Identification and functional characterization of CD8+ T regulatory cells in type 1 diabetes patients

Marsha Pellegrino; Antonino Crinò; Manuela M. Rosado; Alessandra Fierabracci

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210839

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease where autoreactive T lymphocytes destroy pancreatic beta cells. We previously reported a defect in CD4⁺ Tregs cell proliferation and reduced CD4⁺ Tregs PD-1 expression in patients. Another ‘memory-like’ regulatory subset, CD8⁺ Tregs, evaluated as CD8⁺CD25⁺FOXP3⁺, has recently raised interest for their effective suppressive activity. Different CD8⁺ T cell populations, their proliferation capacity and expression of PD-1 molecule were evaluated by flow-cytometer analysis in newly diagnosed, long-term Type 1 diabetes patients compared to healthy normal donors. Under basal conditions, CD8⁺ Tregs and CD8⁺ Teffs were seemingly represented among study groups while there was evidence of diminished expression of PD-1 in Teff subsets of long-term patients. After 3 days of PMA/ionomycin stimulation, patients CD8⁺ Tregs showed decreased percentage in respect to control group. CD8⁺ Teffs were instead increased in long-term diabetics versus controls. PD-1⁺CD8⁺ Tregs were represented at a much lower percentage in long-term diabetic patients, in respect to controls. Importantly, patients CD8⁺ Tregs and CD8⁺ Teffs presented a significant proliferation defect in respect to the control group. In conclusion, our study indicates that a defect of CD8⁺ Tregs is observed in diabetics. This subset could thus represent a novel target of immunotherapy in patients.

Citation: Pellegrino M, Crinò A, Rosado MM, Fierabracci A (2019) Identification and functional characterization of CD8⁺ T regulatory cells in type 1 diabetes patients. PLoS ONE 14(1): e0210839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839

Editor: Keun Seok Seo, Mississippi State University, UNITED STATES

Received: October 29, 2018; Accepted: January 2, 2019; Published: January 16, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Pellegrino et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca corrente RC201702P003967 (AF). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (Type 1 diabetes, T1D) is due to the autoimmune destruction of insulin producing pancreatic islet beta cells by autoreactive effector T lymphocytes [1, 2]. Within its multifactorial pathogenesis, a close interaction of genetic background and environmental agents plays a major role. Establishment of thymic central tolerance in the perinatal age leads to elimination of autoreactive clones. Nevertheless, autoreactive T cells escape to thymic deletion and survive in the circulating peripheral blood (reviewed (rev) in [3, 2]); this implies that the immune system homeostasis is also contributed by peripheral tolerance. Thus, both altered central and peripheral tolerance mechanisms affect the onset and progression of the clinical disease; in particular this implies an altered function of T regulatory cells (Tregs) that play a fundamental role in controlling host immunity to self- or non-self-proteins and infectious agents [2,4].

To date the role of CD4⁺CD25⁺ Tregs in controlling activation of effector autoreactive T lymphocytes in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders still requires to be fully elucidated [2,5]. T1D studies in particular yielded conflicting results regarding their frequency and/or number as well as their suppressive function in T1D patients. Indeed, observed discrepancies across different investigations could be due to diverse biological materials employed such as lymphocytes obtained from the peripheral blood or lymph nodes, even from patients at different stage of disease (onset versus long-term) or of different ethnic populations [2].

We recently provided evidence for defects of CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127^low Tregs in the peripheral blood of T1D patients [2]. Their percentages were significantly higher in basal conditions while that of T effector cells (Teffs) significantly lower in patients than in controls. Tregs were functional in patients as Tregs ratio to Teffs was higher in patients than in controls. Further Treg subsets were characterized based on the expression of programmed-cell death (PD-1). PD-1 or CD279 and its ligand PDL-1 appear to play a significant effect on immune tolerance and cell death. Regarding PD-1/PDL-1 pathway, its regulation affects the function of several immunotypes including Tregs [2,6]. In our study although percentages of total PD-1⁺, PD-1^low and PD-1^high expressing Tregs were similar in patients and in controls in basal conditions, lower Tregs proliferation was observed upon anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation in diabetics [2]. Furthermore, percentages of total PD-1⁺, PD-1^low and PD-1^high expressing Tregs subpopulations were lower in diabetics [2].

Recently, investigations aimed to identify and characterize other Tregs populations beside CD4⁺CD25⁺. In this regard, CD8⁺ T cells are recognized as adaptive immunological suppressive effectors in several conditions, i.e. cancer, transplantation, host defense and even autoimmune diseases (rev in [4]). Authors have described also CD8⁺ Tregs, both in mice and humans [7], that remained neglected for long time due to the lack of available unique markers [8]. Nevertheless, several subsets of CD8⁺ Tregs were depicted based on the expression of CD25, CD56 [9], FoxP3, CXCR3, CD122, CD38, CD8αα, CD45RA, CD45RO, LAG-3 and/or HLA-G as well as the absence of CD28 expression and CD127 (rev in [10, 11]). Several mechanisms are involved in CD8⁺ Tregs suppressive function: release of immunosuppressive factors and inhibitory cytokines such as IL-10 or direct lysis of target cells through cell-cell contact [12]. Furthermore, CD39⁺CD26^-CD8⁺ Tregs release nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase 2 containing extracellular vesicles that act by reducing phosphorylation of the T cell receptor (TCR)-associated kinase ZAP70 through reactive oxygen species (ROS) induction. Indeed, CD8⁺ Tregs were able to regulate general immune responses as well as specific autoimmune T cells keeping under control the normal T cell repertoire in the periphery [13].

Few evidences are reported so far for alterations of CD8⁺ suppressive T cells in human autoimmune diseases i.e. rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), ankylosing spondylitis, systemic sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, primary biliary cirrhosis, experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and Graves’ disease (rev in [14]). Regarding T1D, suppressive CD8⁺ subsets were indeed able to prevent and even reverse T1D in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice [15] where, in particular, the subset of CD8⁺PD-1⁺ Tregs, expressing the β subunit of IL-2 receptor CD122 instead of CD25, revealed to be functional in ameliorating disease [16]. In a trial employing a modified anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) [hOKT3ɣ1 (Ala-Ala)] in T1D patients, Bisikirska et al (2005) [17] originally depicted in responders an increased number and activation of CD8⁺ T cells upon treatment. In particular, anti-CD3 mAb induced the expansion of CD8⁺CD25⁺FoxP3⁺CTLA4⁺ Tregs. This regulatory population was able to inhibit, through contact-dependent mechanism, CD4⁺ T cell responses to the mAb as well as to antigen [17].

Complex interactions are postulated to occur between different subsets of Tregs in order to maintain a balance on the level of tolerance to self thus avoiding altered immunosuppression [18]. It is of interest to note that, specifically in NOD mice, CD4⁺ Th cells and CD4⁺CD25⁺ Tregs would exert opposite roles in the development of memory-like autoregulatory CD8⁺ T cells [18]. To this extent, CD4⁺ Th cells and CD8⁺ Teffs would recruit functional FoxP3⁺ Tregs that, in turn, halt both effector and memory autoregulatory CD8⁺ T cells, thus affecting autoantigen presentation. Current knowledge from NOD mice suggests that autoregulatory CD8⁺ cells arise spontaneously from non-pathogenic low-avidity clones and halt autoantigen-loaded antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in pancreatic lymph nodes [15].

In the light of the foregoing, the aim of this study was to evaluate percentages of CD8⁺ Tregs in the peripheral blood of T1D patients in different phases of disease at onset and during long-term disease in comparison with healthy subjects. Furthermore, we functionally assess these subsets based on the expression of PD-1 molecule.

Materials and methods

Subjects

The patient group consisted of 18 newly diagnosed (ND) and 13 long-standing (long-term, LT) T1D patients. To the ND group of patients belong those subjects recruited at the time of T1D diagnosis, while those subjects with at least 10 years of disease belong to the group of LT patients. Patients were recruited at the Department of Endocrinology at Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital (OPBG) over the past five years. Patients’ sera were tested for diabetes-related autoantibodies (AAbs) i.e. glutamic acid decarboxylase isoform 65 (GADA), protein tyrosine phosphatase insulinoma-associated antigen 2 (IA2) and insulin (IAA) AAbs by radioimmunoassay (RIA), thyroglobulin (Tg), thyroperoxidase (TPO) and tissue transglutaminase (tTGA) AAbs by chemiluminescence (ADVIA Centaur analyzer: Siemens Healthcare, Germany), parietal cell (PCA), adrenal cortex (ACA) and islet cell AAbs by indirect immunofluorescence (IFL). Mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value of patients was 101.3 mmol/mol for newly diagnosed and 66.5 mmol/mol for long-term subjects (cut-off value 48 mmol/mol), indicating a poor metabolic control, which required insulin therapy adjustments. The control group of 20 HD, without family history for autoimmune diseases and no circulating AAbs, was recruited from the OPBG Blood Transfusion Division. All controls in respect to patients were matched for sex, age, ethnic and geographical origin. Enrolled individuals either patients or controls were unrelated. All subjects were recruited in the investigation after obtaining written informed consent. The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the OPBG, which regulates the use of human samples for experimental studies. The written informed consent for the children was obtained from the next of kin. The participants’ consent was recorded using a paper-based inventory system. The IRB approved the consent procedure (1385_OPBG_2017, 14 June 2017).

