Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

ER-Ca2+ sensor STIM regulates neuropeptides required for development under nutrient restriction in Drosophila

Abstract

Neuroendocrine cells communicate via neuropeptides to regulate behaviour and physiology. This study examines how STIM (Stromal Interacting Molecule), an ER-Ca2+ sensor required for Store-operated Ca2+ entry, regulates neuropeptides required for Drosophila development under nutrient restriction (NR). We find two STIM-regulated peptides, Corazonin and short Neuropeptide F, to be required for NR larvae to complete development. Further, a set of secretory DLP (Dorso lateral peptidergic) neurons which co-express both peptides was identified. Partial loss of dSTIM caused peptide accumulation in the DLPs, and reduced systemic Corazonin signalling. Upon NR, larval development correlated with increased peptide levels in the DLPs, which failed to occur when dSTIM was reduced. Comparison of systemic and cellular phenotypes associated with reduced dSTIM, with other cellular perturbations, along with genetic rescue experiments, suggested that dSTIM primarily compromises neuroendocrine function by interfering with neuropeptide release. Under chronic stimulation, dSTIM also appears to regulate neuropeptide synthesis.

Citation: Megha, Wegener C, Hasan G (2019) ER-Ca2+ sensor STIM regulates neuropeptides required for development under nutrient restriction in Drosophila. PLoS ONE 14(7): e0219719. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719

Editor: Gregory P. Copenhaver, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNITED STATES

Received: March 27, 2019; Accepted: June 28, 2019; Published: July 11, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Megha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by Wellcome Trust/ DBT India Alliance (Early Career Award #IA/E/12/1/500742 to M; www.wellcomedbt.org) and NCBS (www.ncbs.res.in) core funding (GH). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Metazoan cells commonly use ionic Ca2+ as a second messenger in signal transduction pathways. To do so, levels of cytosolic Ca2+ are dynamically managed. In the resting state, cytosolic Ca2+ concentration is kept low and maintained thus by the active sequestration of Ca2+ into various organelles, the largest of which is the ER. Upon activation, ligand-activated Ca2+ channels on the ER, such as the ryanodine receptor or inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R), release ER-store Ca2+ into the cytosol. Loss of ER-Ca2+ causes STromal Interacting Molecule (STIM), an ER-resident transmembrane protein, to dimerize and undergo structural rearrangements. This facilitates the binding of STIM to Orai, a Ca2+ channel on the plasma membrane, whose pore now opens to allow Ca2+ from the extracellular milieu to flow into the cytosol. This type of capacitative Ca2+ entry is called Store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) [1]. Of note, key components of SOCE include the IP3R, STIM and Orai, that are ubiquitously expressed in the animal kingdom, underscoring the importance of SOCE to cellular functioning. Depending on cell type and context, SOCE can regulate an array of cellular processes [2].

Neuronal function in particular is fundamentally reliant on the elevation of cytosolic Ca2+. By tuning the frequency and amplitude of cytosolic Ca2+ signals that are generated, distinct stimuli can make the same neuron produce outcomes of different strengths [3]. The source of the Ca2+ influx itself contributes to such modulation as it can either be from internal ER-stores or from the external milieu, through various activity-dependent voltage gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs) and receptor-activated Ca2+ channels or a combination of the two. Although the contributions of internal ER-Ca2+ stores to neuronal Ca2+ dynamics are well recognized, the study of how STIM and subsequently, SOCE-mediated by it, influences neuronal functioning, is as yet a nascent field.

Mammals have two isoforms of STIM, STIM1 and STIM2, both which are widely expressed in the brain. As mammalian neurons also express multiple isoforms of Orai and IP3R, it follows that STIM-mediated SOCE might occur in them. Support for this comes from studies in mice, where STIM1-mediated SOCE has been reported for cerebellar granule neurons [4] and isolated Purkinje neurons [5], while STIM2-mediated SOCE has been shown in cortical [6] and hippocampal neurons [7]. STIM can also have SOCE-independent roles in excitable cells, that are in contrast to its role via SOCE. In rat cortical neurons [8] and vascular smooth muscle cells [9], Ca2+ release from ER-stores prompts the translocation of STIM1 to ER-plasma membrane junctions, and binding to the L-type VGCC, CaV1.2. Here STIM1 inhibits CaV1.2 directly and causes it to be internalized, reducing the long-term excitability of these cells. In cardiomyocyte-derived HL1 cells, STIM1 binds to a T-type VGCC, CaV1.3, to manage Ca2+ oscillations during contractions [10]. These studies indicate that STIM regulates cytosolic Ca2+ dynamics in excitable cells, including neurons and that an array of other proteins determines if STIM regulation results in activation or inhibition of neurons. Despite knowledge of the expression of STIM1 and STIM2 in the hypothalamus (Human Protein Atlas), the major neuroendocrine centre in vertebrates, studies on STIM in neuroendocrine cells are scarce. We therefore used Drosophila melanogaster (Drosophila), the vinegar fly, to address this gap.

Neuroendocrine cells possess elaborate machinery for the production, processing and secretion of neuropeptides (NPs), which perhaps form the largest group of evolutionarily conserved signalling agents [11,12]. Inside the brain, NPs typically modulate neuronal activity and consequently, circuits; when released systemically, they act as hormones. Drosophila is typical in having a vast repertoire of NPs that together play a role in almost every aspect of its behaviour and physiology [13,14]. Consequently, NP synthesis and release are highly regulated processes. As elevation in cytosolic Ca2+ is required for NP release, a contribution for STIM-mediated SOCE to NE function was hypothesized.

Drosophila possess a single gene for STIM, IP3R and Orai, and all three interact to regulate SOCE in Drosophila neurons [15,16]. In dopaminergic neurons, dSTIM is important for flight circuit maturation [15–17], with dSTIM-mediated SOCE regulating expression of a number of genes, including Ral, which controls neuronal vesicle exocytosis [17]. In glutamatergic neurons, dSTIM is required for development under nutritional stress and its’ loss results in down-regulation of several ion channel genes which ultimately control neuronal excitability [18]. Further, dSTIM over-expression in insulin-producing NE neurons could restore Ca2+ homeostasis in a non-autonomous manner in other neurons of an IP3R mutant [19], indicating an important role for dSTIM in NE cell output, as well as compensatory interplay between IP3R and dSTIM. At a cellular level, partial loss of dSTIM impairs SOCE in Drosophila neurons [15,17,20] as well as mammalian neural precursor cells [21]. Additionally, reducing dSTIM in Drosophila dopaminergic neurons attenuates KCl-evoked depolarisation and as well as vesicle release [17]. Because loss of dSTIM specifically in dimm+ NE cells results in a pupariation defect on nutrient restricted (NR) media [22], we used the NR paradigm as a physiologically relevant context in which to investigate STIM’s role in NE cells from the cellular as well as systemic perspective.

Material and methods

Fly husbandry

Flies were grown at 25°C in 12h:12h L:D cycle. Normal food: (1L recipe: 80g corn flour, 20g Glucose, 40g Sugar, 15g Yeast Extract, 4mL propionic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid methyl ester in ethanol 5mL, 5mL ortho butyric acid) For nutritional stress assay, flies were allowed to lay eggs for 6 hours on normal food. After 88hours, larvae were collected and transferred to either normal or NR (100mM Sucrose) food. Pupae and adults were scored after 10 days of observation.

Fly strains

Canton S was used as the wild type (+) control.

The following strains were obtained from Bloomington Drosophila Stock Centre: AKH-GAL4 (25684), Crz-GAL4 (51976), DSK-GAL4 (51981), sNPF-GAL4 (51981), UAS-CrzIR25999 (25999), UAS-dicer2 (24651), UAS-TeTxLc (28837), UAS-TeTxLc-IMP (28838), UAS-CaMPARI (58761), UAS-GFPnls (4776), UAS-mRFP (32218), UAS-TrpA1 (26263), UAS-InR (8248), UAS-amonIR (28583), UAS-RalDN (32094)

The following strains were obtained from Drosophila Genetic Resource Center, Kyoto: sNPF-GAL4 (113901)

The following were from Vienna Drosophila Research Centre stock collection: UAS-IP3RIR (106982), UAS-STIMIR (47073), UAS-CrzIR (30670), UAS-InRI R(999)

The following was from Exelixis at Harvard Medical School: sNPF00448 (c00448)

The following were kind gifts: AstA1-GAL4 (David Anderson), dILP2-GAL4 (Eric Rulifson), hug-GAL4 (Michael Pankratz), NPF-GAL4 (Ping Shen), UAS-sNPRIR (Kweon Yu), Crz::mCherry (Gábor Juhász), UAS-hid::UAS-rpr (Tina Mukherjee), UAS-Shibirets (Toshihiro Kitamoto), tsh-GAL80 (Julie Simpson), UAS-preproANF::GFP (Edwin Levitan), UAS-ChR2XXL (Robert Kittel and Georg Nagel)

The following were previously generated in our laboratory: itprka1091, itprug3, UAS-OraiE180A, UAS-itpr+,UAS-Stim, UAS-RalWT.

