http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1082-1956
Figures
Abstract
The cervical microbiota constitutes an important protective barrier against the invasion of pathogenic microorganisms. A disruption of microbiota within the cervical milieu has been suggested to be a driving factor of sexually transmitted infections. These include Chlamydia trachomatis which frequently causes serious reproductive sequelae such as infertility in women. In this study, we profiled the cervical microbial composition of a population of 70 reproductive-age Malaysian women; among which 40 (57.1%) were diagnosed with genital C. trachomatis infection, and 30 (42.8%) without C. trachomatis infection. Our findings showed a distinct compositional difference between the cervical microbiota of C. trachomatis-infected subjects and subjects without C. trachomatis infection. Specifically, significant elevations of mostly strict and facultative anaerobes such as Streptococcus, Megasphaera, Prevotella, and Veillonella in the cervical microbiota of C. trachomatis-positive women were detected. The results from the current study highlights an interaction of C. trachomatis with the environmental microbiome in the endocervical region.
Citation: Cheong HC, Yap PSX, Chong CW, Cheok YY, Lee CYQ, Tan GMY, et al. (2019) Diversity of endocervical microbiota associated with genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection and infertility among women visiting obstetrics and gynecology clinics in Malaysia. PLoS ONE 14(11): e0224658. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224658
Editor: S.M. Bruisten, GGD Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS
Received: April 15, 2019; Accepted: October 18, 2019; Published: November 18, 2019
Copyright: © 2019 Cheong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The 16S data are available from the NCBI SRA respiratory (BioProject accession no. PRJNA566293).
Funding: This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FP014-2017A) from the Malaysian Ministry of Education to WFW, and University of Malaya Specialist Center (UMSC) C.A.R.E. Fund (PV061-2018) to SS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Alongside Trichomonas vaginalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Treponema pallidum, genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection is one of the four most common curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the world, with approximately 131 million cases of new infections being reported in year 2012 [1, 2]. The seroprevalence for C. trachomatis infection was high (45.5%) in Malaysia with a large percentage (94.4%) of infection among prostitutes [3]. Chlamydial infection also occurs frequently among women with fertility disorders and gynecological problems in Malaysia (22.7%-51.1%), indicating widespread infection within the country [4, 5].
Although a cure for C. trachomatis infection is achievable using appropriate antibiotics for most cases (≥ 97%) [6, 7], a large proportion of asymptomatic cases (50–70%) combined with high rates of reinfection remain the significant challenges to ongoing efforts targeted at preventing bacterial dissemination and reducing damages related to infection [8, 9]. C. trachomatis infections of the genital tract in females are characterized by a vast spectrum of genital tract pathologies that include mucopurulent cervicitis, urethritis, and salpingitis, which could further lead to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), infertility, ectopic pregnancy and cervical cancer [10–12]. Further, genital chlamydial infection is also linked to preterm delivery and spontaneous abortion, as well as neonatal conjunctivitis [8, 13–15].
An increasing number of studies have highlighted disruption of vaginal microbiome as a predisposing factor for infection by urogenital pathogens. A healthy cervicovaginal microbiota is typically dominated by bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus [16]. Lactobacillus spp. exert their protective role in the female reproductive tract against the invasion of pathogenic microorganisms by maintaining the acidity of the mucosal environment, inhibiting the adhesion of pathogens, and producing bactericidal compounds such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [17]. Under in vitro condition, Lactobacillus spp. are potent inhibitors of C. trachomatis largely due to their lactic acid producing capacities [18–20]. In case of bacterial vaginosis, a state of microbial imbalance within the vaginal environment where Lactobacillus spp. were replaced by other anaerobic bacteria has been linked to the increase transmission of STIs, including infections caused by C. trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, human papillomavirus (HPV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [21–25].
Microbiota studies in recent years have shown that women with genital C. trachomatis infection exhibit increased colonization of anaerobic bacteria in the cervicovaginal region, although a causal relationship cannot be determined due to the use of a cross-sectional rather than a longitudinal study design. This suggests the presence of a crosstalk between microbiome community composition and the risk of chlamydial infection, which may dictate the subsequent course and outcome of female reproductive tract disorders [26–29]. However, most of the studies were conducted primarily among the European and South African populations, the data obtained are likely different from the microbiota diversity in the Asian cohort. In this present study, we evaluated the alteration of endocervical microbiome in association with C. trachomatis infection among a cohort of women in Malaysia by performing a 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing analysis.
