A DNA aptamer reveals an allosteric site for inhibition in metallo-β-lactamases

Nazmul H. Khan; Anthony A. Bui; Yang Xiao; R. Bryan Sutton; Robert W. Shaw; Benjamin J. Wylie; Michael P. Latham

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214440

Abstract

The hydrolysis of β-lactam antibiotics by β-lactamase enzymes is the most prominent antibiotic resistance mechanism for many pathogenic bacteria. Out of this broad class of enzymes, metallo-β-lactamases are of special clinical interest because of their broad substrate specificities. Several in vitro inhibitors for various metallo-β-lactamases have been reported with no clinical efficacy. Previously, we described a 10-nucleotide single stranded DNA aptamer (10-mer) that inhibits Bacillus cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase very effectively. Here, we find that the aptamer shows uncompetitive inhibition of Bacillus cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase during cefuroxime hydrolysis. To understand the mechanism of inhibition, we report a 2.5 Å resolution X-ray crystal structure and solution-state NMR analysis of the free enzyme. Chemical shift perturbations were observed in the HSQC spectra for several residues upon titrating with increasing concentrations of the 10-mer. In the X-ray crystal structure, these residues are distal to the active site, suggesting an allosteric mechanism for the aptamer inhibition of the enzyme. HADDOCK molecular docking simulations suggest that the 10-mer docks 26 Å from the active site. We then mutated the three lysine residues in the basic binding patch to glutamine and measured the catalytic activity and inhibition by the 10-mer. No significant inhibition of these mutants was observed by the 10-mer as compared to wild type. Interestingly, mutation of Lys50 (Lys78; according to standard MBL numbering system) resulted in reduced enzymatic activity relative to wild type in the absence of inhibitor, further highlighting an allosteric mechanism for inhibition.

Citation: Khan NH, Bui AA, Xiao Y, Sutton RB, Shaw RW, Wylie BJ, et al. (2019) A DNA aptamer reveals an allosteric site for inhibition in metallo-β-lactamases. PLoS ONE 14(4): e0214440. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440

Editor: Freddie Salsbury Jr, Wake Forest University, UNITED STATES

Received: January 21, 2019; Accepted: March 13, 2019; Published: April 22, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Khan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are in the paper.

Funding: Use of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC01-76SF00515. The SSRL Structural Molecular Biology Program is supported by the DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research, and by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health (including P41GM103393). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIGMS or NIH. Research reported in the publication was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) under award number R01AR063634 (R.B.S), by seed money from the Office of the Vice President for Research, TTU (R.W.S), The National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) under award numbers R35GM124979 (B.J.W.) and by Welch Foundation Grant D-1876 (M.P.L.).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Abbreviations: 5/B/6, Bacillus cereus 5/B/6; BcII, Bacillus cereus 569/H9; HADDOCK, Highly Ambiguous Data-driving DOCKing; HSQC, heteronuclear single quantum coherence; MBLs, metallo-β-lactamases; NDM-1, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase 1; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; SLAC, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center; VIM-4, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase

Introduction

β-lactam antibiotics are the most widely prescribed class of antimicrobial drugs because of their high effectiveness and relatively low cost [1]. Consequently, the evolution of β-lactam antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria is a major threat to human health. The production of β-lactamase enzymes, which catalyze the hydrolysis of the endocyclic amide bond of the β-lactam ring, is the most common mechanism for resistance to these antibiotics [2]. Based on sequence identity, there are four classes of β-lactamases. Classes A, C, and D are serine β-lactamases, which have a serine residue in their active site. Class B enzymes are zinc dependent metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), which require one or two Zn²⁺ in their active site for catalysis [3, 4]. The most studied, clinically important chromosomally encoded MBLs are native to Bacillus cereus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [5]. In recent years, many new and highly transmissible MBLs have been identified [6]. For example, since its discovery in a Swedish male patient of Indian origin in 2009, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase 1 (NDM-1) has emerged as the most dangerous threat in the rise of multi-drug resistant bacteria strains. Encoded in a highly transposable genetic element, NDM-1 can hydrolyze almost all β-lactam antibiotics including carbapenems [7]. Additionally, more than 140 allotypes of imipenemase (IMP) and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) type MBLs have been reported worldwide [8, 9]. Both IMP- and VIM-type enzymes show broad substrate specificity with high affinity for cephalosporins and carbapenems [8]. VIM-type MBLs are also capable of hydrolyzing 6-α-methoxypenicilin, a β-lactam antibiotic thought to be stable against β-lactamases [8–11]. Thus, developing novel inhibitors for MBLs is essential for the continued use of β-lactam antibiotics. Though extensive studies have been performed, no therapeutic inhibitors have been identified. This search is complicated by not fully understanding the role of the catalytic Zn²⁺ ions in the catalytic mechanism and architectural similarities of active sites of MBLs with some mammalian enzymes [12, 13]. Despite these challenges, several promising in vitro inhibitors of MBL have been identified. In most cases, these inhibitors were found to inhibit the enzyme by interacting with the active site residues or by chelating the Zn²⁺ ions [14–18] which would have toxic side effects in humans. For example, the anticancer antibiotic mithramycin inhibits MBL from Bacillus cereus (BcII MBL) by altering the structure of the enzyme and potentially disrupting the active site Zn²⁺ ions [19]. Some inhibitors have also been reported that mediate inhibition of MBL without interacting with the active site Zn²⁺. For example, camelid nanobodies inhibit VIM-4 by interacting with residues away from the active site [20].

For systemic treatment, it is essential to develop directed and selective therapies. To this end, oligonucleotide aptamers show promise as both drugs and drug delivery systems [21, 22]. Aptamers can recognize a target molecule with high affinity and specificity [21]. Advantages of nucleic acid aptamers, compared to traditional antibodies or nanobodies, include their smaller size, structural flexibility, low production cost and time, and little or no immunogenicity or toxicity [21–23]. Nucleic acid aptamers are not however without drawbacks: for example, they are very susceptible to degradation by endogenous nucleases and do not readily cross the plasma membrane both of which limits their bioavailability [24]. Previously, we identified oligonucleotide aptamers that act as inhibitors of Bacillus cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase (hereafter referred to as 5/B/6 MBL; Sequence ID: AAA22562.1). We used SELEX [25] to select single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), and RNA aptamers from random oligonucleotide starting libraries. A truncated 10-residue DNA (10-mer) was the most potent oligonucleotide inhibitor identified from a random 61-mer ssDNA library [14]. Note, the 5/B/6 MBL, which we use in our biochemical and structural studies, is a different isolate from the commonly used BcII MBL (Sequence ID: EEL64219.1). 5/B/6 MBL, which was isolated by Davies et al [26], and BcII MBL, which was isolated by Sabath et al [27] with crystal structures reported by Carfi et al [28] and Fabiane et al [29], share 93% sequence identity, and as we will show below are structurally the same.

In this paper, we couple kinetic and structural studies of the free and inhibited Bacillus cereus 5/B/6 MBL to understand the structure-activity relationships that underlie the inhibition by the 10-mer DNA. We structurally characterized the enzyme using X-ray crystallography and solution state NMR. Our structural data, including chemical shift perturbations from an NMR titration experiment, were leveraged to constrain a model of the enzyme-inhibitor complex. This model was confirmed by mutating enzyme residues found to interact with the 10-mer. Our data suggests that the association of 10-mer with 5/B/6 MBL during cefuroxime hydrolysis allosterically modulates the enzyme, culminating in uncompetitive enzymatic inhibition. This result identifies a novel site for future 5/B/6 and BcII MBL inhibitor design.

Materials and methods

Bacillus cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase expression and purification

For expression and purification of unlabeled enzyme, E. coli BL21 (DE3) codon plus competent cells (Stratagene) were transformed with pET29 plasmid containing the structural gene of B. cereus 5/B/6 MBL. Transformed cells were grown at 37 °C in LB medium supplemented with 0.1 mM ZnSO₄ and 50 μg/ml kanamycin. Enzyme overexpression was induced with 1 mM IPTG added at attenuance at 600 nm of 1.0; the cells were further grown for 12 hours at 20 °C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed, and resuspended in 20 mM MOPS, 1 mM ZnSO₄, pH 7.0 buffer (20/1 buffer). Then the cells were lysed via four passes through a French pressure cell. Cell lysate was centrifuged using a Fiberlite F21-8x50y rotor (Thermo Scientific) at 20000 rpm (47360 g) for 1 hour at 4 °C. Solid (NH₄)₂SO₄ was added to the supernatant to a final concentration of 200 mM. Insoluble materials were removed by ultracentrifugation using a Beckman Ti 90 rotor at 90000 rpm (694000 g) for 2 hours at 4 °C. Supernatant was loaded onto a 25 ml POROS XS strong cation exchange column (Applied Biosystems) previously equilibrated with 20/1 buffer. This column was washed with 20/1 buffer. After elution of unbound materials, the bound enzyme was eluted with a step gradient to 20 mM MOPS, 1 mM ZnSO₄, 200 mM (NH₄)₂SO₄, pH 7. Fractions that contained the enzyme were loaded onto a 7×15.6 cm Bio-gel P-60 column previously equilibrated with 20/1 buffer. The column was washed with 20/1 buffer. Enzyme containing fractions were concentrated by using an Amicon concentrator (Cole-Parmer, USA) equipped with an YM-10 membrane (10000 molecular weight cutoff). After every step of the purification, enzyme activity was calculated with a modified method described by Kim et al. [14] and Davies et al. [30] and total protein was determined by the method of Lowry et al. [31] using bovine serum albumin for the standard. Enzyme purity was ascertained by specific activity and SDS-PAGE and was judged to be >98% pure. Glycerol (20% v/v final concentration) was added to the pure enzyme, which was stored at -20 °C. For NMR experiments, isotopically labeled enzyme was purified in the same way, however, the cells were grown in 2x M9 minimal medium (13.6 g/L Na₂HPO₄, 6.0 g/L KH₂PO₄, 1.0 g/L NaCl, 0.5 g/L Mg₂SO₄∙7H₂O, pH 7.1) [32] supplemented with ¹²C- or ¹³C-d-glucose (3 g/L) and (¹⁵NH₄)₂SO₄ (1 g/L) as the sole carbon and nitrogen sources, respectively, along with vitamins (1 μg/mL each biotin and thiamine) and kanamycin (50 μg/ml). Generally, ~40 and ~25 milligrams of purified enzyme were produced from per liter LB or minimal media, respectively.