Cell preparation

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were separated by Ficoll-Hypaque (Histopaque, Sigma-Aldrich Chemical: St Louis, MO, USA) from sodium heparinized venous blood samples (5–10 mL). Samples were cryo-preserved in liquid-nitrogen according to standard procedures [2,19].

Stimulation of PBMC with phorbol myristate (PMA)-ionomycin

Liquid-nitrogen frozen PBMC from healthy donors and from T1D patients were thawed in complete RPMI medium (Gibco RPMI 1640 Medium, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone, South Logan, UT, USA), L-glutamine (2mM) (EuroClone S.p.A., MI, Italy) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (pen/strep) (EuroClone) according to established protocols [19] and centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 5 minutes at room temperature (RT). Cells were cultured in 48 well plates (Falcon, Corning Incorporated, NY, USA), 1.5×10⁶ cells per well in complete RPMI. Subsequently, cells were stimulated with the addition of 7.5 ng/ml phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) (Calbiochem, Merk, Darmstadt, Germany) and 0.8μg/ml Ionomycin (IONO) (Sigma Aldrich, Merk). The cells were incubated for three to five days at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO₂. At the end of the incubation period, cells were harvested from culture plates and washed by centrifugation 1200 rpm for 5 minutes in PBS at RT. Subsequently cells were stained for FACS analysis as described below.

Proliferation assay

In order to assess cell proliferation, before stimulation, PBMC were previously labeled with 0.1 μg/ml final concentration of 5-chloromethyl fluorescein diacetate (CMFDA) (CellTracker, Invitrogen, Molecular Probes, OR, USA) for 30 minutes at 37°C, washed once by centrifugation at 1200 rpm for 5 minutes at RT and cultured at 7.5x10⁵ cells per well in 96 well flat-bottom plates. Subsequently, the cells were stimulated as described above and incubated for three and five days at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO_2. Cell proliferation was assessed at three and five days by flow cytometry following the staining procedure described below.

Flow cytometry analysis (FACS)

In order to analyze untreated PBMC of HD, ND and LT patients under basal conditions, liquid-nitrogen frozen PBMC were thawed in complete RPMI medium and washed once by centrifugation at 1200 rpm for 5 minutes at RT. A total of 1.5×10⁶ cells per sample were subsequently used for antibodies staining procedure. To identify T cell subsets, the cells were stained for 20 minutes at 4°C with the following antibodies: Brilliant Ultraviolet 737 (BUV737) conjugated mouse anti-human CD3 (Clone UCHT1; 1:40 dilution; BD Biosciences, CA, USA); Brilliant Violet 421 (BV421) conjugated mouse anti-human CD25 (Clone M-A251; 1:40 dilution; BD); allophycocyanin (APC) conjugated mouse anti-human CD8 (Clone RPA-T8; 1:10 dilution; BD) and R-phycoerythrin-Cyanine7 (PE-Cy7) conjugated mouse anti-human CD279 (PD-1) (Clone J105; 1:40 dilution; eBioscience, ThermoFisher Scientific). At the end of the incubation period, cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (EuroClone) 2% FBS by centrifugation at 1200 rpm for 5 minutes at RT. Subsequently, cells underwent procedure for intracellular FoxP3 staining using PE conjugated mouse anti-human FoxP3 antibody (Clone 259D/C7, BD) according to manufactures’ protocol (Human FoxP3 Buffer Set, BD). Based on available literature CD8⁺CD25⁺FoxP3⁺ cells were identified as CD8⁺ Tregs and CD8⁺CD25^-FoxP3^- cells as CD8⁺Teffs [10, 20]. PD-1⁺ cells within the total gate of CD8⁺ Tregs and Teff were identified as CD8⁺ Treg PD-1⁺ cells and CD8⁺ Teff PD-1⁺ cells.

The same procedure was used for the analysis of CD8⁺ Tregs and CD8⁺ Teffs after three days of PMA/ionomycin stimulation. Cells were stained according to the established protocol described above.

To assess cell proliferation of CMFDA labeled CD8⁺ Tregs and CD8⁺ Teffs, an alternative antibody staining was used (vide infra), according to literature [19], after three and five days of PMA/ionomycin stimulation. PBMC were harvested from culture plates and washed by centrifugation at 1200 rpm for 5 minutes at RT in PBS. Subsequently, cells were stained for 20 minutes at 4°C with the following antibodies: BUV737 mouse anti-human CD3 (Clone UCHT1; 1:40 dilution; BD), BV421 mouse anti-human CD25 (Clone M-A251; 1:40 dilution; BD), APC mouse anti-human CD8 (Clone RPA-T8; 1:10 dilution; BD), PE-Cyanine7 mouse anti-human CD279 (PD-1) (Clone J105; 1:40 dilution; eBioscience, ThermoFisher Scientific), PE mouse anti-human CD127 (Clone HIL-7R-M21; 1:40 dilution; BD). Afterwards, cells were washed once by centrifugation at 1200 rpm 5 minutes at RT in PBS 2% FBS. Following this staining procedure, CD8⁺CD25⁺CD127^low were depicted as CD8⁺ Tregs and CD8⁺CD25^-CD127^high were indicated as CD8⁺ Teffs.

Data were acquired by flow-cytometer Fortessa X-20 analyzer (Becton and Dickinson (BD), Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and analyzed by FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences: San Jose, CA, USA). Dead cells were excluded from the analysis by side/forward scatter gating (S1 Fig). Fifty thousand lymphocytes per sample were analyzed.

Correlation of main subsets analyzed and HbA1c

In evaluating the functional significance of divergences observed relative to the immune cell subsets under study in HD and T1D patients, a correlation analysis was performed to investigate the relation between the percentages of these subsets and relative HbA1c (mmol/mol) levels, which are indicative of the metabolic control, in both ND and LT T1D patients.

Statistical analysis

Due to unfeasibility of concurrent intracellular FoxP3 and CMFDA staining, out of the total group of T1D patients 9 ND and 10 LT were dedicated to the intracellular FoxP3 study while 9 ND and 9 LT were used for the CMFDA proliferation assay.

Differences among the various cell populations analyzed between healthy donors, newly diagnosed and long-term patients were tested for statistical significance with the One-way analysis of variance Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s Multiple Comparison post-test. The results were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software version number 5.00 (GraphPad Software: San Diego, CA, USA). A result with p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The correlation coefficients between percentages of subsets analyzed and metabolic parameter HbA1c was evaluated with Spearman test.

Results

Study population

Within the group of ND and LT T1D patients of the present investigation, the mean actual age of ND T1D patients was 10.8 years (ranging from 5 to 14 years; 11 males, 7 females). The mean age at disease onset was 7.7 years (ranging from 6 to 10 years). The mean actual age of LT T1D patients was 23.6 years (ranging from 20 to 30 years; 6 males, 7 females) and the mean duration of the disease was 13.8 years (ranging from 11 to 19 years). The mean age of the HD controls was 23 years (ranging from 18 to 30 years). Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. In addition to T1D (Table 1), 1 newly diagnosed patient has developed autoimmune thyroid disease (AT). The same patient presented associated celiac disease (CD) and no other pathologies were found in the ND group of patients. Further, in addition to T1D (Table 2), 5 long-term patients have developed also AT (autoimmune polyglandular syndrome Type 3 variant, APS3v); of these 3 were affected by Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT), confirmed by the presence of circulating Tg and TPO AAbs and echography pattern of diffuse hypoechogenicity, one patient had developed HT and vitiligo and one Basedow’s disease.

Download:

Table 1. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and metabolic characteristics of the ND T1D patients recruited for the study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.t001

Download:

Table 2. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and metabolic characteristics of the LT T1D patients recruited for the study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.t002

Analysis of CD8⁺ Treg and CD8⁺ Teff cell subsets and their PD-1 expression under basal conditions

Similar frequencies of CD8⁺ Treg and CD8⁺ Teff subsets in PBMC of T1D patients and controls.

Under basal conditions, percentages of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ subsets showed no difference in the ND and LT T1D patients versus control subjects (Fig 1A, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.5954; 1b, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.4756). The percentage of CD8⁺CD25⁺ cells was significantly lower in LT T1D patients than in controls (Fig 1C, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0144). The populations corresponding to CD8⁺ Tregs (CD8⁺CD25⁺FoxP3⁺) and CD8⁺ Teffs (CD8⁺CD25^-FoxP3^-) were similarly represented among the groups under study, displaying no significant difference (Fig 1D, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.6271; 1e, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.4612 and 1f, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.6539).

