Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Corneal deflection amplitude and visual field progression in primary open-angle glaucoma

  • Younhea Jung,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    ⨯
  • Heejeong Chun,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    ⨯
  • Jung Il Moon

    Roles Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    jimoon@catholic.ac.kr

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    ⨯

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the relationship between corneal deflection amplitude and visual field progression rate in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods

This study included 113 eyes of 65 patients with POAG followed for an average of 4.81 ± 1.24 years. Evaluation of visual field progression rate was performed using mean deviation of standard automated perimetry. Corneal deflection amplitude was measured using Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Linear mixed models were performed to determine the relationship between corneal deflection amplitude, intraocular pressure (IOP), and visual field progression rate.

Results

Mean age was 56.36 ± 14.58 years. Baseline average mean deviation was -8.20 ± 9.12 dB and mean treated IOP was 14.38 ± 3.08 mmHg. Average deflection amplitude was 0.90 ± 0.13 mm. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, IOP (P = 0.028 and P < 0.001, respectively) and deflection amplitude (P = 0.034 and P < 0.001, respectively) significantly affected visual field progression rate. Eyes with high IOP and greater deflection amplitude showed faster progression rate.

Conclusions

Corneal deflection amplitude was significantly related with glaucoma progression. Eyes with greater corneal deflection amplitude showed faster visual field progression rate in patients with POAG.

Citation: Jung Y, Chun H, Moon JI (2019) Corneal deflection amplitude and visual field progression in primary open-angle glaucoma. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0220655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220655

Editor: Francesco Oddone, IRCCS Fondazione G.B.Bietti, ITALY

Received: March 7, 2019; Accepted: July 20, 2019; Published: August 12, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Jung et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This research was supported by grant of the Institute of Clinical Medicine Research in the Yeouido St. Mary’s hospital, Catholic University of Korea. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

While glaucoma is a progressive disease, the rate of progression varies widely among patients.[1, 2] Therefore, identifying risk factors related with progression rate may aid clinicians identify patients at high risk for fast progression. Numerous studies have reported high intraocular pressure (IOP) as main risk factor for glaucoma progression.[3–6] In addition, thin central corneal thickness (CCT) has also been identified as risk factor for progression of the disease in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial.[5] This could be due to underestimation of IOP in those with thinner CCT, but it may also be speculated that thinner CCT reflect the anatomical structure of the ocular tissues. In line with this speculation, corneal hysteresis has also been suggested as risk factor for glaucoma progression in several studies.[7–12] The biomechanical property of the cornea might reflect the elasticity and distensibility of the posterior ocular tissues leading to increased susceptibility of the optic nerve head to glaucomatous damage.

More recently, Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) was introduced which measures the corneal deformation process in response to an air impulse and allows in vivo imaging of corneal biomechanical responses.[13–17] It has been suggested to measure the changes in the elastic properties of the cornea, such as how stiff or soft the cornea is, and has been reported to be more useful in detecting the true biomechanical property of the cornea than ORA.[18]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between corneal biomechanical property measured by Corvis ST, deflection amplitude, and visual field progression rate in glaucoma patients.

Materials and methods

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital (SC18RESI0149) and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. In this retrospective study, informed consent was waived by the IRB, because the data were analyzed anonymously. The medical records of patients who visited the glaucoma clinic at Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, with established glaucoma between June and July 2018 were reviewed. Glaucoma was defined as open angle on gonioscopy, a normal anterior chamber based on slit-lamp examination, a glaucomatous optic disc (localized or diffuse neuroretinal rim loss, excavation, or retinal nerve fiber layer defects), and an abnormal visual field consistent with glaucoma (<20% of fixation loss, <15% of false-positive error, and <15% of false-negative error) on at least two consecutive tests. We excluded the first visual field examination from the analyses to reduce the influence of learning effects. After exclusion, those with at least 3 reliable standard automated perimetry (SAP) tests during a minimum of 3 years of follow-up or with at least 5 reliable tests in less than 3 years were included in the study. If a subject underwent surgical or laser treatment, only data prior to the treatment was analyzed. Subjects who presented best-corrected visual acuity <20/40, spherical refraction outside ± 5 diopters or cylinder correction greater than 3 diopters, history of cornea disease, ocular trauma or surgery, or previous refractive laser treatment were excluded from the study. Those with any other ocular or neurologic disease that could influence the visual field were also excluded.

