Figures
Abstract
Background
Dengue fever (DF) outbreaks often arise from imported DF cases in Cairns, Australia. Few studies have incorporated imported DF cases in the estimation of the relationship between weather variability and incidence of autochthonous DF. The study aimed to examine the impact of weather variability on autochthonous DF infection after accounting for imported DF cases and then to explore the possibility of developing an empirical forecast system.
Methodology/principal finds
Data on weather variables, notified DF cases (including those acquired locally and overseas), and population size in Cairns were supplied by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Queensland Health, and Australian Bureau of Statistics. A time-series negative-binomial hurdle model was used to assess the effects of imported DF cases and weather variability on autochthonous DF incidence. Our results showed that monthly autochthonous DF incidences were significantly associated with monthly imported DF cases (Relative Risk (RR):1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–2.28), monthly minimum temperature (oC) (RR: 2.28; 95% CI: 1.77–2.93), monthly relative humidity (%) (RR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.06–1.37), monthly rainfall (mm) (RR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.31–0.81) and monthly standard deviation of daily relative humidity (%) (RR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08–1.50). In the zero hurdle component, the occurrence of monthly autochthonous DF cases was significantly associated with monthly minimum temperature (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.64; 95% CI: 1.01–2.67).
Conclusions/significance
Our research suggested that incidences of monthly autochthonous DF were strongly positively associated with monthly imported DF cases, local minimum temperature and inter-month relative humidity variability in Cairns. Moreover, DF outbreak in Cairns was driven by imported DF cases only under favourable seasons and weather conditions in the study.
Citation: Huang X, Williams G, Clements ACA, Hu W (2013) Imported Dengue Cases, Weather Variation and Autochthonous Dengue Incidence in Cairns, Australia. PLoS ONE 8(12): e81887. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081887
Editor: Lorenz von Seidlein, Menzies School of Health Research, Australia
Received: July 18, 2013; Accepted: October 27, 2013; Published: December 13, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Huang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The authors received financial support from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (#1002608). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The geographical distribution of DF across the world has rapidly expanded in recent decades [1], [2]. Globalization and modern lifestyle changes have increased the number of international travellers around the world. Importation of DF cases has become an important means by which the dengue virus (DENV) spreads to local Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes, particularly in currently non-endemic countries [3], [4]. Although DF is not naturally endemic in Australia, the DF mosquito Ae. aegypti is common in northern Queensland and outbreaks can occur when the DENV is transmitted to the local mosquito population by infected international travellers [5]. Cairns experiences the highest number of DF cases in 2009 in Australia. Reappearance occurred in 1981 after a 26 year absence in Australia [6]. A significant increase has been noted in the number of imported DF cases and the frequency of outbreaks since the international airport was opened in 1984 in Cairns [7]–[9]. Annual outbreaks occur when imported DF cases infect the local Ae. aegypti mosquito population, setting up autochthonous DENV transmission [5]. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the effect of numbers of imported DF cases on the incidence of autochthonous DF in Cairns, Australia [10].
DENV is transmitted by mosquitoes of the genus Ae. aegypti and a number of previous studies have demonstrated that weather conditions can strongly influence breeding, maturation period, virus replication, density and life cycle of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes [11], [12]. DENV transmission is thus highly dependent on weather factors, including temperature, rainfall and relative humidity [13]–[15]. There is growing evidence that climate change may impact on DF emergence [11], [13], [16]–[18]. Recent studies have indicated that climate change does not just increase temperature but also increases the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events such as heatwaves, hurricanes and tropical cyclones, and drought [19]. However, uncertainty regarding the impacts of extreme weather events on DF incidence still exists and there is a need for further investigations [14].
The current study aimed to examine the relationship between the numbers of imported DF cases, weather factors, inter-month climate variations and autochthonous DF incidence, and to facilitate our understanding of the potential effects of imported DF cases and weather variability events on autochthonous DF incidence in Cairns.
Materials and Methods
Study Site and Data Collection
The study site was located at Cairns (latitude −16.55, longitude 145.46), a tropical city that is popular for domestic and foreign tourists, in the north of Queensland, Australia. The highest mean temperature (31°C) occurs in the period of December, January and February. The lowest mean temperature (17–18°C) is observed in the period of June, July and August. The monthly total rainfall is between 279 and 455 mm [20], making Cairns one of the wettest cities in Australia. The population size was 150,920 in the 2010 Census [21], making it the second largest Australian city (after Townsville) in the north of Queensland.
