Individuals co-exposed to sand fly saliva and filarial parasites exhibit altered monocyte function

Moussa Sangare; Yaya Ibrahim Coulibaly; Naureen Huda; Silvia Vidal; Sameha Tariq; Michel Emmanuel Coulibaly; Siaka Yamoussa Coulibaly; Lamine Soumaoro; Ilo Dicko; Bourama Traore; Ibrahim Moussa Sissoko; Sekou Fantamady Traore; Ousmane Faye; Thomas B. Nutman; Jesus G. Valenzuela; Fabiano Oliveira; Seydou Doumbia; Shaden Kamhawi; Roshanak Tolouei Semnani

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009448

Abstract

Background

In Mali, cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and filariasis are co-endemic. Previous studies in animal models of infection have shown that sand fly saliva enhance infectivity of Leishmania parasites in naïve hosts while saliva-specific adaptive immune responses may protect against cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis. In contrast, the human immune response to Phlebotomus duboscqi (Pd) saliva, the principal sand fly vector in Mali, was found to be dichotomously polarized with some individuals having a Th1-dominated response and others having a Th2-biased response. We hypothesized that co-infection with filarial parasites may be an underlying factor that modulates the immune response to Pd saliva in endemic regions.

Methodology/Principal findings

To understand which cell types may be responsible for polarizing human responses to sand fly saliva, we investigated the effect of salivary glands (SG) of Pd on human monocytes. To this end, elutriated monocytes were cultured in vitro, alone, or with SG, microfilariae antigen (MF ag) of Brugia malayi, or LPS, a positive control. The mRNA expression of genes involved in inflammatory or regulatory responses was then measured as were cytokines and chemokines associated with these responses. Monocytes of individuals who were not exposed to sand fly bites (mainly North American controls) significantly upregulated the production of IL-6 and CCL4; cytokines that enhance leishmania parasite establishment, in response to SG from Pd or other vector species. This selective inflammatory response was lost in individuals that were exposed to sand fly bites which was not changed by co-infection with filarial parasites. Furthermore, infection with filarial parasites resulted in upregulation of CCL22, a type-2 associated chemokine, both at the mRNA levels and by its observed effect on the frequency of recruited monocytes.

Conclusions/Significance

Together, our data suggest that SG or recombinant salivary proteins from Pd alter human monocyte function by upregulating selective inflammatory cytokines.

Author summary

In Mali, cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and filariasis are co-endemic. We hypothesized that co-infection with helminth parasites may modulate the immune response to saliva of the CL vector Phlebotomus duboscqi (Pd). Hence, we investigated the effect of Pd salivary glands (SG) on human monocytes in subjects exposed or unexposed to sand fly bites in the context of a concomitant filaria infection. Monocytes of unexposed individuals selectively upregulated the production of IL-6 and CCL4 in response to SG from Pd or other vector species. In contrast, monocytes of individuals exposed to sand fly bites lost their responsiveness to SG, microfilariae antigen and LPS, irrespective of co-infection with filaria. Nevertheless, infection with filaria significantly upreguled the frequency of CCL22⁺monocytes, IL-10⁺mDCs and regulatory T cells. Together, our data suggest that repeated exposure to Pd saliva alters human monocyte function towards a tolerized phenotype while co-infection with filaria favors a Leishmania-promoting Th2/regulatory response.

Citation: Sangare M, Coulibaly YI, Huda N, Vidal S, Tariq S, Coulibaly ME, et al. (2021) Individuals co-exposed to sand fly saliva and filarial parasites exhibit altered monocyte function. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 15(6): e0009448. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009448

Editor: Johan Van Weyenbergh, KU Leuven, BELGIUM

Received: September 30, 2020; Accepted: May 4, 2021; Published: June 9, 2021

This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P50AI098505 (Tropical Medicine Research Center, TMRC) through the Division of extramural Research Program of NIAID, and the Fogarty International Center (grant ID D43TW008652) of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA (https://www.nih.gov/). This research was partly supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The following authors (MS, YIC, ID, MIS and BT) received salaries from the funder (TMRC). The grant was awarded to SD at the University of Bamako. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Cutaneous leishmaniasis, a vector-borne disease transmitted by bites of infected phlebotomine sand flies [1], is endemic in sub Saharan Africa including Mali [2–4]. Sand flies are found in areas endemic for lymphatic filariasis (LF) that results in physical disabilities and carries an important socioeconomic impact [5]. In Mali, the major filarial parasite responsible for LF is Wuchereria bancrofti (Wb) but Mansonella perstans (Mp) is also present [6].

Sand fly saliva has an array of proteins with varied pharmacological properties that facilitate blood feeding [7]. Salivary proteins also exert immunomodulatory effects on the innate immune system [8–11] and induce a strong adaptive immunity [12–14]. Vector-transmission of Leishmania parasites is exclusively by the bite of infected sand flies where the parasites are co-deposited into the skin together with saliva. Studies have consistently shown that saliva generally enhances infectivity of Leishmania parasites in a naïve host [8] while an adaptive immune response to whole saliva or a distinct salivary protein generally protects against cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis in rodent models of infection [15–19]. However, for certain sand fly species and certain salivary proteins induction of a specific adaptive immune response exacerbates Leishmania infection [19,20]. Protective salivary proteins are characterized by their induction of a Th1 delayed-type hypersensitivity response where IFN-γ, considered a strong correlate of protection in leishmaniasis, is induced. The mechanism of this protection remains to be fully elucidated but preliminary evidence points to priming of a protective anti-Leishmania response at the site of bite mediated by immunity to saliva [21,22]. In contrast, disease exacerbation is correlated with the induction of Th2 and/or regulatory cytokines [19]. Overall, such findings suggest that salivary proteins are potent modulators of the host immune response with consequences for the transmitted Leishmania parasites. While the majority of these studies were undertaken in animal models, the human immune response to saliva of Phlebotomus duboscqi (Pd), the principal sand fly vector in Mali, was found to be dichotomously polarized with some individuals developing a Th1-dominated response and others a Th2-biased response [23].

The altered function of the innate immune response, particularly the dysfunction of antigen presenting cells (APC), has been postulated to mediate some of the parasite-specific T cell unresponsiveness seen in patent filarial infection. Previously, we have shown that live MF of Brugia malayi (Bm) modulate dendritic cell (DC) function by altering the expression and function of Toll-like receptors 3 and 4, and by inducing apoptotic DC cell death [22]. In addition to the effect of live MF on DCs, we have shown that circulating monocytes from filaria-infected individuals are laden with filarial antigens, exhibit diminished antigen presentation and processing, and produce fewer proinflammatory cytokines in response to surface receptor crosslinking [24]. Therefore, we hypothesized that a filarial infection may compromise the immune response to sand fly salivary proteins, which in turn may alter the host’s immune response to Leishmania infection. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of sand fly saliva on human monocytes in the context of a concomitant filarial infection.

Methods

Ethics statement

The Institutional Review Board of the National Institutes of Health, USA, and the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology of Bamako, Mali approved the study (FWA 00001769, IRB00001983). Leucopacks from health blood bank donors were obtained from the Department of Transfusion Medicine (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) under (IRB)-approved protocols (IRB# 99-CC-0168). Written informed consent was obtained from all the volunteers prior to their participation.

Study populations

We screened 930 individuals in the Southern districts of Mali, Kolondieba (village of Boundioba) and Kolokani (villages of Tieneguebougou and Bougoudiana). These villages are co-endemic for filaria and leishmania infections [25,26].

The individuals were screened for Leishmania using the leishmanin skin test (LST); for filarial infections using the Immunochromatographic card test (ICT) for LF and thick blood smear for Mansonella perstans (Mp); and for antibodies to sand fly saliva by ELISA. All screened individuals were determined to be positive by sand fly antibody ELISA (SF⁺) and negative by LST test. Among those, we identified 67 SF⁺ and filaria or microfilaria-infected clinically asymptomatic (MF⁺) individuals and 61 SF⁺/MF^- individuals.