Download:

Fig 1. Frequency of cell populations relative to HD, ND and LT T1D patients under basal conditions.

Frozen stocked PBMC samples were analyzed by flow-cytometry analysis to estimate respective frequency of CD4⁺ (a), CD8⁺ (b), CD8⁺CD25⁺ (c), CD8⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ Treg (d), CD8⁺CD25^-Foxp3^- Teff (e) cells and the Treg/Teff ratio (f). In all graphs, horizontal lines represent the mean frequency and each symbol shows an individual. Black circles depict HD, square dots represent ND T1D patients and black triangles associate to LT T1D patients. Significance was calculated in relation to the control group using as statistical test the One-way analysis of variance Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s Multiple Comparison post-test. In this and following figures * p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001. For the investigation present in figure, 20 HD, 9 ND and 10 LT samples were studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.g001

PD-1 frequency is lower in CD8⁺ Teff of LT T1D patients versus controls.

Under basal condition, no difference in the frequency of total PD-1 (Fig 2A, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.4233), PD-1^high (Fig 2B, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.1013) and PD-1^low (Fig 2C, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.6449) was observed in CD8⁺ Tregs, while, in CD8⁺ Teffs, the same PD-1 frequency, either total (Fig 2D, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0020), PD-1^high (Fig 2E, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0445) and PD-1^low (Fig 2F, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0009) appeared significantly lower in the LT T1D PBMC in respect to control PBMC.

Download:

Fig 2. Frequency of CD8⁺ PD-1⁺ subsets under basal conditions.

Graphs show the percentages of CD8⁺ Tregs expressing PD-1 (a), PD-1^high (b), PD-1^low (c), and the percentages of CD8⁺ Teffs expressing PD-1 (d), PD-1^high (e) and PD-1^low (f). For the investigation present in figure, 20 HD, 9 ND and 10 LT samples were studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.g002

Analysis of CD8⁺ Treg and CD8⁺ Teff cell subsets and their PD-1 expression upon PMA-ionomycin stimulation

Lower frequencies of CD8⁺ Tregs and higher frequencies of CD8⁺ Teffs in LT T1D patients.

After three days of PMA-ionomycin stimulation, no significant difference can be inferred among the three study groups regarding the CD4⁺ (Fig 3A, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.4139), CD8⁺ (Fig 3B, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.6981) and CD8⁺CD25⁺ cell populations (Fig 3C, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.5822). However, we observed that the CD8⁺ Treg population was represented at a much lower percentage in LT T1D PBMC in respect to control subjects and ND T1D PBMC (Fig 3D, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0182). The CD8⁺ Teffs, on the other hand, showed increased percentages in LT T1D patients in respect to controls (Fig 3E, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0476). As a consequence, the CD8⁺ Treg/Teff cell ratio was much lower in this group of LT patients in respect to controls and also to the ND patients (Fig 3F, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0102). Of note, the same cells, kept for three days in the unstimulated (RPMI) culture condition (S2A–S2D Fig) did not show any difference in the percentage relative to the subsets analyzed among the three study groups: CD4⁺ (S2A Fig, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.2789), CD8⁺ (S2B Fig, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.4570) CD8⁺ Treg (S2C Fig, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.7799) and CD8⁺ Teff cells (S2D Fig, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0962).

Download:

Fig 3. Frequency of cell populations relative to HD, ND and LT T1D patients upon three days of PMA/ionomycin stimulation.

Flow-cytometry analysis of healthy donor and patients PBMC following three days of PMA/ionomycin stimuli. Graphs show the percentage of CD4⁺ (a), CD8⁺ (b), CD8⁺CD25⁺ (c), CD8⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ Treg (d), CD8⁺CD25^-Foxp3^- Teff (e) cells and the Treg/Teff cell ratio (f). For the investigation present in figure, 13 HD, 9 ND and 8 LT samples were studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.g003

Total PD-1 and PD-1^high frequency is decreased in CD8⁺ Tregs of LT T1D patients than in controls.

The analysis of PD-1 expression after three days of PMA-ionomycin stimulation, revealed a significant lower percentage of CD8⁺PD-1⁺ cells and in particular CD8+PD-1^high cells in the LT T1D group analyzed in respect to the control group (Fig 4A, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0099; 4b, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0018), while there was no difference in the CD8⁺PD-1^low percentages among the three study groups (Fig 4C, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.5888).

Download:

Fig 4. Frequency of CD8⁺ PD-1⁺ subsets upon three days of PMA/ionomycin stimulation.

Graphs show the percentages of CD8⁺ cells expressing PD-1 (a), PD-1^high (b), PD-1^low (c), the percentages of CD8⁺ Tregs expressing PD-1 (d), PD-1^high (e) and PD-1^low (f) and the percentages of CD8⁺ Teffs expressing PD-1 (g), PD-1^high (h) and PD-1^low (i). For the investigation present in figure, 13 HD, 9 ND and 8 LT samples were studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.g004

Regarding CD8⁺ Tregs, the percentages of PD-1⁺ cells was lower in the LT T1D group of patients in respect to the control subjects, in particular, the percentages relative to total PD-1 and PD-1^high (Fig 4D, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0397; 4e, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0054; 4f, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.1608).

PD-1 frequency in similar in CD8⁺ Teffs of T1D patients and controls.

No significant difference was revealed in the frequency of PD-1 in the CD8⁺ Teffs among the three study groups after three days of PMA-ionomycin stimulation (Fig 4G, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.4816; 4h, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.6602; 4i, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.5916).

Analysis of proliferation of CD8⁺ Treg and CD8⁺ Teff cell subsets

Proliferation of CD8⁺ Tregs is impaired significantly in ND T1D patients after 3 day-stimulus.

PMA-ionomycin administration induced T cell proliferation in healthy controls and T1D patients both after three (S3A Fig, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.1713; b, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0704) and five days of stimulation (S3C Fig, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0623; d, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0553). Upon three days of stimuli (Fig 5A–5C), the proliferation of CD8⁺ cells (Fig 5A, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0914) did not show significant differences between the groups of patients analyzed and the controls. However, the frequency of proliferating CD8⁺ Tregs (Fig 5B) appeared lower in both groups of T1D patients in respect to controls but it revealed to be significantly diminished especially in the ND T1D PBMC (Fig 5B, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0029). On the other hand, the proliferation of CD8⁺ Teffs after three days showed no significant difference among the three groups under analysis (Fig 5C, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.4742).

Download:

Fig 5. Proliferative responses of cell subsets under study in HD, ND and LT T1D patients after three days of PMA/ionomycin stimulation.

CMFDA-labeled PBMC from healthy controls and T1D patients were stimulated with PMA/ ionomycin for three and five days and subsequently stained for flow-cytometry analysis. Graphs show the frequency of CD8⁺, CD8⁺ Treg, CD8⁺ Teff proliferating cells after 3 (a-c) and 5 days (d-f) of PMA/ionomycin stimulation. Proliferation was evaluated as percentage of CMFDA-low cells relative to the subset analyzed after stimulation over the percentage of CMFDA-low cells of the same subset in RPMI unstimulated cultures. For the investigation present in figure, 14 HD, 9 ND and 9 LT samples were studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.g005

Proliferation of CD8⁺ Tregs and CD8⁺ Teffs is impaired in T1D patients after 5 day-stimulus.

Prolonged stimulation with PMA-ionomycin for five days (Fig 5D–5F) showed that the frequency of proliferating CD8⁺ cells was decreased in ND T1D PBMC in respect to controls (Fig 5D, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0152). Moreover, the proliferative response of CD8⁺ Tregs of both groups of T1D patients is notably lower in respect to the control group (Fig 5E, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0007). This result was further observed for the CD8⁺ Teff population (Fig 5F, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p = 0.0051).

Correlation between main analysed subsets and metabolic marker of disease HbA1c in patients

Analysis under basal conditions.

No significant correlation was observed between percentages of CD8⁺ Treg cells (relative to Fig 1D) and values of HbA1c in both ND (S4A Fig) and LT T1D patients (S4B Fig). No statistical significance was also observed analyzing percentages of CD8⁺ Treg PD-1⁺ cells in ND and LT T1D patients (S5A and S5B Fig) and percentages of CD8⁺ Teff PD-1⁺ cells in ND and LT T1D patients (S5C and S5D Fig).

Analysis after PMA/ionomycin stimulation.

