https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6971-2677
Figures
Abstract
Background
The prevalence of developmental alterations associated with in-utero Zika virus (ZIKV) exposure in children is not well understood. Furthermore, estimation of the Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) of developmental alterations attributed to ZIKV has not been performed due to lack of population-based cohorts with data on symptomatic and asymptomatic ZIKV exposures and an appropriate control group. The aim of this study was to characterize neurodevelopmental outcomes of children at 11 to 32 months of age with intrauterine ZIKV exposure and estimate the PAF of alterations secondary to ZIKV exposure.
Methodology/Principal findings
We performed a cohort of biannual community-based prospective serosurveys in a slum community in Salvador, Brazil. We recruited women participating in our cohort, with a documented pregnancy from January 2015 to December 2016 and children born to those mothers. Children were classified as ZIKV exposed in utero (born from women with ZIKV seroconversion during pregnancy) or unexposed (born from women without ZIKV seroconversion or that seroconverted before/after pregnancy) by using an IgG monoclonal antibody blockade-of-binding (BoB). We interviewed mothers and performed anthropometric, audiometric, ophthalmological, neurologic, and neurodevelopmental evaluations of their children at 11 to 32 months of age. Among the 655 women participating in the cohort, 66 (10%) were pregnant during the study period. 46 (70%) of them completed follow-up, of whom ZIKV seroconversion occurred before, during, and after pregnancy in 25 (54%), 13 (28%), and 1 (2%), respectively. The rest of women, 7 (21.2%), did not present ZIKV seroconversion. At 11 to 32 months of life, the 13 ZIKV-exposed children had increased risk of mild cognitive delay (RR 5.1; 95%CI 1.1–24.4) compared with the 33 children unexposed, with a PAF of 53.5%. Exposed children also had increased risk of altered auditory behavior (RR 6.0; 95%CI 1.3–26.9), with a PAF of 59.5%.
Conclusions
A significant proportion of children exposed in utero to ZIKV developed mild cognitive delay and auditory behavioral abnormalities even in the absence of gross birth defects such as microcephaly and other neurodevelopmental domains. Furthermore, our findings suggest that over half of these abnormalities could be attributed to intrauterine ZIKV exposure.
Author summary
ZIKV is a neurotropic virus associated with congenital abnormalities that have been grouped under congenital Zika syndrome (CZS), the most prominent being microcephaly. Recent studies have uncovered a spectrum of other abnormalities. However, what remains unclear is the Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) of developmental alterations attributable to ZIKV intrauterine exposure in children (> one year of life). In this population-based cohort study, we found that children (without microcephaly) exposed in utero to ZIKV have an increased incidence of mild cognitive delay and auditory behavior abnormalities, with over half of these events attributable to intrauterine exposure. The results of this study suggest that more than half of alterations found in the population study can be attributed to intrauterine ZIKV exposure, thus demonstrating the importance of monitoring apparently healthy children born during the epidemic, even to asymptomatic mothers. Health services should implement early interventions to limit the morbidity of congenital ZIKV infection.
Citation: Aguilar Ticona JP, Nery N Jr, Ladines-Lim JB, Gambrah C, Sacramento G, de Paula Freitas B, et al. (2021) Developmental outcomes in children exposed to Zika virus in utero from a Brazilian urban slum cohort study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 15(2): e0009162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009162
Editor: Alberto Novaes Ramos Jr, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil, BRAZIL
Received: July 28, 2020; Accepted: January 20, 2021; Published: February 5, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Aguilar Ticona et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIAID R01 AI052473 (AK), R25 U01AI088752 (AK), FIC R01 TW009504 (AK), R25 TW009338 (AK), F31 AI114245 (AK), R01 AI121207 (AK), D43 TW010540 (AK), P01 AI106695 (EH) (https://www.niaid.nih.gov/), Wellcome Trust (102330/Z/13/Z https://wellcome.ac.uk/), Bahia State Research Support Foundation (FAPESB) ZIKA-FAPESB T.O. n° PET0021/2016 (www.fapesb.ba.gov.br) and Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education (CAPES) from Brazil (https://www.capes.gov.br/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Intrauterine Zika virus (ZIKV) infection can lead to teratogenic effects, including microcephaly, grouped under the term congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) [1,2]. However, the possibility of development of other manifestations, such as epilepsy and neurodevelopmental abnormalities, is currently under investigation [1,3,4]. While severe outcomes of CZS have been extensively described, limited prospective information exists regarding the effects of congenital ZIKV infection on the neurodevelopmental outcomes of children, particularly those without apparent defects at birth [5]. Similar to other neurotropic viruses, ZIKV may cause subtle alterations that go undetected until later in life [6–8]. One study in the U.S. Territories and Freely Associated States reported that 9% of their pediatric study population had at least one neurodevelopmental abnormality associated with congenital ZIKV infection [3]. Similar studies that followed children without microcephaly in Brazil [9–11] found that children may develop mild or even severe cognitive delay. In contrast, other cohorts in Colombia [12] and the United States [13] did not find severe sequelae in children exposed to ZIKV in utero and born without microcephaly but still emphasize the need for follow-up beyond one year of life.