Results of ophthalmologic examination and medical history of each patient were reviewed from the clinical notes including best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, Goldmann applanation tonometry, refraction (RK-5; Canon, Tokyo, Japan), ultrasound pachymetry (Tomey, Nagoya, Japan), dilated stereoscopic optic nerve head examination, color optic disc photography (VX-10; Kowa Optimed, Tokyo, Japan), standard automated perimetry (SAP) using the 24–2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), and measurement of corneal deflection amplitude with Corvis ST (software ver. 1.5r1902, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany).

Corvis ST measurements

The corneal deflection amplitude was measured with Corvis ST. Details of the Corvis ST measurements have been described previously[16]. In brief, after centering the patient’s cornea at an 11 mm-distance from the device, an air-puff at a pressure of 25 kPa was automatically emitted. During the process, an ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera imaged 140 digital frames of the response of the central 8.5 mm of the cornea with a resolution of 640x480 pixels over 30 msec. The cornea moved inward until it reaches the highest concavity in response to the air puff. At this time, the amount of corneal displacement at highest concavity, the deformation amplitude, is measured by the device. Deformation amplitude is composed of the deflection amplitude, which is the pure corneal component, and the whole-eye movement, which is the orbital component.[19–21] The deflection amplitude was used for the analysis.

Statistical analyses

The rate of visual field deterioration was calculated retrospectively using the slope of the mean deviation. Linear mixed model was constructed to predict the deterioration rate using age, spherical equivalent, mean treated IOP, central corneal thickness, and deflection amplitude. In addition, we explored the interaction between IOP and deflection amplitude. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS (ver. 17.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). A P value < 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance in all analyses.

Results

A total of 113 eyes from 65 patients with glaucoma were included in the current study (Table 1). The mean age was 56. 36 ± 14.58 years and 32 subjects were male. The mean treated intraocular pressure was 14.38 ± 3.08 mmHg and mean central corneal thickness was 532.72 ± 37.08 ㎛. The mean follow-up period was 4.81 ± 1.24 years. Baseline mean deviation and visual field index were -8.20 ± 9.12 decibels and 79.64 ± 28.77, respectively. The mean corneal deflection amplitude was 0.90 ± 0.13 mm. In the univariate linear mixed model, higher intraocular pressure (unstandardized coefficient = -0.055, standardized coefficient = -0.226, P value = 0.028) and higher deflection amplitude (unstandardized coefficient = -1.220, standardized coefficient = -0.219, P value = 0.034) were significantly associated with faster rate of visual field progression (Table 2). In addition, in the multivariate model, higher intraocular pressure (unstandardized coefficient = -0.155, standardized coefficient = -0.614, P value < 0.001) and higher deflection amplitude (unstandardized coefficient = -3.370, standardized coefficient = -0.415, P value < 0.001) were both significantly associated with faster rate of visual field progression. Figs 1 and 2 show the relationships between visual field progression rate and deflection amplitude and intraocular pressure, respectively. We also explored the interaction between IOP and deflection amplitude, which showed no statistical significance (P value = 0.789). Fig 3 shows the representative cases, and S1 and S2 Videos show the whole corneal responses of Fig 3D and 3H, respectively.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Scatter plot showing the relationship between corneal deflection amplitude and visual field progression rate.

MD = mean deviation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220655.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Scatter plot showing the relationship between treated intraocular pressure and visual field progression rate.

MD = mean deviation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220655.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Representative cases.

Progression rate (-1.96 dB/yr, B) of patient 1 (A-D) with higher deflection amplitude (1.05mm, D) was greater than that (-0.35 dB/yr, F) of patient 2 (E-H) whose deflection amplitude was smaller (0.84mm, H). S1 and S2 Videos show the whole corneal responses of Fig 3D and 3H, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220655.g003

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220655.t001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Results of linear mixed effects model investigating the effect of deflection amplitude on visual field progression rate.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220655.t002

Discussion

In this study, we showed that higher deflection amplitude was significantly related with faster progression of visual field in glaucoma patients. This association was significant even after adjusting for IOP. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report the corneal deflection amplitude as a risk factor for glaucoma progression.