After 3 days of PMA/ionomycin stimulation a significant inverse correlation was observed between percentages of CD8⁺ Treg cells and HbA1c levels in both ND (Fig 6A) and LT T1D patients (Fig 6B). This suggests that low percentages of CD8⁺ Treg cells are indicative of a worse metabolic control. No significant correlation was found between HbA1c values and percentages of CD8⁺ Teff cells after 3 days of PMA/ionomycin stimulation in ND (Fig 6C) and LT T1D patients (Fig 6D). Regarding CD8⁺ Treg/Teff cell ratio after stimulation, a significant correlation was not observed for ND (Fig 6E) while it was evident for LT T1D patients (Fig 6F).

Download:

Fig 6. Correlation study between CD8⁺ Treg and Teff cell subsets after PMA/ionomycin stimulation and HbA1c levels.

(a) Analysis performed for percentages of CD8⁺ Treg cells in ND T1D and (b) LT T1D patients; (c) Analysis performed for percentages of CD8⁺ Teff cells in ND T1D and (d) LT T1D patients. (e) Analysis performed for CD8⁺ Treg/Teff cell ratio in ND T1D and (f) LT T1D patients. For the investigation present in figure, 9 ND and 9 LT samples were studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.g006

Moreover, the study did not reveal a significant correlation between percentages of CD8⁺ Treg PD-1⁺ cells after stimulation and HbA1c levels in ND T1D patients (Fig 7A) while it showed a significant inverse correlation in LT T1D patients (Fig 7B). Overall these data further suggest that low percentages of CD8⁺ Tregs and CD8⁺ Treg PD-1⁺ cells correlate with a worse metabolic control of disease in LT patients.

Download:

Fig 7. Correlation study between percentages of CD8⁺ Treg PD-1⁺ cells after PMA/ionomycin stimulation and HbA1c levels.

(a) Analysis performed in ND T1D and (b) LT T1D patients. For the investigation present in figure, 9 ND and 9 LT samples were studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.g007

Discussion

Tregs are known to counteract autoreactive T cells and induce immune tolerance, through dampening inflammation. Regulatory mechanisms beyond their effects on T, B, natural killer (NK) and NKT cells are cell-to-cell-contact, secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines, effects on APCs, and competition for growth factors.

In the light of the foregoing, novel immunotherapies could be exploited to target specifically Tregs in the perspective to avoid autoimmune disease onset and progression. For long time the only proposed treatment option was halting Teffs function, however, nowadays activating/expanding Tregs is a novel avenue that may lead to improved outcomes with enhanced safety [21] (rev in [22]).

In recent years, the complexity of natural and adaptive Tregs has therefore been the object of several studies [4,23] (vide supra). Natural CD4⁺ Tregs arise in the thymus, express both CD25 and the master regulator of their differentiation and function Foxp3. CD4⁺CD25⁺FoxP3⁺ Tregs are indeed the subtype more extensively investigated. Adaptive Tregs develop in the periphery following self or foreign antigen stimulation in the presence of specific immunomodulatory properties. Other subtypes include interleukin-10 (IL-10)-secreting Tr1, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β)-secreting T helper 3 (TH3) cells, CD4⁺Vα14⁺ NK Tregs, ɣδ T cells, and CD3⁺CD4^-CD8^- (DN) Tregs [10,11].

Recently CD8⁺ suppressor T cells emerged as a novel entity of Tregs [8,10]. Several CD8⁺ suppressive T cell populations were reported; those expressing FoxP3 and CD25 were conventionally considered CD8⁺ Tregs [2,10, 24–26].

To date the phenotypic characterization of CD8⁺ Tregs and their role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases in respect to the identified CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ counterpart remains to be fully unraveled [14]. According to Churlaud et al (2015) [10] CD8⁺ Tregs represents approximately 0.4% of T cells within the PBMC pool in healthy human subjects. CD8⁺ Tregs express low levels of CD127 consistently with CD4⁺ Tregs. Furthermore, CD8⁺ Tregs express lower levels of activation markers as CTLA-4, ICOS and ki-67 than in other CD8⁺ T cell subsets. Regarding CD25, the question of Treg sensitivity to IL-2 is of upmost importance to fully unravel the utility and applicability of their robust suppressive activity in clinical settings [10,22,27–28]. Tregs upon low-dose IL-2 treatment expressed enhanced levels of activation markers, including CD25, GITR, CTLA4 and basal phosphorylation of STAT5 (pSTAT5). Tregs retained a 20-fold higher sensitivity to IL-2 than T effector and NK cells [22]. Interestingly CD8⁺ Tregs were more prone to expand to low IL-2 dose treatment than CD4⁺ Tregs [10]. In addition subsets were identified as CD8⁺CD28^- Tregs [29–32], CD8⁺CD75s⁺ [33], plasmacytoid dendritic cell (DC2)-induced CD8 [34], CD8⁺CD45RC^high Tc1 Treg [35] and TCR peptide specific CD8αα Treg [36]. CD8⁺CD45RC^low T cells non-cytotoxic Tregs were reported, producing type 2 cytokines, expressing FoxP3 and CTLA-4 and able to counteract alloreactive immune responses. Their suppressive effect is mainly exerted through inhibition on CD4 T helper 1 (Th1) cells expansion and on their IFN-ɣ production [11].

As highlighted in the Introduction, the functionality of CD4⁺CD25^high, either Foxp3 or CD127^low, and effects on Teffs function has been intensively investigated by several authors in T1D patients (rev in [2, 37]). We observed defects of the CD4⁺ population activation in long-term patients due to a lower expression of PD-1 on their surface.

In this manuscript, no significant differences were depicted in the relative percentages of CD8⁺ Tregs and CD8⁺ Teffs among LT, ND T1D patients versus healthy normal controls in basal conditions as opposite to the results we published on CD4⁺ Tregs and CD4⁺ Treg/Teff ratio within PBMC that were found higher in the LT disease patients than in normal controls in basal conditions.

In basal conditions, no differences were observed in total percentages of CD8⁺, CD4⁺ T cells across the groups of ND, LT diabetics versus normal controls. We further confirmed the finding of significantly lower percentages of CD8⁺CD25⁺ T cells in the peripheral blood of LT diabetics than in healthy controls suggestive of a lower level of activation [2].

We analyzed the expression of PD-1, indicative of the performance of the PD-1/PDL-1 ligand regulatory pathway, on immunotypes and in particular, CD8⁺ Tregs, as previously unraveled for the CD4⁺CD25⁺ subset. PD-1 signaling is indeed required for the maintenance of functional CD4⁺CD25⁺FoxP3⁺ Tregs to control autoimmunity [38]. In CD4⁺ Tregs PD-1 expression was found inversely correlated with FoxP3 expression; further, low levels of PD-1 are necessary for the regulatory capacity of CD4⁺ Tregs, their TGF-β significant secretion and apoptosis resistance. Nevertheless very low levels of PD-1 expression can affect regulatory function, which relies on low levels of PD-1 expression, but not its absence [38]. Further experimental evidences in NOD mice demonstrate that PD-1 deficiency or administration of a monoclonal antibody to PD-1 promote and exacerbate diabetes development [39–41] with more pronounced CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ infiltration within insulitis. The initial study of Tsutsumi et al. [42] observed a decreased PD-1 expression in CD4⁺ T lymphocytes of a small and heterogeneous group of T1D patients as compared to healthy controls, suggesting that PD-1 plays a role in the development and maintenance of the disease. In a recent report by Fujisawa et al. [43] a lower PD-1 expression in CD4⁺ T cells contributed to the development of T1D through T cell activation. Significantly, a lower PD-1 expression was found in patients with the 7785 C/C genotype. There was no significant correlation between disease duration and frequency of PD-1 expression.

Regarding CD8⁺ Tregs, in basal conditions, we did not detect differences in the percentages of subsets expressing PD1, either total PD1⁺, PD1^high and PD-1^low expressing cells across ND, LD T1D patients and normal controls. Conversely lower percentages of Teff CD8⁺PD-1⁺, CD8+PD-1^high and CD8+PD-1^low cells were detected in LT patients than in normal controls indicative of their reduced efficiency and regulability.

For functional assessment, we adopted a polyclonal stimulation through PMA and ionomycin (S6 Fig). We interestingly observed reduced total percentages of CD8⁺ Tregs in LT diabetics together with increased percentages of CD8⁺ Teffs in the same group of patients respect to controls, confirming the occurred unbalance. Accordingly, Treg/Teff ratio was diminished in long-term diabetics versus controls. Furthermore, this ratio was also reduced in respect to newly diagnosed patients. Remarkably, the detection of similar percentages of total CD8⁺, CD4⁺ and CD8⁺CD25⁺subsets following stimulation comes further in support of their impaired efficacy whilst similar viability of CD8⁺ Treg and Teff populations. Considering the characteristics of polyclonal stimulation, which assesses the overall performance of CD8⁺ T cells, the defect is unmasked in particular for Teffs involved in general adaptive immune responses i.e. against non-self antigens and pathogens. In this regard, increased susceptibility to infections and vaccination failure has been observed in diabetes patients [44–48] not exclusively related to hyperglycemia. Indeed, abnormal immune responses and reduced CD4+ T cell proliferation have been postulated to occur in T1D patients [49–50].

