Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Factors associated with healthcare utilization among community-dwelling elderly in Shanghai, China

  • Man Jiang,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

  • Guang Yang,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation

    Affiliation Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China

  • Lvying Fang,

    Roles Project administration, Validation, Visualization

    Affiliation School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

  • Jin Wan,

    Roles Investigation, Project administration, Supervision

    Affiliation Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

  • Yinghua Yang,

    Roles Investigation, Resources, Software

    Affiliation Management Department, Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control & Prevention, Shanghai, China

  • Ying Wang

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Software

    wangying1013@fudan.edu.cn

    Affiliation School of Public Health/Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with the health status of older Chinese people living in the community, in order to inform strategies to expand access to healthcare.

Methods

Two-phase stratified cluster sampling was applied; 2000 older people participated in this study. Face-to-face interviews were conducted in Shanghai between June and August, 2011. Descriptive analysis was used to examine the respondents’ characteristics. Based on Andersen’s healthcare utilization model, a chi-squared test and multiple logistic regression were performed to examine the influences of predisposing, enabling, need, and contextual factors on healthcare utilization.

Results

We found that 44.5% of the older people in the sample had good self-reported health status, while 12.8% were poor, 14.5% had visited hospitals or clinics as outpatients in the previous two weeks, and 16.5% had been hospitalized in the previous year. Logistic regression analysis revealed that outpatient health services were more likely to be used by women and those whose income was from friends or social relief, who had poor to good self-reported health status, who were experiencing declining health, who engaged in volunteer activities, and who had chronic diseases. Meanwhile, hospitalization was more likely among those in the older age groups, those with pension income, living in outer suburbs, with poor self-reported health status, experiencing difficulty with activities of daily living and outdoor activities, or having a chronic disease.

Conclusions

The results showed the impact of economic status, health status, demographic and social characteristics, and other factors on the health service utilization of elderly people living in the community in Shanghai. Need variables were the strongest predictors of health service use, although contextual factors also contributed.

Introduction

An aging society is one where more than 10% of the population is over 60 years old and/or 7% are over 65 [1]. According to statistics published by the WHO, the percentage of the global population aged 60 and over was 11% by the end of 2011, while that in China was 13% [2]. China is a therefore recognized as an aging society, with Shanghai showing a more extreme position. According to the Shanghai Bureau of Statistics, the city had a population of 14.50 million people registered as living in households by the end of 2016, of whom 31.59% were aged 60 and over, with this percentage increasing annually [3].

This rapidly aging population poses significant challenges for healthcare [4]. With their declining physical function and increasing morbidity from various diseases, the demand for healthcare services from older people is far higher than from other age groups [5]. For instance, 33% of healthcare expenditure in the United States is spent on older people [6]. There is growing recognition globally of the need to evaluate how healthcare services are utilized, and how healthcare systems might best be enhanced to meet the health needs of an aging population [7].

Healthcare utilization means obtaining healthcare from health service providers [8]. Many theoretical models of healthcare utilization have been formulated, interpreting it from various perspectives (such as economic, psychosocial, behavioral, and epidemiological) and exploring which variables influence it and to what degree [9]. For example, the Andersen–Newman model [10] explains healthcare utilization in terms of relationships among predisposing, enabling, need, and contextual factors found in the general population, while Berki and Kobashigawa [11] emphasized the importance of services, socioeconomic factors, and individual characteristics. Other studies focused on vulnerable populations, for example, minority groups or immigrants. Mutchler and Burr [12] examined racial differences in health service utilization, and Aroian et al. [13] focused on elderly immigrants from the former Soviet Union. Factors associated with healthcare utilization can be divided into three types [14]: physiological (e.g., sex, age, race, health status), social (e.g., income, education, social status), and subjective (e.g., self-reported health status).

China is the developing country with the largest elderly population, partly as a result of the implementation of its “One Child” policy in the 1970s [15]. Along with the aging trend, China is experiencing a significant health transition, with older people generally living longer generally but also with increasing years in suboptimal perceived health accompanied by chronic diseases [16]. The problem of healthcare utilization has been studied by some investigators in China, but these studies have not properly considered influencing factors, contextual factors, or disease status. Andersen’s model is a useful framework for studying health service use and for grouping the factors shown to affect health service utilization in older Chinese people [17]. Uncovering factors associated with health service use is important, particularly when used concurrently with conventional care, as this could help avoid potential problems.