Materials and methods
Study population
Our patient cohort comprised 77 female subjects attending the gynecology outpatient clinics at the University of Malaya Medical Centre (a referral centre for subspecialties including early pregnancy, infertility, oncology and general gynaecology) from year 2010 to 2014. All patients were thoroughly briefed about the purpose of the study and written informed consents were obtained from each subject prior to participation in this study. The information pertinent to visits to gynecology clinic including reasons for referral, menstruation, symptoms of genital and urinary tract infection, obstetric and medical histories were documented prior to sample collection by physicians. Patients attending the gynecology clinics for different purposes, especially those diagnosed with infertility, were randomly sampled. From the cohort collection of 180 patients, those with low DNA concentration or insufficient DNA quantity were excluded. A total of 77 samples comprising of approximately 42 C. trachomatis-infected and 35 non-infected samples were then randomly selected from the total patient cohort. The criteria for inclusion were females at the reproductive age (18 to 40 years old), while the criteria for exclusion were positive urine pregnancy test, recent antibiotic therapy, and genital tuberculosis. The definition of primary infertility used in the present investigation is the inability to achieve conception after a minimum period of one year of regular sexual intercourse without the use of contraception, whereas secondary infertility refers to the failure to conceive after the last child birth. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the University of Malaya Medical Centre Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) before commencement of this project (Reference number 908.109).
Specimen processing and diagnosis
Endocervical swabs were collected by the healthcare workers from the endocervix using UTM-RT universal transport media tubes (Copan, Brescia, Italy) and processed as described previously [5]. In brief, the transport tubes containing the endocervical swab was vortex mixed and the homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000× g. The resultant pellet was lysed and separated using phenol chloroform: isoamyl alcohol. DNA was precipitated with 1:10 volume of 3 M sodium acetate and isopropanol. After overnight storage at -20°C, the DNA pellet was washed and then eluted in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5. Detection of genital C. trachomatis infection was performed using a combination technique of nested-PCR and RT-PCR as described previously [5] using primer pairs (Supporting Information S1 Table) specifically targeting the C. trachomatis MOMP and cryptic plasmid genes alongside a separate amplification of human β-globin gene that served as a positive control for successful DNA extraction. All tests were run along with a positive (bacterial DNA) and negative (non-template control) samples.
16S rRNA library preparation and HiSeq sequencing
16S rRNA library was prepared using the protocols outlined in the 16S metagenomic sequencing library preparation part 15044223-B (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Amplification of 16S rRNA V3-V4 hypervariable regions was conducted in a 25 μl PCR reaction containing 2.5 μl of template DNA (5 ng/μl), 5 μl of 1 μM V3-V4 forward primer (5ʹ-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3ʹ) and reverse primer (5ʹ-GACTACHVGGGTATCTA-3ʹ), and 12.5 μl of 2× HiFi hotstart readymix (KapaBiosystems, Wilmington, MA). The PCR cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and subsequently purified using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA).
A second PCR was performed to introduce unique dual indices to the ends of the amplified DNA. The PCR master mix comprised 5 μl of purified PCR products, 5 μl of Nextera XT index primer 1 and 2 (Illumina), 25 μl of 2× HiFi hotstart readymix (KapaBiosystems), and 10 μl of sterile water to a final reaction volume of 50 μl. Samples were amplified using the following protocol: 95°C for 3 min, 8 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, as well as a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. DNA libraries were re-purified with Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter) and DNA quantity was measured with Qubit dsDNA HS assay (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Libraries were loaded on Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo, Alto, CA) to evaluate average fragment size and yield using Agilent high sensitivity DNA kit (Agilent Technologies) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Library qualities were assessed with an Mx3000P qPCR system (Agilent Technologies) using a library quantification kit (KapaBiosystems).
Following initial library quality control on the MiSeq system with the MiSeq V2 reagent kit (Illumina), the libraries were pooled at equimolar concentration with 15% PhiX spike-in. The final library was then subjected to paired-end 2× 250 bp sequencing on a HiSeq 2500 platform using HiSeq rapid SBS kit V2 (Illumina).
Sequencing data analysis
Raw reads generated from Illumina paired-end sequencing were processed and quality filtered by using Mothur version 1.4.0 [30]. Briefly, 46,503,524 paired-end sequences were joined into contigs using Make.contigs command. Sequences were filtered by using the following criteria: minimum 20 bp overlapped, maximum 6 bp homopolymer and no ambiguous nucleotide. Approximately 50% of the sequences was removed based on the filter and a total of 23,029,897 sequences were used for subsequent procedures.
Clustering and assignment of operational taxonomic unit (OTUs) was performed using Recreated SILVA SEED Database Release 132 (https://mothur.org/wiki/Silva_reference_files). Chimeric sequences were identified and removed using VSEARCH within the Mothur pipeline. The final dataset consisted of 669 OTUs from 10141568 sequences (min = 40476; max = 211854), with mean length of 464 bp. Sequences for OTUs were subjected to a search in NCBI’s database using the BLASTn algorithm to identify taxa at the species level (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). For ease of comparison, the data was rarefied to equal depth of 40476 sequences per sample. Alpha diversity metrices including Shannon Diversity Index, Simpson Diversity Index and Pielou’s Evenness were calculated and projected in bar graphs using MicrobiomeSeq package. In addition, bar charts were constructed using phyloseq package [31] to display the proportional differences in genus and phylum across groups.