Selection of the 10-mer DNA

The process of the 10-mer selection by SELEX was described in Kim et al. [14]. The 10-mer (5’-CCAAACTTGG-3’) was purchased from Oligo Factory (Holliston, MA, USA) and used in all inhibition assays and NMR experiments without further purification.

Enzyme kinetic studies

Using cefuroxime as the substrate, we measured 5/B/6 MBL activity in 50 mM MOPS, 1 mM ZnSO₄, pH 7 through a spectrophotometric method described by Kim et al. [14]. In this protocol, the decrease in substrate absorbance (Δε_276nm = 4.42 mM^-1 cm^-1) was continuously monitored at 276 nm during hydrolysis using a Shimadzu UV160U spectrophotometer and a quartz cuvette with 0.1 cm pathlength. All assays were performed with a final concentration of 0.3 μM enzyme in a reaction volume of 300 μL. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required for catalyzing the hydrolysis of 1 μmol of substrate in 1 minute at 30 °C. For inhibition assays, diluted enzyme was pre-incubated with or without 10-mer DNA aptamer in the buffer for 15 min at 25 °C. All kinetic measurements were repeated in at least triplicate. A global nonlinear curve fitting was performed to determine the inhibition type using the equation in GraphPad Prism 6.0 [33], where v is the reaction rate, ; K_m is the Michaelis-Menten constant, ; V_max is the maximum velocity and V_max = k_cat [E] (enzyme concentration), [S] substrate concentration and (where [I] is the inhibitor concentration and is the inhibition constant). In the global fit, the V_max, K_m, and are shared in all datasets. IC₅₀s (concentration of an inhibitor that inhibits 50% of the enzyme) were determined by plotting log of remaining activity as a function of inhibitor concentration.

Crystallography

Crystallization trials for 5/B/6 MBL were carried out using the structure screen 1 + 2 HT-96 (Molecular Dimensions). The concentration of the enzyme sample used for the screening was 20 mg/ml in 5 mM MOPS and 0.5 mM ZnSO₄ at pH 7.0. Crystals typically appear within a week when incubated at 23 °C. Further optimization was performed using 24-well VDX plates and 1 mL reservoir volume containing 0.1 M Tris at pH 8.5 and 8% w/v PEG 8000. Hanging droplets were comprised of 1 μL of reservoir solution and 1 μL of protein. Final X-ray data were collected at 100 K and a wavelength of 1.283 Å using beam line 7–1 at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC). Data were integrated using XDS [34]. Merging and scaling were performed using AIMLESS [35]. Molecular replacement, starting from PDB ID 1BC2 [Fabiane et al 1998], and refinement were done with PHENIX [36]. COOT [37] was used for manual density fitting. The coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (http://pdb.org) under the PDB ID 6DJA. Table 1 summarizes the data collection and refinement statistics. Ramachandran statistics showed that 97.3% and 2.7% of all residues were in favored and allowed regions, respectively.

Download:

Table 1. Data collection and refinement statistics (molecular replacement).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.t001

NMR spectroscopy and sequential backbone assignments

NMR experiments were performed on an Agilent DD2 600 MHz spectrometer (Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a z-axis pulsed field gradient room temperature HCN probe. Standard 3D gradient-selected, sensitivity enhanced triple resonance backbone assignment experiments (HNCACB/CBCAcoNH, HNCA/HNcoCA and HNCO/HNcaCO) [38, 39] were recorded on an ~1.4 mM enzyme sample in 20 mM MOPS, 1 mM ZnSO₄, pH 7 at a set point of 25 °C. Spectra were processed and analyzed with the NMRPipe/NMRDraw software package [40] and CCPN analysis program [41]. The secondary structure of 5/B/6 MBL was predicted by the program TALOS+ [42], using the ¹HN, ¹⁵N, ¹³CO, ¹³C^α, and ¹³C^β chemical shift resonance assignments, and compared with the X-ray crystal structure using PyMol [43]. Additionally, the ¹HN, ¹⁵N, ¹³CO, ¹³C^α, and ¹³C^β chemical shift resonance assignments were submitted to the CS-ROSETTA [44] server (https://csrosetta.bmrb.wisc.edu/csrosetta/submit) and 3000 structures were calculated using default parameters. Note, this structure was only used for diagnostic purposes, to confirm that the measured NMR chemical shifts conform to our X-ray crystal structure. Backbone chemical shift assignments have been deposited in the Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank (http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu/) under BMRB ID 27564.

NMR titration experiments

NMR titration experiments were performed by combining 750 μM uniformly ¹⁵N-labeled enzyme with 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.375, 0.50, 0.625, 0.75, 0.875, 1.0, 1.25, 1.50, 2.0, and 4.0 molar equivalents of the 10-mer aptamer. Gradient-selected, sensitivity enhanced ¹H-¹⁵N HSQC [45, 46] spectra were recorded on an Agilent DD2 600 MHz spectrometer at a set temperature of 25 °C and were processed and analyzed with NMRPipe and CCPN analysis. Chemical shift perturbations at a given inhibitor concentration (δ_NH,i) were calculated according to ; where δ_H and δ_N are the ¹HN and ¹⁵N chemical shifts in the free state (apo) and bound to inhibitor (i), respectively. Binding affinities were calculated by fitting the chemical shift changes of the enzyme as a function of inhibitor concentration to ; where A = (maximum chemical shift change)/2, B = 1+K_D/[protein], y = chemical shift change, and x = [ligand]/[protein].

10-mer-5/B/6 MBL docking

Models of the 10-mer-5/B/6 MBL complex were calculated from molecular docking simulations using the HADDOCK [47] software package (http://milou.science.uu.nl/services/HADDOCK2.2/haddockserver-easy.html). Our crystal structure of 5/B/6 MBL and a model of the 3-D 10-mer hairpin structure, which was calculated in 3D-NuS [48] (https://iith.ac.in/3dnus/index.html), were used as starting structures. Docking restraints were derived from the chemical shift perturbations observed during the 10-mer NMR titration. “Active” residues, which are those experimentally identified to take place in the binding reaction, in the docking simulations included Thr76, Lys78, Phe103, Lys104, Lys107, and Tyr208 of 5/B/6 MBL, whereas all nucleotides in the 10-mer were considered “active.” The residue numbering is presented according to the standard MBL numbering system [49, 50]. “Passive” residues, which are solvent exposed neighbors to “active” residues, were defined automatically by HADDOCK. The 200 calculated structures were automatically classified into 8 clusters.

Site-directed mutagenesis

Site-directed lysine to glutamine mutations were generated through a modified QuikChange (Stratagene) protocol. Plasmids encoding these mutants were transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) codon plus cells for over-expression. Protein purification and activity and inhibition assays were performed as described above.

Results

Enzyme kinetic studies suggest a novel site for aptamer binding

To understand the mechanism of 10-mer inhibition of 5/B/6 MBL, we quantified Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics by monitoring the hydrolysis of the antibiotic cefuroxime (second generation semisynthetic cephalosporin with a furan containing side chain, Fig 1A). For wild type, uninhibited 5/B/6 MBL, K_m, V_max, and k_cat were calculated to be 1.1 ± 0.1 mM, 370 ± 20 μmol∙min^-1∙mg^-1, and 164 ± 8, respectively, from a non-linear regression plot (black points in Fig 1B). The 10-mer aptamer inhibits 5/B/6 MBL cefuroxime hydrolysis with an IC₅₀ of 120 ± 5 nM (S1A Fig). In contrast to the noncompetitive inhibition of 5/B/6 MBL by the 10-mer during cephalosporin C (a cephalosporin antibiotic with a diamino adipoyl side chain, for which a K_m and V_max of 0.39 mM and 1333 μmol∙min^-1∙mg^-1 for the 5/B/6 MBL, respectively [51], Fig 1A) hydrolysis [14], uncompetitive inhibition (Fig 1B and S1B Fig) was observed for the hydrolysis of cefuroxime with a calculated inhibition constant () of 63 ± 3 nM. Thus, the inhibition pattern and kinetic parameters of 5/B/6 MBL differ between substrates and suggests that the 10-mer does not bind 5/B/6 MBL competitively. Note, the 10-mer was originally derived from a 30 nucleotide DNA obtained from our SELEX experiment. As part of that experiment, we showed that the inhibitory effect of this DNA aptamer resulted solely from the 10-mer sequence. Deleting the flanking DNA sequences upstream and downstream of the predicted 10-mer hairpin structure resulted in the same inhibition of 5/B/6 MBL activity as the 30-mer DNA, and the isolated flanking sequences did not inhibit on their own [14].

