Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and birth outcomes in Lebanon and Qatar: Results of the MINA cohort

  • Mariam Ali Abdulmalik,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Primary Health Care Corporation, Doha, Qatar

  • Jennifer J. Ayoub,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Nutrition and Food Sciences Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

  • Amira Mahmoud,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Project administration

    Affiliation Public Health Department, Ministry of Public Health, Doha, Qatar

  • MINA collaborators ,

    The complete membership of the MINA collaborators is found in the Acknowledgments.

  • Lara Nasreddine ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Lara Nasreddine, Farah Naja

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    ln10@aub.edu.lb (LN); fn14@aub.edu.lb (FN)

    Affiliation Nutrition and Food Sciences Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

  • Farah Naja

    Contributed equally to this work with: Lara Nasreddine, Farah Naja

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    ln10@aub.edu.lb (LN); fn14@aub.edu.lb (FN)

    Affiliation Nutrition and Food Sciences Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

Abstract

Accumulating evidence has highlighted the role of maternal nutritional status on fetal development, birth outcomes and child health. The Mother and Infant Nutritional Assessment (MINA) cohort is a 3-year follow-up study of pregnant women and their children in Qatar and Lebanon. This study reports on the characteristics and determinants of pre-pregnancy BMI and Gestational Weight Gain (GWG) of MINA particiants, as well as birth outcomes. A total of 272 pregnant women were recruited during their first trimester from primary healthcare centers as well as private clinics in Beirut (n = 194) and Doha (n = 147). During the first visit, data collection included pre-pregnancy weight, sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. The weight before delivery and neonatal outcomes were extracted from the medical records. GWG was calculated as the difference between weight before delivery and pre-pregnancy weight and was classified into insufficient, adequate, and excessive, as per the IOM criteria. Overall, 42.1% of women had a pre-pregnancy BMI≥25 Kg/m2 (58% in Qatar vs 30.8% in Lebanon, p<0.001). Only 30.2% of women had adequate GWG, while 25.7% and 44.1% of women had insufficient and excessive GWG, respectively. In the cohort 68.7% of infants had a weight adequate-for-gestational age (AGA), 6.7% were SGA and 24.6% were LGA. The proportions of LGA were higher with greater GWG (p<0.05). After adjustment, Qatari women were 3 times more likely to be overweight or obese before pregnancy while a higher education level was associated with significantly lower odds of pre-pregnancy BMI≥25 Kg/m2. Pre-pregnancy BMI≥25 Kg/m2 and regular breakfast consumption were predictors of excessive GWG (OR: 3.20, CI: 1.48–6.91; OR: 2.84, CI: 1.15–7.02, respectively). The high prevalence of pre-pregnancy overweight and excessive GWG among MINA participants underscores the need for culture-specific intervention programs to promote healthy body weight in women of childbearing age, and prevent excessive weight gain during pregnancy.

Introduction

Countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) are witnessing the nutrition transition with its characteristic shifts in diet, lifestyle, and alarming surges in obesity and nutrition-related chronic diseases [1]. Of particular concern amidst these ongoing changes is the nutritional status of women of childbearing age, given its potential impact not only on the health of mothers but also on the offspring’s growth, development and disease susceptibility later in life [2]. The hypothesis of the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DoHaD), which is often coined as ‘fetal or metabolic programming’, refers to the adaptive physiologic and metabolic processes that occur during critical prenatal, perinatal and early postnatal periods, in response to environmental stressors such as suboptimal maternal nutritional status [3]. In the EMR, high rates of overweight and obesity have been reported among women of childbearing age, with estimates reaching as high as 79% [46], implying that women begin their pregnancy with a higher body mass index (BMI) [7]. The high pre-pregnancy BMI was in fact reported as a risk factor for pregnancy and obstetric complications, such as gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, and cesarean deliveries [8], as well as adverse neonatal outcomes such as perinatal mortality, macrosomia, and congenital anomalies [9, 10]. Pre-pregnancy BMI was also reported as one of the factors that influence gestational weight gain (GWG) and its adequacy, which in turn may affect the child’s growth pattern and risk for disease later in life [1113]. In 2009, the Institute of Medicine published the revised GWG guidelines, providing specific weight gain recommendations based on pre-pregnancy BMI categories [14]. GWG below the recommendations was reported to increase the risk for low birthweight (LBW), impaired fetal growth and preterm births [1517], while excess GWG was found to be associated with gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, complicated deliveries, macrosomia [15, 18, 19] as well as adverse cardiometabolic profile in the offspring [20, 21]. Despite the significant health impact of pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG on the health of both the mother and the child, and their implications on the burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), little is known about their prevalence and determinants in countries of the EMR. This is of particular importance to the region, where approximately 60% of mortality is attributed to NCDs [22]. To move this agenda forward, a collaborative endeavor was initiated between Lebanon and Qatar to launch the first mother and child cohort in the region, examining the impact of maternal nutritional status and lifestyle characteristics on neonatal outcomes [23], and investigate the association of nutrition imbalances early in life with birth outcomes, growth patterns, as well as early determinants of NCDs [23]. The “Mother and Infant Nutritional Assessment” (MINA) cohort, a 3-year follow-up study of pregnant women and their children, was launched in 2015 in two Arab countries of the EMR, the first representing middle-income fossil fuel-importer countries (Lebanon) and the second representing high income fossil fuel-exporters (Qatar) [23]. This study is the first to report on findings stemming from the MINA cohort in Lebanon and Qatar. It aims at 1) describing the socioeconomic and lifestyle characteristics of the MINA cohort participants in Lebanon and Qatar; 2) characterizing and examining the determinants of pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG in the cohort of pregnant women in Lebanon and Qatar and 3) presenting the cohort’s birth outcomes. A secondary objective of this paper is the evaluation of the socio-demographic determinants of loss to follow-up in the MINA cohort.

