Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Quality of life and its predictors among patients with chronic kidney disease: A hospital-based cross sectional study

  • Belayneh Kefale ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Belayneh.kefale@yahoo.com

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Science, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia

  • Minyahil Alebachew,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Yewondwossen Tadesse,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Ephrem Engidawork

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Abstract

Introduction

Quality of life (QoL) is increasingly being considered as an important measure of how disease affects patients’ lives, especially for long-term diseases like chronic kidney disease (CKD). Even though there is no statistically significant association between stages of CKD and QoL, it is decreased in patients with early stages of the disease. Hence, this study aimed to assess QoL and its predictors among patients with CKD at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH).

Methods

A cross sectional study was conducted at the nephrology clinic of TASH. A total of 256 patients were recruited through systematic random sampling. Data were collected using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Items (SF-36). The data were entered into Epi Info 7.2.2.2 and analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 statistical software. Descriptive statistics like frequency, percent, mean and standard deviation were used to summarize patients’ baseline characteristics. Student’s unpaired t-test and ANOVA were conducted to compare two groups and more than two groups in the analysis of QoL, respectively. Multivariable linear regression was employed to investigate the potential predictors of QoL.

Results

Quality of life was decreased in all stages of CKD. A reduction in physical functioning (p = 0.03), bodily pain (p = 0.004), vitality (p = 0.019) and social functioning (p = 0.002) was observed progressively across stages of CKD. High income status and greater than 11g/dl hemoglobin level were found to be predictors of all high score SF-36 domains. High family income (β 15.33; 95%CI: 11.33–19.33, p<0.001), higher educational status (β 7.9; 95%CI: 4.10–11.66, p<0.001), and hemoglobin ≥11g/dl (β 8.36; 95%CI: 6.31–10.41, p<0.001) were predictors of better QoL in the physical component summary, whereas absence of CKD complications (β 2.75; 95%CI: 0.56–4.94, p = 0.014), high family income (β 10.10; 95%CI: 5.10–15.10, p<0.001) and hemoglobin ≥11g/dl (β 4.54, 95%CI: 2.01–7.08, p = 0.001) were predictors of better QoL in the mental component summary.

Conclusion

In this setting, QoL decreased in CKD patients in the early stages of the disease. Study participants with low income and hemoglobin level were considered to have worse quality of life in both physical and mental component summaries.

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as abnormal kidney structure or function persisting greater than 3 months [1]. This can be determined either by evidence of kidney damage (typically detected by presence of persistent albuminuria) or by decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR)[2, 3]. CKD is a global public health problem due to the rapid rise of common risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension. Consequently, it will result significance menace to the developing nations with limited resources [2]. Its burden on health care system is becoming immense with increasing prevalence, high costs, and poor outcomes [4]. CKD is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular morbidity, premature mortality, and has severe impact on quality of life (QoL) [4]. Mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) is estimated to be at least 8 to 10 fold higher in CKD patients as compared to non-CKD patients [4]. The costs involved in the management CKD co-morbidities are very high, imposing great difficulties on health care systems, predominantly in countries with limited resources [5].

Studies demonstrated that CKD patients living with significant constraints and restrictions might have an impaired normal psychosocial development [6, 7]. QoL is an independent risk factor for mortality in CKD patients particularly in end stage renal disease (ESRD) [8, 9]. Moreover, several factors such as disease related manifestations, side effects of treatments, and patient’s quality of interaction with family members can influence QoL [10, 11]. Low QoL have been the major problems in CKD patients and their occurrence can adversely impact the course of the disease [12, 13]. Patients with CKD have a reduced QoL and an increased frequency and severity of both symptoms and psychological distress, with the magnitude of these changes negatively correlated with GFR [6, 10]. Association of poorer QoL with preventable factors demonstrated that attention should be given to psychosocial and medical interventions to improve QoL in CKD patients [11]. The available data on QoL of patients on conservative treatment and the relationship between the QoL and GFR is limited [12, 13]. Even though patients with advanced renal insufficiency have a reduced QoL, some studies showed that QoL is decreased in the early stages of disease [14].

