Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Comparison of the response of alternative oxidase and uncoupling proteins to bacterial elicitor induced oxidative burst

  • Ádám Czobor,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary

  • Péter Hajdinák,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary

  • Bence Németh,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary

  • Borbála Piros,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary

  • Áron Németh,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Fermentation Pilot Plant Laboratory, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary

  • András Szarka

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – original draft

    szarka@mail.bme.hu

    Affiliation Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary

Abstract

Plant UCPs are proved to take part in the fine-tuning of mitochondrial ROS generation. It has emerged that mitochondrion can be an important early source of intracellular ROS during plant-pathogen interaction thus plant UCPs must also play key role in this redox fine-tuning during the early phase of plant–pathogen interaction. On the contrary of this well-established assumption, the expression of plant UCPs and their activity has not been investigated in elicitor induced oxidative burst. Thus, the level of plant UCPs both at RNA and protein level and their activity was investigated and compared to AOX as a reference in Arabidopsis thaliana cells due to bacterial harpin treatments. Similar to the expression and activity of AOX, the transcript level of UCP4, UCP5 and the UCP activity increased due to harpin treatment and the consequential oxidative burst. The expression of UCP4 and UCP5 elevated 15-18-fold after 1 h of treatment, then the activity of UCP reached its maximal value at 4h of treatment. The quite rapid activation of UCP due to harpin treatment gives another possibility to fine tune the redox balance of plant cell, furthermore explains the earlier observed rapid decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential and consequent decrease of ATP synthesis after harpin treatment.

Introduction

The first stage of plant-pathogen interaction begins after the contact of pathogen with the plant surface, then it secretes different protein and non-protein effectors called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [1]. The translocation of PAMPs and the successful suppression of plant immune system that results in the penetration and establishment of the pathogen means that pathogen invasion was successful [24]. Parallel a complex signalling network is activated that resulted in the hypersensitive response (HR) and/or the induction of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) [1]. HR involves the activation of programmed cell death (PCD) and the accompanying oxidative burst [5,6]. Oxidative burst is also an early event of the incompatible plant-pathogen interactions [7]. Many enzymatic elements of the plant cells are involved in the generation of excess amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS), hence the activation of plasma membrane-localized NADPH-oxidases [8], cell wall peroxidases [9,10], and apoplastic amine, diamine, and polyamine oxidases [11]. The generation of ROS can be linked to different subcellular organelles, such as the mitochondria [12,13], chloroplasts, and peroxisomes [1,14]. Two different phases of the oxidative burst response can be recognized in incompatible interactions [15,16]. While the first phase is nonspecific and occurs right after the addition of either compatible or incompatible pathogens, the second phase occurs 1.5–3 h after the inoculation and it probably affects only the incompatible plant-pathogen interactions [17]. On one hand ROS generated during the oxidative burst play essential role in the defence again pathogen, since hydroxyl radical, can kill the pathogen directly [18], ROS can behave as secondary messengers through the redox control of transcription factors and establish the interaction with other signalling pathways, such as phosphorylation cascades [1921], they can also take part in the construction of physical barriers [22,23], furthermore they generate jasmonate-type signalling cyclic oxylipins [24] and phytoalexins, secondary metabolites to arrest pathogen growth [25].

On the other hand the level of ROS must be kept below a certain level otherwise they can cause severe cytotoxicity [26]. This nontoxic level of ROS for their signalling role can be achieved by the fine tuning of ROS production and scavenging pathways [27]. There are two different ways to regulate the amount of ROS in plant cells: 1. by the regulation of their production, 2. by scavenging them via different antioxidant mechanisms [28]. Since mitochondria represent one of the major sources of ROS during stress in plant cells [29] and the mitochondrion is likely an important player in plant PCD, including the HR [30] it has emerged that mitochondrion may be an important early source of intracellular ROS during plant-pathogen interaction, because of the so-called mitochondrial oxidative burst. Indeed, in bacterial elicitor treated Arabidopsis cell cultures it was shown that a large and early ROS burst is produced specifically from the mitochondrion, suggesting the electron transport chain (ETC) as the likely source of ROS [31]. This burst of mitochondrial ROS was associated with a decline in mitochondrial membrane potential and cellular ATP levels and the appearance of cytosol-localized cytochrome c. All these events preceded cell death by several hours [31]. At cellular level there are two different ways to regulate the amount of ROS in plant mitochondria: The first way to influence ROS production is to cause or prevent over-reduction of the ETC. The over-reduction of the ETC can be avoided by the means of several unique (plant mitochondria specific) ETC components such as the alternative rotenone resistant NAD(P)H dehydrogenases [32], alternative oxidase (AOX) [33] and the uncoupling proteins (UCPs) which can also be found in animal cells [34].

AOX is the best characterized from the above-mentioned unique plant mitochondrial components. It catalyses the direct oxidation of ubiquinone and reduction of O2 to H2O [33]. AOX also reduces the energy yield of respiration because it is non-proton pumping and bypasses proton-pumping complexes III and IV. Hence AOX can be called as a “safety electron valve” since one of its key roles is to prevent over-reduction of the ETC and allow the continued operation of glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle [35]. Accordingly, AOX maintains the redox balance of the ubiquinone pool, thus minimizing the formation of ROS from reduced ubiquinone [36,37]. AOX transcripts and activity are increased in response to pathogen attack [3841], freezing and chilling [42,43], or low phosphate availability [35,44,45].

Beyond AOX, plant mitochondria contain other “safety valves” in the form of UCPs. UCPs mediate the re-entry of protons–transported by the proton-pumping complexes of the mitochondrial ETC–into the matrix bypassing the ATP-synthetase, hence dissipating the electrochemical proton gradient as heat [34]. At least four different roles were attributed to the UCPs: the generation of metabolic (nonshivering) thermogenesis [46], the control of mitochondrial ROS production [47], response to different stress situations [29], and the regulation of energy metabolism [48]. According to these roles the upregulation of UCP genes in plants could be observed in cold [49,50] and heat [51] stress, drought, mechanical (wound) stress and in response to fungi, nematoda and RNA virus induced pathogen attack [5254]. A mild uncoupling delivered by plant UCPs results in the acceleration of respiration consequently it decreases the generation of superoxide, because on one hand it decreases the tissue O2 tension on the other hand it minimizes the steady-state concentration of reduced respiratory components [34]. Not surprisingly superoxide could activate UCP in potato mitochondria [55]. On the base of these observations a possible physiological role for plant UCPs is the fine tuning of mitochondrial membrane potential that is optimal for oxidative phosphorylation with minimal production of ROS to protect mitochondria from oxidative damage [34].

Although the role and activity of AOX was investigated in plant pathogen interaction thoroughly [13,35,39,5658], the role and activity of the other mentioned "safety valve", plant UCP is unknown in bacterial elicitor induced oxidative burst and HR up to date. Thus, both the expression at RNA and protein level and the activity of plant UCP was investigated in Arabidopsis thaliana cell cultures treated by harpin protein from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (HrpZpto).

