DA-Raf-Mediated Suppression of the Ras—ERK Pathway Is Essential for TGF-β1-Induced Epithelial—Mesenchymal Transition in Alveolar Epithelial Type 2 Cells

Haruko Watanabe-Takano; Kazunori Takano; Masahiko Hatano; Takeshi Tokuhisa; Takeshi Endo

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127888

Abstract

Myofibroblasts play critical roles in the development of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis by depositing components of extracellular matrix. One source of lung myofibroblasts is thought to be alveolar epithelial type 2 cells that undergo epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). Rat RLE-6TN alveolar epithelial type 2 cells treated with transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) are converted into myofibroblasts through EMT. TGF-β induces both canonical Smad signaling and non-canonical signaling, including the Ras-induced ERK pathway (Raf–MEK–ERK). However, the signaling mechanisms regulating TGF-β1-induced EMT are not fully understood. Here, we show that the Ras–ERK pathway negatively regulates TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE-6TN cells and that DA-Raf1 (DA-Raf), a splicing isoform of A-Raf and a dominant-negative antagonist of the Ras–ERK pathway, plays an essential role in EMT. Stimulation of the cells with fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), which activated the ERK pathway, prominently suppressed TGF-β1-induced EMT. An inhibitor of MEK, but not an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, rescued the TGF-β1-treated cells from the suppression of EMT by FGF2. Overexpression of a constitutively active mutant of a component of the Ras–ERK pathway, i.e., H-Ras, B-Raf, or MEK1, interfered with EMT. Knockdown of DA-Raf expression with siRNAs facilitated the activity of MEK and ERK, which were only weakly and transiently activated by TGF-β1. Although DA-Raf knockdown abrogated TGF-β1-induced EMT, the abrogation of EMT was reversed by the addition of the MEK inhibitor. Furthermore, DA-Raf knockdown impaired the TGF-β1-induced nuclear translocation of Smad2, which mediates the transcription required for EMT. These results imply that intrinsic DA-Raf exerts essential functions for EMT by antagonizing the TGF-β1-induced Ras–ERK pathway in RLE-6TN cells.

Citation: Watanabe-Takano H, Takano K, Hatano M, Tokuhisa T, Endo T (2015) DA-Raf-Mediated Suppression of the Ras—ERK Pathway Is Essential for TGF-β1-Induced Epithelial—Mesenchymal Transition in Alveolar Epithelial Type 2 Cells. PLoS ONE 10(5): e0127888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888

Academic Editor: Oliver Eickelberg, Helmholtz Zentrum München, GERMANY

Received: December 25, 2014; Accepted: April 20, 2015; Published: May 21, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Watanabe-Takano et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (22790688) (HW-T), for the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellows (24-5613) (HW-T), and for Challenging Exploratory Research (23659428) (MH) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (20013007) (TE) and for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (25117706) (TE) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology; Intramural Research Grant (23-5 and 26-8) for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (TE); and grants from Kato Memorial Trust for Nambyo Research (HW-T). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive, irreversible, and usually lethal lung disease characterized by interstitial fibrosis of unknown pathogenesis [1–3]. A growing body of evidence indicates that the disease is the result of a fibrotic response driven by abnormally activated alveolar epithelial cells (AECs). These cells produce mediators that induce the formation of myofibroblast foci through the proliferation and activation of resident fibroblasts, attraction of circulating fibrocytes, and stimulation of epithelial—mesenchymal transition (EMT). The myofibroblast foci deposit excessive amounts of extracellular matrix (ECM) components such as collagen and fibronectin, resulting in scarring and destruction of the lung architecture, leading to IPF. Several recent studies have supported the notion that myofibroblasts or fibroblasts generated by EMT of type 2 AECs (AEC2s) are, at least in part, responsible for pulmonary fibrosis [4–8]. These studies use human cells and tissues from IPF patient lungs; rodent lung models treated with bleomycin or transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1); and rodent primary cultured AEC2s or rat AEC2 cell line RLE-6TN (RLE) cells treated with TGF-β1, endothelin-1 (ET-1), or cultured on fibronectin. EMT by the ET-1 treatment or culture on fibronectin is mediated by the induction of TGF- β 1 signaling.

TGF-βis generally recognized as a central mediator of the fibrotic response in physiological tissue repair and in many fibrotic diseases by inducing EMT, activating fibroblasts, and promoting synthesis of the ECM components [9–13]. TGF-β signaling is induced through type I and type II protein Ser/Thr kinase receptors (TβRI and TβRII) [14]. TGF-β binding induces activating phosphorylation of dimeric TβRIs by dimeric TβRIIs. Subsequently, the activated TβRIs recruit and phosphorylate receptor-regulated Smad (R-Smad), Smad2/3. Phosphorylated Smad2/3 dissociates from the receptors and binds to co-Smad, Smad4. The activated Smad2/3–Smad4 heterotrimeric complex translocates into the nucleus and regulates the transcription of specific target genes together with transcriptional coactivators or corepressors.

Besides canonical Smad signaling, TGF-β induces non-canonical, non-Smad signaling including the Ras—ERK pathway, TRAF6—TAK1—JNK/p38 MAPK, RhoA/Cdc42, and PI3K—Akt signaling [15–17]. Combination or crosstalk of these non-Smad signaling pathways or between Smad and non-Smad signaling produces diverse biological responses of TGF-β, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, growth arrest, apoptosis, and EMT. The Ras-induced ERK pathway (Raf—MEK—ERK) is typically activated by growth factors through their receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), which mobilize adaptor proteins, such as Shc and Grb2, and guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) like Sos. The RTK-mediated activation of a specific GEF activates the small GTPase Ras (H-, K-, and N-Ras) via GTP loading. Association of the activated Ras with Raf family proteins (B- and C-Raf) leads to MEK and ERK activation through sequential phosphorylation [18–20]. Similarly to RTKs, activated TβRIs recruit and directly phosphorylate ShcA on Tyr as well as Ser [21]. Although the Tyr kinase activity of TβRIs is much lower than that of RTKs, this phosphorylation of ShcA triggers association with Grb2 and Sos, thereby activating the Ras—ERK pathway.

The effects of the Ras—ERK pathway on TGF-β1-induced EMT are distinct among different cell types. Active Ras and the ERK pathway are required for TGF-β1-induced EMT in human keratinocytes [22, 23]. In addition, active Ras or Raf induces EMT cooperatively with TGF-β1 in canine kidney epithelial cells and mouse mammary epithelial cells [24, 25]. In contrast, the Ras—ERK pathway interferes with TGF-β1-induced, Smad signaling-mediated EMT in primary cultured AECs and AEC cell lines [26, 27]. The growth factor-induced Ras—ERK pathway impedes EMT in AECs through the expression of the Smad signaling inhibitor Smad7, the nuclear export of Smad7 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Smurf1, or the dephosphorylation of Smad2. However, it remains to be clarified whether the TGF-β1-induced Ras—ERK pathway is required or needs to be silenced for EMT induction in AECs.

We have found DA-Raf1 (DA-Raf), which intrinsically antagonizes the Ras—ERK pathway [28, 29]. DA-Raf is generated by alternative splicing from the Araf gene and contains the Ras-binding domain but lacks the kinase domain responsible for activation of the ERK pathway. On the basis of this structure, DA-Raf binds to active Ras and M-Ras and interferes with the Ras—ERK pathway. Consequently, DA-Raf serves as a positive regulator of myogenic differentiation and lung alveolarization, both of which are prevented by the Ras—ERK pathway. Furthermore, exogenously expressed DA-Raf suppresses oncogenic Ras-induced cellular transformed phenotypes and tumorigenicity in cell-transplanted mice.

To clarify the signaling mechanisms of TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells, we have addressed the question of whether DA-Raf participates in the induction of EMT by regulating the Ras—ERK pathway. Here, we show that the Ras—ERK pathway negatively regulates the TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells and that endogenous DA-Raf plays essential roles in EMT by suppressing the TGF-β1-induced Ras—ERK pathway.

