Figures
Abstract
Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. (2n = 28, PPPP), a wild relative of common wheat, possesses many potentially valuable traits that can be transferred to common wheat through breeding programs. The wheat-A. cristatum disomic addition and translocation lines can be used as bridge materials to introduce alien chromosomal segments to wheat. Wheat-A. cristatum 2P disomic addition line II-9-3 was highly resistant to powdery mildew and leaf rust, which was reported in our previous study. However, some translocation lines induced from II-9-3 have not been reported. In this study, some translocation lines were induced from II-9-3 by 60Co-γ irradiation and gametocidal chromosome 2C and then identified by cytological methods. Forty-nine wheat-A. cristatum translocation lines were obtained and various translcoation types were identified by GISH (genomic in situ hybridization), such as whole-arm, segmental and intercalary translocations. Dual-color FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) was applied to identify the wheat chromosomes involved in the translocations, and the results showed that A. cristatum 2P chromosome segments were translocated to the different wheat chromosomes, including 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A, 6A, 7A, 3B, 5B, 7B, 1D, 4D and 6D. Many different types of wheat-A. cristatum alien translocation lines would be valuable for not only identifying and cloning A. cristatum 2P-related genes and understanding the genetics and breeding effects of the translocation between A. cristatum chromosome 2P and wheat chromosomes, but also providing new germplasm resources for the wheat genetic improvement.
Citation: Li H, Lv M, Song L, Zhang J, Gao A, Li L, et al. (2016) Production and Identification of Wheat-Agropyron cristatum 2P Translocation Lines. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0145928. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145928
Editor: Tianzhen Zhang, Nanjing Agricultural University, CHINA
Received: August 27, 2015; Accepted: December 10, 2015; Published: January 5, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by the grant of the National High Technology Research and Development Program (“863” Program) of China (No. 2011AA100102) and the National Scientific and Technological Supporting Program of China (No. 2013BAD01B02). WHL received the fundings. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), widely planted in different parts of the world, is the third most important cereal behind maize and rice. However, modern breeding was challenged by the narrow genetic variation [1,2], which affected further improvements in wheat yield and quality. Wild relatives of wheat possessed many desirable and valuable traits that could be used as gene resources for wheat improvement [3–5]. For example, Agropyron cristatum chromosome 6P with the genes controlling large numbers of florets and kernels per spike and multiple fertile tiller numbers per plant [6,7]; Dasypyrum villosum chromosome 1V including the seed storage protein genes [8]; Thinopyrum ponticum containing stem rust resistance gene Sr43 on chromosome 7E [9]; Psathyrostachys huashanica chromosome 3Ns with the gene(s) for resistance to stripe rust [10]. Distant hybridization, including interspecific and intergeneric, was the first step to introduce elite alien genes to wheat. Many materials produced from distant hybridization, including amphidiploids and addition, substitution, as well as translocation lines with desirable exogenous genes, were considered as immediate materials for transferring alien chromosomal segments into wheat [11].
As one of the important wild relative genera of wheat, Agropyron Gaertn. possesses a basic P genome [12] and contains a large number of useful agronomical traits for wheat improvement, such as resistance to powdery mildew, barley yellow dwarf virus, leaf rust, stripe rust and stem rust [12–18], tolerance to drought [15,19] and low temperature [20], as well as more fertile tiller numbers per plant, spikelets and florets than wheat [7,12]. Therefore, the P genome can be used as a donor to provide desirable genes for wheat genetic improvement. To introduce these favorable genes to wheat, many domestic and international researchers have crossed Agropyron species with wheat. Smith and White [21,22] first began distant hybridization between Agropyron and wheat in the 1940s. Chen et al. [23] successfully hybridized Triticum aestivum Chinese Spring and tetraploid Agropyron for the first time in 1989. Li et al. [24–27] synthesized a series of intergeneric hybrids through wide hybridization and embryo rescue, and then obtained an array of wheat-A. cristatum addition lines. The production of wheat-A. cristatum disomic addition lines will be helpful for not only understanding the genetic constitution and genetic effects of the P-genome chromosomes under the background of common wheat but also providing the possibility of introducing A. cristatum genes into wheat for genetic improvement.
The alien disomic addition lines introduce some unfavorable genes for agronomic and end-use quality traits because of the ‘linkage drag’ during the introduction of the desirable gene. At the same time, the low fertility and genetic instability of alien addition lines make them unlikely to be directly useful in crop production [28]. Translocation lines, particularly some with small alien segments, were usually considered to be more stable and desirable because they lacked any linkage drag. Therefore, development of wheat-A. cristatum translocations makes it possible to transfer agronomically useful genes to wheat. Wheat-A. cristatum 6P translocation lines have been already obtained via the wheat-A. cristatum disomic addition line as a bridge material to introduce large numbers of florets and kernels per spike into wheat [6,29,30]. The development of wheat-A. cristatum 1.4P translocation lines makes it possible to introduce drought and cold tolerance genes to wheat [31]. A compensating Robertsonian translocation has been developed between A. cristatum and wheat, and it could be a useful source of leaf rust resistance in wheat [16].
It was observed that Triticum aestivum cv. ‘Fukuhokomugi’-A. cristatum 2P alien disomic addition line II-9-3 showed high resistance to powdery mildew and leaf rust compared with ‘Fukuhokomugi’ in our laboratory (Submitted). Therefore, the production of wheat-A. cristatum 2P translocation lines may transfer genes conferring resistance to powdery mildew and leaf rust from chromosome 2P into wheat.