Materials and methods

Materials

Murashige and Skoog medium, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), kinetin, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), triphenil-tetrazolium chloride (TTC), xylenol orange, EDTA, succinate, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS), Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP-40), hydroxylamine, sulphanilamide, α-naphthylamine, ampicillin, NP40, safranin, Salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM), kalium-cyanide (KCN), linoleic acid, fatty acid free bovine serum albumin (BSA), luminol, p-Coumaric acid, Carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP), were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. ProBond Purification System was purchased from Invitrogen. Amicon Ultra 30K Centrifugal Filter Units were purchased from Merck. IPTG was obtained from Duchefa Biochemie, cytochrome c was purchased from Fluka. Primary and secondary antibodies were purchased from Agrisera Antibodies. All other chemicals were of analytical or HPLC grade, and were purchased from Reanal, Hungary. Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit, GeneJET Plant RNA Purification Kit, and RevertAid First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit were obtained from Thermo Scientific; SensiFAST SYBR No-ROX Kit was purchased from Bioline.

Plant material

Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia) suspension cells were grown in culture medium containing 0.44% MS + Gamborg (Sigma-Aldrich); 3% Sucrose; 0.24 μg/ml 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid; 0.014 μg/ml Kinetin; pH 5.8 in a rotary shaker (120 rpm) at 22°C in the dark. Cells were subcultured weekly by a tenfold dilution [59].

Harpin production and purification

Harpin (HrpZpto) producing Escherichia coli line [60] was a generous gift from Dr. Alen Collmer (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA). The maintenance of the E. coli cell line and the harpin production were carried out as described earlier by our research group [41]. Harpin protein was purified by a hybrid method using Invitrogen ProBond Purification System, 5 mM MES (2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid) (pH 5.8) was used as final elution buffer [61]. The protein quality was verified by SDS-PAGE. The protein concentration was determined by Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit with BSA standards. Harpin solutions were stored at -20°C.

Harpin treatments

Harpin treatments were done on 4-day old Arabidopsis thaliana cell cultures. HrpZpto preparation or HrpZpto preparation and SHAM (Salicylhydroxamic acid) was added to the cells at a final concentration of 150 nM for HrpZpto and 1 mM for SHAM. The control cells were treated with the same volume of 5 mM MES (pH 5.8) or 5 mM MES (pH 5.8) and SHAM. To test the effect of ethanol, experiments were also carried out using the same amount (1:250 dilution) of ethanol. At the indicated time points, 15 ml of Arabidopsis thaliana cells were harvested by vacuum filtration and frozen in liquid nitrogen [62], then stored at -80°C until analysis.

Cell viability assay

Cell viability was determined by triphenil-tetrazolium chloride (TTC) reduction assay [63]. Briefly, 20 mg of TTC was dissolved in 1 ml of phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.5) and stored in the dark at 4°C until use. Arabidopsis thaliana cells (weighted) were transferred to a microfuge tube and washed with 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) then re-suspended in 980 μl of the same buffer and supplemented with TTC stock solution (20 μl) at a final concentration of 1.25 mM. The mixture was incubated in the dark for 1 h then it was centrifuged (16,000g, 2 min). The supernatant was discarded, and 1 ml of ethanol was added to dissolve the formed formazan salts. After 12 h of incubation, it was centrifuged (16,000g, 2 min) and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 485 nm. Cell viability was normalized to the freshly harvested, vacuum filtrated cell weight.

Superoxide anion generation assay

The detection of superoxide anion was carried out by the method of Unger et al. [64]. Superoxide was detected by the oxidation of hydroxylamine to nitrite. At the indicated time points, 135 μl of Arabidopsis thaliana cells were withdrawn and incubated with 135 μl of Na-phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.8) and 30 μl hydroxylamine (10 mM) in the dark. After 45 min of incubation the samples were centrifuged at 16,000g for 2 min and 100 μl of the supernatant was transferred to a 96-well microtiter plate. To measure the nitrite content of the samples, 100 μl of sulphanilamide (17 mM) and 100 μl of α-naphthylamine (7 mM) was added to each sample and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm. On the base of the following reaction: 2O2·–+ H+ + NH2OH → H2O2 + H2O + NO2, the concentration of O2·–was calculated according to the following equation 2[O2·–] = [NO2]. To verify that nitrite production was due to superoxide generated by the cells, a reaction mixture without hydroxylamine was also used.

Determination of hydrogen-peroxide

The production of hydrogen peroxide was determined by xylenol orange assay [65]. 1 ml of solution A (25 mM FeSO4, 25 mM (NH4)2SO4, and 2.5 M H2SO4) was added to 100 ml of solution B (125 μM xylenol orange and 100 mM sorbitol). 1 ml of Arabidopsis thaliana cell suspension was withdrawn and centrifuged at 16,000g for 1 min. 100 μl supernatant was added to 900 μl xylenol orange reagent (1 ml solution A + 100 ml solution B) immediately and incubated at room temperature for 45 min, finally the absorbance was measured at 560 nm. The formation of H2O2 was verified by the addition of catalase [9].

Analysis of gene expression

RNA was isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana cells by GeneJET Plant RNA Purification Kit. The first-strand cDNA synthesis was performed by Thermo Scientific RevertAid First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit. Oligo(dT)18 primer was used. Real-time PCR was performed by Thermo Scientific PikoReal real-time PCR, using SensiFAST SYBR No-ROX Kit with the primer pairs listed in Table 1. The heat program was the following: 95°C/3 min, 30 cycles of 95°C/30 s and 60°C/30 s. Mitosis protein YLS8 was used as housekeeping gene [66].

Isolation of mitochondria

Approximately 100 g of Arabidopsis thaliana cells were harvested by vacuum filtration. The cells were homogenized by a grinder. Mitochondria were isolated by differential and Percoll gradient centrifugation as described by Zsigmond et al. [70].

The determination of AOX and UCP activity

The activity of AOX was determined by a Hansatech Oxygraph at 22°C as described by Zsigmond et al. [71]. AOX activity was determined from 100 μg (protein) of freshly purified intact mitochondria.

The activity of UCP was determined by the method of Pastore et al. [72] and Vercesi et al. [73]. The mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ) was monitored by the fluorescence of safranin (ex.: 495 nm; em.: 586 nm). 100 μg (protein) of freshly prepared, intact mitochondria was added to 2 ml of reaction buffer (150 mM sucrose, 65 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 0.33 mM EGTA, 2.5 μM safranin, pH 7.2) and the fluorescence was followed until the baseline became stable, then succinate was added at the final concentration of 5 mM. 25 μl of fatty acid free BSA (20%) was added, to inhibit the UCP activity. The activity of UCP was calculated from the difference of fluorescence in the presence and in the absence of BSA. To ensure the maximal uncoupled state of mitochondria, FCCP (2 μM)—a potent mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation uncoupling agent—was added finally. The autofluorescence of every compound was also measured and data were normalized according.

