https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4462-9698
Figures
Abstract
Background
Bothrops asper represents the clinically most important snake species in Central America and Northern South America, where it is responsible for an estimated 50–80% of snakebites. Compositional variability among the venom proteomes of B. asper lineages across its wide range mirrors clinical differences in their envenomings. Bothropic antivenoms generated in a number of Latin American countries commonly exhibit a certain degree of paraspecific effectiveness in the neutralization of congeneric venoms. Defining the phylogeographic boundaries of an antivenom's effectivity has implications for optimizing its clinical use. However, the molecular bases and impact of venom compositions on the immune recognition and neutralization of the toxic activities of across geographically disparate populations of B. asper lineages has not been comprehensively studied.
Methodology/Principal findings
Third-generation antivenomics was applied to quantify the cross-immunorecognizing capacity against the individual components of venoms of three B. asper lineages (B. asper (sensu stricto), B. ayerbei and B. rhombeatus) distributed in south-western (SW) Colombia, of six Latin American antivenoms, produced against homologous (Colombia, INS-COL and PROBIOL) and Costa Rica (ICP)), and heterologous (Argentina (BIOL), Perú (INS-PERU) and Venezuela (UCV)) bothropic venoms. In vivo neutralization assays of the lethal, hemorrhagic, coagulant, defibrinogenating, myotoxic, edematogenic, indirect hemolytic, and proteolytic activities of the three SW Colombian B. asper lineage venoms were carried to compare the preclinical efficacy of three (Colombian INS-COL and PROBIOL, and Costa Rican ICP) antivenoms frequently used in Colombia. Antivenomics showed that all the six antivenom affinity matrices efficiently immunoretained most of the B. asper lineages venom proteins and exhibited impaired binding towards the venoms' peptidomes. The neutralization profile of the INS-COL, PROBIOL and ICP antivenoms towards the biological activities of the venoms of SW Colombian B. asper (sensu stricto), B. ayerbei and B. rhombeatus lineages was coherent with the antivenomics outcome. In addition, the combination of in vitro (antivenomics) and in vivo neutralization results allowed us to determine their toxin-specific and venom neutralizing antibody content. Noteworthy, heterologous INS-PERU, BIOL, and UCV bothropic antivenoms had equal or higher binding capacity towards the venoms components of SW Colombian B. asper lineages that the homologous Colombian and Costa Rican antivenoms.
Conclusions/Significance
The combined in vitro and in vivo preclinical outcome showed that antivenoms manufactured in Colombia and Costa Rica effectively neutralize the major toxic activities of SW Colombian B. asper lineage venoms. The antivenomics profiles of the heterologous antivenoms manufactured in Argentina, Venezuela, and Perú strongly suggests their (pre)clinical adequacy for the treatment of B. asper lineage envenomings in SW Colombia. However, their recommendation in the clinical setting is pending on in vivo neutralization testing and clinical testing in humans. Bothrops asper is a highly adaptable snake species complex, which is considered the most dangerous snake throughout much of its distribution range from the Atlantic lowland of eastern México to northwestern Perú. Antivenoms are the only scientifically validated treatment of snakebite envenomings. Venom variation is particularly common in wide ranging species, such as B. asper, and may result in variable clinical presentations of envenomings, as is the case for the B. asper species complex, potentially undermining the efficacy of snakebite treatments depending on the immunization mixture used in the generation of the antivenom. Conversely, phylogenetic conservation of antigenic determinants confers an unpredictable degree of paraspecificity to homologous antivenoms produced for a geographic area, but also to heterologous congeneric antivenoms, towards the venom components of allopatric conspecific populations. This work aimed at comparing the preclinical profile of a panel of Latin American homologous and heterologous antivenoms against the venoms of B. asper lineages distributed in SW Colombia. The outcome of this study strongly suggests the suitability of considering the heterologous antivenoms BIOL (Argentina), UCV (Venezuela) and INS-PERU (Perú) as alternatives to homologous Colombian INS-COL and PROBIOL and Costa Rican ICP antivenoms for the treatment of envenomings by B. asper (sensu stricto) in W Colombia and Ecuador, B. ayerbei in Cauca and Nariño (Colombia), and B. rhombeatus in Cauca river valley, SW Colombia.
Author summary
Snakebite envenoming is an important occupational health problem, particularly in rural areas of developing countries. The timely administration of an effective antivenom remains the mainstay of snakebite management. However, the use of antivenoms is often limited by non-availability due to high cost or by lack of effectiveness. Antivenom shortage can be addressed through the generation of novel polyspecific antivenoms of wide clinical efficacy against the venoms of the medically-relevant snake species within the geographical range where these antivenoms are intended to be deployed, but also by optimizing the paraspecific use of current antivenoms. In Colombia, antivenoms are supplied by two manufacturers, one public, the Instituto Nacional de Salud (INS), and one private, Laboratorios Probiol (PROBIOL). However, the antivenom supply in Colombia has traditionally been insufficient, a circumstance that has led the Colombian Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social to issue several resolutions and decrees to announce this health emergency in the country, and to import antivenoms produced in México and Costa Rica. Contrary to these countries, where B. asper represents the only species of the genus, in SW Colombia three close phylogenetically related B. asper lineages, B. asper (sensu stricto), B. rhombeatus, and B. ayerbei, are responsible for most severe cases of snakebite accidents and exhibit remarkable differences in the physiopathological profile of their envenomings. This work aimed to assess the immunorecognition characteristics of a panel of antivenoms manufactured in Colombia, Costa Rica, Argentina, Perú and Venezuela towards the venoms of the three SW Colombian B. asper lineages. Additionally, combined quantitative in vitro and in vivo data show that the homologous antivenoms produced in Colombia (INS-COL, PROBIOL) and Costa Rica (ICP) effectively neutralize the lethality and the major toxic activities tested of the three SW Colombian B. asper lineage venoms. Heterologous Argentinian (BIOL), Venezuelan (UCV) and Peruvian (INS-PERU) antivenoms also showed comparable, even higher, effective immunocapturing ability towards the venom proteomes of SW Colombian B. asper (sensu stricto), B. rhombeatus, and B. ayerbei, than the Colombian and Costa Rican antivenoms. These results are in line with previous studies highlighting the notable conservation of paraspecific antigenic determinants across the phylogeny of genus Bothrops, and advocate for considering the heterologous Argentinian, Venezuelan and Peruvian antivenoms as further therapeutic alternatives for the treatment of B. asper spp. snakebites in Colombia.
Citation: Mora-Obando D, Pla D, Lomonte B, Guerrero-Vargas JA, Ayerbe S, Calvete JJ (2021) Antivenomics and in vivo preclinical efficacy of six Latin American antivenoms towards south-western Colombian Bothrops asper lineage venoms. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 15(2): e0009073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073
Editor: Wayne Hodgson, Monash University, AUSTRALIA
Received: October 6, 2020; Accepted: December 15, 2020; Published: February 1, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Mora-Obando et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was partly supported by grant BFU2017-89103-P from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Madrid, Spain, to JJC. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: B. Lomonte works at the Academic Division of Instituto Clodomiro Picado (Universidad de Costa Rica), where one of the antivenoms tested in these studies is produced. The other authors declare no other potential conflicts of interest regarding this manuscript.
Introduction
Snakebite envenoming is an occupational hazard and a WHO category A neglected tropical disease (NTD) [1] that annually kills 81,000–138,000 people living in economically depressed rural communities of Africa, Asia and Latin America, where the provision of health services is limited or inexistent [2,3]. Snakebite leaves victims with permanent physical sequelae and chronic mental morbidity that affects not only the surviving victims, often young agricultural workers but also their entire families, which enter a cycle of generational poverty that is difficult to break [4–6].
In Latin America and the Caribbean 137,000–150,000 snakebite envenomings occur each year, resulting in 3,400–5,000 deaths [2]. With 40,820–44,230 snakebite accidents a year and a mortality rate of 0.05–0.5% [7], the South American subcontinent stands as the most affected region of the New World. Bothropic envenoming is caused by snake species of genera Bothrops, Bothriechis, Bothrocophias and Porthidium. Among them, Bothrops species have the highest epidemiological importance. Particularly B. asper, a species complex widely distributed from México to Perú, where it is commonly known as nauyaca, barba amarilla, terciopelo, equis/talla equis, equis patiana, cacica, pelo de gato, boquidorá, mapaná, damá, tapa, etc. (http://snakedatabase.org/species/Bothrops/asper) [8–10], is responsible for 50–80% of the snakebites and 60–90% of fatalities over much of its range [10,11]. It inhabits the tropical rainforest and tropical evergreen forest more frequently, but due to its ease of adapting to different environments it is also found close to crops or human dwellings [12]. B. asper has crepuscular and nocturnal habits and is recognized as an extremely dangerous snake by its reputation as an irritable snake of large size, rapid reactions and unpredictable behavior, and the high quantity of highly lethal venom (LD50 between 2.06 (1.89–2.04) μg newborns' venom/g mouse body weight and 3.82 (3.65–4.00) μg adults' venom/g mouse; doses reported for snakes from Pacific Costa Rican population) that can deliver in a bite [12,13]. Envenomings by B. asper are characterized by local effects such as edema detectable in the first minutes after the bite; local hemorrhage evident as bleeding or ecchymosis; blisters, regional lymphadenitis, paresthesia, hypothermia, compartment syndrome, dermonecrosis, myonecrosis, abscesses, and gangrene [10,11]. Frequent systemic effects include defibrinogenation, thrombocytopenia, hypotension, massive pulmonary and/or mesenteric capillary micro thrombosis, and these clinical manifestations may become life-threatening as the result of shock and multi-organ failure [10,11].
In Colombia, along the period 2008–2019, the annual cases of snakebites reported by the National Public Health Surveillance System (SIVIGILA) of the National Health Institute (INS) were 3,129 to 5,603 (7–11.1 cases/100,000 population per year) [14–17]. The majority of snakebite envenomings (90–95%) are inflicted by pitvipers of the Viperidae family and involve species from the genera Bothrops (Bothrops asper, B. atrox, B. bilineatus, B. pulcher, B. punctatus, B. taeniatus), Bothriechis (B. schlegelii), Bothrocophias (B. campbelli, B. colombianus, B. hyoprora, B. microphthalmus, B. myersi) and Porthidium (P. lansbergii, P. nasutum), most notably (50–80%) by B. asper in lowlands and inter-Andean valleys. Two percent of snakebites is due to the bushmaster Lachesis spp. (L. acrochorda and L. muta) in tropical rain forest; and 1% of envenomings are due to bites by the rattlesnake Crotalus durissus cumanensis, a species inhabiting desertic dry or semidry lowlands in the Caribbean region, in the high valley of the Magdalena River, in the Orinochian region, and savannahs (Yarí River) of the Caquetá Department. Ophidian accidents caused by coral snakes (e.g., M. ancoralis, M. clarki, M. dissoleucus, M. dumerilii, M. mipartitus, M. nigrocinctus, M. lemniscatus, Micrurus surinamensis) account for about 1% of the total snakebite envenomings in Colombia. The remaining 1–5% are inflicted by other aglyphous and opisthoglyphous snake species, mainly from the Colubridae family [10,18]. The estimated fatality rate is 1–3% [11,18], although with a pattern of notorious regional variation, and 6–10% of patients suffer some type of life-long sequelae, mainly as a result of dermonecrosis and myonecrosis. Due to their low population density and abundant ophidian fauna, the highest snakebite incidence occurs in the Orinochian and Amazonian regions (Fig 1) [15–17,19], where B. atrox inflicts 90% of the snakebites [20]
The figure is adapted from the event report, epidemiological period XIII, Colombia, 2019 [17]. White dashed lines delimit the Colombian Insular (1), Caribbean (2), Andean (3), Pacific (4), Orinochian (5) and Amazonian (6) natural regions. Snakebite incidence data from the Insular region (San Andrés, Providencia, and Santa Catalina) were "missing or excluded" in the 2019 SIVIGILA-INS event report. The left panel highlights species within the clinically important snake families Viperidae and Elapidae with distribution in the Departments of Nariño and/or Cauca, which can potentially cause snakebite accidents in this region. The list was compiled from Ayerbe and Latorre [22] and Sevilla-Sánchez et al. [21]. 1B. asper includes the lineages B. asper (sensu stricto), B. rhombeatus and B. ayerbei. The map was prepared in the QGIS software, version 3.14.15-Pi, using public domain maps available in QGIS OpenLayers Plugin, and the Geoportals of the Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi-IGAC (https://geoportal.igac.gov.co/contenido/datos-abiertos-cartografia-y-geografia) and the Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística-DANE (https://geoportal.dane.gov.co/servicios/descarga-y-metadatos/descarga-mgn-marco-geoestadistico-nacional/) from Colombia. All maps were used under a CC-BY 4.0 license.
