http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-7191
Correction
23 Dec 2019: Shahhosseini N, Kayedi MH, Sedaghat MM, Racine T, Kobinger GP, et al. (2019) Correction: DNA barcodes corroborating identification of mosquito species and multiplex real-time PCR differentiating Culex pipiens complex and Culex torrentium in Iran. PLOS ONE 14(12): e0227018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227018 View correction
Figures
Abstract
Identifying mosquito species is a fundamental step in risk assessment and implementation of preventative strategies. Moreover, Culex pipiens is the most widespread mosquito vector in several regions of Iran and is the main vector for transmission of West Nile virus (WNV). Mosquitoes were collected at 14 sites in northern regions of Iran in 2015 and 2016. A subset of mosquito specimens was selected for identification confirmation using a DNA-barcoding technique. Construction of a phylogenetic tree showed clustering of mosquito sequences into three main genera: Aedes, Anopheles and Culex with individuals of a single species clustered closely together, regardless of where and when they were collected. Cx. pipiens complex and Cx. torrentium were identified and differentiated using multiplex real-time PCR targeting the gene locus for acetylcholinesterase 2 (ace2) to discriminate between Cx. pipiens pipiens and Cx. torrentium. The CQ11 microsatellite locus was used for discrimination between Cpp. biotypes. The predominant mosquito species in investigated regions were Cx. pipiens pipiens biotype pipiens, but we also detected Culex pipiens pipiens biotype molestus and hybrids of the two pipiens biotypes, as well as Cx. torrentium. The results of this study represent the first certain evidence of the presence of Cx. pipiens pipiens biotype molestus and hybrids between pipiens and molestus forms, and Cx. torrentium in Iran through a molecular identification approach. This report of a potentially important bridge vector for WNV might have key influence in the risk projections for WNV in Iran.
Citation: Shahhosseini N, Kayedi MH, Sedaghat MM, Racine T, P. Kobinger G, Moosa-Kazemi SH (2018) DNA barcodes corroborating identification of mosquito species and multiplex real-time PCR differentiating Culex pipiens complex and Culex torrentium in Iran. PLoS ONE 13(11): e0207308. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207308
Editor: Livia Maria Silva Ataide, Universidade de Sao Paulo, BRAZIL
Received: July 10, 2018; Accepted: October 29, 2018; Published: November 14, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Shahhosseini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: Nariman Shahhosseini was supported by Leibniz-Gesellschaft research Project IMPact-Vector (SAW-2014-SGN-3).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Many mosquito species are potential vectors for various pathogens and correct identification in all life stages is essential for effective mosquito monitoring and control [1]. By now, the checklist of Iranian mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) includes 69 species representing seven genera [2–5], of which only a handful of species are known to be vectors for viral diseases [6]. The utilization of morphological characteristics is the most common method of mosquito species identification, but these characteristics can be difficult to interpret without specialized taxonomic expertise and discrimination among species is further complicated if identical characteristics are ruined [7]. For these reasons, a straightforward, reliable and easy-to-use identification method is always in high demand [8]. Although DNA barcoding has been demonstrated to be a well-founded technique for the identification of many taxa, including mosquitoes, some studies reported that two closely related mosquito species of the genus Anopheles and Culex could not be distinguished using the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) barcode [9, 10].
Molecular assays to discriminate between Cx. pipiens pipiens (Cpp.) and Cx. torrentium or to distinguish between the Cpp. biotypes reported so far are based on gel electrophoretic analyses of particular DNA fragments amplified by PCR. These assays are time-consuming and prone to laboratory contamination, which are major disadvantages for the analysis of large sample sizes. To conquer those problems, we used a newly developed multiplex real-time PCR that allows simultaneous discrimination of the various morphologically indistinguishable Culex species and biotypes in a single PCR reaction. The assay targets the gene locus for ace2 to discriminate between Cx. torrentium and Cpp. and the CQ11 microsatellite locus for discrimination between Cpp. biotypes [11].