Results

Sustained activation of the Ras—ERK pathway by FGF2 inhibits TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells

TGF-β activates both Smad signaling and the Ras—ERK pathway. Although Smad signaling is indispensable for TGF-β-induced EMT, it has remained controversial whether the Ras—ERK pathway is required for or interferes with EMT. To determine the role of the Ras—ERK pathway in EMT in RLE cells, first we analyzed the effects of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) on TGF-β1-induced EMT. When RLE cells were treated with TGF-β1, the phosphorylation levels of both MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 were elevated within 5 min (Fig 1A). Both the phosphorylation levels declined to basal levels by 15 min, however, and the reduced levels were retained for at least 48 h. In contrast, when the cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml FGF2 together with TGF- β 1, the phosphorylation levels of both MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 increased within 5 min, and these levels were sustained for more than 24 h (Fig 1B).

Download:

Fig 1. FGF2 induces sustained activation of the Ras—ERK pathway and inhibits TGF-β1-induced EMT.

(A) Transient phosphorylation of MEK and ERK and induction of αSMA expression by TGF-β1 stimulation. RLE cells were stimulated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1. The levels of MEK, phospho (P)-MEK, ERK, P-ERK, and αSMA, as well as β -tubulin as a standard, were analyzed by immunoblotting. (B) Sustained phosphorylation of MEK and ERK and inhibition of αSMA expression by FGF2 stimulation. RLE cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml FGF2 in combination with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1. (C) A dose-dependent reduction of the TGF- β 1-induced αSMA protein level by FGF2 stimulation. RLE cells were stimulated with the indicated concentrations of FGF2 together with 0.5 ng/ml TGF- β 1 for 48 h. The relative intensity of αSMA band is indicated under the blot. (D) Induction of αSMA expression by TGF- β 1 and suppression of the expression by FGF2. RLE cells were stimulated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF- β 1 or with 100 ng/ml FGF2 along with TGF- β 1 for 48 h. αSMA expression and localization was detected by immunofluorescent staining with the Cy3—anti-αSMA mAb (red) as well as nuclear staining with Hoechst 33258 (blue). Scale bar, 50 μm. (E) A dose-dependent reduction of the ratio of TGF- β 1-induced αSMA-expressing cells by FGF2 stimulation. αSMA-expressing cells were detected as in (D). The values are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. **, P < 0.01 by t test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888.g001

Next, to estimate the transitional state from AEC2s to myofibroblasts in RLE cells, we analyzed the expression of α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA), a marker protein of myofibroblasts [30]. Treatment of the cells with TGF-β1 did not affect the amount of αSMA for at least 60 min but highly induced αSMA during 24–48 h after the treatment (Fig 1A). On the other hand, stimulation of the cells with FGF2 along with TGF- β 1 suppressed the induction of αSMA even during the 24–48 h period (Fig 1B). FGF2 inhibited the TGF- β 1-induced αSMA expression in a dose-dependent manner, i.e., 10 ng/ml FGF2 did not suppress the αSMA expression, but 50 ng/ml FGF2 reduced the expression to the basal level, and 100 ng/ml FGF2 further reduced the expression (Fig 1C). Immunofluorescence microscopy located the TGF- β 1-induced αSMA to stress fibers in RLE cells (Fig 1D), indicating that the expressed αSMA carries out the contractile function of myofibroblasts [30]. Addition of FGF2 dose-dependently decreased the ratio of αSMA-expressing cells (Fig 1E), and 100 ng/ml FGF2 prominently reduced the ratio of αSMA-expressing cells (Fig 1D and 1E). These results imply that the low levels of transient activation of MEK and ERK, which are brought about by TGF- β 1 treatment, do not inhibit EMT, but that the FGF2-induced high levels of sustained activation of MEK and ERK suppress TGF- β 1-induced EMT in RLE cells.

Activation of the Ras—ERK pathway but not PI3K—Akt signaling inhibits TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells

Growth factors activate not only the Ras—ERK pathway but also PI3K—Akt signaling [31]. TGF- β also induces both the Ras—ERK pathway and PI3K—Akt signaling as non-Smad signaling [16, 17]. To determine whether only the Ras—ERK pathway or whether both the Ras—ERK pathway and PI3K—Akt signaling are responsible for the FGF2-caused suppression of EMT, we analyzed the effects of inhibitors of these signaling pathways in RLE cells. Treatment of the cells with the MEK inhibitor U0126 recovered the stress fiber-associated αSMA expression that was suppressed by FGF2 stimulation (Fig 2A). U0126 treatment also restored the ratio of αSMA-expressing cells nearly to the ratio induced by TGF- β 1 (Fig 2B). In contrast, treatment with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 had no detectable effect on FGF2-caused suppression of αSMA expression (Fig 2A and 2B). Consequently, FGF2-induced strong and sustained activation of the Ras—ERK pathway (see Fig 1B) but not PI3K—Akt signaling hinders EMT. We also tried to evaluate the effects of TGF- β 1-induced weak and transient activation of the Ras—ERK pathway and PI3K—Akt signaling on EMT by adding U0126 and LY294002, respectively. However, addition of either inhibitor together with TGF- β 1 treatment resulted in extensive apoptosis. Thus, we could not estimate the effects on these signaling pathways (data not shown, see discussion).

Download:

Fig 2. Inhibition of MEK but not PI3K recovers TGF-β1-induced and FGF2-suppressed EMT.

(A) Recovery of FGF2-suppressed αSMA expression by MEK inhibition but not by PI3K inhibition. RLE cells were pretreated with 10 μM of the MEK inhibitor U0126 or the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 for 30 min. Then they were stimulated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 along with 100 ng/ml FGF2 for 48 h. αSMA expression (red) and nuclei (blue) were detected as described in Fig 1 legend. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) The ratio of αSMA-expressing cells in the analysis of (A). The values are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. **, P < 0.01; #, P > 0.05 (not significant) by t test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888.g002

Next, we analyzed the effects of constitutively active mutants of Ras—ERK pathway components on EMT. When we transfected RLE cells with a constitutively active oncogenic mutant of H-Ras(G12V) (Gly12 is converted to Val) and treated with TGF-β1 for 48 h, cells expressing H-Ras(G12V) never expressed αSMA, whereas cells lacking H-Ras(G12V) expression showed αSMA expression and its localization to stress fibers (Fig 3A and 3B). Transfection of B-Raf(V637E), a murine constitutively active oncogenic mutant corresponding to human B-Raf(V600E) [32], also strikingly suppressed αSMA expression (Fig 3A and 3B). Similarly, transfection of MEK1(S218D/S222D), a constitutively active pseudophosphorylation mutant [33], noticeably suppressed αSMA expression (Fig 3A and 3B). These results corroborate the above notion that strong and sustained activation of the Ras—ERK pathway blocks EMT in RLE cells.

Download:

Fig 3. Constitutively active H-Ras, B-Raf, or MEK1 suppresses TGF-β1-induced EMT.

