Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Molecular detection and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidian parasites in Iran

  • Leila Nourani ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Project administration, Software, Writing – original draft

    aliabadi@um.ac.ir (MA); Le.nourani90@gmail.com (LN)

    Current address: Malaria and Vector Research Group (MVRG), Biotechnology Research Center (BRC), Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran

    Affiliations Malaria and Vector Research Group (MVRG), Biotechnology Research Center (BRC), Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

  • Mansour Aliabadian ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Software, Writing – original draft

    aliabadi@um.ac.ir (MA); Le.nourani90@gmail.com (LN)

    Affiliations Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran, Research Department of Zoological Innovations, Institute of Applied Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

  • Omid Mirshamsi,

    Roles Software, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran, Research Department of Zoological Innovations, Institute of Applied Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

  • Navid Dinparast Djadid

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Malaria and Vector Research Group (MVRG), Biotechnology Research Center (BRC), Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran

Correction

11 Feb 2019: Nourani L, Aliabadian M, Mirshamsi O, Dinparast Djadid N (2019) Correction: Molecular detection and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidian parasites in Iran. PLOS ONE 14(2): e0212453. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212453 View correction

Abstract

Background

The mobility of birds across or between continents exposes them to numerous vectors that have the potential to transmit pathogens and spread them into new regions. A combination of rich species diversity of birds along with the small amount of molecular studies in Iran makes observing the blood parasite distribution in wild avian populations indispensable for further estimation and administration of blood parasites.

Methodology/Principal findings

In order to evaluate the infection rate and molecular context of avian blood parasites, bird samples were collected (passerine = 316 and non-passerine = 14) in eight provinces of northern Iran between June to September 2015 and 2016. All bird samples were examined for haematoprotozoan infections by morphological screening using light microscope and mtDNA cytb gene amplification. A total of 115 birds were positive for blood parasites by molecular approach (34.84% overall infection). The infection rate of Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon were 33.03%, 1.21%, and 0.6%, respectively. Sequences analysis has detected 43 lineages in Iranian birds’ hosts. Lineages were attributed to three genera Haemoproteus (n = 37), Plasmodium (n = 4), and Leucocytozoon (n = 2), of which 23 lineages fully matched previously recorded sequences in GenBank and MalAvi data reciprocities. Five lineages of ACDUM1, ACDUM2, PARUS1, PYERY01, and SISKIN1 were detected in multiple hosts’ species from dissimilar families. In Bayesian tree, all sequences were clustered in three main monophyletic clades as Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon genera.

Conclusions/Significance

As the first study outlining the molecular detection of hematozoa of passerines from Iran, the current study has recorded 20 new lineages for three genera of Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon. Additional investigations into these taxa in the avifauna for the other parts of Iran may provide extra information on blood parasites, hosts relationships and distribution patterns.

Introduction

The avian apicomplexan species of Plasmodium Marchiafava et Celli 1885, Leucocytozoon Berestneff 1904 and Haemoproteus Kruse 1980 with an extensive range of vectors are the most frequently and worldwide distributed genera of blood parasites [1]. These protozoan taxa parasitize the vast majority of vertebrate hosts including birds, mammals, and reptiles [2]. These vector-borne pathogens, by enforcing significant ecological and evolutionary pressures on their hosts, are responsible for avian extinction and population decrease through the negative potential imapact on their fitness [38]. Although, hematozoa were taken into account as benign organisms with low pathogenicity in the wild, it has been established that critical infection by haemosporidians may lead to death, anemia, inflammation and other physiopathological conditions [3,9,10]. Birds with a high ability of movement may be exposed by numerous vectors which may elevate the potential risk of pathogen transmission by new lineages around the world [11]. Various haematophagous arthropods comprising mosquitoes (Culicidae), biting midges (Ceratopogonidae), Louse Flies (Hippoboscidae), and Black Flies (Simuliidae) are regarded as the main vectors of avian blood parasites [12]. Preceding studies have illustrated various infection rates between 0–100 percent in bird species around the world, based upon sampling area and detection procedures [1316]. Previous morphological studies have proposed that the species of Haemoproteus are seemingly more host-specific than Plasmodium. The similar evolutionary history of a parasite species and its own host has been considered as the host-specifity [17]. Inversely, the presence of one species on different avian hosts has been mentioned as the host-shifts, which may cause the virulence alteration [18]. However, the level of vertebrate host specificity for most blood parasites’ species remains unknown [19].

To date, the literature has reported Haemoproteus spp. infection in various Iranian birds such as aquatic birds [20], passerines [2123], and domestic birds [24,25]. Several studies have also listed the infection of avian species with Plasmodium spp. [26,27]. Furthermore, several species of birds have been reported as the infected hosts by Leucocytozoon spp. within the country [28]. The aforesaid studies were performed on morphological detection of avian blood parasites while this study is an investigation on the molecular detection of blood parasites of passerin from this region.