The data on numbers of notified DF cases in Cairns (the area based on Cairns Public Health Unit, which include Port Douglas and Innisfail areas). The data included both autochthonous DF cases and imported DF cases between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2009 (Note, cases with an unknown country of origin were removed), which were provided by Queensland Health (the Queensland state government department of health). DF cases were confirmed by positive test results based on DF NS1 antigen, IgM antibody and PCR tests from clinical laboratories [5]. As DF is a notifiable disease, it is a legal requirement that positive test results are reported by laboratories to the Queensland Health, where data are archived by the Communicable Diseases Unit. Imported DF cases were defined as confirmed DF cases with a travel history to DF endemic countries within 12 days. Autochthonous DF cases had no travel history [5]. Daily climate data (including daily minimum temperature (MT), daily relative humidity (RH) and daily rainfall) were obtained at Cairns Aero from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2009. Monthly standard deviations were calculated for daily MT, daily rainfall and daily RH in each month for providing information on within-month climate variation. Annual population size in Cairns was obtained from Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Statistical Analysis and Modelling
Generalised linear regression models with Poisson and negative binomial link have been widely applied to count data analysis in epidemiology. Count data often display over-dispersion due to excess zeroes and/or unobserved heterogeneity [22]. Poisson regression models entail a key assumption that the variance of the outcome is equal to its mean, and thus are not suited to the over-dispersed count data. The classical negative binomial model, which allows the variance to be greater than the mean, is typically used to account for over-dispersion. However, the negative binomial model lacks the ability to account for an excess in zero counts [23]. To account for excess zeroes, hurdle models and zero-inflated models have been commonly used [23]–[28]. The zero-inflated model treats excess zeroes as “structural” and allows for additional “sampling” zeroes, whereas the hurdle model only accommodates excess sampling zeroes. Some research showed that zero-inflated and hurdle models often perform similarly [23], [29]. Model choice between zero-inflated and hurdle models may be more dependent on the study objective or sampling design [23].
The monthly DF data exhibited both over-dispersion and excess zeroes. The hurdle model is more appropriate for data with too many zeroes and scarce cases [30]. Here, a time-series negative-binomial hurdle model (TNBH) was chosen in this case study. A hurdle model is composed of two parts: a binary response model generating the zero cases and a truncated-at-zero count model generating positive counts [31]. A hurdle model is given bywhere yt represents the number of autochthonous DF cases at time period t; β and δ are the model regression coefficients; fcount represents the count process with a negative binomial density; fzero corresponds to the hurdle part using a logistic regression. Let ut be the mean of the autochthonous DF count distribution. In this study, ut and λt can be expressed as:
where xit represents ith independent variable at time period t, including monthly imported DF cases, monthly MT, monthly rainfall, monthly RH and monthly standard deviation for daily RH (SDRH); x6(t−1) and x7(t−1) represent monthly standard deviations of daily MT (SDMT) and daily rainfall (SDR) at a lag of 1 month, respectively. ln(yt−1) and ln(yt−2) are autoregressive terms at lag of 1 and 2 months (AR(1) and AR(2)), which deal with autocorrelation of the residuals. Pt is population size at time period t. Adjustment was made for the population size by including an offset term ln(Pt). The season term is a categorical variable (wet season: November–April), dry season: May–October) in order to adjust for the seasonal pattern. Log-transformations were required for the number of imported cases, lagged autochthonous DF cases, rainfall and SDR to normalize these variables, which were highly skewed.
Several statistics were calculated to assess goodness of fit of the model. The Vuong non-nested test was used to compare the TNBH model with a negative binomial model [32]. We also compared the TNBH with a Poisson model, a negative binomial model and a Poisson hurdle model using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) [33].
Results
Descriptive Analysis
During 2000–2009, there were total of 86 imported DF cases and 1865 autochthonous DF cases in Cairns. The countries of origin associated with the largest total numbers of imported DF cases were Papua New Guinea (27.9%), Indonesia (20.9%), Thailand (10.5%), Philippines (5.8%) and Cambodia (4.7%) in the study period (Figure 1). However, the total number of imported DF cases from Indonesia was larger than that of Papua New Guinea between 2004 and 2009. Figure 2 showed a strong seasonal epidemic pattern of the number of monthly autochthonous DF cases during the study period. The largest numbers of monthly imported DF cases were reported in April and May (Figure 2), although seasonal patterns were not as clear as for autochthonous DF cases.
