Skewed T cell responses to Epstein-Barr virus in long-term asymptomatic kidney transplant recipients

Cecilia Nakid-Cordero; Nadia Arzouk; Nicolas Gauthier; Nadine Tarantino; Martin Larsen; Sylvain Choquet; Sonia Burrel; Brigitte Autran; Vincent Vieillard; Amélie Guihot

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224211

Abstract

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) abnormally replicate the Epstein Barr Virus (EBV). To better understand how long-term immunosuppression impacts the immune control of this EBV re-emergence, we systematically compared 10 clinically stable KTRs to 30 healthy controls (HCs). The EBV-specific T cell responses were determined in both groups by multiparameter flow cytometry with intra cellular cytokine staining (KTRs n = 10; HCs n = 15) and ELISpot-IFNγ assays (KTRs n = 7; HCs n = 7). The T/B/NK cell counts (KTRs n = 10; HCs n = 30) and the NK/T cell differentiation and activation phenotypes (KTRs n = 10; HCs n = 15/30) were also measured. We show that in KTRs, the Th1 effector CD4⁺ T cell responses against latent EBV proteins are weak (2/7 responders). Conversely, the frequencies total EBV-specific CD8⁺T cells are conserved in KTRs (n = 10) and span a wider range of EBNA-3A peptides (5/7responders) than in HCs (5/7responders). Those modifications of the EBV-specific T cell response were associated with a profound CD4⁺ T cell lymphopenia in KTRs compared to HCs, involving the naïve CD4⁺ T cell subset, and a persistent activation of highly-differentiated senescent CD8⁺ T cells. The proportion of total NK / CD8⁺ T cells expressing PD-1 was also increased in KTRs. Noteworthy, PD-1 expression on CD8⁺ T cells normalized with time after transplantation. In conclusion, we show modifications of the EBV-specific cellular immunity in long term transplant recipients. This may be the result of both persistent EBV antigenic stimulation and profound immunosuppression induced by anti-rejection treatments. These findings provide new insights into the immunopathology of EBV infection after renal transplantation.

Citation: Nakid-Cordero C, Arzouk N, Gauthier N, Tarantino N, Larsen M, Choquet S, et al. (2019) Skewed T cell responses to Epstein-Barr virus in long-term asymptomatic kidney transplant recipients. PLoS ONE 14(10): e0224211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211

Editor: James Drummond, Mercer University School of Medicine, UNITED STATES

Received: August 2, 2019; Accepted: October 8, 2019; Published: October 22, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Nakid-Cordero et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: CNC received a PhD fellowship (ref: IP/SC-15666) from La Ligue contre le cancer (https://www.ligue-cancer.net). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors disclose no conflicts of interest except Martin Larsen who is the proprietary owner of Funky Cells software. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) infection is usually asymptomatic in the immunocompetent[1]. After kidney engraftment, therapeutic immunosuppression renders patients vulnerable to infections, often leading to EBV abnormal replication in peripheral blood, a virological status that predispose to EBV-induced post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD).[2–4] EBV-related PTLDs mainly arises early after kidney transplantation but can also occur in the long term.[4] EBV replication is known to be controlled by both T cells [5], and NK cells [6,7]. Thus, analyzing how long-term immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) alters EBV-specific immune response is paramount for preventing long-term EBV-associated complications.

To date, the mechanism leading to the loss of immune control over viral replication after transplantation remains poorly understood. The first mechanisms that could be evoked is immunosuppression with CD4⁺ T cell lymphopenia[8,9]. This loss of immune cells could be linked with activation induced cell death: increased proportions of activated CD38⁺ and pre-apoptotic CD95⁺ T cells have been described in KTRs [10]. Finally, exhausted PD-1⁺ CD8⁺ T cells can be generated in a vicious cycle with viral replication that constitute chronic antigenic stimulation [11,12]. Thus, deciphering the immunopathogenesis of the chronic viral replication in KTRs is paramount if we are to early detect kidney transplant recipients at risk for EBV-related complications.

Such precancerous/cancerous complications are more frequent in multi-organ and thoracic transplant recipients, due to the intensity of maintenance immunosuppression, and in EBV-seronegative recipients, who are mostly infants.[4] Thus, the EBV-specific T cell responses have been mainly studied in those high risk transplant populations. [13–16] In such patients, the effector T CD8⁺ cell responses against EBV seem to be conserved in terms of IFNγ production, when compared to pre-transplant recipients or healthy controls[14,16]. The ability to develop a protective EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cell response has been observed in one EBV seronegative patient who underwent cardiac transplantation from an EBV seropositive donor [17]. However, functional alterations have been reported in children presenting high EBV loads after transplantation, including increased frequencies of monofunctional IFNγ⁺ lytic-EBV specific CD8 T cells[15] and increased expression of PD-1 and CD38 activation markers on EBV-specific T cells, suggesting an exhaustion of those cells.[13] In contrast, the EBV-specific T cell immunity after long-term kidney transplantation have been insufficiently described, especially in the adult population.

Following lung and liver transplantation, immunosuppressive drugs [18] and chronic viral infections [19,20] have been associated with altered NK cell differentiation and function that might expose to non-Hodgkin lymphoma[21,22]. Whether these alterations result from NK cell exhaustion and enhanced PD-1 expression on NK cells, as reported in pediatric PTLD patients, [23] have not yet been studied in adult long-term stable KTRs.

Given that kidney transplantation represents almost half of total solid organ transplantation (SOT) worldwide, according to the Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation (GODT) data, produced by the WHO-ONT collaboration (http://www.transplant-observatory.org), the number of cases of EBV-related complications is probably as elevated for adult KTRs as for other transplanted populations at higher risk. Yet, the EBV-specific cellular immunity has been poorly described in KTRs. Thus, to better understand the EBV long-term immune control after adult kidney transplantation, we conducted a systematic study of peripheral immune cells in long-term clinically stable KTRs and compared them to healthy controls (HCs). Our results show that in KTRs, the Th1 effector CD4⁺T cell responses against latent EBV proteins are weak (2/7 responders). In contrast, the frequencies of EBV-specific CD8⁺T cells are conserved in KTRs (n = 10) and patients responding (n = 5/7) to EBNA-3A, span a wider range of the protein peptide sequence than responding HCs (n = 2/7).

Materials and methods

Study groups

This retrospective study, performed in 2016, included 10 long-term clinically stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from the renal transplantation department of the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Paris, France). Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years old at transplantation, post-transplant follow-up ≥2 years after blood sample, no history of acute graft rejection, malignancy or recurrent infections after transplantation. We selected patients with different post-transplant delays in order to study immune alterations through time. Blood samples for patients were obtained in the context of follow-up consultation and clinical routine blood withdrawal. The healthy control (HC) group was composed of 30 anonymous adult healthy donors, from the French blood bank (Etablissement Français du Sang, Paris, France).

The study was approved by institutional research ethics board, Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France VII, under the protocol no° PP13-022, and performed in accordance with the human-experimentation guidelines of the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital and the declaration of Helsinki, as well as respecting the convention signed between the INSERM (Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Medicale, Ile-de-France, France) and the Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS, Ile-de-France, France) for the cession of blood components to research (Reference: C CPSL UNT—N° 15/EFS/012). All patients and healthy controls provided written informed consent.

Blood sample cryopreservation and viral DNA loads

Blood samples from patients and controls were collected in 5 mL tubes containing Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or Lithium heparin. EDTA tubes were obtained for each patient (n = 10) and one for each healthy control (n = 30) and at least one Lithium heparin tube was obtained for 10 patients and 15 healthy controls. Blood collected in Lithium heparin tubes was diluted 1:2 in RPMI 1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Villebon-sur-Yvette, Courtaboeuf, France) before 30 minutes centrifugation at 2200 revolutions per minute (rpm) through Lymphocyte separation density gradient media (Eurobio, les Ulis, Courtaboeuf, France). The ring containing the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was recovered, washed twice with 50mL of RPMI 1640 medium for 8 minutes at 1700rpm, then suspended in 10% Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) heat-inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, Biowest, Nuaillé, France). Samples were cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen cell bank until use. Following experiments were performed according to PBMC availability.

EBV and CMV viral DNA loads were measured in whole blood using commercial kits artus^®EBV Virus QS-RGQ and artus^®CMV Virus QS-RGQ (QIAgen, Courtaboeuf, France) according to manufacturer’s instructions, with a detection limit set at ≥1.4 log copies/mL. Human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8) viral DNA loads were measured in fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as described elsewhere,[24] with a detection limit of ≥10 copies/10⁶ cells.

Absolute lymphocyte counts, T Cell and NK Cell detailed phenotypes

Total and T/B/NK lymphocyte absolute counts were determined on fresh blood, collected in EDTA tubes, with an automated AQUIOS CL flow cytometry system (Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France) using commercial kits AQUIOS Tetra-1 Panel (ref: B23533) and Tetra-2+ Panel (B23534) according to manufacturer’s instructions (Beckman Coulter).

Detailed T cell phenotype was determined on fresh blood. Briefly, 100μL of blood were stained with two antibody panels shown in Table 1. Anti-CCR7 antibody was incubated at room temperature in the dark for 10 minutes. Then, the rest of antibodies were added and incubated 10 minutes in the same conditions. A TQ-Prep Workstation (Beckman Coulter) was used for incubation, cell lysis and fixation of samples (IMMUNOPREP^™ Reagent System, Beckman Coulter). A Navios flow cytometer was used for acquisition (Beckman Coulter).