Recently, West Nile virus (WNV) has been reported in mosquitoes in northern Iran [12], and in humans in several parts of Iran [13, 14]. WNV belongs to the group of arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) and is transmitted through a mosquito bite. Accordingly, the spread of WNV is dependent on the presence of ornithophilic mosquito vectors in enzootic cycle, and knowledge of the local mosquito species and their distribution are important for assessing risks and for control of possible arbovirus outbreaks.
In some parts of Iran, the predominant mosquito species are the members of the Cx. pipiens complex, which serve foremost as vectors for various arboviruses, including WNV [15]. The Cx. pipiens complex includes several subspecies including Cpp. and Cx. quinquefasciatus, which are the most ubiquitous mosquitoes in temperate and tropical regions, respectively. Cpp. can be subdivided into two distinct biotypes: pipiens and molestus, which are morphologically indistinguishable and differ in physiology and behavior. Whereas, Cpp. biotype pipiens (Linnaeus, 1758) is ornithophilic (feeds on birds), is subjected to diapause (heterodynamic), is anautogeneous (only lays eggs after a blood-meal), and eurygamous (unable to mate in confined spaces), Cpp. biotype molestus (Forskal, 1775) is mammophilic (feeds on mammals), does not diapause (homodynamic), is autogeneous (lays first batch of eggs without taking a blood-meal) and stenogamous (mates in confined spaces). In addition, the molestus biotype is usually found underground in urban areas while the pipiens biotype always lives aboveground [16]. Identification of hybrids between Cpp. pipiens and molestus biotypes is important for WNV risk assessment because these hybrids indicate opportunistic host feeding preferences, which makes them a suitable vector for virus transmission [17].
The sibling species Cx. torrentium and Cx. pipiens are both compromised as vectors of enzootic bird-associated viruses [18]. Adult female Cx. torrentium have identical morphological characteristics as Cpp. biotype pipiens and molestus, which makes morphological discrimination of their females impossible [19].
Identification to the biotype level is considered of great epidemiological significance because Cx. pipiens complex has a wide distribution in Iran and the different biotypes exhibit different host feeding preferences, resulting in different vectoral capacity for WNV. The aim of this study was to complement morphological identification of a subset of specimens and assess the relative abundance of the Cx. pipiens biotypes in 14 different areas spread throughout three provinces of Iran.
Materials and methods
Mosquito collection and morphological identification
Mosquitoes were collected from 14 regions in private lands (the owner of the land gave permission to conduct the study on the site) with different habitat types (rice field, wildlife area, plant, swamp, riverside, wetland, shadow water) in three provinces (Guilan, Mazandaran and Golestan) in northern Iran from May to October 2015 and 2016 (S1 Table), as part of an arbovirus surveillance project. The field studies did not involve endangered or protected species. Various trap types were used, including BG-sentinel traps equipped with lure and CO2 sources, Gravid traps, and EVS traps equipped with an aspirator and dry ice as a source of CO2. Samples were shipped in a cool box to the Medical Entomology Laboratory at Tehran University of Medical Sciences for morphological identification of mosquitoes using discrimination keys of adult Culicidae mosquito species of Iran at the species level [20]. Samples from surveillance programs are often analyzed as pools of morphologically identical female mosquitoes, and as such, non-blood meal mosquitoes trapped in the same location over the same period were pooled up to 250 individuals, whilst blood-meal mosquitoes were labeled as individual samples. Individual blood-meal mosquitoes were investigated for blood-feeding pattern in another study. Later, morphologically identified female mosquito specimens were sent to Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine (Hamburg, Germany) for further molecular analysis.
