Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Leishmania DNA detection and species characterization within phlebotomines (Diptera: Psychodidae) from a peridomicile-forest gradient in an Amazonian/Guianan bordering area

  • Thiago Vasconcelos dos Santos ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    thiagovasconcelos@iec.gov.br

    Affiliations Programa de Pós Graduação em Biologia de Agentes Infecciosos e Parasitários, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará State, Brazil, Seção de Parasitologia, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Ananindeua, Pará State, Brazil

  • Daniela de Pita-Pereira,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil

  • Thais Araújo-Pereira,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil

  • Constança Britto,

    Roles Formal analysis, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil

  • Fernando Tobias Silveira,

    Roles Formal analysis, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Seção de Parasitologia, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Ananindeua, Pará State, Brazil

  • Marinete Marins Póvoa ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Marinete Marins Póvoa, Elizabeth Ferreira Rangel

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Programa de Pós Graduação em Biologia de Agentes Infecciosos e Parasitários, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará State, Brazil, Seção de Parasitologia, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Ananindeua, Pará State, Brazil

  • Elizabeth Ferreira Rangel

    Contributed equally to this work with: Marinete Marins Póvoa, Elizabeth Ferreira Rangel

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Programa de Pós Graduação em Biologia de Agentes Infecciosos e Parasitários, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará State, Brazil, Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Vigilância Entomológica em Diptera e Hemiptera/ Laboratório de Referência Nacional e Internacional/Regional OPAS/OMS de Vigilância Entomológica, Taxonomia e Ecologia de Vetores de Leishmanioses/ Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil

Abstract

In the border region between Brazil and French Guiana, American cutaneous leishmaniasis is a worrisome public health issue, and entomological studies are required there to better identify classical and putative emerging transmission patterns. The present study aimed to detect and characterize Leishmania DNA in the phlebotomine population of Oiapoque (Amapá State, Brazil). Phlebotomines were captured in anthropized and wild environments in the outskirts of Oiapoque municipality, using CDC light traps installed in vertical (ground/canopy level) and horizontal (peridomicile/extradomicile/forest-edge/forest) strata. Captured specimens were identified according to their morphology. Females were processed for Leishmania DNA detection and characterization using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction targeting kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) and the phlebotomine cacophony gene. The kDNA positive samples were characterized by cloning and sequencing the Leishmania 234 bp-hsp70 gene. Among the 3957 phlebotomine specimens captured, 26 pooled female samples were positive for Leishmania (Viannia) spp. DNA. Sequencing analysis allowed species-specific identification of L. (V.) braziliensis DNA in Trichophoromyia ininii, Bichromomyia flaviscutellata, Nyssomyia umbratilis, and Evandromyia infraspinosa, and L. (V.) guyanensis DNA in Ny. umbratilis. A pooled sample of Ny. umbratilis was positive for both L. (V.) braziliensis and L. (V.) guyanensis DNA. The present study provided additional information regarding ACL ecology in Oiapoque, highlighting the presence of L. (V.) braziliensis DNA in different phlebotomine species. The epidemiological implications of these findings and the determinant incrimination of L. (V.) braziliensis as proven vectors in that region must be clarified. In this regard, studies on Leishmania spp. infection and suggestive anthropophilic behavior of associated phlebotomines need to be prioritized in entomological surveillance.

Introduction

Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) are insects of great medical importance owing to their capacity to transmit disease agents, such as Leishmania (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) parasites, the causative agents of American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL)[13]. In nature, ACL causative agents are maintained in a complex series of transmission cycles involving a variety of vectors and reservoirs [4]. The impact of natural, ecological, or man-made pressures can further complicate these relationships and lead to the formation of new transmission cycles [5,6].

ACL is endemic to the Amazonian/Guianan region, where it is caused by five parasite species, namely: Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis, L. (V.) braziliensis, L. (Leishmania) amazonensis, L. (V.) lainsoni, and L. (V.) naiffi [7]. Although L. (V.) guyanensis is considered to be the most important causative agent, potential emerging patterns of infection are worth investigation. For example, in the Oyapock basin, a natural border between the Brazilian state of Amapá and the Ultramarine Department of French Guiana, L. (V.) braziliensis is considered an emerging cause of ACL; reported to be linked to forest encroachment associated with the gold-mining industry [8]. Epidemiological data on the clinical profile of ACL patients in the Brazilian region revealed sporadic mucosal commitment presumed to be caused by this parasite species, drawing attention to a worrisome public health issue [9].

We recently studied ACL ecology in this region, providing comprehensive insights based exclusively on the investigation of the wild environment [6]. However, thelack of data regarding ACL in anthropized environmentsmade usseek further information regarding horizontal stratification of the phlebotomine fauna associated with human dwellings. Therefore, present study aimed to fill some gaps about the eco-epidemiological knowledge of that bordering area, supplying our previous "dissection-based" data on natural infection with those of Leishmania DNA detection.