The aim of this study was to produce various types of wheat-A. cristatum 2P translocation lines induced by 60Co-γ irradiation and gametocidal chromosomes 2C, and identify and characterize these translocation lines by GISH/FISH. These newly developed translocation lines will not only lay a solid groundwork for taking advantage of desirable genes on the chromosome 2P for wheat improvement, but also provide novel germplasms and valuable materials for studying gene expression, balance and interaction between different 2P chromosome segments of A. cristatum and common wheat.
Materials and Methods
Plant materials
Wheat-A. cristatum 2P disomic addition line II-9-3 (2n = 44) was obtained by hybridization between A. cristatum accession Z559 (2n = 4x = 28, PPPP, from Xinjiang, China) and Triticum aestivum cv. ‘Fukuhokomugi’ (2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD) and was inherited stably through several generations of backcrosses. This line was obtained and provided by Dr. Lihui Li of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. T. aestivum cv. ‘Chinese Spring’-Aegilops cylindrica Host 2C addition lines (CS-G2C) (2n = 44) were provided by Professor Jilin Li of Harbin Normal University, China.
Induction techniques and cross combination
Wheat-A. cristatum 2P disomic addition line II-9-3 was overwintered in the field and transplanted into pots before jointing. The plants at the booting stage were irradiated with 60Co gamma rays at a dose of 20 Gray (Gy) and a dose rate of 0.5 Gy/min at the cobalt source chamber of Beijing University [30]. Fresh pollen collected from the donor parent ‘Fukuhokomugi’ was used to pollinate the irradiated spikes of addition line II-9-3, which had been artificially emasculated 1–3 days prior. Mature hybrid seeds were harvested and used to produce a M1BC1 population. Pollen collected from ‘Fukuhokomugi’ was used to pollinate the untreated spikes of wheat-A. cristatum 2P disomic addition line II-9-3 as a control.
Crosses were carried out using the CS-G2C addition line as the female parent and the wheat-A. cristatum 2P disomic addition line II-9-3 as the male parent. Mature hybrid seeds were harvested and selfed to produce a F2 population.
All the materials surveyed in this study were planted at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science Experiment Station in Beijing (39°57'13"N, 116°19'20"E) during the 2013–2014 growing season.
Chromosome preparation
The exposed seeds were dipped into water in Petri dishes with double moistened filter papers at room temperature for one day, and then the water was absorbed by dry filter papers. The seeds were transferred into a refrigerator at 4°C for 48 h and germinated at 23°C in an incubator. Roots were sampled when the length of the roots was approximately 1.5–2.0 cm; these samples were pretreated in ice water for 24–48 h, fixed in a solution of absolute ethanol-acetic acid (3:1, v:v) at 4°C for 48 h, and then kept in 70% ethanol solution at -20°C. The chromosome slides were treated with 45% glacial acetic acid [32]. Cytological observations were made under a BX51 Olympus phase contrast microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan), and the images were captured using a digital camera. The slides were fixed using ultraviolet light in a TL-2000 Ultraviolet Translinker (Japan) for one minute when needed for GISH detection.
GISH analysis
GISH was used to analyse the mitotic metaphase cells of the materials used in this study. A. cristatum and ‘Fukuhokomugi’ genomic DNA was isolated by a modified CTAB (hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) method [33]. The purity and concentration of DNA were measured using a spectrophotometer. The P-genomic DNA and ‘Fukuhokomugi’ genomic DNA were used as probe and block, at a ratio of 1:40, respectively, to identify the A. cristatum chromosomal fragments. The total genomic DNA of A. cristatum was labelled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP and used as a probe for GISH. The GISH procedure followed that described by Liu et al. [31]. The GISH images were observed under a Nikon Eclipse E600 (Japan) fluorescence microscope and captured with a CCD camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc., Sterling Heights, MI, USA).
FISH analysis
FISH was used to characterize the translocated wheat chromosome, and dual-color FISH/GISH was employed by using repetitive DNA clones, i.e., pAs1, pHvG39, pSc119.2 and the total genomic DNA of A. cristatum as probes. The clones pAs1, pHvG39 and pSc119.2 were labelled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP, biotin-16-dUTP and biotin-16-dUTP, respectively, and were used as probes for dual-color FISH. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole). The hybridization signals were examined using a Nikon Eclipse E600 (Japan) fluorescence microscope, and the FISH images were captured using a CCD camera. After FISH, the hybridization signals were washed with PBS (phosphate-buffered saline). The total genomic DNA of A. cristatum was labelled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP as a probe for subsequent GISH. Finally, according to the two hybridization results for the same cell, the homoeologous groups of the translocated wheat chromosomes were analysed by reference to the standard idiogram of the chromosomes of Chinese Spring wheat showing the locations of FISH signals [34,35].
Results
GISH detection of M1BC1 and F2 plants induced by 60Co-γ irradiation and gametocidal chromosome 2C
The GISH results were shown in Table 1. GISH analysis of 263 M1BC1 progenies from 60Co-γ irradiation showed that 39 plants had translocations between chromosome 2P and the wheat chromosomes, 204 plants had a whole chromosome 2P and 20 plants had no chromosome 2P. The translocation frequency induced by irradiation was 14.83%.
