Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Assessing the Effects of Trematode Infection on Invasive Green Crabs in Eastern North America

  • April M. H. Blakeslee ,

    april.blakeslee@liu.edu

    Affiliations Long Island University, 720 Northern Blvd., Brookville, NY, 11548, United States of America, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Rd., Edgewater, MD, 21037, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Carolyn L. Keogh,

    Affiliation University of Georgia, 140 E. Green St., Athens, GA, 30602, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Amy E. Fowler,

    Affiliations Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Rd., Edgewater, MD, 21037, United States of America, Marine Resources Research Institute, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, 217 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC, 29422, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Blaine D. Griffen

    Affiliation University of South Carolina, Department of Biological Sciences and Marine Science Program, 715 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, United States of America

    ⨯

Abstract

A common signature of marine invasions worldwide is a significant loss of parasites (= parasite escape) in non-native host populations, which may confer a release from some of the harmful effects of parasitism (e.g., castration, energy extraction, immune activation, behavioral manipulation) and possibly enhance the success of non-indigenous species. In eastern North America, the notorious invader Carcinus maenas (European green crab) has escaped more than two-thirds its native parasite load. However, one of its parasites, a trematode (Microphallus similis), can be highly prevalent in the non-native region; yet little is known about its potential impacts. We employed a series of laboratory experiments to determine whether and how M. similis infection intensity influences C. maenas, focusing on physiological assays of body mass index, energy storage, and immune activation, as well as behavioral analyses of foraging, shelter utilization, and conspicuousness. We found little evidence for enduring physiological or behavioral impacts four weeks after experimental infection, with the exception of mussel handling time which positively correlated with cyst intensity. However, we did find evidence for a short-term effect of M. similis infection during early stages of infection (soon after cercarial penetration) via a significant drop in circulating immune cells, and a significant increase in the crabs’ righting response time. Considering M. similis is the only common parasite infecting C. maenas in eastern North America, our results for minimal lasting effects of the trematode on the crab’s physiology and behavior may help explain the crab’s continued prominence as a strong predator and competitor in the region.

Citation: Blakeslee AMH, Keogh CL, Fowler AE, Griffen BD (2015) Assessing the Effects of Trematode Infection on Invasive Green Crabs in Eastern North America. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0128674. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674

Academic Editor: Peter Alan Todd, National University of Singapore, SINGAPORE

Received: January 25, 2015; Accepted: April 29, 2015; Published: June 1, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Blakeslee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by a Research Opportunity Award to AMHB and BDG as a supplemental to BDG’s National Science Foundation award (NSF #OCE-1129166). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Over the past few centuries, human activities have transported numerous marine organisms to foreign coastlines at an increasing rate as global trade and shipping methods have become more efficient and widespread [1–4]. Accidental or intentional introductions of marine non-indigenous species (NIS) have resulted in the addition of numerous new organisms, including free-living and parasitic hitchhikers, to marine environments around the world. Once a species has become established and spreads within a foreign environment, it may induce extensive change to its recipient community; for example, NIS have been shown to modify habitats, cause shifts in trophic dynamics (e.g., trophic cascades), and alter community composition and structure [5–12].

A commonly cited factor contributing to the success of many NIS in recipient communities is their release from coevolved natural enemies, including predators, competitors, and parasites [13–16]. Specific to parasites, reductions in the diversity and intensity of parasite infections in non-native hosts is a strong signature of marine invasions globally, and on average, parasite loads in non-indigenous populations are approximately half that of native populations [17]. Such significant parasite losses may benefit host survival and reproduction if hosts are released from the many harmful effects of parasite infection, such as castration, enhanced mortality, energy extraction, immune activation, and/or behavioral modifications [14, 16–18]. However, the benefit of parasite release may be temporary if parasites from the host’s native range invade with subsequent introduction events, or hosts acquire new generalist parasites in their recipient communities [14]. For example, in the 1950s the Red Sea swimming crab Charybdis longicollis invaded the Mediterranean Sea via the Suez Canal, escaping a castrating rhizocephalan parasite in the process; however, in 1992 the parasite also invaded the region, thereby eliminating the crab’s temporary release from parasitic castration [19–21].

The most frequently observed parasitic taxa infecting marine NIS worldwide are digenean trematodes [17], a group known to modify host behaviors and physiology and consequently influence population and community level dynamics [22]. Trematodes use multi-host trophic transmission to complete life cycles, infecting numerous species across a broad phylogenetic spectrum [23–24]. First-intermediate hosts are typically gastropods, which are castrated as the trematode asexually reproduces in the gonad region, generating copious cercariae that are continually shed from the snail. Cercariae seek and encyst as metacercariae within second-intermediate hosts (crustaceans, fish, gastropods, bivalves, worms) and remain dormant until ingestion by the definitive host (fish, birds, mammals). Some trematode species have a truncated life cycle and emerging cercariae directly penetrate definitive hosts, or cercariae encyst on hard/firm substrates (e.g., shell or algae) that are ingested by definitive hosts. Sexual reproduction occurs in the definitive host’s gut, and thousands of trematode eggs enter the marine system via host defecation (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Life cycle of Microphallus similis in eastern North America with Carcinus maenas as second-intermediate host.

Microphallus similis infects multiple hosts to complete its life cycle, starting with (A) two species of Littorina snails (L. saxatilis and L. obtusata), where the trematode asexually reproduces, producing numerous cercariae. (B) These cercariae are shed from the snail into the water column, where they seek out and encyst as a metacercariae within a second-intermediate host, primarily the green crab, Carcinus maenas. To sexually reproduce, (C) the trematode’s crab host must be ingested by a definitive host, often a Larus gull species, where (D) the trematode’s eggs, containing miracidia, are then deposited into the marine environment with the birds’ feces. Grazing snails accidentally ingest these eggs, and the cycle continues.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674.g001

Trematodes exert their strongest physiological and behavioral effects on intermediate hosts, and their influences can range from relatively minor to extreme [24–25]. Physiological effects can include castration, impaired reproductive function, tissue damage, immune activation, energetic diversion of host resources, and tissue or organ dysfunction [26–32]. For example, metacercarial encystment in second-intermediate hosts has been shown to compress and rupture digestive gland (hepatopancreas) tubules [33], induce hemocytic infiltration around cysts [34], and lower host growth rates [35]. Behavioral impacts can include manipulations of host foraging, shelter use, predator avoidance, and conspicuousness. For example, infected hosts have been shown to compensate for the metabolic stress of trematode infection by increasing foraging rates [25, 36], or they may reduce foraging if mobility or prey handling become compromised [37–38]. Trematodes can also enhance trophic transmission by altering predator avoidance behaviors (e.g., modifying shelter usage) [39] or inducing behavioral alterations such that intermediate hosts are more conspicuous to vertebrate predators, thereby increasing the likelihood of transmission to, and sexual reproduction within, definitive hosts (= parasite increased trophic transmission) [25, 40–41]. A well-known example involves the Pacific killifish, which is infected by a trematode that concentrates in the fish’s brain and induces highly conspicuous behaviors like “flashing, surfacing, contorting, shimmying, and jerking”; in turn, infected killifish are preyed upon by seabird definitive hosts at significantly higher rates than are uninfected fish [42].