Protein isolation and western blotting

Protein was isolated in RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 1% NP40, 0.1% SDS, pH 8) [74] supplemented with Plant protease inhibitor cocktail from Sigma-Aldrich. 20 μg of protein was separated by SDS-PAGE (12% running gel) and blotted to nitrocellulose membrane. To verify the homogeneity of the samples, Ponceau S staining was performed. The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBS-Tween buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0,05% Tween 20, pH 7.9) (1 h), then probed with primary antibodies (listed below) in 1% non-fat dry milk (dissolved in TBS-Tween buffer) overnight at 4°C. The secondary antibody (HRP conjugated, Goat anti-Rabbit by Proteintech Group) was added in 1% non-fat dry milk (dissolved in TBS-Tween buffer) and incubated for 1 h. To visualize the labelled proteins, ECL reagent (100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5, 0.2 mM Coumaric acid, 1,25 mM Luminol, 0,1% H2O2,) was used and the signal was detected by light sensitive film (AGFA). Actin was used as loading control.

The following antibodies were used: anti-UCP (Agrisera Antibodies, AS12 1850), anti-AOX1/2 (Agrisera Antibodies, AS04 054), anti-Actin (Agrisera Antibodies, AS13 2640), HRP-conjugated Goat anti-Rabbit (Proteintech Group, SA00001-2).

The densitometry of Western blot data was carried out by ImageJ software and normalized to actin as the reference protein.

Other methods

Protein concentration was determined by Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit with bovine serum albumin as standard, supplied with the kit. All data are expressed as means ± S.D. Statistical analyses (Student’s t test) were performed with SPSS version 13.0.1 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).

Results

The effect of HrpZpto treatment on the viability and ROS generation of Arabidopsis thaliana cells

The generation of huge amount of ROS is a typical hallmark and an early response to plant–pathogen interaction [1,5]. Accordingly, the typical signs of oxidative burst could be observed in Arabidopsis thaliana cells due to HrpZpto treatment. The level of superoxide anion reached its peak value (5.5-fold of the untreated control) after 30 min (Fig 1A). The maximum level of hydrogen-peroxide could be measured later, after 60 min (Fig 1B). The level of both ROS type decreased quickly, no elevated values could be observed 120 min post-treatment and no further ROS peak could be observed within 48 h of treatment (Fig 1A and 1B panel).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Effect of HrpZpto treatment on superoxide anion (A) and H2O2 (B) generation in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cells.

Arabidopsis suspension cells were treated with HrpZpto at the final concentration of 150 nM. At the indicated time points, samples were taken, and the generation of superoxide anion was followed by the oxidation of hydroxylamine to nitrite. The H2O2 content of the samples was determined by xylenol orange assay as described in Materials and methods. Samples, collected from each cell culture before treatments were indicated as zero time point. Value represents mean ± SD from three independent HrpZpto treatments. (Asterisk) Significant difference with respect to control (P<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210592.g001

Similar to our previous results, HrpZpto treatment caused no enhanced cell death (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Effect of HrpZpto treatment on cell viability of Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cells.

Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cells were treated with HrpZpto at the final concentration of 150 nM. At the indicated time points cell viability was determined by TTC reduction assay as described in Materials and methods. Cell viability of samples collected from each cell culture before treatments was regarded as 100%. Value represents mean ± SD from three independent HrpZpto treatments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210592.g002

The effect of HrpZpto on the level and activity of alternative oxidase and uncoupling protein

The excess ROS generation by mitochondrial electron transfer chain can be avoided by AOX and UCP, thus both the expression and the activity of plant UCP and AOX was investigated in control and HrpZpto treated Arabidopsis thaliana cells. The RNA level of AOX1a elevated together with the level of ROS and reached its maximal value (~3.3-fold of untreated control) after 60 min (Fig 3) then decreased to the basal level after 3 h of harpin treatment (Fig 3). Since Arabidopsis thaliana possesses five different AOX isoforms (AOX1a-AOX1d and AOX2) [75] the expression of the other four isoforms was also investigated. Similar to the expression of AOX1a the expression of AOX1d was also significantly elevated due to HrpZpto treatment. The time course of the elevation also showed similar pattern, it reached the maximal value (~27-fold of untreated control) after 60 min (Fig 3). The expression of the other isoforms was not affected by harpin treatment (Fig 3). Interestingly the level of AOX1a mRNA showed an increasing tendency by aging in both the treated and untreated cells (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Relative mRNA level of different AOX isoforms in control and harpin-treated Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cells.

Arabidopsis suspension cells were treated with HrpZpto at the final concentration of 150 nM. At the indicated time points, samples were taken, and total RNA was extracted. Quantitative RT-PCR was carried out by using specific primers designed for the coding sequences of AOX1a, AOX1b, AOX1c, AOX1d, AOX2 and mitosis protein YLS8 (housekeeping gene) genes as described in Materials and methods. The gene expression of the samples collected from each cell culture before treatments, was regarded as 1. Data are expressed as means ± SD from three independent HrpZpto treatments. (Asterisk) Significant difference with respect to control (P<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210592.g003

The expression of UCP4 and UCP5 elevated 15-18-fold after 1 h of treatment. Although the expression of both declined quite quickly it was still significantly elevated 4 and 6 h after the treatment (Fig 4). No changes could be observed in the expression of UCP1, UCP2 and UCP3 due to harpin treatment and the consequential oxidative burst (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Relative mRNA level of different UCP isoforms in control and harpin-treated Arabidopsis thaliana cells.

Arabidopsis suspension cells were treated with HrpZpto at the final concentration of 150 nM. At the indicated time points, samples were taken, and total RNA was extracted. The quantitative RT-PCR was carried out by using specific primers designed for the coding sequences of UCP1, UCP2, UCP3, UCP4, UCP5 and mitosis protein YLS8 (housekeeping gene) genes as described in Materials and methods. The gene expression of the samples collected from each cell culture before treatments, was regarded as 1. Data are expressed as means ± SD from three independent HrpZpto treatments. (Asterisk) Significant difference with respect to control (P<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210592.g004

In the next turn of our experiments the protein levels of AOX and UCP were investigated. Neither the level of AOX, nor the level of UCP changed remarkably due to harpin treatment (Fig 5). According to the gene expression of AOX (Fig 3) its protein level also showed increasing tendency by aging, significantly higher protein levels could be observed in the elder cell cultures (5–6 days old) than in the younger ones (3–4 days old) (Fig 5). This phenomenon in the protein and RNA level of UCP could not be observed (Fig 4 and Fig 5). On the contrary to the unchanged protein levels the activity of both AOX and UCP was elevated due to HrpZpto (150nM) treatment (Fig 6 panel A and B). The activity of AOX responded to the harpin treatment quickly (within 2h). It elevated approximately to 1.4-fold of the activity of the untreated control and reached its maximal value 12h after the harpin treatment with 1.7-fold of the untreated control then fell down to the control value at 48h (Fig 6 panel A).

thumbnail
Fig 5.

