Figures
Abstract
Background
Therapeutic response in infectious disease involves host as well as microbial determinants. Because the immune and inflammatory response to Leishmania (Viannia) species defines the outcome of infection and efficacy of treatment, immunomodulation is considered a promising therapeutic strategy. However, since Leishmania infection and antileishmanial drugs can themselves modulate drug transport, metabolism and/or immune responses, immunotherapeutic approaches require integrated assessment of host and parasite responses.
Methodology
To achieve an integrated assessment of current and innovative therapeutic strategies, we determined host and parasite responses to miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate alone and in combination with pentoxifylline or CpG 2006 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of cutaneous leishmaniasis patients. Parasite survival and secretion of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-10 and IL-13 were evaluated concomitantly in PBMCs infected with Luc-L. (V.) panamensis exposed to meglumine antimoniate (4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 μg SbV/mL) or miltefosine (2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 μM HePC). Concentrations of 4 μM of miltefosine and 8 μg SbV/mL were selected for evaluation in combination with immunomodulators based on the high but partial reduction of parasite burden by these antileishmanial concentrations without affecting cytokine secretion of infected PBMCs. Intracellular parasite survival was determined by luminometry and cytokine secretion measured by ELISA and multiplex assays.
Principal Findings
Anti- and pro-inflammatory cytokines characteristic of L. (V.) panamensis infection were evaluable concomitantly with viability of Leishmania within monocyte-derived macrophages present in PBMC cultures. Both antileishmanial drugs reduced the parasite load of macrophages; miltefosine also suppressed IL-10 and IL-13 secretion in a dose dependent manner. Pentoxifylline did not affect parasite survival or alter antileishmanial effects of miltefosine or meglumine antimoniate. However, pentoxifylline diminished secretion of TNF-α, IFN-γ and IL-13, cytokines associated with the outcome of infection by species of the Viannia subgenus. Exposure to CpG diminished the leishmanicidal effect of meglumine antimoniate, but not miltefosine, and significantly reduced secretion of IL -10, alone and in combination with either antileishmanial drug. IL-13 increased in response to CpG plus miltefosine.
Author Summary
Host determinants of the response to infection have increasingly been recognized as therapeutically relevant targets. Despite the pathogenesis of dermal leishmaniasis being mediated by the immune and inflammatory response, in vitro anti-leishmanial drug screening has been based on antimicrobial effect without consideration of effects on the host response. The results of this study show that peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients allow an integrated evaluation of both antimicrobial efficacy and host response to drugs, immunomodulatory agents, and their combinations. This integrated approach to defining treatment strategies based on host and parasite responses opens the way for the optimization and tailoring of treatment to different clinical circumstances.
Citation: Gonzalez-Fajardo L, Fernández OL, McMahon-Pratt D, Saravia NG (2015) Ex Vivo Host and Parasite Response to Antileishmanial Drugs and Immunomodulators. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9(5): e0003820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003820
Editor: Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, BRAZIL
Received: July 28, 2014; Accepted: May 10, 2015; Published: May 29, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Gonzalez-Fajardo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This research was financed in part by the United States National Institute of Allergy And Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AI093775, and contract 2229-519-28964 from the Colombian National Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS). LGF was supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number D43 TW006589 and COLCIENCIAS Young Investigators and Innovators Program contract Number 138–2010 and 0040-2012. OLF was supported by a doctoral scholarship from COLCIENCIAS and the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number D43 TW006589; her participation in this research was undertaken in partial fulfillment of the doctoral degree requirements in Biomedical Sciences from the Faculty of Health of the Universidad del Valle, Cali Colombia. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The outcome of treatment of leishmaniasis and other infectious diseases is multi-factorial involving host as well as microbial determinants; yet evaluation of antimicrobial drug susceptibility is limited to assessment of drug effects on microbial pathogens and toxicity. However, the efficacy of antimicrobial treatment is linked to the immunocompetence of the host [1–3], and to the role of host defense mechanisms in the containment of infection or pathogenesis of disease [4]. Hence in vitro assay systems of antimicrobial drug susceptibility that allow characterization of host response as well as antimicrobial effect are an important unmet need. The immune and inflammatory responses induced by infection with species of the Leishmania (Viannia) subgenus are pivotal in the pathogenesis of cutaneous and mucosal disease [5–7] and immune competence influences the efficacy of treatment [8]. These findings have motivated the exploration of therapeutic vaccines and immunomodulators as treatment strategies.
Leishmania are obligate intracellular pathogens that modulate a diverse range of host cell functions [9, 10] including the expression and function of drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes [11–13] and innate immune mechanisms [14, 15]. The capacity of Leishmania to modify and to effectively subvert host cell functions in favor of their survival and persistence constitutes a further and complex challenge to therapeutic interventions. Although specific parameters of the host response have been evaluated independently of anti-parasite effects for a few individual drugs [16–18], ex vivo surrogates of therapeutic response are critical to the development and preclinical evaluation of more effective treatments.
Pentoxifylline is thought to mediate immunomodulatory effects via inhibition of the synthesis of TNF-α [19] and has been used in combination with meglumine antimoniate to achieve healing of refractory mucosal leishmaniasis, a disease presentation associated with an intense inflammatory response. Addition of pentoxifylline increased the cure rate and decreased the plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α [20, 21]. Responses to CpG ODN have been found to be dose-dependent and of either Th1-type or T-regulatory-type in mouse models and humans [22–25] and have been investigated in human clinical trials for allergy, cancer, and autoimmunity [26, 27]. The combination of CpG with miltefosine has been evaluated in the treatment of experimental visceral leishmaniasis allowing reduction of both the duration and dosage of miltefosine [28]. Infected hamsters and mice that received the combination therapy presented significantly suppressed levels of Th2 cytokines (IL-10 and TGF-β) and increased mRNA expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-12) [28].
This study reports the development of an ex vivo model of human host and parasite responses to antileishmanial drugs, immunomodulators and their combinations based on PBMCs from cutaneous leishmaniasis patients.