Shanghai was used as the study area, because it has the most severe aging situation in China [18].We examined how predisposing, enabling, need, and contextual factors were related to healthcare utilization. Outpatient service usage rates in the previous two weeks and hospital inpatient services in the previous year were set as dependent variables [19]. The objective of the study was to evaluate factors influencing health status and healthcare utilization among older Chinese people, gathering reference data for policies to improve the healthcare accessibility for the elderly and for the development of health management and healthy aging programs for older people in China and other developing countries with similarly aging populations.

Theoretical framework

First developed in the late 1960s, Andersen’s healthcare utilization model was originally used to measure equitable access to health services and assist in developing policies to promote such access. It aimed to integrate several ideas about how and why health services were used [20], and has been widely used to explore relationships between predisposing, enabling, and need factors and healthcare utilization [21] in a wide variety of contexts, for example predicting emergency room use [22, 23] and patient satisfaction [24].

Predisposing factors are those increasing individuals’ propensity to use services; they include demographic and social characteristics such as sex, age, marital status, race, education level, children, and living conditions. Enabling factors increase individual ability to access services, and includes family and social resources, health insurance, pension or other income, and living location. Need factors reflect illness level and factors affecting it, including self-reported health status, sensory damage, loneliness, ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), changes in health status, smoking and alcohol-drinking status, and presence of a certain chronic disease. The need component involves both health professionals’ and individuals’ perceptions of whether clinical factors require use of healthcare services.

Previous studies have shown that the strongest predictors of healthcare utilization are need factors, followed by enabling and predisposing factors [25]. Some studies have also shown that contextual factors play key roles; for example, geographic variations influence length of hospital stay [26, 27]. Neighborhood [28], characteristics of providers [29] and social capital–related factors such as social trust, civic engagement, and social relations [30] all affect health service utilization. Unlike other age groups, the high incidence of chronic diseases among older people will lead to changes in their health service utilization. Many elderly people have multiple concurrent prevalent diseases at the same time, while most previous studies only considered if people had any chronic diseases or not (yes/no), rather than explore the impact of each disease [17, 31]. It has therefore been necessary to evaluate healthcare utilization using a specialized version of Andersen’s model.

Our study extends Andersen’s model to include the most prevalent diseases in this population as special need factors as well as contextual factors, and aims to determine whether these special variables add predictability to health service utilization. The most prevalent diseases, which can be analyzed as a separate part of the need factors, include hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, cataracts, cerebrovascular disease, bronchitis, and gastroenteritis. Contextual factors considered here include regional economic development, participation in outdoor and community activities, and participation in volunteer work.

Materials and methods

Design and procedures

The phrase “older people” in China generally applies to those who are 60 years old and over; we therefore focused on people aged above 60 living in communities served by the sample community institutions.

We decided on a stratified random sample, and the effect size was estimated as two, meaning that the sample size required was doubled. We estimated a 15% loss to follow-up, so a sample of 1756 older people was needed. We eventually received 2000 valid questionnaires. Ethical approval was received from the Fudan University Research Ethics Committee. Respondents were assured that participation in the study was voluntary, with the return of completed questionnaires being taken as consent; the study data of respondents were collected anonymously.

A cross-sectional design was used to investigate these community-dwelling older Shanghainese adults, in August 2011. The 18 districts (counties) of Shanghai were divided into three levels stratified by socioeconomic status: high, medium, and low. Random sampling was conducted for two districts from each level, with samples collected on the basis of population size. High-SES districts were Pudong (sample of 832) and Changning (199); medium-SES ones were Hongkou (291) and Putuo (274); low-SES ones were Jinshan (157) and Chongming (248). We then randomly selected one street or town (local center) in the medium-SES districts, arranged all their residents in alphabetical order by name, and surveyed them one by one until we had a large enough sample.

The study design and questionnaire were created by the School of Public Health at Fudan University and piloted in 200 elderly people, and then revised. Face-to-face interviews were conducted in June and August 2011. The sampled communities were responsible for coordination with the interviewees and training the investigators. All the interviewers, who included research assistants and experienced peer fieldworkers, had received extensive training on research ethics and assessment methodology prior to data collection. A small gift equivalent in value to US$3, was given to the participants as a token of appreciation for their participation.

Variable content

Adequate operationalization and selection of variables representing the Andersen model was ensured by considering Andersen’s own suggestions [20] as well as known information on the relationships between various factors and health service utilization among the middle-aged and elderly in China, an approach again largely based on the framework of Andersen’s behavioral model [31, 32]. In this study, healthcare utilization was quantified by assessing (1) level of use of outpatient care in the previous two weeks, including family doctor, nursing or specialist visits, and (2) hospitalization(s) in the last year.

Predisposing factors.

