Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A lineage-specific rapid diagnostic test (Chagas Sero K-SeT) identifies Brazilian Trypanosoma cruzi II/V/VI reservoir hosts among diverse mammalian orders

  • Mairi C. W. McClean,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

  • Tapan Bhattacharyya ,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    tapan.bhattacharyya@lshtm.ac.uk

    Affiliation Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

  • Pascal Mertens,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Coris BioConcept, Gembloux, Belgium

  • Niamh Murphy,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

  • Quentin Gilleman,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Coris BioConcept, Gembloux, Belgium

  • Yves Gustin,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Coris BioConcept, Gembloux, Belgium

  • Nicolas Zeippen,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Coris BioConcept, Gembloux, Belgium

  • Samanta C. C. Xavier,

    Roles Data curation, Resources

    Affiliation Laboratory of Trypanosomatid Biology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Ana M. Jansen,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratory of Trypanosomatid Biology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Michael A. Miles

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

Correction

2 Apr 2020: McClean MCW, Bhattacharyya T, Mertens P, Murphy N, Gilleman Q, et al. (2020) Correction: A lineage-specific rapid diagnostic test (Chagas Sero K-SeT) identifies Brazilian Trypanosoma cruzi II/V/VI reservoir hosts among diverse mammalian orders. PLOS ONE 15(4): e0231566. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231566 View correction

Abstract

Trypanosoma cruzi, the protozoan agent of Chagas disease in the Americas, is comprised of six genetic lineages (TcI-TcVI) and a possible seventh (TcBat, related to TcI). Identification of T. cruzi lineages infecting reservoir mammalian species is fundamental to resolving transmission cycles. However, this is hindered by the limited sensitivity and technical complexity of parasite isolation and genotyping. An alternative approach is serology using T. cruzi lineage-specific epitopes, such as those of the trypomastigote small surface antigen (TSSA). For surveillance of T. cruzi lineage infections in mammal species from diverse Brazilian regions, we apply a novel rapid diagnostic test (RDT, Chagas Sero K-SeT), which incorporates the TSSA peptide epitope specific to TcII/V/VI (TSSApep-II/V/VI) and Protein G detection of antibodies. Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT results with sera from experimentally infected mice, from tamarin primates (Leontopithecus spp.) and from canines (Canis familiaris) were concordant with corresponding TSSApep-II/V/VI ELISAs. The Chagas Sero K-Set detected TcII/V/VI infections in Leontopithecus spp. from the Atlantic forest (n = 46), in C. familiaris (n = 16) and Thrichomys laurentius (n = 2) from Caatinga biome and Chiroptera (n = 1) from Acre, Amazonia. The Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT is directly applicable to TcII/V/VI-specific serological surveillance of T. cruzi infection in several different mammalian Orders. It can replace ELISAs and provides efficient, point-of-sampling, low-cost detection of TcII/V/VI infections, with at least equivalent sensitivity, although some mammals may be difficult to trap, and, not unexpectedly, Chagas Sero K-SeT could not recognise feline IgG. Knowledge of sylvatic hosts of T. cruzi can be expanded, new reservoir species discovered, and the ecology of transmission cycles clarified, particularly with adaptation to further mammalian Orders.

Introduction

The protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi is the etiological agent of Chagas disease, infecting 6–7 million people (https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chagas-disease-(american-trypanosomiasis). Vector-borne transmission occurs via contamination of mucous membranes or abraded skin with faeces of triatomine bugs. Other transmission mechanisms include oral ingestion of triatomine contaminated food, trans-placentally, and by blood/organ donation. The initial acute phase can be fatal, particularly in infants and immunosuppressed patients. Without successful chemotherapy T. cruzi infection is usually life-long; during this chronic phase around 30% of those infected progress to chagasic cardiomyopathy, some of whom develop gastrointestinal megasyndromes [14].

T. cruzi is zoonotic, carried by more than 100 mammal species and 40 species of triatomine insect vectors [5]. The range of infected vectors and mammalian hosts in the Americas is from the USA in the North to southern Argentina and northern Chile. The species T. cruzi is divided into the six intra-species lineages (discrete typing units, DTUs) TcI–TcVI [6], with a seventh proposed (TcBat, related to TcI) [7]. Of particular interest is greater understanding of the cryptic natural sylvatic cycles of TcII and the hybrid lineages TcV and TcVI [8], which are associated with severe chagasic cardiomyopathy and megasyndromes in the Southern Cone countries of South America, especially in Bolivia. Historically, active transmission of TcII was common in Brazilian domestic transmission cycles. However, the cases of Chagas disease in the Brazilian Amazon basin are due predominantly to TcI, and also less frequently to TcIV and TcIII. The elucidation of the sylvatic distribution of T. cruzi lineages in Brazil has been subject to extensive research [9, 10], the TcI, TcIII and TcIV lineages are widely distributed in Brazilian mammals and biomes [11], tamarins Leontopithecus spp. [12] and dogs [13, 14] have been implicated by isolate genotyping as natural hosts of TcII/V/VI.

