Providing longer post-fledging periods increases offspring survival at the expense of future fecundity

David López-Idiáquez; Pablo Vergara; Juan Antonio Fargallo; Jesús Martínez-Padilla

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203152

Abstract

The cost of reproduction is a key concept in life-history trade-offs. However, our understanding of the reproductive costs is biased towards measures of reproductive effort obtained before offspring independence. During the post-fledging dependence period (PFDP), it is well known that parents feed and protect their offspring. However, the effort devoted to this reproductive activity has never been considered in the context of of the costs of reproduction. Moreover, the potential fitness benefits and costs for offspring and parents, respectively, of the duration of the PFDP are largely unknown. We estimated the duration of the PFDP over 5 years using wild common kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) and studied its association with survival probability and future parental reproductive performance. Our results show that longer PFDPs increase the survival probability of fledglings, probably due to the benefits obtained from parental care. In addition, we found that providing longer PFDPs was associated with reduced clutch sizes but not the number of fledglings in the subsequent breeding season in males. We suggest that increased parental expenditures on offspring during the PFDP may represent a potential cost of reproduction in breeding males.

Citation: López-Idiáquez D, Vergara P, Fargallo JA, Martínez-Padilla J (2018) Providing longer post-fledging periods increases offspring survival at the expense of future fecundity. PLoS ONE 13(9): e0203152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152

Editor: Charles R. Brown, University of Tulsa, UNITED STATES

Received: February 14, 2018; Accepted: August 15, 2018; Published: September 10, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 López-Idiáquez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are deposited at URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/169111; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/8561.

Funding: The long-term monitoring associated to this study was funded by projects CGL2004-04479/BOS, CGL2007-61395/BOS, CGL2010-15726/BOS and CGL2015-70639-P from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Life history theory posits that since resources are limited, the different strategies or life-history traits may be bound together through trade-offs, whose balance determines individual fitness [1]. The effect of current on future reproduction is one of the best studied trade-offs across different taxa [2–7]. Life-history trade-offs are mediated by the costs incurred from simultaneously producing and maintaining different traits [3,4,8–10]. Particularly, the cost of reproduction implies that increasing current reproductive effort will reduce future reproduction or survival [1]. Given the costs of parental care [11], adult breeders may be subject to reduced survival prospects or to lower reproduction in future breeding attempts [12,13]. However, our understanding of the influence of parental care and their associated costs is based almost entirely on observations and experiments made on parental expenditure during the pre-nesting and nesting stages [3,4,10,14]. This is particularly relevant in birds, a taxonomic group that has been widely used to build the life-history theory. Birds exhibit parental care after the nesting stage and yet, parental expenditure during this phase has rarely been considered in research on the costs of reproduction and life history. In birds, the period during which the fledglings become independent is a crucial stage that may greatly determine offspring fitness [15]. It demands a considerable amount of parental resources [13] and shows variable duration among species and individuals [15,16]. However, we know rather little about the potential cost for parents of a prolonged stage of parental care during the post-fledging dependence period (PFDP).

During the PFDP, fledglings obtain direct benefits from their parents in terms of food [16], nutritional status improvement [17,18], competitive capacity [19] or acquiring foraging and flying skills [20–25], potentially improving survival prospects [17,26]. While very few and recent examples confirm that higher parental expenditure results in a longer PFDP [16,27], the potential reproductive cost of extended parental care paid later in life has been scarcely explored [13].

Theoretically, a parent-offspring conflict emerges because each offspring within a family demands greater parental investment since it is more related to itself than to its siblings, while genetic similarity between parents and all offspring does not differ [28,29]. This differential within-brood allocation during the PFDP has been associated with phenotypic traits, such as melanin-pigmented plumage traits, sex and age [16,27]. These differences can arise due to differential parental investment according to the expected fitness return of each fledgling [30]. For example, parents can invest more in the dispersing sex when there is limited resource availability in order to avoid future competition [31]. Thus, in light of the parent-offspring conflict, it would be expected that an increased parental expenditure during the PFDP will increase survival prospects of offspring, but also impose a reproductive cost to breeders paid through reduced survival and/or future reproduction.

In this study, we explored the fitness consequences of the length of the PFDP of 315 fledglings of Common Kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) over 5 years. We also explore the potential fitness costs of the length of the PFDP on parents in the subsequent breeding season. The duration of the PFDP is variable in kestrels [10,19] and we base our predictions on the idea that PFDP is costly for breeding parents. We therefore predict that 1) parents raising offspring with longer PFDPs will pay a fitness cost, either in reproduction or survival and 2) longer PFDPs will increase survival rates of fledglings.

Methods

Ethics statement

All licences legally required to study, capture and handle kestrels were provided by the Regional Government of Castilla y León (Ref:201715700010993), where our population is located. In addition, we held all the necessary licenses for capturing kestrels approved by the bioethical committee of our research institute, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC). Blood samples were taken following standard procedures as previously described in our kestrel population. During capture, handling or bleeding, we never observed any adverse effect either in adults or in offspring. Finally, fieldwork was conducted on private land under the permission of the owners, the Finat Family.

Study species

The Common Kestrel is a medium-sized diurnal raptor that exhibits a marked sexual dimorphism in body size and plumage colouration [32–34]. At the beginning of the breeding season, males perform courtship feedings increasing their hunting effort by two-fold or more [32,35]. The time that these courtship feedings begin has a strong influence on the time that females start laying eggs, egg quality, and clutch size [32,36–38]. Food provisioning during the breeding season is done nearly exclusively by males [19,32,39,40], while females mainly incubate the eggs [32]. Male food provisioning is maintained throughout nearly the entire breeding season until the second half of the nestling stage when females begin hunting, supporting males in feeding the brood [32]. Fledgling plumage is similar to females, displaying a variable proportion of grey colouration on the rump, a trait that has been described as an index of quality and that is associated with the duration of the PFDP [19,41].