Socio-demographic data gathered included age, gender, education, marital status, nationality, number of children, living situation, and healthy lifestyle. Age was divided into five groups: 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, and ≥80. Three marital statuses were used: married, separated/divorced, widowed. Education had four categories: (1) illiterate, including semi-literate, less than primary education, or home study; (2) primary education; (3) secondary education, including middle and high school as well as vocational education; and (4) higher education, including associate’s, bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees. Living situation was divided into three types: living alone, living with spouse, and living with children. Healthy lifestyles, which serve as a proxy for health beliefs, were measured by two variables: (1) never smoke, smoke at times, smoke often, or had quit smoking; (2) never drink, drink at times, often drink, or had quit drinking alcohol.

Enabling factors.

The enabling factors in the model include healthcare insurance, pension income, source of income, and location. China’s basic medical insurance system can be divided into three types: medical insurance for urban employees, medical insurance for urban and town residents, and “new-type rural cooperative medical scheme” (NRCMS). In addition to these three basic types, we also investigated the proportion of elderly whose healthcare expenses are self-paid or publicly funded. Pension income and source of income can also help capture the accessibility of health services from an economic perspective. In addition, people living in different locations—city center, inner suburbs, and outer suburbs—have different degrees of access to transportation and medical facilities.

Need factors.

The need factors in the model include self-reported health, sensation disorders, feeling lonely or nervous, activity of daily living (ADL) limitations, and chronic diseases. Self-reported health is based on the respondents’ answer to the questions “Would you say your health is good, normal, or poor?” and “Compared with last year, what changes have you made in your health?” Three questions related to mental health, “Do you have sensation disorders?” (yes/no) and “Do you feel lonely or nervous?” (never/sometimes/always), were also included in the questionnaire. Functional ability was assessed using the Barthel Index, which has been regarded as the best tool for this purpose in terms of sensitivity, simplicity, communicability, scalability, and ease of scoring [33]. First published in 1965, its ten items cover eating, dressing and undressing, making up, walking, getting into and out of bed, washing and bathing, going up and down stairs, and toileting and controlling bladder and bowel movements [34]. Comorbidity was measured as the self-reported number of chronic diseases that had been diagnosed by a physician, coded into categories of hypertension, diabetes, cataract, cerebrovascular disease, bronchitis, gastroenteritis, intervertebral disc disease, cardiovascular disease, and asthma.

Data analysis

SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 20.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyze the data. Mean and standard deviation were used in the descriptive statistics. The chi-squared test was used to determine the differences between socio-demographic characteristics. The significance threshold was P < 0.05.

The relationships among socio-demographic characteristics, living habits, social support, mental and physical status, and self-reported health status were tested by the chi-squared test. A series of logistic regression models were performed to establish the independent associations between health service utilization and its determinants. The predictors in Model 1 were based on Andersen’s model; Model 2 tested whether the addition of contextual factors adds incremental predictive power; and Model 3 tested whether the addition of disease status adds incremental predictive power. The index of -2Log Likelihood was used to compare model fit of different models [35]. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

The total sample size comprised 2000 older people. The response rate was 100%, with 57.8% being women. The mean age was 71.61 years, and the proportions in each age group (aged 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79 and ≥80) were around 2:1:1:1:1. The predominant nationality of most was Han (98.9%), with 1.1% being ethnic minorities; 75.8% were married, 21.6% were widowed, and 2.6% were divorced or single. In all, 28.7% had received no formal education. Most lived with a spouse (86.0%), although 35.0% lived with children, and 14.0% lived alone. Medical insurance coverage was good, with 31.5% being part of a medical insurance system for urban and town residents, 45.5% one for urban employees, and 14.7% an NRCMS. Finally, 41.6% lived in the inner suburbs, 38.2% in the city center, and 20.2% in the outer suburbs.

Health status and healthcare utilization

During the previous two weeks, 380 had been ill and 1620 had not. The two-week prevalence of illness was 19.0%, and the two-week visit rate to outpatient services was 14.5%. The rate of not seeking medical care by patients who had been ill in the previous two weeks was 23.9%, while the hospitalization rate in the previous year was 16.5%. Overall, 44.5% reported good health status, 42.8% normal, and 12.8% poor health status. Most, 83.0%, reported that they did not feel lonely, and 89.2% were not nervous; 54.7% felt satisfied with life, and 5.1% were not. Finally, 77.2% had at least one chronic disease.