Methods
Study Design
In order to discern the anti-parasitic and immunomodulatory effects of anti-leishmanial therapies, we have developed an ex vivo model that allows concomitant quantitative evaluation of parasite survival and the elicited immune response within the context of active human leishmaniasis. Human PBMC cultures are widely utilized as a surrogate of the cell-mediated host response. These cultures, in addition to T and B lymphocytes and NK cells, contain monocytes that can differentiate to macrophages, which are the natural host cell of Leishmania. We therefore determined the culture conditions, period of exposure and concentration of anti-leishmanial drugs and immunomodulators alone or in combination that allowed the concomitant evaluation of intracellular parasite survival and the secretion of the pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-13 and IL-10 induced by Leishmania infection of PBMCs from patients having active cutaneous leishmaniasis. The host and parasite response to antileishmanial drugs meglumine antimoniate and miltefosine, which are widely used for the routine treatment of dermal leishmaniasis in the Americas, were evaluated individually and in combination with the immunomodulators pentoxifylline and CpG ODN 2006.
Study Population
Overall twenty-two male and female patients, 18 years of age or older, with parasitologically confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis participated in the study. The number of participants in the various analyses was based on the sample size that in previous studies of the immune response in leishmaniasis patients has allowed significant differences in cytokine production to be detected [29]. Participants were from the Pacific coast region of Colombia and consulted the CIDEIM facilities in the municipality of Tumaco or Cali. All patients were enrolled within 5 months of the onset of disease (Mean 2.3 months) and before initiating treatment. Parasites isolated from the participants were principally L. (V) panamensis (18/19, 95%). All participants of the study were seronegative for HIV-1/HIV-2 by ELISA (Abbott Laboratories). Parasitological confirmation of leishmaniasis was based on detection of amastigotes in smears from the lesions and/or isolation and identification of the Leishmania cultured from tissue fluid aspirated from lesions.
Ethics Statement
The study was approved and monitored by the CIDEIM Institutional Review Board for research involving human subjects in accordance with national and international guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. Voluntary, informed, signed consent was provided by each participant.
Anti-leishmanial Drugs and Immunomodulators
Stock solutions of meglumine antimoniate (SbV) (Walter Reed 214975AK; lot no. BLO9186 90-278-1A1 W601; antimony analysis, 25%–26.5% by weight) (30 mg/mL); pentoxifylline (PTX) (P1784; Sigma) (10 mM), and CpG ODN 2006 (tlrl-2006; Invitrogen) (500 μM) were prepared by dissolution in sterile water, filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane (MS MCE Syringe filters; Membrane Solutions) and stored at -20°C. Based on solubility characteristics, miltefosine (HePC) (63280; Cayman Chemical Co) was dissolved in sterile dimethyl sulfoxide at a concentration of 1.96 mM and stored at -20°C until use. Dilutions of the drugs were prepared in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma) containing 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) on the day of use.
PBMC Isolation
Blood samples of 100 mL were collected after confirming diagnosis and before initiation of treatment. PBMCs were isolated by centrifugation over Histopaque 1077 solution (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the product instructions. The cells were frozen in 90% FBS plus 10% DMSO by slow cooling at approximately 1°C/minute using a freezing container (Thermo Scientific) and stored in liquid nitrogen until the time of experimental evaluation. Prior to each experiment, the cells were rapidly thawed at 37°C and PBMCs with ≥ 90% viability were used for the experiments [30].
Drug Cytotoxicity Control for PBMCs
To control potential confounding effects of drug cytoxicity for host PBMCs, viability was evaluated based on acid phosphatase activity after 120 h exposure to meglumine antimoniate, miltefosine and pentoxifylline at the concentrations employed in the combinations of drugs and immunomodulators [31]. No significant reduction in cell viability was observed when comparing treated cells vs non-treated controls. Previous studies have demonstrated that CpG, even at high concentrations (6 μM), does not alter the viability of human cells [32, 33].
Standardization of PBMC Infection for Detection of Parasite Burden and Cytokine Secretion
For all experiments PBMCs were cultured at a final concentration of 2 x 106 mL. Thawed PBMCs were resuspended at 4x106 cells/mL RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with heat inactivated 10% FBS (complete medium), dispensed as 100 μL aliquots (4x105 cells/well) in 96-well plates and cultured for 2 h at 37°C and 5% CO2 to initiate adherence. Infection with L. (Viannia) panamensis promastigotes transfected with the luciferase reporter gene (Luc), MHOM/COL/03/3594/LUC001 [34, 35] was achieved by adding 50 μL of opsonized stationary phase promastigotes in complete medium at 20:1 or 10:1 parasite to monocyte ratios and incubation for 24 hours at 34°C. Fifty μL of complete culture medium were then added to infected PBMCs. Parasite burden and Th1/Th2 cytokine secretion were evaluated after 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h incubation at 34°C, 5% CO2.
Prior to infection, parasites were opsonized for 1 h at 34°C in RPMI 1640 containing 10% heat-inactivated AB+ human serum [36]. In order to standardize the inoculum for PBMCs, the parasite concentration to achieve the corresponding parasite to monocyte ratio was operationally defined based on the assumption that monocytes obtained from heparinized whole blood and multiple washings constituted approximately 10% of the mononuclear cells [37]. To evaluate and confirm the infection of macrophages differentiated from monocytes in PBMC cultures, parasite burden in total PBMCs was compared with that of adherent cells alone, using an infection ratio of 10:1. For this assessment, luminometric readout of parasite burden was conducted in parallel in PBMCs and after removal of non-adherent cells and extracellular parasites, and the internalization of parasites was confirmed by microscopy”. Responses of PBMCs from individual patients were evaluated in triplicate.