The current avian checklist has recorded more than 548 birds’ species from Iran, of which approximately 235 species belong to the passerines [29]. Due to the rich species diversity of birds and the very restricted number of molecular studies in this region, observing the blood parasites distribution in wild populations seems indispensable for further estimation and administration of blood parasites surveillance and control. In the present study, we amplified a 479 base pair (bp) fragment of mitochondrial gene cytb in haemosporidians’ genera from 72 individuals in Iran (i) to screen hematozoan parasites within Iranian birds, (ii) to assess whether birds within Iranian territories contain lineages previously not recorded from other regions, and (iii) to what degree a single host and/or host species may be infected by multiple parasite lineages.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the guide for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes of the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran The protocol was approved by the committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (protocol number: IR.MUM.FUM.REC.1397.035). Furthermore, all field works were approved by the Department of the Environment, which provided the authority and permission for sample collection from each location in this study (No: 93/61478). All birds were released after blood samples were collected, and all efforts were made to minimize their suffering.

Collection of samples and microscopic examination

Blood samples were collected from wild birds (passerine = 316, and non-passerine = 14) in eight provinces form Iran comprising Razavi Khorasan, North Khorasan, Semnan, Golestan, Mazandaran, Gilan, Zanjan, and Ardabil between June to September 2015 and 2016. Birds were captured using mist nets and within minutes of capture, approximately 50–100 μl of whole blood was drawn from a brachial vein by insulin needles and was preserved into Queens’s buffer [30]. Two or three blood smears of each host were prepared in the field and fixed with absolute methanol. They were then stained with Giemsa and screened for infection of the above mentioned three genera. All smears were inspected using an Olympus BH2 light microscope provided with an Olympus DP7 digital camera and imaging software DP-SOFT, for 10–15 minutes at low magnification (× 400), and then at least 100 fields were examined under high magnification (× 1,000) with immersion oil [2].

Extraction of genomic DNA, PCR, and sequencing

DNA extraction was performed on 330 blood samples using PrimePrep Genomic DNA Isolation Kit for blood” (GENETBIO Inc. Daejeon, South Korea) following manufacturer guidelines. All of the extracted DNA specimens were used for detection of parasite infection using—nested PCR approach. PCR amplifications were accomplished in 25μl volumes and included 50ng/μl of total genomic DNA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, PCR buffer 1X, 1.25 mM of each dNTPs, 0.6 mM of each primer, and 0.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase. The cycling programs for 25 and 35 cycles for outer and inner reactions with primers HaemFNI/HaemR3, HaemF/HaemR2, and HaemFL/HaemR2L were run for the parasites discovery using temperature profiles [5,31]. To determine the positive or negative samples, 2.5 μl of the final PCR product was run on 1% agarose gel. All reactions were performed along with negative (double-distilled H2O) and positive controls (infected specimens determined by microscopy screening) to evaluate the validity of the PCR and control for any other contaminations. Sequencing was performed by Macrogene Co. (Seoul, South Korea).

Phylogenetic analysis

The acquired sequences of 479 base pairs of cytb gene were edited, aligned and collated in a sequence identity matrix using BioEdit [32] and MAFFT online version [33]. All unique lineages were identified using theNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Nucleotide BLAST search [34]. When comparing against the recorded dataset, sequences with one or more nucleotide substitutions were identified as new lineages according to the MalAvi Public Database [35]. Subsequently all sequences of the amplified lineages were deposited in both MalAvi database http://mbio-serv4.mbioekol.lu.se/avianmalaria [35] and GenBank (Accession numbers MG976505-MG976576). The sequence divergence between the different lineages was calculated with the use of a Kimura 2-parameter distance matrix, implemented in the program MEGA6.0 [36]. Phylogenetic relationships were estimated using Bayesian inference implemented in the program MrBayes v3.2 [37] using the sequence evolution model acquired from MODELTEST v3.7 [38]. MCMC analysis was run for 10,000,000 generations and sampled every 1,000 generations. At the end of the analysis, the burn-in period to 50% was set where the chains reached stationary status to calculate the posterior probabilities. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using FigTree v1.3.1 [39]. A resultant Bayesian analysis tree showed lineages situated within three main genera with bootstrap support of each cluster in addition to previously published lineages for similar hosts species around the world (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of blood parasites of mitochondrial DNA cytb lineages attained from infected Iranian birds and MalAvi sequences.

Posterior probability values (>0.8) are given. Provinces of sampling are abbreviated by Ardabil (A), Zanjan (Z), Semnan (E), North Khorasan (S), Razavi Khorasan (R), Golestan (G), Mazandaran (M) and Gilan (K). Schematic images of birds were retrieved from www.HBW.com.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206638.g001

Results

Hosts sampling

In order to detect haemosporidian parasites, 330 birds were examined. Among well-sampled hosts (i.e. > 5) individuals were captured per species. The inspected population consisted of 316 individuals belonging to 37 species, 31 genera and 16 families of passerine and 14 individuals belonging to five species, five genera and five families of non-passerine birds. Family Passeridae was the most frequently captured group (28.79%) and Passer domesticus was the most captured host species. The highest percentage of collected samples was recorded in Razavi Khorasan province (27.27%) and the lowest percentage in Semnan (1.81%) province (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. The identified lineages of blood parasites are illustrated for each host species, host family and location of sampling.

The frequency of infected hosts for Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon using PCR detection of blood parasites from Iran is shown in bracket.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206638.t001

Microscopic inspection

To confirm the presence of blood parasites, 720 blood smears from all captured birds were examined. Due to the hemolysis of RBCs and reduced quality, a total of 37 slides were discarded from this study. Whole PCR positive specimens were matched with the morphological identification of parasite genera. A total of 23 bird species were identified to be harbored by Haemoproteus, and three and one species were infected by Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon, respectively.

