Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Discovery of a Family of Genomic Sequences Which Interact Specifically with the c-MYC Promoter to Regulate c-MYC Expression

Abstract

G-quadruplex forming sequences are particularly enriched in the promoter regions of eukaryotic genes, especially of oncogenes. One of the most well studied G-quadruplex forming sequences is located in the nuclease hypersensitive element (NHE) III1 of the c-MYC promoter region. The oncoprotein c-MYC regulates a large array of genes which play important roles in growth regulation and metabolism. It is dysregulated in >70% of human cancers. The silencer NHEIII1 located upstream of the P1 promoter regulates up-to 80% of c-MYC transcription and includes a G-quadruplex structure (Pu27) that is required for promoter inhibition. We have identified, for the first time, a family of seventeen G-quadruplex-forming motifs with >90% identity with Pu27, located on different chromosomes throughout the human genome, some found near or within genes involved in stem cell maintenance or neural cell development. Notably, all members of the Pu27 family interact specifically with NHEIII1 sequence, in vitro. Crosslinking studies demonstrate that Pu27 oligonucleotide binds specifically to the C-rich strand of the NHEIII1 resulting in the G-quadruplex structure stabilization. Pu27 homologous sequences (Pu27-HS) significantly inhibit leukemic cell lines proliferation in culture. Exposure of U937 cells to the Pu27-HS induces cell growth inhibition associated with cell cycle arrest that is most likely due to downregulation of c-MYC expression at the RNA and/or protein levels. Expression of SOX2, another gene containing a Pu27-HS, was affected by Pu27-HS treatment as well. Our data suggest that the oligonucleotides encoding the Pu27 family target complementary DNA sequences in the genome, including those of the c-MYC and SOX2 promoters. This effect is most likely cell type and cell growth condition dependent. The presence of genomic G-quadruplex-forming sequences homologous to Pu27 of c-MYC silencer and the fact that they interact specifically with the parent sequence suggest a common regulatory mechanism for genes whose promoters contain these sequences.

Citation: Rezzoug F, Thomas SD, Rouchka EC, Miller DM (2016) Discovery of a Family of Genomic Sequences Which Interact Specifically with the c-MYC Promoter to Regulate c-MYC Expression. PLoS ONE 11(8): e0161588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588

Editor: Ratna B. Ray, Saint Louis University, UNITED STATES

Received: June 1, 2016; Accepted: August 8, 2016; Published: August 23, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Rezzoug et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding: This work was supported from the National Institute of Health and National Center for Research Resources (www.nih.gov) Grant # 5P20RR18733-09 to DMM and from National Institute of Health and National Cancer Institute (www.nih.gov) Grant # 1R21CA191663-01A1 to DMM. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The presence of secondary structure in guanine-rich oligonucleotides was first documented in the late 1980’s [1]. Four adjacent guanines (on one strand or on different strands of DNA) can spontaneously arrange in a square planar structure which is stabilized by Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds called G-tetrads. This structure is further stabilized by monovalent cations at physiological concentrations [1, 2]. G-quadruplex motifs are stable three-dimensional structures that result from stacks of G-tetrads. G-quadruplex forming sequences are highly represented in all living organisms [3, 4]. In the human genome the number of potential G-quadruplex forming sequences has been estimated to be 376,000 [5, 6]. More recently, high resolution sequencing techniques have identified at least 716,000 potential G-quadruplex forming sequences [7]. G-quadruplex-forming sequences were initially identified in the immunoglobulin switch region of the IgG gene [1] and in telomeres [2] where they are highly enriched. G-quadruplex forming sequences are preferentially located near the promoter regions of eukaryotic genes, especially of oncogenes including c-MYC [8, 9], KRAS [10], c-KIT [11] and BCL2 [12]. Several of these sequences, including the c-MYC promoter G-quadruplex-forming sequence, have been shown to be negative regulators of transcription. Interestingly, they are less commonly found in the promoters of tumor suppressor genes [13]. The past 20 years have seen an evolving interest in G-quadruplex structures as targets for cancer therapy primarily due to the putative regulatory role of these structures [14, 15].

One of the most well studied G-quadruplex forming sequences is located in the promoter region of the c-MYC oncogene. The c-MYC gene product is a transcription factor that can activate and/or repress the expression of a large array of genes [16] that are essential for multiple cell functions including proliferation, metabolism, differentiation, adhesion and apoptosis [17–20]. Not surprisingly, c-MYC is required in the transcription factor cocktail for the generation of induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSC) and maintenance of “stemness” along with SOX2, OCT4 and KLF4 [21, 22]. In hematopoietic homeostasis, c-MYC plays an important role in maintaining the balance between proliferation/differentiation and apoptosis of hematopoietic stem cells [23]. Considering its importance in cell function, it is not surprising that deregulation of c-MYC is a key factor in many types of malignancy [24, 25], often associated with increased tendency to metastasis and poor prognosis [26, 27]. Notably c-MYC is abnormally expressed in many aggressive hematologic malignancies including Burkitt lymphomas and multiple myeloma (due to chromosomal translocation [28–30]), acute myeloid leukemia (due to gene amplification [31]) and in others (due to mutations that prolong the protein half-life [32]).

The involvement of c-MYC in all basic cell functions implies the necessity for tight regulation at RNA and protein levels. The mechanisms involved in the transcriptional regulation of c-MYC are multiple and complex. One of the major sites of control for human c-MYC transcription has been localized in the region -115 base pairs upstream of the P1 promoter which has been designated as the nuclease hypersensitive element (NHE) III1 This sequence controls >80% of c-MYC expression [8, 33–35]. The NHEIII1 sequence contains a high Cytosine (C) to Guanine (G) ratio and has been shown to form secondary DNA structures: the C-rich coding strand forms i-tetraplex structures (i-motif) and the complementary G-rich non-coding strand forms G-quadruplex structures [8, 9]. NHEIII1 regulates c-MYC transcription [9, 29, 36] and consequently constitutes a good target for anticancer drugs. The purine-rich strand which forms G-quadruplex structures is part of the transcriptional silencer element, and contains a 27 nucleotide sequence known as Pu27 [9, 37]. Mutations in the NHEIII1 element destabilize the G-quadruplex formation and have been reported to result in increased c-MYC transcription in vitro [9, 38], implying that transcription is repressed when the Pu27 sequence is in the G-quadruplex form. Consequently, strategies have been devised to stabilize the NHEIII1 or G-quadruplex using small molecules to inhibit transcription [39–41]. We have used a synthetic oligonucleotide sequence encoding Pu27 to inhibit leukemic cell growth and have shown that downregulation of c-MYC expression is associated with inhibition of cell proliferation and induced cell death, although no effects were observed on normal hematopoietic cells [42].

In addition to their role in transcription regulation, G-quadruplex structures have been shown to be involved in DNA replication by slowing or stopping the replication machinery complex progression and in meiosis where G-quadruplexes overlap with DNA double-strand break sites [4]. They also appear to play important roles in regulation of translation through 5’UTR mRNA containing G-quadruplex structures (review in [43, 44]). However, the function of such sequences is still poorly understood, especially when one considers the disproportionate number of putative G-quadruplex forming sequences in the genome and the number of genes containing such sequences.

We report here the discovery of seventeen putative G-quadruplex-forming DNA sequences homologous to the parent c-MYC Pu27 genomic (Pu27ge) sequence. These sequences are located on different chromosomes throughout the human genome. We have established that each oligonucleotide sequence of the Pu27 family forms a stable G-quadruplex structure, binds in a sequence specific manner to the NHEIII1 of the c-MYC promoter and inhibits cell growth of leukemia cell lines. This growth inhibition is accompanied by cell cycle arrest at G1 and S phases and correlates with a decrease in c-MYC expression. Finally we explore the possible role of these sequences by determining their presence in the transcriptome. Our data imply that this family of genomic DNA sequences may be involved in physiologic regulation of c-MYC as well as genes containing such sequences in their promoter regions. In the case of c-MYC regulation, we suggest that this may occur by binding of Pu27 present in the 5’UTR-mRNA transcripts to the complementary sequence NHEIII1 in the c-MYC promoter in a back-loop mechanism and thereby participating in the transcription machinery in a cell and tissue specific manner.

Material and Methods

Oligonucleotides

The sequences for Pu27 and 17 homologous oligonucleotides located in different chromosomes were determined using a BLAT search of Pu27 on the human GRch38 genome assembly [UCSC Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu)]. The oligonucleotides were purchased from Oligos etc. (Wilsonville, OR) (Table 1). The lyophilized oligonucleotides were reconstituted in sterile nuclease free H2O (Millipore, MA) at 500μM and stored at -20°C.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Sequences of Pu27 and Pu27- homologous G-quadruplex forming oligonucleotides.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.t001

Circular Dichroism (CD) spectrometry

Oligonucleotide samples were diluted at 5μM in TM buffer (50mM TRIS-HCl/2.5mM MgCl2, pH7.0), denatured and annealed overnight at room temperature (RT). The concentration was verified by measuring the OD at 260nm in a Diode Spectrometer before the CD measurement on a Jasco J-710 spectropolarimeter in a 1cm Quartz cuvette. Spectra were recorded from 220nm to 340nm at 20°C; four spectra were averaged for each reading. Molar extinction coefficients were calculated using the IDT calculator (IDT.com, oligoAnalyser3.1). CD data were normalized to strand concentration and are expressed in Molar ellipticity [θ] (deg x cm2 x decimole-1).

