Calvarial osteoblast gene expression in patients with craniosynostosis leads to novel polygenic mouse model

Jonas A. Gustafson; Sarah S. Park; Michael L. Cunningham

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221402

Abstract

Craniosynostosis is the premature fusion of the sutures of the calvaria and is principally designated as being either syndromic (demonstrating characteristic extracranial malformations) or non-syndromic. While many forms of syndromic craniosynostosis are known to be caused by specific mutations, the genetic etiology of non-syndromic, single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) is poorly understood. Based on the low recurrence rate (4–7%) and the fact that recurrent mutations have not been identified for most cases of SSC, we propose that some cases of isolated, single suture craniosynostosis may be polygenic. Previous work in our lab identified a disproportionately high number of rare and novel gain-of-function IGF1R variants in patients with SSC as compared to controls. Building upon this result, we used expression array data from calvarial osteoblasts isolated from infants with and without SSC to ascertain correlations between high IGF1 expression and expression of other osteogenic genes of interest. We identified a positive correlation between increased expression of IGF1 and RUNX2, a gene known to cause SSC with increased gene dosage. Subsequent phosphorylation assays revealed that osteoblast cell lines from cases with high IGF1 expression demonstrated inhibition of GSK3β, a serine/threonine kinase known to inhibit RUNX2, thus activating osteogenesis through the IRS1-mediated Akt pathway. With these findings, we have utilized established mouse strains to examine a novel model of polygenic inheritance (a phenotype influenced by more than one gene) of SSC. Compound heterozygous mice with selective disinhibition of RUNX2 and either overexpression of IGF1 or loss of function of GSK3β demonstrated an increase in the frequency and severity of synostosis as compared to mice with the RUNX2 disinhibition alone. These polygenic mouse models reinforce, in-vivo, that the combination of activation of the IGF1 pathway and disinhibition of the RUNX2 pathway leads to an increased risk of developing craniosynostosis and serves as a model of human SSC.

Citation: Gustafson JA, Park SS, Cunningham ML (2019) Calvarial osteoblast gene expression in patients with craniosynostosis leads to novel polygenic mouse model. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0221402. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221402

Editor: Andre van Wijnen, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, UNITED STATES

Received: January 29, 2019; Accepted: August 6, 2019; Published: August 23, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Gustafson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The data are available from Gene Expression Omnibus, Accession number: GSE27976, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE27976.

Funding: This work was supported by a grant to MLC, R01DE018227, NIH/NIDCR, https://www.nidcr.nih.gov. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Single-suture, non-syndromic craniosynostosis occurs in approximately 1/2500 live births with a familial recurrence rate of 4–7% [1, 2]. Typically, when an infant is born, the calvaria are separated by soft membranous tissue (intrasutural mesenchyme) to allow for skull deformation during birth and brain growth throughout childhood. Premature fusion of the sutures of the calvaria is associated with distortion of skull growth that can be associated with increased intracranial pressure due to constraint of the growing brain and asymmetric facial growth that can lead to dental and vision complications. Currently, the only treatment available for this condition is major, invasive surgery to expand the cranial vault.

A limited number of single gene mutations are known to cause single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) (FGFR3 [3, 4], TWIST1 [4, 5], EFNB1 [6] and TCF12 [7]), but they are most often associated with syndromic features. Mutations in more than 60 genes have been described in syndromic forms of craniosynostosis [8]. These genes and their related pathways give us insight into the molecular functions that may be involved in its etiology. Given this information, and the known recurrence rate of SSC, we propose that many instances of SSC are caused by dysregulation of a combination of genetic pathways.

Several genes have emerged as potential polygenic candidates through our RNA microarray and expression analysis, genomic sequencing, phosphorylation studies, and biomechanical assays. We first performed targeted candidate gene sequencing on 186 patients with SSC and identified rare sequence variants in IGF1R that were overrepresented in an SSC case population [9]. Structural and functional analysis of these IGF1R variants suggested that they cause activation of the IGF1 pathway [9, 10], which is well known to be involved in osteogenesis. IGF1/IGFR1 signaling promotes osteogenic differentiation of calvarial osteoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells inducing expression of COL1A2, ALP, and RUNX2, and matrix mineralization [11–14]. Taken together, these data suggest that activation of the IGF1 pathway may predispose to the development of craniosynostosis.

Concurrently, our lab used correlation analysis of osteoblast transcriptomes from 199 human cases (including the 186 from the targeted sequencing project) and 50 controls to detect distinct patterns of gene expression that were associated with craniosynostosis [15, 16]. Two subpopulations emerged that were unique to cases and distinct from one another [10]. Comparison of these subtypes to existing expression profiles available through the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) identified that the expression patterns from our experiments were correlated with datasets specifically related to osteoblast mineralization [17]. Phosphorylation analysis of cell lines from these two subgroups, as well as cell lines with presumed gain-of-function IGF1R variants [10], demonstrated distinct activating phosphorylation patterns of the IRS1-mediated Akt pathway [15]. This activation of the Akt pathway lead to phosphorylation of GSK3β (Ser9), targeting it for degradation and resulting in disinhibition of RUNX2 and β-catenin [18], known positive regulators of osteoblast differentiation. The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is a critical part of a complex network regulating bone development [19]. Although not well studied in membranous bone development, the Akt pathway is important in mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis [20], osteoblast proliferation and differentiation [21], and chondrogenesis [22].

Subsequent biomechanical assays measuring contractility and migration were performed on primary SSC osteoblasts with and without elevated IGF1 expression. These experiments revealed increased contractility and decreased migration in cells with elevated levels of IGF1, supporting our previous results suggesting that enhanced differentiation is correlated with this subset of SSC cases [23]. The identification of Akt pathway activation, cellular phenotypes consistent with enhanced differentiation in SSC osteoblasts demonstrating increased IGF1 expression, and gain-of-function mutations in IGF1R made the IGF1/IGF1R pathway an obvious choice for further examination.