Larval feeding

3rd instar larvae (10 total) were collected and placed on cotton wool soaked with solution of 4.5% dissolved yeast granules and 0.5% Erioglaucine (Sigma, 861146). Controls contained no dye. Feeding was allowed for 2 hours at 25°C. 5 larvae per tube were crushed in 100μL of double distilled water. Solution was spun at 14000 rpm for 15 minutes and 50μL was withdrawn for absorbance measurement at 625nm in a 96-well plate. 5μL was used to measure protein content using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit (#23227).

qRT-PCR

RNA was isolated from 12–15 larval brains at the specified time points using Trizol. cDNA synthesis was carried out as described [23]. All mRNA levels are reported as fold change normalized to rp49. Primer sequences:

rp49, F:CGGATCGATATGCTAAGCTGT, R:GCGCTTGTTCGATCCGTA.

Crz, F:TCCTTTAACGCCGCATCTCC, R:CGTTGGAGCTGCGATAGACA

CrzR, F:CTGTGCATCCTGTTTGGCAC, R:GGCCTTGTGTATCAGCCTCT

Measuring neuronal activation using CaMPARI

Early third instar larvae were transferred to either normal or NR food. After 24 hours, larvae were recovered and immobilized on double sided tape. UV light from a Hg-arc lamp was focused using the UV filter, on the larvae through a 10X objective on Olympus BX60, for 2 minutes. Larvae were them immediately dissected in ice-cold PBS, mounted in PBS and imaged using Olympus FV-3000 Confocal microscope using a 40X objective and high-sensitivity detectors. Microscope settings for laser intensity, PMT settings and magnification were kept identical for all measurements. Each experiment always had a no UV control, in which larvae were subject to immobilisation but not UV light. Fluorescence intensity was calculated for each cell body using Image J.

Immunofluorescent staining

For expression patterns, 3rd instar larval brains with RGs attached were dissected in ice-cold PBS and fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde at 4°C for 20mins. The samples were washed 4 times in PBS and mounted in 60% glycerol. Endogenous fluorescence was acquired on Olympus FV-3000 using a 20X, 40X or 60X objective, and processed used ImageJ. For samples requiring antibody staining brains were similarly processed and then subjected to permeabilisation (0.3% Triton X-100 + PBS; PBSTx) for 15 mins, 4 hr blocking in 5% normal goat serum in PBSTx at 4oC, followed by overnight incubation in primary antibody (1:1000 Chicken-GFP, Abcam: ab13970) and secondary with Alexa 488 or Alexa 594 (1:400; Abcam). For corazonin (1:1000; raised in Rabbit; Jan Veenstra, University of Bordeaux), all the above steps remained the step, except that dissected brains were fixed for 1hr at RT in 4% PFA and the secondary was anti-rabbit Alexa 405 (1:300, Abcam). Cell bodies were outlined manually and integrated density was used to calculate CTCF (Corrected Total Cell Fluorescence). For all samples, a similar area was measured for background fluorescence.

Direct peptide-profiling by MALDI-TOF MS

Ring glands were dissected in cold HL3.1 and transferred to a MALDI plate as previously described [24]. 0.2 μl of matrix (saturated solution of recrystallized α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in MeOH/EtOH/water 30/30/40% v/v/v) was added, containing 10 nM of stable isotope-labeled HUG-pyrokinin (HUG-PK* (Ser–Val[d8]–Pro–Phe–Lys–Pro–Arg–Leu–amide, Mw = 950.1 Da; Biosyntan, Berlin, Germany)) and 10 nM labeled myosuppressin (MS* (Thr–Asp–Val[d8]–Asp–His–Val–Phe–Leu–Arg–Phe–amide, Mw = 1255.4 Da; Biosyntan) MALDI-TOF mass spectra were acquired in positive ion mode on a 4800 Plus MALDI TOF/TOF analyzer (MDS Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) in a mass range of 900–4000 Da and fixed laser intensity with 20 subspectra and 1000 shots per sample. Data were analyzed with Data Explorer 4.10. Spectra were baseline corrected and de-isotoped. The sum of the resulting relative intensities of the de-isotoped peaks was calculated for the different ion adducts (H+, Na+, K+) of each peptide as well as the labeled peptides*. Then, the ratios sNPF/HUG-PK* and corazonin/MS* were calculated, using the labeled peptide with the most similar molecular weight. For sNPF, all isoforms (1/2-short, 1-long, -3 and -4) variants were totaled.

Optogenetic and thermogenetic experiments

For thermogenetic (dTrpA1, Shibirets) experiments, larvae were matured to 88 hours AEL at 25°C. After transfer to either NR or normal food, vials were placed at 22°C, 25°C or 30°C for either 24 hours (dTrpA1) or till the end of observation time (Shibirets). For optogenetic experiments (Chr2-XXL), larvae were matured to 88AEL in the dark. After transfer to either NR or normal food, one set was placed in the dark while another was placed in an incubator with regular white lights that were on continuously till the end of observation time.

Results and discussion

SOCE is required in sNPF and Crz producing cells for development under nutritional stress

Collectively, more than 20 different NPs are known to be made by the neuroendocrine cells in which reducing SOCE components resulted in poor pupariation upon NR [22]. To shortlist specific NPs important for this paradigm, we undertook a curated GAL4-UAS screen. NP-GAL4s were used to drive the knockdown of IP3R (IP3RIR) [25], and pupariation of the resulting larvae were scored on normal vs NR media (S1A Fig). On normal food, a significant reduction of pupariation was seen only with sNPF-GAL4 (S1A Fig), whose expression strongly correlates with neurons producing sNPF [26]. Upon NR, the largest effect was seen with sNPF-GAL4, followed by small but significant pupariation defect with AstA-GAL4 and DSK-GAL4 (S1A Fig). Neurons that secrete NPs may also secrete neurotransmitters, therefore, a role specifically for sNPF was tested. Reducing the level of sNPF (sNPFIR) or reducing an enzyme required for neuropeptide processing (amontillado; amonIR) [27] in sNPF-GAL4 expressing cells, as well as a hypomorphic sNPF mutation (sNPF00448) resulted in impairment of larval development upon NR (S1B Fig). These data indicate that sNPF is required for pupariating under NR conditions.

sNPF-GAL4 expresses in large number of neurons (>300) in the larval brain [26] (S1C Fig), and also expresses in the larval midgut and epidermis. To further refine sNPF+ neurons on which we can perform cellular investigations, we tested a Crz-GAL4 driver. This driver expresses in fewer neurons (~22), all of which express the neuropeptide Corazonin (Crz). Importantly, a small subset of these, three bilateral neurons in the brain lobe, make Crz and sNPF. [26] (Fig 1A). Reducing SOCE in Crz neurons, by reducing either IP3R or STIM (dSTIMIR) [15,16] or over-expressing a dominant-negative version of Orai (OraiE180A) [23], resulted in reduced pupariation on NR (Fig 1B). The absence of a developmental defect on normal food suggests that SOCE in these neurons is primarily required to survive NR.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. SOCE is required in Crz neurons for larval development on NR media.

(A) Expression pattern of Crz-GAL4 driver, used in this study to manipulate Crz neurons, visualised by expressing membrane bound RFP (mRFP) and GFP with a nuclear localisation signal (GFPnls) (B) % Pupae upon reduction of SOCE by knockdown of STIM (STIMIR), IP3R (IP3RIR) or ectopic expression of a dominant-negative Orai (OraiE180A) in Crz neurons. To measure pupariation, twenty five, 88h±3h old larvae, per vial, were transferred to either normal food (corn flour, yeast, sugar) (See materials and methods for exact composition) or nutrient restricted (NR; 100mM Sucrose) media and number of pupae (and adults where relevant) that developed were counted. N = 6 vials for all experiments in this study. (C) % Pupae upon reduction of either sNPF or Crz (CrzIR, sNPFIR) in Crz neurons, and when, dSTIM or IP3R are expressed in this background (dSTIM O/E; IP3R O/E). (D) % Adults recovered for genotypes in (C). Bars with the same alphabet represent statistically indistinguishable groups. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak multi comparison p<0.05 for (B), (C) and (D). See also S1 Fig and for source data, S1 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719.g001

To test if both sNPF and Crz were required, they were specifically reduced (sNPFIR; CrzIR) in Crz neurons. Knockdown of either NP resulted in larvae with a pupariation defect on NR media but not, on normal food (Fig 1C; S1D Fig). In Drosophila neurons, enhancing the expression of SOCE regulators leads to increased SOCE [16]. To test the positive effect of SOCE on Crz and sNPF, a genetic compensation experiment was carried out. The SOCE-regulators, IP3R or dSTIM were over-expressed in Crz neurons which also expressed reduced levels of either sNPF or Crz. NR larvae with this genetic make-up showed a significant improvement in pupariation on NR media, as compared to NR larvae with only reduced NPs (Fig 1C). Interestingly, the compensation was sufficient to also increase the number of adults that emerged (Fig 1D). Notably, over-expression of either of the two SOCE molecules, dSTIM and IP3R on their own, did not affect pupariation on either normal or NR media (Fig 1C), but unlike on normal food (S1E Fig), did reduce development to adulthood on NR media (Fig 1D). These data underscore the sensitivity of Crz neurons to ER-Ca2+ homeostasis during NR.