Dose-Response and Kinetics Assays of Anti-leishmanial Drugs
Dose-response and kinetics assays of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate were conducted to determine their effect on TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-13 and IL-10 secretion and parasite burden and the relationship between these parameters. Antileishmanial drugs were added to PBMCs infected for 24 h with Luc-L. (V) panamensis, at a parasite to monocyte ratio of 10:1. Drug concentrations evaluated were 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 μg SbV/mL as meglumine antimoniate and 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 μM of miltefosine. This range was employed to determine the drug concentration that substantially reduced but did not eliminate infection (mean approximating 80%) compared with untreated controls, so that the effect of immunomodulators on parasite survival could be determined when combined with anti-leishmanial drugs. Kinetic assays were conducted at 24 hour intervals over 96 h after adding 4 μM of miltefosine or 8 μg SbV/mL as meglumine antimoniate. These assays were conducted at 34°C, 5% CO2
Evaluation of Response to Anti-lieshmanial Drugs and Immunomodulators
A range of concentrations of pentoxifylline and CpG 2006 were evaluated alone or in combination with 4 μM of miltefosine or 8 μg SbV/mL in infected PBMCs. Evaluation of parasite survival and Th1/Th2 cytokine response was conducted with a parasite to monocyte ratio of 10:1 because the parasite burden and kinetics of parasite survival allowed dose-response analyses and discrimination of treated and untreated cultures. Immunomodulators were added at concomitantly with promastigotes to achieve concentrations of 100, 200 and 300 μM pentoxifylline and 2.5, 5, 10 μM CpG ODN 2006; anti-leishmanial drugs were added 24 h after infection. The concentration ranges of immunomodulators were based on prior exploratory experiments to evaluate the effect of pentoxifylline on TNF-α secretion and, previous investigations of CpG ODN 2006 in the in vitro immune response of human PBMCs [32, 33]. Parasite burden and cytokine secretion were evaluated at 120 h of culture, and 96 h after addition of anti-leishmanial drugs.
Parasite and Cytokine Quantification
Plates were centrifuged at room temperature at 1097Xg for 10 min; supernatants were collected and stored at -80°C. Infection was quantified as luciferase activity using luminometry (Chameleon V Multilabel Microplater Reader; Hidex, Finland) as previously described [34]. Concordance between luminometric and conventional microscopic quantification of intracellular amastigotes has been previously reported for evaluation susceptibility to meglumine antimoniate and miltefosine [38, 39]. In the present study the limit of detection of the strain Luc-L. (V) panamensis (Luc 001) by luminometry was 50 promastigotes and 250 intracellular amastigotes. TNF-α, IL-10, IFN-γ, IL-13 were measured in supernatants by ELISA [40] or Luminex Screening Assay (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Luminex assays were performed using 50 μL of culture supernatants in duplicate according to the manufacturers’ specifications.
Statistical Analysis
One-way ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to establish statistical differences among groups. Dunnett or Dunn tests were performed to compare each group with the control group, according to the parametric or non-parametric distribution of data. Analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA), and P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Infection and Immune Response in the Absence of Drugs or Immunomodulators
Parasite burden was proportional to the infective dose of parasites and measurable throughout the observation period of 6 to 72 hours post-infection (Fig 1A). The highest number of parasites was detected at the initial measurement 6 h post-infection and decreased thereafter. No significant differences were observed in the parasite burden in total PBMCs compared to macrophages alone (Fig 1A). Pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory and Th1/Th2 cytokines observed across the clinical spectrum of infection by L. (V) panamensis were induced under these experimental conditions and measured concurrently with the burden of infection. Kinetics of production of individual cytokines varied: TNF-α was secreted early after infection while other cytokines (IL-10, IL-13, IFN-γ) became detectable 24 to 48 hours post-infection (Fig 1B). Unlike parasite burden, cytokine expression was not proportional to the infective dose.
(A) Kinetics of infection evaluating the parasites: monocyte ratios of 10:1 and 20:1 (left panel), and the parasite burden (right panel) in PBMCs vs macrophages alone (infection ratio 10:1) are shown. Parasite survival is expressed as bioluminescence produced by luciferase activity in relative light units (RLU). Mean signal of uninfected cells: 135.3 ± 23.7 RLU. (B) Kinetics of cytokine secretion (TNF-α, IL-10, IL-13, IFN-γ) over the 72 hours of treatment. Data are based on at least 4 patients and expressed as means ± SEM.
Parasitological and Immunological Responses to Anti-leishmanial Drugs
Meglumine antimoniate and miltefosine reduced the parasite load in a concentration-dependent manner reaching statistical significance at the higher range of drug concentrations compared to untreated infected control PBMCs cultures (Fig 2A). Parasitological response was based on % reduction of signal compared with untreated PBMCs for each donor, thereby controlling for variation in parasite burden among donors. Miltefosine suppressed the production of IL-10 and IL-13 in a dose-dependent manner, with the decrease becoming statistically significant at 32 μM of drug compared to control (Fig 2B). In contrast, no significant effect on the production of IFN-γ or TNF-α was observed over the dose range evaluated for this drug. Notably meglumine antimoniate demonstrated statistically significant parasite reduction over a concentration range of 16–64 μg SbV/ml but did not alter secretion of any of the four cytokines evaluated (Fig 2B). Based on the reduction of infection approximating 80% and non-inhibition of cytokine secretion of cytokines at the respective drug concentrations, 8 μg SbV/mL of meglumine antimoniate and 4 μM of miltefosine were selected for the concomitant assay of parasite survival and immune response.
(A) Parasite survival and (B) Cytokine secretion after 96 hours of exposure to increasing concentrations of miltefosine (HePC) and meglumine antimoniate (SbV). TNFα, IL-10, IFNγ and IL-13 were evaluated in supernatants of PBMCs infected with L. (V) panamensis. Data are based on at least 6 patients and presented as mean ± SEM of the parasite burden or cytokine secretion compared to infected control without drug. ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001.
Kinetics of Parasite Survival and Cytokine Production in the Presence of 4 μM of Miltefosine or 8 μg SbV/mL of Meglumine Antimoniate
Parasite burden was significantly reduced by 48 hours of exposure to 4 μM of miltefosine or 8 μg SbV/mL of meglumine antimoniate. Survival continued to decline significantly reaching 9% and 37% at 96 hours at these concentrations of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate respectively, compared with infection in the absence of drug (Fig 3A). Secretion of TNF-α, IL-10, IFN-γ and IL-13 was not affected by either drug at the concentrations evaluated (Fig 3B–3E).
(A) Parasite survival and (B to E) cytokine secretion (IL-13, TNF-α, IL-10, IFN-γ) over 96 h. Mean values ± SEM for PBMCs from 5 patients. ** p ≤ 0.01, control vs both drugs.
Parasitological and Immunological Responses to Combinations of Immunomodulators and Anti-leishmanial Drugs
Parasite survival and cytokine production were differentially affected by the individual drugs and immunomodulators and their combinations. Pentoxifylline did not directly affect parasite survival (Fig 4A) or the leishmanicidal activity of the anti-leishmanial drugs evaluated (Fig 4C and 4E). CpG alone did not significantly affect parasite survival (Fig 4B) but its combination with meglumine antimoniate resulted in significantly lower leishmanicidal activity compared with antimonial drug alone (Fig 4D). In contrast, miltefosine-induced killing of parasites was not altered by CpG (Fig 4F).