With such diverse effects on host physiology and behavior, trematodes have the potential to influence NIS in regions where hosts are infected by prevalent hitchhiking or newly acquired trematodes. Here, we focus on non-indigenous populations of the European green crab Carcinus maenas, one of the most infamous marine invaders globally and a common host to numerous parasite species including trematodes [18, 43–44]. Carcinus maenas has been introduced to five continents and is implicated in significant predatory and competitive impacts on numerous intertidal and subtidal habitats and organisms, including commercial species like clams, scallops, and mussels [5, 45–47]. In the crab’s oldest introduced region in eastern North America (established for ~200 years; [43]), C. maenas has escaped 70% of its native parasite load [44], and crabs in the region can attain larger average sizes, are more intact (reduced limb loss), and are healthier overall than in native populations [18]—likely due in part to the crab’s escape from castrating Sacculina spp. rhizocephalan barnacles [48–50]. The few parasite species that do infect C. maenas in eastern North America include an acanthocephalan, a larval nematode, and the trematode Microphallus similis; the first two species are relatively uncommon, but M. similis can be highly prevalent in the region (up to 100% in adult crabs in some populations) [44]. Microphallus similis may have hitchhiked to North America with C. maenas during the crab’s multiple introductions to the region (consisting of at least two major events; [51]), or perhaps it was acquired from native Littorina spp. periwinkle snails that serve as first-intermediate hosts [44]. The trematode has a three-host infection cycle with a larval cercarial stage in periwinkles, a metacercarial stage in C. maenas, and a final adult stage in shorebirds (Fig 1). Though infected C. maenas may harbor hundreds to thousands of M. similis metacercarial cysts in hepatopancreas and gonad tissues, nothing is yet known about potential influences on C. maenas. Understanding impacts is important because any discernible trematode-modified behaviors and/or physiology could ultimately affect the crab’s interactions in coastal North American communities, such as its predation rates on intertidal and subtidal organisms [52], its ability to effectively compete with other abundant shorecrabs like the non-native Asian shorecrab, Hemigrapsus sanguineus [44, 53–54], or its predation by larger predators like shorebirds [55].

In our study, we use a series of laboratory experiments and field observations to determine whether and how M. similis infection intensity influences C. maenas physiology and/or behavior. Related to physiology, we investigate whether M. similis affects the mass and energy content of hepatopancreas and gonad tissues in the crab and whether the parasite stimulates immune activation via hemolymph cell counts. We also assess whether infected individuals exhibit behavioral response to infection, particularly focusing on consumption, shelter utilization, and conspicuous/active behaviors that could influence the crabs’ predation risk. Our results provide a baseline understanding of trematode-induced effects on this influential crab species in its oldest invaded range.

Methods

Infection Induction Experiment

In June 2012, we collected 72 male (n = 35) and female (n = 37) Carcinus maenas ranging from 45–70 (AVG ± SD: 59.34 ± 7.04) mm carapace width (CW) from Adams Point, Durham, NH, a site with naturally low trematode infection prevalence in both snail and crab hosts (<0.05%; [44, 56]). Field collections of green crabs at this site did not require specific permission, and green crabs are not an endangered species (they are a non-native, nuisance species in eastern North America). Live crabs were transported to the Shoals Marine Laboratory (SML) on Appledore Island (ME), where they were divided evenly by sex and size into three exposure and three control groups (n = 12 crabs per group). Each group was placed into a ~50 liter clear plastic aquarium containing ~20 liters of aerated seawater. Since metacercarial cyst infection intensity has been shown to positively correlate with physiological and behavioral effects in intermediate hosts (e.g., [42]), we induced a gradient of Microphallus similis infection in experimental groups by exposing them to trematode cercariae shed from naturally infected first-intermediate snail hosts, Littorina saxatilis and L. obtusata, for either 24, 72, or 120 hours. These periwinkle snails (n = 1800; >8mm shell length; AVG ± SD: 10.80 ± 1.66) were collected (under an annual collecting permit issued to SML by the state of Maine) from a relatively high trematode infection site on Appledore Island [57] and were divided into two batches (Batch-1 & Batch-2, n = 900 snails each) to induce cercarial emergence (shedding) via dessication ([23], pers. obs.). Snails were alternately dessicated every 24 hours, and then batches were pooled and randomly divided into three groups to spread out infected snails across experimental treatments. 300 of these snails were placed in each aquarium in a metal strainer covered with fine mesh and suspended at the top of the water column to contain and protect snails but also allow shed cercariae to swim downwards to crabs [58]. The three control aquaria contained empty metal strainers. Cercarial emergence was enumerated twice daily (0800h and 2000h) by pooling five 1-mL water samples from the four corners and center of the container and systematically scanning for cercariae under a stereomicroscope at 4x power (10x oculars) (S1 Fig). After morning cercarial counts, 50% water changes were performed. Following their allotted exposure times, crabs were removed from treatment aquaria, weighed and assessed for missing limbs. To eliminate cannibalism risk, crabs were placed into individual plastic aquaria (9.13"L x 6.00"W x 6.12"H) and submerged in a large flow-through sea table at SML for a four week ‘incubation’ period, which provided enough time for metacercarial cysts to reach patency and demonstrate a distinct cyst wall ([59], pers. obs.). During this time, crabs were fed locally-collected Ulva spp. ad libitum. This diet was chosen because it provided limited but sufficient resources for all crabs; moreover, we expected a non-animal diet would enhance detectable differences among treatments when mussels were later added during behavioral trials (see below) since crabs had been deprived of animal protein for four weeks.

Righting Response Trials

Two hours after the induction experiment described above, we performed righting response trials in a subset (n = 11; 5 exposed and 6 control) of the 72-h exposure group to explore whether infected crabs would differ in their ability to right themselves compared to uninfected crabs shortly after cercarial penetration of their tissues. For these trials, individual crabs were removed from the treatment aquaria, immediately placed dorsal side down in a ~40 liter container, and timed for how long it took them to flip back over or right themselves. Each crab was tested three times for an average righting time, and trials were suspended if a crab had not righted itself within five minutes. Results of average righting response times in infected versus uninfected crabs were analyzed using a t-test. This analysis and all subsequent statistical analyses were performed using JMP 9.0.2 (SAS Institute).

Behavioral Trials and Video Analysis

Behavior trials were conducted to explore whether infection intensity influenced crab behaviors related to foraging, shelter utilization, and/or conspicuousness. Following their 4-week ‘incubation’ period, 70 crabs (35 exposed, 35 control) were examined for behavior around the evening high tide (when crabs are often the most active; [60–62]). Experiments were carried out in experimental arenas (S2 Fig), consisting of two replicate ~40 liter plastic containers wrapped in black plastic (to limit light exposure) and filled with ~20 liters of aerated seawater. Crabs were paired so that an experimental trial and its control (e.g., 24-h exposed and 24-h control) were run at the same time. To simulate a natural shelter, a single rock standardized for size and dimensions was covered with 83g of Fucus vesiculosis attached using rubber-bands. Fucus fronds were unique for every trial, and rocks were reused after a thorough washing and drying outside for 24h. Shelters were placed at randomly alternated ends of the arena. Before each trial, crabs were acclimated to the arenas for 30 minutes. Following the acclimation period, five live individually-marked mussels ranging from 12-20mm (16.68 ± 2.41mm) shell length were added to the opposite end of the container from the shelter. Video cameras were mounted above the arenas, which were illuminated using red lighting, and crab behaviors were recorded for 30 minutes. Ten crabs were assessed each evening over a 7-day period. Water was changed completely between trials.

