Cloning and characterization of the Cerasus humilis sucrose phosphate synthase gene (ChSPS1)

Juan Wang; Junjie Du; Xiaopeng Mu; Pengfei Wang

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186650

Abstract

Sucrose is crucial to the growth and development of plants, and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) plays a key role in sucrose synthesis. To understand the genetic and molecular mechanisms of sucrose synthesis in Cerasus humilis, ChSPS1, a homologue of SPS, was cloned using RT-PCR. Sequence analysis showed that the open reading frame (ORF) sequence of ChSPS1 is 3174 bp in length, encoding a predicted protein of 1057 amino acids. The predicted protein showed a high degree of sequence identity with SPS homologues from other species. Real-time RT-PCR analysis showed that ChSPS1 mRNA was detected in all tissues and the transcription level was the highest in mature fruit. There is a significant positive correlation between expression of ChSPS1 and sucrose content. Prokaryotic expression of ChSPS1 indicated that ChSPS1 protein was expressed in E. coli and it had the SPS activity. Overexpression of ChSPS1 in tobacco led to upregulation of enzyme activity and increased sucrose contents in transgenic plants. Real-time RT-PCR analysis showed that the expression of ChSPS1 in transgenic tobacco was significantly higher than in wild type plants. These results suggested that ChSPS1 plays an important role in sucrose synthesis in Cerasus humilis.

Citation: Wang J, Du J, Mu X, Wang P (2017) Cloning and characterization of the Cerasus humilis sucrose phosphate synthase gene (ChSPS1). PLoS ONE 12(10): e0186650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650

Editor: Keqiang Wu, National Taiwan University, TAIWAN

Received: August 25, 2017; Accepted: October 4, 2017; Published: October 16, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This study was supported by the Shanxi Province Scientific Key Support Program (20130311020-7) and Platform Construction Project of Shanxi Province (2013091004-0101) received by JD. The design and conduct of study, the collection and analysis of the data were supported by these funds. It was also funded by the Research Fund for the Shanxi Province Major Science and Technology Program (20121101010) received by JD. The decision to preparation and publish of the manuscript were supported by this fund.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Cerasus humilis, commonly known as Chinese dwarf cherry, is a member of the Rosaceae, and originates in China. It is highly stress-resistant, especially to drought and cold [1]. Its fruit has high nutritional value, containing sugar, organic acid, protein, Vitamin C, and various minerals [2]. It is called ‘calcium fruit’ in China because of the significant concentration of calcium in fruit flesh (0.36%) compared to most other fruits (≤0.1%) [1,3,4]. The kernel of Chinese dwarf cherry has been used both for medicine and food for over 2000 years [5]. The fruit can be consumed fresh or be utilized in food industry, such as beverage, jam and other products [6](S1 Fig).

In higher plants, Sucrose is one of the major products of photosynthesis, and it is also the main form of translocated carbon and the main substrate for sink metabolism [7]. Most of sucrose in leaf were exported to phloem by short distance transportation, then they were unloaded into sink cells by long distance transportation; the rest of the sucrose still remain in leaf. Once unloaded into the sink cells, sucrose is disintegrated by sucrose synthase or invertase and re-synthesized rapidly by sucrose phosphate synthase [8].

Sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) has been validated to plays a key role in carbon metabolism [9]. It is the rate-limiting enzyme in sucrose synthesis which converts fructose-6-phosphate and UDP-glucose into sucrose-6-phosphate, and then sucrose phosphatase (SPP) hydrolyzes sucrose-6-phosphate to sucrose [10–12]. It is likely that SPS regulates sucrose cycling in heterotrophic cells by providing substrates for various metabolic functions while maintaining optimal sucrose levels [13].

Numerous reports have also shown that SPS modulates development of plants. SPS activity affects sucrose accumulation during the fruit maturation stage in banana, citrus, grape, kiwifruit, pear, strawberry, tomato and watermelon [14–21]. Overexpression of a maize SPS gene in potato increases the rate of photosynthesis, inhibits leaf senescence, and increases yield [22]. Sucrose synthesis via OsSPS1 is essential in pollen germination in rice [23]. In sugarcane, the SPS gene family is also associated with sugar-related traits, including sucrose production [24].

Although SPS homologues have been extensively studied in many plants, little is known about the function and expression patterns of SPS-like genes in Cerasus humilis. Differences exist in the expression patterns of SPS homologues in different plants. To understand the mechanism of sucrose synthesis in Cerasus humilis, the SPS homologue ChSPS1 was cloned, and its expression pattern was analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. Its role in sucrose synthesis was investigated by verifying prokaryotic expression of ChSPS1 and overexpressing the gene in tobacco.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

The Cerasus humilis cultivar ‘Nongda No.4’ was grown from the Cerasus humilis germplasm owned by Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province, China. Fruits were harvested from June 18th to September 3rd 2016 (80d, 110d, 117d, 124d, and 131d after anthesis), from three-year-old trees and were used in real-time RT-PCR analyses. A 30-day interval was adopted between the first two developmental stages, because sugar content changes only slightly during this period [25]. Sugar content subsequently changes dramatically, so seven-day intervals were used thereafter. Roots, stems, leaves and flowers were also collected from the same trees for real-time RT-PCR. All materials were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen after harvesting and stored at −80°C until use. The experimental protocol was approved by Shanxi Agriculture University

Cloning the ChSPS1 gene from Cerasus humilis

Total RNA was extracted from mature-stage fruits, using the TaKaRa MiniBEST Plant RNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, Japan), following the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using a TransScript^® Reverse Transcriptase Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) for real-time RT-PCR (TaKaRa, Japan) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Specific primers were designed to amplify the ORF based on the complete sequence of coding sequence (cds) from the Prunus persica (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; accession umber ABV32551.1); primers were synthesized by BGI (Beijing, China). Forward and reverse primer sequences were: ChSPS1-F (5′-ATGGCGAGCAACGATTGGATA-3′) and ChSPS1-R (5′-CTACGTCTTGACAACTCCGA-3′) respectively. PCR was carried out as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 1 min; followed by 36 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing 59.2°C for 30 s, and elongation at 72°C for 1 min, with a final 10min extension step at 72°C. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1% (w/v) agarose gels. PCR products were ligated into the pMD18-T cloning vector (TaKaRa, Japan), and the pMD18-ChSPS1 was then transformed into E. coli DH5α competent cells (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) for sequencing by BGI.