Thick blood smear

Finger-prick and venous blood samples were collected during daytime using a calibrated thick blood smear (60μl). The blood was drawn onto a microscope slide, dried and stained with 10% Giemsa using standard procedures. The stained smears were examined using a light microscope with a 10× objective for the detection of Mp microfilariae.

ICT

The ICT Filariasis test is a rapid-format filarial antigen test that was developed by ICT diagnostics (Filariasis test, Alere Inc., Scarborough, USA). The test is designed for detection of soluble W. bancrofti antigens that circulate in the blood of infected humans.

LST

LST material is supplied as sterile 2.5ml aqueous suspensions, with each ml containing 6×10⁶ killed L. major promastigotes (strain MRHO/IR/75/ER) in phosphate buffered saline and 0.01% thimerosal, pH 7.0–7.1. Leishmanin (0.1ml) was injected intra-dermally in the left forearm. Readings were taken 48 to 72 hours after injection using a ball point pen to determine the induration size. Measurements with a diameter greater than 5mm were considered positive [12].

Anti-saliva ELISA

The blood sample made from the filter paper was obtained using a 6 mm disposable punch, eluted in 0.05% Tween PBS, and stored at room temperature (RT) overnight. The serum obtained from this process is referred to as “eluted blood”. The ELISA test was carried out as described previously [26]. The ELISA plates were coated with 50μl of Pd salivary gland homogenate diluted at 2μg/ml in carbonate/bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4°C. The next day the plates were washed three times with PBS- 0.05% Tween, and blocked with PBS containing 4% bovine serum albumin for 2 hours at room temperature. The plates were washed and sera (100 μl of sera (diluted 1:100 in PBS-Tween+0.5% BSA)) were added and incubated at RT for one hour. After washing, alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat anti-human IgG (Sigma, MO) was added to each well (100μl/well (1:1000 in PBS-Tween-BSA)) and incubated at 37°C for an hour. Following another washing, p-nitrophenyl phosphate substrate (Sigma Sr. Louis, MO) was added and the absorbance was read at 405nm on a Versamax microplate reader after 30 minutes. Values obtained were subtracted from those obtained for the background (where PBS replaced “eluted blood”).

MF antigen preparation

Soluble MF Ag was made from ∼10⁸ live Brugia malayi MF (provided by John McCall, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.) as described previously [27]. The MF were washed repeatedly in RPMI medium containing antibiotics and cultured overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2. Worms were harvested the following day, washed with PBS and frozen at −20°C. The frozen MF were pulverized, sonicated, and extracted in PBS at 37°C for 4 hours and then at 4°C overnight. Following centrifugation at 20000g for 30 minutes, the supernatant was passed through a 0.45μm filter and stored in aliquots at −70°C. The antigen was found to be endotoxin free by QCL-1000 kit.

Sand flies and preparation of SG homogenate

Sand flies were reared at the Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, NIAID, NIH or were kindly provided by Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. SGs were dissected from 5- to 7-day-old females and stored in 20 μl phosphate-buffered saline at -70C. Salivary glands were sonicated followed by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 3 minutes. Supernatants were collected and stored at -80 C until use.

Recombinant proteins preparation

The sand fly salivary proteins were chosen based on their observed immunogenicity in humans [28–30]. The recombinant protein 1H2 (Pdum34; accession no. DQ834330) is a PpSP32-like silk-related protein, while 4B4 (Pdum35; accession no. DQ826522) and 4C2 (Pdum10; accession no. DQ826519) belong the yellow family of proteins from Pd saliva [31]. The function of silk-related proteins remains unknown but yellow proteins have biogenic amine binding properties [32,33]. Additionally, 4B4 and 4C2 have been recently shown to act as neutrophil chemoattractants [30]. LJL143 (accession no. AY445936) from saliva of Lutzomyia longipalpis has both anticoagulant [34] and anti-complement [35] activities. Briefly, cDNA encoding for each of the target salivary proteins from Pd and Lutzomyia. longipalpis (Ll) was cloned into the VR2001-TOPO vector, expressed in HEK-293F cells, and purified using HPLC as previously described [36].

Leishmania antigen, kindly donated by Dr. David L. Sacks (NIAID/NIH) was prepared by freeze/thaw cycles of L. major stationary-phase promastigotes as described previously [37].

In vitro culture of monocytes from North American individuals

Leucopacks from healthy blood bank donors were obtained from the Department of Transfusion Medicine (see ethics statement above). Human monocytes were cultured at 50×10⁶ per 6-well plate in serum-free medium for 2 hours, after which the medium was removed and complete medium (RPMI 1640 medium, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA. supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, Gemini Bioproducts, Sacramento, CA 20 mM glutamine, 100IU/ml penicillin, and 100g/ml streptomycin, Biofluids, Inc., Rockville, MD) was added.

In vitro activation of monocytes from North American individuals

Human monocytes were harvested and further cultured at 1×10⁶ cells/ml either in media alone, or with LPS (1μg/ml), MF antigen (10μg/ml), salivary glands from different sand fly species (1 salivary gland pair/1×10⁶ cells), salivary recombinant proteins 1H2, 4B4 and 9G11 from Pd or LJL143 from Ll (2.5μg/ml), or Leishmania antigen (10μg/ml) for 30 minutes (mRNA expression was measure by qPCR) and 24 hours (cytokine production was measured by Luminex). At the indicated time points, cells were harvested to measure mRNA expression, and the supernatants were collected to assess cytokine and chemokine production.

Monocyte isolation from whole blood of MF⁺/SF⁺ and MF^-/SF⁺ individuals

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from the blood of Malian volunteers or blood bank donors were isolated by Ficoll diatrizoate density centrifugation [38]. Monocytes were isolated from PBMC using a CD14-negative monocyte isolation kit (Dynal Biotech, Lake Success, NY). Typically, the monocytes were ≥96% pure as assessed by flow cytometry.

Monocyte activation from MF⁺/SF⁺ and MF⁺/SF^- individuals

Monocytes isolated using CD14-negative isolation kit (Dynal Biotech) were cultured at 1×10⁶ cells/ml either in media alone, or with LPS (1μg/ml), MF antigen (10μg/ml), salivary glands from different sand fly species (1 salivary gland pair/1×10⁶ cells), Leishmania antigen (10μg/ml) for 24 hours. Cells were harvested and the supernatants were collected to assess cytokine and chemokine production.

RNA preparation and RT-PCR

RNA was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA generation was performed using random hexamers and reverse transcriptase (ABI, Grand Island, NY). Expression of genes (inflammatory: IP10, IL-6, CCL2, CCL4, CCL3, PDL1, and IDO; type-2 associated: CCL22; regulatory: TGF-β, IL-10) were determined by quantitative PCR using TaqMan reagents (ABI) on an ABI 7900HT. The threshold cycles (CT) for 18S and genes of interest were calculated and used to determine the relative transcript levels. The formula 1/delta CT was used to determine the relative transcript levels, where delta CT is the difference between the CT of the target gene and the CT of the corresponding endogenous 18S reference gene.

Cytokine analysis

The concentration of cytokines in culture supernatants was assessed using the Milliplex human cytokine/chemokine magnetic bead panel kit and the Luminex 100/200 system (Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX, USA). The lower limit of detection was 3.2pg/mL for IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, CCL4, IP10, CCL2, IL-10, IL-5, IL-17, and IFN-γ. Supernatant cytokine concentrations were determined by ELISA for CCL22 at a sensitivity of 12.5pg/mL according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Whole blood cell activation

Whole blood was collected from SF⁺/MF^- and SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals and diluted with serum-free media at a 1:1 ratio and cultured in 1ml per condition: media alone, with LPS (1μg/ml), MF ag (20μg/ml), Leish ag (20μg/ml) or SG Pd (1 pair/ml) for 24 hours. Supernatants were collected and cytokine concentrations were measured using Luminex or ELISA. In parallel wells, 12 hours after stimulation, BFA (10μg/condition) was added to permeabilize cells to measure intracellular cytokines. After 24 hours, red blood cells were lysed using 1x BD lysing solution (BD Biosciences, CA), fixed and labeled with antibodies for flow cytometry.

