http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7643-2112
Figures
Abstract
Morphological identification of Pedicularis depends on floral characters. However, some important characters may be lost during the process of pressing the specimen. Pedicularis delavayi was described from northwestern Yunnan, and widely adopted as a variety of P. siphonantha. Unfortunately, the name “P. siphonantha var. delavayi’ incorrectly referred to P. milliana (a new species described in this study) or P. tenuituba in some herbarium specimens and publications. Moreover, phylogenetic relationships among P. delavayi, P. siphonantha and its allies (P. milliana and P. tenuituba) were not fully resolved. In this study, we sampled 76 individuals representing 56 taxa. Of them, 10 taxa were from P. siphonantha lineage, and 11 individuals of P. delavayi represented 9 populations. These species were named as P. siphonantha group on the basis of morphological similarity. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nrITS) and four chloroplast genes/regions were used for phylogenetic analyses. Phylogenetic analyses showed that the P. siphonantha group was polyphyletic: P. delavayi was sister to P. obliquigaleata in clade A; and the remaining species of P. siphonantha group were monophyletic in clade B, named as P. siphonantha lineage. In the P. siphonantha lineage, P. milliana, P. siphonantha, and P. tenuituba were well supported as monophyletic, and P. dolichosiphon was sister to P. leptosiphon. Morphologically, P. delavayi differs from species of the P. siphonantha lineage in having a long petiole (~ 50 mm) and pedicel (~ 40 mm), a ridged corolla tube, and a folded lower-lip of the corolla. Therefore, both morphological characters and phylogenetic evidence strongly supported to reinstate P. delavayi as an independent species and describe P. milliana as new species. In addition, P. neolatituba was proposed to reduce as a new synonymy of P. delavayi.
Citation: Yu W-B, Wang H, Liu M-L, Grabovskaya-Borodina AE, Li D-Z (2018) Phylogenetic approaches resolve taxonomical confusion in Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae): Reinstatement of Pedicularis delavayi and discovering a new species Pedicularis milliana. PLoS ONE 13(7): e0200372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200372
Editor: David A. Lightfoot, College of Agricultural Sciences, UNITED STATES
Received: January 26, 2018; Accepted: June 15, 2018; Published: July 25, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 31470323, and 31200185), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB954100), the Major International Joint Research Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (31320103919), the West Light Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y2227111W1), Visiting Scholar Fellowship of Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the research project of the Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences: “Collections of vascular plants in BIN RAS (history, conservation, study and replenishment).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Flowers of Pedicularis L. (Orobanchaceae) show striking interspecific variations [1, 2], so morphological identification of these species depends much on floral characters [3]. Generally, one species is easily distinguished from another morphologically similar species using fresh flowers in the field. However, floral shape and structure may be changed during the process of pressing and drying the specimen and, in practice, herbarium specimens of closely related species are very difficult to discriminate. DNA barcodes have been widely applied to assist species identification [4–6], particularly when morphological identification is uncertain. In Pedicularis, the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nrITS) or nrITS+rbcL can discriminate at least 78% of species in the genus [3, 7]. However, there is little consensus between the phylogenetic tree and traditional classification in Pedicularis [8–12], and morphologically similar species may not be sister to each other in phylogenetic analyses. Therefore, DNA sequences are very useful to delimit species and to confirm phylogenetic relationship among species.
Pedicularis delavayi was firstly named by Franchet after J. M. Delavay, who collected the type material (S1 Fig) from Yulong Mountain in Lijiang, northwestern Yunnan, China in 1886, while it was validly published by Maximowicz [13]. This species was treated as an independent species [14–17] until Tsoong [18], who downgraded it to a variety in P. siphonantha D. Don. According to illustrations in Chinese Floras [18, 19], the lower lip of P. siphonantha var. delavayi (Franch. ex Maxim.) P. C. Tsoong should be similar to P. siphonantha var. siphonantha as spreading (see Fig 1A). From illustrated publications, the name “P. siphonantha var. delavayi was used for a “long-tubed and purple-red species” (Fig 1B), which is a common species in alpine meadow at altitudes from 3000 m to 4000 m a.s.l. (above sea level, hereafter) in northwestern Yunnan [20–22]. In addition, some publications just used the name “P. siphonantha” referring to this “long-tubed and purple-red species” in northwestern Yunnan [23–27].
A, P. siphonantha. B, P. milliana. C-I, P. delavayi: C, G-I, from Daxue Mtn.; D from Hong Mtn.; E from Yulong Mtn.; F from Wuxu Lake. A spreading middle lobe of the corolla lower-lip with emargination indicated by an arrow in A and B; a folded middle lobe of the corolla lower-lip with emargination indicated by an arrow in D-G; a ridged corolla tube indicated by an arrow in G and H; an inflated calyx tube in the middle upper parts indicated by an arrow in H; black seeds indicated by an arrow in I. A and B were taken by Z.-K. Wu; E by H.-D. Li; C, D, and F-I by W.-B. Yu.
During field expeditions for Pedicularis in the Hengduan Mountains region from 2006 to 2010, we collected an unknown long-tubed species with a purple-red corolla in Shangri-La, northwest Yunnan, and in Jiulong and Kangding, Sichuan, at altitudes around 4000 m (Fig 1C–1F). This species differs from infraspecfic taxa of P. siphonantha and other long-tubed and purple-red species in series Longiflorae Prain by having a folded middle lobe of the lower lip (Fig 1C–1G) and a ridged corolla tube (Fig 1G and 1H). DNA barcoding showed that samples of this species were separated from P. siphonantha [7]. We considered that this species may be new until we checked the type materials of P. delavayi conserved at the herbaria of the V. L. Komarov Botanical Institute in St. Petersburg (LE) (S1 Fig) and the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris (P). Based on morphological comparisons of specimens, we found that our specimens were very similar to the type of P. delavayi. In order to clarify the taxonomical confusion, we examined herbarium specimens of P. siphonantha collected from Yulong Mountain (type location of P. delvayi) conserved at the herbaria of CAS Kunming Institute of Botany (KUN) and CAS Institute of Botany (PE). We found that specimens labeled as “P. siphonantha var. delavayi” included two taxa: one is similar to the type of P. delavayi, and another is the “long-tubed and purple-red species” (Fig 1B), a common species in northwestern Yunnan. Indeed, it is very difficult to discriminate the herbarium specimens as two taxa. Based on the field investigations, we found that P. delavayi differed from the “long-tubed and purple-red species” by having a long petiole and pedicel, inflated calyx tube in the middle upper parts, and folded lower lip of the corolla, as well as occurring at altitudes over 3600 m a.s.l. During recent field expeditions, specimens of P. delavayi were collected from the Yulong Mountain at over 4000 m a.s.l (Fig 1F), and those of the “long-tubed and purple-red species” between 3600 m and 4000 m a.s.l. (Fig 1B). Therefore, we confirmed that P. delavayi and the “long-tubed and purple-red species” were two separated species, and the “long-tubed and purple-red species” should be an undescribed species. In this study, we proposed and described the “long-tubed and purple-red species” as a new species P. milliana W. B. Yu, D. Z. Li & H. Wang.