Gene analysis and phylogenetic tree construction

Amino acid sequences of the different SPS homologues were retrieved using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI Genbank) online search tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) [26]. Amino acid sequence alignments were performed with DNAMAN 6.0 software. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA 6.06, using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm, based on a distance matrix calculated using the Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) metric, with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Real-time RT-PCR analysis

In order to study the expression patterns of ChSPS1 in Cerasus humilis, real-time RT-PCR analyses were conducted on root, stem, leaf, and flower, and five different developmental stages of fruit. Expression was also examined in young leaves of transgenic and wild type tobacco. Total RNA from each tissue sample was used as a template for cDNA synthesis using the PrimeScript^™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Japan).

Specific primers were designed within the ChSPS1 ORF, to amplify a 131bp fragment, using Primer 5.0 software. The forward primer was 5′-GAGCGGAACAAGTGTGAATG-3′; the reverse primer was 5′-AGAACCCAGCCTTCCGTGT-3′. Cerasus humilis ACTIN was used as internal control, with primers 5′-ATCTGCTGGAAGGTGCTGAG-3′ and 5′-CCAAGCAGCATGAAGATCAA-3′. Tobacco ACTIN was used as an internal control, with primers 5′-CATTGGCGCTGAGAGATTCC-3′ and 5′-GCAGCTTCCATTCCGATCA-3′. RT-PCR was performed in a volume of 20 μl with 10 μl 2 × SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa, Japan) 2 μl cDNA (100 ng), 0.4 μl ROX Reference Dye II (TaKaRa, Japan), 0.8 μl of each primer (10 μM), and 6 μl ddH₂O. Each reaction was repeated three times. Amplification was carried out as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 1 min; followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 10 s, annealing at 55.5°C for 30 s, and elongation at 72°C for 1 min. Gene expression data were analyzed with ABI 7500 Software V2.3, and quantified using the comparative CT method (2^−ΔΔCt). Statistical analysis was conducted by IBM SPSS statistics 21.

Determination of soluble sugar content in Cerasus humilis fruit and correlation analysis

The soluble sugar (glucose, fructose, sucrose, sorbitol and total sugar) contents were determined using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) (Waters 1525, USA) as described by YAO et al. [27]. Briefly, 5 g frozen fruit was dried into powder and moisture content was calculated. 0.5 g powder was extracted with 5 ml of acetonitrile solution (50%, v/v). After ultrasonic at 50°C with 20 min and centrifugation at 10,000 rpm with 15 min, supernatant was diluted to 10 ml with acetonitrile solution (50%, v/v). The solution was passed through SPE column and 0.22 μm filter. A sample of 15 μl was injected into the UPLC system for analysis. Acetonitrile/water (72:28, v/v) was used as the solvent at a flow rate 0.12 ml min^-1 at 35°C. In addition, the standard samples were obtained from Sigma Chemicals Company Co. (USA). Calculation was analyzed using Breeze software. The correlation analysis between sugar accumulation and expression level of ChSPS1 was conducted by IBM SPSS statistics 21.

Prokaryotic expression and enzymatic activity assay

The fragment containing ChSPS1 ORF and the correct restriction enzyme sites was amplified using ChSPS1-XbaI-F (5′-TGCTCTAGAATGGCGAGCAACGATTGG-3′) and ChSPS1-XhoI-R (5′-CCGCTCGAGCTACGTCTTGACAACTC-3′) as primers. The PCR product was ligated to pMD18-T vector. The obtained positive plasmids and prokaryotic expression vector pET28a plasmids were digested with XbaI and XhoI (TaKaRa, Japan), then ligated with T4 ligase (TaKaRa, Japan). The correct recombinant prokaryotic expression plasmid was named as pET28a-ChSPS1 (S2 Fig), which was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) competent cells (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China).

The transformants were cultured overnight at 37°C in LB medium with kanamycin (100 mg/L). When the concentration of cell suspension reached an OD600 0.5–0.8, 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to induce protein expression for 5 h at different temperatures (25, 30, 37°C). 1.5 ml bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 5 min and precipitation was resuspended in 100 μl 5×SDS loading buffer. The suspension solution was then boiled for 5–10 min. After they were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min, 15 μl supernatant of each sample was analyzed by SDS-PAGE, which was performed in a 6% (v/v) polyacrylamide vertical slab gel with 5% (v/v) stacking gel. Proteins bands were separated clearly after stained by Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 and destained by Coomassie Blue Staining Destaining Solution.

10 ml bacteria cells with IPTG induction were collected by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm and 4°C for 5 min, then precipitation were resuspended in lysing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5 mM PMSF, 2 mM EDTA) for sonication. The SPS activity was measured in reaction mixture containing 100 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5), 15 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM UDP-glucose, 10 mM fructose-6-phosphate, and crude enzyme extract was incubated for 30 min at 30°C. The reaction was terminated by adding NaOH, a coloration reaction was induced by adding HCl and resorcinol, and the reacted solution was examined using spectrophotometry at 480 nm. Statistical analysis was conducted by IBM SPSS statistics 21.

Plant transformation

Cloned ChSPS1 and the plant expression vector pBI121 were digested with XbaI and SmaI (TaKaRa, Japan), then ligated with T4 ligase (TaKaRa, Japan). The primers were: ChSPS1-XbaI-F (5′-TGCTCTAGAATGGCGAGCAACGATTGG-3′) and ChSPS1-SmaI-R (5′-TCCCCCGGGCTACGTCTTGACAACT-3′). The resulting plasmid (pBI121-ChSPS1) (S3 Fig), which also carried gus and the CaMV35S promoter, was transfected into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105, which was then used to transform tobacco, using the leaf disc method [28]. Resistant calluses were screened out on MS medium supplemented with 100 mg/L kanamycin (kana). Transgenic plants were confirmed by gDNA extraction using the CTAB method [29] followed by PCR with ChSPS1-specific primers.

