https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3205-1836
Figures
Abstract
Background
The current worldwide pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has posed a serious threat to global public health, and the mortality rate of critical ill patients remains high. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that early predict the progression of COVID-19 from severe to critical illness.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with severe or critical ill COVID-19 who were consecutively admitted to the Zhongfaxincheng campus of Tongji Hospital (Wuhan, China) from February 8 to 18, 2020. Baseline variables, data at hospital admission and during hospital stay, as well as clinical outcomes were collected from electronic medical records system. The primary endpoint was the development of critical illness. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify independent factors that were associated with the progression from severe to critical illness.
Results
A total of 138 patients were included in the analysis; of them 119 were diagnosed as severe cases and 16 as critical ill cases at hospital admission. During hospital stay, 19 more severe cases progressed to critical illness. For all enrolled patients, longer duration from diagnosis to admission (odds ratio [OR] 1.108, 95% CI 1.022–1.202; P = 0.013), pulse oxygen saturation at admission <93% (OR 5.775, 95% CI 1.257–26.535; P = 0.024), higher neutrophil count (OR 1.495, 95% CI 1.177–1.899; P = 0.001) and higher creatine kinase-MB level at admission (OR 2.449, 95% CI 1.089–5.511; P = 0.030) were associated with a higher risk, whereas higher lymphocyte count at admission (OR 0.149, 95% CI 0.026–0.852; P = 0.032) was associated with a lower risk of critical illness development. For the subgroup of severe cases at hospital admission, the above factors except creatine kinase-MB level were also found to have similar correlation with critical illness development.
Citation: Li N, Kong H, Zheng X-Z, Li X-Y, Ma J, Zhang H, et al. (2020) Early predictive factors of progression from severe type to critical ill type in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 15(12): e0243195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243195
Editor: Raffaele Serra, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, ITALY
Received: October 20, 2020; Accepted: November 17, 2020; Published: December 2, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The current worldwide pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has posed a serious threat to global public health. As of October 14, 2020, nearly 40 million confirmed cases and more than 1 million deaths have been reported in over 2 hundred countries. In China, a nationwide study indicated the proportion of severe/critical cases was around 7–10% [1] and the mortality was about 4.1% according to the information released by the Chinese National Health Commission [2].
The severity of COVID-19 varies from mild, moderate, severe to critical ill types according to the Guideline for Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Infection (Trial Version 5) [3]. Patients with older age, chronic smoking, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cardiovascular disease) and cancer are at higher risk of poor prognosis and even death [4–8]. And mortality increases with the progression of severity. The study of Guan et al. [4] included 1,099 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from 552 hospitals in 31 provinces of China, and showed that the mortality rate of non-severe (mild and moderate type) and severe (severe and critical ill type) patients were 0.1% and 8.1%, respectively. Yang et al. [5] observed 52 critically ill COVID-19 patients, defined as requirement of mechanical ventilation or a fraction of inspired oxygen of 60% or more, and reported a mortality rate of 61.5%. Two case series from the United States also reported similar mortality rate of 50% and 67%, respectively, in critically ill COVID-19 patients [9,10].
At present, there are no specific drugs or vaccines for COVID-19; the mainstay of treatment is supportive care. Effective interventions that can slow down or prevent disease progression from non-severe to severe or from severe to critically ill are the key of saving life. Therefore, it is important to identify factors that can early predict the progression of COVID-19. In a previous study of Wu et al. [11], old age, comorbidities and late initiation of antiviral treatment were associated with higher risk of COVID-19 progression. However, few studies investigated the predictors of progression from severe to critical illness. In the clinical scenario, patients admitted to hospital with severe symptoms may progress to critical illness within a few days or hours, leaving limited time to deal with. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that early predict the progression of COVID-19 from severe to critical illness.