Among the 148 F2 hybrid progenies of the CS-G2C and wheat-A. cristatum 2P addition lines, 51 plants had P chromosomal segments, accounting for 34.46% of the examined plants. Among them, there were 10 translocated plants (6.76%), 4 double P fragments addition plants (2.70%) and 37 single P fragment addition plants (25.00%). At the same time, neither translocations nor any other types of chromosomal structural changes were detected in any of the wheat-A. cristatum 2P disomic addition line/‘Fukuhokomugi’ F1 plants (control). This indicated that the translocation lines in this experiment totally resulted from the irradiation and gametocidal chromosome effect. Moreover, the frequency of alien translocation induced by irradiation was significantly higher than that induced by gametocidal chromosome 2C.
The alien translocation types and frequencies of the M1BC1 and F2 progenies
Among the 411 M1BC1 and F2 progenies, 49 translocation plants were verified and various translocation types were obtained. The translocation types and frequencies between wheat and A. cristatum 2P chromosomes were shown in Table 2. The translocation plants were divided into two categories: the translocation plants with or without an intact chromosome 2P.
There were 3 alien translocation plants with one intact 2P, including one plant (2.04%) with both small and large alien segmental translocation, as well as 2 plants (4.08%) with small alien segmental translocation (Fig 1A). There were 46 alien translocation plants without one intact 2P: 2 plants (4.08%) having large alien segmental and whole-arm translocation (Fig 1B), 10 plants (20.41%) having both large and small alien segmental reciprocal translocation (Fig 1C), 10 plants (20.41%) having large alien segmental translocation (Fig 1D), 1 plant (2.04%) with two small alien segmental and two intercalary translocations, 1 plant (2.04%) with two small alien segmental and one intercalary translocation (Fig 1E), 2 plants (4.08%) with two whole-arm reciprocal translocation (Fig 1F), 2 plants (4.08%) having small alien segmental and whole-arm translocation (Fig 1G), 1 plant (2.04%) with whole-arm and intercalary translocation (Fig 1H), 5 plants (10.20%) with small alien segmental translocation, 7 plants (14.29%) with whole-arm translocation (Fig 1I) and 3 plants (6.12%) with intercalary translocation. Moreover, we found 2 chimeras in plants 2P-189 and 2P-192. Plant 2P-189 had a whole-arm (Fig 1J1) or large and small alien segmental reciprocal translocation (Fig 1J2) in different root tip cells. Plant 2P-192 had a deletion (Fig 1K1) or intercalary translocation and deletion (Fig 1K2) in different root tip cells.
A. cristatum genomic DNA was labelled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP red fluorescence and the wheat DNA was counterstained with DAPI blue fluorescence. Arrows show the translocated chromosomes. A: Small alien segmental translocation and a 2P chromosome. B: Large alien segmental and whole-arm translocation. C: Large and small alien segmental translocation. D: Large alien segmental translocation. E: Two small alien segmental and intercalary translocation. F: Whole-arm reciprocal translocation. G: Whole-arm and small alien segmental translocation. H: Whole arm and intercalary translocation. I: Whole-arm translocation. J1: Whole-arm translocation. J2: Large and small alien segmental translocation. K1: Deletion. K2: Intercalary translocation and deletion. TL: Translocation line.
In this paper, we reported 74 translocated chromosomes including 24 large alien segmental translocations (LASTs), 25 small alien segmental translocations (SASTs), 8 intercalary translocations (ITs) and 17 whole arm translocations (WATs) (Fig 2). This result showed an ascending order of IT < WAT < LAST ≈ SAST in the occurrence frequency (Table 3). The ratio of SASTs (33.78%), which was the highest, was similar to that of LASTs (32.43%), indicating that SASTs and LASTs were easier to obtain. The ratio of ITs accounted for only 10.81% of the total translocations, indicating that intercalary translocations were the most difficult types to induce. At the same time, 74 translocated chromosomes differed in length. It showed that 60Co-γ irradiation and gametocidal chromosome 2C can randomly cause chromosome breakages and the breakpoints also tended to distribute randomly.
The P-genomic DNA signal was red (wheat DNA was stained blue by DAPI). A: Large alien segmental translocation containing the whole 2P chromosome long arm. B: Large alien segmental translocation containing the whole 2P chromosome short arm. C: Small alien segmental translocation containing the partial 2P chromosome long arm. D: Small alien segmental translocation containing the partial 2P chromosome short arm. E: Whole arm translocation containing the whole 2P chromosome long arm. F: Whole arm translocation containing the whole 2P chromosome short arm. G: Intercalary translocation.
The 74 translocated chromosomes involved 82 breakage-fusion events, including 65 in interstitial regions (79.27%) and 17 in centric regions (20.73%) (Table 3; Fig 2), indicating that 60Co-γ irradiation and gametocidal chromosome 2C had very high efficiency in inducing interstitial breakage. Sixty-six translocations (89.8%, including 17 WATs, 24 LASTs and 25 SASTs) involved one-breakage fusion events, while only 8 ITs involved two-breakage fusion events. This indicated that the major effect of irradiation and gametocidal chromosome 2C was to induce one-breakage fusion events.
Identification of the wheat translocated chromosomes with A. cristatum chromosome 2P
To identify the wheat translocated chromosomes with A. cristatum chromosome 2P, dual-color FISH/GISH was performed in wheat root-tip cells. The FISH results were shown in Table 4. Twenty-three types of translocated chromosomes were identified in the eighteen wheat-A. cristatum alien chromosomal translocation lines. A. cristatum 2P chromosome fragments were translocated with wheat chromosomes 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A, 6A, 7A, 3B, 5B, 7B, 1D, 4D and 6D.
