Mitogenome diversity of Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus: Detection of multiple introduction events in Portugal

Líbia Zé-Zé; Vítor Borges; Hugo Costa Osório; Jorge Machado; João Paulo Gomes; Maria João Alves

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0008657

Abstract

Aedes albopictus, along with Ae. aegypti, are key arbovirus vectors that have been expanding their geographic range over the last decades. In 2017, Ae. albopictus was detected for the first time at two distinct locations in Portugal. In order to understand how the Ae. albopictus populations recently introduced in Portugal are genetically related and which is their likely route of invasion, we performed an integrative cytochrome C oxidase I gene (COI)- and mitogenome-based phylogeographic analysis of mosquitoes samples collected in Portugal in 2017 and 2018 in the context of the global Ae. albopictus diversity. COI-based analysis (31 partial sequences obtained from 83 mosquitoes) revealed five haplotypes (1 to 5), with haplotype 1 (which is widely distributed in temperate areas worldwide) being detected in both locations. Haplotypes 2 and 3 were exclusively found in Southern region (Algarve), while haplotype 4 and 5 were only detected in the North of Portugal (Penafiel, Oporto region). Subsequent high discriminatory analyses based on Ae. albopictus mitogenome (17 novel sequences) not only confirmed a high degree of genetic variability within and between populations at both geographic locations (compatible with the Ae. albopictus mosquito populations circulating in Europe), but also revealed two mitogenome mutational signatures not previously reported at worldwide level. While our results generally sustain the occurrence of multiple introduction events, fine mitogenome sequence inspection further indicates a possible Ae. albopictus migration within the country, from the Northern introduction locality to the Southern region. In summary, the observed scenario of high Ae. albopictus genetic diversity in Portugal, together with the detection of mosquitoes in successive years since 2017 in Algarve and Penafiel, points that both Ae. albopictus populations seem to be already locally established, as its presence has been reported for three consecutive years, raising the public health awareness for future mosquito-borne diseases outbreaks.

Author summary

In 2017, Aedes albopictus was reported for the first time in Portugal at two distinct locations, in the premises of a tire company in Penafiel, in the North, and nearby a golf course in Algarve, a tourism destination in the southernmost country region. The geographical spread of this species is promoted by egg and larvae transport in aquatic trade goods, as tires and aquatic plants, and adult anthropophilic behavior that favors passive land transportation. In Portugal, especially in the Southern region, temperate climate conditions are adequate for adult mosquitoes to survive most of the year. In a way to understand the genetic variability of Ae. albopictus populations introduced in Portugal, we analyzed 31 cytochrome C oxidase I gene (COI) partial sequences and 17 mitogenome sequences, integrating them in the context of the global Ae. albopictus phylogeographic diversity (i.e., 183 COI and 26 mitogenome sequences previously reported at worldwide level). Although COI haplotype 1 predominated, four additional haplotypes (2 to 5) were detected in Portugal. Subsequent in-depth mitogenome analysis revealed considerable genetic diversity, including not only sequences relating to mitogenomes reported mainly from Italy, Japan and China, but also two novel mitogenome mutational signatures.

Our study indicates that Ae. albopictus is locally established in Portugal and intra-country dispersal may have already happened, highlighting the challenges for vector surveillance and control programs aiming at restraining arbovirus disease burden in the future.

Citation: Zé-Zé L, Borges V, Osório HC, Machado J, Gomes JP, Alves MJ (2020) Mitogenome diversity of Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus: Detection of multiple introduction events in Portugal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14(9): e0008657. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008657

Editor: Mariangela Bonizzoni, Universita degli Studi di Pavia, ITALY

Received: October 24, 2019; Accepted: July 28, 2020; Published: September 30, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Zé-Zé et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Aedes (Stegomya) albopictus, originally described by Skuse in 1894 from India, is one of the most invasive mosquito species that in the last 50 years has successfully colonized most of the tropical and temperate regions worldwide. In the 1970s its expansion was noticed in several islands in the Indian and Pacific Oceans [1] and for the first time in Europe, in Albania, in 1979 [2]. In the 1980s, Ae. albopictus was reported in the Americas [3], in Brazil [4], and in Africa [5]. The geographic range of this species increased dramatically in the 1990s. The spread to Mexico happened in the early 1990s [6, 7] and was confirmed by all Central American countries in 2010 [5].

In Italy, it was detected in 1990, in the port of Genoa where it was introduced in a shipment of used tires from USA [8]. Italy is nowadays considered the most heavily-infested country in Europe, since Ae. albopictus become established in most areas of the country (less than 600 m above sea level) and is abundant in many urban areas [9].

Since the introduction in Italy, Ae. albopictus has been gradually spreading in Europe, and specially into most of the Mediterranean countries (S1 Fig). More recently, in 2017, this mosquito was reported in Portugal at two distinct locations, in a tire company located in the North of Portugal, Penafiel (Oporto region) [10], and nearby a golf resort in the South, Algarve region [11]. Since then, its presence has been reported at the same locations continuously and its establishment and dispersal raises concern for autochthonous mosquito-borne disease outbreaks.

The worldwide successful expansion of Ae. albopictus has been promoted by unwilled transport of eggs in artificial and natural containers (with several introductions routed by used tires and Lucky bamboo trades), and to its anthropophilic behavior that promotes a close relation with humans and consequent passive transport via private or public ground vehicles [12, 13].

This impressive invasive capacity is undoubtedly associated to this species adaptive plasticity and the significant genetic population-based variation observed [14]. Aedes albopictus ability to inhabit temperate regions with relatively cold and dry climates is related to egg diapause which confers cold-hardiness, and is absent in tropical populations of this species, adapted to warm and wet climates [15]. In this sense, the risk of establishment is believed to be related to the origin of the mosquitoes, since mosquito populations with egg diapause of temperate origins are more likely to establish in temperate latitudes [12].

Aedes albopictus, beyond being a nuisance species having considerable impact in environmental health and community welfare, is a competent vector species of a wide range of arboviruses and parasites, which raises the most concern in veterinary and public health. The transmission and spread of pathogenic flaviviruses such as dengue, Zika, West Nile, yellow fever and Japanese encephalitis viruses, alphaviruses like chikungunya virus, and also bunyaviruses as the La Crosse and Rift Valley fever viruses makes this mosquito a major global public health issue.

Autochthonous transmission of dengue and chikungunya has been reported in Europe related to Ae. albopictus, since 2007, when an outbreak of chikungunya with circa 330 suspected and confirmed cases occurred in the region of Emilia Romagna in Italy [16, 17]. More recently, chikungunya outbreaks have been reported in France in 2010 [18, 19], 2014 [20], and 2017 [21], and again, in Italy in 2017 [22]. Autochthonous dengue cases caused by dengue serotypes 1 and 2 have also been reported in 2010 in Croatia [23] and France [24], and in France in 2013 [25], 2014 [26] and 2015 [27]. In 2018, 12 cases of autochthonous dengue were confirmed in the EU, six in Spain (five in the region of Murcia and one in Catalonia) and six in France (five cases in Saint Laurent du Var, one case in Montpellier) [28].