(A) Suppression of TGF-β1-induced EMT by constitutively active H-Ras, B-Raf, and MEK1. RLE cells were transfected with Myc-tagged H-Ras(G12V), EGFP-tagged B-Raf(V637E), EGFP—MEK1(S218D/S222D), or EGFP expression vector. Twenty-four hours after the transfection, they were treated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 48 h. αSMA expression (red) and nuclei (blue) were detected as described in Fig 1 legend. Myc- and EGFP-tagged proteins were detected by anti-Myc pAb and anti-GFP pAb staining, respectively (green). Scale bar, 20 μm. (B) The ratio of αSMA-expressing cells in the analysis of (A). The values are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. **, P < 0.01 by t test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888.g003

Expression of DA-Raf is required for TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells

Although FGF2-induced strong and sustained activation of the Ras—ERK pathway hindered EMT, TGF-β1-induced weak and transient activation of the Ras—ERK pathway did not affect EMT (see Fig 1A–1E). Thus, regulatory mechanisms of the weak and transient activation of the Ras—ERK pathway induced by TGF-β1 need to be elucidated. Accordingly, we addressed the question of whether DA-Raf, an intrinsic antagonist of the Ras—ERK pathway [28, 29], negatively regulates the TGF-β1-induced Ras—ERK pathway to a level that does not suppress EMT. RLE cells highly expressed DA-Raf regardless of treatment with TGF-β1 (Fig 4A). To determine whether DA-Raf participates in EMT, we knocked down DA-Raf expression by RNA interference (RNAi) using two distinct small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) of DAraf. Both these siRNAs target the 3’ untranslated region of DAraf mRNA because this is the only region not included in Araf mRNA, which is generated by alternative splicing of common Araf/DAraf pre-mRNA [28]. Transfection of either of these two siRNAs in RLE cells strikingly reduced the level of endogenous DA-Raf protein, whereas neither affected the A-Raf protein level (Fig 4A). Thus, these siRNAs specifically knocked down DA-Raf expression without showing off-target effects on A-Raf expression. The knockdown of DA-Raf strongly suppressed TGF-β1-induced elevation of αSMA expression to a level comparable to that of the control cells without TGF-β1 treatment (Fig 4A). In addition, immunofluorescent staining of αSMA showed that the introduction of either of these two siRNAs strikingly reduced the number of αSMA-expressing cells induced by TGF-β1 treatment (Fig 4B and 4C). Since EMT in RLE cells is accompanied by a decrease in epithelial cell marker E-cadherin as well as an increase in myofibroblast marker αSMA [27], we also analyzed the effect of DA-Raf knockdown on E-cadherin expression. TGF-β1 treatment reduced the E-cadherin protein level, whereas the level was hardly affected in DAraf siRNA-introduced cells (Fig 4A).

Download:

Fig 4. Knockdown of DA-Raf abrogates TGF-β1-induced EMT.

(A) Suppression of TGF-β1-induced αSMA expression by knockdown of DA-Raf with DAraf siRNAs. RLE cells were transfected with DAraf siRNAs as well as a control siRNA. Twenty-four hours after the transfection, they were treated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 48 h. The levels of DA-Raf, A-Raf, αSMA, and E-cadherin, as well as β-tubulin as a standard, were analyzed by immunoblotting. (B) Suppression of TGF-β1-induced αSMA expression with DAraf siRNAs. RLE cells were transfected with DAraf siRNAs and treated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1. αSMA expression (red) and nuclei (blue) were detected by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) The ratio of αSMA-expressing cells in the analysis of (B). The values are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. **, P < 0.01 by t test. (D) Elevation of the TGF-β1-suppressed Cdh1 (E-cadherin) mRNA level and suppression of the TGF-β1-induced Acta2 (αSMA) mRNA level with DAraf siRNAs. RLE cells were transfected with DAraf siRNAs and treated with TGF-β1 for 48 h. Relative levels of Cdh1 and Acta2 mRNAs normalized to the Actb (β-actin) mRNA level were determined by real-time PCR. The values are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. **, P < 0.01 by t test. (E) Dose-dependent induction of αSMA expression by TGF-β1 and its suppression by DAraf siRNAs. RLE cells were transfected with DAraf siRNAs and treated with 0.1–5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 48 h. The intensities of αSMA and β-tubulin bands on immunoblots were analyzed by densitometry. The graph shows the ratio of αSMA to β-tubulin band intensity against TGF-β1 concentration. The values are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. a.u., arbitrary units.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888.g004

Next, we analyzed the effect of DA-Raf knockdown during TGF-β1 treatment on the levels of Cdh1 (E-cadherin) and Acta2 (αSMA) mRNAs by quantitative real-time RCR. The Cdh1 mRNA level was reduced by 48 h after TGF-β1 treatment (Fig 4D). In contrast, expression of either of the DAraf siRNAs interfered with the reduction of Cdh1 mRNA and elevated the Cdh1 mRNA level in comparison with that in control siRNA-expressing cells (Fig 4D). Thus, DA-Raf seems to antagonize epithelial cell properties in RLE cells. On the other hand, the Acta2 mRNA level was increased by TGF-β1 treatment, and introduction of either of the DAraf siRNAs abrogated this increase (Fig 4D). This result is consistent with those of immunoblotting and immunofluorescence analyses (Fig 4A–4C). Taken together, these results indicate that DA-Raf is required for the induction of EMT by TGF-β1 in RLE cells.

Further, we evaluated the effect of DA-Raf on the αSMA expression induced by various concentrations of TGF-β1 by quantifying the αSMA level on immunoblots. TGF-β1 even at a low concentration (0.1 ng/ml) caused αSMA expression and dose-dependently facilitated αSMA expression at least to the concentration of 5 ng/ml (Fig 4E). Transfection of either of the DAraf siRNAs effectively reduced the αSMA level at any TGF-β1 concentration (Fig 4E). Accordingly, intrinsic DA-Raf is likely to maximally accelerate EMT induced by TGF-β1 at any concentrations examined.

Suppression of the Ras—ERK pathway by DA-Raf is responsible for TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells

DA-Raf binds to active Ras and suppresses the ERK pathway. In consequence, intrinsic DA-Raf serves as a positive regulator of myogenic differentiation [28] and lung alveolarization [29], both of which are prevented by the Ras—ERK pathway. Accordingly, we examined whether DA-Raf is required for TGF-β1-induced EMT through suppressing the Ras—ERK pathway. A coimmunoprecipitation assay showed that stimulation of RLE cells with TGF-β1 induced the binding of DA-Raf to Ras (Fig 5A). Thus, we analyzed the phosphorylation status of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 in the control and DA-Raf knockdown cells. Endogenous DA-Raf as well as A-Raf was expressed at a constant level for 60 min during TGF-β1 stimulation in the control cells (Fig 5B). In these cells, the phosphorylation levels of both MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 were transiently elevated at around 5 min after TGF-β1 stimulation and then declined to basal levels by 15 min. On the other hand, their phosphorylation levels were higher in DA-Raf knockdown cells than in the control cells at every time point for at least 60 min (Fig 5B). These results suggest that the binding of DA-Raf to Ras, which is activated by TGF-β1 stimulation, interferes with the activation of MEK and ERK in RLE cells.

Download:

Fig 5. Suppression of the ERK pathway by DA-Raf is required for TGF-β1-induced EMT.

(A) Induction of the binding of DA-Raf to Ras by TGF-β1 stimulation. The binding was analyzed by a coimmunoprecipitation assay. RLE cells were treated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 5 min. DA-Raf was immunoprecipitated with anti-DA-Raf pAb, and coprecipitated Ras was detected by immunoblotting with pan-Ras mAb. (B) Elevation of the phosphorylation levels of MEK and ERK by DA-Raf knockdown. RLE cells were transfected with DAraf siRNA1 as well as the control siRNA and treated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for the indicated time. The levels of MEK, P-MEK, ERK, P-ERK, DA-Raf, A-Raf, and β-tubulin were analyzed by immunoblotting. The relative intensities of P-MEK1/2 and P-ERK1/2 bands are indicated under their blots. (C) Recovery of DAraf siRNA-blocked αSMA expression with U0126. RLE cells were transfected with DAraf siRNA1 or siRNA2 and then treated with 2 or 5 μM U0126 and 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 48 h. The level of αSMA, as well as β-tubulin as a standard, was analyzed by immunoblotting. (D) Recovery of DAraf siRNA-impaired αSMA expressing cells with U0126. RLE cells were transfected with DAraf siRNA1 or siRNA2 and then treated with 5 μM U0126 and 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 48 h. αSMA expression (red) and nuclei (blue) were detected. Scale bar, 50 μm. (E) The ratio of αSMA-expressing cells in the analysis of (D). The values are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; #, P > 0.05 (not significant) by t test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888.g005

Subsequently, we analyzed the effect of DA-Raf knockdown together with inhibition of the ERK pathway on TGF-β1-induced EMT. The expression level of αSMA in TGF-β1-stimulated RLE cells was hardly affected by treatment with U0126, which inhibits the ERK pathway (Fig 5C). On the other hand, although the level of αSMA in TGF-β1-stimulated cells was markedly reduced by the knockdown of DA-Raf with the DAraf siRNAs, treatment of the knockdown cells with U0126 recovered the αSMA level (Fig 5C). Immunofluorescent detection of αSMA-expressing cells also showed that treatment of the TGF-β1-stimulated cells with U0126 did not affect the level of αSMA expression or the ratio of αSMA-expressing cells (Fig 5D and 5E). On the other hand, knockdown of DA-Raf with either of the siRNAs notably reduced the level of αSMA expression and the ratio of αSMA-expressing cells induced by the TGF-β1 treatment (Fig 5D and 5E). However, treatment of the DA-Raf knockdown cells with U0126 compensated for this reduction (Fig 5D and 5E). Taken together, these results imply that intrinsic DA-Raf plays an essential role in TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells by suppressing the Ras—ERK pathway.