Interestingly, frequency of CD8⁺ proliferating Tregs was reduced in ND diabetics versus healthy controls after 3 days of PMA-ionomycin stimulation. This reduction of CD8⁺ proliferating Tregs frequency was also observed among ND diabetics versus controls after 5 days of stimulation and, in addition, this phenomenon was observed for LT diabetics versus controls. At this time of stimulation, total frequency of proliferating CD8⁺ T cells was reduced in ND diabetics versus controls. Even CD8⁺ Teffs frequency was diminished in LT and ND diabetics versus healthy controls. Concurrently, of note, frequency of CD3⁺ and CD4⁺ proliferating T cells were similar among the 3 groups indicating that the reduced frequency results in the underlined subsets are not due to intrinsic increased level of apoptosis (S3 Fig).

Remarkably, in the functional evaluation, frequency of PD-1⁺CD8⁺ T cells and PD-1^high CD8⁺ T cells was reduced in LT diabetics versus healthy controls. Again total PD-1⁺ and PD-1^high CD8⁺ Tregs were significantly reduced in LT diabetics versus healthy controls. Conversely no significant difference was observed in the frequency of total PD-1⁺, PD-1^high and PD-1^low CD8⁺ Teff subsets.

As conclusive remark, our pilot study identifies a novel CD8⁺ Treg cell population, which is defective in diabetics due to a lower expression of PD-1 on its surface. As also applied to other subsets of Tregs the characterization of the CD8⁺ Treg population in the pancreas and peripheral lymphnodes of T1D patient should be also elucidated, although we can foresee the limitation of the lack of human biological specimens. Furthermore, a future research avenue could be to test their ‘antigen-specificity’ since these have been reported as more potent in suppressing autoimmunity than polyclonal Tregs [37].

Definitively our results encourage further studies on the role of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in controlling the autoimmune process in T1D patients for tailored immunotherapeutic approaches to be developed in years to come.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Representative gating strategy.

Representative gating strategy for the flow cytometry analysis of lymphocytes for CD8⁺ T cell subsets. Data were collected with flow-cytometer Fortessa X-20analyzer (Becton and Dickinson (BD), Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and analyzed by FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences: San Jose, CA, USA). Lymphocytes were identified through their scatter properties (FSC-A×SSC-A plot). Due to the limited number of CD8⁺ Tregs, at least 20,000 CD8⁺ events were acquired. In this example, nitrogen frozen PBMC were thawed, stained as described in the method section for antibodies to CD3, CD8, CD25, PD-1 and Foxp3, and subsequently analyzed. The plots show depiction of CD8⁺CD25⁺ cells, CD8⁺ Tregs and CD8⁺ Teffs and the analysis of PD-1⁺, PD-1^high and PD-1^low, between these last two subsets in RPMI (a) and after PMA/ionomycin stimulation (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Frequency of cell subsets under investigation relative to HD, ND and LT T1D patients upon three days unstimulated culture condition (RPMI).

Flow-cytometry analysis of healthy donor and patients PBMC following three days of unstimulated RPMI culture. Graphs show the percentage of CD4⁺ (a), CD8⁺ (b), CD8⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ Treg (c), CD8⁺CD25^-Foxp3^- Teff (d) cells. For the investigation present in figure, 13 HD, 9 ND and 9 LT were studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Proliferative responses of the subsets under study in HD, ND and LT T1D patients after three days of PMA/ionomycin stimulation.

CMFDA-labeled PBMC from HD and T1D patients were stimulated with PMA/ionomycin for three and five days and subsequently stained for flow-cytometry analysis. Graphs show the frequency of CD3⁺ (a), CD4⁺ (b) proliferating cells after 3 and 5 (c-d) days of stimulation. Proliferation was evaluated as percentage of CMFDA-low cells relative to the subset analyzed after stimulation over the percentage of CMFDA-low cells of the same subset in RPMI unstimulated culture. For the investigation present in figure, 15 HD, 9 ND and 9 LT were studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Correlation of percentages of CD8⁺ Treg cells with levels of HbA1c under basal conditions.

(a) Analysis performed in ND T1D and (b) LT T1D patients. For the investigation present in figure, 18 ND and 13 LT samples were studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Correlation of percentages CD8⁺ PD-1⁺ Treg cells and percentages CD8⁺ PD-1⁺ Teff cells with levels of HbA1c under basal conditions.

(a) Analysis performed for percentages of CD8⁺ Treg PD-1⁺ cells in ND T1D and (b) LT T1D patients; (c) Analysis performed for percentages of CD8⁺ Teff PD-1⁺ cells in ND T1D and (d) LT T1D patients. For the investigation present in figure, 18 ND and 13 LT samples were studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Viability of cell cultures after PMA/ ionomycin stimulation.

(a) Histogram shows the percentage of viable lymphocytes after 3 days of PMA/ionomycin stimulation (Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p <0.05). (b) Histogram shows the % of viable lymphocytes after 5 days of PMA/ionomycin stimulation (Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance p <0.05). For the investigation present in figure, 14 HD, 9 ND and 9 LT samples were studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210839.s006

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Dr. Federica Frasca for technical and analytic support and Dr. Ezio Giorda for technical support of flow-cytometry acquisition.