Univariate analysis of outpatients’ health service utilization

Table 1 shows the chi-squared test results for each Andersen model predictor of two-week visit rate. Of the predisposing predictors, only gender and previously having smoked had any relationship to outpatient health service utilization: men were less likely to use outpatient health services than women. Three of the enabling predictors were found related to outpatient health service use: pension income level, source of income, and location. Respondents with pension income of 1000–2000 RMB monthly, whose income source was a pension, and who lived in the outer suburbs were more likely to use outpatient health services. Need predictor characteristics related to outpatient health service use were poor self-reported health status, sensation disorders, feeling lonely and/or nervous, poor satisfaction with life, limitation to activities of daily living (ADLs), health status changing for the worse, and having a chronic disease. Respondents with chronic diseases such as heart disease, cataracts, cerebrovascular disease, and gastroenteritis were particularly more likely to use outpatient health services. Living in a poorer region and having more contact with friends and neighbors were also related to outpatient health service use.

thumbnail
Table 1. Univariate analysis of outpatient health service utilization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207646.t001

Logistic regression analysis of outpatient healthcare services utilization

The inclusion level was set to p < 0.05 and the exclusion criterion to p > 0.1. Then, all the variables were included in stepwise regression; only the variables in the final results are shown. Table 2 shows the logistic regression analysis results of each Andersen model predictor of outpatient visit rate in the previous two weeks, as the dependent variable. In all three models, gender (model 1: OR 1.344; 95% 0.994–1.818, p = 0.064) was not statistically significant. Compared to those whose income was from a pension, those who had income from other sources (model 1: OR 6.497; 95% 3.599–11.727, p = 0.000) were more likely to use outpatient healthcare services. The statistically significant need predictors were poor self-reported health status (model 1: OR 6.497; 95% 3.599–11.727, p = 0.000), normal satisfaction with life (model 1: OR 1.472; 95% 1.088–1.992, p = 0.012), and a change for the worse in physical health (model 1: OR 3.301; 95% 1.502–7.258, p = 0.003). As for contextual factors, elderly who engaged in volunteering (no vs. yes) (model 3: OR 0.619; 95% 0.415–0.924, p = 0.019) were more likely to use health services. Of the newly added disease factors in Model 3, both heart diseases (model 3: OR 1.693; 95% 1.234–2.324, p = 0.001) and gastroenteritis (model 3: OR 2.181; 95% 1.315–3.616, p = 0.003) were associated with the utilization of health services.

thumbnail
Table 2. Logistic regression analysis of outpatient healthcare services utilization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207646.t002

The index of -2Log Likelihood was 1339.348 for model 1. After including contextual factors, in model 2, this index dropped to 1333.388. This was further reduced to 1313.703 when disease status was added. Therefore, model 3 was the optimal model.

Univariate analysis of hospitalization

Table 3 shows the chi-squared test results for each Andersen model predictor of hospitalization rate. Four predisposing factors were related to hospitalization service use: age group, marital status, education and number of children. Older, less educated, and widowed people with more children were more likely to use hospital services. The enabling predictors source of income and region were also related to hospitalization service. Respondents whose income was from work or savings were less likely to have been hospitalized than those whose income was provided by their family. Those living in the outer suburbs were more likely to have been hospitalized. Need predictors related to hospitalization were poor self-reported health status, sensation disorders, feeling lonely or nervous, having poor satisfaction with life, limitation in one or more activities of daily living (ADLs), change for the worse in physical health, previously having smoked, and having one or more chronic diseases.

Coming from a poorer area, doing fewer outdoor activities, and taking part in fewer family gatherings were found to have significant positive relationships with hospitalization. Respondents with hypertension (χ2 = 7.932, p < 0.05), heart disease (χ2 = 41.326, p < 0.05), diabetes (χ2 = 4.321, p < 0.05), cataracts (χ2 = 9.33, p < 0.05), cerebrovascular disease (χ2 = 155.849, p < 0.05), bronchitis (χ2 = 34.634, p < 0.05), and gastroenteritis (χ2 = 5.958, p < 0.05) were significantly more likely to have been hospitalized in the previous year.

Logistic regression analysis of hospitalization

The inclusion level was set to p < 0.05 and the exclusion criterion to p > 0.1. Based on these thresholds, all the variables were included in stepwise regression. Table 4 shows the final logistic regression analysis results of each Andersen model predictor of hospitalization rate in the previous year. Older age groups were more likely to have been hospitalized. Those with income from work or savings (model 1: OR 0.511; 95%CI 0.279–0.938, p = 0.030) were less likely to have been hospitalized than those with income from a pension, contrary to the case with outpatient service use. Those living in the outer suburbs were more likely to have been hospitalized (model 1: OR 1.316; 95%CI 0.962–1.8028, p = 0.001). Poor self-reported health status (model 1: OR 3.377; 95%CI 2.234–5.104, p = 0.000), being limited in one or more activity of daily living (ADL) (model 1: OR 2.954; 95%CI 1.388–6.29, p = 0.005), having three types of chronic diseases, and poor regional economic level (model 3: OR 3.429; 95%CI 1.782–6.596, p = 0.000) were positively associated with having been hospitalized.