Oligonucleotide structure

Oligonucleotides were 5’-labeled with 32P-ATP (3μCu) using T4 PNK and 1x kinase buffer for 20 minutes at 37°C. Unincorporated nucleotides were removed using G-25 Sephadex columns. Samples (4,000 cpm) were then mixed with cold oligonucleotide, boiled for ten minutes and allowed to anneal overnight. An equal volume of 2x glycerol dye was added and run on a 15% native acrylamide gel at 250V for 3h. Bands were visualized by exposing a Kodak phosphor-imager screen and scanned using a Molecular Imager (Pharos FX Plus, Bio-Rad) then to Kodak film for 12h at -80°C.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)

PCR product of 134bp covering the NHEIII1 of the c-MYC promoter (TS), was incubated with 100,000cpm of 32P-labeled Pu27 or Pu-HS in 20mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 25mM KCl, 2mM MgCl2, 0.1mM EDTA, 0.2mM DTT, 2mM spermidine and 10% glycerol for 15 min at 37°C. For the competition assay, increasing concentrations of “cold” Pu27 oligonucleotide (1nM to 1μM) were added to each labeled oligonucleotide and incubated for an additional 15 min. After incubation, an equal volume of 2x glycerol dye was added. Complexes (50,000cpm) were resolved by electrophoresis on a 5% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel, and visualized as described above.

Cross-linking experiment

The target sequences (TS) double strand (ds), C-rich and G-rich single strand (ss) (IDT, Coralville IA) covering the c-MYC NHEIII1 were hybridized with Pu27 or Pu27 containing the cross-linker [3-cyanovinylcarbazole (CNVK) kindly provided by Dr. Niles A. Pierce] that was incorporated at the position 1 = PuK1 or position 12 = PuK12 of the Pu27 nucleotide sequence (PuK1 and PuK12 were synthetized by IDT). The cross-linking protocol follows the methodology described by Dr. Pierce [45] with some modifications. The target sequences (1.8μM) were mixed or not with Pu27, PuK1 or PuK12 (3μM) in SSC buffer (150mM NaCl, 15mM trisodium citrate, pH7.0) and annealed for 5min at 95°C in heating block. The samples were then cooled-down at RT for 35min in the dark. Half of each sample was then distributed in a round bottom 96 well plate, placed on ice and irradiated with a UV hand lamp at 365nm for 3min. The samples were then analyzed for crosslinking by: (1). Electrophoresis in denaturing polyacrylamide gel (12% polyacrylamide/8M Urea) using 2.5μl of the samples mixed with 2X glycerol dye before loading on the gel. A 10bp ladder (Invitrogen) was denatured and run in the 1st well for size reference. At the end of the electrophoresis the gel was stained with SYBR® Gold (Molecular Probes) and the bands visualized and photographed in Molecular Imager (Pharos FX Plus, Bio-Rad) and (2). PCR: 1μl of each sample was mixed with primers designed to recognize the 5’-end (Fw) and the 3’-end (Rev) of the 134bp TS (S1 Table) in tubes containing Ready-To-Go PCR beads (GE Healthcare Bio-sciences, Pittsburgh, PA) and run in a one way PCR using one of the primers or in regular PCR with both primers. Electrophoresis using 2% agarose gel was then used to determine the size of the PCR products. Bands were visualized using ethidium bromide and gel photographed with a gel doc (UVP).

Cell culture

Four leukemia cell lines were investigated: U937 (histiocytic, myeloid lymphoma, AML), Molt-4 (acute-T-lymphoblastic leukemia, ALL), HL-60 (acute promyelocytic leukemia, APL) and Raji (Burkitt’s lymphoma, BL), all obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). Cell lines were maintained in culture in RPMI-1640/10%FBS/penicillin-streptomycin (all from HyClone, Utah) at 37°C/5%CO2 in humid atmosphere and were evaluated at exponential growth.

MTT assay

Cells were seeded at 5x103 cells/well in 96-well flat bottom plates in the presence of different concentrations of oligonucleotides for 24h up to 5 days as specified in the text. Untreated cells were used as control, and media for blank. Cell proliferation was evaluated by using MTT [3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl) 2,5-diphenyltetrazolium Bromide) Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO] [42]. Data are shown as percent of the untreated control for an average of at least 3 experiments+/- Standard deviation.

Gene and sequences expression by RT-qPCR

U937 were cultured at 1x106cells/5ml in the presence of 10μM Pu27-HS compared to untreated for 72h. At this time point cells were collected and divided in 3 tubes to perform FACS analysis, RNA extraction and protein extraction.

For c-MYC or SOX2 expression.

Cells for RNA extraction were pelleted, suspended in 5ml TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen™, NY) and stored at -80°C until samples for 3 separate experiments were collected. RNA extraction was performed following manual instruction and concentration measured on NanoDrop 2000 (NanoDrop, DE). The purified RNA (0.1μg/ sample) was used to generate cDNA with the SuperSript® VILO cDNA synthesis Kit following the instruction manual. To detect the expression of c-MYC and SOX2 primer pairs were designed (sequences in S1 Table), 18S and β-Actin were used as reference genes (all primers from Invitrogen™). SYBR®Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems®, NY) was used for the RT-qPCR reaction in ViiA™7 (Applied Biosystems®). Gene expression was calculated using CT value and ΔΔCT [46] and expressed as fold change averaged for 3 distinct experiments.

For the expression of the different Pu27-HS.

RNA was extracted from 1x106 peripheral blood cells from two healthy donors (Innovative Research, Novi MI) and form the 4 Leukemia cell lines previously used in this study as described above. cDNA was generated with 100ng of RNA and evaluated in RTq-PCR. The primers sequences are located in S1 Table, 18S and GAPDH were used as reference genes (all from Invitrogen™) and SYBR®Green PCR Master Mix was used for the RT-qPCR reaction in ViiA™7. Data are represented as comparison of CT values obtained from normal donors and leukemia cells. A CT value above 34 was considered not determined.

Flow cytometry for cell cycle

U937 were cultured at 1x106 cells/5ml in the presence of 10μM either Pu27-HS compared to untreated cells for 3 days. Cells were collected, washed in PBS and fixed in 70% ethanol and stored at -20°C for at least 2 hrs. Cell suspensions were then washed in PBS and incubated with 5μl 7AAD (eBioscience, Inc., CA) for 20min on ice then analyzed on FACSCalibur (Beckton-Dickinson, NJ). FACS data analyses were performed using the multicycle analysis program from FCS Express4 software (DeNovo Software, CA). Data are expressed as percent of cells in each cell cycle sub-group averaged for 3 separate experiments.

Western blot

U937 were cultured at 1x105 cells/5ml in the presence of Pu27 or Pu27-HS (10μM) compared to untreated cells for 3 days. Total protein lysates was prepared using M-Per lysis buffer (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) containing protease inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics, IN) according to manufacturer instruction and quantified using Coomassie Protein reagent (Thermo Scientific, MA). Equal amounts of protein were run in 4–15% gradient gel (Bio-Rad) for 1h at 70 V, and then transferred to PVDF membrane using an Iblot (Invitrogen™). The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk, washed in PBST (PBS/0.05% Tween), hybridized for 1h at RT with anti-c-MYC antibody or anti-Sox2 (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. TX), α-tubulin or β-tubulin (both form Cell Singnaling technology, MA), were used to normalize the protein loading followed by washes in PBST, then incubated 1h at RT with goat anti-mouse antibody. The protein was visualized using femto-chemiluminescence reagent (Thermo Scientific™ Pierce™).

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as mean +/- standard deviation (SD) between untreated versus treated and assessed using unpaired two-tailed Student T-test and one-way ANOVA. Data were considered significant for p-value < 0.05.

Results

Pu27 family of quadruplex-forming sequences has 18 members

A BLAT sequence similarity search [UCSC Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu)] with Pu27ge identified 17 homologous sequences (from 88% to 100% homology) localized on different chromosomes (Fig 1A). Most of the Pu27 homologous sequences (hereafter referred to as Pu27-HS) are located within gene transcription regions including the noncoding region of SOX2 /Pu3+, GRM6 /Pu5-, and NAV2 /Pu11+ or on the noncoding strand of the genes (Pu27/c-MYC, Pu20-/CDH4) (Table 1). In several cases the Pu27-HS are located at distance varying from 10Kb to 70Kb from the transcription initiation site of the nearest gene (Table 1). Among the genes containing a Pu27-HS within their transcription regions are genes producing proteins involved in stem cell maintenance such as c-MYC and SOX2 [47] or differentiation TLE4 [48], in brain development and neuron differentiation/function such as NAV2 [49, 50], SDK1 [51], SPTLC2 [52], CDH4 (R-cadherin) [53] and GRM6 [54] (Table 2). Notably, these genes products play a role in embryonic development and in cancer [47, 48, 55, 56].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Localization and biophysical analysis of the Pu27 homologous oligonucleotides sequences.