Materials and methods

Study area

The municipality of Oiapoque (03°49'29"N, 51°49'05"W) is the most important Brazilian socioeconomic link with the bordering Ultramarine Department of French Guiana. ACL is endemic in this region and is regarded as a “bi-national” issue, asapproximately half of cases appear to be acquired on the Brazilian side, and half on the French Guianan side [9]. Two environments were selected to be surveyed, as follows:

  1. Wild environment: Vila Vitória Road (03° 51’ 28.1” N, 51° 48’ 41.3” W), as described in our previous survey [6], a recently opened road that provides eastern access from Oiapoque to Vila Vitória. The forested area shows minimal evidence of human activity and is therefore considered to be well preserved.
  2. Anthropized environment: Vila Vitória settlement (3°52'50.8"N, 51°47'35.7"W), a rural settlement surrounded by forest in the Brazilian border region of the Oiapoque River and approximately 6 km from the urban area of Oiapoque. Here, a randomly selected domicile within an environment with known ACL cases was surveyed, taking into consideration to be at the pattern distance (200 to 500m) of the forested area, which is a buffer radius assumed for the preventive measures for ACL transmission by L. (V.) guyanensis, attributed to the apparently limited flight range of the vector Nysomyia umbratilis[1013].

The Fig 1 shows the study area, located in Guianan Ecoregion Complex, South America (A), in the border area between Brazil and French Guiana (B), where in the outskirts of the Brazilian municipality of Oiapoque it can be observed two different environments, wild (D) and anthropized (E), supposed to be ACL foci.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Study area.

Located in Guianan Ecoregion Complex, South America (A), the border area between Brazil and French Guiana (B) is socioeconomically linked by the Brazilian municipality of Oiapoque and the French Guianan comune of Saint Georges de l'Oyapock (C), where ACL seems to be occurring in both wild (D) and anthropized (E) environments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219626.g001

Sampling

Site I was sampled using four CDC light traps installed approximately 100 m in-forest. Two were placed 20 m apart, 1.5m above ground (ground level) and two 20m apart, 20 m above ground (tree canopy level). Captures were performed from November 2016 to October 2017, four nights per month, totalizing 1152 h of sampling (12 h of operation for each CDC x two CDCs per site x four nights x 12 months) for each site.

Site II was sampled using four CDC light traps installed 1.5m above ground in a horizontal transect (from the direction of residence to forest), with the following vertical strata: peridomicile, extradomicile, forest-edge, and forest environments. Captures were performed from February to October 2016, four nights per month, totalizing 432 h of sampling (12 h of operation for each CDC x four nights per month x nine months) for each site.

Phlebotomines were immediately processed in the field laboratory and stored in 70% ethanol. They were identified using morphological characteristics in fresh conditions or processed for mounting on glass slides using Berlese fluid, according to Ryan [14]. Mounting of females was performed using only the last abdominal segments and head, as the thorax and abdomen were required for Leishmania DNA detection and characterization. Taxonomic criteria and nomenclature were adopted following those outlined by Galati et al. [15] and Galati [16].

Leishmania DNA detection and characterization

Procedures for DNA detection and characterization of Leishmania species from non-blood-fed phlebotomine females (stored in 70% ethanol) were based on the methodology proposed by Pita-Pereira et al. [17] and Araújo-Pereira et al. [18].

First, a total extract of the macerates of phlebotomine females of the same species without visible blood meal, individually processed or grouped in pools up to 20 specimens, and phlebotomine males (negative controls) were processed for DNA extraction. DNA was extracted using the commercial Wizard SV Genomic DNA Purification System kit (Promega, Madison, USA) according to the manufacturer's specifications. Hot-start multiplex PCR was performed using two pairs of oligonucleotides as follows: The first pair targets a 120bp fragment of the constant region of the kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) mini-circle [oligonucleotide A (5'-GGC CCA TAC ACC AAC CCC-3') and oligonucleotide B (5'-GGG GTA GGG GCG TTC TGC GAA-3')] [19]. The second pair targets the IVS6 region of the phlebotomine cacophony gene [5Lccac (5'-GTG GCC GAA CAT AAT GTT AG-3') and 3Llcac (5'-CCA CGA ACA AGT TCA ACA TC-3')][20]. The inclusion of the second pair of oligonucleotides confers reliability of DNA extraction from phlebotomine samples. The amplified products wereresolved using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by staining with Nancy-520 (Merck).

To optimize detection sensitivity, the amplification products were additionally subjected to dot-blot hybridization using a biotinylated probe specific for Leishmania (Viannia) (5’-TAA TTG TGC ACG GGG AGG CCA-3') [21]. The hybridization reaction was developed using Luminol reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA). Positive controls consisted of a pooled sample of experimentally infected Lutzomyia longipalpis females, after 72h of feeding on rabbit blood containing 2 × 105 L. braziliensis parasites/mL.