Relative protein level of AOX (A) and UCP (B) in control and harpin-treated Arabidopsis thaliana cells. Arabidopsis thaliana cells were treated with HrpZpto at the final concentration of 150 nM. At the indicated time points samples were taken, and total protein was extracted. Western blot was carried out by specific antibodies for AOX, UCP and Actin (loading control) as described in Materials and methods. The samples collected from each cell culture before treatments were indicated as time point 0. Data are expressed as means ± SD from three independent HrpZpto treatments. (Asterisk) Significant difference with respect to control (P<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210592.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6.

Effect of HrpZpto treatments on the activity of AOX (A) and UCP (B) in Arabidopsis thaliana cells. Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cells were treated with HrpZpto at the final concentration of 150 nM. At the indicated time points, samples were taken. The alternative oxidase (AOX) and uncoupling protein (UCP) activities were determined from freshly purified mitochondria from control and HrpZpto-treated Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cells as described in Materials and methods. The samples collected from each cell culture before treatments were indicated as time point 0. Data are expressed as means ± SD from three independent HrpZpto treatments. (Asterisk) Significant difference with respect to control (P<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210592.g006

Similar to the activity of AOX, the activity of UCP responded quite quickly to harpin treatment and to the consequent oxidative burst. A slightly elevated UCP activity (1.4-fold of the untreated control) could be measured as quickly as 2h after the treatment (Fig 6 panel B). UCP activity reached its maximal value 4h after the harpin treatment with 2.1-fold of the untreated control, then it descended to 1.5-fold at 6h (Fig 6 panel B). Finally, no difference could be measured in the UCP activity of harpin treated and non-treated Arabidopsis cells after 12h, 24h or 48h of harpin treatment (Fig 6 panel B).

The effect of HrpZpto on the rate of respiration

According to the higher AOX and UCP activities, higher respiration rate could be measured in HrpZpto (150nM) treated cells compared to the untreated controls (Fig 7). In line with the maximal AOX and UCP activity, the respiration reached its maximal rate (~1.5-fold elevation) 4h after the harpin treatment, (Fig 7.). The addition of SHAM (1mM) could decrease the rate of respiration through the inhibition of AOX (Fig 7.). However, the co-treatment of cells by SHAM (1mM) and HrpZpto (150nM) resulted in higher respiration than SHAM (1mM) treatment alone (Fig 7.) suggesting that a part of the elevation of the respiratory rate resulted from the enhanced activity of UCP in the initial phase (0h-6h) of harpin treatment.

thumbnail
Fig 7. Effect of HrpZpto treatments on the respiration of Arabidopsis thaliana cells.

Arabidopsis thaliana cells were treated with HrpZpto (150 nM) or SHAM (1 mM) or both (HrpZpto (150 nM) and SHAM (1 mM)). At the indicated time points, samples were taken. The respiration of the cells was determined by Clark-type oxygen electrode as described in Materials and methods. The samples collected from each cell culture before treatments were indicated as time point 0. Data are expressed as means ± SD from three independent HrpZpto treatments. (Asterisk) *Significant difference with respect to control; #Significant difference with respect to SHAM treatment, and between control and SHAM treatment indicated by caret mark (^) (P<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210592.g007

Discussion

The generation of huge amount of ROS is a typical hallmark and an early response of plant–pathogen interaction [1,5]. This so-called oxidative burst develops almost immediately after the contact of plant cells and pathogen-derived elicitors, such as harpin proteins [31,76]. Although ROS generated during the oxidative burst play essential role in the defense against pathogen, the uncontrolled overproduction of ROS is unequivocally harmful to the plant cell [5]. Approximately 60 min of exposure to H2O2 was enough to initiate irreversible processes which lead to cell death [77]. The elimination of ROS generated due to pathogen or elicitor protein treatment could clearly mitigate the rate of HR [77,78]. All these observations highlight the importance of the fine-tuning of redox balance in bacterial (elicitor) induced oxidative burst.

Plant UCPs are proved to take part in the fine tuning of mitochondrial ROS generation [34] furthermore it has emerged that the mitochondrion can be an important early source of intracellular ROS during plant-pathogen interaction [31] thus they can play key role in this redox fine-tuning during the early phase of plant–pathogen interaction. On the contrary of this well-established assumption the expression of plant UCPs at both RNA and protein level and their activity has not been investigated in bacterial elicitor induced oxidative burst up to date. To fill this scientific gap, we aimed at the investigation of the level of plant UCPs and their activity in Arabidopsis thaliana cells due to bacterial harpin (HrpZpto) treatments.

In concordance with the earlier observations of Desikan et al. [77,79], Reboutier et al. [76] and our group [41] the oxidative burst developed rapidly due to HrpZpto treatment (Fig 1). The role of plasma membrane-localized NADPH-oxidases [8], cell wall peroxidases [9,10], and apoplastic amine, diamine, and polyamine oxidases [11] was proposed in the generation of excess ROS in oxidative burst. Furthermore, on the base of mitochondrial ROS production in different stresses [29] and the involvement of mitochondria in plant PCD, including the HR [30] mitochondria can also be an important player of oxidative burst. Plant mitochondria also play an essential role in the elimination of ROS [29]. The over-reduction of the elements of plant mitochondrial ETC leads to excess ROS generation. This over-reduction of the ETC can be avoided by the means of several plant mitochondria specific ETC components such as AOX and UCP [29]. The role and the regulation of AOX in plant pathogen interaction is well established [30,35,39,5658], however almost nothing is known about the regulation and role of plant UCP in bacterial elicitor induced oxidative burst and HR up to date. Thus, both the expression at RNA and protein level and the activity of plant UCP and AOX (as a reference) was investigated in Arabidopsis thaliana cell cultures treated by the harpin protein HrpZpto.

According to the earlier observations [80] the RNA level of AOX1a elevated together with the level of ROS and reached its maximal value after 60 min of incubation time (Fig 3). Similar increase in AOX1 transcripts was reported in Nicotiana sylvestris after 1 hour of bacterial harpin treatment. The elevation of AOX1 transcripts was only transient in both cases, since it dropped down to the basal level after 3 h of harpin treatment (Fig 3), [35]. Since Arabidopsis thaliana possesses five different AOX isoforms (AOX1a-AOX1d and AOX2) [75] the expression of the other four isoforms was also investigated. Similar to the expression of AOX1a the expression of AOX1d was also significantly elevated due to HrpZpto treatment. The time course of the elevation of AOX1d transcript showed similar pattern (Fig 3). The expression of the other isoforms was not affected by harpin treatment (Fig 3). Our results underline the exceptional role of AOX1a in stress responses. The elevated mRNA level of AOX1d suggests that it can be a partner of AOX1a in elicitor induced oxidative burst. This assumption is further strengthened by the observation that AOX1d expression was increased in aox1a knockout mutants from Arabidopsis (even if it could not compensate fully for the lack of AOX1a) [81,82]. Interestingly the level of AOX1a mRNA showed an increasing tendency by the elapsed time in both the treated and untreated cells (Fig 3). It is assumed that the aging of cell cultures can be in the background of this phenomenon.