(A). Chromosome localization of the Pu27-HS. (B). Circular dichroism spectra for 14 members of the Pu27 family of oligonucleotides showing peaks at 260nm representative of the presence of parallel G-quadruplex. (C). Electromobility shift assays (EMSA), 32P-labeled oligonucleotides were run on a polyacrylamide gel that shows unique band for each of the oligonucleotides that migrated.; one representative Phospho imager picture is shown. (D). EMSA for competition assay.32P-labeled Pu27 was run in the presence of a 134bp double strand target sequence (TS) containing the NHEIII1 of the c-MYC promoter +/- different concentrations of cold Pu27; Kodak image is shown. (E). EMSA for competition assay applied to 14 Pu27-HS 32P-labeled incubated with 134bp target sequence +/- cold Pu27 at 1nM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Localization of the different Pu27 homologous sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.t002

The low complexity and repetitive pattern of the Pu27-HS suggests the presence of binding sites for transcription factors (TF). In fact, it has been shown that the P0-P1 region of c-MYC contains binding sites for Nucleolin, SP1 [57–60] and 4 putative binding sites for Myeloid Zinc Finger 1 (MZF1) [61]. Therefore we performed a search for the presence of possible TF binding sites within the Pu27-HS sequences using readily available bio-informatics websites [(http://alggen.lsi.upc.es/cgi-bin/promov3/promo/promoinit.cgi?dirDB=TF_8.3), (http://www.cbrc.jp/research/db/TFSEARCH.html)]. Common binding sites for GR-α, TFII-I, RXR-α and MZF1 (with 1 to 4 binding sites) were identified within all members of the Pu27 family. Putative binding sites for STAT4, c-ETS1 and ELK-1 were also found in most of the Pu27-HS, while SP1, IKZF1, GATA1 or P53 were found in 1 or 2 sequences only (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Table of predicted transcription factors binding sites in the Pu27 homologous sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.g002

All of the Pu27 homologous sequences form G-quadruplex

Although the Pu27-HS are of different lengths, they all contain a common core of four consecutive runs of three to four guanines suggesting the capability to form G-quadruplex structures. Therefore oligonucleotides encoding each Pu27-HS were analyzed by Circular Dichroism spectrometry (CD). All of the Pu27 family members formed an intramolecular parallel G-quadruplex evidenced by the presence of a peak of Molecular Ellipticity (θ) at 260-262nm (Fig 1B and S1A Fig). The higher amplitude obtained with Pu5 can be an indicator of the number of G-tetrad stacks as Pu5 contains 7 runs of 3–4 guanines compared to Pu27 (5 runs). However, it could also be due to the formation of “G-wire” structures which may be observed with long sequences. In order to evaluate the presence of secondary structures, Pu27-HS were subjected to an electromobility shift assay (EMSA). Most Pu27-HS displayed no secondary structures (hair pin, duplex or wires) as shown by the presence of unique bands. However, Pu9 demonstrated a faint band of larger molecular weight which may be due to dimer formation (Fig 1C). The presence of a unique band for Pu5 confirms that the CD amplitude is most likely due to the number of G-tetrad stacks, ruling out the possibility of wire formation.

All Pu27 homologous sequences bind specifically to the NHEIII1 target sequence

Next we evaluated whether Pu27 binds to its target sequence (TS) in the c-MYC promoter region [37, 62]. The binding target is a double stranded (ds) DNA fragment of 134bp derived from the c-MYC promoter region containing the proximal NHEIII1 sequence. EMSA experiments show high affinity binding of Pu27 to the TS (Fig 1D and S1B Fig: lane 2), that was competed by adding increasing concentrations of unlabeled Pu27. This competition assay shows a dose-dependent displacement of the 32P-labeled Pu27/target band (Fig 1D lanes 3–6) with 1nM Pu27 being the minimal concentration required to fully compete with 32P-Pu27. Importantly, other quadruplex-forming oligonucleotides such as KRAS did not compete with Pu27 for binding to the TS (S1C Fig). These data strongly suggest that Pu27 binds specifically to NHEIII1, stabilizing the genomic G-quadruplex structure thus, inhibiting c-MYC transcription.

The gel shift assay was also used to characterize the binding of the Pu27-HS to the NHEIII1 sequence and demonstrate that all of the Pu27-HS oligonucleotides bind to the TS (Fig 1E and S1B Fig: lane 2) and were displaced by unlabeled-Pu27 (Fig 1E and S1B Fig: lane 3). EMSA control with other G-quadruplex sequences such as 32P-AS1411 [63] or with 32P-KRAS [10] showed no binding to the TS (S1D Fig). Taken together these data demonstrate the specificity of the Pu27-HS binding to the NHEIII1 parent sequence and suggest that the binding occurs at the same site of c-MYC promoter region.

Pu27-homologous sequences inhibit leukemic cells proliferation

We have previously shown that Pu27 downregulates c-MYC expression and inhibits the growth of leukemia cell lines [42]. We therefore assessed the ability of the Pu27-HS oligonucleotides to inhibit the growth of four leukemia cell lines at 5μM and 10μM in 5 day cultures using MTT assay. The effect on cell growth was dose and cell line dependent and the four cell lines investigated in this study show significant inhibition of cell proliferation. Overall, the U937 cell line was less sensitive to Pu27-HS < HL-60 < Molt-4 < Raji (Fig 3). Notably, all the Pu27-HS oligonucleotides restricted leukemia cell growth, in some cases more effectively than Pu27, such as Pu1, Pu2 or Pu3-. Interestingly, the relative sensitivity of each cell line appears to be different for each Pu27 family member. For instance, U937 cells demonstrate only 30% or less inhibition in the presence of Pu1.2, Pu3+, Pu9, Pu17 or Pu20 (Fig 3A), while HL-60 seems to be less responsive to Pu9 and Pu16 (Fig 3B) and Molt-4 to Pu1.2, Pu17 or Pu20 (Fig 3D). All Pu27-HS reduce cell growth by 90% and greater for Raji (Fig 3C). The cell sensitivity to Pu27-HS may depend on (de)regulation (mutation, translocation…) of c-MYC or of other genes containing these sequences and on the presence of NHEIII1 in the promoter region. Furthermore, the degree of sensitivity could relate to the extent to which proliferation of each cell type is dependent on c-MYC overexpression. For all cell lines, the most potent growth inhibiting sequences were Pu27, Pu1, Pu2, Pu3-, Pu5, Pu7, Pu10.1, Pu10.2 and Pu11.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Growth inhibition assay for four different leukemia cell lines exposed to the Pu27-HS.

(A) U937, (B) HL-60, (C) Raji, and (D) Mol-4: 5000cells/well were exposed to 5 or 10μM of Pu27 homologous oligonucleotides sequences for 5 days then evaluate for growth inhibition in MTT assay. Data report the average+ SD of at least 3 different experiments (*p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.g003

The AML cell line U937 was used to further investigate the effect of the Pu27–HS in cell culture. This cell line overexpresses c-MYC relative to normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells control (Fig 4A and 4B) most likely due to the trisomy of chromosome 8 [64] but not from translocation therefore c-MYC expression should remain under the control of the NHEIII1.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Expression of c-MYC in four leukemia cell lines and 2 healthy donors PBMC.

(A). Bar graph representing RT-qPCR for relative expression (CT values) of c-MYC in 4 leukemia cell lines and PBMC. (B) Western blot for c-MYC protein expression. (C). Bar graph for the quantification of protein normalized to α-tubulin.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.g004

Pu27–HS control c-MYC expression

One possible mechanism by which the Pu27-HS oligonucleotides inhibit leukemic cell proliferation is by downregulating c-MYC expression as previously shown for Pu27 [42]. Therefore, U937 cells were exposed to either of the Pu27-HS at 10μM for 72h and c-MYC transcription was evaluated by RT-qPCR analysis of total RNA. There was a significant downregulation in c-MYC expression in the cells treated with Pu27, as expected, and with five of the Pu27-HS (Pu2, Pu5, Pu9, Pu14 and Pu17) (Fig 5A), four of Pu27-HS downregulated c-MYC expression less efficiently (Pu1.2, Pu7, Pu10.2, Pu16). However, c-MYC was significantly upregulated in U937 exposed to four of the Pu27-HS: Pu1, Pu3-, Pu3+ and Pu10.1 (Fig 5A), four Pu27-HS did not affect c-MYC expression at that time point. The difference observed at the transcription level could be due to difference in specificity -as we expect Pu27 will have higher specificity for its target- or difference in regulation (upregulation instead of downregulation) for these particular Pu27-HS (i.e. Pu1, Pu3-,Pu3+ or Pu10.1). Given the fact that all Pu27-HS can bind to the DNA sequence containing Pu27 target and that all sequences induce growth inhibition at 5 days we wanted to verify the effects of the Pu27-HS on c-MYC protein expression using western blotting assay. There was a marked reduction of c-MYC in all treatment groups compared to untreated control even in cells where there was no change or upregulation of c-MYC transcription (Fig 5B and 5C) suggesting delay or anomalies in the translation.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. Effect of Pu27-HS on c-MYC expression in U937 after 3 days exposure.