Download:

Fig 1. Inhibition of 5/B/6 MBL by the 10-mer aptamer during cefuroxime hydrolysis.

A) Chemical structures of the β-lactam antibiotics cephalosporin C and cefuroxime. Also shown is the M-fold predicted secondary structure of the 10-mer DNA aptamer. B) Plot of the specific activity versus cefuroxime concentration. Points and error bars are the average and standard deviation of at least three measurements. Solid lines represent the non-linear regression calculation (global correlation coefficient R² = 0.964), which shows the uncompetitive inhibition pattern during cefuroxime hydrolysis. Black circle: 10-mer concentration [I] = 0 (local correlation coefficient R² = 0.969); cyan: [I] = 20 nM (R² = 0.957); green: [I] = 40 nM (R² = 0.961); magenta: [I] = 60 nM (R² = 0.965); red: [I] = 80 nM (R² = 0.949); yellow: [I] = 100 nM (R² = 0.913); and blue: [I] = 120 nM (R² = 0.960).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.g001

Uncompetitive inhibitors require the formation of the enzyme-substrate complex in order to interact with the enzyme and are characterized by decreases in both K_m and V_max, as seen here for cefuroxime in Fig 1B and S1B Fig. During uncompetitive inhibition, an enzyme-catalyzed reaction becomes blocked beyond ES formation [52]. On the other hand, noncompetitive inhibitors can either bind to the enzyme alone or to the enzyme-substrate complex and are characterized by an increase in K_m and decrease in V_max. Therefore, the 10-mer aptamer inhibition pattern exhibited for each substrate indicates that the interaction of the inhibitor with 5/B/6 MBL probably occurs at an allosteric site distal to the active site (i.e. is not competitive with the substrate) [20, 53].

Structure of wild type B. cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase

To put the mechanism of inhibition into a structural context, X-ray crystallography trials were initiated for the aptamer-free and 10-mer-bound enzyme. The 2.5 Ångström (Å) resolution crystal structure of aptamer-free 5/B/6 MBL with both Zn²⁺ ions bound is shown in Fig 2. Crystal structures of several B1 metallo-β-lactamases have been determined and can be found on the MBLED (Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Engineering Database; http://www.mbled.uni-stuttgart.de) [54]. Subclass B1 MBLs display a αβ/βα sandwich fold in their tertiary structures with a consensus sequence of HXHXD(X)_iH(X)_jC(X)_kH (in single letter code for amino acids where X = any amino acid, i = 55–74, j = 18–24, and k = 37–41), with H, D, and C residues coordinating the Zn²⁺ ions [15]. Our structure shows a similar fold. Table 1 contains the crystallography data collection and refinement statistics.

Download:

Fig 2. X-ray crystal structure of 5/B/6 MBL shows the typical MBL fold.

Secondary structural elements are colored deep teal for beta sheets and orange for alpha helices; whereas, turns/coils are colored grey and the Zn²⁺ atoms are represented by light blue spheres. The left panel shows the overall enzyme structure with lysine residues at the allosteric site in Loop 4 (L4) and Loop 6 (L6). The right structure shows the active site residues that are responsible for coordinating the two Zn²⁺ ions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.g002

Because of difficulties in obtaining diffraction quality crystals of the 10-mer-bound 5/B/6 MBL, solution state NMR studies were also initiated. The ¹H-¹⁵N HSQC of aptamer-free 5/B/6 MBL is shown in Fig 3; over 87% (199 non-proline residues out of 228 total residues) of the backbone ¹HN, ¹⁵N, ¹³CO, ¹³C^α, and ¹³C^β resonances were assigned. Main chain assignments were not obtained for Glu28-Lys34, Glu39, Lys50, Ser62, Pro68, Ser69, Ala140, Glu168, Glu169, Pro170, Ser176-Asn179, Asn184, Pro192, Gly193, Pro206, Ser227, Asn233, and Pro261. Most of the unassigned residues are found either in turns or loop regions. The secondary structure propensities were calculated from the NMR data by TALOS+ and compared with those of the X-ray crystal structure. The length and position of the secondary structure elements agreed between the X-ray crystallography and solution state NMR data sets (S2 Fig). The CS-ROSETTA calculated solution NMR structure also shows the typical αβ/βα sandwich fold for metallo-β-lactamases (S3A Fig). Because many of the loop resonances were not assigned and the Zn²⁺ ions were not present in the CS-ROSETTA modeling, small differences exist between the X-ray crystal and solution NMR structures. This is shown in S3B Fig where the α-helix and β-sheet regions of the X-ray crystal and NMR structures were aligned in PyMOL to compare the two structures. The C^α r.m.s.d. for regions of secondary structure is 2.37 Å indicating that the two structures are indeed similar. Together, these structural data are the starting point for understanding the structure of the 10-mer aptamer-inhibited 5/B/6 MBL.

Download:

Fig 3. 2D ¹H-¹⁵N HSQC spectra of 5/B/6 MBL.

Amino acid assignments are indicated. Inset is a magnification of the more crowded region.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.g003

NMR titration experiments confirm that the 10-mer does not bind to the enzyme active site

We next performed NMR titration experiments to determine the location of 10-mer binding and the binding affinity (S4 Fig). Changes in the chemical environment of NMR active nuclei upon ligand binding are easily detected by monitoring chemical shift perturbations (CSPs) [55]. While the vast majority of residues experience no change in resonance position upon addition of 10-mer (S4 Fig), six residues showed significant CSPs upon titrating with increasing concentrations of 10-mer (0 to 4 molar equivalents): Thr76, Lys78, Phe103, Lys104, Lys107, and Tyr208. Interestingly, all of these residues are on the opposite side of the enzyme from the active site in three structurally adjacent loops (L4, L6, L13). Among these residues were three lysines (78, 104, and 107) on loops L4 and L6, shown in the crystal structure in Fig 2A, that make up a basic patch. The side chain amines of Lys78 and Lys107 are 11.7 Å away from each other providing ample space to occupy the loop region of the 10-mer (~8.7 Å distance between A5 and C6 of the aptamer). Moreover, the distance between the backbone amide groups of Lys104 and Tyr208 is ~22 Å, which is within the range of the length of a 10-mer hairpin structure (~20 Å). A spectral overlay highlighting the chemical shift perturbations between the reference and several inhibitor concentrations for these lysine residues is shown in Fig 4A. Since binding of 10-mer to enzyme occurred in the fast exchange regime of the chemical shift timescale, binding affinities were extracted from fits of the CSPs (Fig 4). While the CSPs are small in magnitude, likely reflecting that the interaction between 10-mer and 5/B/6 MBL occurs largely through side chain interactions, we were able to analyze the data to determine binding affinities. Typical hyperbolic binding curves were observed for all three lysine residues, shown in Fig 4B, and K_Ds of 100–233 nM were obtained from fits to a two-state quadratic binding isotherm. Note that this binding affinity is comparable to the obtained from analysis of the kinetic inhibition data (63 ± 3 nM).

Download:

Fig 4. NMR titration of 5/B/6 MBL with the 10-mer aptamer reveals the site of aptamer binding.

A) 2D ¹H-¹⁵N HSQC spectra of lysine residues that showed chemical shift perturbation upon the addition of 10-mer. The direction of the movement for each peak is shown with a black arrow. The lightest color represents the no inhibitor condition and the darkest color represents presence of 3 mM of the 10-mer (i.e., 4.0 molar equivalents). B) Binding curves for the three lysine residues. The calculated K_Ds from individual fits of the Lys78, Lys104, and Lys107 chemical shift change are 125 ± 4 nM, 233 ± 6 nM, and 100 ± 3 nM, respectively. Errors in the K_D are from the fit.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.g004

It was previously hypothesized that the 10-mer exerts its inhibition by binding near the active site thereby perturbing the coordination of Zn²⁺ ions [14]. Significantly, no CSPs were observed in the HSQC spectra for the Zn²⁺-coordinating active site residues (His116, His118, Asp120, His196, Cys221 and His263; S4 Fig) indicating that the 10-mer does not strip the catalytic ions. This binding of aptamer to a site away from the active site supports the hypothesis of allosteric inhibition of the 5/B/6 MBL by the 10-mer.

Molecular docking identifies probable interaction of the 10-mer with 5/B/6 MBL at the allosteric site

For a low-resolution visualization of the 10-mer–enzyme complex, we performed molecular docking simulations using HADDOCK [47]. 200 models of the complex were calculated using our X-ray crystallography model and a hairpin model of the 10-mer aptamer, which was calculated in 3D-NuS [48]. Constraints were placed between the six 5/B/6 MBL residues that experienced CSPs and all ten residues of the 10-mer. Fig 5 and S5 Fig show the resulting structures of the simulated enzyme-aptamer complexes with different orientations of the 10-mer.

Download:

Fig 5. Model of the 10-mer bound to 5/B/6 MBL provides a picture of the inhibited state.