The incidence of CKD in Ethiopia is rising because of increased risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus [15]. An extensive study of factors affecting QoL would render valuable perspicacity for the healthcare providers in renal clinic to improve QoL. However, evidence-based research that evaluates QoL and associated factors among patients with CKD in developing countries is scanty [9]. Thus, there should be a continuing need to routinely assess factors affecting QoL among patients with CKD in clinical practice [11, 16]. This is especially important in resource-limited countries like Ethiopia, as the preponderance of economic instability, low literacy level, and restricted access to healthcare facilities, inadequate follow up and co-morbidities might have led to worse QoL. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of CKD patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital and to determine the related factors.

Methods

Study design and settings

A cross-sectional study was conducted from May to September 2017 at the nephrology clinic of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH), the largest general public hospital, where tertiary care is being provided in Ethiopia. The Nephrology clinic provides treatment to different types of renal disease and its complications. The renal days are mainly Monday, Tuesday and Thursday; on an average 6, 12 and 12 CKD patients were selected, respectively. Single population proportion formula was used to calculate the sample size [17]

Where;

n = is desired sample size for population >10,000;

Z = is standard normal distribution usually set as 1.96 (which corresponds to 95% confidence level);

P = means that we use positive prevalence estimated, to maximize sample size. Negative prevalence = 1 − 0.5 = 0.5,

d = degree of accuracy desired (marginal error is 0.05); then the sample size is

The expected number of source population in the study period (N), based on the average number of patients coming to the clinic three days in a week with a total of 20 weeks was 600 (20*6+20*12+20*12).

Where N = source population and n = estimated sample size for N≥10,000 population.

Therefore, the corrected sample size with a 10% contingency provided a final sample size of 256 CKD patients.

Inclusion criteria

CKD patients aged 18 years and above and who understood Amharic language were targeted since Amharic is the predominant and national language in the region. However, patients with cognitive, speech or hearing impairment were excluded from the study and only those who signed the informed consent were included in the study.

Data collection techniques

Three nurses were recruited as data collectors. Training was given to them regarding appropriate use of the data collection instruments focusing on uniform interpretation of questions, strict use of study criterion, explanation of study objectives and getting consents from study participants.

Data were collected using structured questionnaire, which contained socio-demographic characteristics, clinical parameters and The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) (S1 Annex). SF-36 is a generic instrument translated and validated scale in Amharic [18], was utilized to collect information necessary to assess QoL. The 36-item short form questionnaire is a multi-item scale, not specific to any disease or treatment group. The SF-36 is covered by a conceptual model of QoL [19] and includes 36 items that yield an 8-dimension profile on a 100-point scale; a higher score indicates a better perceived health state. The eight dimensions are: Physical function (PF), Role limitations caused by physical problems (RP), Pain (BP), General health (GH), Vitality/energy (VT), Social function (SF), mental health/emotional well-being (MH) and Role limitations caused by emotional problems/mental health (RE). In addition it is used to estimate change in health status over the past year. The data collection instrument was assessed by an expert physician in the field of nephrology for clarity and comprehensiveness of its contents. Pre-testing was done on 5% of the study participants before the start of the actual study. After pre-testing all the necessary modifications and adjustments were done before implementing in the main study.

Data analysis

Data were sorted, cleaned, coded and entered into Epi Info 7.2.2.2 and analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 statistical software. Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percent, mean and standard deviation were used to summarize patients’ baseline socio-demographic data and clinical parameters. Student’s unpaired t-test and one-way ANOVA were conducted to compare two groups and three or more groups in the analysis of QoL, respectively. When t-test & ANOVA result was statistically significant, multivariable linear regression was employed to identify the potential predictors of the physical and mental component summary. P-value < 0.05 considered as statistically significant.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

Males comprised 58% of the sex category. Majority of the participants were in the age group of less than 61 years, which accounted for 54.3%. Mean age of the study population was 52.5 (SD = 16.8) years (range 18 to 90 years). Married participants accounted for 69.9% and being retired (25.4%) and government employee (23.4%) accounted for the highest percentage of occupation. Education-wise, 34.4% and 27.7% attended primary and higher education, respectively. Majority of the participants were non-health professionals (97.3%). A significant proportion of the study participants (29.7%) had average level of monthly family income [20] (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristic of chronic kidney disease patients attending the renal clinic of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212184.t001

Disease related characteristics

Overall, patients had been diagnosed with CKD for an average of 4.7 (SD = 3.5) years, ranging from under five years (158, 61.7%) through 5–10 years (75, 29.3%) to above ten years (23, 9%). In stage 5 CKD patients, having more than three co-morbidities (47.5%) and complications (66.7%) were the most prevalent clinical conditions. Fasting blood sugar, serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen increased, while hemoglobin decreased across the stages (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Clinical and laboratory parameters according to the stage of chronic kidney disease patients attending the renal clinic of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212184.t002

