Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Synanthropy and diversity of Phlebotominae in an area of intense transmission of visceral leishmaniasis in the South Pantanal floodplain, Midwest Brazil

  • Suellem Petilim Gomes Barrios ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Suellem Petilim Gomes Barrios, Luciana Escalante Pereira, Neiva Zandonaide Nazário Monaco, Gustavo Graciolli, Alessandra Gutierrez de Oliveira

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Programa de Pós-Graduação em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

  • Luciana Escalante Pereira ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Suellem Petilim Gomes Barrios, Luciana Escalante Pereira, Neiva Zandonaide Nazário Monaco, Gustavo Graciolli, Alessandra Gutierrez de Oliveira

    Roles Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologias Ambientais, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

  • Neiva Zandonaide Nazário Monaco ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Suellem Petilim Gomes Barrios, Luciana Escalante Pereira, Neiva Zandonaide Nazário Monaco, Gustavo Graciolli, Alessandra Gutierrez de Oliveira

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Centro de Controle de Vetores, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

  • Gustavo Graciolli ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Suellem Petilim Gomes Barrios, Luciana Escalante Pereira, Neiva Zandonaide Nazário Monaco, Gustavo Graciolli, Alessandra Gutierrez de Oliveira

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

  • Aline Etelvina Casaril,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

  • Jucelei de Oliveira Moura Infran,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

  • Everton Falcão de Oliveira,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Programa de Pós-Graduação em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil, Instituto Integrado de Saúde, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

  • Wagner de Souza Fernandes,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Programa de Pós-Graduação em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

  • Antônio Conceição Paranhos Filho,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculdade de Engenharia, Arquitetura e Urbanismo e Geografia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

  • Alessandra Gutierrez de Oliveira

    Contributed equally to this work with: Suellem Petilim Gomes Barrios, Luciana Escalante Pereira, Neiva Zandonaide Nazário Monaco, Gustavo Graciolli, Alessandra Gutierrez de Oliveira

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    alessandra.oliveira@ufms.br

    Affiliations Programa de Pós-Graduação em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

Abstract

Phlebotomines have been recorded from a wide variety of habitats, and some of these vector species have shown preference for human environments, with high levels of adaptation. This study evaluated the degree of preference of these vectors for urban, rural, and forested environments (synanthropic behavior), as well as the diversity of these species, in three areas (forested, rural, and urban, exhibiting different degrees of anthropogenic changes) in a region of intense transmission of visceral leishmaniasis in Corumbá county, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Using light traps, sand fly specimens were collected from the three environments simultaneously, from May 2015 to April 2017, totaling 7 213 sand flies of 14 species in eight genera. Nuorteva’s synanthropy index was determined for the species Lutzomyia cruzi, Brumptomyia brumpti, Micropygomyia peresi, Lu. forattinii, Martinsmyia oliveirai and Evandromyia corumbaensis. Lutzomyia cruzi, the vector of Leishmania infantum in Corumbá, was the most abundant vector species, recorded from all three areas and sampling plots, on all 24 months investigated. This species exhibited the highest synanthropic index (+75.09), indicating a strong preference for urban environments. Brumptomyia brumpti, Micropygomyia peresi, Lu. forattinii, and Martinsmyia oliveirai showed preference, albeit not strong, for urban environments. Overall, males were more abundant than females (W = 490; p < 0.0001). High density, high synanthropic index, and sustained indoor presence were found for Mi. peresi in the rural area. Monitoring changes in the ecological behavior of sand flies is of vital importance, as these changes may indicate an increased likelihood of leishmaniasis emergence or reemergence.

Introduction

Leishmaniasis, a disease whose etiological agents involve roughly 20 species of the genus Leishmania (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae), is transmitted to animals and humans through the bites of female insects of the order Diptera, family Psychodidae, subfamily Phlebotominae. Six countries alone account for 90% of all cases of visceral and tegumentary leishmaniasis in the world. In the Americas, Brazil is the only country on this list [1, 2].

In the 1930s, incidence in Brazil was sporadic, with no epidemic cycles, but affected all age ranges. Early findings by Chagas [3] and Deane and Deane [4] led to a false belief that sand flies were restricted to wild and rural environments in the vicinity of forests. In the 1950s, however, the urbanization of leishmaniasis became evident, with cases detected in northeastern Brazil and later across the country [58]. Since then, epidemiological studies have revealed changes in the epidemiological profile of leishmaniasis in Brazil, formerly affecting only animals in the wild and occasionally humans who ventured into wild environments [5, 9]. The disease has now been reported from both rural and urban environments in all Brazilian regions, characterizing the entire country as an endemic area [1].

In early studies on the phlebotomine fauna of Mato Grosso do Sul state, conducted in the 1930s, sand flies were only found in the wild [3,10,11,12,13]. Unplanned urbanization, deforestation, slash-and-burn, poor sanitary conditions, and climate change have all contributed to destroying the natural habitats of sand flies, forcing these insects to seek food and shelter in human dwellings, as well as where domestic animals are housed [14].

Subsequent adaptation to these new environments has been revealed by synanthropy studies that evaluated the level of adaptation of these insects to human environments [15, 16]. Some specimens can become highly adapted to new environments, to the point of fully depending on the ecological relationships operating in the anthropogenically altered environment [16]. Varying degrees of domesticity have been observed among insect species [16].

The destruction not only of wild biocenosis, but also of shelter availability and intra- and peridomestic food sources, can foster adaptation in many insects, particularly in species exhibiting eclectic dietary behavior [17]. To measure the degree of association of a given species with human-modified environments, Nuorteva [15] developed an index that compares quantitative data for the species in three ecological areas.

The purpose of the present study was to describe the degrees of synanthropy, diversity, and richness of the phlebotomine fauna of three areas (forested, rural, and urban) along a transect exhibiting varying degrees of anthropogenic interference in Corumbá county, Mato Grosso do Sul state, Midwest Brazil, and to examine the influence of environmental variables (temperature and precipitation) on species composition.

