphthamide causes immunotoxin resistance in a lymphoma cell line with a deletion of the WDR85 gene. J Biol Chem 288: 12305–12312. pmid:23486472
- 31. Lin Z, Su X, Chen W, Ci B, Zhang S, Lin H (2014) Dph7 catalyzes a previously unknown demethylation step in diphthamide biosynthesis. J Am Chem Soc 136: 6179–6182. pmid:24739148
- 32. Ortiz PA, Ulloque R, Kihara GK, Zheng H, Kinzy TG (2006) Translation elongation factor 2 anticodon mimicry domain mutants affect fidelity and diphtheria toxin resistance. J Biol Chem 281: 32639–32648. pmid:16950777
- 33. Stahl S, da Silva Mateus Seidl AR, Ducret A, Kux van Geijtenbeek S, Michel S, Racek T, et al. (2015) Loss of diphthamide pre-activates NF-κB and death receptor pathways and renders MCF7 cells hypersensitive to tumor necrosis factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 10732–10737. pmid:26261303
- 34. Chen CM, Behringer RR (2004) Ovca1 regulates cell proliferation, embryonic development, and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev 18: 320–332. pmid:14744934
- 35. Nobukuni Y, Kohno K, Miyagawa K (2005) Gene trap mutagenesis-based forward genetic approach reveals that the tumor suppressor OVCA1 is a component of the biosynthetic pathway of diphthamide on elongation factor 2. J Biol Chem 280: 10572–10577. pmid:15637051
- 36. Liu M, Yin K, Guo X, Feng H, Yuan M, Liu Y, et al. (2017) Diphthamide biosynthesis 1 is a novel oncogene in colorectal cancer cells and is regulated by MiR-218-5p. Cell Physiol Biochem 44: 505–514. pmid:29145210
- 37. Liu S, Wiggins JF, Sreenath T, Kulkarni AB, Ward JM, Leppla SH (2006) Dph3, a small protein required for diphthamide biosynthesis, is essential in mouse development. Mol Cell Biol 26: 3835–3841. pmid:16648478
- 38. Nakajima J, Oana S, Sakaguchi T, Nakashima M, Numabe H, Kawashima H, et al. (2018) Novel compound heterozygous DPH1 mutations in a patient with the unique clinical features of airway obstruction and external genital abnormalities. J Hum Genet 63: 529–532. pmid:29362492
- 39. Sekiguchi F, Nasiri J, Sedghi M, Salehi M, Hosseinzadeh M, Okamoto N, et al. (2018) A novel homozygous DPH1 mutation causes intellectual disability and unique craniofacial fatures. J Hum Genet 63: 487–491. pmid:29410513
- 40. Liu S, Bachran C, Gupta P, Miller-Randolph S, Wang H, Crown D, et al. (2012) Diphthamide modification on eukaryotic elongation factor 2 is needed to assure fidelity of mRNA translation and mouse development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 13817–13822. pmid:22869748
- 41. Pellegrino S, Demeshkina N, Mancera-Martinez E, Melnikov S, Simonetti A, Myasnikov A, et al. (2018) Structural insights into the role of diphthamide on elongation factor 2 in messenger RNA reading frame maintenance. J Mol Biol [Epub ahead of print]
- 42. Susorov D, Zakharov N, Shuvalova E, Ivanov A, Egorova T, Shuvalov A, et al. (2018) Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2 (eEF2) catalyzes reverse translocation of the eukaryotic ribosome. J Biol Chem 293: 5220–5229. pmid:29453282
- 43. Usaj M, Tan Y, Wang W, VanderSluis B, Zou A, Myers CL, et al. (2017) TheCellMap.org: A web-accessible database for visualizing and mining the global yeast genetic interaction network. G3 7: 1539–1549. pmid:28325812
- 44. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, Sevier CS, et al. (2010) The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327: 425–431. pmid:20093466
- 45. Costanzo M, VanderSluis B, Koch EN, Baryshnikova A, Pons C, Tan G, et al. (2016) A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function. Science 353: pii: aaf1420.