Model of the 10-mer bound to 5/B/6 MBL. The lowest energy HADDOCK structure is given, while a representative structure from the seven other clusters is given in S5 Fig. The coloring of secondary structural elements for the 5/B/6 MBL follows Fig 2, and the red, blue and green sticks denote K78, K104, and K107, respectively. The 10-mer is shown as salmon sticks and the two Zn²⁺ ions are light blue spheres. A) The overall structure of the enzyme-10-mer complex. B) A closer view of the enzyme-10-mer interaction site.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.g005

The docking models suggest that loops L4 and L6 predominantly interact with the 10-mer (Fig 5A). In the majority of the representative models, Lys104 (5 of 8 models–S5a, S5b, S5c, S5e and S5g Fig) and Lys107 (7 of 8 –not seen in S5c Fig) form ionic interactions with the ribose-phosphate backbone of the 10-mer. Interestingly, there are four models where these basic residues recognize A-T or C-G base pairs in the model stem loop DNA (Fig 5 and S5c, S5d and S5f Fig). A similar story is also found for Lys78: it forms ionic interactions with the DNA backbone in 3 of 8 models (Fig 5 and S5d and S5g Fig), or in one interesting case (S5b Fig), Lys78 hydrogen bonds with the imino nitrogen of Cyt6, which is in the proposed loop of the 10-mer. In half of the models (S5a, S5b, S5d and S5e Fig), the hydroxyl group of Tyr208 on L13 forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone of the DNA. Lastly, we did not observe any direct interactions in the HADDOCK models between the 10-mer and Thr76 and Phe103, so the CSPs for these residues must be due to indirect effects from aptamer binding. Note, that the small backbone amide CSPs observed in Fig 5 and S5 Fig are indeed consistent with these models, which suggest that the binding of 10-mer to 5/B/6 MBL is mediated through side chain interactions. Thus, we hypothesize that the 10-mer interacts with the lysine residues (Fig 5B) on L4 and L6 and disrupts a network of residues towards the Zn2 ion.

Mutations confirm the presence of an allosteric site on B. cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase

To corroborate our binding model, three lysine-to-glutamine mutants were made via site-directed mutagenesis (K78Q, double mutation K104Q/K107Q, and triple mutation K78Q/K104Q/K107Q). As these mutations are far from the active site, it was expected that there would be no change in enzymatic activity during cefuroxime hydrolysis. Specific activities of wild type and mutant enzymes are shown in Table 2. Without the inhibitor, the double mutant (K104Q/K107Q) showed no significant change in activity as compared to wild type. On the other hand, the single mutant (K78Q) and triple mutant (K78Q/K104Q/K107Q) enzymes showed ~30% less activity than wild type enzyme. Analysis of the steady-state kinetics data (Fig 6) indicates that there are statistically significant (p-value = 0.0018) decreases in k_cat for K78Q and K78Q/K104Q/K107Q and no change in K_m (Table 2) as compared to wild type enzyme. This decrease in k_cat would likely have minimal effect on the activity of mutated enzyme in vivo; nevertheless, this result suggests that an allosteric network extends through the interior of the enzyme from the active site. Finally, inhibition of the three mutant enzymes by 10-mer was also studied. As shown in Table 2, no significant inhibition was observed in any of the mutant enzymes as compared to wild type, confirming our NMR and HADDOCK results that the aptamer must bind to these residues. Thus, disruption of ionic interactions between these lysine residues and the DNA leads to an inability of the 10-mer to bind the enzyme. This is consistent with our structural models where the inhibition by the aptamer occurs through binding to a unique allosteric binding site (Fig 5).

Download:

Fig 6. Steady-state kinetics of cefuroxime hydrolysis by different mutants of 5/B/6 MBL confirms 10-mer binding site.

Activities of three mutant enzymes were compared with the activity of wild type enzyme, where black is the wild type enzyme, and green, blue, and red correspond to K104Q/K107Q, K78Q, and K78Q/K104Q/K107Q, respectively. The solid lines represent fits to the Michaelis-Menten equation with the resulting kinetic values reported in Table 2. Correlation coefficients (R²) of 0.993, 0.981, 0.990, and 0.978 where obtained for wild type, K78Q, K104Q/K107Q, and K78Q/K104Q/K107Q, respectively. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of five replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.g006

Download:

Table 2. Steady-state parameters of 5/B/6 MBL mutants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.t002

Discussion

Here, we described the structural basis for nanomolar uncompetitive inhibition of B. cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase during cefuroxime hydrolysis by a 10-nucleotide DNA aptamer. We observe that the inhibition pattern of the 10-mer differs substrate-to-substrate (noncompetitive for cephalosporin C [14], uncompetitive for cefuroxime); thus, the kinetic mechanism details for the inhibition by the 10-mer are different for the two substrates. Different reaction mechanisms have been proposed for NDM-1 MBL hydrolysis of carbapenem and cephalosporin β-lactams [56, 57]. Like FEZ-1 MBL, the activity of the 5/B/6 MBL depends in part on the chemical moiety at the C-7 position of cephalosporin substrates, as the presence of an α-methoxy group at C-7 of cefoxitin has a negative effect on 5/B/6 MBL activity when compared to cephalothin hydrolysis [58]. Other differences could come from the charged groups in cephalosporins, which could interact electrostatically with the enzyme [59]. The difference in kinetic mechanism could then be extended to the inhibition pattern of the 10-mer on cephalosporin antibiotic hydrolysis by 5/B/6 MBL.

Our 2.5 Å crystal structure of aptamer-free 5/B/6 MBL overlays favorably with the structure of the closely related BcII enzyme (~93% sequence identity; PDB ID: 1BC2; C^α r.m.s.d. = 1.08 Å). Additionally, our structure also overlays extremely well with the crystal structures of NDM-1, VIM-2, and IMP-1 MBLs (PDB IDs: 3RKJ, 4NQ2, and 1DDK) with C^α r.m.s.d.’s of 1.07, 0.71, and 0.98 Å, respectively, highlighting the highly conserved nature of these folds. Interestingly, our structure shows that in 5/B/6 MBL Zn2 has a higher B-factor compared to Zn1, indicating that Zn2 exhibits a partial occupancy in the active site pocket unlike Zn1. Coupled to this, the active site residue His263 is found to be in two conformations in the X-ray structure (S6 Fig). This result suggests that His263 plays an important role in directing Zn2 to its location within the active site by acting as a gate locking Zn2 in place once it is bound. In fact, molecular dynamics simulations, directed evolution, and NMR relaxation experiments have suggested that the presence of a glycine residue at position 262, which is present in 5/B/6 MBL, increases the flexibility of His263 and other active site residues, alters the coordination of the Zn²⁺ ions, and affects the substrate specificity of the MBL [60–62].

Like antibody-antigen binding reactions, aptamers interact with their target through structural recognition [63, 64]. Usually, unpaired nucleotides in loop or bulge regions of a ssDNA molecule are involved in recognition of the protein through hydrogen bonding, which imparts the specificity of the aptamer-protein interaction [65]. Therefore, we hypothesize that the 10-mer in this study also interacts with 5/B/6 MBL through the loop region of its hairpin structure. Moreover, charged amino acids are generally found on the surface of proteins, and play many essential roles including the formation of protein-nucleic acid complexes [66]. To compensate for the negatively charged phosphate backbone, the protein-nucleic acid binding regions are primarily positively charged. For 5/B/6 MBL, the change in chemical shifts (and therefore the chemical environment) of the three positively charged lysine residues distal from the active site are indicative of 10-mer interaction at that site (Fig 4A). The shortest distance between the active site and inhibitor binding site is 25 Å, as measured from His116 to Lys78 –too far away for the aptamer to interact directly with both sites. However, any allosteric changes to the active site must be subtle, as the amide NMR chemical shifts of active site residues are not perturbed by 10-mer binding. One possibility is that the 10-mer binding could alter conformational changes or local dynamics around the active site required for catalysis [57, 67, 68]. Our proposed structural models for the enzyme-inhibitor complex (Fig 5 and S5 Fig) lack experimental restraints on the 10-mer structure in solution. Clearly, an experimentally derived structure of the 10-mer and additional restraints between aptamer and 5/B/6 MBL are required to fully understand the nature of this interaction. Nevertheless, instead of a potential therapeutic, the 10-mer should be viewed as a tool–the low-resolution models of the complex provided by the NMR titration and HADDOCK and the mutagenesis data have allowed us to define a novel allosteric site on this enzyme, which could now be subjected to rational drug design.

Interestingly, five of the six residues in 5/B/6 MBL that were perturbed upon the 10-mer binding and were used as restraints in the HADDOCK docking simulations are also conserved in the BcII MBL enzyme–Lys104 is a glutamine in the BcII MBL. This immediately suggests that the 10-mer will also bind to the BcII MBL, since these enzymes share ~93% sequence identity. In fact, preliminary studies have shown that the 10-mer does indeed inhibit cephalosporin antibiotic hydrolysis by the BcII MBL (R.W.S. personal communication). The K104Q/K107Q double mutation of 5/B/6 MBL, which contains the analogous BcII MBL Gln76 (103), was not inhibited by the 10-mer aptamer (Table 2). However, this could be due to the additive effect of losing two charge-charge interactions with the 10-mer; whereas, BcII MBL would retain one. A more in-depth mutagenesis study is necessary to tease these effects out, while the effect of the 10-mer on BcII MBL can be directly tested. Sequence alignment of the 340 subclass B1 sequences in the MBLED reveals that the basic residues utilized by the 10-mer for binding to 5/B/6 MBL are each present in ~30% of sequences. Thus, the 10-mer will probably not be a general inhibitor of subclass B1 MBLs. Nevertheless, given the high degree of structural similarity between the 5/B/6 MBL, NDM-1, VIM-4, and IMP enzymes, it is tempting to hypothesize that related allosteric sites also exist within these enzymes. In fact, epitope mapping of the VIM-4 inhibitory nanobody, which also utilizes an allosteric mechanism for inhibition, revealed that the nanobody binds VIM-4 MBL on the structurally analogous L6 that contains residues Lys104 and Lys107, which are perturbed in our NMR titration experiments, in 5/B/6 MBL [20]. Thus, there is very strong evidence that the allosteric site described herein is a common motif among several highly transmissible β-lactam neutralizing metallo-enzymes.