Identification of infecting T. cruzi lineage(s) by direct genotyping may be biased due to sequestration in host tissues or selection in culture, potentially in a lineage-dependent manner. This may lead to incomplete interpretation of the distribution of T. cruzi lineages in mammals. Of the many commercial in-house and rapid serological tests for human and animal T. cruzi infections, none is designed to identify T. cruzi lineage(s). The mucin Trypomastigote Small Surface Antigen (TSSA), expressed on the vertebrate bloodstream trypomastigote form, is the only T. cruzi antigen so far shown to be applicable to lineage-specific serology [15, 16]. The amino acid cores of TSSA from TcI, TcIII, and TcIV each have their own lineage-specific sequence. The TcII sequence is shared with TcV and TcVI, which have a second TcV/TcVI haplotype, and are hybrids of TcII and TcIII. Antigens based on the TSSA isoform common to TcII/V/VI have been applied to serology (ELISA) of naturally infected animals of two mammalian Orders. Cimino et al [17] used an E. coli-produced recombinant protein with dog sera from northern Argentina. Kerr et al [18] used a synthetic peptide epitope, TSSApep-II/V/VI, with Brazilian primates, confirming that Leontopithecus rosalia (golden lion tamarin) and Leontopithecus chrysomelas (golden lion-headed tamarin) may act as reservoir hosts of lineages TcII/V/VI.

An obstacle to expanding this lineage-specific serology to a wider range of mammalian Orders, and thus to resolving ecological cycles and reservoir distribution, is the availability of suitable secondary species-specific antibody conjugates. An alternative approach is to utilise conjugates linked to Protein G, produced naturally by group C and G streptococci, which binds the Fc region of a range of mammalian IgGs. We recently developed a TSSApep-II/V/VI-specific lateral flow immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic test (RDT) called Chagas Sero K-SeT, which incorporates Protein G conjugate, and demonstrated its efficacy with sera from Bolivian Chagas disease patients [19], and with Argentine sympatric humans and dogs [20].

Here, we apply Chagas Sero K-SeT to sera from experimental murine infections, and to rapid serological surveillance for TcII/V/VI infections among a range of mammalian Orders and biomes in Brazil.

Materials and methods

Ethics approval

Production of mouse sera adhered to the European 3Rs policy of Refinement, Reduction and Replacement (99/167/EG: Council decision of 25/1/99), took place in authorised animal facilities by licensed staff in agreement with the European Directive 86/609/EEC, and with review and approvals under UK Home office regulations [Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986; project licence number 70/6997 to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine]. All Brazilian samples were obtained following the guidelines of the Animal Ethics Committee (CEUA) of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute/FIOCRUZ and all procedures followed protocols approved by the FIOCRUZ Committee of Bioethics (license LW 81/12).

Origins of animal sera

Experimental infections.

Mus musculus (strain CD1) were inoculated with 106 organisms from stationary phase cultures containing infective metacyclic trypomastigotes of known biological clones of T. cruzi representing the lineages TcII (MHOM/BR/00/Y), TcIII (MDAS/PY/00/Arma18) and TcIV (MAOT/BO/00/10R26). Serum was collected at approximately 10 months post-inoculation, and serology for infection was detected using T. cruzi lysate as described below in section ‘Experimental murine sera’

Naturally infected mammals.

Sera were archived samples collected in Brazil from naturally infected mammals as part of the ongoing field research programmes of author AMJ and collaborators. Collection sites encompass a range of geographical locations, mammalian Orders, species and biomes, as shown in Fig 1, map derived from www.simplemappr.net [21].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Map of Brazil showing origins of mammalian serum samples.

States and biomes from which Chagas Sero K-SeT positive samples were identified are shown in orange; states from which no positive samples were identified are shown in grey. Abbreviations: AC, Acre; BA, Bahia; CE, Ceará; MA, Maranhão; MS, Mato Grosso do Sul; PI, Piauí; RJ, Rio de Janeiro; RN, Rio Grande do Norte; TO, Tocantins.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227828.g001

TSSA lineage-specific peptides

Synthetic peptides TSSApep-II/V/VI, TSSApep-III, TSSApep-IV, and TSSApep-V/VI, representing the specific TSSA epitopes of T. cruzi lineages, identified from strains described in [16], were synthesised, with N-terminal biotinylation (Table 1); details of TSSApep-II/V/VI antigenicity have been described previously [22, 23]. The indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) was applied to all naturally- infected serum samples.

thumbnail
Table 1. Trypanosoma cruzi lineage-specific peptides (TSSApep) used in serology.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227828.t001

Lineage-specific TSSApep ELISA

Replica assays were performed simultaneously in duplicate plates. TSSA peptide (TSSApep) ELISAs were performed with the four lineage-specific peptides shown in Table 1. Mean values of optical density (OD) were calculated from the duplicate plates; cut-off values were mean negative serum values + 3 SD, with at least two reference negatives in every ELISA plate. Positive/negative controls for each sylvatic mammal type were used according to the results of previous serology by immunofluorescence.