Quality of life SF-36 domains and summary scores

QoL, as evaluated by the means of SF-36 domains, scores in all dimensions were impaired progressively and significantly (p<0.05) across CKD stages and the lowest scores were found in stage 5 CKD patients except emotional role functioning in stage 4 (p = 0.005). As shown in Table 3, the dimensions showing highest and least scores were emotional role functioning (78±34.7) and bodily pain (59.3±22.6) in stages 1 and 2, social functioning (68±24.6) and physical role functioning (48.6±40.4) in stage 3, mental health (55.6±18.9) and physical role functioning (38.2±40.2) in stage 4 and emotional role functioning (56.1±45.6) physical role functioning (26.6±40.4) in stage 5, respectively (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Quality of life domains and mean summary scores of patients in different stages of chronic kidney disease patients attending the renal clinic of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212184.t003

Factors associated with quality of life

The results of the comparative statistical analysis of the QoL domains of CKD patients according to the categorical socio-demographic variables are shown in Table 4. Among the domains that constitute the SF-36 physical and mental component summaries, higher scores in all SF-36 domains were observed in patients ≤ 60 years (p<0.05) and higher education (p<0.05) groups. High family income (p<0.001) groups had higher score in all SF-36 domains except physical functioning, emotional role functioning, and mental health. The present study showed that male patients had escalated QoL in terms of general health (p = 0.034), vitality (p = 0.038), social functioning (p = 0.011) and mental health (p = 0.018). In addition, occupation had statistical significant difference with physical functioning (p = 0.001), physical role functioning (p<0.001), bodily pain (p = 0.007) and vitality (p = 0.026) (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Comparative statistical analysis of mean scores of SF-36 domains among patients with chronic kidney disease, according to the categorical socio-demographic variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212184.t004

Comparative statistical analysis of the SF-36 domains of CKD patients according to the clinical & laboratory parameters are shown in Table 5. Among the domains that constitute the SF-36 physical and mental component summaries, lower scores in SF-36 domains were associated with higher CKD stages (p<0.05) except emotional role functioning, on five or more medications (p<0.001), having three or more co-morbidities (p≤0.001), presence of CKD complications (p<0.001), having hemoglobin ≤11g/dl level (p<0.001) and being non-adherent to their medications (p<0.05). General health was low in patients having greater than 110 mmHg mean arterial pressure (Table 5).

thumbnail
Table 5. Comparative statistical analysis of the mean scores of SF-36 domains of patients with chronic kidney disease, according to the categorical clinical/laboratory parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212184.t005

According to the comparative statistical analysis of categorical socio-demographic variables across composite summary, higher scores in the physical and mental component summary were found among patients who were younger (p<0.001, p<0.05), had higher education (p<0.001, p<0.001) and high family income (p<0.001, p<0.001), respectively of CKD patients. Occupation had also statistically significant mean difference with physical component summary (Table 6).

thumbnail
Table 6. Comparative statistical analysis of the mean scores of physical and mental composite summaries of patients with chronic kidney disease, according to the categorical socio-demographic variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212184.t006

As per the comparative statistical analysis of clinical & laboratory parameters, lower scores in the physical and mental component summary were found among patients who were on advanced CKD stage (p<0.001, p<0.001), five or more medications (p<0.001, p<0.001), three or more co-morbidities (p<0.001, p<0.001) and had hemoglobin ≤11g/dl level (p<0.001, p<0.001), respectively of CKD patients (Table 7).

thumbnail
Table 7. Comparative statistical analysis of mean scores of physical and mental composite summaries of patients with chronic kidney disease, according to the categorical clinical & laboratory parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212184.t007

After adjustment through multivariable linear regression, higher family income status and greater than 11g/dl hemoglobin level were found to be predictors of all high score SF-36 domains. Being female, presence of complications, advanced stage of CKD, patients with five or more medications and three or more co-morbidities were predictors of low physical functioning. Being adherent to medications and absence of CKD complications were found predictors of better general health and mental health, respectively. Likewise, advanced CKD was a predictor of worse social functioning, vitality and bodily pain (Table 8). No associations were detected between any other socio-demographic or clinical variables and the scores of the SF-36.