Allosteric drugs are used as therapeutics for several human diseases. The most common uses of allosteric modulators are for neurotransmitter receptor proteins in central nervous system disorders. For example, benzodiazepines act as positive modulators to enhance the effect of γ-amino butyric acid (GABA) by interacting with GABA_A receptors; whereas, 6,7-dihydropyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrazin-4(5H)-one acts as the negative modulator of metabotropic glutamate receptor-2 (mGluR2) [69]. To treat viral infection, use of allosteric inhibitors is also well established. For example, dasabuvir, an hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase inhibitor, is used against chronic viral infection [70], and noncompetitive binding non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors are a critical components of combination therapy used to treat HIV [71]. The development of similar allosteric inhibitors for bacterial enzymes has received attention very recently [20]. The alarming problem of antibiotic resistance has gained considerable interest and has pushed the discovery of new therapeutic agents to fight against bacterial infection. Because of the consensus active site architecture, finding effective inhibitors for MBLs have been mostly limited to orthosteric investigations. Due to their toxicity to the human body, divalent cation chelating agents specifically for MBLs are impossible to develop [14, 16, 72, 73]. Therefore, targeting allosteric sites for developing new drugs has great potential, as it is likely that specific allosteric modulators can be found for a unique site on the target protein that consequently avoids adverse effects to the human host [69, 74].

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Kinetic assays for Bacillus cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase during cefuroxime hydrolysis.

A) Determination of IC₅₀ (120 ± 5 nM) of 10-mer for Bacillus cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase during cefuroxime hydrolysis. B) Lineweaver-Burke double reciprocal plot of the data in Fig 1B highlighting the uncompetitive inhibition pattern.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.s001

(EPS)

S2 Fig. Comparison of secondary structure elements derived from solution NMR data with those of the x-ray crystal structure of 5/B/6 MBL.

Prediction of secondary structure elements from the NMR data was derived from backbone NMR chemical shifts using TALOS+ and are shown in orange bars for α-helices and cyan bars for β-sheets. Grey bars indicate unassigned residues. Secondary structure elements of 5/B/6 MBL x-ray crystal structure are indicated in orange rectangles for α-helices and cyan arrows for β-sheets. PDB ID: 6DJA was used to determine secondary structural elements from the crystal structure.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.s002

(EPS)

S3 Fig. Solution NMR structure of 5/B/6 MBL.

(A) The ¹HN, ¹⁵N, ¹³CO, ¹³Cα, and ¹³Cβ chemical shift resonance assignments were submitted to the CS-ROSETTA and 3000 structures were calculated using default parameters. The lowest energy structure is shown here as a representative of all structures. The zinc ions coordinating the active site residues are not shown here. (B) Overlay of CS-ROSETTA derived model of 5/B/6 MBL (olive green) and the X-ray crystal structure (light green), which highlights the similarity of the secondary structure and the overall fold.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.s003

(EPS)

S4 Fig. Overlay of 2D 1H-15N HSQC spectra for the NMR titration of 5/B/6 MBL with the 10-mer aptamer.

Green, orange, red, light blue, and dark blue contours represent 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4 M equivalents of 10-mer DNA, respectively, titrated into 0.75 mM ¹⁵N-labeled 5/B/6 MBL. Data were collected at 600 MHz and 25 °C. Assignments are given for peaks in the active site (His86, His88, Asp90, His149, Cys168 and His210) as well as for peaks that titrated with 10-mer (denoted with arrows that highlight the direction of the chemical shift movement).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.s004

(EPS)

S5 Fig. Structural models of the 10-mer-enzyme complex.

These models were calculated through HADDOCK molecular docking. The coloring of secondary structural elements for the 5/B/6 MBL follows Fig 2, and the red, blue and green sticks denote Lys50, Lys76, and Lys77, respectively. The 10-mer is shown as salmon sticks and the two Zn2+ ions are light blue spheres.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.s005

(EPS)

S6 Fig. The two conformational states of His210, an active site residue.

These states arise due to partial occupancy of Zn2. This residue might play some important roles in directing Zn2 to its binding position, which may act as a gate to hold the Zn1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214440.s006

(EPS)

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Marella D. Canny (TTU) for generating the 5/B/6 MBL construct in pET29 and for critically reading this manuscript.