Confirming species identification through DNA-barcoding
The first mosquito-borne virus surveillance program in Iran in 2015–2016 recorded 25 morphologically distinct species in four genera [12]. A subset of morphologically identified blood-meal female mosquito species, comprising 55 individual mosquitoes, was selected for confirmation using DNA-barcoding. DNA-barcoding amplifies a 560 base pair (bp) fragment of the COI to identify species type of a wide range of mosquitoes. Each individual mosquito was homogenized and DNA extracted using the procedure previously described [21]. For PCR, amplification was conducted with primers targeting the mtDNA gene (560-bp fragment of COI). The primer pair used were: CI-J-1632 (5'-TGATCAAATTTATAAT-3') and CI-N-2191 (5'-GGTAAAATTAAAATATAAACTTC-3') [22]. Reactions were made in 25 μl volume containing 10 μl DNA template, 2× HotStar Taq plus Master Mix 4.20 μl, 25 mM MgCl2 1.6 μl, 10 μM of each primer in 0.6 μl (QIAGEN). The temperature profile consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 40°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min [23]. An aliquot of 5 μl of each PCR product was subjected to electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel stained with Midori-green and photographed with a Gel Doc system. When bands with the expected size were visualized, the remaining PCR products were used for Sanger sequencing (LGC genomic, Berlin) and the sequences compared to already existing sequences from the publicly available database GenBank.
DNA sequence analysis
In addition to sequences obtained in this study, a data set was extracted from GenBank (S2 Table). The DNA sequences were subjected to alignment using ClustalW. A neighbor joining (NJ) tree based on Tamura-Nei genetic distances was created to provide a graphic representation of the clustering pattern among different species [24, 25]. These analyses of the sequences were conducted using Geneious version 11.1.2 software. For comparison, the data set was also analyzed by Maximum Likelihood (ML) statistical method with Kimura 2-parameter model using MEGA version 7.0.26 software.
Real-time PCR for differentiation of Cx. pipiens complex and Cx. torrentium
The species of female mosquitoes of the Cx. pipiens complex and Cx. torrentium were determined by a multiplex real-time PCR using previously designed primers for Cx. pipiens: 1725-F (5'-GCGGCCAAATATTGAGACTT-3') and 1726-R (5'- CGTCCTCAAACATCCAGACA-3') and probes: Cx. pipiens all (5'-Cy55- GGAACATGTTGAGCTTCGGK -BBQ-1–3'), Cx. pipiens pipiens biotype pipiens (5'-JOE-GCTTCGGTGAAGGTTTGTGT-BHQ1–3') and Cx. pipiens pipiens biotype molestus (5'- Rox-TGAACCCTCCAGTAAGGTATCAACTAC- BHQ2–3'). Cx. torrentium was detected using the primers Cx. torrentium F (5'-GACACAGGACGACAGAAA-3'), and R (5'- GCCTACGCAACTACTAAA-3') and the probe Cx. torrentium (5'-FAM- CGATGATGCCTGTGCTACCA-BHQ1-3'). Multiplex real-time PCR was carried out in a 20 μl reaction volume using HotStarTaq Master Mix Kit (Qiagen). Real-time PCR was performed with an initial denaturation step at 95°C (15 min), followed by 50 cycles of denaturation at 95°C (15 sec), annealing at 60°C (20 s), extension at 72°C (30 sec), and a final elongation at 40°C (30sec) [11].
Results
Mosquito barcoding
A total of 33,093 female mosquito specimens were collected including 32,618 non-blood meal female mosquitos in 387 pools and 475 individual female blood-meal mosquitoes (S3 Table), of which 55 individual female mosquitos were selected for identification confirmation by DNA-barcoding technique. Blasting sequence results in GenBank confirmed the identification of 5 Ae. vexans, 19 An. pseudopictus/ hyrcanus, 11 An. sacharovi, 10 Cx. tritaeniorhyncus, and 10 Cx. pipiens.
A NJ tree based on Tamura-Nei genetic distances showed clustering of mosquito sequences in three main genus Aedes, Culex and Anopheles, with individuals of a single species clustered closely together, regardless of where and when they were collected. Five species were characterized by a distinctive set of COI sequences that formed well-supported clusters in the NJ-tree (Ae. unilineatus used as outgroup). Anopheles clustered together, while An. sacharovi formed a separate group, and two sibling species, An. hyrcanus and An. pseudopictus formed a well-supported clade in the NJ tree, identified as monophyletic taxa.