Haematoprotozoan molecular detection and infection rate

All collected blood samples were examined for haematoprotozoan infection and 115 individuals were positive for blood parasite genera using molecular approach (34.84% overall infection). Only one sample of Emberiza buchanani was co-infected with two genera of Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon. The infection rates for Haemoproteus, Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon were 33.03%, 1.21% and 0.6% respectively (Table 1). Of the 43 avian species included in this study, 29 species (27 passerines and two non-passerines) harbored blood parasites. The bird species of Iduna pallida with four Haemoproteus lineages were the most frequently infected hosts by different parasites (Table 1).

Lineages diversity

Based on morphological examination, repetitive PCR-positive samples of similar hosts in the same sampling localities were not sequenced. A total of 72 amplified samples by the nested PCR reactions were sequenced. Double peak sequences (co-infected) and poor-quality samples on the electropherograms were omitted from this study. Molecular identification of blood parasites using mtDNA cytb sequences detected 43 lineages of the collected bird samples from Iran. Lineages were attributed to the genera of Haemoproteus (n = 37), Plasmodium (n = 4), and Leucocytozoon (n = 2). Of these lineages, 20 were new, consisting of at least one base-pair difference from the lineages stored in MalAvi database (Table 1). Inspection of the found lineages revealed that only five Haemoproteus lineages (ACDUM1, ACDUM2, PARUS1, PYERY01, and SISKIN1) were infecting multiple hosts’ species (11.62%). Of which, three lineages were detected from different localities and PARUS1 was found in the same location of both hosts. Additionally, the lineages ACDUM1, ACDUM2, ACDUM3, ARW1, ACSTE1, BRW1, GRW03, HIP2, HIP4, LULU1, HIICT1, SISKIN01, CCF6, PYERY01, YWT3, PADOM05, PAHIS2, PARUS1, LAMPUR01, TURDUS2, GRW04, ORW1, and SYAT5 were 100 percent identical to the reported lineages in BLAST analyses (Table 1). The molecular approach could identify seven lineages of AEGCAU05, ALCATT01, CCF6, HIRUS17, YWT3, SYAT5, and EMBUC02 which were not recognized by the morphological method due to the presence of trophozoite or young gametocyte stages in prepared slides.

Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon novel lineages

The acquired results showed that 27 of the studied bird species were infected with Haemoproteus lineages of which 92.59% belonged to passerine hosts. Haemoproteus was the predominate genus in comparison with Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon. In this study, 17 new lineages of GRBRU01, CUCUR01, EMBUC01, FISEM01, FISEM02, GRMEL01, GRBRU02, HIRUS17, GRMEL02, PETPET01, OEOEN01, PETPET02, IDPAL01, SITTEP01, AEGCAU05, PADOM32, and ALCATT01 were detected from this region. Additionally, four avian species were infected with Plasmodium lineages, all of them being observed in passerines. MOALB03 was the only new lineage found in the collected samples. Moreover, in two infected hosts, novel Leucocytozoon lineages of CYACAE06 and EMBUC02 were observed in the passerine hosts (Table 1).

Molecular phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic relationship of avian parasite genera was affirmed via attained Bayesian tree in three main clades using amplified sequences (n = 72) and retrieved MalAvi sequences (n = 95) are shown in Fig 1. For each genus, robust posterior probability (>0.8) supported for the main clades encompassed lineages collected from avian species in Iran. The largest number of lineages belonged to Haemoproteus with sub-clades not well supported for all lineages. The haemosporidians genera of Haemoproteus and Plasmodium appeared as sister groups and the Leucocytozoon clade was placed as the basal group. All Haemoproteus lineages were situated in one clade except for TURDUS2 (Haemoproteus minutus), HLW1, WW1, and COLL2 which was placed in a sister group.

Discussion

As a study outlining the molecular detection of hematozoa of wild birds, the current study has recorded new lineages for three genera of Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon from Iran. PCR-based molecular procedures for recognition of avian blood parasites provide a distinct chance to confirm numerous theories about their evolution, function, and specificity [31]. The relatively high frequency of newly identified lineages necessitates further studies in the Middle East region. In this study, results showed a total of 20 novel lineages and 23 previously recorded lineages within bird hosts from Iran (Table 1). Such findings will generate a database of host distribution and geographical range of hematozoan parasites [35]. Of the 72 amplified sequences of haemosporidians in this study, 53.48 percent of lineages have been identified by preceding studies around the world including ACDUM1, ACDUM2, ACDUM3, ARW1, ACSTE1, BRW1, GRW03, HIP2, HIP4, LULU1, HIICT1, SISKIN01, CCF6, YWT3, PADOM05, PAHIS2, PYERY01, PARUS1, LAMPUR01, TURDUS2, SYAT5, ORW1, and GRW04 (Table 2). Our results showed the new geographical locations of bird hosts for these listed lineages. In regards to the MalAvi database, 11 of the identified lineages were associated with pre-discovered morphospecies, Haemoproteus belopolskyi (ARW1 and HIICT), H. pastoris (LAMPUR01), H. balmorali)LULU1), H. Passeris (PADOM05), H. majoris (PARUS1), H. tartakovskyi (SISKIN01), H. minutus (TURDUS2), H. motacillae (YWT3), Plasmodium relictum (GRW04), and P. vaughani (SYAT5). Classification of parasites at species level and species delimitation in avian malaria parasites is very difficult, particularly in Haemoproteus, as a threshold of inter- and intra-species variation has not been set by the use of molecular markers [40]. This may explain the reason why most published articles in this field have focused on lineages instead of species level. There are more than 3132 identified unique lineages for avian malaria and the closely related genera from 1561 host species in MalAvi as of August 2018 [35].