The DNA recovered from each Leishmania-positive sample was subjected to a second, semi-nested-PCR assay targeting the hsp70 gene. This gene region validated for distinguishing different species of Leishmania present in Brazil, with broad coverage of the L. (Viannia) subgenus. In the first PCR step, a 234 bp fragment of hsp70 was amplified using the oligonucleotides 5'-GGA CGA GAT CGA GCG CAT GGT-3' and 5'-TCC TTC GAC GCC TCC TGG TTG-3' [22]. In the second step, the same forward oligonucleotide is paired with the following reverse oligonucleotide: 5'-GGA GAA CTA CGC GTA CTC GAT GAA G-3' [23] to amplify a 144 bp internal region of the 234bp fragment. The amplified fragments were purified and cloned into competent Escherichia coli DH5α cells using the pGEM T-Easy Vector kit vector (Promega), according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

Sanger sequencing was performed with the RPT01A-PDTIS, Fiocruz-RJ sequencing platform (ABI 3730XL Applied Biosystem) [24], using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The electropherograms were initially analyzed using the Phred program [25], and regions with good sequence resolution were submitted for assembly using the CAP3 program [26], Vector sequence removal was performed using the NCBI VecScreen program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/VecScreen/VecScreen.html). Sequences were compared to those available in the BLASTnucleotide database (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) using the BLASTN algorithm.

Data analysis

The Shannon-Wiener (H) diversity index was estimated and evaluated with a t-test to compare diversities between the different sites sampled with equal effort (i.e.: wild environment: 1,152 h for each vertical stratum; anthropized environment: 432 h for each horizontal stratum), using the Past software version 3.22 (Øyvind Hammer, Oslo, Norway),[27]. Significance level was set at 5%.

Environmental issues

Capturing and processing invertebrate fauna (phlebotomines) were authorized by the Sistema de Autorização e Informação em Biodiversidade—SISBIO (Biodiversity Authorization and Information System), under protocol No. 44524.

Results

A total of 3957 phlebotomine specimens were captured, 1189 from the anthropized environment and 2768 from the wild environment. Thirty-one species were identified, including Evandromyia infraspinosa, Nyssomyia umbratilis, and Trichophoromyia ininii which were the most frequent, accounting for 2837 (71.7%) of the total number captured. Greatest diversity was observed, for the wild environment, in the ground level (H = 1.907) and, for the anthropized environment, in the peridomicile (H = 1.809) (Table 1). When comparing diversities within the anthropized environment, all horizontal strata, with exception of extradomicile x forest edge, were significantly different. Within the wild environment, both vertical strata (ground and canopy level) have diversity indexes significantly different (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Table 1. Phlebotomine species composition and vertical/horizontal stratification in anthropized and wild environments of Oiapoque, Amapá, Brazil, bordering French Guiana.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219626.t001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Diversity indexes estimated for the horizontal strata of anthropized environment (A) and for the vertical strata of the wild environment (B).

I: peridomicile; II: extradomicile; III: forest edge; IV: forest; V: ground level; VI: canopy level; (*): p< 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219626.g002

Phlebotomine DNA extraction was considered successful in 551 samples that amplified the cacophony gene; and thus appropriate for Leishmania spp. DNA detection. Engorged phlebotomines were excluded from the infection assays due to the risk of detecting a non-established infection in flies that had recently consumed blood from an infected source.

Twenty-six samples were positive for Leishmania (Viannia) spp. DNA. In the anthropized environment, Leishmania (Viannia) spp. DNA was detected in forest-edge samples of Psychodopygus squamiventris maripaensis (n = 1) and Bichromomyia flaviscutellata (n = 3), and in forest samples of N. umbratilis (n = 1) and Th. ininii (n = 2). In the wild environment, Leishmania (Viannia) spp. DNA was detected in B. flaviscutellata (n = 1) and E. infraspinosa (n = 2) caught at ground level, in N. umbratilis from ground (n = 4) and canopy (n = 9) levels, and in P. s. maripaensis from ground (n = 1) and canopy (n = 2) levels.

The minimum rate of DNA detection (number of positive samples / total samples tested x 100) was calculated for each the five species captured and positive for Leishmania spp. DNA: P. s. maripaensis (18.1%), N. umbratilis (5.8%), Bi. flaviscutellata (7%), E. infraspinosa (2.8%) and T. ininii (1.2%). Leishmania species identification was successful in 8 of the 26 positive samples, with coverage varying from 80–97% and identity from 88–100%. It was not possible to characterize the others due to cloning failures resulting from low DNA levels or incompatibility with the available sequences in the database.