Loss of IP3R and sNPF has previously been shown to affect larval feeding [28–30]. Hence, larval intake of dye-colored food in a 2-hour span was measured. Age-synchronized larvae with knockdown of either dSTIM, IP3R, Crz or sNPF in Crz neurons exhibited no difference in the amount of dye ingested (S1F Fig), suggesting that developmental defects in the NR assay do not arise from a fundamental feeding problem.

Altogether, these genetic experiments helped identify a set of NP expressing neurons, the Crz neurons, a subset of which also express sNPF, in which SOCE plays an important role during development on NR.

Crz+ and sNPF+ DLP neurons majorly contribute to development on NR, and are activated by NR

In the larval CNS, Crz is expressed in 3 pairs of DLPs (Dorso Lateral Peptidergic neurons) in the pars lateralis region of the brain lobes, 1 pair of neurons in dorso-medial region and 8 pairs of interneurons in the VG (ventral ganglion) [31]. Other than the dorso-medial neurons, the Crz-GAL4 used in this study recapitulates the known expression pattern for Crz. (S2A and S2B Fig; Cartoon: Fig 2A). Additionally, adjacent to DLPs, low expression of Crz-GAL4 was observed in 3–4 neurons that do not express Crz (S2A and S2C Fig). As mentioned previously, Crz+ DLPs co-express sNPF [26]. In terms of neuronal architecture, the DLP neurons have two major branches: the anterior branch culminates in a dense nest of neurites at the ring gland (RG), while the posterior branch terminates in the subesophageal zone (SEZ). The VG neurons form a network amongst themselves to ultimately give rise to two parallel bundles that travel anteriorly, and end in the brain lobes. To visualize the overall distribution of NPs in the Crz neurons, we ectopically expressed a rat neuropeptide coupled to GFP (ANF::GFP), a popular tool used to track NP transport and release in Drosophila [32] (S2D Fig). Firstly, within the DLPs, like Crz::mcherry (S2A Fig), ANF::GPF was either in the cell bodies or RG projections, but not in the projections terminating at the subesophageal zone (S2D Fig), suggesting selective NP transport to the RG, which is a major neurohaemal site for systemic release of neuropeptides. Secondly, ANF::GFP intensity was higher in the cell bodies of the DLPs than VG neurons (S2D Fig).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Crz+ and sNPF+ DLPs are required for development on NR media and activated by NR.

(A) Cartoon of Crz+ and sNPF+ neurons in the larval CNS marked by Crz-GAL4. DLP: dorso lateral peptidergic; VG: Ventral Ganglion; SEZ: Subesophageal zone (B) % Pupae when dSTIM is selectively down-regulated only in Crz+ and sNPF+ DLPs, by using the tsh-Gal80 transgene and in the presence of dicer2. Control: tshGal80/+;dSTIMIR/+. Data represents mean ± SEM (C) Representative image. Expression of the UV-activated Ca2+ indicator, CaMPARI in Crz+ and sNPF+ DLPs, in larvae on 24 hours of normal (Fed) or NR media (24h NR). Fluorescence at 561nm (F561) reflects Ca2+ levels, while at 488nm (F488) reflects levels of the indicator CaMPARI. (D) Quantification of Ca2+ levels as reported by F561/488 ratio in DLPs in larvae on 24 hours of normal or NR media, in the presence and absence of UV-stimulation. N>7 larvae for UV-stimulated; N = 3 for No UV stimulation. Bars with the same alphabet represent statistically indistinguishable groups. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak multi comparison test p<0.05 for (B). Mann-Whitney Test for (D). See also S2 Fig and for source data, S2 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719.g002

The close proximity of the terminal projections of the Crz+ VG neurons and the anterior branch of the Crz+ DLP neurons in the brain lobe suggested possible neuromodulation between the two sets of neurons. Therefore, we undertook experiments to distinguish the contribution of DLPs vs VG localized Crz neurons, to the development in NR media. First, we utilized tshGAL80 to restrict Crz-GAL4 expression to the DLPs (S2E Fig). The level of pupariation under NR conditions observed with restricted expression of dSTIMIR (Fig 2B; Mean: 51%±4.2) was similar to that seen with full expression (Fig 1B; Mean: 40.7%±13.3), suggesting a major contribution of the DLP neurons to the NR phenotype. Furthermore, sNPF>CrzIR larvae have levels of pupariation of NR larvae (S2F Fig; Mean: 30.9%±7.8) similar to Crz>CrzIR NR larvae (Fig 1C; Mean: 33.8%±5.9). Because sNPF-GAL4 marks only the Crz+ DLP neurons and not the Crz+ VG neurons (S1C Fig), this too suggests a major role for the Crz+ DLP neurons.

Requirement of SOCE in Crz neurons for pupariation on NR (Fig 1C) suggested that these neurons experience elevated cytosolic Ca2+ in NR conditions and are therefore, stimulated by chronic starvation. To test this, the UV light-activated genetically encoded calcium sensor, CaMPARI [33], was utilised. The sensor fluoresces in the GFP range (F488) and is converted irreversibly to fluoresce in the RFP range (F561), when exposed to UV light and in the presence of Ca2+. The level of conversion positively titrates with Ca2+ concentrations. Larva expressing CaMPARI in Crz+ neurons were placed in either normal or NR media for 24 hours (24h NR). Whole larvae were immobilized, and exposed to UV light for 2mins. Control larva were subject to the same treatment but, without being exposed to UV light (Fig 2C and 2D; no UV). Detection of F561 in the fed state suggests that these neurons are active even under normal food conditions (Fig 2C and 2D). Notably, after 24 hours on NR media, chronic starvation caused a ~2-fold increase in average levels F561 and therefore, of neuronal activation (Fig 2D). F561/F488 ratios did not appear to change in the VG neurons (S2G and S2H Fig). While there is a possibility that VG neurons do not exhibit higher F561 because of insufficient penetration of UV light, the CaMPARI results together with the genetic experiments (Fig 2B, S2F Fig), formed the basis for selecting the DLP neurons for further analysis on how dSTIM affects Crz and sNPF.

dSTIM regulates NP synthesis and release in Crz neurons

Crz peptide levels were measured in DLP neurons by staining larval brains with an antiserum raised against the mature Crz peptide sequence [34]. Two locations on the DLP neurons were chosen for measurement: neuronal cell body/soma and neurite projections on the RG. In control DLP neurons, 24 hrs of NR caused average levels of Crz levels to increase, in both locations (Fig 3A, S3A and S3B Fig). In comparison, DLP neurons expressing dSTIMIR displayed increased Crz peptide levels on normal food itself, and this remained unaltered upon NR, for both locations (Fig 3A, S3B and S3C Fig). sNPF levels could not be similarly measured by immunofluorescence because sNPF is expressed in many neurons close to the DLPs (S1C Fig), making measurements specifically from the DLP soma difficult to quantify. Instead, semi-quantitative, direct, mass spectrometric profiling of dissected RGs was employed. This technique can measure peptide levels relative to stable isotopic standards at single neurohaemal release sites [35]. As Crz levels between the cell bodies and projections correlated, and Crz+ DLPs are the sole contributors of sNPF on the RG [26], this technique allowed us to infer sNPF levels in DLPs. In controls, 24hrs of NR, increased the average level of sNPF ~5-fold on the RG (Fig 3C). In comparison, RG preparations from larvae where DLPs express dSTIMIR, displayed increased sNPF levels on normal food itself, and this remained unaltered upon NR (Fig 3C). Although Crz was detected in the RG preparations, it was of much lower intensity. Average Crz levels increased with NR in the control, and in dSTIMIR condition, but statistically higher levels of Crz were seen only in the NR, dSTIMIR condition (S3D Fig). Nonetheless, broad agreement in trends, between Crz using immunofluorescence and sNPF using MALDI-MS, suggest that the two peptides are similarly regulated by NR and dSTIM. This is consistent with genetic experiments which showed that over-expression of dSTIM can rescue loss of both, sNPF as well as Crz (Fig 1C and 1D).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. dSTIM regulates Crz and sNPF levels.