General procedures

The study was conducted from 2005 to 2017 in the Campo Azálvaro region, a flat and treeless grassland located in central Spain mainly devoted to cattle grazing (40°40’N, 4°20’W). During the breeding season, nests were monitored to detect laying date (day the first egg was laid) and to record clutch size (mean = 4.98, range = 3–7, n = 86) and number of fledglings (mean = 4.13, range = 1–6, n = 86). Adult breeders were captured using nest traps when nestlings were 10–13 days old. When nestlings were 26 days old, they were weighed (to the nearest g) and their blood was sampled for molecular sexing. In addition, we also measured the proportion of grey colouration on nestling rumps (0% corresponding to a completely brown rump and 100% to a fully grey rump [42]). Nestlings were marked with a combination of colour rings during 2005–2007 and 2012 and with PVC rings with a unique alphanumeric code during the year 2013 to identify fledglings from long distances [16]. We carried out a food-supplementation experiment in 2006 [16], and only considered the un-manipulated individuals in this study.

PFDP duration, offspring and adult survival

We consider the length of the PFDP as the number of days that fledglings remain in the surroundings of the nest, with 31.3 days old being the average age at which the chicks begin fledging [19]. The duration of the PFDP was estimated for 315 fledglings from 86 nests during the months of June, July and August for 5 years (21 nests in 2005, 13 in 2006, 21 in 2007, 19 in 2012 and 12 in 2012) by identifying all fledglings present around the nest every two days. In our study area, fledglings are easily detectable from long distances. Breeding nest-boxes are located alongside fences and fledglings are usually seen perching on them rather than on the ground. Fledgling identification was made from a car, using a telescope (20x60) between 7:30 and 19:30, at a distance sufficient to identify the coloured rings or to read the PVC rings without interfering with fledgling behaviour (see [19] for further information). We considered “day of independence” as the last day an individual was observed and the duration of the PFDP as the number of days since chicks were 32 days old (age at which all nestling have fledged [19]) until the day of independence. Nest monitoring was prolonged for 7 days from the last detection of a given offspring to increase the accuracy of the PFDP duration estimation. This estimation of the duration of the PFDP can be considered misleading since mortality before independence can alter the estimation of the length of the PFDP. However, a recent review reported that weekly survival rates for predator species during the first month are around 90% [43]. In addition, during the long-term monitoring of our population, we detected an extremely low rate of predation during the PFDP (9 out of 1737 fledglings ringed from 1998 to 2016). Thus, we consider that our estimation of the duration of the PFDP is highly reliable, as previously shown [16,19].

We used recruitment as a proxy of post-fledging survival [10,44–46]. In our population, fledgling recruitment takes place during the first four years of life (first year 44%, second year 48%, third year 6% and fourth year 2%; n = 130, period between 2004 and 2017). However, 92% of the recruits occurred during the 2 years following birth. Recruitment has never been observed after four years of age. For this reason, we monitored the four years following the year of birth to determine fledgling survival. In addition, kestrels in our population do not skip breeding. Only seven out of 153 individuals (5%) that nested two years or more in our population were missing in any intervening year, although the absence of these individuals was probably due to the impossibility of capturing them rather than a skipped breeding, as some nests can fail before capture. Adult survival was then estimated by their presence-absence as breeders during the two subsequent years.

Both fledgling and adult survival were estimated by banding individuals with PVC and metal ring codes and recapturing them in the subsequent years as breeders (using nest-traps when nestlings are 10–13 days old), using nest camera recorders or reading ring PVC codes with the aid of a telescope when it was not possible with either of the two first methods (see [47]).

Statistical procedures

All models were conducted in R statistical software using the lme4 and car packages [48,49]. We performed three sets of models. The first set of models aimed to explore the association between the duration of the PFDP and survival in offspring, using Generalised Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) with binomial distribution of errors. Survival (1 or 0) was the dependent variable and PFDP, chick sex, rump colouration, laying date and weight were included as explanatory terms. Interactions between PFDP and sex and PFDP and rump colouration were also included in the models. In addition, we performed a model to explore the association between clutch size and the number of fledglings and the duration of the PFDP. We performed a Linear Mixed Model (LMM) with normal distribution of errors in which PFDP was included as a dependent variable, and laying date, clutch size, fledgling weight and sex, and the number of fledglings as explanatory terms. In both models, since food conditions vary inter-annually [50] and due to the low number of levels of this variable (5 levels corresponding to each study year), year was included in the model as a fixed factor. Female identity was included as a random factor. We used female instead of nest because female quality may mediate the duration of the PFDP [16] and because the same female produced offspring in different years.

The second set of models was carried out to explore the association between the duration of PFDP experienced by breeding adults in a given year (t) and their reproductive output the following year (t+1). We used LMMs with normal distribution of errors considering clutch size (CS_t+1), and the number of fledglings (NF_t+1) as dependent variables in different models. Since breeding adults in a given year (t) may have raised offspring with different PFDP durations, we used the mean duration of the PFDP of the brood for each adult each year (PFDPmean_t) as an explanatory variable. To control for the potential effect of current reproductive effort, we included clutch size (CS_t) and the number of fledglings (NF_t) in year (t) as explanatory variables when CS_t+1 or NF_t+1 were the dependent variables, respectively. Laying date (LD_t+1) was also included in all models to control for the differences in reproductive performance across the breeding season. Previous studies in this species have shown that clutch size is positively associated with age in males [51]. To control for the potential effects of this variable we included minimum age as an explanatory variable. We included this term of minimum age because we do not reliably know the real age of all the individuals and including the latter would cause a reduction in the number of observations included in the models. Finally, year was included as a fixed factor to control for the inter-annual differences in food abundance (see above). Individual identity was included as a random factor.

In the third set of models, we explored the association between the duration of the PFDP and adult survival to the following breeding season for males and females separately. We included adult survival as a dependent variable and PFDPmean_t as an explanatory term, using GLMMs with a binomial distribution of errors. We also included CS at year t as a covariate to control for the potential effects of past parental expenditure on adult survival. Year was included as a covariate to control for the potential effects of environmental heterogeneity [50] and individual identity as a random factor. In addition, males and females were analysed separately as they play different roles during breeding and thus they may experience different reproduction costs.