The reasons for these contrasting results could be due to differences in study settings or other unknown factors. Furthermore, these studies have primarily focused on mothers with symptomatic infection, and most have also focused on children with birth defects, notably microcephaly. This has prevented estimation of the population attributable fraction (PAF) of neurodevelopmental abnormalities secondary to intrauterine ZIKV exposure, regardless of maternal symptomatology and presence of defects at birth. Characterizing the spectrum and incidence of neurodevelopmental abnormalities related to congenital ZIKV infection, in children born to both symptomatic and asymptomatic mothers, could lead to a better understanding of the clinical sequelae of CZS and consequently more timely interventions and improved outcomes. In this study, we prospectively characterized development of children at 11 to 32 months of age exposed to ZIKV in utero in a slum community in Salvador, Brazil and estimated the PAF of abnormalities secondary to intrauterine ZIKV exposure.
Methods
Ethics statement
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Yale University (1006006956) and the ethics committee of the Hospital Geral Roberto Santos–Bahia (1.866.918). All caregivers provided signed consent for interviews, blood collection, and clinical evaluations.
Study site
This study was performed in Salvador, one of the epicenters of the Zika epidemic [14]. Our study area was the slum community of Pau da Lima, where 73% (95% CI 70%-76%) of individuals were infected by ZIKV during the 2015 epidemic [14]. We identified pregnant women during the epidemic, with and without seroconversion to ZIKV, and performed neurodevelopmental and anthropometric evaluations of their children at 11 to 32 months of age.
This work built upon a long-term prospective cohort study of slum residents that started in 2003, originally focused on Leptospirosis [15,16]. Our last study census from 2013 identified a high population density (14,122 individuals in 3,689 households in 0.17 km2). This slum community notably has significant socioeconomic determinants, such as low median income (US$ 1.30 per capita per day per household), the presence of illegal settlements, and substandard sanitation [16].
Using follow-up data from 2013 as a baseline population, we randomly selected 3,716 participants ≥5 years old. Of these, 2,421 (65.1%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the study by providing informed consent and spending >3 nights per week in a household inside the study area. Of these, we followed 2016 (83.3%) participants in serologic surveys performed twice annually (August to September and February to March), in both 2015 and 2016. Among participants we followed, 781 (38.7%) were women between 10 and 49 years old in 2016. Of these, women who reported pregnancy from January 1st, 2015 to December 31st, 2016 and their newborns were selected for further analysis (Fig 1).
* One participant reported two pregnancies during the study period, one ending in stillbirth due to extreme premature delivery at 26 weeks and the other ending in a live singleton birth. The live birth was included in the 46 live births that were followed. † ZIKV-exposed children born to mothers with seroconversion to ZIKV during pregnancy.‡ ZIKV-unexposed children born to mothers who had not been infected during pregnancy (without ZIKV seroconversion or ZIKV seroconversion before or after pregnancy).