Sequencing analyses are summarized in Table 2. BLAST analysis with sequences available from GenBank revealed the presence of L. (V.) braziliensis DNA in one T. ininii (10 specimens) sample from the forest-edge, one of B. flaviscutellata (6 specimens) from the forest, two of N. umbratilis (10 specimens, each) from canopy level, and two of E. infraspinosa (10 specimens, each) from ground level. Two samples of N. umbratilis (10 specimens each) from the canopy level were positive for Leishmania DNA, one was identified as L. (V.) guyanensis and the other contained DNA from both L. (V.) braziliensis and L. (V.) guyanensis.

thumbnail
Table 2. Samples of phlebotomines PCR-multiplex-positive for the cacophony gene (Phlebotominae) and for the kDNA gene (Leishmania spp.) with descriptions of the environment where they were captured, number of specimens analyzed and sequencing results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219626.t002

Discussion

In Brazil, ACL presents three characteristic epidemiological patterns: 1) Sylvatic, where transmission occurs mainly in primary forest environments; considered a zoonosis of wild animals with occasional human cases in areas of recent colonization due to the penetration of the man into the wild. 2) Occupational/recreational, associated with disordered forest exploration and with the clearing of forests for the construction of roads, hydroelectric power plants, village settlements, timber extraction, agricultural and military training activities, and ecotourism. 3) Rural and peri-urban in colonization areas, related to the migratory process, occupation of slopes and clusters in urban centers associated with secondary or residual forests [13]. Of these, the two former patterns are well recognized in the Amazon region, and support the hypothesis to be occurring in the studied area.

As hypothesized, the phlebotomine species composition observed in this study were highly similar to that recently presented in our previous study [6]. Therefore, to avoid redundancy, the present discussion here is focused on the results of horizontal stratification and Leishmania DNA detection within the phlebotomine population.

In the wild environment, diversity was significantly higher in the ground (H = 1.907; p < 0.05), where CDCs are usually set spatially congruent with the flight level of majority of phlebotomine species. On the other hand, canopy stratum comprise a ecological subsystem with fewer number of species with close relationship with arboreal vertebrates, such as occur with N. umbratilis and sloths and birds [6]. In the anthropized environment, differences on the diversity indexes were statistically significant when comparing between each stratum, with exception of extradomicile x forest edge. Similar environmental pressure and ecological niche between these sampling points may explain this apparent similarity. Greatest diversity found in the peridomicile (H = 1.809; p < 0.05) can be attributed to the search for shelter and offer of blood of domestic animals [13, 19].

Eight phlebotomine species were found in the extra-forest environments (peridomicile/extradomicile strata). Among these, it is important to highlight B. flaviscutellata, this species can be found in primary and secondary forests [28], and may be progressively adapting to environments modified by man [29,30]. Several studies have demonstrated the potential of peridomiciliarization of this species in the Amazonian region [3134]; however, the peridomiciliary populations were usually small, compared to those in the forest stratum. The higher frequency of Bi. flaviscutellata in a forested environment, compared to the peridomiciliary ecotope is consistent with the findings of other studies [30, 3537]. Therefore, there is no concrete evidence herethat this species has established peridomiciliary colonization. This assertion is further supported by a study conducted within the Bragança region of Pará, where pregnant Bi. flaviscutellata females were found only in the forest environment [38].

Molecular tools have been gradually replacing the traditional technique of phlebotomine dissection and provide several advantages, particularly with respect to sensitivity and specificity [39] allowing the detection of a single parasite [17]. However, it cannot be denied that parasite isolation significantly extends the range of investigations which can be performed. Therefore, it is suggested that, in entomological studies, DNA detection techniques and molecular characterization of Leishmania spp. be combined with dissection and attempted parasite isolation. Present results support our previous “dissection-based” information about Leishmania parasites in the Oiapoque environment [6].

The minimum detection rate observed by the molecular method (4.7%) was higher than that demonstrated in our early experience in Oiapoque using the dissection method (0.78%) [6], which is apparently attributed to the recognized high sensitivity of PCR and its variants [17,39]. However, we recognize that, in hands of experienced team and in females without a visible bloodmeal, the microscopical examination of dissected midguts is equally sensitive as Q-PCR, as has been proven elsewhere [40]. In addition, there are several other possible explanations to these differences of infection/detection rates, like the effect of season, micro-location of trapping sites, that should not be neglected in such comparisons.

It is important to note that these values do not necessarily reflect the risk of human infection; other factors should be considered in assessing the risk of exposure to ACL agents, such as the degree of anthropophilia of their potential vectors [3].

The cloning and sequencing stages are important because phlebotomines present a complex biological material and although kDNA detection provides high sensitivity, it does not allow identification to species level. Using this method, identification is possible at the level of genus and subgenus and this is a particular problem with the subgenus Viannia. Unfortunately, the best targets for genotyping, such as Hsp70, are not good detection targets due to low copy number. Therefore, effective detection and identification of Leishmania spp. from phlebotomines requires a primary detection step targeting kDNA, followed by a subsequent genotyping step using another molecular target, such as hsp70. Even so, the efficiency is reduced, due to the low amount of target DNA, and then we consider some identity values lower than 90%. Although we were unable to characterize 18 of the 26 positive samples, the sequence of eight pools showed compatible coverage and identity to contemplate characterization at species-specific level; providing important information in the context of Amazonian/Guianan ACL.