Each crab video (n = 68 due to two corrupted videos) was assessed by a single observer (AMHB). An ethogram (S1 File) was used to collect behavioral data every 30s for 30m (n = 60 data points) to provide a relative understanding of the proportion of time and the total amount of time (in seconds) crabs spent doing specific behaviors during the recording period. The recorded behaviors included active behaviors (walking, climbing on shelter, climbing up aquaria walls, actively handling or consuming mussels) and inactive behaviors (standing still, under shelter, on shelter, standing next to shelter). Each behavior was regressed with cyst abundance to look for correlations between infection intensity and the particular behavior, or a larger grouping of behaviors (e.g., active, inactive). We also regressed temporal data (in seconds) for three variables (search time for mussels, time spent in association with shelter, and handling time for each mussel and all mussels collectively) with cyst abundance. Finally, we regressed the total number of mussels eaten per crab at the end of the 30m period with cyst abundance to determine if infection intensity influenced mussel consumption.

Crab Dissections and Cyst Counts

Crabs were dissected the morning after their individual behavioral trials using protocols modified from [18, 44, 63]. Crabs were anaesthetized by freezing for 30m at 0°C and then dissected by separating the upper and lower carapace using a sterilized razor blade. A series of 10 tissue squashes—i.e., the amount of tissue needed to fill the area of a 22x22-mm glass cover slip—were removed from each crab to capture a large subset of the hepatopancreas (8 squashes), thoracic ganglion (1 squash), and gonad (1 squash). Squashes focused on the hepatopancreas because prior work found cysts to concentrate in this area [18, 44, 63]. Each squash slide was weighed and then viewed under a compound microscope at 4x (10x oculars) to enumerate all M. similis metacercarial cysts per squash using a handheld tally counter. Experimentally induced (new) cysts were easily differentiated from naturally acquired (old) cysts based on the presence of a thick cyst wall in old cysts as opposed to a very thin cyst wall in new cysts ([59]; S3 Fig). We rarely found old cysts in dissected crabs (<0.05% of all counted cysts), demonstrating very low initial metacercarial infection in crabs. Following cyst counts, all hepatopancreas and gonad tissues (including those scraped from slides) were removed from each crab and kept frozen for later physiological analyses (see below). In one heavily infected crab (>7000 counted cysts), we also took several photographs (n = 7) to estimate the percentage of internal space cysts may take up in an infected crab’s hepatopancreas (using ImageJ analysis). Finally, we gathered cyst intensity data from crabs collected at a local SML field site in 2012 (n = 4) and 2007 (n = 27) (the latter reported in [44]) to compare cyst intensities between experimentally-infected crabs in the lab and naturally infected crabs in the field. Total cyst abundance in naturally infected and experimentally infected crabs in each of the exposure treatments (controls, 24-h, 72-h, 120-h) were compared in a one-way ANOVA to test for differences in cyst intensity among the treatment groups.

Hepatosomatic and Gonadosomatic Indices and Estimation of Total Cyst Abundance and Mass

We separately dried the hepatopancreas, the gonads (male or female), and the remainder of the body of each crab (including the four naturally infected crabs from Appledore Island) at 70°C for 72h. Each component was then weighed using a digital scale. The hepatosomatic index (HSI) and the gonadosomatic index (GSI) were calculated as the ratio of dried hepatopancreas or gonad to the overall dried body weight of a crab [54] after subtracting off any metacercarial cyst mass. To determine metacercarial mass in the hepatopancreas, we used cyst abundance and hepatopancreas squash weights (g) to estimate the total number of cysts within the hepatopancreas using a conservative lower confidence interval from our calculations of the average number of cysts per gram of tissue. We then multiplied this lower-bound cyst estimate by a mass constant (7.23869*10–6 g) for a single metacercaria, which was determined by obtaining an average cyst diameter (0.303 ± 0.089) from several (n = 15) M. similis metacercarial cysts, converting that diameter to a volume, and then multiplying that volume by a typical density (1.1 g/cm3) for most tissues (as used in [22] for multiple metazoan parasites including metacercariae; R. Hechinger, pers. comm.). This formula therefore provided an estimate of the total wet weight of metacercariae within the hepatopancreas. However, because our total hepatopancreas weight for the crab was a dry mass, we determined the ratio of the total cyst wet mass to the total hepatopancreas wet mass from all squashes and then multiplied this by the hepatopancreas dry mass, thus providing a conservative estimate of the total dry weight of metacercarial cysts within a crab’s hepatopancreas. For the gonad, we had a single squash (which captured much, if not all, the gonad tissue within a crab), so counts from this one squash were used to estimate metacercarial weight in the gonad as described for the hepatopancreas.

Additionally, some crabs were missing walking legs or chelipeds when they were assessed for physiology and this can skew HSI and GSI estimates by reducing overall body mass used to calculate these indices. We therefore accounted for missing limbs by obtaining dry weights (g) of a subset (n = 31) of crab limbs (walking legs and chelipeds) and then regressing limb weights with CW (walking legs: R2 = 0.582; cheliped: R2 = 0.751) to obtain a regression formula that we used to calculate and replace the weight of lost limbs. After all these adjustments and conversions were made, HSI and GSI were then regressed with cyst abundance to determine if infection intensity influenced these physiological indices.

Calorimetry and Lipid Analyses

We determined the energy content of the hepatopancreas for the majority of the crabs (control = 18; 24-h = 10; 72-h = 12; 120-h = 10) using a 0.1g subsample of the hepatopancreas that was pressed into a firm pellet and combusted using a Parr 6725 semi-micro oxygen bomb calorimeter. This provided the mass-specific energy content; thus it was converted to the total energy of the hepatopancreas by multiplying it with the corrected hepatopancreas mass for each crab (where metacercariae mass was removed using our lower bound confidence interval of estimated metacercariae in the hepatopancreas; see methods above). In this analysis, we made the assumption that energy content of cyst tissue in the subsample was the same as crab tissue. We used a regression to determine any effects of cyst intensity on energy content in the hepatopancreas.

We also analyzed the bulk lipid content of the five most infected crabs (28,000 ± 17,000 cysts per g of hepatopancreas tissue) and the five least infected crabs (zero infection) to look for any differences related to infection status. We performed bulk lipid extraction on a 1g subsample of the hepatopancreas of each of these crabs, using a modified [64–65] method in which chloroform is replaced with hexanes [65]. The lipid contribution of these two groups (infected versus uninfected) were compared using a t-test. Because there was no difference in lipid content of these two extreme groups of crabs (see Results), lipids in the remaining crabs were not analyzed.

Immune Activation Assay

To assess whether exposure to trematode cercariae stimulated a cellular immune response in crab hosts, a separate group of control and exposed crabs were bled approximately 72h after trematode cercariae exposure and then again ~4 weeks after exposure. In each crab, undiluted hemolymph was withdrawn from under the unsclerotinized membrane of a single walking leg from 9 control and 10 exposed crabs using a sterile 23 gauge needle and a cold 10mL disposable syringe and deposited into a microcentrifuge tube on ice. Twenty microliters of hemolymph were immediately pipette-mixed into 100uL of cold marine anticoagulant solution (per [66]) and then distributed to two wells of a KOVA Glasstic gridded slide (Hycor), where they were photographed at 40x on a compound microscope for cell counts. We counted all hemocytes in a 0.33mm square (or 0.66mm square for lower-density samples) grid for six replicate pictures per crab to determine the mean density of hemocytes per μL of diluted hemolymph. We compared the density of circulating hemocytes in control and experimental groups separately for the 72-h and 4-week post-exposure groups using t-tests. Differences in the time hemolymph was collected (and of tidal cycle, which can influence hemocyte densities; [67]) for the two sampling periods (72h and 4 weeks) prevented us from directly comparing circulating hemocyte densities between the time periods.