thumbnail
Table 2. Detailed information about detected lineages, their previously identified hosts, new host records from Iran, related near lineages, and major hosts in some sampling locations is given.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206638.t002

The new amplified sequences of this study are illustrated in the phylogenetic tree with the nearest lineages obtained from BLAST analysis and prevoiusly reported lineages of similar hosts (Fig 1). All sequences were clustered in three main monophyletic clades as Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon lineages. Two new lineages of Leucocytozoon are clustered as sister groups in two sub-clades of clade A. Likewise, the Plasmodium lineages in clade C are grouped as the sister taxa of Haemoproteus lineages in clade D.

Nucleotide distinctiveness collation with previously recorded sequences confirmed the relative shift of Haemoproteus lineages among birds found in Iran. Five shared lineages of ACDUM1, ACDUM2, PARUS1, PYERY01, and SISKIN1 were detected in different hosts from dissimilar families. ACDUM1 were observed in Acrocephalus dumetorum from North Khorasan and Phylloscopus trochilus from Semnan. ACDUM2 were collected in both Acrocephalus dumetorum from Razavi Khorasan & North Khorasan and Aegithalos caudatus form Mazandaran. Both infected hosts of PARUS1 (Parus major & Sitta tephronata) were recorded from North Khorasan. The species Passer montanus from Razavi Khorasan & Linaria cannabina from Ardabil were infected by PYERY01. Lineage of SISKIN1 were found in Carduelis carduelis from Razavi Khorasan and North Khorasan and non-passerine species of Dendrocopos syriacus from Zanjan province. Altogether these common lineages belong to Haemoproteus spp. (Table 2). Recent studies on blood parasites have recorded numerous lineages listed in Table 2 with detailed information about sampling locality in comparison with collected samples as new distribution and hosts from Iran. There is increasing evidence that haemosporidian infections in non-competent hosts result in abortive development of the parasites before they reach the stage of infectious gametocytes. As such DNA may leak into the blood, it is possible that the host range across bird taxa is an overestimation of parasite distribution within their competant hosts. Thus, microscopic examination of blood films remains a gold complementary method in the field of haemosporidian parasite studies [41].

Moreover, considering that most of the investigated birds do not inhabited and have entered Iran through migration routes, detection of more than half of the common previously identified lineages from another part of the world could be a reason for this (Table 1). Iranian avifauna is influenced by three birds’ migration routes, consisting of Central Asian Flyway, West Asian/East African Flyway, and Black sea/Mediterranean Flyway. Of the examined birds, the species of Acrocephalus dumetorum, A. melanopogone, Aegithalos caudatus, Galerida cristata, Carduelis carduelis, Linaria cannabina, Serinus pusillus, Motacilla alba, Ficedula hypoleuca, Passer domesticus, P. montanus, Petronia petronia, Parus major, Sitta tephronata, Turdus merula, and Dendrocopos syriacusi are resident in Iran while the rest are passengers, wintering or breeding in the summer [42].

Due to the lower divergence rate in malarial parasites rather than vertebrates, very close lineages can be found in different hosts of various families [6]. For instance, SISKIN1 and AEGCAU05 with 0.4% genetic variation were detected in two hosts of Fringillidae and Aegithalidae with high genetic differences. Species of Haemoproteus are often considered to be specific to birds within a family or subfamily [70,71]. However, there is experimental evidence which shows the successful transmission of the hemoproteids between birds belonging to different families/sub-families of the same order. It remains unclear how often such host shifts occur in wildlife. Fallon et al. (2003, 2005) provided the first molecular evidence that the same lineages of Haemoproteus spp. are present in birds belonging to different families of Passeriformes [72,73]. Szymanski and Lovette (2005) showed that Haemoproteus lineages recovered from two or more host individuals were found in at least two host families. This data indicates that some Haemoproteus spp. lineages exhibit a low degree of host specificity [8].

Haemosporidians as the most recurrent blood parasites, showed the comparatively high infection rate of 34.83% in the present study. In another investigation, the reported infection rate of avian hosts around the world were 29.5% in China [74], 12% in tropical regions of Costa Rica [75], 33% in Philippines [76], 35% in neotropical areas in Brazil [77], 40% in central Africa [6], and 50% in India [78]. Haemoproteus was the most affluent in comparison with other genera from the northern part of Iran which was in accordance with preceding studies [13,74,76]. In recent studies, the lowest recorded overall prevalence of Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon was 3.1% and eight new lineages were found in South American waterfowls (from Peru and Argentina) [15]. The relatively medium prevalence of haemosporidians in the collected samples from Peninsular Malaysia was 30.3% and Haemoproteus were the predominant genus in comparison with Plasmodium. Moreover, 10 new lineages of Haemoproteus spp. and three new lineages of Plasmodium spp. were reported by molecular technique using cytb gene [16]. Very high overall infection prevalence of 83.6% was registered for two sympatric sand hill crane populations seized in Texas [79]. Likewise, another investigation on captive birds from a Brazilian megalopolis, have reported the overall prevalence 97.6% of the genus Plasmodium and 2.4% of Haemoproteus and 14 new lineages of Plasmodium spp. and two lineages of Haemoproteus spp. were detected using mitochondrial gene of cytb [80]. This amount of difference may be related to the lower pathogenicity in regard to Plasmodium. Infected birds can rarely be captured by mist net due to their lessened mobility and activity and also due to the variation in vector abundance [1]. Additionally, several factors such as temporal and spatial influence, gender, age, immunological system, distinctive study approaches and various collected taxa may influence the prevalence rate in hematozoan parasites [15,16,81]. As the collection of samples for potential vectors in this study were performed near aquatic localities and rivers, the infection rate by Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon parasites were recorded as very low in contrast with Haemoproteus sampled throughout Iran, which may be attributed to the lack of available vectors in these regions.