The SW Colombian Departments of Nariño and Cauca are characterized by their impressive mountainous relief belonging to the northern portion of the great Andean mountain system, which extends along the Pacific coast of South America. Its orogeny makes the Colombian Andean natural region one of the most biodiverse in the country, including venomous snakes of the Viperidae and Elapidae families (Fig 1) [21,22]. Saldarriaga-Córdoba et al. [23] and Salazar-Valenzuela et al. [24] have recently described the existence of phylogeographic structure across B. asper distribution. Three B. asper lineages found in Nariño and Cauca Departments (Colombia), B. asper (sensu stricto) on the Pacific versant of the western mountain range, B. ayerbei in the upper Patia river valley and B. rhombeatus in the Cauca river valley [25], account for the largest proportion of snakebites in SW Colombia [22]. Two hundred and thirty-nine snakebite cases occurred in Nariño and Cauca in 2019, 56 cases more than 2018. Fig 1 lists the species that potentially cause these accidents in the Departments of Nariño and Cauca. Although this figure is lower than those documented in other Departments (e.g. Antioquia and Norte de Santander) [14–17], the marginal areas where accidents occur along with the limited distribution of antivenoms, among others factors, prevent victims from accessing proper treatment and, as a consequence, there is high underreporting of cases, deaths increase, and physical, psychological, social and economic sequelae are serious [3,21].
The Instituto Nacional de Salud (INS) and Laboratorios Probiol (PROBIOL) manufacture and commercialize in Colombia antivenoms generated from plasma of hyperimmunized horses with mixtures of venoms from B. asper (sensu lato), B. atrox and Crotalus durissus cumanensis, and Laboratorios Probiol additionally includes venom of Lachesis muta in the immunization mixture [26]. However, antivenom supply in the country has traditionally been insufficient and the Colombian Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social has issued several resolutions and decrees declaring health emergencies owing to the scarcity of antivenoms, having been necessary to import them from other countries, particularly México and Costa Rica [11,27]. An analysis of the availability of antivenom in the period 1992 to 2016 revealed that compared to the need for +30,000 vials per year, the average national production in that period was 22,000 vials; production exceeded the demand only in some years [27]. Despite antivenom shortage is clearly related to an increase in the mortality rate, and the impact of snakebites could be reduced by the Government demonstrating more interest in this public health issue, initiatives such as the creation of additional antivenom-producing companies have not been materialized [26,27]. In addition, to complicate the picture, clinical observations over two decades have evidenced distinctive local and systemic signs and symptoms of envenoming caused by different B. asper lineages [28–31], with B. asper (sensu stricto) venom causing stronger myotoxic activity than those of B. ayerbei and B. rhombeatus, with the latter venom being the most coagulant, whereas B. ayerbei venom is poorly myotoxic but the most hemorrhagic among the three lineage venoms [28,29]. In line with these functional data, comparative venomics of B. asper lineages distributed from México to Ecuador, including venoms from México, Costa Rica, and populations from the Pacific side of Ecuador and SW Colombia, revealed similar overall toxin family compositions albeit exhibiting quantitative differences chiefly in the relative abundance of their four major protein families, snake venom metalloproteinase (SVMP), serine proteinase (SVSP), phospholipase A2 (PLA2) and C-type lectin-like (CTL) [32].
The cross-reactivity of mono- and polyvalent antivenoms manufactured in México (Birmex, Bioclon), Costa Rica (ICP), Venezuela (UCV), and Colombia (INS-COL, PROBIOL) towards B. asper venoms from México [33], Guatemala [34], Costa Rica [35,36], Panamá [37], northern Colombia [38], and Ecuador [39] have been reported. The aim of this work was to perform a detailed comparative preclinical analysis of a panel of six antivenoms manufactured in Colombia, Venezuela, Costa Rica, Perú and Argentina to quantify their capability to immunorecognize the toxins of B. asper lineage venoms (B. asper (sensu stricto), B. rhombeatus, and B. ayerbei) from Department of Cauca (Colombia). The neutralization of the lethal and major toxic activities of these B. asper lineage venoms by the polyvalent Colombian (INS-COL, PROBIOL) and Costa Rican (ICP) antivenoms was also assessed through combined in vivo and in vitro assays.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
Assays performed in mice were approved by the Institutional Committee for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (CICUA) of the University of Costa Rica (approval number 082–08).
Snake venoms
Venoms of adult snakes from Department of Cauca (Colombia), two of B. asper from the municipalities of Playa Rica and Huisitó (El Tambo in the Pacific coast), four of B. ayerbei from the Alto Patía river valley (El Tambo, San Joaquín, Pomorroso, Cauca) and four of B. rhombeatus from Cauca river valley (Popayán and Cajibío municipalities), were obtained from wild-caught specimens maintained in the serpentarium of the Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de la Universidad del Cauca-Bioterio (CIBUC-Bioterio). Venoms were collected by allowing the snake to bite on a glass conical funnel covered with Parafilm. Crude venom was lyophilized and stored at -20°C until used. Equal quantities of each lineage venom were pooled to perform the in vitro and in vivo assays.
Antivenoms
Six commercial polyvalent antivenoms (Table 1) were tested: INS-COL from the Instituto Nacional de Salud of Colombia, batch numbers 15SAP01 and 16SAP01 with expiry dates 12/2018 and 04/2019, respectively; PROBIOL produced by Laboratorios Probiol S.A. (Colombia), batch number AP066XI16-ES with expiry date 11/2018; ICP-polyvalent from Instituto Clodomiro Picado (Costa Rica), batch 6060618 POLF with expiry date 12/2023; INS-PERU from Instituto Nacional de Salud of Perú, batch 10200045 with expiry date 02/2018; UCV, produced by Centro de Biotecnología de la Unidad de Farmacia of the Universidad Central de Venezuela, batch 179 with expiry date 07/2017; and BIOL produced by Instituto Biológico Argentino S.A.I.C., batch 3664 with expiry date 10/2018.
All antivenoms were generated from plasma of horses hyperimmunized against different mixtures of venoms: B. atrox (Meta and Casanare, Orinoquía; Amazonas and Caquetá, Amazonía), B. asper (sensu stricto, Departments of Atlántico, Bolívar, Cauca (Isla Gorgona), Cauca river valley (Pacific region), and Tolima); B. rhombeatus, Antioquia), and Crotalus. d. cumanensis (INS-COL); B. atrox (Meta and Casanare, Orinoquia; Amazonas and Caquetá, Amazonía), B. asper (sensu stricto, Costa Atlántica; B. rhombeatus, Magdalena Medio river valley and Cauca river valley), Crotalus. d. cumanensis, and Lachesis muta (PROBIOL); B. asper, C. simus, Crotalus vegrandis and L. stenophrys (ICP); B. atrox, B. barnetti, B. brazili, B. pictus, and Bothrocophias hyoprora (INS-PERU); B. atrox, B. colombiensis, B. venezuelensis, Porthidium lansbergii hutmanni; C.d. cumanensis, and C.d. ruruima (UCV); and B. asper, C. simus, and L. muta (BIOL). INS-COL, PROBIOL, ICP, INS-PERU antivenoms are composed of whole immunoglobulins (IgGs), whereas the UCV and BIOL antivenoms are made up of the antigen-binding fragments F(ab')2 purified from pepsin-digested whole hyperimmune serum.
Characterization of the antivenoms
Physicochemical characteristics of the antivenoms, such as color, odor, and pH were examined and recorded. The antivenom total protein concentration (mg/mL) was determined spectrophotometrically using an extinction coefficient for a 1 mg/mL concentration (ε0.1%) at 280 nm of 1.36 (mg/mL)−1 cm−1 [40,41]. The homogeneity and purity of the antivenoms were assessed by non-reducing SDS-PAGE analysis in 8.5% polyacrylamide gels and proteomics characterization of the Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250-stained protein bands [42]. To this end, protein bands of interest were excised, subjected to in-gel reduction (10 mM dithiothreitol, 30 min at 65°C) and alkylation (50 mM iodacetamide, 2 h in the dark at room temperature), followed by overnight digestion with sequencing-grade trypsin (66 ng/μL in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate, 10% ACN; 0.25 μg/sample) using an automated Genomics Solution ProGest Protein Digestion Workstation. Tryptic digests were dried in a vacuum centrifuge (SPD SpeedVac, ThermoSavant), redissolved in 15 μL of 5% ACN containing 0.1% formic acid, and submitted to LC-MS/MS. Tryptic peptides were separated by nano-Acquity UltraPerformance LC (UPLC) using BEH130 C18 (100μm × 100 mm, 1.7μm particle size) column in-line with a Waters SYNAPT G2 High Definition Mass Spectrometry System. The flow rate was set to 0.6 μL/min with a linear gradient of 0.1% formic acid in MilliQ water (solution A) and 0.1% formic acid in ACN (solution B) with the following conditions: isocratically 1% B for 1 min, followed by 1–12% B for 1 min, 12–40% B for 15 min, 40–85% B for 2 min. For CID-MS/MS, the electrospray ionization source was operated in positive ion mode and both singly- and multiply-charged ions were selected for CID-MS/MS at sample cone voltage of 28 V and source temperature of 100°C. The LC–MS eluate was continuously scanned from 300 to 1990 m/z in 1 sec and peptide ion MS/MS analysis was performed over the range m/z 50–2000 with scan time of 0.6 sec. Fragmentation spectra were i) match against the last update of the NCBI non-redundant database (release 239.0 of 8/18/2020) using the on-line form of the MASCOT Server (version 2.6) at http://www.matrixscience.com, and ii) processed in Waters Corporation's ProteinLynx Global SERVER 2013 version 2.5.2. (with Expression version 2.0). The following search parameters were used: Taxonomy: all entries; enzyme: trypsin (2 missed cleavage allowed); MS/MS mass tolerance was set to ± 0.6 Da; carbamidomethyl cysteine and oxidation of methionine were selected as fixed and variable modifications, respectively. The relative abundances (% of total protein bands area) of antivenom components were estimated by densitometry of Coomassie-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gels using Image Studio Lite, version 5.2 (LI-COR Biosciences) software, and the relative abundances of different proteins contained in the same SDS-PAGE bands were estimated based on the relative ion intensities of the most abundant MS/MS-derived tryptic peptide ions associated with each protein.
Third-generation antivenomics
Third-generation antivenomics was applied to assess the immunorecognition ability of the antivenom [43,44]. Antivenoms (INS-COL, PROBIOL, ICP, INS-PERU, UCV, BIOL) were dialyzed against distilled water, lyophilized, and reconstituted in coupling buffer (0.2 M NaHCO3, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 8.3). Affinity columns were prepared in batch as follow: 3 mL of CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B matrix (Ge Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) packed in an ABT column (Agarose Bead Technologies, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid), later washed with 10x matrix volumes of cold 1 mM HCl (to preserve the activity of reactive groups) followed by two matrix volumes of coupling buffer to adjust the pH of the column to 7.0–8.0. ~100 mg of each lyophilized antivenom was dissolved in 2x matrix volumes of coupling buffer and incubated with 3 mL CNBr-activated matrix overnight at 4°C. The amount of coupled protein (IgG or F(ab’)2) was determined as the difference between the quantity of protein incubated and the quantity uncoupled measured spectrophotometrically at 280 nm before and after incubation with the matrix. After the coupling, any remaining active-matrix groups were blocked with 6 mL of 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.5 overnight at 4°C and the excess of uncoupled antibody was eliminated by alternatively washing 6 times with 3x matrix volumes of 0.1 M acetate buffer (0.5 M NaCl, pH 4.0–5.0), and 3x matrix volumes of 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (0.5 M NaCl, pH 8.5). Five affinity columns each containing 8 mg of immobilized antivenom were equilibrated with three volumes of PBS (20 mM phosphate buffer, 135 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) and incubated with increasing amounts (100–1200 μg of total venom proteins) of venom (B. asper (sensu stricto), B. rhombeatus, or B. ayerbei) dissolved in 350 μL of PBS, and the mixtures were incubated for 1 h at room temperature in an orbital shaker. In parallel, as specificity controls, the highest amount of venom was incubated with 350 μL of mock matrix and 350 μL of matrix coupled with 8 mg of naïve equine IgG. The non-retained fractions of columns incubated with 100–300 μg, 600 μg, 900 μg, and 1200 μg were recovered with 2x, 4x, 6x and 8x matrix volumes of PBS, respectively, and the immunocaptured proteins were eluted with 3x (100–300 μg) and 6x (600–1200 μg) matrix volumes of 0.1M glycine-HCl, pH 2.7 buffer and brought to neutral pH with 1M Tris-HCl, pH 9.0. The column fractions (non-retained and retained) with highest volume (600–1200 μg) were divided equally to avoid concentrating or diluting the total proteins too much as follows: fractions recovered in 600 μg, ; non-retained and retained fractions in 900 μg,
and
; non-retained and retained fractions in 1200 μg,
and
. These aliquots were concentrated in a Savant SpeedVac vacuum centrifuge (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) to 40 μL and fractionated by reverse-phase HPLC using an Agilent LC 1260 High-Pressure Gradient System (Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a Discovery BIO Wide Pore C18 (15 cm×2.1 mm, 3 μm particle size, 300 Å pore size) column and a DAD detector. Elution was monitored at 215 nm with a reference wavelength of 400 nm [43,44].