Methods

This is the first study to report on the results of the MINA cohort, conducted in Beirut, Lebanon and Doha, Qatar. The details of the MINA protocol are published elsewhere [23]. In brief, the MINA cohort is a three–year follow-up study of pregnant women and their children. Women were recruited during their first trimester (0–13 weeks of gestation), between November 2015 and December 2018. Recruitment sites were the primary healthcare centers as well as private clinics in both Beirut and Doha. To be included in the study, women ought to be Lebanese, Qatari, or non-Qatari living in Qatar for more than 5 years, pregnant with a singleton, and not suffering from any chronic diseases that may affect dietary intake. Data collection for the MINA cohort took place at 9 time points/visits (3 visits during each trimester of pregnancy and 6 visits post-partum). In addition to these visits, delivery data were obtained through extraction from the hospital medical records. For the purpose of this study, data obtained from visit 1 and from medical records were used. The protocol of the MINA was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the American University of Beirut (Protocol ID: NUT. FN. 12) and the Primary Health Care Corporation in Qatar (Protocol ID: PHCC/ RC/15/04/006). All subjects signed a written consent before participating.

Data collection

For visit 1, which took place during the first trimester of pregnancy, trained research assistants approached potential participants in the healthcare facility’s waiting room and introduced the study objective and protocol. After consent and during a face-to-face interview, the participants completed a multi-component socio-demographic and lifestyle questionnaire. In addition, following the interview, the participants’ height was measured.

The socio-demographic section included questions regarding age (in years), number of children (0, ≥1), education level (up to high school-including technical diploma, university or higher), employment status (employed, housewife), family ties with husband (yes, no), family income (low (<1000 USD), middle (between 1000 and 2000 USD), high (≥2000 USD)), husband’s age (in years) and husband’s education level (up to high school, university or higher). Lifestyle characteristics were pre-pregnancy smoking (current smoker, non-smoker-including past smoker), smoking during pregnancy, folic acid supplementation pre-pregnancy (yes, no) and during pregnancy, breakfast consumption (regular, non-regular) before and during pregnancy, as well as physical activity during pregnancy. The latter was assessed using the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) [24]. Total physical activity was calculated by weighting each type of activity by its energy requirements defined in MET-minutes (multiples of the resting metabolic rate for an activity multiplied by the minutes performed). Three categories of physical activity, including low, moderate, and high intensity were assigned to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd tertile of METS-min per week. In addition to socio-demographic and lifestyle information, participants were asked to report their pre-pregnancy weight (Kg). Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard protocol using the Seca 213 Stadiometer. In this study, pre-pregnancy BMI was calculated as the pre-pregnancy weight (in Kg) divided by the square of height (in m2).

The delivery and birth outcome data were extracted from the participants’ medical record at the hospital where delivery took place (after subjects’ consent). The data included the following variables:

  • Weight before delivery (Kg): When admitted for delivery at the hospital, the weight of pregnant women was recorded.
  • Neonatal outcomes including gestational age (weeks), birthweight (Kg), and length at birth (cm). Preterm delivery was defined as birth at < 37 completed weeks of gestation. LBW was defined as birthweight < 2.5 Kg, whereas fetal macrosomia was defined as birthweight > 4 Kg. In addition, birthweights were converted to gestational age and sex-specific percentiles. Birthweights below the 10th centile were classified as small-for-gestational age (SGA) [25, 26], and those above the 90th centile as large-for-gestational age (LGA) [27, 28].

Using data from visit 1 and from the medical record, GWG was calculated (Kg) as the difference between the weight before delivery (from the medical record) and the pre-pregnancy weight reported by the participant at visit 1. The 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations were used to classify GWG into insufficient, adequate, and excessive [14], as follows: Insufficient GWG was defined as a weight gain during pregnancy of < 12.5 Kg in underweight women, < 11.5 Kg in normal weight women, < 7 Kg in overweight women, and < 5 Kg in obese women; adequate GWG was defined as a weight gain during pregnancy of 12.5–18 Kg in underweight women, 11.5–16 Kg in normal weight women, 7–11.5 Kg in overweight women, and 5–9 Kg in obese women; while excessive GWG was defined as a weight gain during pregnancy of > 18 Kg in underweight women, > 16 Kg in normal weight women, > 11.5 Kg in overweight women, and > 9 Kg in obese women.

Statistical analysis

Characteristics of the study population were presented using descriptive statistics including means, SD and proportions. Independent t-test and chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables (respectively) between the Lebanese and Qatari arms of the cohort. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to calculate the OR and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals describing the associations among socio-demographic and lifestyle variables with two main dependent variables: pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG. For GWG, multinomial logistic regressions were used with the reference category being “within recommendations”. Binary logistic regressions were used for pre-pregnancy BMI. In the multiple regression analyses, adjustments were made for those variables, which were significantly associated with the outcome in the simple regressions. Pairwise deletion was used to deal with missing data. Statistical analyses were carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Fig 1 represents the recruitment flow of women in the MINA cohort in Lebanon and Qatar. Overall, 992 eligible pregnant women were approached (n = 450 in Lebanon and n = 542 in Qatar). Of those, 341 (34.4%) accepted to participate, signed the consent form and were enrolled in the cohort (n = 194 in Lebanon and n = 147 in Qatar). Delivery data were available for 272 women (loss to follow up rate: 20.2%; 28.4% in Lebanon and 9.5% in Qatar). The two main reasons which were cited for dropping out were lack of time and moving out of the country. The table describing the associations of various socio-demographic characteristics with loss to follow is found in S1 Appendix. In the overall sample population, loss to follow up was associated with a higher age of the husband (p = 0.03) and a lower income (p = 0.01). In Lebanon, in addition to income, a lower education level of the husband was found to be associated with loss to follow up (p = 0.04). In Qatar, the main determinant of loss to follow up was employment status, whereby employed women were more likely to drop out as compared to women who were housewives (p = 0.04). (S1 Appendix).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Flow chart of the MINA cohort subjects’ recruitment, in Lebanon and Qatar.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219248.g001