GUS assay

Histochemical GUS assays were performed according to the procedure described by Mu et al. [6]. Leaves from kana-resistant and wild type lines were respectively placed in GUS-staining solution and incubated at 37°C overnight. After staining, the tissue was washed in 30% (v/v) ethanol for 15 min, then in 50% (v/v) ethanol for 30 min, and put into 100% (v/v) ethanol to remove all plant pigments.

Determination of SPS activity and sucrose content in transgenic tobacco

The crude enzyme extract was obtained using the method described by Yang et al. [30], with some modifications. Fresh leaves (about 1.0 g) was ground up with 3mL of the following solution: 100 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl₂, 1mM Na₂EDTA, 2.5 mM DTT, 0.5% (w/v) BSA, and 10% (v/v) glycerol. After centrifugation at 12,000 rpm and 4°C for 20 min, supernatants were used as a crude enzyme extract. The assay of ChSPS1 activity in tobacco was conducted following the method as described in E.coli. The sucrose contents of the transgenic tobacco lines were determined following the method as described in Cerasus humilis. Statistical analysis was conducted by IBM SPSS statistics 21.

Results

Cloning and sequence analysis of ChSPS1

RNA isolation and PCR amplification yielded a specific band on electrophoresis, of approximately 3000 bp. Sequencing of this band indicated that it was identical to the predicted sequence length. 3174 bp full-length ORF of ChSPS1 was obtained from the fruit of Cerasus humilis, which encoded a 1057 amino acid protein (S1 Text). The molecular weight of the ChSPS1 protein was 118 kDa, and its predicted isoelectric point (PI) was 6.10.

BLAST similarity searching showed that the deduced amino acid sequence contained significant sequence similarity to genes from other species. SPS proteins were highly conserved both in length and structure across different species. Alignment was carried out using the amino acid sequences of SPS proteins from Prunus persica and Malus domestica as references. The amino acid sequence similarities of ChSPS1 from Cerasus humilis with SPS proteins from Prunus persica and Malus domestica were 98.8% and 92.9%, respectively (Fig 1).

Download:

Fig 1. Amino acid sequence alignment of ChSPS1 from Cerasus humilis with SPS proteins from Malus domestica (GenBank accession: XP_008336979.1) and Prunus persica (ABV32551.1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650.g001

To evaluate the evolutionary relationships between ChSPS1 and apparently homologous sequences, a phylogenetic tree was constructed, containing 16 species (Fig 2A). The ChSPS1 protein examined in this study (indicated by the red dot in the figure) shared a close evolutionary relationship with PpSPS1 (from Prunus persica), and was more distantly related to proteins from Dimocarpus longan and Mangifera indica. The results suggest that the cloned ChSPS1 is homologous to SPS. The four AtSPS gens from Arabidopsis thaliana and all other known plant SPS genes belonged to three families—A, B and C according to Lunn et al. [12]. The phylogenetic analysis suggested that ChSPS1 gene (indicated by the red dot in the figure) belonged to famly A (Fig 2B)

Download:

Fig 2.

(A) Phylogenetic analysis of the amino acid sequences of ChSPS1 with 15 other SPS homologues. Species names and GenBank accession numbers are: PpSPS1 (Prunus persica, ABV32551.1), PbSPS1 (Pyrus bretschneideri, XP_009363963.1), MdSPS1 (Malus domestica, XP_008336979.1), CsSPS1 (Cucumis sativus, NP_001292684.1), GsSPS (Glycine soja, KHN15044.1), PtSPS (Populus trichocarpa, XP_006389443.1), LcSPS (Litchi chinensis, AFP23360.1), TcSPS (Theobroma cacao, XP_007013574.1), MnSPS1 (Morus notabilis, XP_010099850.1), SlSPS (Solanum lycopersicum, BAB18136.1), CmSPS (Cucumis melo, ABC96184.1), NtSPS (Nicotiana tabacum, NP_001311832.1), MsSPS (Medicago sativa, AAK09427.2), DlSPS (Dimocarpus longan, AJW82919.1), and MiSPS (Mangifera indica, BAM68537.1). (B) Phylogenetic analysis of the amino acid sequences of ChSPS1 with 4 AtSPS homologues. AtSPSA1 (At5g20280), AtSPSA2 (At5g11110), AtSPSB (At1g04920), AtSPSC (At4g10120).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650.g002

Spatio-temporal expression pattern of ChSPS1

Real-time RT-PCR was performed to investigate ChSPS1 expression patterns in various tissues (root, stem, leaf, flower and fruit) and different developmental stages after anthesis of Cerasus humilis. The result indicated ChSPS1 was expressed in all tissues, with the highest level of ChSPS1 mRNA in fruit (Fig 3A). Transcription of ChSPS1 was at its highest level during the late stage of fruit ripening (Fig 3B).

Download:

Fig 3. Spatio-temporal expression patterns of ChSPS1 gene from Cerasus humilis.

Columns with error bars indicate RQ (Relative Quantification), RQmax, RQmin respectively calculated by ABI 7500 apparatus. (A) Expression of ChSPS1 gene at different organs (root, stem, leaf, flower and fruit); (B) Expression of ChSPS1 gene at different developmental stages after anthesis (80d, 110d, 117d, 124d, 131d). The error bars represent standard deviation, and different lowercase letters indicate significant statistical difference at p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650.g003

Soluble sugar content in Cerasus humilis fruit and correlation analysis

The contents of soluble sugar for cultivar ‘Nongda No.4’ at five different developmental stages (80d, 110d, 117d, 124d, and 131d after anthesis) were determined. The result showed that the sucrose content, glucose content, fructose content, sorbitol content and total sugar content were all increased steadily during fruit development (Table 1). The correlation analysis suggested that the expression level of ChSPS1 was significantly positively correlated with glucose content and sorbitol content respectively, while it was very significantly positively correlated with the total sugar and sucrose content (Table 2).