In all models, we calculated the Variance Inflation Factors (VIFs) among our explanatory variables and found no evidence of collinearity (all<1.43—see S1–S8 Tables).

Results

We found that the mean duration of the PFDP for the kestrel fledglings was 15.25±0.40 days. Regarding offspring, we found that the length of the PFDP was positively associated with the probability of offspring survival (0.067±0.034, F = 1.942, P = 0.049, Fig 1). Year was retained as a covariate as two of its levels were significantly associated with the probability of survival (Year₂₀₀₆, p = 0.040; Year₂₀₁₃, P = 0.044). None of the explanatory variables (chick sex: F = 0.021, P = 0.647; rump colouration: F = 0.518, p = 0.414; laying date: F = 0.535, P = 0.531; weight: F = 0.761, P = 0.380) or interactions (PFDP*chick sex: F = 0.869, P = 0.351; PFDP*rump colouration: F = 0.395, P = 0.535) explained the probability of survival. We also found a significant positive association between PFDP and clutch size (1.478±0.571, F_1,120.910 = 6.685, p = 0.010) but not for the number of fledglings (F_1,166.220 = 1.097, p = 0.296). In the model, laying date (-0.235±0.049, F_1,132.828 = 22.564, p<0.001) and year (F_4,147.16 = 9.392, p<0.001) were retained as statistically significant covariates. No significant associations were found either for fledgling weight (F_1,271.925 = 0.039, p = 0.842) or for sex (F_1,276.32 = 0.086, p = 0.769).

Download:

Fig 1.

(A) Relationship between the probability of post-fledging survival and the duration of the post-fledging dependence period measured in days. Dots represent each individual fledgling and the box plot represents the mean length of the post-fledging dependence period in days for survivors (survival probability = 1) and non-survivors (survival probability = 0). In (B), we show the relationship between clutch size and mean duration of the post-fledging dependence period. Values of clutch size represent the residuals obtained from the model (see Methods for further details). In both figures, sub-indices denote current (_t) or following year (_t+1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.g001

In relation to breeding adults, we found that the mean length of the PFDP and clutch size the following year (t+1) were negatively associated (Table 1, Fig 1) in males. No relationships were found either for NF_t+1, or for the reproductive variables explored in females (Table 1). We found no significant relationship between PFDPmean_t and adult survival (Table 2). In both models, the results remained unchanged when considering the maximum duration of the PFDP (see S9 and S10 Tables for further information).

Download:

Table 1. Results of the Linear Mixed Models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledging dependence period (PFDPmean_t) and the following years' (Year_t+1) clutch size (CS_t+1) and number of fledglings (NF_t+1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.t001

Download:

Table 2. Results of the Generalised Linear Mixed Models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledging dependence period (PFDPmean_t) and survival to the following reproductive season (t+1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.t002

Discussion

Our results reveal opposite relationships between the PFDP and fitness components of parents and offspring. A longer duration of the PFDP seems to increase survival in fledglings on the one hand and reduce future fecundity in parents on the other.

The positive association between the duration of the PFDP and survival may arise from the benefits that offspring obtain during this period. For example, breeding parents in better body condition are able to invest more time and energy in their offspring resulting in longer PFDPs [16]. This investment is expected to increase the body condition of the offspring [17], a key component for recruitment and survival [52]. Also, during this period fledglings spend much of their time practicing hunting with inanimate objects or real prey (pers. obs., [32]). Thus, after longer PFDPs fledglings are expected to improve flying and hunting skills that could potentially increase their survival probabilities [17]. Fledgling sex did not affect the association between the length of the PFDP and survival rates. These results may be unexpected considering that females are superior competitors for food compared to their male sibs during the nestling period [53] and that better body condition at fledging increases offspring survival [52]. In kestrels, during the nestling period, a lower competitive capacity in males results in a reduction in body condition with respect to female fledglings [10,53]. However, there is a shift in the access to food provided by parents during the PFDP [19]. Specifically, males outcompete females in their access to food due to their enhanced flying skills [19]. This result may support the idea that there is a sex-dependent improvement in body condition in male fledglings during the PFDP, compensating for the lower sibling competition abilities of males during the nestling period [53].

It can be argued that our estimates of survival are biased due to the potential confounding effects of dispersing individuals, as it has been described that fledglings can disperse more than 100 km [54], although in adults, 84% of individuals disperse at distances less than 10 km and 94% less than 25 km [46]. Our population is located in an isolated nest-box population area [55] and it has been reported that kestrels positively select nest-boxes for breeding over other nest sites when provided [32,56,57]. Considering that every year during the study period a proportion of nest-boxes are left unoccupied (varying from 31% to 77% in the study period), we believe the dispersal outside our study area must be very low. The distance between the two farthest nest-boxes in our study area is 5 km [48]. Thus, the study of the dispersal between nest-boxes, as conducted in other studies [47, 54], would not be very informative in our case. We are confident in the reliability of our survival estimation, as we did not find any individuals breeding in the surroundings of our study area or any dispersing chicks breeding in any of the nearby nest-box populations (Villalar de los Comuneros– 112 km from our study area; San Martín de Valderaduey– 155 km from our study area) that we also study [58,59]. Nevertheless, for our purposes, natal dispersal is considered a cost in terms of fitness reduction, as it increases mortality [60,61].