Table 1 describes the socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics of the total study sample, as well as by country. Overall, 40.4% of women were older than 30 years and 22.7% were younger than 25 years of age. For 61.8% of the sample, this pregnancy was not their first. A total of 66.2% had a university degree or higher and 46.3% were employed. In the cohort, 16.3% of women had family ties with their husbands. As for income, 62.7% of women had a high monthly income compared to 14.5% who were in the low income category. With regards to lifestyle characteristics before and during pregnancy, only 5.3% of women reported being current smokers before pregnancy and 2.4% during pregnancy; 41.1% did not consume breakfast regularly before pregnancy and 26.8% during pregnancy. Only 28.1% of participants took folic acid supplementation before pregnancy, while 84.9% did during pregnancy. The comparison of socio-demographic and lifestyle factors between Lebanon and Qatar showed that, compared to pregnant women in the Qatari arm, Lebanese pregnant women were more likely to have a university or higher education level (77.3% vs 51.4%, p<0.001); report a ‘smoker’ status before and during pregnancy (9.3% vs 0%, p<0.001; 4.1% vs 0%, p = 0.01 (respectively)) and take folic acid supplementation before pregnancy (34.6 vs 19.4%, p = 0.002). On the other hand, in the Qatari arm of the cohort, greater proportions of women were not in their first pregnancy (69.4% vs 55.4%, p = 0.01), were housewives (67.1% vs 43.5%, p<0.001), had family ties with their husband (25.5% vs 9.3%, p<0.001, belonged to the high income level (83.9% vs 53.7%, p<0.001) and were not consuming breakfast regularly during pregnancy (36.6% vs 19.5%, p<0.001), as compared to women in the Lebanese arm of the cohort. (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Distribution of socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics of pregnant women enrolled in the MINA*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219248.t001

Table 2 displays the pregnancy characteristics as well as the birth outcomes in the MINA cohort. Overall, 42.1% of women had a BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m2 with higher proportions reported in the Qatari arm as compared to the Lebanese arm (58% vs 30.8%, p<0.001). Only 30.2% of women had adequate GWG, while 25.7% and 44.1% of women had insufficient and excessive GWG, respectively. No significant difference was noted for the distribution of the various categories of GWG between the two arms of the cohort. As for birth outcomes, in the MINA cohort, the mean gestational age was 38.59±1.59 weeks. Mean birthweight and birth length were 3.23±0.49 Kg and 50.15±2.50 cm, respectively. Gestational age and birth length were significantly higher in Qatar compared to Lebanon (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively). In the cohort, 8.5% of infants were preterm, 5.5% had LBW (<2.5 kg) and 4.3% were macrocosmic (>4.0 Kg). Furthermore, while 68.7% had a weight adequate-for-gestational age (AGA), 6.7% were SGA and 24.6% were LGA. No significant differences were observed for the distribution of birthweight and birthweight for age classification between the Lebanese and Qatari arm of the cohort.

thumbnail
Table 2. Pregnancy characteristics and birth outcomes in the MINA cohort *.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219248.t002

The distribution of the weight for age (SGA, AGA, and LGA) was significantly different across the various categories of GWG in the MINA cohort (p<0.05). (Fig 2). The proportions of LGA were higher with greater GWG. More specifically 14.3%, 25% and 30.2% of infants were classified as LGA among women with insufficient, adequate and excessive GWG, respectively. (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Distribution (%) of SGA, AGA and LGA birthweights according to the various categories of GWG in the study population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219248.g002

The correlates of pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m2 were examined among the study participants, using simple and multiple logistic regressions. Simple regression results showed that, among socio-demographic variables, maternal age, nationality, number of children, education levels of mother and husband are all associated with pre-pregnancy BMI. (Table 3). The results of the multiple logistic regression analysis, which included the aforementioned variables that were found significantly associated with the outcomes, showed that women who were 30 years or older were more likely to have a pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m2 (OR: 3.24, 95% CI: 1.43–7.32). In addition, Qatari women were 3 times more likely to be overweight or obese before pregnancy (OR: 2.85, 95%CI: 1.69–4.81). A higher education level was associated with significantly lower odds of pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m2 (OR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.22–0.85).

thumbnail
Table 3. Simple logistic regression analysis for the association of study characteristics with a pre-pregnancy BMI ≥25 kg/m2 among MINA cohort participants*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219248.t003

The results of the associations of GWG with socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics are presented in Table 4. A higher maternal age (≥ 30 years) was associated with 2.69 times the odds of excessive GWG, 95% CI (1.15–6.31). Women in the Qatari arm were more likely to fall below recommendations for GWG (OR: 2.21, 95%CI: 1.02–4.80). A pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m2 was associated with 3-fold increase in the odds of excessive GWG, 95% CI (1.56–6.17). In addition, regular breakfast consumption was associated with higher odds of excessive GWG (OR: 2.47, 95%CI: 1.08–5.66). (Table 4). After adjustment for significant determinants, the results of the multiple multinomial regression confirmed that a Qatari nationality was associated with insufficient GWG (p<0.05) (OR: 2.99, 95%CI:1.23–7.25), while pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m2 and regular breakfast consumption were all significant predictors of excessive GWG (p<0.05). (OR: 3.20, 95%CI: 1.48–6.91; OR: 2.84, 95%CI: 1.15–7.02), respectively).

thumbnail
Table 4. Simple multinomial logistic regression analysis for the association of participants’ characteristics with GWG among study participants *.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219248.t004

Discussion

This is the first study to report on results stemming from the MINA cohort [23]. It described the sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics of the cohort participants in Lebanon and Qatar and examined pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG and their determinants in the study population. It showed that 42% of women in Lebanon and Qatar entered pregnancy with a BMI exceeding 25 kg/m2, and only 30% had adequate GWG. High pre-pregnancy BMI was found to be associated with older age, a Qatari nationality and lower education levels. In turn, a higher pre-pregnancy BMI was found to be an independent risk factor for excessive GWG. Noteworthy, the study described the cohort’s birth outcomes, showing that 8.5% of infants were preterm, 5.5% had LBW, 4.3% were macrocosmic, 6.7% were SGA and 24.6% were LGA. A positive association between excessive GWG and LGA was observed.