Methods

Study area

The municipality of Corumbá (Fig 1) (18° 59′ 44″ S; 57° 19′ 36″ W; 116 m above sea level) is located at the northwest area of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in the South-Mato-Grosso Pantanal’s plain. Corumbá is located 415 km from the State capital, Campo Grande. The city has a total area of 64,721.719 km2, which represents 18.19% of the State’s territorial extension. According to the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), in 2016, the total population of Corumbá was estimated at 103,703 inhabitants and 90% of these resided in the city’s urban perimeter [18].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Location of the study area, with county limits and urban area of Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

White dots represent transect. The urban area of the municipality of Corumbá is represented by a Landsat 8, OLI, Band 4, 5 and 6. Earth Explorer Path 227 row 73 composition RGB 654 (26/05/2015). Note: the map of Brazil (and the shapefile used to generate it) used for the elaboration of Fig 1 was extracted from the database of public domain of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (https://downloads.ibge.gov.br/downloads_top.php) and U.S. Geological Survey (http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.g001

At the west border of Corumbá is Bolivia, which is separated from the municipality by dry border, at south-west border is Paraguay, at north is Mato Grosso State, at southeast is Porto Murtinho and at east Corumbá borders the following municipalities: Ladário, Bodoquena, Miranda, Aquidauana, Rio Verde do Mato Grosso, Coxim and Sonora. The urban area of the municipality is located in a mountainous region known as Morraria do Urucum, in an area of submontane deciduous forest. The predominant vegetal coverage is the Brazilian Cerrado, which is a savannah-like biome typical of the Pantanal wetland, with flat areas of low, fire-resistant trees, small palms and thorny bushes and contain characteristic vegetative formations (Cerradão, Campo Sujo, Campo Limpo and others) [19]. The Pantanal is the largest wetland in the world, of which comprise the central floodplain in Brasil, Bolivia, and Paraguay and the lowlands of the Pantanal form a broad plain. During the rainy season flooding is extensive, creating an interconnected waterway among swamps, lagoons and oxbow lakes, serve as nursery areas for fishes, crustaceans, and a variety of aquatic plants [20]. The climate is classified according to Köppen as tropical (AW), with dry winter (April to September) and rainy summer (October to March) [21, 22]. The municipality is epidemiologically classified as area of intense transmission of VL human cases [23]. From 2010 to 2017, 66 human cases of VL were confirmed in Corumbá, [24].

Collection sites

Points were selected, along a transect, from the most preserved area (forest area), to the less preserved area (urban area) (Fig 1), totalizing three areas for sand flies collections: forest area, rural area and urban area [15] (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Coordinates and description of sampling plots (forested, rural, and urban areas).

Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.t001

  1. Forest Area (19° 03' 14'' S; 57° 36' 54'' W): Composed of rocky areas, shrubs, trees, vines and typical herbs of cerrado. It is characterized as a legal reserve area, located three kilometers away from the rural area. A trap was installed at the border of the forest, intermediate site, between wild and anthropized environment (Plot 1). The other two traps were installed inside the wild forest, a meter and 2 meters above the ground (Plot 2 and 3) (Table 1).
  2. Rural Area (19° 01' 41' 'S; 57° 37' 08'' W): Area with a residence located near the forest area, which presents remnants of native vegetation. Presence of a dog inside the residence. The distance between rural and urban areas was 2 km. A trap was installed in the intradomicile, with presence of dogs and cats in the interior (Plot 4). Trap 5 (Plot 5) was installed in the peridomicile, with dogs and cats present, and trap 6 (Plot 6) was installed in the peridomiciliary area, on the edge of a forest adjacent to a rural residence (Table 1).
  3. Urban Area (19° 00' 45'' S; 57° 37' 30'' W): Area within the urban perimeter of Corumbá, with the presence of domestic animals (chickens, geese, guinea fowl, peacocks, birds and dogs) and urban lighting interference. All traps were installed in the peridomiciliary area. Trap 7 (Plot 7) was installed inside a chicken coop (Gallus gallus domesticus) (Linnaeus, 1758). Trap 8 (Plot 8) was attached to the birding area, such as turkey (Meleagris sp.) (Linnaeus, 1758) and peacock (Pavo sp.) (Linnaeus, 1758) and trap 9 (Plot 9) was installed in the backyard of the residence, with dogs, rabbits and the presence of leaves and fruits in decomposition on the ground (Table 1).

Sand fly collection

Sand flies were collected using modified Falcão light traps [25], between 06:00 p.m. and 06:00 a.m., for 24 months (May/2015 to April/ 2017), totalizing 864 hours of sample effort for each area. Collections were performed simultaneously, at the three sample sites. In order to identify the species, the structures of the head, thorax and abdomen were used, with emphasis on the genitalia, following the classification proposed by Galati [26]. The abbreviation of the genera followed Marcondes [27].

Data analysis

The evaluation of the most abundant species according to their spatial distribution was performed using the Standardized Index of Species Abundance (SISA), according to Roberts e Hsi [28], where values ≥1 correspond to the most abundant species. To analyze the diversity of species of each area, the Shannon Weaver Diversity Index (H) was used [29]. The measure of dominance/evenness of species found in the community was calculated using the Pielou’s Index (J). This index ranges from 0 to 1, where values close to 1 demonstrate uniformity at the site and reveal whether only one species is dominant or if species are in equilibrium [29].

Diversity profiles by the Rényi series provide different diversity measures to compare equivalently the collection areas. This index was calculated using the vegan package [30]. The diversity value is equal to the number of species in the sample when the parameter α = 0. For α = 1, the diversity value corresponds to the Shannon index; and if considered α = 2, to Simpson's index [31, 32, 33].

The degree of association between climatic variables (temperature and accumulated rainfall) and the number of sand fly specimens form each area (forest, rural and urban) were evaluated by the Spearman’s correlation. Due to the non-homogenous absolute frequency of species among the collection sites, correlation analyzes were conditioned to the factor "collection site".

The Wilcoxon test was used to verify statistical differences between sex of sand flies. Taxonomic richness and abundance of individuals were compared between the three collection areas using Kruskal-Wallis and, Wilcoxon as post-test. In all analyzes, the p value used to demonstrate statistical significance was 0.05. The analyzes were conducted in software R version 3.2.0 [34].

To compare the three sampled areas a similarity matrix was used, calculated by the Bray-Curtis similarity index demonstrated through a dendrogram. This dendrogram uses similarity matrix values, based on distances calculated from differences between sample densities for each species, using the BioDiversity Pro program [35].

To confirm sample sufficiency and species richness, the species accumulation curve was calculated using the EstimateS program, version 9.1.0 with 1,000 randomizations of the data set (sample-based) and 95% confidence interval [36]. To calculate the Synanthropic Index (SI) of Nuorteva [15], the following formula was used: where:

  • ‘a’ represents the percentage of individuals of a given species collected in the urban area;
  • “b” stands for the percentage of individuals of this same species collected in the rural area; and
  • ‘c’ represents percentage of individuals of this species collected in the forest area.