Using the same patient cohort, we performed copy number variant analysis and identified a duplication of RUNX2 in two cases with familial metopic SSC and hypodontia [24]. This observation has now been validated by other groups reporting increased dosage of RUNX2 in families with craniosynostosis [25]. In addition to being a known positive regulator of osteoblast differentiation [26, 27], RUNX2 is known to be inhibited by TWIST1 [28, 29]. Mutations in TWIST1 cause Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, a hereditary form of craniosynostosis [30, 31], however, we have shown that disinhibition of RUNX2 caused by mutations in the highly conserved TWIST1 twist-box domain is associated with non-syndromic unilateral coronal and sagittal craniosynostosis [5].

In this manuscript we present data from mouse cross-breeding experiments designed to explore possible polygenic inheritance of craniosynostosis using Twist1/Igf1 and Twist1/Gsk3β compound heterozygotes to test hypotheses generated from our previous human expression data. These mouse models demonstrate an increased frequency and severity of craniosynostosis and support the hypothesis that combined dysregulation of the TWIST1 and IGF1 pathways could contribute to an increase risk in humans.

Methods

Ethics statement

This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seattle Children’s Hospital (approval number 12394). Written informed consent from parents or guardians of children with SSC was obtained and a consent waiver was obtained for the use of anonymous control samples. See reference [9].

Calvarial tissue sample collection

Post-surgical calvarial bone samples which would have otherwise been discarded were collected from 211 cases and 50 controls between the years of 2002 and 2006. Computed Tomography confirmed the diagnosis of isolated sagittal, metopic, or unilateral coronal synostosis in each case. All cases were screened for the presence of major medical conditions such as syndromic craniosynostosis, cardiac defects, seizure disorders, cerebral palsy, health conditions requiring surgical intervention, presence of three or more minor extra-cranial malformations; or presence of any other major malformations. No individuals with these conditions were enrolled. Control samples were obtained from patients undergoing a craniotomy for reasons other than craniosynostosis (e.g. brain tumor, hydrocephalus, etc.) or autopsies. Control samples were not obtained from individuals with disorders that affect bone such as skeletal dysplasias. Tissue samples were collected in Waymouth’s Media (WM) (10% FBS, 2% Corning Antibiotic Antimycotic Solution 100X, Corning, NY) and sent to the lab for processing.

Osteoblast growth

Calvarial tissue was rinsed in WM and the surrounding soft tissue was removed. Using a sterile scalpel blade, the tissue was cut into 1-2mm pieces and 2 pieces per well were cultured in 12-well plates at 37°C, 5% CO₂, and 99% humidity. Upon confluence, cells were washed with PBS, trypsinized with 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA (GE Hyclone, Logan, UT), and passaged into T75 flasks. Confluent cells were cryogenically stored in freezing media containing 90% FBS and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide in a liquid nitrogen freezer. As previously descried, alkaline phosphatase activity was used to assure osteoblast lineage and all samples demonstrated high ALP activity [32].

RNA extraction

Cell lines were cultured to sub-confluence in T25 flasks and passaged to a density of 175,000 cells per 25cm². At 75% confluence, cells were trypsinized, washed in cold 1X PBS, and RNA was isolated using the Roche High Pure miRNA Isolation Kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Initial thawing of the cells for this process was done in batches, and batch effect was considered during expression analysis. RNA integrity was assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and only samples with a RIN score of >8.0 were used for further analysis.

cDNA microarray and expression analysis

cDNA microarray assays were performed on 261 calvarial tissue samples (211 cases and 50 controls) using Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST array technology. See full methods in reference [15].

All microarray data are MIAME compliant and the raw dataset has been deposited in the MIAME compliant Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession number GSE27976 [17]. For the purposes of this study, transcript expression analysis was restricted to 399 transcripts (S1 Table) chosen a priori based on their role in bone development and osteoblast differentiation. Transcript expression levels were assessed visually by applying conditional formatting to expression level values for each gene and analyzed by paired t-test.

Mouse husbandry, genotyping, and phenotyping

All mouse work was approved by Seattle Children’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and complies with NIH Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Commercially available mouse lines Igf1^(+/tg)/Igf1^(tg/tg) (transgenic overexpression of Igf1), Gsk3β^(+/-) (hemizygous knockout of Gsk3β), and Twist1^(+/-) (loss-of-function point mutation in Twist1 “twist-box” domain) from Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME were bred to congenicity on a C57BL/6J background with a minimum of 9 backcross generations (≥99.5% identity). See official Jackson Laboratory nomenclature (S2 Table). Compound heterozygous mice were generated from crossing these three strains to one another (Table 1). The genotype of each mouse was determined by PCR for Gsk3β^(+/-) and Igf1^(+/tg), and by Sanger sequencing for Twist1^(+/-). Primers are listed in S3 Table. Phenotyping for polydactyly was used to determine Twist1 heterozygosity once congenicity was established as it is a fully penetrant trait [33]. Homozygous Twist1 and Gsk3β mice are known to be embryonic lethal and thus were maintained as heterozygotes [34, 35]. Gsk3β^(+/-) mice have been shown to have significantly lower Gsk3β expression than their wildtype counterparts [36] Igf1 mice were maintained as both homozygotes and heterozygotes. Mouse IGF1 ELISA Kit (Abcam, ab100695, Cambridge, MA) was used to validate overexpression of IGF1 in the serum of IGF1 transgenic animals (reported by Wu, et al [37]). Random sampling of 4 transgenic and control mice revealed a greater than 3-fold increase in expression of IGF1 (20.6±3.8 vs. 6.0±2.3 pg/ml, respectively). Because neither the twist-box point mutation nor the disinhibition of RUNX2 can be quatified by protein or RNA expression, we inferred the effect of the Twist1 missense mutation on RUNX2 by observation of the polydactyly phenotype in Twist1^(+/-). mice. Litters of interest were sacrificed at P28 by CO₂ euthanasia and prepared for microCT scanning.