Intrauterine ZIKV exposure
We used a ZIKV NS1 blockade-of-binding (BOB) ELISA to evaluate mothers’ exposure to ZIKV in all women included in this study [17,18]. This assay has a reported sensitivity and specificity of 92.0–95.0% and 89.0–95.9%, respectively, and can distinguish ZIKV infections from dengue virus infections [17,18]. We classified a positive ZIKV response using a cut-off of ≥50% inhibition in the BOB value: {1 –[(OD sample–OD minimum value)/delta value]} x 100, where OD represents optical density [17]. We defined intrauterine ZIKV exposure as seroconversion between consecutive serosurveys during pregnancy in the epidemic period. We divided intrauterine ZIKV exposure into two groups: a) “confirmed” when two samples were available during pregnancy, the first being negative and the second being positive, and b) “probable” when one sample during pregnancy was negative and the second obtained after delivery (~4 months) was positive. For probable cases, ZIKV infection may have occurred during pregnancy or after delivery. Lack of exposure was defined as absence of seroconversion or seroconversion that occurred before (mean of 3.6 months) or after pregnancy. We estimated the pregnancy period using date of birth and gestational age.
Outcomes
A multidisciplinary team (physiotherapists, speech therapists, physicians including an ophthalmologist and neurologist, and nurses) collected information on mothers and children using interviews, chart review, and clinical evaluations. We interviewed mothers using a standardized questionnaire to obtain sociodemographic characteristics and medical history, including history of childbirth and the relevant perinatal period. We collected information on each child at birth and during the follow-up period (11 to 32 months of age). For birth information, we reviewed the prenatal Brazilian monitoring program card and Child Health Record during inpatient care to obtain information on gestational age and anthropometric measurements. We performed a comprehensive assessment during the follow up period, collecting growth parameters and evaluating neurodevelopmental, auditory, and ophthalmological outcomes. The multidisciplinary team collecting this information was kept unaware of (blinded to) participants’ serological status.
Growth parameters
We recorded weight, length, and head circumference at birth (collected from the Child Health Record) and at the time of the study visit. We analyzed these using reference values (Z-scores) from INTERGROWTH-21 [19] and the WHO [20] for measurements collected at birth and during the follow-up period, respectively.
Neurodevelopmental evaluation
We used the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd ed. (Bayley III), a neurodevelopmental tool validated in Brazil for children between 16 days and 42 months of age. It includes five domains: Cognitive, Language, Motor, Socio-emotional, and Adaptive Behavior. Children can be classified as having severe neurodevelopmental delay (composite score ≤70 [≤-2 SD]), mild delay (71 to 85 [-2 SD to -1 SD]), or normal development (>85) [11,21]. We also used a screening version of the Bayley III tool that focuses on the Cognitive, Language, and Motor domains. The scales are adjusted for the child’s age and categorized into 3 categories: at risk, emerging, and competent. Children classified as at risk and emerging in the Bayley screening were reevaluated using the complete Bayley protocol. Children classified as competent in the Bayley screening were considered > -1 SD in the Cognitive, Language, and Motor domains of the complete Bayley protocol (i.e. normal development) and were pooled with those who underwent the complete Bayley protocol in the final analysis.
We also used the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) [22], a standardized evaluation for children between 2 and 24 months of age, to categorize severity of neurological deficits. It includes 26 items that evaluate cranial nerve functions, posture, quality and quantity of movements, muscle tone, and deep tendon reflexes. The overall score ranges from 0 to 78. Scores >74 for children >18 months of age and >73 for children between 12 and 18 months of age indicate adequate neurological development.
Neurosensory evaluation
We performed auditory evaluations with the Simonek hearing kit [23], an adapted conditioned play audiometry test, used to screen children up to 48 months of age. It was performed by speech therapists and physicians trained to the assessment. It includes eight musical objects with different frequency levels from 38.2 to 95.1 decibels. The kit evaluates reflexes, attention, location, orientation in front of different auditory stimuli, and otoacoustic emissions (OAE), which are used for the detection of auditory changes of cochlear origin. The ophthalmologic evaluation included an appropriately focused physical exam, external ocular examination, ocular biomicroscopy, and indirect ophthalmoscopy with pupillary dilation, which has been used to evaluate CZS-associated abnormalities [24].