(A, C and E) Dose response for pentoxifylline alone, combined with 8 μg SbV/ml meglumine antimoniate or 4 μM miltefosine. (B, D and F) Dose response for CpG alone, combined with 8 μg SbV/ml meglumine antimoniate or 4 μM miltefosine. Data are presented as means ± SEM of the parasite burden compared to infected control cultures without drugs for PBMCs from 10 patients. * p< 0.05.
A significant, dose-dependent reduction of TNF-α, IL-13 and IFN-γ secretion occurred when infected PBMCs were exposed to pentoxifylline (Fig 5A). The suppressive effect of pentoxifylline on IL-13 and IFN-γ production was conserved when this immunomodulator was combined with miltefosine or meglumine antimoniate (Fig 5B and 5C). Neither pentoxifylline alone or in combination with anti-leishmanial drugs affected the secretion of IL-10 induced by infection (Fig 5). Pentoxifylline did not induce the secretion of cytokines in uninfected PBMCs being either undetectable or present in amounts less than or equal to that detected in the corresponding control cultures without pentoxifylline.
Cells from 10 patients were infected at a parasite: monocyte ratio of 10:1. Cytokine levels (IL-10, IL-13, TNF-α, IFN-γ) were determined after exposure for 96 h to different concentrations of pentoxifylline (PTX), (A) alone, combined with (B) 8 μg SbV/ml meglumine antimoniate or (C) 4 μM miltefosine. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.0001, **** p ≤ 0.0001.
In the case of CpG, IL-10 secretion diminished significantly in response to this immunomodulator alone and in combination with miltefosine or meglumine antimoniate, whereas secretion of IL-13 increased in cultures exposed to the combination of miltefosine with CpG, reaching significance at 10 μM CpG (Fig 6). Neither TNFα nor IFN-γ secretion was altered by CpG or combinations of this immunomodulator with miltefosine (Fig 6A and 6C), nor was secretion of IL13, IFN-γ and TNF-α significantly altered by CpG in combination with meglumine antimoniate (Fig 6B). In uninfected PBMCs, CpG induced the secretion of IL-10 (median concentration for PBMCs without stimulus was 0 vs 151 pg/mL with 10 μM CpG; Mann Whitney test p = 0.0023, n = 8) but did not induce secretion of IL-13 (median without stimulus, 38 pg/mL vs 42 pg/mL with 10 μM CpG, Mann Whitney test p = 0.2788, n = 8) or TNF-α and IFN-γ, which were not detected in supernatants of uninfected PBMCs with or without CpG.
Cells from 10 patients were infected at a parasite: monocyte ratio of 10:1. Cytokine levels (IL-10, IL-13, TNF-α, IFN-γ) were determined after exposure for 96 h to different concentrations of CpG (A) alone, combined with (B) 8 μg SbV/ml meglumine antimoniate or (C) 4 μM miltefosine. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Discussion
Pre-clinical assessment of alternative therapeutic approaches including drug combinations and co-adjuvant immunotherapy have been constrained by the unavailability of in vitro models that approximate the in vivo response. The results of this investigation substantiate the feasibility of an integrated evaluation of parasite viability and host response using an ex vivo model of infection based on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and Leishmania transfected with a luciferase reporter gene construct. This innovative strategy allows anti-parasitic efficacy and immunomodulatory effects of anti-leishmanial drugs and immunotherapeutic agents to be determined in systemically circulating cells of the human host, and thereby, access to the interplay of the antimicrobial agent and innate and acquired host defense.
Parasites transfected with reporter genes have been successfully employed to quantify parasite survival in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo [34, 41]. In particular, experiments that evaluated the susceptibility of intracellular amastigotes to meglumine antimoniate and miltefosine using luciferase activity as a measure of parasite viability have substantiated high correlation with conventional microscopy [38, 39]. In this ex vivo model, the use of luciferase transfected Leishmania allowed us to quantify viable parasites in host macrophages differentiated during culture of human mononuclear cells (lymphocytes and monocytes) exposed to live promastigotes, and to do so without the biases inherent to visual assessment by microscopy. Importantly, assay of primary monocyte-derived macrophage infection was achieved in a 96-well plate format as utilized for assessment of cell-mediated immune responses using PBMCs. The advantages of microcultures of human cells are further extended by multiplex assays which require minimal volumes of supernatant (25–50 μl) for the quantification of cytokines and other mediators. Cytometric (FACS) analyses of cell subsets and gene expression assay are also feasible using cells from these microcultures, thereby broadly expanding the immunological information that can be accessed using this analytic approach.
The robustness of the assessment of parasite burden in PBMCs was supported by readily measurable signal for both 10:1 and 20:1 parasite to cell ratios at all time intervals evaluated over 3 days of culture post-infection and the comparable parasite burden of total PBMCs and adherent cells alone (Fig 1A). Furthermore, PBMC cultures allowed the simultaneous assessment of surviving parasites and secretion of multiple cytokines post-infection. Interestingly, although the parasite burden was proportional to the inoculum of promastigotes, cytokine secretion was not (Fig 1A and 1B). The independence of these parameters was also shown in the divergence of cytokine responses and parasite survival in the presence of increasing concentrations of meglumine antimoniate and miltefosine (Fig 2), in the distinct kinetics of these responses during exposure to a single concentration of antileishmanial drug (Fig 3), and is generally supported by other studies [42, 43].
The conventional macrophage-amastigote model of drug susceptibility assessment evaluates the leishmanicidal effect of drugs that act directly on the parasite or the host macrophage. This long and widely used approach is not informative about collateral immunomodulatory effects of these drugs or for agents whose activity is mediated by other cells of the immune system. Hence, neither the effect of the immune response on the outcome of treatment nor the anti-leishmanial drug on the immune response is evaluable with macrophages alone. Importantly, in the ex vivo PBMC model, parasite viability diminished in a drug concentration-dependent manner, as occurs in the macrophage-amastigote model of drug susceptibility evaluation [34, 44].