L. (V.) guyanensis DNA was detected in several samples of N. umbratilis, supporting the whole context that this natural vector x parasite relationship that has been discussed in the course of our past experience in Oiapoque [6] and based on the extensive literature from the Amazon region [3,4,10,4145]

L. (V.) braziliensis DNA was detected in four different phlebotomine species: T. ininii, B. flaviscutellata, E. infraspinosa, and N. umbratilis. In Brazil, L. (V.) braziliensis transmission is associated with the highest number of known vectors, where there are 17 phlebotomine species with proven or potential links to its transmission; seven of which are only associated by molecular findings [4]. The wide geographical distribution and genetic diversity of L. (V.) braziliensis strains [46] may contribute, in part, to the large list of its vectors. Furthermore, these transmission cycles may be very specific, as each leishmanian ecotope is reported to be spatiotemporally unique [6].

Interestingly, L. (V.) braziliensis DNA has not been found previously in any of these four phlebotomine species. Conversely, B. flaviscutellata and N. umbratilis play well-recognized roles in the transmission of the respectively associated parasites, L. (L.) amazonensis and L. (V.) guyanensis [2,4]. Leishmania sp. DNA was detected in Trichophoromyia ininii, considered a low-anthropophilic phlebotomine species, in Sabajo Heuvels, Suriname [47]. E. infraspinosa had previously been found in Oiapoque carrying promastigotes that were subsequently characterized as L. (V.) guyanensis from the residual material present on the slide [6].

The detection of L. (V.) braziliensis in four different phlebotomine species suggests concomitant contact of these insects with potential reservoirs of the parasite. Considering that rodents are the most likely animals to be involved in maintaining the enzootic cycle of L. (V.) braziliensis [4851], it is rationally inferential that these phlebotomines are feeding and ingesting parasitic forms in a competent source of infection within a compatible spatiotemporal context. The potential feeding habits of three, of these four species of sand fly, is a corroborating factor for this statement. Rodentophilia is undoubtedly well recognized for B. flaviscutellata [52] and N. umbratilis has been found alternatively feeding on blood from rodents in an environmentally-impacted area close to Manaus, Amazonian Brazil [53]. Additionally, E. infraspinosa, which infrequently bites man in the bordering region of Jari, between the Brazilian states of Pará and Amapá, was relatively frequent species in Disney-trapped rodent trap catches [10]. Furthermore, Dasyprocta leporina DNA was recently detected in E. infraspinosa in Saint Georges de l'Oyapock, Guiana [54]. Still in regard of E. infraspinosa, in our past experience during captures in area I, this species has drawn medical attention for having been observed biting professionals during Shannon trap captures in same circumstances of having been found naturally infected by L. (V.) guyanensis [6]. Conversely, other populations of this fly species may present distinct feeding behavior. For example, previous studies of anuran trypanosomatids carried by this phlebotomine species in the western Amazon led to the hypothesis that it feeds on cold-blooded animals in this ecotope [55]. These findings stress the need for further investigation of E. infraspinosa with respect to L. (V.) braziliensis-associated ACL transmission; particularly as these phlebotomine populations may also be permissive to other Leishmania spp. and have suggestive anthropophilic behavior.

One pooled sample of ten females of N. umbratilis was concomitantly positive for L. (V.) braziliensis and L. (V.) guyanensis DNA; however, it cannot be ascertained whether these two parasites were within the same phlebotomine or in different specimens of that pool. In this study and in the literature [5356] it is convergent with the possibility of N. umbratilis feed on different animals that act as potential reservoirs of Leishmania spp.

Conclusions

The results of the present study provide additional information on ACL ecology in Oiapoque, highlighting the presence L. (V.) braziliensis DNA in different phlebotomine species captured in ecologically distinct environments and strata in the study area. It should be noted, however, that these findings alone are not sufficient to conclude that there is a transmission cycle involving these phlebotomines and L. (V.) braziliensis. First, absence of visible blood cannot be interpreted as the possible survival of the parasite. Second, and more importantly, studies focused to this topic demonstrated that parasite DNA is detectable few days after Leishmania are killed in the non-natural vectors [57,58], reinforcing that PCR-based findings, when analyzed in isolation, are not enough for vector incrimination. Considering established natural infection, the epidemiological importance of these potential transmission cycles still require further evidence. Quantification of the parasitic load and/or demonstration of infective forms would certainly present a further step towards improving knowledge of the potential vectors of L. (V.) braziliensis in this region. Nonetheless, the known capacity of these species to harbor Leishmania spp. combined with suggestive anthropophilic behavior present a need for prioritized entomological surveillance.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the team of the Instituto Evandro Chagas (Fábio Márcio Medeiros da Silva Freire, Iorlando da Rocha Barata and Luciene Aranha da Silva Santos), the team of the Universidade Federal do Amapá—Campus binacional de Oiapoque (Dr. Emerson Monteiro dos Santos, Marcos Barbosa da Silva, Sebastiane de Freitas Araújo and Viviane Caetano Firmino) for their technical support in field work. The authors are also indebted with Mônica Magalhães Barbosa (Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis—Escritório de Oiapoque) for her logistical facilites provided for the field work.