The beta-diversity (overall differences in bacterial composition across infection i.e. non-infected versus C. trachomatis-infected; and fertility i.e. fertile versus infertile/miscarriage status) was evaluated using Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) and Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA). Further, taxa showing significant differences in abundance between infection status i.e. chlamydial-infected and non-infected patients were identified using negative log binomial model implemented in DESeq2 R package [32]. Correction of multiple correction was conducted using Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure implemented in DESeq2. Differentially expressed phylum genus and OTUs were selected by using BH adjusted P-value cut off of 0.01.
Results
Patients’ demographics
The study cohort consisted of 77 voluntarily participating women of reproductive age (20–44) presenting to the Obstetrics and Gynecology clinic at the University of Malaya Medical Center from the year 2010 to 2014. After quality filtering and chimera removal, 7 samples which generated fewer than 40,000 16S rRNA gene amplicon reads were omitted from further analyses. The final population comprised 70 subjects with ages ranging from 20 to 44 (mean age: 31.4; IQR: 27–35). Of the 70 subjects enrolled, 50 were married, 3 were divorced, and the remaining 17 women had not disclosed their marital status. The study cohort comprised 74.3% (52/70) subjects from the Malay ethnic group, Chinese and Indians each contributing 11.4% (8/70), while 2.4% (2/70) were of other ethnic backgrounds, which describes the demographic diversity of the multiethnic communities in Malaysia (Table 1). Among all, 51.4% (34/70) subjects were grouped as infertile including 20 diagnosed with primary or secondary infertility and 14 patients with miscarriage experience. Besides, 22.9% (16/70) of the subjects reported menstrual irregularity.
The demographics and clinical characteristics were analyzed using GraphPad PRISM software 7.0.
The relationship of C. trachomatis infection with infertility
A total of 40 out of 70 participants were infected with genital C. trachomatis based on the diagnostic test result. No significant correlation between chlamydial infection was detected with demographics such as age, marital status, as well as ethnicity (Table 1). When the subjects were grouped by infertility status, 88% (30/34) of the subjects from the infertile group was infected by C. trachomatis, as opposed to only 28% (10/36) in the fertile group. Indeed, a significant association between genital chlamydial infection and infertility was established (OR:19.50, 95% CI:5.459–69.66, P < 0.0001***). It is noteworthy that high prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was detected among the patients suffering from primary or secondary infertility (OR:103.50, 95% CI:5.722–1871, P < 0.0001***) and miscarriage (OR:6.50, 95% CI:1.652–25.58, P < 0.0089**), which were 100% (20/20) and 71% (10/14), respectively. However, the prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was not associated with menstrual health.
Association between C. trachomatis infection and the endocervical microbial community composition
The phylum and genus based taxonomic distributions are provided in Fig 1 and compared using negative log binomial model. Among all the patients, the dominant phyla were Firmicutes, followed by Bacteroidetes and Tenericutes (Fig 1A). When the comparison was made at phylum level, an enriched level of Chlamydiae was observed in the subjects diagnosed with (+) genital C. trachomatis infection; while those without (-) genital C. trachomatis infection was found to harbor higher levels of Tenericutes and Proteobacteria. At genus level, higher level of Delftia, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas, Cloacibacterium, Prevotella, Veillonella, Megasphaera, Ureaplasma, and Ralstonia were obvious among the subjects with C. trachomatis infection (+) compared to the group without chlamydial infection (Fig 1A).
(A) The overall phylum- or genus-based distributions of bacterial taxa in all subjects with (+) and without (-) genital C. trachomatis infection. (B) The phylum- or genus-based distributions of bacterial taxa among the infertile cohort, with (+) or without (-) genital C. trachomatis infection. Reads that were not aligned to reference alignment are denoted as “unclassified”.
When we restricted our analysis to infertile women, elevated level of phyla Bacteroidetes was detected the C. trachomatis-infected samples (+). A lower prevalence of genus Megasphaera was detected among the subjects with C. trachomatis infection (+) in comparison to the non-infected group (Fig 1B).
Genital C. trachomatis infection is accompanied by increased endocervical colonization of Lactobacillus sp., Streptococcus agalactiae, Prevotella colorans, Pseudomonas sp., Veillonella sp., and Delftia sp.; and reduced Aerococcus christensenii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
After considering fertility status as a covariate on infection, we identified 11 differentially abundant taxa between C. trachomatis-positive and negative women (Fig 2). The composition of cervical microbiome for the subjects positive for C. trachomatis were associated with high taxa levels of a number of genera which included Chlamydia (OTU25), Lactobacillus (OTU2), Streptococcus (OTU3), Megasphaera (OTU10/29), Prevotella_6 (OTU15), Pseudomonas (OTU33), Veillonella (OTU39), as well as Delftia (OTU70). Meanwhile, the genera Aerococcus (OTU13) and Stenotrophomonas (OTU32) were lower among subjects with C. trachomatis infection compared to those without chlamydial infection.