thumbnail
Table 8. Adjusted analysis for predictors of SF-36 domains among chronic kidney disease patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212184.t008

The present study revealed that only high family income, educational status and hemoglobin >11g/dl level were predictors of better QoL in the physical component summary, after adjustments through multivariable linear regression. The independent predictors of higher mental component summary were high family income, hemoglobin >11g/dl level and absence of CKD complications (Table 9).

thumbnail
Table 9. Adjusted analysis for predictors of physical and mental component summaries of the Short Form (SF-36) among chronic kidney disease patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212184.t009

Discussion

The present study revealed that QoL decreased across all CKD stages, which is similar with various studies [13, 21]. Quality of life domains such as physical functioning, bodily pain, vitality and social functioning were found statistically significant with CKD stages. The domains which make up the physical QoL were more impaired than domains that constitute the mental QoL. This finding is in agreement with the results obtained from previous studies, which demonstrated poorer physical component QoL in relation to mental component QoL in renal patients [5, 13]. This could probably be due to the chronic nature of the disease; patients may adapt not only to the disease and its treatment but also psychologically to their situations that directly affect patients’ QoL over time. The mean score of physical component summary was found to be 38.1±9.5. This finding is similar with previous findings in Iran [11], Canada & Denmark [22, 23] and different from other studies in Brazil [13]. On the other hand, mental composite summary was found to be 46±9.1. This finding is also in accordance with studies conducted in Brazil & Denmark [13, 23] and different from studies conducted in Nigeria & USA [10, 24]. This variation could be attributed to differences in socioeconomic and education status, management approaches between the countries, and sample size between studies. Socioeconomic status has been implicated in QoL in several studies of renal patients [13, 25]. CKD patients with low socioeconomic status could not afford the prescribed regimens for the management of various illness co-existed and this affects their QoL and adherence [26]. The finding of this study indicated that there were low QoL scores in all stages of CKD, which is associated with low socioeconomic status of the study participants in Ethiopia. Besides, it also demonstrated a significant decrease in QoL progressively in the different stages of renal disease based on the mean values of the SF-36 scores, which were below 70 in all dimensions. However, normal healthy populations usually have scores above this level in most studies [19].

On the evaluation of socio-demographic and clinical variables through multivariable linear regression analysis, all SF-36 domains, physical and mental component summary were found to be strongly associated with family income and hemoglobin level. In addition, an advanced stage of CKD was found a predictor of worse physical functioning, social functioning, vitality and bodily pain. These findings are in accordance with other studies in Denmark [23], Jordan [27], Saudi [3], Ireland [28], Portugal [7], and showed that socio-economic status was a predictor of QOL score. A prospective study conducted by Braga et al [26] revealed that higher socioeconomic level was significantly related to better QoL. Similarly, lower social status, characterized by lower education, worse financial situation, or lack of employment has also been consistently associated with impaired QoL [29]. This could be due to the fact that people with low economic status do not access effective health care due to economic constraints. This might suppress utilization of good QoL, effective health care in developing countries including Ethiopia.

Besides, various studies revealed that hemoglobin ≥11g/dl was associated with better QoL. A study in the US indicated that hemoglobin level was positively associated with QoL [24]. In different literature, the impact of hemoglobin in CKD on QoL is well described [30, 31]. This may be due to the low level of hemoglobin being associated with a greater risk of co-morbidities, which could result in fatigue and reduced physical activities, thus, decreasing QoL.

With regard to education, participants with a higher level of education had better physical component summary than patients with lower education level. This finding is similar to other previous studies which showed that participants with higher educational level have better QoL [32, 33]. This may be due to educated participants have greater access to information about their disease, better economic conditions, and better capacity to evaluate traumatic phenomena. It is also assumed that CKD patients with higher education mainly participate in activities that require more intellectual over those that require greater physical effort. Thus, low educational status may attribute the poor QoL of CKD patients. Presences of CKD complications were found to be strongly associated with low score on mental composite summary in the present study. This is comparable to a study by Silverberg et al [34] & Kimel et al [35] where history of CVD and anemia were found to be negatively associated with QoL. The study participants in this study who have different complications scored low QoL. The possible reason for this finding may be due to CKD patients with different complications were more likely on many drugs at the same time and may also be at advanced stage of CKD [36]. All these factors may constitute great burden for the patients and invariably reduce their QoL. In the present study variables like sex, co-morbidity status, CKD stage, occupation and pill burden were not statistically significant associated with QoL, which were predictors of in various studies. This variation may be due to methodological difference and management approaches between studies in different countries.