Statistical analysis
We used the statistical package SPSS v21 for data analysis. We used frequency and percentages to characterize categorical data and median and interquartile range to characterize quantitative data. We grouped participants by seroconversion status during pregnancy. We compared developmental and clinical changes between these two groups using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. We measured associations between ZIKV exposure during pregnancy and study outcomes by Relative Risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). To calculate the PAF of abnormalities secondary to intrauterine ZIKV exposure, we used the formula PAF = Pe (RR − 1) / [Pe (RR– 1) + 1], where Pe is the proportion of the population that was exposed. The 95% CI was calculated by substitution: PAF lower limit = Pe (RRL− 1) / [Pe (RRL− 1) + 1] and PAF upper limit = Pe (RRU− 1) / [Pe (RRU− 1) + 1], where RRL and RRU are the lower and upper limits of the 95% CI of RR, respectively [25].
Results
From January 2015 to December 2016, we identified 66/2016 (3.3%) pregnant women within the cohort to potentially include in our analysis. Of these, 18 were not included: 15 due to change in residence to a household outside the study site, and 3 due to refusal to participate. Among the 48 (72.7%) women who consented to participate, there were 49 reported pregnancies, including 46 live births, 2 miscarriages and 1 stillbirth (Fig 1).
Sociodemographic characteristics and exposure to ZIKV
Demographic and socioeconomic information and history of pregnancy are described in Table 1. Most mothers were young, self-identified as black, and completed elementary school. 39 (84.8%) of the women had had ZIKV infection at some point during the study period: 13 (28.2%) seroconverted during pregnancy, 25 (54.3%) before pregnancy, and one (2.2%) after pregnancy (Table 1 and Fig 2). Out of the 13 who seroconverted during pregnancy, nine were considered as confirmed and four as probable. The difference between the first (negative) and the second (positive) samples was 6.4 months (IQR 5.6–7.2) (S1 Table).
The continuous blue line represents estimated conception, calculated as the difference between date of birth and the gestational age at birth. The dashed blue line represents day of birth and the grey area between them represents the pregnancy period. Black and red dots are ZIKV BOB-negative and BOB-positive samples, respectively. (A) Mothers with evidence of probable ZIKV infection during the pregnancy period, (B) mothers with evidence of ZIKV infection before the pregnancy period, (C) mothers with evidence of ZIKV infection after the pregnancy period, and (D) mothers without evidence of ZIKV infection during the follow-up.
Anthropometric and neurodevelopment outcomes
We did not identify severe alterations in the anthropometric and neurological evaluations by Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) (Fig 3, Table 2, and S2 Table). Sixteen children (34.8%) were classified as at risk or emerging in the Bayley screening evaluation, which led to follow-up evaluation with the complete Bayley III (S1 Fig). We found scores equal to or below 85 (<-1 SD) in 6 children in the cognitive domain (13%), 5 in language (10%), and 2 in motor (4%). Our results show that children of mothers with ZIKV seroconversion during pregnancy, compared to children of mothers who did not seroconvert, had a 5.1-fold (95%CI 1.1–24.4) higher risk of a Bayley III score 1SD below the mean (≤85) in the cognitive domain, with a PAF of 53.5% (95%CI 1.4–86.9). There was no statistically significant difference in risk with respect to the language and motor development (Table 2) or socio-emotional and adaptive domains (S3 Table).
(A) Anthropometric measures at birth using Intergrowth parameters and (B) anthropometric measures during the follow-up period using WHO parameters.
Neurosensory outcomes
We performed ophthalmological evaluations on 34 children. Abnormal findings included a single instance each of unilateral cataract (2.9%), unilateral ptosis (2.9%), and posterior synechiae (2.9%). We evaluated 21 children using an OAE test and found no abnormalities. In the auditory behavioral evaluation, 7 (15.9%) showed behavioral problems related to orientation, localization, and attention in response to an auditory stimulus. Auditory behavioral assessment also showed that children born to women with ZIKV seroconversion during pregnancy had a risk of abnormal auditory behavior 6.0-fold (95% CI 1.3–26.9) higher than that of those born to women without seroconversion, with a PAF of 59.5% (95% CI 8.6–88.4) (Table 2).