The study population included 341 pregnant women from Lebanon and Qatar, with some disparities being noted in the subjects’ characteristics between countries. Some of these disparities are a direct reflection of inter-country differences in wealth, cultural aspects, and social norms. For instance, Qatar is one of the richest countries in the world in terms of Gross Domestic Product per capita [29], hence explaining the significantly higher income among Qataris in our study. In addition, the proportions of housewives and those reporting family ties between husband and wife were significantly higher in Qatar, which potentially reflects the prevalent social norms in the country. Consanguinity (i.e. marriage between first cousins) is in fact common in the Qatari context and, approximately a third of women of reproductive age are not employed [29]. The fact that the prevalence of smoking was found to be nill in the Qatari arm of the cohort may be due to a reporting bias, given that smoking is considered as a socially unacceptable behavior among women [30].

In our study, approximately 4 out 10 women (42%) were found to have a high pre-pregnancy BMI, with significantly higher proportions in Qatar (58%) compared to Lebanon (30.8%). The observed proportions among Lebanese women are within the range reported in the literature [3134], but those observed among Qatari women are considerably higher. Pre-pregnancy overweight, which reflects the mother’s nutritional status prior to conception, may increase the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes [3538] and heighten the offspring’s risk for chronic diseases later in life [39, 40]. Thus, the observed high proportion of pre-pregnancy overweight in our study may carry long-lasting ramifications on the health and wellbeing of future generations and further exacerbate the NCD epidemic. Therefore, there is an eminent need for culture-specific preventive strategies and a concerted action among various concerned health authorities to foster healthy body weight in women of childbearing age. To be effective, such strategies ought to be based on a thorough understanding of context-specific correlates of pre-pregnancy overweight. In our study, and in line with previous investigations [4143], higher age (above 30 years) was associated with increased odds of pre-gestation overweight. Older age may in fact be accompanied by multiple pregnancies and consequently a higher possibility of weight retention. Alternatively, it is well known that energy expenditure tends to decrease with age, which may further aggravate the risk of weight gain among women [44, 45]. Another factor that was found to be associated with pre-pregnancy BMI was education level. More specifically, higher educational attainment was associated with significantly lower odds of pre-pregnancy overweight. Education would in fact enable women to obtain information about health, particularly nutrition-related information, and consequently contribute to improving dietary behavior, lifestyle and hence the prevention of overweight [46, 47]. Previous studies conducted in Lebanon and Qatar showed that higher educational attainment was associated with increased adherence to healthier dietary and lifestyle patterns [46, 48], and lower prevalence of obesity and adiposity-related metabolic abnormalities among women [49, 50]. The fact that, in our study, a Qatari nationality was an independent risk factor for pre-pregnancy overweight is reflective of the higher overall prevalence of overweight and obesity in Qatar (and other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries) [5153], compared to Lebanon (and the Levant area) [4, 54, 55]. Qatar is in fact categorized as a country in advanced nutrition transition stage, with high levels of overweight and obesity and significant shifts in diet and lifestyle towards westernized patterns, while Lebanon is still categorized as a country in early nutritional transition stages, with relatively moderate levels of obesity [56].

The study findings documented a high prevalence of insufficient and excessive GWG, with no significant differences between Lebanon and Qatar. Overall, only 30% of the participating women fell within the adequate GWG based on the IOM guidelines, while 26% and 44% had insufficient and excessive GWG, respectively. These rates are within the range reported by recent studies, including a systematic review and meta-analysis which showed that 23% and 47% of pregnant women had insufficient and excessive GWG, respectively [31, 57]. The observed high prevalence of inadequate GWG and particularly excessive GWG is of public health concern, given its potential adverse effect on birth outcomes as well as disease risk later in life [58, 59]. Among the predictors of excessive GWG were pre-pregnancy BMI and breakfast consumption. In our study, and in accordance with findings reported by previous studies [1113], a high pre-pregnancy BMI was found to be an independent risk factor for excessive GWG. These findings have implications on the inter-generational cycle of obesity. Women who have excessive weight gain during pregnancy are more likely to retain their weight post-partum [60] and to enter the next pregnancy with a higher BMI. The latter is by itself a risk factor for another cycle of excessive GWG and the delivery of heavier babies who have higher odds of becoming overweight or obese later in life [61]. These observations may carry long-term public heath ramifications, especially in the local context of the EMR, where the prevalence of overweight and obesity is increasing at an alarming rate [1, 4]. In Qatar, aggressive weight management is being implemented among pregnant women as part of the “Clinical Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy” that were developed by the Ministry of Public Health [62]. This may explain the fact that in our study, a Qatari nationality was found to be an independent predictor of low GWG. Unexpectedly, regular breakfast consumption was found to be a significant predictor of excessive GWG in our study. Very few studies have examined breakfast consumption in relation of GWG. A review article by Phelan et al (2011) has included regular breakfast consumption within the list of potentially effective interventions for the prevention of excessive GWG [63]. In this context, it is important to note that energy density and nutrient composition may be key confounders for the association between breakfast’s frequency of consumption and excessive GWG. A breakfast high in sugar and refined grains may promote weight gain as opposed to a breakfast that is rich in whole grains, fruits, vegetables and protein [64]. There is therefore a need for future studies that investigate the association of breakfast consumption with GWG while taking into consideration its composition as well as its frequency.