Download:

Table 1. Primary antibodies used for T cell detailed phenotype.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.t001

For the phenotypic study of NK cells, PBMCs were thawed in RPMI+ medium (100 UI/mL penicillin / 100 μg/mL streptomycin / 0.25 μg/mL Amphotericin B, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.1 mM MEM NEAA, 2mM L-glutamine; Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 20% FBS (Biowest), then washed twice with RPMI+ medium 10% FBS for 5 minutes at 1500rpm. After last wash, 1x10⁶ PBMCs were stained for 30 minutes at 4°C with antibodies described in Table 2. Stained cells were washed with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (PBS 1x; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and fixed with 300 μL of BD CellFIX 1x (BD Biosciences). At least 5,000 events in the CD3^-CD56⁺ lymphocytes gate were acquired with a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and data were analyzed with FlowJo software version 10.5 (Tree star; Ashland, USA). The gating strategy is shown in S1 Fig.

Download:

Table 2. Primary antibodies used for NK cell detailed phenotype.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.t002

EBV peptides

Synthetic latent and lytic EBV peptides included: previously described 8–11 mers restricted to different class-I MHC molecules [25,26] (S1 Table; GeneCust Europe, Ellange, Luxembourg), previously described 11–20 mers restricted to different class-II MHC molecules [26,27] (S2 Table); Epytop, Nimes, France), 15-mers overlapping by 10 amino acids and spanning the whole BZLF-1 protein sequence (GenBank reference: AAA66529.1; S3 Table; GeneCust Europe) and 15-mers overlapping by 10 amino acids and spanning the immunogenic C-terminal region of EBNA-3A protein (GenBank reference: AFY97915.1; S4 Table; GeneCust Europe). All KTRs but one had HLA (Human leucocyte antigen) alleles matching class-I or class-II-MHC restricted optimal peptides (S5 Table).

EBV-specific T cell detection by intracellular cytokine staining assay

PBMCs were thawed as mentioned above then suspended at 1x10⁶ cells/mL in RPMI+ medium 10% FBS and incubated overnight at 37°C, 5% CO₂. Next day, PBMCs (0.5-1x10⁶ cells/mL) were suspended in RPMI+ medium and stimulated with BZLF-1 overlapping 15mers + class I MHC-restricted lytic-EBV optimal peptides, class I MHC-restricted latent EBV optimal peptides (2μg/mL), Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB; 1μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich) as a positive control or RPMI+ medium only as a negative control. According to sample availability, PBMCs of five patients and five controls were also stimulated with class II MHC-restricted latent EBV optimal peptides (2μg/mL). Then, brefeldin A and monensin (10μg/mL and 5μg/mL, respectively; Sigma-Aldrich) were added to PBMCs, followed by a 6 hour incubation at 37°C, 5% CO₂. After stimulation, cells were washed with PBS1x-BSA 0.5% and suspended in 1mL of PBS 1x. All antibodies used from that moment on were from BD Biosciences (Table 3). Cells were incubated for 15 minutes with the viability stain at room temperature in the dark, then washed and stained with extracellular antibodies for 15 minutes at room temperature in the dark. The FIX & PERM^® Cell Permeabilization Kit was used according to manufacturer’s recommendations (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After fixation and permeabilization, cells were stained with intracellular antibodies for 15 minutes at room temperature in the dark, then washed and fixed with 300 ml of BD CellFIX^™ 1x. Acquisition was performed in the Flow Cytometry Core CyPS (Sorbonne University, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France) using a five-laser LSR Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) standardized with the same lot of CST beads (BD Biosciences) before each acquisition.

Download:

Table 3. Primary antibodies used in intracellular cytokine staining assay.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.t003

Data were analyzed with FlowJo software version 10.5 as shown in S2A and S2B Fig. EBV-specific T cells were detected after specific stimulation by the production of IFNγ, interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) in individual gates (S2C Fig). Then, a boolean gate including the 3 cytokines (IFNγ and/or IL-2 and/or TNFα) was created to study response size and immune-checkpoint expression (S2D Fig).

Using flow cytometry, polyfunctionality was defined as the ability to co-express multiple cytokines at the single-cell level [28].To study the polyfunctionality of EBV-specific T cells, we used a Boolean combination gate strategy to create the seven possible combinations of IFNγ, IL-2 and/or TNFα cytokine production; next, data were analyzed with the Funky Cells ToolBox 0.1.2 (www.FunkyCells.com) developed by Martin Larsen, PhD. We define a T cell as polyfunctional when more than one cytokine, that is IFNγ, IL-2 and/or TNFα, is produced simultaneously. Monofunctionality is defined when only one of the studied cytokines is produced at the single-cell level; however, there are many other functional molecules that we have not studied here, that might be expressed by those cells. Thus the term “monofunctional” is restricted to the cytokines array we studied here. Data are reported after background subtraction. Polyfunctionality profiles and immune-checkpoint expression were only studied in patients with positive responses after background subtraction and at least 100 events available in the 3 cytokine Boolean gate (S2D Fig).

ELISpot-IFNγ assay

MultiScreen HTS-IP 96-well plates (Merck Millipore, Molsheim, France) were washed three times with PBS1x, then coated with anti-human IFNγ capture antibody (1μg/mL; Mouse IgG1κ clone: B-B1; Diaclone, Besançon, France) and incubated overnight at 4°C. The next day, plates were washed and blocked with RPMI+ medium supplemented with 10% FBS for 30 minutes at 37°C, 5% CO₂. Thawed PBMCs (1 x10⁵ cells/well) were stimulated in triplicates with RPMI+ medium supplemented with 10% FBS as negative control, phytohemagglutinin (PHA, 2μg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) as positive control and EBV peptides (2μg/mL, then incubated at 37°C, 5% CO₂. EBV-specific CD4⁺ T cell response was detected after 40-hour incubation with class II MHC-restricted latent EBV peptides (divided in 3pools of 11 peptides). EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cell response was detected after 20-hour incubation with BZLF-1 (divided in 5 pools of ≤10 peptides), EBNA-3A (divided in 16 pools of ≤10 peptides) and class I MHC-restricted latent (divided in 4 pools of ≤10 peptides), and lytic (1 pool of 3 peptides) EBV optimal peptides at 37°C. Plates were then washed 3 times with each PBS1x, PBS1x-Tween 20 and PBS1x. The anti-human IFN-γ detection antibody (0.5μg/mL; Mouse IgG1κ clone: B-G1; Diaclone) was added and incubated for 6 hours at 37°C. After 3 washes with PBS1x, Streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase (dilution 1:1000; GE Healthcare, France) was added and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. After wash, 50μL/ well of NBT/ BCIP (nitro-blue tetrazolium chloride/5-bromo-4-chloro-3'-indolyphosphate p-toluidine salt; Thermo Fisher Scientific) were added and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes in the dark. Reaction was stopped with water followed by three washes with water. Plate was air dried for at least 24 hours in the dark then Spot forming cells(SFC) were read using AID Elispot reader and AID Elispot software (Autoimmun Diagnostika, Strassberg, Germany). The mean numbers of SFC from triplicates or duplicates were adjusted to 1 x10⁶ PBMCs after background subtraction. The thawing viability threshold was set at 50% live cells, and ELISpot-IFNγ positivity threshold was 50 SFC per million cells. The mean viability by trypan blue immediately after thawing was 73% (SD = 13%) for 10 patients and 83% (SD = 19%) for 15 controls.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with Graph Pad Prism version 6 for Windows (La Jolla, USA). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess differences between independent groups of patients. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlations were determined with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and statistical significance of P-values according to Bonferroni correction threshold (0.0041). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using R language with the heatmap.2 function from the gplots package[29] and dendrograms were generated based on the Ward.D method[30].

Results

Patients characteristics and lymphopenia status

Ten clinically long-term stable adult KTRs were included, with a median post-transplant duration of 12.5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 13–25 years). At the time of blood sampling, all patients were clinically stable, and were receiving combined immunosuppressive therapy (Table 4). Six out of 10 had detectable EBV viral loads in peripheral blood. When compared to HCs, KTRs presented global lymphopenia (median: KTRs = 1,256 vs. HCs = 1,996/mm³; P = 0.0455; S3A Fig), involving mainly B cells (median CD19⁺: KTRs = 45 vs. HCs = 213/mm³, P = 0.0002; S3C Fig) and CD4⁺ T cells (median CD4⁺: KTRs = 484 vs. HCs = 1,007/mm³; P = 0.0007; S3E Fig). Of note, the absolute B cell and CD4⁺ T cell counts were not related to the type of immunosuppressive treatment and persisted overtime after transplantation (S3G and S3H Fig). Furthermore, follow up of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺T cell counts in 2 patients and of EBV viral loads in 5 patients, showed stable values overtime (S4 Fig). Three years after sample collection, one patient was undergoing dialysis (KTR #7), while the others were clinically stable in particular without EBV-related PTLDs.