Flow cytometery: Staining and gating strategy

Cryopreserved whole blood was thawed at room temperature, washed with RPMI 1640 plus 5mm EDTA (Life Technologies, Inc.), and diluted in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS. Viability was determined using CD45 FITC (BD Biosciences Becton Dickinson). Cell pellets (100μl) were incubated with different panels of antibodies including anti-CD3-Alexa Fluor700, anti-CD4-APC, anti-CD127-PE-Cy5 (Bio Legend), anti-CD25-APC-Cy7, anti-CD14-APC-Cy7, anti-CD15-PE-Cy5, anti-CD19-PE-Cy7, anti-CD11c PE-Cy5, anti-HLA-DR-APC-Cy7, anti-CD123-PE-Cy7 (BD Biosciences) and anti-CD16-Pacific Orange (Invitrogen). In those panels to determine the production of chemokines, we also include anti-CCL22-PE and anti-IL-10- Pacific Blue (BD Biosciences). After 20 minutes of staining, cells were fixed using a BD FACS lysing solution (BD Biosciences). Cells were analyzed on a Fortessa flow cytometer.

Tregs were analyzed gating on CD3+ CD4⁺ CD25⁺ CD127^low and mDCs were analyzed gating on Lineage (CD3, CD14, CD20 FITC) negative HLA-DR⁺CD11c⁺CD123⁺

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of data from real-time PCR, Luminex, and ELISA was done using a Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test, and for clinical data the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was performed to compare between SF⁺/MF⁺ and SF⁺/MF^- individuals using Graph Pad Prism version 8 (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

Results

Saliva of the vector sand fly Phlebotomus duboscqi (Pd) upregulates the production of CCL4 and IL-6 in human monocytes

Recruitment and immunomodulation of monocytes at the site of a sand fly bite following exposure to saliva has been reported in the past [39]. Here, we assessed the effect of SG Pd on polarization of monocytes from healthy donors and compared it to the effect of MF ag, Leishmania antigen (Leish ag), or LPS (positive control). To assess the phenotype of monocytes, we measured the production of cytokines associated with a proinflammatory response (IL-6, IP10, CCL2, CCL3, CCL4), a type-2 response (CCL22), and a regulatory response (IL-10). Production of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and CCL4 (MIP-1-β) was significantly upregulated after stimulation for 24 hours with either SG Pd, MF ag or Leish ag (Fig 1). Interestingly, SG Pd had the most restrictive effect on monocytes, only upregulating IL-6 and CCL4. In comparison, MF ag upregulated monocytes production of all the tested cytokines (Fig 1). Leish ag also upregulated the production of all cytokines with the exception of IP10. Of note, despite the pronounced response at the protein level, mRNA expression of selected genes was not altered after 4 hours of stimulation with SG Pd, Pd recombinant salivary proteins 1H2 and 4B4, or MF ag (S1 Fig). The difference could be due to the shorter exposure to stimuli to evaluate gene expression. Further, only the mRNA levels for CCL2 and CCL4 were significantly induced by Leish ag (S1 Fig).

Download:

Fig 1. Saliva of the vector sand fly Phlebotomus duboscqi upregulates the production of CCL4 and IL-6 in human monocytes.

Human monocytes were unexposed (closed circles) or exposed (open circles) to either saliva of SG Pd, MF ag, Leish ag, or to LPS (positive control) for 24 hours in vitro. Supernatants were collected and the levels of A) Type-1 associated chemokines/cytokines IL-6, CCL4, IP10, and CCL2, B) Type-2 associated chemokine CCL22, and C) regulatory cytokine IL-10 were measured. Each line represents an independent donor (n = 6–14). Statistical difference in cytokine production between unexposed and exposed cells are measured using Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test; * (p<0.05); ** (P<0.005).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009448.g001

Saliva of several vector species of sand flies upregulates the production of CCL4 and IL-6 in human monocytes

As some proteins in saliva of sand fly species are species-specific, and most have been shown to possess immunomodulatory effects on T cells, macrophages and DC populations, we next examined the effect of saliva of several sand fly species on the modulation of human monocytes from healthy donors. Similar to SG Pd, saliva of Phlebotomus papatasi (SG Pp), Phelobotomus argentipes (SG Pa), Phleobotomus sergenti (SG Ps), Phelobotomus perniciosus (SG Ppr), and Lutzomyia longipalpis (SG Ll) significantly upregulated the production of CCL4 and IL-6 in human monocytes (Fig 2). Additionally, CCL2 production was also significantly upregulated by SG Ll and SG Ps, while the production of a type 2 cytokine CCL22 was only enhanced by Ppr demonstrating global and species-specific effects of sand fly saliva on human monocytes (Fig 2).

Download:

Fig 2. Saliva of several vector species of sand flies upregulates the production of CCL4 and IL-6 in human monocytes.

Human monocytes were unexposed (closed circles) or exposed (open circles) to saliva of either SG Pp, SG Pa, SG Ps, SG Ppr, and SG Ll for 24 hours. Supernatants were collected and the levels of A) Type 1-associated chemokines/cytokines IL-6, CCL4, IP10, and CCL2, B) Type-2 associated chemokine CCL22, and C) regulatory cytokine IL-10 were measured. Each line represents an independent donor (n = 6–8). Statistical difference in cytokine production between unexposed and exposed cells are measured using Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test; * (p<0.05); ** (P<0.005).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009448.g002

Immunomodulatory effects of salivary and parasitic antigens are lost in monocytes of individuals naturally exposed to vector bites

Next, we aimed to assess the response of monocytes from individuals that are naturally exposed to saliva through vector bites in the context of a helminth infection. We tested individuals in regions of Mali co-endemic for both Pd sand flies and filarial infection. The first group are individuals who are sand fly bite positive (SF⁺) and MF negative (MF^-), hereafter referred to as SF⁺/MF^-. The second group are individuals positive for sand fly bite (SF⁺) and positive for MF (MF⁺), hereafter referred to as SF⁺/MF⁺ (see Study populations section for a full description). To assess cytokine production, monocytes of both groups were isolated from PBMC and cultured overnight in either media alone or with SG Pd, MF ag, or LPS (positive control).

Interestingly, stimulation with SG Pd did not induce any of the proinflammatory, type-2 or regulatory cytokines in monocytes of both groups despite having originated from individuals naturally exposed to sand fly bites (Fig 3). In fact, while IL-6 and CCL4 were upregulated in monocytes from sand fly bite-naive individuals (Fig 2), this response was lost in SF⁺ individuals regardless of their MF status (Fig 3). More importantly, exposure to sand fly bites also dampened the monocyte response to MF antigen and even to LPS, observed for some cytokines (Fig 3). Supporting previous data [24,40], monocytes of MF⁺ individuals were less responsive than monocytes of MF^- individuals since LPS significantly induced the production of CCL4 and IL-10 only in MF^- individuals (Fig 3). Of note, no significant differences between the SF⁺/MF^- and SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals were observed when basal cytokine production (media alone) was measured (S2 Fig). Collectively, these data suggest that monocytes from individuals repeatedly exposed to sand fly bites exhibit a dampened response to stimulation with any antigen. This could be due to a much higher basal cytokine expression in monocytes of individuals naturally exposed to sand fly bite (Fig 3; closed circles) than unexposed individuals from North America (Fig 1; closed circles).

Download:

Fig 3. Upregulation of CCL4, CCL2 and IL-6 production by saliva of the sand fly Phlebotomus duboscqi is lost in monocytes of individuals naturally exposed to vector bites.

Monocytes from PBMCs of SF⁺/MF⁺ (n = 11), and SF⁺/MF^- (n = 10) individuals were isolated and cultured in media alone (closed circles) or exposed to (open circles) either SG Pd, MF ag, or LPS for 24 hours. Supernatants were collected and cytokine levels were measured by Luminex. Each line represents an individual. Statistical difference in cytokine production between unexposed and exposed cells are measured using Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test; * (p<0.05); ** (P<0.005).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009448.g003

Increase in mRNA expression of CCL22 and frequency of CCL22⁺ monocytes in SF⁺/MF⁺ than SF⁺/MF^- individuals

To assess the effect of helminth infection on gene expression, we measured the basal mRNA expression in monocytes of SF⁺/MF^- compared to SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals. While there was no difference in proinflammatory and regulatory cytokine production, monocytes of SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals showed a significantly higher expression of CCL22, a type-2 chemokine (Fig 4), suggesting that exposure to sand fly saliva does not change the MF-induced type-2 phenotype.