Our results also show that males that raised offspring for longer PFDPs, paired up with females that laid smaller clutches the following year. The cost of reproduction implies that increasing current reproductive effort will reduce future reproduction or survival [1]. Our results support this idea, as the potential cost of caring for offspring during the PFDP may be paid in terms of smaller clutches but not in the number of fledglings or adult survival in the subsequent breeding season. This specific life-history trade-off between current and future reproduction has been previously demonstrated in birds [3,4,6], and explained by an increased energy investment during reproduction. We found that a decrease in clutch size with an increase in the duration of PFDP occurred only in males, probably because of the higher resource expenditure of males compared to females in their offspring during the post-fledging period, likely in feeding and parental care [19,40]. In addition, it has been experimentally shown that only breeding males increase their hunting effort as a response to enlarged broods [10]. Thus, the reduced clutch sizes the following breeding season can be explained by the cost that males paid when raising offspring for a longer PFDP the previous year, the effect being only observed during the initial stages of reproduction, when the females are laying eggs. However, our results do not show fitness differences associated with providing longer or shorter PFDPs, as we did not find a significant association between PFDP duration and the number of fledglings. To explain this apparent contradiction, we speculate that males providing longer PFDPs are of higher quality, with these males being more efficient in chick-rearing, which allows them to recover from a potential fitness reduction as a result of the decrease in the number of eggs laid. This agrees with the “hypothesis of clutch size errors” proposed by J.M. Aparicio (1993) [62] This hypothesis posits that the relationship between fitness and parental quality is more dependent on the probability of misadjusting the clutch size with respect to the number of fledglings that the parents can adequately rear, than producing larger or smaller clutches per se. Although speculative, this idea is plausible and should be investigated by manipulating the duration of the PFDP.

Finally, our results show that providing longer PFDPs did not have any significant effects on survival probabilities of the breeding adults. Interestingly, however, those analyses also revealed a significant and positive association between clutch size and the probability of surviving to the following breeding season in males. This result suggests that clutch size, rather than the number of fledglings, is a better proxy for male investment in the common kestrel [63]. This association is supported by our results that show that clutch size is a better predictor of the duration of the PFDP than the number of fledglings, in agreement with previous studies stating that clutch size is a good predictor of parental investment in offspring [63] and of male quality [64].

Taken together, our results suggest two opposing selective forces within a parent-offspring conflict context. On the one hand, offspring will be positively selected to extend the duration of the PFDP, as they increase their own probability of survival. On the other, parental effort devoted to increasing the time spent caring for offspring during the PFDP may lead to costs in terms of future productivity by reducing the number of eggs laid the following year. Future studies are needed to understand why the clutch size reduction experienced in males providing longer PFDPs is not reflected in a decrease in the number of fledglings.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Variance Inflation Factors (VIF) for the dependent variables used in the models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDPmean) and following years (t+1) reproductive output in males.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Correlation coefficients between each pair of variables used as explanatory in the models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDPmean) and following years (t+1) reproductive output in males.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Variance Inflation Factors (VIF) for the dependent variables used in the models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDPmean) and followings year (t+1) reproductive output in females.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.s003

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Correlation coefficients between each pair of variables used as explanatory in the models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDPmean) and followings year (t+1) reproductive output in females.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.s004

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Variance Inflation Factors (VIF) for the dependent variables used in the models exploring the association between the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDP) length on fledgling recruitment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.s005

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Correlation coefficients between each pair of variables used as explanatory in the models exploring the association between the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDP) length and the reproductive output of the parents.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.s006

(DOCX)

S7 Table. Variance Inflation Factors (VIF) for the dependent variables used in the models exploring the association between the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDP) length and the reproductive output of the parents.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.s007

(DOCX)

S8 Table. Correlation coefficients between each pair of variables used as explanatory in the models exploring the influence of the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDP) length on fledgling recruitment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.s008

(DOCX)

S9 Table. Results of the Linear Mixed Models exploring the association between the maximum duration of the post-fledging dependence period (PFDPmax_t) and the following years' clutch size (CS_t+1) and number of fledglings (NF_t+1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.s009

(DOCX)

S10 Table. Results of the Generalised Linear Mixed Models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledging dependence period (PFDPmean_t) and survival to the following reproductive season (t+1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203152.s010

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Juan Navarro-López, Isabel López-Rull and Juan San Teodoro for their help during fieldwork. The study was carried out on the Finat family property. We thank Sarah Young for reviewing the English. This is a contribution of El Ventorrillo Biological Station.