In Portugal, a National Vector Surveillance Network-REVIVE (REde de VIgilância de VEctores)—is established since 2008 under the custody of the Portuguese Ministry of Health [29]. Nowadays, the REVIVE network includes the General Directorate of Health (DGS), the five Regional Health Administrations (ARS) (namely Algarve, Alentejo, Lisboa e Vale do Tejo, Centro and Norte), the National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge (INSA), and, in the outermost regions, the Institute of Health Administration of Madeira and the Regional Health Directorate of Azores. REVIVE carries out the nationwide surveillance of the most significant hematophagous arthropods in public health (mosquitoes, ticks, and sandflies). Surveillance of mosquito species and screening of field-collected mosquitoes for arboviruses is regularly performed. At airports, ports, storage areas, and specific border regions with Spain, monitoring takes place throughout the year with the commitment of local and regional authorities.

Mitochondrial DNA genes, namely cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 (ND5), have been largely used to study the genetic relationships of Ae. albopictus [30–33] producing significant sequence data from most of the countries where this species has already been recorded. Mitochondrial DNA genes are ideal genetic markers to assess ancestry and demographic changes in populations [34] since their inheritance is uniparental (maternal in Ae. albopictus), recombination events are absent, they have high mutation and nucleotide substitution rates and a well-defined effective population size of one-fourth nuclear genes [34–36]. However, some limitations detected in COI and ND5 population studies suggest that the variation observed may be insufficient to phylogenetically place mosquitos into haplogroups [37–39]. In a way to overcome these constrains, Battaglia et al. [40] studied sequence variation in the entire coding regions of 27 mitogenomes and define five haplogroups in Asia, of which only three (A1a1, A1a2, and A1b) were likely to be related to the worldwide spread of Ae. albopictus.

In order to understand how Ae. albopictus populations recently introduced in Portugal are genetically related and which is their likely route of invasion, we performed an integrative COI- and mitogenome-based phylogeographic analysis of mosquitoes collected in Portugal in 2017 and 2018 in the context of the global Ae. albopictus diversity.

Materials and methods

Mosquito samples and DNA extraction

In order to explore the mitogenome diversity, we analyzed nine Aedes albopictus mosquitoes from 12^th September to 4^th October 2017, and in 11^th July 2018 in the premises of a tire company, located in the metropolitan area of Oporto, municipality of Penafiel, and 17 Ae. albopictus females in Loulé municipality, Algarve region, from 12^th July 2018 to 4^th October 2018 (Table 1). All mosquito samples were collected by the national REVIVE surveillance network [10], at public and private proprieties with the respective accountable/owners knowledge and permission. Samples for DNA extraction were selected individually and in pools (up to six mosquitoes). All these mosquitoes were previously identified at morphological [41, 42] and molecular (Osório et al. [10], and this work for mosquitos collected in 2018) levels. Additionally, 7 and 60 mosquitos, collected in Algarve and Penafiel, respectively, from 26^th September to 17^th October 2018 were also molecularly identified using COI gene of mitochondrial DNA using primers LCO 1490 and HCO 2198 [43], as previously described [10]. Mosquito samples collected in 2018 were selected for mitogenome sequence using COI haplotype data.

Download:

Table 1. Aedes albopictus samples collected in Portugal.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008657.t001

Mosquitoes were grinded individually and analyzed individually or in pools (up to 6 specimens) with a mortar and pestle with liquid nitrogen and 500 μL of minimal essential medium supplied with 10% FBS, streptomycin (0.1 mg/mL) and amphotericin B (1 mg/mL). An aliquot of 300 μL was preserved at -80°C and the remaining volume was further grinded 300 μL of Lysis Buffer (NUCLISENS easyMAG, Biomérieux), added to the homogenizer cartridge (Invitrogen) and centrifuged at 12,000g for 2 min to remove cellular debris and reduce lysate viscosity. Total nucleic acid extraction was performed using the prepared lysate suspensions in the automated platform NUCLISENS easyMAG (Biomérieux).

Amplicon-based next-generation sequencing

Mitochondrial coding regions (1–14,893 bp) were amplified according to the protocol described by Battaglia et al. [40] by the amplification of two long PCR fragments using primers 274F (5’AGC TAA CTC TTG ATT AGG GGC A3’) and 8875R (5’TGT TGA GGC ACC TGT TTC AG3’) for coding region 1 (8.6 Kb), and 8415F (5’TTA AAG TCG GAG GAG CAG CT3’) and 14717R (5’AAA TTT GTG CCA GCT ACC GC3’) for coding region 2 (6.3 Kb). Nine mosquito’s mitogenomes were sequenced individually, and 14 COI sequences were obtained from 21 mosquitoes collected in Oporto region. From Algarve region, eight mitogenome sequences were obtained from 18 mosquitoes and 17 COI amplicons were sequenced from 65 mosquitoes. Long PCRs were carried out in 50 μL reaction mixtures with 1x AccuPrime PCR Buffer II (Invitrogen), 1 U of AccuPrime Taq DNA Polymerase High Fidelity (Invitrogen), 0.2 μM of each primer and 10–50 ng of template DNA. PCR conditions were as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, and 35 cycles of 94°C for 30s, 59°C for 30 s and 68°C for 9 min, and final extension at 68°C for 5 min. Successful amplicons were screened on a 1.5% agarose gel and further purified using Agencourt AMPure XP PCR Purification kit before proceeding to Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation (Illumina), according to manufacture instructions. Libraries were subsequently sequenced (2 x 150 bp or 2 x 200 bp paired-end reads) using a MiSeq (Illumina) equipment.

Data analysis

Core bioinformatics analyses were conducted using INSaFLU (https://insaflu.insa.pt/), a web-based platform for amplicon-based NGS data analysis [44]. Briefly, the bioinformatics pipeline (detailed in Borges et al. [44]) involved: i) raw NGS reads quality analysis and improvement using FastQC v. 0.11.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) and Trimmomatic v. 0.27 [45] (http://www.usadellab.org/cms/index.php?page=trimmomatic), respectively; ii) reference-based mapping, consensus generation and variant detection using the multisoftware tool Snippy v. 3.2-dev (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy) (the captured sequence of the mitogenome of Ae. albopictus strain Rimini isolate 1#Rim1 haplogroup A1a1a1 was used as reference; NCBI accession number KX383916; positions 283–14702); and, iii) alignment of consensus sequences using MAFFT v. 7.313 [46] (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/). Mean depth of coverage per sample ranged from ~450x to 1500x. Reads datasets generated during this study are available at the European Nucleotide Archive (Project accession number PRJEB32796). Detailed ENA accession numbers are described in S2 Table.