The percentage of immunorecognition was obtained by the integration of RP-HPLC profiles of retained and non-retained fractions. The fraction of non-immunocaptured molecules was estimated as the relative ratio of the chromatographic areas of the proteins recovered in the non-retained (NR) and retained (R) affinity chromatography fractions applying the equation %NRi = 100-[(Ri|(Ri+NRi)) x 100], where Ri corresponds to the area of the same protein “i” in the chromatogram of the fraction retained and eluted from the affinity column. This result was corrected for toxins such as SVMP which elute with difficulty from the column due to their high binding affinity to the immobilized antivenom. In this case, the percentage of non-immunocaptured toxin “i” (% NRtoxin“i”) was calculated as the ratio between the chromatographic areas of the same peak recovered in the non-retained fraction (NRtoxin“i”) and in a reference venom (Vtoxin“i”) containing the same amount of total protein that the parent venom sample and run under identical chromatographic and experimental conditions, using the equation %NRtoxin "i" = (NRtoxin "i"/Vtoxin "i") x 100 [45].
Neutralization of biological effects of venoms
The neutralizing capacity of antivenoms manufactured in Colombia (INS-COL, PROBIOL) and Costa Rica (ICP) towards major bothropic biological effects (i.e., lethality, hemorrhagic, coagulant, myotoxic, defibrinogenating, edematogenic, indirect hemolytic, and proteolytic), determined in this study or previously reported by Mora-Obando et al. [28] and Rengifo-Ríos et al. [29] for the same venoms, was tested using standardized protocols recommended by the WHO [46–48] with slight modifications. In particular, although WHO recommends "using groups of 5–6 mice (of the same strain and weight range used for the LD50 assay) for ED50 determinations, although 10 mice may be needed for some venoms". In our experience with bothropoid venoms 4 mice groups and 4–6 levels of antivenom:venom ratios provide strong statistics for calculating ED50s with narrow 95% confidence intervals. Thus, to comply with the principles of the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) and the ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of in vivo Experiments) (NC3Rs, https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arriveguidelines), without compromising the robustness of the ED50 data, here the number of animals was 4 per antivenom:venom level. The median lethal dose (LD50) of Bothrops rhombeatus venom was determined using Probits [28,49]. All neutralization assays were performed by incubating for 30 min at 37°C constant amounts of venom (challenge dose) (Table 2) with increasing dilutions of antivenoms, previously dialyzed and lyophilized and dissolved to a final concentration of 70 mg/mL in PBS [50]. In each experiment, positive and negative control mice groups were injected, respectively, with venom in PBS and antivenom alone. After each assay, mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation [48].
Neutralization of venom lethality.
Groups of four CD-1 mice (16–18 g) received intraperitoneal injections of four LD50s (challenge dose) (Table 2) mixed with antivenom in different proportions (250–1000 μL antivenom/mg venom) dissolved in PBS. Forty-eight hours later, the number of surviving mice in each group was recorded. The antivenoms' capacity to neutralize the venoms' lethal activity was expressed as median effective dose (ED50), which corresponds to the amount of antivenom that protects 50% of the injected mice [35]. ED50 value and its 95% confidence limits for each venom was calculated using Probit analyses with software BioStat v. 2008.
Calculation of the venom toxin-specific and venom neutralizing antibody content of antivenoms.
The data from the antivenomics and ED50 experiments were combined to calculate the fraction of anti-toxin and venom neutralizing IgG or F(ab’)2 molecules [41]. Briefly, the percentage of anti-toxin IgG or F(ab’)2 molecules in the antivenoms was calculated by dividing [(1/2 maximal amount (in μmoles) of total venom proteins bound per antivenom vial) x molecular mass (in kDa) of antibody (IgG, 160 kDa or F(ab’)2, 110 kDa) molecule] by the [total amount of antibody (IgG or F(ab’)2) (in mg) per antivenom vial] [44,51,52]. To calculate the percentage of lethality neutralizing antibodies, the potency (P) of the antivenoms was first obtained, i.e. the amount of venom (mg) neutralized per 1 mL of each antivenom, was calculated as P = [(n-1)/ ED50]×LD50, where “n” is the number of LD50s used as challenge dose to determine the ED50 and, "n-1" is used because at the endpoint of the neutralization assay, the remaining activity of one LD50 remains unneutralized causing the death of 50% of mice [53,54]. For the calculation of P, LD50 and ED50 values were expressed, respectively, in mg venom/mouse and mL of antivenom that protect 50% of the mice population inoculated with n×LD50. Finally, the antivenom's potency (P) was divided by the maximal amount of total venom proteins bound by mL of antivenom [41].
Neutralization of hemorrhagic activity.
Groups of four mice (18–20 g) received intradermal injections of 0.1 mL each containing 10 Minimum Hemorrhagic Doses (MHDs) of venom (Table 2) incubated with increasing dilutions of antivenom (62.5–1000 μL antivenom/mg venom). Two hours post-injection mice were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation, their skin removed, and the area of the hemorrhagic lesion photographed. The images were processed with software Inkscape v. 0.92 as described by Jenkins et al. [55]. The antivenom neutralization capacity (MHDED50) was defined as the venom/antivenom ratio that reduced the diameter of the hemorrhagic lesion to 50% compared to the diameter of the lesion in the positive control [50].
Neutralization of coagulant activity.
0.1 mL aliquots each containing a fixed-dose of venom (Table 2) incubated with antivenom at different ratios (7.8–1000 μL antivenom/mg venom) were added to 0.2 mL of citrated human plasma preincubated for 30 min at 37°C. Clotting times were recorded and the Effective Dose (ED) of the antivenom was calculated as the venom/antivenom ratio which prolonged the clotting time three times compared to that of plasma incubated with venom alone [56].
Neutralization of defibrinogenating activity.
Groups of four CD-1 mice (18–20 g) received intravenous injections of 200 μL of PBS containing two Minimum Defibrinogenating doses (MDDs) (Table 2) incubated with antivenom at different ratios (62.5–2000 μL antivenom/mg venom). One hour post-injection the animals were anesthetized and bled to obtain around 0.2 mL of blood, which was left undisturbed for two hours at room temperature. Neutralization ability of the antivenom was expressed as effective dose (ED), defined as the lowest venom/antivenom ratio in which blood coagulation occurred in all the mice [56].
Neutralization of myotoxic activity.
A fixed-dose of venom (50 μg) incubated with antivenom at ratios of 250, 500, and 1000 μL antivenom/mg venom were injected in groups of four mice (18–20 g) into the right gastrocnemius muscle. 3 h later, a blood sample was obtained from the caudal vein and the plasma creatine kinase (CK) activity, expressed as units/L, was measured using a UV kinetic assay (CK-Nac, Biocon Diagnostik). The neutralization capacity of the antivenom was expressed as ED50, defined as the venom/antivenom ratio where CK levels were reduced by 50% compared to the positive control [48,57].
Neutralization of edematogenic activity.
Each animal of groups of four mice (18–20 g) received a subcutaneous injection in the right footpad, containing a mixture of 5 μg of venom incubated with antivenoms at final ratios of 250–1000 μL antivenom/mg venom, in a total volume of 50 μL of PBS. The left footpad injected with PBS alone served as negative control. Footpads' thickness, measured using a low-pressure spring caliper (Oditest) 0.5, 1, 3, and 6 h post-injection, was considered a quantitative indicator of edema, and the data were expressed as percentage. The antivenoms' neutralizing capacities were determined at 60 min and the ED50 expressed as the venom/antivenom ratio in which edema was reduced by 50% compared to the positive control [58].
Neutralization of indirect hemolytic activity.
The indirect hemolytic activity of each venom was determined following the method described by Arce-Bejarano et al. [59], with slight modifications, using rabbit erythrocytes in a tube fluid phase system. Briefly, rabbit blood was collected by venipuncture in Falcon tubes containing Alsever's solution (2.05% dextrose, 0.8% sodium citrate, 0.055% citric acid, and 0.42% sodium chloride) as anticoagulant, and centrifuged at 400 xg for 5 min. Red blood cells were washed five times in 0.14 M NaCl, 0.01 M Tris, pH 7.7 (TBS). 50 μL of a reaction mixture containing a 5% suspension of erythrocytes in TBS gently mixed with 0.25% w/v sn-3-phosphatidylcholine was incubated with 250 μL containing various amounts of venom diluted in TBS-Ca2+ (TBS supplemented with 10mMCaCl2, pH 7.7) in 96-well plates. Identical mixtures without venom or replacing venom by 0.1% Triton X-100 in water were included as negative (0% hemolysis) and positive (100% hemolysis) controls, respectively. The plates were incubated for 60 min at 37°C with mild stirring every 20 min, centrifuged at 400 xg for 5 min, and the absorbance of the supernatants measured at 540 nm using a microwell plate reader was considered a quantitative index of hemolysis. Experiments were performed in triplicates and the results were expressed as percentages of the hemolysis recorded for the positive control. For assessing an antivenom's neutralization activity, a fixed challenge dose defined as three times the amount of venom that hemolyzed 50% of the erythrocytes was incubated at increasing ratios of antivenom (250–1000 μL antivenom /mg venom) for 30 min at 37°C, after which 50 μL of the 5% suspension of erythrocytes/0.25% w/v sn-3-phosphatidylcholine was added, and the indirect hemolytic activity measured as above. The neutralizing capacity of antivenom (ED50) was defined as the venom/antivenom ratio in which the venom-induced hemolytic activity was reduced by 50% compared to the positive control [59].
Neutralization of proteolytic activity.
The proteolytic activity of each venom was determined according to the method described by Gutiérrez et al. [50]. Briefly, 20 μL aliquots containing 2.5–40 μg of venom were added to 100 μL of substrate (10 mg/mL azocasein in 25 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4) and incubated at 37°C for 90 min in 96-well plates. Reactions were stopped by adding 200 μL of 5% trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged (350 xg x 5 min). Hundred fifty μL of supernatant were mixed with the same volume of 0.5 M NaOH and the absorbance at 450 nm recorded. For antivenom neutralization testing, the challenge dose corresponded to the amount of venom capable of inducing a change in absorbance of 0.5 at 450 nm. Challenge doses of each venom, either alone or incubated with antivenom at several ratios of (250, 500, and 1000 μL antivenom/mg venom) in a total volume of 25 μL, were tested as above. The ED50 antivenom's neutralizing capacity was expressed as the venom/antivenom ratio in which proteolysis was reduced by 50% compared to the positive control [50].
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Antibody titers of the antivenoms were determined by ELISA. For this end, 1 μg samples of venom dissolved in 100 μL of PBS (20 mM phosphate, 135 mM NaCl, pH 7.4), were coated overnight at 4°C per well of 96-well plates (Dynatech Immulon, Alexandria, VA). Thereafter, the plates were decanted and free sites in each venom-coated well was blocked with 100 μl/well of 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Antivenoms dissolved in PBS to a concentration of 70 mg/mL were serially diluted (1:1000–1:128000) in PBS containing 1% BSA, added to the wells and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The plates were then washed five times with PBS and bound antibodies detected following incubation for 1 h at room temperature with 100 μL of a 1:2000 dilution of anti-horse IgG-phosphatase-conjugate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in FALC buffer (0.05 M Tris, 0.15 M NaCl, 20 μM ZnCl2, 1mM MgCl2, pH 7.4) containing 1% BSA. Finally, the plates were washed five times with FALC buffer, the substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate (1mg/ml) in diethanolamine buffer (1mM MgCl2, 90mM diethanolamine, pH 9.8) was added, and the absorbance at 405 nm was recorded for 5–60 min using a microplate reader (Multiskan Labsystems Ltd., Helsinki, Finland).
Statistical analyses
Results were represented as dose-response graphs and reported as the mean ± SD of duplicate, triplicate, or quadruplicate determinations depending on the biological activity assessed. Antivenom ED50s against venom lethality was calculated using the software BioStat v. 2008, and the values were considered significantly different among groups when the 95% confidence limits did not overlap. ED50s towards venom hemorrhagic, coagulant, edematogenic, proteolytic and myotoxic activities were calculated from the equations of the regression analyses in Excel (Microsoft Office 2019). The significance of the differences between the experimental groups was determined by parametric or non-parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis, respectively), followed by post hoc tests to identify significant differences between group pairs. Differences with p ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All the statistical analyses were performed using Software IBM SPSS Statistics version 23.