References

1. Stearns SC. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford, UK.: Oxford University Press; 1992.
2. Candolin U. Reproduction under predation risk and the trade-off between current and future reproduction in the threespine stickleback. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. The Royal Society; 1998;265: 1171–1175.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Gustafsson L, Pärt T. Acceleration of senescence in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis by reproductive costs. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 1990;347: 279–281.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Gustafsson L, Sutherland WJ. The costs of reproduction in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 1988;335: 813–815.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Rivalan P, Prévot-Julliard A-C, Choquet R, Pradel R, Jacquemin B, Girondot M. Trade-off between current reproductive effort and delay to next reproduction in the leatherback sea turtle. Oecologia. 2005;145: 564–574. pmid:16028096
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Hanssen SA, Hasselquist D, Folstad I, Erikstad KE. Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. The Royal Society; 2005;272: 1039–1046. pmid:16024362
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Hamel S, Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M. Tradeoff between offspring mass and subsequent reproduction in a highly iteroparous mammal. Oikos. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2011;120: 690–695.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Metcalfe NB, Alonso-Alvarez C. Oxidative stress as a life-history constraint: the role of reactive oxygen species in shaping phenotypes from conception to death. Functional Ecology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2010;24: 984–996.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Alonso-Alvarez C, Bertrand S, Devevey G, Prost J, Faivre B, Chastel O, et al. An experimental manipulation of life-history trajectories and resistance to oxidative stress. Evolution. 2006;60: 1913–1924. pmid:17089975
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Dijkstra C, Bult A, Bijlsma S, Daan S, Meijer T, Zijlstra M. Brood Size Manipulations in the Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus): Effects on Offspring and Parent Survival. J Anim Ecol. British Ecological Society; 1990;59: 269–285.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Clutton-Brock TH. The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press; 1991.
12. Stearns SC. Trade-Offs in Life-History Evolution. Functional Ecology. [British Ecological Society, Wiley]; 1989;3: 259–268.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Wheelwright NT, Tice KA, Freeman-Gallant CR. Postfledging parental care in Savannah sparrows: sex, size and survival. Animal Behaviour. 2003;65: 435–443.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Owens IPF, Bennett PM. Mortality Costs of Parental Care and Sexual Dimorphism in Birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 1994;257: 1–8.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Martínez-Padilla J, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Mougeot F, Ludwig SC, Redpath SM. Experimentally elevated levels of testosterone at independence reduce fitness in a territorial bird. Ecology. Ecological Society of America; 2014;95: 1033–1044.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Vergara P, Fargallo JA, Martínez-Padilla J. Reaching independence: food supply, parent quality, and offspring phenotypic characters in kestrels. Behavioral Ecology. 2010;21: 507–512.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Ridley AR, Raihani NJ. Variable postfledging care in a cooperative bird: causes and consequences. Behavioral Ecology. 2007;18: 994–1000.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Emlen ST. An evolutionary theory of the family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1995;92: 8092–8099.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Vergara P, Fargallo JA. Sex, melanic coloration, and sibling competition during the postfledging dependence period. Behavioral Ecology. 2008;19: 847–853.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Yoda K, Kohno H, Naito Y. Development of flight performance in the brown booby. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2004;271: S240–S242.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Wheelwright NT, Templeton JJ. Development of foranging skills and the transition to independence in juvenile savannah sparrows. The Condor. 2003;105: 279–287.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Marchetti K, Price T. Differences in the foraging of juvenile and adult birds: The importance of developmental constrains. Biological Reviews. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 1989;64: 51–70.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Davies NB. Parental Care and the Transition To Independent Feeding in the Young Spotted Flycatcher (Muscicapa Striata). Behaviour. 1976;59: 280–294.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Johnson SJ. Development of hunting and self-sufficency in juvenile Red-tailed Hawks (Buteo jamaicensis). Journal of Raptor Research. 1986;20: 6.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Bustamante J. Behaviour of colonial common kestels (Falcon tinunculus) during the post-fledging dependece period in southwestern Spain. Journal of Raptor Research. Raptor Research Foundation; 1994.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Grüebler MU, Naef-Daenzer B. Survival benefits of post-fledging care: experimental approach to a critical part of avian reproductive strategies. J Anim Ecol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2010;79: 334–341. pmid:20059611
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Arroyo BE, De Cornulier T, Bretagnolle V. Parental investment and parent–offspring conflicts during the postfledging period in Montagu's harriers. Animal Behaviour. 2002;63: 235–244.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Trivers RL. Parent-Offspring Conflict. American Zoologist. 1974;14: 249–264.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Kölliker M, Boos S, Wong JWY, Röllin L, Stucki D, Raveh S, et al. Parent–offspring conflict and the genetic trade-offs shaping parental investment. Nature Communications. 2015;6. pmid:25880586
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Stamps JA. When Should Avian Parents Differentially Provision Sons and Daughters? The American naturalist. University of Chicago Press; 1990;135: 671–685.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Ridley AR, Huyvaert KP. Sex-biased preferential care in the cooperatively breeding Arabian babbler. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2007;20: 1271–1276. pmid:17584222
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Village A. The Kestrel. London: T & A. D. Poyser; 1990.
33. Palokangas P, Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H, Huhta E, Tolonen P, Alatalo RV. Female kestrels gain reproductive success by choosing brightly ornamented males. Animal Behaviour. 1994;47: 443–448.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Massemin S, Korpimäki E, Wiehn J. Reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors: evaluation of the hypotheses in kestrels breeding in a temporally changing environment. Oecologia. Springer-Verlag; 2000;124: 26–32. pmid:28308409
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Masman D, Daan S, Dijkstra C. Time allocation in the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus), and the principle of energy minimization. J Anim Ecol. 1988: 22.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Meijer T. Reproductive decisions in the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). University of Groningen. 1988.
37. Martínez-Padilla J, Dixon H, Vergara P, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Fargallo JA. Does egg colouration reflect male condition in birds? Die Naturwissenschaften. Springer-Verlag; 2010;97: 469–477. pmid:20309517
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Martínez-Padilla J, Fargallo JA. Food supply during prelaying period modifies the sex-dependent investment in eggs of Eurasian kestrels. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. Springer-Verlag; 2007;61: 1735–1742.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Tolonen P, Korpimäki E. Determinants of parental effort: a behavioural study in the Eurasian kestrel, Falco tinnunculus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. Springer-Verlag; 1994;35: 355–362.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Boileau N, Bretagnolle V. Post-fledging Dependence Period in the Eurasian Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in Western France. Journal of Raptor Research. The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. 5400 Bosque Blvd., Suite 680, Waco TX 76710, U.S.A; 2014;48: 248–256.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Vergara P, Fargallo JA, Martínez-Padilla J, Lemus JA. Inter-annual variation and information content of melanin-based coloration in female Eurasian kestrels. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2009;97: 781–790.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Fargallo JA, Laaksonen T, Korpimäki E, Wakamatsu K. A melanin-based trait reflects environmental growth conditions of nestling male Eurasian kestrels. Evol Ecol. 2007;21: 157–171.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Naef-Daenzer B, Grüebler MU. Post-fledging survival of altricial birds: ecological determinants and adaptation. J Field Ornithol. 2016;87: 227–250.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. López-Rull I, Vergara P, Martinez-Padilla J, Fargallo JA. Early constraints in sexual dimorphism: survival benefits of feminized phenotypes. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2016;29: 231–240. pmid:26494322
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Kim SY, Fargallo JA, Vergara P, Martinez-Padilla J. Multivariate heredity of melanin-based coloration, body mass and immunity. Heredity (Edinb). The Genetics Society; 2013;111: 139–146. pmid:23591519
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Terraube J, Vasko V, Korpimäki E. Mechanisms and reproductive consequences of breeding dispersal in a specialist predator under temporally varying food conditions. Oikos. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2015;124: 762–771.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Navarro-López J, Fargallo JA. Trophic Niche in a Raptor Species: The Relationship between Diet Diversity, Habitat Diversity and Territory Quality. PloS one. Public Library of Science; 2015;10: e0128855. pmid:26047025
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker BM, Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software. 2015.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Fox J, Sanford W. An {R} Companion to Applied Regression. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage; 2011.
50. Fargallo JA, Martínez-Padilla J, Viñuela J, Blanco G, Torre I, Vergara P, et al. Kestrel-Prey Dynamic in a Mediterranean Region: The Effect of Generalist Predation and Climatic Factors. PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science; 2009;4: e4311. pmid:19234618
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. López-Idiáquez D, Vergara P, Fargallo JA, Martínez-Padilla J. Old males reduce melanin-pigmented traits and increase reproductive outcome under worse environmental conditions in common kestrels. Ecol Evol. 2016;6: 1224–1235. pmid:26941948
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Bouwhuis S, Vedder O, Garroway CJ, Sheldon BC. Ecological causes of multilevel covariance between size and first-year survival in a wild bird population. J Anim Ecol. 2015;84: 208–218. pmid:24975718
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Fargallo JA, Laaksonen T, Korpimaki E, Poyri V, Griffith SC, Valkama J. Size-mediated dominance and begging behaviour in Eurasian kestrel broods. Evolutionary Ecology Research. 2003;5: 549–558.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Adriaensen F, Verwlmp N, Dhondt AA. Between cohort variation in dispersal distance in the European Kestrel Falco tinnunculus as shown by ringing recoveries. Ardea. 1998;86: 147:152.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
55. Fargallo JA, Blanco G, Potti J, Viñuela J. Nestbox provisioning in a rural population of Eurasian Kestrels: breeding performance, nest predation and parasitism. Bird Study. Taylor & Francis; 2001;48: 236–244.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
56. Cavé AJ. The Breeding of the Kestrel, Falco Tinnunculus L., in the Reclaimed Area Oostelijk Flevoland. Netherlands Journal of Zoology. Brill; 1967;18: 313–407.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Valkama J, Korpimaki E. Nestbox characteristics, habitat quality and reproductive success of Eurasian Kestrels. Bird Study. 1999;46: 81–88.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
58. Martínez-Padilla J, López-Idiáquez D, Lopez-Perea JJ, Mateo R, Paz A, Viñuela J. A negative association between bromadiolone exposure and nestling body condition in common kestrels: management implications for vole outbreaks. Pest Manag Sci. 2017;73: 364–370. pmid:27616006
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
59. Paz A, Jareño D, Arroyo L, Viñuela J, Arroyo B, Mougeot F, et al. Avian predators as a biological control system of common vole (Microtus arvalis) populations in north-western Spain: experimental set-up and preliminary results. Pest Manag Sci. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013;69: 444–450. pmid:22517676
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
60. Bowler DE, Benton TG. Variation in dispersal mortality and dispersal propensity among individuals: the effects of age, sex and resource availability. J Anim Ecol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2009;78: 1234–1241. pmid:19548883
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
61. Matthysen E. Multicausality of dispersal: a review. Dispersal Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608898.003.0001
62. Aparicio JM. The Effect of Clutch Size Errors on Fitness: A Hypothesis. Oikos. [Nordic Society Oikos, Wiley]; 1993;68: 186–190.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
63. Fargallo JA, Laaksonen T, Pöyri V, Korpimäki E. Inter-sexual differences in the immune response of Eurasian kestrel nestlings under food shortage. Ecology Letters. Blackwell Science Ltd; 2002;5: 95–101.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
64. Navarro-López J, Vergara P, Fargallo JA. Trophic niche width, offspring condition and immunity in a raptor species. Oecologia. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014;174: 1215–1224. pmid:24368708
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Stearns SC. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford, UK.: Oxford University Press; 1992.