Furthermore, to confirm the involvement of DA-Raf in TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells, we examined whether DA-Raf participates in the translocation of Smad2 into the nucleus for the transactivation of its target genes leading to EMT. We analyzed the nuclear translocation of mCherry-tagged Smad2 by live cell imaging. Without TGF-β1 treatment, Smad2 was distributed in the cytoplasm but not in the nucleus regardless of whether DA-Raf was knocked down with the DAraf siRNA (Fig 6A). Smad2 markedly translocated into the nucleus in the control cells by 60 min after TGF-β1 stimulation, whereas it only marginally translocated into the nucleus in DA-Raf knockdown cells even at 60 min after TGF-β1 stimulation (Fig 6A and 6B; S1 and S2 Movies). Therefore, DA-Raf is indispensable for the nuclear translocation of Smad2, which is required for TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells.

Download:

Fig 6. Knockdown of DA-Raf hinders the nuclear translocation of Smad2 induced by TGF-β1.

(A) Live cell images of the localization of Smad2. mCherry—Smad2-expressing RLE cells transfected with the control siRNA or DAraf siRNA1 were stimulated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for the indicated time. The color indicator shows fluorescence intensity of mCherry—Smad2. Scale bar, 20 μm. (B) The degree of mCherry—Smad2 localization in the nucleus in the analysis of (A). Smad2 localized to the nucleus was calculated from the nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio of mCherry—Smad2 intensity. The box plot represents the data of 4 independent live cell images. *, P < 0.03; **, P < 0.005 by t test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888.g006

Discussion

EMT plays crucial roles in a variety of physiological and pathological phenomena, including development, morphogenesis, wound healing, fibrosis, cancer cell invasion, and metastasis [34, 35]. EMT from AEC2s to myofibroblasts is, at least in part, responsible for pulmonary fibrosis [4, 5, 7, 8]. TGF-β, which activates both Smad signaling and non-Smad signaling including the Ras—ERK pathway and PI3K—Akt signaling, critically regulates EMT. Although Smad signaling is indispensable for TGF-β-induced EMT, it remains controversial whether the Ras—ERK pathway is required for or interferes with EMT [22–27]. We have shown here that the Ras—ERK pathway negatively regulates TGF-β-induced EMT in RLE cells. We have also revealed that intrinsic DA-Raf interferes with the TGF-β-induced Ras—ERK pathway and consequently plays an essential role in EMT.

To determine whether the contradictory roles of the Ras—ERK pathway in EMT are due to a difference in the mode and strength of stimulation of the Ras—ERK pathway, we examined the activation pattern of the ERK pathway by TGF-β1 and by TGF-β1 with FGF2 in RLE cells. TGF-β1 stimulation only weakly and transiently activated MEK and ERK immediately after stimulation, whereas stimulation with FGF2 along with TGF-β1 caused strong and sustained activation of MEK and ERK. FGF2 dose-dependently prevented TGF-β1-induced EMT. Therefore, strong and sustained activation of MEK and ERK negatively regulates EMT in RLE cells. This notion is supported by the results that the MEK inhibitor U0126 canceled the inhibitory effect of FGF2 and that the exogenous expression of a constitutively active mutant of H-Ras, B-Raf, or MEK strongly blocked TGF-β1-induced EMT.

Furthermore, these conclusions are in line with the previous findings that the Ras—ERK pathway induced by hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) or FGF1 interferes with TGF-β1-induced EMT in primary cultured AECs and AEC cell lines [26, 27]. In contrast, stimulation with epidermal growth factor (EGF) or transformation with active mutants of H-Ras or C-Raf facilitates TGF-β1-induced EMT in human keratinocytes, canine kidney epithelial cells, and mouse mammary epithelial cells [22–25]. In addition, inhibition of MEK with U0126 prevented EMT in these cells. Therefore, although the Ras—ERK pathway positively regulates TGF-β1-induced EMT in several or many cell types, it negatively regulates in AECs including RLE cells. The molecular mechanisms responsible for this difference remain to be elucidated. However, ERK phosphorylates the linker regions of Smad2/3, which are activated by TGF-β, resulting in suppression of the nuclear translocation of Smad2/3 and of Smad-dependent transcription [36]. On the other hand, the Ras—ERK pathway cooperates with TGF-β to induce Smad-dependent expression of Snail1, which is required for EMT through repressing E-cadherin expression [37]. Thus, these apparently contradictory effects of the Ras—ERK pathway on TGF-β signaling might be differentially exerted between the above different cell types.

Although the Ras—ERK pathway negatively regulates EMT in RLE cells, PI3K—Akt signaling may not affect EMT, because the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 did not reverse the FGF2-induced prevention of EMT. However, the addition of either U0126 or LY294002 together with TGF-β1 severely induced apoptosis. Accordingly, the Ras—ERK pathway and PI3K—Akt signaling activated by TGF-β1, even if they are at low levels of activity, seem to be necessary for preventing apoptosis. Indeed, TGF-β1 has proapoptotic effects, the mechanisms of which differ among different cell types [38]. In contrast, both the Ras—ERK pathway and PI3K—Akt signaling possess antiapoptotic functions [39, 40]. Consequently, one aspect of the physiological significance of the TGF-β1-activated Ras—ERK pathway and PI3K—Akt signaling might be preventing apoptosis that can be induced by TGF-β1.

The knockdown of DA-Raf with the siRNAs facilitated TGF-β1-induced activating phosphorylation of MEK and ERK and interfered with TGF-β1-induced EMT. Thus, intrinsic DA-Raf is essential and sufficient for suppressing the TGF-β1-induced Ras—ERK pathway to cause EMT in RLE cells. However, intrinsic DA-Raf is not sufficient to prevent the high levels of MEK and ERK activities that are induced by FGF2 stimulation or the expression of constitutively active H-Ras, B-Raf, or MEK, to bring about EMT. In other words, the high levels of MEK and ERK activities are beyond the limit that intrinsic DA-Raf can suppress. DA-Raf knockdown impaired the TGF-β1-induced nuclear translocation of Smad2. Thus, DA-Raf plays an essential role in the nuclear translocation of Smad2, which in turn induces transcription of several genes for EMT, by suppressing the Ras—ERK pathway.

There are several proteins that negatively regulate the Ras—ERK pathway. These include Sprouty/Spred proteins [41, 42], RKIP [43, 44], and IMP [45, 46], in addition to DA-Raf. Both Sprouty and RKIP bind to Raf to inhibit the ERK pathway by preventing the binding of MEK. Sprouty also obstructs the growth factor receptor—Ras—ERK pathway by interacting with distinct proteins, depending on the signaling. In contrast, IMP uncouples signal transduction from Raf to MEK by inactivating the scaffold protein KSR. Among them, conditional deletion of Sprouty in lens epithelial cells increases ERK phosphorylation, elevates TGF-β signaling, and promotes TGF-β-induced EMT [47]. Conversely, overexpression of Sprouty in lens epithelial cells suppresses TGF-β-induced signaling and EMT. On the other hands, the effects of RKIP and IMP on TGF-β-induced EMT remain to be elucidated. The effect of Sprouty on TGF-β-induced EMT is inconsistent with that of DA-Raf, which is clarified in this study. It is necessary to examine whether this inconsistency stems from the difference in the regulatory mechanisms between DA-Raf and Sprouty or the difference in cell types used.