We also compared children of women with symptomatic and asymptomatic ZIKV infection during pregnancy and found no significant difference in clinical and developmental outcomes (S4 Table). This was also true when comparing children of mothers with confirmed and probable intrauterine ZIKV exposure. Moreover, the statistical associations between intrauterine ZIKV exposure and cognitive and auditory behavioral abnormalities persisted after excluding probable exposed cases from the analysis (S5 Table).
Discussion
Our findings from a cohort of women living in a slum community in Brazil suggest that both symptomatic and asymptomatic ZIKV infection during pregnancy is associated with mild neurodevelopmental abnormalities in congenitally infected children without apparent birth defects. Children of mothers exposed to ZIKV during pregnancy had 5-fold greater risk of mild cognitive delay (30.8% of the cohort) than unexposed children, as well as a 6-fold greater risk of abnormal auditory behavior. Furthermore, more than half of these abnormalities could be attributed to intrauterine ZIKV exposure. Although we did not identify differences in the global neurodevelopmental (considering the overall Bayley scale) between children born to women with and without ZIVK infection during the pregnancy, 30.8% of the exposed children had mild cognitive impairment (Bayley cognitive scale). Among them, approximately half could be attributed to in-utero ZIKV infection (~15% of the cohort).
In Brazil, during the ZIKV epidemic, we found evidence that more than half of the cases of children with neurodevelopmental delay in an urban slum community may be attributable to intrauterine ZIKV exposure. Our population-based study, including a control group of children from the same community, gave us the unique opportunity to calculate the percentage of abnormalities attributable to ZIKV intrauterine exposure. We found no statistically significant difference in risk of impairment with respect to maternal symptomology during pregnancy, suggesting that a considerable group of children born to asymptomatic ZIKV(+) mothers may be experiencing neurodevelopmental delay without prior suspicion. A previous study of pre-school children from middle- and low-income countries found cognitive delay in 10.1% of children, attributing 2.5 to42.7% of the delay in these children to social determinants such as poverty, low levels of stimulation in the home, and did not have access to unimproved drinking water and sanitation [26]. We attributed 53.5% of the mild cognitive delay and 59.5% of auditory behavioral abnormalities in our cohort to ZIKV infection during pregnancy, which are higher than that attributed to any sole socio-environmental factor described in the study above. The combination of intrauterine ZIKV exposure and socio-environmental factors may all influence the extent of delay and could be an interesting line of future enquiry. However, there was no significant difference in the other neurodevelopmental domains (language, motor, social-emotional, and adaptive behavior Bayley scale scores) and the overall Bayley score between exposed and unexposed children.
Our findings did not reveal any children with severe cognitive delay but rather a greater frequency of mild cognitive delay (30.8%) in this Brazilian slum community. These results are similar to other recent findings with subtle differences. A study in the U.S. Territories and Freely Associated States showed that amongst 1,495 children exposed to ZIKV, 9% had neurodevelopmental abnormalities possibly associated with CZS [3]. In another cohort study of 146 children in Rio de Janeiro, 28.1% had mild delay in some neurodevelopmental domain [10]. In the Rio de Janeiro cohort, 4.1% and 5.5% of children without microcephaly from symptomatic pregnancies had mild and severe cognitive delay, respectively [10]. Another study of children with intrauterine ZIKV exposure in Colombia and the U.S. did not find developmental impairments but demonstrated decreasing developmental trajectories in different skills, including communication, social cognition, and mobility [12].
With respect to language and motor development, we found a proportion of mild delay in each group (<12%), but without significant difference between the exposed and control groups. In contrast, the Rio cohort had higher proportions of children who experienced mild language delay (28.7%), severe language delay (12.3%), and mild motor delay (16.4%), though without a control group for comparison [10]. Another Brazilian study followed children born from symptomatic pregnancies without microcephaly at one year of age, finding that 12.5% of them (7/56) had neurodevelopmental delay including language, motor, or behavioral deficits [9].