thumbnail
Table 4. Logistic regression analysis of hospitalization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207646.t004

Next, the -2Log Likelihood (Model 1) was 1421.322. After adjusting for the predictors in Model 1, adding the contextual factors, the -2Log Likelihood for Model 2 was 1408.983. After adjusting for the predictors in Model 2, having diseases predicted hospitalization, and the -2 Log Likelihood for Model 3 was 1341.064.

Discussion

This study improves our understanding of factors that influence use of healthcare services by older people in Shanghai and other Chinese cities, especially factors related to disease status and contextual factors, which have only rarely been considered previously.

Predisposing factors

We observed that predisposing factors including age, gender, pension income level, source of income, and marital status were statistically associated with utilization of health services in univariate analysis. Meanwhile, age contributed significantly to variance in utilization of hospitalization in logistic regression analysis.

There are some controversies around findings related to gender. Some studies have suggested that women are more likely to have used outpatient services in the previous two weeks than men [36] and that this might be related to women’s physical and psychological characteristics, since they more often belong to vulnerable groups [37]. Some studies have found that men are more likely to delay treatment than women because of social and behavioral factors [26]; however, other studies suggested the opposite [38]. This study found that the female outpatient visit rate in the previous two weeks was higher than that of men.

Older individuals tend to have more need for healthcare because they usually have more comorbid conditions [39, 40] and suffer from more adverse effects of treatment [41]. This study also found that with increasing age, the annual admission rate increased, which is consistent with prior research [42].

Previous investigations of living conditions and education have shown conflicting results. Some studies have indicated that older people living alone are more likely to be admitted to hospital than those living with an informal caregiver [43]. Education was positively and significantly related to use of outpatient services in some previous research [3, 44, 45]; however, other studies [46, 47] showed that older people with a lower educational level are more likely to visit their general practitioner. The present study reported no links between healthcare use and either living conditions or education. Women and/or in older people should be a key target groups for health interventions.

Enabling factors

The observations that source of income [4851] and regional economic development were significantly related to health service utilization among older people are consistent with earlier research [52, 53]. Compared with those whose income came from pensions, work, or family, those whose income came from friends or social relief had visited healthcare services more in the previous two weeks but been hospitalized less in the previous year. This is probably because those relying on friends or social relief cannot afford expensive hospital care and are therefore more likely to use outpatient services.

Higher health service utilization was seen among those living further away from the city center. In general, older people living nearer to the city center tend to live in nursing or residential homes because they have less access to family care and more of this support infrastructure because of greater local economic development. This finding may be the result of the stratified cluster sampling used in this study, because those living in such institutions, who usually need more healthcare, were excluded from our sample. To promote equitable healthcare utilization among older people living in the community, relevant departments and agencies should provide sufficient care for those living in outer suburbs and those whose incomes comes from friends or social relief, as these groups tend to use health services more.

Need factors

Previous research has generally found that health service use is mainly associated with need variables [36, 54]. This study similarly observed that self-reported health status, general level of life satisfaction, physical health change, feelings of loneliness, and limitations in ADLs were significantly, positively related to health service utilization.

Self-reported health status reflects the feelings, ideas, and beliefs of individuals about their health [55, 56]. An individual’s decision to use health services is the result of a complex interaction of factors relating to their health or self-perceived health status and to the availability of healthcare [36]. Consistent with other research, we found that older people with poor self-reported health had significantly higher odds of using both outpatient and inpatient services (2.469 and 2.456 times that of healthier individuals, respectively). Older people whose health status worsens tend to use more outpatient services but to be hospitalized less. Meanwhile, older people who are limited in ADLs have higher odds of being hospitalized than those without any such limitations. Elderly people with higher anxiety, depression, and/or concerns about their health and life have less capacity to resist disease and so also tend to use more healthcare services. However, healthcare utilization was not associated with sensation disorders, again consistent with previous studies [36].

Disease status

We also looked at the effect of special need factors—various chronic diseases on healthcare service utilization. The seven most prevalent diseases—hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, cataracts, cerebrovascular disease, bronchitis, and gastroenteritis—were added into the model. The study found that older people with heart disease and gastroenteritis use more outpatient services, while those with heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and bronchitis tend to be hospitalized more. Those with hypertension or diabetes use fewer healthcare services, probably because these diseases are more stable and can be controlled through medication and other self-treatments.