Materials and methods
Study design and participants
This retrospective cohort study involved patients who were consecutively admitted to the Zhongfaxincheng campus of Tongji Hospital (Wuhan, China) from February 8 to 18, 2020. This campus was designated for severe and critically ill patients and was taken over by a medical team from Peking University. The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China (2020 [077]) on March 13, 2020.
The inclusion criteria were: (1) age ≥18 years; (2) laboratory-confirmed COVID-19; and (3) severe or critically ill cases. The exclusion criteria were patients with missing data of primary endpoint, i.e., development of critical illness or not during hospital stay. Considering that the study was retrospective in nature and no follow-up was performed, the Ethics Committee agreed to waive written informed consent. Personal data of patients were kept strictly confidential. This manuscript adheres to the applicable STROBE guidelines.
Clinical management
All patients received nasopharyngeal swab sampling and were tested by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assays before admission. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed according to the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Infection [3] and the World Health Organization interim guidance [12]. At hospital admission, symptoms, comorbidities and pre-hospital treatments were obtained from self-report or by asking family members via telephone. Vital signs were recorded. Full blood count, biochemical tests, and coagulation assays were performed and evaluated for all patients.
As a routine practice, all severe patients were provided with oxygen therapy. For those whose pulse oxygen saturation was 93% or less while breathing ambient air and/or respiratory rate was 30 breaths per minute or higher, an initial oxygen therapy with a flow of 5 L/min was started. The flow of oxygen was adjusted and the oxygen delivery systems (nasal prong, oxygen mask, or non-rebreathing mask) were selected according to the severity of hypoxia. For patients who were given non-rebreathing mask with an oxygen flow of 10–15 L/min but still had a pulse oxygen saturation of 90% or less or a respiratory rate of 30 breaths per minute or higher, i.e., those with suspected severe acute hypoxic respiratory failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome, mechanical ventilation was initiated. Antiviral drugs therapy was provided according to physicians’ discretion. Antibiotics were added when bacterial infection was highly suspected or confirmed. Gamma globulin and glucocorticoids were administered in some critically ill cases.
Definition of severe and critically ill COVID-19
Severe and critically ill COVID-19 were diagnosed according to the 5th version Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Infection [3]. Severe COVID-19 was defined as having any of the following: (1) respiratory distress with respiratory rate ≥30 breaths per minute; (2) pulse oxygen saturation of ≤93% in resting-state; or (3) PaO2/FiO2 ≤300 mmHg. Critically ill COVID-19 was defined as severe cases having any of the following: (1) respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation; (2) shock; or (3) dysfunction of other organs.
Data collection
The data were extracted from electronic medical records and reviewed by a trained team of physicians. Demographics (age and sex), symptoms since onset, comorbidities, smoking history, time from onset to hospital admission, time from diagnosis to hospital admission, treatments before admission (antiviral treatment, antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, and gamma globulin), vital signs, laboratory tests at admission (full blood count, biochemical tests, coagulation assays), treatments after hospital admission (therapeutic medications and respiratory supports), and clinical outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was the development of critical illness, either at hospital admission or during hospital stay.
Statistical analysis
All enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to the development of critical illness. The normality of data was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Continuous variables were compared using the student’s t-test (normal distribution) or Mann–Whitney U-test (non-normal distribution). Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test.
Univariable logistic regression analyses were performed to screen factors that might be associated with the development critical illness. For factors with P ≤0.10, the presence of collinearity was determined using Pearson correlation test or Spearman correlation test; for those with collinearity or clinical relevance, only one parameter was included for further analysis. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify independent factors that were associated with the progression from severe type to critically ill type with Wald (backward) method. A P value of <0.05 (two-sided) was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software for Windows (version 22.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Patients
Between February 8 to 18, 2020, 138 patients with diagnosed COVID-19 were consecutively admitted. All patients met the inclusive/exclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Among the enrolled patients, 119 were diagnoses as severe cases and 16 as critically ill cases at hospital admission; during hospital stay, 19 more severe cases progressed to critical illness, resulting a total of 35 critically ill cases (Fig 1).