(A). Evaluation of c-MYC gene expression by RT-qPCR after 72h exposure to 10μM Pu27-HS oligonucleotides. Data represent the average in fold change compared to untreated +/- SD of 3 independent experiments (*p<0.05). (B). Evaluation of c-MYC protein expression by Western Blot, representative blot is shown. (C). Quantification of c-MYC normalized to β-Tubulin, bar graph shows the average of intensity of the band for 3 separate experiments (*p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.g005

Pu27 binds to C-rich strand in the NHEIII1 of c-MYC promoter

To further characterize the binding of Pu27 to its target sequence and determine the mechanism by which this binding could alter c-MYC transcription, we took advantage of a UV activated cross-linker to covalently bind the DNA target sequence and the Pu27 encoding oligonucleotide [45]. The cross-linker [3-cyanovinylcarbazole (CNVK = K)] is a photoactive nucleoside analogue originally described by Yoshimura et.al. [65, 66], that was incorporated in Pu27 sequence (at the position 1 = PuK1 or position 12 = PuK12). Pu27, PuK1 and PuK12 were hybridized to the target sequence double stranded (TS-ds) previously used in EMSA assay for the binding study, or with the C-rich and G-rich single strands of the same sequence (C-r ss, G-r ss), then exposed to UV light for crosslinking in order to create a covalent bond (CxL). The presence of binding was confirmed by electrophoresis that revealed a second band of higher molecular weight above the migration band of the TS-ds (Fig 6A) and of the C-rich ss TS but not with G-rich ss TS (Fig 6B). As expected from the EMSA experiment, a binding band was also observed with Pu27 without CNVK. Since the crosslink with CVNK is stable even at high temperature [66] we were able to verify the binding using one way PCR with primers designed to recognize each strand of the double strand target. Fig 6C shows an agarose gel run with the PCR products, “Fw” is for the primer reading the C-rich strand and “Rev” for the primer reading the G-rich. Smaller products, indicating Pu27 binding on the strand, were present in TS-ds/PuK1, TS-ds/PuK12 and even in TS-ds/Pu27 (although with less product most likely due to loss of the binding in the absence of the crosslinker) when PCR was performed with the Fw primers reflecting binding to the C-rich strand. This was confirmed with the PCR products derived from the cross-linking experiment of the single stranded targets (C-rich and G-rich) with PuK1 and PuK12 that show small PCR products only for PuK1 and PuK12 hybridization with the C-rich strand. Taken together these data suggest that the oligonucleotide encoding the G-rich Pu27 binds by Watson-and Crick binding to the C-rich strand which is the transcribed strand of the c-MYC gene. This result also suggests that all the oligonucleotide sequence members of the Pu27-HS bind in this manner as well. In addition, this result raises the possibility that Pu27 and/or the Pu27-HS bind to the 5’UTR mRNA that will have resulted from the transcription initiation at the P0 promoter and therefore containing the target sequence.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 6. Pu27 binds to the C-rich strand in the NHEIII1 of c-MYC promoter.

(A). Polyacrylamide denaturing gel electrophoresis of product of hybridization of Pu27 and Pu27 containing the crosslinker 3-cyanovinylcarbazole (CNVK): PuK1 and PuK12 with the 134bp double strand target sequences (TS ds) before and after crosslinking (CxL). (B). Same experiment for hybridization of PuK1 and PuK12 with the C-rich (C-r ss) or G-rich (G-r ss) single strands of the TS. Two representative gels are shown; the binding of Pu27 is evidence by the presence of an extra band (Pu27/TS) of higher molecular weight. (C). Agarose gel for the size of PCR product of the crosslinking samples. One way PCR was realized using “Fw” primer to identify the C-rich strand and “Rev” primer to identify the G-rich stand. The binding of Pu27 to the TS was confirmed by the presence of a smaller band in the C-rich strand.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.g006

Pu27-HS are specific of the nucleotide sequences in the DNA

Since we have demonstrated that the Pu27-HS are able to modulate c-MYC expression by binding to the target sequence in the c-MYC promoter NHEIII1, it is conceivable that other genes containing these sequences could be regulated in the same manner. Among the genes containing such sequences, SOX2 is the most likely to be expressed in the hematopoietic progenitor cells present in leukemia cell lines. The SOX2 promoter contains a G-quadruplex forming sequence of the Pu27 family: Pu3+. SOX2 is a transcription factor present in stem cells involved in the maintenance of stem cell self-renewal and is also part of the transcription cocktail along with c-MYC for the generation and maintenance of iPSC. Furthermore, SOX2 and c-MYC are present at the same transcription sites of a large variety of genes [67]. We verified the expression of SOX2 in the 4 leukemia cell lines investigated in this study and in PBMC from 2 healthy donors. The SOX2 gene was indeed expressed in all cells leukemia and normal PBMC (Fig 7A). Similarly the expression of SOX2 protein was confirmed by western blotting in the four leukemia cell lines and PBMC (Fig 7B). However, the protein expression was lower in U937, Molt-4 and especially in Raji compared to HL-60 or to the control PBMC and did not correlate with SOX2 gene expression.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 7. Effect of Pu27-HS on SOX2 expression in U937 after 3 days exposure.

(A). Bar graph representing RT-qPCR (CT values) for SOX2 (red bars) compared to c-MYC (gray bars) expression in 4 leukemia cell lines and PBMC from 2 donors. (B) Western blot for SOX2 protein expression in 4 leukemia cell lines and PBMC. Bar graph for the quantification of SOX2 protein normalized to α-tubulin. (C). Evaluation of SOX2 expression compared to c-MYC after 72h exposure to 10μM Pu27-HS. Data represent the average of fold change for treated compared to untreated +/- SD of 3 independent experiments (*p<0.05). (D). Evaluation of SOX2 protein expression in U937 by Western Blot, representative blot is shown. Quantification of SOX2 normalized to α-Tubulin, bar graph shows the average of intensity of the bands for 2 separate experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.g007

We then investigated the expression of SOX2 in U937 cells exposed to Pu27-HS for 3 days in the same conditions described for c-MYC expression. The RT-qPCR data revealed that SOX2 transcription is modulated in the same manner as c-MYC for at least for 9 out of 18 Pu27-HS (Fig 7C). For Pu3-, Pu10.1 and Pu14 exposed cells there was no effect on SOX2 expression while c-MYC was upregulated or downregulated, and for Pu11 and Pu16 exposed cells there was no effect on c-MYC expression but significant SOX2 upregulation for Pu11 and downregulation for Pu16 (Fig 7C). Some of the sequences did not affect SOX2 or c-MYC expression such as Pu1.2, Pu9.2, Pu20 and PuX. All together this data suggest that each Pu27-HS provided similar regulation for the genes containing such sequence, however the mechanism of action can be different i.e. Pu27 downregulates while Pu1 or Pu3+ upregulate gene expression. As for c-MYC the gene and protein expression did not always match, we investigated the effect of the Pu27-HS on SOX2 protein expression by western blotting. The SOX2 protein expression was upregulated in all treatments compared to untreated (Fig 7D) suggesting a possible post-transcriptional regulation by some of the Pu27-HS.

Pu27 homologous sequences induce cell cycle arrest in the G1 and S phases

It is likely that the inhibition of cell proliferation observed in the leukemic cells after 5 days of Pu27 treatment is due to the decrease in c-MYC expression. As c-MYC is involved at different levels in regulating cell proliferation we decided to investigate the cell cycle status of the U937 cell line during exposure to Pu27-HS. U937 cells were grown in the presence of 10μM of the Pu27-HS for 3 days, at which time cells were collected and counted in the exclusion dye Trypan blue to evaluate cell growth and viability. As shown in Fig 8A, by day three cell growth was already significantly reduced in U937 exposed to most of the Pu27-HS compared to untreated; however, there was no significant change in cell viability compared to the control untreated (Fig 8A red bars) except for Pu9 exposed cells where a small but consistent increase in cell death was observed.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 8. Effect of Pu27-HS on cell cycle progression in U937 after 3 days exposure.