Diseases such as heart disease, cataracts, and cerebrovascular disease have a longer course, and easily lead to complications and morbidity. Health education on age-related diseases, especially chronic diseases, should be carried out in the community to help people prevent and control these diseases, maintain a stable state of health, and improve their quality of life.

Contextual factors

Contextual factors are another important, although often neglected group of factors affecting healthcare utilization [21, 23, 24]. We found that older people who engage in volunteering tend to use more outpatient services. This might be because the government has developed many community health services and promoted their utilization. Living in a poorer region and participating fewer outdoor activities were also positively related to higher healthcare use. However, compared with the poorer medical conditions in outer suburbs, richer areas often have better medical services and more skilled personnel, which may improve disease prevention, management, and prognosis. More attention should also be paid to older people’s psychological needs, such as for psychological guidance and comfort, especially among those in poor physical condition and/or those who do not spend time in outdoor activities. The key to improving healthcare utilization is to improve older people’s social environment, through increased social support and availability of activities near home. A wider range of healthy activities could be arranged within the community to promote older people’s mental and physical health and strengthen their psychological self-adjustment.

Conclusions

The results showed the impact of economic status, health status, demographic and social characteristics, and other factors on the health service utilization of elderly people living in the community in Shanghai. Need variables in the Andersen model, including self-reported health status, life satisfaction, physical health change, and disease status, were the strongest factors influencing health service use, consistent with previous research [14, 20]. Contextual factors, especially regional economic level and volunteer activities, also contributed to it.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. The first is its cross-sectional design. The method of investigation was a self-reported household survey, which may have led to recall bias and affected the accuracy of the survey results. A longitudinal study would be helpful in the future, to collect data through long-term continuous tracking and provide time-series data to improve understanding. Additionally, while healthcare services include primary care [57], preventive health services [58], outpatient services [59], ambulatory care [60] and hospital inpatient services [61], we focused only on use of outpatient and inpatient services. In addition, only people aged above 60 living in the community in Shanghai were sampled, while those living in nursing homes or pension agencies were excluded even though they may have more need for healthcare services. Their situation should be explored in a further study.

Supporting information

S1 File. Outpatient database.

Database used for univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis of outpatient health service utilization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207646.s001

(XLSX)

S2 File. Inpatient database.

Database used for univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis of hospitalization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207646.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the members of the Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission and to the individuals of the School of Public Health at Fudan University who participated in the study. The authors also thank anonymous reviewers who have given us constructive comments and suggestions to improve this article.