Over the period 2000–2009, the mean monthly RH was 89.8%, ranging from 72.3–98.0%. The monthly rainfall ranged from 0.0–44.4 mm with an average of 5.5 mm. The mean monthly MT was 21°C and fluctuated between 14.3 and 24.9°C. The mean monthly SDRH, SDR and SDMT were 8.5% (range 3.1–17.9%), 10.3 mm (range 0.0–61.1mm) and 1.8°C (range 0.5–4.2°C.), respectively. The pairwise scatter plot with smoother spline depicts the crude relationships between all the selected variables (Figure 3).
ADF is monthly autochthonous DF cases. LIMDF is log-transformed monthly imported DF cases. Lrainfall is log-transformed monthly rainfall. SDRH is monthly standard deviation of daily relative humidity. LSDR is log-transformed monthly standard deviation of daily rainfall at a lag of one month. LSDMT is monthly standard deviation of daily minimum temperature at a lag of one month.
Lagged weather effects were identified by cross-correlation analysis. Figure 4 shows the cross-correlations between monthly autochthonous DF cases and selected climate variables. Significant cross-correlations at lags of 0–1 and 5–7 months were observed among log-transformed rainfall, MT and log-transformed SDR. Autochthonous DF cases were positively associated with RH at a lag of 0 months, and were negatively associated with RH at lags of 4–9 months. Autochthonous DF cases were negatively associated with SDMT at a lag of zero month. No lagged effects were observed between SDRH and autochthonous DF cases. We only included weather variables at lags of 0 or 1 month in the TNBH model because of DF biologic plausibility. The effects of lag of 4–9 months were considered as a seasonal variation.
ADF is monthly autochthonous DF cases. SDRH is monthly standard deviation of daily relative humidity. SDMT is monthly standard deviation of daily minimum temperature. ln(SDR) is log-transformed monthly standard deviation of daily rainfall. The two dash lines are critical values for cross-correlation (at the 5% level).
Time Series Hurdle Model
In this study, 60% of the observations on monthly autochthonous DF cases were zero values. The mean and variance of the numbers of monthly autochthonous DF cases were 15.5 and 2221, respectively. The data exhibited both over-dispersion and excess zeroes. Our results indicated that the TNBH model was flexible and suitable to our data based on AIC and Vuong non-nested test.
The selected variables and the final TNBH model were assessed by cross-correlation functions, the Vuong non-nested test and the AIC. The results indicated that the final TNBH model had the lowest AIC value (AIC = 421.12) in comparison with the time-series Poisson model (AIC = 817.9), the time-series negative binomial model (AIC = 442.9) and the time-series Poisson hurdle model (AIC = 695). The Vuong non-nested test also showed the superiority of the TNBH over the time-series negative binomial model (p<0.000). The residuals of the TNBH model appeared to fluctuate randomly around zero and with little autocorrelation after accounting for the AR(1) and AR(2).
Table 1 showed the estimated parameters, RR, OR and 95% CI for the negative binomial component and the zero hurdle component of the TNBH model. After adjustment for seasonality, population size and autocorrelation at lags of 1–2 months in the TNBH, the results of the negative binomial component showed that monthly autochthonous DF incidence was significantly and positively associated with log-transformed monthly imported DF cases (RR:1.52; 95% CI: 1.01–2.28), monthly MT (RR: 2.28; 95% CI: 1.77–2.93), monthly RH (RR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.06–1.37), and monthly SDRH (RR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08–1.50). There was a statistically significant negative relationship between incidence of monthly autochthonous DF and log-transformed monthly rainfall (RR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.31–0.81). Moreover, monthly MT (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.01–2.67) was significantly related to the occurrence of monthly autochthonous DF cases in the zero hurdle model component.
Discussion
Our study concluded that observed incidence of autochthonous DF was significantly positively associated with the number of imported DF cases, but that the occurrence of autochthonous DF counts was associated with MT rather than the current number of imported DF cases. After accounting for incorporating imported DF cases, the study confirmed that local weather factors, including MT, rainfall and RH, strongly influenced the observed incidence of autochthonous DF in Cairns, Australia.