Results and discussion
The ability of different mono- and polyvalent experimental and commercial bothropic antivenoms to neutralize the most relevant toxic effects produced by B. asper bites was demonstrated in the late 1990s [60–62], and the outcome clearly showed that the antivenoms were more effective in preventing the systemic than the local (myotoxic, dermonecrotic and hemorrhagic) tissue damaging effects [63–65]. Current antivenoms manufactured in Colombia are generated from plasma of horses hyperimmunized with mixtures of B. atrox, B. asper and C.d. cumanensis venoms supplemented (Laboratorios Probiol) or not (Instituto Nacional de Salud, INS-COL) with venom of the bushmaster L. muta. Given the wide range of B. asper and the occurrence of intraspecific phylogeographic structure [23,24,32], it is not surprising [62] that different antivenom effectiveness has been observed regarding the number of vials needed in the treatment of envenomings inflicted by snakes from Pacific region than from the Andean region (S. Ayerbe, personal communication). Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the immunological characteristics of a panel of bothropic antivenoms that includes the national products as well as those imported or potentially importable antivenoms, which may complement national production in the treatment of envenomings caused by the three lineages of the B. asper complex distributed in SW Colombia, B. asper (sensu stricto), B. rhombeatus, and B. ayerbei, whose structural and functional venomics profiles have recently been reported [28,32].
Physicochemical characterization of the antivenoms
Table 1 summarizes the physicochemical characteristics of the 6 antivenoms (INS-COL, PROBIOL, INS-PERU, ICP, UCV, BIOL) examined. Total protein concentration was similar among INS-COL, INS-PERU, ICP and BIOL antivenoms, ranging from 56.8 to 59.7 mg/mL, whereas UCV had lowest (41.9 mg/mL) and PROBIOL presented a much higher (200.7 mg/mL) protein content. SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig 2) confirmed the type of antibody molecule specified in the products' inserts (IgG or F(ab’)2) (Table 1), but also revealed a number of other protein bands. Protein spots excised from the SDS-PAGE gels were identified through tandem-mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis as aggregation and degradation products of IgG (Fig 2, yellow-filled circles) and non-IgG proteins (Fig 2, red-filled circles) (S1 Table)
Lanes 1a/b or 2a/b, vials used in the experiments. Molecular weight markers (MW) are indicated on the left. Coomassie Brilliant blue-stained bands labeled 1–37 were excised and submitted to tandem mass spectrometry analysis (S1 Table). Bands containing IgG aggregation or degradation products are identified by yellow-filled circles. Red-filled circles denote non-IgG proteins bands.
The INS-COL antivenom showed a predominance (82.3%) of intact IgG glycoforms (Fig 2, bands 2 and 3) and their aggregation (band 1, 2.9%) and degradation (4, 11.6%; 5, 1.3%; 6, 0.7%) products, and a 1.1% of α1B-glycoprotein (Fig 2, band 7). In comparison, PROBIOL antivenom contained significantly lower intact IgG bands (41.8%), comparable IgG degradation 137 kDa product (7.1%), and much higher non-IgG contaminants, notably albumin found in band 16 (Fig 2), accounting for 30.8% of the total antivenom proteins, and other plasma proteins in bands 8 (α2-macroglobulin, 7.9%), 12 and 13 (haptoglobin, 3.7%), 14 (serotransferrin, 4.1%), and 15 (α1B-glycoprotein, 3.7%) (Fig 2 and S1 Table).
Costa Rican ICP and Peruvian INS-PERU antivenoms displayed a very similar SDS-PAGE banding patterns and MS/MS-derived protein profiles, characterized by 80% intact IgGs, 3–4% IgG aggregates, 12–15% IgG degradation products, and minor non-IgG contaminants (0.9% vs 1.5% α1B-glycoprotein in bands 22 and 29, respectively; and 2.5% haptoglobin in band 27 of ICP antivenom) (Fig 2).
The F(ab')2 antivenoms manufactured in Venezuela (UCV) and Argentina (BIOL) exhibit similar qualitative SDS-PAGE profiles (Fig 2), though the latter represents a better purified product (88% F(ab')2, 7.3% IgG degradation product, and 4.4% non-IgG (fibrinogen γ-chain) contaminant) than the fabotherapic produced by the Universidad Central de Venezuela (70% F(ab')2, 9.9% non- processed IgG, 0.5% IgG aggregates, 13.3% IgG degradation products, and 6% α2-macroglobulin) (S1 Table).
The presence of IgG aggregates and non-IgG protein impurities contribute to the reduced safety profile of the products by increasing the possibility of early (anaphylactoid) reactions and anaphylactic shock due to IgE antibodies against these heterologous animal proteins [62,66–69]. The outcome of our present study indicates a need for improving the fractionation of the hyperimmune plasma, particularly the PROBIOL and UCV products.
Immunoreactivity profile of antivenoms: third-generation antivenomics
The immunoreactivity of the six antivenoms against the venom components of B. asper (sensu stricto), B. ayerbei, and B. rhombeatus, previously identified by Mora-Obando et al. [28,32] was investigated by third-generation antivenomics [43–45] (Figs 3–5 and S1–S3). Table 3 summarizes the antivenoms' immunorecognition capabilities. All the antivenoms recognized around 12–14% of the low-molecular mass components eluted during the first 10 min in chromatographic fractions 1–3. These fractions comprise endogenous tripeptide inhibitors of snake venom metalloproteinases (SVMPi) [70–73], 10–12 amino acid residue bradykinin-potentiating-like peptides (BPPs) [72,74,75], and disintegrin (DIS) molecules. Among these early-eluting venom components only disintegrin are immunogenic [76–79], and therefore, the immunoretained fraction may comprise this class of toxins, which in B. ayerbei [28], B. asper, and B. rhombeatus [32] represent 2.3–5.6% of their total venom proteins. On the other hand, chromatographic fractions 4–7, eluted between 10–30 min, comprised disintegrin-like/cysteine-rich (DC) fragments of PIII-SVMPs, phospholipase A2 (PLA2) molecules, cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRISP) and serine proteinases (SVSP), and were immunocaptured at maximal immunoaffinity column binding capacity with average efficacy of 62% (B. asper), 70% (B. rhombeatus), and 80% (B. ayerbei) (Table 3). Chromatographic fractions 8–14 eluted between 30–45 min contained SVMP, C-type lectin-like proteins (CTL), SVSP, L-amino acid oxidase (LAO), and phosphodiesterase (PDE), and were immunoretained in the affinity matrices with average efficacy of 80% (B. asper), 87% (B. rhombeatus), and 69% (B. ayerbei) (Table 3). Table 4 shows a summary of the maximum total toxin binding capacity of each of the B. asper linage venoms by the different antivenoms. Extrapolated to mg venom immunocaptured per gram of antivenom the ranking of antivenoms according to their respective highest to lowest binding capacity towards total components was [BIOL > INS-PERU > UCV > INS-COL > ICP > PROBIOL] for B. asper (sensu stricto), [BIOL > INS-COL > (UCV ~ INS-PERU) > ICP > PROBIOL] for B. rhombeatus, and [INS-COL > (BIOL ~ INS-PERU) > UCV > ICP > PROBIOL] for B. ayerbei. In terms of percentage of toxin-binding antibodies, the order from highest to lowest relative abundance was [INS-PERU > (BIOL ~ INS-COL) > UCV > ICP > PROBIOL] for B. asper (sensu stricto), [INS-COL > (BIOL ~ INS-PERU) > (ICP ~ UCV ~ PROBIOL)] for B. rhombeatus, and [(INS-COL ~ INS-PERU) > BIOL > ( ICP ~ UCV ~ PROBIOL)] for B. ayerbei.
Panel A displays the fractionation by reverse-phase HPLC of the venom components. Proteins eluting in each peak (1–14) were assigned using the venomics information reported by Mora-Obando et al. [32]. SVMP, snake venom Zn2+-metalloproteinase and their proteolytic fragments Disintegrin/Cysteine fragments (DC-frag); PLA2-K49/D49, phospholipase types Lys49 and Asp49; SVSP, serine proteinase; CTL, C-type lectin-like; DIS, disintegrin; CRISP, cysteine-rich secretory protein; LAO, L-amino acid oxidase; PDE, phosphodiesterase; SVMPi, SVMP inhibitors; BPP, bradykinin-potentiating-like peptides. Panels B-G represent RP-HPLC fractionations of the non-immunoretained fractions recovered in the flow-through fraction of the affinity columns of immobilized antivenoms INS-COL (B), PROBIOL (C), ICP (D), INS-PERU (E), UCV (F), BIOL (G) incubated with increasing amounts of venom (100–1200 μg). Panels H and I display to chromatographic separations of the venom fraction not retained in the mock matrix control and the naïve equine immunoglobulins control, respectively. The numbers on top of the chromatographic peaks represent the percentage of each fraction.
Panel A displays the fractionation by reverse-phase HPLC of the venom components. Proteins eluting in each peak (1–14) were assigned using the venomics information reported by Mora-Obando et al. [32]. Panels B-G represent RP-HPLC fractionations of the non-immunoretained fractions recovered from the affinity columns of immobilized antivenoms INS-COL (B), PROBIOL (C), ICP (D), INS-PERU (E), UCV (F), BIOL (G) incubated with increasing amounts of venom (100–1200 μg). Panels H and I display to chromatographic separations of the venom fraction not retained in the mock matrix control and the naïve equine immunoglobulins control, respectively. The numbers on top of the chromatographic peaks represent the percentage of each fraction.
Immunocapture capacity of polyvalent antivenoms towards B. ayerbei venom from Patia river valley, Colombia (A). Panel A displays the fractionation by reverse-phase HPLC of the venom components. Proteins eluting in each peak (1–14) were assigned using the venomics information reported by Mora-Obando et al. [28]. Panels B-G represent RP-HPLC fractionations of the non-immunoretained fractions recovered from the affinity columns of immobilized antivenoms INS-COL (B), PROBIOL (C), ICP (D), INS-PERU (E), UCV (F), BIOL (G) incubated with increasing amounts of venom (100–1200 μg). Panels H and I display to chromatographic separations of the venom fraction not retained in the mock matrix control and the naïve equine immunoglobulins control, respectively. The numbers on top of the chromatographic peaks represent the percentage of each fraction.
Although none of the antivenom affinity matrices outshined all the others in its ability to immunocapture each and every one of the components of the three B. asper lineage venoms, the results displayed in S2–S19 Tables and summarized in Tables 3 and 4 clearly classify the antivenoms into two groups according to their antivenomics immunocapturing features, with [BIOL, INS-PERU, INS-COL and UCV] (61.3 ± 9.9 (BAS), 63.2 ± 9.7 (BRH), and 52.7 ± 6.9 (BAY) mgV/gAV) in the top group and [ICP > PROBIOL] (26.2 ± 8.8 (BAS), 37.2 ± 5.7 (BRH), and 29.5 ± 6.0 (BAY) mgV/gAV) in the least effective group. The same trend was observed when the immunoreactivity of INS-COL, ICP, and PROBIOL against the three B. asper lineage venoms was comparatively assessed by ELISA: INS-COL showed the highest titer against all the venoms and the lower levels of cross-reactivity of ICP and PROBIOL against the three venoms were similar and indistinguishable between themselves (Fig 6). In addition, comparison of the relative amounts (%) of anti-toxin antibodies in the different antivenoms (Table 4), calculated assuming one antigen binding site occupied per immobilized antibody molecule, revealed that, on average, 28.5 ± 8.1%, 27.6 ± 5.2%, and 22.5 ± 7.3% of INS-COL, INS-PERU, and BIOL antivenom antibodies, respectively, recognized antigenic determinants on toxins from each of the three B. asper lineage venoms, whereas these figures were 18.7 ± 6.5%, 18.1 ± 5.6% and 13.9 ± 6.3% in the case of UCV, ICP and PROBIOL antivenoms, respectively. INS-COL, PROBIOL and ICP showed higher percentages of anti-BRH than anti-BAS and anti-BAY antibodies, whereas BIOL and UCV contained equivalent relative amounts of anti-BAS and anti-BRH, but significantly lower % of anti-BAY antibodies, and the relative amounts of anti-toxin antibodies in INS-PERU were BAS > BRH > BAY (Table 4). These figures fall within the range of percentages (6–28%) of anti-toxin antibodies determined for other commercial antivenoms [48,51,52,79–81]. The distinct cross-reactive profiles of the different bothropic antivenoms may be ascribed to the immunization process, in particular to the use of venoms from different Bothrops species or from different geographic variations of the same nominal species used by the different manufacturers, i.e. INS-COL and PROBIOL (B. atrox, B. asper), INS-PERU (B. atrox, B. pictus, B. barnetti, B. brazili [82]), ICP (Costa Rican B. asper from Caribbean and Pacific populations), UCV (B. atrox, B. colombiensis, B. venezuelensis), BIOL (B. asper of undisclosed geographic origin) [63].