References

1. Perez F, Endimiani A, Hujer KM, Bonomo RA. The continuing challenge of ESBLs. Current Opinion in Pharmacology. 2007;7(5):459–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2007.08.003 pmid:17875405
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Frere JM. Beta-lactamases and bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Molecular Microbiology. 1995;16(3):385–95. pmid:7565100
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Bebrone C. Metallo-β-lactamases (classification, activity, genetic organization, structure, zinc coordination) and their superfamily. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2007;74(12):1686–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2007.05.021 pmid:17597585
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Palzkill T. Metallo-β-lactamase structure and function. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2013;1277:91–104. pmid:23163348
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Yong D, Toleman MA, Giske CG, Cho HS, Sundman K, Lee K, et al. Characterization of a New Metallo-beta-Lactamase Gene, bla(NDM-1), and a Novel Erythromycin Esterase Gene Carried on a Unique Genetic Structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae Sequence Type 14 from India. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2009;53(12):5046–54. pmid:19770275
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Walsh TR, Toleman MA, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Metallo-β-Lactamases: the Quiet before the Storm? Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2005;18(2):306–25. pmid:15831827
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Rolain JM, Parola P, Cornaglia G. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM-1): towards a new pandemia? Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2010;16(12):1699–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03385.x pmid:20874758
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Cornaglia G, Giamarellou H, Rossolini GM. Metallo-β-lactamases: a last frontier for β-lactams? The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2011;11(5):381–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70056-1 pmid:21530894
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Mojica MF, Bonomo RA, Fast W. B1-Metallo-beta-Lactamases: Where Do We Stand? Current Drug Targets. 2016;17(9):1029–50. pmid:26424398
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Makena A, Duzgun AO, Brem J, McDonough MA, Rydzik AM, Abboud MI, et al. Comparison of Verona Integron-Borne Metallo-beta-Lactamase (VIM) Variants Reveals Differences in Stability and Inhibition Profiles. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2016;60(3):1377–84. pmid:26666919
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Verbist L. In vitro activity of temocillin (BRL 17421), a novel beta-lactamase-stable penicillin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1982;22(1):157. pmid:6982023
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Drawz SM, Bonomo RA. Three Decades of beta-Lactamase Inhibitors. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2010;23(1):160–+. pmid:20065329
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Meini M-R, Llarrull LI, Vila AJ. Overcoming differences: The catalytic mechanism of metallo-β-lactamases. FEBS letters. 2015;589(22):3419–32. Epub 2015/08/20. pmid:26297824.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Kim SK, Sims CL, Wozniak SE, Drude SH, Whitson D, Shaw RW. Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria: Novel Metalloenzyme Inhibitors. Chemical Biology & Drug Design. 2009;74(4):343–8. pmid:19751419
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Wang Z, Fast W, Valentine AM, Benkovic SJ. Metallo-β-lactamase: structure and mechanism. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 1999;3(5):614–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(99)00017-4. pmid:10508665
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. King AM, Reid-Yu SA, Wang W, King DT, De Pascale G, Strynadka NC, et al. Aspergillomarasmine A overcomes metallo-beta-lactamase antibiotic resistance. Nature. 2014;510(7506):503–+. pmid:24965651
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Hinchliffe P, Gonzalez MM, Mojica MF, Gonzalez JM, Castillo V, Saiz C, et al. Cross-class metallo-beta-lactamase inhibition by bisthiazolidines reveals multiple binding modes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2016;113(26):E3745–E54. pmid:27303030
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Brem J, van Berkel SS, Aik W, Rydzik AM, Avison MB, Pettinati I, et al. Rhodanine hydrolysis leads to potent thioenolate mediated metallo-β-lactamase inhibition. Nature chemistry. 2014;6(12):1084–90. pmid:25411887.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Lahiri S, Panja A, Dasgupta D. Association of a Zn2+ containing metallo beta-lactamase with the anticancer antibiotic mithramycin. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2015;142:75–83. pmid:25450021
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Sohier Jean S, Laurent C, Chevigné A, Pardon E, Srinivasan V, Wernery U, et al. Allosteric inhibition of VIM metallo-β-lactamases by a camelid nanobody. Biochemical Journal. 2013;450(3):477. pmid:23289540
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Kruspe S, Mittelberger F, Szameit K, Hahn U. Aptamers as Drug Delivery Vehicles. Chemmedchem. 2014;9(9):1998–2011. pmid:25130604
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Zhou JH, Rossi J. Aptamers as targeted therapeutics: current potential and challenges (vol 16, pg 181, 2017). Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2017;16(6):440-. pmid:28450742
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Breaker RR. DNA aptamers and DNA enzymes. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 1997;1(1):26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(97)80105-6. pmid:9667831
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Lakhin AV, Tarantul VZ, Gening LV. Aptamers: Problems, Solutions and Prospects. Acta Naturae. 2013;5(4):34–43. pmid:24455181
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Tuerk C, Gold L. Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNApolymerase. Science. 1990;249(4968):505–10. pmid:2200121
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Davies RB, Abraham EP, Fleming J, Pollock MR. Comparison of beta-lactamase-II from Bacillus cereus 569-H-9 with a beta-lactamase from Bacillus-cereus 5-B-6. Biochemical Journal. 1975;145(2):409–11. pmid:808215
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Sabath LD, Abraham EP. Zinc as a cofactor for cephalosporinase from Bacillus cereus 569. Biochemical Journal. 1966;98(1):C11–&.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Carfi A, Pares S, Duée E, Galleni M, Duez C, Frère JM, et al. The 3-D structure of a zinc metallo-beta-lactamase from Bacillus cereus reveals a new type of protein fold. The EMBO journal. 1995;14(20):4914–21. pmid:7588620.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Fabiane SM, Sohi MK, Wan T, Payne DJ, Bateson JH, Mitchell T, et al. Crystal Structure of the Zinc-Dependent β-Lactamase from Bacillus cereus at 1.9 Å Resolution: Binuclear Active Site with Features of a Mononuclear Enzyme. Biochemistry. 1998;37(36):12404–11. pmid:9730812
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Davies RB, Abraham EP, Melling J. Separation, purification and properties of β-lactamase I and β-lactamase II from Bacillus cereus 569/H/9. Biochemical Journal. 1974;143(1):115–27. pmid:4219278
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, and, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1951;193(1):265–75. pmid:14907713
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Azatian SB, Kaur N, Latham MP. Increasing the buffering capacity of minimal media leads to higher protein yield. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2019. pmid:30613903
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Swift ML. GraphPad prism, data analysis, and scientific graphing. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. 1997;37(2):411–2.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Kabsch W. Evaluation of single-crystal X-ray-diffraction data from a position-sensitive detector. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 1988;21:916–24.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Evans PR, Murshudov GN. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography. 2013;69:1204–14. pmid:23793146
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography. 2010;66:213–21. pmid:20124702
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography. 2010;66:486–501. pmid:20383002
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Kay LE, Ikura M, Tschudin R, Bax A. Three-dimensional triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy of isotopically enriched proteins. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969). 1990;89(3):496–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(90)90333-5.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Grzesiek S, Bax A. An efficient experiment for sequential backbone assignment of medium-sized isotopically enriched proteins. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 1992;99(1):201–7.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. NMRPIPE—A multidimensional spectral processing system based on unix pipes. Journal of Biomolecular Nmr. 1995;6(3):277–93. pmid:8520220
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Vranken WF, Boucher W, Stevens TJ, Fogh RH, Pajon A, Llinas P, et al. The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: Development of a software pipeline. Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics. 2005;59(4):687–96. pmid:15815974
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Shen Y, Delaglio F, Cornilescu G, Bax A. TALOS+: A hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts. Journal of biomolecular NMR. 2009;44(4):213–23. pmid:19548092
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. DeLano WL. PyMOL: An Open-Source Molecular Graphics Tool2002. 82–92 p.
44. Lange OF, Rossi P, Sgourakis NG, Song YF, Lee HW, Aramini JM, et al. Determination of solution structures of proteins up to 40 kDa using CS-Rosetta with sparse NMR data from deuterated samples. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(27):10873–8. pmid:22733734
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Palmer AG, Cavanagh J, Wright PE, Rance M. Sensitivity improvement in proton-detected two-dimensional heteronuclear correlation NMR spectroscopy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969). 1991;93(1):151–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(91)90036-S.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Kay L, Keifer P, Saarinen T. Pure absorption gradient enhanced heteronuclear single quantum correlation spectroscopy with improved sensitivity. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1992;114(26):10663–5.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin A. HADDOCK: A protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2003;125(7):1731–7. pmid:12580598
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Patro LPP, Kumar A, Kolimi N, Rathinavelan T. 3D-NuS: A Web Server for Automated Modeling and Visualization of Non-Canonical 3-Dimensional Nucleic Acid Structures. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2017;429(16):2438–48. pmid:28652006
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Galleni M, Lamotte-Brasseur J, Rossolini GM, Spencer J, Dideberg O, Frère J-M, et al. Standard Numbering Scheme for Class B β-Lactamases. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2001;45(3):660–3. pmid:11181339
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Garau G, Garcia-Saez I, Bebrone C, Anne C, Mercuri P, Galleni M, et al. Update of the standard numbering scheme for class B beta-lactamases. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2004;48(7):2347–9. pmid:15215079
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Shaw RW, Clark SD, Hilliard NP, Harman JG. Hyperexpression in Escherichia coli, purification, and characterization of the metallo-β-lactamase of Bacillus cereus 5/B/6. Protein Expression and Purification. 1991;2(2):151–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1046-5928(91)90064-P.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Dougall IG, Unitt J. Chapter 2—Evaluation of the Biological Activity of Compounds: Techniques and Mechanism of Action Studies A2—Wermuth, Camille Georges. In: Aldous D, Raboisson P, Rognan D, editors. The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry (Fourth Edition). San Diego: Academic Press; 2015. p. 15–43.
53. Sperka T, Pitlik J, Bagossi P, Tozser J. Beta-lactam compounds as apparently uncompetitive inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2005;15(12):3086–90. pmid:15893929
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Widmann M, Pleiss J, and Oelschlaeger P. Systematic Analysis of Metallo-β-Lactamases Using an Automated Database. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2012;56(7):3481–91. pmid:22547615
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Lisi GP, Loria JP. Solution NMR Spectroscopy for the Study of Enzyme Allostery. Chemical Reviews. 2016;116(11):6323–69. pmid:26734986
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Lisa MN, Palacios AR, Aitha M, Gonzalez MM, Moreno DM, Crowder MW, et al. A general reaction mechanism for carbapenem hydrolysis by mononuclear and binuclear metallo-beta-lactamases. Nature Communications. 2017;8. pmid:28912448
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. Feng H, Liu X, Wang S, Fleming J, Wang D-C, Liu W. The mechanism of NDM-1-catalyzed carbapenem hydrolysis is distinct from that of penicillin or cephalosporin hydrolysis. Nature Communications. 2017;8(1):2242. pmid:29269938
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
58. Mercuri PS, Bouillenne F, Boschi L, Lamotte-Brasseur J, Amicosante G, Devreese B, et al. Biochemical Characterization of the FEZ-1 Metallo-β-Lactamase of Legionella gormanii ATCC 33297(T) Produced in Escherichia coli. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2001;45(4):1254–62. pmid:11257043