[ref2] 2. Candolin U. Reproduction under predation risk and the trade-off between current and future reproduction in the threespine stickleback. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. The Royal Society; 1998;265: 1171–1175.
View Article
Google Scholar

[3] View Article

[4] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Gustafsson L, Pärt T. Acceleration of senescence in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis by reproductive costs. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 1990;347: 279–281.
View Article
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Gustafsson L, Sutherland WJ. The costs of reproduction in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 1988;335: 813–815.
View Article
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Rivalan P, Prévot-Julliard A-C, Choquet R, Pradel R, Jacquemin B, Girondot M. Trade-off between current reproductive effort and delay to next reproduction in the leatherback sea turtle. Oecologia. 2005;145: 564–574. pmid:16028096
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[12] View Article

[13] PubMed/NCBI

[14] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Hanssen SA, Hasselquist D, Folstad I, Erikstad KE. Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. The Royal Society; 2005;272: 1039–1046. pmid:16024362
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[16] View Article

[17] PubMed/NCBI

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Hamel S, Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M. Tradeoff between offspring mass and subsequent reproduction in a highly iteroparous mammal. Oikos. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2011;120: 690–695.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Metcalfe NB, Alonso-Alvarez C. Oxidative stress as a life-history constraint: the role of reactive oxygen species in shaping phenotypes from conception to death. Functional Ecology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2010;24: 984–996.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Alonso-Alvarez C, Bertrand S, Devevey G, Prost J, Faivre B, Chastel O, et al. An experimental manipulation of life-history trajectories and resistance to oxidative stress. Evolution. 2006;60: 1913–1924. pmid:17089975
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Dijkstra C, Bult A, Bijlsma S, Daan S, Meijer T, Zijlstra M. Brood Size Manipulations in the Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus): Effects on Offspring and Parent Survival. J Anim Ecol. British Ecological Society; 1990;59: 269–285.
View Article
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Clutton-Brock TH. The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press; 1991.