Larvae were subjected to 24 hours of normal (fed) or nutrient restricted (NR) media. Crz levels were measured in DLP neurons by immunofluorescence on larval brains. All manipulations were performed using the Crz-GAL4 driver (A) Relative levels of Crz peptide in DLP neuron cell bodies, Control = crz>dicer2. dSTIMIR = crz> dSTIMIR,dicer2. Number of cells measured shown atop bars. N>12 brains (B) Representative images for cell bodies measured in (A). (C) Relative levels of total sNPF peptides measured on dissected ring glands (N atop bars) and quantified using MALDI-MS. Externally added heavy standard (Hug-PK*) was used to normalise peptide levels between samples. (D) % Pupae on normal or NR media, upon reduced peptide processing (amonIR,dicer2) protein synthesis (Insulin receptor; InRIR) or vesicle exocytosis (dominant-negative Ral; RalDN) in Crz+ neurons. Data represents mean ± SEM (E) Relative levels of Crz upon expression of amonIR and dicer2. N>10 brains. (F) Relative levels of Crz upon indicated cellular perturbation of Crz+ neurons. N≥6 brains. control: Crz-GAL4/+. (G) Crz mRNA levels from larval brains when Crz is reduced by two different RNAi lines. N ≥ 5. (H) Corazonin receptor (CrzR) mRNA levels from larval brains with reduced Crz. N ≥ 4. (I) CrzR mRNA levels from larval brains expressing indicated cellular perturbations in Crz neurons. N ≥ 6 (J) Crz mRNA levels from larval brains. Control = crz>dicer2. dSTIMIR = crz> dSTIMIR,dicer2 N ≥ 6. Bars with the same alphabet represent statistically indistinguishable groups. Kruskal-Wallis Test with Dunn’s multicomparison correction p<0.05 for (A), (C), (F). Mann-Whitney Test for (E). Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multi comparison test p<0.05 for (D), (J). One-way ANOVA with Tukey multi comparison test p<0.05 for (G), (H), (I). See also S3 Fig and for source data, S3 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719.g003

Thus, increased activation of DLP neurons by NR (Fig 2D), appears to result in peptide accumulation. Loss of dSTIM increases peptide levels on normal food, and prevents an increase in peptide levels upon NR.

As an ER-Ca2+ sensor, dSTIM may potentially regulate several cellular processes that would affect NPs such as their synthesis, processing, trafficking and/or release. As STIMIR increased peptide levels in the cell body as well as neurite projections on the RG, a major trafficking defect was unlikely (Fig 3A vs S3B and S3C Fig). This does not rule out a role for dSTIM in dense-core vesicle trafficking, but merely indicates that trafficking of Crz is not observably disrupted by STIMIR. We therefore proceeded to examine systemic and cellular phenotypes when molecules known to reduce overall NP synthesis (InRIR; Insulin Receptor) [36], peptide processing (amonIR) [27], and vesicle exocytosis (RalDN) [17] were expressed in Crz neurons. All three perturbations caused a pupariation defect on NR media (Fig 3D). However, despite similar systemic outcomes, amonIR, which reduces the prohormone convertase required for peptide maturation, reduced Crz levels (Fig 3E). Because this is not seen with STIMIR, a role for dSTIM in peptide processing was not pursued further.

Expression of InRIR caused a modest increase in Crz peptide levels in DLP neurons in the fed state and peptide levels did not increase as in the control, in NR media (Fig 3F). InR is a global protein synthesis regulator, and its expression scales DIMM+ NE cell size, with functional consequences [36]. As the Crz+ DLPs are DIMM+ [37], we expected InRIR to reduce, not increase peptide levels. A potential explanation for this observation is that Crz peptide levels are under feedback regulation, which was substantiated when we examined how Crz transcript and peptide levels are connected. Similarities between InRIR and STIMIR phenotypes, coupled with a previous observation that IP3R, another SOCE component, positively regulates protein synthesis in Drosophila neuroendocrine cells [22], prompted us to test if dSTIM too regulates protein synthesis in general. We ectopically expressed a physiologically irrelevant neuropeptide construct (ANF::GFP), that yields a processed peptide in Drosophila neurons [32]. ANF::GFP levels in control and dSTIMIR DLP neurons were similar (S3E Fig), suggesting that dSTIM does not have generic effects on peptide synthesis. Instead, its effect on Crz and sNPF synthesis may be specific. The lack of Crz elevation upon NR, in DLP neurons where InRIR is expressed, leads to the speculation that InR signalling is required for the up-regulation of protein synthesis needed for increased peptide synthesis, processing and packaging during NR.

We previously found that Ral expression lies downstream of dSTIM-mediated SOCE in Drosophila pupal brains [38], and in dopaminergic neurons, over-expression of RalDN reduces secretion of ANF::GFP [17]. These previous data, coupled with the observation that RalDN and dSTIMIR show similarly high Crz levels in the fed state, suggest that dSTIM affects vesicle secretion through regulation of Ral expression. To independently validate if vesicle release is important in Crz neurons, we over-expressed a temperature sensitive dynamin mutant (Shibirets) also shown to reduce NP release [39] and tetanus toxin (TNT) shown to prevent release of eclosion hormone, a neuropeptide [40]. Both manipulations caused a pupariation defect on NR (S3F Fig). It is unclear why RalDN causes Crz levels to decrease upon NR. In Drosophila pacemaker neurons, Ral has been shown to bias the sensitivity of a neuropeptide receptor, the Pigment Dispensing Factor Receptor [41]. Perhaps, functions distinct from Ral’s contribution to vesicle exocytosis contribute to this observation. Nonetheless, the lack of increase in Crz levels in DLP neurons upon NR, when InRIR and RalDN are expressed, assumes significance in the context of pupariation of NR larvae. Control larvae subject to 24hrs of NR, display increased Crz (Fig 3A) and sNPF (Fig 3C) levels, and then proceed to successfully complete development to pupae (Fig 1C). Whereas, in dSTIMIR, InRIR and RalDN conditions, on NR, neither do DLPs display increased Crz levels (Fig 3A and 3F), nor do all larvae pupariate (Figs 1B, 1C and 3D). Thus, an increase in peptide levels on NR correlates with larval ability to pupariate on NR. Taken in context with increased neuronal activation during NR (Fig 2D), and evidence that functional vesicle exocytosis (Fig 3D, S3F Fig) as well as adequate peptide production (Fig 3D) is required for survival on NR, these data suggest that increased production and release of Crz and sNPF during NR, is required for NR larvae to successfully complete development.

To prove that Crz and sNPF are released during NR, the ideal experiment would be to measure levels of secreted NPs. But small size (8–10 amino acids), low hemolymph titres and high complexity of hemolymph, make peptide measurements by biochemical means highly challenging in Drosophila. Moreover, NPs exhibit endocrine as well as paracrine signalling [42]; and the latter will not be reflected in hemolymph measurements. Fortunately, in the Crz signalling system there is feedback compensation between secreted Crz and Corazonin receptor (CrzR) mRNA levels, providing a means to gauge secreted Crz levels indirectly. In adults, expression of CrzIR in Crz neurons, increased levels of CrzR on the fat body [43]. We thus tested if CrzR, which in larvae appears to be expressed in the salivary glands and CNS [44], was subject to similar feedback. In larval brains, reducing Crz, using two different CrzIR strains, not only caused a reduction in Crz mRNA levels (Fig 3G), but also a concomitant increase in CrzR mRNA levels (Fig 3H). Conversely, reducing CrzR levels (CrzRIR) in the larval CNS, results in up-regulation of Crz mRNA (S3G Fig). This confirmed the existence of feedback in the Crz signalling system, and the use of neuronal CrzR transcript levels as a measure of secreted Crz levels. In line with this inference, we observed an up-regulation of CrzR mRNA in larval brains where Crz neurons are expressing either InRIR or amonIR or RalDN (Fig 3I). Therefore, the observation that in the STIMIR condition CrzR mRNA levels are high (Fig 3I), supports the idea that dSTIM function is necessary for the secretion of optimal levels of Crz.

Because dSTIM-mediated SOCE is known to induce changes in gene expression [38], we probed if Crz expression is sensitive to NR and dSTIM. In the control, NR did not change Crz mRNA levels (Fig 3J), suggesting that a post-transcriptional mechanism is responsible for increasing Crz peptide levels upon NR (Fig 3A, S3B and S3C Fig). In the STIMIR condition, Crz transcript levels were up-regulated on normal food conditions (Fed) and no further increase was observed upon NR (Fig 3J). The straightforward explanation for high Crz peptide levels in STIMIR condition could therefore be attributed to higher gene expression of Crz. However, data from other perturbations in Crz neurons suggested that a linear interpretation between Crz mRNA and peptide levels cannot not be made. When CrzIR is expressed, Crz mRNA is reduced (Fig 3G), but peptide levels are elevated (S3I Fig); whereas, when amonIR is expressed, Crz mRNA is increased (S3H Fig), but peptide levels are decreased (Fig 3E). Meanwhile, in three conditions, Crz mRNA as well as peptide levels are higher than controls: CrzRIR (S3G vs S3I Fig), InRIR (S3H vs S3F Fig) and RalDN (S3H vs S3F Fig). Note also that both higher (dSTIMIR, InRIR, RalDN) or lower (amonIR) Crz peptide levels in DLP cell bodies, result in reduced systemic Crz signalling (CrzR mRNA levels; Fig 3I). These data indicate that Crz transcription, translation and release are independently regulated. A simple explanation for elevated levels of Crz transcript as well as peptide levels in STIMIR is therefore, feedback compensation. Moreover, there is no change in Crz mRNA upon 24hrs of NR, when STIMIR is expressed (Fig 3J). Together, this argues against a direct role for dSTIM in regulating Crz gene expression.