A comprehensive phylogeny of Chinese Pedicularis shows that the species P. siphonantha is a polyphyletic group, var. delavayi (≡ P. delavayi) and other varieties of P. siphonantha falling into two subclades in clade 3 [8]. Pedicularis delavayi was sister to P. obliquigeleata in subclade A. In the subclade 3B, var. siphonantha and var. stictochila H. Wang & W.B. Yu (= P. tenuituba H.L. Li), and five species from series Longiflorae by having purple/red/pink corollas with twisted beaks formed a strongly supported lineage, i.e. the P. siphonantha lineage, which is a molecular delimitation. In the present study, we made extensive sampling of P. delavayi from nine populations (10 new samples), and two additional samples of P. milliana from Yulong Mountains in Lijiang, one additional new sample of P. tenuituba, and selected taxa from all recognized monophyletic lineages in clade 3, and the sister P. axillaris Franch. ex Maxim. [8]. DNA sequences from nrITS and four chloroplast regions (matK, rbcL, trnH-psbA and trnL-F) were generated and analyzed. Our main goal was to evaluate the monophyly of P. delavayi, and its phylogenetic relationship to the P. siphonantha lineage, in particular to P. milliana and P. tenuituba. If the monophyletic P. delavayi was excluded from the P. siphonantha lineage, P. delavayi should be reinstated as an independent species; and the monophyly of P. milliana was supported, which should be described and illustrated as a new species.
Material and methods
Ethics statement
No specific permissions were required for these locations/activities during the fieldwork, and none of studied species was listed as endangered or protected species in the first batch of “China’s Catalogue of the National Protected Key Wild Plants” (http://www.forestry.gov.cn/yemian/minglu1.htm).
Plant samplings
In total, we sampled 76 individuals representing 56 taxa, including all representative taxa were identified in clade 3, and its sister P. axillaris [8]. Pedicularis siphonantha group, based on morphological delimitation, consisted of 11 species (S1 Table). Of them, four species P. delavayi, “P. milliana” (an undescribed species), P. siphonantha, and P. tenuituba (= P. siphonantha var. stictochila) have a wide distribution range. The remaining seven species only collected once or few gatherings around the type locality: 1) P. sigmoidea Franch. ex Maxim. were found in Eryuan and Lijiang, northwest Yunnan; 2) P. dolichosiphon (Hand.-Mazz.) H.L.Li) (≡ P. siphonantha var. dolichosiphon Hand.-Mazz.), P. dolichantha Bonati, P. leptosiphon H. L. Li, P. variegata H. L. Li and P. humilis Bonati were recollected from the type locality; and 3) P. fastigiata Franch. only had the type, which was not included in this study. In this study, we chose 11 samples of P. delavayi (three samples from the type locality Yulong Mountain, Lijiang), and three samples of P. milliana and P. tenuituba (S2 Table). Natural population of P. humilis was just rediscovered in 2015 [28]. It is the first time to include this species for phylogenetic analyses.
Fresh leaf tissues were collected in the field and preserved in silica gel. All DNA samples and voucher specimens are stored at the Germplasm Bank of Wild Species and the herbarium of CAS Kunming Institute of Botany (KUN), respectively. There are 284 sequences from 64 individuals which have been published in other studies [6–8, 29]. In this study, we generated 62 new sequences from 23 individuals (with 11 newly sampled individuals). A conspectus of voucher information is presented in S2 Table. The DNA sequence matrix is available in S1 File.
Specimen examination and identification
Fresh specimens were observed in the field. Fresh flowers were collected and fixed in FAA solution. Herbarium specimens from the herbaria CDBI, KUN, LE, MPU, and PE were examined and identified, and digital images of types from the herbaria E, K and P were accessed online. Flower and fruits characters in the line drawings of P. delavayi were based on field photos and FAA-preserved flowers.
DNA isolation, PCR and sequencing
For the 11 new samples, total genomic DNA was extracted from silica gel-dried tissue using a modified 2× CTAB method. Five DNA loci, one nuclear region (nrITS) and four chloroplast genes/regions (matK, rbcL, trnH-psbA, and trnL-F), were sequenced in this study. Primer information for the five loci were presented in previous studies [7, 30]. Protocols for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing followed the study of Yu et al. [7].
Sequence assembly and alignment
The newly obtained raw sequences were assembled and edited using Geneious version 7.1 [31]. The nrITS is a multiple copy region. These copies showed evolutionary consistent in the sequenced 75 samples, only one sample, HW10244 belonging to P. tenuituba, had one ambiguous basecall (i.e. multiple superimposed peaks in chromatograms). The ambiguous site was assigned using IUPAC ambiguity characters.
Preliminary alignments were automatically aligned using MAFFT version 7.2 [32], then adjusted manually in Geneious. The aligned matrix was concatenated to a combined matrix using SequenceMatrix version 1.73 [33]. Sequence characteristics were calculated using MEGA version 6.0 [34].