Results

Below, we present our results for each experiment. We tested crab sex as a potential explanatory factor for all experiments, but in our exploratory analyses, we found few differences between the sexes, thus results below represent pooled data for males and females (unless otherwise stated).

Infection Induction Experiment

A subset of Littorina spp. exposure snails (n = 200) were dissected. Twenty-nine percent of these were infected with trematodes, and 9% were specifically infected with Microphallus similis. Each infected snail can contain hundreds of cercariae, and our cercarial emergence data (S1 Fig) demonstrated a continual supply of M. similis in the aquaria, especially in the mornings after dessicated snails had been added.

We found significant differences among infection intensities and exposure times in all tissues (hepatopancreas, gonad, and thoracic ganglion) across the 70 crabs (p<0.001), and a post-hoc Tukey’s test revealed a significantly (p<0.01) greater infection intensity for the 120-h exposure treatment compared to the 24-h and 72-h treatments, as well as all three controls; in addition, natural infections from Appledore Island in 2007 and 2012 were not significantly different from either the 24-h or 72-h treatments but were significantly lower than the 120-h treatment (Fig 2A). We also found crab carapace width (CW) to significantly correlate with infection intensity per gram of hepatopancreas tissue when an exponential distribution was modeled (AICc = 555; p = 0.0006, versus a linear distribution AICc = 619; p = 0.0163); i.e., larger crabs contained exponentially more cysts per gram of hepatopancreas than did smaller crabs (Fig 2B).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Average (± SE) infection intensity of metacercarial cysts in hepatopancreas, gonad, and thoracic ganglion tissues in each treatment and naturally at Appledore Island, ME and metacercarial cyst intensity per gram hepatopancreas tissue by crab carapace width (mm).

(a) Differences in capitalized letters above the bars indicate a significant difference in infection intensity (p<0.05) of counted cysts. Numbers above the control bars indicate the average infection intensities per control (all less than 1). LOW (24) and CONT (24) refer to the 24 hour infection treatment and its associated control; MED (72) and CONT (72) refer to the 72 hour infection treatment and its associated control; HIGH (120) and CONT (120) refer to the 120 hour infection treatment and its associated control; ‘LARUS’ refers to naturally infected crabs collected at Larus Ledge in 2007 and 2012 on Appledore Island, Isles of Shoals, ME. (b) There is a significant exponential relationship between crab size (CW) and cyst intensity per gram hepatopancreas.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674.g002

In many of the 72-h and 120-h crabs, we found numerous cysts in the thoracic ganglion, the crab’s nerve center. However, cyst abundance was positively correlated in pairwise comparisons of tissue types for all crabs (ganglion and hepatopancreas correlation = 0.776; p<0.0001; ganglion and gonad correlation = 0.387; p = 0.0007; hepatopancreas and gonad correlation = 0.368; p = 0.0013); as such, we pooled metacercarial counts into a single value for cyst infection intensity for the behavioral and physiological analyses below (unless otherwise stated). Finally, our analysis of the space cysts exploit in a heavily infected crab (>7000 counted cysts) suggested they could occupy 18–54% (36% ± 18%) of a crab’s hepatopancreas.

Righting Response Trials

We found a significant difference (p = 0.002) in the average righting response time of infected versus uninfected crabs (Fig 3). The average (±SE) righting time in seconds for infected individuals (125 ± 38) was 17 times higher than the average righting time for uninfected individuals (7 ± 3).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Average (± SE) righting response time (seconds) for uninfected and infected crabs from the 72h (medium) treatment.

This demonstrates the average time it took for crabs to right themselves after being placed on their dorsal side. These trials took place two hours after the 72h induction experiment ended, shortly after cercarial penetration of crab tissues.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674.g003

Behavioral Trials after Four Week Incubation

Regressions of cyst intensity with the various behaviors recorded in the ethogram (providing a relative understanding of the types and magnitudes of behaviors a crab performed in the thirty minute period) found no significant or strong correlations for individual behaviors or when behaviors were pooled into behavior types (shelter-use, foraging, active, inactive) (see S1 Table for a list of behaviors and regression statistics). Moreover, independently timed behaviors also demonstrated no correlation with cyst intensity, except for a significant positive correlation between average mussel handling time and infection intensity (R2 = 0.238; p<0.001) (Fig 4), and this correlation remained intact even when a possible outlier (a crab with ~6500 cysts) was removed (R2 = 0.123; p = 0.005). A principle components multivariate analysis using a correlation matrix (S4 Fig) also demonstrated mussel handling time to be the strongest correlative variable (0.488) of crab behavior with cyst intensity.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Regression of mussel handling time by metacercarial cyst intensity.

Metacercarial infection intensity represents actual counts. The regression remains significant with (R2 = 0.238; p<0.001) or without (R2 = 0.123; p = 0.005) the crab with 6500 cysts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674.g004

HSI and GSI, Calorimetry, and Lipid Analyses

There was no correlation between HSI and cyst intensity (R2 = 0.000; p = 0.996) (Fig 5A). For GSI, there was no correlation with cyst intensity when females and males were pooled (R2 = 0.052, p = 0.210) or separated (F: R2 = 0.125, p = 0.150; M: R2 = 0.099, p = 0.273) (Fig 5B–5D).There was also no significant effect of cyst intensity (R2 = 0.003, p = 0.727) on resulting calorimetry of the hepatopancreas. Moreover, in our lipid analysis of the five most infected versus five least infected crabs, there was no significant differences in the average % lipid content between the two groups (p = 0.280).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. Hepatosomatic index (HSI) and gonadosomatic index (GSI) analyses by cyst intensity (estimated metacercarial abundance).

Panel ‘a’ represents HSI for all crabs combined; ‘b’ represents GSI for all crabs combined; ‘c’ represents GSI for females only; ‘d’ represents GSI for males only. Cyst intensity for HSI is lower bound estimated hepatopancreas metacercarial cyst abundance, and cyst intensity for GSI is lower bound estimated gonad metacercarial cyst abundance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674.g005

Immune Activation

Exposure to trematode cercariae significantly depressed the density of circulating hemocytes in crabs sampled immediately after the 72-h exposure relative to controls (p<0.008; Fig 6). However, this trend did not persist for crabs sampled 4 weeks after exposure (p = 0.97).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 6. Average (± SE) hemocyte counts in crabs 72 hours after exposure and after the four week incubation period.