- 46. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Myers CL, Andrews B, Boone C (2011) Charting the genetic interaction map of a cell. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22: 66–74. pmid:21111604
- 47. Kimata Y, Kohno K (1994) Elongation factor 2 mutants deficient in diphthamide formation show temperature-sensitive cell growth. J Biol Chem 269: 13497–13501. pmid:8175783
- 48. Chan TF, Carvalho J, Riles L, Zheng XF (2000) A chemical genomics approach toward understanding the global functions of the target of rapamycin protein (TOR). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 13227–13232. pmid:11078525
- 49. Reinke A, Chen JC, Aronova S, Powers T (2006) Caffeine targets TOR complex I and provides evidence for a regulatory link between the FRB and kinase domains of Tor1p. J Biol Chem 281: 31616–31626. pmid:16923813
- 50. Thatcher JW, Shaw JM, Dickinson WJ (1998) Marginal fitness contributions of nonessential genes in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 253–257. pmid:9419362
- 51. Fichtner L, Schaffrath R (2002) KTI11 and KTI13, Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes controlling sensitivity to G1 arrest induced by Kluyveromyces lactis zymocin. Mol Microbiol 44: 865–875. pmid:11994165
- 52. Fichtner L, Jablonowski D, Schierhorn A, Kitamoto HK, Stark MJR, Schaffrath R (2003) Elongator’s toxin-target (TOT) function is nuclear localization sequence dependent and suppressed by post-translational modification. Mol Microbiol 49: 1297–1307. pmid:12940988
- 53. Glatt S, Zabel R, Vonkova I, Kumar A, Netz DJ, Pierik AJ, et al. (2015) Structure of the Kti11/Kti13 heterodimer and its double role in modifications of tRNA and eukaryotic elongation factor 2. Structure 23: 149–160. pmid:25543256
- 54. Kolaj-Robin O, McEwen AG, Cavarelli J, Séraphin B (2015) Structure of the Elongator cofactor complex Kti11/Kti13 provides insight into the role of Kti13 in Elongator-dependent tRNA modification. FEBS J 282: 819–833. pmid:25604895
- 55. Huang B, Johansson MJ, Byström AS (2005) An early step in wobble uridine tRNA modification requires the Elongator complex. RNA 11: 424–436. pmid:15769872
- 56. Zabel R, Bär C, Mehlgarten C, Schaffrath R (2008) Yeast α-tubulin suppressor Ats1/Kti13 relates to the Elongator complex and interacts with Elongator partner protein Kti11. Mol Microbiol 69: 175–187. pmid:18466297
- 57. Schaffrath R, Leidel SA (2017) Wobble uridine modifications–a reason to live, a reason to die?! RNA Biol 14: 1209–1222. pmid:28277930
- 58. Carette JE, Guimaraes CP, Varadarajan M, Park AS, Wuethrich I, Godarova A, et al. (2009) Haploid genetic screens in human cells identify host factors used by pathogens. Science 326: 1231–1235. pmid:19965467
- 59. Gelperin DM, White MA, Wilkinson ML, Kon Y, Kung LA, Wise KJ, et al. (2005) Biochemical and genetic analysis of the yeast proteome with a movable ORF collection. Genes Dev 19: 2816–2826. pmid:16322557
- 60. Spahn CM, Gomez-Lorenzo MG, Grassucci RA, Jørgensen R, Andersen GR, Beckmann R, et al. (2004) Domain movements of elongation factor eEF2 and the eukaryotic 80S ribosome facilitate tRNA translocation. EMBO J 23: 1008–1019. pmid:14976550
- 61. Ortiz PA, Kinzy TG (2005) Dominant-negative mutant phenotypes and the regulation of translation elongation factor 2 levels in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 5740–5748. pmid:16214807
- 62. Harger JW, Dinman JD (2003) An in vivo dual-luciferase assay system for studying translational recoding in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 9: 1019–1024. pmid:12869712
- 63. Hörberg J, Saenz-Méndez P, Eriksson LA (2018) QM/MM Studies of Dph5—a promiscuous methyltransferase in the eukaryotic biosynthetic pathway of diphthamide. J Chem Inf Model [Epub ahead of print]
- 64. Hampsey M (1997) A review of phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13: 1099–1133. pmid:9301019
- 65. Abeyrathne PD, Koh CS, Grant T, Grigorieff N, Korostelev AA (2016) Ensemble cryo-EM uncovers inchworm-like translocation of a viral IRES through the ribosome. Elife 5: e14874. pmid:27159452