In summation, these data have been inferred as follows: on normal food, partial loss of dSTIM reduces systemic Crz signalling, indicating a requirement for dSTIM in Crz secretion. On NR media, Crz+ DLPs are stimulated to increase peptide synthesis and release, in order for NR larvae to complete development. Peptide up-regulation upon NR is abrogated when dSTIM is reduced. These add up to suggest that dSTIM compromises NE cell function in a manner that affects peptide synthesis and release, with functional consequences for survival on NR.

Systemic and cellular phenotypes observed with reduced dSTIM in Crz neurons can be rescued by increasing synthesis and release of peptides

To validate a role for dSTIM in peptide synthesis and release, we tested genetic perturbations that can compensate for this deficiency, to rescue developmental and cellular phenotypes associated with dSTIMIR expression in Crz neurons. In the case of NPs, genetic over-expression may not translate to enhanced release, as proteins involved in NP processing as well as the regulated secretory pathway would need to be up-regulated. Furthermore, regulatory feedback from peptides to their transcription may complicate over-expression, as seen for the Crz signalling system (S3I Fig). To get around these issues, and because InRIR phenocopied STIMIR (Fig 3A, 3D, 3F and 3I and S3H Fig), we opted to increase protein synthesis by over-expression of the Insulin receptor (InR). Cell size (S4A Fig) as well as Crz levels (S4B and S3C Figs) in DLP neurons scaled with InR over-expression, supporting the effectiveness of InR. To increase release, we over-expressed RalWT as Ral over-expression can compensate for vesicle release in dopaminergic neurons expressing STIMIR [17]. In Crz neurons with reduced dSTIM, over-expression of either InR or RalWT rescued pupariation on NR media (Fig 4A); restored peptide up-regulation upon NR (Fig 4A and 4B) and decreased CrzR mRNA back to control levels (Fig 4D). Of note, over-expressing RalWT or InR by itself, in Crz neurons, did not alter CrzR mRNA levels (Fig 4D), suggesting that neuronal activation, which happens on NR media (Fig 2D) potentiates their activity.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Systemic and cellular phenotypes caused by partial loss of dSTIM in Crz neurons, can be rescued by increasing peptide synthesis or release.

(A) % Pupae upon expression of Insulin receptor (InR) or Ral (RalWT) in Crz neurons expressing dSTIMIR. Genotypes: dSTIMIR = crz>dSTIMIR. InR rescue = Crz>InR,dSTIMIR,dicer2. RalWTrescue = Crz> RalWT, dSTIMIR,dicer2. InR control: dicer2;InR/+; dSTIMIR /+;. RalWT control: RalWT /+; dSTIMIR /+. Data represents mean ± SEM. (B) RalWTrescue or (C) InR rescue larvae were transferred to normal (Fed) or NR media for 24 hours. Crz immunofluorescence levels in DLP neurons were measured. Number of cells measured shown atop bars. N>7 brains (D) Crz receptor (CrzR) mRNA levels in larval brains expressing various molecules in Crz neurons. InR = Crz>InR. RalWT = Crz>RalWT. N≥4. (E) % Pupae upon expression of TrpA1 in Crz neurons expressing dSTIMIR. TrpA1 control: dicer2;TrpA1/+; dSTIMIR /+; TrpA1 rescue: Crz>TrpA1, dSTIMIR,dicer2. Larvae were reared at 25°C, at 88h±3h AEL age transferred to NR media and incubated either at 30°C or 22°C for 24 hours, and returned to 25°C thereafter. Data represents mean ± SEM. (F) Crz levels in DLP neurons upon 24 hrs of NR or normal food (Fed) at 30°C for indicated genotypes. N > 5 brains. (G) Crz receptor (CrzR) transcript levels in larval brains expressing various molecules in Crz+ neurons, when larvae are reared at 30°C. TrpA1: Crz>TrpA1. N = 6. one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey’s test p<0.05 for (A), (D), (E), (G). Mann-Whitney test for (B), (C). Kruskal-Wallis Test with Dunn’s multi-comparison correction p<0.05 for (F). See also S4 Fig and for source data, S4 Table

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719.g004

To increase neuronal activity, we utilised the temperature and voltage-gated cation channel, TrpA1 [45]. Over-expression of dTrpA1 and its activation by raising the temperature to 30°C for 24 hours, in the dSTIMIR background, rescued pupariation of NR larvae (Fig 4E). It also restored the ability of DLP neurons to increase Crz levels upon NR (Fig 4F) and decreased levels of CrzR mRNA (Fig 4G). In line with the feedback between CrzR mRNA levels and systemic Crz signaling, over-expression of dTrpA1 alone in Crz neurons resulted in a decrease in CrzR mRNA levels (Fig 4G), supporting the role for neuronal activation in secreting Crz. Interestingly, development to adulthood on NR, for dSTIMIR larvae, was also significantly increased upon over-expression of InR (S4E Fig) and TrpA1 (S4F Fig), but not RalWT (S4E Fig).

An optogenetic approach, utilizing the over-expression of Channelrhodopsin (ChR2-XXL), a light-sensitive cation channel, also rescued pupariation but not to the same extent (S4D Fig). Poorer rescue with ChR2-XXL could be because sustained activation of this channel depress synaptic transmission and the channel is less conductive for Ca2+ compared to TrpA1 [46]. Similar genetic manipulation, with TrpA1 and Chr2-XXL, in a hypomorphic IP3R mutant (itprku) resulted in a small but significant rescue of itprku pupariation on NR media (S4G and S4H Fig).

Together, these results strongly suggested that defects arising from dysregulated intracellular Ca2+ signalling, may be overcome by increasing vesicle exocytosis (RalWT, TrpA1, ChR2-XXL rescue) or protein synthesis (InR rescue). Importantly, the rescues observed with InR, RalWT and dTrpA1 are effective at the molecular (CrzR levels), cellular (Crz peptide levels upon NR) as well as systemic (NR larvae) level.

Conclusions

This study employed an in vivo approach coupled to a functional outcome, in order to broaden our understanding of how STIM regulates neuropeptides. A role for dSTIM-mediated SOCE in Drosophila neuroendocrine cells for survival on NR was previously established [22]. The previous study offered the opportunity to identify SOCE-regulated peptides, produced in these neuroendocrine cells, that could be investigated in a physiologically relevant context.

In Drosophila, both Crz and sNPF have previously been attributed roles in many different behaviours. Crz has roles in adult metabolism and stress responses [43,47–49], sperm transfer and copulation [50], and regulation of ethanol sedation [51,52]. While, sNPF has been implicated in various processes including insulin regulation [28,48] circadian behaviour [53], sleeping [54,55] and feeding [28]. Thus, the identification of Crz and sNPF in coping with nutritional stress is perhaps not surprising, but a role for them in coordinating the larval to pupal transition under NR is novel.

A role for Crz in conveying nutritional status information was originally proposed by Jan Veenstra [56], which this study now supports. In larvae, Crz+ DLPs are known to play a role in sugar sensing [57] and in adults, they express the fructose receptor Gr43a [58]. Additionally, they express receptors for neuropeptides DH31 [59], DH44 [59] and AstA [56], which are made in the gut as well as larval CNS. Together, these observations and our study are strongly indicative of a role for Crz+ DLPs in directly or indirectly sensing nutrients, with a functional role in larval survival and development in nutrient restricted conditions.

Several neuropeptides and their associated signalling systems are evolutionarily conserved [11,12]. The similarities between Crz and GnRH (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone), and sNPF and PrRP (Prolactin-releasing peptide), at the structural [11], developmental [60] and receptor level therefore, is intriguing. Structural similarity of course does not imply functional conservation, but notably, like sNPF, PrRP has roles in stress response and appetite regulation [61]. This leads to the conjecture that GnRH and PrRP might play a role in mammalian development during nutrient restriction.

dSTIM regulates Crz and sNPF at the levels of peptide release and likely, peptide synthesis upon NR. We speculate that neuroendocrine cells can use these functions of STIM, to fine tune the amount and timing of peptide release, especially under chronic stimulation (such as 24hrs NR), which requires peptide release over a longer timeframe. Temporal regulation of peptide release by dSTIM may also be important in neuroendocrine cells that co-express peptides with multifunctional roles, as is the case for Crz and sNPF. It is conceivable that such different functional outcomes may require distinct bouts of NP release, varying from fast quantile release to slow secretion [62]. As elevation in cytosolic Ca2+ drives NP vesicle release, neurons utilise various combinations of Ca2+ influx mechanisms to tune NP release. For example, in Drosophila neuromuscular junction, octopamine elicits NP release by a combination of cAMP signalling and ER-store Ca2+, and the release is independent of activity-dependent Ca2+ influx [63]. In the mammalian dorsal root ganglion, VGCC activation causes a fast and complete release of NP vesicles, while activation of TRPV1 causes a pulsed and prolonged release [64]. dSTIM-mediated SOCE adds to the repertoire of mechanisms that can regulate cytosolic Ca2+ levels and therefore, vesicle release. This has already been shown for Drosophila dopaminergic neurons [17] and this study extends the scope of release to peptides. Notably, dSTIM regulates exocytosis via Ral in neuroendocrine cells, like in dopaminergic neurons.