Analysis were done in all cohorts after accounting for differences in fertility status across the study groups. Red bars represent bacteria genus which were significantly abundant in C. trachomatis-infected group compared to non-chlamydial-infected group; whereas blue bars represent significant groups that are more abundant in non-chlamydial infected group. Numbers in bracket represents OTU.
Sequence for each OTU was blasted using NCBI database to identify the microorganisms at species level. The species which matched the highest sequence homology with the input are as shown in Table 2. The abundant species in the C. trachomatis infected group were Lactobacillus gallinarum or Lactobacillus crispatus (OTU2), Streptococcus agalactiae (OTU3), Prevotella colorans (OTU15), Pseudomonas mendocina or Psudomonas oleovorans (OTU33), Veillonella ratti or Veillonella seminalis (OTU39), and Delftia lacustris or Delftia tsuruhatensis (OTU70). Whereas the abundant species in the non-chlamydial infected group were recognized as Aerococcus christensenii (OTU13), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (OTU32). Some OTUs, for example OTU10 and OTU29, were unable to be identified at species level because of limited information in the database.
OTUs were searched against NCBI database using the BLASTn algorithm. The identified species with the highest homology and their accession numbers are listed. For BLAST results with more than one different species, only the top three species with the identical homology are displayed.
Taxonomic diversity profiles of the endocervical microbiota in the presence of C. trachomatis infection
Alpha diversity measures including Pielou’s evenness alongside Simpson’s and Shannon’s indices were examined (Fig 3A). There is a general trend of higher alpha diversity indices in non-C. trachomatis infected than those in the C. trachomatis-infected subjects. However, the difference did not achieve statistical significance at alpha = 0.05 (Fig 3A). Beta diversity between the groups was further assessed by CAP (Fig 3B) and PERMANOVA analysis (Table 3). In CAP, separation between non-infected and infected groups was observed along axis CAP1. Indeed, a significance in bacterial compositional difference between groups with different infection status was apparent (pseudo-F = 1.4744, P(perm) = 0.039). However, statistical significance was not achieved between groups with different fertility status (pseudo-F = 1.384, P(perm) = 0.079).
(A) Alpha diversity boxplots of the cervical microbiota community of subjects with and without diagnosis of C. trachomatis. Pielou’s evenness, Simpson’s, and Shannon’s indices were used to numerically measure species evenness and diversity across all sample groups. The alpha diversity for each group was not statistically different between groups. (B) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) inferred based on log2 regularized OTUs data.
Discussion
In this study, most of the patients diagnosed with C. trachomatis (88%) experienced primary or secondary infertility (100%, P<0.0001) as well as miscarriage (71%, P = 0.0089). A prior epidemiological study has indicated that women with genital C. trachomatis infection are 30% more likely to develop PID, ectopic pregnancy, as well as tubal factor infertility (TFI) than those without, whereas infections with C. trachomatis elevate the risk of PID by an additional 20% [33]. Our results are consistent with this finding, whereby a significant positive correlation between C. trachomatis and infertility was detected. Given the high prevalence of C. trachomatis infection and the severity of disease that ensues from the infection, a more effective screening and treatment strategy is warranted to curb the dissemination of C. trachomatis in the population. Notably, our study cohort comprised three major ethnic groups, namely the Malays, Chinese, Indians, as well as ethnic minority participants of other nationalities. However, due to the small sample size, the differences between ethnicities were not compared.
The vaginal flora, which constitutes 9% of the human microbiome, have been shown to play a critical role in the maintenance of overall health condition and disease state of the female reproductive tract [34]. Many studies have demonstrated that women with bacterial vaginosis are at higher risk of other sexually transmitted pathogens that includes C. trachomatis, signifying the importance of microbiota homeostasis and its role as a determinant in disease outcome [21, 23, 24, 35]. While the precise etiologic agents in bacterial vaginosis remain unclear, the prevailing view is that the disease is polymicrobial in nature caused by overgrowth of a consortium of anaerobic bacteria such as Gardnerella vaginalis, as well as microbes belonging to the genera Streptococcus, Veillonella, Prevotella, Peptostreptococcus and Bacteroides [36–38]. Although alpha-diversity analyses did not reveal categorical difference in cervical microbiota diversity across the sample groups, further evaluation of the cervical bacterial community using beta-diversity measure showed that there was significant difference in the taxonomic compositions between the subjects in relation to C. trachomatis infection (PERMANOVA, pseudo-F = 1.4744, P(perm) = 0.039). In addition, we report here that women with genital chlamydial infection harbor significantly more abundant bacteria such as Streptococcus agalactiae, Pseudomonas sp., Veillonellaceae bacterium, Megasphaera sp., Veillonella sp., Prevotella colorans, Veillonella sp., as well as Delftia sp., the majority of these are anaerobes and facultative anaerobes which have been implicated in BV [36–39]. Other studies have also reported an increase in the colonization of diverse anaerobic bacteria in the cervicovaginal environment of women with C. trachomatis infection [26–28, 40, 41]. It is currently unknown whether Delftia can modulate the host susceptibility to other pathogens. Delftia tsuruhatensis appears to constitute the normal microbiota of the human vulva but there is evidence to suggest that its abundance in amniotic fluid and blood is associated with preterm birth [42, 43]. The significant presence of Delftia sp. in our C. trachomatis-positive group, therefore, merits further study to better elucidate its role in the female endocervical microbiota.