(A). Evaluation of percent of cell growth (gray) and percentage of cell death (red) by Trypan Blue after 3 days exposure to 10μM Pu27-HS. (B). Bar graph representing the percentage of cells in G1 (gray), S (red) and G2 (blue) phases of the cell cycle. Averages for 3 independent experiments are shown, *p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.g008

While c-MYC is expressed at low levels in quiescent cells, it is induced upon cell division and constitutively expressed throughout the cell cycle [68]. c-MYC is involved at different stages of the cell cycle progression. In addition, overexpression of c-MYC has been suggested to shorten the G1-[69] and the S-phases [70] of the cell cycle in doing so increasing cell division rate. We have previously shown that Pu27 induces cell cycle arrest in G1-phase most likely due to c-MYC downregulation. The analysis of the cell cycle status in U937 exposed to the Pu27-HS confirmed our previous observation of G1 arrest for Pu27 (Fig 8B). In addition to Pu27, cell cycle arrest at the G1-phase was induced by Pu1, Pu1.2, Pu2 and Pu10.2 which would be consistent with c-MYC involvement in the G1/S phase transition [68] suggesting that these Pu27-HS may affect c-MYC and its downstream target in the same manner. In contrast Pu5, Pu9, Pu11, Pu14, Pu17 and Pu20 induced a cell cycle arrest at the S-phase reflecting the role of c-MYC at different check points of the cell cycle. Nevertheless, the accumulation of cells at either G1- or S-phase of the cell cycle will reduce the relative number of dividing cell and eventually result in growth inhibition.

Some of the Pu27 homologous sequences are present in the transcriptome

As shown in Table 1 most of the Pu27 homologous sequences are located within the untranslated region (UTR) of the mRNA for some genes (c-MYC, SOX2.), or in/or near long non-coding RNA, however some sequences are not located in the vicinity of a gene. In an attempt to understand the role of these sequences in cell function, we investigated whether the Pu27-HS are expressed in the transcriptome of normal and leukemic cells. The total RNA was collected from each cell line at optimal growth and converted to cDNA as was the RNA collected form 2 healthy donors’ peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). The transcription level of each of the Pu27-HS was evaluated by RT-qPCR assay using primer pairs designed to encompass each Pu27-HS on the same strand. The threshold cycle (CT) was considered significant for a number of cycles below 34 for highly expressed and CT values between 34 and 35 for lowly expressed and not detected for CT values above 35. The data show that Pu3+, Pu11 and Pu14 were highly expressed in all four cell lines and PBMC indicating their presence in the untranslated mRNA- while Pu2, Pu16 and Pu20 were expressed in leukemic cells and less in PBMC (Fig 9A and 9B). Some of the Pu27-HS transcripts were present in the leukemia cells but not in the PBMC and some were lowly or not expressed in any of the cells investigated within the scope of this study. The difference in expression of the Pu27-HS between healthy donors PBMC and Leukemia cell lines could reveal a role for these sequences in this malignancy. Notably, Pu27 was lowly transcribed in U937 compared to Molt-4, Raji or HL-60 which seems to express the most correlating Pu27 with c-MYC expression for this cell line. As Pu27 is present in the untranslated region (UTR) of the mRNA, the low level of Pu27 expression in U937 could indicate a low level of UTR-mRNA. The fact that the expression of Pu27 in U937 did not correlate with the expression of c-MYC suggests a truncated or absent 5’UTR-mRNA for this cell line and could reflect the role of such RNA in the gene transcription. Furthermore, the fact that these sequences are expressed at relatively high levels will be consistent with their regulatory role in gene expression.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 9. Expression of the 18 Pu27-HS in leukemia cell lines and in healthy donor PBMC.

(A). Bar graph for the CT values of RT-qPCR realized with total RNA collected form 4 leukemia cell lines and 2 healthy donor PBMC. (B). Table showing the CT values for expression (white), lowly expressed (gray) and not determined (pink).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.g009

Discussion

The estimated number of G-quadruplex forming motifs has increased with the decoding of the human genome [7, 71]. Thus, it is not surprising that some G-quadruplex-forming sequences may be found in multiple copies, as is the case for the G-quadruplex-forming sequences within telomeres or centromeres of the chromosomes, reflecting the fact that they share the same function. However, G-quadruplex-forming sequences contained in regulatory regions of eukaryotic promoters have generally been thought to be unique. Unexpectedly, our search for localization of Pu27 revealed 17 putative G-quadruplex forming sequences with a high degree of homology to the sequence of NHEIII1 in the c-MYC promoter. These DNA sequences, homologous to Pu27, are located in different chromosomes and often are positioned in or near gene transcription sites.

The oligonucleotides encoding all the Pu27-HS were confirmed to form G-quadruplex and to bind specifically to the double stranded Pu27 parent sequence in NHEIII1 of c-MYC promoter. Furthermore, we have previously shown that Pu27 inhibits cell growth and downregulates c-MYC transcription in leukemic cell lines [42]. We show here that all of the Pu27 family members inhibit cell proliferation as much as, and in some cases even more than Pu27 in four different leukemia cell lines presumably through c-MYC downregulation. The fact that all the Pu27-HS share the Pu27 structure and bind in a sequence-specific manner to the c-MYC promoter silencer raises the possibility of a complex regulatory system for c-MYC (and perhaps for the other genes containing such sequences) that may involve intra-chromosomal and inter-chromosomal interactions. Such interactions have been reported for enhancers localized at sites distant from the gene promoter such as in the β-globin cluster gene [72] and even, on other chromosomes (T-helper2 cytokines genes [73]). There is evidence supporting long range control (LRC) of c-MYC transcription, as enhancers have been found as far as 335Kb from the c-MYC promoter [74, 75] and binding sites for CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) [76] and TCF-4 are present within the promoter region [77, 78]. At least one binding site for CTCF is located within the complementary strand (C-rich) containing NHEIII1 further suggesting a role in LCR for this silencing element. Another possibility is that one or more of these Pu27-HS may be transcribed into a noncoding transcript which will interact specifically with the parent Pu27 target sequence. Such an interaction if it occurs would be expected to stabilize the G-quadruplex structure keeping the transcription in off position and would be sequence and gene specific. In fact, we found that most of the sequences of the Pu27 family are present in the transcriptome. The relative expression of such sequences seems to be proportional to their presence in the UTR of transcribed genes such as SOX2, NAV2 or SPTLC2 and would likely be cell/tissue specific. It is thus possible that in normal cell function the G-quadruplex contained in the newly transcribed mRNA regulates further transcription in a DNA-RNA back-loop binding as it has been demonstrated for c-MYC 5’UTR mRNA [79]. The low representation of Pu27 in the transcriptome of U937 could be a characteristic of this particular cell line and may reflect the lack of control for c-MYC transcription by the G-quadruplex structure present in the 5’UTR-mRNA.

The fact that most of the Pu27-HS are located within gene transcription sites also suggests a potential role in the regulation of these genes analogous to that of Pu27/NHEIII1 on c-MYC regulation and therefore they may define concordant pathways for gene regulation. This also predicts cell specificity for these sequences. In this work, the comparison of the effect of the different Pu27-HS on the expression of c-MYC and SOX2 revealed that the majority of these G-quadruplex sequences affect both genes expression in the same manner suggesting that this will be true for all the genes containing such sequences. Furthermore, most of the Pu27-HS affect cells similarly as Pu27 suggesting that they are interchangeable, and confirmed the binding of the Pu27-HS to the same sequences in the gene promoters. This will be in concordance with different regulatory mechanisms utilized by the Pu27-HS depending most likely on the binding site (in the gene or 5’UTR-mRNA) and the cell type/condition (see further for possible mechanisms in Fig 10). It is however interesting to note that while Pu27 downregulated c-MYC and SOX2 expression (silencing these genes) Pu3+ -which is located in the SOX2 transcribed region- upregulated these two genes expression suggesting different mechanisms of action for Pu27 and Pu3+ to control their respective gene expression at least in this leukemic cell line. It is possible that the difference in gene regulation for Pu27 and Pu3+ depend on the position of their genomic counterpart within their respective gene. Notably, U937 cells were not very sensitive to Pu3+ at day 5 (Fig 2), however by day 6 about 80% growth inhibition was reached (FR observations). We have also observed a significant down-regulation of SOX2 gene expression in U937 exposed to Pu3+ when cultured at higher density (FR observations). These observations suggest that SOX2 is under a more complex regulatory network most likely dependent on the cell number. It has been suggested that small increase in SOX2 protein can trigger differentiation in mouse embryonic cells [80] it is therefore possible that the increase in expression obtained after Pu27-HS exposure could orient the U937 cells towards differentiation. While we have demonstrated that Pu27 binds to the silencer in c-MYC promoter little is known about G-quadruplex involved in the regulation of SOX2 transcription. Further investigation of G-quadruplex induced regulation of such a key gene as SOX2 would be of the extreme importance for the understanding of cancer and neural development. In addition, the evaluation of the effect each Pu27-HS for the regulation of their respective genes will be informative of the specific role played by these particular G-quadruplex sequences in the cell biology and will likely provide additional possibilities for applications in cancer and stem cell therapy.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 10. Schematic of mechanisms of action for the Pu27-HS to inhibit c-MYC expression in U937.