References

  1. 1. Lainson R, Shaw JJ. New World Leishmaniasis. In: Topley & Wilson’s Microbiology and Microbial Infections. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010.
  2. 2. World Health Organization (WHO). Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data: Control of the Leishmaniasis: Report of a meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on the Control of Leishmaniasis, Geneva, (WHO technical report series; no. 949), 2010, 186pp.
  3. 3. Ready P. Biology of Phlebotomine Sand Flies as Vectors of Disease Agents. Annual Review of Entomology. 58: 227–250, 2013. pmid:23317043
  4. 4. Rangel EF, Lainson R, Costa SM, Shaw JJ, Carvalho BM. Sand fly vectors of American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Brazil. In: Rangel E.F & Shaw J.J. (editors). Brazilian sand flies: Biology, taxonomy, medical importance and control. Rio de Janeiro, Brazilian Ministry of Health. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation; 2018. pp. 341–380.
  5. 5. Fouque F, Gaborit P, Issaly J, Carinci R, Gantier J-C, Ravel C, et al. Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) associated with changing patterns in the transmission of the human cutaneous leishmaniasis in French Guiana. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102:35–40. pmid:17293996
  6. 6. Vasconcelos dos Santos T, Prévot G, Ginouvès M, Duarte R, Silveira FT, Póvoa MM, et al. Ecological aspects of Phlebotomines (Diptera: Psychodidae) and the transmission of American cutaneous leishmaniasis agents in an Amazonian/ Guianan bordering area. Parasites & Vectors. 2018;11:612.
  7. 7. Rotureau B. Ecology of the Leishmania species in the Guianan Ecoregion Complex. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2006;74:81–96. pmid:16407350
  8. 8. Simon S, Nacher M, Carme B, Basurko C, Roger A, Adenis A. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in French Guiana: revising epidemiology with PCR-RFLP. Trop Med Health. 2017;45:5. pmid:28265182
  9. 9. Vasconcelos dos Santos T, Chaves RCG, Prévot G, Silveira FT, Póvoa MM, Rangel EF. Binational burden of American cutaneous leishmaniasis in Oiapoque, Amapá State, Brazil, bordering French Guiana. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. 2019;52:e20180256. pmid:30942256
  10. 10. Ready PD, Lainson R, Shaw JJ, Ward RD. The ecology of Lutzomyia umbratilis Ward &Fraiha (Diptera: Psychodidae), the major vector to man of Leishmania braziliensisguyanensis in north-eastern Amazonian Brazil,Bulletin of Entomological Research.1986;76: 21–40.
  11. 11. Esterre P, Chippaux JP, Lefait JF, Dedet J-P, Evaluation of a cutaneous leishmaniasis control program in a forest village of French Guyana. Bull WHO.1986;64: 559–565. pmid:3490925
  12. 12. Dedet JP. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in French Guiana: a review. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.1990;43: 25–28. pmid:2200289
  13. 13. Brasil—Ministry of Health. Secretary of Surveillance in Health. Department of Surveillance in Transmissible Diseases. Guide to surveillance of tegumentary leishmaniasis [in Portuguese]. 2nd ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde press; 2017.
  14. 14. Ryan L. Flebótomos do estado do Pará. Documento Técnico. n.1. Belém, 1986
  15. 15. Galati EAB, Galvis-Ovallos F, Lawyer P, Léger N, Depaquit J. An illustrated guide for characters and terminology used in descriptions of Phlebotominae (Diptera, Psychodidae). Parasite. 2017;24: 26. pmid:28730992
  16. 16. Galati EAB. Phlebotominae (Diptera, Psychodidae): Classification, morphology, and terminology of adults and identification of American taxa. In: Rangel E.F. & Shaw J.J. (eds.) Brazilian sand flies: Biology, taxonomy, medical importance and control. Rio de Janeiro, Brazilian Ministry of Health. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, 2018, pp.9–212.
  17. 17. Pita-Pereira D, Alves CR, Souza MB, Brazil RP, Bertho A, Barbosa A, et al. Identification of naturally infected Lutzomyia intermedia and Lutzomyia migonei with Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) revealed by a PCR multiplex non-isotopic hybridization assay. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.2005;99: 905–913. pmid:16143358
  18. 18. Araujo-Pereira T, Pita-Pereira D, Boité MC, Melo M, Costa-Rego TA, Fuzari AA, et al. First description of Leishmania (Viannia) infection in Evandromyia saulensis, Pressatia sp. and Trichophoromyia auraensis (Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) in a transmission area of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Acre state, Amazon Basin, Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz.2017;112:75–78. pmid:28076470
  19. 19. Passos VM, Lasmar EB, Gontijo CM, Fernandes O, Degrave W. Natural infection of a domestic cat (Felisdomesticus) with Leishmania (Viannia) in the metropolitan region of Belo Horizonte, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 1996;91:19–20. pmid:8734945
  20. 20. Lins RM, Oliveira SG, Souza NA, De Queiroz RG, Justiniano SC, Ward RD, et al. Molecular evolution of the cacophony IVS6 region in sand flies. Insect Molecular Biology. 2002;11:117–122. pmid:11966876