Download:

Table 1. Genotypes of mouse crosses performed and subsequent pups of interest.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221402.t001

MicroCT scanning and image rendering

A Skyscan 1076 micro Computed Tomography (microCT) scanner was used to render high-quality 3-dimensional CT images of skulls from P28 mice with our genotypes of interest. Scans were performed at a maximum of 35um slice thickness and with the following parameters; 55Kv, 179uA, 0.5mm aluminum filter, 360 ms exposure, rotation step of 0.7°, 180° scan, and 3 frame averaging. CT scans were reconstructed using NRecon software (Micro Photonics, Allentown, PA) and rendered in Drishti Volume Exploration and Presentation Tool [38] (Open Access, Australian Capital Territory) with consistent editing parameters. Images were processed to isolate the skull cap from the rest of the skull to improve suture visualization in 3D. Phenotyping was conducted blindly as to genotype and scored as unaffected or unilateral or bilateral fusion of the coronal suture. Though metopic, coronal, sagittal, and lambdoid sutures were all analyzed, craniosynostosis was only observed in the coronal sutures. In this study, we considered bilateral synostosis to be a more severe phenotype than unilateral synostosis. We also observed a subtype of fusion we call “bridging,” defined as a small segment of fusion resembling a bridge across the otherwise patent suture. Although we do not take this into consideration with regard to severity of the disease in our mice, we make note of this phenotype in S1 Fig.

Statistical analysis

Expression analysis.

A paired t-test assuming equal variance was performed to compare the expression levels of each gene between the 23 highest IGF1 expressing cases and both the remaining 188 cases and the 50 unaffected controls.

Mouse phenotype proportion analysis.

Statistical analysis was performed using a chi-squared test for comparison of proportions. Percent of expected affected for each compound heterozygous genotype was calculated by the sum of observed affected in each component genotype. Proportions were then compared using an n of 17 for the comparison of Igf1^(+/tg) and Twist1^(+/-) to Twist1^(+/-)/Igf1^(+/tg) and an n of 18 for the comparison of Gsk3β^(+/-) and Twist1^(+/-) to Twist1^(+/-)/Gsk3β^(+/-).

Results

cDNA microarray and expression analysis

Our initial data review identified a striking association between IGF1 expression and many of the 399 candidate genes chosen a priori due to their role in osteogenesis and bone development. Comparison of the expression levels of our candidate genes in the 23 cases with the highest levels of IGF1 expression (High IGF1 Cases) and both the 50 unaffected controls (Fig 1A) and the remaining 188 cases (affected controls; Fig 1B) revealed strong correlations between IGF1 expression and many of our candidate genes. The expression of 161 transcripts was significantly different between the High IGF1 Case subset and unaffected controls and the expression of 173 transcripts was significantly different between the High IGF1 Case subset and the affected controls. These data reveal that cases with increased IGF1 expression demonstrate a pattern of osteoblast gene expression not found in control osteoblasts or cases with lower IGF1 expression (S1 Table). Notably, we identified that expression of RUNX2, a transcription factor critical for osteogenesis, was correlated with IGF1 expression and was significantly different between High IGF1 cases and unaffected controls (p-value = 8.61x10-4) as well as affected controls (p-value = 1.42x10-5).

Download:

Fig 1. Heat map representation of RNA expression of genes involved with bone biology.

The candidate genes of interest depicted in this heat map have a statistically significant difference in expression between (A) 23 cases with the highest IGF1 expression levels and unaffected controls and (B) 23 cases with the highest IGF1 expression levels and 188 remaining cases (affected controls). Affected controls represent SSC cases with lower IGF1 expression. IGF1 expression is shown in the far-left column (arrow) and sorted high to low. The expression of each transcript is represented with conditional formatting with green indicating highest and red representing lowest expression among individuals. Candidate gene expression is ordered left to right by the ratio of the mean expression value of the top 23 (high IGF1 cases) to the mean of unaffected controls (A) and affected control cases (B). See S1 Table for the complete gene list and statistical significance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221402.g001

MicroCT phenotyping

We analyzed 3D-rendered CT images of congenic, postnatal day 28 (P28) C57BL/6J mice with the following single-variant genotypes; Gsk3β^(+/-), Twist1^(+/-), Igf1^(+/tg), Igf1^(tg/tg), and with the following compound- heterozygous variant genotypes; Gsk3β^(+/-)/Twist1^(+/-), Twist1^(+/-)/Igf1^(+/tg), and Gsk3β^(+/-)/Igf1^(+/tg) (Table 2, S1 Fig). Due to technical factors or postnatal death, 9 mice were scanned at days other than P28 (see S1 Fig). We observed no instances of suture fusion in Igf1^(+/tg), Igf1^(tg/tg), or wildtype mice. Fifteen percent of Gsk3β^(+/-) mice had suture fusion, one of which had increased biparietal diameter suggestive of hydrocephalus. One Gsk3β^(+/-) mouse without suture fusion also had increased biparietal diameter. Based on the suture morphology we suspect that this mouse had bilateral coronal suture fusion that was disrupted due to pressure from brain growth and concomitant hydrocephalus. This animal was classified as not having craniosynostosis (S1 Fig). Thirty-five percent of Twist1 ^(+/-) mice had suture fusion.