Worth to mention, whole blood collected from SF⁺/MF⁺ and SF⁺/MF^- individuals, cultured in media alone showed no difference in the production of any of the inflammatory, type-2 or regulatory cytokines between the groups (S3 Fig).

Download:

Fig 4. mRNA expression of CCL22 and the frequency of CCL22⁺ monocytes and IL-10⁺ mDC is higher in SF⁺/MF⁺ than SF⁺/MF^- individuals.

A) Monocytes from PBMCs of SF⁺/MF⁺ (n = 11) and SF⁺/MF^- (n = 10) individuals were isolated and cultured in media for 24 hours. Cells were harvested, and A) mRNA levels were measured by TaqMan real-time PCR and normalized to the levels of 18S rRNA. Results are shown as geometric mean of 1/average ΔCT and graphed as boxes and whiskers (with minimum and maximum; there is no mRNA detection below 0.0277 (the dotted line). B) Whole blood from SF⁺/MF⁺ (n = 5) and SF⁺/MF^- (n = 5) individuals were RBC-lysed and cultured in media alone for 24 hours. Cells were harvested and the frequency of intracellular CCL22⁺ cells in CD14⁺/HLA-DR⁺ monocytes IL-10⁺ cells in HLA-DR⁺/CD11c⁺/CD123^- mDCs were measured by flow cytometry. Bars represent geometric mean of frequency in SF⁺/MF⁺ (n = 5) and SF⁺/MF^- (n = 5). Statistical difference in between the two groups are measured using nonparametric Mann- Whitney test; * (p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009448.g004

SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals have a higher frequency of Treg and IL-10⁺ mDC than SF⁺/MF^- individuals

To understand whether exposure to sand fly bite changes the composition of innate immune cells, we performed flow cytometry on whole blood of SF⁺/MF^- and SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals. To this end, we did not see a significant difference in the frequency of lymphocytes or neutrophils, but observed a significant increase in the percentage of CD25⁺/CD127^low Tregs in SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals (Fig 5A). Further, though there was no overall difference in the number of monocytes or mDC in SF⁺/MF⁺ as compared to SF⁺/MF^- individuals, a significant increase was observed in the frequency of CCL22⁺ monocytes and IL-10⁺ mDCs in SF⁺/MF⁺ as compared to SF⁺/MF^- individuals (Fig 5). These data suggest that exposure to sand fly saliva through bites doesn’t change the regulatory phenotype that has already been established by helminth infection.

Download:

Fig 5. SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals have a higher frequency of Treg than SF⁺/MF^- individuals.

Whole blood from SF⁺/MF⁺ (n = 5) and SF⁺/MF^- (n = 5) individuals were RBC-lysed and frequency of different subsets were measured by flow cytometry. Frequency of B lymphocytes were not different between SF⁺/MF^- and SF⁺/MF⁺ (1.81±1.21 and 3.96±2.38 respectively, p = 0.11). Statistical difference in frequency of subsets between the two groups are measured using nonparametric Mann- Whitney; * (p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009448.g005

Discussion/Conclusion

To date, most studies of sand fly saliva have been focused on leishmaniasis; understandable as sand flies are biological vectors that transmit Leishmania by bite. Nevertheless, in real-life situations humans are exposed to multiple infections. Importantly, co-infections have been shown to shape the immune response to pathogens including helminths, Plasmodium and Leishmania [41–43]. Another underexplored yet equally relevant facet to immunomodulation is that humans are frequently exposed to saliva of biting disease vectors that contains immunomodulatory and immunogenic proteins [44–46]. It has been established that sand fly saliva contains immunomodulatory molecules that manipulate the host immune response exacerbating infection by Leishmania, while adaptive immunity generated against salivary proteins in experimentally- or naturally-exposed hosts associates to protection from leishmaniasis [44].

Filariasis and leishmaniasis are co-endemic in Mali where the majority of inhabitants are also exposed to sand fly bites [25]. Here, we aimed at understanding how natural exposure to sand fly saliva through repeated bites, regardless of Leishmania infection, may affect the host response to filaria. Additionally, we also explored how filaria-infected individuals modulate the response to sand fly bites.

As monocytes are recruited to the bite site of disease vectors [42,45], we focused the investigation on understanding the response of these cells in humans that are unexposed or naturally-exposed to sand flies. Interestingly, monocytes recovered from individuals naturally-exposed to sand fly bites were refractory to antigenic challenge, and became unresponsive to filarial or leishmanial antigens, or even potent activators such as LPS. This finding has important implications regarding the response of bite-experienced humans to various pathogens. This is also of particular relevance to Leishmania parasites that are transmitted by sand flies since monocytes are their host cells. The effect of monocyte dysfunction upon repeated exposure to sand fly bites on the establishment and progression of Leishmania infection remains to be assessed.

In contrast to saliva-exposed monocytes, cells from healthy volunteers produced significantly higher levels of several inflammatory and regulatory cytokines/chemokines in response to filarial and leishmanial antigens but only upregulated the production of CCL4 (MIP-1 β) and IL-6 in response to sand fly saliva. Our findings support previous studies that reported the induction of IL-6 and CCL2, another monocyte chemoattractant, in response to sand fly saliva or bites [42,44]. IL-6 is a proinflammatory cytokine that has been shown to down modulate the killing of Leishmania amazonensis in human macrophages [47]. In addition, it has been shown that Lutzomyia longipalpis sand fly salivary gland homogenates enhance IL-6 production by human monocytes which may enhance the survival of Leishmania in humans infected with the parasite [48]. A study reporting the upregulation of CCL4 by Leishmania donovani hypothesized that this parasite induces the expression of CCL4 in host cells to attract regulatory CCR5⁺ cells to the site of infection, and to further downregulate host immune response [49]. Interestingly, similar to SG Pd, Leish ag, and LPS also upregulate CCL4 in unexposed monocytes, but not if monocytes have been pre-exposed to sand fly bites. This data suggests that repeated exposure to sand fly bites in endemic regions alters the innate immune response rendering them less responsive to further activation with either sand fly salivary proteins, Leishmania antigens or LPS. It is important to note that monocytes from Malian individuals produce a higher basal level of cytokines compared to controls, rendering them less responsive to antigen-specific stimulation. However, since the majority of individuals living in endemic areas in Mali have been exposed to sand fly bites, we compared the response of their monocytes to cells from North American individuals as controls. As such, factors other than repeated exposure to sand fly saliva may have contributed to the induction of the heightened state of activation observed for Malian monocytes.

Chronic infection with filarial parasites is known to bias the human immune response towards a more regulatory Th2/M2 profile, hence diminishing the Th1/M1 response [43,50]. In this study we have observed that compared to cells from SF⁺/MF^- subjects, monocytes from SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals produce less cytokines and are more of the M2-phenotype, evidenced by a higher CCL22 mRNA expression and a higher frequency of CCL22⁺ cells. Furthermore, the frequency of IL-10⁺ myeloid DC and T regulatory cells are increased in SF⁺/MF⁺ as compared to SF⁺/MF^- individuals, indicative of an immune response biased towards a regulatory state. Further MF ag induced the production of type-1, type 2, and regulatory cytokines in monocytes from individuals not previously exposed to sand fly bites. However, in individuals that are exposed to sand fly bites in endemic regions, microfilariae (SF⁺/MF⁺) does not alter basal cytokine production from either monocytes or whole blood. This is in accordance with the helminth induction of both regulatory and type-2 phenotypes [51] which seems not to be affected by exposure to sand fly bites.