It is possible that other types of impairments may appear in children exposed to ZIKV in-utero, as has been the case for other viruses. Vertical transmission of HIV, for instance, has been associated with mild and severe cognitive, motor, and language impairments [27,28], moreover the prevalence of these manifestations increase with child age, during the development [29]; West Nile Virus has long been associated with encephalitis, meningitis, or possible neurodevelopmental disorders [8]; and cytomegalovirus, rubella, toxoplasmosis, and herpes virus infections have been associated with cognitive deficits, language development, and visual changes [7]. These infections have also been related to hearing loss, detected even after birth and the neonatal period, and which can be progressive and fluctuating [1,30]. Although the children in our study did not experience hearing loss, we reported behavioral auditory problems in 38% of children, related to orientation, localization, and attention to auditory stimuli. Our results add to the body of knowledge of neurodevelopmental sequelae in children with in utero ZIKV exposure, but it is necessary to consider that other manifestations may arise later on and in different contexts. Still, our results reinforce that monitoring developmental impairments in the preschool period is critical for this pediatric population, as sustained delay without intervention has increased risk of learning and behavioral problems and functional impairments in the next stage of life [27,31].
We acknowledge our study’s limitations. First, the sample size in this population study was limited, affecting the study’s statistical power, as reflected in the wide ranges in the confidence intervals of relative risks describing the associations between ZIKV exposure and auditory and cognitive delays. Second, despite multiple attempts, there was difficulty in moving participants to a hospital to collect neuroimaging and complete ophthalmological and auditory evaluations, thus possibly affecting the rate of defects that could have been identified. Furthermore, otoacoustic emissions test is not a preferred methodology for acoustic evaluation; however, it can help to screen and rule out auditory problems to be confirmed later by Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) [32]. Moreover, serological surveys do not allow for exact estimation of asymptomatic infection time, as we classified four cases as probable seroconversion during pregnancy; however, our conclusions still held after exclusion of probable exposed cases from the analysis. Cross-reactivity between ZIKV and DENV is also of concern in serological studies, especially considering that >90% of the population (≥20 years old) in this community had DENV antibodies before the Zika epidemic [14]. However, 96% of samples collected prior to the epidemic were negative for ZIKV antibodies, suggesting lack of cross-reactivity between viruses. The high ZIKV attack rate in this study (>70%), similar to previous results from the same area [14], and the persistence of high antibody levels after seroconversion across subsequent time points, suggest that the majority of seroconversions over this period could be attributed to ZIKV infection. Additionally, while molecular confirmation is ideal in the clinical setting, it is not a practical method to characterize ZIKV exposure in populations, since only 34% of infections in this population were associated with fever or rash [14]. Thus, reliance on this method could lead to underestimation of infection in pregnant women and the incidence of sequelae in their children.
In summary, we documented a high incidence of mild neurodevelopmental impairments, specifically in the cognitive domain and auditory behavior, that could be attributable to both symptomatic and asymptomatic ZIKV intrauterine exposure. Children with neurodevelopmental impairment benefit from early intervention, behooving healthcare providers and caregivers to be alert to these potential clinical manifestations and perform timely detection of developmental and behavioral problems. These early interventions should also include children with mild cognitive impairment born to asymptomatic mothers during pregnancy, who may have a different perception of risk to their children’s development, and thus should prompt widespread screening of potential ZIKV infection during the epidemic period as part of pregnancy care protocols.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Serum samples collection period among 13 ZIKV-exposed (confirmed and probable) children.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009162.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Anthropometric evaluation outcomes in children with and without evidence of ZIKV infection in their mothers during pregnancy.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009162.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of 16 children with abnormal neurodevelopmental screening result.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009162.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Table. Cognitive development and auditory behavior of 13 children born to women exposed to ZIKV during pregnancy, classified by presence or absence symptoms during pregnancy.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009162.s004
(DOCX)
S5 Table. Neurological examination, ophthalmological, auditory and neurodevelopment evaluation outcomes in ZIKV-exposed (confirmed and probable) and unexposed children.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009162.s005
(DOCX)
S1 Fig. Bayley III score of 16 children without normal neurodevelopmental screening result.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009162.s006
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the members of the Pau da Lima community in Salvador, Brazil for their support. We would also like to thank team members from the Collective Health Institute Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Yale University, and the University of California, Berkeley.