Experimental murine sera.

96-well flat bottomed plates (735–0465: Immulon 4HBX, VWR, UK) were coated with 1 μg/100 μL/well of avidin (A9275: Sigma-Adlrich, UK) diluted in coating buffer (15 mM Na2CO3, 34 mM NaHCO3, pH 9.6) for capture of biotinylated lineage-specific peptide (Table 1). As positive controls, separate wells were coated with lysate of T. cruzi TcII (IINF/PY/00/Chaco23) at 0.2 μg/100 μL/well. Plates were covered with an adhesive sheet (676001: Greiner Bio-one, UK) and incubated overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed x 3 with PBS/0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 20 (P7949: Sigma-Aldrich) (PBS/T) and blocked with 200 μL blocking buffer (PBS/2% skimmed milk powder, Premier International Foods, UK) for 2 h at 37°C. TSSApep at 1 μg/100 μL/well in PBS/T containing 2% skimmed milk powder (PBS/T/M) was added to the avidin-coated wells, for 1 h at 37°C. After washing (x 3), 100 μL/well of a 1:100 dilution of serum in PBS/T/M was added, for 1 h at 37°C. After washing (x 6), 100 μL/well of Peroxidase-AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) antibody (polyclonal; Jackson Immunoresearch, USA; Cat. no. 115-035-003, Lot no. 45266; Antibody Registry AB_10015289) diluted 1:5000 in PBS/T/M was added, for 1 h at 37°C. After washing (x 6), plates were developed with substrate comprised of 100 μL/well of 50 mM phosphate/citrate buffer (pH 5.0) containing 2 mM o-phenylenediamine HCl (OPD; P1526: Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.009% (vol/vol) H2O2 (216763: Sigma-Aldrich), and plates developed in the dark at room temperature for 10 minutes. Substrate reactions were stopped by addition of 2M H2SO4 (50 μL/well), and absorbance read at 490 nm.

Primate sera.

ELISA plates were coated, blocked, and received TSSApep as described in Table 1 as described above. Thereafter, 100 μL/well of a 1:200 dilution of primate serum in PBS/T/M was applied, for 1 h at 37°C. Following washing (x 6), 100 μL/well of goat anti-human IgG-peroxidase (polyclonal; Sigma-Aldrich, USA; Cat. no. A0170; Antibody Registry AB_257868) diluted 1:5000 in PBS/T/M was added, for 1 h at 37°C. After washing (x 6), plates were developed with 100 μL/well of 3,3’,5,5’-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB; Bio-Manguinhos, Fiocruz, Brazil) in the dark at room temperature. After stopping the reaction, absorbances were read at 450 nm.

Canine sera.

ELISA plates were coated directly with 1 μg/100 μL/well TSSApep in coating buffer overnight, without avidin, because we observed that some dog sera bound non-specifically to avidin. After washing and blocking steps as described above, 100 μL/well of 1:200 dilution of canine serum in PBS/T/M was added and incubated, for 1 h at 37°C. After washing (x 6), 100 μL/well of 1:10 000 dilution of Peroxidase-AffiniPure Rabbit Anti-Dog IgG (H+L) antibody (polyclonal; Jackson Immunoresearch, USA; Cat. no. 304-035-003, Lot no. 105408; Antibody Registry AB_2339344) was added, for 1 h at 37°C. ELISA development was by Biomanghuinos TMB as described above, or alternatively by TMB ELISA substrate (ab171523: Abcam, UK). The dilutions of sera and peroxidase-conjugated antibody were previously optimised by titration.

Feline sera.

ELISA plates were coated, blocked, and received TSSApep as described for murine sera. Thereafter, 100 μL/well of a 1:100 dilution of feline serum in PBS/T/M was applied, for 1 h at 37°C. After washing (x 6), 100 μL/well of rabbit anti-cat Ig-HRP (horse radish peroxidase, polyclonal; Sigma-Aldrich, UK; Cat. no. SAB3700080, Lot no. RI21730) diluted 1: 10 000 was added. Development was by OPD or TMB.

Other mammalian sera.

Coating, blocking, addition of TSSApep and of 1:100 dilutions of sera were as described for canine samples. IgG was assayed with the following conjugates according to type of mammal: for armadillo, 1:1000 dilution of Protein G-HRP (P8170; Sigma-Aldrich, UK); for opossum, 1:5000 dilution of goat anti-opossum IgG (H+L)-HRP conjugate (polyclonal; Alpha Diagnostic International, USA; Cat. no. 30815-HP); for coati, 1:5000 dilution of goat anti-raccoon IgG-HRP (polyclonal; Bethyl Laboratories, USA; Cat. no. A140-123P; Antibody Register AB_1966121); for bat, 1:5000 dilution of goat-anti bat IgG (H+L)-HRP (polyclonal; Bethyl Laboratories, USA; Cat. no. A140-118P; Antibody Register AB_309475).