[ref12] 12. Stearns SC. Trade-Offs in Life-History Evolution. Functional Ecology. [British Ecological Society, Wiley]; 1989;3: 259–268.
View Article
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Wheelwright NT, Tice KA, Freeman-Gallant CR. Postfledging parental care in Savannah sparrows: sex, size and survival. Animal Behaviour. 2003;65: 435–443.
View Article
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Owens IPF, Bennett PM. Mortality Costs of Parental Care and Sexual Dimorphism in Birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 1994;257: 1–8.
View Article
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Martínez-Padilla J, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Mougeot F, Ludwig SC, Redpath SM. Experimentally elevated levels of testosterone at independence reduce fitness in a territorial bird. Ecology. Ecological Society of America; 2014;95: 1033–1044.
View Article
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Vergara P, Fargallo JA, Martínez-Padilla J. Reaching independence: food supply, parent quality, and offspring phenotypic characters in kestrels. Behavioral Ecology. 2010;21: 507–512.
View Article
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Ridley AR, Raihani NJ. Variable postfledging care in a cooperative bird: causes and consequences. Behavioral Ecology. 2007;18: 994–1000.
View Article
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Emlen ST. An evolutionary theory of the family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1995;92: 8092–8099.
View Article
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Vergara P, Fargallo JA. Sex, melanic coloration, and sibling competition during the postfledging dependence period. Behavioral Ecology. 2008;19: 847–853.
View Article
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Yoda K, Kohno H, Naito Y. Development of flight performance in the brown booby. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2004;271: S240–S242.
View Article
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Wheelwright NT, Templeton JJ. Development of foranging skills and the transition to independence in juvenile savannah sparrows. The Condor. 2003;105: 279–287.
View Article
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Marchetti K, Price T. Differences in the foraging of juvenile and adult birds: The importance of developmental constrains. Biological Reviews. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 1989;64: 51–70.
View Article
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Davies NB. Parental Care and the Transition To Independent Feeding in the Young Spotted Flycatcher (Muscicapa Striata). Behaviour. 1976;59: 280–294.
View Article
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Johnson SJ. Development of hunting and self-sufficency in juvenile Red-tailed Hawks (Buteo jamaicensis). Journal of Raptor Research. 1986;20: 6.
View Article
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Bustamante J. Behaviour of colonial common kestels (Falcon tinunculus) during the post-fledging dependece period in southwestern Spain. Journal of Raptor Research. Raptor Research Foundation; 1994.
View Article
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Grüebler MU, Naef-Daenzer B. Survival benefits of post-fledging care: experimental approach to a critical part of avian reproductive strategies. J Anim Ecol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2010;79: 334–341. pmid:20059611
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] PubMed/NCBI

[78] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Arroyo BE, De Cornulier T, Bretagnolle V. Parental investment and parent–offspring conflicts during the postfledging period in Montagu's harriers. Animal Behaviour. 2002;63: 235–244.
View Article
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Trivers RL. Parent-Offspring Conflict. American Zoologist. 1974;14: 249–264.
View Article
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Kölliker M, Boos S, Wong JWY, Röllin L, Stucki D, Raveh S, et al. Parent–offspring conflict and the genetic trade-offs shaping parental investment. Nature Communications. 2015;6. pmid:25880586
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Stamps JA. When Should Avian Parents Differentially Provision Sons and Daughters? The American naturalist. University of Chicago Press; 1990;135: 671–685.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Ridley AR, Huyvaert KP. Sex-biased preferential care in the cooperatively breeding Arabian babbler. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2007;20: 1271–1276. pmid:17584222
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Village A. The Kestrel. London: T & A. D. Poyser; 1990.

[ref33] 33. Palokangas P, Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H, Huhta E, Tolonen P, Alatalo RV. Female kestrels gain reproductive success by choosing brightly ornamented males. Animal Behaviour. 1994;47: 443–448.
View Article
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Massemin S, Korpimäki E, Wiehn J. Reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors: evaluation of the hypotheses in kestrels breeding in a temporally changing environment. Oecologia. Springer-Verlag; 2000;124: 26–32. pmid:28308409
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Masman D, Daan S, Dijkstra C. Time allocation in the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus), and the principle of energy minimization. J Anim Ecol. 1988: 22.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Meijer T. Reproductive decisions in the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). University of Groningen. 1988.

[ref37] 37. Martínez-Padilla J, Dixon H, Vergara P, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Fargallo JA. Does egg colouration reflect male condition in birds? Die Naturwissenschaften. Springer-Verlag; 2010;97: 469–477. pmid:20309517
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Martínez-Padilla J, Fargallo JA. Food supply during prelaying period modifies the sex-dependent investment in eggs of Eurasian kestrels. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. Springer-Verlag; 2007;61: 1735–1742.
View Article
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Tolonen P, Korpimäki E. Determinants of parental effort: a behavioural study in the Eurasian kestrel, Falco tinnunculus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. Springer-Verlag; 1994;35: 355–362.
View Article
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Boileau N, Bretagnolle V. Post-fledging Dependence Period in the Eurasian Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in Western France. Journal of Raptor Research. The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. 5400 Bosque Blvd., Suite 680, Waco TX 76710, U.S.A; 2014;48: 248–256.
View Article
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Vergara P, Fargallo JA, Martínez-Padilla J, Lemus JA. Inter-annual variation and information content of melanin-based coloration in female Eurasian kestrels. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2009;97: 781–790.
View Article
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Fargallo JA, Laaksonen T, Korpimäki E, Wakamatsu K. A melanin-based trait reflects environmental growth conditions of nestling male Eurasian kestrels. Evol Ecol. 2007;21: 157–171.
View Article
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Naef-Daenzer B, Grüebler MU. Post-fledging survival of altricial birds: ecological determinants and adaptation. J Field Ornithol. 2016;87: 227–250.
View Article
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. López-Rull I, Vergara P, Martinez-Padilla J, Fargallo JA. Early constraints in sexual dimorphism: survival benefits of feminized phenotypes. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2016;29: 231–240. pmid:26494322
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Kim SY, Fargallo JA, Vergara P, Martinez-Padilla J. Multivariate heredity of melanin-based coloration, body mass and immunity. Heredity (Edinb). The Genetics Society; 2013;111: 139–146. pmid:23591519
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Terraube J, Vasko V, Korpimäki E. Mechanisms and reproductive consequences of breeding dispersal in a specialist predator under temporally varying food conditions. Oikos. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2015;124: 762–771.
View Article
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Navarro-López J, Fargallo JA. Trophic Niche in a Raptor Species: The Relationship between Diet Diversity, Habitat Diversity and Territory Quality. PloS one. Public Library of Science; 2015;10: e0128855. pmid:26047025
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker BM, Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software. 2015.
View Article
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Fox J, Sanford W. An {R} Companion to Applied Regression. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage; 2011.