For the integration of mosquitos circulating in Portugal into the global Ae. albopictus genetic diversity, nucleotide consensus sequences of both COI gene and mitogenome were aligned against multiple sequences available at GenBank (183 COI and 26 mitogenome sequences previously reported at worldwide level; S1 and S2 Tables respectively) using MAFFT v. 7.313 [46]. The obtained nucleotide alignments were manually inspected/corrected using MEGA 7.0 [47] (https://www.megasoftware.net/) and further used to build approximately-maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees applying the double-precision mode of FastTree2 under the General Time-Reversible (GTR) model (1000 bootstraps) [48]. The shared internal regions of the COI gene and mitogenome subjected to comparative genetic analyses in this study correspond to positions 1,511–2,080 and 283–14,653 of the reference mitogenome (Rimini isolate 1; GenBank accession number KX383916), respectively. Aedes albopictus metrics of genetic diversity including the number of polymorphic sites, haplotype diversity, and nucleotide diversity for COI and mitogenome sequences, for all determined sequences and for Oporto and Algarve populations were estimated using DnaSP v.5.0 [49].

Phylogenetic data integration and visualization was performed using GrapeTree [50] and Microreact (also used for geospatial data visualization) [51].

Results

COI haplotypes diversity in Portugal

Thirty-one mtDNA COI partial sequences from 83 Ae. albopictus mosquitoes collected in Portugal were analyzed (GenBank accession numbers MF990905, MK995303-MK995332) representing five haplotypes (i.e. maternal lineages) and a total of four polymorphic sites (Table 1). Estimated nucleotide diversity and haplotype diversity was higher in Algarve than in Oporto population (π = 0.00149, Hd = 0.6895 vs π = 0.00043, Hd = 0.2747).

Analysis of partial DNA sequences from the COI gene obtained from mosquitoes collected in 2018 enabled the identification of three haplotypes (1, 2 and 3) in Algarve (Southern Portugal) and allowed the detection of two new haplotypes (4 and 5) in Penafiel (Northern Portugal)(Table 1 and S2 Fig). Haplotype 1, which is shared in both regions, represents the most common and widely distributed in temperate areas (Fig 1, S2 Fig, Table 1 and S1 Table). The observed diversity detected in Portugal, considering the geospatial haplotype distribution in Europe (Fig 1B; S2 Fig), can be well explained by passive land-transportation from other European countries, especially from the Mediterranean countries.

Download:

Fig 1. Integration of mosquitos detected in Portugal into the global A. albopictus COI-based genetic diversity.

(A) Microreact Visualization of a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed based on 31 novel COI sequences obtained from mosquito circulating in Portugal plus 182 sequences available at GenBank (S1 Table). The colored external rings (from the outside in) indicate the COI haplotype/GenBank accession numbers, country, country region and year of collection. The tree nodes are colored according with the COI haplotype. For better tree visualization, the highly divergent VN103-9 strain haplotype 40 was excluded from the tree and the NC006817 sequence representative of mitogenome haplogroup A3 / COI haplotype 6 was used as root. (B) Geospatial mapping of A. albopictus detected in the Portugal by COI haplotype in the context of the mosquito distribution in Europe region (plus Morocco). Of note, the geographical placement of circles (colored by haplotype distribution) in the map may not correspond to the exact location where mosquitos were collected (refer to S1 Table for details about the used location) and the circles size does not correlate with number of sequences documented in each location. The internal region of the COI gene under comparison corresponds to positions 1511–2080 of the Rimini isolate 1 reference mitogenome (GenBank accession number KX383916). Phylogenetic and geospatial data were integrated using the freely available platform Microreact [51], with the map presented here being externally created with the open source website https://landlook.usgs.gov/viewer.html. The tree file and associated metadata can be investigated and downloaded through the free online platform Microreact (https://microreact.org/project/yXjPW4KyU/e82361b6).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008657.g001

Mitogenome-based phylogeography of Ae. albopictus

A total of 17 novel mitogenomes coding sequences, 14 almost complete (i.e., >95% of coding sequence, from 14,370 to 14,420 bp; GenBank accessions MN513352-MN513359, MN513361, MN513362, MN513364-MN513366 and MN513368) and three partial sequences (GenBank accessions MN513360, MN513363 and MN513367, for PoMo2709, PoMoF503 and PoMoF618, respectively) were determined in this study, representing nine different sequences (Table 1, S3 Table). Using mitogenome sequences, the estimated nucleotide diversity was higher in Algarve (π = 0.00052 vs π = 0.00047), but the haplotype diversity was higher in Oporto Ae. albopictus population (Hd = 0.8056 vs Hd = 0.7500). Sequence analysis confirms a high level of mitogenome diversity in both locations compatible with the Ae. albopictus mosquito populations circulating in Europe (Fig 2, S2 and S3 Tables). Overall, and as previously reported by Battaglia et al. [40] for most of mitogenomes circulating in temperate regions, the Portuguese mitogenome’ sequences grouped within haplogroup A1. Specifically, (i) PoMo2600, PoMo2601, PoMo2604, PoMo2608 mitogenomes from Oporto cluster with mitogenomes from Italy and USA (A1a1a1a, using Battaglia et al. haplogroup designation), (ii) PoMo2728 and PoMoF636 mitogenomes from Algarve clusters with A1a1a mitogenome from Japan (J Wa1), (iii) PoMo2602 and PoMoF505 mitogenomes from Oporto clusters more closely with Chinese Foshan sequence, from a laboratory-maintained strain founded in 1981 from mosquitoes from Southeast China (A1a2), and (iv) PoMo2607 mitogenome from Oporto clusters with Ath2 mitogenome from Greece (A1a2a) (Fig 2, S3 Table). Nevertheless, besides the mitogenome-based divergence reported previously [40], two novel sequence clusters were recovered represented respectively by two sequences, PoMoF506 and PoMoF607 from Algarve, and three sequences, PoMo2599 (2017, Oporto) and PoMo2711 and 2708 (2018, Algarve) (Fig 2). The sequence variation observed in the latest group, enrolling similar sequences observed in the northern region in 2017, and posteriorly in the southern region in 2018, may indicate a possible migration of Ae. albopictus within the country, compatible with the observed mutational and temporal profiles (S3 Table).

Download:

Fig 2. Mitogenome-based phylogeographic analysis of mosquitos detected in Portugal.