Comparison of Protein A and Protein G peroxidase conjugates.

In comparative pilot assays, Protein A-HRP (Southern Biotech, USA: Cat. no. 7300–05) and Protein G- HRP (Fisher Scientific, UK; Cat. no. 11899150) were used at 1:1000 dilution in ELISA with sera from armadillos, cats, rodents and dogs. In these assays, TSSApep-II/V/VI (directly coated) and lysate were used separately as antigens. Reactions were developed with OPD.

Chagas Sero K-SeT rapid diagnostic test (RDT)

This novel, low cost, lateral flow immunochromatographic rapid test was developed with Coris BioConcept, and employs TSSApep-II/V/VI as the coated antigen, and colloidal gold-labelled Protein G as the detection molecule for specific IgG, as previously described [19, 20]. Following application of the serum sample on the sample zone (wide green line, Fig 2) then buffer in the buffer window, reactions were considered positive if at 15 minutes incubation a band was observed at the antigen line, in conjunction with an integral test validation line.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Concordance of TSSApep ELISA and Chagas Sero K-Set across mammalian Orders.

Representative samples from experimental T. cruzi murine infections and natural infections of Thrichomys laurentius (Rodentia: Echimyidae), Canis familiaris (Carnivora: Canidae) and Leontopithecus chrysomelas (Primata: Callitrichidae). For primate samples, Kappa test = 0.84, 95% confidence intervals (0.64–1.00). Sample Lc4 was T. cruzi seronegative. The T. laurentius sample shown here did not have a corresponding ELISA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227828.g002

Statistical analysis

Significance of concordance between RDT results and ELISA (Kappa test) was calculated using GraphPad (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA).

Results

Lineage-specific TSSApep ELISA

TSSApep ELISA for experimental murine, and naturally infected primate, dog and cat are described below in relation to the Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT. TSSApep ELISA data could not be obtained using the available conjugated secondary antibodies for other mammals, whether mammal-specific (bat, opossum, coati) or Protein G conjugates (armadillo).

Concordance of lineage-specific ELISA and Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT.

Fig 2 shows representative examples of results with sera from experimental murine infections, and natural infections of rodents (Thrichomys laurentius), canines (Canis familiaris) and primates (Leontopithecus chrysomelas), assayed by both TSSApep ELISA and Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT.

In experimental murine infections and natural infections of Primata (Callitrichidae) and Carnivora (Canidae), TSSApep-II/V/VI ELISA and Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT results were concordant; P < 0.0001 for primates, for which most data were available (Table 2). Three of the primates TcII seropositive by ELISA were also TcV/VI ELISA positive, indicating TcV/VI infection or both TcII and TcV/VI infection. In agreement with previous ELISAs [24], serum from experimental murine infection with TcII was Chagas Sero K-SeT positive, whereas serum from TcIII and TcIV infections were negative by this RDT (Fig 2). Thus, not only did these two lineage-specific assays perform equally well, the colloidal gold-labelled Protein G in Chagas Sero K-SeT had the capacity to recognise specific IgG in diverse mammalian Orders (Rodentia, Carnivora, Primata).

thumbnail
Table 2. Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT serological surveillance for TcII/V/VI natural infections among Brazilian mammal species.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227828.t002

Prevalence of TcII/V/VI infections detected by Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT

Among the primates, the Chagas Sero K-SeT showed that 19 of 68 (29%) L. rosalia in Rio de Janeiro State and 27 of 35 (77%) of L. chrysomelas in the northern Brazilian State of Bahia were seropositive, indicating a high prevalence of TcII/V/VI infections, for which the natural hosts were previously poorly known. For L. rosalia and L. chrysomelas, 8 and 23 of the same samples, respectively, were previously tested by TSSApep ELISA [18]. In all but one case the Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT result accorded with the ELISAs; the non-matching case was positive by the RDT but negative by ELISA; Kappa test = 0.84 (95% confidence intervals: 0.64–1.00) (S1 Appendix).

Among the dogs, 16 of 57 (28%) of C. familiaris from the Caatinga biome of Ceará State were seropositive by Chagas Sero K-SeT.

One bat (Phyllostomus elongatus) of 19 examined (Phyllostomus, Artibeus, Carollia), and two Thrichomys laurentius (Fig 2) from the Caatinga biome in Piauí State were Chagas Sero K-SeT seropositive and thus carried a TcII and/or TcV/VI infection (Table 2).

ELISA using the anti-cat IgG secondary antibody detected two TSSApep-II/V/VI seropositive cats. Chagas Sero K-SeT detected no infections in felines.

Of other mammals, for which no corresponding ELISA data were available, Chagas Sero K-SeT found no TcII/V/VI infections in: coati (Nasua nasua, 29), crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous, 19), maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus, 4); opossum (Didelphis and Philander, 13), or armadillo whether Euphractus (48) or Dasypus sp. (1) (Table 2).