In the NJ tree, Cx. pipiens complex clustered with Cx. tritaeniorhyncus in Culex genus in two separate groups. Cx. pipiens and Cx. quinquefasciatus are two closely related species that can be confused using morphological identification. The samples of these two species were grouped together without any partition (Fig 1). In addition, comparison between phylogenetic trees constructed by NJ model (Geneious software) and ML model (MEGA software) showed similar topology (S1 Fig).
An alignment of COI gene sequences (560 bp) was used to construct the NJ tree in Geneious 11.1.2 software. Numbers displayed on branches are the bootstrap support obtained through 1000 replications. Sequences obtained from GenBank are shown with accession numbers.
Prevalence of Cx. pipiens complex and Cx. torrentium
A total of 21,170 (64%) specimens are identified as Cx. pipiens complex out of which 20,882 represent pooled samples (non-blood meal specimens) and 288 represent individual samples (blood-meal specimens). Overall, the predominant Culex species in Iran was found to be cpp. biotype pipiens, with an abundance of 15,205 (71.83%) pooled and individual specimens, whilst cpp. biotype molestus comprises 5 (0.02%) individual specimens, 4 collected with BG trap and 1 collected with EVS trap. The signal of cpp. biotype pipiens and molestus were found in 5,736 pooled specimens (27.09%), of which 10 (0.04%) individual specimens, all collected with BG-sentinel trap, can be considered as the hybrid Cpp. pipiens/molestus and the rest were a mixture of two biotypes in pooled samples. Also, multiplex real-time PCR results revealed 7 (0.03%) individual specimens were Cx. quinquefasciatus, 6 collected with BG-sentinel trap and 1 collected with EVS trap (Table 1).
Moreover, two mosquito pools containing 117 and 100 specimens showed a signal of both Cx. pipiens and Cx. torrentium, indicating the presence of Cx. torrentium among pooled specimens (Table 1).
Dynamics of populations and species distributions
The greatest number of mosquitoes were collected in September (31.8%) followed by August (25%), July (18.9%) and June (17.7%), whilst the number of collected mosquitoes was less than 7% for May and October. Blood meal mosquitoes were mainly collected in July. No considerable regional differences were observed in Culex species abundance and species composition between trapping sites.
Regarding species dominating habitats between May and October, the prevalence of Cx. pipiens complex versus other mosquito species were almost equal in May, whereas Cx. pipiens complex became the dominant species in habitats for the next three months, peaking in August. In September, Cx. pipiens complex terminates its domination in habitats and its numbers fall, while the population of other mosquito species increase (Fig 2).
Discussion
Several mosquito-borne viruses transmitted by culicine mosquitoes, such as Dengue virus and WNV, have been reported in Iran [26–29]. Since only a handful of mosquito species play an important role in disease transmission in Iran [30], precise mosquito identification and feeding behavior of mosquitoes are of note for monitoring, risk assessment and implementation of preventative strategies.
DNA barcoding is an efficient molecular technique for the identification of mosquitoes, despite the fact that identification of a few closely related species remains difficult [8].
The taxonomy of the species An. hyrcanus group still remains controversial, as An. hyrcanus and An. pseudopictus Grassi were originally treated as separate species [31]. Taking into consideration that An. hyrcanus has almost identical morphological features to An. pseudopictus, species identification via DNA barcoding would be an important addition to traditional morphology-based methods and a highly useful tool for species recognition [32]. Comparison of their COI sequences showed a high degree of genetic similarity and a phylogenetic tree could not be used to separate An. hyrcanus from An. pseudopictus, which is in accordance with a previous report [33]. Regarding the current genetic analyses, we agree with previous suggestions not to consider An. hyrcanus and An. pseudopictus as distinct species [34]. Moreover, member of the Cx. pipiens complex could not be distinguished based on their COI marker gene in phylogeny tree. Accordingly, the current sequence data based on COI marker demonstrated that a more precise molecular taxonomic technique is needed to differentiate mosquito species within Cx. pipiens complex, and An. pseudopictus and An. hyrcanus group.