References
- 1. Moore CA, Staples JE, Dobyns WB, Pessoa A, Ventura CV, Fonseca EB, et al. Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in congenital Zika syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(3):288–95. pmid:27812690; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5561417.
- 2. Boeuf P, Drummer HE, Richards JS, Scoullar MJ, Beeson JG. The global threat of Zika virus to pregnancy: epidemiology, clinical perspectives, mechanisms, and impact. BMC Med. 2016;14(1):112. pmid:27487767; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4973112.
- 3. Rice ME, Galang RR, Roth NM, Ellington SR, Moore CA, Valencia-Prado M, et al. Vital signs: Zika-associated birth defects and neurodevelopmental abnormalities possibly associated with congenital Zika virus infection—U.S. territories and freely associated states, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(31):858–67. Epub 2018/08/10. pmid:30091967; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6089332.
- 4. Oliveira-Filho J, Felzemburgh R, Costa F, Nery N, Mattos A, Henriques DF, et al. Seizures as a complication of Congenital Zika Syndrome in early infancy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98(6):1860–2. Epub 2018/04/26. pmid:29692307; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6086187.
- 5. Adams Waldorf KM, Olson EM, Nelson BR, Little ME, Rajagopal L. The aftermath of Zika: need for long-term monitoring of exposed children. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26(9):729–32. pmid:29960747; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6136144.
- 6. Adams Waldorf KM, Nelson BR, Stencel-Baerenwald JE, Studholme C, Kapur RP, Armistead B, et al. Congenital Zika virus infection as a silent pathology with loss of neurogenic output in the fetal brain. Nat Med. 2018;24(3):368–74. Epub 2018/02/06. pmid:29400709; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5839998.
- 7. Manicklal S, Emery VC, Lazzarotto T, Boppana SB, Gupta RK. The "silent" global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26(1):86–102. pmid:23297260; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3553672.
- 8. Pridjian G, Sirois PA, McRae S, Hinckley AF, Rasmussen SA, Kissinger P, et al. Prospective study of pregnancy and newborn outcomes in mothers with West nile illness during pregnancy. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016;106(8):716–23. pmid:27223334; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5008687.
- 9. Einspieler C, Utsch F, Brasil P, Panvequio Aizawa CY, Peyton C, Hydee Hasue R, et al. Association of infants exposed to prenatal Zika virus infection with their clinical, neurologic, and developmental status evaluated via the general movement assessment tool. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(1):e187235. pmid:30657537; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6431234.
- 10. Nielsen-Saines K, Brasil P, Kerin T, Vasconcelos Z, Gabaglia CR, Damasceno L, et al. Delayed childhood neurodevelopment and neurosensory alterations in the second year of life in a prospective cohort of ZIKV-exposed children. Nat Med. 2019;25(8):1213–7. Epub 2019/07/10. pmid:31285631; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6689256.
- 11. Lopes Moreira ME, Nielsen-Saines K, Brasil P, Kerin T, Damasceno L, Pone M, et al. Neurodevelopment in infants exposed to Zika virus in utero. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(24):2377–9. pmid:30575464; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6478167.
- 12. Mulkey SB, Arroyave-Wessel M, Peyton C, Bulas DI, Fourzali Y, Jiang J, et al. Neurodevelopmental abnormalities in children with In utero Zika virus exposure without congenital Zika syndrome. JAMA Pediatr. 2020. Epub 2020/01/07. pmid:31904798.
- 13. Lee EH, Cooper H, Iwamoto M, Lash M, Conners EE, Bloch D, et al. First 12 months of life for infants in New York city, New York, with possible congenital Zika virus exposure. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2019. Epub 2019/05/28. pmid:31125410.
- 14. Rodriguez-Barraquer I, Costa F, Nascimento EJM, Nery NJ, Castanha PMS, Sacramento GA, et al. Impact of preexisting dengue immunity on Zika virus emergence in a dengue endemic region. Science. 2019;363(6427):607–10. Epub 2019/02/09. pmid:30733412.
- 15. Hagan JE, Moraga P, Costa F, Capian N, Ribeiro GS, Wunder EA Jr., et al. Spatiotemporal determinants of urban leptospirosis transmission: four-year prospective cohort study of slum residents in Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(1):e0004275. pmid:26771379; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4714915.