The figure illustrates the integrative phylogenetic and geospatial analysis of 14 novel mitogenome sequences obtained from mosquito circulating in Portugal plus 25 sequences available in GenBank (S2 Table). The tree nodes are colored according with distinct mitogenome backgrounds (classified as haplogroup, according to Battaglia et al. [40] when possible). Colored blocks (from left to right) indicate the (inferred) haplogroup, COI haplotype and country / region of the 39 mitogenomes under comparison. Of note, inferred haplogroups are indicated within brackets (see details in S3 Table), where divergent sequences that do not present SNP/indel profiles of previously defined haplogroups representative are indicated as potentially “new” (in yellow) haplogroups (including one potentially novel haplogroup detected in Oporto region and another detected in both Oporto and Algarve regions). Of note, the geographical placement of circles (colored by inferred haplogroups) in the map may not correspond to the exact location where mosquitos were collected (refer to S2 Table for details about the applied location). The internal region of the mitogenome sequence under comparison corresponds to positions 283–14653 of the Rimini isolate 1 reference mitogenome (GenBank accession number KX383916). The tree scale reflects the number of substitution per site in the 14400 bp alignment. Phylogenetic and geospatial data were integrated using the freely available platform Microreact [51], with the map presented here being externally created with the open source website https://landlook.usgs.gov/viewer.html. The tree file and associated metadata can be investigated and downloaded through the free online platform Microreact (https://microreact.org/project/nkGjD666d/b3aad1e8).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008657.g002

Discussion

Overall and as expected, the Aedes albopictus mosquitos collected in Portugal, in 2017 and 2018, are related to populations involved in the worldwide spread of this species through temperate regions. The genetic diversity observed at both locations, especially by mitogenome sequence analysis, indicates that the main introduction events were distinct and unrelated. However, the determination of a unique cluster of mitogenome sequences in Penafiel, Oporto in 2017 (PoMo2599) and in Algarve in September of 2018 (PoMo2711 and PoMo2708) may indicate migration of Ae. albopictus in Portugal from Oporto to Algarve. Algarve is about 560 km apart from Penafiel, using driveways. This southern country region is a common vacation destination, with increased tourism in the summer. Although in 2019, no additional collections sites for Ae. albopictus were, so far, reported by the REVIVE, the geographic spread within the country cannot be excluded. However, further mitogenome surveys enabling the access of sequences from mosquitoes collected in other European countries, namely in Spain are imperative to access a clear picture of this species geographic expansion.

In Penafiel (Northern location, Oporto region), the increased genetic diversity suggests multiple introduction events via tires transport. This hypothesis is supported by the detection of new distinct COI/mitogenome sequences in 2018 comparing with 2017. Despite several international connections by sea and sea ports in Portugal, representing high risk entry points, the pattern of genetic diversity observed in Ae. albopictus mosquitoes suggests that the introduction events detected at both sites/regions were promoted by passive land-transportation mainly from other European countries. In Penafiel, at the premises of the tire company, the introduction event was most probably by immature stages, including eggs and larvae, and in Algarve most likely of adult mosquitoes by passive transport in public or private vehicles. Nevertheless, introduction events of immature mosquito’s stages in Algarve cannot be excluded. Some mitogenome sequences detected in Penafiel in 2017 (PoMo2600, PoMo2601, PoMo2604 and PoMo2608) are identical to mitogenome sequences detected in Italy (Cassino, region of Lazio [40]; GenBank accession KX383921), indicating this country as the most probable origin of, at least, some of the mosquitoes populations introduced in Portugal. These results are in agreement with the general assumption that Italy is the geographic origin of the recent Ae. albopictus spread in Europe [52] and also corroborates the report by Osório et al. [10] of an Ae. albopictus Insect Specific Flavivirus (ISF) sequence detected in Penafiel in 2017 similar to ISF sequences detected previously in Italy.

From other perspective, the high genetic diversity perceived in our results prove the coexistence of different genetic sources, thus raising the hypothesis that such population plasticity can be enough to difficult eventual vector control strategies. Additionally, the detection of mosquitoes in successive years since 2017 in Algarve and Penafiel points that both Ae. albopictus populations seem to be already locally established, as its presence has been reported for three consecutive years.

Furthermore, as vector spread is a key risk factor for arbovirus transmission, with arboviruses outbreaks typically occurring 5–15 years after Ae. aegypti or Ae. albopictus detection [52], the presence of Ae. albopictus in Portugal is a major public health threat, raising concern about the introduction of several arboviruses in the continent to the same level as already recognized in Madeira Island. In fact, Ae. aegypti present in Madeira since 2005 [53], was associated with the major dengue outbreak reported in Europe in 2012 [54].

Considering the emerging arboviruses (namely Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya viruses) and the rapid movement of viremic travelers, the risk of autochthonous cases in Europe is directly linked to the presence of Aedes vectors (especially during the summer season when vectorial capacity is sufficient to sustain transmission) and the number of travelers that arrive viremic increases [55]. A recent work by Massad et al. [55] estimates that Portugal received 71 dengue-viremic air passengers in 2012 (following Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy and Spain). Regarding Algarve, the public health concern is particularly high, since this region is an important tourism destination in Europe. Moreover, when considering the expected number of dengue viremic air passengers arriving only from Brazil, Portugal is the third European country at high risk, receiving 68 dengue-viremic travelers (closely following France and Italy that are expected to receive 70 and 69 dengue-viremic travelers, respectively). In fact, this work [55] points out the high risk of arbovirus introduction and occurrence of secondary autochthonous cases in Portugal, especially from Brazil.

In conclusion, our work, by providing the analysis of the genetic diversity of Ae. albopictus detected in Portugal in 2017 and 2018, highlights the importance of surveillance at “hotspots” for mosquito introductions, as tires companies, and points of entry (borders, ports and airports), as well as the implementation of vector control methods by the responsible authorities to prevent (new) introductions, establishments and dispersals within the country.

Considering recent prediction studies, habitat suitability for Ae. albopictus expansion is expected in Portugal from North to South [52]. In this scenario, the application of vector control measures and the maintenance of national entomological surveillance programs is crucial to effectively lower the risk of future autochthonous arbovirus cases (and outbreaks) in Portugal.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Aedes albopictus spread in Europe and Mediterranean associated countries.

The timeline indicates the years and countries were Ae. albopictus were detected. The number of mosquitos above the line indicates the number of new countries detections at each year. Geographical distribution details in European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Aedes albopictus—Factsheet for experts https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/disease-vectors/facts/mosquito-factsheets/aedes-albopictus; Kraemer MU, Sinka ME, Duda KA, Mylne AQ, Shearer FM, Barker CM, et al. The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus. Elife. 2015; 4:e08347 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08347; [10–11].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008657.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Integration of mosquitos circulating in Portugal into the Aedes albopictus COI haplotype diversity.