The molecular and morphological techniques are complementary to each other. In our study a molecular approach was successful in the identification of seven lineages AEGCAU05, ALCATT01, CCF6, HIRUS17, YWT3, SYAT5, and EMBUC02 which failed to be identified through inspection of prepared slides from birds with a low level of infection [82]. Findings of similar studies also demonstrated the effectiveness of more sensitive PCR-based methods in comparison with the morphological detection of apicomplexan blood parasites [19,78]. Moreover, other investigations have demonstrated an equal efficiency of both methods of blood parasite discovery [16].

In this study, our results demonstrated that Iran as a corridor in birds migratory routes may be influenced to have the high risk of exposure to new parasites. Thereupon, previously common identified lineages may be detected in new hosts in unchecked regions (e.g. more than 50% of our detected lineages). As the molecular study for detection of birds hematozoa from Iran, 20 novel lineages for three genera of Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon were reported from this region and about 12% of lineages of were observed in multiple species from different families of birds. Additional investigations into these taxa in the avifauna for other parts of Iran may attain further data on the detection of new lineages, and pursue the relationship and distribution pattern between blood parasites and hosts.

Supporting information

S1 Table. The exact coordinate of sampling site of each province from Iran.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206638.s001

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to declare their sincere appreciation to all those colleagues who kindly assisted in the sampling, especially Mehrnaz Tavassoli. We are also immensely grateful to Prof. Staffan Bensch, Lund University for his invaluable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Moreover, the authors would like to express sincere appreciation to Samane Purches, Andrew Purches, and Nastaran Tavassoli for their comments.