Antivenoms INS-COL (●), PROBIOL (), ICP (○) were serially diluted by a factor of two (starting from a dilution of 1/1000) and tested by ELISA against the following crude venoms: B. asper (sensu stricto) (A), B. rhombeatus (B) and B. ayerbei (C). Equine normal serum was included as negative control (◆). Each point represents the mean ± SD of three independent determinations. Statistically significant differences were observed among the titers of the antivenoms INS-COL vs. PROBIOL and/or ICP against the venoms of B. asper (dilutions 1: 1000, 8000, 16000, 64000), B. rhombeatus (dilutions 1:2000–128000) and B. ayerbei (dilutions 1:1000–16000).
Neutralization of the biological effects of B. asper venoms by INS-COL, PROBIOL, and ICP antivenoms
Lethality.
As a rule of thumb, immunocapturing capacity ≥ 20–25% of total venom proteins has been proposed to correlate with a promising outcome in an in vivo lethality neutralization assay [83], and increasing percentages of immunocapturing indicate greater neutralizing potencies of the corresponding bait antivenoms. Table 5 summarizes the results of the neutralizing capacities of the Colombian antivenoms INS-COL and PROBIOL and the Costa Rican ICP towards the lethal, hemorrhagic (Fig 7), coagulant (Fig 8), defibrinogenating, myotoxic (Fig 9), edematogenic (Fig 10), proteolytic (Fig 11), and indirect hemolytic (Fig 12) effects of the venoms of SW Colombian B. asper (sensu stricto), B. rhombeatus, and B. ayerbei. All three antivenoms followed the "antivenomics rule" regarding their potency to neutralize the lethal effect of the three B. asper lineage venoms, as well as the coagulant and proteolytic effects (Table 5). Antivenoms INS-COL and ICP showed statistically indistinguishable capacities to neutralize the indirect hemolytic effect of B. asper and B. rhombeatus venoms, the coagulant effect of B. rhombeatus venom, and the defibrinogenating and myotoxic effects of B. rhombeatus and B. ayerbei venoms (Table 5).
Comparison of the neutralizing capacity of the antivenoms manufactured by INS-COL (A-C), PROBIOL (D-F), ICP (G-I) towards the hemorrhagic effect caused by the venoms of B. asper (sensu stricto) (●), B. rhombeatus (), B. ayerbei (○). Hemorrhagic lesions were measured as hemorrhagic units (HaU) [55] 2 h after intradermal injection of 10 MHD (challenge dose) mixed with antivenom in the ratios indicated in the figure. Each point represents the mean ± SD of four replicates. In all assays, statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were observed among the ratios 500–1000 μL antivenom/mg venom compared to the positive control.
Comparison of the neutralizing capacity of the antivenoms manufactured by INS-COL (A-C), PROBIOL (D-F), ICP (G-I) towards the coagulant effect caused by the venoms of B. asper (sensu stricto) (●), B. rhombeatus (), B. ayerbei (○). Clotting time was recorded after mixing and incubating 2 MCD (challenge dose) with different ratios of antivenom, as indicated in the figure, and adding them to human citrated plasma. Each point represents the mean ± SD of replicates of two independent experiments.
Comparison of the neutralizing capacity of the antivenoms manufactured by INS-COL (A-D), PROBIOL (E-H), ICP (I-L) towards the myotoxic effect caused by the venoms of B. asper (sensu stricto) (A, E, I), B. rhombeatus (B, F, J), B. ayerbei (C, D, G, H, K, L). Muscle damage was measured as plasma creatine kinase activity 3 h after intramuscular injection of 50 μg of venom mixed with antivenom in the ratios indicated in the figure (●). Antivenom control (○). PBS control (---). Each point represents the mean ± SD of four replicates. Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) compared to the venom control are represented by asterisks.
Comparison of the neutralizing capacity of the antivenom manufactured by INS-COL (A-C), PROBIOL (D-F), ICP (G-I) towards the edematogenic effect caused by the venom of B. asper (sensu stricto) (A, D, G), B. rhombeatus (B, E, H) and B. ayerbei (C, F, I). Edema was measured as the increase in the thickness of footpad compared to the negative control (PBS) and monitored during 6 h after subcutaneous injection of 5 μg of venom (●) mixed with antivenom in the ratios: 1000 μL antivenom/mg venom (○), 500 μL antivenom/mg venom (Δ), 250 μL antivenom/ mg venom (). Each point represents the mean ± SD of four replicates. Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) compared to the venom control are represented by asterisks.
Proteolytic activity of the venoms of B. asper (sensu stricto), B. rhombeatus, and B. ayerbei (A) and neutralizing capacity of the antivenoms manufactured by INS-COL (●), PROBIOL (○) and ICP () towards B. asper (B), B. rhombeatus (C) and B. ayerbei (D). Neutralization of the proteolytic activity was measured on azocasein, as described in the Material and methods section, 90 min after mixing and incubating 12.5 μg of venom (challenge dose) with antivenom in the ratios indicated in the figure. Each point represents the mean ± SD of three replicates. Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) compared to the venom controls are represented by asterisks.
Indirect hemolytic effect produced by venoms of B. asper, B. rhombeatus, and B. ayerbei (A) and neutralizing capacity of the antivenoms INS-COL (●), PROBIOL (○) and ICP () towards B. asper (sensu stricto) venom (B) and B. rhombeatus (C). Neutralization of indirect hemolysis was measured on rabbit erythrocytes, as described in the Material and methods section, 1 h after mixing and incubating of 5.1 μg of venom (challenge dose) with antivenom in the ratios indicated in the figure. Each point represents the mean ± SD of three replicates. Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) compared to the venom control are represented by asterisks.
The fraction of toxin-binding antibody molecules present in the antivenoms INS-COL, PROBIOL, and ICP, which contributed to protect the test animals from the lethal effect of the three B. asper lineage venoms, was derived by dividing the percentage of neutralizing antibodies (calculated from the antivenom's potency, S20 Table) by the percentage of toxin-binding antibodies (calculated from the maximal total venom protein binding capacity of the antivenom) (B. asper, S2–S4 Tables; B. rhombeatus, S8–S10 Tables; B. ayerbei, S14–S16 Tables). For these calculations, it was assumed that antibodies immobilized in the affinity columns bound on average one antigen molecule per IgG/F(ab')2 molecule, while in solution the same antibodies would have their two antigen-binding sites occupied. These conditions are based on the most coherent fitting of the data from a number of combined antivenomics and in vivo neutralization studies carried out in our laboratory during the last years. The results listed in Table 4 unveiled that 60.4 ± 12.3%, 50.1 ± 5.2% and 26.8 ± 9.1% of the toxin-binding antibodies of ICP, INS-COL, and PROBIOL contribute to the lethality neutralization activity of these antivenoms, respectively. Expressed as relative abundance of toxin-neutralizing antibodies per vial, INS-COL contained the highest value (14.0 ± 2.6%), followed by ICP (10.5 ± 1.4%) and PROBIOL (3.5 ± 0.9%) (Table 4). The potency (in mg of venom neutralized per gram of antivenom antibodies) of INS-COL, ICP and PROBIOL were roughly similar for the three B. asper lineage venoms (Table 5), with average values of 58.2 ± 4.1, 42.9 ± 7.1, and 13.6 ± 4.1 mg V/g AV, respectively.
Venoms' toxic activities.
Hemorrhage induced by the three venoms was almost completely neutralized by INS-COL and ICP antivenoms at a ratio of 1000 μL antivenom/mg venom (Fig 7A–7C and 7G–7I). At the same ratio, a hemorrhagic lesion between 50 and 100 mm2 was observed with PROBIOL antivenom (Fig 7D–7F). Except for the B. rhombeatus venom's lethal effect, which was neutralized with statistically indistinguishable ED50 by INS-COL and ICP, the neutralizing efficacy of the antivenoms followed the order INS-COL > ICP > PROBIOL (Table 5). The antivenoms followed the same trend regarding their coagulant, defibrinogenating neutralization activities (Table 5). In this sense, INS-COL and ICP antivenoms extended the coagulation time above 30 min at a ratio of 250 μL antivenom/mg venom (Fig 8A–8C and 8G–8I), while even at a ratio of 500 μL antivenom/mg venom PROBIOL did not triple the coagulation time compared to the positive control (Fig 8D–8F). The ED50 of PROBIOL to neutralize the coagulant and the defibrinogenating activity of the three venoms was 2–4 times less effective than those of INS-COL and ICP (p<0.05) (Table 5).
The myotoxic effect of the venoms was nearly abrogated by INS-COL and ICP antivenoms at a ratio of 1000 μL antivenom/mg venom (Fig 9A–9D and 9I–9L). Conversely, PROBIOL antivenom only showed an average neutralization capacity of about 60% at the highest antivenom/venom ratios tested (Fig 9E–9H). Consequently, the ED50s of INS-COL and ICP are statistically indistinguishable from each other and significantly (p<0.05) higher (more effective) than that of PROBIOL towards each Colombian B. asper lineage venom tested (Table 5).
Both INS-COL and ICP antivenoms effectively neutralized, albeit the Colombian product exhibiting slightly higher ED50 compared to the Costa Rican antivenom, the edematogenic effect of B. asper (sensu stricto), B. rhombeatus, and B. ayerbei venoms (Table 5). However, even at the highest antivenom/venom ratio tested, PROBIOL was unable to reduce the effect to 50% (Table 5). Edematogenic activity curves, in which the injected animals were monitored during 360 min (Fig 10A–10I), showed that both INS-COL and ICP antivenoms reduced, at the highest ratio of antivenom tested and within the first 30 min, > 50% of the edema produced by all the venoms (Fig 10A–10C and 10G–10I). On the contrary, PROBIOL was only capable of partly neutralizing (by 30%) the edema triggered by B. rhombeatus venom (Fig 10D–10F). In general, the neutralizing effect of antivenoms was maintained six hours after venom injection (Fig 10); besides, INS-COL and ICP antivenoms neutralized the vasculotoxic effect produced by the venom, contributing in parallel to the neutralization of bleeding.
Interestingly, in some experiments involving PROBIOL antivenom/venom mixtures the edema increased above the size of the positive control (mice injected with venom alone) (Fig 10D–10F). Previous studies performed with B. asper venom from Costa Rica have also described this circumstance [84]. Proteolytic release of vasoactive peptides from serum protein contaminants (i.e., α2-globulins) during the incubation time of the antivenom/venom mixture, affecting vascular permeability and edema formation, has been invoked to explain this phenomenon. The fact that this event was mainly observed in experiments involving the antivenom with the most impurities of plasma proteins, PROBIOL (Fig 1 and S1 Table), would support this explanation.
Proteolytic activity of the three venoms was similar (Fig 11A). This effect is attributed mainly to the action of serine proteinases and Zn2+-dependent SVMPs present in B. asper venom [50]. INS-COL antivenom effectively neutralized the proteolytic activity of the three Colombian B. asper lineage venoms (ED50 = 42.3 ± 7.7 mg venom/g antivenom), followed in order of potency by ICP and PROBIOL (23.5 ± 5.3, and 14.9 ± 2.8 mg venom/g antivenom), respectively (Fig 11B and 11C and Table 5).
Indirect hemolytic activity was recorded in B. asper (sensu stricto) and B. rhombeatus venoms, but not in B. ayerbei venom (Fig 12A), as has been previously noted [28]. This effect is associated to high abundance of myotoxic PLA2s [85] and was quantified measuring the venom's phospholipase activity on phosphatidylcholine using erythrocyte lysis as an indicator [86]. The equivalent indirect hemolytic activity of B. asper (sensu stricto) and B. rhombeatus (Fig 12B) venoms was neutralized by INS-COL and ICP antivenoms with similar ED50 of 24.0 ± 0.5 mg venom/g antivenom (Table 5), while PROBIOL did not show neutralization efficacy of the indirect hemolytic activity of B. asper (sensu stricto) and B. rhombeatus venoms even at a ratio of 2000 μL antivenom/mg venom.