Download:

Table 4. Patients characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.t004

Low Th1 CD4⁺ T cells against latent EBV antigens in long-term stable kidney transplant recipients

We studied the EBV-specific CD4⁺T cell response directed against lytic and latent EBV proteins. According to PBMC availability, we used overlapping 15 mer-peptides spanning the whole lytic BZLF-1 protein (KTRs n = 10, HCs n = 15), and class II MHC-restricted latent EBV optimal peptides (KTRs n = 5, HCs n = 5). Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays identified CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T specific responses by multiparameter flow cytometry (S2 Fig). The frequencies of CD4⁺ T cells producing IFNγ, IL-2, or TNFα against latent and lytic EBV peptides were similar in KTRs and HCs although the latent–specific responses were particularly weak in both groups (S5A Fig). Next, we characterized the functional capacity and immunecheckpoint expression of those EBV-specific cells from responding KTRs and HCs. The polyfunctionality profile showed that the lytic specific CD4⁺ T cells were monofunctional in responders of both groups (responders, KTRs n = 8/10; HCs n = 13/15) suggesting an effector memory CD4⁺ T cell response, while the latent specific CD4⁺ T cells were mainly polyfunctional suggesting a central memory CD4⁺ T cell response (responders, KTRs n = 3/5; HCs n = 4/5) (Fig 1A). There was no difference in PD-1 and Tim-3 expression by latent and lytic EBV-specific CD4⁺ T cells between groups (S5B–S5D Fig). Of note, the number of events detected in the CD4⁺IFNg⁺ gate was two- to ten-fold higher than in the CD8⁺IFNg⁺ gate confirming that the class II MHC-restricted EBV optimal peptides we used preferentially triggered CD4⁺ T cells (S6 Fig). Considering the weak latent–specific responses, we further studied the CD4⁺ T cell responses against class II MHC-restricted latent-EBV optimal peptides with an ELISpot-IFNγ assay, a more sensitive technique than ICS assay that detect Th1 effector CD4⁺ T cell responses. We found that the latent EBV-specific MHC Class II restricted T cell responses were significantly lower in KTRs when compared to HCs (2/7 responders vs. 8/8 responders; median SFC/10⁶ PBMC: KTRs = 24 vs. HCs = 1032; P = 0.0012; Fig 1B). This was not due to an immunodominance bias because the HLA-typing of KTRs was diverse and adapted to MHC-class II restricted peptides (S5 Table).

Download:

Fig 1. EBV-specific T cell responses in long-term kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and healthy controls (HCs).

(A) Polyfunctionality profile of latent (responders, KTRs n = 3/5; HCs n = 4/5) and lytic (responders, KTRs n = 8/10; HCs n = 13/15) EBV-specific CD4⁺ T cells from responding KTRs and HCs, displaying each possible combination of cytokine (IFNγ, IL-2, TNFα) production, generated by Boolean gate strategy. (B) Latent EBV-specific CD4⁺ T cell response measured by ELISpot-IFNγ as spot forming cells (SFC)/10⁶ PBMC. (C) Polyfunctionality profile of latent (responders, KTRs n = 9/10; HCs n = 11/15) and lytic (responders, KTRs n = 9/10; HCs n = 14/15) EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells from responding KTRs and HCs. (D) EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cell response against latent and lytic EBV peptides measured by ELISpot-IFNγ as SFC/10⁶ PBMC. (E) Diversity of ELISpot-IFNγ responses against each peptide pool by group. (F) Proportion of BZLF-1 vs. EBNA-3A T cell responses within the total sum of both responses by ELISpot-IFNγ (SFC/10⁶ PBMCs). Exact P-values were calculated with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test; only significant values (P<0.05) are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.g001

Together, those results show that in KTRs CD4⁺T cell responses against latent EBV proteins are weak while the EBV lytic responses are conserved. They also show that the lytic EBV-specific CD4⁺ T cell responses are monofunctional suggesting an effector and effector memory profile, while the latent EBV-specific CD4⁺ T cell responses are polyfunctional suggesting a central memory phenotype. The loss of the Th1 effector/effector memory latent specific CD4⁺ T cells is in line with the total CD4⁺ T cell lymphopenia observed in KTRs (S3E Fig), and evokes a new mechanism for predisposition to EBV-related complications in this immunosuppressed population.

Broader diversity of CD8⁺ T cell responses against EBNA-3A in KTRs

We next studied the EBV-specific CD8⁺T cells directed against lytic and latent EBV proteins using BZLF-1 overlapping 15 mers and class I MHC-restricted lytic and latent EBV optimal peptides by ICS. The lytic and latent EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cell responses were similar between KTRs and HCs in terms of frequency (EBV lytic responders: 9/10 KTRs vs. 14/15 HCs; EBV latent responders: 9/10 KTRs vs. 11/15 HCs; S5E Fig). The cytokine-secretion profile of lytic EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells was mainly monofunctional, with higher frequencies of IFNγ⁺ IL-2^- TNFα^- specific cells in KTRs when compared to HC group, suggesting an effector-differentiation (P = 0.0831; Fig 1C). The latent EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells showed similar cytokine production profiles in KTRs and HCs, with equal distribution between polyfunctional and monofunctional cells (Fig 1C). Moreover, PD-1 expression by EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells was similar between groups (S5F and S5H Fig) and was not correlated with the EBV viral load (S7 Fig).

We further studied the diversity of the CD8⁺ T cell responses against EBV immunodominant proteins lytic BZLF-1, and latent EBNA-3A, by ELISpot-IFNγ assay. We tested in parallel the class I-MHC restricted latent and lytic EBV optimal peptides. Of note, the CD8⁺T cell responses to those antigens detected with ICS by flow cytometry (S5E Fig) were approximately 10 times greater than the CD4⁺ T cell ones (S5A Fig), thus we considered that responses detected against BZLF-1 and EBNA-3A 15-mer peptides by ELISpot-IFNγ assay were mainly of CD8⁺ T cell origin.

All KTRs (n = 7/7) and HCs (n = 7/7) responded against at least one EBV peptide pool in ELISpot assay, with a wide range of reactivity observed between individuals; although the total (latent and lytic) EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cell responses, measured as SFC x10⁶ PBMCs, showed similar median values between groups (median: KTRs = 390 vs. HCs = 733; P = 0.7991; Fig 1D). However, the BZLF-1-specific-T cells of KTRs were directed within all five peptides pools, while the responses of HCs were directed at pools 2 to 4 corresponding to the central region of the BZLF-1 protein (responders KTRs n = 5/7, HCs 5/7; Fig 1E). Interestingly, the KTRs EBNA-3A responses were mainly directed against the N-terminal portion of the protein (AA position 133 to 542), and only KTRs responded to EBNA-3A peptide pools 1 to 4, containing the EBNA-3 family homology domain[31] (Fig 1E), contrasting with the HCs responses which were directed towards the central region of the EBNA-3A sequence (EBNA-3A responders KTRs n = 5/7, HCs 2/7). Thus, when taking in count the proportional contribution of those responses against EBNA-3A or BZLF-1 only, the KTRs CD8⁺ T cell responses seem skewed to the N-terminal portion of the EBNA-3A protein (Fig 1F).

Together, those results, although observed in a little sample of patients, suggest that effector CD8⁺ T cell responses against EBV diversify after kidney transplantation, possibly because of active EBV infection. Particularly, the EBNA-specific CD8 T cell response in KTRs may diversify because B cells establish a transcription program in type III latency cycle, a program were all EBV-EBNA proteins are expressed.[32]

Alterations of EBV-specific effector T cell responses segregate KTRs from HCs

Because our results showed several modifications of EBV-specific effector/effector memory T cells in KTRs, we studied in KTRs and HCs those EBV-specific responses with unsupervised hierarchical clustering in order to demonstrate that the EBV-specific T cell immune profile is different in KTRs than in HC. We selected 5 HCs and 6 KTRs from whom we had all available ELISpot-IFNγ assays. As shown in Fig 2, KTRs clustered separately from HCs when taken into account both latent and lytic EBV-specific effector/effector memory CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell responses. Such segregation was mainly influenced by the latent CD4⁺ T cell responses and the EBNA-3A-specific CD8⁺ T cell responses. Interestingly, we observed 2 clusters within the KTR group: the closest cluster to HCs was composed by two patients who presented strong responses against both EBNA-3A and BZLF-1 proteins and high EBV loads, while the other four KTRs had overall similar responses and presented mild or undetectable viral loads (Fig 2).

Download:

Fig 2. Hierarchical clustering of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and healthy controls (HCs) according to effector T cell responses.

Heatmap plot of EBV-specific CD4⁺ Th1 and CD8⁺ effector T cell responses detected by ELISpot-IFNγ. Lines are individual KTRs (Blue) or HCs (Red). Columns are each peptide pool tested separately in ELISpot IFNg assay. Color scale represents the magnitude of the response expressed in spot forming cells (SFC)/10⁶ PBMCs. Dendrograms were generated using unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on the Ward.D method. Last column to the right show the EBV load determined at simultaneous blood sample in Log copies/mL.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.g002

Taken together, those data suggest that the modifications of the EBV-specific T cell responses in KTRs might reflect the balance between the enhancement of cellular immunity induced by persistent viral antigenic stimulation (high EBV viral loads), and the life-long immunosuppression that impacts mainly the CD4⁺ T cell compartment (S3E Fig). The resulting EBV-specific immunity is a skewed CD8⁺ T cell response towards EBNA-3A while the latent CD4⁺ specific-T cells remain barely detectable.

Peripheral blood NK cells characteristics in long-term kidney transplant recipients

NK cells are the first line of cellular defense against EBV infection, thought it has been poorly described in KTRs. We thus performed a detailed phenotype of peripheral NK cells in 10 KTRs and 12 HCs. First, both groups presented similar proportions of CD56 ^Bright and CD56^dim subsets (Fig 3A, S8A Fig). NK cells from KTRs were indistinguishable from those of HCs in terms of cell-surface expression of the main NK receptors studied, including c-lectin receptors (NKG2C and NKG2A), natural cytotoxicity receptors (NKp30 and NKp46), and killer immunoglobulin receptors (Kir2DL2/3 and Kir3DL1), along with other tested activation and NK cell markers, such as HLA-DR, CD69, CD57, and Siglec-7 (Fig 3B–3K). In contrast, the frequency of PD-1⁺ NK cells, though low, was significantly higher in KTRs than in HCs (median %: KTRs = 0.61 vs. HCs = 0.05; P = 0.0093; Fig 3L) despite similar PD-1 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) between groups (S8B Fig). Thus, these data suggest that both the chronic allo-antigenic stimulation and the immunosuppressive regimens used in long-term kidney transplantation have no major impact on the NK cell compartment, except for a slight PD-1 over-expression which could alter NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity and cytokine production.