Limitation of the study

The cross-sectional nature of the study did not allow a follow up, which would have provided a better design for identifying the worse quality of life and contributing factors. On the other hand, the quantitative nature of the data could not properly highlight the reasons for low quality of life from the patients’ perspective, which would have been better revealed by conducting in-depth interviews or focus group discussions. The study looked at only a single facility and hence caution should be exercised in extrapolating the results.

Conclusions

Quality of life was impaired progressively across the 5 CKD stages. The domains which make up the physical quality of life were more impaired than domains that constitute the mental quality of life. Study participants with low income and hemoglobin level were considered to have worse quality of life in both physical and mental component summaries.

Ethical approval

Approval and permission were sought from Ethical Review Board of school of pharmacy and department of internal medicine of Addis Ababa University.

Supporting information

S1 Annex. Structured questionnaire and data abstraction format.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212184.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge TASH renal clinic staffs for their valuable contribution towards this project. Finally, we also would like to extend our acknowledgment to RAND who develop the 36-Item Health Survey as part of Medical Outcomes Study.

References

  1. 1. Hill NR, Fatoba ST, Oke JL, Hirst JA, O’Callaghan CA, Lasserson DS, et al. Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease–A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158765. pmid:27383068
  2. 2. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney Int Suppl, 2009(113): p. S1–130. pmid:19644521
  3. 3. Bayoumi M, Al Harbi A, Al Suwaida A, Al Ghonaim M, Al Wakeel J, Mishkiry A. Predictors of quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl, 2013. 24(2): p. 254–9. pmid:23538347
  4. 4. Jha V., Wang A.Y.-M., and Wang H. The impact of CKD identification in large countries: the burden of illness. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012. 27(suppl 3): p. iii32–iii38.
  5. 5. Bohlke M, Nunes DL, Marini SS, Kitamura C, Andrade M, Von-Gysel MPO. Predictors of quality of life among patients on dialysis in southern Brazil. Sao Paulo Med J. 2008;126(5):252–6. pmid:19099157
  6. 6. Kalantar-Zadeh K. and Unruh M. Health related quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005. 37(2): p. 367–378. pmid:16142573
  7. 7. Moura A, Madureira J, Alija P, Fernandes J, Oliveira J, Lopez M, et al. Predictors of health-related quality of life perceived by end-stage renal disease patients under online hemodiafiltration. Quality of Life Research. 2015. 24(6): p. 1327–1335. pmid:25381124
  8. 8. Baiardi F, Degli EE, Cocchi R, Fabbri A, Sturani A, Valpiani G, et al. Effects of clinical and individual variables on quality of life in chronic renal failure patients. Journal of Nephrology, 2002. 15(1): p. 61–67. pmid:11936428
  9. 9. Awuah KT, Finkelstein SH, Finkelstein FO. Quality of life of chronic kidney disease patients in developing countries. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3(2):227.
  10. 10. Ayanda KA. and Ajiboye OAAPO. Quality of Life of Chronic Kidney Disease Patients in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. JBAH, 2014; 4(5):17–28.
  11. 11. MahboobLessan P, Zohreh R. Contributing factors in health-related quality of life assessment of ESRD patients: a single center study. Nephro-urology Monthly. Int J Nephrol Urol. 2009;1(2):129–36.
  12. 12. Magacho EJ, Ribeiro LC, Chaoubah A, Bastos MG. Adherence to drug therapy in kidney disease. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2011;44(3):258–62. pmid:21344138
  13. 13. Cruz MC, Andrade C, Urrutia M, Draibe S, Nogueira-Martins LA, Sesso Rde C. Quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clinics. 2011;66(6):991–5. pmid:21808864
  14. 14. Kimmel PL and Patel SS. Quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease: focus on end-stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis. Semin Nephrol. 2006 26(1):68–79. pmid:16412831
  15. 15. Fiseha T, Kassim M, Yemane T. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and associated risk factors among diabetic patients in southern Ethiopia. Am J Health Res. 2014;2(4):216–21.