Concluding remarks
Our data confirm and expand previous studies. Otero et al. (2002) reported a comparative study of the neutralizing capacity of four polyvalent antivenoms manufactured in Colombia (INS-COL, PROBIOL), Venezuela (UCV), and México (Antivipmyn, Instituto Bioclon) against the pharmacological and enzymatic effects of the venoms of B. asper and Porthidium nasutum from Antioquia (northwest Colombia) and Chocó (west Colombia) [38]. In their study, INS-COL and Antivipmyn antivenoms showed the highest neutralizing efficacy against the lethal and other pharmacological (hemorrhagic, edema-forming, myonecrotic, defibrinogenating and indirect hemolytic) effects of B. asper venom pooled from 40–45 specimens from different regions of Antioquia and Chocó. Conversely, antivenom PROBIOL presented the lowest neutralizing capacity towards the same activities, and the Venezuelan UCV antivenom had intermediate neutralization abilities. Understanding the basis of the effectivity of antivenoms against homologous and heterologous venoms demands the quantitative assessment of its toxin-resolved immunorecognition profile. Here we have applied third-generation antivenomics to compare the specific and paraspecific immunoreactivity of six bothropic antivenoms against three Colombian B. asper lineage venoms. The antivenomics outcome showed that all the major toxin families, i.e., SVMP, PLA2, CRISP, SVSP, CTL [32], were immunocaptured at maximal immunoaffinity column binding capacity with average efficacy of 62–87% (Table 3). These results clearly indicate that the paraspecificity exhibited by the six bothropic antivenoms against the three Colombian B. asper lineage venoms is not biased towards any particular family of toxins but is well balanced among the different venom protein families. Therefore, our study provides a solid experimental ground to rationalize the reported immunological profiles of INS-COL, UCV, and PROBIOL [38], and other bothropic antivenoms (INS-PERU, ICP, and BIOL), against B. asper venoms from different geographic Colombian ecoregions. These results strongly suggest the feasibility of adding these antivenoms to the list of candidates for the treatment of snakebite accidents caused by the species of the B. asper complex from SW Colombia, B. asper (sensu stricto), B. rhombeatus and B. ayerbei in the Departments of Nariño and Cauca.
Queiroz and co-workers [87] have reported in vitro qualitative (Western blot) and semi-quantitative (ELISA) evidence that Brazilian polyspecific pentabothropic (SAB) or antibothropic-lachesic F(ab')2 antivenoms exhibited variable paraspecific immunoreactivity towards nineteen venoms of bothropic snakes, including B. brazili, B. alternatus, B. atrox, B. bilineatus, B. castelnaudi, B. cotiara, B. erythromelas, B. fonsecai, B. insularis, B. itapetiningae, B. jararaca, B. jararacussu, B. leucurus, B. marajoensis, B. moojeni, B. neuwiedi, B. pirajai, B. pradoi, and Bothrocophias hyoprorus. The remarkable para-specificity exhibited by antivenoms generated against immunization mixtures that included venoms from phylogenetic distant Bothrops species may be ascribed to large conservation of immunoreactive epitope on venom toxins across much of the natural history of Bothrops, a genus that had its roots in South America during the middle Miocene, 14.07 (CI95: 16.37–11.75) Mya [88,89] (Fig 13). Biogeographic studies support B. asper as the first species complex to split from the B. atrox group in the Pliocene, around 3.02–2.32 Mya [90], and cladogenesis into lineages began soon thereafter, towards the end of the Pliocene [23]. The realization of the existence of large immunological conservation across Bothrops phylogeny emerged also from studies of the paraspecific effectiveness of the pentabothropic polyvalent antivenom SAB (soro antibotrópico pentavalente) produced by Instituto Butantan (São Paulo, Brazil) [52,76,79,91–94] using a pool of venoms from B. jararaca (50%), B. jararacussu (12.5%), B. moojeni (12.5%), B. alternatus (12.5%) and B. neuwiedi (12.5%) [95,96]. Further, an assessment of the ability of seven polyspecific antivenoms, produced in Argentina, Brazil, Perú, Bolivia, Colombia and Costa Rica using different immunization mixtures, to neutralize lethal, hemorrhagic, coagulant, defibrinogenating and myotoxic activities of the venoms of B. diporus (Argentina), B. jararaca (Brazil), B. matogrossensis (Bolivia), B. atrox (Perú and Colombia) and B. asper (Costa Rica) also showed a pattern of extensive cross-neutralization of all the venoms tested, with quantitative differences in the values of the effective doses of the antivenoms [93,97]. Similar results were obtained in a comparative a preclinical assessment of the efficacy of two whole IgG antivenoms, prepared in Perú and Costa Rica, to neutralize the most relevant toxic effects induced by the venoms of Peruvian Bothrops atrox, B. brazili, B. barnetti and B. pictus [98]. Both antivenoms were effective in the neutralization of these four venoms in a rodent model of envenoming, indicating an extensive immunological cross-reactivity exists between Bothrops spp. venoms from Perú and Costa Rica.
All the species complex groups within genus Bothrops include taxa that represent the main medically important venomous snakes in their range [9,99]. Our present results converge with previous studies in revealing the capacity of a number of bothropic antivenoms to neutralize, in preclinical tests, homologous and heterologous Bothrops venoms in Central and South America, and also highlight quantitative differences in their ED50s. The combination of antivenomics and in vivo neutralization assays provides relevant information to delineate the species spectrum and geographic range of clinical applicability of an antivenom. Now, the challenge is to conduct an extensive study to define the matrix of preclinical effectiveness of all the bothropic antivenoms against all the venoms of (medically relevant) species within the genus Bothrops.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Antivenomics analysis of polyvalent antivenoms towards the venom of B. asper (sensu stricto).
Panel A displays the fractionation by reverse-phase HPLC of the venom components. Proteins eluting in each peak (1–14) were assigned using the venomics information reported by Mora-Obando et al. [32]. Abbreviations for the venom components as in the legend of Fig 2A. Panels B-G represent RP-HPLC fractionations of the immunoretained fractions recovered in the affinity columns of immobilized antivenoms INS-COL (B), PROBIOL (C), ICP (D), INS-PERU (E), UCV (F), BIOL (G) incubated with increasing amounts of venom (100–1200 μg). Panels H and I display to chromatographic separations of the venom fraction retained in the mock matrix control and the naïve equine immunoglobulins control, respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s001
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Antivenomics analysis of polyvalent antivenoms towards the venom of B. rhombeatus.
Panel A displays the fractionation by reverse-phase HPLC of the venom components. Proteins eluting in each peak (1–14) were assigned using the venomics information reported by Mora-Obando et al. [32]. Abbreviations for the venom components as in the legend of Fig 3A. Panels B-G represent RP-HPLC fractionations of the immunoretained fractions recovered in the affinity columns of immobilized antivenoms INS-COL (B), PROBIOL (C), ICP (D), INS-PERU (E), UCV (F), BIOL (G) incubated with increasing amounts of venom (100–1200 μg). Panels H and I display to chromatographic separations of the venom fraction retained in the mock matrix control and the naïve equine immunoglobulins control, respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s002
(TIF)
S3 Fig. Immunocapture capacity of polyvalent antivenoms towards the venom of B. ayerbei.
Panel A displays the fractionation by reverse-phase HPLC of the venom components. Proteins eluting in each peak (1–14) were assigned using the venomics information reported by Mora-Obando et al. [28]. Abbreviations for the venom components as in the legend of Fig 4A. Panels B-G represent RP-HPLC fractionations of the immunoretained fractions recovered in the affinity columns of immobilized antivenoms INS-COL (B), PROBIOL (C), ICP (D), INS-PERU (E), UCV (F), BIOL (G) incubated with increasing amounts of venom (100–1200 μg). Panels H and I display to chromatographic separations of the venom fraction retained in the mock matrix control and the naïve equine immunoglobulins control, respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s003
(TIF)
S1 Table. MS/MS assignment of protein bands excised from SDS-PAGE analysis of the six polyvalent antivenoms studied.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s004
(XLSX)
S2 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. asper (Cauca) venom proteins by INS-COL antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s005
(XLSX)
S3 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. asper (Cauca) venom proteins by PROBIOL antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s006
(XLSX)
S4 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. asper (Cauca) venom proteins by ICP antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s007
(XLSX)
S5 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. asper (Cauca) venom proteins by INS-PERU antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s008
(XLSX)
S6 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. asper (Cauca) venom proteins by UCV antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s009
(XLSX)
S7 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. asper (Cauca) venom proteins by BIOL antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s010
(XLSX)
S8 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. rhombeatus (Cauca) venom proteins by INS-COL antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s011
(XLSX)
S9 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. rhombeatus (Cauca) venom proteins by PROBIOL antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s012
(XLSX)
S10 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. rhombeatus (Cauca) venom proteins by ICP antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s013
(XLSX)
S11 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. rhombeatus (Cauca) venom proteins by INS-PERU antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s014
(XLSX)
S12 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. rhombeatus (Cauca) venom proteins by UCV antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s015
(XLSX)
S13 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. rhombeatus (Cauca) venom proteins by BIOL antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s016
(XLSX)
S14 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. ayerbei (Cauca) venom proteins by INS-COL antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s017
(XLSX)
S15 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. ayerbei (Cauca) venom proteins by PROBIOL antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s018
(XLSX)
S16 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. ayerbei (Cauca) venom proteins by ICP antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s019
(XLSX)
S17 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. ayerbei (Cauca) venom proteins by INS-PERU antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s020
(XLSX)
S18 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. ayerbei (Cauca) venom proteins by UCV antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s021
(XLSX)
S19 Table. Concentration-dependent immunoretained (RET) B. ayerbei (Cauca) venom proteins by BIOL antivenom affinity column.
Maximal binding for each RP-HPLC fraction is highlighted in yellow background. Green background, amount (in μg) of toxin family proteins immunoretained in the affinity columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s022
(XLSX)
S20 Table. Neutralization of biological activities of south-western Colombian B. asper lineage venoms by polyvalent antivenoms (values adjusted according to protein concentration per vial).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009073.s023
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the excellent benchwork assistance of Yania Rodríguez, Sarai Quesada-Bernat, Libia Sanz and Alicia Pérez (Evolutionary and Translational Venomics Laboratory) and Erika Camacho, Daniela Solano, Adriana Alfaro, Adriana Sánchez and Andrés Sánchez (Instituto Clodomiro Picado). The authors also thank the Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas-Bioterio de la Universidad del Cauca (Colombia) for donation of SW Colombian snake venom samples, and the CeiBA Foundation (Pasto-Nariño, Colombia) for a Doctoral Training Scholarship (to DMO). Samples used in this study were obtained under permission from the Autoridad Nacional de Licencias Ambientales ANLA of the Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible, Colombia, Resolution 0152 of February 12, 2015. This study was performed as a partial requirement for the Ph.D. degree of Diana Mora-Obando at the University of Valencia, Spain.
References
- 1.
World Health Organization. Report of the tenth meeting of the WHO strategic and technical advisory group for neglected tropical diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Technical Report Series. WHO Press; 2017. pp. 1–19. Available from: https://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/NTD_STAG_report_2017.pdf?ua=1.
- 2. Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe AR, de Silva N, Gunawardena NK, Pathmeswaran A, Premaratna R, et al. The global burden of snakebite: a literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med. 2008;5: e218. pmid:18986210
- 3.
Gutiérrez JM. Snakebite Envenoming in Latin America and the Caribbean. In: Gopalakrishnakone P, Vogel CW, Seifert SA, Tambourgi D V., editors. Clinical Toxinology in Australia, Europe, and Americas. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2018. pp. 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7438-3_14
- 4. Gutiérrez JM, Calvete JJ, Habib AG, Harrison RA, Williams DJ, Warrell DA. Snakebite envenoming. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2017;3: 17063. pmid:28905944
- 5. Harrison RA, Hargreaves A, Wagstaff SC, Faragher B, Lalloo DG. Snake Envenoming: A Disease of Poverty. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3: e569. pmid:20027216
- 6. Longbottom J, Shearer FM, Devine M, Alcoba G, Chappuis F, Weiss DJ, et al. Vulnerability to snakebite envenoming: A global mapping of hotspots. Lancet. 2018;392: 673–684. pmid:30017551
- 7.
Sant’Ana Malaque CM, Gutiérrez JM. Snakebite envenomation in central and South America. In: Brent J, Burkhart K, Dargan P, Hatten B, Megarbane B, Palmer R, editors. Critical Care Toxicology. Switzerland: Springer, Cham; 2015. pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20790-2_146–1
- 8. Otero R, Tobón GS, Gómez LF, Osorio RG, Valderrama R, Hoyos D, et al. Accidente ofídico en Antioquia y Chocó. Aspectos clínicos y epidemiológicos (marzo de 1989-febrero de 1990). Acta Médica Colomb. 1992;17: 229–249. Available from: http://www.actamedicacolombiana.com/anexo/articulos/04-1992-04-.pdf.