Download:

Fig 3. Phenotypic features of NK cells in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and healthy controls (HCs).

Percentage of A) CD56^Bright, B) CD57⁺, C) NKG2A⁺, D) NKG2C⁺, E) NKp30⁺, F) NKp46⁺, G) Kir2DL2/3⁺, H) Kir3DL1⁺, I) CD69⁺, J) HLA-DR⁺, K) Siglec-7⁺ and L) PD-1⁺ in CD3^-CD56⁺ NK cells from 10 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and 12 healthy controls (HCs). Expression was measured at the surface by flow cytometry on thawed PBMCs. Horizontal bars indicate the median. Exact P-values were calculated with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.g003

PD-1 normalizes over time on kidney transplant recipients CD8⁺ T cells

We next examined whether the expression of the PD-1 immune checkpoint molecule was also increased on CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, as observed on NK cells. On total CD4⁺ T cells, the activation and exhaustion phenotype showed similar PD-1 expression and PD-1/Tim-3 co-expression in KTRs and HCs (Fig 4A and 4B), while the expression of the pre-apoptotic marker CD95 was increased in KTRs when compared to HCs (median: KTRs = 73% vs. HCs = 51%; P = 0.0003; S9A Fig). Conversely, the proportions of PD-1⁺ CD8⁺ T cells were two-fold higher in KTRs, compared to HCs (median %: KTRs = 34.5 vs. HCs = 17.7; P = 0.0424; Fig 4C). Interestingly, the proportion of PD-1⁺CD8⁺ T cells decreased with time with a significant negative correlation with post-transplantation duration (P = 0.0025, Rho = -0.8511; Fig 4E). Moreover, when compared to HCs, total CD8⁺ T cells of KTRs were significantly activated (median HLA-DR⁺ CD8⁺ cells, KTRs = 37% vs. HCs = 13%, P = 0.0003; median HLA-DR⁺ CD38⁺ CD8⁺ T cells, KTRs = 9% vs. HCs = 4%, P = 0.0005; median CD95⁺ CD8⁺ T cells, KTRs = 47% vs. HCs = 38%, P = 0.0356; S9B Fig). Of note, none of those activation markers diminished with time after transplantation or was correlated with EBV loads (S6 Table), indicating that this persistent activation probably results from homeostatic activation due to immunosuppression. The PD-1 overexpression by CD8⁺ T cells which normalizes with time after transplantation suggests that the allogeneic chronic stimulation fade overtime and that peripheral immune tolerance might be gradually established.

Download:

Fig 4. T cell activation/exhaustion phenotype during kidney transplantation.

PD-1 and Tim-3 expression on A) CD4⁺ and B) CD8⁺ peripheral blood total T cells. Data are shown for 10 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and 15 healthy controls (HCs). C) Correlation between the frequency of PD-1⁺ CD8⁺ T cells and the number of years after transplantation in 10 KTRs. Horizontal bars indicate the median. Exact P-values were calculated with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test and the correlation was assessed with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Bonferroni significativity threshold for correlations was 0.0041.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.g004

In addition to the activation markers expression, the analysis of T cell differentiation patterns in KTRs showed a shift from naïve to effector-memory CD4⁺ T cells proportions, when compared to HCs (median naïve, KTRs = 18% vs. HCs = 34%; P = 0.0029; median effector-memory, KTRs = 58% vs. HCs = 37%, P = 0.0029; S10A Fig). Similar results were obtained for CD8⁺ T cells, with significantly lower proportions of naïve (median: KTRs = 12% vs. HCs = 37%, P<0.0001) and central-memory cells (median: KTRs = 0.7% vs. HCs = 3.0%, P<0.0001) and higher proportions of terminally differentiated effector memory CD8⁺T cells (median: KTRs = 63% vs. HCs = 19%, P<0.0001; S10B Fig), in KTRs when compared to HCs. Of note, terminally differentiated effector memory T cells (TEMRA), defined as CCR7^-CD45RA⁺, are known to be mainly CD57⁺.^.[33] In agreement, senescent CD57⁺ CD8⁺ T cells were also increased in KTRs (median: KTRs = 37% vs. HCs = 14%, P = 0.0004; S10B Fig). No relation was observed between those alterations and the time after transplantation or EBV viral loads (S6 Table), suggesting that the CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell differentiation towards a senescent phenotype persists long-term after kidney transplantation, independently of EBV replication.

Discussion

Our characterization of the EBV-specific T cell responses in long-term immunosuppressed but clinically stable KTRs showed specific alterations with a decrease of peripheral CD4⁺ T cell immunity against latent EBV antigens and modifications of the EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cell responses that were directed against the N-terminal portion of the EBNA proteins. Those modifications were associated with total T and NK cell phenotypic alterations.

To our knowledge, this is the first time that low circulating Th1 effector CD4⁺ T cells against latent EBV antigens have been reported in clinically-stable adult KTRs. Because in our study the CD4⁺ T cell responses against lytic EBV peptides were similar in KTRs and in HCs, the specific loss of CD4⁺ T cell responses against latent EBV peptides cannot be fully explained by the persistent CD4⁺ T cell lymphopenia observed in our patients. Polymorphisms of the EBNA-1 sequence have been reported in EBV+PTLD patients and healthy controls who have detectable CD8⁺ T cell responses against the viral variant but not against the prototype EBV laboratory strain B95-8[34]; thus, protein sequence variations might explain low detection of specific-CD4⁺ T cells, except the class II MHC-restricted peptide pools we used were composed of 6 different latent EBV proteins and all of tested HCs strongly recognized at least one peptide pool. However, we had no access to the HLA alleles of HCs and could not exclude if the absence of T cell responses against class II MHC-restricted peptides was linked to an immunodominance bias. Nevertheless, all but one KTR tested had class-II MHC alleles that fitted with the MHC class-II peptide list used in the ELISpot-IFNγ assay. Such a lack of latent EBV-specific CD4⁺ T cells has been identified in various types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-patients[35] and in immunocompetent individuals with EBV-related lymphoma,[36] as well as in one transplant patient with EBV-related PTLD.[37] In addition, prolonged EBV-seronegativity has been observed in solid organ transplant recipients who develop early-onset EBV+PTLDs.[38] Altogether, these data suggest that defective EBV-specific CD4⁺ T cell immunity could favor NHL development and particularly PTLDs.

In contrast, we also found that KTRs had similar proportions of EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cell responses compared to HCs, regardless of detectable EBV loads in blood of most patients, which reflects active EBV-infection. However, fewer HCs had responses against EBNA-3A protein while KTRs had a broader spanning of T cell responses against BZLF-1 and EBNA-3A proteins than HCs. One likely hypothesis is that active EBV infection exposes KTRs to a broader repertory of EBV epitopes while the expansion of those specific CD8⁺ T cells is impacted by life-long immunosuppressive treatment; consequently, such balance is traduced in conserved proportions of circulating EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in KTRs, when compared to HCs. In agreement, unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis clearly segregated controls from patients according to EBV-specific effector T cell responses. Furthermore, the broader spanning of T cell responses against EBNA-3A protein in KTRs might reflect the abundance of EBV latency III-infected B cell, yet, none of the KTRs studied here-in however had developed any EBV-related complication. Thus, those results raise the question whether diversity and repertory of T cell responses against latency III EBV proteins have a protective role in adult KTRs against EBV-related post-transplant diseases, which could favor the development of new immunotherapies. Indeed, the main goal of prophylactic and therapeutic immunotherapies against EBV-related complications is to provide or induce protective T cell responses able to eliminate EBV-infected tumor cells expressing viral proteins [39]. First, the definition of EBV epitopes matching different HLA molecules are fundamental for the development of “off-the-shelf” EBV-specific CTLs for adoptive transfer. [40] Second we provide here the EBV-specific T cell repertoire of a group of PTLD-free patients, evoking an immune-correlate of tumor control. The recognition of specific regions of EBNA-3A protein we observed could thus be interesting, if confirmed, for the development of vaccination and CTL adoptive transfer strategies; especially taking in count that EBV-related lymphomas of transplant recipients often express latency III-infection program [2], which includes the EBNA-3 family proteins [32].

In parallel, we examined the T cell peripheral blood phenotype of KTRs. We observed a switch from naïve to terminally differentiated effector memory CD8⁺ T cell populations, characteristic of immunosenescence observed in the elderly[41] but also in KTRs.[8,42,43] Importantly, we also showed a persistent CD8⁺ T cell activation beyond 12 years after kidney transplantation which to our knowledge, has been described early after transplantation in the context of chronic viral infections[13,44] graft rejection, [10,45] and cancers but not in clinically-stable transplant recipients.[46] Noteworthy the increased PD-1 expression on CD8⁺ T cells normalized with time, suggesting that the allogeneic stimulation decreases overtime and thus that peripheral tolerance might be gradually established with time after kidney transplantation. Moreover, such a discordance with increased activation markers and senescent cells could be linked with persistent low-grade viral replication (EBV, but also CMV) or T cell lymphopenia and homeostatic activation. In agreement with our results, Moran et al. observed increased PD-1 expression by total CD8⁺ T cells of pediatric renal transplant recipients, compared to pre-transplantation and regardless of EBV loads patients carried; the mean time from transplantation to the study was 3.3 years. [15] Thus, those findings comply with our hypothesis that PD-1 expression increases early after transplantation, independently of EBV loads. Interestingly, another study of adult kidney transplant recipients immunophenotype have shown an association between increased PD-1 expression by CD8⁺ T cells and increased risk of graft rejection [47], authors of that study conclude that increased PD-1 expression might result from chronic immuneactivation; which is also in line with our hypothesis of chronic allogeneic stimulation.