References

  1. 1. United Nations. The aging of populations and its economic and social implications. New York (NY): The Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs; 1956.
  2. 2. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2016/en/
  3. 3. Shanghai Bureau of Statistics. Shanghai Statistical Yearbook [EB/OL] [Internet]. Shanghai Statistical Network. Available from: http://www.stats-sh.gov.cn/tjnj/nj17.htm?d1=2017tjnj/C0201.htm
  4. 4. Zhang CL. Analysis of factors influencing the use of medical services of elderly people. Popul Res. 1996;2: 70–73.
  5. 5. Yang L, Cui Y, Tan D, Fang PQ. Study on the health status and application of health service of old population in rural area. Mod Prev Med. 2008;6: 1076–1077.
  6. 6. American Medical Association Council of Scientific Affairs. White paper on elderly health: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(12): 2459–2472. pmid:2288622
  7. 7. Nie JX, Wang L, Tracy CS, Moineddin R, Upshur RE. Health care service utilization among the elderly: findings from the study to understand the chronic condition experience of the elderly and the disabled (SUCCEED project). J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(6): 1044–1049. pmid:19019098
  8. 8. Borras JM. La utilization dels serveis sanitaria. Gac Sanit. 1994;8: 30–49. pmid:8056490
  9. 9. Hulka BS, Wheat JR. Patterns of utilization. The patient perspective. Med Care. 1985;23: 438–60. pmid:4010347
  10. 10. Andersen R, Newman JF. Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Meml Fund Q Health Soc. 1973;51: 95–124.
  11. 11. Berki SE, Kobashigawa B. Socioeconomic and need determinants of ambulatory care use: Path analysis of the 1970 Health Interview Survey data. Med Care. 1976;14(5): 405–421. pmid:1271881
  12. 12. Mutchler JE, Burr JA. Racial differences in health and health care service utilization in later life: the effect of socioeconomic status. J Health Soc Behav. 1991;32(4): 342–356. pmid:1765625
  13. 13. Aroian KJ, Khatutsky G, Tran TV, Balsam AL. Health and social service utilization among elderly immigrants from the former Soviet Union. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001;33(3): 265–271. pmid:11552554
  14. 14. Jiang HR. Influencing factors to medical care seeking of urban elder in the background of health system reform. Theor Res. 2013;(28): 122–123.
  15. 15. Rajan S I. China’s one-child policy: implication for population aging. Econ Polit Wkly. 1994;29(38): 2502–2506.
  16. 16. Gong CH, Kendig H, He X. Factors predicting health services use among older people in China: an analysis of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study 2013. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16: 63. pmid:26892677
  17. 17. Brown C, Barner J, Bohman T, Richards K. A multivariate test of an expanded Andersen health care utilization model for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in African Americans. J Altern Complement Med. 2009;15(8): 911–919. pmid:19678783
  18. 18. Jia P, Hu S, Yang N. The management research based on stepwise regression model in the Shanghai community endowment service. International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 2014.
  19. 19. Fuller GF. Falls in the elderly. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(7): 2159. pmid:10779256
  20. 20. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36(1): 1–10. pmid:7738325
  21. 21. Aparasu R, Mort J, Brandt H. Psychotropic prescription use by community-dwelling elderly in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51: 671–677. pmid:12752843
  22. 22. Padgett DK, Brodsky B. Psychosocial factors influencing non-urgent use of the emergency room: a review of the literature and recommendations for research and improved service delivery. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35(9): 1189–1197. pmid:1439937
  23. 23. Padgett DK, Struening EL, Andrews H, Pittman J. Predictors of emergency room use by homeless adults in New York City: the influence of predisposing, enabling and need factors. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(4): 547–556. pmid:7481949
  24. 24. Upchurch DM, Burke A, Dye C, Chyu L, Kusunoki Y, Greendale GA. A sociobehavioral model of acupuncture use, patterns, and satisfaction among women in the United States, 2002. Womens Health Issues. 2008;18(1): 62–71. pmid:18069003
  25. 25. De Boer A, Wijker W, de Haes H. Predictors of health care utilization in the chronically ill: a review of the literature. Health Policy. 1997;42: 101–115. pmid:10175619
  26. 26. Andrulis DP, McGregor CM, Weiss KB, Ramirez KL, Ginsberg CA, Shaw-Taylor Y. U.S. hospital care for HIV-infected persons and the role of public and private teaching hospitals: 1988–1991. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1995;9: 193–203. pmid:7749798
  27. 27. McKinney MM. Variations in rural, AIDS epidemiology and service delivery models in the United States. J Rural Health. 2002;18: 455–466. pmid:12186320
  28. 28. Law M, Wilson K, Eyles J, Elliott S, Jerrett M, Moffat T, et al. Meeting health need, accessing health care: the role of neighbourhood. Health Place. 2005;11(4): 367–377. pmid:15886144
  29. 29. Kitahata MM, Van Rompaey SE, Shields AW. Physician experience in the care of HIV-infected persons is associated with earlier adoption of new antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000;24: 106–114. pmid:10935685
  30. 30. Jung M, Viswanath K. Does community capacity influence self-rated health? Multilevel contextual effects in Seoul, Korea. Soc Sci Med. 2013;77: 60–69. pmid:23232024