The Synanthropic Index of Nuorteva (SI) ranges from +100 to -100. Negative values indicate aversion to the human environment while positive values represent a greater preference for anthropogenic environments [15]. This index was calculated for species that presented n> 10.

To generate georeferenced maps, shapefiles were obtained from Intituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística website (http://www.ibge.gov.br) [37] and U.S. Geological Survey [38], and the species with their respective record coordinates were inserted using QGIS 2.18.10 software [39] and SPRING software [40].

To compare species richness among the three biomes, a Venn diagram was designed in the ClickCharts 3.01 software [41], highlighting the number of unique species and that of common species among the areas.

Weather data

The climatic data referring to the study period were extracted from the database of the Center for Monitoring Weather, Climate and Water Resources of Mato Grosso do Sul, which is linked to the National Institute of Meteorology (INMET) [42].

Ethical statement

The research group has a permanent license for the collection of zoological material issued by the Instituto Brasileiro de Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais (IBAMA SISBio 25952–1). Field studies were carried out on 3 private properties, the owners of which gave permission to conduct the study in their respective intra and peridomiciliary areas. In addition, the field studies did not involve any endangered or protected species.

Results

Fourteen phlebotomine species in eight genera were collected during a 24-month period: Brumptomyia brumpti, Evandromyia aldafalcaoae, Ev. corumbaensis, Ev. lenti, Ev. sallesi, Ev. walkeri, Lutzomyia cruzi, Lu. forattinii, Martinsmyia oliveirai, Micropygomyia peresi, Nyssomyia whitmani, Psathyromyia bigeniculata, Pa. hermanlenti and Sciopemyia sordellii (Table 2). This is the first report of Pa. hermanlenti presence in Corumbá.

thumbnail
Table 2. Absolute and relative frequencies of sand fly species in forested (n = 250), rural (n = 3420), and urban (n = 3543) areas and all three areas combined (n = 7213).

Shannon index (H), Pielou index (J), and standardized index of species abundance (SISA). Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.t002

Table 2 shows the absolute and relative frequencies of sand flies. Significant differences were found between the forested and the urban area (W = 81.5; p < 0.0001), as well as between the forested and the rural area (W = 71; p < 0.0001) (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Absolute frequency of sandflies in three areas (forested, rural, urban).

Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.g002

The species Lu. cruzi (standardized index of species abundance, SISA = 1.00) was the most abundant species, detected in all ten sampling plots and on all 24 months investigated, accounting for 82.66% of all sand flies captured. It was also the most frequent species in all three areas, representing over 50% of the number of sand flies collected from each environment (66.00%, 67.52%, and 98.44% for forested, rural, and urban areas, respectively) (Table 2). Significant differences were observed for Lu. cruzi between forested and rural areas (W = 85; p < 0.0001) and between forested and urban areas (W = 71.5; p < 0.0001) (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Absolute frequency of Lutzomyia cruzi in three areas (forested, rural, urban).

Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.g003

Micropygomyia peresi, which also ranked second in species abundance (SISA = 0.94), was the second most frequent species (11.94% of the total), both in the rural (23.65%) and the urban area (0.82%) (Table 2 and Fig 4). No population homogeneity was observed for Mi. peresi between forested and rural areas (W = 71.5, p < 0.0001) or between rural and urban areas (W = 492, p < 0.0001) (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Absolute frequency of Micropygomyia peresi in three areas (forested, rural, urban).

Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.g004

Fig 5 shows the distribution of sand flies during the 24-month sampling period and the relationships between distribution, precipitation, and temperature. Collection numbers peaked in the rainy, warm season (February-March, 2016, in the urban area and February, 2017, in the rural area). A sharp decrease in species density was observed in the dry, cold season. In forested and urban areas, the absolute frequency of sand flies did not correlate significantly with temperature or precipitation (forest temperature: r = 0.3841, p = 0.0638; forest precipitation: r = 0.03797, p = 0.8602; urban temperature: r = 0.1204, p = 0.5749; urban area precipitation: r = 0.2235; p = 0.2936). In the rural environment, absolute frequency correlated with temperature (r = 0.5086; p = 0.0121), but not with precipitation (r = 0.2782; p = 0.1874) (Fig 5).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Temperature, precipitation, and seasonal distribution of sand flies in three areas (forested, rural, urban).

Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.g005

With regard to seasonality of the two most abundant species, peaks for Lu. cruzi subsequent to the rainy season (February-March) were observed in both years (Fig 6). No significant correlations were observed between Lu. cruzi and temperature (r = 0.2641; p = 0.2123) or rainfall (r = 0.0425; p = 0.8435) in the forested area or between Lu. cruzi and temperature (r = 0.1208; p = 0.5736) or rainfall (r = 0.2270; p = 0.2861) in the urban area. In the rural area, the absolute frequency of Lu. cruzi correlated significantly with temperature (r = 0.4199; p = 0.0410), but not with rainfall (r = 0.2619; p = 0.2162). For Mi. peresi, a significant correlation with temperature (r = 0.5582; p = 0.0045) was detected in the rural area (Fig 6).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Temperature, precipitation, and seasonal distribution of Lutzomyia cruzi and Micropygomyia peresi, Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.g006

No significant correlations were observed in the other areas. Sand fly frequency was highest in the rural environment (47.41%) and the urban area (49.11%), in contrast with the forested environment (3.46%). Diversity (H = 1.0906) and equitability (J = 0.5244) were highest in the forested area (Shannon diversity index) (Table 2). Similarity was highest between the rural and urban areas (67.90%) and lowest between the forested and urban areas (11.17%) (Fig 7).

thumbnail
Fig 7. Similarities among three areas (forested, rural, urban).

Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.g007

Although initially a larger species richness can be observed in the rural area (n = 13 species) in relation to the others (forest: n = 8 species, urban: n = 6 species) (Fig 8) and the profile of Rényi (α = 0) has been higher in the rural area, the rural and forest areas are non-comparable because the diversity profiles are intersecting. In any case, the urban area presented less diversity in comparison to the others.

thumbnail
Fig 8. Species richness and diversity profiles of Rényi, showing Shannon index (H) (α = 1) and Simpson index (S) (α = 2) diversity in the three sampled areas (forest, rural and urban).

Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.g008

Evandromyia corumbaensis, Lu. cruzi, Lu. forattinii, and Mi. peresi were recorded in all three areas. Evandromyia walkeri was found exclusively in the forested area and Ev. aldafalcaoae, Ny. whitmani, and Sc. sordellii were found in the rural area alone (Table 2 and Fig 9).

thumbnail
Fig 9. Distribution of sandfly species in three areas (forested, rural, urban).

Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.g009

Among the 14 recorded species, synanthropy index were calculated for the seven species. Based on the synanthropy index, Lu. cruzi was found to have a strong preference (+75.09) for urban environments, while Br. brumpti, Mi. peresi, Lu. forattinii, and Mt. oliveirai were categorized as having a preference for these environments. Only Ev. corumbaensis was categorized as independent from urban environments (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Synanthropic index for male and female sand flies (n > 10) in three areas (forested, rural, urban).

Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.t003

A total of 5997 males (83.11%) and 1216 females (16.89%) were collected. Males were more frequent in all three areas (male-to-female ratio: 4.93:1). Pooling all species together revealed a significant difference in absolute frequency between males and females (W = 490; p < 0.0001). For Lu. cruzi, the most abundant species in this study, an 8:1 male-to-female ratio (5299 males, 663 females; Table 4) was found, representing a significant difference (W = 519.5; p < 0.001). Males of Lu. cruzi represented 78.32%, 75.94%, and 99.12% of individuals for this species in the forested, rural, and urban areas, respectively (Table 5).

thumbnail
Table 4. Distribution of male and female specimens (n = 7213).

Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.t004

thumbnail
Table 5. Distribution of male and female specimens (n = 7213), by area (forested, rural, urban).

Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.t005

The results for sampling adequacy, based on the curve of species accumulation for the three areas, did not reveal apparent stabilization, thus failing to attain the predicted asymptote, suggesting the need for a greater sampling effort to record additional species (Fig 10).

thumbnail
Fig 10. Cumulative curve of sandfly species in forested, rural, and urban areas (solid red line), 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines), and rarefaction curve (solid black line).

Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. May 2015 to April 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215741.g010

Discussion

This is the first study of sand fly synanthropy conducted in Midwest Brazil. The species Lu. cruzi had exhibited high synanthropic index and high population density. The Pantanal floodplain comprises both terrestrial and aquatic environments harboring a huge diversity of dipterous species, particularly species that, although restricted to wild environments, act as vectors of human pathogens. Destruction of the original vegetation, environmental imbalance, deforestation, agricultural development, human migration, and poor-quality, unplanned urbanization cause wild vectors and reservoirs of several parasites to adapt to rural and urban environments. The Pantanal floodplain is no exception to this phenomenon [6, 43].

Corumbá county has played a historical role in the study of leishmaniasis, as the place of diagnosis of the first human case of visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil, in 1913 [44]. In the 1980s, Nunes et al. [45] detected the prevalence of Leishmania sp. among dogs in the county, with cases of canine leishmaniasis recorded throughout the urban area. At the time, collection efforts revealed the phlebotomine fauna to comprise eight species, including Lu. cruzi, Lu. forattinii, and Ev. corumbaensis [46]. Successive faunal studies conducted in Corumbá showed an increase in the number of detected species over time, but a reduction in the number of individuals in some populations. In 2014, Casaril et al. [47] reported the presence of 12 species, four of which were new. Recently, Oliveira et al. [48] found 13 species.

Since the earliest studies of phlebotomines in the Pantanal region [46], Lu. cruzi had exhibited high anthropophilia and high population density. In the present study, this species was frequent in all plots throughout the collection period, accounting for 82.66% of the sand flies collected. Lutzomyia cruzi, the predominant vector species in Corumbá, has been reported as a vector for L. infantum [4952]. Its synanthropic index indicates a strong preference for urban environments, demonstrating the adaptability of this species for eclectic feeding habits, which occurs in both preserved and disturbed environments.

In the present study, Mi. peresi, the second most prevalent species, was frequently found intradomestically. The species, often reported from environments with human presence in Mato Grosso do Sul [47, 53, 54] had a positive synanthropic index (+47.68) in the present study, indicating a preference for urban environments. Although the genus Micropygomyia—believed to feed on cold-blooded animals, such as lacertids [46]—has not been associated with Leishmania transmission to humans or animals, fauna monitoring should be periodically performed to detect the presence and circulation of Leishmania sp. in these sand flies.

In contrast with previous investigations conducted in the same county [46, 47, 55, 56], our study detected a sharp decrease in the density of Lu. forattinii, even in an urban environment containing chicken coops. Density of this species was highest in the rural area. Intense competition between species can cause one of the species to decline or even disappear [57]. It has been suggested that, owing to strong phylogenetic proximity [55], Lu. cruzi and Lu. forattinii share the same resources, implying competition. Despite a decline in density, Lu. forattinii remains a public health concern, not only because Leishmania DNA has been detected in females, but also owing to the high anthropophilia exhibited by this species [50]. The preference for urban environments (synanthropic index: +35.20) further exacerbates the concern over Lu. forattinii in the epidemiology of leishmaniasis.

Evandromyia corumbaensis and Ev. sallesi, two species belonging to the Cortelezzii complex, were collected in the present study. With type locality in Corumbá [58], Ev. corumbaensis exhibited eclectic behavior in the present study, having been recorded in forested and peridomestic areas (including chicken coops). Despite a low synanthropic index (+14.58: independence from anthropogenic environments), and although vector capacity has not been documented for Ev. corumbaensis, species belonging to the same complex, such as Ev. sallesi, have been reported as naturally infected with L. infantum promastigotes in Minas Gerais state [59], suggesting the importance of monitoring these species in the Pantanal floodplain. In the present study, Evandromyia lenti was found at a low density, comprising only females, recorded from better preserved environments. Natural infection with L. braziliensis [60] has been reported for Evandromyia lenti, a species often associated with domestic shelter in rural areas [61].

Of the areas investigated, the forest had the lowest density of sand flies (3.46%), corroborating findings by Teodoro et al. [62] (4.2%). In the present study, the forested areas had rocky soil with few litter layers, a feature that may have contributed to the low density of sand flies, since these insects depend on decaying organic matter for the development of immature forms. Despite having the lowest density, the forested area exhibited the highest diversity, as shown by the Shannon index (H), which combines not only richness and abundance of recorded species, but also balance between species [63] and these data were reinforced by Rényi diversity profile, these index is one of the most useful methods for ordering communities; it performs well irrespective of the species number of the community; the intersection of the diversity profiles is also well-indicated by this method [32]. Lutzomyia cruzi was the most frequent species in the forested area. Evandromyia walkeri was recorded only in this environment (one male specimen). Nieves et al. [64] associated Ev. walkeri with conserved areas in Venezuela, including specimens naturally infected with developmental forms of Leishmania sp., suggesting that this sand fly species may be involved in the transmission of tegumentary leishmaniasis agents. Casaril et al. [47] and Figueiredo et al. [65] reported a sustained presence of this species in peridomestic environments, particularly those with domestic animals.