- 16. Felzemburgh RD, Ribeiro GS, Costa F, Reis RB, Hagan JE, Melendez AX, et al. Prospective study of leptospirosis transmission in an urban slum community: role of poor environment in repeated exposures to the Leptospira agent. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(5):e2927. Epub 2014/05/31. pmid:24875389; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4038618.
- 17. Balmaseda A, Stettler K, Medialdea-Carrera R, Collado D, Jin X, Zambrana JV, et al. Antibody-based assay discriminates Zika virus infection from other flaviviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(31):8384–9. Epub 2017/07/19. pmid:28716913; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5547631.
- 18. Balmaseda A, Zambrana JV, Collado D, García N, Saborío S, Elizondo D, et al. Comparison of four serological methods and two reverse transcription-pcr assays for diagnosis and surveillance of Zika virus infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(3):e01785–17. pmid:29305550; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5824050.
- 19. Villar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora CG, Ohuma EO, Bertino E, Altman DG, et al. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014;384(9946):857–68. Epub 2014/09/12. pmid:25209487.
- 20. de Onis M, Garza C, Victora CG, Onyango AW, Frongillo EA, Martines J. The WHO multicentre growth reference study: planning, study design, and methodology. Food Nutr Bull. 2004;25(1 Suppl):S15–26. Epub 2004/04/09. pmid:15069916.
- 21.
Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. 3rd. San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment Inc; 2006.
- 22. Haataja L, Mercuri E, Regev R, Cowan F, Rutherford M, Dubowitz V, et al. Optimality score for the neurologic examination of the infant at 12 and 18 months of age. J Pediatr. 1999;135(2 Pt 1):153–61. Epub 1999/08/04. pmid:10431108.
- 23. Cardoso MC. Fonoaudiologia na infância. Thieme Revinter Publicações LTDA; 2018.
- 24. de Paula Freitas B, de Oliveira Dias JR, Prazeres J, Sacramento GA, Ko AI, Maia M, et al. Ocular findings in infants with microcephaly associated with presumed Zika virus congenital infection in salvador, Brazil. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(5):529–35. Epub 2016/02/13. pmid:26865554; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5444996.
- 25. Daly LE. Confidence limits made easy: interval estimation using a substitution method. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998;147(8):783–90. Epub 1998/04/29. pmid:9554420.
- 26. Emerson E, Savage A, Llewellyn G. Significant cognitive delay among 3- to 4-year old children in low- and middle-income countries: prevalence estimates and potential impact of preventative interventions. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(5):1465–74. Epub 2018/08/08. pmid:30085108.
- 27. Bernheimer LP, Keogh BK, Guthrie D. Young children with developmental delays as young adults: predicting developmental and personal-social outcomes. Am J Ment Retard. 2006;111(4):263–72. Epub 2006/06/24. pmid:16792428.
- 28. Pamplona M, Chaves EC, Carvalho AC, Pamplona R, Vallinoto ACR, Queiroz MAF, et al. Influence of exposure and vertical transmission of HIV-1 on the neuropsychomotor development in children. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019;52:e20180263. pmid:30652795.
- 29. Van Rie A, Harrington PR, Dow A, Robertson K. Neurologic and neurodevelopmental manifestations of pediatric HIV/AIDS: a global perspective. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2007;11(1):1–9. Epub 2006/12/02. pmid:17137813.
- 30. Cohen BE, Durstenfeld A, Roehm PC. Viral causes of hearing loss: a review for hearing health professionals. Trends Hear. 2014;18. Epub 2014/08/01. pmid:25080364; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4222184.
- 31. Keogh BK, Bernheimer LP, Guthrie D. Children with developmental delays twenty years later: where are they? How are they? Am J Ment Retard. 2004;109(3):219–30. Epub 2004/04/10. pmid:15072520.
- 32. Ho V, Daly KA, Hunter LL, Davey C. Otoacoustic emissions and tympanometry screening among 0–5 year olds. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(3):513–9. Epub 2002/08/01. pmid:12148864.