References

1. Fierabracci A. The potential of multimer technologies in type 1 diabetes prediction strategies. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2011;27: 216–29. pmid:21309048
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Perri V, Russo B, Crinò A, Schiaffini R, Giorda E, Cappa M, Rosado MM, Fierabracci A. Expression of PD-1 Molecule on Regulatory T Lymphocytes in Patients with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16: 22584–605. pmid:26393578
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Fierabracci A. Recent insights into the role and molecular mechanisms of the autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene in autoimmunity. Autoimmun. Rev. 2011;10: 137–43. pmid:20850570
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Zhao H, Liao X, and Kang Y. Tregs: Where We Are and What Comes Next? Front Immunol. 2017;8: 1578. pmid:29225597
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Putnam AL, Vendrame F, Dotta F, Gottlieb PA. CD4+CD25high regulatory T cells inhuman autoimmune diabetes. J. Autoimmun. 2005,24: 55–62. pmid:15725577
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Saresella M, Marventano I, Longhi R, Lissoni F, Trabattoni D, Mendozzi L, Caputo D, Clerici M. CD4+CD25+FoxP3+PD1- regulatory T cells in acute and stable relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and their modulation by therapy. Faseb J. 2008;22: 3500–8. pmid:18587005
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Berger CT, Hess C. Neglected for too long?—CD8+ Tregs release NOX2-loaded vesicles to inhibit CD4+ T cells. J Clin Invest. 2016;126: 1646–8. pmid:27088803
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Jebbawi F, Fayyad-Kazan H, Merimi M, Lewalle P, Verougstraete JC, Leo O, Romero P, Burny A, Badran B, Martiat P, Rouas R. A microRNA profile of human CD8(+) regulatory T cells and characterization of the effects of microRNAs on Treg cell-associated genes. J Transl Med. 2014;12: 218. pmid:25090912
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Hu D, Weiner HL, Ritz J. Identification of cytolytic CD161- CD56+ regulatory CD8 T cells in human peripheral blood. PLoS One 2013;8: e59545. pmid:23527216
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Churlaud G, Pitoiset F, Jebbawi F, Lorenzon R, Bellier B, Rosenzwajg M, Klatzmann D. Human and Mouse CD8(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) Regulatory T Cells at Steady State and during Interleukin-2 Therapy. Front Immunol. 2015;6: 171. pmid:25926835
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Xystrakis E, Dejean AS, Bernard I, Druet P, Liblau R, Gonzalez-Dunia D, Saoudi A. Identification of a novel natural regulatory CD8 T-cell subset and analysis of its mechanism of regulation. Blood 2004;104: 3294–301. pmid:15271801
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Lu L, Cantor H. Generation and regulation of CD8(+) regulatory T cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 2008;5: 401–6. pmid:19118505
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Nanda NK, Sercarz EJ. A truncated T cell receptor repertoire reveals underlying immunogenicity of an antigenic determinant. Exp Med. 1996;184: 1037–43.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Filaci G, Fenoglio D, Indiveri F. CD8(+) T regulatory/suppressor cells and their relationships with autoreactivity and autoimmunity. Autoimmunity 2011;44: 51–7. pmid:20670118
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Tsai S, Shameli A, Yamanouchi J, Clemente-Casares X, Wang J, Serra P, Yang Y, Medarova Z, Moore A, Santamaria P. Reversal of autoimmunity by boosting memory-like autoregulatory T cells. Immunity 2010;32: 568–80. pmid:20381385
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Wang Y, Xie Q, Liang CL, Zeng Q, Dai Z. Chinese medicine Ginseng and Astragalus granules ameliorate autoimmune diabetes by upregulating both CD4+FoxP3+ and CD8+CD122+PD1+ regulatory T cells. Oncotarget 2017;8: 60201–9. pmid:28947964
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Bisikirska B, Colgan J, Luban J, Bluestone JA, Herold KC. TCR stimulation with modified anti-CD3 mAb expands CD8+ T cell population and induces CD8+CD25+ Tregs. J Clin Invest. 2005;115: 2904–13. pmid:16167085
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Shameli A, Yamanouchi J, Tsai S, Yang Y, Clemente-Casares X, Moore A, Serra P, Santamaria P. IL-2 promotes the function of memory-like autoregulatory CD8+ T cells but suppresses their development via FoxP3+ Treg cells. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43: 394–403. pmid:23180662
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Gianchecchi E, Crinò A, Giorda E, Luciano R, Perri V, Russo AL, Cappa M, Rosado MM, Fierabracci A. Altered B cell homeostasis and toll-like receptor 9-driven response in type 1 diabetes carriers of the C1858T PTPN22 allelic variant: implications in the disease pathogenesis. PLoS One. 2014;9: e110755. pmid:25333705
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Huang CT, Workman CJ, Flies D, Pan X, Marson AL, Zhou G, Hipkiss EL, Ravi S, Kowalski J, Levitsky HI, Powell JD, Pardoll DM, Drake CG, Vignali DA. Role of LAG-3 in regulatory T cells. Immunity 2004;21: 503–13. pmid:15485628
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Grinberg-Bleyer Y, Baeyens A, You S, Elhage R, Fourcade G, Gregoire S, Cagnard N, Carpentier W, Tang Q, Bluestone J, Chatenoud L, Klatzmann D, Salomon BL, Piaggio E. IL-2 reverses established type 1 diabetes in NOD mice by a local effect on pancreatic regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2010;207: 1871–8. pmid:20679400
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Rosenzwajg M, Churlaud G, Mallone R, Six A, Dérian N, Chaara W, Lorenzon R, Long SA, Buckner JH, Afonso G, Pham HP, Hartemann A, Yu A, Pugliese A, Malek TR, Klatzmann D. Low-dose interleukin-2 fosters a dose-dependent regulatory T cell tuned milieu in T1D patients. J Autoimmun. 2015;58: 48–58. pmid:25634360
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Morikawa H, Sakaguchi S. Genetic and epigenetic basis of Treg cell development and function: From a FoxP3-centered view to an epigenome-defined view of natural Treg cells. Immunol. Rev. 2014;259: 192–205. pmid:24712467
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Frisullo G, Nociti V, Iorio R, Plantone D, Patanella AK, Tonali PA, Batocchi AP. CD8(+)Foxp3(+) T cells in peripheral blood of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Hum Immunol. 2010;71: 437–41. pmid:20138197
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Mahic M, Henjum K, Yaqub S, Bjørnbeth BA, Torgersen KM, Taskén K, Aandahl EM. Generation of highly suppressive adaptive CD8(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells by continuous antigen stimulation. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38: 640–6. pmid:18266270
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Correale J, Villa A. Role of CD8+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2010;67: 625–38. pmid:20437560
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Saadoun D, Rosenzwajg M, Joly F, Six A, Carrat F, Thibault V, Sene D, Cacoub P, Klatzmann D. Regulatory T-cell responses to low-dose interleukin-2 in HCV-induced vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365: 2067–77. pmid:22129253
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Hartemann A, Bensimon G, Payan CA, Jacqueminet S, Bourron O, Nicolas N, Fonfrede M, Rosenzwajg M, Bernard C, Klatzmann D. Low-dose interleukin 2 in patients with type 1 diabetes: a phase 1/2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1: 295–305. pmid:24622415
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Tang XL, Smith TR, Kumar V. Specific control of immunity by regulatory CD8 T cells.Cell Mol Immunol. 2005;2: 11–9. pmid:16212906
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Filaci G, Suciu-Foca N. CD8+ T suppressor cells are back to the game: are they players in autoimmunity? Autoimmun Rev. 2002;1: 279–83. pmid:12848981
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Wang H, Daniel V, Sadeghi M, Opelz G. Differences in the induction of induced human CD4(+) CD25(+) FoxP3(+) T-regulatory cells and CD3(+) CD8(+) CD28(-) T-suppressor cells subset phenotypes in vitro: comparison of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate/ionomycin and phytohemagglutinin stimulation. Transplant Proc. 2013;45: 1822–31. pmid:23769052
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Fenoglio D, Ferrera F, Fravega M, Balestra P, Battaglia F, Proietti M, Andrei C, Olive D, Antonio LC, Indiveri F, Filaci G. Advancements on phenotypic and functional characterization of non-antigen-specific CD8+CD28- regulatory T cells. Hum Immunol. 2008;69: 745–50. pmid:18832002
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Zimring JC, Kapp JA. Identification and characterization of CD8+ suppressor T cells. Immunol Res. 2004;29: 303–12. pmid:15181291
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Gilliet M, Liu YJ. Generation of human CD8 T regulatory cells by CD40 ligand-activated plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2002;195: 695–704. pmid:11901196
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Field AC, Bloch MF, Bellon B. Neonatal tolerance to a Th2-mediated autoimmune disease generates CD8+ Tc1 regulatory cells. J Autoimmun. 2003;21: 201–12. pmid:14599845
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Kumar V, Sercarz E. An integrative model of regulation centered on recognition of TCR peptide/MHC complexes. Immunol Rev. 2001;182: 113–21. pmid:11722628
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Tang Q, Henriksen KJ, Bi M, Finger EB, Szot G, Ye J, Masteller EL, McDevitt H, Bonyhadi M, Bluestone JA. In vitro-expanded antigen-specific regulatory T cells suppress autoimmune diabetes. J Exp Med. 2004;199: 1455–65. pmid:15184499
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Wong M, La Cava A, Hahn BH. Blockade of programmed death-1 in young (New Zealand Black x New Zealand White)F1 mice promotes the suppressive capacity of CD4+ regulatory T cells protecting from lupus-like disease. J Immunol. 2013;190: 5402–10. pmid:23636058
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Ansari MJ, Salama AD, Chitnis T, Smith RN, Yagita H, Akiba H, Yamazaki T, Azuma M, Iwai H, Khoury SJ, Auchincloss H Jr, Sayegh MH. The programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway regulates autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. J Exp Med. 2003;198: 63–9. pmid:12847137
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Wang J, Yoshida T, Nakaki F, Hiai H, Okazaki T, Honjo T. Establishment of NOD-Pdcd1-/- mice as an efficient animal model of type I diabetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102: b11823–8.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Pauken KE, Jenkins MK, Azuma M, Fife BT. PD-1, but not PD-L1, expressed by islet-reactive CD4+ T cells suppresses infiltration of the pancreas during type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2013;62: 2859–69. pmid:23545706
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Tsutsumi Y, Jie X, Ihara K, Nomura A, Kanemitsu S, Takada H, Hara T. Phenotypic and genetic analyses of T-cell-mediated immunoregulation in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006;23: 1145–50. pmid:16978382
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Fujisawa R, Haseda F, Tsutsumi C, Hiromine Y, Noso S, Kawabata Y, Mitsui S, Terasaki J, Ikegami H, Imagawa A, Hanafusa T. Low programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) expression in peripheral CD4(+) T cells in Japanese patients with autoimmune type 1 diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015;180: 452–7. pmid:25682896
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Muller LM, Gorter KJ, Hak E, Goudzwaard WL, Schellevis FG, Hoepelman AI, Rutten GE. Increased risk of common infections in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41: 281–8. pmid:16007521
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Huo C, Zhang S, Zhang S, Wang M, Qi P, Xiao J, Hu Y, Dong H. Mice with type 1 diabetes exhibit increased susceptibility to influenza A virus. Microb Pathog. 2017;113: 233–41. pmid:29066377
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Nenna R, Papoff P, Moretti C, Pierangeli A, Sabatino G, Costantino F, Soscia F, Cangiano G, Ferro V, Mennini M, Salvadei S, Scagnolari C, Antonelli G, Midulla F. Detection of respiratory viruses in the 2009 winter season in Rome: 2009 influenza A (H1N1) complications In children and concomitant type 1 diabetes onset. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol.2011;24: 651–9. pmid:21978697
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Reading PC, Allison J, Crouch EC, Anders EM. Increased susceptibility of diabetic mice to influenza virus infection: compromise of collectin-mediated host defense of the lung by glucose? J Virol. 1998;72: 6884–7. pmid:9658139
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Lau D, Eurich DT, Majumdar SR, Katz A, Johnson JA. Effectiveness of influenza vaccination in working-age adults with diabetes: a population-based cohort study. Thorax.2013;68: 658–63. pmid:23535212
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Eibl N, Spatz M, Fischer GF, Mayr WR, Samstag A, Wolf HM, Schernthaner G, Eibl MM. Impaired primary immune response in type-1 diabetes: results from a controlled vaccination study. Clin Immunol. 2002;103: 249–59. pmid:12173299
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Spatz M, Eibl N, Hink S, Wolf HM, Fischer GF, Mayr WR, Schernthaner G, Eibl MM. Impaired primary immune response in type-1 diabetes. Functional impairment at the level of APCs and T-cells. Cell Immunol. 2003;221: 15–26. pmid:12742378
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Fierabracci A. The potential of multimer technologies in type 1 diabetes prediction strategies. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2011;27: 216–29. pmid:21309048
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Perri V, Russo B, Crinò A, Schiaffini R, Giorda E, Cappa M, Rosado MM, Fierabracci A. Expression of PD-1 Molecule on Regulatory T Lymphocytes in Patients with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16: 22584–605. pmid:26393578
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Fierabracci A. Recent insights into the role and molecular mechanisms of the autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene in autoimmunity. Autoimmun. Rev. 2011;10: 137–43. pmid:20850570
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Zhao H, Liao X, and Kang Y. Tregs: Where We Are and What Comes Next? Front Immunol. 2017;8: 1578. pmid:29225597
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Putnam AL, Vendrame F, Dotta F, Gottlieb PA. CD4+CD25high regulatory T cells inhuman autoimmune diabetes. J. Autoimmun. 2005,24: 55–62. pmid:15725577
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Saresella M, Marventano I, Longhi R, Lissoni F, Trabattoni D, Mendozzi L, Caputo D, Clerici M. CD4+CD25+FoxP3+PD1- regulatory T cells in acute and stable relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and their modulation by therapy. Faseb J. 2008;22: 3500–8. pmid:18587005
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Berger CT, Hess C. Neglected for too long?—CD8+ Tregs release NOX2-loaded vesicles to inhibit CD4+ T cells. J Clin Invest. 2016;126: 1646–8. pmid:27088803
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Jebbawi F, Fayyad-Kazan H, Merimi M, Lewalle P, Verougstraete JC, Leo O, Romero P, Burny A, Badran B, Martiat P, Rouas R. A microRNA profile of human CD8(+) regulatory T cells and characterization of the effects of microRNAs on Treg cell-associated genes. J Transl Med. 2014;12: 218. pmid:25090912
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Hu D, Weiner HL, Ritz J. Identification of cytolytic CD161- CD56+ regulatory CD8 T cells in human peripheral blood. PLoS One 2013;8: e59545. pmid:23527216
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Churlaud G, Pitoiset F, Jebbawi F, Lorenzon R, Bellier B, Rosenzwajg M, Klatzmann D. Human and Mouse CD8(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) Regulatory T Cells at Steady State and during Interleukin-2 Therapy. Front Immunol. 2015;6: 171. pmid:25926835
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Xystrakis E, Dejean AS, Bernard I, Druet P, Liblau R, Gonzalez-Dunia D, Saoudi A. Identification of a novel natural regulatory CD8 T-cell subset and analysis of its mechanism of regulation. Blood 2004;104: 3294–301. pmid:15271801
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Lu L, Cantor H. Generation and regulation of CD8(+) regulatory T cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 2008;5: 401–6. pmid:19118505
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Nanda NK, Sercarz EJ. A truncated T cell receptor repertoire reveals underlying immunogenicity of an antigenic determinant. Exp Med. 1996;184: 1037–43.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Filaci G, Fenoglio D, Indiveri F. CD8(+) T regulatory/suppressor cells and their relationships with autoreactivity and autoimmunity. Autoimmunity 2011;44: 51–7. pmid:20670118
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Tsai S, Shameli A, Yamanouchi J, Clemente-Casares X, Wang J, Serra P, Yang Y, Medarova Z, Moore A, Santamaria P. Reversal of autoimmunity by boosting memory-like autoregulatory T cells. Immunity 2010;32: 568–80. pmid:20381385
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Wang Y, Xie Q, Liang CL, Zeng Q, Dai Z. Chinese medicine Ginseng and Astragalus granules ameliorate autoimmune diabetes by upregulating both CD4+FoxP3+ and CD8+CD122+PD1+ regulatory T cells. Oncotarget 2017;8: 60201–9. pmid:28947964
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Bisikirska B, Colgan J, Luban J, Bluestone JA, Herold KC. TCR stimulation with modified anti-CD3 mAb expands CD8+ T cell population and induces CD8+CD25+ Tregs. J Clin Invest. 2005;115: 2904–13. pmid:16167085
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Shameli A, Yamanouchi J, Tsai S, Yang Y, Clemente-Casares X, Moore A, Serra P, Santamaria P. IL-2 promotes the function of memory-like autoregulatory CD8+ T cells but suppresses their development via FoxP3+ Treg cells. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43: 394–403. pmid:23180662
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Gianchecchi E, Crinò A, Giorda E, Luciano R, Perri V, Russo AL, Cappa M, Rosado MM, Fierabracci A. Altered B cell homeostasis and toll-like receptor 9-driven response in type 1 diabetes carriers of the C1858T PTPN22 allelic variant: implications in the disease pathogenesis. PLoS One. 2014;9: e110755. pmid:25333705
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Huang CT, Workman CJ, Flies D, Pan X, Marson AL, Zhou G, Hipkiss EL, Ravi S, Kowalski J, Levitsky HI, Powell JD, Pardoll DM, Drake CG, Vignali DA. Role of LAG-3 in regulatory T cells. Immunity 2004;21: 503–13. pmid:15485628
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Grinberg-Bleyer Y, Baeyens A, You S, Elhage R, Fourcade G, Gregoire S, Cagnard N, Carpentier W, Tang Q, Bluestone J, Chatenoud L, Klatzmann D, Salomon BL, Piaggio E. IL-2 reverses established type 1 diabetes in NOD mice by a local effect on pancreatic regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2010;207: 1871–8. pmid:20679400
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Rosenzwajg M, Churlaud G, Mallone R, Six A, Dérian N, Chaara W, Lorenzon R, Long SA, Buckner JH, Afonso G, Pham HP, Hartemann A, Yu A, Pugliese A, Malek TR, Klatzmann D. Low-dose interleukin-2 fosters a dose-dependent regulatory T cell tuned milieu in T1D patients. J Autoimmun. 2015;58: 48–58. pmid:25634360
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Morikawa H, Sakaguchi S. Genetic and epigenetic basis of Treg cell development and function: From a FoxP3-centered view to an epigenome-defined view of natural Treg cells. Immunol. Rev. 2014;259: 192–205. pmid:24712467
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Frisullo G, Nociti V, Iorio R, Plantone D, Patanella AK, Tonali PA, Batocchi AP. CD8(+)Foxp3(+) T cells in peripheral blood of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Hum Immunol. 2010;71: 437–41. pmid:20138197
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Mahic M, Henjum K, Yaqub S, Bjørnbeth BA, Torgersen KM, Taskén K, Aandahl EM. Generation of highly suppressive adaptive CD8(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells by continuous antigen stimulation. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38: 640–6. pmid:18266270
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Correale J, Villa A. Role of CD8+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2010;67: 625–38. pmid:20437560
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Saadoun D, Rosenzwajg M, Joly F, Six A, Carrat F, Thibault V, Sene D, Cacoub P, Klatzmann D. Regulatory T-cell responses to low-dose interleukin-2 in HCV-induced vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365: 2067–77. pmid:22129253
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Hartemann A, Bensimon G, Payan CA, Jacqueminet S, Bourron O, Nicolas N, Fonfrede M, Rosenzwajg M, Bernard C, Klatzmann D. Low-dose interleukin 2 in patients with type 1 diabetes: a phase 1/2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1: 295–305. pmid:24622415
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Tang XL, Smith TR, Kumar V. Specific control of immunity by regulatory CD8 T cells.Cell Mol Immunol. 2005;2: 11–9. pmid:16212906
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Filaci G, Suciu-Foca N. CD8+ T suppressor cells are back to the game: are they players in autoimmunity? Autoimmun Rev. 2002;1: 279–83. pmid:12848981
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Wang H, Daniel V, Sadeghi M, Opelz G. Differences in the induction of induced human CD4(+) CD25(+) FoxP3(+) T-regulatory cells and CD3(+) CD8(+) CD28(-) T-suppressor cells subset phenotypes in vitro: comparison of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate/ionomycin and phytohemagglutinin stimulation. Transplant Proc. 2013;45: 1822–31. pmid:23769052
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Fenoglio D, Ferrera F, Fravega M, Balestra P, Battaglia F, Proietti M, Andrei C, Olive D, Antonio LC, Indiveri F, Filaci G. Advancements on phenotypic and functional characterization of non-antigen-specific CD8+CD28- regulatory T cells. Hum Immunol. 2008;69: 745–50. pmid:18832002
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Zimring JC, Kapp JA. Identification and characterization of CD8+ suppressor T cells. Immunol Res. 2004;29: 303–12. pmid:15181291
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Gilliet M, Liu YJ. Generation of human CD8 T regulatory cells by CD40 ligand-activated plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2002;195: 695–704. pmid:11901196
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] PubMed/NCBI