The results obtained for the rural area (47.11% of total sampled sand flies) reveal the role played by intermediate environments in the maintenance of sand flies, since the features of rural environments tend to select species exhibiting an adaptive potential. Furthermore, rural environments provide conditions for the survival of sand flies (humidity, shade, decaying organic matter, domestic animals, and human dwellings near preserved forest). Vilela et al. [66] reported high diversity and high density in rural and urban environments, respectively, demonstrating the degree of adaptation that sand flies have been undergoing in response to anthropogenic changes, especially for Lu. cruzi.

Only male specimens were collected for Ev. aldafalcaoae, Ny. whitmani and Pa. hermanlenti, and only females for Sc. sordellii—all four species found exclusively in the rural area. Evandromyia aldafalcaoae, a species restricted to Mato Grosso do Sul, has been frequently collected from disturbed environments—peridomestically in the Pantanal sub-region of Nhecolândia [67] and in Corumbá county [47, 55], as well as indoors [65, 68]. Nyssomyia whitmani, a vector of etiological agents of cutaneous leishmaniasis in several Brazilian localities, has been frequently reported from Mato Grosso do Sul, especially where outbreaks of tegumentary leishmaniasis have occurred [61, 69, 70, 71].

Sciopemyia sordellii was found at a very low density in the present study. Casaril et al. [47] reported a decline of this species in Corumbá county, relative to a previous survey [46]. Urban expansion into forested areas can cause sand fly species to either disappear locally or successfully adapt to environmental changes, with an increase in relative abundance [57]. Sciopemyia sordellii is characteristic of rural areas and more preserved environments such as forests and caves [46, 47, 72]. In the present study, Br. brumpti occurred almost exclusively in the rural area, with a positive synanthropic index (+50.77: preference for urban environments). As yet, however, this genus does not pose epidemiological concern for leishmaniasis transmission.

Psathyromyia bigeniculata, a species with epidemiological importance, was found mainly in the rural area. The species has a wide geographic distribution and has been frequently reported from our study area [47, 48]. Reports of natural infection with flagellates [70, 73], as well as reports of vector competence in experimental transmission [74] and anthropophilic activity in various regions [61], have drawn attention to the importance of monitoring this species. Psathyromyia hermanlenti and Mt. oliverai were also found in the rural area, suggesting a preference for forested and rural environments [7577].

The role of chicken coops in maintaining the biological cycle of Leishmania species in urban areas has been reported elsewhere [76,7880]. In the present study, most Lu. cruzi specimens were collected from chicken coops, where decaying organic matter, humidity, and shelter facilitate breeding of this vector species, suggesting the potential of chicken coops to spread vector populations [8183]. The three areas sampled proved heterogeneous for the presence or absence of sand fly species, and similarities were more pronounced for anthropogenically altered areas. Species composition can be influenced by geographic and meteorological conditions, but mostly by microclimate, increasing the likelihood of high similarity between anthropogenically altered habitats [84].

The species accumulation curve showed that the sampling effort was insufficient to reveal the richness of the sand fly, suggesting that richness can be increased in three sampled areas, mainly in the most preserved. Lutzomyia cruzi was collected on all months of sampling, both in the rainy and dry seasons, revealing the high plasticity of this species in the region. Micropygomyia peresi was absent from records only in June, 2016. Lu. cruzi populations peaked in October, February, and March, showing a trimodal pattern, as also observed by Galati et al. [46], Casaril et al. [47], and Fernandes et al. [71]. No periodicity was observed for rainfall, and sand fly frequency did not correlate significantly with this variable. Influence of temperature on Lu. cruzi and Mi. peresi densities was observed only for the rural area.

Males predominated significantly for most species, as shown by male-to-female ratios, corroborating results obtained by Casaril et al. [47]. The predominance of males may have resulted from the method of capture employed, since males are more strongly attracted to light traps [14]. Attracted by light before mating, males perform lekking, an aggregation behavior observed in Lu. longipalpis and Lu. cruzi [85,86]. Pheromones released to attract females also attract other male sand flies [87]. Courtship involves wing flapping in continuous circling movements (a behavior termed “love song”), attracting females receptive to copulation [88]. A number of male pheromone chemotypes have been identified, including 9-methyl-germacrene-B, 3-methyl-α-himachalene, and cembrene-1 [8992]. Engorged females tend to shelter in poorly lit places; also, being heavier than males, these females are less likely to reach the height of light traps and be captured.

The variety of synanthropic behaviors of dipterans, such as flies and mosquitoes, has been reported. Few studies, however, have discussed this behavior for sand flies [93, 94]. Comparing three types of environment is useful to reveal the degree of adaptation of sand flies to anthropogenically altered areas and identify the selective pressures imposed by these changes [16]. The high synanthropic index obtained for Lu. cruzi indicates the overall high degree of adaptability of this species in occupying and breeding in areas subjected to distinct levels of change—a feature that raises concern, since controlling this species, which is a vector of L. infantum, a protozoan associated with high lethality in South America, is costly, burdensome, and often unsatisfactory. Elucidating the synanthropic behavior of sand flies yields information to assist in vector control by revealing the adaptive potential of these insects to areas with human presence and indicating the likelihood of disease emergence and endemism in these environments.