COVID-19, Coronavirus Disease 2019.
Of all enrolled patients, the mean age was 62 (SD 14) years, and 51.4% (71/138) were male. Symptoms that appeared in more than half of patients included fever (86.2%), cough (84.1%), dyspnea (66·7%), and expectoration (62.0%). The median time from symptom onset to hospital admission was 14 (interquartile range [IQR] 11–18) days. The median time from diagnosis to hospital admission was 8 (IQR 4–13) days. Before admission, 71.0% (98/138) of patients received antiviral drugs and 68.1% (94/138) received antibiotics (Table 1).
Baseline characteristics and variables at admission
Of all enrolled patients, when compared with severe cases without aggravation, those who developed critical illness were older, and received fewer antiviral drugs (especially arbidol) and antibiotics (especially fluoroquinolones) before admission (Table 1). At hospital admission, patients who developed critical illness had a faster respiratory rate, a greater proportion with pulse oxygen saturation <93%, higher white blood cell and neutrophil counts, but a lower lymphocyte count; regarding biochemical test results, they had higher serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, lactate dehydrogenase, myoglobin, hypersensitive cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase-MB, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, but a lower level of serum albumin; regarding coagulation, they had a longer prothrombin time and a higher D-dimer level (Table 2; S1 Table).
In the subgroup of severe cases at hospital admission, when compared with cases without aggravation, those who developed critical illness received fewer arbidol before admission (Table 1). At hospital admission, patients who developed critical illness had a faster respiratory rate, a greater proportion with pulse oxygen saturation <93%, higher white blood cell and neutrophil counts, but a lower lymphocyte count; regarding biochemical test results, they had higher serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, lactate dehydrogenase, myoglobin, hypersensitive cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase-MB, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; regarding coagulation, they had a longer prothrombin time, a longer activated partial thromboplastin time, and a higher D-dimer level (Table 2; S1 Table).
Treatments after admission and outcomes
Of all enrolled patients, when compared with severe cases without aggravation, those who developed critical illness received more antibiotics (especially fluoroquinolones), more glucocorticoids, more gamma globulin, and more noninvasive/invasive ventilation; they developed critical illness in a median 2 (IQR 0–8) days, and had a higher in-hospital mortality. Those who survived had a longer hospital stay (Table 3).
In the subgroup of severe cases at hospital admission, when compared with cases without aggravation, those who developed critical illness received more antibiotics, more glucocorticoids, and more noninvasive/invasive ventilation; they developed critical illness in a median 5 (IQR 4–11) days and had a higher in-hospital mortality (Table 3).
Predictors of progression from severe type to critically ill type
Of all enrolled patients, univariable analysis identified 26 factors with P ≤0.10 (S2 Table). After excluding factors having collinearity or clinical relation with others, 13 factors were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. Five factors were identified to be independently associated with the development of critical illness in COVID-19 patients; of them longer duration from diagnosis to admission (odds ratio [OR] 1.108, 95% CI 1.022–1.202; P = 0.013), pulse oxygen saturation at admission <93% (OR 5.775, 95% CI 1.257–26.535; P = 0.024), higher neutrophil count (OR 1.495, 95% CI 1.177–1.899; P = 0.001) and higher creatine kinase-MB level (OR 2.449, 95% CI 1.089–5.511; P = 0.030) at admission were associated with a higher risk, whereas higher lymphocyte count at admission (OR 0.149, 95% CI 0.026–0.852; P = 0.032) was associated with a lower risk of critical illness development (Table 4).