- 9.
Warrell DA. Snakebites in Central and South America: epidemiology, clinical features, and clinical management. In: Campbell JA, Lamar WW, editors. The Venomous Reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press; 2004. pp. 709–761.
- 10.
Ayerbe S. Ofidismo en Colombia. Enfoque, diagnóstico y tratamiento. In: Ordóñez CA, Ferrada R, Buitrago R, editors. Cuidado Intensivo y Trauma. 2nd edition. Distribuna, Bogotá, DC.; 2009. pp. 1143–1167.
- 11. Epidemiological Otero-Patiño R., clinical and therapeutic aspects of Bothrops asper bites. Toxicon. 2009;54: 998–1011. pmid:19591857
- 12. Freire A, Kuch U. A note on the geographical distribution of Bothrops asper (Garman, 1883) in Ecuador. Snake. 1994;26: 135–139.
- 13. Sasa M, Wasko DK, Lamar WW. Natural history of the terciopelo Bothrops asper (Serpentes: Viperidae) in Costa Rica. Toxicon. 2009;54: 904–922. pmid:19563822
- 14.
León LJ. Informe de evento accidente ofidico, Colombia, 2016. Instituto Nacional de Salud-Dirección de Vigilancia y Análisis del Riesgo en Salud Pública. Bogotá, DC.; 2017. pp. 1–33. Available from: https://www.ins.gov.co/buscador-eventos/Informesdeevento/Accidenteofídico 2016.pdf.
- 15.
Rojas-Bárcenas AM. Informe de evento accidente ofídico, Colombia, 2017. Instituto Nacional de Salud-Dirección de Vigilancia y Análisis del Riesgo en Salud Pública. Bogotá, DC.: Instituto Nacional de Salud-Dirección de Vigilancia y Análisis del Riesgo en Salud Pública; 2018. pp. 1–16. Available from: https://www.ins.gov.co/buscador-eventos/Informesdeevento/ACCIDENTEOFÍDICO 2017.pdf.
- 16.
Rojas-Bárcenas AM. Informe de evento accidente ofídico, Colombia, 2018. Instituto Nacional de Salud-Dirección de Vigilancia y Análisis del Riesgo en Salud Pública. Bogotá, DC.; 2019. pp. 1–33. Available from: https://www.ins.gov.co/buscador-eventos/Informesdeevento/ACCIDENTEOFÍDICO_2018.pdf.
- 17.
Rojas-Bárcenas AM. Informe de evento accidente ofídico. Periodo epidemiológico XIII, Colombia, 2019. Instituto Nacional de Salud-Dirección de Vigilancia y Análisis del Riesgo en Salud Pública. Bogotá, DC.; 2020. pp. 1–2.
- 18.
Otero-Patiño R. Snake Bites in Colombia. In: Gopalakrishnakone P, Vogel C-W, Seifert S, Tambourgi D V, editors. Clinical Toxinology in Australia, Europe, and Americas. Dordrecht: Springer; 2018. pp. 3–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6288-6_41–2
- 19.
Otero-Patiño R. Epidemiología, clínica y terapéutica del envenenamiento ofídico en Colombia. 1st ed. In: D’Suze G, Corzo G, Paniagua J, editors. Emergencias por animales ponzoñosos en las Américas. 1st ed. Mexico: Dicresa S.A. de C.V.; 2011. pp. 489–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2011.11.017 pmid:22146491
- 20. Silva-Haad JJ. Las serpientes del género Bothrops en la amazonia colombiana. Aspectos biomédicos (epidemiología, clínica y biología del ofidismo). Acta Médica Colomb. 1989;14: 148–165. Available from: http://www.actamedicacolombiana.com/anexo/articulos/03-1989-04.pdf.
- 21. Sevilla-Sánchez MJ, Mora-Obando D, Calderón JJ, Guerrero-Vargas JA, Ayerbe-González S. Accidente ofídico en el departamento de Nariño, Colombia: análisis retrospectivo (2008–2017). Biomédica. 2019;39: 715–736. pmid:31860183
- 22.
Ayerbe S, Latorre JP. Manual para la prevención y mejoramiento en la atención del paciente con accidente ofídico. Popayán, Colombia.: Secretaría Departamental de Salud del Cauca; 2009. pp. 1–66.
- 23. Saldarriaga-Córdoba M, Parkinson CL, Daza JM, Wüster W, Sasa M. Phylogeography of the Central American lancehead Bothrops asper (SERPENTES: VIPERIDAE). PLOS ONE. 2017;12: e0187969. pmid:29176806
- 24.
Salazar-Valenzuela CD. Diversification in the Neotropics: Insights from demographic and phylogenetic patterns of Lancehead Pitvipers (Bothrops spp.). Doctoral Thesis. The Ohio State University. 2016. Available from: https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=osu1462545845.
- 25. Folleco-Fernández J. Taxonomía del complejo Bothrops asper (Serpentes: Viperidae) en el sudoeste de Colombia. Revalidación de la especie Bothrops rhombeatus (Garcia 1896) y descripción de una nueva especie. Rev Noved Colomb. 2010;10: 33–70. Available from:https://revistas.unicauca.edu.co/index.php/novedades/article/view/1177.
- 26. Gutiérrez JM. Current challenges for confronting the public health problem of snakebite envenoming in Central America. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2014;20: 7. pmid:24602234
- 27. Gómez-Cardona JP, Gómez-Cabal C, Gómez-Cabal ML. Sueros antiofídicos en Colombia: análisis de la producción, abastecimiento y recomendaciones para el mejoramiento de la red de producción. Biosalud. 2017;16: 96–116.
- 28. Mora-Obando D, Guerrero-Vargas JA, Prieto-Sánchez R, Beltrán J, Rucavado A, Sasa M, et al. Proteomic and functional profiling of the venom of Bothrops ayerbei from Cauca, Colombia, reveals striking interspecific variation with Bothrops asper venom. J Proteomics. 2014;96: 159–172. pmid:24231109
- 29. Rengifo-Rios AM, Muñoz-Gómez LM, Cabezas-Fajardo FA, Guerrero-Vargas JA. Edematic and coagulant effects caused by the venom of Bothrops rhombeatus neutralized by the ethanolic extract of Piper auritum. J Ethnopharmacol. 2019;242: 112046. pmid:31279070
- 30. Ayerbe S. Ofidismo en el departamento del Cauca, Colombia. Epidemiología, etiología, clínica y complicaciones. Rev la Fac Ciencias la Salud la Univ del Cauca. 2000;2: 21–27. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6544560.
- 31. Cañas CA, Castro-Herrera F, Castaño-Valencia S. Clinical syndromes associated with Viperidae family snake envenomation in southwestern Colombia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2020. [online ahead of print]. pmid:32879965
- 32. Mora-Obando D, Salazar-Valenzuela D, Pla D, Lomonte B, Guerrero-Vargas JA, Ayerbe S, et al. Venom variation in Bothrops asper lineages from north-western South America. J Proteomics. 2020;229: 103945. pmid:32829066
- 33. Segura A, Herrera M, Villalta M, Vargas M, Uscanga-Reynell A, de León-Rosales SP, et al. Venom of Bothrops asper from Mexico and Costa Rica: intraspecific variation and cross-neutralization by antivenoms. Toxicon. 2012;59: 158–62. pmid:22119752
- 34. Rojas G, Gutiérrez JM, Gené JA, Gómez Paniagua M, Cerdas Fallas L. Neutralización de las actividades tóxicas y enzimáticas de cuatro venenos de serpientes de Guatemala y Honduras por el antiveneno polivalente producido en Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop. 1987;35: 59–67. Available from: http://www.kerwa.ucr.ac.cr/handle/10669/29147. pmid:3444924
- 35. Bogarín G, Segura E, Durán G, Lomonte B, Rojas G, Gutiérrez J. Evaluación de la capacidad de cuatro antivenenos comerciales para neutralizar el veneno de la serpiente Bothrops asper (terciopelo) de Costa Rica. Toxicon. 1995;33: 1242–1247. pmid:8585095
- 36. Gutiérrez J, Sanz L, Flores-Días M, Villalta M, León G, Estrada R, et al. Impact of regional variation in Bothrops asper snake venom on the design of antivenoms: integrating antivenomics and neutralization approaches. J Proteome Res. 2010;9: 564–577. pmid:19911849
- 37. Vélez SM, Salazar M, de Patiño HA, Gómez L, Rodríguez A, Correa D, et al. Geographical variability of the venoms of four populations of Bothrops asper from Panama: Toxicological analysis and neutralization by a polyvalent antivenom. Toxicon. 2017;132: 55–61. pmid:28392273
- 38. Otero R, Núñez V, Barona J, Díaz A, Saldarriaga M. Características bioquímicas y capacidad neutralizante de cuatro antivenenos polivalentes frente a los efectos farmacológicos y enzimáticos del veneno de Bothrops asper y Porthidium nasutum de Antioquia y Chocó. Iatreia. 2002;15: 5–15. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-07932002000100001.
- 39. Laines J, Segura Á, Villalta M, Herrera M, Vargas M, Alvarez G, et al. Toxicity of Bothrops sp snake venoms from Ecuador and preclinical assessment of the neutralizing efficacy of a polyspecific antivenom from Costa Rica. Toxicon. 2014;88: 34–37. pmid:24950051
- 40.
Howard G, Kaser M. Making and using antibodies: a practical handbook. 2nd edition. Florida, U.S.A.: CRC press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2014.
- 41. Pla D, Sanz L, Quesada-Bernat S, Villalta M, Baal J, Chowdhury MAW, et al. Phylovenomics of Daboia russelii across the indian subcontinent. Bioactivities and comparative in vivo neutralization and in vitro third-generation antivenomics of antivenoms against venoms from India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. J Proteomics. 2019;207: 103443. pmid:31325606
- 42. Eichberg S, Sanz L, Calvete JJ, Pla D. Constructing comprehensive venom proteome reference maps for integrative venomics. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2015;12: 557–573. pmid:26400467
- 43. Pla D, Rodríguez Y, Calvete J. Third generation antivenomics: Pushing the limits of the in vitro preclinical assessment of antivenoms. Toxins (Basel). 2017;9: 158. pmid:28489039
- 44. Calvete JJ, Rodríguez Y, Quesada-Bernat S, Pla D. Toxin-resolved antivenomics-guided assessment of the immunorecognition landscape of antivenoms. Toxicon. 2018;148: 107–122. pmid:29704534
- 45.
Calvete JJ, Gutiérrez JM, Sanz L, Pla D, Lomonte B. Antivenomics: A Proteomics Tool for Studying the Immunoreactivity of Antivenoms. In: Kool J, Niessen WM, editors. Analyzing Biomolecular Interactions by Mass Spectrometry. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co; 2015. pp. 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527673391.ch7
- 46.
World Health Organization. Guidelines for the production, control and regulation of snake antivenom immunoglobulins. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Technical Report Series. WHO Press; 2010. pp. 1–134.
- 47. Gutiérrez JM, Rojas G, Lomonte B, Gené JA, Chaves F, Alvarado J, et al. Standardization of assays for testing the neutralizing ability of antivenoms. Toxicon. 1990;28: 1127–9; author reply 1129–1132. pmid:2264065
- 48.
Gutiérrez JM, Rojas G, Bogarín G, Lomonte B. Evaluation of the neutralizing ability of antivenoms for the treatment of snake bite envenoming in Central America. In: Bon C, Goyffon M, editors. Envenomings and Their Treatments. Fondation Marcel M´erieux, Lyon; 1996. pp. 223–231.
- 49.
Finney DJ. Statistical method in biological assay. London: Charles Griffin and Company Limited; 1971.
- 50. Gutiérrez JM, Gené JA, Rojas G, Cerdas L. Neutralization of proteolytic and hemorrhagic activities of Costa Rican snake venoms by a polyvalent antivenom. Toxicon. 1985;23: 887–893. pmid:3913055
- 51. Al-Shekhadat RI, Lopushanskaya KS, Segura Á, Gutiérrez JM, Calvete JJ, Pla D. Vipera berus berus Venom from Russia: Venomics, Bioactivities and Preclinical Assessment of Microgen Antivenom. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11: 90. pmid:30717298
- 52. Sanz L, Pérez A, Quesada-Bernat S, Diniz-Sousa R, Calderón LA, Soares AM, et al. Venomics and antivenomics of the poorly studied Brazil’s lancehead, Bothrops brazili (Hoge, 1954), from the Brazilian State of Pará. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2020;26: e20190103. pmid:32362928
- 53. Araujo HP, Bourguignon SC, Boller MAA, Dias AASO, Lucas EPR, Santos IC, et al. Potency evaluation of antivenoms in Brazil: The national control laboratory experience between 2000 and 2006. Toxicon. 2008;51: 502–514. pmid:18155119
- 54. Morais V, Ifran S, Berasain P, Massaldi H. Antivenoms: Potency or median effective dose, which to use? J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2010;16: 191–193.