While it is difficult to clarify whether the large corneal deflection amplitude was a result of or a causative factor of visual field progression because we did not measure the corneal deflection amplitude at baseline, there can be several speculations for our findings. First, the intraocular pressure of those with high corneal deflection amplitude may have been underestimated, indicating they may have actually had higher intraocular pressure resulting in faster deterioration. Second, those who showed faster visual field progression may have been treated more vigorously, resulting in changes in corneal biomechanics. Long-term use of antiglaucoma eyedrops have been reported to have an effect on the biomechanical properties of the cornea.[22–25] Wu et al.[25] reported that chronic use of prostaglandin analogues was related with significantly larger deformation amplitude compared to naïve glaucomatous eyes. Other studies have also shown changes in corneal biomechanical properties after using topical prostaglandin analogues.[22, 24] Prostaglandin analogues can increase matrix metalloproteinase levels and remodel extracellular matrix resulting in altered corneal biomechanics.[26, 27]

More importantly, as the biomechanical properties of the cornea reflect the extracellular matrix compositions of the cornea, which could be related to those of the lamina cribrosa and peripapillary sclera, high corneal deflection amplitude may be a marker of increased susceptibility of optic disc to glaucomatous damage. We have previously reported that corneal deformation amplitude was associated with peripapillary atrophy area in patients with glaucoma.[16] The biomechanical properties of these load-bearing structures determine how they are deformed in response to IOP-related stress.[28] Stiffer eyes were less prone to biomechanical changes induced by chronic IOP elevation in experimental models, which is compatible to our findings.[29, 30] Steinhart et al. [30] reported that mice with stiffer sclera showed less loss of retinal ganglion cells in response to IOP elevation and speculated that scleral stiffening in glaucoma may protect the optic disc by increased load carried in the sclera.

The relationship between corneal biomechanical property and glaucoma progression has been previously reported using another instrument, the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA).[8–10] Medeiros et al. [8] reported that lower corneal hysteresis was related with faster rate of visual field loss, suggesting that corneal hysteresis is a risk factor to glaucoma progression. However, corneal hysteresis measured by ORA and corneal deflection amplitude measured by Corvis ST measure different biomechanical properties of the cornea. Hysteresis of viscoelastic materials is a measure of the energy absorption during the loading-unloading, stress-strain cycle and the amount of energy absorption is calculated as the area surrounded by the loading-unloading curves[31,32]; whereas greater deflection amplitude refers to the change of shape of the loading-unloading curves.[32] Previous study has shown that Corvis ST may be more useful in measuring the true biomechanical property of the cornea.[18]

In conclusion, higher corneal deflection amplitude was significantly related with faster visual field progression rate in patients with glaucoma, and more aggressive intraocular pressure reduction may be indicated in these patients.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset. Minimal data set.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220655.s001

(XLS)

S1 Video. The whole corneal response video of patient 1 with higher deflection amplitude (1.05mm, Fig 3D) and faster rate of progression (-1.96 dB/yr).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220655.s002

(AVI)

S2 Video. The whole corneal response video of patient 2 with smaller deflection amplitude (0.84mm, Fig 3H) and slower rate of progression (-0.35 dB/yr).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220655.s003

(AVI)