The silencer NHEIII1 in the c-MYC promoter is in equilibrium between the OFF position when it forms G-quadruplex structure or ON when in duplex resulting in mRNA and protein production. In the presence of Pu27-HS (blue) the protein can be inhibited after several possibilities of binding: 1) Pu27-HS bind to the C-rich strand and stabilize the G-quadruplex and inhibit transcription. 2) Pu27-HS bind to C-rich duplex and induce error in the mRNA and inhibit translation. 3) Pu27-HS bind to the C-rich complementary sequence in the 5’UTRmRNA and inhibit translation. 4) Pu27-HS bind to the G-rich, stabilize the G-quadruplex and inhibit transcription.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.g010

We demonstrate in this study that the inhibition of cell proliferation of the U937 cell line by the Pu27-HS was associated with cell cycle arrest at the G1 and S phases suggesting an effect at different regulatory points of the cell cycle. c-MYC is a transcription factor that functions as a transcription regulator for genes in the G1 to S phase transition (E2F1, CDK1…), for genes involved in DNA replication and in the check points (CHK1, CHK2, GADD45…) thus interfering with the cell cycle progression at different level [81]. Notably, it has been shown that c-MYC accelerates the cell entry into G1 phase, the G1 to S transition and the S-phase progression [68–70]. Therefore, a decrease in c-MYC expression would explain the cell cycle arrest where cells will not complete mitosis resulting in inhibition in cell proliferation as observed in cells exposed to Pu27 homologous sequence for 5 days.

Although the exact mechanism by which Pu27 inhibits c-MYC expression is not known, it is likely mediated through direct interaction of the oligonucleotide sequence with its genomic counterpart in c-MYC promoter region, either by intermolecular quadruplex formation or by strand invasion [82]. Our in vitro experiments in which Pu27 (G-rich) was covalently crosslinked to its target sequence clearly indicates that the sequence-specific binding occurs with the C-rich strand of the NHEIII1, via strand invasion. Since Watson-Crick binding of the Pu27 oligonucleotide to the C-rich genomic target would inherently stabilize the G-quadruplex structure of the endogenous Pu27 sequence, the transcription machinery would be repressed (1 in Fig 10). This is very likely the mechanism by which Pu27 oligonucleotide sequences inhibit c-MYC expression. The high sequence similarity of the Pu27-HS suggests that they will preferably bind to the C-rich strand as well. We confirmed that most of the Pu27 family members significantly reduced c-MYC protein expression in leukemic cells. However, this effect was not always the result of a downregulation of c-MYC transcription. Indeed, in some cases the protein expression was reduced even when there was no effect on the c-MYC transcription. This discrepancy could either be result of errors in the transcription of the new mRNA due to the binding of the oligonucleotide sequences to their target NHEIII1 in Triplex manner (2 in Fig 10), or of the binding of the oligonucleotides sequences to the 5’UTR-mRNA (3 in Fig 10) as antisense, resulting in both cases in decrease in the translation [83]. At this stage of our investigation, we cannot exclude the possible binding of the exogenous sequences to the G-rich strand of the NHEIII1 in vivo to form intermolecular G-quadruplex, stabilizing the G-quadruplex to silence transcription (4 in Fig 10) [9]. More studies will be necessary to extensively investigate the actual binding of these sequences in vivo in order to determine exactly how they work. Nevertheless, at this point of our knowledge and with the evidences presented in this study we have proposed a summary of possible mechanisms for Pu27/Pu27-HS inhibition of c-MYC expression in Fig 10.

It is interesting to speculate about the reason for the existence of these G-quadruplex motifs which contain a similar core of oligonucleotides sequence but are located in different chromosomes. It is possible that quadruplex-forming sequences represent a generalized mechanical feature as suggested by Sen et al. [1, 84] to stabilize the pairing of homologous chromosomes during meiosis or a common mechanism (protein binding, RNA binding…) to regulate transcription of highly expressed genes such as c-MYC. The presence of binding sites for different transcription factors common to all the Pu27-HS is in concordance with shared regulatory mechanism. For instance, the presence of MZF1 binding site(s) in all the Pu27 homologous sequences [61] favors a common mechanism especially in regards to the fact that this transcription factor is involved in differentiation of hematopoietic cells [85]. MZF1 may be involved in an early stage of hematopoiesis and plays a role in terminal differentiation–especially of granulocyte lineage [85], it has also been shown to regulate c-MYC expression in lung adenocarcinoma [61]. Furthermore, NHEIII1 requirement for c-MYC transcription silencing is dependent upon formation of G-quadruplex structures [9, 40, 86]. This 3D folding of the segment of DNA will mask the binding of the TF sites thereby impeding c-MYC transcription. In leukemia, c-MYC overexpression may be caused by translocation or amplification implying that the control normally exerted by NHEIII1 through stable G-quadruplex structure is abolished, thereby freeing TF binding sites that could promote c-MYC expression. The addition of exogenous Pu27 that bind specifically to NHEIII1 could stabilize the G-quadruplex either by strand invasion of the complementary C-rich strand (as suggested by the crosslinking experiment describe herein) or by Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds on the G-rich strand [82] occupying MZF1 and/or other TF(s) binding sites to restore the regulatory potential of NHEIII1.

Nevertheless, the finding of these almost identical nucleotide sequences located in the promoter region of genes involved in stem cell maintenance such as c-MYC and SOX2, neural cell differentiation (SOX2, NAV2, GRM6) or near gene involved in senescence such as BRD7 suggested a shared regulatory mechanism involving sequence specific interactions of either genomic DNA sequences or transcripts of G-quadruplex-forming sequences. Regardless, we believe that the growth inhibitory effects of the Pu27 family of oligonucleotides may provide an opportunity to effectively target c-MYC expression that could be exploited for cancer therapy.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig.

(A): Circular dichroism spectra for 4 extra oligosequences from the Pu27 family compared to Pu27. (B): Specificity of four extra Pu27-HS binding to Pu27 target sequence in the c-MYC promoter. (C): Specificity of Pu27 binding to its target sequence, no competition observed by a different G-quadruplex forming oligonucleotide sequences (K-RAS). (D): Specificity of Pu27 binding to its target sequence in the c-MYC promoter, no binding with the G-quadruplex forming oligonucleotides AS1411 or K-RAS.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.s001

(PDF)

S1 Table. Primers pairs for RT-qPCR analysis: to determine expression of the Pu27 genomic family and target c-MYC and SOX2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161588.s002

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks Dr. Niles A. Peirce for providing the UV sensitive crosslinker: [3-cyanovinylcarbazole (CNVK)].

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: DMM FR SDT.
  2. Formal analysis: FR ECR.
  3. Funding acquisition: DMM.
  4. Investigation: SDT FR.
  5. Methodology: FR SDT.
  6. Supervision: DMM.
  7. Validation: FR SDT.
  8. Writing – original draft: FR.
  9. Writing – review & editing: DMM ECR SDT FR.