This study demonstrates that repeated exposure to sand fly saliva has a profound effect on human monocytes that renders them unresponsive to stimuli. Superimposed on this, the immune response of individuals residing in regions co-endemic for filaria is further modulated by microfilariae, revealing the complexity of the immune interactions that shape the human response to disease vectors and the pathogens they transmit in real-life scenarios. Studies that consider multi-factorial settings that affect the human immune system simultaneously are much needed and may reveal new information vital to understanding how diseases establish in the natural environment.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Short term exposure to saliva of the vector sand fly Phlebotomus duboscqi does not alter the mRNA expression of Type 1, Type 2 or regulatory genes in human monocytes.

Human monocytes were unexposed (media) or exposed to either SG Pd, Leish ag, MF ag, LPS, or recombinant proteins 4B4, 1H2, LJ143, or 4C2 for 4 hours. mRNA expression of (A) Type-1 associated genes CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, IP10, and IL-6, (B) Type-2 associated gene CCL22, and (C) regulatory gene IL-10 was measured. Data are represented as box and whiskers (min to max) of 1/average ΔC_t (n = 5–7). The mRNA detection threshold (dotted line) is 0.027. Statistical differences in mRNA expression are measured using Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test; * (p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009448.s001

(TIFF)

S2 Fig. Basal cytokine levels in overnight monocyte culture of SF⁺/MF^- and SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals.

Monocytes were isolated from PBMC of SF⁺ /MF^- (n = 13) and SF⁺ /MF⁺ (n = 11) individuals. Cells were cultured in media for 24 hours and supernatant was collected and cytokine levels were measured by Luminex. Bars represent the geometric mean with 95% CI. Statistical analysis was done using nonparametric Mann- Whitney test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009448.s002

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. Basal cytokine levels in cultured whole blood of SF⁺/MF^- and SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals.

Whole blood from SF⁺ /MF^- (n = 13) and SF⁺ /MF⁺ (n = 11) individuals were RBC-lysed and cultured in media for 24 hours. The supernatant was collected and cytokine levels were measured by Luminex. Bars represent the geometric mean with 95% CI.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009448.s003

(TIFF)

S4 Fig. Anti-Pd SG antibody titers as indicators of sand fly exposure versus basal cytokine expression of all SF⁺ individuals regardless of MF status.

Our data suggests that there is no significant correlation between any of the tested cytokines and antibody titers. Nevertheless, the cellular immune response may be very different from the antibody response.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009448.s004

(TIFF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the study communities in Kolokani and Kolondieba and the Fieldworkers for their support. We also would like to thank the ICER community and field workers for their dedication and support. We thank Dr. Sasisekhar Bennuru for his assistance with the figures.