  21. 21. Fernandes O, Bozza M, Pascale JM, de Miranda AB, Lopes UG, Degrave WM. An oligonucleotide probe derivedfromkDNAminirepeatsisspecific for Leishmania (Viannia). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 1996;91:279–84. pmid:9040846
  22. 22. Graça GC, Volpini AC, Romero GA, Oliveira-Neto MP, Hueb M, Porrozzi R, et al. Development and validation of PCR-basedassays for diagnosis of American cutaneousleishmaniasis and identification of the parasite species. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2012;107:664–74. pmid:22850958
  23. 23. Zampieri RA, Laranjeira-Silva MF, Muxel SM, Stocco de Lima AC, Shaw J.J, Floeter-Winter LM. High Resolution Melting Analysis Targeting hsp70 as a Fast and Efficient Method for the Discrimination of Leishmania Species. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases.2016;10:e0004485. pmid:26928050
  24. 24. Sanger F. The Croonian Lecture. Nucleotide sequences in DNA. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B-Biological Sciences.1975;191:317–333.
  25. 25. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl M, Green P. Base calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Research. 1998;8: 175–185. pmid:9521921
  26. 26. Huang X, Madan A. CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Research.1999;9:868–877. pmid:10508846
  27. 27. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001.4(1):9pp.
  28. 28. Shaw JJ, Lainson R. Leishmaniasis in Brazil: VI. Observations on the seasonal variations of Lutzomyia flaviscutellata in different types of forest and its relationship to enzootic rodent leishmaniasis (Leishmania mexicana amazonensis). Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.1972;66:709–717. pmid:4647642
  29. 29. Ready PD, Lainson R, Shaw JJ. Leishmaniasis in Brazil: XX. Prevalence of "enzootic rodent leishmaniasis" (Leishmania mexicana amazonensis), and apparent absence of "pian bois" (Le. braziliensis guyanensis), in plantations of introduced tree species and in other non-climax forests in eastern Amazônia, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.1983;77: 775–785. pmid:6665830
  30. 30. Lainson R, Shaw J.J, Silveira FT, Souza AAA, Braga RR, Ishikawa EAY. The dermal leishmaniases of Brazil, with special reference to the eco-epidemiology of the disease in Amazonia. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz.1994;89:435–443. pmid:7476229
  31. 31. Andrade ARO, Nunes VLB, Galati EAB, Arruda CCP, Santos MFC, Rocca MEG, et al. Epidemiological study on leishmaniasis in an area of environmental tourism and ecotourism, State of Mato Grosso do Sul, 2006–2007. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. 2009; 42 488–493. pmid:19967228
  32. 32. Rebêlo JMM, Assunção Júnior AN, Silva O, Moraes JLP. Ocorrência de flebotomíneos (Diptera, Psychodidae) em focos de leishmanioses, em área de ecoturismo do entorno do Parque Nacional dos Lençóis Maranhenses, Brasil. Cadernos de Saude Publica.2010;26:195–198.
  33. 33. Vilela ML, Azevedo CG, Carvalho BM, Rangel EF. Phlebotomine fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) and putative vectors of leishmaniases in impacted area by hydroelectric plant, state of Tocantins, Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e27721. pmid:22163271
  34. 34. Brito VN, De Almeida ABPF, Nakazato L, Duarte R, Souza CO, Sousa VRF. Phlebotomine fauna, natural infection rate and feeding habits of Lutzomyia cruzi in Jaciara, state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2014; 109:899–904. pmid:25410993
  35. 35. Almeida PS, Leite JA, Araújo AD, Batista PM, Touro RBS, Araújo VS, et al. Fauna of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera, Psychodidae) in areas with endemic American cutaneous leishmaniasis in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia.2013;57:105–112.
  36. 36. Carvalho BM, Maximo M, Costa WA, Santana ALF, Costa SM, Rego TANC, et al. Leishmaniasis transmission in an ecotourism area: potential vectors in Ilha Grande, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Parasites & Vectors. 2013; 6: 325.
  37. 37. Ramos WR, Medeiros JF, Julião GR, Ríos-Velásquez CM, Marialva EF, Desmouliére SJM, et al. Anthropic effects on sand fly (Diptera: Psychodidae) abundance and diversity in an Amazonian rural settlement, Brazil. Acta Tropica.2014;139:44–52. pmid:25009952
  38. 38. Carvalho BM, Vasconcelos dos Santos T, Barata IR, Lima JAN, Silveira FT, Vale MM, et al. Entomological surveys of Lutzomyia flaviscutellata and other vectors of cutaneous leishmaniasis in municipalities with records of Leishmania amazonensis within the Bragança region of Pará State, Brazil. Journal of Vector Ecology. 2018; 43:168–178. pmid:29757525
  39. 39. Perez JE, Ogusuku E, Inga R, Lopez M, Monje J, Paz L, et al. Natural Leishmania infection of Lutzomyia spp. in Peru. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.1994; 88:161–164. pmid:8036658