Here we identify different morphologically indistinguishable Culex species and biotypes using a multiplex real-time PCR. The method was used to analyze 21,170 Culex specimens from a recent mosquito-borne virus surveillance program in Iran. The results indicate the existence of Cx. pipiens complex and Cx. torrentium in northern Iran, as well as the sympatric occurrence of Cpp. biotype pipiens and biotype molestus. Considering the low prevalence of biotype molestus within the investigated regions, it can be assumed that crossbreeding between the two Cpp. biotypes are a rare event.
Since pooled samples are not suitable for analysis of possible hybrids, a number of individual mosquito specimens were subjected to multiplex real-time PCR. As a result, for the first time ever, hybrids of pipiens and molestus biotypes were clearly identified in 10 individual specimens from Iran. Since the signal for Cpp. biotype pipiens and biotype molestus was detected in 27.09% (5,736) of pooled mosquito samples, it is likely that at least some of the pools that revealed a signal for Cpp. biotype pipiens and biotype molestus may contain biotype hybrids. To have a more realistic perspective for hybrid frequencies, more individual mosquito samples should be analyzed. The opportunistic blood-feeding preference of hybrids makes them high risk vectors to bridge WNV from avian to mammalian hosts [16]. Accordingly, the presence and abundance of hybrids in a region might increase the risk of WNV outbreaks in the human population [15].
While previous reports have demonstrated the presence of Cx. quinquefasciatus in south and central regions of Iran [35], the current data clearly indicates the presence of Cx. quinquefasciatus in the northern regions of Iran, a first for this species. There are some previous uncertain records of Cx. torrentium in Iran based on unreliable characteristics [2], but Cx. torrentium cannot be distinguished from members of the Cx. pipiens complex with certainty based on morphological characteristics alone [36]. Based on real-time PCR result, we confidently report the first evidence of Cx. torrentium in northern provinces of Iran.
Understanding the composition of mosquito populations is critical for evaluating their roles in disease transmission and developing more effective control strategies. According to the dynamics of species distributions, it can be assumed that WNV infections will occur more frequently in the investigated areas during July and August, when the Cx. pipiens population is at its peak, which also coincides with our ability to catch a high number of blood-engorged mosquitoes. This assumption is in accordance with previous findings of mosquito-derived WNV in August in a northern province of Iran [12].
It can be concluded that in northern provinces of Iran, Cx. torrentium evidence is solid, moreover, Cx. pipiens complex consists of cpp. biotype pipiens, cpp. biotype molestus, and a limited hybridization occur between them. Although Cx. quinquefasciatus was observed in the investigated areas, hybrids between cpp. biotype pipiens and Cx. quinquefasciatus was not detected. This report of a potentially important bridge vector for WNV might have pivotal impact in the risk projections for WNV in Iran.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Trapping sites in the Iran (2015–2016) with coordinate and land use information.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207308.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. GeneBank accession number of the specimens used in the sequence analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207308.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Species from the 475 blood-meal individual mosquitoes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207308.s003
(DOCX)
S1 Fig. Phylogenetic tree was constructed by ML model based on COI sequences of 55 mosquitoes in MEGA 7.0.26 software.
Numbers displayed on branches are the bootstrap support obtained through 1000 replications. Sequences obtained from GenBank are shown with accession numbers.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207308.s004
(TIFF)
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all people involved with the sampling. We would like to thank to Dr. Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit and Renke Luhken that made this research possible and the laboratory staff at the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine.
References
- 1. Rozo-Lopez P, Mengual X. Mosquito species (Diptera, Culicidae) in three ecosystems from the Colombian Andes: identification through DNA barcoding and adult morphology. ZooKeys. 2015(513):39.