References

1. CDC—Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CDC—Leishmaniasis [Internet]. Parasites—Leishmaniasis. 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 27]. https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/leishmaniasis/
2. Alvar J, Vélez ID, Bern C, Herrero M, Desjeux P, Cano J, et al. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. Kirk M, editor. PLoS One. 2012. p. e35671. pmid:22693548
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Boakye DA, Wilson M, Kweku M. A review of leishmaniasis in west Africa. Ghana Med J. Ghana Medical Association; 2005;39:94–7. pmid:17299551
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Oliveira F, Doumbia S, Anderson JM, Faye O, Diarra SS, Traoré P, et al. Discrepant prevalence and incidence of Leishmania infection between two neighboring villages in Central Mali based on leishmanin skin test surveys. Louzir H, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e565. pmid:20016847
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Eppig C, Fincher CL, Thornhill R. Parasite prevalence and the worldwide distribution of cognitive ability. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010. p. 3801–8. pmid:20591860
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Dembélé M, Bamani S, Dembélé R, Traoré MO, Goita S, Traoré MN, et al. Implementing preventive chemotherapy through an integrated national neglected tropical disease control program in Mali. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6. pmid:22448294
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Ribeiro JMC, Francischetti IMB. R OLE OF A RTHROPOD S ALIVA IN B LOOD F EEDING: Sialome and Post-Sialome Perspectives. Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;48:73–88. pmid:12194906
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Titus RG, Bishop J V, Mejia JS. The immunomodulatory factors of arthropod saliva and the potential for these factors to serve as vaccine targets to prevent pathogen transmission. Parasite Immunol. 2006. p. 131–41. pmid:16542315
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Brodie TM, Smith MC, Morris R V, Titus RG. Immunomodulatory effects of the Lutzomyia longipalpis salivary gland protein maxadilan on mouse macrophages. Infect Immun. 2007;75:2359–65. pmid:17339357
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Lima EP, Goulart MOF, Rolim Neto ML, Sommerfeld J, Kroeger A, Frentiu F, et al. Meta-analysis of studies on chemical, physical and biological agents in the control of Aedes aegypti. BMC Public Health. BioMed Central; 2015;15:858. pmid:26341708
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Wheat WH, Pauken KE, Morris RV, Titus RG. Lutzomyia longipalpis salivary peptide maxadilan alters murine dendritic cell expression of CD80/86, CCR7, and cytokine secretion and reprograms dendritic cell-mediated cytokine release from cultures containing allogeneic T cells. J Immunol. 2008;180:8286–98. pmid:18523295
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Kamhawi S, Belkaid Y, Modi G, Rowton E, Sacks D. Protection against cutaneous leishmaniasis resulting from bites of uninfected sand flies. Science. 2000;290:1351–4. pmid:11082061
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Oliveira F, Jochim RC, Valenzuela JG, Kamhawi S. Sand flies, Leishmania, and transcriptome-borne solutions. Parasitol Int. 2009;58:1–5. pmid:18768167
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Bethony JM, Cole RN, Guo X, Kamhawi S, Lightowlers MW, Loukas A, et al. Vaccines to combat the neglected tropical diseases. Immunol Rev. 2011;239:237–70. pmid:21198676
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Oliveira F, Lawyer PG, Kamhawi S, Valenzuela JG. Immunity to distinct sand fly salivary proteins primes the anti-leishmania immune response towards protection or exacerbation of disease. Lehane MJ, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e226. pmid:18414648
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Anderson JM, Samake S, Jaramillo-Gutierrez G, Sissoko I, Coulibaly CA, Traoré B, et al. Seasonality and prevalence of Leishmania major infection in Phlebotomus duboscqi neveu-lemaire from two neighboring villages in Central Mali. Bates PA, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1139. pmid:21572984
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Aday LA. Health status of vulnerable populations. Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:487–509. pmid:8054096
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Morris RV, Shoemaker CB, David JR, Lanzaro GC, Titus RG. Sandfly Maxadilan Exacerbates Infection with Leishmania major and Vaccinating Against It Protects Against L. major Infection. J Immunol. 2001;167:5226–30. pmid:11673536
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. de Moura TR, Oliveira F, Rodrigues GC, Carneiro MW, Fukutani KF, Novais FO, et al. Immunity to Lutzomyia intermedia saliva modulates the inflammatory environment induced by Leishmania braziliensis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e712. pmid:20559550
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. de Moura TR, Oliveira F, Novais FO, Miranda JC, Clarêncio J, Follador I, et al. Enhanced Leishmania braziliensis infection following pre-exposure to sandfly saliva. Jaffe C, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007;1:e84. pmid:18060088
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Gomes R, Teixeira C, Teixeira MJ, Oliveira F, Menezes MJ, Silva C, et al. Immunity to a salivary protein of a sand fly vector protects against the fatal outcome of visceral leishmaniasis in a hamster model. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:7845–50. pmid:18509051
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Rossi M, Fasel N. How to master the host immune system? Leishmania parasites have the solutions! Int Immunol. Oxford University Press; 2018;30:103–11. pmid:29294040
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Oliveira F, de Carvalho AM, de Oliveira CI. Sand-fly saliva-Leishmania-man: The trigger trio. Front Immunol. Frontiers Media SA; 2013;4:375. pmid:24312093
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Semnani RT, Keiser PB, Coulibaly YI, Keita F, Diallo AA, Traore D, et al. Filaria-induced monocyte dysfunction and its reversal following treatment. Infect Immun. American Society for Microbiology (ASM); 2006;74:4409–17. pmid:16861626
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Sangare MB, Coulibaly YI, Coulibaly SY, Coulibaly ME, Traore B, Dicko I, et al. A cross-sectional study of the filarial and Leishmania co-endemicity in two ecologically distinct settings in Mali. Parasites and Vectors. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2018;11:18. pmid:29310700
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Traoré B, Oliveira F, Faye O, Dicko A, Coulibaly CA, Sissoko IM, et al. Prevalence of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Districts of High and Low Endemicity in Mali. Boelaert M, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0005141. pmid:27898671
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Steel C, Nutman TB. Helminth antigens selectively differentiate unsensitized CD45RA+ CD4+ human T cells in vitro. J Immunol. 1998;160:351–60. http://www.jimmunol.org/content/160/1/351 pmid:9551991
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Marzouki S, Abdeladhim M, Abdessalem C Ben, Oliveira F, Ferjani B, Gilmore D, et al. Salivary Antigen SP32 Is the Immunodominant Target of the Antibody Response to Phlebotomus papatasi Bites in Humans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6. pmid:23209854
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Cecilio Fonseca M, Santos da Silva RC, Nascimento CS, Bastos Borges K. Computational contribution to the electrophoretic enantiomer separation mechanism and migration order using modified β-cyclodextrins. Electrophoresis. Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2017;38:1860–8. pmid:28387965
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Guimarães-Costa R, Fernández-Eulate G, Wahbi K, Leturcq F, Malfatti E, Behin A, et al. Clinical correlations and long-term follow-up in 100 patients with sarcoglycanopathies. Eur J Neurol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2021;28:660–9. pmid:33051934
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Kato H, Takeuchi O, Sato S, Yoneyama M, Yamamoto M, Matsui K, et al. Differential roles of MDA5 and RIG-I helicases in the recognition of RNA viruses. Nature. Nature; 2006;441:101–5. pmid:16625202
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Sima M, Novotny M, Pravda L, Sumova P, Rohousova I, Volf P. The diversity of yellow-related proteins in sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). Traub-Csekö YM, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2016;11:e0166191. pmid:27812196
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Sumova P, Sima M, Kalouskova B, Polanska N, Vanek O, Oliveira F, et al. Amine-binding properties of salivary yellow-related proteins in phlebotomine sand flies. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2019;115:103245. pmid:31604119
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Collin N, Assumpção TCF, Mizurini DM, Gilmore DC, Dutra-Oliveira A, Kotsyfakis M, et al. Lufaxin, a novel factor Xa inhibitor from the salivary gland of the sand fly lutzomyia longipalpis blocks protease-activated receptor 2 activation and inhibits inflammation and thrombosis in vivo. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. NIH Public Access; 2012;32:2185–96. pmid:22796577
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Mendes-Sousa AF, do Vale VF, Silva NCS, Guimaraes-Costa AB, Pereira MH, Sant’Anna MR V., et al. The Sand Fly Salivary Protein Lufaxin Inhibits the Early Steps of the Alternative Pathway of Complement by Direct Binding to the Proconvertase C3b-B. Front Immunol. Frontiers Media SA; 2017;8:1065. pmid:28912782
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Abdeladhim M, V. Coutinho-Abreu I, Townsend S, Pasos-Pinto S, Sanchez L, Rasouli M, et al. Molecular Diversity between Salivary Proteins from New World and Old World Sand Flies with Emphasis on Bichromomyia olmeca, the Sand Fly Vector of Leishmania mexicana in Mesoamerica. Ghedin E, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. Public Library of Science; 2016;10:e0004771. pmid:27409591
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Charmoy M, Hurrell BP, Romano A, Lee SH, Ribeiro-Gomes F, Riteau N, et al. The Nlrp3 inflammasome, IL-1β, and neutrophil recruitment are required for susceptibility to a nonhealing strain of Leishmania major in C57BL/6 mice. Eur J Immunol. Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2016;46:897–911. pmid:26689285
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Böyum A. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Isolation of monuclear cells by one centrifugation, and of granulocytes by combining centrifugation and sedimentation at 1 g. Scand J Clin Lab Investig Suppl. 1968;97:77–89. pmid:4179068
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Menezes MJ, Costa DJ, Clarêncio J, Miranda JC, Barral A, Barral-Netto M, et al. Immunomodulation of human monocytes following exposure to Lutzomyia intermedia saliva. BMC Immunol. 2008;9:12. pmid:18402685
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Sasisekhar B, Aparna M, Augustin DJ, Kaliraj P, Kar SK, Nutman TB, et al. Diminished monocyte function in microfilaremic patients with lymphatic filariasis and its relationship to altered lymphoproliferative responses. Infect Immun. American Society for Microbiology (ASM); 2005;73:3385–93. pmid:15908365
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Shen SS, Qu XY, Zhang WZ, Li J, Lv ZY. Infection against infection: Parasite antagonism against parasites, viruses and bacteria. Infect Dis Poverty. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2019;8. pmid:31200765
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Dey R, Joshi AB, Oliveira F, Pereira L, Guimarães-Costa AB, Serafim TD, et al. Gut Microbes Egested during Bites of Infected Sand Flies Augment Severity of Leishmaniasis via Inflammasome-Derived IL-1β. Cell Host Microbe. Cell Press; 2018;23:134–143.e6. pmid:29290574
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Damania B, Dittmer DP. What lies within: Coinfections and immunity. Cell Host Microbe. Cell Press; 2014. p. 145–7. pmid:25121741
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Lestinova T, Rohousova I, Sima M, de Oliveira CI, Volf P. Insights into the sand fly saliva: Blood-feeding and immune interactions between sand flies, hosts, and Leishmania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. Public Library of Science; 2017;11. pmid:28704370
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Pingen M, Schmid MA, Harris E, McKimmie CS. Mosquito Biting Modulates Skin Response to Virus Infection. Trends Parasitol. Elsevier Ltd; 2017. p. 645–57. pmid:28495485
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Manning S, Danielson KM. The immunomodulatory role of tumor-derived extracellular vesicles in colorectal cancer. Immunol. Cell Biol. John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 2018. p. 733–41. pmid:29575270
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Hatzigeorgiou DE, He S, Sobel J, Grabstein KH, Hafner A, Ho JL. IL-6 down-modulates the cytokine-enhanced antileishmanial activity in human macrophages. J Immunol. 1993;151:3682–92. https://www.jimmunol.org/content/151/7/3682 pmid:8397259
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Tomiotto-Pellissier F, Bortoleti BT da S, Assolini JP, Gonçalves MD, Carloto ACM, Miranda-Sapla MM, et al. Macrophage Polarization in Leishmaniasis: Broadening Horizons. Front Immunol. NLM (Medline); 2018;9:2529. pmid:30429856
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Kumari S, Shivam P, Kumar S, Jamal F, Singh MK, Bimal S, et al. Leishmania donovani mediated higher expression of CCL4 induces differential accumulation of CD4+CD56+NKT and CD8+CD56+NKT cells at infection site. Cytokine. Academic Press; 2018;110:306–15. pmid:29807685
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Metenou S, Nutman TB. Regulatory T cell subsets in filarial infection and their function. Front Immunol. Frontiers Media SA; 2013;4. pmid:24137161
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Semnani RT, Mahapatra L, Moore V, Sanprasert V, Nutman TB. Functional and phenotypic characteristics of alternative activation induced in human monocytes by interleukin-4 or the Parasitic nematode Brugia malayi. Infect Immun. American Society for Microbiology (ASM); 2011;79:3957–65. pmid:21788379
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. CDC—Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CDC—Leishmaniasis [Internet]. Parasites—Leishmaniasis. 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 27]. https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/leishmaniasis/

[ref2] 2. Alvar J, Vélez ID, Bern C, Herrero M, Desjeux P, Cano J, et al. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. Kirk M, editor. PLoS One. 2012. p. e35671. pmid:22693548
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[3] View Article

[4] PubMed/NCBI

[5] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Boakye DA, Wilson M, Kweku M. A review of leishmaniasis in west Africa. Ghana Med J. Ghana Medical Association; 2005;39:94–7. pmid:17299551
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] PubMed/NCBI