There was a significantly positive relationship between numbers of imported DF cases and autochthonous DF incidence in Cairns in the study. Approximately 90% of imported DF cases were from the countries in Pacific region and Southeast Asia. DF is endemic to countries in this region, including Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines and Cambodia, which include popular holiday destinations for Australians, and where many Australians have family or work-related links. Our study indicated that imported DF cases strongly influenced autochthonous DF cases, and the occurrence of autochthonous DF was not associated with imported DF cases in the hurdle part. These findings could support the suggestion that imported DF cases play a significant role in influencing numbers of local DF cases under favourable weather conditions.
Our results revealed that MT and RH were significantly, positively associated with incidence of autochthonous DF. Temperature and RH have been demonstrated as the main determinants of DENV transmission and influence the life cycle of Ae. aegypti, like many previous studies [34]–[37]. Increasing temperatures lead to an increase in feeding frequency and shorter gonotrophic cycle, pupae development period, virus replication and extrinsic incubation period for Ae. aegypti [38]–[40], and thus enhance the risk of DF outbreaks. Increasing RH also favours oviposition, blood-feeding, longevity, virus propagation and density of Ae. aegypti [41]–[43].
Rainfall was also found to be negatively associated with autochthonous DF incidence in the study. Many researches have indicated that increased rainfall can increase the number of outdoor larval breeding places of Ae. aegypti and can therefore increase the density of mosquitos and enhance the risk of DENV transmission [40], [41], [44]. On the other hand, some studies have reported a negative relationship between rainfall and DF cases, which has been explained by larvae and eggs being washed away by massive rainfall [45]–[48]. Previous research indicated that many container types were suitable to Ae. Aegypti breeding sites in wet season in Cairns, such as pot plant base, pot plant pot, bucket, black plastic, small plastic container, palm frond and bromeliad, and that limited resources in containers significantly negatively influenced the abundance and size of Ae. aegypti in Cairns [49]. Cairns typically has a tropical monsoon climate with abundant amounts of rainfall in the form of frequent thunderstorms in the wet season [50]. Here, the result could be explained that heavy rainfalls might immediately wash away larvae from some subterranean sites and small, shallow containers. Moreover, frequent thunderstorms might flush away some resources from containers to lead to restriction of growth and development of larvae and reduction of the adult population of Ae. aegypti in Cairns.
Our result revealed that within-month variability in daily RH played a significant positive role in autochthonous DF incidence in Cairns. In general, RH variation is highly dependent on the fluctuations of temperature, precipitation and evaporation. Therefore, RH variation might be derived by the fluctuations of other weather factors, particularly heavy rainfall. Our study suggested that SDRH could be considered as a small-scale climate index to capture within-month climate variation, particularly in extreme weather events within a month in Cairns.
The study had several known limitations. First, underreporting would have been likely if people infected by DF had subclinical conditions and did not seek medical attention. Misclassification among the imported, autochthonous DF cases and other arboviral infections (eg., chikungunya) could also be possible. Second, a number of potential confounders (ie., virus strain, mosquito population densities and survival, population immunity and social factors) may affect the assessment of the relationship between weather variability and the DENV transmission. More detailed risk assessment may also be required. Additionally, previous study showed that the key determinants of observed DF incidence included temperature, rainfall and humidity. However, the advantage of our study was that the relationship between weather variables and autochthonous DF incidence was examined under accounting for imported DF cases and excess zeroes.
In summary, our research showed that monthly imported DF cases, local weather variables and inter-month relative humidity variability were strongly associated with incidence of monthly autochthonous DF in Cairns between January 2000 and December 2009. Imported DF cases might be a key driver in wet season. The result also indicated that increasing monthly RH fluctuation enhanced the risk of DENV transmission in Cairns. The results could provide new insights for the future control, prediction and prevention of the risk of DENV transmission. Local health authorities may give a close surveillance of imported DF cases and control local Ae. aegypti during favourable weather conditions for DENV transmission.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Queensland Department of Health, Australian Bureau of Meteorology, and Australian Bureau of Statistics for providing the data on notified dengue fever cases, climate, and population growth, respectively.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: XH WH. Analyzed the data: XH WH GW AC. Wrote the paper: XH WH GW AC.
References
- 1. Phillips ML (2008) Dengue reborn: widespread resurgence of a resilient vector. Environmental Health Perspectives 116: A382.
- 2.