Download:

Table 2. Phenotypes of each mouse strain and heterozygous cross.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221402.t002

The instance of suture fusion increased from 35% in Twist1 ^(+/-) and 15% in Gsk3β^(+/-) to 94% in Twist1^(+/-)/Gsk3β^(+/-), a significance of p = 0.0038 (accounting for the additive effect of these disease-causing genotypes). Of note, inclusion of the mouse with suspected craniosynostosis in our analysis did not change the interpretation of our results (p = 0.0121). There was no significant increase in the severity of craniosynostosis when comparing these groups. The incidence of fusion was not significantly increased in Twist1^(+/-)/Igf1^(+/tg) as compared to Twist1 ^(+/-) mice, but the severity (bilateral) increased from 6% of Twist1 ^(+/-) to 29% of Twist1^(+/-)/Igf1^(+/tg) (p = 0.0766) (Figs 2 and 3).

Download:

Fig 2. MicroCT images of representative P28 skulls.

(A) wildtype C57BL/6J mouse with normal calvarial suture pattern, (B) Twist1^(+/-) mouse with right coronal craniosynostosis, (C) Twist1 ^(+/-)/Gsk3β^(+/-) mouse with partial bilateral coronal craniosynostosis, and (D) Twist1^(+/-)/Igf1^(+/tg) mouse with right coronal craniosynostosis. Sutures are labelled as follows: M (metopic or interfrontal), C (coronal), S (sagittal), and L (lambdoid). Arrows designate areas of premature suture fusion.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221402.g002

Download:

Fig 3. Percentage of mice with craniosynostosis by genotype.

Mice that harbored mutations in both Twist1 ^(+/-) and Gsk3β^(+/-) showed a significant increase in rate of craniosynostosis as compared to the expected additive outcome of Twist1 ^(+/-) and Gsk3β^(+/-) independently (based on their individual rates of craniosynostosis). Mice that harbored mutations in both Twist1 ^(+/-) and Igf1^(+/tg) showed a near-significant increase in instances of bilateral craniosynostosis as compared to the expected additive outcome of bilateral craniosynostosis in Twist1 ^(+/-) and Igf1^(+/tg) (or Igf1^(tg/tg)) independently.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221402.g003

We observed a disproportionally lower number of mice with the Gsk3β^(+/-)/Igf1^(+/tg) genotype than predicted by Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (~10% as compared to the expected 25%), suggesting the possibility of prenatal lethality of this genotype. While none of the Gsk3β^(+/-)/Igf1^(+/tg) mice that survived to P28 showed suture fusion, the reduced number of offspring with this genotype precludes our ability to define the true craniosynostosis rate.

Discussion

While there have been great advances in our understanding of the molecular genetic causes of syndromic craniosynostosis, the etiology of most cases of the more common single suture synostoses remains unknown. Its low recurrence rate suggests multifactorial, polygenic, or oligogenic inheritance. In this study, we describe compound heterozygous mutant mice with genetically altered expression of Igf1 and Gsk3β and disinhibition of Runx2, that result in a significantly increased rate or severity of craniosynostosis when compared to mice with each genotype in isolation.

Our mouse models were based on human expression data demonstrating a positive correlation between IGF1 and RUNX2 expression in a subgroup of osteoblasts derived from clinical cases of SSC. The IGF1/IGF1R pathway is critical for normal bone growth and density [39] and has been implicated in the etiology of craniosynostosis [9, 10]. IGF1 signaling through IGF1R activates the Akt pathway, inhibits GSK3β, and results in disinhibition of β-catenin and RUNX2, promoting osteogenesis [40–42]. GSK3β is known to attenuate RUNX2 transcriptional activity though phosphorylation (Ser369, Ser373, Ser377) and Twist1 inhibits RUNX2 function through protein-protein intearction at the twist-box. Thus, our mouse models Igf1^(+/tg), Twist1^(+/-), and Gsk3β^(+/-) converge to reduce inhibition and increase the transcriptional activity of Runx2. The mouse models selected for our work mimicked activation of the Akt pathway and selective disinhibition of RUNX2 to determine the additive effects of pathway dysregulation (Fig 4.) [18, 41, 43, 44].

Download:

Fig 4. Schematic representation of intersection of pathways of interest.

(Left Panel) In the absence of IGF1/IGF1R binding, the Akt pathway is inactive and GSK3β Ser9 is unphosphorylated resulting in inhibition of RUNX2 (through phosphorylation of S369, S373, S377) and β-catenin. In parallel, TWIST1 suppresses RUNX2 function via direct interaction of RUNX2 with the twist-box domain of TWIST1. (Right Panel) In our experimental system we tested the hypothesis that dysregulation of both the TWIST1/RUNX2 and IGF1/Akt pathways would result in an increased incidence of craniosynostosis. This schematic demonstrates our hypothesis that the combination of a twist-box mutation of Twist1 and activation of the IGF1/AKT pathway would result in activation of osteogenic transcripts and manifest as craniosynostosis. The pathways shown are derived from previously described data [19, 41, 43, 44].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221402.g004

The Twist1^(+/-) mouse is known to harbor a point mutation in the twist-box resulting in selective disinhibition of RUNX2 leading to coronal synostosis of variable penetrance and expressivity. This was validated in our study demonstrating that 35% of Twist1^(+/-) mice developed coronal synostosis.

While none of the Igf1^(+/tg) or Igf1^(tg/tg) transgenic mice developed craniosynostosis, 23% of the Gsk3β^(+/-) mice displayed craniosynostosis and/or presumed hydrocephalus, a previously undescribed phenotype with incomplete penetrance. With this unexpected result, we reviewed recent sequence data from our cohort and identified a missense mutation (c.T185C:p.I62T) in a single case of sagittal synostosis. This variant has not been identified in more than 250,000 alleles sequenced [45, 46], resides in both an ATP binding domain and the catalytic domain of the Serine/Threonine Kinase, and is conserved in all vertebrates including zebrafish. This finding not only supports the role of GSK3β in polygenic inheritance but suggests that isolated missense mutations may cause craniosynostosis. An additional trend that we observed is an exaggerated bifurcation of the interfrontal suture in Twist1^(+/-)/Gsk3β^(+/-) compound heterozygous mice. While is is known that C57B/6J mice naturally present with an “interfrontal bone” [47] and thus bifurcated interfrontal sutures, we see that our compound heterozygotes have noticeably more defined and obtuse bifurcation. The significance of this observation is unknown.