The study has also importantly described the cohort’s birth outcomes. Overall, the rates of preterm birth, LBW, SGA, LGA and macrosomia obtained in this study were comparable to regional and international estimates. More specifically, the rates of preterm deliveries (8.5%) in our study were lower than the 2014 global estimate of 10.6% [65] and the rates reported for Asia as a whole (10.4–13.4%) [65]. Similarly the rates of LBW (5.5%) were below the global estimate of 16% in 2013 [66] and the regional average for the EMR (19.3%) [67]. The observed rate of SGA (6.7%) is in agreement with that reported recently from a birth cohort in Kuwait (7.4%) [68], while the rate of macrosomia (4.3%) was within the range described for both developing (0.5–14.9%) and developed countries (5–20%) [6870]. As for LGA, its prevalence (24.6%) was similar to that reported from a recent study in Kuwait [68], while being higher than estimates reported from Italy and China (5.3–10.6%) [71, 72]. The high prevalence of LGA may be explained by the prevalence of excessive GWG in our cohort, which is a known risk factor for accelerated fetal growth [31, 73, 74]. In fact, our results documented a significant association between LGA and excessive GWG. The mechanisms behind this association could be related to insulin resistance, which often occurs in women with excessive weight gain during pregnancy [73]. Insulin resistance causes metabolic abnormalities that increase the flux of nutrients to the fetus, including large amounts of glucose, resulting in hyperinsulinemia and fetal growth acceleration [73]. Insulin resistance may also be associated with higher concentrations of triglycerides that placental lipases hydrolyze and transfer to fetal circulation, resulting in increased energy input to the fetus [73, 75, 76].

A secondary objective of this study was the investigation of the socio-demographic determinants of loss to follow-up in the MINA cohort. Our results showed that loss to follow up was associated with certain socioeconomic factors such as lower income, but also with specific characteristics among husbands, including older age and lower education status. These findings resonate with those obtained by a recent qualitative study conducted by our group among pregnant women in Lebanon, and which has investigated the interaction between individual and contextual factors in motivating or deterring pregnant women from participating in research studies [77]. In that study, partners were recognized as levers whose full support would incite women to be more engaged in the research experience, whereas their lack of support can hinder the subjects’ interest and deter their participation [77]. In line with our study findings, many of the participants in the qualitative study pointed to education level as an important factor in the decision to participate in research studies, while misconception and lack familiarity with research was described as an important deterrent [77]. The fact that women’s employment status was associated with loss to follow up in our study is in agreement with previous studies highlighting concerns around time commitment, and work absenteeism as major barriers against participation in research studies [77, 78].

The strengths of this study include its prospective nature which allows for the exploration of causal relationships whilst requiring less recall than other epidemiological study designs [79, 80]. In addition, though the MINA cohort is multi country, the protocols and procedures were standardized throughout data collection and cleaning. Modelled after the protocols of the MINA was another cohort in the region: the Mother and Infant Study Cohort (MISC) in the Northern Emirates of the UAE [81]. The unified methodology in these cohorts will allow for cross country comparisons in the future. However, the results of this study ought to be considered in light of the following limitations. First the low response rate observed in our study may have potentially led to a selection bias, while the small sample size may have led to underpowered analyses. Second, information pertinent to pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG were extracted from the participants’ medical records. Although standards techniques were implemented by the clinics and health care centers for the measurement of body weight, we cannot rule out the possibility of random errors in these measurements. Third, the information pertinent to socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics were collected using a questionnaire in an interview setting. As observed in the majority of questionnaire-based studies, the interview-based approach may be associated with social desirability bias [82]. However, in our study, fieldworkers had received extensive training prior to data collection in order to reduce judgmental verbal and nonverbal communication and hence minimize potential social desirability bias.

Conclusion

The high prevalence of pre-pregnancy overweight and excessive GWG among the MINA participants raises major public health concern, given the mounting evidence for their association with maternal and neonatal complications as well as adverse health outcomes later in life. The study showed that pre-pregnancy BMI was an independent predictor of excess GWG and that the latter was associated with higher rates of LGA. Importantly, this study identified the sociodemographic determinants of high pre-pregnancy BMI and excessive GWG in the local context of countries in the EMR. These findings should feed into the development of culture-specific evidence based interventions for the promotion of healthy body weight in women of childbearing age, and the prevention of excessive weight gain during pregnancy. The adoption of heathy diets, and appropriate sleep and physical activity patterns ought to be integrated within health care programs that target women in countries of the EMR.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Socio-demographic determinants of loss to follow up in the MINA cohort.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219248.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the MINA collaborators including Dr. Nahla Hwalla, Dr. Ghina Ghazeeri, Dr. Anwar Nassar, Dr. Khalid Yunis, Dr. Saadeddine Itani, Dr. Al Anoud Al Thani, Dr. Zelaikha Bashwar, Dr. Hiba Bawadi. In addition, the authors recognize the contribution of the field workers including Ms. Aya Chatila, Ms. Chirine Assi, Ms. Sarah Batakji, Mrs Zeina Mogharbel, Ms. Sara Elfasakhany, and Dr. Zeinab Mahdi. The authors would like to thank the study participants for their time and commitment.