The Protein G used in Chagas Sero K-SeT did recognise nearly a quarter or the dogs tested by this RDT; the Protein G-HRP used in ELISA failed to recognise dog IgG. The Protein A- HRP accorded with the result with specific anti-cat secondary antibody, and also recognised anti-T. cruzi lysate IgG in two armadillos.

Discussion

Recent publications have reviewed the complexities relating to Chagas disease and T. cruzi molecular epidemiology [3, 25]. Regarding the latter point, the application of serology based on lineage-specific antigens has great potential for resolving the cryptic ecological cycles and the discovery of novel reservoir hosts of this parasite. Applications of T. cruzi lineage–specific serology to naturally-infected animals are with dogs [17, 26], primates [18] and sympatric dogs, cats, and armadillo [20]. We have applied Chagas Sero K-SeT to exploit the capacity of Protein G to recognise TSSApep-II/V/VI specific IgG from a range of mammalian Orders. Previous reports of RDTs for T. cruzi serology of animal reservoirs have used InBios Trypanosoma cruzi-Detect-Canine [27] or Chagas StatPak [28], with no lineage-specific diagnosis. We demonstrate the versatility of the Chagas Sero K-SeT to recognise TSSApep-II/V/VI specific IgG in experimental murine T. cruzi infections, and in natural infections across several Orders of Brazilian mammals, namely Primata, Carnivora (canine), Rodentia and Chiroptera.

The Chagas Sero K-SeT with Leontopithecus spp. sera demonstrated the capacity of this RDT for lineage-specific serology of primates, previously achieved only with ELISA using conjugated anti-human IgG [18]. Previous reports [29, 30] hypothesised that primates could be reservoir hosts of TcII; however, searches for TcII infections in Brazilian Amazonian primates only yielded TcI and TcIV. Our results confirm the high prevalence of TcII/V/VI infections in Brazilian Leontopithecus primates in the Atlantic Forest region of eastern Brazil, not in the Amazonian forest [29, 30]. Beyond Brazil, TcII was recently isolated by xenodiagnosis of a free-living capuchin (Sapajus cay) from eastern Paraguay [31], and T. cruzi genotypes compatible with TcII, TcV and TcVI were reported in howler monkeys (Alouatta caraya) in northern Argentina [32]. The occurrence of these lineages in non-contiguous areas of South America and their broad range of host genera suggest that the primate ecological cycles of these lineages are far from fully elucidated.

Rocha et al [13] genotyped TcII from Brazilian dogs, as single or mixed TcI-TcII infections in Minas Gerais State, southern Brazil. Previous reports [17, 26] have used a recombinant E. coli-produced TSSA fusion protein from CL Brener strain (TcVI; a clone from parental strain CL) in ELISA with naturally infected dogs from northern Argentina; however, the recombinant included sequences that are shared with other lineages. Chagas Sero K-SeT identified TcII/V/VI infections in dogs from Ceará state, in north-eastern Brazil, a region previously known to be highly endemic for TcII in domestic transmission cycles, although intradomiciliary transmission of T. cruzi has now been controlled. However, Lima et al [14] also reported TcII/V/VI and TcV/VI respectively in two dogs from Pará state, north of the Amazon Basin.

Domestic cats, which can acquire infection by eating triatomines or infected mice, are hosts of T. cruzi, as known from the early discovery of Chagas disease [33, 34], and Rocha et al [13] reported TcI from a wild ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) in Minas Gerais State. The two feline samples TSSApep-II/V/VI seropositive by ELISA were negative by Chagas Sero K-SeT as expected, because Protein G does not bind feline IgG [35]. We found here that Protein A could recognise feline IgG, and its further application for serological surveillance is warranted.

Regarding rodents, we show that the TSSApep-II/V/VI ELISA with anti-mouse IgG can be replaced by Chagas Sero K-SeT with Protein G. Thrichomys laurentius is a sylvatic host of T. cruzi [36, 37] in Ceará state, northeast Brazil. The TSSApep-II/V/VI seropositives identified here by Chagas Sero K-SeT were from the neighbouring state of Piauí. Similarly, a single bat specimen was positive by Chagas Sero K-Set; T. cruzi lineages have been reported from Brazilian bats, by genotyping [38, 39].

Armadillos, especially D. novemcinctus, have been reported as natural hosts of TcIII throughout South America [11, 40, 41], thus the absence of TcII/V/VI infections from all 49 armadillos was not surprising. Although Chagas Sero K-SeT was shown to be able to detect infection in armadillo [20], positive test line intensity was weak; Protein A may be more appropriate than Protein G for binding of armadillo IgG, as others have reported [42], and which we observed here. No armadillo-specific conjugate was available for ELISA; this also encourages further deployment of Protein A for these important reservoirs hosts. Opossums have been identified as common hosts of TcI but rarely reported as hosts of TcII [11, 43].

Diagnosis of T. cruzi infection has not hitherto been lineage-specific. The search for a TcI-specific antigen applicable to animals and humans remains an important current research goal, and may elucidate the reported differences in serological and immune responses in regions endemic for different lineages [4446].