Phylogenetic analyses
Bayesian Inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods were used to reconstruct phylogenetic trees. The nrITS and plastid datasets were combined to analyze. No nucleotide positions were excluded from analyses. Partitioned BI analyses were performed using MrBayes [35], with DNA substitution models selected for each gene partition by the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) using jModeltest [36, 37]. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analyses were performed using MrBayes for 10,000,000 generations for the dataset, with two simultaneous runs, and each run comprising four incrementally heated chains. The BI analyses were started with a random tree and sampled every 1000 generations. Number of generations for the dataset were sufficient, because the average standard deviation of split frequencies for the dataset was lower than 0.005 (0.002900), and Potential Scale Reduction Factor of Convergence Diagnostic [38] for the datasets was 1.00. The first 25% of the trees was discarded as burn-in, and the remaining trees were used to generate a majority-rule consensus tree. Posterior probability values (PP) ≥ 0.95 were considered as well supported [39–41]. The ML tree searches and bootstrap estimation of clade support were conducted with RAxML [42]. These analyses used the GTR substitution model with gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity among sites and the proportion of invariable sites estimated from the data. The dataset was partitioned by genes. Support values for the node and clade were estimated from 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap support (BS) ≥ 70 are considered well supported [43]. Both BI and ML analyses, as well as jModelTest, were performed at the CIPRES Science Gateway (http://www.phylo.org).
Nomenclature
The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) in a work with an ISSN or ISBN will represent a published work according to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants [44], and hence the new names contained in the electronic publication of a PLOS ONE article are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone, so there is no longer any need to provide printed copies.
In addition, new names contained in this work have been submitted to IPNI, from where they will be made available to the Global Names Index. The IPNI LSIDs can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID contained in this publication to the prefix http://ipni.org/. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central (https://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/) and Researchgate (https://www.researchgate.net/)
Results
Information of DNA sequences
Sequence characteristics of five DNA regions and the concatenated datasets are summarized in Table 1. In the datasets, the numbers of variable and parsimony informative sites were highest for nrITS, followed by trnH-psbA, trnL-F, matK and rbcL. For three selected groups (P. delavayi, P. siphonantha lineage, and P. delavayi + P. siphonantha lineage, i.e. P. siphonantha group), three spacers (nrITS, trnH-psbA and trnL-F) were more variable and informative than two coding genes (matK and rbcL), then matK was more than rbcL. One exception for P. delavayi, the alignment of matK had only one variable site in the 11 individuals, whereas alignment of rbcL had three variable and two informative sites, respectively.
Phylogenetic analyses
The BI tree using the total dataset is presented in Fig 2. The topology was similar to that in previous study [8]. Two major clades were recovered, named as A and B following Yu et al. [8]. Pedicularis delavayi fell into clade A, and P. siphonantha lineage was in clade B. Both P. delavayi (BS/PP = 100/1.00) and P. siphonantha lineage (BS/PP = 96/1.00) were strongly supported as monophyletic, respectively. In the clade of P. delavayi, three Lijiang samples (from the type locality) formed a group (BS/PP = 98/1.00), which was weakly supported sister to the remaining eight samples (PP = 0.62); three Sichuan samples were strongly supported as monophyletic (BS/PP = 92/1.00), and two Yunnan samples (HW10130 and HW10172) as sister. The P. siphonantha lineage split in two groups. One group included clade P. dolichosiphon + P. leptosiphon (BS/PP = 100/1.00), and monophyletic P. siphonantha (BS/PP = 100/1.00) and P. tenuituba (= P. siphonantha var. stictochila) (BS/PP = 100/1.00). Another group comprised of the remaining five sampled species (including P. humilis) and sample LIDZ1518. Three samples of P. milliana from Lijiang were monophyletic by moderate supporting (BS/PP = 55/0.88), then the Lijiang sample (LIDZ1584) of P. sigmoidea was resolved as sister (BS/PP = 99/1.00), followed by the Eryuan sample (YWB2015059) of P. sigmoidea (BS/PP = 100/1.00). Peducularis humilis nested with sample LIDZ1518 (BS/PP = 84/0.79), with long branch length, and P. variegata was sister to them (BS/PP = 90/1.00).
Topology shows the majority rule consensus of the BI tree. BI posterior probability (PP) ≥ 0.50 and ML bootstrap support (BS) ≥ 50 were annotated on the branch. PP ≥ 0.95 and/or BS ≥ 70 were drawn with thicker and black lines.
Morphological comparisons
Morphologically, P. delavayi is similar to P. siphonantha by having large and bi-lobed middle lobe of lower-lip, and semi-circle and crestless beak. However, the middle lobe of P. delavayi was significantly incurved (Fig 1C–1G; vs. spreading in P. siphonantha, Fig 1A), which was crushed in herbarium specimens (e.g. S1 Fig). Based on comparisons of flowering specimens, we found that P. delavayi also differed from P. siphonantha by having a long petiole (~ 50 mm) and pedicel (~ 40mm), a furfuraceous surface on the abaxial leaf blade, a ridged corolla tube, a folded lower-lip of the corolla, and four pubescent filaments (S2 Fig). In addition, we found that the type of P. neolatituba (type specimen online: http://pe.ibcas.ac.cn/en/) was very close to specimens of P. delavayi and should be reduced to a synonym of P. delavayi.
Pedicularis milliana (Fig 1C) is very similar to P. siphonantha by having smooth corolla tube, spreading corolla lower-lip, large and bi-lobed middle lobe, and semi-circle and crestless beak. Because the distribution of P. delavayi overlaps with P. milliana in northwestern Yunnan, Tsoong [18] might consider the plants of P. milliana as P. delavayi. Therefore, he downgraded P. delavayi to a variety under P. siphonantha. Clearly, P. milliana was separated from P. siphonantha, which is strongly supported by phylogenetic analyses. In addition, sample LIDZ1518 (an unknown taxon) was similar to P. milliana in having spreading corolla lower-lip, large and bi-lobed middle lobe, and semi-circle beak, and to P. sigmoidea in having spreading corolla lower-lip, large and bi-lobed middle lobe, and crested beak. However, phylogenetic analyses indicating it was a separated lineage, close to P. humilis and P. variegata.