Compound heterozygous Twist1^(+/-)/Gsk3β^(+/-) had a significantly higher frequency of craniosynostosis than predicted by the additive effects of each mutation alone (increasing from 35% in Twist1^(+/-) and 15% in Gsk3β^(+/-) to 94% in Twist1^(+/-)/Gsk3β^(+/-) compound heterozygotes). Furthermore, there was a near significant increase in the rate of bilateral coronal synostosis in Twist1^(+/-)/Igf1^(+/tg) compound heterozygotes when compared to the rate in the parental strains.

These data suggest that a functional interaction between the TWIST1/RUNX2 and IGF1 pathways is integral to normal calvarial development. We have provided data supporting that combined dysregulation of these pathways result in the first example of polygenic inheritance of craniosynostosis in an animal model. While our data suggest that dysregulation of the TWIST1/RUNX2 and IGF1/Akt pathways may predispose humans to craniosynostosis, further translational research is necessary before the development of clinical utility.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. MicroCT images of all mice included in this study.

The phenotype of 91 mice was classified in this study. Each skull image is designated by genotype and pattern of suture fusion (U) Unilateral craniosynostosis, (Ub) Unilateral craniosynostosis with “bridging” phenotype, (B) Bilateral craniosynostosis, or (Bb) Bilateral craniosynostosis with “bridging” phenotype. (*) Irregular and wide suture margins and wide biparietal diameter of this mouse suggests the possibility bilateral coronal suture fusion that was disrupted due to concomitant hydrocephalus. This animal was classified as not having craniosynostosis. (**) Mouse died at P23 with potential hydrocephalus based on increased bi-parietal diameter. Postnatal age at the time of sacrifice is noted if other than P28.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221402.s001

(PDF)

S1 Table. Genes with significantly altered expression in cases with high IGF1 expression.

Alpha list of 399 genes of interest chosen a priori for their role in osteoblast development and bone biology. (§) indicates significant difference in expression levels between 23 cases with the highest levels of IGF1 expression and 50 unaffected controls. (¥) indicates significant difference in expression levels between 23 cases with the highest levels of IGF1 expression and 188 affected control cases (e.g. cases with craniosynostosis with low IGF1 expression). (↑) indicates a the gene is positively correlated with IGF1 and (↓) indicates that a gene is inversely correlated with IGF1 for the group(s) it is significant in.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221402.s002

(PDF)

S2 Table. Official mouse strain names and abbreviations used in manuscript.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221402.s003

(PDF)

S3 Table. Primers used to genotype each mouse strain.

Primer sequences for Igf1 and Gsk3β sourced from Jackson Laboratories genotyping protocols (jax.org). Primers spanning Twist1 Ser192Pro designed in-house.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221402.s004

(PDF)