Fig 7 summarizes postulated mechanisms of TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells and the essential role of DA-Raf in EMT. TGF-β1-induced Smad2/3 signaling is required for EMT to convert RLE cells into myofibroblasts expressing αSMA, collagen 1, and fibronectin. TGF-β1-induced Ras activity is weak, and intrinsic DA-Raf is enough to suppress the ERK pathway by binding to activated Ras. In contrast, FGF2 stimulation (as well as FGF1 or HGF stimulation [26, 27]) or overexpression of constitutively active Ras, Raf, or MEK enhances the activity of the TGF-β1-induced Ras—ERK pathway. Intrinsic DA-Raf is not sufficient to overcome the high activity of the Ras—ERK pathway. Consequently, activated ERK interferes with Smad2/3 function that induces EMT. This interference may be achieved directly by phosphorylation of the linker regions of Smad2/3 [27, 36] or indirectly by inducing expression of Smad7, an inhibitor of TβRI—Smad2/3 interaction, and transport of Smad7 and Smurf1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that causes Smad degradation, from the nucleus to the cytoplasm [26]. Thus, the nuclear translocation of Smad2/3 and subsequent Smad-dependent transcription are prevented. Accordingly, DA-Raf serves as a guardian of TGF-β1-induced EMT by antagonizing the Ras—ERK pathway in at least RLE cells.

Download:

Fig 7. Postulated mechanisms of TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells and the essential function of DA-Raf for EMT.

(A) TGF-β1-induced Smad2/3 signaling is essential for EMT from RLE cells to myofibroblasts expressing αSMA, collagen 1, and fibronectin. TGF-β1-induced Ras activity is weak, and intrinsic DA-Raf is sufficient to suppress the ERK pathway by binding to activated Ras. (B) FGF2 stimulation (as well as FGF1 or HGF stimulation) or overexpression of the constitutively active Ras, Raf, or MEK intensifies the activity of the Ras—ERK pathway activated by TGF-β1. Intrinsic DA-Raf is not sufficient to overcome the strong Ras—ERK pathway activity. Activated ERK might interfere with the nuclear translocation of Smad2/3, which is required to induce EMT.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888.g007

TGF-β1-induced EMT in AEC2s is generally considered to be responsible for pulmonary fibrosis [9–13]. Therefore, elucidation of signaling mechanisms that drive TGF-β1-induced EMT in AEC2s may lead to the development of therapeutic strategies to attenuate fibrogenesis. Since DA-Raf does not directly affect Smad2/3 signaling but suppresses the TGF-β1-induced non-Smad Ras—ERK pathway, the information obtained in this study might provide ideas to treatment for pulmonary fibrosis without loss of the other important functions of TGF-β1 in maintaining homeostasis. Furthermore, it is intriguing to examine whether DA-Raf also participates in TGF-β-induced EMT in development or tumor cell invasion. These examinations might develop the notion that DA-Raf is extensively involved in the regulation of EMT.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and EMT induction

Rat AEC2 cell line RLE-6TN (RLE) cells [48] were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). RLE cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s-modified Eagle’s medium/Nutrient F-12 Ham (DMEM/F12) (Sigma) containing 10% FBS and subcultured every 2 d. To induce EMT, 1 10⁴ cells/cm² were cultured in DMEM/F12 containing 1% FBS for 24 h and then stimulated with 0.5 ng/ml recombinant human TGF-β1 (R&D Systems) dissolved in 4 mM HCl containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin for 48 h. To assess the effect of FGF2 on EMT, cells were stimulated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 and 10–100 ng/ml recombinant human FGF2 (Wako) with 100 μg/ml heparin. To analyze signaling pathways, cells were pretreated with 2–10 μM U0126 (Promega) or 10 μM LY294002 (Promega) for 30 min and then stimulated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 alone or in combination with 50 ng/ml FGF2.

cDNA cloning, plasmid construction, and transfection

Mouse Braf, Map2k1 (MEK1), and Smad2 cDNAs containing the entire coding regions were cloned from mouse brain mRNA by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR using Omniscript Reverse Transcriptase (Qiagen) and Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The primer sets used are indicated in S1 Table.

These cDNAs were digested with XhoI, BamHI, and EcoRI, respectively, and subcloned in pBluescript II vector (Agilent Technologies). Constitutively active B-Raf(V637E) and MEK1(S218D/S222D) cDNAs were constructed by introducing point mutations into wild-type cDNAs in the vector by PCR. The primer sets used are indicated in S2 Table.

These PCR products were self-ligated. Braf and Map2k1 cDNA fragments excised with XhoI and BamHI, respectively, were inserted into pEGFP-C1 vector (Clontech) in frame with the EGFP-tag. Smad2 cDNA fragment excised with EcoRI was inserted into pmCherry-C1 vector (Clontech) in frame with the mCherry-tag. pEF-BOS/Myc-H-Ras(G12V) was constructed as described previously [28].

The recombinant plasmids were transfected to RLE cells with Lipofectamine LTX mixed with Plus Reagent (Life Technologies).

RNAi

Stealth RNAi siRNA duplexes (Life Technologies) were used to knock down rat DA-Raf. The target sequences of the siRNAs were:

DAraf siRNA1: 5´-CCCTGACAGATTATACTTTCGTTTA-3´;
DAraf siRNA2: 5´-GCATGGGACTGTGGGATCATTGGTA-3´;
control siRNA: 5’-CCCACATAGTATTGACTTTGTGTTA-3’.

The siRNAs were mixed with Lipofectamine RNAiMax Reagent in OPTI-MEM (Life Technologies) and transfected to RLE cells at a concentration of 10 nM.

Immunoblotting

To detect αSMA, RLE cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed with the SDS sample buffer. For the analysis of signaling proteins, washed cells were lysed with a lysis buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 μg/ml pepstatin A, 10 mM Na₃VO₄, and 10 mM NaF). The lysates were cleared by centrifugation and treated with the SDS sample buffer. The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and analyzed by immunoblotting as described previously [49]. Primary antibodies used were anti-β-tubulin mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb) E7 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, DSHB), anti-αSMA mouse mAb 1A4 (Sigma), anti-E-cadherin rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-MEK1/2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (pAb), anti-phospho-MEK1/2 (Ser217/221) rabbit pAb, anti-ERK1/2 rabbit pAb, anti-phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) mouse mAb (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-A-Raf rabbit pAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-DA-Raf rabbit pAb [28]. The blotting bands were detected with a ChemiDoc MP system (Bio-Rad). The band intensity was densitometrically analyzed by using ImageJ software (NIH).

Coimmunoprecipitation assay

The anti-DA-Raf pAb was coupled to Protein A Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (GE Healthcare). RLE cells were lysed with the lysis buffer, and the lysates were incubated with the antibody-coupled Sepharose for 60 min at 4°C [50]. After thorough washing with the lysis buffer, bound proteins were dissociated with the SDS sample buffer and detected by immunoblotting with anti-Ras mouse mAb RAS10 (Millipore).

Fluorescence microscopy

RLE cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M Na-PO₄ (pH7.4) for 15 min, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min. They were incubated with Cy3-conjugated anti-αSMA mouse mAb (Sigma), anti-Myc-tag rabbit pAb (Cell Signaling Technology) for 1 h at room temperature, or anti-GFP rabbit pAb (Medical and Biological Laboratories) overnight at 4°C. The cells were then incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit goat IgG (Life Technologies) to detect Myc-tag and GFP. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33258 (Life Technologies). The specimens were observed with a Carl Zeiss Axioskop microscope equipped with a CoolSNAP cf CCD camera (Photometrics) operated with Openlab software (PerkinElmer). αSMA-positive and -negative cells were determined by setting a threshold intensity with ImageJ software and counted.

Real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from RLE cells with TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies) and quantitated with NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Each RNA (2.5 μg) was reverse-transcribed into cDNA with SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit (Life Technologies). Real-time PCR was performed with Applied Biosystems 7300 Real-Time PCR System by using SYBR Green I master mix (Life Technologies) as described previously [51, 52]. The primer sets used are indicated in S3 Table.