  16. 16. DiMatteo MR. Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research. Medical care. 2004;42(3):200–9. pmid:15076819
  17. 17. Pourhoseingholi MA, Vahedi M, Rahimzadeh M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2013;6(1):14. pmid:24834239
  18. 18. Kebede D, Alem A, Shibre T, Negash A, Deyassa N, Beyero T. Health related quality of life (SF-36) survey in Butajira, rural Ethiopia: normative data and evaluation of reliability and validity. Ethiop Med J. 2004;42(4):289–97. pmid:16122121
  19. 19. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med care. 1992; 30(6): 473–83. pmid:1593914
  20. 20. Kefale B, Tadesse Y, Alebachew M, Engidawork E. Management practice, and adherence and its contributing factors among patients with chronic kidney disease at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital: A hospital-based cross-sectional study. PloS One, 2018. 13(7): p. e0200415. pmid:30044830
  21. 21. Pagels AA, Söderkvist BK, Medin C, Hylander B, Heiwe S. Health-related quality of life in different stages of chronic kidney disease and at initiation of dialysis treatment. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10(1):71.
  22. 22. Mujais SK, Story K, Brouillette J, Takano T, Soroka S, Franek C, et al. Health-related quality of life in CKD patients: correlates and evolution over time. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(8):1293–301. pmid:19643926
  23. 23. Molsted S, Prescott L, Heaf J, Eidemak I. Assessment and clinical aspects of health-related quality of life in dialysis patients and patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephron Clin Pract. 2007;106(1):c24–c33. pmid:17409766
  24. 24. Perlman RL, Finkelstein FO, Liu L, Roys E, Kiser M, Eisele G, et al. Quality of life in chronic kidney disease (CKD): a cross-sectional analysis in the Renal Research Institute-CKD study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45(4):658–66. pmid:15806468
  25. 25. Finkelstein FO, Wuerth D, Finkelstein SH. Health related quality of life and the CKD patient: challenges for the nephrology community. Kidney Int. 2009;76(9):946–52. pmid:19675529
  26. 26. Braga SFM, Peixoto SV, Gomes IC, Acúrcio FdA, Andrade EIG, Cherchiglia ML. Factors associated with health-related quality of life in elderly patients on hemodialysis. Revista de saude publica. 2011;45(6):1127–36. pmid:22124742
  27. 27. Shdaifat E.A. and Manaf MRA. Quality of life of caregivers and patients undergoing haemodialysis at Ministry of Health, Jordan. International Journal of Applied, 2012. 2(3).
  28. 28. Blake C., Codd MB, Cassidy A and O'Meara YM. Physical function, employment and quality of life in end-stage renal disease. J Nephrol. 2000. 13(2): p. 142–9. pmid:10858978
  29. 29. Dasari P, Venkateshwarlu K, Venisetty R. Management of comorbidities in chronic kidney disease: a prospective observational study. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;6(2):363–7.
  30. 30. Lefebvre P, Vekeman F, Sarokhan B, Enny C, Provenzano R, Cremieux P-Y. Relationship between hemoglobin level and quality of life in anemic patients with chronic kidney disease receiving epoetin alfa. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22(10):1929–37. pmid:17022852
  31. 31. Finkelstein FO, Story K, Firanek C, Mendelssohn D, Barre P, Takano T, et al. Health-related quality of life and hemoglobin levels in chronic kidney disease patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(1):33–8. pmid:18987300
  32. 32. Fukushima RLM, Menezes ALC, Inouye K, Pavarini SCI, Orlandi FdS. Quality of life and associated factors in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 2016;29(5):518–24.
  33. 33. García-Llana H, Remor E, Selgas R. Adherence to treatment, emotional state and quality of life in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis. Psicothema. 2013;25(1):79–86. pmid:23336548
  34. 34. Silverberg DS, Wexler D, Blum M, Iaina A, Sheps D, Keren G, et al. Effects of treatment with epoetin beta on outcomes in patients with anaemia and chronic heart failure. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2005;28(1):41–7. pmid:15489560
  35. 35. Kimel M, Leidy NK, Mannix S, Dixon J. Does epoetin alfa improve health-related quality of life in chronically ill patients with anemia? Summary of trials of cancer, HIV/AIDS, and chronic kidney disease. Value Health. 2008;11(1):57–75. pmid:18237361
  36. 36. Padhi S, Glen J, Pordes BA, Thomas ME. Management of anaemia in chronic kidney disease: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2015;350: h2258 pmid:26044132