[ref50] 50. Fargallo JA, Martínez-Padilla J, Viñuela J, Blanco G, Torre I, Vergara P, et al. Kestrel-Prey Dynamic in a Mediterranean Region: The Effect of Generalist Predation and Climatic Factors. PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science; 2009;4: e4311. pmid:19234618
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. López-Idiáquez D, Vergara P, Fargallo JA, Martínez-Padilla J. Old males reduce melanin-pigmented traits and increase reproductive outcome under worse environmental conditions in common kestrels. Ecol Evol. 2016;6: 1224–1235. pmid:26941948
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Bouwhuis S, Vedder O, Garroway CJ, Sheldon BC. Ecological causes of multilevel covariance between size and first-year survival in a wild bird population. J Anim Ecol. 2015;84: 208–218. pmid:24975718
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Fargallo JA, Laaksonen T, Korpimaki E, Poyri V, Griffith SC, Valkama J. Size-mediated dominance and begging behaviour in Eurasian kestrel broods. Evolutionary Ecology Research. 2003;5: 549–558.
View Article
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Adriaensen F, Verwlmp N, Dhondt AA. Between cohort variation in dispersal distance in the European Kestrel Falco tinnunculus as shown by ringing recoveries. Ardea. 1998;86: 147:152.
View Article
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Fargallo JA, Blanco G, Potti J, Viñuela J. Nestbox provisioning in a rural population of Eurasian Kestrels: breeding performance, nest predation and parasitism. Bird Study. Taylor & Francis; 2001;48: 236–244.
View Article
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Cavé AJ. The Breeding of the Kestrel, Falco Tinnunculus L., in the Reclaimed Area Oostelijk Flevoland. Netherlands Journal of Zoology. Brill; 1967;18: 313–407.
View Article
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Valkama J, Korpimaki E. Nestbox characteristics, habitat quality and reproductive success of Eurasian Kestrels. Bird Study. 1999;46: 81–88.
View Article
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Martínez-Padilla J, López-Idiáquez D, Lopez-Perea JJ, Mateo R, Paz A, Viñuela J. A negative association between bromadiolone exposure and nestling body condition in common kestrels: management implications for vole outbreaks. Pest Manag Sci. 2017;73: 364–370. pmid:27616006
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[177] View Article

[178] PubMed/NCBI

[179] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Paz A, Jareño D, Arroyo L, Viñuela J, Arroyo B, Mougeot F, et al. Avian predators as a biological control system of common vole (Microtus arvalis) populations in north-western Spain: experimental set-up and preliminary results. Pest Manag Sci. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013;69: 444–450. pmid:22517676
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[181] View Article

[182] PubMed/NCBI

[183] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Bowler DE, Benton TG. Variation in dispersal mortality and dispersal propensity among individuals: the effects of age, sex and resource availability. J Anim Ecol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2009;78: 1234–1241. pmid:19548883
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] PubMed/NCBI

[187] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Matthysen E. Multicausality of dispersal: a review. Dispersal Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608898.003.0001

[ref62] 62. Aparicio JM. The Effect of Clutch Size Errors on Fitness: A Hypothesis. Oikos. [Nordic Society Oikos, Wiley]; 1993;68: 186–190.
View Article
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Fargallo JA, Laaksonen T, Pöyri V, Korpimäki E. Inter-sexual differences in the immune response of Eurasian kestrel nestlings under food shortage. Ecology Letters. Blackwell Science Ltd; 2002;5: 95–101.
View Article
Google Scholar

[193] View Article

[194] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Navarro-López J, Vergara P, Fargallo JA. Trophic niche width, offspring condition and immunity in a raptor species. Oecologia. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014;174: 1215–1224. pmid:24368708
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] PubMed/NCBI

[198] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Ethics statement

Study species

General procedures

PFDP duration, offspring and adult survival

Statistical procedures

Results

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Table. Variance Inflation Factors (VIF) for the dependent variables used in the models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDPmean) and following years (t+1) reproductive output in males.

S2 Table. Correlation coefficients between each pair of variables used as explanatory in the models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDPmean) and following years (t+1) reproductive output in males.

S3 Table. Variance Inflation Factors (VIF) for the dependent variables used in the models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDPmean) and followings year (t+1) reproductive output in females.

S4 Table. Correlation coefficients between each pair of variables used as explanatory in the models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDPmean) and followings year (t+1) reproductive output in females.

S5 Table. Variance Inflation Factors (VIF) for the dependent variables used in the models exploring the association between the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDP) length on fledgling recruitment.

S6 Table. Correlation coefficients between each pair of variables used as explanatory in the models exploring the association between the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDP) length and the reproductive output of the parents.

S7 Table. Variance Inflation Factors (VIF) for the dependent variables used in the models exploring the association between the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDP) length and the reproductive output of the parents.

S8 Table. Correlation coefficients between each pair of variables used as explanatory in the models exploring the influence of the post-fledgling dependence period (PFDP) length on fledgling recruitment.

S9 Table. Results of the Linear Mixed Models exploring the association between the maximum duration of the post-fledging dependence period (PFDPmaxt) and the following years' clutch size (CSt+1) and number of fledglings (NFt+1).

S10 Table. Results of the Generalised Linear Mixed Models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledging dependence period (PFDPmeant) and survival to the following reproductive season (t+1).

Acknowledgments

References

S9 Table. Results of the Linear Mixed Models exploring the association between the maximum duration of the post-fledging dependence period (PFDPmax_t) and the following years' clutch size (CS_t+1) and number of fledglings (NF_t+1).

S10 Table. Results of the Generalised Linear Mixed Models exploring the association between the mean duration of the post-fledging dependence period (PFDPmean_t) and survival to the following reproductive season (t+1).