Notably, at the concentrations evaluated in combination with immunomodulators, and which are below their CMax in vivo [45, 46], neither meglumine antimoniate nor miltefosine altered cytokine expression of uninfected or infected PBMCs (Fig 3). Hence, these drug concentrations allowed assessment of immunodulation by CpG and pentoxifylline without the confounding influence of the antileishmanial drugs. Although time-dependent reduction in parasite viability occurred in the absence of treatment, parasite burden was sustained and significantly higher than in treated cultures from 48 hours onward. This attrition of infection is likely mediated by the activation of effector mechanisms in sensitized lymphocytes and host macrophages.
Although miltefosine has been reported to induce IFN-γ secretion in uninfected human mononuclear cells [47], in the corresponding study, an approximately 5-fold higher concentration of miltefosine (19.6 μM versus 4 μM) was utilized and included co-stimulation with either IL-2 or IL-2/phytohemagglutinin [47]. We did not observe induction of IFN-γ secretion in dose response experiments with miltefosine even at comparable or higher concentrations of miltefosine (Fig 2) but secretion of IL-10 and IL-13 was significantly reduced in a dose dependent manner. Miltefosine has been shown to act in multiple ways and is an AKT (serine, threonine kinase) inhibitor, which is known to be involved in immune activation [48]. However the specific effects of miltefosine on the immune system are not well understood. The suppression of IL-10 and IL-13 secretion by miltefosine in PBMCs infected with Leishmania is a novel finding. Attribution of suppression of these cytokines to miltefosine is supported by the disparity between the dose-response of the parasiticidal and immunomodulatory effects of this drug as well as the absence of immunomodulatory effects of meglumine antimony despite the significant dose-dependent reduction of parasite burden (Fig 2).
In this study we found that compounds that modify the host immune response can affect the parasiticidal activity of anti-leishmanial drugs, as evidenced by a significant reduction in parasite killing when meglumine antimoniate was combined with CpG. The precise mechanisms, remain to be determined and will be of interest for future studies to define the interactions and “cross-talk” between drug-regulated and immunomodulatory processes. Considering the interdependent relationship between the host immune response and the efficacy of anti-leishmanial treatment, as illustrated by the high incidence of failures and relapses in immunocompromised patients [49–51], this model approximates natural infection and is particularly useful for the study of therapeutic interventions involving immunomodulation.
The contribution of immune response to the efficacy of anti-leishmanial treatments is acknowledged yet poorly understood. Several in vivo studies suggest a direct relation between the leishmanicidal effect of antimony and host immune factors like IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-12 [52–55], and recent evidence suggests that activation of the host immune response by miltefosine is a constituent of its mechanism of action [56–58]. The inclusion of sensitized cells of the adaptive immune response in the assessment of therapeutic agents allowed the quantification of pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory and Th1/Th2 cytokines that are elicited over the clinical spectrum of infection by species of the Viannia subgenus [59–61]. Further, high expression of pro-inflammatory chemokines such as CCL2, CXCL-9 and CXCL-10 has been associated with chronicity of dermal leishmaniasis caused by L. (Viannia) braziliensis infection [48]. Reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide production have also been identified among effector mechanisms that may be induced by antimonial drugs and participate in the elimination of Leishmania [62]. These and other potential immune response parameters including cell phenotypes and gene expression associated with clinical outcome and therapeutic response can also be assessed using this model.
Immunomodulators of potential use in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis, demonstrated concentration dependent effects critical to the outcome of Leishmania infection and disease. These ex vivo results confirm the usefulness of PBMCs to determine whether interventions that modify the host immune response can affect parasite survival and to what extent. The observed suppressive effect of pentoxifylline on cytokine production was consistent with previous reports using re-stimulation of PBMCs with soluble Leishmania antigen and in vitro immune responses during other pathologies associated with exacerbated inflammatory response [63–66].
The relevance of these findings to treatment is also illustrated by the recently reported results of a pilot study in cutaneous leishmaniasis patients infected with L. (V) braziliensis treated with the combination of antimony and pentoxifylline [21]. In latter study, both the conventional and combination treatments were accompanied by reduced secretion of pro-inflammatory TNF-α and IFN-γ by re-stimulated PBMCs on day 15 of treatment compared to pretreatment. However, the reduction was more pronounced in the antimony plus pentoxifylline group (84% vs 48%). In the ex vivo analysis of PBMCs from patients infected with L. (V) panamensis, the combination of meglumine antimoniate and pentoxifylline resulted in a significant reduction in secretion of IFN-γ and the Th2 cytokine IL-13.
CpG alone significantly induced the secretion of IL-10 in uninfected PBMCs, corroborating a previous report [67], yet interestingly, CpG in combination with antileishmanial drugs diminished the secretion of IL-10 by infected-PBMCs. Similarly the decrease of IL-10 and TGF-β by CpG2006 alone or in combination with miltefosine was reported recently by Shivahare and collaborators in the models of L. donovani infection in hamster and BALB/c mice. Therefore the use of immunomodulatory agents together with anti-leishmanial drugs may yield effects that differ from what has been previously observed for the agents alone, underscoring the importance of pre-clinical evaluation of immunotherapeutic strategies.
In conclusion, the ex vivo PBMC model of Leishmania infection provides access to host as well as parasite determinants of therapeutic response. Analysis of the interplay of acquired and innate immunity and anti-leishmanial drugs and co-adjuvant immunotherapeutic agents is achievable using PBMCs from donors previously exposed to natural infection with Leishmania. Using this approach, therapeutic strategies for leishmaniasis, particularly those that seek to intervene in the immune and inflammatory response can be evaluated and adjusted to optimize host and parasite responses to achieve healing.
Acknowledgments
We thank our colleagues Maria del Mar Castro, Jimena Jojoa and Wilson Cortés for their assistance in the diagnosis, management and enrollment of patients, Maryori Vidarte, María Claudia Barrera and Alejandra Arcos for technical assistance in the culture and characterization of Leishmania strains used in this study, Yenifer Orobio for her guidance in the statistical analysis, and Beatriz Parra of the Universidad del Valle for her collaboration in the conduct of Luminex assays.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: LGF OLF NGS DMP. Performed the experiments: LGF OLF. Analyzed the data: LGF OLF NGS DMP. Wrote the paper: LGF OLF NGS DMP.
References
- 1.