Discussion
Phylogenetic delimitation of P. siphonantha group
Pedicularis siphonantha was firstly described from Nepal [45], which has been recognized as endemic to the Himalayan region [17, 46]. According to current taxonomic treatments [18, 19], P. siphonantha var. delavay and var. stictochila occur in the Hengduan Mountains region, i.e. northwestern Yunnan, western Sichuan, and southeastern Qinghai. Pedicularis siphonantha var. dolichosiphon was discovered in Muli, south Sichuan [47], then upgraded to an independent species by Li [17]. In the Chinese edition of Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Tsoong [18] did not mention P. dolichosiphon, or he might have overlooked this species. According to current phylogenetic analyses, P. siphonantha was polyphyletc, delimitation of P. siphonantha group needed to revise. Firstly, P. siphonantha var. delavayi was close to P. obliquigaleata in clade A, whereas the other taxa of P. siphonantha were included in the P. siphonantha lineage. Therefore, P. siphonantha var. delavayi should be reinstated as an independent species. Then, the remaining three infraspecific taxa of P. siphonantha (var. dolichosiphon, var. siphonantha and var. stictochila) and P. leptosiphon formed a clade, and var. dolichosiphon was strongly supported as sister to P. leptosiphon. Of them, P. siphonantha var. siphonantha has a semicircle beak, and the other three taxa have S-shaped beak. Integrating geographical distribution, we agree with the treatment by Li [17] to adopt var. dolichosiphon and var. stictochila as independent species as P. dolichosiphon and P. tenuituba, respectively.
Infraspecific delimitation of P. siphonantha was not fully resolved. In a taxonomical revision, Prain [16] included P. hookeriana Wall. ex Benth. as a synonym of P. siphonantha var. siphonantha, and P. elephas Boiss. and P. punctata Decne. as synonyms of var. brevituba Prain. Nevertheless, some taxonomists treated P. hookeriana and P. punctata as independent species [48–50], and have placed P. elephas close to P. rhinanathoides Schrenk [13, 48]. A comprehensive phylogeny of Pedicularis showed that both P. hookeriana and P. punctata fell into the clade of P. siphonantha from the Himalayas (R. Ree, Personal Communication). In the early of 1900s, Bonati added two varieties under P. siphonantha, var. prostrata Bonati [51] from Sikkim and var. birmanica Bonati [52] from upper Burma. In a revision of Pedicularis from Bhutan, Mill [53] pointed out that P. siphonantha var. prostrata was easily confused with P. hookeriana, whereas this variety had broader and ovate leaves and shorter corolla tubes. For P. siphonantha var. birmanica, we found its type materials were close to that of P. humilis. Therefore, P. siphonantha var. birmanica should be reduced as a synonym of P. humilis.
Parallel evolution of long-tubular corollas in Pedicularis
During revision of Pedicularis, Li [2, 17, 54] and Tsoong [18, 55] hypothesized that long-tubular corollas were independently evolved at least six and ten times, respectively. Phylogenetic inferences supported their hypotheses that long-tubular corollas were independently derived from short-tubular corollas at least eight times [9], or up to 21 times [8]. Long-tubular species occurred in seven of 13 clades, plus two unresolved species P. batangensis Franch. & Bur. and P. flexuosa Hook. f. [8]. Series Longiflorae Prain included more than 20 long-tubular species from the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains region [17, 18, 49, 53]. Species of series Longiflorae fell into clade 3, however, this series was not supported as monophyletic (see Results in [8], and this study). Phylogenetic analyses tended to split series Longiflorae into four groups: a) P. siphonantha lineage, b) P. delavayi, c) P. longiflora, and 4) P. armata–P. cranolopha group (including a short-tubular species, P. fletcherii). From morphological similarity and geographical distribution, P. delavayi and P. longiflora were close to P. siphonantha lineage and P. armata–P. cranolopha group, respectively. However, phylogenetic evidence indicated that the four groups may evolve independently.
Evolution of long-tubular corollas in Pedicularis were hypothesized to adopt long-tongued pollinators [2]. However, pollination observations showed that long-tubular species were exclusively pollinated by bumblebees [23, 24, 56–59]. Long-tubular corollas are associated with beaked galea, and beaked species rewards pollinators for pollen only [1, 56]. Due to anthers are tightly enclosed by the beaked galea, long-tongued Lepidoptera are impossible to dislodge pollen from the tightly enclosed anthers. Only bumblebees can open the concealed anthers from the beaked galea using forelegs, and release pollen by vibrating wings in high speed, i.e. buzz-pollination [60]. When long-tongued pollinators driving evolution of long-tubular corollas was rejected, an alternative hypothesis for enhancing pollination attractiveness was proposed [56, 58]. However, pollinator attraction hypothesis was not supported by experiments on P. siphonantha (corrected as P. milliana herein) and P. tricolor Hand.-Mazz. [24]. Pollination treatments indicated that elongation of corolla tube (and pistil length) may put more selective pressure for male-to-male competition during the pollen germination [61]. Moreover, plants growing in more fertilized conditions can produce longer corolla tube [24]. We suggested that evolution of long-tubular corollas may have some advantages in high altitudes, because most of long-tubular species occur in alpine meadow over 3000 m a.s.l. in the Himalya-Hengduan Mountains region [62, 63]. Such ecological factors may independently drive elongation of corolla tube in different lineages. Subsequent diversification of lineage may be mainly induced by geographical isolation. Pedicularis siphonantha lineage is one good example to illustrate geographical isolation facilitating species divergence in the Himalya-Hengduan Mountains region [8].
Reinstatement of Pedicularis delavayi
Phylogenetic analyses strongly support P. delavayi as a separated species, which is sister to P. obliquigaleata in clade A, not included in P. siphonantha lineage in clade B. From floral color and beak shape, P. delavayi was easy to misplace into the P. siphonantha group. In the revision of Chinese Pedicularis, Li [17] cited dozens of specimens for P. delavayi; however, some Sichuan specimens were P. tenuituba, and some Yunnan specimens were P. milliana. Subsequently, Tsoong [18] might be failed to check diagnostic characters of P. delvayi, or might misplaced the plants of P. milliana or P. tenuituba as P. delavayi, thus he downgraded P. delavayi as a variety in P. siphonantha. Unfortunately, Tsoong’s incorrect treatment has been widely adopted by current Chinese Floras [19, 64], checklists [20, 21, 65] and other publications [22, 66]. Moreover, illustrations and/or voucher specimens of “P. siphonantha var. delvayi” from northwestern Yunnan were P. milliana, or mixed with P. milliana [20, 21, 22, 65, 66]. Some herbarium specimens of P. tenuituba from Sichuan were misidentified as “P. siphonantha var. delvayi”. According to morphological and phylogenetic evidence, we propose to reinstate P. delavayi as an independent species. Full description and line drawing (see S2 Fig) were provided.