[135] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Field AC, Bloch MF, Bellon B. Neonatal tolerance to a Th2-mediated autoimmune disease generates CD8+ Tc1 regulatory cells. J Autoimmun. 2003;21: 201–12. pmid:14599845
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Kumar V, Sercarz E. An integrative model of regulation centered on recognition of TCR peptide/MHC complexes. Immunol Rev. 2001;182: 113–21. pmid:11722628
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Tang Q, Henriksen KJ, Bi M, Finger EB, Szot G, Ye J, Masteller EL, McDevitt H, Bonyhadi M, Bluestone JA. In vitro-expanded antigen-specific regulatory T cells suppress autoimmune diabetes. J Exp Med. 2004;199: 1455–65. pmid:15184499
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Wong M, La Cava A, Hahn BH. Blockade of programmed death-1 in young (New Zealand Black x New Zealand White)F1 mice promotes the suppressive capacity of CD4+ regulatory T cells protecting from lupus-like disease. J Immunol. 2013;190: 5402–10. pmid:23636058
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Ansari MJ, Salama AD, Chitnis T, Smith RN, Yagita H, Akiba H, Yamazaki T, Azuma M, Iwai H, Khoury SJ, Auchincloss H Jr, Sayegh MH. The programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway regulates autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. J Exp Med. 2003;198: 63–9. pmid:12847137
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Wang J, Yoshida T, Nakaki F, Hiai H, Okazaki T, Honjo T. Establishment of NOD-Pdcd1-/- mice as an efficient animal model of type I diabetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102: b11823–8.
View Article
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Pauken KE, Jenkins MK, Azuma M, Fife BT. PD-1, but not PD-L1, expressed by islet-reactive CD4+ T cells suppresses infiltration of the pancreas during type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2013;62: 2859–69. pmid:23545706
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Tsutsumi Y, Jie X, Ihara K, Nomura A, Kanemitsu S, Takada H, Hara T. Phenotypic and genetic analyses of T-cell-mediated immunoregulation in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006;23: 1145–50. pmid:16978382
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] PubMed/NCBI

