Introduction

Chagas disease (ChD), caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, remains a major public health issue in endemic areas where international collaborative efforts initiatives have been carried out to improve socioeconomic and household conditions, blood banks screenings and vector control [1,2]. Currently, it is estimated that Chagas disease affects between 6 and 8 million individuals, with an estimated number of deaths of approximately 12,000 per year worldwide [3]. The pathogenesis of ChD is not completely understood, but seems to depend on a complex interaction between host and parasite [4]. Pathogenic mechanisms that develop clinical signs in patients in the chronic phase is still an issue in debate, nonetheless, persistence of the parasite seems to be responsible of the progress of the damage [4–8].

In the chronic phase of the disease, when parasitemia falls, the diagnosis is mainly performed by conventional serological methods and is based on the positivity of, at least two different tests [9]. The parasitological methods xenodiagnosis and hemoculture, of low sensitivity in this infection phase, have been replaced by molecular methods, as conventional Polymerase Chain Reaction (cPCR) and real time PCR, both have proved to be useful parasitological tools for evaluation of trypanocide efficacy [9–12].

It is estimated that parasitological and serological cure with nifurtimox (NF) or benznidazole (BZ) is reached in up to 98–100% of infected neonates and in 70–75% of the patients treated in the acute phase [13], while the percentages of serological and/or parasitological reversion in the chronic phase are not conclusive [14,15].

This study aims to compare the parasitological condition of patients, before and after (6.6 years on average) treatment with NF using qualitative detection of T. cruzi DNA by cPCR assays.

Materials and methods

Results

T. cruzi kDNA was detected in 96 of the 114 (84.2%) pre-treatment cases, while in the post-treatment, only 7 individuals (6.1%) showed the 330 bp specific band (Fig 1). Seventeen patients (14.9%) presented a negative cPCR before being treated, and this status was maintained in the post-treatment. Six (5.3%) individuals maintained the positive condition despite the treatment. Finally, one case (0.9%) that had a negative cPCR assay before the treatment, was positive after treatment (not shown in Fig 1). The proportion of positive cPCR cases after the NF treatment showed a statistically significant difference compared to positive cases before treatment (p<0.0001) (Table 1).

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Fig 1. Conventional PCR with 121–122 primers to amplify variable regions of minicircle of Trypanosoma cruzi kDNA in 11 chilean patients with chronic Chagas disease treated with nifurtimox.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221100.g001

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Table 1. Treatment of chronic Chagas disease with nifurtimox. Conventional PCR results before and after treatment in prolonged follow-up (6.6 years average).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221100.t001

Electrophoretic pattern of minicircle region 330 bp in size of T. cruzi kDNA-cPCR amplified with primers 121 and 122 from 11 Chilean patients with chronic Chagas disease treated with nifurtimox evaluated in prolonged follow-up. (A) Positive cPCR of 11 cases in pre-therapy condition (B) 6 cases with positive cPCR before and after therapy, and 5 cases with positive and negative cPCR before and after treatment, respectively. M: 100 base pair ladder; MC: PCR mix control; NC: negative control (DNA of individual without Chagas disease); PC: positive control (DNA T. cruzi Tulahuen strain).

Discussion

The results obtained in this study show that 90 out of 96 cases (93.8%) with positive cPCR in pre-therapy have negative cPCR in the 6.6 years average follow-up control. This is concordant with others studies. In Switzerland, thirty-seven Latin American migrants with chronic ChD were treated with NF and followed-up three years later. All patients had negative cPCR results but one (2.7%) was positive with real-time PCR [19]. A study conducted in Brazil on individuals with chronic ChD treated with NF or BZ demonstrated that 31 out of 48 patients (64.6%) had negative cPCR results in an average of 20 years of follow-up [20]. On the other hand, of 29 people with chronic ChD who completed successfully a treatment with BZ, 48.3% showed no amplification of T. cruzi DNA by nested PCR in the follow-up, while 10.3% of the studied samples were considered inconclusive [21]. Murcia et al. demonstrated a negative conversion of cPCR in 96 Bolivians migrants with chronic ChD, 90 days after treatment with BZ [22]. The same author, shows that 96.7% of Bolivian migrants with chronic ChD followed 7 years post-therapy with BZ, maintained a negative cPCR [23]. Finally, Cardoso et al., described that 83.4% of individuals with chronic ChD treated with BZ had negative results by real-time PCR after two years follow-up [24]. Although there are differences in the drug administration protocols, age of the patients and parasitological methods of T. cruzi detection in the mentioned studies conducted in the last two decades, there is concordance in high percentages of parasitological negativization in patients with chronic ChD treated with NF or BZ.

Regarding the case with negative and positive cPCR results before and after treatment, respectively, there are other similar cases in the literature [22]. cPCR success depends on the burden of circulating parasites in a patient’s bloodstream. As T. cruzi circulates in very small amounts in the chronic phase, a false negative cannot be discarded. In the present study, 84.2% positive cPCR in pre-therapy conditions is concordant with the sensitivity described for the method [25–27]. No related infections were included (Leishmaniasis or T. rangeli), since they are absent in Chile [25,28]. The 121 and 122 primers cannot amplify the target in T. rangeli efficiently due to mismatches in the 3' end of the primer, therefore the possibility of T. rangeli mis-amplification is remote [26]. Finally, there are exceptional reports of dwellings in Chile with intrusion (but not colonization) of infected vectors, in spite of the interruption of the domestic cycle in 1999 [29].

A single point of study in a post-therapy follow-up is not sufficient to conclude that the parasite is absent, for this reason it is necessary to investigate the parasitological evolution at several times in the follow-up, applying qualitative and quantitative parasitological methods in order to confirm positive or negative laboratory findings.

Conclusions

There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of positive cases by cPCR before and after therapy with NF in the studied population.

Although T. cruzi was not detected in 93.9% of the cases after treatment, all of them maintained positive serology [30], for this reason, it is not possible to interpret the obtained results as parasitological cure according to the current cure criterion.

The results of the present study demonstrated therapy failure in 6.1% of the cases.

Some authors recommend cPCR for chronic Chagas disease diagnosis only when serological tests are inconclusive [26], but we consider that qualitative detection of circulating T. cruzi could be a complementary tool to quantitative methods such as real-time PCR, which is more expensive and not easily accessible.

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

To the health care staff of the outpatient clinics of the Provinces of Choapa and Limarí for their dedication and collaboration in the present study.