WHO (2013) Sustaining the drive to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases. World Health Organization. 20 Avenue Appia,1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
- 3. Degallier N, Favier C, Boulanger J-P, Menkes C (2009) Imported and autochthonous cases in the dynamics of dengue epidemics in Brazil. Revista de Saúde Pública 43: 1–7.
- 4. Hu W, Clements A, Williams G, Tong S, Mengersen K (2012) Spatial patterns and socioecological drivers of dengue fever transmission in Queensland, Australia. Environmental Health Perspectives 120: 260.
- 5.
Queensland Government (2011) Queensland Dengue Management Plan. Available: http://www.health.qld.gov.au/dengue/documents/dengue-mgt-plan.pdf Accessed 2013 Feb 16.
- 6. Kay BH, Barker-Hudson P, Stallman ND, Wiemers MA, Marks EN, et al. (1984) Dengue fever. Reappearance in northern Queensland after 26 years. Medical journal of Australia 140: 264–268.
- 7. Ritchie SA, Hanna JN, Hills SL, Piispanen JP, McBride WJH, et al. (2002) Dengue control in north Queensland, Australia: case recognition and selective indoor residual spraying. Dengue Bulletin 26: 7–13.
- 8. Seed CR, Kiely P, Hyland CA, Keller AJ (2009) The risk of dengue transmission by blood during a 2004 outbreak in Cairns, Australia. Transfusion 49: 1482–1487.
- 9. Knope K, Giele C (2013) null (2013) Increasing notifications of dengue in Australia related to overseas travel, 1991 to 2012. Communicable diseases intelligence quarterly report 37: E55–59.
- 10. Bannister-Tyrrell M, Williams C, Ritchie SA, Rau G, Lindesay J, et al. (2013) Weather-Driven Variation in Dengue Activity in Australia Examined Using a Process-Based Modeling Approach. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 88: 65–72.
- 11. Martens WJM, Jetten TH, Focks DA (1997) Sensitivity of malaria, schistosomiasis and dengue to global warming. Climatic Change 35: 145–156.
- 12. Focks DA, Brenner RJ, Hayes J, Daniels E (2000) Transmission thresholds for dengue in terms of Aedes aegypti pupae per person with discussion of their utility in source reduction efforts. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 62: 11–18.
- 13. Hu W, Clements A, Williams G, Tong S (2010) Dengue fever and El Nino/Southern Oscillation in Queensland, Australia: a time series predictive model. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 67: 307–311.
- 14. Banu S, Hu W, Hurst C, Tong S (2011) Dengue transmission in the Asia-Pacific region: impact of climate change and socio-environmental factors. Tropical Medicine & International Health 16: 598–607.
- 15. Racloz V, Ramsey R, Tong S, Hu W (2012) Surveillance of Dengue Fever Virus: A Review of Epidemiological Models and Early Warning Systems. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6: e1648.
- 16. Nicholls N (1993) El Niflo-southern oscillation and vectorborne disease. The Lancet 342: 1284–1285.
- 17. Patz JA, Martens W, Focks DA, Jetten TH (1998) Dengue fever epidemic potential as projected by general circulation models of global climate change. Environmental Health Herspectives 106: 147.
- 18. Hales S, de Wet N, Maindonald J, Woodward A (2002) Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: an empirical model. The Lancet 360: 830–834.
- 19. McMichael AJ, Woodruff RE, Hales S (2006) Climate change and human health: present and future risks. The Lancet 367: 859–869.
- 20.
Bureau of Meteorology (2012) Climate of Cairns.
- 21.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) National Regional Profile: Cairns (Statistical Subdivision)
- 22.
Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
- 23. Rose CE, Martin SW, Wannemuehler KA, Plikaytis BD (2006) On the use of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling vaccine adverse event count data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 16: 463–481.
- 24. Jones AM (1989) A double-hurdle model of cigarette consumption. Journal of Applied Econometrics 4: 23–39.
- 25. Yen ST, Adamowicz WL (1994) Participation, Trip Frequency and Site Choice: A Multinomial - Poisson Hurdle Model of Recreation Demand. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie 42: 65–76.
- 26. Dalrymple ML, Hudson IL, Ford R (2003) Finite mixture, zero-inflated Poisson and hurdle models with application to SIDS. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 41: 491–504.
- 27. Neelon BH, O’Malley AJ, Normand SLT (2010) A Bayesian model for repeated measures zero-inflated count data with application to outpatient psychiatric service use. Statistical Modelling 10: 421–439.
