In supporting information file S4 Table, some table row headers were omitted in the final version of the table, leading to incorrect numbers in the rows affected. For example in the last section ‘50c per litre’, the row heading ‘% expenditure food and non-alcoholic drinks’ is missing.
Please see the corrected S4 Table.
Supporting information
S4 Table. Cost-effectiveness results of the sensitivity analyses.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003310.s001
(PDF)
Reference
- 1. Lal A, Mantilla-Herrera AM, Veerman L, Backholer K, Sacks G, Moodie M, et al. (2017) Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: A cost-effectiveness and equity analysis. PLoS Med 14(6): e1002326. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002326 pmid:28654688
Citation: Lal A, Mantilla-Herrera AM, Veerman L, Backholer K, Sacks G, Moodie M, et al. (2020) Correction: Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: A cost-effectiveness and equity analysis. PLoS Med 17(7): e1003310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003310
Published: July 29, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Lal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.