Elting LS, Rubenstein EB, Rolston KVI, Bodey GP. Outcomes of Bacteremia in Patients with Cancer and Neutropenia: Observations from Two Decades of Epidemiological and Clinical Trials. Clinical Infectious Diseases1997. p. 247–59.
- 2. Flateau C, Le Loup G, Pialoux G. Consequences of HIV infection on malaria and therapeutic implications: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11(7):541–56. Epub 2011/06/28. pmid:21700241.
- 3. Nelson CA, Zunt JR. Tuberculosis of the central nervous system in immunocompromised patients: HIV infection and solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(9):915–26. Epub 2011/10/01. pmid:21960714; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3218626.
- 4. Pirofski LA, Casadevall A. The damage-response framework of microbial pathogenesis and infectious diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;635:135–46. Epub 2008/10/10. pmid:18841709.
- 5. Diaz YR, Rojas R, Valderrama L, Saravia NG. T-bet, GATA-3, and Foxp3 expression and Th1/Th2 cytokine production in the clinical outcome of human infection with Leishmania (Viannia) species. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(3):406–15. Epub 2010/06/30. pmid:20583921.
- 6. Carvalho LP, Passos S, Schriefer A, Carvalho EM. Protective and pathologic immune responses in human tegumentary leishmaniasis. Front Immunol. 2012;3:301. Epub 2012/10/13. pmid:23060880; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3463898.
- 7. Nylen S, Eidsmo L. Tissue damage and immunity in cutaneous leishmaniasis. Parasite Immunol. 2012;34(12):551–61. Epub 2012/09/27. pmid:23009296.
- 8. Maurer-Cecchini A, Decuypere S, Chappuis F, Alexandrenne C, De Doncker S, Boelaert M, et al. Immunological determinants of clinical outcome in Peruvian patients with tegumentary leishmaniasis treated with pentavalent antimonials. Infect Immun. 2009;77(5):2022–9. Epub 2009/02/25. pmid:19237520; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2681755.
- 9. Ramirez C, Diaz-Toro Y, Tellez J, Castilho TM, Rojas R, Ettinger NA, et al. Human macrophage response to L. (Viannia) panamensis: microarray evidence for an early inflammatory response. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(10):e1866. Epub 2012/11/13. pmid:23145196; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3493378.
- 10. Shio MT, Hassani K, Isnard A, Ralph B, Contreras I, Gomez MA, et al. Host cell signalling and leishmania mechanisms of evasion. J Trop Med. 2012;2012:819512. Epub 2011/12/02. pmid:22131998; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3216306.
- 11. Mookerjee Basu J, Mookerjee A, Banerjee R, Saha M, Singh S, Naskar K, et al. Inhibition of ABC transporters abolishes antimony resistance in Leishmania Infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(3):1080–93. Epub 2007/12/07. pmid:18056276; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2258502.
- 12. Marques-da-Silva C, Chaves MM, Rodrigues JC, Corte-Real S, Coutinho-Silva R, Persechini PM. Differential modulation of ATP-induced P2X7-associated permeabilities to cations and anions of macrophages by infection with Leishmania amazonensis. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25356. Epub 2011/10/04. pmid:21966508; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3179508.
- 13. Gomez MA, Navas A, Marquez R, Rojas LJ, Vargas DA, Blanco VM, et al. Leishmania panamensis infection and antimonial drugs modulate expression of macrophage drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes: impact on intracellular parasite survival. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(1):139–49. Epub 2013/08/27. pmid:23975742; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3861331.
- 14. Shio MT, Olivier M. Editorial: Leishmania survival mechanisms: the role of host phosphatases. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88(1):1–3. Epub 2010/07/02. pmid:20591873.
- 15. Franco LH, Beverley SM, Zamboni DS. Innate immune activation and subversion of Mammalian functions by leishmania lipophosphoglycan. J Parasitol Res. 2012;2012:165126. Epub 2012/04/24. pmid:22523640; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3317186.
- 16. Amarante MK, Watanabe MA, Conchon-Costa I, Fiori LL, Oda JM, Bufalo MC, et al. The effect of propolis on CCL5 and IFN-gamma expression by peripheral blood mononuclear cells from leishmaniasis patients. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2012;64(1):154–60. Epub 2011/12/14. pmid:22150683.
- 17. Rodrigues RF, Charret KS, Campos MC, Amaral V, Echevarria A, Dos Reis C, et al. The in vivo activity of 1,3,4-thiadiazolium-2-aminide compounds in the treatment of cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(1):182–90. Epub 2011/10/12. pmid:21987238.
- 18. Mendez S, Traslavina R, Hinchman M, Huang L, Green P, Cynamon MH, et al. The antituberculosis drug pyrazinamide affects the course of cutaneous leishmaniasis in vivo and increases activation of macrophages and dendritic cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(12):5114–21. Epub 2009/09/23. pmid:19770283; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2786368.
- 19. Han J, Thompson P, Beutler B. Dexamethasone and pentoxifylline inhibit endotoxin-induced cachectin/tumor necrosis factor synthesis at separate points in the signaling pathway. J Exp Med. 1990;172(1):391–4. Epub 1990/07/01. pmid:2358784; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2188134.
- 20. Machado PRL, Lessa H, Lessa M, Guimarães LH, Bang H, Ho JL, et al. Oral Pentoxifylline Combined with Pentavalent Antimony: A Randomized Trial for Mucosal Leishmaniasis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2007;44(6):788–93. pmid:17304449
- 21. Brito G, Dourado M, Polari L, Celestino D, Carvalho LP, Queiroz A, et al. Clinical and immunological outcome in cutaneous leishmaniasis patients treated with pentoxifylline. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90(4):617–20. Epub 2014/02/26. pmid:24567316; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3973503.
- 22. Wingender G, Garbi N, Schumak B, Jungerkes F, Endl E, von Bubnoff D, et al. Systemic application of CpG-rich DNA suppresses adaptive T cell immunity via induction of IDO. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36(1):12–20. Epub 2005/12/03. pmid:16323249.
- 23. Waibler Z, Anzaghe M, Konur A, Akira S, Muller W, Kalinke U. Excessive CpG 1668 stimulation triggers IL-10 production by cDC that inhibits IFN-alpha responses by pDC. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38(11):3127–37. Epub 2008/11/11. pmid:18991289.