We performed dual-color FISH/GISH using P genomic DNA and the clone pAs1 labelled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP, the clones pHvG39 and pSc119.2 labelled with biotin-16-dUTP. Plant 2P-23 has 2 translocated chromosomes; the small alien segmental translocation of 2P-23 showed an obvious green fluorescent signal near the centromeric region of the short arm and a faint green signal in the middle of the long arm; the arm ratio is large. Accordingly, it was a 5BS.L-2P translocation with a small 2P fragment. Further, the large alien segmental translocation of 2P-23 exhibited a faint green signal at the end of the arm; it was a 3A-2P translocation with a large 2P fragment (Fig 3A1 and 3A2). Plant 2P-35 contained a 7A-2PL.2PS-7A intercalary translocation (Fig 3B1 and 3B2). Plant 2P-40 contained a 4DL.4DS-2PL small-segment translocation (Fig 3C1 and 3C2). Plant 2P-43 contained a 1A-2PS whole-arm translocation (Fig 3D1 and 3D2). Plant 2P-48 was a dual heterozygous translocation plant containing 1D-2PL and 7A-2PS (Fig 3E1 and 3E2). Plant 2P-55 had a 5A-2P reciprocal translocation with 2P fragments (Fig 3F1 and 3F2). Plant 2P-80 contained a 3A-2PL whole-arm translocation (Fig 3G1 and 3G2). Plant 2P-116 contained a 7B-2P small-segment translocation (Fig 3H1 and 3H2). Plant 2P-122 contained a 4AL.4AS-2PL small-segment translocation (Fig 3I1 and 3I2). Plant 2P-167 contained a 6AS.6AL-2PL small-segment translocation (Fig 3J1 and 3J2). Plant 2P-173 contained a 6DS.6DL-2PL small-segment translocation (Fig 3K1 and 3K2). Plant 2P-187 was a 3A-2PS.2PL large-segment translocation with a large 2P segment (Fig 3L1 and 3L2). Plant 2P-190 was a dual heterozygous translocation plant containing 2A-2PL and 7A-2PS (Fig 3M1 and 3M2). Plant 2P-205 contained a 4D-2PL whole-arm translocation (Fig 3N1 and 3N2). Plant 2P-213 contained a 3B-2PL whole-arm translocation (Fig 3O1 and 3O2). Plant 2P-269 was a 7A-2PS.2PL large-segment translocation with a large 2P segment (Fig 3P1 and 3P2). Plant 2P-355 was a 4D-2PS.2PL large-segment translocation with a large 2P segment (Fig 3Q1 and 3Q2). Plant 2P-367 had a 5A-2P reciprocal translocation with 2P fragments (Fig 3R1 and 3R2).
A1-R1: GISH patterns of wheat-A. cristatum translocation lines. Total genomic DNA of A. cristatum was labelled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP and visualized with red fluorescence. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI and visualized with blue fluorescence. A2-R2: FISH patterns of wheat-A. cristatum translocation lines. A2-N2, P2-R2: The repetitive sequence clone pHvG39 was labelled with biotin-16-dUTP and visualized with green fluorescence; O2: The repetitive sequence clone pSc119.2 was labelled with biotin-16-dUTP and visualized with green fluorescence. The repetitive sequence clone pAs1 was labelled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP and visualized with red fluorescence. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI and visualized with blue fluorescence. Arrows point to the translocated chromosomes. A. 2P-23; B. 2P-35; C. 2P-40; D. 2P-43; E. 2P-48; F. 2P-55; G. 2P-80; H. 2P-116; I. 2P-122; J. 2P-167; K. 2P-173; L. 2P-187; M. 2P-190; N. 2P-205; O. 2P-213; P. 2P-269; Q. 2P-355; R. 2P-367.
Discussion
Chromosome translocations can be induced by Ph-system, tissue culture, gametocidal chromosomes and ionization irradiation. Allosyndetic associations between wheat and A. cristatum are rare [23,36–38]; consequently, homoeologous pairing between wheat and A. cristatum chromosomes rarely takes place even when induced with a Ph-system [39]. Translocations induced by tissue culture are very technical and troublesome because they require a long period to obtain regenerative plants [40]. Compared with the first two approaches, the gametocidal chromosome from Aegilops cylindrica Host was successfully used to induce chromosome mutations in common wheat in nature. These chromosome variations could be transmitted to stable offspring [41], which was considered as an effective method to induce chromosomal structural variations [42]. Ionizing irradiation can induce chromosome breakage randomly and yield many translocation types including small segment translocations and intercalary translocations [43], which has been widely used in transferring useful genes from wild relatives to wheat for the improvement of resistance or tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses [8,29,44,45]. In our study, forty-nine 2P translocated plants were successfully obtained, which was the first study to report such a finding. Abundant types of alien chromosome translocations were induced by both ionizing irradiation and gametocidal chromosome 2C, which indicated that these two methods were useful for producing wheat-A. cristatum 2P translocations.
Ionizing irradiation has been proven as an effective method to induce chromosomal translocations [46]. Dry seed, plants at meiosis and spikes at the pollen stage can be used as irradiated materials [29,30,47]. The present study showed that irradiation of plants at meiosis was highly effective. We only pollinated irradiated spikes using fresh pollen from untreated plants. More M1BC1 seeds can be obtained as long as donor parents (untreated plants) have sufficient pollen. Furthermore, the treatment of booting stage plants in the pots was more convenient than that on spikes. Additionally, chromosomal structural variants can be directly identified in the M1BC1 generation by GISH.