References

1. Lajeunie E, Le Merrer M, Bonaiti-Pellie C, Marchac D, Renier D. Genetic study of scaphocephaly. Am J Med Genet. 1996;62(3):282–5. pmid:8882788
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Greenwood J, Flodman P, Osann K, Boyadjiev SA, Kimonis V. Familial incidence and associated symptoms in a population of individuals with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Genet Med. 2014;16(4):302–10. pmid:24071792
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Gripp KW, McDonald-McGinn DM, Gaudenz K, Whitaker LA, Bartlett SP, Glat PM, et al. Identification of a genetic cause for isolated unilateral coronal synostosis: a unique mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. J Pediatr. 1998;132(4):714–6. pmid:9580776
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Mulliken JB, Gripp KW, Stolle CA, Steinberger D, Muller U. Molecular analysis of patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal synostosis). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(7):1899–909. pmid:15253176
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Seto ML, Hing AV, Chang J, Hu M, Kapp-Simon KA, Patel PK, et al. Isolated sagittal and coronal craniosynostosis associated with TWIST box mutations. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A(7):678–86. pmid:17343269
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Lee E, Le T, Zhu Y, Elakis G, Turner A, Lo W, et al. A craniosynostosis massively parallel sequencing panel study in 309 Australian and New Zealand patients: findings and recommendations. Genet Med. 2018;20(9):1061–8. pmid:29215649
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. di Rocco F, Baujat G, Arnaud E, Renier D, Laplanche JL, Daire VC, et al. Clinical spectrum and outcomes in families with coronal synostosis and TCF12 mutations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(12):1413–6. pmid:24736737
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Clarke CM, Fok VT, Gustafson JA, Smyth MD, Timms AE, Frazar CD, et al. Single suture craniosynostosis: Identification of rare variants in genes associated with syndromic forms. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176(2):290–300. pmid:29168297
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Cunningham ML, Horst JA, Rieder MJ, Hing AV, Stanaway IB, Park SS, et al. IGF1R variants associated with isolated single suture craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A(1):91–7. pmid:21204214
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Stamper BD, Mecham B, Park SS, Wilkerson H, Farin FM, Beyer RP, et al. Transcriptome correlation analysis identifies two unique craniosynostosis subtypes associated with IRS1 activation. Physiol Genomics. 2012;44(23):1154–63. pmid:23073384
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Guo Y, Tang CY, Man XF, Tang HN, Tang J, Zhou CL, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 promotes osteogenic differentiation and collagen I alpha 2 synthesis via induction of mRNA-binding protein LARP6 expression. Dev Growth Differ. 2017;59(2):94–103. pmid:28211947
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Chen L, Zou X, Zhang RX, Pi CJ, Wu N, Yin LJ, et al. IGF1 potentiates BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells through the enhancement of BMP/Smad signaling. BMB Rep. 2016;49(2):122–7. pmid:26645636
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Wang T, Wang Y, Menendez A, Fong C, Babey M, Tahimic CG, et al. Osteoblast-Specific Loss of IGF1R Signaling Results in Impaired Endochondral Bone Formation During Fracture Healing. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(9):1572–84. pmid:25801198
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Xue P, Wu X, Zhou L, Ma H, Wang Y, Liu Y, et al. IGF1 promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from rat bone marrow by increasing TAZ expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;433(2):226–31. pmid:23473758
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Stamper BD, Park SS, Beyer RP, Bammler TK, Farin FM, Mecham B, et al. Differential expression of extracellular matrix-mediated pathways in single-suture craniosynostosis. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26557. pmid:22028906
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository:GSE27976. Nucleic Acids Res.30(1):207–10.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 41(Database issue):D991–5. pmid:23193258
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Kugimiya F, Kawaguchi H, Ohba S, Kawamura N, Hirata M, Chikuda H, et al. GSK-3beta controls osteogenesis through regulating Runx2 activity. PLoS One. 2007;2(9):e837. pmid:17786208
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. McGonnell IM, Grigoriadis AE, Lam EW, Price JS, Sunters A. A specific role for phosphoinositide 3-kinase and AKT in osteoblasts? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2012;3:88.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Baker N, Sohn J, Tuan RS. Promotion of human mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis by PI3-kinase/Akt signaling, and the influence of caveolin-1/cholesterol homeostasis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:238. pmid:26626726
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Xi JC, Zang HY, Guo LX, Xue HB, Liu XD, Bai YB, et al. The PI3K/AKT cell signaling pathway is involved in regulation of osteoporosis. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2015;35(6):640–5. pmid:26390889
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Kita K, Kimura T, Nakamura N, Yoshikawa H, Nakano T. PI3K/Akt signaling as a key regulatory pathway for chondrocyte terminal differentiation. Genes Cells. 2008;13(8):839–50. pmid:18782222
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Al-Rekabi Z, Wheeler MM, Leonard A, Fura AM, Juhlin I, Frazar C, et al. Activation of the IGF1 pathway mediates changes in cellular contractility and motility in single-suture craniosynostosis. J Cell Sci. 2016;129(3):483–91. pmid:26659664
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Mefford HC, Shafer N, Antonacci F, Tsai JM, Park SS, Hing AV, et al. Copy number variation analysis in single-suture craniosynostosis: multiple rare variants including RUNX2 duplication in two cousins with metopic craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A(9):2203–10. pmid:20683987
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Varvagiannis K, Stefanidou A, Gyftodimou Y, Lord H, Williams L, Sarri C, et al. Pure de novo partial trisomy 6p in a girl with craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A(2):343–51. pmid:23307468
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Komori T. Runx2, an inducer of osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;149(4):313–23. pmid:29356961
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Komori T. Requisite roles of Runx2 and Cbfb in skeletal development. J Bone Miner Metab. 2003;21(4):193–7. pmid:12811622
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Kronenberg HM. Twist genes regulate Runx2 and bone formation. Dev Cell. 2004;6(3):317–8. pmid:15030754
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Komaki M, Karakida T, Abe M, Oida S, Mimori K, Iwasaki K, et al. Twist negatively regulates osteoblastic differentiation in human periodontal ligament cells. J Cell Biochem. 2007;100(2):303–14. pmid:16888803
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. el Ghouzzi V, Le Merrer M, Perrin-Schmitt F, Lajeunie E, Benit P, Renier D, et al. Mutations of the TWIST gene in the Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;15(1):42–6. pmid:8988167
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Howard TD, Paznekas WA, Green ED, Chiang LC, Ma N, Ortiz de Luna RI, et al. Mutations in TWIST, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, in Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;15(1):36–41. pmid:8988166
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Park SS, Beyer RP, Smyth MD, Clarke CM, Timms AE, Bammler TK, et al. Osteoblast differentiation profiles define sex specific gene expression patterns in craniosynostosis. Bone. 2015;76:169–76. pmid:25753363
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Browning VL, Chaudhry SS, Planchart A, Dixon MJ, Schimenti JC. Mutations of the mouse Twist and sy (fibrillin 2) genes induced by chemical mutagenesis of ES cells. Genomics. 2001;73(3):291–8. pmid:11350121