References

  1. 1. OPAS. Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde. Leishmanioses: Informe Epidemiológico nas Américas. Washington: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde; 2017.
  2. 2. WHO. World Health Organization. Leishmaniasis. Fact sheet. 2017. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs375/en/
  3. 3. Chagas E, Chagas AW. Notas sobre a epidemiologia da leishmaniose visceral americana em Mato Grosso. O Hospital. 1938; 13.
  4. 4. Deane L, Deane MP. Observações sôbre abrigos e criadouros de flebótomos no Noroeste do Estado do Ceará. Rev Bras Malariol Doenças Trop. 1957; 9.
  5. 5. Deane LM. Leishmaniose visceral no Brasil: estudos sobre reservatórios transmissores realizados no estado do Ceará. Rio de Janeiro: Serviço Nacional de Educação Sanitária, 1956.
  6. 6. Costa JML. Epidemiologia das Leishmanioses no Brasil. Gaz Méd Bahia. 2005; 75.
  7. 7. Costa CHN. Characterization and speculations on the urbanization of visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2008; 24.
  8. 8. Maia-Elkhoury ANS, Alves WA, Sousa-Gomes ML, Sena JM, Luna EA. Visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil: trends and challenges. Cad.Saúde Pública. 2008; 24.
  9. 9. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Manual de vigilância e controle da leishmaniose visceral. Brasília: Editora do Ministério da Saúde; 2014.
  10. 10. Mangabeira Filho O. Sobre duas novas espécies de Phlebotomus (Diptera: Psychodidae). Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 1938; 33.
  11. 11. Barreto MP. Nova contribuição para o estudo da distribuição geográfica dos flebótomos americanos (Diptera: Psychodidae). Arq. Faculdade Hig. Saude Publica. 1951; 16.
  12. 12. Forattini OP. Algumas observações sobre biologia de flebótomos (Diptera, Psychodidae) em região da bacia do rio Paraná (Brasil). Arq Faculdade Hig Saude Publica. 1954; 8.
  13. 13. Forattini OP. Sobre a classificação da subfamília Phlebotominae nas Américas (Diptera, Psychodidae). Pap. Avulsos Zool. 1971; 24.
  14. 14. Aguiar GM, Vilela ML, Schuback PD, Soucasaux T, Azevedo AC. Aspectos da ecologia dos flebotomos do Parque Nacional da Serra dos Orgãos, Rio de Janeiro. IV. Frequência mensal em armadilhas luminosas (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1985; 80.
  15. 15. Nuorteva P. Synanthropy of Blowflies (Diptera, Calliphoridae) in Finland. Ann Entomol Fenn. 1963; 29.
  16. 16. Forattini OP. Ecologia, epidemiologia e sociedade. São Paulo, SP: Artes Médicas; 2004.
  17. 17. Gomes AC. Mecanismos e significado epidemiologico da domiciliação. Rev Saúde Públ. 1986; 20.
  18. 18. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). Cidades@ 2017, Mato Grosso do Sul. Available from: http://cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/uf.php?lang=&coduf=50&search=mato-grosso-do-sul.
  19. 19. Mato Grosso do Sul. Atlas Multirreferencial. Campo Grande: Secretaria de Planejamento e Coordenação Geral (SEPLAN); 1990.
  20. 20. Lourival R, Harris M, Mountambault JR. Introduction to the Pantanal, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. In: Willink PW, Chernoff B, Alonso LE, Mountambault JR, Lourival R, editors. A biological assessment of the aquatic ecosystems of the Pantanal, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 18. Conservation International, Washington, DC; 2000. pp: 28–33.
  21. 21. Soriano BMA. Caracterização climática de Corumbá, MS. Boletim de Pesquisa. Corumbá: Embrapa-CPAP; 1997.
  22. 22. Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves JLM, Sparovek G. Koppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z. 2013; 22.
  23. 23. Mato Grosso do Sul. Informe Epidemiológico das Leishmanioses nº 1/2017. Governo do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul. Secretaria de Saúde do Estado, Coordenadoria Estadual Controle de Vetores, Gerência Estadual de Zoonoses, Campo Grande, Brasil. 2017.
  24. 24. Mato Grosso do Sul. Informe Epidemiológico das Leishmanioses nº 1/2018 –Leishmaniose Visceral Mato Grosso do Sul, Semana Epidemiológica 1 a 52 de 2017. Governo do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul. Secretaria de Saúde do Estado, Coordenadoria Estadual Controle de Vetores, Gerência Estadual de Zoonoses, Campo Grande, Brasil. 2018.
  25. 25. Falcão AR. Um novo modelo de armadilha luminosa de sucção para pequenos insetos. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 1981; 76.
  26. 26. Galati EAB. Classification Morphology and Terminology of Adults and Identification of American Taxa. In: Rangel EF, Lainson R, editors. Brazilian Sand Flies: Biology, Taxonomy, Medical Importance and Control. Springer; 2018. pp. 9–212.
  27. 27. Marcondes CB. A proposal of generic and subgeneric abbreviations for phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) of the world. Entomol News. 2007; 118.
  28. 28. Roberts DR, Hsi BP. An index of species abundance for use with mosquito surveillance data. Environ Entomol. 1979; 8.
  29. 29. Service MW. Mosquito ecology: field sampling methods. 2º ed. London: Elsevier; 1993.
  30. 30. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. Community Ecology Package. Package “Vegan”. Version 2.5–4. R Core Team, 2019.
  31. 31. Hill MO. Diversity and Evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology. 1973; 54.
  32. 32. Tóthmérész B. Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. J. Veg. Sci. 1995; 6.
  33. 33. Chagas AP, Soares DC, Sousa GCR, Viana RB, Rebelo JMM, Garcez LM. Ecological aspects of phlebotomine sand flies in the foci of leishmaniasis in the eastern Amazon, Pará State, Brazil Rev. Pan-Amaz. Saude. 2016; 7.
  34. 34. R Core Team, 2019. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2019. Avaliable from: www.R-project.org/.
  35. 35. McAleece N, Gage JDG, Lambshead PJD, Paterson GLJ. BioDiversity Professional statistics analysis software. Scottish Association for Marine Science and the Natural History Museum London; 1997.
  36. 36. Colwell RK. Estimates: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9.1.0. User’s Guide and application. Available from: <http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates/.>
  37. 37. IBGE. (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). Estados@ 2017. Mato Grosso do Sul. 2017. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/estadosat/perfil.php?sigla=ms.
  38. 38. USGS (United States Geological Survey). LANDSAT 8 OLI Band 4, 5 and 6. Earth Explorer Path 227 row 73. http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/, [accessed September 23, 2017].
  39. 39. OSGeo. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. Quantum GIS (QGIS). Open Source Geographic Information System (GIS). Version 2.18.10. “Dufour”. 2017. Available from: http://qgis.org/.