GrapeTree visualization of a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed based on 31 COI sequences obtained from mosquito circulating in Portugal plus 183 sequences available at GenBank (S1 Table). Tree nodes are colored according with COI haplotype, country, year of collection and geographical region in Portugal. The branch lengths are presented in logarithmic scale and the area of the nodes correlates with the number of sequences with a unique sequence profile (corresponding to a distinct COI haplotypes). The internal region of COI gene under comparison corresponds to positions 1511–2080 of the Rimini isolate 1 reference mitogenome (GenBank accession KX383916).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008657.s002

(TIF)

S1 Table. COI sequences analyzed in the present study and associated metadata.

A total of 31 COI sequences obtained from mosquito detected in Portugal plus 183 sequences available at GenBank were analyzed. Of note, the geographical placement (latitude/longitude) may not correspond to the exact location where mosquitos were collected for some samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008657.s003

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Mitogenome sequences analyzed in the present study and associated metadata (including 17 novel mitogenome sequences and 26 previously reported sequences available at GenBank).

Of note, the geographical placement (latitude/longitude) may not correspond to the exact location where mosquitos were collected for some samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008657.s004

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Mutational mapping of mitogenome sequences (17 novel mitogenome sequences obtained in the present study plus 26 sequences available in GenBank; see S2 Table for details), and haplogroup classification of mosquitos detected in Portugal, according to Battaglia et al [40], when possible.

Inferred haplogroups are indicated within brackets, where divergent sequences that do not present SNP/indel profiles of previously defined haplogroups representative are indicated as potentially “new” haplogroups. For matrix simplification, sequences are organized by haplogroup and the highly divergent sequence representative of mitogenome haplogroup A3 (NC006817) was excluded. The matrix exclusively includes SNP/indels detected within the mitogenome internal region used for phylogeographic analysis (Fig 2), corresponding to positions 283–14,653 of the Rimini isolate 1 reference mitogenome (GenBank accession number KX383916.1). Positions within the COI region used in this study (1,511–2,080) are highlighted in yellow. Of note, in order to increase the discrimintory power, the partial sequences indicated with asterisk (*) were not included in the mitogenome-based phylogenetic inferences presented in Fig 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008657.s005

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Marco Brustolin and Carles Aranda for proving the collection date and location in Spain of the sampled mosquitoes corresponding to haplotypes H1 to H8 COX1 sequences. We are also grateful to REVIVE team for the mosquito collection nationwide.