To date, many translocation lines have been screened and identified involving three wheat-A. cristatum disomic addition lines [29–31]. A new strategy to rapidly produce a large number of translocations between wheat and A. cristatum has been developed [30]. This strategy was used to induce additional four wheat-A. cristatum disomic addition lines and to produce wheat-A. cristatum alien translocation lines with different breakpoints and P segments of different sizes. The translocation lines can be further used to construct a deletion bin map of each P chromosome.
The transfer of desirable genes from the tertiary gene pool could be an efficient way to increase genetic diversity and improve cultivated wheat [28,48]. Translocation lines, especially small alien segment translocations, would be genetically more stable and desirable [49]. The production of small alien segment translocations makes it possible to transfer useful genes from wild relatives to wheat compared with the low fertility and genetic instability of addition and substitution lines [50–52]. A. cristatum has many potentially valuable traits that can be used in wheat improvement, so it is important to produce wheat-A. cristatum 2P small-segment translocations to transfer useful genes to wheat for broadening wheat genetic diversity. Huang et al. [53] identified two homozygous wheat-A. cristatum 6P small intercalary translocation lines. These lines did not carry undesirable genes and had a good compensation effect of A. cristatum chromatin, which further confirmed that the wheat-A. cristatum small alien segments translocations were desirable. Twenty-five small fragment alien translocations were obtained in the present study by ionizing irradiation and gametocidal chromosome 2C, which would make it possible to utilize desirable genes from A. cristatum 2P chromosome.
Many wheat-alien chromosomal translocation lines carrying desirable genes have been reported in recent years [8,54,55], but some have not been fully utilized in wheat breeding due to the incomplete compensation for the replaced wheat chromosomal segments. Only well-compensating translocations were beneficial in wheat improvement. Until now, only a few exogenous desirable genes have played an important role in wheat breeding [4,56]. It is of great significance to explore the evolutionary relatedness, homoeologous relationships and degree of colinearity between wheat and alien chromosomes [4,52,57]. Agropyron are cross-pollinating plants. The tetraploid A. cristatum derived from the hybridizations between diploid A. cristatum and A. mongolicum. Although the diploid A. cristatum and A. mongolicum contained the same basic P genome, their P genomes exhibited rearrangements and variation [58,59]. Han et al. [17] detected the genetic rearrangement of P genomes by identifying four different types of wheat-A. cristatum 6P disomic addition lines and speculated that genomic rearrangements may occur in the wheat-A. cristatum addition line. Accordingly, we speculated that A. cristatum chromosome 2P may have genetic arrangement to some extent. Although the A. cristatum chromosome 2P fragment was translocated to wheat homoeologous groups (1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) in this study, some wheat-A. cristatum 2P translocation lines were not agronomically poor in the field environment. Thus, we could not exclude the possibility that the wheat-A. cristatum 2P translocation lines may have a subordinate complementary relationship with wheat homoeologous groups (1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) and that the offspring may have a partial compensation effect because of genomic rearrangement. The present study showed that A. cristatum chromosome 2P was translocated to all three wheat genomes and that the wheat A genome had the highest recombination frequency. The results were inconsistent with previous studies, which showed that the wheat B genome possessed the highest number of chromosome arrangements [60]. The translocation lines obtained in this study differed in breakpoint locations and alien segment lengths. The same 2P chromosome segment could be transferred to different wheat chromosomes/genomes. Different 2P chromosome segments could also be transferred to the same wheat chromosome/homoeologous group. These lines would be useful in studies to better understand recombination, interaction and genetic balance between wheat chromosomes and the A. cristatum 2P chromosome. In addition, they could provide a theoretical basis for the utilization of desirable genes of the chromosome 2P in wheat breeding.
Powdery mildew and leaf rust, caused by Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici (Bgt) and Puccinia recondita f. sp. tritici, respectively, are two devastating diseases that cause severe yield losses in most of the wheat production areas [61,62]. Powdery mildew can cause yield losses up to 50% [63], whereas leaf rust caused yield losses ranging from 40% [64] to 70% [65]. Breeding resistant varieties is the most economical and effective way to control these diseases. To date, approximately 42 loci with more than 70 alleles conferring resistance to powdery mildew genes [66] and more than 70 loci for leaf rust resistance genes [67] have been reported. Unfortunately, many of these resistance genes usually become ineffective when new pathogen variants emerge due to co-evolution of the host and pathogen [68]. Hence, there is an urgent need to identify new and effective sources of resistance for wheat improvement. It has been observed that the wheat-A. cristatum 2P addition line possessed high resistance to powdery mildew and leaf rust compared with ‘Fukuhokomugi’ in our laboratory (Submitted). By preliminary phenotypic evaluation, newly developed 2P alien translocation lines 2P-173 and 2P-205 were highly resistant to powdery mildew (S1 Fig) and the translocation line 2P-205 was highly resistant to leaf rust (S2 Fig). This showed that the A. cristatum 2P chromosome harbored genes conferring high resistance to powdery mildew and leaf rust. Furthermore, segregating populations involved in wheat-A. cristatum 2P alien translocation lines with different breakpoints are being developed. These will lay the foundation for locating and cloning novel powdery mildew and leaf rust resistance genes and providing new germplasm accessions for wheat genetic improvement.
In summary, the wheat-A. cristatum 2P alien chromosomal translocations were successfully induced and numerous translocation lines that possessed whole-arm, segmental and intercalary translocations were obtained for the first time in this study. These newly developed translocation lines will not only lay the foundation for mapping and cloning of powdery mildew and leaf rust resistant genes on the A. cristatum 2P chromosome, but also provide excellent germplasm resources and ideal experimental materials for breeding application and basic research.