References

  1. 1. Atkinson CT, van Riper C III (1991) Pathogenicity and epizootiology of avian haematozoa: Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon, and Haemoproteus. Bird–parasite interactions: 19–48.
  2. 2. Valkiunas G (2004) Avian malaria parasites and other haemosporidia: CRC press.
  3. 3. Atkinson CT, Thomas NJ, Hunter DB (2009) Parasitic diseases of wild birds: John Wiley & Sons.
  4. 4. Ruiz X, Oro D, González-Solís J (1995) Incidence of a Haemoproteus lari parasitemia in a threatened gull: Larus audouinii. Ornis fennica 72: 159–164.
  5. 5. Bensch S, Stjernman M, Hasselquist D, Örjan Ö, Hannson B, Westerdahl H, et al. (2000) Host specificity in avian blood parasites: a study of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus mitochondrial DNA amplified from birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 267: 1583–1589.
  6. 6. Ricklefs RE, Fallon SM (2002) Diversification and host switching in avian malaria parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 269: 885–892.
  7. 7. Beadell JS, Ishtiaq F, Covas R, Melo M, Warren BH, Atkinson CT, et al. (2006) Global phylogeographic limits of Hawaii's avian malaria. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 273: 2935–2944.
  8. 8. Szymanski M, Lovette I (2005) High lineage diversity and host sharing of malarial parasites in a local avian assemblage. Journal of Parasitology 91: 768–774. pmid:17089742
  9. 9. Marzal A, De Lope F, Navarro C, Møller AP (2005) Malarial parasites decrease reproductive success: an experimental study in a passerine bird. Oecologia 142: 541–545. pmid:15688214
  10. 10. de Macchi BM, Miranda FJB, de Souza FS, de Carvalho ECQ, Albernaz AP, do Nascimento JLM, et al. (2013) Chickens treated with a nitric oxide inhibitor became more resistant to Plasmodium gallinaceum infection due to reduced anemia, thrombocytopenia and inflammation. Veterinary research 44: 8. pmid:23398940
  11. 11. Hubálek Z (2004) An annotated checklist of pathogenic microorganisms associated with migratory birds. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 40: 639–659. pmid:15650082
  12. 12. Ricklefs R (2005) Review. Avian Malaria parasites and Other Haemosporidia. By G Valkiūnas Boca Raton(Florida): CRC Press The Quarterly Review in Biology 80: 364–365.
  13. 13. Belo NO, Pinheiro RT, Reis EnS, Ricklefs RE, Braga EM (2011) Prevalence and lineage diversity of avian haemosporidians from three distinct cerrado habitats in Brazil. PLoS One 6: e17654. pmid:21408114
  14. 14. Yoshimura A, Koketsu M, Bando H, Saiki E, Suzuki M, Watanabe Y, et al. (2014) Phylogenetic comparison of avian haemosporidian parasites from resident and migratory birds in northern Japan. Journal of wildlife diseases 50: 235–242. pmid:24484482
  15. 15. Smith MM, Ramey AM (2015) Prevalence and genetic diversity of haematozoa in South American waterfowl and evidence for intercontinental redistribution of parasites by migratory birds. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 4: 22–28. pmid:25830104
  16. 16. Ivanova K, Zehtindjiev P, Mariaux J, Georgiev BB (2015) Genetic diversity of avian haemosporidians in Malaysia: Cytochrome b lineages of the genera Plasmodium and Haemoproteus (Haemosporida) from Selangor. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 31: 33–39. pmid:25577987
  17. 17. Poulin R, Krasnov BR, Mouillot D (2011) Host specificity in phylogenetic and geographic space. Trends in parasitology 27: 355–361. pmid:21680245
  18. 18. Ricklefs RE, Fallon SM, Bermingham E (2004) Evolutionary relationships, cospeciation, and host switching in avian malaria parasites. Systematic Biology 53: 111–119. pmid:14965906
  19. 19. Križanauskienė A, Hellgren O, Kosarev V, Sokolov L, Bensch S, Valkiūnas G (2006) Variation in host specificity between species of avian hemosporidian parasites: evidence from parasite morphology and cytochrome b gene sequences. Journal of Parasitology 92: 1319–1324. pmid:17304814
  20. 20. Hashemi SH, Sargazi D, Anvari D. The study of Lico contamination by Haemoproteus spp in Sistan region; 2015. Research Trend. pp. 757.
  21. 21. Nourani L, Aliabadian M, Dinparast-Djadid N, Mirshamsi O (2017) New Host Records for Haemoproteus spp. (Apicomplexa: Haemosporidiasina) in Passeriformes from North-West of Iran. Journal of arthropod-borne diseases 11: 236. pmid:29062848
  22. 22. Nourani L, Aliabadian M, Mirshamsi O, Djadid ND. Detection of the avian blood parasites from northeast of Iran; 2017.
  23. 23. NOURANI L, ALIABADIAN M, DJADID ND, MIRSHAMSI O (2018) Occurrence of Haemoproteus spp. (Haemosporida: Haemo-proteidae) in New Host Records of Passerine Birds from the East of Iran. Iranian Journal of Parasitology 13: 267–274. pmid:30069211
  24. 24. Bahrami AM, Monfared AL, Razmjoo M (2012) Pathological study of parasitism in racing pigeons: An indication of its effects on community health. African Journal of Biotechnology 11: 12364–12370.
  25. 25. Nematollahi A, Ebrahimi M, Ahmadi A, Himan M (2012) Prevalence of Haemoproteus columbae and Trichomonas gallinae in pigeons (Columba domestica) in Isfahan, Iran. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 36: 141–142. pmid:23542461
  26. 26. Gorji SF, Shemshadi B, Habibi H, Jalali S, Davary M, Sepehri M (2012) Survey on parasites in sparrows of Amol (Mazandaran Province, Iran). Journal of Life Sciences 6: 783.
  27. 27. Nazifi S, Razavi S, Yavari F, Rajaifar M, Bazyar E, Esmailnejad Z (2008) Evaluation of hematological values in indigenous chickens infected with Plasmodium gallinaceum and Aegyptianella pullorum. Comparative Clinical Pathology 17: 145.
  28. 28. Dezfoulian O, Zibaei M, Nayebzadeh H, Haghgoo M, Emami-Razavi A, Kiani K (2013) Leucocytozoonosis in domestic birds in southwestern iran: an ultrastructural study. Iranian journal of parasitology 8: 171. pmid:23682276