[166] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Fujisawa R, Haseda F, Tsutsumi C, Hiromine Y, Noso S, Kawabata Y, Mitsui S, Terasaki J, Ikegami H, Imagawa A, Hanafusa T. Low programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) expression in peripheral CD4(+) T cells in Japanese patients with autoimmune type 1 diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015;180: 452–7. pmid:25682896
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] PubMed/NCBI

[170] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Muller LM, Gorter KJ, Hak E, Goudzwaard WL, Schellevis FG, Hoepelman AI, Rutten GE. Increased risk of common infections in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41: 281–8. pmid:16007521
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Huo C, Zhang S, Zhang S, Wang M, Qi P, Xiao J, Hu Y, Dong H. Mice with type 1 diabetes exhibit increased susceptibility to influenza A virus. Microb Pathog. 2017;113: 233–41. pmid:29066377
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] PubMed/NCBI

[178] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Nenna R, Papoff P, Moretti C, Pierangeli A, Sabatino G, Costantino F, Soscia F, Cangiano G, Ferro V, Mennini M, Salvadei S, Scagnolari C, Antonelli G, Midulla F. Detection of respiratory viruses in the 2009 winter season in Rome: 2009 influenza A (H1N1) complications In children and concomitant type 1 diabetes onset. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol.2011;24: 651–9. pmid:21978697
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] PubMed/NCBI

[182] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Reading PC, Allison J, Crouch EC, Anders EM. Increased susceptibility of diabetic mice to influenza virus infection: compromise of collectin-mediated host defense of the lung by glucose? J Virol. 1998;72: 6884–7. pmid:9658139
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[184] View Article

[185] PubMed/NCBI

[186] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Lau D, Eurich DT, Majumdar SR, Katz A, Johnson JA. Effectiveness of influenza vaccination in working-age adults with diabetes: a population-based cohort study. Thorax.2013;68: 658–63. pmid:23535212
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] PubMed/NCBI

[190] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Eibl N, Spatz M, Fischer GF, Mayr WR, Samstag A, Wolf HM, Schernthaner G, Eibl MM. Impaired primary immune response in type-1 diabetes: results from a controlled vaccination study. Clin Immunol. 2002;103: 249–59. pmid:12173299
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] PubMed/NCBI

[194] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Spatz M, Eibl N, Hink S, Wolf HM, Fischer GF, Mayr WR, Schernthaner G, Eibl MM. Impaired primary immune response in type-1 diabetes. Functional impairment at the level of APCs and T-cells. Cell Immunol. 2003;221: 15–26. pmid:12742378
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] PubMed/NCBI

[198] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Subjects

Cell preparation

Stimulation of PBMC with phorbol myristate (PMA)-ionomycin

Proliferation assay

Flow cytometry analysis (FACS)

Correlation of main subsets analyzed and HbA1c

Statistical analysis

Results

Study population

Analysis of CD8+ Treg and CD8+ Teff cell subsets and their PD-1 expression under basal conditions

Similar frequencies of CD8+ Treg and CD8+ Teff subsets in PBMC of T1D patients and controls.

PD-1 frequency is lower in CD8+ Teff of LT T1D patients versus controls.

Analysis of CD8+ Treg and CD8+ Teff cell subsets and their PD-1 expression upon PMA-ionomycin stimulation

Lower frequencies of CD8+ Tregs and higher frequencies of CD8+ Teffs in LT T1D patients.

Total PD-1 and PD-1high frequency is decreased in CD8+ Tregs of LT T1D patients than in controls.

PD-1 frequency in similar in CD8+ Teffs of T1D patients and controls.

Analysis of proliferation of CD8+ Treg and CD8+ Teff cell subsets

Proliferation of CD8+ Tregs is impaired significantly in ND T1D patients after 3 day-stimulus.

Proliferation of CD8+ Tregs and CD8+ Teffs is impaired in T1D patients after 5 day-stimulus.

Correlation between main analysed subsets and metabolic marker of disease HbA1c in patients

Analysis under basal conditions.

Analysis after PMA/ionomycin stimulation.

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Representative gating strategy.

S2 Fig. Frequency of cell subsets under investigation relative to HD, ND and LT T1D patients upon three days unstimulated culture condition (RPMI).

S3 Fig. Proliferative responses of the subsets under study in HD, ND and LT T1D patients after three days of PMA/ionomycin stimulation.

S4 Fig. Correlation of percentages of CD8+ Treg cells with levels of HbA1c under basal conditions.

S5 Fig. Correlation of percentages CD8+ PD-1+ Treg cells and percentages CD8+ PD-1+ Teff cells with levels of HbA1c under basal conditions.

S6 Fig. Viability of cell cultures after PMA/ ionomycin stimulation.

Acknowledgments

References

Analysis of CD8⁺ Treg and CD8⁺ Teff cell subsets and their PD-1 expression under basal conditions

Similar frequencies of CD8⁺ Treg and CD8⁺ Teff subsets in PBMC of T1D patients and controls.

PD-1 frequency is lower in CD8⁺ Teff of LT T1D patients versus controls.

Analysis of CD8⁺ Treg and CD8⁺ Teff cell subsets and their PD-1 expression upon PMA-ionomycin stimulation

Lower frequencies of CD8⁺ Tregs and higher frequencies of CD8⁺ Teffs in LT T1D patients.

Total PD-1 and PD-1^high frequency is decreased in CD8⁺ Tregs of LT T1D patients than in controls.

PD-1 frequency in similar in CD8⁺ Teffs of T1D patients and controls.

Analysis of proliferation of CD8⁺ Treg and CD8⁺ Teff cell subsets

Proliferation of CD8⁺ Tregs is impaired significantly in ND T1D patients after 3 day-stimulus.

Proliferation of CD8⁺ Tregs and CD8⁺ Teffs is impaired in T1D patients after 5 day-stimulus.

S4 Fig. Correlation of percentages of CD8⁺ Treg cells with levels of HbA1c under basal conditions.

S5 Fig. Correlation of percentages CD8⁺ PD-1⁺ Treg cells and percentages CD8⁺ PD-1⁺ Teff cells with levels of HbA1c under basal conditions.