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Bult CJ, Blake JA, Smith CL, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Mouse Genome Database G. Mouse Genome Database (MGD) 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;http://www.informatics.jax.org/marker/MGI:98872
35. Gao X, Wang JY, Gao LM, Yin XF, Liu L. Identification and analysis of glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta1 interactome. Cell Biol Int. 2013;37(8):768–79. pmid:23505128
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Georgy SR, Cangkrama M, Srivastava S, Partridge D, Auden A, Dworkin S, et al. Identification of a Novel Proto-oncogenic Network in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(9).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Wu Y, Sun H, Yakar S, LeRoith D. Elevated levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I in serum rescue the severe growth retardation of IGF-I null mice. Endocrinology. 2009;150(9):4395–403. pmid:19497975
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. National Computational Infrastructure [http://sf.anu.edu.au/Vizlab/drishti/index.shtml.
39. Yakar S, Rosen CJ, Beamer WG, Ackert-Bicknell CL, Wu Y, Liu JL, et al. Circulating levels of IGF-1 directly regulate bone growth and density. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(6):771–81. pmid:12235108
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Desbois-Mouthon C, Cadoret A, Blivet-Van Eggelpoel MJ, Bertrand F, Cherqui G, Perret C, et al. Insulin and IGF-1 stimulate the beta-catenin pathway through two signalling cascades involving GSK-3beta inhibition and Ras activation. Oncogene. 2001;20(2):252–9. pmid:11313952
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Wang L, Shao YY, Ballock RT. Thyroid hormone-mediated growth and differentiation of growth plate chondrocytes involves IGF-1 modulation of beta-catenin signaling. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(5):1138–46. pmid:20200966
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Xian L, Wu X, Pang L, Lou M, Rosen CJ, Qiu T, et al. Matrix IGF-1 maintains bone mass by activation of mTOR in mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Med. 2012;18(7):1095–101. pmid:22729283
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Gaur T, Lengner CJ, Hovhannisyan H, Bhat RA, Bodine PV, Komm BS, et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(39):33132–40. pmid:16043491
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Bialek P, Kern B, Yang X, Schrock M, Sosic D, Hong N, et al. A twist code determines the onset of osteoblast differentiation. Dev Cell. 2004;6(3):423–35. pmid:15030764
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, Samocha KE, Banks E, Fennell T, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536(7616):285–91. pmid:27535533
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/.
47. Zimmerman H, Yin Z, Zou F, Everett ET. Interfrontal Bone Among Inbred Strains of Mice and QTL Mapping. Front Genet. 2019;10:291. pmid:31001328
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Lajeunie E, Le Merrer M, Bonaiti-Pellie C, Marchac D, Renier D. Genetic study of scaphocephaly. Am J Med Genet. 1996;62(3):282–5. pmid:8882788
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Greenwood J, Flodman P, Osann K, Boyadjiev SA, Kimonis V. Familial incidence and associated symptoms in a population of individuals with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Genet Med. 2014;16(4):302–10. pmid:24071792
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Gripp KW, McDonald-McGinn DM, Gaudenz K, Whitaker LA, Bartlett SP, Glat PM, et al. Identification of a genetic cause for isolated unilateral coronal synostosis: a unique mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. J Pediatr. 1998;132(4):714–6. pmid:9580776
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Mulliken JB, Gripp KW, Stolle CA, Steinberger D, Muller U. Molecular analysis of patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal synostosis). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(7):1899–909. pmid:15253176
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Seto ML, Hing AV, Chang J, Hu M, Kapp-Simon KA, Patel PK, et al. Isolated sagittal and coronal craniosynostosis associated with TWIST box mutations. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A(7):678–86. pmid:17343269
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Lee E, Le T, Zhu Y, Elakis G, Turner A, Lo W, et al. A craniosynostosis massively parallel sequencing panel study in 309 Australian and New Zealand patients: findings and recommendations. Genet Med. 2018;20(9):1061–8. pmid:29215649
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. di Rocco F, Baujat G, Arnaud E, Renier D, Laplanche JL, Daire VC, et al. Clinical spectrum and outcomes in families with coronal synostosis and TCF12 mutations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(12):1413–6. pmid:24736737
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Clarke CM, Fok VT, Gustafson JA, Smyth MD, Timms AE, Frazar CD, et al. Single suture craniosynostosis: Identification of rare variants in genes associated with syndromic forms. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176(2):290–300. pmid:29168297
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Cunningham ML, Horst JA, Rieder MJ, Hing AV, Stanaway IB, Park SS, et al. IGF1R variants associated with isolated single suture craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A(1):91–7. pmid:21204214
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Stamper BD, Mecham B, Park SS, Wilkerson H, Farin FM, Beyer RP, et al. Transcriptome correlation analysis identifies two unique craniosynostosis subtypes associated with IRS1 activation. Physiol Genomics. 2012;44(23):1154–63. pmid:23073384
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Guo Y, Tang CY, Man XF, Tang HN, Tang J, Zhou CL, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 promotes osteogenic differentiation and collagen I alpha 2 synthesis via induction of mRNA-binding protein LARP6 expression. Dev Growth Differ. 2017;59(2):94–103. pmid:28211947
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Chen L, Zou X, Zhang RX, Pi CJ, Wu N, Yin LJ, et al. IGF1 potentiates BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells through the enhancement of BMP/Smad signaling. BMB Rep. 2016;49(2):122–7. pmid:26645636
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Wang T, Wang Y, Menendez A, Fong C, Babey M, Tahimic CG, et al. Osteoblast-Specific Loss of IGF1R Signaling Results in Impaired Endochondral Bone Formation During Fracture Healing. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(9):1572–84. pmid:25801198
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Xue P, Wu X, Zhou L, Ma H, Wang Y, Liu Y, et al. IGF1 promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from rat bone marrow by increasing TAZ expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;433(2):226–31. pmid:23473758
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Stamper BD, Park SS, Beyer RP, Bammler TK, Farin FM, Mecham B, et al. Differential expression of extracellular matrix-mediated pathways in single-suture craniosynostosis. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26557. pmid:22028906
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository:GSE27976. Nucleic Acids Res.30(1):207–10.
View Article
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 41(Database issue):D991–5. pmid:23193258
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Kugimiya F, Kawaguchi H, Ohba S, Kawamura N, Hirata M, Chikuda H, et al. GSK-3beta controls osteogenesis through regulating Runx2 activity. PLoS One. 2007;2(9):e837. pmid:17786208
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. McGonnell IM, Grigoriadis AE, Lam EW, Price JS, Sunters A. A specific role for phosphoinositide 3-kinase and AKT in osteoblasts? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2012;3:88.
View Article
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Baker N, Sohn J, Tuan RS. Promotion of human mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis by PI3-kinase/Akt signaling, and the influence of caveolin-1/cholesterol homeostasis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:238. pmid:26626726
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] PubMed/NCBI