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
59. Feng H, Ding JJ, Zhu DY, Liu XH, Xu XY, Zhang Y, et al. Structural and Mechanistic Insights into NDM-1 Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Cephalosporins. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2014;136(42):14694–7. pmid:25268575
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
60. Tomatis PE, Rasia RM, Segovia L, Vila AJ. Mimicking natural evolution in metallo-beta-lactamases through second-shell ligand mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(39):13761–6. pmid:16172409
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
61. Oelschlaeger P, Schmid RD, Pleiss J. Modeling domino effects in enzymes: Molecular basis of the substrate specificity of the bacterial metallo-beta-lactamases IMP-1 and IMP-6. Biochemistry. 2003;42(30):8945–56. pmid:12885227
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
62. Gonzalez MM, Abriata LA, Tomatis PE, Vila AJ. Optimization of Conformational Dynamics in an Epistatic Evolutionary Trajectory. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2016;33(7):1768–76. pmid:26983555
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
63. Sun HG, Zhu X, Lu PY, Rosato RR, Tan W, Zu YL. Oligonucleotide Aptamers: New Tools for Targeted Cancer Therapy. Molecular Therapy-Nucleic Acids. 2014;3. pmid:25093706
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
64. Fichou Y, Ferec C. The potential of oligonucleotides for therapeutic applications. Trends in Biotechnology. 2006;24(12):563–70. pmid:17045686
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
65. Choi SJ, Ban C. Crystal structure of a DNA aptamer bound to PvLDH elucidates novel single-stranded DNA structural elements for folding and recognition. Scientific Reports. 2016;6. pmid:27725738
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
66. Gitlin I, Carbeck JD, Whitesides GM. Why Are Proteins Charged? Networks of Charge–Charge Interactions in Proteins Measured by Charge Ladders and Capillary Electrophoresis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2006;45(19):3022–60. pmid:16619322
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
67. Sharma N, Hu Z, Crowder MW, Bennett B. Conformational Changes in the Metallo-β-lactamase ImiS During the Catalytic Reaction: An EPR Spectrokinetic Study of Co(II)-Spin Label Interactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2008;130(26):8215–22. pmid:18528987
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
68. Rydzik AM, Brem J, van Berkel SS, Pfeffer I, Makena A, Claridge TDW, et al. Monitoring Conformational Changes in the NDM-1 Metallo-β-lactamase by (19)F NMR Spectroscopy. Angewandte Chemie (International Ed in English). 2014;53(12):3129–33. pmid:24615874
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
69. Abdel-Magid AF. Allosteric Modulators: An Emerging Concept in Drug Discovery. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2015;6(2):104–7. pmid:25699154
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
70. King JR, Zha JH, Khatri A, Dutta S, Menon RM. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Dasabuvir. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2017;56(10):1115–24. pmid:28258380
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
71. de Bethune MP. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), their discovery, development, and use in the treatment of HIV-1 infection: A review of the last 20 years (1989–2009). Antiviral Research. 2010;85(1):75–90. pmid:19781578
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
72. Karsisiotis AI, Damblon CF, Roberts GCK. Solution structures of the Bacillus cereus metallo-beta-lactamase BcII and its complex with the broad spectrum inhibitor R-thiomandelic acid. Biochemical Journal. 2013;456:397–407. pmid:24059435
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
73. Kim S-K, Demuth M, Schlesinger SR, Kim SJ, Urbanczyk J, Shaw RW, et al. Inhibition of Bacillus anthracis metallo-β-lactamase by compounds with hydroxamic acid functionality. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry. 2016:1–6. pmid:27557855
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
74. Grover AK. Use of Allosteric Targets in the Discovery of Safer Drugs. Medical Principles and Practice. 2013;22(5):418–26. pmid:23711993
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Perez F, Endimiani A, Hujer KM, Bonomo RA. The continuing challenge of ESBLs. Current Opinion in Pharmacology. 2007;7(5):459–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2007.08.003 pmid:17875405
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Frere JM. Beta-lactamases and bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Molecular Microbiology. 1995;16(3):385–95. pmid:7565100
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Bebrone C. Metallo-β-lactamases (classification, activity, genetic organization, structure, zinc coordination) and their superfamily. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2007;74(12):1686–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2007.05.021 pmid:17597585
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Palzkill T. Metallo-β-lactamase structure and function. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2013;1277:91–104. pmid:23163348
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Yong D, Toleman MA, Giske CG, Cho HS, Sundman K, Lee K, et al. Characterization of a New Metallo-beta-Lactamase Gene, bla(NDM-1), and a Novel Erythromycin Esterase Gene Carried on a Unique Genetic Structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae Sequence Type 14 from India. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2009;53(12):5046–54. pmid:19770275
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Walsh TR, Toleman MA, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Metallo-β-Lactamases: the Quiet before the Storm? Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2005;18(2):306–25. pmid:15831827
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Rolain JM, Parola P, Cornaglia G. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM-1): towards a new pandemia? Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2010;16(12):1699–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03385.x pmid:20874758
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Cornaglia G, Giamarellou H, Rossolini GM. Metallo-β-lactamases: a last frontier for β-lactams? The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2011;11(5):381–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70056-1 pmid:21530894
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Mojica MF, Bonomo RA, Fast W. B1-Metallo-beta-Lactamases: Where Do We Stand? Current Drug Targets. 2016;17(9):1029–50. pmid:26424398
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Makena A, Duzgun AO, Brem J, McDonough MA, Rydzik AM, Abboud MI, et al. Comparison of Verona Integron-Borne Metallo-beta-Lactamase (VIM) Variants Reveals Differences in Stability and Inhibition Profiles. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2016;60(3):1377–84. pmid:26666919
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Verbist L. In vitro activity of temocillin (BRL 17421), a novel beta-lactamase-stable penicillin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1982;22(1):157. pmid:6982023
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Drawz SM, Bonomo RA. Three Decades of beta-Lactamase Inhibitors. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2010;23(1):160–+. pmid:20065329
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Meini M-R, Llarrull LI, Vila AJ. Overcoming differences: The catalytic mechanism of metallo-β-lactamases. FEBS letters. 2015;589(22):3419–32. Epub 2015/08/20. pmid:26297824.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Kim SK, Sims CL, Wozniak SE, Drude SH, Whitson D, Shaw RW. Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria: Novel Metalloenzyme Inhibitors. Chemical Biology & Drug Design. 2009;74(4):343–8. pmid:19751419
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Wang Z, Fast W, Valentine AM, Benkovic SJ. Metallo-β-lactamase: structure and mechanism. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 1999;3(5):614–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(99)00017-4. pmid:10508665
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. King AM, Reid-Yu SA, Wang W, King DT, De Pascale G, Strynadka NC, et al. Aspergillomarasmine A overcomes metallo-beta-lactamase antibiotic resistance. Nature. 2014;510(7506):503–+. pmid:24965651
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Hinchliffe P, Gonzalez MM, Mojica MF, Gonzalez JM, Castillo V, Saiz C, et al. Cross-class metallo-beta-lactamase inhibition by bisthiazolidines reveals multiple binding modes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2016;113(26):E3745–E54. pmid:27303030
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Brem J, van Berkel SS, Aik W, Rydzik AM, Avison MB, Pettinati I, et al. Rhodanine hydrolysis leads to potent thioenolate mediated metallo-β-lactamase inhibition. Nature chemistry. 2014;6(12):1084–90. pmid:25411887.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Lahiri S, Panja A, Dasgupta D. Association of a Zn2+ containing metallo beta-lactamase with the anticancer antibiotic mithramycin. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2015;142:75–83. pmid:25450021
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Sohier Jean S, Laurent C, Chevigné A, Pardon E, Srinivasan V, Wernery U, et al. Allosteric inhibition of VIM metallo-β-lactamases by a camelid nanobody. Biochemical Journal. 2013;450(3):477. pmid:23289540
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Kruspe S, Mittelberger F, Szameit K, Hahn U. Aptamers as Drug Delivery Vehicles. Chemmedchem. 2014;9(9):1998–2011. pmid:25130604
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Zhou JH, Rossi J. Aptamers as targeted therapeutics: current potential and challenges (vol 16, pg 181, 2017). Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2017;16(6):440-. pmid:28450742
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Breaker RR. DNA aptamers and DNA enzymes. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 1997;1(1):26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(97)80105-6. pmid:9667831
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Lakhin AV, Tarantul VZ, Gening LV. Aptamers: Problems, Solutions and Prospects. Acta Naturae. 2013;5(4):34–43. pmid:24455181
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Tuerk C, Gold L. Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNApolymerase. Science. 1990;249(4968):505–10. pmid:2200121
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Davies RB, Abraham EP, Fleming J, Pollock MR. Comparison of beta-lactamase-II from Bacillus cereus 569-H-9 with a beta-lactamase from Bacillus-cereus 5-B-6. Biochemical Journal. 1975;145(2):409–11. pmid:808215
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Sabath LD, Abraham EP. Zinc as a cofactor for cephalosporinase from Bacillus cereus 569. Biochemical Journal. 1966;98(1):C11–&.
View Article
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Carfi A, Pares S, Duée E, Galleni M, Duez C, Frère JM, et al. The 3-D structure of a zinc metallo-beta-lactamase from Bacillus cereus reveals a new type of protein fold. The EMBO journal. 1995;14(20):4914–21. pmid:7588620.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Fabiane SM, Sohi MK, Wan T, Payne DJ, Bateson JH, Mitchell T, et al. Crystal Structure of the Zinc-Dependent β-Lactamase from Bacillus cereus at 1.9 Å Resolution: Binuclear Active Site with Features of a Mononuclear Enzyme. Biochemistry. 1998;37(36):12404–11. pmid:9730812
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Davies RB, Abraham EP, Melling J. Separation, purification and properties of β-lactamase I and β-lactamase II from Bacillus cereus 569/H/9. Biochemical Journal. 1974;143(1):115–27. pmid:4219278
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, and, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1951;193(1):265–75. pmid:14907713
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Azatian SB, Kaur N, Latham MP. Increasing the buffering capacity of minimal media leads to higher protein yield. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 2019. pmid:30613903
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Swift ML. GraphPad prism, data analysis, and scientific graphing. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. 1997;37(2):411–2.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Kabsch W. Evaluation of single-crystal X-ray-diffraction data from a position-sensitive detector. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 1988;21:916–24.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Evans PR, Murshudov GN. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography. 2013;69:1204–14. pmid:23793146
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography. 2010;66:213–21. pmid:20124702
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography. 2010;66:486–501. pmid:20383002
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Kay LE, Ikura M, Tschudin R, Bax A. Three-dimensional triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy of isotopically enriched proteins. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969). 1990;89(3):496–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(90)90333-5.
View Article
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Grzesiek S, Bax A. An efficient experiment for sequential backbone assignment of medium-sized isotopically enriched proteins. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 1992;99(1):201–7.
View Article
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. NMRPIPE—A multidimensional spectral processing system based on unix pipes. Journal of Biomolecular Nmr. 1995;6(3):277–93. pmid:8520220
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Vranken WF, Boucher W, Stevens TJ, Fogh RH, Pajon A, Llinas P, et al. The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: Development of a software pipeline. Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics. 2005;59(4):687–96. pmid:15815974
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] PubMed/NCBI