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Oliveira F, Doumbia S, Anderson JM, Faye O, Diarra SS, Traoré P, et al. Discrepant prevalence and incidence of Leishmania infection between two neighboring villages in Central Mali based on leishmanin skin test surveys. Louzir H, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e565. pmid:20016847
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] PubMed/NCBI

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Eppig C, Fincher CL, Thornhill R. Parasite prevalence and the worldwide distribution of cognitive ability. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010. p. 3801–8. pmid:20591860
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] PubMed/NCBI

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Dembélé M, Bamani S, Dembélé R, Traoré MO, Goita S, Traoré MN, et al. Implementing preventive chemotherapy through an integrated national neglected tropical disease control program in Mali. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6. pmid:22448294
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Ribeiro JMC, Francischetti IMB. R OLE OF A RTHROPOD S ALIVA IN B LOOD F EEDING: Sialome and Post-Sialome Perspectives. Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;48:73–88. pmid:12194906
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Titus RG, Bishop J V, Mejia JS. The immunomodulatory factors of arthropod saliva and the potential for these factors to serve as vaccine targets to prevent pathogen transmission. Parasite Immunol. 2006. p. 131–41. pmid:16542315
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Brodie TM, Smith MC, Morris R V, Titus RG. Immunomodulatory effects of the Lutzomyia longipalpis salivary gland protein maxadilan on mouse macrophages. Infect Immun. 2007;75:2359–65. pmid:17339357
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Lima EP, Goulart MOF, Rolim Neto ML, Sommerfeld J, Kroeger A, Frentiu F, et al. Meta-analysis of studies on chemical, physical and biological agents in the control of Aedes aegypti. BMC Public Health. BioMed Central; 2015;15:858. pmid:26341708
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Wheat WH, Pauken KE, Morris RV, Titus RG. Lutzomyia longipalpis salivary peptide maxadilan alters murine dendritic cell expression of CD80/86, CCR7, and cytokine secretion and reprograms dendritic cell-mediated cytokine release from cultures containing allogeneic T cells. J Immunol. 2008;180:8286–98. pmid:18523295
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Kamhawi S, Belkaid Y, Modi G, Rowton E, Sacks D. Protection against cutaneous leishmaniasis resulting from bites of uninfected sand flies. Science. 2000;290:1351–4. pmid:11082061
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Oliveira F, Jochim RC, Valenzuela JG, Kamhawi S. Sand flies, Leishmania, and transcriptome-borne solutions. Parasitol Int. 2009;58:1–5. pmid:18768167
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Bethony JM, Cole RN, Guo X, Kamhawi S, Lightowlers MW, Loukas A, et al. Vaccines to combat the neglected tropical diseases. Immunol Rev. 2011;239:237–70. pmid:21198676
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Oliveira F, Lawyer PG, Kamhawi S, Valenzuela JG. Immunity to distinct sand fly salivary proteins primes the anti-leishmania immune response towards protection or exacerbation of disease. Lehane MJ, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e226. pmid:18414648
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Anderson JM, Samake S, Jaramillo-Gutierrez G, Sissoko I, Coulibaly CA, Traoré B, et al. Seasonality and prevalence of Leishmania major infection in Phlebotomus duboscqi neveu-lemaire from two neighboring villages in Central Mali. Bates PA, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1139. pmid:21572984
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Aday LA. Health status of vulnerable populations. Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:487–509. pmid:8054096
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Morris RV, Shoemaker CB, David JR, Lanzaro GC, Titus RG. Sandfly Maxadilan Exacerbates Infection with Leishmania major and Vaccinating Against It Protects Against L. major Infection. J Immunol. 2001;167:5226–30. pmid:11673536
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. de Moura TR, Oliveira F, Rodrigues GC, Carneiro MW, Fukutani KF, Novais FO, et al. Immunity to Lutzomyia intermedia saliva modulates the inflammatory environment induced by Leishmania braziliensis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e712. pmid:20559550
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] PubMed/NCBI

[73] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. de Moura TR, Oliveira F, Novais FO, Miranda JC, Clarêncio J, Follador I, et al. Enhanced Leishmania braziliensis infection following pre-exposure to sandfly saliva. Jaffe C, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007;1:e84. pmid:18060088
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] PubMed/NCBI

[77] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Gomes R, Teixeira C, Teixeira MJ, Oliveira F, Menezes MJ, Silva C, et al. Immunity to a salivary protein of a sand fly vector protects against the fatal outcome of visceral leishmaniasis in a hamster model. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:7845–50. pmid:18509051
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] PubMed/NCBI

[81] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Rossi M, Fasel N. How to master the host immune system? Leishmania parasites have the solutions! Int Immunol. Oxford University Press; 2018;30:103–11. pmid:29294040
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] PubMed/NCBI

[85] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Oliveira F, de Carvalho AM, de Oliveira CI. Sand-fly saliva-Leishmania-man: The trigger trio. Front Immunol. Frontiers Media SA; 2013;4:375. pmid:24312093
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Semnani RT, Keiser PB, Coulibaly YI, Keita F, Diallo AA, Traore D, et al. Filaria-induced monocyte dysfunction and its reversal following treatment. Infect Immun. American Society for Microbiology (ASM); 2006;74:4409–17. pmid:16861626
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Sangare MB, Coulibaly YI, Coulibaly SY, Coulibaly ME, Traore B, Dicko I, et al. A cross-sectional study of the filarial and Leishmania co-endemicity in two ecologically distinct settings in Mali. Parasites and Vectors. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2018;11:18. pmid:29310700
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Traoré B, Oliveira F, Faye O, Dicko A, Coulibaly CA, Sissoko IM, et al. Prevalence of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Districts of High and Low Endemicity in Mali. Boelaert M, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0005141. pmid:27898671
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Steel C, Nutman TB. Helminth antigens selectively differentiate unsensitized CD45RA+ CD4+ human T cells in vitro. J Immunol. 1998;160:351–60. http://www.jimmunol.org/content/160/1/351 pmid:9551991
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] PubMed/NCBI

[105] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Marzouki S, Abdeladhim M, Abdessalem C Ben, Oliveira F, Ferjani B, Gilmore D, et al. Salivary Antigen SP32 Is the Immunodominant Target of the Antibody Response to Phlebotomus papatasi Bites in Humans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6. pmid:23209854
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Cecilio Fonseca M, Santos da Silva RC, Nascimento CS, Bastos Borges K. Computational contribution to the electrophoretic enantiomer separation mechanism and migration order using modified β-cyclodextrins. Electrophoresis. Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2017;38:1860–8. pmid:28387965
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Guimarães-Costa R, Fernández-Eulate G, Wahbi K, Leturcq F, Malfatti E, Behin A, et al. Clinical correlations and long-term follow-up in 100 patients with sarcoglycanopathies. Eur J Neurol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2021;28:660–9. pmid:33051934
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Kato H, Takeuchi O, Sato S, Yoneyama M, Yamamoto M, Matsui K, et al. Differential roles of MDA5 and RIG-I helicases in the recognition of RNA viruses. Nature. Nature; 2006;441:101–5. pmid:16625202
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] PubMed/NCBI