  31. 31. Gong CH, Kendig H, He X. Factors predicting health services use among older people in China: an analysis of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study 2013. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1): 63.
  32. 32. Li YN, Nong DX, Wei B, Feng QM, Luo HY. The impact of predisposing, enabling, and need factors in utilization of health services among rural residents in Guangxi, China. BMC Health Services Research, 2016;16(1): 592. pmid:27760531
  33. 33. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42: 703–709. pmid:2760661
  34. 34. Mahoney FL, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14: 61–65.
  35. 35. Cressie N. Pearson’s X2 and the loglikelihood ratio statistic G2: a comparative review. Int Stat Rev. 1989;57(1): 19–43.
  36. 36. Wu XY, Wang AH, Li SH. Analysis impact factors on demand and utilization of health care in urban residents. Chin Health Resour. 2004;1: 21–23.
  37. 37. Schellhorn M, Stuck AE, Minder CE, Beck JC. Health services utilization of elderly Swiss: evidence from panel data. Health Econ. 2000;9(6): 533–545. pmid:10983005
  38. 38. Xu G, Yuan ZK, Zhu H. The health service demand and utilization of elderly population. Chin J Gerontol. 2010;10: 1417–1419.
  39. 39. Liu L, Tian W, Yao H. Utilization of health care services by elderly people with National Health Insurance in Taiwan: the heterogeneous health profile approach. Health Policy. 2012;108(2–3): 246–255. pmid:23022286
  40. 40. Li X, Zhang W. The impacts of health insurance on health care utilization among the older people in China. Soc Sci Med. 2013;85: 59–65. pmid:23540367
  41. 41. Adams PD1, Ritz J, Kather R, Patton P, Jordan J, Mooney R, et al. The differential effects of surgical harm in elderly populations: does the adage: “they tolerate the operation, but not the complications” hold true? Am J Surg. 2014;208(4): 656–662. pmid:24929708
  42. 42. Martínez-Sellés M, García Robles JA, Prieto L, Serrano JA, Muñoz R, Frades E, et al. Annual rates of admission and seasonal variations in hospitalizations for heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002;4: 779–786. pmid:12453550
  43. 43. Landi F, Onder G, Cesari M, Barillaro C, Lattanzio F, Carbonin PU, et al. Comorbidity and social factors predicted hospitalization in frail elderly patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(8): 832–836. pmid:15551473
  44. 44. de Belvis AGD, Avolio M, Spagnolo A, Damiani G, Sicuro L, Cicchetti A, et al. Factors associated with health-related quality of life: the role of social relationships among the elderly in an Italian region. J Public Health. 2008;122: 784–793.
  45. 45. de Belvis AG, Avolio M, Spagnolo A, Damiani G, Sicuro L, Cicchetti A, et al. Health status and associated factors among the community-dwelling elderly in China. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;56: 199–204. pmid:23102740
  46. 46. Fernández-Olano C1, Hidalgo JD, Cerdá-Díaz R, Requena-Gallego M, Sánchez-Castaño C, Urbistondo-Cascales L, et al. Factors associated with health care utilization by the elderly in a public health care system. Health Policy. 2006;75: 131–139. pmid:15961181
  47. 47. Hu HW, Li Y, Li YJ. Urban and rural differences, opulence, system fairness and the elderly health services utilization. J Guangxi Econ Manag Cadre Coll. 2011;3: 20–28.
  48. 48. Chen FW, Yang Xl, Liu J. Analysis on the situation of health service utilization and its influencing factors among aged people. Mod Prev Med. 2007;16: 3083–3085.
  49. 49. Zang JP, Na DQ, Chu XW. Survey of health service demand and utilization among the elderly of Chenggong province. Chin Rural Health Serv Adm. 2002;22(5): 21–22.
  50. 50. Wang YX, Deng XN, He LJ, Zhang XH, Li YF. Investigation of life and health needs of 509 urban elderly. Chin J Gerontol. 2008;28(20): 2037–2040.
  51. 51. Pan CD. Investigation of medical demand status and its influencing factors of elderly people in Shaoxing city. Chin J Gerontol. 2005;25(11): 1325–1327.
  52. 52. McCoy JL, Brown DL. Health status among low-income elderly persons: rural-urban differences. Soc Secur Bull. 1978;41(6): 14–26. pmid:675459
  53. 53. Shapiro E, Roos LL. Using health care: rural/urban differences among the Manitoba elderly. Gerontol Soc Am. 1984;24(3): 270–274.
  54. 54. Dunlop DD, Manheim LM, Song J, Chang RW. Gender and ethnic/racial disparities in health care utilization among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57: 221–233.
  55. 55. Mossey JM, Shapiro E. Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1982;72(8): 800–808. pmid:7091475
  56. 56. Markides KS, Martin HW. Predicting self-related health among the aged. J Aging Health. 1996;8(2): 254–279.
  57. 57. McGrail MR, Humphreys JS. Measuring spatial accessibility to primary health care services: utilising dynamic catchment sizes. Appl Geogr. 2014;54: 182–188.
  58. 58. Kim ES, Moored KD, Giasson HL, Smith J. Satisfaction with aging and use of preventive health services. Prev Med. 2014;69: 176–180. pmid:25240763
  59. 59. Lin Y, Tian W, Chen C. Urbanization and the utilization of outpatient services under National Health Insurance in Taiwan. Health Policy. 2011;103(2–3): 236–243. pmid:21920621
  60. 60. Chen YC, Hwang SJ, Lai HY, Chen TJ, Lin MH, Chen LK, et al. Ambulatory health care utilization of the older people under the National Health Insurance in Taiwan. J Clin Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;2(2): 53–57.
  61. 61. Saliba W, Fediai A, Edelstein H, Markel A, Raz R. Trends in the burden of infectious disease hospitalizations among the elderly in the last decade. Eur J Intern Med. 2013;24(6): 536–540. pmid:23810234