Our results also show an increased expression of PD-1 by NK cells of KTRs though at low levels. Such a PD-1 overexpression by NK cells has recently become of interest in the context of persistent CMV infection and cancer, [23,48–51]. Nevertheless further confirmation is required to clearly determine whether PD-1 expression by NK cells, in addition to PD-1 overexpression by CD8⁺ T cells, could compromise the main antiviral and antitumor NK cell functions in KTRs.

The low number of subjects included and the retrospective design of our study are two main limitations. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up, particularly including patients who will develop further EBV-related PTLD, are thus required to highlight whether the immune alterations described here-in are protective or detrimental and if they allow to identify patients at risk for late complications. Although we were limited to explore the regulatory T cells in our patients, there is growing evidence of the role of induced graft immune tolerance by regulatory T cells in kidney transplant recipients [52,53]. Therefore, it would have been interesting to explore the fluctuations of regulatory T cell populations in a group of kidney transplant recipients with a long post-transplant period without rejection events.

In conclusion, here we show for the first time that all immunomodulating agents after renal transplantation namely immunosuppressive drugs, alloantigenic stimulation and chronic EBV infection results in modifications of the EBV-specific T cell repertoire with skewed responses towards the N-terminal portion of the EBNA-3A protein and with defective EBV-specific Th1 effector CD4⁺ T cell responses. These findings provide new insights in the immunopathology of EBV infection after renal transplantation that could help to identify immune biomarkers for predicting EBV-related PTLD diagnosis, and to develop new preventive immunotherapies against EBV.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Example of gating strategy used for the NK cell phenotype by flow cytometry.

Multiparametric flow cytometry data were analyzed with FlowJo software. After doublets exclusion in Forward scatter height (FSH-H) versus area (FSH-A), lymphocytes were selected with Side scatter area (SSC-A) versus Forward scatter area (FSH-A). NK cells were selected as CD3^-CD56⁺ lymphocytes. Expression of c-lectin receptors (NKG2C and NKG2A), natural cytotoxicity receptors (NKp30 and NKp46), killer immunoglobulin receptors (Kir2DL2/3 and Kir3DL1) and activation and NK cell markers (HLA-DR, CD69, CD57, and Siglec-7 and PD-1) was analyzed on CD3^-CD56⁺ lymphocytes. Each marker was gated to measure its expression in CD56^bright and CD56^dim cell-subsets. PD-1 fluorescence minus one (FMO) staining technique was used to determine PD-1 positivity detection limit.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Example of the gating strategy used to detect EBV-specific T cells by flow cytometry with intracellular cytokine staining.

(A) Live CD3⁺ T cells were selected within total lymphocytes after doublet exclusion. (B) PD-1 and Tim-3 expression by total CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells was measured under unstimulated condition according to FMO controls. (C) EBV-specific T cells were detected by cytokine production (IFNγ, IL-2, TNFα) out of total CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and pooled in a (D) single boolean gate to measure PD-1 and Tim-3 expression and co-expression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Lymphocyte subpopulations in long-term kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and healthy controls (HCs).

Absolute numbers of: (A) CD45⁺ lymphocytes, (B) CD3^-CD56⁺/CD16⁺ NK cells, (C) CD19⁺ B cells; (D) CD3⁺ T cells; (E) CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells; and (F) CD4/CD8 ratio from 10 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and 30 healthy controls(HCs). Horizontal bars indicate the median. Correlations between absolute counts of (G) CD19⁺ or (H) CD4⁺ T lymphocytes and the number of years after transplantation in 10 KTRs. Exact P-values were calculated with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test and correlation was assessed with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Bonferroni significativity threshold for correlations was 0.0041.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Absolute T cell counts and EBV load follow up after kidney transplantation.

Absolute numbers of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and EBV loads (Log copies/mL) at different time points in two kidney transplant recipients (KTRs): (A) KTR #9 and (B) KTR #10. EBV loads (Log copies/mL) at different time points in (C) KTR #1, (D) KTR #6 and (D) KTR #7. Dotted lines indicate the blood sample in this study. EBV load detection limit is 1.4 log copies/mL.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Frequency and Immune-checkpoint expression of EBV-specific T cells in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

(A) Frequency of latent (KTRs n = 5; HCs n = 5) and lytic (KTRs n = 10; HCs n = 15) EBV-specific CD4⁺ T cells (IFNγ, IL-2, and TNFα) determined by intracellular cytokine staining assay with flow cytometry. Frequency of (B) PD-1 and (C) Tim-3 expression and (D) co-expression on latent (responders: KTRs n = 3/5; HCs n = 4/5) and lytic (responders: KTRs n = 8/10; HCs n = 13/15) EBV-specific CD4⁺ T cells from responding KTRs and HCs. (E) Frequency of latent and lytic EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells (KTRs n = 10; HCs n = 15). Frequency of (F) PD-1 and (G) Tim-3 expression and (H) co-expression on latent (responders: KTRs n = 9/10; HCs n = 11/15) and lytic (responders: KTRs n = 9/10; HCs n = 14/15) EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells from responding KTRs and HCs. Horizontal bars indicate the median. Exact P-values were calculated with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test; only significant values (P<0.05) are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Comparison of IFNγ production by CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells after stimulation with latent EBV class II MHC-restricted peptides.

PBMCs of one kidney transplant recipient (KTR 8) and one healthy control (HC 2), were stimulated with media or with latent EBV class II MHC-restricted peptides to verify the specificity of peptide recognition. Dot plot shows IFNγ⁺ cells within total CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cells detected by intracellular cytokine (IFNγ) staining assay in flow cytometry.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s006

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Association between PD-1 expression by EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells and EBV viral load in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

The correlation between the frequency of PD-1 expression on lytic-EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells from responding KTRs (n = 9/10) and the EBV load (Log of copies/mL) was assessed with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Bonferroni significativity threshold was 0.0041.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s007

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Supplemental phenotypic features of NK cells in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and healthy controls (HCs).

Percentage of (A) CD56^Dim CD3^- NK cells and (B) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of PD-1 in total CD56⁺CD3^- NK cells from 10 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and 12 healthy controls (HCs). Expression was measured at the surface by flow cytometry on thawed PBMCs. Horizontal bars indicate the median. Exact P-values were calculated with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s008

(TIF)

S9 Fig. T cell activation phenotype during kidney transplantation.

Frequency of (A) CD4⁺ and (B) CD8⁺ T cells expressing common activation markers detected by flow cytometry. Data are shown for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs; n = 10) and healthy controls (HCs; n = 30). Horizontal bars indicate the median. Exact P-values were calculated with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s009

(TIF)

S10 Fig. T cell differentiation during kidney transplantation.

Frequency of (A) CD4⁺ and (B) CD8⁺ T cell differentiation subtypes detected by flow cytometry. Data are shown for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs; n = 10) and healthy controls (HCs; n = 30). Horizontal bars indicate the median. Exact P-values were calculated with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s010

(TIF)

S1 Table. Sequences of 42 class I MHC-restricted latent and lytic EBV optimal peptides.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s011

(PDF)

S2 Table. Sequences of 33 class II MHC-restricted latent EBV optimal peptides.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s012

(PDF)

S3 Table. Sequences of BZLF-1 overlapping peptides.

47 15mer peptides overlapping by 10 amino acids and covering the lytic BZLF-1 protein.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s013

(PDF)

S4 Table. Sequences of EBNA-3A overlapping peptides.

160 15mer peptides overlapping by 10 amino acids and partially covering the latent EBNA-3A protein.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s014

(PDF)

S5 Table. Class I- and class II-HLA alleles and predicted responses to EBV optimal peptides of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

■ Predicted and positive response; 〼Predicted and negative response; ●Unpredicted and positive response; □Predicted but undetermined response.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s015

(PDF)

S6 Table. Correlations between T cell phenotype, time after transplantation and EBV load of kidney transplant recipients.

EBV, Epstein-Barr virus. ^aBonferroni significativity threshold ≤ 0.0041

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224211.s016

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the ‘Etablissement Français du Sang’ for providing blood samples.

They also thank Christophe Parizot, Catherine Blanc, Bénédicte Hoareau, Assia Samri, the T4/T8 department, Alice Rousseau and Sophie Even for technical advice, Delphine Sauce and Abdelali Boudifa for helpful discussion, as well as Guislaine Carcelain for kindly providing latent EBV peptides.

The English text was edited by Cremer Consulting.