  40. 40. SPRING: Integrating remote sensingand GIS by object-oriented data modelling. Camara G, Souza RCM, Freitas UM, Garrido J Computers & Graphics. 1996; 20.
  41. 41. NCH Software. ClickCharts Diagram & Flowchart Software. Version 3.01. 2017. Available from: https://www.nchsoftware.com/chart/index.html.
  42. 42. Cemtec, Centro de Monitoramento de Tempo, do Clima e dos Recursos Hídricos de Mato Grosso do Sul. Banco de Dados–Boletins. Portal do Governo de Mato Grosso do Sul; 2017. Available from: http://www.cemtec.ms.gov.br/.
  43. 43. Gontijo CMF, MELO MN. Leishmaniose visceral no Brasil: quadro atual, desafios e perspectivas. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2004; 7.
  44. 44. Migone LE. Un caso de Kalazar a Assuncion (Paraguay). Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1913; 6.
  45. 45. Nunes VLB, Yamamoto YY, Rego Junior RFA, Dorval MEC, Galati EAB, Oshiro ET, et al. Aspectos epidemiológicos da leishmaniose visceral em cães de Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul. Pesqui Vet Bras. 1988; 8.
  46. 46. Galati EAB, Nunes VLB, Rego Junior FA, Oshiro ET, Chang MR. Estudo de flebotomíneos (Diptera: Psychodidae) em foco de leishmaniose visceral no Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Rev Saúde Públ. 1997; 31.
  47. 47. Casaril AE, Monaco NZN, Oliveira EF, Eguchi GU, Paranhos Filho AC, Pereira LE, et al. Spatiotemporal analysis of sandfly fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an endemic area of visceral leishmaniasis at Pantanal, central South America. Parasit Vectors. 2014; 7. pmid:25128480
  48. 48. Oliveira EF, Casaril AE, Fernandes WS, Ravanelli MS, Medeiros MJ, Gamarra RM, et al. Monthly distribution of phlebotomine sand flies, and biotic and abiotic factors related to their abundance, in an urban area to which visceral leishmaniasis is endemic in Corumbá, Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11: e0165155. pmid:27783667
  49. 49. Santos SO, Arias J, Ribeiro AA, Hoffmann MP, Freitas RA, Malacco MAF. Incrimination of Lutzomyia cruzi as a vector of American Visceral Leishmaniasis. Med Vet Entomol. 1998; 12.
  50. 50. Pita-Pereira D, Cardoso MAB, Alves CR, Brazil RP, Britto C. Detection of natural infection in Lutzomyia cruzi and Lutzomyia forattinii (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) by Leishmania infantum chagasi in an endemic area of visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil using a PCR multiplex assay. Acta Trop. 2008; 107. pmid:18502392
  51. 51. Oliveira EF, Oshiro ET, Fernandes WS, Ferreira AMT, Oliveira AG, Galati EAB. Vector competence of Lutzomyia cruzi naturally demonstrated for Leishmania infantum and suspected for Leishmania amazonensis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017a; 96. pmid:28077746
  52. 52. Oliveira EF, Oshiro ET, Fernandes WS, Murat PG, Medeiros MJ, Souza AI, et al. Experimental infection and transmission of Leishmania by Lutzomyia cruzi (Diptera: Psychodidae): Aspects of the ecology of parasite-vector interactions. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017b; 11. pmid:28234913
  53. 53. Galati EAB, Nunes VLB, Boggiani PC, Dorval MEC, Cristaldo G, Rocha HC, et al. Phlebotomines (Diptera: Psychodidae) in forested areas of the Serra da Bodoquena, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2006; 101.
  54. 54. Oliveira GMG, Figueiro Filho EA, Andrade GMC, Araujo LA, Oliveira MLG, Cunha RV. Flebotomíneos (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) no Município de Três Lagoas, área de transmissão intensa de leishmaniose visceral, Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Rev Pan-Amaz Saude. 2010; 1.
  55. 55. Galati EAB, Rego Junior FA, Nunes VLB, Teruya E. Fauna Flebotominica do município de Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil e descrição de Lutzomyia forattinii, sp. (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae). Rev Bras Entomol. 1985; 29.
  56. 56. Almeida PS, Nascimento JC, Ferreira AD, Minzão LD, Portes F, Miranda AM, et al. Espécies de flebotomíneos (Diptera: Psychodidae) coletadas em ambiente urbano em municípios com transmissão de Leishmaniose Visceral do estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Rev Bras Entomol. 2010; 54.
  57. 57. Ricklefs RE. A economia da natureza. 6ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2010.
  58. 58. Galati EAB, Nunes VLB, Oshiro ET, Rego Junior FA. Nova espécie de Phlebotominae, Lutzomyia corumbaensis, sp. n. (Diptera, Psychodidae) do complexo Lutzomyia cortelezzii. Rev Bras Entomol. 1989; 33.
  59. 59. Saraiva L, Carvalho GML, Gontijo CMF, Quaresma PF, Lima ACVMR, Falcão A, et al. Natural infection of Lutzomyia neivai and Lutzomyia sallesi (Diptera: Psychodidae) by Leishmania infantum chagasi in Brazil. J Med Entomol. 2009; 46.
  60. 60. Paiva BR, Oliveira AG, Dorval MEC, Galati EAB, Malafronte RS. Species-specific identification of Leishmania in naturally infected sand flies captured in Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil. Acta Trop. 2010; 115. pmid:20219438
  61. 61. Galati EAB, Nunes VLB, Dorval MEC, Oshiro ET, Cristaldo G, Espíndola MA, et al. Estudo dos flebotomíneos (Diptera, Psychodidae), em área de leishmaniose tegumentar, no Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Rev Saúde Públ. 1996; 30.
  62. 62. Teodoro U, Salvia Filho VL, Lima EM, Spinosa RP, Barbosa OC, Ferreira MEMC, et al. Observações sobre o comportamento de flebotomíneos em ecótopos florestais e extraflorestais, em área endêmica de leishmaniose tegumentar americana, no norte do Estado do Paraná, sul do Brasil. Rev Saúde Públ. 1993; 27.
  63. 63. Hubalék Z. Measures of species diversity in ecology: an evaluation. Folia Zool. 2000; 49.
  64. 64. Nieves E, Oraá L, Rondón Y, Sánchez M, Sánchez Y, Rojas M, et al. Effect of environmental disturbance on the population of sand flies and Leishmania transmission in an endemic area of Venezuela. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2014; 2014. pmid:24949018
  65. 65. Figueiredo HR, Santos MFC, Casaril AE, Infran JOM, RIBEIRO LM, Fernandes CES, et al. Sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an endemic area for leishmaniases in Aquidauana municipality, Pantanal of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2016; 58. pmid:27982353
  66. 66. Vilela ML, Azevedo CG, Carvalho BM, Rangel EF. Phlebotomine fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) and putative vectors of leishmaniases in impacted area by hydroelectric plant, state of Tocantins, Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2014; 6. pmid:22163271
  67. 67. Braga-Miranda LC, Miranda M, Galati EAB. Phlebotomine fauna in a rural area of the Brazilian Pantanal. Rev Saúde Públ. 2006; 40.