[78] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Xi JC, Zang HY, Guo LX, Xue HB, Liu XD, Bai YB, et al. The PI3K/AKT cell signaling pathway is involved in regulation of osteoporosis. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2015;35(6):640–5. pmid:26390889
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] PubMed/NCBI

[82] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Kita K, Kimura T, Nakamura N, Yoshikawa H, Nakano T. PI3K/Akt signaling as a key regulatory pathway for chondrocyte terminal differentiation. Genes Cells. 2008;13(8):839–50. pmid:18782222
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] PubMed/NCBI

[86] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Al-Rekabi Z, Wheeler MM, Leonard A, Fura AM, Juhlin I, Frazar C, et al. Activation of the IGF1 pathway mediates changes in cellular contractility and motility in single-suture craniosynostosis. J Cell Sci. 2016;129(3):483–91. pmid:26659664
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] PubMed/NCBI

[90] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Mefford HC, Shafer N, Antonacci F, Tsai JM, Park SS, Hing AV, et al. Copy number variation analysis in single-suture craniosynostosis: multiple rare variants including RUNX2 duplication in two cousins with metopic craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A(9):2203–10. pmid:20683987
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] PubMed/NCBI

[94] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Varvagiannis K, Stefanidou A, Gyftodimou Y, Lord H, Williams L, Sarri C, et al. Pure de novo partial trisomy 6p in a girl with craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A(2):343–51. pmid:23307468
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Komori T. Runx2, an inducer of osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;149(4):313–23. pmid:29356961
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Komori T. Requisite roles of Runx2 and Cbfb in skeletal development. J Bone Miner Metab. 2003;21(4):193–7. pmid:12811622
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Kronenberg HM. Twist genes regulate Runx2 and bone formation. Dev Cell. 2004;6(3):317–8. pmid:15030754
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Komaki M, Karakida T, Abe M, Oida S, Mimori K, Iwasaki K, et al. Twist negatively regulates osteoblastic differentiation in human periodontal ligament cells. J Cell Biochem. 2007;100(2):303–14. pmid:16888803
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. el Ghouzzi V, Le Merrer M, Perrin-Schmitt F, Lajeunie E, Benit P, Renier D, et al. Mutations of the TWIST gene in the Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;15(1):42–6. pmid:8988167
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Howard TD, Paznekas WA, Green ED, Chiang LC, Ma N, Ortiz de Luna RI, et al. Mutations in TWIST, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, in Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;15(1):36–41. pmid:8988166
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Park SS, Beyer RP, Smyth MD, Clarke CM, Timms AE, Bammler TK, et al. Osteoblast differentiation profiles define sex specific gene expression patterns in craniosynostosis. Bone. 2015;76:169–76. pmid:25753363
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Browning VL, Chaudhry SS, Planchart A, Dixon MJ, Schimenti JC. Mutations of the mouse Twist and sy (fibrillin 2) genes induced by chemical mutagenesis of ES cells. Genomics. 2001;73(3):291–8. pmid:11350121
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Bult CJ, Blake JA, Smith CL, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Mouse Genome Database G. Mouse Genome Database (MGD) 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;http://www.informatics.jax.org/marker/MGI:98872

[ref35] 35. Gao X, Wang JY, Gao LM, Yin XF, Liu L. Identification and analysis of glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta1 interactome. Cell Biol Int. 2013;37(8):768–79. pmid:23505128
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] PubMed/NCBI

[135] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Georgy SR, Cangkrama M, Srivastava S, Partridge D, Auden A, Dworkin S, et al. Identification of a Novel Proto-oncogenic Network in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(9).
View Article
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Wu Y, Sun H, Yakar S, LeRoith D. Elevated levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I in serum rescue the severe growth retardation of IGF-I null mice. Endocrinology. 2009;150(9):4395–403. pmid:19497975
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. National Computational Infrastructure [http://sf.anu.edu.au/Vizlab/drishti/index.shtml.

[ref39] 39. Yakar S, Rosen CJ, Beamer WG, Ackert-Bicknell CL, Wu Y, Liu JL, et al. Circulating levels of IGF-1 directly regulate bone growth and density. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(6):771–81. pmid:12235108
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Desbois-Mouthon C, Cadoret A, Blivet-Van Eggelpoel MJ, Bertrand F, Cherqui G, Perret C, et al. Insulin and IGF-1 stimulate the beta-catenin pathway through two signalling cascades involving GSK-3beta inhibition and Ras activation. Oncogene. 2001;20(2):252–9. pmid:11313952
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Wang L, Shao YY, Ballock RT. Thyroid hormone-mediated growth and differentiation of growth plate chondrocytes involves IGF-1 modulation of beta-catenin signaling. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(5):1138–46. pmid:20200966
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Xian L, Wu X, Pang L, Lou M, Rosen CJ, Qiu T, et al. Matrix IGF-1 maintains bone mass by activation of mTOR in mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Med. 2012;18(7):1095–101. pmid:22729283
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] PubMed/NCBI

[159] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Gaur T, Lengner CJ, Hovhannisyan H, Bhat RA, Bodine PV, Komm BS, et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(39):33132–40. pmid:16043491
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[161] View Article

[162] PubMed/NCBI

[163] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Bialek P, Kern B, Yang X, Schrock M, Sosic D, Hong N, et al. A twist code determines the onset of osteoblast differentiation. Dev Cell. 2004;6(3):423–35. pmid:15030764
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] PubMed/NCBI

[167] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, Samocha KE, Banks E, Fennell T, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536(7616):285–91. pmid:27535533
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] PubMed/NCBI

[171] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/.

[ref47] 47. Zimmerman H, Yin Z, Zou F, Everett ET. Interfrontal Bone Among Inbred Strains of Mice and QTL Mapping. Front Genet. 2019;10:291. pmid:31001328
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Ethics statement

Calvarial tissue sample collection

Osteoblast growth

RNA extraction

cDNA microarray and expression analysis

Mouse husbandry, genotyping, and phenotyping

MicroCT scanning and image rendering

Statistical analysis

Expression analysis.

Mouse phenotype proportion analysis.

Results

cDNA microarray and expression analysis

MicroCT phenotyping

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. MicroCT images of all mice included in this study.

S1 Table. Genes with significantly altered expression in cases with high IGF1 expression.

S2 Table. Official mouse strain names and abbreviations used in manuscript.

S3 Table. Primers used to genotype each mouse strain.

References