References

1. Abbott RJ, Pachnio A, Pedroza-Pacheco I, Leese AM, Begum J, Long HM, et al. Asymptomatic Primary Infection with Epstein-Barr Virus: Observations on Young Adult Cases. J Virol. 2017;91. pmid:28835490
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Dharnidharka VR. Comprehensive review of post–organ transplant hematologic cancers. Am J Transplant. 2018;18: 537–549. pmid:29178667
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Sprangers B, Nair V, Launay-Vacher V, Riella L V., Jhaveri KD. Risk factors associated with post-kidney transplant malignancies: An article from the Cancer-Kidney International Network. Clin Kidney J. 2018;11: 315–329. pmid:29942495
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Dierickx D, Habermann TM. Post-Transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorders in Adults. N Engl J Med. 2018;378: 549–562. pmid:29414277
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Hislop AD, Taylor GS, Sauce D, Rickinson AB. Cellular Responses to Viral Infection in Humans: Lessons from Epstein-Barr Virus. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25: 587–617. pmid:17378764
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Münz C. Epstein-Barr virus-specific immune control by innate lymphocytes. Front Immunol. 2017;8: 1–7.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Williams H, McAulay K, Macsween KF, Gallacher NJ, Higgins CD, Harrison N, et al. The immune response to primary EBV infection: A role for natural killer cells. Br J Haematol. 2005;129: 266–274. pmid:15813855
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Luque Y, Jamme M, Rabant M, Dewolf S, Noël LH, Thervet E, et al. Long-term CD4 lymphopenia is associated with accelerated decline of kidney allograft function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31: 487–495. pmid:26492923
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Glowacki F, Al Morabiti M, Lionet A, Labalette M, Provot F, Noel C, et al. Long-Term Kinetics of a T-Lymphocytes Subset in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Relationship With Posttransplant Malignancies. Transplant Proc. Elsevier Inc.; 2009;41: 3323–3325. pmid:19857742
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Mancebo E, Castro MJ, Allende LM, Talayero P, Brunet M, Millán O, et al. High proportion of CD95+and CD38+in cultured CD8+T cells predicts acute rejection and infection, respectively, in kidney recipients. Transpl Immunol. Elsevier B.V.; 2016;34: 33–41. pmid:26773856
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Sester U, Presser D, Dirks J, Gärtner BC, Köhler H, Sester M. PD-1 expression and IL-2 loss of cytomegalovirus- specific t cells correlates with viremia and reversible functional anergy. Am J Transplant. 2008;8: 1486–1497. pmid:18510628
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. La Rosa C, Krishnan A, Longmate J, Martinez J, Manchanda P, Lacey SF, et al. Programmed Death–1 Expression in Liver Transplant Recipients as a Prognostic Indicator of Cytomegalovirus Disease. J Infect Dis. 2008;197: 25–33. pmid:18171281
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Macedo C, Webber S a, Donnenberg AD, Popescu I, Hua Y, Green M, et al. EBV-specific CD8+ T cells from asymptomatic pediatric thoracic transplant patients carrying chronic high EBV loads display contrasting features: activated phenotype and exhausted function. J Immunol. 2011;186: 5854–5862. pmid:21460204
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Macedo C, Donnenberg A, Popescu I, Reyes J, Abu-Elmagd K, Shapiro R, et al. EBV-specific memory CD8+T cell phenotype and function in stable solid organ transplant patients. Transpl Immunol. 2005;14: 109–116. pmid:15935301
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Moran J, Dean J, De Oliveira A, O’Connell M, Riordan M, Connell J, et al. Increased levels of PD-1 expression on CD8 T cells in patients post-renal transplant irrespective of chronic high EBV viral load. Pediatr Transplant. 2013;17: 806–814. pmid:24118875
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Wilsdorf N, Eiz-Vesper B, Henke-Gendo C, Diestelhorst J, Oschlies I, Hussein K, et al. EBV-specific T-Cell immunity in pediatric solid organ graft recipients with posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease. Transplantation. 2013;95: 247–255. pmid:23222899
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Pietersma FL, van Oosterom A, Ran L, Schuurman R, Meijer E, de Jonge N, et al. Adequate control of primary EBV infection and subsequent reactivations after cardiac transplantation in an EBV seronegative patient. Transpl Immunol. 2012;27: 48–51. pmid:22342937
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Neudoerfl C, Mueller BJ, Blume C, Daemen K, Stevanovic-Meyer M, Keil J, et al. The peripheral NK cell repertoire after kidney transplantation is modulated by different immunosuppressive drugs. Front Immunol. 2013;4: 1–14.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Béziat V, Dalgard O, Asselah T, Halfon P, Bedossa P, Boudifa A, et al. CMV drives clonal expansion of NKG2C + NK cells expressing self-specific KIRs in chronic hepatitis patients. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42: 447–457. pmid:22105371
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Achour A, Baychelier F, Besson C, Arnoux A, Marty M, Hannoun L, et al. Expansion of CMV-mediated NKG2C+ NK cells associates with the development of specific de novo malignancies in liver-transplanted patients. J Immunol. 2014;192: 503–11. pmid:24307732
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Baychelier F, Achour A, Nguyen S, Raphael M, Toubert A, Besson C, et al. Natural killer cell deficiency in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma after lung transplantation. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2015;34: 604–612.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Peraldi MN, Berrou J, Venot M, Chardiny V, Durrbach A, Vieillard V, et al. Natural killer lymphocytes are dysfunctional in kidney transplant recipients on diagnosis of cancer. Transplantation. 2015;99: 2422–2430. pmid:26798861
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Wiesmayr S, Webber SA, Macedo C, Popescu I, Smith L, Luce J, et al. Decreased NKp46 and NKG2D and elevated PD-1 are associated with altered NK-cell function in pediatric transplant patients with PTLD. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42: 541–550. pmid:22105417
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Marcelin AG, Aaron L, Mateus C, Gyan E, Gorin I, Viard JP, et al. Rituximab therapy for HIV-associated Castleman disease. Blood. 2003;102: 2786–2788. pmid:12842986
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Rickinson AB, Moss DJ. Human Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Responses To Epstein Barr Virus Infection. Annu Rev Immunol. 1997;15: 405–431. pmid:9143694
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Woodberry T, Suscovich TJ, Henry LM, Davis JK, Frahm N, Walker BD, et al. Differential Targeting and Shifts in the Immunodominance of Epstein-Barr Virus–Specific CD8 and CD4 T Cell Responses during Acute and Persistent Infection. J Infect Dis 2005;192: 1513–1524. pmid:16206065
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Leen ANN, Meij P, Redchenko I, Middeldorp J, Bloemena E, Rickinson A, et al. Differential Immunogenicity of Epstein-Barr Virus Latent-Cycle Proteins for Human CD4 ϩ T-Helper 1 Responses. J Virol. 2001;75: 8649–8659. pmid:11507210
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Boyd A, Almeida JR, Darrah PA, Sauce D, Seder RA, Appay V, et al. Pathogen-Specific T Cell Polyfunctionality Is a Correlate of T Cell Efficacy and Immune Protection. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–18.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Warnes GR, Bolker B, Bonebakker L, Gentleman R, Liaw WHA, Lumley T, et al. gplots: Various R Programming Tools for Plotting Data. R package version 3.0.1; 2016. Database: CRAN [Internet]. Accessed: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gplots.
30. Everitt BS, Landau S, Leese M, Stahl D. Agglomerative methods. In: Analysis Cluster. 5^th ed. London, UK. John Wiley &Sons, Ltd. 2011.
31. Styles C, Paschos K, White R, Farrell P. The Cooperative Functions of the EBNA3 Proteins Are Central to EBV Persistence and Latency. Pathogens. 2018;7: 1–15.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Bhattacharjee S, Roy SG, Bose P, Saha A. Role of EBNA-3 family proteins in EBV associated B-cell lymphomagenesis. Front Microbiol. 2016;7: 1–16.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Mollet L, Sadat-Sowti B, Duntze J, Leblond V, Bergeron F, Calvez V, et al. CD8(hi+)CD57+ T lymphocytes are enriched in antigen-specific T cells capable of down-modulating cytotoxic activity. Int Immunol. 1998;10: 311–323. pmid:9576619
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Jones K, Nourse JP, Morrison L, Nguyen-Van D, Moss DJ, Burrows SR, et al. Expansion of EBNA1-specific effector T cells in posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders. Blood. 2010;116: 2245–2252. pmid:20562330
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Gasser O, Bihl FK, Wolbers M, Loggi E, Steffen I, Hirsch HH, et al. HIV patients developing primary CNS lymphoma lack EBV-specific CD4 + T cell function irrespective of absolute CD4+ T cell counts. PLoS Med. 2007;4: 556–561.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Heller KN, Arrey F, Steinherz P, Portlock C, Chadburn A, Kelly K, et al. Patients with Epstein Barr virus-positive lymphomas have decreased CD4 + T-cell responses to the viral nuclear antigen 1. Int J Cancer. 2008;123: 2824–2831. pmid:18781564
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Calarota SA, Chiesa A, Zelini P, Comolli G, Minoli L, Baldanti F. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus-specific memory CD4+ T cells using a peptide-based cultured enzyme-linked immunospot assay. Immunology. 2013;139: 533–544. pmid:23560877
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Davis JE, Sherritt MA, Bharadwaj M, Morrison LE, Elliott SL, Kear LM, et al. Determining virological, serological and immunological parameters of EBV infection in the development of PTLD. Int Immunol. 2004;16: 983–989. pmid:15159377
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Dasari V, Bhatt KH, Smith C, Khanna R. Designing an effective vaccine to prevent Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases: challenges and opportunities. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16: 377–390. pmid:28276306
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. O’Reilly RJ, Prockop S, Hasan AN, Koehne G, Doubrovina E. Virus-specific T-cell banks for “off the shelf” adoptive therapy of refractory infections. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51: 1163–1172. pmid:27042851
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Seyda M, Quante M, Uehara H, Slegtenhorst BR, Elkhal A, Tullius SG. Immunosenescence in renal transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2015;20: 417–423. pmid:26154914
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Betjes MGH, Meijers RWJ, De Wit EA, Weimar W, Litjens NHR. Terminally differentiated CD8 + temra cells are associated with the risk for acute kidney allograft rejection. Transplantation. 2012;94: 63–69. pmid:22691956
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Schaenman JM, Rossetti M, Sidwell T, Groysberg V, Sunga G, Korin Y, et al. Increased T cell immunosenescence and accelerated maturation phenotypes in older kidney transplant recipients. Hum Immunol. 2018;79: 659–667. pmid:29913200
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Wang Y, Liu Y, Han R, Li Q, Yao Z, Niu W, et al. Monitoring of CD95 and CD38 expression in peripheral blood T lymphocytes during active human cytomegalovirus infection after orthotopic liver transplantation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25: 138–142. pmid:19817952
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Boleslawski E, Benothman S, Grabar S, Correia L, Podevin P, Chouzenoux S, et al. CD25, CD28 and CD38 expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes as a tool to predict acute rejection after liver transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2008;22: 494–501. pmid:18565100
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. O’Byrne KJ, Dalgleish AG. Chronic immune activation and inflammation as the cause of malignancy. Br J Cancer. 2001;85: 473–483. pmid:11506482
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Pike R, Thomas N, Workman S, Ambrose L, Guzman D, Sivakumaran S, et al. PD1-expressing T cell subsets modify the rejection risk in renal transplant patients. Front Immunol. 2016;7: 126. pmid:27148254
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Pittari G, Vago L, Festuccia M, Bonini C, Mudawi D, Giaccone L, et al. Restoring Natural Killer Cell Immunity against Multiple Myeloma in the Era of New Drugs. Front Immunol. 2017;8: 1444. pmid:29163516
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Liu Y, Cheng Y, Xu Y, Wang Z, Du X, Li C, et al. Increased expression of programmed cell death protein 1 on NK cells inhibits NK-cell-mediated anti-tumor function and indicates poor prognosis in digestive cancers. Oncogene. 2017;36: 6143–6153. pmid:28692048
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Pesce S, Greppi M, Tabellini G, Rampinelli F, Parolini S, Olive D, et al. Identification of a subset of human natural killer cells expressing high levels of programmed death 1: A phenotypic and functional characterization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139: 335–346. pmid:27372564
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Beldi-Ferchiou A, Lambert M, Dogniaux S, Vély F, Vivier E, Olive D, et al. PD-1 mediates functional exhaustion of activated NK cells in patients with Kaposi sarcoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7: 72961–72977. pmid:27662664
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Mederacke YS, Vondran FW, Kollrich S, Schulde E, Schmitt R, Manns MP, et al. Transient increase of activated regulatory T cells early after kidney transplantation. Sci Rep. 2019;9: 1–12.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Andreola G, Chittenden M, Shaffer J, Cosimi AB, Kawai T, Cotter P, et al. Mechanisms of Donor-Specific Tolerance in Recipients of Haploidentical Combined Bone Marrow/Kidney Transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2011;11: 1236–1247. pmid:21645255
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Abbott RJ, Pachnio A, Pedroza-Pacheco I, Leese AM, Begum J, Long HM, et al. Asymptomatic Primary Infection with Epstein-Barr Virus: Observations on Young Adult Cases. J Virol. 2017;91. pmid:28835490
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Dharnidharka VR. Comprehensive review of post–organ transplant hematologic cancers. Am J Transplant. 2018;18: 537–549. pmid:29178667
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Sprangers B, Nair V, Launay-Vacher V, Riella L V., Jhaveri KD. Risk factors associated with post-kidney transplant malignancies: An article from the Cancer-Kidney International Network. Clin Kidney J. 2018;11: 315–329. pmid:29942495
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Dierickx D, Habermann TM. Post-Transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorders in Adults. N Engl J Med. 2018;378: 549–562. pmid:29414277
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Hislop AD, Taylor GS, Sauce D, Rickinson AB. Cellular Responses to Viral Infection in Humans: Lessons from Epstein-Barr Virus. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25: 587–617. pmid:17378764
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Münz C. Epstein-Barr virus-specific immune control by innate lymphocytes. Front Immunol. 2017;8: 1–7.
View Article
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Williams H, McAulay K, Macsween KF, Gallacher NJ, Higgins CD, Harrison N, et al. The immune response to primary EBV infection: A role for natural killer cells. Br J Haematol. 2005;129: 266–274. pmid:15813855
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Luque Y, Jamme M, Rabant M, Dewolf S, Noël LH, Thervet E, et al. Long-term CD4 lymphopenia is associated with accelerated decline of kidney allograft function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31: 487–495. pmid:26492923
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Glowacki F, Al Morabiti M, Lionet A, Labalette M, Provot F, Noel C, et al. Long-Term Kinetics of a T-Lymphocytes Subset in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Relationship With Posttransplant Malignancies. Transplant Proc. Elsevier Inc.; 2009;41: 3323–3325. pmid:19857742
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Mancebo E, Castro MJ, Allende LM, Talayero P, Brunet M, Millán O, et al. High proportion of CD95+and CD38+in cultured CD8+T cells predicts acute rejection and infection, respectively, in kidney recipients. Transpl Immunol. Elsevier B.V.; 2016;34: 33–41. pmid:26773856
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Sester U, Presser D, Dirks J, Gärtner BC, Köhler H, Sester M. PD-1 expression and IL-2 loss of cytomegalovirus- specific t cells correlates with viremia and reversible functional anergy. Am J Transplant. 2008;8: 1486–1497. pmid:18510628
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. La Rosa C, Krishnan A, Longmate J, Martinez J, Manchanda P, Lacey SF, et al. Programmed Death–1 Expression in Liver Transplant Recipients as a Prognostic Indicator of Cytomegalovirus Disease. J Infect Dis. 2008;197: 25–33. pmid:18171281
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Macedo C, Webber S a, Donnenberg AD, Popescu I, Hua Y, Green M, et al. EBV-specific CD8+ T cells from asymptomatic pediatric thoracic transplant patients carrying chronic high EBV loads display contrasting features: activated phenotype and exhausted function. J Immunol. 2011;186: 5854–5862. pmid:21460204
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Macedo C, Donnenberg A, Popescu I, Reyes J, Abu-Elmagd K, Shapiro R, et al. EBV-specific memory CD8+T cell phenotype and function in stable solid organ transplant patients. Transpl Immunol. 2005;14: 109–116. pmid:15935301
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Moran J, Dean J, De Oliveira A, O’Connell M, Riordan M, Connell J, et al. Increased levels of PD-1 expression on CD8 T cells in patients post-renal transplant irrespective of chronic high EBV viral load. Pediatr Transplant. 2013;17: 806–814. pmid:24118875
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Wilsdorf N, Eiz-Vesper B, Henke-Gendo C, Diestelhorst J, Oschlies I, Hussein K, et al. EBV-specific T-Cell immunity in pediatric solid organ graft recipients with posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease. Transplantation. 2013;95: 247–255. pmid:23222899
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Pietersma FL, van Oosterom A, Ran L, Schuurman R, Meijer E, de Jonge N, et al. Adequate control of primary EBV infection and subsequent reactivations after cardiac transplantation in an EBV seronegative patient. Transpl Immunol. 2012;27: 48–51. pmid:22342937
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Neudoerfl C, Mueller BJ, Blume C, Daemen K, Stevanovic-Meyer M, Keil J, et al. The peripheral NK cell repertoire after kidney transplantation is modulated by different immunosuppressive drugs. Front Immunol. 2013;4: 1–14.
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Béziat V, Dalgard O, Asselah T, Halfon P, Bedossa P, Boudifa A, et al. CMV drives clonal expansion of NKG2C + NK cells expressing self-specific KIRs in chronic hepatitis patients. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42: 447–457. pmid:22105371
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] PubMed/NCBI