References

1. Estrada-Franco JG, Craig GB. Biology, Disease Relationships, and Control of Aedes albopictus. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization, 1995.
2. Adhami J., Reiter P. Introduction and establishment of Aedes. (Stegomyia.) albopictus Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae) in Albania. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1998;14:3403. pmid:9813831
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Sprenger D, Wuithiranyagool T. The discovery and distribution of Aedes albopictus in Harris County, Texas. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1986;2:217–9. pmid:3507493
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Forattini OP. 1986. Identificação de Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus no Brasil. Rev Saúde Publ São Paulo 20: 244–5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89101986000300009
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Bonizzoni M, Gasperi G, Chen X, James AA. The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus: current knowledge and future perspectives. Trends in Parasitology 2013;29(9):460–8. pmid:23916878
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Rai KS. Aedes albopictus in the Americas. Annu Rev Entomol 1991;36:459–84. pmid:2006869
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Lounibos LP. Invasion by insect vectors of human disease. Ann Rev Entomol 2002;47:233–66. pmid:11729075
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Sabatini A, Raineri V, Trovato G, Coluzzi M. Aedes albopictus in Italia e possibile difusione della specie nell’ area mediterranea. Parasitologia 1990;32:301–4. pmid:2132441
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Valerio L, Marini F, Bongiorno G, Facchinelli L, Pombi M, Caputo B, Maroli M, Della Torre A. Host-feeding patterns of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in urban and rural contexts within Romeprovince, Italy. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2010;10:291–4. pmid:19485771
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Osório HC, Zé-Zé L, Neto M, Silva S, Marques F, Silva AS, Alves MJ. Detection of the invasive mosquito species Aedes (Stegomya) albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Portugal Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:E820. pmid:29690531
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Marabuto E, Rebelo MT. The Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes (Stegomya) albopictus (Skuse), a vector of dengue, chikungunya and zika viruses, reaches Portugal (Diptera: Culicidae). Zootaxa 2018;4413:197–200. pmid:29690129
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Benedict MQ, Levine RS, Hawley WA, Lounibos LP. Spread of the tiger: global risk of invasion by the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2007;7:76–85. pmid:17417960
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Schaffner F, Versteirt V, Hendrickx G, Zeller H, Van Bortel W. A review of the invasive mosquitoes in Europe: ecology, public health risks, and control options. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2012;12:435–47. pmid:22448724
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Chen X-G, Jiang X, Gu J, Xu M, Wu Y, Deng Y, et al. Genome sequence of the Asian Tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus, reveals insights into its biology, genetics, and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015;112:E5907–15. pmid:26483478
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Hawley WA, Reiter P, Copeland RS, Pumpuni CB, Craig GB Jr. Aedes albopictus in North America: probable introduction in used tires from northern Asia. Science 1987;236:1114–6. pmid:3576225
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Rezza R, Nicoletti L, Angelini R, Romi R, Finarelli AC, Panning M, et al. Infection with chikungunya virus in Italy: an outbreak in a temperate region. Lancet 2007;30:1840–6. pmid:18061059
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Angelini R, Finarelli AC, Angelini P, Po C, Petropulacos K, Silvi G, et al. Chikungunya in north-eastern Italy: a summing up of the outbreak. Euro Surveill 2007;12:E071122.2. pmid:18053561
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Grandadam M, Caro V, Plumet S, Thiberge JM, Souares Y, Failloux AB, et al. Chikungunya virus, southeastern France. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17:910–3. pmid:21529410
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Vega-Rua A, Zouache K, Caro V, Diancourt L, Delaunay P, Grandadam M, et al. High efficiency of temperate Aedes albopictus to transmit chikungunya and dengue viruses in the Southeast of France. PloS one 2013;8:e59716. pmid:23527259
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Delisle E, Rousseau C, Broche B, Leparc-Goffart I, L'Ambert G, Cochet A, et al. Chikungunya outbreak in Montpellier, France, September to October 2014. Euro Surveill 2015;20:21108. pmid:25955774
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Calba C, Guerbois-Galla M, Franke F, Jeannin C, Auzet-Caillaud M, Grard G, et al. Preliminary report of an autochthonous chikungunya outbreak in France, July to September 2017. Euro Surveill 2017;22:17–00647. pmid:29019313
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Manica M, Guzzetta G, Poletti P, Filipponi F, Solimini A, Caputo B, et al. Transmission dynamics of the ongoing chikungunya outbreak in Central Italy: from coastal areas to the metropolitan city of Rome, summer 2017. Euro Surveill 2017;22:17–00685. pmid:29113629
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Gjenero-Margan I, Aleraj B, Krajcar D, Lesnikar V, Klobucar A, Pem-Novosel I, et al. Autochthonous dengue fever in Croatia, August-September 2010. Euro Surveill 2011;16: 19805. https://doi.org/10.2807/ese.16.09.19805-en pmid:21392489
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. La Ruche G, Souares Y, Armengaud A, Peloux-Petiot F, Delaunay P, Despres P, et al. First two autochthonous dengue virus infections in metropolitan France, September 2010. Euro Surveill 2010;15:19676. https://doi.org/10.2807/ese.15.39.19676-en pmid:20929659
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Marchand E, Prat C, Jeannin C, Lafont E, Bergmann T, Flusin O, et al. Autochthonous case of dengue in France, October 2013. Euro Surveill 2013;18:20661. pmid:24342514
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Giron S, Rizzi J, Leparc-Goffart I, Septfons A, Tine R, Cadiou B, et al. New occurrence of autochthonous cases of dengue fever in southeast France, August-September 2014. Bulletin épidémiologique hebdomadaire 2015;13–14:217.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Succo T, Leparc-Goffart I, Ferre JB, Roiz D, Broche B, Maquart M, et al. Autochthonous dengue outbreak in Nimes, South of France, July to September 2015. Euro Surveill 2016;21:30240. pmid:27254729
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Local transmission of dengue fever in France and Spain– 2018–22 October 2018. Stockholm: ECDC;2018. https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/rapid-risk-assessment-local-transmission-dengue-fever-france-and-spain
29. Osório HC, Zé-Zé L, Amaro F, Alves MJ. Mosquito surveillance for prevention and control of emerging mosquito-borne diseases in Portugal—2008–2014. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014;11:11583–96. pmid:25396768
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Žitko T, Kovačić A, Desdevises Y, Puizina J. Genetic variation in East-Adriatic populations of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), inferred from NADH5 and COI sequence variability. Eur J Entomol 2011;108:501–8. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2011.065
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Beebe NW, Ambrose L, Hill LA, Davis JB, Hapgood G, Cooper RD, et al. Tracing the Tiger: Population Genetics Provides Valuable Insights into the Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus Invasion of the Australasian Region. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013;7:e2361. pmid:23951380
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Zhong D, Lo E, Hu R, Metzger ME, Cummings R, Bonizzoni M, et al. Genetic analysis of invasive Aedes albopictus populations in Los Angeles County, California and its potential public health impact. PLoS One 2013;8:e68586. pmid:23861921
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Eskildsen GA, Rovira JR, Smith O, Miller MJ, Bennett KL, McMillan WO, Loaiza J. Maternal invasion history of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus into the Isthmus of Panama: Implications for the control of emergent viral disease agents. PLoS One 2018;13:e0194874. pmid:29579112
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Avise JC. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism and a connection between Genetics and Demography of relevance to Conservation. Conservation Biology 1995;9:686–90. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09030686.x
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Birungi J, Munstermann LE. Genetic Structure of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) Populations Based on Mitochondrial Nd5 Sequences: Evidence for an Independent Invasion into Brazil and United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 2002;95:125–32. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0125:GSOAAD]2.0.CO;2
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Usmani-Brown S, Cohnstaedt L, Munstermann LE. Population Genetics of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) Invading Populations, Using Mitochondrial nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Dehydrogenase Subunit 5 Sequences. Ann Entomol Soc Am 2009;102:144–50. pmid:22544973
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Torroni A, Achilli A, Macaulay V, Richards M, Bandelt HJ. Harvesting the fruit of the human mtDNA tree. Trends Genet 2006;22:339–45. pmid:16678300
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Achilli A, Olivieri A, Pellecchia M, Uboldi C, Colli L, Al-Zahery N, et al. Mitochondrial genomes of extinct aurochs survive in domestic cattle. Curr Biol 2008;18:R157–8. pmid:18302915
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Achilli A, Olivieri A, Soares P, Lancioni H, Kashani BH, Perego UA et al. Mitochondrial genomes from modern horses reveal the major haplogroups that underwent domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:2449–54. pmid:22308342
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Battaglia V, Gabrieli P, Brandini S, Capodiferro MR, Javier PA, Chen XG. The Worldwide Spread of the Tiger Mosquito as Revealed by Mitogenome Haplogroup Diversity. Front Genet 2016;7:208. pmid:27933090
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Ribeiro H, Ramos HC. Identification keys of the mosquitoes of Continental Portugal, Açores and Madeira. Eur Mosq Bull 1999;3:1–11.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Schaffner F, Anges G, Geoffroy B, Hervy J-P, Rhaiem A, Brunhes J. The mosquitoes of Europe: an identification and training programme 2001, Montepellier, France: IRD editions (CD-ROM).
43. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial Cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates Molecular marine biology and biotechnology 1994;3:294–9. pmid:7881515
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Borges V, Pinheiro M, Pechirra P, Guiomar R. Gomes JP. INSaFLU: an automated open web-based bioinformatics suite “from-reads” for influenza whole-genome-sequencing-based surveillance. Genome Medicine 2018;10:46. pmid:29954441
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina Sequence Data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2114–20. pmid:24695404
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:3059–66. pmid:12136088
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA/: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016;33:1870–4 pmid:27004904
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP FastTree 2 –Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e9490. pmid:20224823
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1451–2. pmid:19346325
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Zhou Z, Alikhan N-F, Sergeant MJ, Luhmann N, Vaz C, Francisco AP, Carriço JA, Achtman M. GrapeTree: visualization of core genomic relationships among 100,000 bacterial pathogens. Genome Res; 28:1395–404. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.232397.117 pmid:30049790
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Argimón S, Abudahab K, Goater RJE, Fedosejev A, Bhai J, Glasner C, Feil EJ, Holden MTG, Yeats CA, Grundmann H, Spratt BG, Aanensen DM. Microreact: visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography. Microbial Genomics 2016;2 (11): 1–11. pmid:28348833
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Kraemer MUG, Reiner RC, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Gilbert M, Pigott DM, et al. Past and future spread of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Nature Microbiol 2019;4:854–63. pmid:30833735
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Margarita Y, Santos Grácio AJ, Lencastre I, Silva AC, Novo T, Sousa C. First record of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) (Diptera, Culicidae) in Madeira Island—Portugal (Portuguese, English abstract). Acta Parasitológica Portuguesa 2006;13:59–61.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Dengue outbreak in Madeira, Portugal, March 2013. Stockholm: ECDC;2014 ISBN 978-92-9193-564-2 https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/media/en/publications/Publications/dengue-madeira-ECDC-mission-2013.pdf
55. Massad E, Amaku M, Coutinho FAB, Struchiner CJ, Burattini MN, Khan K, et al. Estimating the probability of dengue virus introduction and secondary autochthonous cases in Europe. Sci Rep 2018;8:4629. pmid:29545610
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Estrada-Franco JG, Craig GB. Biology, Disease Relationships, and Control of Aedes albopictus. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization, 1995.