  29. 29. Perrins C (2004) The Howard & Moore complete checklist of the birds of the world. Times Supplements Limited Tower House, Sovereign Park, Market Harborough Le87 4jj, England.
  30. 30. Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69: 82–90.
  31. 31. Hellgren O, Waldenström J, Bensch S (2004) A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. Journal of Parasitology 90: 797–802. pmid:15357072
  32. 32. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT; 1999. [London]: Information Retrieval Ltd., c1979-c2000. pp. 95–98.
  33. 33. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular biology and evolution 30: 772–780. pmid:23329690
  34. 34. BLAST N Search nucleotide databases using a nucleotide query. Online verfügbar unter https://blast ncbi nlm nih gov/Blast cgi.
  35. 35. Bensch S, Hellgren O, PÉREZ‐TRIS J (2009) MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 1353–1358. pmid:21564906
  36. 36. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular biology and evolution 30: 2725–2729. pmid:24132122
  37. 37. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. pmid:12912839
  38. 38. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 14: 817–818.
  39. 39. Rambaut A (2012) FigTree v. 1.4. Molecular evolution, phylogenetics and epidemiology. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh, Institute of Evolutionary Biology.
  40. 40. Nilsson E, Taubert H, Hellgren O, Huang X, Palinauskas V, Markovets MY, et al. (2016) Multiple cryptic species of sympatric generalists within the avian blood parasite Haemoproteus majoris. Journal of evolutionary biology 29: 1812–1826. pmid:27262030
  41. 41. Hellgren O, Waldenström J, PERÉZ‐TRIS J, SZÖLL E, Si Ö, Hasselquist D, et al. (2007) Detecting shifts of transmission areas in avian blood parasites—a phylogenetic approach. Molecular Ecology 16: 1281–1290. pmid:17391413
  42. 42. Kaboli M, Aliabadian M, Tohidifar M, Hashemi A, Musavi SB, Roselaar CC (2016) Atlas of birds of Iran: Jahad Daneshgahi, Karazmi Branch.
  43. 43. Reullier J, PÉREZ‐TRIS J, Bensch S, Secondi J (2006) Diversity, distribution and exchange of blood parasites meeting at an avian moving contact zone. Molecular Ecology 15: 753–763. pmid:16499700
  44. 44. Zehtindjiev P, Ilieva M, Križanauskienė A, Oparina O, Oparin M, Bensch S (2009) Occurrence of haemosporidian parasites in the paddyfield warbler, Acrocephalus agricola (Passeriformes, Sylviidae). Acta Parasitologica 54: 295–300.
  45. 45. Ishtiaq F (2017) Exploring host and geographical shifts in transmission of haemosporidians in a Palaearctic passerine wintering in India. Journal of Ornithology 158: 869–874. pmid:30003008
  46. 46. Palinauskas V, Iezhova TA, Križanauskienė A, Markovets MY, Bensch S, Valkiūnas G (2013) Molecular characterization and distribution of Haemoproteus minutus (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae): a pathogenic avian parasite. Parasitology international 62: 358–363. pmid:23557683
  47. 47. Kimura M, Dhondt AA, Lovette IJ (2006) Phylogeographic structuring of Plasmodium lineages across the North American range of the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus). Journal of Parasitology 92: 1043–1049. pmid:17152948
  48. 48. Walther EL, Carlson JS, Cornel A, Morris BK, Sehgal RN (2016) First molecular study of prevalence and diversity of avian haemosporidia in a Central California songbird community. Journal of Ornithology 157: 549–564.
  49. 49. Marzal A, Ricklefs RE, Valkiūnas G, Albayrak T, Arriero E, Bonneaud C, et al. (2011) Diversity, loss, and gain of malaria parasites in a globally invasive bird. PloS one 6: e21905. pmid:21779353
  50. 50. Synek P, Albrecht T, Vinkler M, Schnitzer J, Votýpka J, Munclinger P (2013) Haemosporidian parasites of a European passerine wintering in South Asia: diversity, mixed infections and effect on host condition. Parasitology research 112: 1667–1677. pmid:23385972
  51. 51. Oakgrove KS, Harrigan RJ, Loiseau C, Guers S, Seppi B, Sehgal RNM (2014) Distribution, diversity and drivers of blood-borne parasite co-infections in Alaskan bird populations. International journal for parasitology 44: 717–727. pmid:25014331
  52. 52. Waldenström J, Bensch S, Kiboi S, Hasselquist D, Ottosson U (2002) Cross‐species infection of blood parasites between resident and migratory songbirds in Africa. Molecular Ecology 11: 1545–1554. pmid:12144673
  53. 53. Zehtindjiev P, Ilieva M, Westerdahl H, Hansson B, Valkiūnas G, Bensch S(2008) Dynamics of parasitemia of malaria parasites in a naturally and experimentally infected migratory songbird, the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Experimental parasitology 119: 99–110. pmid:18280472
  54. 54. Mata VA, da Silva LP, Lopes RJ, Drovetski SV (2015) The Strait of Gibraltar poses an effective barrier to host-specialised but not to host-generalised lineages of avian Haemosporidia. International journal for parasitology 45: 711–719. pmid:26056737
  55. 55. Ishtiaq F, Beadell JS, Warren BH, Fleischer RC (2012) Diversity and distribution of avian haematozoan parasites in the western Indian Ocean region: a molecular survey. Parasitology 139: 221–231. pmid:22075855
  56. 56. Zehtindjiev P, Križanauskienė A, Scebba S, Dimitrov D, Valkiūnas G, Hegemann A, et al. (2012) Haemosporidian infections in skylarks (Alauda arvensis): a comparative PCR-based and microscopy study on the parasite diversity and prevalence in southern Italy and the Netherlands. European Journal of Wildlife Research 58: 335–344.
  57. 57. Hellgren O, Križanauskiene A, Valkiūnas G, Bensch S (2007) Diversity and phylogeny of mitochondrial cytochrome B lineages from six morphospecies of avian Haemoproteus (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae). Journal of Parasitology 93: 889–896. pmid:17918371