Similar to the expression of AOX1a and AOX1d, the expression of UCP4 and UCP5 elevated 15-18-fold after 1 h of harpin treatment. Although the expression of both declined quite quickly it was still significantly elevated 4 and 6 h after the treatment (Fig 4). There is no data on the expression of UCPs in biotic stress, but the expression of UCP5 was significantly elevated in high-light stress [83,84]. Furthermore, increased transcript level of UCP4 and UCP5 could be observed in Cd-exposed Arabidopsis seedlings [68]. No changes could be observed in the expression of UCP1, UCP2 and UCP3 due to harpin treatment and the consequential oxidative burst (Fig 4). In the next turn the protein levels of AOX and UCP were investigated. Neither of the level of AOX, nor the level of UCP changed remarkably due to harpin treatment (Fig 5.). According to the gene expression of AOX (Fig 3) its protein level showed increasing tendency by aging, significantly higher protein levels could be observed in the elder cell cultures (5–6 days old) than in the younger ones (3–4 days old) (Fig 5). This phenomenon in the protein and RNA level of UCP could not be observed (Fig 4 and Fig 5). On the contrary to the unchanged protein levels the activity of both AOX and UCP was elevated due to HrpZpto treatment (Fig 6 panel A and B). The activity of AOX responded to the harpin treatment quickly. It reached its maximal value 12h after the harpin treatment with 1.7-fold of the untreated control then decreased to the control value at 48h post-treatment (Fig 6 panel A). It is worth to note that very similar elevation and time course pattern of AOX derived respiration could be observed in harpin treated Nicotiana sylvestris [35]. On the base of the transcript and protein level it was concluded that AOX activity changes due to harpin treatment were essentially controlled at the posttranslational level [35]. Similar to the activity of AOX, the activity of UCP responded quite quickly to the harpin treatment and to the consequent oxidative burst. It reached its peak value 4h after the harpin treatment (Fig 6 panel B). The transcript level of UCP4 and UCP5 increased several fold due to harpin treatment and the consequential oxidative burst. We found that the non-stressed basic transcript level of UCP5 is approximately the 6% of the transcript level of "main" uncoupling protein, UCP1. As a consequence of the harpin treatment, it elevated approximately 18-fold, hence it can commensurate with the level of UCP1 (Fig 4). Unfortunately, the antibody used for the determination of UCP protein level is specific only for UCP1 and UCP2 [85] and does not bond to UCP4 or UCP5. Hence the protein level of UCP4 and 5 could not be determined. The elevated activity of UCP due to harpin treatment (Fig 6) suggests that the activity of UCP is regulated at transcriptional level or at transcriptional and post-translational levels in biotic stress. The latter assumption is supported by the observation that plant UCP activity is enhanced by ROS or hydroxynonenal [86]. This way the increased superoxide-anion level generated by the HrpZpto provoked oxidative burst could elevate the activity of UCP both directly and indirectly via the generation of 4-hydroxy-2- trans-nonenal [34].

According to the higher AOX and UCP activity higher respiration rate could be measured in HrpZpto treated cells compared to the untreated controls (Fig 7). Parallel with the maximal AOX and UCP activity, the respiration reached its maximal rate (~1.5-fold elevation) 4h after the harpin treatment, (Fig 7.). Elevated UCP and AOX activity was described to accompany by higher oxygen consumption and limited superoxide-anion generation [34,87,88]. The addition of SHAM could decrease the rate of respiration by the inhibition of AOX (Fig 7.). However, the co-treatment of cells by SHAM and HrpZpto resulted in higher respiration than SHAM treatment alone (Fig 7.) suggesting that a part of the elevation of the respiratory rate resulted from the enhanced activity of UCP.

The present experiments demonstrate for the first time that the transcript level of UCP4 and UCP5 and the activity of UCP are elevated due to biotic stress. Our results also reinforced the earlier observations on the involvement of plant mitochondria in harpin induced oxidative burst [31]. The role of mitochondria in harpin induced oxidative burst is further strengthened by the activation of AOX due to harpin treatment [31] (Figs 3 and 5 and 6). AOX as a part of the mitochondrial ETC can prevent the overreduction of the ubiquinol pool and reduce the mitochondrial generation of ROS. The elevation of the transcript level and activity of AOX in plant pathogen interaction was documented several times [13,35,39,5658]. Our results presented here help to understand the earlier observation of Krause and Durner [31]. In their pioneer work they found that harpin-induced defence responses are associated with accumulation of mitochondrial ROS and NO, and specifically with altered mitochondrial functions such as mitochondrial ROS production, and the decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential. The elevated level of UCP4, UCP5 transcripts and UCP activity explain the earlier observed rapid decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential and consequent decrease of ATP synthesis after harpin treatment [31]. The activation of this "safety valve" can contribute to the avoidance of the generation of H2O2 at a harmful level [87,89]. This way, the activation of UCP can prevent the plant cells from further superoxide-anion generation thus from fatal oxidative damage [31,90] in harpin induced oxidative burst. The quite rapid activation of UCP due to harpin treatment, described by our group herein, gives another possibility to fine tune the redox balance of plant cell.

Supporting information

S1 File. Data_set_elicitor.

Data set of all experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210592.s001