Download:

Table 1. The contents of soluble sugar during fruit development (mg·g^-1FW).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650.t001

Download:

Table 2. The correlation analysis between soluble sugar contents and expression level of ChSPS1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650.t002

Prokaryotic expression and enzymatic activity assay

The plasmids pET28a and pET28a-ChSPS1 were transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) competent cell. By SDS-PAGE analysis, correct recombinant proteins with a molecular weight of approximately 118 kDa were successfully expressed (Fig 4A, Lanes 3–5), while the E. coli/pET28a control protein and E. coli/pET28a-ChSPS1 were not found at the expected position (about 118 kDa) in the un-induced samples. The protein temperature conditions of expression were optimized to improve yield. SDS-PAGE analysis also showed that the ChSPS1 protein was optimally expressed in the transformed E. coli cell at 30°C (Fig 4A).

Download:

Fig 4.

(A) SDS-PAGE analysis of the ChSPS1 protein. (B) Enzyme activity analysis of SPS in E. coli. Lane M: Protein molecular weight markers. Lane 1 and 1: Lysis of E. coli/pET28a without IPTG induction. Lane 2 and 2: Lysis of E. coli/ pET28a-ChSPS1 without IPTG induction. Lanes 3–5 and 3–5: Lysis of E. coli/ pET28a-ChSPS1 were induced with IPTG at 25, 30, and 37°C. The position of the objective protein is indicated by an arrow. The error bars represent standard deviation, and different lowercase letters indicate significant statistical difference at p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650.g004

The SPS activity of the cells containing pET28a-ChSPS1 was higher than that of the cells carrying empty pET28a (Fig 4B). The IPTG could significantly increase the SPS activity, probably through inducing more expression of SPS protein in the transformed E. coli cells. The result indicated that ChSPS1 might be a functional gene encoding SPS protein, because the fusion protein had the activity of SPS.

Overexpression of ChSPS1 in tobacco

A total of 50 Kana-resistant lines were screened on MS solid medium supplemented with 100 mg/L Kanamycin after different culture phases of tobacco (S4 Fig). Ten lines were selected at random, for gDNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR analysis with ChSPS1-specific primers, and GUS assays; eight lines were both PCR-positive (Fig 5A) and GUS-positive (Fig 5C), indicating that ChSPS1 had integrated into the tobacco genome. No gus gene expression was detected in non-transformed control shoots (Fig 5B). Real-time RT-PCR analysis showed that the expression levels of ChSPS1 in transgenic tobacco lines were significantly higher than those in wild type lines (Fig 5D).

Download:

Fig 5.

(A) PCR detection of the ChSPS1 gene in kana-resistant shoot lines of Cerasus humilis. M: DNA molecular weight markers. WT: DNA from wild type tobacco. ChSPS1: positive control, pMD18-ChSPS1 plasmid DNA. L1–L10: kana-resistant shoots. L4 and L7: two kana-resistant escapes. (B, C) Chemical organizational analysis of GUS. (B) wild type tobacco; (C) transgenic tobacco. (D) Expression levels of ChSPS1 in the leaf of transgenic and wild type tobacco. (E) Enzyme activity analysis of SPS in the leaf of transgenic and wild type tobacco. (F) Sucrose content in the leaf of transgenic and wild type tobacco. The error bars represent standard deviation, and different lowercase letters indicate significant statistical difference at p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650.g005

SPS enzyme play an important role in plant sugar metabolism, and the overexpression of ChSPS1 in transgenic lines may affect SPS enzyme activity and sucrose content. Among the transgenic lines, the highest ChSPS1 expression level (L2), the middle level (L3) and the lowest level (L9) were selected to determine SPS activity and sucrose content. Both SPS activity and sucrose content of transgenic lines were higher than in the wild type line (Fig 5E and 5F).

Discussion

Sucrose plays an important role in the plant life cycle. As the major photosynthetic product, it is essential for growth, the synthesis of biomass and as a carbon and energy source [10]. SPS is a key enzyme that regulates the sucrose synthesis pathway [31]. The SPS homologue ChSPS1 was cloned from Cerasus humilis. The ChSPS1 ORF was found to be 3174 bp long, encoding a predicted protein of 1057 amino acids. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis showed that ChSPS1 protein has a very close evolutionary relationship with PpSPS1 (from Prunus persica), PbSPS1 (from Pyrus bretschneideri) and MdSPS1 (from Malus domestica). The structure of SPS homologues is highly conserved, and the phylogeny of these genes reflects known phylogenetic relationships [32,33]

SPS genes have been shown to have differential expression patterns in many plant species, including rice, alfalfa, banana, citrus, kiwifruit, peach and potato [33–39]. For example, the SPS gene from kiwifruit was found differentially expressed in fruits and other tissues such as roots, leaves, stems and flowers at different developmental stages [36]. The peach PpSPS was found highly expressed in maturing stages of fruit, while in leaves and the phloem-enriched fraction expression did not follow any particular rule during fruit development [37]. We had shown that transcription levels of ChSPS1 were different in root, stem, leaf, flower, and fruit of Cerasus humilis. ChSPS1 was expressed most strongly in fruit, with the second highest level detected in leaf. Expression increased gradually during fruit development, and there is a significant positive correlation between expression of ChSPS1 and sucrose content, which suggests that function of ChSPS1 may be to promote the accumulation of sucrose in fruits of Cerasus humilis.

Recombinant protein could be expressed using different heterologous systems including E. coli, yeast, and insect cells [40]. The E.coli based system is a typical prokaryotic expression system and has the highest expression potential [41]. In our research, ChSPS1 protein was successfully expressed in E. coli system for the first time, and the enzyme activity assay of transformed bacterial cells showed also that ChSPS1 encoding protein had a typical function of SPS.