Pedicularis neolatituba P. C. Tsoong was described from Songpan, northern Sichuan, which had short plant (less than 10 cm), long pedicel (up to 40 mm) and basal circinate-incurved galea [18]. In protologue, Tsoong proposed this species similar to three long-pedicelled species, P. franchetiana, P. mussotii, and P. mychophila, then established series Neolatitubae P. C. Tsoong. After checking the type specimen of P. neolatituba, we found that it was difficult to distinguished from specimens of P. delavayi. Pedicularis delavayi also has long pedicel, anterior cleft and mid-upper part inflated calyx, basal twisted galea, semi-circle beak, ciliate corolla lobes and pubescent filaments. The plant height is variable in different specimens. Therefore, we proposed to reduce P. neolatituba as a new synonymy of P. delavayi.
Delimitation of new species P. milliana
The new species, P. milliana, is a common meadow species at altitudes between 3000 m and 4000 m in northwestern Yunnan, where it overlaps with P. delavayi. Because previous revisions of Chinese Pedicularis by Li [17] and Tsoong [18] were mainly based on herbarium specimens, the flat and dry flowers made these authors overlook the fact that P. delavayi bore a folded lower corolla lip, so specimens of P. milliana were treated as P. delavayi. Therefore, the altitudinal range of P. delavayi was described as from 3000 m to 4600 m a.s.l. [17–19]. Based on field investigations, we found that P. delavayi only grew at altitudes above 4000 m a.s.l. in northwestern Yunnan, and could extend to 3600 m a.s.l. in Jiulong, western Sichuan. By contrast, P. milliana preferred growing at altitudes between 3000 m and 3800 m a.s.l. in northwestern Yunnan. In addition, the habitat of P. delavayi is dry meadow or low shrub, while that of P. milliana is moist meadows or wetland margins. Taxonomic confusion between P. delavayi and P. milliana has mainly been caused by the loss of key morphological characters in dried specimens, whereas fresh floral characters easily distinguish P. milliana from P. delavayi. Phylogenetic analyses supported P. milliana sister to P. sigmoidea. To further clarify phylogenetic relationship between P. milliana and P. sigmoidea needs to extensively sample more populations of them in northwestern Yunnan. It is noteworthy that phylogenetic analysis is an effective approach to delimit the new species P. milliana, and to resolve its phylogenetic placement.
In the P. siphonantha lineage, the floral shape of P. milliana is similar to P. siphonantha in tube length, semicircle twisted beak, and sub-equal lobes and emarginate mid-lobe of lower lip. However, phylogenetic analyses showed that P. milliana fell into the clade with P. dolichantha, P. humilis, P. sigmoidea, P. variegata, and unknown taxon. Specimen collections show that P. dolichantha was only collected from the type locality Huize, northeast Yunnan; P. humilis is rediscovered in the type locality at the south Gaoligong Mountain, west Yunnan; P. sigmoidea is restricted to Dali, Lijiang and Heqing, northwest Yunnan; P. variegata is only found in Muli, southwest Sichuan, and the unknown taxon is collected in Jiaozi Mountain, north-central Yunnan. Phylogenetic relationships and geographic patterns indicate that evolution of P. milliana and its relatives from the southwestern mountains of China should be independent from the Himalayan P. siphonantha. Therefore, the geographical barrier created by high mountains in southwestern China may have facilitated species divergence among P. milliana and its relatives. Pedicularis milliana is a new species which is uncovered by both morphological characters and DNA sequences.
Taxonomic treatment
Pedicularis delavayi Franch. ex Maxim. [urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:806977–1], Bull. Acad. Imp. Sci. Saint-Pétersbourg 32: 531, pl. 1, fig. 7. 1888 ≡ Pedicularis siphonantha var. delavayi (Franch. ex Maxim.) P. C. Tsoong, Fl. Reipubl. Popularis Sin. 68: 374. 1963. Type: China. Yunnan: Lijiang (Li-kiang), Yulong Snow Mountain (Suee Shan), alt. 4,000m, 14 Aug. 1886, J. M. Delavay s.n. (holotype, LE!, barcode 01010308; isotypes, K!, barcode 000708729, MPU!, barcode 020765, P!, barcode 02987194).
Synonymy: Pedicularis neolatituba P. C. Tsoong [urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:807391–1, misspelled as “neolatimba” in IPNI], in Fl. Reipubl. Popularis Sin. 68: 418–419, pl. 72, f. 1–3. 1963. Syn. nov. Type: China. Sichuan: Songpan (Dongrergo), alt. 4,700m, 9 Aug 1922, H. Smith 3162 (holotype, PE!, barcode 00033070; isotype: PE!, barcode 00119661).
Perennial herb, barely 10 cm tall, drying black or not. Roots fleshy, fusiform. Stems 1 to several, unbranched and erect or ± ascending, 2–10 cm, with lines of hairs. Basal leaves numerous, mostly membraneous and no leaf blade when beginning to flowering, blades development delayed; petiole up to 5 cm, winged, glabrescent; leaf blades lanceolate-oblong, 10–30 mm, sparely pubescent on both surfaces, abaxially furfuraceous, pinnatipartite; leaf segments 5–10 pairs, triangular-ovate to oblong-ovate, margin dentate; leafe veins sparely pubescent. Cauline leaves alternate or pseudo-opposite; petiole 0.5–5 cm, sparely pubescent; leaf blades and segments similar to basal ones. Flowers alternate and axillary, dense, flowering ± synchronous; pedicel 0.5–4 cm, sparely pubescent. Calyx tube 0.8–1 cm, 1/3–2/5 cleft anteriorly, mid-upper part inflated in flowering, sparsely long-pubescent; calyx lobes 3 or 5, rarely 2, lateral lobes leaflike, and posterior lobe ± entire or absent. Corolla purple-red, base whitish, and white spots on the base of galea and the center of lower lip; corolla tube 3–6.5 cm, slender, glabrescent, ridged; galea strongly twisted apically; beak slender, semicircular or slightly S-shaped, bent upward, to 1.2 cm; lower lip ciliate, 1.5–2.0 × 1.5–1.8 cm, lobes emarginate, middle lobe smaller and involute; filaments attached near tube throats, pubescent. Capsule obliquely oblong, apiculate, 1.4–1.7 × 0.4–0.6 cm; seed black, linear-ovate.