The grey bar is the control and the black bar is the experimental treatment showing circulating hemocytes per μL hemolymph from blood drawn for exposed and control crabs for two exposure periods. *refers to a significant difference (p<0.05) between the treatments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674.g006

Discussion

While prior investigations of host-trematode systems have found numerous intermediate hosts to be susceptible to trematode-mediated behavioral manipulations (e.g., [25]) and physiological impairment [33], we found little evidence for lasting physiological and behavioral impacts in parasitized crabs four weeks after experimental infection. In particular, none of the physiological indices (HSI or GSI), nor lipid or calorimetry analyses, demonstrated any significant correlations with cyst intensity. Specific to reproduction, a prior investigation of parasite influence in native and non-native populations of C. maenas also found no effect of microphallid trematode infection on a reproduction index in the crab [68]. Likewise, behavioral experiments demonstrated little effect of M. similis infection intensity on crab foraging, shelter-use, or conspicuousness four weeks after experimental infection, even though it was common to observe hundreds of cysts in the crab’s thoracic ganglia (nerve center) in highly infected individuals. Similarly, a different decapod species, the Dungeness crab (Cancer magister), demonstrated little behavioral response to metacercariae encysted within its nervous system (including the ganglia) [69]. However, our study did uncover a significant positive correlation between cyst intensity and crab handling time of mussels (i.e., the more infected a crab was, the longer it took (on average) to crush and consume mussels), and a multivariate PCA analysis confirmed this to be the strongest correlative variable with cyst intensity among all investigated behaviors. Interestingly, though handling time increased with infection intensity, we found no effect of intensity on the number of mussels consumed during our 30-minute observations (though a shorter observation period may have revealed an influence). In many mesopredators, longer prey handling times have been shown to enhance risk of predation, competition, wave dislodgement, among other biotic and abiotic factors in intertidal marine systems [70–73]. Moreover, trematode infection itself can influence host foraging; for example, due to enhanced handling time of larger prey items as a result of trematode parasitism, infected three-spined sticklebacks were observed to switch to smaller prey [74]. Moreover, infected individuals of the common periwinkle snail, Littorina littorea, demonstrated lower consumption rates of ephemeral algae compared to uninfected individuals, and this conferred a positive indirect effect on the prey, which had significantly greater percent cover in experimental plots compared to controls with uninfected snails [38]. Interestingly, an increase in mussel handling time has also been observed in C. maenas in its native range as a result of exposure to an environmental contaminant [75], and this could suggest analogous responses to different types of stressors.

Though our physiological and behavioral experiments demonstrated little effect of M. similis on C. maenas after the four week ‘incubation’ period, we found a strong signal of immune system activation in experimental crabs shortly after trematode exposure. In particular, we observed significantly fewer hemocytes (per μL) in hemolymph from exposed crabs compared to control crabs just 72 hours after exposure to cercariae. This drop in hemocyte density after exposure likely resulted from the recruitment of hemocytes to encysting metacercaria, as seen in histological studies of other trematode species in C. maenas and in other crab intermediate hosts [33, 76–77]. While this induced effect did not appear to exert a long term energy cost (i.e., there was no effect of infection on our measures of energy storage after four weeks), it is possible that it resulted in a shorter term energy expenditure as hemocytes were consumed and replenished during early stages of cercarial penetration [78–79]. Remarkably, this signal of immune activation in infected crabs had disappeared by four weeks, and the two groups showed similar circulating hemocyte densities. Likewise, a trematode infection experiment of an amphipod intermediate host found parasite-induced mortality to be highest during the first two days after exposure (i.e., while cercariae were actively penetrating and migrating through the host) and declined later on; mortality was also found to be intensity dependent [80]. It is possible that hemocyte production or changes in circulation are not particularly expensive in terms of resource diversion, as large fluctuations in circulating hemocyte densities have been associated with environmental contaminants, tidal fluctuations, and molt cycle in other decapods as well as in C. maenas [67, 81]. Overall, our finding of a significant but ephemeral negative impact of trematode exposure seems to suggest that the primary pathology for the second intermediate host occurs early in the infection process and declines after the trematode successfully encysts.

A second effect of M. similis infection shortly after cercarial penetration was a significantly slower righting response time in infected crabs, whereby infected individuals demonstrated greater lethargy than uninfected individuals. We also anecdotally noted enhanced lethargy in infected versus control crabs in the 120-h (high) infection treatment just after the induction experiment; however, these lethargic behaviors seemed to disappear over time, and by four weeks, heavily infected crabs qualitatively behaved similarly to control crabs. Slower righting response times due to environmental conditions like temperature, hypoxia, and chemical toxins have been observed in several species of crabs (e.g., [82–84]), and in Norway lobsters, infection by a parasitic dinoflagellate resulted in lower swimming capacity in infected versus uninfected individuals [85]. Overall, slower response times and increased lethargy could be detrimental to afflicted individuals that are less able to flee from predators, thereby increasing their predation risk [74, 86].

Another noteworthy aspect of our study was that we were able to clearly and significantly establish a gradient of infection based on exposure time to infected snails, where actual cyst counts ranged from approximately 20 to 7000 cysts (total estimates were 50 to >40,000 cysts) in the 24-h and 120-h treatments, respectively. In fact, we calculated that a heavily infected crab could have as much as 53% of its internal hepatopancreas tissue taken up by M. similis cysts. Even with such a significant space appropriation, the marginal lasting effects of cyst intensity we found in infected crabs may be partly attributed to a slowing of cyst growth at four weeks associated with a reduction in energy extraction that would have been much stronger during early stages of active cyst growth; i.e., [59] found M. similis cyst size to increase from 0.05 to 0.55 mm during cyst maturation, while in our study, we calculated cyst diameters at four weeks to be on average about 0.30 (±0.09 SD) mm. Thus, at this point of maturation, cysts will continue to grow but likely not as rapidly as early stages, which may also help explain why we observed a stronger influence of M. similis shortly after infection compared to four weeks later.

In our study, we also revealed a significant positive correlation between crab size and cyst intensity, and this correlation was stronger when fit to an exponential rather than a linear model. Positive correlations between size and infection intensity are common in trematode intermediate hosts, and a plausible explanation for this pattern is time; i.e., larger/older individuals have had more time to accrue infections [32, 57, 87–88]. In our study, however, time is not a relevant factor since the experiment was carried out over a <5 day period. While larger hosts naturally have greater space for more cysts, the exponential relationship we uncovered seems to suggest other factors may be involved. For example, host chemical cues are an important part of the infection process and may influence cercarial host-finding behavior [89–90] resulting in greater infection in certain size classes of intermediate hosts [23]. For C. maenas, larger crabs likely elicit the strongest chemical cues, possibly attracting more cercariae and enhancing infection intensity in larger individuals. Alternatively (or in addition to), cercariae could respond to cues from one another and demonstrate aggregation behaviors. Aggregation behaviors have been observed in many trematode species, and chemical communication among trematode larval stages is a potential mechanism for aggregation [74, 91–92]. In fact, aggregation may be adaptive due to the chance nature of infection; i.e., many cercariae die before they can infect a host [93], thus those that do successfully infect a second-intermediate host may aggregate to alleviate possible Allee effects when reaching the definitive host [92]. However, high intensities of infection with trematode metacercariae have also been correlated with smaller metacercarial size and lower fecundity in resulting adult worms, suggesting a density-dependent fitness cost to the parasite [30].

In conclusion, our study represents the first endeavor exploring both physiological and behavioral impacts of trematode parasitism in C. maenas, a highly successful global invader. Trematodes are a parasite group frequently associated with substantial host impacts, including tissue damage, reproductive damage, and parasite-increased trophic transmission [25, 33–35, 42]. However, our study revealed few significant effects of M. similis cyst intensity on C. maenas physiology or behavior, except at very early stages of infection. Once crabs surpassed those early stages, they seemed to “recover” and show few differences from uninfected crabs. Thus, even though C. maenas has failed to escape one of its most prevalent parasites in eastern North America [44], even high intensity infections of M. similis appear to have minimal long-term physiological or behavioral influences on the crab. This may suggest that, in some cases, the transfer or acquisition of certain parasites in marine NIS may do little to hinder an invasive host population, like green crabs in eastern North America. Further investigations throughout multiple non-native ranges where NIS are infected by few to no parasites can provide a greater understanding of the influence that parasite escape and parasite release may be having on worldwide populations of NIS, in general, and C. maenas specifically [18, 68].

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Cercarial emergence counts for Microphallus similis only (A) and all cercariae (B).