[74] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Achour A, Baychelier F, Besson C, Arnoux A, Marty M, Hannoun L, et al. Expansion of CMV-mediated NKG2C+ NK cells associates with the development of specific de novo malignancies in liver-transplanted patients. J Immunol. 2014;192: 503–11. pmid:24307732
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] PubMed/NCBI

[78] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Baychelier F, Achour A, Nguyen S, Raphael M, Toubert A, Besson C, et al. Natural killer cell deficiency in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma after lung transplantation. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2015;34: 604–612.
View Article
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Peraldi MN, Berrou J, Venot M, Chardiny V, Durrbach A, Vieillard V, et al. Natural killer lymphocytes are dysfunctional in kidney transplant recipients on diagnosis of cancer. Transplantation. 2015;99: 2422–2430. pmid:26798861
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] PubMed/NCBI

[85] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Wiesmayr S, Webber SA, Macedo C, Popescu I, Smith L, Luce J, et al. Decreased NKp46 and NKG2D and elevated PD-1 are associated with altered NK-cell function in pediatric transplant patients with PTLD. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42: 541–550. pmid:22105417
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Marcelin AG, Aaron L, Mateus C, Gyan E, Gorin I, Viard JP, et al. Rituximab therapy for HIV-associated Castleman disease. Blood. 2003;102: 2786–2788. pmid:12842986
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Rickinson AB, Moss DJ. Human Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Responses To Epstein Barr Virus Infection. Annu Rev Immunol. 1997;15: 405–431. pmid:9143694
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Woodberry T, Suscovich TJ, Henry LM, Davis JK, Frahm N, Walker BD, et al. Differential Targeting and Shifts in the Immunodominance of Epstein-Barr Virus–Specific CD8 and CD4 T Cell Responses during Acute and Persistent Infection. J Infect Dis 2005;192: 1513–1524. pmid:16206065
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Leen ANN, Meij P, Redchenko I, Middeldorp J, Bloemena E, Rickinson A, et al. Differential Immunogenicity of Epstein-Barr Virus Latent-Cycle Proteins for Human CD4 ϩ T-Helper 1 Responses. J Virol. 2001;75: 8649–8659. pmid:11507210
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] PubMed/NCBI

[105] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Boyd A, Almeida JR, Darrah PA, Sauce D, Seder RA, Appay V, et al. Pathogen-Specific T Cell Polyfunctionality Is a Correlate of T Cell Efficacy and Immune Protection. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–18.
View Article
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Warnes GR, Bolker B, Bonebakker L, Gentleman R, Liaw WHA, Lumley T, et al. gplots: Various R Programming Tools for Plotting Data. R package version 3.0.1; 2016. Database: CRAN [Internet]. Accessed: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gplots.