In Drosophila larval Crz+ DLPs, dSTIM appears to have a role in both fed, as well as NR conditions. On normal food, not only do Crz+ DLPs exhibit small but significant levels of neuronal activity (Fig 2D) but also, loss of dSTIM in these neurons reduced Crz signalling (Fig 3I). Thus, dSTIM regulates Ca2+ dynamics and therefore, neuroendocrine activity, under basal as well as stimulated conditions. This is consistent with observations that basal SOCE contributes to spinogenesis, ER-Ca2+ dynamics as well as transcription [65]. However, in our case, this regulation appears to have functional significance only in NR conditions as pupariation of larvae, with reduced levels of dSTIM in Crz+ neurons, is not affected on normal food (Fig 1B). In a broader context, STIM is a critical regulator of cellular Ca2+ homeostasis as well as SOCE, and a role for it in the hypothalamus has been poorly explored. Because STIM is highly conserved across the metazoan phyla, our study predicts a role for STIM and STIM-mediated SOCE in peptidergic neurons of the hypothalamus. There is growing evidence that SOCE is dysregulated in neurodegenerative diseases [66]. In neurons derived from mouse models of familial Alzheimer’s’ disease [67] and early onset Parkinson’s [65], reduced SOCE has been reported. How genetic mutations responsible for these diseases manifest in neuroendocrine cells is unclear. If they were to also reduce SOCE in peptidergic neurons, it’s possible that physiological and behavioural symptoms associated with these diseases, may in part stem from compromised SOCE-mediated NP synthesis and release.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Identification of SOCE-regulated neuropeptides to survive NR.

A. Genetic Screen. GAL4s for various peptides were used to drive IP3RIR and the corresponding larvae were tested for their ability to pupariate on normal or NR media. AstA: Allatostatin A; AKH: Adipokinetic Hormone; DSK: Drosulphakinin; Hug: Hugin; NPF: Neuropeptide F; sNPF: short Neuropeptide F. B. % Pupae in NR media when sNPF is reduced by RNAi (sNPRIR) or by reducing an enzyme required for neuropeptide processing (amonIR) in sNPF-GAL4 expressing cells, or in a hypomorphic sNPF mutant (sNPF00448). C. 3rd instar larval brain expressing GFP in sNPF-GAL4 producing neurons and a mcherry-tagged corazonin (Crz::mcherry). Note the co-localisation of sNPF-GAL4 with Crz::mcherry, only in the brain lobes (arrow). D. % Pupae on normal and NR media when Crz is reduced in Crz+ neurons, using a second RNAi line (crzIR25999) E. % Pupae and adults that developed on normal food from larvae where Crz+ neurons over-expressed either dSTIM or IP3R. Differences are not statistically significant. F. Food intake as measured by absorbance of coloured food (A625) fed to larvae for the indicated genotypes. N = 8 sets of 5 larvae each. Differences are not statistically significant. one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey’s test p<0.05 for (A), (B), (F). Ordinary two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multi-comparison test p<0.05 for (D). Bars with the same alphabet represent statistically indistinguishable groups. Data represents mean ± SEM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719.s001

(TIFF)

S2 Fig. Characterization of Crz+ neurons.

A. and B. Expression pattern of Crz-GAL4 (observed via GFPnls) closely matched the expression of Crz (observed by a genomically integrated, mCherry-tagged corazonin: Crz::mCherry). C. Crz-GAL4 also expresses in ~4–5 additional neurons in the DLP region, that are not marked by Crz::mCherry (See A). The level of expression also varies with the marker. GFPnls vs histone-tagged to RFP (H2B::RFP).D. Overall distribution of NPs in Crz+ neurons followed by the expression of GFP-tagged rat ANF (ANF::GFP) and mCD8-tagged membrane bound RFP (UAS-mRFP). Note the exclusion of ANF from projections that end in the SEZ. E. Representative image. Expression of tsh-GAL80 in crz>GFP expressing brains causes the loss of GFP expression in the VG. F. % Pupae when Corazonin is reduced (CrzIR) in sNPF-GAL4 expressing neurons. This allows restricted expression of CrzIR only in DLPs (S1C Fig). Ordinary two-way ANOVA with a post hoc Sidak’s multi-comparison test p<0.05. Data represents mean ± SEM.G. Representative image. Expression of the UV-activated Ca2+ indicator, CaMPARI in Crz+ VG neurons. F561 reflects Ca2+ levels, while F488 reflects levels of the indicator. H. Quantification of F561/488 ratio in the presence and absence of UV-stimulation, after 24hrs in either normal or NR food, in Crz+ VG neurons. N>7 larvae for UV-stimulated; N = 3 for No UV stimulation. Kruskal-Wallis Test with Dunn’s multi-comparison correction p<0.05. Bars with the same alphabet represent statistically indistinguishable groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719.s002

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. dSTIM regulates Crz peptide and mRNA levels similar to InR and Ral.

A. Representative image. How “Box” and “projection” areas were delineated for measuring levels of Crz by immunofluorescence, at the ring gland (RG). Box is a 50X50 px square. Lines are a 50X15px rectangle. These measurements were made in a subset of DLPs for which Crz intensity were measured in cell bodies, plotted in Fig 3A. B. and C. Quantification of Crz levels at the RG. D. Relative Crz peptide levels measured on dissected RGs (N atop bars) and quantified using MALDI-MS. Externally added heavy standard (MS*) was used to normalise peptide levels between samples. Kruskal-Wallis Test with Dunn’s multi-comparison correction p<0.05 E. Relative levels of the Rat Neuropeptide ANF::GFP measured by GFP fluorescence, in Crz+ DLPs in either control (crz>dicer2) or dSTIMIR condition (crz>dstimIR,dicer2). Two-tailed t-test. Total number of cell bodies counted mentioned atop bars. N>15 brains. F. % Pupae when vesicle release is perturbed either by expressing a dynamin mutant activated at 30°C (Shibrets), or tetanus toxin light chain (TeTxLc). TeTxLC-IMP: inactivated TeTxLc. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey’s test p<0.05. Data represents mean ± SEM. G. Crz mRNA levels in larval brain with pan-neuronal reduction in CrzR (crzRIR). Two-tailed t-test. N = 4. H. Crz mRNA levels in larval brains where protein synthesis (InRIR) or peptide processing (amonIR) or vesicle exocytosis (RalDN) are perturbed in Crz+ neurons. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey’s test p<0.05. N>4. I. Relative levels of Crz measured on cell bodies of Crz+ DLP neurons when either Crz (CrzIR) is reduced in Crz+ neurons or its receptor CrzR (crzRIR) is reduced pan-neuronally. Kruskal-Wallis Test with Dunn’s multicomparison correction p<0.05. N>10 brains. Bars with the same alphabet represent statistically indistinguishable groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719.s003

(TIFF)

S4 Fig. Increasing neuronal activity or protein synthesis can overcome phenotypes observed with loss of dSTIM in Crz neurons.

A. Cell size of DLP neurons, upon over-expression of Insulin receptor (InR) in Crz+ neurons. N = 5 brains. Student’s t-test. Representative images in B. C. Relative Crz peptide levels in cell bodies of Crz+ DLP neurons expressing InR. N = 5. Student’s t-test. p<0.001 D. % Pupae upon NR, when in Crz+ neurons, dSTIM was reduced, and ChR2-XXL, the light activated channel was ectopically expressed. Larvae were reared in the dark and post-transfer to NR, either continued to be kept in the “Dark” or moved to an incubator with 24 lights (white light) ON (Light) till the end of the pupariation assay (~ 10days). two-way ANOVA with a post hoc Sidak’s multi-comparison test p<0.05. E. % Adults recovered upon over-expression of Insulin receptor (InR) or Ral (RalWT) in Crz+ neurons expressing dSTIMIR. InR rescue: crz>InR,dSTIMIR,dicer2. RalWT rescue: crz> RalWT, dSTIMIR,dicer2. InR control: dicer2;InR/+; dSTIMIR /+;. RalWT control: RalWT /+; dSTIMIR /+. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey’s test p<0.05. F. % Adults recovered upon over-expression of TrpA1 in Crz+ neurons expressing dSTIMIR. TrpA1 control: dicer2;TrpA1/+; dSTIMIR /+; TrpA1 rescue: crz>TrpA1, dSTIMIR,dicer2 Ordinary one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey’s test p<0.05. N = 6 Ordinary one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey’s test p<0.05. N = 6. G and H. % Pupae upon NR, in an hypomorphic IP3R mutant (itprka1091/ug3) with Crz+ neurons over-expressing either dTrpA1, and post-transfer incubating at 30°C for 24hours, or ChR2-XXL and reared in light till the end of the assay. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey’s test p<0.05. for (G). Student’s t-test for (H). Bars with the same alphabet represent statistically indistinguishable groups. Data represents mean ± SEM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719.s004

(TIFF)

S1 Table. Source data used to plot figures Fig 1 and S1 Fig.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719.s005

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Source data used to plot figures Fig 2 and S2 Fig.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719.s006

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Source data used to plot figures Fig 3 and S3 Fig.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719.s007

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Source data used to plot figures Fig 4 and S4 Fig.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219719.s008

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

Supported by Wellcome Trust/ DBT India Alliance (Early Career Award #IA/E/12/1/500742 to M) and NCBS core funding (GH). We thank Jan Veenstra for the Crz antibody and helpful suggestions with immunostaining. Members of the Hasan lab for help with fly transfers, critical comments and helpful discussions. Drosophila fly community (List in supplementary information), BDSC, VDRC, NIG and DGRC for fly strains. NCBS Central Imaging and Flow Facility, for imaging, and Jörg Kahnt (core facility for mass spectrometry and proteomics, Max-Planck-Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg) for access to the mass spectrometer.