Distribution and habitat.
Pedicularis delavayi is endemic to the Hengduan Mountains region. After re-examination of the herbarium specimens and extensive field expeditions, we confirmed that this species occurs in northwest Yunnan (Deqin, Lijiang, and Shangri-La counties), and west and north Sichuan (Daocheng, Jiulong, Kangding, Luding, Miangning, Muli, Songpan, and Xiangcheng counties). This species mainly grows in alpine meadows or at the margin of alpine shrub, at the altitude over 3600 m a.s.l.
Phenology.
According to field collection and herbarium records, flowering individuals were collected from early June to early August. Fruiting specimens conserved at the herbaria were difficult to identify. In August 2007 and 2008, we collected fruiting individuals with mature seeds at Daxueshan Mountain of Shangri-La, northwest Yunnan.
Conservation status.
Pedicularis delavayi is not common, and it is restricted to alpine meadows. Its habitats may be threatened by human activities in pasture and tourism. This species can be considered Least Concern (LC) according to IUCN Red List criteria.
Selected specimens examined.
China. Yunnan: Deqin, L.-M. Gao et al., 25794 (KUN); Lijiang, Yulong Mt. H.-D. Li & H. Tang LHD2014-01 (KUN), LHD201-20 (KUN), LHD201340 (KUN); Shangi-La, W.-B.Yu 015 (KUN), W.-B.Yu et al. HW10130 (KUN), HW10172 (KUN), HW10200 (KUN), LIDZ1258 (KUN). Sichuan: Daocheng, Bowa Mt., Sichuan Vegetation Exped. 1923 (CDBI); Jiulong, Qing-Quan Wang 20508 (CDBI), W.-B.Yu et al., LIDZ1116 (KUN), YWB201507224 (KUN), YWB201507260 (KUN); Kangding, Zheduo Mt., Ru Jiang & Cun-Li Jin 02086 (KUN, PE), W.B.Yu et al., HW10316 (KUN); Xiangcheng, Wuming Mt., Fu-Sheng Yang Y0071 (PE).
Pedicularis milliana W. B. Yu, D. Z. Li & H. Wang, sp. nov. [urn:lsid:ipni.org:names: 77185944–1] Type: China. Yunnan: Shangri-la, Xiaozhongdian, Tianbao Mountain, 27°36′22.8″N, 99°53′14.4″E, Alt. 3687m, 22 July 2010, Wen-Bin Yu, Wei Jiang, Yang Luo & Min-Lu Liu HW10095 (holotype, KUN; isotypes: KUN). Fig 1C, S3 and S4 Figs.
Perennial herbs, low to tall, drying black or not. Roots usually cylindric. Stems solitary and ± erect, or sometimes numerous and outer stems procumbent, striate, pubescent or sparsely pubescent. Leaves basal and cauline; petiole of basal leaves 15–30 mm, petiole of cauline leaves 10–25 mm, winged, sparsely long pubescent; leaf blade lanceolate-oblong to linear-oblong, 10–60 × 7–16 mm, abaxially sparsely long pubescent along midvein, furfuraceous, adaxially glabrescent or sparsely pubescent, pinnatisect; segments 6–15 pairs, somewhat lanceolate to broadly ovate or triangular, pinnatifid, or double dentate. Flowers axillary, dense, sometimes interrupted at basal position; bracts leaflike, glabrescent or long ciliate. Calyx pubescent; tube to 1.2 cm, 1/4–1/3 cleft anteriorly; lobes 3, lateral lobes large and leaflike, posterior one smallest. Corolla rose-red; tube 40–80 mm, finely pubescent; galea strongly twisted apically, without a conspicuously auriculate protrusion; beak semicircular or slightly S-shaped, to 1.1 cm, slender; lower lip lobse 3, ciliate, 1.1–1.5 × 1.5–2.0 cm, 2 lateral lobes larger, slightly incurved at the upper margin, middle lobe slightly smaller, emarginate, 2-lobed. Anterior filament pair pubescent. Capsule ovoid-oblong, to 20 mm long; seed dark brown, linear-ovate.ca. 1.2 × 3.0 mm.
Distribution and habitat.
Pedicularis milliana is endemic to northwestern Yunnan. This new species mainly occurs in humid meadows, along the grassland of mountain streams, or at the margin of low shrubs, at the altitude between 3000 m and 4000 m. Generally, this species grows close to wetland species, P. longiflora, P. rhinanthoides, and/or P. cephalantha.
Phenology.
According to field collection and herbarium records, flowering plants were collected from early June to early August. Fruiting specimens were collected from July to September.
Conservation.
Pedicularis milliana is a common species in alpine meadows in northwestern Yunnan. Its habitats are likely to be threatened by human activities. This species can be considered Least Concern (LC) according to IUCN Red List criteria.
Etymology.
The species epithet honors Dr. Robert R. Mill, who works at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, UK. Dr. Mill is a taxonomic expert for Pedicularis and several other groups of seed plants, and authored dozens of papers or book chapter on the taxonomy and revision of Pedicularis.
Additional examined specimens.
China. Yunnan: Deqin, S.-D. Zhang & H.-J. He, 08836 (KUN), W.-B. Yu et al. 2014123 (KUN); Lijiang, W.-B. Yu et al. LIDZ1580 (KUN), YWB-003 (KUN); Shangri-La, W.-B. Yu et al., HW10095 (KUN), HW10122 (KUN), HW10141 (KUN), HW10156 (KUN), HW10163 (KUN); Weixi, Hengduanshan Exped. 01644, 3104 (PE), W.-B. Yu et al. 2014099 (KUN).
Supporting information
S1 Table. Taxonomic overview of P. delavayi, P. siphonantha and its allies.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200372.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Summary of studied species in this study, including voucher information and GenBank accessions.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200372.s002
(XLSX)
S1 Fig. Holotype of Pedicularis delavayi Franch. ex Maxim., Delavay s.n. (barcode LE 01010308).
This photo was prepared by A. E. Grabovskaya-Borodina.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200372.s003
(JPG)
S2 Fig. Line drawing of Pedicularis delavayi Franch. ex Maxim.