- 2. Azari-Hamidian S. Checklist of Iranian mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Vector Ecology. 2007;32(2):235–42. pmid:18260513
- 3. Djadid ND, Jazayeri H, Gholizadeh S, Rad SP, Zakeri S. First record of a new member of Anopheles Hyrcanus Group from Iran: molecular identification, diagnosis, phylogeny, status of kdr resistance and Plasmodium infection. Journal of medical entomology. 2009;46(5):1084–93. pmid:19769039
- 4. Azari-Hamidian S, Norouzi B, Noorallahi A. Orthopodomyia pulcripalpis (Diptera: Culicidae), a genus and species new to the Iranian mosquito fauna, with a review of bionomical information. Zootaxa. 2017;4299(1):141–5.
- 5. Doosti S, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Schaffner F, Moosa-Kazemi SH, Akbarzadeh K, Gooya MM, et al. Mosquito surveillance and the first record of the invasive mosquito species Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse)(Diptera: Culicidae) in southern Iran. Iranian journal of public health. 2016;45(8):1064. pmid:27928533
- 6. Oshaghi M, Yaghobi-Ershadi M, Shemshad K, Pedram M, Amani H. The Anopheles superpictus complex: introduction of. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2008;101(5):429–34. pmid:19192616
- 7. Verna TN, Munstermann LE. Morphological variants of Aedes aegypti collected from the leeward island of Antigua. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 2011;27(3):308–11. pmid:22017096
- 8. Versteirt V, Nagy ZT, Roelants P, Denis L, Breman FC, Damiens D, et al. Identification of Belgian mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) by DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2015;15(2):449–57. pmid:25143182
- 9. Laurito M, de Oliveira TM, Almiron WR, Sallum MAM. COI barcode versus morphological identification of Culex (Culex)(Diptera: Culicidae) species: a case study using samples from Argentina and Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2013;108:110–22.
- 10. Wang G, Li C, Guo X, Xing D, Dong Y, Wang Z, et al. Identifying the main mosquito species in China based on DNA barcoding. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47051. pmid:23071708
- 11. Rudolf M, Czajka C, Börstler J, Melaun C, Jöst H, von Thien H, et al. First nationwide surveillance of Culex pipiens complex and Culex torrentium mosquitoes demonstrated the presence of Culex pipiens biotype pipiens/molestus hybrids in Germany. PloS one. 2013;8(9):e71832. pmid:24039724
- 12. Shahhosseini N, Chinikar S, Moosa‐Kazemi SH, Sedaghat MM, Kayedi MH, Lühken R, et al. West Nile Virus lineage‐2 in culex specimens from Iran. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2017;22(10):1343–9.
- 13. Meshkat Z, Chinikar S, Shakeri M, Manavifar L, Moradi M, Mirshahabi H, et al. Prevalence of West Nile virus in Mashhad, Iran: A population–based study. Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine. 2015;8(3):203–5. pmid:25902161
- 14. Chinikar S, Shah-Hosseini N, Mostafavi E, Moradi M, Khakifirouz S, Jalali T, et al. Seroprevalence of West Nile virus in Iran. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 2013;13(8):586–9. pmid:23697768
- 15. Vogels CB, Fros JJ, Göertz GP, Pijlman GP, Koenraadt CJ. Vector competence of northern European Culex pipiens biotypes and hybrids for West Nile virus is differentially affected by temperature. Parasites & vectors. 2016;9(1):393.
- 16. Amraoui F, Tijane M, Sarih M, Failloux A-B. Molecular evidence of Culex pipiens form molestus and hybrids pipiens/molestus in Morocco, North Africa. Parasites & vectors. 2012;5(1):83.
- 17. Reusken C, De Vries A, Buijs J, Braks M, Den Hartog W, Scholte EJ. First evidence for presence of Culex pipiens biotype molestus in the Netherlands, and of hybrid biotype pipiens and molestus in northern Europe. Journal of Vector Ecology. 2010;35(1):210–2. pmid:20618670
- 18. LundstrÖM JO, Niklasson B, Francy DB. Swedish Culex torrentium and Cx. pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) as experimental vectors of Ockelbo virus. Journal of medical entomology. 1990;27(4):561–3. pmid:2167372
- 19. Smith JL, Fonseca DM. Rapid assays for identification of members of the Culex (Culex) pipiens complex, their hybrids, and other sibling species (Diptera: Culicidae). The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2004;70(4):339–45. pmid:15100444
- 20. Azari-Hamidian S, Harbach RE. Keys to the adult females and fourth-instar larvae of the mosquitoes of Iran (Diptera: Culicidae). Zootaxa. 2009;2078(1):1–33.