Live cell imaging

RLE cells were transfected with the recombinant plasmid pmCherry-C1/Smad2 by electroporation using NEPA21 (Nepagene) and plated on 35-mm glass base dishes. They were transfected with the control or DAraf siRNA 12 h after the electroporation. The cells were shifted to DMEM/F12 containing 1% FBS 24 h later and cultured for more 24 h. The dishes were placed on the stage of a confocal laser-scanning microscope FV1200 (Olympus) equipped with a CO₂ incubator. Live cell images were acquired every 24 s for 60 min after addition of 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 to the culture medium. Fluorescence intensity of mCherry—Smad2 in the nucleus and cytoplasm at each time point was analyzed with the region measurement tool of MetaMorph software (Molecular Device).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted with KaleidaGraph software (Synergy Software). Statistical significance of the data from at least three independent experiments was assessed by Student’s t-test.

Supporting Information

S1 Movie. Localization of Smad2 in a control siRNA-expressing RLE cell stimulated with TGF-β1.

mCherry—Smad2-expressing RLE cells transfected with the control siRNA were stimulated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 60 min.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888.s001

(MOV)

S2 Movie. Localization of Smad2 in a DAraf siRNA-expressing RLE cell stimulated with TGF-β1.

mCherry—Smad2-expressing RLE cells transfected with DAraf siRNA1 were stimulated with 0.5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 60 min.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888.s002

(MOV)

S1 Table. Primer sets to clone mouse Braf, Map2k1, and Smad2 cDNAs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888.s003

(PDF)

S2 Table. Primer sets to introduce point mutations in Braf and Map2k1 cDNAs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888.s004

(PDF)

S3 Table. Primer sets for real-time PCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127888.s005

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Arima, A. Sakamoto, and L. Fujimura for discussions and A. Goda and M. Hanazono for technical support. The manuscript was proofread by Editage.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: HW-T KT TE. Performed the experiments: HW-T KT. Analyzed the data: HW-T KT MH TT TE. Wrote the paper: HW-T KT TE.