In the subgroup of severe cases at hospital admission, univariable analysis identified 16 factors with P ≤0.10 (S2 Table). After excluding factors having collinearity or clinical relation with others, 11 factors were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. Four factors were identified to be independently associated with the development of critical illness in COVID-19 patients; of them longer duration from diagnosis to admission (OR 1.085, 95% CI 1.009–1.167; P = 0.027), pulse oxygen saturation at admission <93% (OR 11.182, 95% CI 2.426–51.534; P = 0.002) and higher neutrophil count at admission (OR 1.403, 95% CI 1.117–1.763; P = 0.004) were associated with a higher risk, whereas higher lymphocyte count at admission (OR 0.147, 95% CI 0.028–0.760; P = 0.022) was associated with a lower risk of critical illness development (Table 4).
Discussion
The mortality rate of COVID-19 patients in critical conditions remains high [9,10]. Identification of high-risk patients in advance may help improve outcome by providing more aggressive therapy. In the present study, we screened easily accessible factors that may early predict the development of or progression to critical illness. Of note, higher neutrophil count and lower lymphocyte count at admission were associated with an increased risk of critical illness in both all enrolled patients and those with severe illness at admission. Our results indicated that we should be alert to patients with these characteristics and consider measures to prevent disease progression.
Previous studies have revealed a significant difference in lymphocyte count between severe and non-severe cases [4,13], between intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients [4,6,14], as well as between survivors and non-survivors with COVID-19 [15]. Mechanisms leading to lymphopenia in COVID-19 patients are not clear but may include the following, i.e., lymphocyte death resulted from direct virus infection, lymphatic organs (such as thymus and spleen) damage due to direct virus infection, lymphocyte apoptosis induced by inflammatory cytokines, inhibition of lymphocytes by metabolic acidosis, and translocation of lymphocyte from peripheral blood to the target organs such as lungs [16,17]. Both lower lymphocyte count and lower lymphocyte percentage are strongly related to the severity of disease, they also predict the progression to critical illness. Tan et al. [16] established a time-lymphocyte percentage model and verified that lymphocyte percentage can reliably classify the severity (moderate, severe, and critical ill) of COVID-19 patients. In another study, Wang and colleagues reported that decrease of CD8+ T cells and B cells and increase of CD4+/CD8+ ratio were independently associated with poor outcomes [18]. In line with above results, we also found that low lymphocyte count at admission was an independent predictor of critical case or progression to critical illness.
Considering the significant decreases of lymphocyte count/percentage and their association with the severity and outcomes of COVID-19 patients, measures to increase lymphocytes may improve outcome. In previous studies, effective therapy was followed by increased lymphocytes [18,19]. Antiviral therapies are suggested for COVID-19 patients according to guidelines issued by the Chinese National Health Commission [3]. In one study, early antiviral treatment was associated with less disease progression [11]. Thymosin, an immune enhancer by inducing T cell differentiation and maturity, is also used in some severe and critical COVID-19 patients but the efficacy remained unclear [18,20]. In the present study, critical cases of all enrolled patients received fewer antiviral drugs (especially arbidol) before admission, also indicating the potential effect of early antiviral therapy.
Neutrophil count and neutrophil percentage are significantly increased in severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients [13–15,21]. Our results also showed that high neutrophil count independently predicted the development of critical illness. Increased neutrophil suggests a possible bacterial infection or a non-infectious inflammatory response. In a study of 339 elderly patients with COVID-19, 143 cases (42.8%) had comorbid bacterial infection [22]. And the rate of bacterial co-infection was higher in severe/critical ill patients than in mild/moderate patients [11]. It is known that dry cough is the typical symptom of COVID-19 patients at early stage [4,6]. In the present study, 62.0% of patients had expectoration at admission, suggesting a potential bacterial co-infection in those severe cases; furthermore, patients who developed critical illness received less antibiotic therapy before admission. Therefore, active bacteriological surveillance, empirical antibiotic therapy in patients with suspected co-infection, and timely clarification of pathogenic bacteria may help to slow disease progression and improve outcome but requires demonstration. On the other hand, the study of Zhang and colleagues [13] excluded patients with common bacteria or viruses associated community-acquired pneumonia and those with procalcitonin level of greater than 0.5 ng/ml; they still found that neutrophil was higher in severe patients and those with poor outcomes (ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, or death). This indicates higher neutrophil count might also be a reflection of excessive inflammation.