References

  1. 1. Sibai AM, Nasreddine L, Mokdad AH, Adra N, Tabet M, Hwalla N. Nutrition transition and cardiovascular disease risk factors in Middle East and North Africa countries: reviewing the evidence. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2010; 57(3–4):193–203. pmid:21088386
  2. 2. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, De Onis M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet. 2013; 382(9890):427–51.
  3. 3. Barker DJ. In utero programming of chronic disease. Clinical science. 1998; 95(2):115–28. pmid:9680492
  4. 4. Nasreddine L, Naja F, Chamieh MC, Adra N, Sibai A-M, Hwalla N. Trends in overweight and obesity in Lebanon: evidence from two national cross-sectional surveys (1997 and 2009). BMC public health. 2012; 12(1):798.
  5. 5. Haj Bakri A, Al-Thani A. Chronic Disease Risk Factor Surveillance: Qatar STEPS Report 2012. The Supreme Council of Health Qatar; 2013. [cited April 20, 2019]. https://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/steps/Qatar_2012_STEPwise_Report.pdf.
  6. 6. Kingdom of Bahrain Ministry of Health and UNDP. National non-communicable diseases risk factors survey 2007. Report of the national non-communicable diseases STEPwise survey; 2009. [cited April 20, 2019]. https://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/steps/2007_STEPS_Survey_Bahrain.pdf.
  7. 7. Leddy MA, Power ML, Schulkin J. The impact of maternal obesity on maternal and fetal health. Reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. 2008; 1(4):170. pmid:19173021
  8. 8. Vinturache A, Moledina N, McDonald S, Slater D, Tough S. Pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI) and delivery outcomes in a Canadian population. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014; 14(1):422.
  9. 9. Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris J, Wadsworth J, Joffe M, Beard R, et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287 213 pregnancies in London. International journal of obesity. 2001; 25(8):1175. pmid:11477502
  10. 10. Young T, Woodmansee B. Factors that are associated with cesarean delivery in a large private practice: The importance of prepregnancy body mass index and weight gain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187:312–8. pmid:12193918
  11. 11. Lynch C, Sexton D, Hession M, Morrison J. Obesity and mode of delivery in primigravid and multigravid women. Am J Perinatol. 2008; 25:163–7. pmid:18300188
  12. 12. Campbell E, Dworatzek P, Penava D, de Vrijer B, Gilliland J, Matthews J, et al. Factors that influence excessive gestational weight gain: Moving beyond assessment and counselling. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Medicine. 2016; 29(21):3527–31. pmid:26742688
  13. 13. Samura T, Steer J, Michelis L, Carroll L, Holland E, Perkins R. Factors associated with excessive gestational weight gain: Review of current literature. Global Advances in Health and Medicine. 2016; 5(1):87–93. pmid:26937318
  14. 14. Institute of Medicine & National Research Council. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2009.
  15. 15. Siega-Riz A, Viswanathan M, Moos M, Deierlein A, Mumford S, Knaack J, et al. A systematic review of outcomes of maternal weight gain according to the Institute of Medicine recommendations: birthweight, fetal growth, and postpartum weight retention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201(4):339.e1–14.
  16. 16. Bodnar L, Siminerio L, Himes K, Hutcheon J, Lash T, Parisi S, et al. Maternal obesity and gestational weight gain are risk factors for infant death. Obesity. 2016; 24(2):490–8. pmid:26572932
  17. 17. Poston L. Gestational weight gain: Influences on the long-term health of the child. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care. 2012; 15(3):252–7. pmid:22406744
  18. 18. Li N, Liu E, Guo J, Pan L, Li B, Wang P, et al. Maternal prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on pregnancy outcomes. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e82310. pmid:24376527
  19. 19. Lau E, Liu J, Archer E, McDonald S, Liu J. Maternal weight gain in pregnancy and risk of obesity among offspring: a systematic review. J Obes. 2014; 2014:524939. pmid:25371815
  20. 20. Gaillard R, Steegers E, Franco O, Hofman A, Jaddoe V. Maternal weight gain in different periods of pregnancy and childhood cardio-metabolic outcomes. The Generation R Study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015; 39(4):677–85.
  21. 21. Norman J, Reynolds R. The consequences of obesity and excess weight gain in pregnancy. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2011; 70(4):450–6. pmid:21880162
  22. 22. World Health Organization. Assessing national capacity for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases: report of the 2015 country capacity survey in the Eastern Mediterranean Region; 2016. [cited April 20, 2019]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250370/EMROPUB_2016_EN_19168.pdf?sequence=1.
  23. 23. Naja F, Nasreddine L, Al Thani AA, Yunis K, Clinton M, Nassar A, et al. Study protocol: mother and infant nutritional assessment (MINA) cohort study in Qatar and Lebanon. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2016; 16(1):98.
  24. 24. Chasan-Taber L, Schmidt MD, Roberts DE, Hosmer D, Markenson G, Freedson PS. Development and validation of a pregnancy physical activity questionnaire. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2004; 36(10):1750–60.
  25. 25. De Onis M, Habicht J-P. Anthropometric reference data for international use: recommendations from a World Health Organization Expert Committee. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 1996; 64(4):650–8. pmid:8839517
  26. 26. WHO Expert Committee. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995; 854:1–452. pmid:8594834
  27. 27. Chiavaroli V, Derraik JG, Hofman PL, Cutfield WS. Born large for gestational age: bigger is not always better. The Journal of pediatrics. 2016; 170:307–11. pmid:26707580
  28. 28. Bocca-Tjeertes I, Kerstjens JM, Reijneveld SA, Veldman K, Bos AF, de Winter AF. Growth patterns of large for gestational age children up to age 4 years. Pediatrics. 2014; 133(3):e643–e9. pmid:24567020