These counts were performed every 12h during the induction experiment for the two batches of snails (see methods) for the low treatment (diamond = 24 hour exposure), the medium treatment (square = 72 hour exposure), and the high treatment (triangle = 120 hour exposure). Each point represents five 1 ml replicate samples. ‘M’ stands for morning. Control treatments are not shown because all control aquaria had 0 cercariae for every sampling point.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Experimental arenas for behavioral trials.

A schematic of the experimental arena set-up including the shelter (Fucus-covered rock) and the food item (five mussels) is shown in (A). The actual set-up is shown in (B), including the two acclimation arenas on the left and the two experimental arenas on the right with video cameras mounted above the experimental arenas such that the whole arena could be recorded. After each trial, the video camera mount was moved to record crabs that had been acclimating in the other two arenas. Red lighting was used to illuminate the arenas for recording.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Naturally acquired (old) versus experimentally-induced (new) Microphallus similis metacercarial cysts in infected Carcinus maenas.

The image of the old cyst comes from a naturally infected crab at Appledore Island; old cysts are distinguished by a thick cyst wall. The new cyst image comes from an experimentally infected crab in a four-week old infection; newer cysts have a very thin cyst wall. Images taken by AMHB on a compound microscope at 4x magnification.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Principle Components Analysis (PCA) of Behavior Data.

Analysis is based upon a correlation matrix from the behavioral ethogram data. 45% of the variation is accounted for in PC1 and PC2. The highest correlation with cyst intensity (total cysts) was with mussel handling time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674.s004

(TIF)

S1 Table. Statistical results of video analyses for behavioral trials after four-week incubation.

Individual regressions with cyst intensity (total cyst abundance per crab) are reported for each of the recorded behaviors in the ethogram across all crabs. The ethogram data provide a relative understanding of the types and magnitudes of behaviors that crabs performed every 30s over the thirty minute recording period. Behaviors were independently assessed and also grouped into different categories, including all shelter related behaviors (walking/climbing on shelter, on shelter, under shelter, next to shelter), all foraging related behaviors (handling, cracking, and opening mussels and consuming mussels), active/conspicuous behaviors (walking, climbing walls, walking/climbing shelter, handling and consuming mussels), and inactive behaviors (standing, on shelter, under shelter, next to shelter). Timed behaviors (in seconds) are also recorded. These were behaviors that were independently timed during video analysis to assess the potential effect of cyst intensity on the total amount of time crabs spent at the shelter, the total amount of time it took for crabs to encounter a mussel (i.e., search time), and the handling time of mussels averaged across all handled mussels (out of 5 provided)—this latter analysis is listed twice to demonstrate the effect of removing a possible outlier (a crab with 6500 cysts) (see Fig 4). Finally, the proportion of mussels consumed (out of 5 provided) was also regressed with cyst intensity. Significant regressions are denoted by a (*) and are bolded.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674.s005

(PDF)

S1 File. Ethogram of crab behaviors during each 30 minute trial.

Column 1 includes each 30 second time points. Behaviors were then divided into different types depending on shelter or foraging. Any behaviors observed at each 30 second time point were marked and then the number of times these behaviors occurred within 30 minutes were tallied at the bottom.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128674.s006

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank the LIU-Post summer internship program for funding a student intern, Melanie Bram. We thank the Shoals Marine Laboratory (SML contribution #181) for use of facilities, equipment, and space. We thank C. Malcolm and M. Sanderson for their assistance on the project. We thank R. Hechinger and T. Huspeni for their advice; R. Houghton for creating the parasite life cycle diagram in Fig 1; and J. Williams and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable suggestions, which significantly improved the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AMHB CLK AEF BDG. Performed the experiments: AMHB CLK AEF BDG. Analyzed the data: AMHB CLK BDG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AMHB CLK BDG. Wrote the paper: AMHB CLK AEF BDG.