Differential abundance analysis (DESeq2) further showed that the taxon Lactobacillus crispatus and L. gallinarum was significantly elevated in the microbiota of women infected with C. trachomatis relative to those without C. trachomatis infection. Evidence is emerging that prevalence of particular Lactobacillus provides fewer protection compared to other members of the same genus. L. crispatus has been found to inhibit C. trachomatis infection, replication, as well as attachment to host cells; these effects are likely related to its production of lactic acid that lowers the surrounding pH and inhibits chlamydial growth [18–20]. However, it was reported recently that L. crispatus promotes repair of injured vaginal epithelial cells by promoting the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF), which may help to reduce subsequent acquisition of urogenital tract infections [44]. L. crispatus was reported as one of the major compositions of endocervix microbiota among the asymptomatic C. trachomatis-infected patients in South Africa [28]. Meanwhile, L. gallinarum has previously been found in a high percentage of HPV-infected women in Beijing, China [45]. L. iners (OTU1) (data not shown) was the most abundant taxon in the endocervical milieu of both infected and non-infected group. Such dominance has been previously reported among normal healthy reproductive Thai and Chinese women [46, 47]. L. iners has been shown to be negatively associated with unfavorable reproductive health outcomes. Although commonly detected in the vagina of healthy reproductive age women [48], a high prevalence of L. iners has been shown to be a predictive factor for bacterial vaginosis and pre-term delivery [49–52]. In fact, L. iners-dominated microbiota has been linked to increased predisposition to acquisition of C. trachomatis, HIV, as well as M. genitalium, indicating its double-edged sword role in female reproductive health [26, 53–55]. However, we were unable to unequivocally determine the identity of the Lactobacillus in the present study as the sequences of L. gallinarum and L. crispatus had the identical homology in the BLAST results.
Conversely, subjects negative for C. trachomatis displayed significantly greater abundance of Aerococcus christensenii. Certain members of the genus Aerococcus including A. urinae, A. sanguinocola, and A. viridans are rare pathogens involved in urinary tract infections particularly among individuals with comorbidities [56–58]. In a similar study, Di Pietro et al. interrogated the microbial constituents of a population of Italian women infected with C. trachomatis and identified A. christensenii as the species closely associated with chlamydial infection [40]. Balle et al. showed that A. christensenii was only weakly related to C. trachomatis infection in a cohort of South African adolescents [28]. A. christensenii has previously been implicated as a cause of chorioamnionitis in a case report [59]. Beyond that, much remains unknown about the role of A. christensenii in the female genital tract. Currently, there is a paucity of information concerning the significance of Stenotrophomonas in the context of female reproductive health. S. maltophilia is considered as a human commensal and is a frequently isolated microorganism in urine specimens. Although rare, S. maltophilia has been reported to be a cause of nosocomial urinary tract infection [60, 61].
In conclusion, our study showed significant difference in endocervical microbiota between C. trachomatis-infected and non-infected cohorts among patients visiting gynecology clinics from Malaysia. However, we highlighted that genital C. trachomatis infection was not directly connected to increased cervical bacterial diversity, as no significant differences were observed in data richness and evenness. Further, we showed that infection with C. trachomatis was related to elevated prevalence of mostly strict and facultative anaerobes, however disruption of the sequencing data by PCR artefact should also be alerted [62]. Future studies involving a larger cohort with more stringent criteria will allow us to delineate the endocervical microbial landscape of women living in Malaysia. Nevertheless, the role of the anaerobes in disease progression is currently unknown, hence a further study to evaluate the involvement of taxa such as A. christensenii and S. maltophilia in chlamydial infection is warranted.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Primers used in the present study for diagnosis of C. trachomatis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224658.s001
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We would like to extend our gratitude to all the study participants in this study and the dedicated team of nurses at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University Malaya Medical Center for their assistance in collecting the clinical specimens.
References
- 1. Newman L, Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, Wijesooriya NS, Unemo M, Low N, et al. Global Estimates of the Prevalence and Incidence of Four Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections in 2012 Based on Systematic Review and Global Reporting. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0143304. pmid:26646541; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4672879.