- 24. Vollmer J, Krieg AM. Immunotherapeutic applications of CpG oligodeoxynucleotide TLR9 agonists. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61(3):195–204. Epub 2009/02/13. pmid:19211030.
- 25. Pourgholaminejad A, Jamali A, Samadi-Foroushani M, Amari A, Mirzaei R, Ansaripour B, et al. Reduced efficacy of multiple doses of CpG-matured dendritic cell tumor vaccine in an experimental model. Cell Immunol. 2011;271(2):360–4. Epub 2011/09/06. pmid:21889129.
- 26. Jahrsdorfer B, Weiner GJ. CpG oligodeoxynucleotides as immunotherapy in cancer. Update Cancer Ther. 2008;3(1):27–32. Epub 2009/03/04. pmid:19255607; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2390897.
- 27. Fonseca DE, Kline JN. Use of CpG oligonucleotides in treatment of asthma and allergic disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61(3):256–62. Epub 2009/01/27. pmid:19167442.
- 28. Shivahare R, Vishwakarma P, Parmar N, Yadav PK, Haq W, Srivastava M, et al. Combination of liposomal CpG oligodeoxynucleotide 2006 and miltefosine induces strong cell-mediated immunity during experimental visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94596. Epub 2014/04/16. pmid:24732039; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3986403.
- 29. Rodriguez-Pinto D, Saravia NG, McMahon-Pratt D. CD4 T cell activation by B cells in human Leishmania (Viannia) infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:108. Epub 2014/02/27. pmid:24568275; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3937821.
- 30. Sambor A, Garcia A, Berrong M, Pickeral J, Brown S, Rountree W, et al. Establishment and maintenance of a PBMC repository for functional cellular studies in support of clinical vaccine trials. J Immunol Methods. 2014;409:107–16. Epub 2014/05/03. pmid:24787274; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4152919.
- 31. Bodley AL, McGarry MW, Shapiro TA. Drug cytotoxicity assay for African trypanosomes and Leishmania species. J Infect Dis. 1995;172(4):1157–9. Epub 1995/10/01. pmid:7561203.
- 32. Pedersen G, Andresen L, Matthiessen MW, Rask-Madsen J, Brynskov J. Expression of Toll-like receptor 9 and response to bacterial CpG oligodeoxynucleotides in human intestinal epithelium. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005;141(2):298–306. Epub 2005/07/06. pmid:15996194; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1809430.
- 33. Landrigan A, Yiu G, Agarwal K, Utz PJ. Therapeutic Toll-like receptor agonists directly influence mouse and human T cell lymphoma cell viability and cytokine secretion. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53(1):166–8. Epub 2011/07/26. pmid:21780996; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3339659.
- 34. Romero IC, Saravia NG, Walker J. Selective action of fluoroquinolones against intracellular amastigotes of Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis in vitro. J Parasitol. 2005;91(6):1474–9. Epub 2006/03/17. pmid:16539034.
- 35. Roy G, Dumas C, Sereno D, Wu Y, Singh AK, Tremblay MJ, et al. Episomal and stable expression of the luciferase reporter gene for quantifying Leishmania spp. infections in macrophages and in animal models. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000;110(2):195–206. Epub 2000/11/09. pmid:11071276.
- 36. Rojas R, Valderrama L, Valderrama M, Varona MX, Ouellette M, Saravia NG. Resistance to antimony and treatment failure in human Leishmania (Viannia) infection. J Infect Dis. 2006;193(10):1375–83. Epub 2006/04/19. pmid:16619185.
- 37. Boyum A. Isolation of lymphocytes, granulocytes and macrophages. Scand J Immunol. 1976;Suppl 5:9–15. Epub 1976/06/01. pmid:1052391.
- 38. Ashutosh , Gupta S, Ramesh , Sundar S, Goyal N. Use of Leishmania donovani field isolates expressing the luciferase reporter gene in in vitro drug screening. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(9):3776–83. Epub 2005/09/01. pmid:16131481; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1195392.
- 39. Fernandez O, Diaz-Toro Y, Valderrama L, Ovalle C, Valderrama M, Castillo H, et al. Novel approach to in vitro drug susceptibility assessment of clinical strains of Leishmania spp. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(7):2207–11. Epub 2012/04/21. pmid:22518860; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3405580.
- 40. Bosque F, Saravia NG, Valderrama L, Milon G. Distinct innate and acquired immune responses to Leishmania in putative susceptible and resistant human populations endemically exposed to L. (Viannia) panamensis infection. Scand J Immunol. 2000;51(5):533–41. Epub 2000/05/03. pmid:10792848.
- 41. Osorio Y, Travi BL, Renslo AR, Peniche AG, Melby PC. Identification of small molecule lead compounds for visceral leishmaniasis using a novel ex vivo splenic explant model system. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(2):e962. Epub 2011/03/02. pmid:21358812; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3039689.
- 42. Brachelente C, Muller N, Doherr MG, Sattler U, Welle M. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in naturally infected dogs is associated with a T helper-2-biased immune response. Vet Pathol. 2005;42(2):166–75. Epub 2005/03/09. pmid:15753470.
- 43. Nelson KG, Bishop JV, Ryan RO, Titus R. Nanodisk-associated amphotericin B clears Leishmania major cutaneous infection in susceptible BALB/c mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(4):1238–44. Epub 2006/03/30. pmid:16569834; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1426947.
- 44. Gebre-Hiwot A, Tadesse G, Croft SL, Frommel D. An in vitro model for screening antileishmanial drugs: the human leukaemia monocyte cell line, THP-1. Acta Trop. 1992;51(3–4):237–45. Epub 1992/08/01. pmid:1359751.
- 45. Cruz A, Rainey PM, Herwaldt BL, Stagni G, Palacios R, Trujillo R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of Antimony in Children Treated for Leishmaniasis with Meglumine Antimoniate. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2007;195(4):602–8. pmid:17230422
- 46. Dorlo TP, van Thiel PP, Huitema AD, Keizer RJ, de Vries HJ, Beijnen JH, et al. Pharmacokinetics of miltefosine in Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(8):2855–60. Epub 2008/06/04. pmid:18519729; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2493105.
- 47. Hochhuth CH, Vehmeyer K, Eibl H, Unger C. Hexadecylphosphocholine induces interferon-gamma secretion and expression of GM-CSF mRNA in human mononuclear cells. Cell Immunol. 1992;141(1):161–8. Epub 1992/04/15. pmid:1555249.