[159] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Shen Y, Delaglio F, Cornilescu G, Bax A. TALOS+: A hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts. Journal of biomolecular NMR. 2009;44(4):213–23. pmid:19548092
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[161] View Article

[162] PubMed/NCBI

[163] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. DeLano WL. PyMOL: An Open-Source Molecular Graphics Tool2002. 82–92 p.

[ref44] 44. Lange OF, Rossi P, Sgourakis NG, Song YF, Lee HW, Aramini JM, et al. Determination of solution structures of proteins up to 40 kDa using CS-Rosetta with sparse NMR data from deuterated samples. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(27):10873–8. pmid:22733734
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Palmer AG, Cavanagh J, Wright PE, Rance M. Sensitivity improvement in proton-detected two-dimensional heteronuclear correlation NMR spectroscopy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969). 1991;93(1):151–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(91)90036-S.
View Article
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Kay L, Keifer P, Saarinen T. Pure absorption gradient enhanced heteronuclear single quantum correlation spectroscopy with improved sensitivity. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1992;114(26):10663–5.
View Article
Google Scholar

[173] View Article

[174] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin A. HADDOCK: A protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2003;125(7):1731–7. pmid:12580598
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] PubMed/NCBI

[178] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Patro LPP, Kumar A, Kolimi N, Rathinavelan T. 3D-NuS: A Web Server for Automated Modeling and Visualization of Non-Canonical 3-Dimensional Nucleic Acid Structures. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2017;429(16):2438–48. pmid:28652006
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] PubMed/NCBI

[182] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Galleni M, Lamotte-Brasseur J, Rossolini GM, Spencer J, Dideberg O, Frère J-M, et al. Standard Numbering Scheme for Class B β-Lactamases. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2001;45(3):660–3. pmid:11181339
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[184] View Article

[185] PubMed/NCBI

[186] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Garau G, Garcia-Saez I, Bebrone C, Anne C, Mercuri P, Galleni M, et al. Update of the standard numbering scheme for class B beta-lactamases. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2004;48(7):2347–9. pmid:15215079
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] PubMed/NCBI

[190] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Shaw RW, Clark SD, Hilliard NP, Harman JG. Hyperexpression in Escherichia coli, purification, and characterization of the metallo-β-lactamase of Bacillus cereus 5/B/6. Protein Expression and Purification. 1991;2(2):151–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1046-5928(91)90064-P.
View Article
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Dougall IG, Unitt J. Chapter 2—Evaluation of the Biological Activity of Compounds: Techniques and Mechanism of Action Studies A2—Wermuth, Camille Georges. In: Aldous D, Raboisson P, Rognan D, editors. The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry (Fourth Edition). San Diego: Academic Press; 2015. p. 15–43.

[ref53] 53. Sperka T, Pitlik J, Bagossi P, Tozser J. Beta-lactam compounds as apparently uncompetitive inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2005;15(12):3086–90. pmid:15893929
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] PubMed/NCBI

[198] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Widmann M, Pleiss J, and Oelschlaeger P. Systematic Analysis of Metallo-β-Lactamases Using an Automated Database. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2012;56(7):3481–91. pmid:22547615
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[200] View Article

[201] PubMed/NCBI

[202] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Lisi GP, Loria JP. Solution NMR Spectroscopy for the Study of Enzyme Allostery. Chemical Reviews. 2016;116(11):6323–69. pmid:26734986
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[204] View Article

[205] PubMed/NCBI

[206] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Lisa MN, Palacios AR, Aitha M, Gonzalez MM, Moreno DM, Crowder MW, et al. A general reaction mechanism for carbapenem hydrolysis by mononuclear and binuclear metallo-beta-lactamases. Nature Communications. 2017;8. pmid:28912448
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[208] View Article

[209] PubMed/NCBI

[210] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Feng H, Liu X, Wang S, Fleming J, Wang D-C, Liu W. The mechanism of NDM-1-catalyzed carbapenem hydrolysis is distinct from that of penicillin or cephalosporin hydrolysis. Nature Communications. 2017;8(1):2242. pmid:29269938
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[212] View Article

[213] PubMed/NCBI

[214] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Mercuri PS, Bouillenne F, Boschi L, Lamotte-Brasseur J, Amicosante G, Devreese B, et al. Biochemical Characterization of the FEZ-1 Metallo-β-Lactamase of Legionella gormanii ATCC 33297(T) Produced in Escherichia coli. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2001;45(4):1254–62. pmid:11257043
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[216] View Article

[217] PubMed/NCBI

[218] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Feng H, Ding JJ, Zhu DY, Liu XH, Xu XY, Zhang Y, et al. Structural and Mechanistic Insights into NDM-1 Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Cephalosporins. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2014;136(42):14694–7. pmid:25268575
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[220] View Article

[221] PubMed/NCBI

[222] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Tomatis PE, Rasia RM, Segovia L, Vila AJ. Mimicking natural evolution in metallo-beta-lactamases through second-shell ligand mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(39):13761–6. pmid:16172409
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[224] View Article

[225] PubMed/NCBI

[226] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Oelschlaeger P, Schmid RD, Pleiss J. Modeling domino effects in enzymes: Molecular basis of the substrate specificity of the bacterial metallo-beta-lactamases IMP-1 and IMP-6. Biochemistry. 2003;42(30):8945–56. pmid:12885227
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[228] View Article

[229] PubMed/NCBI

[230] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Gonzalez MM, Abriata LA, Tomatis PE, Vila AJ. Optimization of Conformational Dynamics in an Epistatic Evolutionary Trajectory. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2016;33(7):1768–76. pmid:26983555
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[232] View Article

[233] PubMed/NCBI

[234] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Sun HG, Zhu X, Lu PY, Rosato RR, Tan W, Zu YL. Oligonucleotide Aptamers: New Tools for Targeted Cancer Therapy. Molecular Therapy-Nucleic Acids. 2014;3. pmid:25093706
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[236] View Article

[237] PubMed/NCBI

[238] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Fichou Y, Ferec C. The potential of oligonucleotides for therapeutic applications. Trends in Biotechnology. 2006;24(12):563–70. pmid:17045686
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[240] View Article

[241] PubMed/NCBI

[242] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Choi SJ, Ban C. Crystal structure of a DNA aptamer bound to PvLDH elucidates novel single-stranded DNA structural elements for folding and recognition. Scientific Reports. 2016;6. pmid:27725738
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[244] View Article

[245] PubMed/NCBI

[246] Google Scholar

[ref66] 66. Gitlin I, Carbeck JD, Whitesides GM. Why Are Proteins Charged? Networks of Charge–Charge Interactions in Proteins Measured by Charge Ladders and Capillary Electrophoresis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2006;45(19):3022–60. pmid:16619322
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[248] View Article

[249] PubMed/NCBI

[250] Google Scholar

[ref67] 67. Sharma N, Hu Z, Crowder MW, Bennett B. Conformational Changes in the Metallo-β-lactamase ImiS During the Catalytic Reaction: An EPR Spectrokinetic Study of Co(II)-Spin Label Interactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2008;130(26):8215–22. pmid:18528987
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[252] View Article

[253] PubMed/NCBI

[254] Google Scholar

[ref68] 68. Rydzik AM, Brem J, van Berkel SS, Pfeffer I, Makena A, Claridge TDW, et al. Monitoring Conformational Changes in the NDM-1 Metallo-β-lactamase by (19)F NMR Spectroscopy. Angewandte Chemie (International Ed in English). 2014;53(12):3129–33. pmid:24615874
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[256] View Article

[257] PubMed/NCBI

[258] Google Scholar

[ref69] 69. Abdel-Magid AF. Allosteric Modulators: An Emerging Concept in Drug Discovery. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2015;6(2):104–7. pmid:25699154
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[260] View Article

[261] PubMed/NCBI

[262] Google Scholar

[ref70] 70. King JR, Zha JH, Khatri A, Dutta S, Menon RM. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Dasabuvir. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2017;56(10):1115–24. pmid:28258380
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[264] View Article

[265] PubMed/NCBI

[266] Google Scholar

[ref71] 71. de Bethune MP. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), their discovery, development, and use in the treatment of HIV-1 infection: A review of the last 20 years (1989–2009). Antiviral Research. 2010;85(1):75–90. pmid:19781578
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[268] View Article

[269] PubMed/NCBI

[270] Google Scholar

[ref72] 72. Karsisiotis AI, Damblon CF, Roberts GCK. Solution structures of the Bacillus cereus metallo-beta-lactamase BcII and its complex with the broad spectrum inhibitor R-thiomandelic acid. Biochemical Journal. 2013;456:397–407. pmid:24059435
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[272] View Article

[273] PubMed/NCBI

[274] Google Scholar

[ref73] 73. Kim S-K, Demuth M, Schlesinger SR, Kim SJ, Urbanczyk J, Shaw RW, et al. Inhibition of Bacillus anthracis metallo-β-lactamase by compounds with hydroxamic acid functionality. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry. 2016:1–6. pmid:27557855
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[276] View Article

[277] PubMed/NCBI

[278] Google Scholar

[ref74] 74. Grover AK. Use of Allosteric Targets in the Discovery of Safer Drugs. Medical Principles and Practice. 2013;22(5):418–26. pmid:23711993
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[280] View Article

[281] PubMed/NCBI

[282] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Bacillus cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase expression and purification

Selection of the 10-mer DNA

Enzyme kinetic studies

Crystallography

NMR spectroscopy and sequential backbone assignments

NMR titration experiments

10-mer-5/B/6 MBL docking

Site-directed mutagenesis

Results

Enzyme kinetic studies suggest a novel site for aptamer binding

Structure of wild type B. cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase

NMR titration experiments confirm that the 10-mer does not bind to the enzyme active site

Molecular docking identifies probable interaction of the 10-mer with 5/B/6 MBL at the allosteric site

Mutations confirm the presence of an allosteric site on B. cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Kinetic assays for Bacillus cereus 5/B/6 metallo-β-lactamase during cefuroxime hydrolysis.

S2 Fig. Comparison of secondary structure elements derived from solution NMR data with those of the x-ray crystal structure of 5/B/6 MBL.

S3 Fig. Solution NMR structure of 5/B/6 MBL.

S4 Fig. Overlay of 2D 1H-15N HSQC spectra for the NMR titration of 5/B/6 MBL with the 10-mer aptamer.

S5 Fig. Structural models of the 10-mer-enzyme complex.

S6 Fig. The two conformational states of His210, an active site residue.

Acknowledgments

References