References

1. Thannickal VJ, Toews GB, White ES, Lynch JP III, Martinez FJ (2004) Mechanisms of pulmonary fibrosis. Annu Rev Med 55: 395–417. pmid:14746528
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Selman M, Pardo A, Kaminski N (2008) Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: aberrant recapitulation of developmental programs? PLoS Med 5: e62. pmid:18318599
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. King TE Jr, Pardo A, Selman M (2011) Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lancet 378: 1949–1961. pmid:21719092
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Willis BC, Liebler JM, Luby-Phelps K, Nicholson AG, Crandall ED, du Bois RM, et al. (2005) Induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in alveolar epithelial cells by transforming growth factor-β1: potential role in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Pathol 166: 1321–1332. pmid:15855634
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Kim KK, Kugler MC, Wolters PJ, Robillard L, Galvez MG, Brumwell AN, et al. (2006) Alveolar epithelial cell mesenchymal transition develops in vivo during pulmonary fibrosis and is regulated by the extracellular matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 13180–13185. pmid:16924102
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Jain R, Shaul PW, Borok Z, Willis BC (2007) Endothelin-1 induces alveolar epithelial-mesenchymal transition through endothelin type A receptor-mediated production of TGF-β1. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 37: 38–47. pmid:17379848
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Tanjore H, Xu XC, Polosukhin VV, Degryse AL, Li B, Han W, et al. (2009) Contribution of epithelial-derived fibroblasts to bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180: 657–665. pmid:19556518
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Marmai C, Sutherland RE, Kim KK, Dolganov GM, Fang X, Kim SS, et al. (2011) Alveolar epithelial cells express mesenchymal proteins in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 301: L71–L78. pmid:21498628
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Leask A, Abraham DJ (2004) TGF-β signaling and the fibrotic response. FASEB J 18: 816–827. pmid:15117886
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Willis BC, Borok Z (2007) TGF-β-induced EMT: mechanisms and implications for fibrotic lung disease. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 293: L525–L534. pmid:17631612
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Pohlers D, Brenmoehl J, Löffler I, Müller CK, Leipner C, Schultze-Mosgau S, et al. (2009) TGF-β and fibrosis in different organs—molecular pathway imprints. Biochim Biophys Acta 1792: 746–756. pmid:19539753
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Biernacka A, Dobaczewski M, Frangogiannis NG (2011) TGF-β signaling in fibrosis. Growth Factors 29: 196–202. pmid:21740331
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Chapman HA (2011) Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in pulmonary fibrosis. Annu Rev Physiol 73: 413–435. pmid:21054168
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Massagué J (2012) TGFβ signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13: 616–630. pmid:22992590
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Mulder KM (2000) Role of Ras and Mapks in TGFβ signaling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 11: 23–35. pmid:10708950
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Zhang YE (2009) Non-Smad pathways in TGF-β signaling. Cell Res 19: 128–139. pmid:19114990
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Mu Y, Gudey SK, Landström M (2012) Non-Smad signaling pathways. Cell Tissue Res 347: 11–20. pmid:21701805
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Cox AD, Der CJ (2010) Ras history: The saga continues. Small GTPases 1: 2–27. pmid:21686117
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Matallanas D, Birtwistle M, Romano D, Zebisch A, Rauch J, von Kriegsheim A, et al. (2011) Raf family kinases: old dogs have learned new tricks. Genes Cancer 2: 232–260. pmid:21779496
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Roskoski R Jr (2012) ERK1/2 MAP kinases: structure, function, and regulation. Pharmacol Res 66: 105–143. pmid:22569528
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Lee MK, Pardoux C, Hall MC, Lee PS, Warburton D, Qing J, et al. (2007) TGF-β activates Erk MAP kinase signalling through direct phosphorylation of ShcA. EMBO J 26: 3957–3967. pmid:17673906
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Zavadil J, Bitzer M, Liang D, Yang YC, Massimi A, Kneitz S, et al. (2001) Genetic programs of epithelial cell plasticity directed by transforming growth factor-β. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 6686–6691. pmid:11390996
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Davies M, Robinson M, Smith E, Huntley S, Prime S, Paterson I (2005) Induction of an epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human immortal and malignant keratinocytes by TGF-β1 involves MAPK, Smad and AP-1 signalling pathways. J Cell Biochem 95: 918–931. pmid:15861394
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Lehmann K, Janda E, Pierreux CE, Rytömaa M, Schulze A, McMahon M, et al. (2000) Raf induces TGFβ production while blocking its apoptotic but not invasive responses: a mechanism leading to increased malignancy in epithelial cells. Genes Dev 14: 2610–2622. pmid:11040215
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Janda E, Lehmann K, Killisch I, Jechlinger M, Herzig M, Downward J, et al. (2002) Ras and TGFβ cooperatively regulate epithelial cell plasticity and metastasis: dissection of Ras signaling pathways. J Cell Biol 156: 299–313. pmid:11790801
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Shukla MN, Rose JL, Ray R, Lathrop KL, Ray A, Ray P (2009) Hepatocyte growth factor inhibits epithelial to myofibroblast transition in lung cells via Smad7. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 40: 643–653. pmid:18988920
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Ramos C, Becerril C, Montaño M, García-De-Alba C, Ramírez R, Checa M, et al. (2010) FGF-1 reverts epithelial-mesenchymal transition induced by TGF-β1 through MAPK/ERK kinase pathway. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 299: L222–L231. pmid:20495078
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Yokoyama T, Takano K, Yoshida A, Katada F, Sun P, Takenawa T, et al. (2007) DA-Raf1, a competent intrinsic dominant-negative antagonist of the Ras—ERK pathway, is required for myogenic differentiation. J Cell Biol 177: 781–793. pmid:17535970
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Watanabe-Takano H, Takano K, Sakamoto A, Matsumoto K, Tokuhisa T, Endo T, et al. (2014) DA-Raf-dependent inhibition of the Ras-ERK signaling pathway in type 2 alveolar epithelial cells controls alveolar formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: E2291–E2300. pmid:24843139
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, Chaponnier C, Brown RA (2002) Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 349–363. pmid:11988769
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J (2010) Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 141: 1117–1134. pmid:20602996
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Dhomen N, Marais R (2007) New insight into BRAF mutations in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 31–39. pmid:17208430
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Yan M, Templeton DJ (1994) Identification of 2 serine residues of MEK-1 that are differentially phosphorylated during activation by raf and MEK kinase. J Biol Chem 269: 19067–19073. pmid:8034665
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA (2009) Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 139: 871–890. pmid:19945376
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Xu J, Lamouille S, Derynck R (2009) TGF-β-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Cell Res 19: 156–172. pmid:19153598
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Kretzschmar M, Doody J, Timokhina I, Massagué J (1999) A mechanism of repression of TGFβ/Smad signaling by oncogenic Ras. Genes Dev 13: 804–816. pmid:10197981
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Horiguchi K, Shirakihara T, Nakano A, Imamura T, Miyazono K, Saitoh M (2009) Role of Ras signaling in the induction of snail by transforming growth factor-β. J Biol Chem 284: 245–253. pmid:19010789
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Heldin C-H, Landström M, Moustakas A (2009) Mechanism of TGF-β signaling to growth arrest, apoptosis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21: 166–176. pmid:19237272
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. McCubrey JA, Steelman LS, Chappell WH, Abrams SL, Wong EW, Chang F, et al. (2007) Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in cell growth, malignant transformation and drug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta 1773: 1263–1284. pmid:17126425
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Manning BD, Cantley LC (2007) AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell 129: 1261–1274. pmid:17604717
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Kim HJ, Bar-Sagi D (2004) Modulation of signalling by Sprouty: a developing story. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 441–450. pmid:15173823
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Mason JM, Morrison DJ, Basson MA, Licht JD (2006) Sprouty proteins: multifaceted negative-feedback regulators of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. Trends Cell Biol 16: 45–54. pmid:16337795
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Yeung K, Seitz T, Li S, Janosch P, McFerran B, Kaiser C, et al. (1999) Suppression of Raf-1 kinase activity and MAP kinase signalling by RKIP. Nature 401: 173–177. pmid:10490027
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Odabaei G, Chatterjee D, Jazirehi AR, Goodglick L, Yeung K, Bonavida B (2004) Raf-1 kinase inhibitor protein: structure, function, regulation of cell signaling, and pivotal role in apoptosis. Adv Cancer Res 91: 169–200. pmid:15327891
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Matheny SA, Chen C, Kortum RL, Razidlo GL, Lewis RE, White MA (2004) Ras regulates assembly of mitogenic signalling complexes through the effector protein IMP. Nature 427: 256–260. pmid:14724641
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Matheny SA, White MA (2009) Signaling threshold regulation by the Ras effector IMP. J Biol Chem 284: 11007–11011. pmid:19091743
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Shin EH, Basson MA, Robinson ML, McAvoy JW, Lovicu FJ (2012) Sprouty is a negative regulator of transforming growth factor β-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cataract. Mol Med 18: 861–873. pmid:22517312
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Driscoll KE, Carter JM, Iype PT, Kumari HL, Crosby LL, Aardema MJ, et al. (1995) Establishment of immortalized alveolar type II epithelial cell lines from adult rats. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 31: 516–527. pmid:8528500
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Watanabe-Takano H, Takano K, Keduka E, Endo T (2010) M-Ras is activated by bone morphogenetic protein-2 and participates in osteoblastic determination, differentiation, and transdifferentiation. Exp Cell Res 316: 477–490. pmid:19800879
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Takano K, Watanabe-Takano H, Suetsugu S, Kurita S, Tsujita K, Kimura S, et al. (2010) Nebulin and N-WASP cooperate to cause IGF-1-induced sarcomeric actin filament formation. Science 330: 1536–1540. pmid:21148390
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Fujimura L, Watanabe-Takano H, Sato Y, Tokuhisa T, Hatano M (2009) Prickle promotes neurite outgrowth via the Dishevelled dependent pathway in C1300 cells. Neurosci Lett 467: 6–10. pmid:19788910
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Koizumi K, Takano K, Kaneyasu A, Watanabe-Takano H, Tokuda E, Abe T, et al. (2012) RhoD activated by fibroblast growth factor induces cytoneme-like cellular protrusions through mDia3C. Mol Biol Cell 23: 4647–4661. pmid:23034183
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Thannickal VJ, Toews GB, White ES, Lynch JP III, Martinez FJ (2004) Mechanisms of pulmonary fibrosis. Annu Rev Med 55: 395–417. pmid:14746528
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Selman M, Pardo A, Kaminski N (2008) Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: aberrant recapitulation of developmental programs? PLoS Med 5: e62. pmid:18318599
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. King TE Jr, Pardo A, Selman M (2011) Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lancet 378: 1949–1961. pmid:21719092
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Willis BC, Liebler JM, Luby-Phelps K, Nicholson AG, Crandall ED, du Bois RM, et al. (2005) Induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in alveolar epithelial cells by transforming growth factor-β1: potential role in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Pathol 166: 1321–1332. pmid:15855634
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Kim KK, Kugler MC, Wolters PJ, Robillard L, Galvez MG, Brumwell AN, et al. (2006) Alveolar epithelial cell mesenchymal transition develops in vivo during pulmonary fibrosis and is regulated by the extracellular matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 13180–13185. pmid:16924102
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Jain R, Shaul PW, Borok Z, Willis BC (2007) Endothelin-1 induces alveolar epithelial-mesenchymal transition through endothelin type A receptor-mediated production of TGF-β1. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 37: 38–47. pmid:17379848
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Tanjore H, Xu XC, Polosukhin VV, Degryse AL, Li B, Han W, et al. (2009) Contribution of epithelial-derived fibroblasts to bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180: 657–665. pmid:19556518
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Marmai C, Sutherland RE, Kim KK, Dolganov GM, Fang X, Kim SS, et al. (2011) Alveolar epithelial cells express mesenchymal proteins in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 301: L71–L78. pmid:21498628
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Leask A, Abraham DJ (2004) TGF-β signaling and the fibrotic response. FASEB J 18: 816–827. pmid:15117886
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Willis BC, Borok Z (2007) TGF-β-induced EMT: mechanisms and implications for fibrotic lung disease. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 293: L525–L534. pmid:17631612
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Pohlers D, Brenmoehl J, Löffler I, Müller CK, Leipner C, Schultze-Mosgau S, et al. (2009) TGF-β and fibrosis in different organs—molecular pathway imprints. Biochim Biophys Acta 1792: 746–756. pmid:19539753
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Biernacka A, Dobaczewski M, Frangogiannis NG (2011) TGF-β signaling in fibrosis. Growth Factors 29: 196–202. pmid:21740331
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Chapman HA (2011) Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in pulmonary fibrosis. Annu Rev Physiol 73: 413–435. pmid:21054168
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Massagué J (2012) TGFβ signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13: 616–630. pmid:22992590
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Mulder KM (2000) Role of Ras and Mapks in TGFβ signaling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 11: 23–35. pmid:10708950
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Zhang YE (2009) Non-Smad pathways in TGF-β signaling. Cell Res 19: 128–139. pmid:19114990
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Mu Y, Gudey SK, Landström M (2012) Non-Smad signaling pathways. Cell Tissue Res 347: 11–20. pmid:21701805
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Cox AD, Der CJ (2010) Ras history: The saga continues. Small GTPases 1: 2–27. pmid:21686117
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Matallanas D, Birtwistle M, Romano D, Zebisch A, Rauch J, von Kriegsheim A, et al. (2011) Raf family kinases: old dogs have learned new tricks. Genes Cancer 2: 232–260. pmid:21779496
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Roskoski R Jr (2012) ERK1/2 MAP kinases: structure, function, and regulation. Pharmacol Res 66: 105–143. pmid:22569528
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Lee MK, Pardoux C, Hall MC, Lee PS, Warburton D, Qing J, et al. (2007) TGF-β activates Erk MAP kinase signalling through direct phosphorylation of ShcA. EMBO J 26: 3957–3967. pmid:17673906
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Zavadil J, Bitzer M, Liang D, Yang YC, Massimi A, Kneitz S, et al. (2001) Genetic programs of epithelial cell plasticity directed by transforming growth factor-β. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 6686–6691. pmid:11390996
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Davies M, Robinson M, Smith E, Huntley S, Prime S, Paterson I (2005) Induction of an epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human immortal and malignant keratinocytes by TGF-β1 involves MAPK, Smad and AP-1 signalling pathways. J Cell Biochem 95: 918–931. pmid:15861394
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Lehmann K, Janda E, Pierreux CE, Rytömaa M, Schulze A, McMahon M, et al. (2000) Raf induces TGFβ production while blocking its apoptotic but not invasive responses: a mechanism leading to increased malignancy in epithelial cells. Genes Dev 14: 2610–2622. pmid:11040215
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Janda E, Lehmann K, Killisch I, Jechlinger M, Herzig M, Downward J, et al. (2002) Ras and TGFβ cooperatively regulate epithelial cell plasticity and metastasis: dissection of Ras signaling pathways. J Cell Biol 156: 299–313. pmid:11790801
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Shukla MN, Rose JL, Ray R, Lathrop KL, Ray A, Ray P (2009) Hepatocyte growth factor inhibits epithelial to myofibroblast transition in lung cells via Smad7. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 40: 643–653. pmid:18988920
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Ramos C, Becerril C, Montaño M, García-De-Alba C, Ramírez R, Checa M, et al. (2010) FGF-1 reverts epithelial-mesenchymal transition induced by TGF-β1 through MAPK/ERK kinase pathway. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 299: L222–L231. pmid:20495078
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Yokoyama T, Takano K, Yoshida A, Katada F, Sun P, Takenawa T, et al. (2007) DA-Raf1, a competent intrinsic dominant-negative antagonist of the Ras—ERK pathway, is required for myogenic differentiation. J Cell Biol 177: 781–793. pmid:17535970
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Watanabe-Takano H, Takano K, Sakamoto A, Matsumoto K, Tokuhisa T, Endo T, et al. (2014) DA-Raf-dependent inhibition of the Ras-ERK signaling pathway in type 2 alveolar epithelial cells controls alveolar formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: E2291–E2300. pmid:24843139
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, Chaponnier C, Brown RA (2002) Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 349–363. pmid:11988769
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J (2010) Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 141: 1117–1134. pmid:20602996
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Dhomen N, Marais R (2007) New insight into BRAF mutations in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 31–39. pmid:17208430
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Yan M, Templeton DJ (1994) Identification of 2 serine residues of MEK-1 that are differentially phosphorylated during activation by raf and MEK kinase. J Biol Chem 269: 19067–19073. pmid:8034665
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA (2009) Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 139: 871–890. pmid:19945376
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Xu J, Lamouille S, Derynck R (2009) TGF-β-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Cell Res 19: 156–172. pmid:19153598
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Kretzschmar M, Doody J, Timokhina I, Massagué J (1999) A mechanism of repression of TGFβ/Smad signaling by oncogenic Ras. Genes Dev 13: 804–816. pmid:10197981
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Horiguchi K, Shirakihara T, Nakano A, Imamura T, Miyazono K, Saitoh M (2009) Role of Ras signaling in the induction of snail by transforming growth factor-β. J Biol Chem 284: 245–253. pmid:19010789
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Heldin C-H, Landström M, Moustakas A (2009) Mechanism of TGF-β signaling to growth arrest, apoptosis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21: 166–176. pmid:19237272
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. McCubrey JA, Steelman LS, Chappell WH, Abrams SL, Wong EW, Chang F, et al. (2007) Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in cell growth, malignant transformation and drug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta 1773: 1263–1284. pmid:17126425
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Manning BD, Cantley LC (2007) AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell 129: 1261–1274. pmid:17604717
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Kim HJ, Bar-Sagi D (2004) Modulation of signalling by Sprouty: a developing story. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 441–450. pmid:15173823
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Mason JM, Morrison DJ, Basson MA, Licht JD (2006) Sprouty proteins: multifaceted negative-feedback regulators of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. Trends Cell Biol 16: 45–54. pmid:16337795
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Yeung K, Seitz T, Li S, Janosch P, McFerran B, Kaiser C, et al. (1999) Suppression of Raf-1 kinase activity and MAP kinase signalling by RKIP. Nature 401: 173–177. pmid:10490027
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] PubMed/NCBI