- 2. Unemo M, Bradshaw CS, Hocking JS, de Vries HJC, Francis SC, Mabey D, et al. Sexually transmitted infections: challenges ahead. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(8):e235–e79. Epub 2017/07/14. pmid:28701272.
- 3. Ngeow YF, Rachagan SP, Ramachandran S. Prevalence of chlamydial antibody in Malaysians. J Clin Pathol. 1990;43(5):400–2. Epub 1990/05/01. pmid:2196283; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC502444.
- 4. Ravindran J, Tan YI, Ngeow YF. The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in patients with pelvic inflammatory disease. Med J Malaysia. 1998;53(1):16–21. Epub 2000/09/01. pmid:10968132.
- 5. Yeow TC, Wong WF, Sabet NS, Sulaiman S, Shahhosseini F, Tan GM, et al. Prevalence of plasmid-bearing and plasmid-free Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women who visited obstetrics and gynecology clinics in Malaysia. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:45. Epub 2016/03/19. pmid:26987367; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4797335.
- 6. Lau CY, Qureshi AK. Azithromycin versus doxycycline for genital chlamydial infections: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(9):497–502. Epub 2002/09/10. pmid:12218839.
- 7. Miller KE. Diagnosis and treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Am Fam Physician. 2006;73(8):1411–6. pmid:16669564.
- 8. Spiliopoulou A, Lakiotis V, Vittoraki A, Zavou D, Mauri D. Chlamydia trachomatis: time for screening? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11(9):687–9. pmid:16104982.
- 9. Walker J, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Chen MY, Bradshaw CS, Twin J, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis incidence and re-infection among young women—behavioural and microbiological characteristics. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37778. pmid:22662220; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3360595.
- 10. Brunham RC, Rey-Ladino J. Immunology of Chlamydia infection: implications for a Chlamydia trachomatis vaccine. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5(2):149–61. pmid:15688042.
- 11. Moss NJ, Ahrens K, Kent CK, Klausner JD. The decline in clinical sequelae of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection supports current control strategies. J Infect Dis. 2006;193(9):1336–8; author reply 8–9. pmid:16586376.
- 12. Mackern-Oberti JP, Motrich RD, Breser ML, Sanchez LR, Cuffini C, Rivero VE. Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the male genital tract: an update. J Reprod Immunol. 2013;100(1):37–53. pmid:23870458.
- 13. Manavi K. A review on infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(6):941–51. pmid:16934531.
- 14. Wilkowska-Trojniel M, Zdrodowska-Stefanow B, Ostaszewska-Puchalska I, Redzko S, Przepiesc J, Zdrodowski M. The influence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection on spontaneous abortions. Adv Med Sci. 2009;54(1):86–90. pmid:19403438.
- 15. Rours GI, Duijts L, Moll HA, Arends LR, de Groot R, Jaddoe VW, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection during pregnancy associated with preterm delivery: a population-based prospective cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2011;26(6):493–502. pmid:21538042; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3115062.
- 16. Kaminska D, Gajecka M. Is the role of human female reproductive tract microbiota underestimated? Benef Microbes. 2017;8(3):327–43. Epub 2017/05/16. pmid:28504576.
- 17. Cribby S, Taylor M, Reid G. Vaginal microbiota and the use of probiotics. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2008;2008:256490. Epub 2008/01/01. pmid:19343185; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2662373.
- 18. Gong Z, Luna Y, Yu P, Fan H. Lactobacilli inactivate Chlamydia trachomatis through lactic acid but not H2O2. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107758. Epub 2014/09/13. pmid:25215504; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4162611.
- 19. Mastromarino P, Di Pietro M, Schiavoni G, Nardis C, Gentile M, Sessa R. Effects of vaginal lactobacilli in Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014;304(5–6):654–61. Epub 2014/05/31. pmid:24875405.
- 20. Nardini P, Nahui Palomino RA, Parolin C, Laghi L, Foschi C, Cevenini R, et al. Lactobacillus crispatus inhibits the infectivity of Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies, in vitro study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29024. Epub 2016/06/30. pmid:27354249; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4926251.
- 21. Gillet E, Meys JF, Verstraelen H, Bosire C, De Sutter P, Temmerman M, et al. Bacterial vaginosis is associated with uterine cervical human papillomavirus infection: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:10. Epub 2011/01/13. pmid:21223574; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3023697.
- 22. Brotman RM, Bradford LL, Conrad M, Gajer P, Ault K, Peralta L, et al. Association between Trichomonas vaginalis and vaginal bacterial community composition among reproductive-age women. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(10):807–12. Epub 2012/09/26. pmid:23007708; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3458234.