Supporting Information
S1 Fig. Preliminary evaluation of powdery mildew resistance of the newly developed wheat-A. cristatum translocation lines and their parents.
1: Wheat-A. cristatum alien 2P disomic addition line II-9-3. 2: Wheat-A. cristatum 2P alien translocation line 2P-205. 3: Wheat-A. cristatum 2P alien translocation line 2P-173. 4: Fukuhokomugi. 5: Zhongzuo9504.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145928.s001
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Preliminary evaluation of leaf rust resistance of the newly developed wheat-A. cristatum translocation line and their parents.
1: Wheat-A. cristatum alien 2P disomic addition line II-9-3. 2: Wheat-A. cristatum 2P alien translocation line 2P-205. 3: Fukuhokomugi.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145928.s002
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Yuqing Lu (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences) for her constructive suggestions on this manuscript. We would like to thank the cobalt source chamber of Beijing University for irradiation treatment.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: WHL LHL. Performed the experiments: HHL. Analyzed the data: HHL WHL LHL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WHL LHL LQS MJL. Wrote the paper: HHL WHL LHL JPZ ANG.
References
- 1. Tiwari VK, Wang S, Sehgal S, Vrána J, Friebe B, Kubaláková M, et al. SNP Discovery for mapping alien introgressions in wheat. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1): 273.
- 2. Fu S, Sun C, Yang M, Fei Y, Tan F, Yan B, et al. Genetic and epigenetic variations induced by wheat-rye 2R and 5R monosomic addition lines. PloS One. 2013;8(1): e54057. pmid:23342073
- 3. Colmer TD, Flowers TJ, Munns R. Use of wild relatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat. J Exp Bot. 2006;57(5): 1059–1078. pmid:16513812
- 4. Friebe B, Jiang J, Raupp W, McIntosh R, Gill B. Characterization of wheat-alien translocations conferring resistance to diseases and pests: current status. Euphytica. 1996;91(1): 59–87.
- 5. Triebe B, Mukai Y, Dhaliwal H, Martin T, Gill B. Identification of alien chromatin specifying resistance to wheat streak mosaic and greenbug in wheat germplasm by C-banding and in situ hybridization. Theor Appl Genet. 1991;81(3): 381–389. pmid:24221269
- 6. Wu J, Yang X, Wang H, Li H, Li L, Li X, et al. The introgression of chromosome 6P specifying for increased numbers of florets and kernels from Agropyron cristatum into wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;114(1): 13–20. pmid:17031609
- 7. Ye X, Lu Y, Liu W, Chen G, Han H, Zhang J, et al. The effects of chromosome 6P on fertile tiller number of wheat as revealed in wheat-Agropyron cristatum chromosome 5A/6P translocation lines. Theor Appl Genet. 2015;128(5): 797–811. pmid:25656149
- 8. Zhang R, Zhang M, Wang X, Chen P. Introduction of chromosome segment carrying the seed storage protein genes from chromosome 1V of Dasypyrum villosum showed positive effect on bread-making quality of common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127(3): 523–533. pmid:24408374
- 9. Niu Z, Klindworth D, Yu G, Friesen T, Chao S, Jin Y, et al. Development and characterization of wheat lines carrying stem rust resistance gene Sr43 derived from Thinopyrum ponticum. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127(4): 969–980. pmid:24504553
- 10. Pang Y, Chen X, Zhao J, Du W, Cheng X, Wu J, et al. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a wheat-Leymus mollis 3D (3Ns) substitution line with resistance to leaf rust. J Genet Genomics. 2014;41(4): 205–214. pmid:24780618
- 11. Wang D. Wide hybridization: engineering the next leap in wheat yield. J Genet Genomics. 2009;36(9): 509–510. pmid:19782951
- 12.
Dewey DR. The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization with the perennial Triticeae: Springer; 1984.
- 13. Sarma D, Knott D. The transfer of leaf-rust resistance from Agropyron to Triticum by irradiation. Can J Genet Cytol. 1966;8(1): 137–143.
- 14. Friebe B, Zeller F, Mukai Y, Forster B, Bartos P, McIntosh R. Characterization of rust-resistant wheat-Agropyron intermedium derivatives by C-banding, in situ hybridization and isozyme analysis. Theor Appl Genet. 1992;83(6–7): 775–782. pmid:24202753
- 15. Dong Y, Zhou R, Xu S, Li L, Cauderon Y, Wang R. Desirable characteristics in perennial Triticeae collected in China for wheat improvement. Hereditas. 1992;116: 175–178.
- 16. Ochoa V, Madrid E, Said M, Rubiales D, Cabrera A. Molecular and cytogenetic characterization of a common wheat-Agropyron cristatum chromosome translocation conferring resistance to leaf rust. Euphytica. 2015;201(1): 89–95.
- 17. Han H, Bai L, Su J, Zhang J, Song L, Gao A, et al. Genetic rearrangements of six wheat-Agropyron cristatum 6P addition lines revealed by molecular markers. PloS One. 2014;9(3): e91066. pmid:24595330
- 18. Lu Y, Wu X, Yao M, Zhang J, Liu W, Yang X, et al. Genetic mapping of a putative Agropyron cristatum-derived powdery mildew resistance gene by a combination of bulked segregant analysis and single nucleotide polymorphism array. Mol Breed. 2015;35(3): 1–13.
- 19. Asay K, Johnson D. Genetic variances for forage yield in crested wheatgrass at six levels of irrigation. Crop Sci. 1990;30(1): 79–82.