Overexpression of SPS genes has been reported to increase or decrease sucrose contents in the transgenic plants. Alfalfa transformed with a ZmSPS homologue resulted in higher SPS activity and sucrose accumulation in transformants, compared to wild type alfalfa [13]. Overexpression of ZmSPS in tobacco not only increased the sucrose/starch ratio in transformants’ leaves, but also caused earlier flowering of tranformed plants [9]. In muskmelon, SPS plays an important role in regulating plant growth and determining sucrose accumulation in fruit development [42]. However, decreased sucrose contents were observed in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants overexpressing cyanobacterial SPS [43]. In this study, ChSPS1 from Cerasus humilis was overexpressed in tobacco and high levels of ChSPS1 transcripts were detected in transgenic plants. ChSPS1 overexpression led to increased SPS activities and sucrose contents in transgenic tobacco leaves which coincided with the increased SPS activity in E.coli from prokaryotic expression assay. These results showed that high levels of ChSPS1 expression can promote sucrose accumulation either in transgenic plants or in procaryotic organism.

Hitherto, little attention has been paid to molecular biological studies of sugar accumulation in the fruits of Cerasus humilis. Here we have cloned and expressed ChSPS1 protein in E.coli, meanwhile, we also transfected ChSPS1 into tobacco and demonstrated its involvement in sucrose synthesis. These results provide a step toward better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of sugar metabolism in Cerasus humilis, futhermore faciliate the molecular breeding of this species.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The phenotypic characteristic of fruits for Cerasus humilis cultivar ‘Nongda No.4’.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Identification of the pET28a-ChSPS1 expression vector by enzyme digestion.

M: DNA Marker DL5000; 1: Positive control; 2: Enzyme digestion results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Identification of the pBI121-ChSPS1expression vector by enzyme digestion.

M: DNA Marker DL5000; 1: Positive control; 2: Enzyme digestion results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Different culture phases of transgenic tobacco.

(A, B, C) Differentiation stages of cultivation; (D, E, F) Rooting stages of cultivation; (G, H) Transplanting stages of cultivation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650.s004

(TIF)

S1 Text. The sequencing data of ChSPS1 gene.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186650.s005

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

This study is a part of the PhD. thesis of the first author. I thank sincerely Professor Du as my doctoral advisor to the design of experiment and Mr. Mu as my classmate for revision of the paper. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