  40. 40. Myskova J, Voptyka J, Volf P. Leishmania in sand flies: comparison of quantitative polymerase chain reaction with other techniques to determine the intensity of infection. Journal of Medical Entomology. 2008;45:133–8. pmid:18283954
  41. 41. Lainson R, Shaw JJ, Ward RD, Ready PD, Naiff RD. Leishmaniasis in Brazil: XIII. Isolation of Leishmania from armadillos (Dasypusnovemcinctus), and observations on the epidemiology of cutaneous leishmaniasis in north Pará State, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.1979;73: 239–242. pmid:473314
  42. 42. Lainson R, Shaw JJ, Ready PD, Miles M, Póvoa MM. Leishmaniasis in Brazil: XVI. Isolation and identification of Leishmania species from sandflies, wild mammals and man in north Pará State, with particular reference to L. braziliensis guyanensis, causative agent of ‘pian-bois’. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1981;75:530–536. pmid:7324128
  43. 43. Rangel EF, Lainson R, Souza AA, Ready P, Azevedo ACR. Variation between geographical populations of Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani (Antunes & Coutinho, 1939) sensulato (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) in Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz.1996; 91:43–50. pmid:8734947
  44. 44. Killick-Kendrick R. Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 1990;4: 1–24. pmid:2132963
  45. 45. Brazil RP, Fuzzari AA, Andrade Filho JD. Sand Fly Vectors of Leishmania in the Americas—A Mini Review. Entomology, Ornithology and Herpetology.2015;4: 2.
  46. 46. Cupolillo E, Brahim LR, Toaldo CB, de Oliveira-Neto MP, de Brito ME, Falqueto A, et al. Genetic polymorphism and molecular epidemiology of Leishmania (Viannia)braziliensis from different hosts and geographic areas in Brazil. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003; 41:3126–3132. pmid:12843052
  47. 47. Kent AD, Vasconcelos dos Santos T, Gangadin A, Samjhawan A, Mans DRA, Schallig HDFH. Studies on the sand fly fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) in high-transmission areas of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Republic of Suriname. Parasites & Vectors.2013; 6:318.
  48. 48. Vasconcelos IA, Vasconcelos AW, Fe Filho NM, Queiroz RG, Santana EW, Bozza M, et al.The identity of Leishmania isolated from sand flies and vertebrate hosts in amajor focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Baturité, northeastern Brazil. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1994; 50:158–164. pmid:8116807
  49. 49. Brandão- Filho SP, Brito ME, Carvalho FG, Ishikawa EAY, Cupolillo E, Floeter- Winter L, et al. Wild and synanthropic hosts of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in the endemic cutaneous leishmaniasis locality of Amaraji, Pernambuco State, Brazil. Transactiosn of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.2003; 97:291–296.
  50. 50. Roque AL, Cupolillo E, Marchevsky RS, Jansen AM. Thrichomys laurentius (Rodentia; Echimyidae) as a putative reservoir of Leishmania infantum and L. braziliensis: patterns of experimental infection. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2010;4:e589. pmid:20126407
  51. 51. Roque AL, Jansen AM. Wild and synanthropic reservoirs of Leishmania species in the Americas. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife. 2014;29:251–262.
  52. 52. Shaw JJ, Lainson R. Leishmaniasis in Brazil: II. Observations on enzootic rodent leishmaniasis in the lower Amazon region—the feeding habits of the vector, Lutzomyia flaviscutellata, in reference to man, rodents and other animals. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.1968;62:396–405. pmid:5659233
  53. 53. Nery LCR, Lorosa ES, Franco AMR. Feeding preference of the sand flies Lutzomyia umbratilis and L. spathotrichia (Diptera: Psychodidae, Phlebotominae) in an urban forest patch in the city of Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz.2004;99:571–574. pmid:15558165
  54. 54. Kocher A, de Thoisy B, Catzeflis F, Valière S, Bañuls AL, Murienne J. iDNA screening: Disease vectors as vertebrate samplers. Molecular Ecology. 2017;26:6478–6486. pmid:28926155
  55. 55. Ferreira RC, Souza AA, Freitas R, Campaner M, Takata CSA, Barret TV, et al. Phylogenetic lineage of closely related trypanosomes (Trypanosomatidae, Kinetoplastida) of anurans and sand flies (Psychodidae, Diptera) sharing the same ecotopes in Brazilian Amazonia. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2008;55:427–35 pmid:19017063
  56. 56. Christensen HA, Arias JR, Vasquez AM, Freitas RA. Hosts of sandfly vectors of Leishmania braziliensisguyanensisin the central Amazon of Brazil. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.1982;31:239–242. pmid:7072886
  57. 57. Seblova V, Sadlova J, Carpenter S, Volf P. Development of Leishmania parasites in Culicoidesnubeculosus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) and implications for screening vector competence. Journal of Medical Entomology. 2012;49:967–70. pmid:23025175
  58. 58. Seblova V, Sadlova J, Carpenter S, Volf P. Speculations on biting midges and other bloodsucking arthropods as alternative vectors of Leishmania. Parasites & Vectors. 2014. 7:222