As recently described [9, 10], the association of T. cruzi lineages with hosts, biomes or habitats is complex and not fixed. Infecting lineage composition may fluctuate within mammalian populations over time if there is varying exposure and transmission efficiency. Mixed infections, such as TcI and TcII, may occur in single mammals, and are not currently detectable by lineage-specific serology; nevertheless, due to sustained infection antibodies to TcII should not be lost. The Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT described here does not make redundant T. cruzi genotyping, or advanced analytical techniques such as flow cytometry [47]; however, by detecting lineage-specific host IgG, it can provide epidemiological information when direct parasite genotyping is hampered or subject to confounding biases.

Conclusion

The biological and geographical range of mammals from which specific anti-TSSApep-II/V/VI IgG has been identified by Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT demonstrates its great potential in identifying novel reservoir hosts and elucidating ecological cycles of lineage transmission. We have shown here that this rapid, easy to use and interpret, Protein G-based RDT can replace ELISA in T. cruzi TSSApep-II/V/VI lineage-specific serology of a range of mammalian Orders; it does not require isolation, culture or direct genotyping of parasites, nor is it subject to confounders of those approaches. The combined use of Protein A and Protein G (or Protein A/G) as detection molecules for IgG may increase further the range of mammalian Orders to which lineage-specific serology can be applied.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Primate data used for Kappa analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227828.s001