References

1. Du JJ, Yang HY, Chi JW. A preliminary study of selected strains of the Chinese dwarf cherry tree. China Fruits. 1993;3:23–24.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Du JJ, Yang HY, Cao Q, Yang HY. The study on biological characteristics of Chinese dwarf cherry [Cerasus humilis (Bge.) Sok]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University. 1992;12(4):311–314.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Li WD, Li O, Zhang AR, Li L, Hao JH, Jin JS, et al. Genotypic diversity of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of Chinese dwarf cherry [Cerasus humilis (Bge.) Sok.] in China. Scientia Horticulturae. 2014;75:208–213.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Mu XP, Aryal N, Du JM, Du JJ. Oil content and fatty acid composition of the kernels of 31 different cultivars of Chinese dwarf cherry [Cerasus humilis (Bge.) Sok]. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology. 2015;90:525–529.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Chau CF, Wu SH. The development of regulations of Chinese herbal medicines for both medicinal and food uses. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2006;17:313–323.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Mu XP, Liu M, Wang PF, Shou JP, Du JJ. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and plant regeneration in Chinese dwarf cherry [Cerasus humilis (Bge.) Sok]. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology. 2016;91:71–78.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Farrar J, Pollock C, Gallagher J. Sucrose and the integration of metabolism in vascular plants [J]. Plant Science. 2000;154:1–11. pmid:10725553
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Hubbard NL, Pharr DM, Huber SC. Sucrose phosphate synthase and other sucrose metabolizing enzymes in fruits of various species. Physiologia Plantarum. 1991;82(2):191–196.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Seger M, Gebril S, Tabilona J, Peel A, Sengupta-Gopalan C. Impact of concurrent overexpression of cytosolic glutamine synthetase (GS1) and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) on growth and development in transgenic tobacco. Planta. 2015;241:69–81. pmid:25213117
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Sharma S, Sreenivasulu N, Harshavardhan VT, Seiler C, Sharma S, Khalil ZN, et al. Delineating the structural, functional and evolutionary relationships of sucrose phosphate synthase gene family II in wheat and related grasses. BMC Plant Biology. 2010;10:134. pmid:20591144
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Winter H, Huber S. Regulation of sucrose metabolism in higher plants: localization and regulation of activity of key enzymes. Critical Reviews in plant sciences. 2000;19, 31–67.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Lunn J, MacRae E. New complexities in the synthesis of sucrose. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2003;6(3):208–214. pmid:12753969
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Gebril S, Seger M, Villanueva MF, Ortega JH, Baggam S, Sengupta-Gopalan C. Transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa) with increased sucrose phosphate synthase activity shows enhanced growth when grown under N2-fixing conditions. Planta. 2015;242:1009–1024. pmid:26055333
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Nascimento JROD, Cordenunsi BR, Lajolo FM, Alcocer MJC. Banana sucrose-phosphate synthase gene expression during fruit ripening. Planta. 1997;203:283–288. pmid:9431676
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Komatsu A, Takanokura Y, Takaya M, Omura M, Akihama T. Differential expression of three sucrose-phosphate synthase isoforms during sucrose accumulation in citrus fruits (Citrus unshiu Marc.). Plant Science. 1999;140:169–178.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Dai ZW, Leon C, Feil R, Lunn JE, Delrot S, Gomes E. Metabolic profiling reveals coordinated switches in primary carbohydrate metabolism in grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.), a non-climacteric fleshy fruit. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2013;64:1345–1355. pmid:23364938
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Langenkamper G, McHale R, Gardner RC. Sucrose-phosphate synthase steady-state mRNA increases in ripening kiwifruit. Plant Molecular Biology. 1998;36:857–869. pmid:9520277
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Yu NW, Li JC, Wang JZ, Cai ZM, Sha SF, Li HJ. Roles of related enzymes in accumulation of sugars in Nanguoli Pear fruit. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2011;24:919–923.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Chai YM, Jia HF, Li CL, Qin L, Shen YY. Transcriptional analysis of sugar metabolism-related genes during strawberry fruit development. Acta Horticulturae Sinica. 2011;38:637–643.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Ngugen-Quoc B, Foyer CH. A role for ‘futile cycles’ involving invertase and sucrose synthase in sucrose metabolism of tomato fruit. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2001;52:881–889. pmid:11432905
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Yativ M, Harary I, Wol S. Sucrose accumulation in watermelon fruits: Genetic variation and biochemical analysis. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2010;167:589–596. pmid:20036442
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Ishimaru K, Hirotsu N, Kashiwagi T, Madoka Y, Nagasuga K, Ono K, et al. Overexpression of a maize SPS gene improves yield characters of potato under field conditions. Plant Prod. 2008;11:104–107.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Hirose T, Hashida Y, Aoki N, Okamura M, Yonekura M, Ohto C, et al. Analysis of gene-disruption mutants of a sucrose phosphate synthase gene in rice, OsSPS1, shows the importance of sucrose synthesis in pollen germination. Plant Science. 2014;225:102–106. pmid:25017165
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. McIntyre CL, Goode ML, Cordeiro G, Bundock P, Eliott F, Henry RJ. Characterisation of alleles of the sucrose phosphate synthase gene family in sugarcane and their association with sugar-related traits. Molecular Breeding. 2015;35:98.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Wang PF, Cao Q, He YB, Du JJ. Composition and dynamic changes of sugars and acids in Chinese dwarf cherry (Cerasus humilis Bunge) during fruit development. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica. 2011;31:1411–1416.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Jiang X, Yao F, Li XJ, Jia BL, Zhong GY, Zhang JF, et al. Molecular cloning, characterization and expression analysis of the protein arginine N-methyltransferase 1 gene (As-PRMT1) from Artemia sinica. Gene. 2015;565:122–129. pmid:25843627
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Yao GF, Zhang SL, Wu J, Gao YF, Liu J, Han K, et al. Analysis of components and contents of soluble sugars and organic acids in ten cultivars of pear by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University. 2011;34:25–31.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Wei ZG, Qu ZS, Zhang LJ, Zhao SJ, Bi ZH, Ji XH, et al. Overexpression of poplar xylem sucrose synthase in tobacco leads to a thickened cell wall and increased height. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10:e0120669 pmid:25807295
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Stockinger EJ, Mulinix CA, Long CM, Brettin TS, Iezzonl AF. A linkage map of sweet cherry based on RAPD analysis of a microspore-derived callus culture population. Journal of Heredity. 1996;37:214–218.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Yang ZY, Wang TD, Wang HC, Jia BL, Zhong GY, Zhang J F, et al. Patterns of enzyme activities and gene expressions in sucrose metabolism in relation to sugar accumulation and composition in the aril of Litchi chinensis Sonn. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2013;170:731–740. pmid:23499454
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. ElSayed AI, Boulila M, Rafudeen MS. Investigation into the Expression of Sucrose Transporters and Sucrose Phosphate Synthase mRNA in Different Plant Species. Agricultural Research. 2013; 2(1):31–42.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Lutfiyya LL, Xu NF, D’Ordine RL, Morrell JA, Miller PW, Duff SMG. Phylogenetic and expression analysis of sucrose phosphate synthase isozymes in plants. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2007;164:923–933. pmid:16876912
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Okamura M, Aoki N, Hirose T, Yonekura M, Ohto C, Ohsugi R. Tissue specific and diurnal change in gene expression of the sucrose phosphate synthase gene family in rice. Plant Science. 2011;181:159–166. pmid:21683881
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Aleman L, Ortega JL, Martinez-Grimes M, Seger M, Holguin FO, Uribe DJ, et al. Nodule-enhanced expression of a sucrose phosphate synthase gene member (MsSPSA) has a role in carbon and nitrogen metabolism in the nodules of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Planta. 2010;231:233–244. pmid:19898977
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Choudhury SR, Roy S, Sengupta DN. A comparative study of cultivar differences in sucrose phosphate synthase gene expression and sucrose formation during banana fruit ripening. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2009;54:15–24.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Komatsu A, Takanokura Y, Omura M, Akihama T. Cloning and molecular analysis of cDNAs encoding three sucrose phosphate synthase isoforms from citrus fruit (Citrus unshiu Marc.), Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 1996;252, 346–351.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Fung RWM, Langenkämpe G, Gardner RC, MacRae E. Differential expression within an SPS gene family. Plant Science. 2003;164:459–470.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Zhang CH, Shen ZJ, Zhang YP, Han J, Ma RJ, Korir NK. Cloning and expression of genes related to the sucrose metabolizing enzymes and carbohydrate changes in peach. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2013;35(2):589–602.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Reimholz R, Geiger M, Iiaake V, Deiting U, Krause KP, Sonnewald U, Stitt M. Potato plants contain multiple forms of sucrose phosphate synthase, which differ in their tissue distributions, their levels during development, and their responses to low temperature. Plant Cell Environment. 1997;20:291–305.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Jaiswal S, Khanna N, Swaminathan S. High-level expression and one-step purification of recombinant dengue virus type 2 envelope domain III protein in Escherichia coli. Protein Expression and Purification. 2004;33:80–91. pmid:14680965
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Liu BQ, Li GX, Sui XW, Yin JH, Wang H, Ren XF. Expression and functional analysis of porcine aminopeptidase N produced in prokaryotic expression system. Journal of Biotechnology. 2009;141:91–96. pmid:19428736
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Tian HM, Ma LY, Zhao C, Hao H, Gong B, Xu XY, et al. Antisense repression of sucrose phosphate synthase in transgenic muskmelon alters plant growth and fruit development. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2010;393(3):365–370. pmid:20138160
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Yoon SY, Lee JW, Bhoo SH, Jeon JS, Lee YH, Hahn TR. Analysis of carbon metabolism in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana transformed with the cyanobacterial sucrose phosphate synthase gene. Journal of Plant Biology. 2004;47:42–47.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Du JJ, Yang HY, Chi JW. A preliminary study of selected strains of the Chinese dwarf cherry tree. China Fruits. 1993;3:23–24.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Du JJ, Yang HY, Cao Q, Yang HY. The study on biological characteristics of Chinese dwarf cherry [Cerasus humilis (Bge.) Sok]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University. 1992;12(4):311–314.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Li WD, Li O, Zhang AR, Li L, Hao JH, Jin JS, et al. Genotypic diversity of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of Chinese dwarf cherry [Cerasus humilis (Bge.) Sok.] in China. Scientia Horticulturae. 2014;75:208–213.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Mu XP, Aryal N, Du JM, Du JJ. Oil content and fatty acid composition of the kernels of 31 different cultivars of Chinese dwarf cherry [Cerasus humilis (Bge.) Sok]. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology. 2015;90:525–529.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Chau CF, Wu SH. The development of regulations of Chinese herbal medicines for both medicinal and food uses. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2006;17:313–323.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Mu XP, Liu M, Wang PF, Shou JP, Du JJ. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and plant regeneration in Chinese dwarf cherry [Cerasus humilis (Bge.) Sok]. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology. 2016;91:71–78.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Farrar J, Pollock C, Gallagher J. Sucrose and the integration of metabolism in vascular plants [J]. Plant Science. 2000;154:1–11. pmid:10725553
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] PubMed/NCBI