[172] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Odabaei G, Chatterjee D, Jazirehi AR, Goodglick L, Yeung K, Bonavida B (2004) Raf-1 kinase inhibitor protein: structure, function, regulation of cell signaling, and pivotal role in apoptosis. Adv Cancer Res 91: 169–200. pmid:15327891
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Matheny SA, Chen C, Kortum RL, Razidlo GL, Lewis RE, White MA (2004) Ras regulates assembly of mitogenic signalling complexes through the effector protein IMP. Nature 427: 256–260. pmid:14724641
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] PubMed/NCBI

[180] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Matheny SA, White MA (2009) Signaling threshold regulation by the Ras effector IMP. J Biol Chem 284: 11007–11011. pmid:19091743
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] PubMed/NCBI

[184] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Shin EH, Basson MA, Robinson ML, McAvoy JW, Lovicu FJ (2012) Sprouty is a negative regulator of transforming growth factor β-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cataract. Mol Med 18: 861–873. pmid:22517312
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] PubMed/NCBI

[188] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Driscoll KE, Carter JM, Iype PT, Kumari HL, Crosby LL, Aardema MJ, et al. (1995) Establishment of immortalized alveolar type II epithelial cell lines from adult rats. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 31: 516–527. pmid:8528500
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] PubMed/NCBI

[192] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Watanabe-Takano H, Takano K, Keduka E, Endo T (2010) M-Ras is activated by bone morphogenetic protein-2 and participates in osteoblastic determination, differentiation, and transdifferentiation. Exp Cell Res 316: 477–490. pmid:19800879
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[194] View Article

[195] PubMed/NCBI

[196] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Takano K, Watanabe-Takano H, Suetsugu S, Kurita S, Tsujita K, Kimura S, et al. (2010) Nebulin and N-WASP cooperate to cause IGF-1-induced sarcomeric actin filament formation. Science 330: 1536–1540. pmid:21148390
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[198] View Article

[199] PubMed/NCBI

[200] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Fujimura L, Watanabe-Takano H, Sato Y, Tokuhisa T, Hatano M (2009) Prickle promotes neurite outgrowth via the Dishevelled dependent pathway in C1300 cells. Neurosci Lett 467: 6–10. pmid:19788910
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[202] View Article

[203] PubMed/NCBI

[204] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Koizumi K, Takano K, Kaneyasu A, Watanabe-Takano H, Tokuda E, Abe T, et al. (2012) RhoD activated by fibroblast growth factor induces cytoneme-like cellular protrusions through mDia3C. Mol Biol Cell 23: 4647–4661. pmid:23034183
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[206] View Article

[207] PubMed/NCBI

[208] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Results

Sustained activation of the Ras—ERK pathway by FGF2 inhibits TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells

Activation of the Ras—ERK pathway but not PI3K—Akt signaling inhibits TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells

Expression of DA-Raf is required for TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells

Suppression of the Ras—ERK pathway by DA-Raf is responsible for TGF-β1-induced EMT in RLE cells

Discussion

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and EMT induction

cDNA cloning, plasmid construction, and transfection

RNAi

Immunoblotting

Coimmunoprecipitation assay

Fluorescence microscopy

Real-time PCR

Live cell imaging

Statistical analysis

Supporting Information

S1 Movie. Localization of Smad2 in a control siRNA-expressing RLE cell stimulated with TGF-β1.

S2 Movie. Localization of Smad2 in a DAraf siRNA-expressing RLE cell stimulated with TGF-β1.

S1 Table. Primer sets to clone mouse Braf, Map2k1, and Smad2 cDNAs.

S2 Table. Primer sets to introduce point mutations in Braf and Map2k1 cDNAs.

S3 Table. Primer sets for real-time PCR.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References