  58. 58. Valkiūnas G, Palinauskas V, Križanauskienė A, Bernotienė R, Kazlauskienė R, Iezhova TA (2013) Further observations on in vitro hybridization of hemosporidian parasites: patterns of ookinete development in Haemoproteus spp. The Journal of parasitology 99: 124–136. pmid:22924917
  59. 59. Bensch S, Waldenström J, Jonzén N, Westerdahl H, Hansson B, Sejberg D, et al. (2007) Temporal dynamics and diversity of avian malaria parasites in a single host species. Journal of Animal Ecology 76: 112–122. pmid:17184359
  60. 60. Drovetski SV, Aghayan SA, Mata VA, Lopes RJ, Mode NA, Harvey JA, et al. (2014) Does the niche breadth or trade‐off hypothesis explain the abundance–occupancy relationship in avian Haemosporidia? Molecular ecology 23: 3322–3329. pmid:24689968
  61. 61. Dimitrov D, Zehtindjiev P, Bensch S (2010) Genetic diversity of avian blood parasites in SE Europe: Cytochrome b lineages of the genera Plasmodium and Haemoproteus (Haemosporida) from Bulgaria. Acta Parasitologica 55: 201–209.
  62. 62. Martinsen E, Paperna I, Schall J (2006) Morphological versus molecular identification of avian Haemosporidia: an exploration of three species concepts. Parasitology 133: 279–288. pmid:16740182
  63. 63. Loiseau C, Zoorob R, Robert A, Chastel O, Julliard R, Sorci G (2011) Plasmodium relictum infection and MHC diversity in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 278: 1264–1272.
  64. 64. López G, Muñoz J, Soriguer R, Figuerola J (2013) Increased endoparasite infection in late-arriving individuals of a trans-Saharan passerine migrant bird. PloS one 8: e61236. pmid:23620731
  65. 65. Schrenzel MD, Maalouf GA, Keener LL, Gaffney PM (2003) Molecular characterization of malarial parasites in captive passerine birds. Journal of Parasitology 89: 1025–1033. pmid:14627151
  66. 66. Beadell JS, Covas R, Gebhard C, Ishtiaq F, Melo M, Schmidt BK, et al. (2009) Host associations and evolutionary relationships of avian blood parasites from West Africa. International journal for parasitology 39: 257–266. pmid:18713636
  67. 67. Valkiūnas G, Palinauskas V, Ilgūnas M, Bukauskaitė D, Dimitrov D, Bernotienė R, et al. (2014) Molecular characterization of five widespread avian haemosporidian parasites (Haemosporida), with perspectives on the PCR-based detection of haemosporidians in wildlife. Parasitology research 113: 2251–2263. pmid:24728557
  68. 68. Bentz S, Rigaud T, Barroca M, Martin-Laurent F, Bru D, Moreau J, et al. (2006) Sensitive measure of prevalence and parasitaemia of haemosporidia from European blackbird (Turdus merula) populations: value of PCR-RFLP and quantitative PCR. Parasitology 133: 685–692. pmid:16948874
  69. 69. Scordato ES, Kardish MR (2014) Prevalence and beta diversity in avian malaria communities: host species is a better predictor than geography. Journal of Animal Ecology 83: 1387–1397. pmid:24810878
  70. 70. Bennett GF, Campbell A (1972) Avian Haemoproteidae. I. Description of Haemoproteus fallisi n. sp. and a review of the haemoproteids of the family Turdidae. Canadian journal of zoology 50: 1269–1275. pmid:4628849
  71. 71. Savage AF, Greiner EC (2004) Hematozoa of the avian family Brachypteraciidae (the Ground-rollers). Journal of Parasitology 90: 1468–1472. pmid:15715245
  72. 72. Fallon SM, Ricklefs RE, Swanson B, Bermingham E (2003) Detecting avian malaria: an improved polymerase chain reaction diagnostic. Journal of Parasitology 89: 1044–1047. pmid:14627154
  73. 73. Fallon SM, Bermingham E, Ricklefs RE (2005) Host specialization and geographic localization of avian malaria parasites: a regional analysis in the Lesser Antilles. The American Naturalist 165: 466–480. pmid:15791538
  74. 74. Zhang Y, Wu Y, Zhang Q, Su D, Zou F (2014) Prevalence patterns of avian Plasmodium and Haemoproteus parasites and the influence of host relative abundance in southern China. PloS one 9: e99501. pmid:24911323
  75. 75. Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA, Brooks DR, Hanelt B, Brant SV, Sutherlin ME, et al. (2004) Additional observations on blood parasites of birds in Costa Rica. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 40: 555–561. pmid:15465725
  76. 76. Silva-Iturriza A, Ketmaier V, Tiedemann R (2012) Profound population structure in the Philippine Bulbul Hypsipetes philippinus (Pycnonotidae, Aves) is not reflected in its Haemoproteus haemosporidian parasite. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 12: 127–136. pmid:22108671
  77. 77. Lacorte GA, Felix GM, Pinheiro RR, Chaves AV, Almeida-Neto G, Neves FS, et al. (2013) Exploring the diversity and distribution of neotropical avian malaria parasites–a molecular survey from Southeast Brazil. PLoS One 8: e57770. pmid:23469235
  78. 78. Ishtiaq F, Gering E, Rappole JH, Rahmani AR, Jhala YV, Dove CJ, et al. (2007) Prevalence and diversity of avian hematozoan parasites in Asia: a regional survey. Journal of wildlife diseases 43: 382–398. pmid:17699077
  79. 79. Bertram MR, Hamer SA, Hartup BK, Snowden KF, Medeiros MC, Outlaw DC, et al. (2017) A novel Haemosporida clade at the rank of genus in North American cranes (Aves: Gruiformes). Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 109: 73–79. pmid:28012954
  80. 80. Chagas CRF, Valkiūnas G, Guimarães LO, Monteiro EF, Guida FJV, Simões RF, et al. (2017) Diversity and distribution of avian malaria and related haemosporidian parasites in captive birds from a Brazilian megalopolis. Malaria journal 16: 83. pmid:28212654
  81. 81. Isaksson C, Sepil I, Baramidze V, Sheldon BC (2013) Explaining variance of avian malaria infection in the wild: the importance of host density, habitat, individual life-history and oxidative stress. BMC ecology 13: 15. pmid:23565726
  82. 82. Olias P, Wegelin M, Zenker W, Freter S, Gruber AD, Klopfleisch R(2011) Avian malaria deaths in parrots, Europe. Emerging Infectious Diseases 17: 950. pmid:21529428