[22] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Hubbard NL, Pharr DM, Huber SC. Sucrose phosphate synthase and other sucrose metabolizing enzymes in fruits of various species. Physiologia Plantarum. 1991;82(2):191–196.
View Article
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Seger M, Gebril S, Tabilona J, Peel A, Sengupta-Gopalan C. Impact of concurrent overexpression of cytosolic glutamine synthetase (GS1) and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) on growth and development in transgenic tobacco. Planta. 2015;241:69–81. pmid:25213117
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Sharma S, Sreenivasulu N, Harshavardhan VT, Seiler C, Sharma S, Khalil ZN, et al. Delineating the structural, functional and evolutionary relationships of sucrose phosphate synthase gene family II in wheat and related grasses. BMC Plant Biology. 2010;10:134. pmid:20591144
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Winter H, Huber S. Regulation of sucrose metabolism in higher plants: localization and regulation of activity of key enzymes. Critical Reviews in plant sciences. 2000;19, 31–67.
View Article
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Lunn J, MacRae E. New complexities in the synthesis of sucrose. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2003;6(3):208–214. pmid:12753969
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Gebril S, Seger M, Villanueva MF, Ortega JH, Baggam S, Sengupta-Gopalan C. Transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa) with increased sucrose phosphate synthase activity shows enhanced growth when grown under N2-fixing conditions. Planta. 2015;242:1009–1024. pmid:26055333
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Nascimento JROD, Cordenunsi BR, Lajolo FM, Alcocer MJC. Banana sucrose-phosphate synthase gene expression during fruit ripening. Planta. 1997;203:283–288. pmid:9431676
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Komatsu A, Takanokura Y, Takaya M, Omura M, Akihama T. Differential expression of three sucrose-phosphate synthase isoforms during sucrose accumulation in citrus fruits (Citrus unshiu Marc.). Plant Science. 1999;140:169–178.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Dai ZW, Leon C, Feil R, Lunn JE, Delrot S, Gomes E. Metabolic profiling reveals coordinated switches in primary carbohydrate metabolism in grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.), a non-climacteric fleshy fruit. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2013;64:1345–1355. pmid:23364938
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Langenkamper G, McHale R, Gardner RC. Sucrose-phosphate synthase steady-state mRNA increases in ripening kiwifruit. Plant Molecular Biology. 1998;36:857–869. pmid:9520277
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Yu NW, Li JC, Wang JZ, Cai ZM, Sha SF, Li HJ. Roles of related enzymes in accumulation of sugars in Nanguoli Pear fruit. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2011;24:919–923.
View Article
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Chai YM, Jia HF, Li CL, Qin L, Shen YY. Transcriptional analysis of sugar metabolism-related genes during strawberry fruit development. Acta Horticulturae Sinica. 2011;38:637–643.
View Article
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Ngugen-Quoc B, Foyer CH. A role for ‘futile cycles’ involving invertase and sucrose synthase in sucrose metabolism of tomato fruit. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2001;52:881–889. pmid:11432905
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Yativ M, Harary I, Wol S. Sucrose accumulation in watermelon fruits: Genetic variation and biochemical analysis. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2010;167:589–596. pmid:20036442
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] PubMed/NCBI

[73] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Ishimaru K, Hirotsu N, Kashiwagi T, Madoka Y, Nagasuga K, Ono K, et al. Overexpression of a maize SPS gene improves yield characters of potato under field conditions. Plant Prod. 2008;11:104–107.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Hirose T, Hashida Y, Aoki N, Okamura M, Yonekura M, Ohto C, et al. Analysis of gene-disruption mutants of a sucrose phosphate synthase gene in rice, OsSPS1, shows the importance of sucrose synthesis in pollen germination. Plant Science. 2014;225:102–106. pmid:25017165
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. McIntyre CL, Goode ML, Cordeiro G, Bundock P, Eliott F, Henry RJ. Characterisation of alleles of the sucrose phosphate synthase gene family in sugarcane and their association with sugar-related traits. Molecular Breeding. 2015;35:98.
View Article
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Wang PF, Cao Q, He YB, Du JJ. Composition and dynamic changes of sugars and acids in Chinese dwarf cherry (Cerasus humilis Bunge) during fruit development. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica. 2011;31:1411–1416.
View Article
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Jiang X, Yao F, Li XJ, Jia BL, Zhong GY, Zhang JF, et al. Molecular cloning, characterization and expression analysis of the protein arginine N-methyltransferase 1 gene (As-PRMT1) from Artemia sinica. Gene. 2015;565:122–129. pmid:25843627
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] PubMed/NCBI