  29. 29. Al Thani M, Al Thani A, Al-Chetachi W, Al Malki B, Khalifa S, Haj Bakri A, et al. A ‘high Risk’Lifestyle pattern is associated with metabolic syndrome among Qatari women of reproductive age: a cross-sectional national study. International journal of molecular sciences. 2016; 17(6):698.
  30. 30. Maziak W, Nakkash R, Bahelah R, Husseini A, Fanous N, Eissenberg T. Tobacco in the Arab world: old and new epidemics amidst policy paralysis. Health policy and planning. 2013; 29(6):784–94. pmid:23958628
  31. 31. El Rafei R, Abbas HA, Charafeddine L, Nakad P, Al Bizri A, Hamod D, et al. Association of Pre‐Pregnancy Body Mass Index and Gestational Weight Gain with Preterm Births and Fetal Size: an Observational Study from L ebanon. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology. 2016; 30(1):38–45. pmid:26469281
  32. 32. Bogaerts A, Van den Bergh B, Nuyts E, Martens E, Witters I, Devlieger R. Socio‐demographic and obstetrical correlates of pre‐pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain. Clinical Obesity. 2012; 2(5–6):150–9. pmid:25586250
  33. 33. Lee JM, Kim MJ, Kim MY, Han JY, Ahn HK, Choi JS, et al. Gestational weight gain is an important risk factor for excessive fetal growth. Obstetrics & gynecology science. 2014; 57(6):442–7.
  34. 34. Athukorala C, Rumbold AR, Willson KJ, Crowther CA. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2010; 10(1):56.
  35. 35. Wise LA, Palmer JR, Heffner LJ, Rosenberg L. Prepregnancy body size, gestational weight gain, and risk of preterm birth in African-American women. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2010; 21(2):243.
  36. 36. Shaw GM, Wise PH, Mayo J, Carmichael SL, Ley C, Lyell DJ, et al. Maternal prepregnancy body mass index and risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology. 2014; 28(4):302–11. pmid:24810721
  37. 37. Liu X, Du J, Wang G, Chen Z, Wang W, Xi Q. Effect of pre-pregnancy body mass index on adverse pregnancy outcome in north of China. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2011; 283(1):65–70. pmid:21197595
  38. 38. Alberico S, Montico M, Barresi V, Monasta L, Businelli C, Soini V, et al. The role of gestational diabetes, pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on the risk of newborn macrosomia: results from a prospective multicentre study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014; 14(1):23.
  39. 39. Luu TM, Katz SL, Leeson P, Thébaud B, Nuyt A-M. Preterm birth: risk factor for early-onset chronic diseases. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2016; 188(10):736. pmid:26644500
  40. 40. Armitage JA, Poston L, Taylor PD. Developmental origins of obesity and the metabolic syndrome: the role of maternal obesity. Obesity and Metabolism. 36: Karger Publishers; 2008. p. 73–84.
  41. 41. Çalik KY, Yildiz NK, Erkaya R. Effects of gestational weight gain and body mass index on obstetric outcome. Saudi journal of biological sciences. 2018; 25(6):1085–9. pmid:30174506
  42. 42. Boudet-Berquier J, Salanave B, Desenclos J-C, Castetbon K. Sociodemographic factors and pregnancy outcomes associated with prepregnancy obesity: effect modification of parity in the nationwide Epifane birth-cohort. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2017; 17(1):273. pmid:28841845
  43. 43. Hill B, Bergmeier H, McPhie S, Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz M, Teede H, Forster D, et al. Is parity a risk factor for excessive weight gain during pregnancy and postpartum weight retention? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obesity reviews. 2017; 18(7):755–64. pmid:28512991
  44. 44. Hong SA, Peltzer K, Lwin KT. The prevalence of underweight, overweight and obesity and their related socio-demographic and lifestyle factors among adult women in Myanmar, 2015–16. PloS one. 2018; 13(3):e0194454. pmid:29547655
  45. 45. Hillemeier MM, Weisman CS, Chuang C, Downs DS, McCall-Hosenfeld J, Camacho F. Transition to overweight or obesity among women of reproductive age. Journal of Women’s Health. 2011; 20(5):703–10. pmid:21599427
  46. 46. Naja F, Nasreddine L, Itani L, Chamieh MC, Adra N, Sibai AM, et al. Dietary patterns and their association with obesity and sociodemographic factors in a national sample of Lebanese adults. Public health nutrition. 2011; 14(9):1570–8. pmid:21557871
  47. 47. Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Does social class predict diet quality? The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2008; 87(5):1107–17. pmid:18469226
  48. 48. Al Thani M, Al Thani A, Al-Chetachi W, Al Malki B, Khalifa S, Bakri A, et al. Lifestyle patterns are associated with elevated blood pressure among qatari women of reproductive age: A cross-sectional national study. Nutrients. 2015; 7(9):7593–615. pmid:26371041
  49. 49. Chamieh MC, Moore HJ, Summerbell C, Tamim H, Sibai AM, Hwalla N. Diet, physical activity and socio-economic disparities of obesity in Lebanese adults: findings from a national study. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15(1):279.
  50. 50. Al-Thani MH, Cheema S, Sheikh J, Mamtani R, Lowenfels AB, Al-Chetachi WF, et al. Prevalence and determinants of metabolic syndrome in Qatar: results from a National Health Survey. BMJ open. 2016; 6(9):e009514. pmid:27601485
  51. 51. STEPS. Palestine STEPS Survey 2010–2011 Fact Sheet. WHO STEPS chronic disease risk factor surveillance (6-3C-1). http://www.who.int/chp/steps/Palestine_FactSheet_2010-11.pdf?ua=1.
  52. 52. ALNohair S. Obesity in gulf countries. International journal of health sciences. 2014; 8(1):79. pmid:24899882
  53. 53. Ng SW, Zaghloul S, Ali H, Harrison G, Popkin BM. The prevalence and trends of overweight, obesity and nutrition‐related non‐communicable diseases in the Arabian Gulf States. Obesity Reviews. 2011; 12(1):1–13. pmid:20546144
  54. 54. Ministry of Health. Non-Communicable Diseases and their Risk Factors. Syrian Arab Republic. Directorate of Environmental and Chronic Diseases; 2003. WHO]. http://www.who.int/chp/steps/SyrianArabRepublicSTEPSReport.PDF?ua=1.