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Camejo D, Guzmán-Cedeño Á, Moreno A. Reactive oxygen species, essential molecules, during plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Physiol Biochem. Elsevier Masson; 2016;103: 10–23. pmid:26950921
  2. 2. Hogenhout SA, Van der Hoorn RAL, Terauchi R, Kamoun S. Emerging Concepts in Effector Biology of Plant-Associated Organisms. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2009;22: 115–122. pmid:19132864
  3. 3. Dodds PN, Rafiqi M, Gan PHP, Hardham AR, Jones DA, Ellis JG. Effectors of biotrophic fungi and oomycetes: Pathogenicity factors and triggers of host resistance. New Phytol. 2009;183: 993–1000. pmid:19558422
  4. 4. Kuhn H, Panstruga R. Introduction to a virtual special issue on phytopathogen effector proteins. New Phytol. 2014;202: 727–730. pmid:24716512
  5. 5. Apel K, Hirt H. REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES: Metabolism, Oxidative Stress, and Signal Transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55: 373–399. pmid:15377225
  6. 6. Hakmaoui A, Pérez-Bueno ML, García-Fontana B, Camejo D, Jiménez A, Sevilla F, et al. Analysis of the antioxidant response of Nicotiana benthamiana to infection with two strains of Pepper mild mottle virus. J Exp Bot. 2012;63: 5487–5496. pmid:22915745
  7. 7. Torres MA. ROS in biotic interactions. Physiol Plant. 2010;138: 414–429. pmid:20002601
  8. 8. Mur LAJ, Kenton P, Lloyd AJ, Ougham H, Prats E. The hypersensitive response; The centenary is upon us but how much do we know? J Exp Bot. 2008;59: 501–520. pmid:18079135
  9. 9. Bindschedler L V., Dewdney J, Blee KA, Stone JM, Asai T, Plotnikov J, et al. Peroxidase-dependent apoplastic oxidative burst in Arabidopsis required for pathogen resistance. Plant J. 2006;47: 851–863. pmid:16889645
  10. 10. Choi HW, Kim YJ, Lee SC, Hong JK, Hwang BK. Hydrogen Peroxide Generation by the Pepper Extracellular Peroxidase CaPO2 Activates Local and Systemic Cell Death and Defense Response to Bacterial Pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2007;145: 890–904. pmid:17905862
  11. 11. Allan AC. Two Distinct Sources of Elicited Reactive Oxygen Species in Tobacco Epidermal Cells. Plant Cell Online. 1997;9: 1559–1572. pmid:12237396
  12. 12. Garmier M, Priault P, Vidal G, Driscoll S, Djebbar R, Boccara M, et al. Light and oxygen are not required for harpin-induced cell death. J Biol Chem. 2007;282: 37556–37566. pmid:17951254
  13. 13. Cvetkovska M, Vanlerberghe GC. Alternative oxidase impacts the plant response to biotic stress by influencing the mitochondrial generation of reactive oxygen species. Plant, Cell Environ. 2013;36: 721–732. pmid:22978428
  14. 14. Karpinski S, Gabrys H, Mateo A, Karpinska B, Mullineaux PM. Light perception in plant disease defence signalling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003;6: 390–396. pmid:12873535
  15. 15. Baker CJ. Early Responses During Plant-Bacteria Interactions in Tobacco Cell Suspensions. Phytopathology. 1991;81: 1504.
  16. 16. Keppler LD. Active Oxygen Production During a Bacteria-Induced Hypersensitive Reaction in Tobacco Suspension Cells. Phytopathology. 1989;79: 974–978.
  17. 17. Baker CJ, Orlandi EW. Active Oxygen in Plant Pathogenesis. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1995;33: 299–321. pmid:18999963
  18. 18. Chen SX, Schopfer P. Hydroxyl-radical production in physiological reactions. A novel function of peroxidase. Eur J Biochem. 1999;260: 726–735. pmid:10103001
  19. 19. Kovtun Y, Chiu W-L, Tena G, Sheen J. Functional analysis of oxidative stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97: 2940–2945. pmid:10717008
  20. 20. Mou Z, Fan W, Dong X. Inducers of plant systemic acquired resistance Regulate NPR1 function through redox changes. Cell. 2003;113: 935–944. pmid:12837250
  21. 21. Kornas A, Kuźniak E, Ślesak I, Miszalski Z. The key role of the redox status in regulation of metabolism in photosynthesizing organisms. Acta Biochim Pol. 2010;57: 143–151. 20101977 [pii] pmid:20559571
  22. 22. Bradley DJ, Kjellbom P, Lamb CJ. Elicitor- and wound-induced oxidative cross-linking of a proline-rich plant cell wall protein: A novel, rapid defense response. Cell. 1992;70: 21–30. pmid:1623521
  23. 23. Hückelhoven R. Cell Wall–Associated Mechanisms of Disease Resistance and Susceptibility. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2007;45: 101–127. pmid:17352660
  24. 24. Montillet J-L. Fatty Acid Hydroperoxides and H2O2 in the Execution of Hypersensitive Cell Death in Tobacco Leaves. Plant Physiol. 2005;138: 1516–1526. pmid:15980200
  25. 25. Thoma I, Loeffler C, Sinha AK, Gupta M, Krischke M, Steffan B, et al. Cyclopentenone isoprostanes induced by reactive oxygen species trigger defense gene activation and phytoalexin accumulation in plants. Plant J. 2003;34: 363–375. pmid:12713542
  26. 26. Grant JJ, Loake GJ. Update on Signaling Role of Reactive Oxygen Intermediates and Cognate Redox Signaling in Disease Resistance 1. Plant Mol Biol. 2000;124: 21–29.
  27. 27. Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Gollery M, Van Breusegem F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. Elsevier Current Trends; 2004;9: 490–498. pmid:15465684
  28. 28. Szarka A, Tomasskovics B, Bánhegyi G. The ascorbate-glutathione-α-tocopherol triad in abiotic stress response. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13: 4458–4483. pmid:22605990
  29. 29. Møller IM. PLANT MITOCHONDRIA AND OXIDATIVE STRESS: Electron Transport, NADPH Turnover, and Metabolism of Reactive Oxygen Species. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way, P.O. Box 10139, Palo Alto, CA 94303–0139, USA; 2001;52: 561–591. pmid:11337409
  30. 30. Cvetkovska M, Vanlerberghe GC. Coordination of a mitochondrial superoxide burst during the hypersensitive response to bacterial pathogen in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant, Cell Environ. 2012;35: 1121–1136. pmid:22211396
  31. 31. Krause M, Durner J. Harpin inactivates mitochondria in Arabidopsis suspension cells. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004;17: 131–139. pmid:14964527
  32. 32. Geisler DA, Johansson FI, Svensson ÅS, Rasmusson AG. Antimycin A treatment decreases respiratory internal rotenone-insensitive NADH oxidation capacity in potato leaves. BMC Plant Biol. 2004;4: 8. pmid:15140267
  33. 33. Djajanegara I, Finnegan PM, Mathieu C, McCabe T, Whelan J, Day DA. Regulation of alternative oxidase gene expression in soybean. Plant Mol Biol. 2002;50: 735–742. pmid:12374304
  34. 34. Vercesi AE, Borecký J, Maia I de G, Arruda P, Cuccovia IM, Chaimovich H. Plant Uncoupling Mitochondrial Proteins. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57: 383–404. pmid:16669767