  68. 68. Santos SO, Andrade Filho JD, Honer MR. Lutzomyia aldafalcaoae sp. n. a new species of Phlebotominae (Diptera: Psychodidae) from Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2001; 96.
  69. 69. Andrade ARO, Dorval MEC, Andrade SMO, Marques A, Silva BAK, Andreotti R. Phlebotomine fauna in the Ponta Porã city: epidemiological importante in border line between Brazil and Paraguay. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2012; 2.
  70. 70. Brilhante AF, Dorval MEMC, Galati EAB, Rocha HC, Cristaldo G, Nunes VLB. Phlebotomine fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an area of fishing tourism in central–western Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2015; 57. pmid:26200964
  71. 71. Fernandes WS, Borges L, Casaril AE, Oliveira EF, Infran JOM, Piranda EM, et al. Sand fly fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) in Cerrado, the Central Western of Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2017; 59. pmid:28902295
  72. 72. Oliveira AG, Galati EAB, Oliveira O, Oliveira GR, Espindola IAC, Dorval MEC, et al. Abundance of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) in urban transmission of visceral leishmaniasis in Campo Grande, State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2006; 101.
  73. 73. Sánchez-García L, Berzunza-Cruz M, Becker-Fauser I, Rebollar-Téllez EA. Sand flies naturally infected by Leishmania (L.) mexicana in the peri-urban area of Chetumal city, Quintana Roo, México. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010; 104. pmid:20171709
  74. 74. Lawyer PG, Young DG. Experimental transmission of Leishmania mexicana to hamsters by bites of Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) from the United States. J Med Entomol. 1987; 24.
  75. 75. Santos TV, Barata IR, Souza AAA, Silveira FT, Lainson R. Primeiro registro de Lutzomyia termitophila Martins, Falcão e Silva (1964) e Lutzomyia hermanlenti Martins, Silva e Falcão (1970) (Diptera: Psychodidae) no Estado do Pará, Brasil. Rev Pan-Amazônica Saúde. 2011; 2.
  76. 76. Oliveira AG, Andrade Filho JD, Falcão AL, Brazil RP. Estudo de flebotomíneos (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae) da zona urbana da cidade de Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil, 1999–2000. Cad Saúde Pública. 2003; 19.
  77. 77. Galati EAB, Nunes VLB, Boggian PC, Dorval MEC, Cristaldo G, Rocha HC, et al. Phlebotomines (Diptera, Psychodidae) in caves of the Serra da Bodoquena, Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol. 2003; 47.
  78. 78. Nunes VLB, Galati EAB, Cardozo C, Rocca M, Andrade ARO, Santos MFC, Aquino RB, Rosa D. Estudo de flebotomíneos (Diptera, Psychodidae) em área urbana do município de Bonito, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Rev Bras Entomol. 2008; 52.
  79. 79. Oliveira AG, Marassá AM, Consales CA, Dorval MEC, Fernandes CE, Oliveira GR, et al. Observations on the feeding habits of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz & Neiva, 1912) (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) in Campo Grande, an endemic area of visceral leishmaniasis in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Acta Trop. 2008; 107. pmid:18611387
  80. 80. Brito VN, Almeida ABPF, Nakazato L, Duarte R, Souza CO, Sousa VRF. Phlebotomine fauna, natural infection rate and feeding habits of Lutzomyia cruzi in Jaciara, state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014; 109. pmid:25410993
  81. 81. Bigeli JG, Oliveira Júnior WP, Teles NMM. Diagnosis of Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi infection in dogs and the relationship with environmental and sanitary aspects in the municipality of Palmas, state of Tocantins, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2012; 45.
  82. 82. Alexander B, Carvalho RL, Mccallun H, Pereira MH. Role of the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) in the epidemiology of urban visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002; 8. pmid:12498667
  83. 83. Teodoro U, Lonardoni MVC, Silveira TGV, Dias AC, Abbas M, Alberton D, et al. Luz e galinhas como fatores de atração de Nyssomyia whitmani em ambiente rural, Paraná, Brasil. Rev Saúde Públ. 2007; 41.
  84. 84. Feliciangeli MD. Ecology of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in a restricted focus of cutaneuos leishmaniasis in northern Venezuela. I. Description of the study área, catching methods and species composition. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1987; 82.
  85. 85. Jones TM, Hamilton JGC. A role for pheromones in mate choice in a lekking sand fly. Animal Behav. 1998; 56.
  86. 86. Kelly DW, Dye C. Pheromones, kairomones and the aggregation dynamics of the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis. Animal Behav. 1997; 53.
  87. 87. Quinnel RJ, Dye C. Correlates of the peridomestic abundance of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Amazonian Brazil. Med Vet Entomol. 1994; 8.
  88. 88. Souza NA, Vigoder FM, Araki AS, Ward RD, Kyriacou CP, Peixoto AA. Analysis of the copulatory courtship songs of Lutzomyia longipalpis in six populations from Brazil. J. Med. Entomol. 2004; 41.
  89. 89. Araki AS, Vigoder FM, Bauzer LGSR, Ferreira GEM, Souza NA, Araújo IB, et al. Molecular and behavioral differentiation among brazilian populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae). Plos Negl Trop Dis. 2009; 3. pmid:19172187
  90. 90. Brazil RP, Hamilton JGC. Isolation and identification of 9-methylgermacrene-B as the putative sex pheromone of Lutzomyia cruzi (Mangabeira, 1938) (Diptera: Psychodidae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz.2002; 97.
  91. 91. Hamilton JGC, Brazil RP, Campbell-Lendrum D, Davies CR, Kelly DW, Pessoa FAC, et al. Distribution of putative male sex pheromones among Lutzomyia sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae). Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002; 96. pmid:11989537
  92. 92. Vigoder FM, Araki AS, Bauzer LGSR, Souza NA, Brazil RP, Peixoto AA. Lovesongs and period gene polymorphisms indicate Lutzomyia cruzi (Mangabeira, 1938) as a sibling species of the Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz and Neiva, 1912) complex. Infect Gent Evol. 2010; 10. pmid:20478408
  93. 93. Barata RA, Ursine RL, Nunes FP, Morais DH, Araújo HS. Synanthropy of mosquitoes and sand flies near the Aimorés hydroelectric power plant, Brazil. J Vector Ecol. 2012; 37. pmid:23181864
  94. 94. Jahanifard E, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Akhavan AA, Akbarzadeh K, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Rassi Y, et al. Diversity of sand flies (Diptera, Psychodidae) in southwest Iran with emphasis on synanthropy of Phlebotomus papatasi and Phlebotomus alexandri. Acta Trop. 2015; 140. pmid:25159535