This drawing is based on the gathering W.-B. Yu 015 (KUN) from Daxue Mountain, Shangri-La, NW Yunnan. A, Habit. B, leave. C, calyx tube. D, calyx tube open. E, corolla lower lip. F, stamens and style. This line drawing was prepared by X-L. Wu.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200372.s004
(JPG)
S3 Fig. Holotype of Pedicularis milliana W. B. Yu, D. Z. Li & H. Wang, W.-B. Yu et al. HW2015095 (KUN).
This gathering was collected at Tianbao Mountain, Shangri-La, NW Yunnan. This photo was taken by W.-B. Yu.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200372.s005
(JPG)
S4 Fig. Line drawing of Pedicularis milliana W. B. Yu, D. Z. Li & H. Wang based on W.-B. Yu et al. HW2015095 (holoype, KUN), from the left plant in S3 Fig.
A. Habit; B. calyx; C. flower; D. stamens and style. This line drawing was prepared by M.-L. Liu.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200372.s006
(JPG)
S1 File. DNA sequence matrix of the five DNA markers.
The matrix is partitioned by regions.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200372.s007
(NEX)
Acknowledgments
We thank the curators of K, MPU, P and PE for providing online access to specimens, and the curators of CDBI, KUN, and PE for allowing study of the specimens. We are grateful to L.-M. Gao, H.-J. He, W. Jiang, H.-D. Li, R. Li, Y. Luo, X.-C. Shi, H. Tang, D. Wu, J.-D. Ya, Z.-K. Wu, Q.-L. Yang, and S.-D. Zhang for their kind help in the field and/or providing samples for this study; to P.-H. Huang, J. Yang, and C.-X. Zeng for their assistance in molecular experiments; to X.-L. Wu for line drawings of S2 Fig; and to H.-D. Li and Z.-K. Wu for their permissions in using photographs; and to R. Corlett for reading an early version of this manuscript.
References
- 1. Yu W-B, Cai J, Wang H, Chen J-Q. Advances in floral divergence and reproductive adaptation in Pedicularis L. (Orobanchaceae). Chinese Bulletin of Botany. 2008;25(4):392–400.
- 2. Li H-L. Evolution in the flowers of Pedicularis. Evolution. 1951;5:158–64.
- 3. Liu M-L, Yu W-B, Wang H. Rapid identification of plant species and iflora: application of DNA barcoding in a large temperate genus Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae). Plant Diversity and Resources. 2013;35(6):707–14.
- 4. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(23):8369–74. ISI:000229650500053. pmid:15928076
- 5. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences. 2003;270(1512):313–21. ISI:000181064200013. pmid:12614582
- 6. China Plant BOL Group. Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:19641–6. pmid:22100737
- 7. Yu W-B, Huang P-H, Ree RH, Liu M-L, Li D-Z, Wang H. DNA barcoding of Pedicularis L. (Orobanchaceae): evaluating four universal DNA barcoding loci in a large and hemiparasitic genus. J Sys Evol. 2011;49(5):425–37.
- 8. Yu W-B, Liu M-L, Wang H, Mill RR, Ree RH, Yang J-B, et al. Towards a comprehensive phylogeny of the large temperate genus Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae), with an emphasis on species from the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains. BMC Plant Biology. 2015;15(1):176. pmid:26159907
- 9. Ree RH. Phylogeny and the evolution of floral diversity in Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2005;166(4):595–613.
- 10. Tkach N, Ree RH, Kuss P, Roser M, Hoffmann MH. High mountain origin, phylogenetics, evolution, and niche conservatism of arctic lineages in the hemiparasitic genus Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014;76:75–92. WOS:000336820800008. pmid:24631857
- 11. Yang F-S, Wang X-Q. Extensive length variation in the cpDNA trnT-trnF region of hemiparasitic Pedicularis and its phylogenetic implications. Plant Syst Evol. 2007;264(3–4):251–64. ISI:000245431600008.
- 12. Robart BW, Gladys C, Frank T, Kilpatrick S. Phylogeny and biogeography of North American and Asian Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae). Syst Bot. 2015;40(1):229–58.
- 13. Maximowicz CJ. Diagnoses plantarum novarum asiaticarum. VII. Bull Acad Sci St Petersbourg. 1888;32(4):477–629.
- 14. Bonati G. Contribution à l'étude du genre Pedicularis. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France. 1910;57 (18):1–35.
- 15. Limpricht W. Studien über die Gattung Pedicularis. Repert Spec Nov Regni Veg. 1924;20:161–265.
- 16. Prain D. The species of Pedicularis of the Indian Empaire and its frontiers. Ann Roy Bot Gard Clac. 1890;3:1–196.
- 17. Li H-L. A revision of the genus Pedicularis in China. part II. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 1949;101:1–214.
- 18.
Tsoong P-C. Scrophulariaceae (Pars II). In: Chien S-S, Chun W-Y, editors. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinacae. 68. Beijing: Science Press; 1963. p. 1–378.
- 19.
Yang H-B, Holmgren NH, Mill RR. Pedicularis Linn. In: Wu Z-Y, Raven P-H, editors. Flora of China. St. Louis, Beijing: Missouri Botanical Garden Press & Science Press; 1998. p. 97–209.
- 20.
Guan KY. Highland flowers of Yunnan. Kunming: Yunnan Science and Techology Press; 1998.
- 21.
Xu B, Li Z-M, Sun H. Seed plants of the alpine subnival belt from the Hengduan mountians, SW China. Beijing: Science Press; 2013. 413 p.
- 22. Yu W-B, Zhang S-D, Wang H. New taxa of Pedicularis (Scrophulariaceae) from the Hengduan Mountains, Southwestern China. Novon. 2008;18(1):125–9.
- 23. Huang S-Q, Fenster CB. Absence of long-proboscid pollinators for long-corolla-tubed Himalayan Pedicularis species: implications for the evolution of corolla length. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2007;168(3):325–31. ISI:000245270100006.
- 24. Huang S-Q, Wang X-P, Sun S-G. Are long corolla tubes in Pedicularis driven by pollinator selection? Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2016;58(8):698–700. pmid:26714618
- 25. Yang C-F, Sun S-G, Guo Y-H. Resource limitation and pollen source (self and outcross) affecting seed production in two louseworts, Pedicularis siphonantha and P. longiflora (Orobanchaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 2005;147(1):83–9. ISI:000226700800004.