  35. 35. Vidal G, Ribas-Carbo M, Garmier M, Dubertret G, Rasmusson AG, Mathieu C, et al. Lack of Respiratory Chain Complex I Impairs Alternative Oxidase Engagement and Modulates Redox Signaling during Elicitor-Induced Cell Death in Tobacco. Plant Cell Online. 2007;19: 640–655. pmid:17277035
  36. 36. Purvis AC, Shewfelt RL. Does the alternative pathway ameliorate chilling injury in sensitive plant tissues? Physiol Plant. 1993;88: 712–718. pmid:28741777
  37. 37. Day D a, Wiskich JT. Regulation of alternative oxidase activity in higher plants. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1995;27: 379–385. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8595973 pmid:8595973
  38. 38. Lennon AM, Neuenschwander UH, Ribas-Carbo M, Giles L, Ryals JA, Siedow JN. The Effects of Salicylic Acid and Tobacco Mosaic Virus Infection on the Alternative Oxidase of Tobacco. Plant Physiol. 1997;115: 783–791. pmid:12223844
  39. 39. Simons BH. Enhanced Expression and Activation of the Alternative Oxidase during Infection of Arabidopsis with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato. Plant Physiol. 1999;120: 529–538. pmid:10364404
  40. 40. Ordog SH, Higgins VJ, Vanlerberghe GC. Mitochondrial alternative oxidase is not a critical component of plant viral resistance but may play a role in the hypersensitive response. Plant Physiol. 2002;129: 1858–65. pmid:12177499
  41. 41. Czobor Á, Hajdinák P, Szarka A. Rapid ascorbate response to bacterial elicitor treatment in Arabidopsis thaliana cells. Acta Physiol Plant. 2017;39: 62.
  42. 42. Vanlerberghe GC, McIntosh L. Lower Growth Temperature Increases Alternative Pathway Capacity and Alternative Oxidase Protein in Tobacco. Plant Physiol. 1992;100: 115–119. pmid:16652932
  43. 43. Gonzàlez-Meler MA, Ribas-Carbo M, Giles L, Siedow JN. The Effect of Growth and Measurement Temperature on the Activity of the Alternative Respiratory Pathway. Plant Physiol. 1999;120: 765–772. pmid:10398711
  44. 44. Parsons HL, Yip JY, Vanlerberghe GC. Increased respiratory restriction during phosphate-limited growth in transgenic tobacco cells lacking alternative oxidase. Plant Physiol. 1999;121: 1309–20. pmid:10594118
  45. 45. Juszczuk IM, Wagner AM, Rychter AM. Regulation of alternative oxidase activity during phosphate deficiency in bean roots (Phaseolus vulgaris). Physiol Plant. 2001;113: 185–192. pmid:12060295
  46. 46. Nicholls DG, Rial E. A history of the first uncoupling protein, UCP1. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1999;31: 399–406. pmid:10653469
  47. 47. Skulachev VP. Role of uncoupled and non-coupled oxidations in maintenance of safely low levels of oxygen and its one-electron reductants. Q Rev Biophys. 1996;29: 169–202. pmid:8870073
  48. 48. Jarmuszkiewicz W, Woyda-Ploszczyca A, Antos-Krzeminska N, Sluse FE. Mitochondrial uncoupling proteins in unicellular eukaryotes. Biochim Biophys Acta—Bioenerg. 2010;1797: 792–799. pmid:20026010
  49. 49. Nantes IL, Fagian MM, Catisti R, Arruda P, Maia IG, Vercesi AE. Low temperature and aging-promoted expression of PUMP in potato tuber mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 1999;457: 103–106. pmid:10486573
  50. 50. Nogueira FTS, De Rosa VE, Menossi M, Ulian EC, Arruda P. RNA expression profiles and data mining of sugarcane response to low temperature. Plant Physiol. 2003;132: 1811–24. pmid:12913139
  51. 51. Swidzinski J a, Sweetlove LJ, Leaver CJ. A custom microarray analysis of gene expression during programmed cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2002;30: 431–446. pmid:12028573
  52. 52. van Wees SCM, Chang H-S, Zhu T, Glazebrook J. Characterization of the Early Response of Arabidopsis to Alternaria brassicicola Infection Using Expression Profiling[w]. Plant Physiol. 2003;132: 606–617. pmid:12805591
  53. 53. Vercauteren I, Van Der Schueren E, Van Montagu M, Gheysen G. Arabidopsis thaliana genes expressed in the early compatible interaction with root-knot nematodes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2001;14: 288–99. pmid:11277426
  54. 54. Whitham SA, Quan S, Chang HS, Cooper B, Estes B, Zhu T, et al. Diverse RNA viruses elicit the expression of common sets of genes in susceptible Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Plant J. 2003;33: 271–283. pmid:12535341
  55. 55. Considine MJ, Goodman M, Echtay KS, Laloi M, Whelan J, Brand MD, et al. Superoxide stimulates a proton leak in potato mitochondria that is related to the activity of uncoupling protein. J Biol Chem. 2003;278: 22298–22302. pmid:12672801
  56. 56. Lacomme C, Roby D. Identification of new early markers of the hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 1999;459: 149–153. pmid:10518009
  57. 57. Amirsadeghi S, McDonald AE, Vanlerberghe GC. A glucocorticoid-inducible gene expression system can cause growth defects in tobacco. Planta. 2007;226: 453–463. pmid:17333253
  58. 58. Vanlerberghe GC. Alternative oxidase: A mitochondrial respiratory pathway to maintain metabolic and signaling homeostasis during abiotic and biotic stress in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14: 6805–6847. pmid:23531539
  59. 59. Hajdinák P, Czobor Á, Lőrincz T, Szarka A. The Problem of Glutathione Determination: a Comparative Study on the Measurement of Glutathione from Plant Cells. Period Polytech Chem Eng. 2018;
  60. 60. Preston G. The HrpZ Proteins of Pseudomonas syringae pvs. syringae, glycinea, and tomato Are Encoded by an Operon Containing Yersinia ysc Homologs and Elicit the Hypersensitive Response in Tomato but not Soybean. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 1995;8: 717. pmid:7579616
  61. 61. Kvitko BH, Ramos AR, Morello JE, Oh HS, Collmer A. Identification of harpins in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, which are functionally similar to HrpK1 in promoting translocation of type III secretion system effectors. J Bacteriol. 2007;189: 8059–8072. pmid:17873033
  62. 62. Desikan R. Harpin Induces Activation of the Arabidopsis Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases AtMPK4 and AtMPK6. Plant Physiol. 2001;126: 1579–1587. pmid:11500556
  63. 63. Castro-Concha LA, Escobedo RM, Miranda-Ham MDL. Measurement of cell viability in in vitro cultures. Methods in molecular biology. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2006. pp. 71–6.
  64. 64. Unger C, Kleta S, Jandl G, Tiedemann A V. Suppression of the defence-related oxidative burst in bean leaf tissue and bean suspension cells by the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea. J Phytopathol. Blackwell Verlag GmbH; 2005;153: 15–26.