  55. 55. Department of Statistics [Jordan] and ICF International. Jordan Population and Family Health Survey 2012; 2013. [Calverton, Maryland, USA: Department of Statistics and ICF International]. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR282/FR282.pdf.
  56. 56. World Health Organization. Nutrition; 2019. [cited April 20, 2019]. http://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/nutrition/index.html.
  57. 57. Goldstein RF, Abell SK, Ranasinha S, Misso M, Boyle JA, Black MH, et al. Association of gestational weight gain with maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2017; 317(21):2207–25. pmid:28586887
  58. 58. Jiang H, Qian X, Li M, Lynn H, Fan Y, Jiang H, et al. Can physical activity reduce excessive gestational weight gain? Findings from a Chinese urban pregnant women cohort study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2012; 9(1):12.
  59. 59. Miao M, Dai M, Zhang Y, Sun F, Guo X, Sun G. Influence of maternal overweight, obesity and gestational weight gain on the perinatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Scientific reports. 2017; 7(1):305. pmid:28331199
  60. 60. Hill B, McPhie S, Skouteris H. The role of parity in gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention. Women’s Health Issues. 2016; 26(1):123–9. pmid:26542383
  61. 61. Walker R, Bennett C, Blumfield M, Gwini S, Ma J, Wang F, et al. Attenuating pregnancy weight gain—what works and why: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2018; 10(7):944.
  62. 62. Ministry of Public Health State of Qatar. Clinical Guidelines for the State of Qatar: The diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus in pregnancy. 2017.
  63. 63. Phelan S, Jankovitz K, Hagobian T, Abrams B. Reducing excessive gestational weight gain: lessons from the weight control literature and avenues for future research. Women’s Health. 2011; 7(6):641–61. pmid:22040207
  64. 64. Rosato V, Edefonti V, Parpinel M, Milani GP, Mazzocchi A, Decarli A, et al. Energy contribution and nutrient composition of breakfast and their relations to overweight in free-living individuals: a systematic review. Advances in Nutrition. 2016; 7(3):455–65. pmid:27184273
  65. 65. Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller A-B, Lumbiganon P, Petzold M, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2019; 7(1):e37–e46. pmid:30389451
  66. 66. Unicef. Low birthweight; 2014. [cited April 20, 2019]. https://data.unicef.org/topic/nutrition/low-birthweight/.
  67. 67. Nasreddine L, Ayoub JJ, Al Jawaldeh A. Review of the nutrition situation in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2018; 24(1):77–91. pmid:29658624
  68. 68. AlSeaidan M, Al Wotayan R, Christophi CA, Al‐Makhseed M, Abu Awad Y, Nassan F, et al. Birth Outcomes in a Prospective Pregnancy–Birth Cohort Study of Environmental Risk Factors in Kuwait: The TRACER Study. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology. 2016; 30(4):408–17. pmid:27193754
  69. 69. Henriksen T. The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2008; 87(2):134–45. pmid:18231880
  70. 70. Koyanagi A, Zhang J, Dagvadorj A, Hirayama F, Shibuya K, Souza JP, et al. Macrosomia in 23 developing countries: an analysis of a multicountry, facility-based, cross-sectional survey. The Lancet. 2013; 381(9865):476–83.
  71. 71. Bianchi C, de Gennaro G, Romano M, Aragona M, Battini L, Del Prato S, et al. Pre-pregnancy obesity, gestational diabetes or gestational weight gain: Which is the strongest predictor of pregnancy outcomes? Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2018; 144:286–93. pmid:30189224
  72. 72. Xiao L, Ding G, Vinturache A, Xu J, Ding Y, Guo J, et al. Associations of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with birth outcomes in Shanghai, China. Scientific reports. 2017; 7:41073. pmid:28120879
  73. 73. Zhao R, Xu L, Wu M, Huang S, Cao X. Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain influence birth weight. Women and Birth. 2018; 31(1):e20–e5. pmid:28716548
  74. 74. Costa BMF, Paulinelli RR, Barbosa MA. Association between maternal and fetal weight gain: cohort study. Sao Paulo Medical Journal. 2012; 130(4):242–7. pmid:22965365
  75. 75. Gauster M, Hiden U, Blaschitz A, Frank S, Lang U, Alvino G, et al. Dysregulation of placental endothelial lipase and lipoprotein lipase in intrauterine growth-restricted pregnancies. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2007; 92(6):2256–63.
  76. 76. Gil-Sánchez A, Demmelmair H, Parrilla JJ, Koletzko B, Larqué E. Mechanisms involved in the selective transfer of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids to the fetus. Frontiers in genetics. 2011; 2:57. pmid:22303352
  77. 77. Ayoub J, Abiad M, Forman M, MINA Collaborators, Honein-AbouHaidar G, Naja F. The interaction of personal, contextual, and study characteristics and their effect on recruitment and participation of pregnant women in research: a qualitative study in Lebanon. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18(1):155. pmid:30497391
  78. 78. Woodall A, Morgan C, Sloan C, Howard L. Barriers to participation in mental health research: are there specific gender, ethnicity and age related barriers? BMC Psychiatry. 2010; 10(1):103.
  79. 79. Yekta Z, Ayatollahi H, Porali R, Farzin A. The effect of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on pregnancy outcomes in urban care settings in Urmia-Iran. BMC Pregnancy and childbirth. 2006; 6(1):15.
  80. 80. Ng SW, Zaghloul S, Ali H, Harrison G, Yeatts K, El Sadig M, et al. Nutrition transition in the United Arab Emirates. European journal of clinical nutrition. 2011; 65(12):1328. pmid:21772317
  81. 81. Radwan H, Hashim M, Obaid RS, Hasan H, Naja F, Al Ghazal H, et al. The Mother-Infant Study Cohort (MISC): Methodology, challenges, and baseline characteristics. PloS one. 2018; 13(5):e0198278. pmid:29851999
  82. 82. Okamoto K, Ohsuka K, Shiraishi T, Hukazawa E, Wakasugi S, Furuta K. Comparability of epidemiological information between self-and interviewer-administered questionnaires. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2002; 55(5):505–11. pmid:12007554