References

  1. 1. Prakriya M, Lewis RS. Store-Operated Calcium Channels. Physiol Rev. United States; 2015;95: 1383–1436. pmid:26400989
  2. 2. Putney JW, Steinckwich-Besançon N, Numaga-Tomita T, Davis FM, Desai PN, D’Agostin DM, et al. The functions of store-operated calcium channels. Biochim Biophys Acta—Mol Cell Res. 2017;1864: 900–906. pmid:27913208
  3. 3. Brini M, Cali T, Ottolini D, Carafoli E. Neuronal calcium signaling: function and dysfunction. Cell Mol Life Sci. Switzerland; 2014;71: 2787–2814. pmid:24442513
  4. 4. Lalonde J, Saia G, Gill G. Store-operated calcium entry promotes the degradation of the transcription factor Sp4 in resting neurons. Sci Signal. United States; 2014;7: ra51. pmid:24894994
  5. 5. Hartmann J, Karl RM, Alexander RPD, Adelsberger H, Brill MS, Ruhlmann C, et al. STIM1 controls neuronal Ca(2)(+) signaling, mGluR1-dependent synaptic transmission, and cerebellar motor behavior. Neuron. United States; 2014;82: 635–644. pmid:24811382
  6. 6. Berna-Erro A, Braun A, Kraft R, Kleinschnitz C, Schuhmann MK, Stegner D, et al. STIM2 Regulates Capacitive Ca2+ Entry in Neurons and Plays a Key Role in Hypoxic Neuronal Cell Death. Sci Signal. 2009;2: ra67 LP–ra67. Available: http://stke.sciencemag.org/content/2/93/ra67.abstract
  7. 7. Sun S, Zhang H, Liu J, Popugaeva E, Xu N-J, Feske S, et al. Reduced synaptic STIM2 expression and impaired store-operated calcium entry cause destabilization of mature spines in mutant presenilin mice. Neuron. United States; 2014;82: 79–93. pmid:24698269
  8. 8. Park CY, Shcheglovitov A, Dolmetsch R. The CRAC channel activator STIM1 binds and inhibits L-type voltage-gated calcium channels. Science. United States; 2010;330: 101–105. pmid:20929812
  9. 9. Wang Y, Deng X, Mancarella S, Hendron E, Eguchi S, Soboloff J, et al. The calcium store sensor, STIM1, reciprocally controls Orai and CaV1.2 channels. Science. United States; 2010;330: 105–109. pmid:20929813
  10. 10. Nguyen N, Biet M, Simard É, Béliveau É, Francoeur N, Guillemette G, et al. STIM1 participates in the contractile rhythmicity of HL-1 cells by moderating T-type Ca2+ channel activity. Biochim Biophys Acta—Mol Cell Res. 2013;1833: 1294–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.02.027
  11. 11. Jékely G. Global view of the evolution and diversity of metazoan neuropeptide signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110: 8702 LP– 8707. Available: http://www.pnas.org/content/110/21/8702.abstract
  12. 12. Elphick MR, Mirabeau O, Larhammar D. Evolution of neuropeptide signalling systems. J Exp Biol. 2018;221: jeb151092. pmid:29440283
  13. 13. Nassel DR, Winther AM. Drosophila neuropeptides in regulation of physiology and behavior. Prog Neurobiol. 2010;92: 42–104. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20447440 pmid:20447440
  14. 14. Taghert PH, Nitabach MN. Peptide neuromodulation in invertebrate model systems. Neuron. United States; 2012;76: 82–97. pmid:23040808
  15. 15. Venkiteswaran G, Hasan G. Intracellular Ca2+ signaling and store-operated Ca2+ entry are required in Drosophila neurons for flight. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106: 10326–10331. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19515818 pmid:19515818
  16. 16. Chakraborty S, Deb BK, Chorna T, Konieczny V, Taylor CW, Hasan G. Mutant IP3 receptors attenuate store-operated Ca2+ entry by destabilizing STIM-Orai interactions in Drosophila neurons. J Cell Sci. 2016; pmid:27591258
  17. 17. Richhariya S, Jayakumar S, Kumar Sukumar S, Hasan G. dSTIM and Ral/Exocyst Mediated Synaptic Release from Pupal Dopaminergic Neurons Sustains Drosophila Flight. eneuro. 2018;5. Available: http://eneuro.org/content/early/2018/05/22/ENEURO.0455-17.2018.abstract
  18. 18. Jayakumar S, Richhariya S, Deb BK, Hasan G. A Multicomponent Neuronal Response Encodes the Larval Decision to Pupariate upon Amino Acid Starvation. J Neurosci. 2018;38: 10202 LP– 10219. pmid:30301757
  19. 19. Agrawal N, Venkiteswaran G, Sadaf S, Padmanabhan N, Banerjee S, Hasan G. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor and dSTIM function in Drosophila insulin-producing neurons regulates systemic intracellular calcium homeostasis and flight. J Neurosci. 2010;30: 1301–1313. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20107057 pmid:20107057
  20. 20. Chakraborty S, Hasan G. IP3R, store-operated Ca2+ entry and neuronal Ca2+ homoeostasis in Drosophila. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012/01/21. 2012;40: 279–281. [pii] pmid:22260705
  21. 21. Gopurappilly R, Deb BK, Chakraborty P, Hasan G. Stable STIM1 Knockdown in Self-Renewing Human Neural Precursors Promotes Premature Neural Differentiation [Internet]. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 2018. p. 178. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnmol.2018.00178
  22. 22. Megha , Hasan G. IP3R-mediated Ca2+ release regulates protein metabolism in Drosophila neuroendocrine cells: implications for development under nutrient stress. Development. England; 2017;144: 1484–1489. pmid:28289132
  23. 23. Pathak T, Agrawal T, Richhariya S, Sadaf S, Hasan G. Store-Operated Calcium Entry through Orai Is Required for Transcriptional Maturation of the Flight Circuit in Drosophila. J Neurosci. United States; 2015;35: 13784–13799. pmid:26446229
  24. 24. Wegener C, Neupert S, Predel R. Direct MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric peptide profiling of neuroendocrine tissue of Drosophila. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;615: 117–127. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20013204 pmid:20013204
  25. 25. Agrawal T, Sadaf S, Hasan G. A genetic RNAi screen for IP(3)/Ca(2)(+) coupled GPCRs in Drosophila identifies the PdfR as a regulator of insect flight. PLoS Genet. 2013/10/08. 2013;9: e1003849. [pii] pmid:24098151
  26. 26. Nassel DR, Enell LE, Santos JG, Wegener C, Johard HA. A large population of diverse neurons in the Drosophila central nervous system expresses short neuropeptide F, suggesting multiple distributed peptide functions. BMC Neurosci. 2008;9: 90. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=18803813 pmid:18803813
  27. 27. Rhea JM, Wegener C, Bender M. The proprotein convertase encoded by amontillado (amon) is required in Drosophila corpora cardiaca endocrine cells producing the glucose regulatory hormone AKH. PLoS Genet. 2010;6: e1000967. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20523747 pmid:20523747
  28. 28. Lee KS, You KH, Choo JK, Han YM, Yu K. Drosophila short neuropeptide F regulates food intake and body size. J Biol Chem. 2004;279: 50781–50789. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=15385546 pmid:15385546
  29. 29. Subramanian M, Jayakumar S, Richhariya S, Hasan G. Loss of IP3 receptor function in neuropeptide secreting neurons leads to obesity in adult Drosophila. BMC Neurosci. 2013/12/20. 2013;14: 157. [pii] pmid:24350669
  30. 30. Agrawal N, Padmanabhan N, Hasan G. Inositol 1,4,5- trisphosphate receptor function in Drosophila insulin producing cells. PLoS One. 2009;4: e6652. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19680544 pmid:19680544
  31. 31. Choi YJ, Lee G, Hall JC, Park JH. Comparative analysis of Corazonin-encoding genes (Crz’s) in Drosophila species and functional insights into Crz-expressing neurons. J Comp Neurol. United States; 2005;482: 372–385. pmid:15669053
  32. 32. Rao S, Lang C, Levitan ES, Deitcher DL. Visualization of neuropeptide expression, transport, and exocytosis in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurobiol. United States; 2001;49: 159–172.
  33. 33. Fosque BF, Sun Y, Dana H, Yang C-T, Ohyama T, Tadross MR, et al. Neural circuits. Labeling of active neural circuits in vivo with designed calcium integrators. Science. United States; 2015;347: 755–760. pmid:25678659