[121] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Sima M, Novotny M, Pravda L, Sumova P, Rohousova I, Volf P. The diversity of yellow-related proteins in sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). Traub-Csekö YM, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2016;11:e0166191. pmid:27812196
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Sumova P, Sima M, Kalouskova B, Polanska N, Vanek O, Oliveira F, et al. Amine-binding properties of salivary yellow-related proteins in phlebotomine sand flies. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2019;115:103245. pmid:31604119
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Collin N, Assumpção TCF, Mizurini DM, Gilmore DC, Dutra-Oliveira A, Kotsyfakis M, et al. Lufaxin, a novel factor Xa inhibitor from the salivary gland of the sand fly lutzomyia longipalpis blocks protease-activated receptor 2 activation and inhibits inflammation and thrombosis in vivo. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. NIH Public Access; 2012;32:2185–96. pmid:22796577
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Mendes-Sousa AF, do Vale VF, Silva NCS, Guimaraes-Costa AB, Pereira MH, Sant’Anna MR V., et al. The Sand Fly Salivary Protein Lufaxin Inhibits the Early Steps of the Alternative Pathway of Complement by Direct Binding to the Proconvertase C3b-B. Front Immunol. Frontiers Media SA; 2017;8:1065. pmid:28912782
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Abdeladhim M, V. Coutinho-Abreu I, Townsend S, Pasos-Pinto S, Sanchez L, Rasouli M, et al. Molecular Diversity between Salivary Proteins from New World and Old World Sand Flies with Emphasis on Bichromomyia olmeca, the Sand Fly Vector of Leishmania mexicana in Mesoamerica. Ghedin E, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. Public Library of Science; 2016;10:e0004771. pmid:27409591
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Charmoy M, Hurrell BP, Romano A, Lee SH, Ribeiro-Gomes F, Riteau N, et al. The Nlrp3 inflammasome, IL-1β, and neutrophil recruitment are required for susceptibility to a nonhealing strain of Leishmania major in C57BL/6 mice. Eur J Immunol. Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2016;46:897–911. pmid:26689285
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Böyum A. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Isolation of monuclear cells by one centrifugation, and of granulocytes by combining centrifugation and sedimentation at 1 g. Scand J Clin Lab Investig Suppl. 1968;97:77–89. pmid:4179068
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Menezes MJ, Costa DJ, Clarêncio J, Miranda JC, Barral A, Barral-Netto M, et al. Immunomodulation of human monocytes following exposure to Lutzomyia intermedia saliva. BMC Immunol. 2008;9:12. pmid:18402685
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] PubMed/NCBI

[153] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Sasisekhar B, Aparna M, Augustin DJ, Kaliraj P, Kar SK, Nutman TB, et al. Diminished monocyte function in microfilaremic patients with lymphatic filariasis and its relationship to altered lymphoproliferative responses. Infect Immun. American Society for Microbiology (ASM); 2005;73:3385–93. pmid:15908365
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Shen SS, Qu XY, Zhang WZ, Li J, Lv ZY. Infection against infection: Parasite antagonism against parasites, viruses and bacteria. Infect Dis Poverty. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2019;8. pmid:31200765
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Dey R, Joshi AB, Oliveira F, Pereira L, Guimarães-Costa AB, Serafim TD, et al. Gut Microbes Egested during Bites of Infected Sand Flies Augment Severity of Leishmaniasis via Inflammasome-Derived IL-1β. Cell Host Microbe. Cell Press; 2018;23:134–143.e6. pmid:29290574
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] PubMed/NCBI

[165] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Damania B, Dittmer DP. What lies within: Coinfections and immunity. Cell Host Microbe. Cell Press; 2014. p. 145–7. pmid:25121741
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[167] View Article

[168] PubMed/NCBI

[169] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Lestinova T, Rohousova I, Sima M, de Oliveira CI, Volf P. Insights into the sand fly saliva: Blood-feeding and immune interactions between sand flies, hosts, and Leishmania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. Public Library of Science; 2017;11. pmid:28704370
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] PubMed/NCBI

[173] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Pingen M, Schmid MA, Harris E, McKimmie CS. Mosquito Biting Modulates Skin Response to Virus Infection. Trends Parasitol. Elsevier Ltd; 2017. p. 645–57. pmid:28495485
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[175] View Article

[176] PubMed/NCBI

[177] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Manning S, Danielson KM. The immunomodulatory role of tumor-derived extracellular vesicles in colorectal cancer. Immunol. Cell Biol. John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 2018. p. 733–41. pmid:29575270
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[179] View Article

[180] PubMed/NCBI

[181] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Hatzigeorgiou DE, He S, Sobel J, Grabstein KH, Hafner A, Ho JL. IL-6 down-modulates the cytokine-enhanced antileishmanial activity in human macrophages. J Immunol. 1993;151:3682–92. https://www.jimmunol.org/content/151/7/3682 pmid:8397259
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[183] View Article

[184] PubMed/NCBI

[185] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Tomiotto-Pellissier F, Bortoleti BT da S, Assolini JP, Gonçalves MD, Carloto ACM, Miranda-Sapla MM, et al. Macrophage Polarization in Leishmaniasis: Broadening Horizons. Front Immunol. NLM (Medline); 2018;9:2529. pmid:30429856
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[187] View Article

[188] PubMed/NCBI

[189] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Kumari S, Shivam P, Kumar S, Jamal F, Singh MK, Bimal S, et al. Leishmania donovani mediated higher expression of CCL4 induces differential accumulation of CD4+CD56+NKT and CD8+CD56+NKT cells at infection site. Cytokine. Academic Press; 2018;110:306–15. pmid:29807685
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[191] View Article

[192] PubMed/NCBI

[193] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Metenou S, Nutman TB. Regulatory T cell subsets in filarial infection and their function. Front Immunol. Frontiers Media SA; 2013;4. pmid:24137161
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[195] View Article

[196] PubMed/NCBI

[197] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Semnani RT, Mahapatra L, Moore V, Sanprasert V, Nutman TB. Functional and phenotypic characteristics of alternative activation induced in human monocytes by interleukin-4 or the Parasitic nematode Brugia malayi. Infect Immun. American Society for Microbiology (ASM); 2011;79:3957–65. pmid:21788379
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[199] View Article

[200] PubMed/NCBI

[201] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Background

Methodology/Principal findings

Conclusions/Significance

Author summary

Introduction

Methods

Ethics statement

Study populations

Thick blood smear

ICT

LST

Anti-saliva ELISA

MF antigen preparation

Sand flies and preparation of SG homogenate

Recombinant proteins preparation

In vitro culture of monocytes from North American individuals

In vitro activation of monocytes from North American individuals

Monocyte isolation from whole blood of MF+/SF+ and MF-/SF+ individuals

Monocyte activation from MF+/SF+ and MF+/SF- individuals

RNA preparation and RT-PCR

Cytokine analysis

Whole blood cell activation

Flow cytometery: Staining and gating strategy

Statistical analysis

Results

Saliva of the vector sand fly Phlebotomus duboscqi (Pd) upregulates the production of CCL4 and IL-6 in human monocytes

Saliva of several vector species of sand flies upregulates the production of CCL4 and IL-6 in human monocytes

Immunomodulatory effects of salivary and parasitic antigens are lost in monocytes of individuals naturally exposed to vector bites

Increase in mRNA expression of CCL22 and frequency of CCL22+ monocytes in SF+/MF+ than SF+/MF- individuals

SF+/MF+ individuals have a higher frequency of Treg and IL-10+ mDC than SF+/MF- individuals

Discussion/Conclusion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Short term exposure to saliva of the vector sand fly Phlebotomus duboscqi does not alter the mRNA expression of Type 1, Type 2 or regulatory genes in human monocytes.

S2 Fig. Basal cytokine levels in overnight monocyte culture of SF+/MF- and SF+/MF+ individuals.

S3 Fig. Basal cytokine levels in cultured whole blood of SF+/MF- and SF+/MF+ individuals.

S4 Fig. Anti-Pd SG antibody titers as indicators of sand fly exposure versus basal cytokine expression of all SF+ individuals regardless of MF status.

Acknowledgments

References

Monocyte isolation from whole blood of MF⁺/SF⁺ and MF^-/SF⁺ individuals

Monocyte activation from MF⁺/SF⁺ and MF⁺/SF^- individuals

Increase in mRNA expression of CCL22 and frequency of CCL22⁺ monocytes in SF⁺/MF⁺ than SF⁺/MF^- individuals

SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals have a higher frequency of Treg and IL-10⁺ mDC than SF⁺/MF^- individuals

S2 Fig. Basal cytokine levels in overnight monocyte culture of SF⁺/MF^- and SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals.

S3 Fig. Basal cytokine levels in cultured whole blood of SF⁺/MF^- and SF⁺/MF⁺ individuals.

S4 Fig. Anti-Pd SG antibody titers as indicators of sand fly exposure versus basal cytokine expression of all SF⁺ individuals regardless of MF status.