  65. 65. Wolff SP. Ferrous ion oxidation in presence of ferric ion indicator xylenol orange for measurement of hydroperoxides. Methods Enzymol. Academic Press; 1994;233: 182–189.
  66. 66. Remans T, Smeets K, Opdenakker K, Mathijsen D, Vangronsveld J, Cuypers A. Normalisation of real-time RT-PCR gene expression measurements in Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to increased metal concentrations. Planta. 2008;227: 1343–1349. pmid:18273637
  67. 67. Escobar MA, Franklin KA, Svensson AS, Salter MG, Whitelam GC, Rasmusson AG. Light regulation of the Arabidopsis respiratory chain. Multiple discrete photoreceptor responses contribute to induction of type II NAD(P)H dehydrogenase genes. Plant Physiol. American Society of Plant Biologists; 2004;136: 2710–2721. pmid:15333756
  68. 68. Keunen E, Jozefczak M, Remans T, Vangronsveld J, Cuypers A. Alternative respiration as a primary defence during cadmium-induced mitochondrial oxidative challenge in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ Exp Bot. Elsevier; 2013;91: 63–73.
  69. 69. Thirkettle-Watts D, McCabe TC, Clifton R, Moore C, Finnegan PM, Day DA, et al. Analysis of the alternative oxidase promoters from soybean. Plant Physiol. American Society of Plant Biologists; 2003;133: 1158–69. pmid:14551329
  70. 70. Zsigmond L, Tomasskovics B, Deák V, Rigó G, Szabados L, Bánhegyi G, et al. Enhanced activity of galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase and ascorbate-glutathione cycle in mitochondria from complex III deficient Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2011;49: 809–815. pmid:21601466
  71. 71. Zsigmond L, Rigo G, Szarka A, Szekely G, Otvos K, Darula Z, et al. Arabidopsis PPR40 Connects Abiotic Stress Responses to Mitochondrial Electron Transport. Plant Physiol. American Society of Plant Biologists; 2008;146: 1721–1737. pmid:18305213
  72. 72. Trono D, Soccio M, Mastrangelo AM, De Simone V, Di Fonzo N, Pastore D. The transcript levels of two plant mitochondrial uncoupling protein (pUCP)-related genes are not affected by hyperosmotic stress in durum wheat seedlings showing an increased level of pUCP activity. Biosci Rep. 2006;26: 251–261. pmid:16855867
  73. 73. Costa ADT, Nantes IL, Ježek P, Leite A, Arruda P, Vercesi AE. Plant uncoupling mitochondrial protein activity in mitochondria isolated from tomatoes at different stages of ripening. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1999;31: 527–533. pmid:10653480
  74. 74. Balogh T, Lőrincz T, Stiller I, Mandl J, Bánhegyi G, Szarka A. The Level of ALR is Regulated by the Quantity of Mitochondrial DNA. Pathol Oncol Res. Springer Netherlands; 2016;22: 431–437. pmid:26584568
  75. 75. Polidoros AN, Mylona P V., Arnholdt-Schmitt B. Aox gene structure, transcript variation and expression in plants. Physiol Plant. 2009;137: 342–353. pmid:19781002
  76. 76. Reboutier D, Frankart C, Briand J, Biligui B, Laroche S, Rona J-P, et al. The HrpN(ea) harpin from Erwinia amylovora triggers differential responses on the nonhost Arabidopsis thaliana cells and on the host apple cells. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007;20: 94–100. pmid:17249426
  77. 77. Desikan R, Reynolds A, Hancock JT, Neill SJ. Harpin and hydrogen peroxide both initiate programmed cell death but have differential effects on defence gene expression in Arabidopsis suspension cultures. Biochem J. 1998;330: 115–120. pmid:9461499
  78. 78. Levine A, Tenhaken R, Dixon R, Lamb C. H2O2 from the oxidative burst orchestrates the plant hypersensitive disease resistance response. Cell. 1994;79: 583–93. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7954825 pmid:7954825
  79. 79. Desikan R, Hancock JT, Neill SJ, Coffey MJ, Jones OT. Elicitor-induced generation of active oxygen in suspension cultures of Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem Soc Trans. 1996;24: 199S. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8736857 pmid:8736857
  80. 80. Cvetkovska M, Vanlerberghe GC. Alternative oxidase impacts the plant response to biotic stress by influencing the mitochondrial generation of reactive oxygen species. Plant, Cell Environ. 2013;36: 721–732. pmid:22978428
  81. 81. Strodtkötter I, Padmasree K, Dinakar C, Speth B, Niazi PS, Wojtera J, et al. Induction of the AOX1D Isoform of Alternative Oxidase in A. thaliana T-DNA Insertion Lines Lacking Isoform AOX1A Is Insufficient to Optimize Photosynthesis when Treated with Antimycin A. Mol Plant. 2009;2: 284–297. pmid:19825614
  82. 82. Kühn K, Yin G, Duncan O, Law SR, Kubiszewski-Jakubiak S, Kaur P, et al. Decreasing Electron Flux through the Cytochrome and/or Alternative Respiratory Pathways Triggers Common and Distinct Cellular Responses Dependent on Growth Conditions. Plant Physiol. 2015;167: 228–250. pmid:25378695
  83. 83. Yoshida K, Noguchi K. Differential gene expression profiles of the mitochondrial respiratory components in illuminated arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;50: 1449–1462. pmid:19567377
  84. 84. Yoshida K, Watanabe C, Kato Y, Sakamoto W, Noguchi K. Influence of chloroplastic photo-oxidative stress on mitochondrial alternative oxidase capacity and respiratory properties: A case study with arabidopsis yellow variegated 2. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008;49: 592–603. pmid:18296449
  85. 85. https://www.agrisera.com/en/artiklar/ucp-uncoupling-protein-2.html. Agrisera Antibodies. In: Last accessed: 2018.09.21.
  86. 86. Smith AMO, Ratcliffe RG, Sweetlove LJ. Activation and Function of Mitochondrial Uncoupling Protein in Plants. J Biol Chem. 2004;279: 51944–51952. pmid:15456782
  87. 87. Paventi G, Pastore D, Bobba A, Pizzuto R, Di Pede S, Passarella S. Plant uncoupling protein in mitochondria from aged-dehydrated slices of Jerusalem artichoke tubers becomes sensitive to superoxide and to hydrogen peroxide without increase in protein level. Biochimie. 2006;88: 179–188. pmid:16181725
  88. 88. Ito-Inaba Y, Hida Y, Inaba T. What is critical for plant thermogenesis? Differences in mitochondrial activity and protein expression between thermogenic and non-thermogenic skunk cabbages. Planta. 2009;231: 121–130. pmid:19859730
  89. 89. Brandalise M, Maia IG, Borecký J, Vercesi AE, Arruda P. Overexpression of Plant Uncoupling Mitochondrial Protein in Transgenic Tobacco Increases Tolerance to Oxidative Stress. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2003;35: 203–209. pmid:13678271
  90. 90. Xie Z, Chen Z. Harpin-induced hypersensitive cell death is associated with altered mitochondrial functions in tobacco cells. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000;13: 183–190. pmid:10659708