- 23. Gallo MF, Macaluso M, Warner L, Fleenor ME, Hook EW 3rd, Brill I, et al. Bacterial vaginosis, gonorrhea, and chlamydial infection among women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic: a longitudinal analysis of possible causal links. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22(3):213–20. Epub 2011/12/24. pmid:22192490.
- 24. Bautista CT, Wurapa EK, Sateren WB, Morris SM, Hollingsworth BP, Sanchez JL. Association of Bacterial Vaginosis With Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Among Women in the U.S. Army. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(5):632–9. Epub 2016/11/07. pmid:27816380.
- 25. Gosmann C, Anahtar MN, Handley SA, Farcasanu M, Abu-Ali G, Bowman BA, et al. Lactobacillus-Deficient Cervicovaginal Bacterial Communities Are Associated with Increased HIV Acquisition in Young South African Women. Immunity. 2017;46(1):29–37. pmid:28087240; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5270628.
- 26. van der Veer C, Bruisten SM, van der Helm JJ, de Vries HJ, van Houdt R. The Cervicovaginal Microbiota in Women Notified for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Case-Control Study at the Sexually Transmitted Infection Outpatient Clinic in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(1):24–31. Epub 2016/08/28. pmid:27567124.
- 27. Filardo S, Di Pietro M, Porpora MG, Recine N, Farcomeni A, Latino MA, et al. Diversity of Cervical Microbiota in Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Infection: A Pilot Study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:321. Epub 2017/08/05. pmid:28770172; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5509768.
- 28. Balle C, Lennard K, Dabee S, Barnabas SL, Jaumdally SZ, Gasper MA, et al. Endocervical and vaginal microbiota in South African adolescents with asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11109. Epub 2018/07/25. pmid:30038262; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6056523.
- 29. Tamarelle J, de Barbeyrac B, Le Hen I, Thiebaut A, Bebear C, Ravel J, et al. Vaginal microbiota composition and association with prevalent Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a cross-sectional study of young women attending a STI clinic in France. Sex Transm Infect. 2018. Epub 2018/01/24. pmid:29358524.
- 30. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(23):7537–41. Epub 2009/10/06. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2786419. pmid:19801464
- 31. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61217. Epub 2013/05/01. pmid:23630581; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3632530.
- 32. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. Epub 2014/12/18. pmid:25516281; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4302049.
- 33. Davies B, Turner KM, Frolund M, Ward H, May MT, Rasmussen S, et al. Risk of reproductive complications following chlamydia testing: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Denmark. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(9):1057–64. pmid:27289389.
- 34. Group NHW, Peterson J, Garges S, Giovanni M, McInnes P, Wang L, et al. The NIH Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res. 2009;19(12):2317–23. Epub 2009/10/13. pmid:19819907; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2792171.
- 35. Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Landers DV, Sweet RL. Bacterial vaginosis is a strong predictor of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(5):663–8. Epub 2003/02/21. pmid:12594649.
- 36. Biagi E, Vitali B, Pugliese C, Candela M, Donders GG, Brigidi P. Quantitative variations in the vaginal bacterial population associated with asymptomatic infections: a real-time polymerase chain reaction study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28(3):281–5. Epub 2008/09/03. pmid:18762999.
- 37. Turovskiy Y, Sutyak Noll K, Chikindas ML. The aetiology of bacterial vaginosis. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;110(5):1105–28. Epub 2011/02/22. pmid:21332897; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3072448.
- 38. Nelson TM, Borgogna JL, Brotman RM, Ravel J, Walk ST, Yeoman CJ. Vaginal biogenic amines: biomarkers of bacterial vaginosis or precursors to vaginal dysbiosis? Front Physiol. 2015;6:253. Epub 2015/10/21. pmid:26483694; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4586437.
- 39. Ranjit E, Raghubanshi BR, Maskey S, Parajuli P. Prevalence of Bacterial Vaginosis and Its Association with Risk Factors among Nonpregnant Women: A Hospital Based Study. Int J Microbiol. 2018;2018:8349601. Epub 2018/04/26. pmid:29692813; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5859802.
- 40. Di Pietro M, Filardo S, Porpora MG, Recine N, Latino MA, Sessa R. HPV/Chlamydia trachomatis co-infection: metagenomic analysis of cervical microbiota in asymptomatic women. New Microbiol. 2018;41(1):34–41. Epub 2018/01/10. pmid:29313867.
- 41. Witkin SS. Vaginal microbiome studies in pregnancy must also analyse host factors. BJOG. 2019;126(3):359. Epub 2018/05/24. pmid:29791773.
- 42. DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Amogan HP, Kusanovic JP, Bik EM, Gotsch F, et al. Microbial prevalence, diversity and abundance in amniotic fluid during preterm labor: a molecular and culture-based investigation. PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e3056. Epub 2008/08/30. pmid:18725970; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2516597.