References

  1. 1. Sen D, Gilbert W. Formation of parallel four-stranded complexes by guanine-rich motifs in DNA and its implications for meiosis. Nature. 1988;334(6180):364–6. pmid:3393228.
  2. 2. Sundquist WI, Klug A. Telomeric DNA dimerizes by formation of guanine tetrads between hairpin loops. Nature. 1989;342(6251):825–9. pmid:2601741.
  3. 3. Andorf CM, Kopylov M, Dobbs D, Koch KE, Stroupe ME, Lawrence CJ, et al. G-quadruplex (G4) motifs in the maize (Zea mays L.) genome are enriched at specific locations in thousands of genes coupled to energy status, hypoxia, low sugar, and nutrient deprivation. Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao. 2014;41(12):627–47. pmid:25527104.
  4. 4. Capra JA, Paeschke K, Singh M, Zakian VA. G-Quadruplex DNA Sequences Are Evolutionarily Conserved and Associated with Distinct Genomic Features in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(7):e1000861. pmid:20676380
  5. 5. Huppert JL, Balasubramanian S. G-quadruplexes in promoters throughout the human genome. Nucleic acids research. 2007;35(2):406–13. pmid:17169996; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1802602.
  6. 6. Verma A, Halder K, Halder R, Yadav VK, Rawal P, Thakur RK, et al. Genome-wide computational and expression analyses reveal G-quadruplex DNA motifs as conserved cis-regulatory elements in human and related species. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2008;51(18):5641–9. pmid:18767830.
  7. 7. Chambers VS, Marsico G, Boutell JM, Di Antonio M, Smith GP, Balasubramanian S. High-throughput sequencing of DNA G-quadruplex structures in the human genome. Nature biotechnology. 2015;33(8):877–81. pmid:26192317.
  8. 8. Simonsson T, Pecinka P, Kubista M. DNA tetraplex formation in the control region of c-myc. Nucleic acids research. 1998;26(5):1167–72. pmid:9469822; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC147388.
  9. 9. Siddiqui-Jain A, Grand CL, Bearss DJ, Hurley LH. Direct evidence for a G-quadruplex in a promoter region and its targeting with a small molecule to repress c-MYC transcription. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99(18):11593–8. pmid:12195017; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC129314.
  10. 10. Cogoi S, Xodo LE. G-quadruplex formation within the promoter of the KRAS proto-oncogene and its effect on transcription. Nucleic acids research. 2006;34(9):2536–49. pmid:16687659; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1459413.
  11. 11. Rankin S, Reszka AP, Huppert J, Zloh M, Parkinson GN, Todd AK, et al. Putative DNA quadruplex formation within the human c-kit oncogene. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2005;127(30):10584–9. pmid:16045346; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2195896.
  12. 12. Dai J, Dexheimer TS, Chen D, Carver M, Ambrus A, Jones RA, et al. An intramolecular G-quadruplex structure with mixed parallel/antiparallel G-strands formed in the human BCL-2 promoter region in solution. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2006;128(4):1096–8. pmid:16433524; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2556172.
  13. 13. Eddy J, Maizels N. Gene function correlates with potential for G4 DNA formation in the human genome. Nucleic acids research. 2006;34(14):3887–96. pmid:16914419; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1557811.
  14. 14. Ou TM, Lu YJ, Tan JH, Huang ZS, Wong KY, Gu LQ. G-quadruplexes: targets in anticancer drug design. ChemMedChem. 2008;3(5):690–713. pmid:18236491.
  15. 15. Balasubramanian S, Hurley LH, Neidle S. Targeting G-quadruplexes in gene promoters: a novel anticancer strategy? Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2011;10(4):261–75. pmid:21455236; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3119469.
  16. 16. Dang CV, O'Donnell KA, Zeller KI, Nguyen T, Osthus RC, Li F. The c-Myc target gene network. Seminars in cancer biology. 2006;16(4):253–64. pmid:16904903.
  17. 17. Eilers M, Eisenman RN. Myc's broad reach. Genes & development. 2008;22(20):2755–66. pmid:18923074; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2751281.
  18. 18. Prochownik EV, Kukowska J. Deregulated expression of c-myc by murine erythroleukaemia cells prevents differentiation. Nature. 1986;322(6082):848–50. pmid:3528863.
  19. 19. Kohlhuber F, Hermeking H, Graessmann A, Eick D. Induction of Apoptosis by the c-Myc Helix-Loop-Helix/Leucine Zipper Domain in Mouse 3T3-L1 Fibroblasts. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1995;270(48):28797–805. pmid:7499403
  20. 20. Miller DM, Thomas SD, Islam A, Muench D, Sedoris K. c-Myc and cancer metabolism. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2012;18(20):5546–53. pmid:23071356; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3505847.
  21. 21. Chappell J, Dalton S. Roles for MYC in the establishment and maintenance of pluripotency. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2013;3(12):a014381. pmid:24296349.
  22. 22. Smith KN, Singh AM, Dalton S. Myc represses primitive endoderm differentiation in pluripotent stem cells. Cell stem cell. 2010;7(3):343–54. pmid:20804970; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2954754.
  23. 23. Wilson A, Murphy MJ, Oskarsson T, Kaloulis K, Bettess MD, Oser GM, et al. c-Myc controls the balance between hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Genes & development. 2004;18(22):2747–63.
  24. 24. Felsher DW, Bishop JM. Reversible tumorigenesis by MYC in hematopoietic lineages. Molecular cell. 1999;4(2):199–207. pmid:10488335.
  25. 25. Adhikary S, Eilers M. Transcriptional regulation and transformation by Myc proteins. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2005;6(8):635–45. pmid:16064138.
  26. 26. Wolfer A, Wittner BS, Irimia D, Flavin RJ, Lupien M, Gunawardane RN, et al. MYC regulation of a "poor-prognosis" metastatic cancer cell state. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(8):3698–703. pmid:20133671; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2840447.
  27. 27. Jenkins RB, Qian J, Lieber MM, Bostwick DG. Detection of c-myc oncogene amplification and chromosomal anomalies in metastatic prostatic carcinoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer research. 1997;57(3):524–31. pmid:9012485.
  28. 28. Lin P, Dickason TJ, Fayad LE, Lennon PA, Hu P, Garcia M, et al. Prognostic value of MYC rearrangement in cases of B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma. Cancer. 2012;118(6):1566–73. pmid:21882178.
  29. 29. Battey J, Moulding C, Taub R, Murphy W, Stewart T, Potter H, et al. The human c-myc oncogene: structural consequences of translocation into the IgH locus in Burkitt lymphoma. Cell. 1983;34(3):779–87. pmid:6414718.
  30. 30. Shou Y, Martelli ML, Gabrea A, Qi Y, Brents LA, Roschke A, et al. Diverse karyotypic abnormalities of the c-myc locus associated with c-myc dysregulation and tumor progression in multiple myeloma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97(1):228–33. pmid:10618400; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC26645.
  31. 31. Dalla-Favera R, Wong-Staal F, Gallo RC. Onc gene amplification in promyelocytic leukaemia cell line HL-60 and primary leukaemic cells of the same patient. Nature. 1982;299(5878):61–3. pmid:6955596.
  32. 32. Gregory MA, Hann SR. c-Myc Proteolysis by the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway: Stabilization of c-Myc in Burkitt's Lymphoma Cells. Molecular and cellular biology. 2000;20(7):2423–35. pmid:10713166
  33. 33. Bentley DL, Groudine M. Novel promoter upstream of the human c-myc gene and regulation of c-myc expression in B-cell lymphomas. Molecular and cellular biology. 1986;6(10):3481–9. pmid:3540591
  34. 34. Davis TL, Firulli AB, Kinniburgh AJ. Ribonucleoprotein and protein factors bind to an H-DNA-forming c-myc DNA element: possible regulators of the c-myc gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1989;86(24):9682–6. pmid:2690070; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC298565.
  35. 35. Siebenlist U, Hennighausen L, Battey J, Leder P. Chromatin structure and protein binding in the putative regulatory region of the c-myc gene in Burkitt lymphoma. Cell. 1984;37(2):381–91. pmid:6327064.
  36. 36. Postel EH, Mango SE, Flint SJ. A nuclease-hypersensitive element of the human c-myc promoter interacts with a transcription initiation factor. Molecular and cellular biology. 1989;9(11):5123–33. pmid:2601711; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC363664.
  37. 37. Cooney M, Czernuszewicz G, Postel EH, Flint SJ, Hogan ME. Site-specific oligonucleotide binding represses transcription of the human c-myc gene in vitro. Science. 1988;241(4864):456–9. Epub 1988/07/22. pmid:3293213.
  38. 38. Beckett J, Burns J, Broxson C, Tornaletti S. Spontaneous DNA Lesions Modulate DNA Structural Transitions Occurring at Nuclease Hypersensitive Element III1 of the Human c-myc Proto-Oncogene. Biochemistry. 2012;51(26):5257–68. pmid:22667821
  39. 39. Ma Y, Ou TM, Hou JQ, Lu YJ, Tan JH, Gu LQ, et al. 9-N-Substituted berberine derivatives: stabilization of G-quadruplex DNA and down-regulation of oncogene c-myc. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2008;16(16):7582–91. pmid:18674916.
  40. 40. Hurley LH, Von Hoff DD, Siddiqui-Jain A, Yang D. Drug targeting of the c-MYC promoter to repress gene expression via a G-quadruplex silencer element. Seminars in oncology. 2006;33(4):498–512. Epub 2006/08/08. pmid:16890804.
  41. 41. Huang MJ, Cheng YC, Liu CR, Lin S, Liu HE. A small-molecule c-Myc inhibitor, 10058-F4, induces cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and myeloid differentiation of human acute myeloid leukemia. Experimental hematology. 2006;34(11):1480–9. pmid:17046567.
  42. 42. Sedoris KC, Thomas SD, Clarkson CR, Muench D, Islam A, Singh R, et al. Genomic c-Myc quadruplex DNA selectively kills leukemia. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2012;11(1):66–76. Epub 2011/11/16. pmid:22084162; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3701457.
  43. 43. Bochman ML, Paeschke K, Zakian VA. DNA secondary structures: stability and function of G-quadruplex structures. Nature reviews Genetics. 2012;13(11):770–80. pmid:23032257; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3725559.
  44. 44. Huppert JL. Hunting G-quadruplexes. Biochimie. 2008;90(8):1140–8. pmid:18294969.