- 20. Limin A, Fowler D. An interspecific hybrid and amphiploid produced from Triticum aestivum crosses with Agropyron cristatum and Agropyron desertorum. Genome. 1990;33(4): 581–584.
- 21. White WJ. Intergeneric crosses between Triticum and Agropyron. Scientific Agriculture. 1940;21: 198–232.
- 22. Smith DC. Intergeneric hybridization of cereals and other grasses. J agric Res. 1942;64: 33–47.
- 23. Chen Q, Jahier J, Cauderon Y, Cauderon A. Cytological studies on Agropyron Gaertn species from Inner Mongolia, China. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences Série 3, Sciences de la vie. 1989;309(11): 519–525.
- 24. Li L, Li X, Li P, Dong Y, Zhao G. Establishment of wheat-Agropyron cristatum alien additons lines. I. Cytology of F3, F2BC1, BC4, and BC3F1 progenies. Acta Genetica Sinica. 1997;24(2): 154–159.
- 25. Li L. Producion and cytogenetic study of intergeneric hybirds of Triticum aestivum L. with Agropyron desertorum (Fisch.) Schult. and Agropyron michnoi Roshev. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 1991;24(6): 1–10.
- 26. Li L, Yang X, Zhou R, Li X, Dong Y. Establishment of Wheat-Agropyron cristatum alien addition lines. Ⅱ. Identification of alien chromosomes and analysis of development approaches. Acta Genetica Sinica. 1998;25(6): 538–544.
- 27. Li L, editor Cytogenetics and self-fertility of hybrids between Triticum aestivum L. and Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. Chinese Science Abstracts Series B; 1995.
- 28. Qi Z, Du P, Qian B, Zhuang L, Chen H, Chen T, et al. Characterization of a wheat-Thinopyrum bessarabicum (T2JS-2BS.2BL) translocation line. Theor Appl Genet. 2010;121(3): 589–597. pmid:20407740
- 29. Luan Y, Wang X, Liu W, Li C, Zhang J, Gao A, et al. Production and identification of wheat-Agropyron cristatum 6P translocation lines. Planta. 2010;232(2): 501–510. pmid:20490543
- 30. Song L, Jiang L, Han H, Gao A, Yang X, Li L, et al. Efficient induction of wheat-Agropyron cristatum 6P translocation lines and GISH detection. PloS One. 2013;8(7): e69501. pmid:23874966
- 31. Liu W, Luan Y, Wang J, Wang X, Su J, Zhang J, et al. Production and identification of wheat-Agropyron cristatum (1.4P) alien translocation lines. Genome. 2010;53(6): 472–481. pmid:20555436
- 32. Cuadrado A, Schwarzacher T, Jouve N. Identification of different chromatin classes in wheat using in situ hybridization with simple sequence repeat oligonucleotides. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;101(5–6): 711–717.
- 33. Kidwell KK, Osborn TC. Simple plant DNA isolation procedures. Plant genomes: methods for genetic and physical mapping: Springer; 1992. p. 1–13.
- 34. Mukai Y, Nakahara Y, Yamamoto M. Simultaneous discrimination of the three genomes in hexaploid wheat by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization using total genomic and highly repeated DNA probes. Genome. 1993;36(3): 489–494. pmid:18470003
- 35. Pedersen C, Langridge P. Identification of the entire chromosome complement of bread wheat by two-colour FISH. Genome. 1997;40(5): 589–593. pmid:18464850
- 36. Martin A, Cabrera A, Esteban E, Hernández P, Ramirez M, Rubiales D. A fertile amphiploid between diploid wheat (Triticum tauschii) and crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum). Genome. 1999;42(3): 519–524. pmid:10382299
- 37. Martin A, Rubiales D, Cabrera A. Meiotic pairing in a trigeneric hybrid Triticum Tauschii-Agropyron Cristatum-Hordeum Chilense. Hereditas. 1998;129(2): 113–118.
- 38. Soliman M, Rubiales D, Cabrera A. A fertile amphiploid between durum wheat (Triticum Turgidurn) and the×Agroticum Amphiploid (Agropyron cristatum×T. Tauschii). Hereditas. 2001;135(2–3): 183–186. pmid:12152332
- 39. Jubault M, Tanguy A-M, Abélard P, Coriton O, Dusautoir J-C, Jahier J. Attempts to induce homoeologous pairing between wheat and Agropyron cristatum genomes. Genome. 2006;49(2): 190–193. pmid:16498469
- 40. Bie T, Cao Y, Chen P. Mass production of intergeneric chromosomal translocations through pollen irradiation of Triticum durum-Haynaldia villosa amphiploid. J Integr Plant Biol. 2007;49(11): 1619–1626.
- 41. Su W, Cong W, Shu Y, Wang D, Xu G, Guo C. Gametocidal chromosomes enhancing chromosome aberration in common wheat induced by 5-azacytidine. Genet Mol Res. 2013;12(3): 2227. pmid:23884766
- 42. Endo T. The gametocidal chromosome as a tool for chromosome manipulation in wheat. Chromosome Res. 2007;15(1): 67–75. pmid:17295127
- 43. Jiang J, Friebe B, Gill BS. Recent advances in alien gene transfer in wheat. Euphytica. 1993;73(3): 199–212.
- 44. Zhang R, Wang X, Chen P, Scoles G. Molecular and cytogenetic characterization of a small alien-segment translocation line carrying the softness genes of Haynaldia villosa. Genome. 2012;55(9): 639–646. pmid:22900990
- 45. Cao Y, Bie T, Wang X, Chen P. Induction and transmission of wheat-Haynaldia villosa chromosomal translocations. J Genet Genomics. 2009;36(5): 313–320. pmid:19447380
- 46. Sears E. The transfer of leaf-rust resistance from Aegilops umbellulata to wheat. Genetics in plant breeding Brook-haven Symposia in Biology 1956.