[ref2] 2. Adhami J., Reiter P. Introduction and establishment of Aedes. (Stegomyia.) albopictus Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae) in Albania. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1998;14:3403. pmid:9813831
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[3] View Article

[4] PubMed/NCBI

[5] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Sprenger D, Wuithiranyagool T. The discovery and distribution of Aedes albopictus in Harris County, Texas. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1986;2:217–9. pmid:3507493
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] PubMed/NCBI

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Forattini OP. 1986. Identificação de Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus no Brasil. Rev Saúde Publ São Paulo 20: 244–5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89101986000300009
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Bonizzoni M, Gasperi G, Chen X, James AA. The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus: current knowledge and future perspectives. Trends in Parasitology 2013;29(9):460–8. pmid:23916878
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Rai KS. Aedes albopictus in the Americas. Annu Rev Entomol 1991;36:459–84. pmid:2006869
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Lounibos LP. Invasion by insect vectors of human disease. Ann Rev Entomol 2002;47:233–66. pmid:11729075
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Sabatini A, Raineri V, Trovato G, Coluzzi M. Aedes albopictus in Italia e possibile difusione della specie nell’ area mediterranea. Parasitologia 1990;32:301–4. pmid:2132441
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Valerio L, Marini F, Bongiorno G, Facchinelli L, Pombi M, Caputo B, Maroli M, Della Torre A. Host-feeding patterns of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in urban and rural contexts within Romeprovince, Italy. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2010;10:291–4. pmid:19485771
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Osório HC, Zé-Zé L, Neto M, Silva S, Marques F, Silva AS, Alves MJ. Detection of the invasive mosquito species Aedes (Stegomya) albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Portugal Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:E820. pmid:29690531
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Marabuto E, Rebelo MT. The Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes (Stegomya) albopictus (Skuse), a vector of dengue, chikungunya and zika viruses, reaches Portugal (Diptera: Culicidae). Zootaxa 2018;4413:197–200. pmid:29690129
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Benedict MQ, Levine RS, Hawley WA, Lounibos LP. Spread of the tiger: global risk of invasion by the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2007;7:76–85. pmid:17417960
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Schaffner F, Versteirt V, Hendrickx G, Zeller H, Van Bortel W. A review of the invasive mosquitoes in Europe: ecology, public health risks, and control options. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2012;12:435–47. pmid:22448724
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Chen X-G, Jiang X, Gu J, Xu M, Wu Y, Deng Y, et al. Genome sequence of the Asian Tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus, reveals insights into its biology, genetics, and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015;112:E5907–15. pmid:26483478
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Hawley WA, Reiter P, Copeland RS, Pumpuni CB, Craig GB Jr. Aedes albopictus in North America: probable introduction in used tires from northern Asia. Science 1987;236:1114–6. pmid:3576225
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Rezza R, Nicoletti L, Angelini R, Romi R, Finarelli AC, Panning M, et al. Infection with chikungunya virus in Italy: an outbreak in a temperate region. Lancet 2007;30:1840–6. pmid:18061059
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Angelini R, Finarelli AC, Angelini P, Po C, Petropulacos K, Silvi G, et al. Chikungunya in north-eastern Italy: a summing up of the outbreak. Euro Surveill 2007;12:E071122.2. pmid:18053561
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Grandadam M, Caro V, Plumet S, Thiberge JM, Souares Y, Failloux AB, et al. Chikungunya virus, southeastern France. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17:910–3. pmid:21529410
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Vega-Rua A, Zouache K, Caro V, Diancourt L, Delaunay P, Grandadam M, et al. High efficiency of temperate Aedes albopictus to transmit chikungunya and dengue viruses in the Southeast of France. PloS one 2013;8:e59716. pmid:23527259
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Delisle E, Rousseau C, Broche B, Leparc-Goffart I, L'Ambert G, Cochet A, et al. Chikungunya outbreak in Montpellier, France, September to October 2014. Euro Surveill 2015;20:21108. pmid:25955774
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Calba C, Guerbois-Galla M, Franke F, Jeannin C, Auzet-Caillaud M, Grard G, et al. Preliminary report of an autochthonous chikungunya outbreak in France, July to September 2017. Euro Surveill 2017;22:17–00647. pmid:29019313
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Manica M, Guzzetta G, Poletti P, Filipponi F, Solimini A, Caputo B, et al. Transmission dynamics of the ongoing chikungunya outbreak in Central Italy: from coastal areas to the metropolitan city of Rome, summer 2017. Euro Surveill 2017;22:17–00685. pmid:29113629
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Gjenero-Margan I, Aleraj B, Krajcar D, Lesnikar V, Klobucar A, Pem-Novosel I, et al. Autochthonous dengue fever in Croatia, August-September 2010. Euro Surveill 2011;16: 19805. https://doi.org/10.2807/ese.16.09.19805-en pmid:21392489
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. La Ruche G, Souares Y, Armengaud A, Peloux-Petiot F, Delaunay P, Despres P, et al. First two autochthonous dengue virus infections in metropolitan France, September 2010. Euro Surveill 2010;15:19676. https://doi.org/10.2807/ese.15.39.19676-en pmid:20929659
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Marchand E, Prat C, Jeannin C, Lafont E, Bergmann T, Flusin O, et al. Autochthonous case of dengue in France, October 2013. Euro Surveill 2013;18:20661. pmid:24342514
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Giron S, Rizzi J, Leparc-Goffart I, Septfons A, Tine R, Cadiou B, et al. New occurrence of autochthonous cases of dengue fever in southeast France, August-September 2014. Bulletin épidémiologique hebdomadaire 2015;13–14:217.
View Article
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Succo T, Leparc-Goffart I, Ferre JB, Roiz D, Broche B, Maquart M, et al. Autochthonous dengue outbreak in Nimes, South of France, July to September 2015. Euro Surveill 2016;21:30240. pmid:27254729
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Local transmission of dengue fever in France and Spain– 2018–22 October 2018. Stockholm: ECDC;2018. https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/rapid-risk-assessment-local-transmission-dengue-fever-france-and-spain