[90] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Yao GF, Zhang SL, Wu J, Gao YF, Liu J, Han K, et al. Analysis of components and contents of soluble sugars and organic acids in ten cultivars of pear by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University. 2011;34:25–31.
View Article
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Wei ZG, Qu ZS, Zhang LJ, Zhao SJ, Bi ZH, Ji XH, et al. Overexpression of poplar xylem sucrose synthase in tobacco leads to a thickened cell wall and increased height. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10:e0120669 pmid:25807295
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Stockinger EJ, Mulinix CA, Long CM, Brettin TS, Iezzonl AF. A linkage map of sweet cherry based on RAPD analysis of a microspore-derived callus culture population. Journal of Heredity. 1996;37:214–218.
View Article
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Yang ZY, Wang TD, Wang HC, Jia BL, Zhong GY, Zhang J F, et al. Patterns of enzyme activities and gene expressions in sucrose metabolism in relation to sugar accumulation and composition in the aril of Litchi chinensis Sonn. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2013;170:731–740. pmid:23499454
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. ElSayed AI, Boulila M, Rafudeen MS. Investigation into the Expression of Sucrose Transporters and Sucrose Phosphate Synthase mRNA in Different Plant Species. Agricultural Research. 2013; 2(1):31–42.
View Article
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Lutfiyya LL, Xu NF, D’Ordine RL, Morrell JA, Miller PW, Duff SMG. Phylogenetic and expression analysis of sucrose phosphate synthase isozymes in plants. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2007;164:923–933. pmid:16876912
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Okamura M, Aoki N, Hirose T, Yonekura M, Ohto C, Ohsugi R. Tissue specific and diurnal change in gene expression of the sucrose phosphate synthase gene family in rice. Plant Science. 2011;181:159–166. pmid:21683881
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Aleman L, Ortega JL, Martinez-Grimes M, Seger M, Holguin FO, Uribe DJ, et al. Nodule-enhanced expression of a sucrose phosphate synthase gene member (MsSPSA) has a role in carbon and nitrogen metabolism in the nodules of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Planta. 2010;231:233–244. pmid:19898977
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Choudhury SR, Roy S, Sengupta DN. A comparative study of cultivar differences in sucrose phosphate synthase gene expression and sucrose formation during banana fruit ripening. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2009;54:15–24.
View Article
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Komatsu A, Takanokura Y, Omura M, Akihama T. Cloning and molecular analysis of cDNAs encoding three sucrose phosphate synthase isoforms from citrus fruit (Citrus unshiu Marc.), Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 1996;252, 346–351.
View Article
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Fung RWM, Langenkämpe G, Gardner RC, MacRae E. Differential expression within an SPS gene family. Plant Science. 2003;164:459–470.
View Article
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Zhang CH, Shen ZJ, Zhang YP, Han J, Ma RJ, Korir NK. Cloning and expression of genes related to the sucrose metabolizing enzymes and carbohydrate changes in peach. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2013;35(2):589–602.
View Article
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Reimholz R, Geiger M, Iiaake V, Deiting U, Krause KP, Sonnewald U, Stitt M. Potato plants contain multiple forms of sucrose phosphate synthase, which differ in their tissue distributions, their levels during development, and their responses to low temperature. Plant Cell Environment. 1997;20:291–305.
View Article
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Jaiswal S, Khanna N, Swaminathan S. High-level expression and one-step purification of recombinant dengue virus type 2 envelope domain III protein in Escherichia coli. Protein Expression and Purification. 2004;33:80–91. pmid:14680965
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Liu BQ, Li GX, Sui XW, Yin JH, Wang H, Ren XF. Expression and functional analysis of porcine aminopeptidase N produced in prokaryotic expression system. Journal of Biotechnology. 2009;141:91–96. pmid:19428736
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Tian HM, Ma LY, Zhao C, Hao H, Gong B, Xu XY, et al. Antisense repression of sucrose phosphate synthase in transgenic muskmelon alters plant growth and fruit development. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2010;393(3):365–370. pmid:20138160
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Yoon SY, Lee JW, Bhoo SH, Jeon JS, Lee YH, Hahn TR. Analysis of carbon metabolism in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana transformed with the cyanobacterial sucrose phosphate synthase gene. Journal of Plant Biology. 2004;47:42–47.
View Article
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Cloning the ChSPS1 gene from Cerasus humilis

Gene analysis and phylogenetic tree construction

Real-time RT-PCR analysis

Determination of soluble sugar content in Cerasus humilis fruit and correlation analysis

Prokaryotic expression and enzymatic activity assay

Plant transformation

GUS assay

Determination of SPS activity and sucrose content in transgenic tobacco

Results

Cloning and sequence analysis of ChSPS1

Spatio-temporal expression pattern of ChSPS1

Soluble sugar content in Cerasus humilis fruit and correlation analysis

Prokaryotic expression and enzymatic activity assay

Overexpression of ChSPS1 in tobacco

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The phenotypic characteristic of fruits for Cerasus humilis cultivar ‘Nongda No.4’.

S2 Fig. Identification of the pET28a-ChSPS1 expression vector by enzyme digestion.

S3 Fig. Identification of the pBI121-ChSPS1expression vector by enzyme digestion.

S4 Fig. Different culture phases of transgenic tobacco.

S1 Text. The sequencing data of ChSPS1 gene.

Acknowledgments

References