References

  1. 1. Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Leske MC, Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial G. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2271–6. pmid:19854514.
  2. 2. Anderson DR, Drance SM, Schulzer M, Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study G. Natural history of normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(2):247–53. pmid:11158794.
  3. 3. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration.The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):429–40. pmid:11024415.
  4. 4. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):714–20; discussion 829–30. pmid:12049575.
  5. 5. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Dong L, Yang Z, et al. Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(11):1965–72. pmid:17628686.
  6. 6. Medeiros FA, Alencar LM, Zangwill LM, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. The Relationship between intraocular pressure and progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(6):1125–33 e1-3. pmid:19376584; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2848169.
  7. 7. Zhang C, Tatham AJ, Abe RY, Diniz-Filho A, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, et al. Corneal Hysteresis and Progressive Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss in Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;166:29–36. pmid:26949135; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5758050.
  8. 8. Medeiros FA, Meira-Freitas D, Lisboa R, Kuang TM, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Corneal hysteresis as a risk factor for glaucoma progression: a prospective longitudinal study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(8):1533–40. pmid:23642371; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3804228.
  9. 9. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(5):868–75. pmid:16527231.
  10. 10. De Moraes CVG, Hill V, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Lower corneal hysteresis is associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(4):209–13. pmid:21654511.
  11. 11. Hong Y, Shoji N, Morita T, Hirasawa K, Matsumura K, Kasahara M, et al. Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma patients with different visual field progression speed. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(7):973–8. pmid:27500103; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4951676.
  12. 12. Aoki S, Murata H, Matsuura M, Fujino Y, Nakakura S, Nakao Y, et al. The effect of air pulse-driven whole eye motion on the association between corneal hysteresis and glaucomatous visual field progression. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2969. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5813173. pmid:29445204
  13. 13. Herber R, Terai N, Pillunat KR, Raiskup F, Pillunat LE, Sporl E. [Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer (Corvis ST) for measurement of corneal biomechanical parameters: A praxis-related overview]. Ophthalmologe. 2018. pmid:29767348.
  14. 14. Hirasawa K, Nakakura S, Nakao Y, Fujino Y, Matsuura M, Murata H, et al. Changes in Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Cataract Surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;195:26–35. pmid:30071213.
  15. 15. Huseynova T, Waring GOt, Roberts C, Krueger RR, Tomita M. Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(4):885–93. pmid:24388837.
  16. 16. Jung Y, Park HY, Park CK. Association between Corneal Deformation Amplitude and Posterior Pole Profiles in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):959–64. pmid:26875001.
  17. 17. Jung Y, Park HL, Yang HJ, Park CK. Characteristics of corneal biomechanical responses detected by a non-contact scheimpflug-based tonometer in eyes with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(7):e556–e63. pmid:28636261.
  18. 18. Tejwani S, Shetty R, Kurien M, Dinakaran S, Ghosh A, Sinha Roy A. Biomechanics of the cornea evaluated by spectral analysis of waveforms from ocular response analyzer and Corvis-ST. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e97591. pmid:25162229; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4146464.
  19. 19. Sinha Roy A, Kurian M, Matalia H, Shetty R. Air-puff associated quantification of non-linear biomechanical properties of the human cornea in vivo. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;48:173–82. pmid:25955559.
  20. 20. Vinciguerra R, Ambrosio R Jr., Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Lopes B, Morenghi E, et al. Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(12):803–10. pmid:27930790.
  21. 21. Vellara HR, Ali NQ, Gokul A, Turuwhenua J, Patel DV, McGhee CN. Quantitative Analysis of Corneal Energy Dissipation and Corneal and Orbital Deformation in Response to an Air-Pulse in Healthy Eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(11):6941–7. pmid:26513499.
  22. 22. Tsikripis P, Papaconstantinou D, Koutsandrea C, Apostolopoulos M, Georgalas I. The effect of prostaglandin analogs on the biomechanical properties and central thickness of the cornea of patients with open-angle glaucoma: a 3-year study on 108 eyes. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013;7:1149–56. pmid:24115838; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3793594.
  23. 23. Meda R, Wang Q, Paoloni D, Harasymowycz P, Brunette I. The impact of chronic use of prostaglandin analogues on the biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(2):120–5. pmid:27162226; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5293847.
  24. 24. Bolivar G, Sanchez-Barahona C, Teus M, Castejon MA, Paz-Moreno-Arrones J, Gutierrez-Ortiz C, et al. Effect of topical prostaglandin analogues on corneal hysteresis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(6):e495–8. pmid:25722009.
  25. 25. Wu N, Chen Y, Yu X, Li M, Wen W, Sun X. Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties after Long-Term Topical Prostaglandin Therapy. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155527. pmid:27187282; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4871478.
  26. 26. Oh DJ, Martin JL, Williams AJ, Russell P, Birk DE, Rhee DJ. Effect of latanoprost on the expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(9):3887–95. pmid:16936101.
  27. 27. Honda N, Miyai T, Nejima R, Miyata K, Mimura T, Usui T, et al. Effect of latanoprost on the expression of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 on the ocular surface. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(4):466–71. pmid:20385943.
  28. 28. Sigal IA, Yang H, Roberts MD, Burgoyne CF, Downs JC. IOP-induced lamina cribrosa displacement and scleral canal expansion: an analysis of factor interactions using parameterized eye-specific models. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1896–907. pmid:20881292; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3101679.
  29. 29. Girard MJ, Suh JK, Bottlang M, Burgoyne CF, Downs JC. Biomechanical changes in the sclera of monkey eyes exposed to chronic IOP elevations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(8):5656–69. pmid:21519033; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3176060.
  30. 30. Steinhart MR, Cone FE, Nguyen C, Nguyen TD, Pease ME, Puk O, et al. Mice with an induced mutation in collagen 8A2 develop larger eyes and are resistant to retinal ganglion cell damage in an experimental glaucoma model. Mol Vis. 2012;18:1093–106. pmid:22701298; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3374490.
  31. 31. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(12):5337–47. Epub 2006/11/24. pmid:17122122.
  32. 32. Matsuura M, Hirasawa K, Murata H, Nakakura S, Kiuchi Y, Asaoka R. The usefulness of CorvisST Tonometry and the Ocular Response Analyzer to assess the progression of glaucoma. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40798. pmid:28094315; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5240132.