[ref29] 29. Osório HC, Zé-Zé L, Amaro F, Alves MJ. Mosquito surveillance for prevention and control of emerging mosquito-borne diseases in Portugal—2008–2014. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014;11:11583–96. pmid:25396768
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Žitko T, Kovačić A, Desdevises Y, Puizina J. Genetic variation in East-Adriatic populations of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), inferred from NADH5 and COI sequence variability. Eur J Entomol 2011;108:501–8. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2011.065
View Article
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Beebe NW, Ambrose L, Hill LA, Davis JB, Hapgood G, Cooper RD, et al. Tracing the Tiger: Population Genetics Provides Valuable Insights into the Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus Invasion of the Australasian Region. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013;7:e2361. pmid:23951380
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Zhong D, Lo E, Hu R, Metzger ME, Cummings R, Bonizzoni M, et al. Genetic analysis of invasive Aedes albopictus populations in Los Angeles County, California and its potential public health impact. PLoS One 2013;8:e68586. pmid:23861921
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Eskildsen GA, Rovira JR, Smith O, Miller MJ, Bennett KL, McMillan WO, Loaiza J. Maternal invasion history of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus into the Isthmus of Panama: Implications for the control of emergent viral disease agents. PLoS One 2018;13:e0194874. pmid:29579112
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Avise JC. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism and a connection between Genetics and Demography of relevance to Conservation. Conservation Biology 1995;9:686–90. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09030686.x
View Article
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Birungi J, Munstermann LE. Genetic Structure of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) Populations Based on Mitochondrial Nd5 Sequences: Evidence for an Independent Invasion into Brazil and United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 2002;95:125–32. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0125:GSOAAD]2.0.CO;2
View Article
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Usmani-Brown S, Cohnstaedt L, Munstermann LE. Population Genetics of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) Invading Populations, Using Mitochondrial nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Dehydrogenase Subunit 5 Sequences. Ann Entomol Soc Am 2009;102:144–50. pmid:22544973
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Torroni A, Achilli A, Macaulay V, Richards M, Bandelt HJ. Harvesting the fruit of the human mtDNA tree. Trends Genet 2006;22:339–45. pmid:16678300
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Achilli A, Olivieri A, Pellecchia M, Uboldi C, Colli L, Al-Zahery N, et al. Mitochondrial genomes of extinct aurochs survive in domestic cattle. Curr Biol 2008;18:R157–8. pmid:18302915
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Achilli A, Olivieri A, Soares P, Lancioni H, Kashani BH, Perego UA et al. Mitochondrial genomes from modern horses reveal the major haplogroups that underwent domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:2449–54. pmid:22308342
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Battaglia V, Gabrieli P, Brandini S, Capodiferro MR, Javier PA, Chen XG. The Worldwide Spread of the Tiger Mosquito as Revealed by Mitogenome Haplogroup Diversity. Front Genet 2016;7:208. pmid:27933090
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Ribeiro H, Ramos HC. Identification keys of the mosquitoes of Continental Portugal, Açores and Madeira. Eur Mosq Bull 1999;3:1–11.
View Article
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Schaffner F, Anges G, Geoffroy B, Hervy J-P, Rhaiem A, Brunhes J. The mosquitoes of Europe: an identification and training programme 2001, Montepellier, France: IRD editions (CD-ROM).

[ref43] 43. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial Cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates Molecular marine biology and biotechnology 1994;3:294–9. pmid:7881515
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Borges V, Pinheiro M, Pechirra P, Guiomar R. Gomes JP. INSaFLU: an automated open web-based bioinformatics suite “from-reads” for influenza whole-genome-sequencing-based surveillance. Genome Medicine 2018;10:46. pmid:29954441
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina Sequence Data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2114–20. pmid:24695404
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] PubMed/NCBI

[165] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:3059–66. pmid:12136088
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[167] View Article

[168] PubMed/NCBI

[169] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA/: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016;33:1870–4 pmid:27004904
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] PubMed/NCBI

[173] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP FastTree 2 –Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e9490. pmid:20224823
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[175] View Article

[176] PubMed/NCBI

[177] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1451–2. pmid:19346325
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[179] View Article

[180] PubMed/NCBI

[181] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Zhou Z, Alikhan N-F, Sergeant MJ, Luhmann N, Vaz C, Francisco AP, Carriço JA, Achtman M. GrapeTree: visualization of core genomic relationships among 100,000 bacterial pathogens. Genome Res; 28:1395–404. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.232397.117 pmid:30049790
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[183] View Article

[184] PubMed/NCBI

[185] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Argimón S, Abudahab K, Goater RJE, Fedosejev A, Bhai J, Glasner C, Feil EJ, Holden MTG, Yeats CA, Grundmann H, Spratt BG, Aanensen DM. Microreact: visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography. Microbial Genomics 2016;2 (11): 1–11. pmid:28348833
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[187] View Article

[188] PubMed/NCBI

[189] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Kraemer MUG, Reiner RC, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Gilbert M, Pigott DM, et al. Past and future spread of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Nature Microbiol 2019;4:854–63. pmid:30833735
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[191] View Article

[192] PubMed/NCBI

[193] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Margarita Y, Santos Grácio AJ, Lencastre I, Silva AC, Novo T, Sousa C. First record of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) (Diptera, Culicidae) in Madeira Island—Portugal (Portuguese, English abstract). Acta Parasitológica Portuguesa 2006;13:59–61.
View Article
Google Scholar

[195] View Article

[196] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Dengue outbreak in Madeira, Portugal, March 2013. Stockholm: ECDC;2014 ISBN 978-92-9193-564-2 https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/media/en/publications/Publications/dengue-madeira-ECDC-mission-2013.pdf

[ref55] 55. Massad E, Amaku M, Coutinho FAB, Struchiner CJ, Burattini MN, Khan K, et al. Estimating the probability of dengue virus introduction and secondary autochthonous cases in Europe. Sci Rep 2018;8:4629. pmid:29545610
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[199] View Article

[200] PubMed/NCBI

[201] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Author summary

Introduction

Materials and methods

Mosquito samples and DNA extraction

Amplicon-based next-generation sequencing

Data analysis

Results

COI haplotypes diversity in Portugal

Mitogenome-based phylogeography of Ae. albopictus

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Aedes albopictus spread in Europe and Mediterranean associated countries.

S2 Fig. Integration of mosquitos circulating in Portugal into the Aedes albopictus COI haplotype diversity.

S1 Table. COI sequences analyzed in the present study and associated metadata.

S2 Table. Mitogenome sequences analyzed in the present study and associated metadata (including 17 novel mitogenome sequences and 26 previously reported sequences available at GenBank).

S3 Table. Mutational mapping of mitogenome sequences (17 novel mitogenome sequences obtained in the present study plus 26 sequences available in GenBank; see S2 Table for details), and haplogroup classification of mosquitos detected in Portugal, according to Battaglia et al [40], when possible.

Acknowledgments

References