A higher neutrophil count and a lower lymphocyte count, i.e., the increase of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, is demonstrated as a prognostic biomarker in cancer patients [23,24]. A meta-analysis including 6 studies of 824 patients found that a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicted clinical severity and poor prognosis of patients with COVID-19 [25]. Our results are in line with the above studies and provide further clues that early combined antiviral and antibiotic therapy may be beneficial for COVID-19 patients. Further studies are required to confirm our hypothesis.
In the present study, long duration from diagnosis to admission was an independent predictor of disease progression. The surge of COVID-19 patients and the relative shortage of medical resources in early February of 2020 in Wuhan delayed the hospitalization of some patients. Failure to receive timely hospital treatment might be the main reason for disease progression. Similar phenomenon was also observed in the study of Wang et al. [6] that ICU patients had a longer duration from symptom onset to hospital admission when compared with non-ICU patients. Low oxygen saturation is related to the severity of lung injury and is an important indicator to initiate oxygen therapy and mechanical ventilation. Oxygen saturation <93% was one of the diagnostic criteria of severe COVID-19. Our results showed that pulse oxygen saturation of <93% at admission independently predicts the progression of the disease to critical illness. Therefore, care should be taken for these patients. We also found that higher level serum creatine kinase-MB predicted critical illness; similar result was reported by others [26,27].
There are several limitations in the present study. First, the sample size included in this study was relatively small. Larger sample size studies are required to verify our results. Second, we did not collect imaging examination (chest X-ray and CT scan) data because of the difficulty to quantify results. However, available evidences showed that CT results are significantly correlated with pulse oxygen saturation and lymphocyte numbers [28]; and that lymphocyte percentage can be used reliably to classify disease severity without other auxiliary indicators [16]. Therefore, shortage of imagining results does not seem to change our results. Third, due to the retrospective nature of the study, bias may be introduced by unrecognized factors. Nonetheless, our results provide clues for interventional studies.
Conclusions
In summary, results of this retrospective study showed that high neutrophil count and low lymphocyte count at admission were early independent predictors of progression to critical illness in severe COVID-19 patients. The effects of early combined antiviral and antibiotic therapy on the outcomes of COVID-19 patients deserve further study.
Supporting information
S2 Table. Predictors of progression from severe type to critical type in COVID-19 patients (univariable logistic regression analysis).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243195.s002
(DOCX)
S1 Dataset. Relevant data underlying the main results.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243195.s003
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Hong-Yu Yang M.D. (Department of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China) for his help in the acquisition of data. We also thank all team members of Peking University in Wuhan for their great work in fighting against COVID-19.
References
- 1. Chan KW, Wong VT, Tang SCW. COVID-19: An Update on the Epidemiological, Clinical, Preventive and Therapeutic Evidence and Guidelines of Integrative Chinese-Western Medicine for the Management of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease. Am J Chin Med. 2020 Mar 13:1–26. pmid:32164424
- 2.
National Health Commission's briefing on the pneumonia epidemic situation. Released on April 16, 2020. http://en.nhc.gov.cn/2020-04/16/c_79229.htm
- 3.