- 66. Murray J, Savva CG, Shin BS, Dever TE, Ramakrishnan V, Fernández IS (2016) Structural characterization of ribosome recruitment and translocation by type IV IRES. Elife 5: e13567. pmid:27159451
- 67. Hekman KE, Yu GY, Brown CD, Zhu H, Du X, Gervin K, et al. (2012) A conserved eEF2 coding variant in SCA26 leads to loss of translational fidelity and increased susceptibility to proteostatic insult. Hum Mol Genet 21: 5472–5483. pmid:23001565
- 68. Dever TE, Dinman JD, Green R (2018) Translation elongation and recoding in eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol [Epub ahead of print]
- 69. Addinall SG, Holstein EM, Lawless C, Yu M, Chapman K, Banks AP, et al. (2011) Quantitative fitness analysis shows that NMD proteins and many other protein complexes suppress or enhance distinct telomere cap defects. PLoS Genet 7: e1001362. pmid:21490951
- 70. Villahermosa D, Fleck O (2017) Elp3 and Dph3 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe mediate cellular stress responses through tRNALysUUU modifications. Sci Rep 7: 7225. pmid:28775286
- 71. Scheidt V, Jüdes A, Bär C, Klassen R, Schaffrath R (2014) Loss of wobble uridine modification in tRNA anticodons interferes with TOR pathway signaling. Microb Cell 1: 416–424. pmid:28357221
- 72. Nedialkova DD, Leidel SA (2015) Optimization of codon translation rates via tRNA modifications maintains proteome integrity. Cell 161: 1606–1618. pmid:26052047
- 73. Klassen R, Grunewald P, Thüring KL, Eichler C, Helm M, Schaffrath R (2015) Loss of anticodon wobble uridine modifications affects tRNALys function and protein levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 11: e0119261.
- 74. Klassen R, Ciftci A, Funk J, Bruch A, Butter F, Schaffrath R (2016) tRNA anticodon loop modifications ensure protein homeostasis and cell morphogenesis in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 44: 10946–10959. pmid:27496282
- 75. Tükenmez H, Xu H, Esberg A, Byström AS (2015) The role of wobble uridine modifications in +1 translational frameshifting in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 43: 9489–9499. pmid:26283182
- 76. Klassen R, Bruch A, Schaffrath R (2017) Independent suppression of ribosomal +1 frameshifts by different tRNA anticodon loop modifications. RNA Biol 14: 1252–1259. pmid:27937809
- 77. Sokołowski M, Klassen R, Bruch A, Schaffrath R, Glatt S (2018) Cooperativity between different tRNA modifications and their modification pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta 1861: 409–418.
- 78. Sherman F (2002) Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol 350: 3–41. pmid:12073320
- 79. Gietz D, St Jean A, Woods RA, Schiestl RH (2002) Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res 20: 1425.
- 80. Gueldener U, Heinisch J, Koehler GJ, Voss D, Hegemann JH (2002) A second set of loxP marker cassettes for Cre-mediated multiple gene knockouts in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 30: e23. pmid:11884642
- 81. Jablonowski D, Fichtner L, Martin VJ, Klassen R, Meinhardt F, Stark MJ, et al. (2001) Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall chitin, the Kluyveromyces lactis zymocin receptor. Yeast 18: 1285–1299. pmid:11571753
- 82. Zachariae W, Shin TH, Galova M, Obermaier B, Nasmyth K (1996) Identifiation of subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 274: 201–1204.
- 83. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Chem 72: 248–254.
- 84. Kublik A, Deobald D, Hartwig S, Schiffmann CL, Andrades A, von Bergen M, et al. (2016) Identification of a multi-protein reductive dehalogenase complex in Dehalococcoides mccartyi strain CBDB1 suggests a protein-dependent respiratory electron transport chain obviating quinone involvement. Environ Microbiol 18: 3044–3056. pmid:26718631
- 85. Seidel K, Kühne J, Adrian L (2018) The complexome of Dehalococcoides mccartyi reveals its organohalide respiration-complex is modular. Front Microbiol 9: 1130 pmid:29946299