- 48. van Blitterswijk WJ, Verheij M. Anticancer mechanisms and clinical application of alkylphospholipids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1831(3):663–74. Epub 2012/11/10. pmid:23137567.
- 49. Garcia-Cordoba F, Ortuno FJ, Segovia M, Gonzalez Diaz G. Fatal visceral leishmaniasis, with massive bone-marrow infection, in an immunosuppressed but HIV-negative Spanish patient, after the initiation of treatment with meglumine antimoniate. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2005;99(2):125–30. Epub 2005/04/09. pmid:15814031.
- 50. Ritmeijer K, Dejenie A, Assefa Y, Hundie TB, Mesure J, Boots G, et al. A comparison of miltefosine and sodium stibogluconate for treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in an Ethiopian population with high prevalence of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(3):357–64. Epub 2006/06/29. pmid:16804852.
- 51. Tuon FF, Sabbaga Amato V, Floeter-Winter LM, de Andrade Zampieri R, Amato Neto V, Siqueira Franca FO, et al. Cutaneous leishmaniasis reactivation 2 years after treatment caused by systemic corticosteroids—first report. Int J Dermatol. 2007;46(6):628–30. Epub 2007/06/07. pmid:17550567.
- 52. Murray HW, Montelibano C, Peterson R, Sypek JP. Interleukin-12 Regulates the Response to Chemotherapy in Experimental Visceral Leishmaniasis. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2000;182(5):1497–502. pmid:11023473
- 53. Escobar P, Yardley V, Croft SL. Activities of hexadecylphosphocholine (miltefosine), AmBisome, and sodium stibogluconate (Pentostam) against Leishmania donovani in immunodeficient scid mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(6):1872–5. Epub 2001/05/17. pmid:11353640; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC90560.
- 54. Muniz-Junqueira MI, de Paula-Coelho VN. Meglumine antimonate directly increases phagocytosis, superoxide anion and TNF-alpha production, but only via TNF-alpha it indirectly increases nitric oxide production by phagocytes of healthy individuals, in vitro. Int Immunopharmacol. 2008;8(12):1633–8. Epub 2008/08/12. pmid:18692597.
- 55. Fan K, Borden E, Yi T. Interferon-gamma is induced in human peripheral blood immune cells in vitro by sodium stibogluconate/interleukin-2 and mediates its antitumor activity in vivo. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2009;29(8):451–60. Epub 2009/06/12. pmid:19514839; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2956636.
- 56. Wadhone P, Maiti M, Agarwal R, Kamat V, Martin S, Saha B. Miltefosine promotes IFN-gamma-dominated anti-leishmanial immune response. J Immunol. 2009;182(11):7146–54. Epub 2009/05/21. pmid:19454711.
- 57. Mukhopadhyay D, Das NK, Roy S, Kundu S, Barbhuiya JN, Chatterjee M. Miltefosine effectively modulates the cytokine milieu in Indian post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(9):1427–36. Epub 2011/09/22. pmid:21933878.
- 58. Mukherjee AK, Gupta G, Adhikari A, Majumder S, Kar Mahapatra S, Bhattacharyya Majumdar S, et al. Miltefosine triggers a strong proinflammatory cytokine response during visceral leishmaniasis: role of TLR4 and TLR9. Int Immunopharmacol. 2012;12(4):565–72. Epub 2012/03/01. pmid:22361489.
- 59. Salhi A, Rodrigues V Jr., Santoro F, Dessein H, Romano A, Castellano LR, et al. Immunological and genetic evidence for a crucial role of IL-10 in cutaneous lesions in humans infected with Leishmania braziliensis. J Immunol. 2008;180(9):6139–48. Epub 2008/04/22. pmid:18424735.
- 60. Castilho TM, Goldsmith-Pestana K, Lozano C, Valderrama L, Saravia NG, McMahon-Pratt D. Murine model of chronic L. (Viannia) panamensis infection: Role of IL-13 in disease. European Journal of Immunology. 2010;40(10):2816–29. pmid:20827674
- 61. de Assis Souza M, de Castro MC, de Oliveira AP, de Almeida AF, de Almeida TM, Reis LC, et al. Cytokines and NO in American tegumentary leishmaniasis patients: profiles in active disease, after therapy and in self-healed individuals. Microb Pathog. 2013;57:27–32. Epub 2013/02/23. pmid:23428929.
- 62. Mookerjee Basu J, Mookerjee A, Sen P, Bhaumik S, Sen P, Banerjee S, et al. Sodium antimony gluconate induces generation of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide via phosphoinositide 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in Leishmania donovani-infected macrophages. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(5):1788–97. Epub 2006/04/28. pmid:16641451; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1472228.
- 63. D'Hellencourt CL, Diaw L, Cornillet P, Guenounou M. Differential regulation of TNF alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, TNF beta, and IL-10 by pentoxifylline. Int J Immunopharmacol. 1996;18(12):739–48. Epub 1996/12/01. pmid:9172017.
- 64. Gutierrez-Reyes G, Lopez-Ortal P, Sixtos S, Cruz S, Ramirez-Iglesias MT, Gutierrez-Ruiz MC, et al. Effect of pentoxifylline on levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines during chronic hepatitis C. Scand J Immunol. 2006;63(6):461–7. Epub 2006/06/13. pmid:16764700.
- 65. Ribeiro de Jesus A, Luna T, Pacheco de Almeida R, Machado PR, Carvalho EM. Pentoxifylline down modulate in vitro T cell responses and attenuate pathology in Leishmania and HTLV-I infections. Int Immunopharmacol. 2008;8(10):1344–53. Epub 2008/08/09. pmid:18687297.
- 66. Kim SJ, Kim JW, Kim YH, Lee SH, Yoon HK, Kim CH, et al. Effects of tranilast and pentoxifylline in a mouse model of chronic asthma using house dust mite antigen. J Asthma. 2009;46(9):884–94. Epub 2009/11/13. pmid:19905913.
- 67. Vollmer J, Rankin R, Hartmann H, Jurk M, Samulowitz U, Wader T, et al. Immunopharmacology of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides and ribavirin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(6):2314–7. Epub 2004/05/25. pmid:15155243; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC415599.