- 28.
Jalava K, Sane J, Ollgren J, Ruuhela R, Rätti O, et al.. (2012) Climatic, ecological and socioeconomic factors as predictors of Sindbis virus infections in Finland. Epidemiology & Infection doi:10.1017/S095026881200249X: 1–10.
- 29. Gray BR (2005) Selecting a distributional assumption for modelling relative densities of benthic macroinvertebrates. Ecological Modelling 185: 1–12.
- 30. Jalava K, Ollgren J, Eklund M, Siitonen A, Kuusi M (2011) Agricultural, socioeconomic and environmental variables as risks for human verotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC) infection in Finland. BMC Infectious Diseases 11: 275.
- 31. Mullahy J (1986) Specification and testing of some modified count data models. Journal of Econometrics 33: 341–365.
- 32. Vuong Q (1989) Likelihood tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrics 57: 307–333.
- 33.
Akaike H (1998) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. New York: Springer. 199–213.
- 34. Bi P, Tong S, Donald K, Parton KA, Hobbs J (2001) Climate variability and the dengue outbreak in Townsville, Queensland, 1992–93. Environmental Health 1: 54.
- 35.
Hii YL, Rocklöv J, Ng N, Tang CS, Pang FY, et al.. (2009) Climate variability and increase in intensity and magnitude of dengue incidence in Singapore. Global Health Action DOI: 10.3402/gha.v2i0.2036.
- 36. Wu PC, Lay JG, Guo HR, Lin CY, Lung SC, et al. (2009) Higher temperature and urbanization affect the spatial patterns of dengue fever transmission in subtropical Taiwan. Science of the Total Environment 407: 2224–2233.
- 37. Lambrechts L, Paaijmans KP, Fansiri T, Carrington LB, Kramer LD, et al. (2011) Impact of daily temperature fluctuations on dengue virus transmission by Aedes aegypti. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 7460–7465.
- 38. Watts DM, Burke DS, Harrison BA, Whitmire RE, Nisalak A (1987) Effect of temperature on the vector efficiency of Aedes aegypti for dengue 2 virus. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 36: 143–152.
- 39. Rueda L, Patel K, Axtell R, Stinner R (1990) Temperature-dependent development and survival rates of Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 27: 892–898.
- 40. Descloux E, Mangeas M, Menkes CE, Lengaigne M, Leroy A, et al. (2012) Climate-Based Models for Understanding and Forecasting Dengue Epidemics. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6: e1470.
- 41. Thu HM, Aye KM, Thein S (1998) The effect of temperature and humidity on dengue virus propagation in Aedes aegypti mosquitos. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 29: 280–284.
- 42. Morales Vargas RE, Ya-umphan P, Phumala-Morales N, Komalamisra N, Dujardin JP (2010) Climate associated size and shape changes in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) populations from Thailand. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 10: 580–585.
- 43. Wu PC, Guo HR, Lung SC, Lin CY, Su HJ (2007) Weather as an effective predictor for occurrence of dengue fever in Taiwan. Acta Tropica 103: 50–57.
- 44. Nakhapakorn K, Tripathi NK (2005) An information value based analysis of physical and climatic factors affecting dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever incidence. International Journal of Health Geographics 4: 13.
- 45. Foo L, Lim T, Lee H, Fang R (1985) Rainfall, abundance of Aedes aegypti and dengue infection in Salangor, Malaysia. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 16: 560–568.
- 46. Thammapalo S, Chongsuwiwatwong V, McNeil D, Geater A (2005) The climatic factors influencing the occurrence of dengue hemorrhagic fever in Thailand. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 36: 191–196.
- 47. Arcari P, Tapper N, Pfueller S (2007) Regional variability in relationships between climate and dengue/DHF in Indonesia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 28: 251–272.
- 48. Halide H, Ridd P (2008) A predictive model for dengue hemorrhagic fever epidemics. International Journal of Environmental Health Research 18: 253–265.
- 49. Williams C, Johnson P, Ball T, Ritchie S (2013) Productivity and population density estimates of the dengue vector mosquito Aedes aegypti (Stegomyia aegypti) in Australia. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 27: 313–322.
- 50.
Sturman AP, Tapper NJ (1996) The weather and climate of Australia and New Zealand. Melbourne; New York: Oxford University Press.