- 47. Sears E, Gustafson J. Use of radiation to transfer alien chromosome segments to wheat. Crop Sci. 1993;33(5): 897–901.
- 48. Zhao R, Wang H, Xiao J, Bie T, Cheng S, Jia Q, et al. Induction of 4VS chromosome recombinants using the CS ph1b mutant and mapping of the wheat yellow mosaic virus resistance gene from Haynaldia villosa. Theor Appl Genet. 2013;126(12): 2921–2930. pmid:23989649
- 49. Faris JD, Xu SS, Cai X, Friesen TL, Jin Y. Molecular and cytogenetic characterization of a durum wheat-Aegilops speltoides chromosome translocation conferring resistance to stem rust. Chromosome Res. 2008;16(8): 1097–1105. pmid:18855109
- 50. Calderon MDC, Ramirez MDC, Martin A, Prieto P. Development of Hordeum chilense 4Hch introgression lines in durum wheat: a tool for breeders and complex trait analysis. Plant Breed. 2012;131(6): 733–738.
- 51. Placido DF, Campbell MT, Folsom JJ, Cui X, Kruger GR, Baenziger PS, et al. Introgression of novel traits from a wild wheat relative improves drought adaptation in wheat. Plant Physiol. 2013;161(4): 1806–1819. pmid:23426195
- 52. Danilova TV, Friebe B, Gill BS. Development of a wheat single gene FISH map for analyzing homoeologous relationship and chromosomal rearrangements within the Triticeae. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127(3): 715–730. pmid:24408375
- 53. Huang C, Zhang J, Liu W, Yang X, Li X, Lu Y, et al. Identification of wheat-Agropyron cristatum 6P chromosome intercalary translocation lines. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources. 2013;4: 004.
- 54. Liu W, Danilova TV, Rouse MN, Bowden RL, Friebe B, Gill BS, et al. Development and characterization of a compensating wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium Robertsonian translocation with Sr44 resistance to stem rust (Ug99). Theor Appl Genet. 2013;126(5): 1167–1177. pmid:23358862
- 55. Zhang Q, Li Q, Wang X, Wang H, Lang S, Wang Y, et al. Development and characterization of a Triticum aestivum-Haynaldia villosa translocation line T4VS·4DL conferring resistance to wheat spindle streak mosaic virus. Euphytica. 2005;145(3): 317–320.
- 56. Gill BS, Friebe B, Raupp WJ, Wilson DL, Cox TS, Sears RG, et al. Wheat genetics resource center: the first 25 years. Advances in Agronomy. 2006;89: 73–136.
- 57. Ceoloni C, Jauhar PP. Chromosome engineering of the durum wheat genome: Strategies and applications of potential breeding value. Genetic resources, chromosome engineering, and crop improvement: cereals. 2006;2: 27–59.
- 58. Hsiao C, Asay KH, Dewey DR. Cytogenetic analysis of interspecific hybrids and amphiploids between two diploid crested wheatgrasses, Agropyron mongolicum and A. cristatum. Genome. 1989;32(6): 1079–1084.
- 59. Li L, Dong Y. Progress in studies of Agropyron Gaertn. Hereditas. 1993;15(1): 45–48.
- 60. Puertas M, Badaeva E, Dedkova O, Gay G, Pukhalskyi V, Zelenin A, et al. Chromosomal rearrangements in wheat: their types and distribution. Genome. 2007;50(10): 907–926. pmid:18059554
- 61. Ren Y, Li Z, He Z, Wu L, Bai B, Lan C, et al. QTL mapping of adult-plant resistances to stripe rust and leaf rust in Chinese wheat cultivar Bainong 64. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;125(6): 1253–1262. pmid:22806327
- 62. Hao Y, Parks R, Cowger C, Chen Z, Wang Y, Bland D, et al. Molecular characterization of a new powdery mildew resistance gene Pm54 in soft red winter wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;128(3): 465–476. pmid:25533209
- 63. Griffey C, Das M, Stromberg E. Effectiveness of adult-plant resistance in reducing grain yield loss to powdery mildew in winter wheat. Plant Dis. 1993;77(6): 618–622.
- 64. Khan MH, Bukhari A, Dar ZA, Rizvi SM. Status and strategies in breeding for rust resistance in wheat. Agric Sci. 2013;4(06): 292.
- 65. Dubin H, Torres E. Causes and consequences of the 1976–1977 wheat leaf rust epidemic in northwest Mexico. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1981;19(1): 41–49.
- 66. Fu B, Chen Y, Li N, Ma H, Kong Z, Zhang L, et al. pmX: a recessive powdery mildew resistance gene at the Pm4 locus identified in wheat landrace Xiaohongpi. Theor Appl Genet. 2013;126(4): 913–921. pmid:23400828
- 67.
McIntosh R, Yamazaki Y, Dubcovsky J, Rogers W, Morris C, Somers D, et al. MacGene 2012: catalogue of gene symbols for wheat. 2013.
- 68. Fu S, Ren Z, Chen X, Yan B, Tan F, Fu T, et al. New wheat-rye 5DS-4RS·4RL and 4RS-5DS·5DL translocation lines with powdery mildew resistance. J Plant Res. 2014;127(6): 743–753. pmid:25163586