- 43. You Y-A, Yoo JY, Kwon EJ, Kim YJ. Blood Microbial Communities During Pregnancy Are Associated With Preterm Birth. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10(1122). pmid:31214131
- 44. Takada K, Komine-Aizawa S, Kuramochi T, Ito S, Trinh QD, Pham NTK, et al. Lactobacillus crispatus accelerates re-epithelialization in vaginal epithelial cell line MS74. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018;80(3):e13027. Epub 2018/08/26. pmid:30144195.
- 45. Gao W, Weng J, Gao Y, Chen X. Comparison of the vaginal microbiota diversity of women with and without human papillomavirus infection: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:271. Epub 2013/06/14. pmid:23758857; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3684509.
- 46. Shi Y, Chen L, Tong J, Xu C. Preliminary characterization of vaginal microbiota in healthy Chinese women using cultivation-independent methods. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35(3):525–32. Epub 2009/06/17. pmid:19527394.
- 47. Sirichoat A, Buppasiri P, Engchanil C, Namwat W, Faksri K, Sankuntaw N, et al. Characterization of vaginal microbiota in Thai women. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5977. Epub 2018/12/01. pmid:30498641; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6252066.
- 48. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108 Suppl 1:4680–7. Epub 2010/06/11. pmid:20534435; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3063603.
- 49. Tamrakar R, Yamada T, Furuta I, Cho K, Morikawa M, Yamada H, et al. Association between Lactobacillus species and bacterial vaginosis-related bacteria, and bacterial vaginosis scores in pregnant Japanese women. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:128. Epub 2007/11/08. pmid:17986357; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2212641.
- 50. Macklaim JM, Gloor GB, Anukam KC, Cribby S, Reid G. At the crossroads of vaginal health and disease, the genome sequence of Lactobacillus iners AB-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108 Suppl 1:4688–95. Epub 2010/11/10. pmid:21059957; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3063587.
- 51. Kindinger LM, Bennett PR, Lee YS, Marchesi JR, Smith A, Cacciatore S, et al. The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):6. Epub 2017/01/21. pmid:28103952; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5244550.
- 52. Stafford GP, Parker JL, Amabebe E, Kistler J, Reynolds S, Stern V, et al. Spontaneous Preterm Birth Is Associated with Differential Expression of Vaginal Metabolites by Lactobacilli-Dominated Microflora. Front Physiol. 2017;8:615. Epub 2017/09/08. pmid:28878691; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5572350.
- 53. Borgdorff H, Tsivtsivadze E, Verhelst R, Marzorati M, Jurriaans S, Ndayisaba GF, et al. Lactobacillus-dominated cervicovaginal microbiota associated with reduced HIV/STI prevalence and genital HIV viral load in African women. ISME J. 2014;8(9):1781–93. Epub 2014/03/07. pmid:24599071; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4139719.
- 54. Molenaar MC, Singer M, Ouburg S. The two-sided role of the vaginal microbiome in Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium pathogenesis. J Reprod Immunol. 2018;130:11–7. Epub 2018/08/28. pmid:30149363.
- 55. van Houdt R, Ma B, Bruisten SM, Speksnijder A, Ravel J, de Vries HJC. Lactobacillus iners-dominated vaginal microbiota is associated with increased susceptibility to Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Dutch women: a case-control study. Sex Transm Infect. 2018;94(2):117–23. Epub 2017/09/28. pmid:28947665; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6083440.
- 56. Mohan B, Zaman K, Anand N, Taneja N. Aerococcus Viridans: A Rare Pathogen Causing Urinary Tract Infection. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(1):DR01–DR3. Epub 2017/03/10. pmid:28273968; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5324413.
- 57. Higgins A, Garg T. Aerococcus urinae: An Emerging Cause of Urinary Tract Infection in Older Adults with Multimorbidity and Urologic Cancer. Urol Case Rep. 2017;13:24–5. Epub 2017/04/25. pmid:28435789; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5393163.
- 58. Zhang Q, Kwoh C, Attorri S, Clarridge JE 3rd. Aerococcus urinae in urinary tract infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(4):1703–5. Epub 2000/04/04. pmid:10747177; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC86536.
- 59. Carlstein C, Marie Soes L, Jorgen Christensen J. Aerococcus christensenii as Part of Severe Polymicrobial Chorioamnionitis in a Pregnant Woman. Open Microbiol J. 2016;10:27–31. Epub 2016/03/26. pmid:27014376; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4787314.
- 60. Vartivarian SE, Papadakis KA, Anaissie EJ. Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia urinary tract infection. A disease that is usually severe and complicated. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(4):433–5. Epub 1996/02/26. pmid:8607729.
- 61. Denton M, Kerr KG. Microbiological and clinical aspects of infection associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11(1):57–80. Epub 1998/02/11. pmid:9457429; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC121376.
- 62. Kebschull JM, Zador AM. Sources of PCR-induced distortions in high-throughput sequencing data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(21):e143. Epub 2015/07/19. pmid:26187991; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4666380.