- 21. Shahhosseini N, Lühken R, Jöst H, Jansen S, Börstler J, Rieger T, et al. Detection and characterization of a novel rhabdovirus in Aedes cantans mosquitoes and evidence for a mosquito-associated new genus in the family Rhabdoviridae. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2017;55:260–8. pmid:28943405
- 22. Kambhampati S, Smith P. PCR primers for the amplification of four insect mitochondrial gene fragments. Insect molecular biology. 1995;4(4):233–6. pmid:8825760
- 23. Mousson L, Dauga C, Garrigues T, Schaffner F, Vazeille M, Failloux A-B. Phylogeography of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.) and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse)(Diptera: Culicidae) based on mitochondrial DNA variations. Genetics Research. 2005;86(1):1–11.
- 24. Kumar NP, Rajavel A, Natarajan R, Jambulingam P. DNA barcodes can distinguish species of Indian mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of medical entomology. 2007;44(1):1–7. pmid:17294914
- 25. Cywinska A, Hunter F, Hebert PD. Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Medical and veterinary entomology. 2006;20(4):413–24. pmid:17199753
- 26. Chinikar S, Ghiasi SM, Shah-Hosseini N, Mostafavi E, Moradi M, Khakifirouz S, et al. Preliminary study of dengue virus infection in Iran. Travel medicine and infectious disease. 2013;11(3):166–9. pmid:23194952
- 27. Shahhosseini N, Chinikar S, Nowotny N, Fooks AR, Schmidt-Chanasit J. Genetic analysis of imported dengue virus strains by Iranian travelers. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2016;6(11):850–3.
- 28. Shah-Hosseini N, Chinikar S, Ataei B, Fooks AR, Groschup MH. Phylogenetic analysis of West Nile virus genome, Iran. Emerging infectious diseases. 2014;20(8):1419. pmid:25061976
- 29. Chinikar S, Shahhosseini N. Phylogenetic analysis on emerging Arboviruses in Iran. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2016;53:160.
- 30. Chan A, Chiang L-P, Hapuarachchi HC, Tan C-H, Pang S-C, Lee R, et al. DNA barcoding: complementing morphological identification of mosquito species in Singapore. Parasites & vectors. 2014;7(1):569.
- 31. Ramsdale C, Snow K. Distribution of the genus Anopheles in Europe. European Mosquito Bulletin. 2000(7):1–26.
- 32. Ponçon N, Toty C, Kengne P, Alten B, Fontenille D. Molecular evidence for similarity between Anopheles hyrcanus (Diptera: Culicidae) and Anopheles pseudopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), sympatric potential vectors of malaria in France. Journal of medical entomology. 2008;45(3):576–80. pmid:18533455
- 33. Fang Y, Shi W-Q, Zhang Y. Molecular phylogeny of Anopheles hyrcanus group members based on ITS2 rDNA. Parasites & vectors. 2017;10(1):417.
- 34. Lebl K, Nischler EM, Walter M, Brugger K, Rubel F. First record of the disease vector Anopheles hyrcanus in Austria. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 2013;29(1):59–60. pmid:23687857
- 35. Dehghan H, Sadraei J, Moosa-Kazemi S, Baniani NA, Nowruzi F. The molecular and morphological variations of Culex pipiens complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran. Journal of vector borne diseases. 2013;50(2):111. pmid:23995312
- 36. Danabalan R, Ponsonby DJ, Linton Y-M. A critical assessment of available molecular identification tools for determining the status of Culex pipiens sl in the United Kingdom. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 2012;28(4s):68–74.