  34. 34. Veenstra JA. Peptidergic paracrine and endocrine cells in the midgut of the fruit fly maggot. Cell Tissue Res. 2009;336: 309–323. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19319573 pmid:19319573
  35. 35. Wegener C, Herbert H, Kahnt J, Bender M, Rhea JM. Deficiency of prohormone convertase dPC2 (AMONTILLADO) results in impaired production of bioactive neuropeptide hormones in Drosophila. J Neurochem. 2011;118: 581–595. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=21138435 pmid:21138435
  36. 36. Luo J, Liu Y, Nassel DR, Nässel DR. Insulin/IGF-regulated size scaling of neuroendocrine cells expressing the bHLH transcription factor Dimmed in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2014/01/05. Public Library of Science; 2013;9: e1004052. pmid:24385933
  37. 37. Park D, Veenstra JA, Park JH, Taghert PH. Mapping peptidergic cells in Drosophila: where DIMM fits in. PLoS One. 2008;3: e1896. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=18365028 pmid:18365028
  38. 38. Richhariya S, Jayakumar S, Abruzzi K, Rosbash M, Hasan G. A pupal transcriptomic screen identifies Ral as a target of store-operated calcium entry in Drosophila neurons. Sci Rep. The Author(s); 2017;7: 42586. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42586 pmid:28195208
  39. 39. Wong MY, Cavolo SL, Levitan ES. Synaptic neuropeptide release by dynamin-dependent partial release from circulating vesicles. Mol Biol Cell. United States; 2015;26: 2466–2474. pmid:25904335
  40. 40. McNabb SL, Truman JW. Light and peptidergic eclosion hormone neurons stimulate a rapid eclosion response that masks circadian emergence in Drosophila. J Exp Biol. 2008;211: 2263–2274. pmid:18587121
  41. 41. Klose M, Duvall L, Li W, Liang X, Ren C, Steinbach JH, et al. Functional PDF Signaling in the Drosophila Circadian Neural Circuit Is Gated by Ral A-Dependent Modulation. Neuron. 2016/05/05. 2016;90: 781–794. pmid:27161526
  42. 42. Nässel DR. Neuropeptide signaling near and far: how localized and timed is the action of neuropeptides in brain circuits? Invertebr Neurosci. 2009;9: 57. pmid:19756790
  43. 43. Kubrak OI, Lushchak O V, Zandawala M, Nässel DR. Systemic corazonin signalling modulates stress responses and metabolism in Drosophila. Open Biol. The Royal Society; 2016;6: 160152. pmid:27810969
  44. 44. Chintapalli VR, Wang J, Dow JAT. Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease. Nat Genet. United States; 2007;39: 715–720. pmid:17534367
  45. 45. Hamada FN, Rosenzweig M, Kang K, Pulver SR, Ghezzi A, Jegla TJ, et al. An internal thermal sensor controlling temperature preference in Drosophila. Nature. England; 2008;454: 217–220. pmid:18548007
  46. 46. Dawydow A, Gueta R, Ljaschenko D, Ullrich S, Hermann M, Ehmann N, et al. Channelrhodopsin-2–XXL, a powerful optogenetic tool for low-light applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111: 13972 LP– 13977. Available: http://www.pnas.org/content/111/38/13972.abstract pmid:25201989
  47. 47. Lee G, Kim KM, Kikuno K, Wang Z, Choi YJ, Park JH. Developmental regulation and functions of the expression of the neuropeptide corazonin in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Tissue Res. 2008;331: 659–673. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=18087727 pmid:18087727
  48. 48. Kapan N, Lushchak O V, Luo J, Nässel DR. Identified peptidergic neurons in the Drosophila brain regulate insulin-producing cells, stress responses and metabolism by coexpressed short neuropeptide F and corazonin. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69: 4051–4066. pmid:22828865
  49. 49. Johnson EC, Kazgan N, Bretz CA, Forsberg LJ, Hector CE, Worthen RJ, et al. Altered Metabolism and Persistent Starvation Behaviors Caused by Reduced AMPK Function in Drosophila. Hassan BA, editor. PLoS One. San Francisco, USA: Public Library of Science; 2010;5: e12799. pmid:20862213
  50. 50. Tayler TD, Pacheco DA, Hergarden AC, Murthy M, Anderson DJ. A neuropeptide circuit that coordinates sperm transfer and copulation duration in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. National Academy of Sciences; 2012;109: 20697–20702. pmid:23197833
  51. 51. McClure KD, Heberlein U. A Small Group of Neurosecretory Cells Expressing the Transcriptional Regulator apontic and the Neuropeptide corazonin Mediate Ethanol Sedation in Drosophila. J Neurosci. Society for Neuroscience; 2013;33: 4044–4054. pmid:23447613
  52. 52. Sha K, Choi S-H, Im J, Lee GG, Loeffler F, Park JH. Regulation of Ethanol-Related Behavior and Ethanol Metabolism by the Corazonin Neurons and Corazonin Receptor in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2014;9: e87062. Available: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087062 pmid:24489834
  53. 53. Selcho M, Millán C, Palacios-Muñoz A, Ruf F, Ubillo L, Chen J, et al. Central and peripheral clocks are coupled by a neuropeptide pathway in Drosophila. Nat Commun. The Author(s); 2017;8: 15563. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15563 pmid:28555616
  54. 54. Chen W, Shi W, Li L, Zheng Z, Li T, Bai W, et al. Regulation of sleep by the short neuropeptide F (sNPF) in Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. England; 2013;43: 809–819. pmid:23796436
  55. 55. Shang Y, Donelson NC, Vecsey CG, Guo F, Rosbash M, Griffith LC. Short neuropeptide F is a sleep-promoting inhibitory modulator. Neuron. United States; 2013;80: 171–183. pmid:24094110
  56. 56. Veenstra JA. Does corazonin signal nutritional stress in insects? Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;39: 755–762. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19815069 pmid:19815069
  57. 57. Mishra D, Miyamoto T, Rezenom YH, Broussard A, Yavuz A, Slone J, et al. The Molecular Basis of Sugar Sensing in Drosophila Larvae. Curr Biol. Elsevier; 2013;23: 1466–1471. pmid:23850280
  58. 58. Miyamoto T, Amrein H. Diverse roles for the Drosophila fructose sensor Gr43a. Fly (Austin). Landes Bioscience; 2014;8: 19–25. pmid:24406333
  59. 59. Johnson EC, Shafer OT, Trigg JS, Park J, Schooley DA, Dow JA, et al. A novel diuretic hormone receptor in Drosophila: evidence for conservation of CGRP signaling. J Exp Biol. England; 2005;208: 1239–1246. pmid:15781884
  60. 60. Hartenstein V. The neuroendocrine system of invertebrates: a developmental and evolutionary perspective. J Endocrinol. England; 2006;190: 555–570. pmid:17003257
  61. 61. Onaka T, Takayanagi Y, Leng G. Metabolic and stress-related roles of prolactin-releasing peptide. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21: 287–293. pmid:20122847
  62. 62. van den Pol AN. Neuropeptide transmission in brain circuits. Neuron. United States; 2012;76: 98–115. pmid:23040809
  63. 63. Shakiryanova D, Zettel GM, Gu T, Hewes RS, Levitan ES. Synaptic neuropeptide release induced by octopamine without Ca2+ entry into the nerve terminal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108: 4477–4481. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=21368121 pmid:21368121
  64. 64. Wang Y, Wu Q, Hu M, Liu B, Chai Z, Huang R, et al. Ligand- and voltage-gated Ca2+ channels differentially regulate the mode of vesicular neuropeptide release in mammalian sensory neurons. Sci Signal. 2017;10: eaal1683. Available: http://stke.sciencemag.org/content/10/484/eaal1683.abstract pmid:28634208
  65. 65. Zhou Q, Yen A, Rymarczyk G, Asai H, Trengrove C, Aziz N, et al. Impairment of PARK14-dependent Ca(2+) signalling is a novel determinant of Parkinson’s disease. Nat Commun. England; 2016;7: 10332. pmid:26755131
  66. 66. Secondo A, Bagetta G, Amantea D. On the Role of Store-Operated Calcium Entry in Acute and Chronic Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front Mol Neurosci. Switzerland; 2018;11: 87. pmid:29623030
  67. 67. Popugaeva E, Bezprozvanny I. Role of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ signaling in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease. Front Mol Neurosci. Switzerland; 2013;6: 29. pmid:24065882