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Nunes MCP, Beaton A, Acquatella H, Bern C, Bolger AF, Echeverria LE, et al. Chagas Cardiomyopathy: An Update of Current Clinical Knowledge and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;138(12):e169–e209. pmid:30354432.
  2. 2. Perez-Molina JA, Molina I. Chagas disease. Lancet. 2018;391(10115):82–94. pmid:28673423.
  3. 3. Zingales B. Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity: Something new for something known about Chagas disease manifestations, serodiagnosis and drug sensitivity. Acta Trop. 2018;184:38–52. pmid:28941731.
  4. 4. Prata A. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of Chagas disease. Lancet Infectious Dis. 2001;1(2):92–100.
  5. 5. Breniere SF, Waleckx E, Barnabe C. Over Six Thousand Trypanosoma cruzi Strains Classified into Discrete Typing Units (DTUs): Attempt at an Inventory. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(8):e0004792. pmid:27571035
  6. 6. Zingales B, Andrade SG, Briones MR, Campbell DA, Chiari E, Fernandes O, et al. A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: second revision meeting recommends TcI to TcVI. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(7):1051–4. pmid:20027478.
  7. 7. Lima L, Espinosa-Alvarez O, Ortiz PA, Trejo-Varon JA, Carranza JC, Pinto CM, et al. Genetic diversity of Trypanosoma cruzi in bats, and multilocus phylogenetic and phylogeographical analyses supporting Tcbat as an independent DTU (discrete typing unit). Acta Trop. 2015;151:166–77. pmid:26200788.
  8. 8. Lewis MD, Llewellyn MS, Yeo M, Acosta N, Gaunt MW, Miles MA. Recent, independent and anthropogenic origins of Trypanosoma cruzi hybrids. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(10):e1363. pmid:22022633.
  9. 9. Jansen AM, Xavier SC, Roque AL. The multiple and complex and changeable scenarios of the Trypanosoma cruzi transmission cycle in the sylvatic environment. Acta Trop. 2015;151:1–15. pmid:26200785.
  10. 10. Jansen AM, Xavier S, Roque ALR. Trypanosoma cruzi transmission in the wild and its most important reservoir hosts in Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):502. pmid:30189896.
  11. 11. Barros JHS, Xavier SCC, Bilac D, Lima VS, Dario MA, Jansen AM. Identification of novel mammalian hosts and Brazilian biome geographic distribution of Trypanosoma cruzi TcIII and TcIV. Acta Trop. 2017;172:173–9. pmid:28499908.
  12. 12. Lisboa CV, Monteiro RV, Martins AF, Xavier SC, Lima Vdos S, Jansen AM. Infection with Trypanosoma cruzi TcII and TcI in free-ranging population of lion tamarins (Leontopithecus spp): an 11-year follow-up. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110(3):394–402. pmid:25946156.
  13. 13. Rocha FL, Roque AL, Arrais RC, Santos JP, Lima Vdos S, Xavier SC, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi TcI and TcII transmission among wild carnivores, small mammals and dogs in a conservation unit and surrounding areas, Brazil. Parasitology. 2013;140(2):160–70. pmid:23062278.
  14. 14. Lima Vdos S, Xavier SC, Maldonado IF, Roque AL, Vicente AC, Jansen AM. Expanding the knowledge of the geographic distribution of Trypanosoma cruzi TcII and TcV/TcVI genotypes in the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e116137. pmid:25551227
  15. 15. Di Noia JM, Buscaglia CA, De Marchi CR, Almeida IC, Frasch AC. A Trypanosoma cruzi small surface molecule provides the first immunological evidence that Chagas’ disease is due to a single parasite lineage. J Exp Med. 2002;195(4):401–13. pmid:11854354
  16. 16. Bhattacharyya T, Brooks J, Yeo M, Carrasco HJ, Lewis MD, Llewellyn MS, et al. Analysis of molecular diversity of the Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigote small surface antigen reveals novel epitopes, evidence of positive selection and potential implications for lineage-specific serology. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40(8):921–8. pmid:20097201.
  17. 17. Cimino RO, Rumi MM, Ragone P, Lauthier J, D’Amato AA, Quiroga IR, et al. Immuno-enzymatic evaluation of the recombinant TSSA-II protein of Trypanosoma cruzi in dogs and human sera: a tool for epidemiological studies. Parasitology. 2011;138(8):995–1002. pmid:21518468.
  18. 18. Kerr CL, Bhattacharyya T, Xavier SC, Barros JH, Lima VS, Jansen AM, et al. Lineage-specific serology confirms Brazilian Atlantic forest lion tamarins, Leontopithecus chrysomelas and Leontopithecus rosalia, as reservoir hosts of Trypanosoma cruzi II (TcII). Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):584. pmid:27846858
  19. 19. Bhattacharyya T, Messenger LA, Bern C, Mertens P, Gilleman Q, Zeippen N, et al. Severity of Chagasic Cardiomyopathy Is Associated With Response To A Novel Rapid Diagnostic Test For Trypanosoma cruzi TcII/V/VI. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. pmid:29438471.
  20. 20. Murphy N, Macchiaverna NP, Victoria Cardinal M, Bhattacharyya T, Mertens P, Zeippen N, et al. Lineage-specific rapid diagnostic tests can resolve Trypanosoma cruzi TcII/V/VI ecological and epidemiological associations in the Argentine Chaco. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(1):424. pmid:31522683
  21. 21. Shorthouse DP. SimpleMappr, an online tool to produce publication-quality point maps. [Retrieved from https://www.simplemappr.net. Accessed September 27, 2019]. 2010.
  22. 22. Bhattacharyya T, Falconar AK, Luquetti AO, Costales JA, Grijalva MJ, Lewis MD, et al. Development of peptide-based lineage-specific serology for chronic Chagas disease: geographical and clinical distribution of epitope recognition. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(5):e2892. pmid:24852444
  23. 23. Balouz V, Camara Mde L, Canepa GE, Carmona SJ, Volcovich R, Gonzalez N, et al. Mapping antigenic motifs in the trypomastigote small surface antigen from Trypanosoma cruzi. Clin Vaccine immunol. 2015;22(3):304–12. pmid:25589551
  24. 24. Bhattacharyya T, Mills EA, Jansen AM, Miles MA. Prospects for T. cruzi lineage-specific serological surveillance of wild mammals. Acta Trop. 2015;151:182–6. pmid:26116784.
  25. 25. Lidani KCF, Andrade FA, Bavia L, Damasceno FS, Beltrame MH, Messias-Reason IJ, et al. Chagas Disease: From Discovery to a Worldwide Health Problem. Front Public Health. 2019;7:166. pmid:31312626