References

  1. 1. Brawley SH, Coyer JA, Blakeslee AMH, Hoarau G, Johnson LE, Byers JE, et al. Historical invasions of the intertidal zone of Atlantic North America associated with distinctive patterns of trade and emigration. PNAS. 2009; 106: 8239–8244. pmid:19416814
  2. 2. Levine JM, D'Antonio CM. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos. 1999; 15–26.
    • 3. Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Carlton JT, Wonham MJ, Hines AH. Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2000; 31; 481–531.
    • 4. Cohen AN, Carlton JT. Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science. 1998; 279: 555–558. pmid:9438847
    • 5. Glude JB. The effects of temperature and predators on the abundance of the soft-shell clam Mya arenaria in New England. Trans Am Fish Soc. 1955; 84: 13–26.
    • 6. Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM. Spread and potential impact of the recently introduced European green crab Carcinus maenas, in central California. 1995; Mar. Biol. 122: 239–247.
    • 7. Brousseau DJ, Filipowicz A, Baglivo JA. Laboratory investigations of the effects of predator sex and size on prey selection by the Asian crab, Hemigrapsus sanguineus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2001; 262: 199–210. pmid:11445087
    • 8. Walton WC, MacKinnon C, Rodriguez LF, Proctor C, Ruiz GM. Effect of an invasive crab upon a marine fishery: green crab, Carcinus maenas, predation upon a venerid clam, Katelysia scalarina, in Tasmania (Australia). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2002; 272: 171–189.
    • 9. Ross DJ, Johnson CR, Hewitt CL, Ruiz GM. Interaction and impacts of two introduced species on a soft-sediment marine assemblage in SE Tasmania. Mar Biol. 2004; 144: 747–756.
    • 10. Rudnick DA, Chan V, Resh VH. Morphology and impacts of the burrows of the Chinese Mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards (Decapoda, Grapsoidea), in south San Francisco Bay, California, U.S.A. Crustaceana. 2005; 78: 787–807.
    • 11. Hollebone AL, Hay ME. An invasive crab alters interaction webs in a marine community. Biol. Invas. 2008; 10: 347–358.
    • 12. Simberloff D, Martin JL, Genovesi P, Maris V, Wardle DA, Aronson J, et al. Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013; 28: 58–66. pmid:22889499
    • 13. Keane RM, Crawley MJ. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002; 17: 164–170.
    • 14. Torchin ME, Mitchell CE. Parasites, pathogens, and invasions by plants and animals. Front. Ecol. Env. 2004; 2: 183–190.
    • 15. Liu H, Stiling P. Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. Biol. Invas. 2006; 8: 1535–1545.
    • 16. Torchin ME, Lafferty KD, Dobson AP, Mckenzie VK, Kuris AM. Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature. 2003; 421: 628–630. pmid:12571595
    • 17. Blakeslee AMH, Fowler AE, Keogh CL. Marine invasions and parasite escape: updates and new perspectives. Adv. Mar. Biol. 2013; 66: 87–169 pmid:24182900
    • 18. Torchin ME, Lafferty KD, Kuris AM. Release from parasites as natural enemies: increased performance of a globally introduced marine crab. Biol. Inv. 2001; 3: 333–345.
    • 19. Innocenti G, Galil BS. Modus vivendi: invasive host/parasite relations—Charybdis longicollis Leene, 1938 (Brachyura: Portunidae) and Heterosaccus dollfusi Boschma, 1960 (Rhizocephala: Sacculinidae). Hydrobiol. 2007; 590: 95–101.
    • 20. Innocenti G, Pinter N, Galil BS. Observations on the agonistic behavior of the swimming crab Charybdis longicollis Leene infected by the rhizocephalan barnacle Heterosaccus dollfusi Boschma. Can. J. Zool. 2003; 81: 173–176.
    • 21. Innocenti G, Galil BS, Yokes MB, Diamant A, Goren M. Here and there: a preliminary note on the prevalence of an alien rhizocephalan parasite at the southern and northern limits of its introduced range. J. Parasitol. 2009; 95: 1387–1390. pmid:19530888
    • 22. Kuris AM, Hechinger RF, Shaw JC, Whitney KL, Aguirre-Macedo L, Boch CA, et al. Ecosystem energetic implications of parasite and free-living biomass in three estuaries. Nature. 2008; 454: 515–518. pmid:18650923
    • 23. Combes C, Fournier A, Mone H, Theron A. Behaviors in trematode cercariae that enhance parasite transmission—patterns and processes. Parasitol. 1994; 109: S3–S13
    • 24. Chubb JC, Ball MA, Parker GA. Living in intermediate hosts: evolutionary adaptations in larval helminths. Trends in Parasitol. 2010; 26: 93–102. pmid:20022560
    • 25. Lafferty KD. The evolution of trophic transmission. Parasitol. Tod. 1999; 15: 111–115.
    • 26. Threlfall W. Note on metacercariae of Spelotrema excellens Nicoll in Carcinus maenas (L.). J. exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1986; 2: 154–155.
    • 27. Strong PL, Cable RM. Fine structure and development of the metacercarial cyst in Microphallus opacus (Ward, 1894). J. Parasitol. 1972; 58: 92–98. pmid:4335049
    • 28. Heard RW, Overstreet RM. Taxonomy and life histories of two new North American species of "Carneophallus" (= Microphallus) (Digenea: Microphallidae). Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 1983; 50: 170–174.
    • 29. Meissner K, Bick A. Mortality of Corophium volutator (Amphipoda) caused by infestation with Maritrema subdolum (Digenea, Microphallidae)-laboratory studies. Dis Aquat Org. 1999; 35: 47–52.
    • 30. Fredensborg BL, Poulin R. Larval helminths in intermediate hosts: Does competition early in life determine the fitness of adult parasites? Internat. J. Parasitol. 2005; 35: 1061–1070. pmid:16019005
    • 31. Saville DH, Irwin SWB. A study of the mechanisms by which the cercariae of Microphallus primas (Jag, 1909) Stunkard, 1957 penetrate the shore crab, Carcinus maenas (L). Parasitology 2005; 131: 521–529. pmid:16174417
    • 32. Koehler AV, Poulin R. Host partitioning by parasites in an intertidal crustacean community. The J. Parasitol. 2010; 96: 862–868. pmid:20950092
    • 33. Robaldo RB, Monserrat J, Cousin JCB, Bianchini A. Effects of metacercariae (Digenea: Microphallidae) on the hepatopancreas of Chasmagnathus granulata (Decapoda: Grapsidae). Dis. Aquat. Org. 1999; 37: 153–157.
    • 34. Martorelli SR, Schuldt M. Encapsulation of metacercariae (Digenea, Microphallidae) in Cyrtograpsusangulatus and Palaemonetesargentinus (Crustacea, Decapoda). Revista De Biologia Tropical. 1990; 38: 295–304.
    • 35. Thieltges DW. Effect of infection by the metacercarial trematode Renicola roscovita on growth in intertidal blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2006; 319: 129–134.
    • 36. Milinski M. Parasitism and host decision-making. In: Barnard CJ, Behnke JM (eds) Parasites and host behaviour. 1990; Taylor and Francis, London, pp 95–116.
      • 37. Williams IC, Ellis C. Movements of the common periwinkle, Littorina littorea (L.), on the Yorkshire coast in winter and the influence of infection with larval Digenea. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1975; 17: 47–58.
      • 38. Wood CL, Byers JE, Cottingham KL, Altman I, Donahue MJ, Blakeslee AMH. Parasites alter community structure. PNAS. 2007; 104: 9335–9339. pmid:17517667
      • 39. Hansen EK, Poulin R. Impact of a microphallid trematode on the behaviour and survival of its isopod intermediate host: phylogenetic inheritance? Parasitol. Res. 2005; 97: 242–246. pmid:15997403
      • 40. Choisy M, Brown SP, Lafferty KD, Thomas F. Evolution of trophic transmission in parasites: why add intermediate hosts? Am. Nat. 2003; 162: 172–181. pmid:12858262
      • 41. Lafferty KD, Kuris AM. Parasitic castration: the evolution and ecology of body snatchers. Trends in Parasitol. 2009; 25: 564–572. pmid:19800291
      • 42. Lafferty KD, Morris AK. Altered behavior of parasitized killifish Increases susceptibility to predation by bird final hosts. Ecol. 1996; 77: 1390–1397.
      • 43. Carlton JT, Cohen AN. Episodic global dispersal in shallow water marine organisms: the case history of the European shore crabs Carcinus maenas and C. aestuarii. J. Biogeogr. 2003; 30: 1809–1820.
      • 44. Blakeslee AMH, Keogh CL, Byers JE, Kuris AM, Lafferty KD, Torchin ME. Differential escape from parasites by two competing introduced crabs. 2009; Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 393: 83–96.
      • 45. Richards MG, Huxham M, Bryant A. Predation: a causal mechanism for variability in intertidal bivalve populations. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 1999; 241: 159–177.
      • 46. Whitlow WL, Rice NA, Sweeney C. Native species vulnerability to introduced predators: testing an inducible defense and a refuge from predation. Biol Invas. 2003; 5: 23–31.
      • 47. Griffen BD, Byers JE. Community impacts of two invasive crabs: the interactive roles of density, prey recruitment, and indirect effects. Biol Invas. 2009; 11:027–940
      • 48. Werner M. Prevalence of the parasite Sacculina carcini Thompson 1836 (Crustacea, Rhizocephala) on its host crab Carcinus maenas (L.) on the west coast of Sweden. Ophelia. 2001; 55: 101–110.