  45. 45. Vieregg JR, Nelson HM, Stoltz BM, Pierce NA. Selective nucleic acid capture with shielded covalent probes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2013;135(26):9691–9. pmid:23745667; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3703666.
  46. 46. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. Epub 2002/02/16. pmid:11846609.
  47. 47. Park SB, Seo KW, So AY, Seo MS, Yu KR, Kang SK, et al. SOX2 has a crucial role in the lineage determination and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells through Dickkopf-1 and c-MYC. Cell death and differentiation. 2012;19(3):534–45. pmid:22015605; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3278737.
  48. 48. Laing AF, Lowell S, Brickman JM. Gro/TLE enables embryonic stem cell differentiation by repressing pluripotent gene expression. Developmental Biology. 2015;397(1):56–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.10.007. pmid:25446531
  49. 49. McNeill EM, Klockner-Bormann M, Roesler EC, Talton LE, Moechars D, Clagett-Dame M. Nav2 hypomorphic mutant mice are ataxic and exhibit abnormalities in cerebellar development. Dev Biol. 2011;353(2):331–43. pmid:21419114; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3250223.
  50. 50. McNeill EM, Roos KP, Moechars D, Clagett-Dame M. Nav2 is necessary for cranial nerve development and blood pressure regulation. Neural development. 2010;5:6. pmid:20184720; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2843687.
  51. 51. Yamagata M, Weiner JA, Sanes JR. Sidekicks: synaptic adhesion molecules that promote lamina-specific connectivity in the retina. Cell. 2002;110(5):649–60. pmid:12230981.
  52. 52. Rotthier A, Auer-Grumbach M, Janssens K, Baets J, Penno A, Almeida-Souza L, et al. Mutations in the SPTLC2 subunit of serine palmitoyltransferase cause hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type I. American journal of human genetics. 2010;87(4):513–22. pmid:20920666; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2948807.
  53. 53. Redies C, Treubert-Zimmermann U, Luo J. Cadherins as regulators for the emergence of neural nets from embryonic divisions. Journal of Physiology-Paris. 2003;97(1):5–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2003.10.002.
  54. 54. Huang Y-Y, Haug MF, Gesemann M, Neuhauss SCF. Novel Expression Patterns of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 6 in the Zebrafish Nervous System. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e35256. pmid:22523578
  55. 55. Tan F, Zhu H, Tao Y, Yu N, Pei Q, Liu H, et al. Neuron navigator 2 overexpression indicates poor prognosis of colorectal cancer and promotes invasion through the SSH1L/cofilin-1 pathway. Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research: CR. 2015;34:117. pmid:26452645; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4600204.
  56. 56. Weina K, Utikal J. SOX2 and cancer: current research and its implications in the clinic. Clinical and translational medicine. 2014;3:19. pmid:25114775; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4126816.
  57. 57. Bates PJ, Kahlon JB, Thomas SD, Trent JO, Miller DM. Antiproliferative activity of G-rich oligonucleotides correlates with protein binding. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1999;274(37):26369–77. pmid:10473594.
  58. 58. Gonzalez V, Guo K, Hurley L, Sun D. Identification and characterization of nucleolin as a c-myc G-quadruplex-binding protein. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2009;284(35):23622–35. pmid:19581307; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2749137.
  59. 59. Blume SW, Snyder RC, Ray R, Thomas S, Koller CA, Miller DM. Mithramycin inhibits SP1 binding and selectively inhibits transcriptional activity of the dihydrofolate reductase gene in vitro and in vivo. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1991;88(5):1613–21. pmid:1834700; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC295684.
  60. 60. Snyder RC, Ray R, Blume S, Miller DM. Mithramycin blocks transcriptional initiation of the c-myc P1 and P2 promoters. Biochemistry. 1991;30(17):4290–7. pmid:1827033.
  61. 61. Tsai LH, Wu JY, Cheng YW, Chen CY, Sheu GT, Wu TC, et al. The MZF1/c-MYC axis mediates lung adenocarcinoma progression caused by wild-type lkb1 loss. Oncogene. 2014. pmid:24793789.
  62. 62. Kim HG, Reddoch JF, Mayfield C, Ebbinghaus S, Vigneswaran N, Thomas S, et al. Inhibition of transcription of the human c-myc protooncogene by intermolecular triplex. Biochemistry. 1998;37(8):2299–304. Epub 1998/03/28. pmid:9485376.
  63. 63. Bates PJ, Laber DA, Miller DM, Thomas SD, Trent JO. Discovery and development of the G-rich oligonucleotide AS1411 as a novel treatment for cancer. Experimental and molecular pathology. 2009;86(3):151–64. pmid:19454272; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2716701.
  64. 64. Lee JY, Lee CH, Shim SH, Seo HK, Kyhm JH, Cho S, et al. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of the monoblastic cell line U937. karyotype clarification by G-banding, whole chromosome painting, microdissection and reverse painting, and comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer genetics and cytogenetics. 2002;137(2):124–32. pmid:12393283.
  65. 65. Yoshimura Y, Fujimoto K. Ultrafast reversible photo-cross-linking reaction: toward in situ DNA manipulation. Organic letters. 2008;10(15):3227–30. pmid:18582065.
  66. 66. Fujimoto K, Yamada A, Yoshimura Y, Tsukaguchi T, Sakamoto T. Details of the Ultrafast DNA Photo-Cross-Linking Reaction of 3-Cyanovinylcarbazole Nucleoside: Cis–Trans Isomeric Effect and the Application for SNP-Based Genotyping. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2013;135(43):16161–7. pmid:24087918
  67. 67. Kwan KY, Shen J, Corey DP. C-MYC transcriptionally amplifies SOX2 target genes to regulate self-renewal in multipotent otic progenitor cells. Stem cell reports. 2015;4(1):47–60. pmid:25497456; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4297878.
  68. 68. Rabbitts PH, Watson JV, Lamond A, Forster A, Stinson MA, Evan G, et al. Metabolism of c-myc gene products: c-myc mRNA and protein expression in the cell cycle. The EMBO journal. 1985;4(8):2009–15. pmid:4065102; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC554455.
  69. 69. Nass SJ, Dickson RB. Epidermal growth factor-dependent cell cycle progression is altered in mammary epithelial cells that overexpress c-myc. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 1998;4(7):1813–22. pmid:9676860.
  70. 70. Robinson K, Asawachaicharn N, Galloway DA, Grandori C. c-Myc accelerates S-phase and requires WRN to avoid replication stress. PLoS One. 2009;4(6):e5951. pmid:19554081; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2694031.
  71. 71. Huppert JL, Balasubramanian S. Prevalence of quadruplexes in the human genome. Nucleic acids research. 2005;33(9):2908–16. pmid:15914667; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1140081.
  72. 72. Tolhuis B, Palstra RJ, Splinter E, Grosveld F, de Laat W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus. Molecular cell. 2002;10(6):1453–65. pmid:12504019.
  73. 73. Spilianakis CG, Lalioti MD, Town T, Lee GR, Flavell RA. Interchromosomal associations between alternatively expressed loci. Nature. 2005;435(7042):637–45. pmid:15880101.
  74. 74. Yochum GS, Cleland R, Goodman RH. A genome-wide screen for beta-catenin binding sites identifies a downstream enhancer element that controls c-Myc gene expression. Molecular and cellular biology. 2008;28(24):7368–79. pmid:18852287; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2593444.
  75. 75. Pomerantz MM, Ahmadiyeh N, Jia L, Herman P, Verzi MP, Doddapaneni H, et al. The 8q24 cancer risk variant rs6983267 shows long-range interaction with MYC in colorectal cancer. Nature genetics. 2009;41(8):882–4. pmid:19561607; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2763485.
  76. 76. Filippova GN, Fagerlie S, Klenova EM, Myers C, Dehner Y, Goodwin G, et al. An exceptionally conserved transcriptional repressor, CTCF, employs different combinations of zinc fingers to bind diverged promoter sequences of avian and mammalian c-myc oncogenes. Molecular and cellular biology. 1996;16(6):2802–13. pmid:8649389; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC231272.
  77. 77. Sotelo J, Esposito D, Duhagon MA, Banfield K, Mehalko J, Liao H, et al. Long-range enhancers on 8q24 regulate c-Myc. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(7):3001–5. pmid:20133699; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2840341.
  78. 78. He TC, Sparks AB, Rago C, Hermeking H, Zawel L, da Costa LT, et al. Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway. Science. 1998;281(5382):1509–12. pmid:9727977.
  79. 79. Blume SW, Miller DM, Guarcello V, Shrestha K, Meng Z, Snyder RC, et al. Inhibition of tumorigenicity by the 5'-untranslated RNA of the human c-myc P0 transcript. Experimental cell research. 2003;288(1):131–42. pmid:12878165.
  80. 80. Kopp JL, Ormsbee BD, Desler M, Rizzino A. Small Increases in the Level of Sox2 Trigger the Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem cells. 2008;26(4):903–11. pmid:18238855
  81. 81. Bretones G, Delgado MD, León J. Myc and cell cycle control. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Gene Regulatory Mechanisms. 2015;1849(5):506–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.03.013.
  82. 82. Simonsson T, Henriksson M. c-myc Suppression in Burkitt's lymphoma cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2002;290(1):11–5. pmid:11779125.
  83. 83. Halder K, Wieland M, Hartig JS. Predictable suppression of gene expression by 5'-UTR-based RNA quadruplexes. Nucleic acids research. 2009;37(20):6811–7. pmid:19740765; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2777418.
  84. 84. Tang SJ. A Model of Repetitive-DNA-Organized Chromatin Network of Interphase Chromosomes. Genes. 2012;3(1):167–75. pmid:24704848; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3902797.
  85. 85. Perrotti D, Melotti P, Skorski T, Casella I, Peschle C, Calabretta B. Overexpression of the zinc finger protein MZF1 inhibits hematopoietic development from embryonic stem cells: correlation with negative regulation of CD34 and c-myb promoter activity. Molecular and cellular biology. 1995;15(11):6075–87. pmid:7565760; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC230859.
  86. 86. Ou TM, Lu YJ, Zhang C, Huang ZS, Wang XD, Tan JH, et al. Stabilization of G-quadruplex DNA and down-regulation of oncogene c-myc by quindoline derivatives. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2007;50(7):1465–74. pmid:17346034.