[ref30] 30. Everitt BS, Landau S, Leese M, Stahl D. Agglomerative methods. In: Analysis Cluster. 5^th ed. London, UK. John Wiley &Sons, Ltd. 2011.

[ref31] 31. Styles C, Paschos K, White R, Farrell P. The Cooperative Functions of the EBNA3 Proteins Are Central to EBV Persistence and Latency. Pathogens. 2018;7: 1–15.
View Article
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Bhattacharjee S, Roy SG, Bose P, Saha A. Role of EBNA-3 family proteins in EBV associated B-cell lymphomagenesis. Front Microbiol. 2016;7: 1–16.
View Article
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Mollet L, Sadat-Sowti B, Duntze J, Leblond V, Bergeron F, Calvez V, et al. CD8(hi+)CD57+ T lymphocytes are enriched in antigen-specific T cells capable of down-modulating cytotoxic activity. Int Immunol. 1998;10: 311–323. pmid:9576619
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Jones K, Nourse JP, Morrison L, Nguyen-Van D, Moss DJ, Burrows SR, et al. Expansion of EBNA1-specific effector T cells in posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders. Blood. 2010;116: 2245–2252. pmid:20562330
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Gasser O, Bihl FK, Wolbers M, Loggi E, Steffen I, Hirsch HH, et al. HIV patients developing primary CNS lymphoma lack EBV-specific CD4 + T cell function irrespective of absolute CD4+ T cell counts. PLoS Med. 2007;4: 556–561.
View Article
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Heller KN, Arrey F, Steinherz P, Portlock C, Chadburn A, Kelly K, et al. Patients with Epstein Barr virus-positive lymphomas have decreased CD4 + T-cell responses to the viral nuclear antigen 1. Int J Cancer. 2008;123: 2824–2831. pmid:18781564
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Calarota SA, Chiesa A, Zelini P, Comolli G, Minoli L, Baldanti F. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus-specific memory CD4+ T cells using a peptide-based cultured enzyme-linked immunospot assay. Immunology. 2013;139: 533–544. pmid:23560877
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] PubMed/NCBI

[135] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Davis JE, Sherritt MA, Bharadwaj M, Morrison LE, Elliott SL, Kear LM, et al. Determining virological, serological and immunological parameters of EBV infection in the development of PTLD. Int Immunol. 2004;16: 983–989. pmid:15159377
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Dasari V, Bhatt KH, Smith C, Khanna R. Designing an effective vaccine to prevent Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases: challenges and opportunities. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16: 377–390. pmid:28276306
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. O’Reilly RJ, Prockop S, Hasan AN, Koehne G, Doubrovina E. Virus-specific T-cell banks for “off the shelf” adoptive therapy of refractory infections. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51: 1163–1172. pmid:27042851
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Seyda M, Quante M, Uehara H, Slegtenhorst BR, Elkhal A, Tullius SG. Immunosenescence in renal transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2015;20: 417–423. pmid:26154914
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Betjes MGH, Meijers RWJ, De Wit EA, Weimar W, Litjens NHR. Terminally differentiated CD8 + temra cells are associated with the risk for acute kidney allograft rejection. Transplantation. 2012;94: 63–69. pmid:22691956
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Schaenman JM, Rossetti M, Sidwell T, Groysberg V, Sunga G, Korin Y, et al. Increased T cell immunosenescence and accelerated maturation phenotypes in older kidney transplant recipients. Hum Immunol. 2018;79: 659–667. pmid:29913200
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] PubMed/NCBI

[159] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Wang Y, Liu Y, Han R, Li Q, Yao Z, Niu W, et al. Monitoring of CD95 and CD38 expression in peripheral blood T lymphocytes during active human cytomegalovirus infection after orthotopic liver transplantation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25: 138–142. pmid:19817952
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[161] View Article

[162] PubMed/NCBI

[163] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Boleslawski E, Benothman S, Grabar S, Correia L, Podevin P, Chouzenoux S, et al. CD25, CD28 and CD38 expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes as a tool to predict acute rejection after liver transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2008;22: 494–501. pmid:18565100
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] PubMed/NCBI

[167] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. O’Byrne KJ, Dalgleish AG. Chronic immune activation and inflammation as the cause of malignancy. Br J Cancer. 2001;85: 473–483. pmid:11506482
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] PubMed/NCBI

[171] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Pike R, Thomas N, Workman S, Ambrose L, Guzman D, Sivakumaran S, et al. PD1-expressing T cell subsets modify the rejection risk in renal transplant patients. Front Immunol. 2016;7: 126. pmid:27148254
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[173] View Article

[174] PubMed/NCBI

[175] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Pittari G, Vago L, Festuccia M, Bonini C, Mudawi D, Giaccone L, et al. Restoring Natural Killer Cell Immunity against Multiple Myeloma in the Era of New Drugs. Front Immunol. 2017;8: 1444. pmid:29163516
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[177] View Article

[178] PubMed/NCBI

[179] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Liu Y, Cheng Y, Xu Y, Wang Z, Du X, Li C, et al. Increased expression of programmed cell death protein 1 on NK cells inhibits NK-cell-mediated anti-tumor function and indicates poor prognosis in digestive cancers. Oncogene. 2017;36: 6143–6153. pmid:28692048
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[181] View Article

[182] PubMed/NCBI

[183] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Pesce S, Greppi M, Tabellini G, Rampinelli F, Parolini S, Olive D, et al. Identification of a subset of human natural killer cells expressing high levels of programmed death 1: A phenotypic and functional characterization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139: 335–346. pmid:27372564
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] PubMed/NCBI

[187] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Beldi-Ferchiou A, Lambert M, Dogniaux S, Vély F, Vivier E, Olive D, et al. PD-1 mediates functional exhaustion of activated NK cells in patients with Kaposi sarcoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7: 72961–72977. pmid:27662664
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[189] View Article

[190] PubMed/NCBI

[191] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Mederacke YS, Vondran FW, Kollrich S, Schulde E, Schmitt R, Manns MP, et al. Transient increase of activated regulatory T cells early after kidney transplantation. Sci Rep. 2019;9: 1–12.
View Article
Google Scholar

[193] View Article

[194] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Andreola G, Chittenden M, Shaffer J, Cosimi AB, Kawai T, Cotter P, et al. Mechanisms of Donor-Specific Tolerance in Recipients of Haploidentical Combined Bone Marrow/Kidney Transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2011;11: 1236–1247. pmid:21645255
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] PubMed/NCBI

[198] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Study groups

Blood sample cryopreservation and viral DNA loads

Absolute lymphocyte counts, T Cell and NK Cell detailed phenotypes

EBV peptides

EBV-specific T cell detection by intracellular cytokine staining assay

ELISpot-IFNγ assay

Statistical analysis

Results

Patients characteristics and lymphopenia status

Low Th1 CD4+ T cells against latent EBV antigens in long-term stable kidney transplant recipients

Broader diversity of CD8+ T cell responses against EBNA-3A in KTRs

Alterations of EBV-specific effector T cell responses segregate KTRs from HCs

Peripheral blood NK cells characteristics in long-term kidney transplant recipients

PD-1 normalizes over time on kidney transplant recipients CD8+ T cells

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Example of gating strategy used for the NK cell phenotype by flow cytometry.

S2 Fig. Example of the gating strategy used to detect EBV-specific T cells by flow cytometry with intracellular cytokine staining.

S3 Fig. Lymphocyte subpopulations in long-term kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and healthy controls (HCs).

S4 Fig. Absolute T cell counts and EBV load follow up after kidney transplantation.

S5 Fig. Frequency and Immune-checkpoint expression of EBV-specific T cells in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

S6 Fig. Comparison of IFNγ production by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after stimulation with latent EBV class II MHC-restricted peptides.

S7 Fig. Association between PD-1 expression by EBV-specific CD8+ T cells and EBV viral load in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

S8 Fig. Supplemental phenotypic features of NK cells in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and healthy controls (HCs).

S9 Fig. T cell activation phenotype during kidney transplantation.

S10 Fig. T cell differentiation during kidney transplantation.

S1 Table. Sequences of 42 class I MHC-restricted latent and lytic EBV optimal peptides.

S2 Table. Sequences of 33 class II MHC-restricted latent EBV optimal peptides.

S3 Table. Sequences of BZLF-1 overlapping peptides.

S4 Table. Sequences of EBNA-3A overlapping peptides.

S5 Table. Class I- and class II-HLA alleles and predicted responses to EBV optimal peptides of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

S6 Table. Correlations between T cell phenotype, time after transplantation and EBV load of kidney transplant recipients.

Acknowledgments

References

Low Th1 CD4⁺ T cells against latent EBV antigens in long-term stable kidney transplant recipients

Broader diversity of CD8⁺ T cell responses against EBNA-3A in KTRs

PD-1 normalizes over time on kidney transplant recipients CD8⁺ T cells

S6 Fig. Comparison of IFNγ production by CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells after stimulation with latent EBV class II MHC-restricted peptides.

S7 Fig. Association between PD-1 expression by EBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells and EBV viral load in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).