      • 49. Goddard JH, Torchin ME, Kuris AM, Lafferty KD. Host specificity of Sacculina carcini, a potential biological control agent of the introduced European green crab Carcinus maenas in California. Biol. Invas. 2005; 7: 895–912.
      • 50. Mouritsen KN, Jensen T. The effect of Sacculina carcini infections on the fouling, burying behaviour and condition of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. Mar. Biol. Res. 2006; 2: 270–275.
      • 51. Roman J. Diluting the founder effect: cryptic invasions expand a marine invader's range. Proc. Royal Soc. B. 2009; 273: 2453–2459.
      • 52. Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM. Predicting the impact of introduced species: lessons from the multiple invasions of the European green crab. Biol. Conserv. 1996; 78: 59–66.
      • 53. Lohrer AM, Whitlatch RB. Interactions among aliens: apparent replacement of one exotic species by another. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2002; 83: 719–732.
      • 54. Griffen BD, Altman I, Hurley J, Mosblack H. Reduced fecundity by one invader in the presence of another: A potential mechanism leading to species replacement. J. Exper. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2011; 406: 6–13.
      • 55. Ellis JC, Chen W, O'Keefe B, Shulman M J, Witman JD. Predation by gulls on crabs in rocky intertidal and shallow subtidal zones of the Gulf of Maine. J. Exper. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2005; 324: 31–43.
      • 56. Blakeslee AMH, Byers JE. Using parasites to inform ecological history: comparisons among three congeneric marine snails. Ecol. 2008; 89: 1068–1078. pmid:18481531
      • 57. Byers JE, Blakeslee AMH, Linder E, Cooper AB, Maguire TJ. Controls of spatial variation in the prevalence of trematode parasites infecting a marine snail. Ecol. 2008; 89: 439–451.
      • 58. McCarthy HO, Fitzpatrick S, Irwin SWB. Life history and life cycles: production and behavior of trematode cercariae in relation to host exploitation and next-host characteristics. J. Parasitol. 2002; 88: 910–918. pmid:12435129
      • 59. Stunkard HW. The morphology and life history of the digenetic trematode, Microphallus similis (Jagerskiold, 1900) Baer, 1943. Biol. Bull. 1957; 112: 254–266.
      • 60. Lindberg WJ. Behavior of the Oregon mud crab Hemigrapsus oregonensis (Dana) (Brachyura, Grapsidae). Crustaceana. 1980; 39: 262–280.
      • 61. Batie RE. Rhythmic locomotor activity in the intertidal shore-crab Hemigrapsus oregonensis (Brachyura, Grapsidae) from the Oregon Coast. NW Sci. 1983; 57: 49–56.
      • 62. Saigusa M, Kawagoye O. Circatidal rhythm of an intertidal crab, Hemigrapsus sanguineus: synchrony with unequal tide height and involvement of a light response mechanism. Mar Biol. 1997; 129: 87–96.
      • 63. Torchin ME, Lafferty KD, Kuris AM. Parasites and marine invasions. Parasitol. 2002; 124: S137–151.
      • 64. Folch J, Lees M, Stanley GHS. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957; 226, 497–509. pmid:13428781
      • 65. Hara A, Radin NS. Lipid extraction of tissues with a low toxicity solvent. Analyt. Biochem. 1978; 90: 420–426. pmid:727482
      • 66. Dittmer J, Koehler AV, Richard FJ, Poulin R, Sicard M. Variation of parasite load and immune parameters in two species of New Zealand shore crabs. 2011; Parasitol. Res. 109: 759–767. pmid:21400115
      • 67. Truscott R, White KN. The influence of metal and temperature stress on the immune system of crabs. Funct. Ecol. 1990; 4: 455–461.
      • 68. Zetlmeisl C, Hermann J, Petney T, Glenner H, Griffiths C, Taraschewski H. Parasites of the shore crab Carcinus maenas (L.): implications for reproductive potential and invasion success. Parasitology 2011; 138: 394–401. pmid:20880423
      • 69. Sparks AK, Hibbits J. A trematode metacercaria encysted in the nerves of the Dungeness crab, Cancer magister. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1981; 38: 88–93.
      • 70. Menge JL. Prey selection and foraging period of the predaceous rocky intertidal snail, Acanthina punctulata. Oecologia 1974; 17: 293–316.
      • 71. Elner RW, Raffaelli DG. Interactions between two marine snails, Littorina rudis Maton and Littorina nigrolineata Gray, a predator, Carcinus maenas (L.), and a parasite, Microphallus similis Jägerskiold. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1980; 43: 151–160.
      • 72. Hughes RN, Dunkin SDB. Behavioural components of prey selection by dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus (L.), feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis L., in the laboratory. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1984; 77: 45–68.
      • 73. Richardson TD, Brown KM. Wave exposure and prey size selection in an intertidal predator. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1990; 142: 105–120.
      • 74. Barber I, Crompton DWT. The distribution of the metacercariae of Diplostomum phoxini in the brain of minnows, Phoxinus phoxinus. Parasitologica. 1997; 44: 19–25. pmid:9229570
      • 75. Dissanayake A, Piggott C, Baldwin C, Sloman KA. Elucidating cellular and behavioural effects of contaminant impact (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, PAHs) in both laboratory-exposed and field-collected shore crabs, Carcinus maenas (Crustacea Decapoda). Mar. Environ. Res. 2010; 70: 368–373. pmid:20727579
      • 76. Stentiford GD, Feist SW. A histopathological survey of shore crab (Carcinus maenas) and brown shrimp (Crangon crangon) from six estuaries in the United Kingdom. J. Invert. Path. 2005; 88: 136–146.
      • 77. Pina S, Russell-Pinto F, Rodrigues P. Morphological and molecular study of Microphallus primas (Digenea: Microphallidae) metacercaria, infecting the shore crab Carcinus maenas from northern Portugal. Folia Parasitologica. 2011; 58: 48–54. pmid:21539138
      • 78. Kraaijeveld AR, Limentani EC, Godfray HCJ. Basis of the trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 2001; 268: 259–261.
      • 79. Rolff J, Siva-Jothy MT. Invertebrate ecological immunology. Science. 2003; 301: 472–475. pmid:12881560
      • 80. Fredensborg BL, Mouritsen KN, Poulin R. Intensity-dependent mortality of Paracalliope novizealandiae (Amphipoda: Crustacea) infected by a trematode: experimental infections and field observations. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2004; 311: 253–265.
      • 81. Johansson MW, Keyser P, Sritunyalucksana K, Soderhall K. Crustacean haemocytes and haematopoiesis. Aquaculture. 2000; 191: 45–52.
      • 82. Rebach S. Burying behavior in relation to substrate and temperature in the hermit crab, Pagurus longicarpus. Ecol. 1974; 55: 195–198.
      • 83. Warrenchuk JJ, Shirley TC. Effects of windchill on the snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio). Crabs in Cold Water Regions: Biology, Management, and Economics. 2002; 19: 81–96.
      • 84. Small D, Calosi P, White D, Spicer JI, Widdicombe S. Impact of medium-term exposure to CO2 enriched seawater on the physiological functions of the velvet swimming crab Necora puber. Aquat Biol. 2010; 10: 11–21.
      • 85. Stentiford GD, Neil DM, Atkinson RJA, Bailey N. An analysis of swimming performance in the Norway lobster, Nephrops norvegicus L. infected by a parasitic dinoflagellate of the genus Hematodinium. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2000; 247: 169–181. pmid:10742502
      • 86. Johnson PT. The effect of trematode infection on amphibian limb development and survivorship. Science. 1999; 284: 802–804. pmid:10221912
      • 87. Poulin R. Variation in the intraspecific relationship between fish length and intensity of parasitic infection: biological and statistical causes. J. Fish Biol. 2000; 56: 123–137.
      • 88. De Montaudouin X, Jensen KT, Desclaux C, Wegeberg AM, Sajus MC. Effect of intermediate host size (Cerastoderma edule) on infectivity of cercariae of Himasthla quissetensis (Echinostomatidae: Trematoda). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK. 2005; 85: 809–812.
      • 89. Haas W, Stiegeler P, Keating A, Kullmann B, Rabenau H, Schönamsgruber E, et al. Diplostomum spathaceum cercariae respond to a unique profile of cues during recognition of their fish host. Intern. J. Parasitol. 2002; 32: 1145–1154.
      • 90. Haas W. Parasitic worms: strategies of host finding, recognition and invasion. Zool. 2003; 106: 349–364.
      • 91. Fried B. Chemical communication in hermaphroditic digenetic trematodes. J. Chem. Ecol. 1986; 12: 1659–1677. pmid:24305884
      • 92. Neal AT, Poulin R. Substratum preference of Philophthalmus sp. cercariae for cyst formation under natural and experimental conditions. J. Parasitol. 2012; 98: 293–298. pmid:22519811
      • 93. Kaplan AT, Rebhal S, Lafferty KD, Kuris AM. Small estuarine fishes feed on large trematode cercariae: lab and field investigations. J. Parasitol. 2009; 95: 477–480. pmid:18763852