- 26. Yang CF, Guo YH, Gituru RW, Sun SG. Variation in stigma morphology—How does it contribute to pollination adaptation in Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae)? Plant Syst Evol. 2002;236(1–2):89–98. ISI:000180234400007.
- 27. Yu W-B, Cai J, Li D-Z, Mill RR, Wang H. Floral ontogeny of Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae), with an emphasis on the corolla upper lip. Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 2013;51(4):435–50. WOS:000321621800007.
- 28. Li R, Shi X, Yu W-B, Feng S, Sun W. Rediscovery of the supposedly extinct Pedicularis humilis in the eastern Himalayas. Oryx. 2016;50(02):204-.
- 29. Liu M-L, Yu W-B. Pedicularis wanghongiae (Orobanchaceae), a new species from Yunnan, southwestern China. Phytotaxa. 2015;217(1):53–62.
- 30. Yu W-B, Huang P-H, Li D-Z, Wang H. Incongruence between nuclear and chloroplast DNA phylogenies in Pedicularis section Cyathophora (Orobanchaceae). Plos One. 2013;8(9):e74828. pmid:24069353
- 31. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(12):1647–9. WOS:000305419800052. pmid:22543367
- 32. Katoh K, Toh H. Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(15):1899–900. pmid:20427515
- 33. Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R. SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics. 2011;27(2):171–80. ISI:000288124600005.
- 34. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–9. pmid:24132122
- 35. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(12):1572–4. ISI:000184878700016. pmid:12912839
- 36. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Meth. 2012;9(8):772.
- 37. Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology. 2003;52(5):696–704. ISI:000185732500010. pmid:14530136
- 38. Gelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. 1992:457–72.
- 39. Alfaro ME, Zoller S, Lutzoni F. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20(2):255–66. ISI:000181036100013. pmid:12598693
- 40. Erixon P, Svennblad B, Britton T, Oxelman B. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology. 2003;52(5):665–73. pmid:14530133.
- 41. Kolaczkowski B, Thornton JW. Effects of branch length uncertainty on Bayesian posterior probabilities for phylogenetic hypotheses. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24(9):2108–18. ISI:000249587200022. pmid:17636043
- 42. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology. 2008;57(5):758–71. ISI:000259995600008. pmid:18853362
- 43. Hillis DM, Bull JJ. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology. 1993;42(2):182–92.
- 44.
McNeil D, editor. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code), adopted by the eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011 (Regnum Vegetabile, 154). Ruggell: A.R.G. Gantner Verlag; 2012.
- 45.
Don D, Hamilton F, Wallich N. Prodromus florae Nepalensis: sive Enumeratio vegetabilium quae in itinere per Nepaliam proprie dictam et regiones conterminas, ann. 1802–1803. Londini: J. Gale; 1825.
- 46.
Pennell FW. The Scrophulariaceae of eastern temperate North America. Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia; 1935.
- 47.
Handel-Mazzetti HREv. Plantae novae sinenses. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse. 1923;60:114–8.
- 48.
Pennell FW. The Scrophulariaceae of the Western Himalayas. The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Monographs. 1943;5:1–163.
- 49.
Yamazaki T. A revision of the genus Pedicularis in Nepal. In: Ohba H, Malla SB, editors. The Himalayan Plants. 1. Tokyo: University Museum, University of Tokyo; 1988. p. 91–161.
- 50.
Husain T, Garg A, Agnihotri P. Genus Pedicularis L. (Scrophulariaceae) in India: a revisionary Study: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh; 2010.
- 51. Bonati G. The alpine and subalpine vegestation of south-east Sikkim. Records of the Botanical Survey of India. 1904;4:323–431.
- 52. Bonati G. New species of the genera Phtheirospermum and Pedicularis. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh. 1921;13:103–41.
- 53.
Mill RR. Pedicularis L. (Scrophulariaceae). In: Grierson AJC, Long DG, editors. Flora of Bhutan. 2 (3). Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh; 2001. p. 1156–234.
- 54. Li H-L. A revision of the genus Pedicularis in China. part I. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 1948;100:205–378.
- 55. Tsoong P-C. A new system for the genus Pedicularis. Acta Phytotax Sin. 1955;4:71–147.
- 56. Macior LW, Sood SK. Pollination ecology of Pedicularis megalantha D. Don (Scrophulariaceae) in the Himachal Himalaya. Plant Species Biol. 1991;6(2):75–81.
- 57. Macior LW, Tang Y. A preliminary study of the pollination ecology of Pedicularis in the Chinese Himalaya. Plant Species Biol. 1997;12(1):1–7.
- 58. Macior LW, Tang Y, Zhang J-C. Reproductive biology of Pedicularis (Scrophulariaceae) in the Sichuan Himalaya. Plant Species Biol. 2001;16(1):83–9.
- 59. Wang H, Li D-Z. Pollination biology of four Pedicularis species (Scrophulariaceae) in northwestern Yunnan, China. Ann MO Bot Gard. 2005;92(1):127–38. ISI:000229456900009.
- 60. Yu W-B, Li D-Z, Wang H. Highly efficient pollination by bumblebees ensures seed production in Pedicularis lachnoglossa (Orobanchaceae), an early-flowering Himalayan plant. J Sys Evol. 2012;50(3):218–26.
- 61. Yang CF, Wang QF. Nectarless flowers with deep corolla tubes in Pedicularis: does long pistil length provide an arena for male competition? Bot J Linn Soc. 2015;179(3):526–32. WOS:000364530100013.
- 62. Tsoong P-C. A new system for the genus Pedicularis (continued II). Acta Phytotax Sin. 1956;5:205–78.
- 63. Tsoong P-C. A new system for the genus Pedicularis (continued III). Acta Bot Sin. 1961;9(3–4):230–74.
- 64.
Wang H. Pedicularis L. In: Chen S-K, Wang H, editors. Flora Yunnanica, Vol 16. Beijing: Science Press; 2006. p. 468–611.
- 65.
Wang W-T, Wu S-G, editors. Vascular plants of the Hengduan Mountains (Part II). Beijing: Science Press; 1994.
- 66. Cai J, Wang H, Gu Z-J, Mill RR, Li D-Z. Karyotypes of thirteen species of Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae) from the Hengduan Mountains Region, NW Yunnan, China. Caryologia. 2004;57(4):337–47. ISI:000228079000003.