The Fifth Revised Trial Version of the Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Diagnosis and Treatment Guidance. Available at: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7652m/202002/41c3142b38b84ec4a748e60773cf9d4f.shtml
- 4. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 28. pmid:32109013
- 5. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia J, Liu H, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Feb 24; S2213-2600(20)30079-5. pmid:32105632
- 6. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020 Feb 7. pmid:32031570
- 7. Zhang L, Zhu F, Xie L, Wang C, Wang J, Chen R, et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19-infected cancer patients: A retrospective case study in three hospitals within Wuhan, China. Ann Oncol. 2020 Mar 26; S0923-7534(20)36383-3. pmid:32224151
- 8. Guan WJ, Liang WH, Zhao Y, Liang HR, Chen ZS, Li YM, et al. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with Covid-19 in China: A Nationwide Analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020 Mar 26; 2000547. pmid:32217650
- 9. Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, Lokhandwala S, Riedo FX, Chong M, et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of 21 Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA. 2020 Mar 19; e204326. pmid:32191259
- 10. Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M, Kim R, Jerome KR, Nalla AK, et al. Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region—Case Series. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 30. pmid:32227758
- 11. Wu J, Li W, Shi X, Chen Z, Jiang B, Liu J, et al. Early antiviral treatment contributes to alleviate the severity and improve the prognosis of patients with novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). J Intern Med. 2020 Mar 27. pmid:32220033
- 12.
WHO. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when COVID-19 is suspected: interim guidance. Mar 13, 2020. https://www.who.int/publications-detail/clinical-management-of-severe-acute-respiratory-infection-when-novel-coronavirus-(ncov)-infection-is-suspected
- 13. Zhang G, Zhang J, Wang B, Zhu X, Wang Q, Qiu S. Analysis of clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of 95 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a retrospective analysis. Respir Res. 2020 Mar 26;21(1):74. pmid:32216803
- 14. Qin C, Zhou L, Hu Z, Zhang S, Yang S, Tao Y, et al. Dysregulation of immune response in patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 12;ciaa248. pmid:32161940
- 15. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054–1062. pmid:32171076
- 16. Tan L, Wang Q, Zhang D, Ding J, Huang Q, Tang YQ, et al. Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: a descriptive and predictive study. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020 Mar 27;5:33. pmid:32296069
- 17. Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):420–422.. pmid:32085846
- 18. Wang F, Nie J, Wang H, Zhao Q, Xiong Y, Deng L, et al. Characteristics of peripheral lymphocyte subset alteration in COVID-19 pneumonia. J Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 30;jiaa150. pmid:32227123
- 19. Zheng M, Gao Y, Wang G, Song G, Liu S, Sun D, et al. Functional exhaustion of antiviral lymphocytes in COVID-19 patients. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020 Mar 19; pmid:32203188
- 20. Mo P, Xing Y, Xiao Y, Deng L, Zhao Q, Wang H, et al. Clinical characteristics of refractory COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 16;ciaa270. pmid:32173725
- 21. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497–506. pmid:31986264
- 22. Wang L, He W, Yu X, Hu D, Bao M, Liu H, et al. Coronavirus Disease 2019 in elderly patients: characteristics and prognostic factors based on 4-week follow-up. J Infect. 2020 Mar 30; S0163-4453(20)30146-8. pmid:32240670
- 23. Powell AGMT, Chin C, Coxon AH, Chalishazar A, Christian A, Roberts SA, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. BJS Open. 2020 Mar 31. pmid:32232963
- 24. Lu Y, Jiang J, Ren C. The clinicopathological and prognostic value of the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0230979. pmid:32241019
- 25. Lagunas-Rangel FA. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio and Lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020 Apr 3. pmid:32242950
- 26. Han H, Xie L, Liu R, Yang J, Liu F, Wu K, et al. Analysis of heart injury laboratory parameters in 273 COVID-19 patients in one hospital in Wuhan, China. J Med Virol. 2020 Mar 31. pmid:32232979
- 27. Gao L, Jiang D, Wen XS, Cheng XC, Sun M, He B, et al. Prognostic value of NT-proBNP in patients with severe COVID-19. Respir Res. 2020 Apr 15;21(1):83. pmid:32293449
- 28. Wang K, Kang S, Tian R, Zhang X, Zhang X, Wang Y. Imaging manifestations and diagnostic value of chest CT of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the Xiaogan area. Clin Radiol. 2020 May;75(5):341–347. pmid:32216961