  26. 26. Floridia-Yapur N, Vega-Benedetti AF, Rumi MM, Ragone P, Lauthier JJ, Tomasini N, et al. Evaluation of recombinant antigens of Trypanosoma cruzi to diagnose infection in naturally infected dogs from Chaco region, Argentina. Parasite immunol. 2014;36(12):694–9. pmid:25201522.
  27. 27. Enriquez GF, Cardinal MV, Orozco MM, Schijman AG, Gurtler RE. Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in naturally infected dogs and cats using serological, parasitological and molecular methods. Acta Trop. 2013;126(3):211–7. pmid:23499860
  28. 28. Curtis-Robles R, Snowden KF, Dominguez B, Dinges L, Rodgers S, Mays G, et al. Epidemiology and Molecular Typing of Trypanosoma cruzi in Naturally-Infected Hound Dogs and Associated Triatomine Vectors in Texas, USA. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(1):e0005298. pmid:28095511
  29. 29. Maia da Silva F, Naiff RD, Marcili A, Gordo M, D’Affonseca Neto JA, Naiff MF, et al. Infection rates and genotypes of Trypanosoma rangeli and T. cruzi infecting free-ranging Saguinus bicolor (Callitrichidae), a critically endangered primate of the Amazon Rainforest. Acta Trop. 2008;107(2):168–73. pmid:18603222.
  30. 30. Marcili A, Valente VC, Valente SA, Junqueira AC, da Silva FM, Pinto AY, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi in Brazilian Amazonia: Lineages TCI and TCIIa in wild primates, Rhodnius spp. and in humans with Chagas disease associated with oral transmission. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39(5):615–23. pmid:19041313.
  31. 31. Acosta N, Miret J, Lopez E, Schinini A. First report of Sapajus cay naturally infected by Trypanosoma cruzi in San Pedro Department, Paraguay. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2016;25(3):327–32. pmid:27579529.
  32. 32. Martinez MF, Kowalewski MM, Salomon OD, Schijman AG. Molecular characterization of trypanosomatid infections in wild howler monkeys (Alouatta caraya) in northeastern Argentina. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2016;5(2):198–206. pmid:27617205
  33. 33. Chagas C. Nova tripanozomiaze humana. Estudos sobre a morfolojia e o ciclo evolutivo do Schizotrypanum cruzi n. gen., n. sp., ajente etiolojico de nova entidade morbida do homem. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1909;1:159.
  34. 34. Mott KE, Mota EA, Sherlock I, Hoff R, Muniz TM, Oliveira TS, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi infection in dogs and cats and household seroreactivity to T. cruzi in a rural community in northeast Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1978;27(6):1123–7. pmid:103446.
  35. 35. Adamczyk B, Tharmalingam-Jaikaran T, Schomberg M, Szekrenyes A, Kelly RM, Karlsson NG, et al. Comparison of separation techniques for the elucidation of IgG N-glycans pooled from healthy mammalian species. Carbohydr Res. 2014;389:174–85. pmid:24680513.
  36. 36. Roque AL, Xavier SC, da Rocha MG, Duarte AC, D’Andrea PS, Jansen AM. Trypanosoma cruzi transmission cycle among wild and domestic mammals in three areas of orally transmitted Chagas disease outbreaks. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79(5):742–9. pmid:18981516.
  37. 37. Lima MM, Sarquis O, de Oliveira TG, Gomes TF, Coutinho C, Daflon-Teixeira NF, et al. Investigation of Chagas disease in four periurban areas in northeastern Brazil: epidemiologic survey in man, vectors, non-human hosts and reservoirs. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2012;106(3):143–9. pmid:22136953.
  38. 38. da Costa AP, Nunes PH, Leite BHS, Ferreira J, Tonhosolo R, da Rosa AR, et al. Diversity of bats trypanosomes in hydroeletric area of Belo Monte in Brazilian Amazonia. Acta Trop. 2016;164:185–93. pmid:27633579.
  39. 39. Dos Santos FCB, Lisboa CV, Xavier SCC, Dario MA, Verde RS, Calouro AM, et al. Trypanosoma sp. diversity in Amazonian bats (Chiroptera; Mammalia) from Acre State, Brazil. Parasitology. 2017:1–10. pmid:29144219.
  40. 40. Yeo M, Acosta N, Llewellyn M, Sanchez H, Adamson S, Miles GA, et al. Origins of Chagas disease: Didelphis species are natural hosts of Trypanosoma cruzi I and armadillos hosts of Trypanosoma cruzi II, including hybrids. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35(2):225–33. pmid:15710443.
  41. 41. Llewellyn MS, Lewis MD, Acosta N, Yeo M, Carrasco HJ, Segovia M, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi IIc: phylogenetic and phylogeographic insights from sequence and microsatellite analysis and potential impact on emergent Chagas disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(9):e510. pmid:19721699
  42. 42. Duthie MS, Truman RW, Goto W, O’Donnell J, Hay MN, Spencer JS, et al. Insight toward early diagnosis of leprosy through analysis of the developing antibody responses of Mycobacterium leprae-infected armadillos. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011;18(2):254–9. pmid:21177914.
  43. 43. Herrera HM, Lisboa CV, Pinho AP, Olifiers N, Bianchi RC, Rocha FL, et al. The coati (Nasua nasua, Carnivora, Procyonidae) as a reservoir host for the main lineages of Trypanosoma cruzi in the Pantanal region, Brazil. Trans R SocTrop Med Hyg. 2008;102(11):1133–9. pmid:18541281.
  44. 44. Sosa-Estani S, Gamboa-Leon MR, Del Cid-Lemus J, Althabe F, Alger J, Almendares O, et al. Use of a rapid test on umbilical cord blood to screen for Trypanosoma cruzi infection in pregnant women in Argentina, Bolivia, Honduras, and Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79(5):755–9. pmid:18981518.
  45. 45. Verani JR, Seitz A, Gilman RH, LaFuente C, Galdos-Cardenas G, Kawai V, et al. Geographic variation in the sensitivity of recombinant antigen-based rapid tests for chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Am Journal Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80(3):410–5. pmid:19270291.
  46. 46. Martin DL, Marks M, Galdos-Cardenas G, Gilman RH, Goodhew B, Ferrufino L, et al. Regional variation in the correlation of antibody and T-cell responses to Trypanosoma cruzi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90(6):1074–81. pmid:24710614
  47. 47. Alessio GD, de Araujo FF, Sales PA Jr, Gomes MS, Amaral LRD, Pascoal Xavier MA, et al. Accomplishing the genotype-specific serodiagnosis of single and dual Trypanosoma cruzi infections by flow cytometry Chagas-Flow ATE-IgG2a. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(2):e0006140. pmid:29462135