- 55. Jenkins TP, Sánchez A, Segura Á, Vargas M, Herrera M, Stewart TK, et al. An improved technique for the assessment of venom-induced haemorrhage in a murine model. Toxicon. 2017;139: 87–93. pmid:29024773
- 56. Gené J, Roy A, Rojas G, Gutiérrez J, Cerdas L. Comparative study on coagulant, defibrinating, fibrinolytic and fibrinogenolytic activities of Costa Rican crotaline snake venoms and their neutralization by a polyvalent antivenom. Toxicon. 1989;27: 841–848. pmid:2781583
- 57. Gutiérrez JM, Chaves F, Bolaños R, Cerdas L, Rojas E, Arroyo O, et al. Neutralización de los efectos locales del veneno de Bothrops asper por un antiveneno polivalente. Toxicon. 1981;19: 493–500. pmid:7330888
- 58. Lomonte B, Tarkowski A, Hanson LÅ. Host response to Bothrops asper snake venom. Analysis of edema formation, inflammatory cells, and cytokine release in a mouse model. Inflammation. 1993;17: 93–105. pmid:8491517
- 59. Arce-Bejarano R, Lomonte B, Gutiérrez JM. Intravascular hemolysis induced by the venom of the Eastern coral snake, Micrurus fulvius, in a mouse model: Identification of directly hemolytic phospholipases A2. Toxicon. 2014;90: 26–35. pmid:25088177
- 60. Otero R, Gutiérrez JM, Núñez V, Robles A, Estrada R, Segura E, et al. A randomized double-blind clinical trial of two antivenoms in patients bitten by Bothrops atrox in Colombia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996;90: 696–700. pmid:9015522
- 61. Otero-Patiño R, Cardoso JLC, Higashi HG, Nunez V, Diaz A, Toro MF, et al. A randomized, blinded, comparative trial of one pepsin-digested and two whole IgG antivenoms for Bothrops snake bites in Uraba, Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;58: 183–189. pmid:9580075
- 62. Otero R, Gutiérrez JM, Rojas G, Núñez V, Díaz A, Miranda E, et al. A randomized blinded clinical trial of two antivenoms, prepared by caprylic acid or ammonium sulphate fractionation of IgG, in Bothrops and Porthidium snake bites in Colombia: Correlation between safety and biochemical characteristics of ant. Toxicon. 1999;37: 895–908. pmid:10340829
- 63.
Kalil J, Fan HW. Production and Utilization of Snake Antivenoms in South America. In: Gopalakrishnakone P, Cruz L., Luo S, editors. Toxins and drug discovery. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2017. pp. 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6452-1_26
- 64. Espino-Solis GP, Riaño-Umbarila L, Becerril B, Possani LD. Antidotes against venomous animals: State of the art and prospectives. J Proteomics. 2009;72: 183–199. pmid:19457345
- 65. Gutiérrez JM, León G, Rojas G, Lomonte B, Rucavado A, Chaves F. Neutralization of local tissue damage induced by Bothrops asper (terciopelo) snake venom. Toxicon. 1998;36: 1529–1538. pmid:9792169
- 66. Sarmiento K, Rodríguez A, Quevedo-Buitrago W, Torres I, Ríos C, Ruiz L, et al. Comparación de la eficacia, la seguridad y la farmacocinética de los antivenenos antiofídicos: revisión de literatura. Univ Medica. 2020;61: 30–51.
- 67. León G, Vargas M, Segura Á, Herrera M, Villalta M, Sánchez A, et al. Current technology for the industrial manufacture of snake antivenoms. Toxicon. 2018;151: 63–73. pmid:29959968
- 68. Morais V, Massaldi H. Snake antivenoms: adverse reactions and production technology. J Venom Anim Toxins incl Trop Dis. 2009;15: 2–18. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1678-91992009000100002&script=sci_arttext.
- 69. Otero R, Gutiérrez J, Beatriz Mesa M, Duque E, Rodríguez O, Luis Arango J, et al. Complications of Bothrops, Porthidium, and Bothriechis snakebites in Colombia. A clinical and epidemiological study of 39 cases attended in a university hospital. Toxicon. 2002;40: 1107–114. pmid:12165312
- 70. Huang K-F, Hung C-C, Wu S-H, Chiou S-H. Characterization of Three Endogenous Peptide Inhibitors for Multiple Metalloproteinases with Fibrinogenolytic Activity from the Venom of Taiwan Habu (Trimeresurus mucrosquamatus). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;248: 562–568. pmid:9703966
- 71. Huang KF, Chiou SH, Ko TP, Wang AHJ. Determinants of the inhibition of a Taiwan habu venom metalloproteinase by its endogenous inhibitors revealed by X-ray crystallography and synthetic inhibitor analogues. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269: 3047–3056. pmid:12071970
- 72. Munawar A, Zahid A, Negm A, Akrem A, Spencer P, Betzel C. Isolation and characterization of Bradykinin potentiating peptides from Agkistrodon bilineatus venom. Proteome Sci. 2016;14:1–9. pmid:26770072
- 73. Wagstaff SC, Favreau P, Cheneval O, Laing GD, Wilkinson MC, Miller RL, et al. Molecular characterisation of endogenous snake venom metalloproteinase inhibitors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;365: 650–656. pmid:18029259
- 74. Greene LJ, Camargo AC, Krieger EM, Stewart JM, Ferreira SH. Inhibition of the conversion of angiotensin I to II and potentiation of bradykinin by small peptides present in Bothrops jararaca venom. Circ Res. 1972;31: Suppl 2:62–71. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/med/4341481. pmid:4341481
- 75. Luft FC. The Bothrops legacy: Vasoactive peptides from Brazil. Renin Rep. 2008;10: 57–64. pmid:18404610
- 76. Jorge RJB, Monteiro HSA, Gonçalves-Machado L, Guarnieri MC, Ximenes RM, Borges-Nojosa DM, et al. Venomics and antivenomics of Bothrops erythromelas from five geographic populations within the Caatinga ecoregion of northeastern Brazil. J Proteomics. 2015;114: 93–114. pmid:25462430
- 77. Gonçalves-Machado L, Pla D, Sanz L, Jorge RJB, Leitão-De-Araújo M, Alves MLM, et al. Combined venomics, venom gland transcriptomics, bioactivities, and antivenomics of two Bothrops jararaca populations from geographic isolated regions within the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. J Proteomics. 2016;135: 73–89. pmid:25968638
- 78. Madrigal M, Pla D, Sanz L, Barboza E, Arroyo-Portilla C, Corrêa-Netto C, et al. Cross-reactivity, antivenomics, and neutralization of toxic activities of Lachesis venoms by polyspecific and monospecific antivenoms. Casewell NR, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11: e0005793. pmid:28787445
- 79. Sanz L, Quesada-Bernat S, Pérez A, De Morais-Zani K, SantˈAnna SS, Hatakeyama DM, et al. Danger in the Canopy. Comparative Proteomics and Bioactivities of the Venoms of the South American Palm Pit Viper Bothrops bilineatus Subspecies bilineatus and smaragdinus and Antivenomics of B. b. bilineatus (Rondônia) Venom against the Bra. J Proteome Res. 2020;19: 3518–3532. pmid:32686412
- 80. Pla D, Sanz L, Molina-Sánchez P, Zorita V, Madrigal M, Flores-Díaz M, et al. Snake venomics of Lachesis muta rhombeata and genus-wide antivenomics assessment of the paraspecific immunoreactivity of two antivenoms evidence the high compositional and immunological conservation across Lachesis. J Proteomics. 2013;89: 112–123. pmid:23747394
- 81. Sanz L, Quesada-Bernat S, Chen PY, Lee CD, Chiang JR, Calvete JJ. Translational venomics: Third-Generation Antivenomics of Anti-Siamese Russell’s Viper, Daboia siamensis, Antivenom Manufactured in Taiwan CDC’s Vaccine Center. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018;3. pmid:30274462
- 82.
Ministerio de Salud de Perú. Norma Técnica sobre Prevención y Tratamiento de Acccidentes por Animales Ponzoñosos. 2004. p. 58.
- 83. Calvete J, Sanz L, Pla D, Lomonte B, Gutiérrez J. Omics meets biology: application to the design and preclinical assessment of antivenoms. Toxins (Basel). 2014;6: 3388–3405. pmid:25517863
- 84. Gutiérrez JM, Rojas G, Lomonte B, Gené JA, Cerdas L. Comparative study of the edema-forming activity of Costa Rican snake venoms and its neutralization by a polyvalent antivenom. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C Comp Pharmacol. 1986;85: 171–175. pmid:2877785
- 85. Alape-Girón A, Sanz L, Escolano J, Flores-Diaz M, Madrigal M, Sasa M, et al. Snake venomics of the lancehead pitviper Bothrops asper: geographic, individual, and ontogenetic variations. J Proteome Res. 2008;7: 3556–3571. pmid:18557640
- 86. de Hurtado I, Layrisse M. A quantitative method for the assay of snake venom hemolytic activity. Toxicon. 1964;2: 43–49.
- 87. Queiroz GP, Pessoa LA, Portaro FC V, Furtado MDFD, Tambourgi D V. Interspecific variation in venom composition and toxicity of Brazilian snakes from Bothrops genus. Toxicon. 2008;52: 842–51. pmid:18983867
- 88. Alencar LRV, Quental TB, Grazziotin FG, Alfaro ML, Martins M, Venzon M, et al. Diversification in vipers: Phylogenetic relationships, time of divergence and shifts in speciation rates. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016;105: 50–62. pmid:27480810
- 89. Zaher H, Murphy RW, Arredondo JC, Graboski R, Machado-Filho PR, Mahlow K, et al. Large-scale molecular phylogeny, morphology, divergence-time estimation, and the fossil record of advanced caenophidian snakes (Squamata: Serpentes). PLOS ONE. 2019;14: e0216148. pmid:31075128
- 90. Hamdan B, Guedes TB, Carrasco PA, Melville J. A complex biogeographic history of diversification in Neotropical lancehead pitvipers (Serpentes, Viperidae). Zool Scr. 2020;49: 145–158.
- 91. Ferreira ML, Moura-da-Silva AM, Mota I. Neutralization of different activities of venoms from nine species of Bothrops snakes by Bothrops jararaca antivenom. Toxicon. 1992;30: 1591–1602. pmid:1488768
- 92. Bogarín G, Morais JF, Yamaguchi IK, Stephano MA, Marcelino JR, Nishikawa AK, et al. Neutralization of crotaline snake venoms from Central and South America by antivenoms produced in Brazil and Costa Rica. Toxicon. 2000;38: 1429–1441. pmid:10758277
- 93. Segura A, Castillo MC, Núñez V, Yarlequé A, Gonçalves LRC, Villalta M, et al. Preclinical assessment of the neutralizing capacity of antivenoms produced in six Latin American countries against medically-relevant Bothrops snake venoms. Toxicon. 2010;56: 980–989. pmid:20621114
- 94. Sousa LF, Nicolau CA, Peixoto PS, Bernardoni JL, Oliveira SS, Portes-Junior JA, et al. Comparison of Phylogeny, Venom Composition and Neutralization by Antivenom in Diverse Species of Bothrops Complex. Gutiérrez J, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7: e2442. pmid:24069493
- 95.
Raw I, Guidolin R, Higashi H, Kelen E. Antivenins in Brazil: Preparation. Handbook of Natural Toxins. In: Tu AT, editor. Handbook of Natural Toxins. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1991. pp. 557–811.
- 96.
Brasil, Ministério da Saúde. Normas de Produção e Controle de Qualidade de Soros Antiofıdicos. Diário Oficial da União. 1996. pp. 23491–23512.
- 97. Dias da Silva W, Tambourgi D V. Comment on “Preclinical assessment of the neutralizing capacity of antivenoms produced in six Latin American countries against medically-relevant Bothrops Bothrops venoms.” Toxicon. 2011;57: 1109–1110. pmid:21524658
- 98. Rojas E, Quesada L, Arce V, Lomonte B, Rojas G, Gutierrez JM. Neutralization of four Peruvian Bothrops sp. snake venoms by polyvalent antivenoms produced in Perú and Costa Rica: preclinical assessment. Acta Trop. 2005;93: 85–95. pmid:15589801
- 99.
Gutiérrez M, José . Snakebite Envenomation in Central America. In: Mackessy S., editor. Handbook of Venoms and Toxins of Reptiles. Boca Ratón: CRC Press; 2009. pp. 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420008661.ch24