Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Histone H3 gene is not a suitable marker to distinguish Alternaria tenuissima from A. alternata affecting potato

  • Yue Zhang ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Yue Zhang, Peiyu Tian

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation

    Affiliation Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Virology, Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China

  • Peiyu Tian ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Yue Zhang, Peiyu Tian

    Roles Data curation, Investigation

    Affiliation Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Virology, Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China

  • Guohua Duan,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Virology, Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China

  • Fangluan Gao,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Virology, Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China

  • Guido Schnabel,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States of America

  • Jiasui Zhan ,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    chenfengping@fafu.edu.cn (FC); jiasui.zhan@fafu.edu.cn (JZ)

    Affiliations Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Virology, Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China, State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China

  • Fengping Chen

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    chenfengping@fafu.edu.cn (FC); jiasui.zhan@fafu.edu.cn (JZ)

    Affiliation Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Virology, Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China

Correction

22 Aug 2022: Zhang Y, Tian P, Duan G, Gao F, Schnabel G, et al. (2022) Correction: Histone H3 gene is not a suitable marker to distinguish Alternaria tenuissima from A. alternata affecting potato. PLOS ONE 17(8): e0273605. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273605 View correction

Abstract

Potato Alternaria leaf blight is one of the economically most important disease in potato production worldwide. A recent study reported a quick method to distinguish main Alternaria pathogens A. tenuissima, A. alternata, and A. solani using partial histone H3 gene sequences. Using this method, our collection of 79 isolates from 8 provinces in China were presumably separated into A. tenussima and A. alternata. But in depth morphological and genetic analysis casted doubt on this identification. Culture morphologies of six presumed A. alternata isolates (PresA_alt) and six presumed A. tenuissima isolates (PresA_ten) were not significantly different. PresA_ten isolates also produced conidia in branched chains which supposed to be A. aternata. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) and five genes commonly used for species identification including glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1), β-tubulin, plasma membrane ATPase (ATPase), and calmodulin genes. The results showed that GPDH and TEF1 sequences of PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates were identical. The 12 isolates did not cluster by presumed species neither by individual or concatenated sequence comparisons. The phylogeny–trait association analysis confirmed that the two group isolates were undistinguishable by those molecular markers. Analysis of histone H3 gene sequences revealed variable intron sequences between PresA_ten and PresA_alt isolates, but the amino acid sequences were identical. Our results indicate that the previously published method to distinguish Alternaria species based on histone H3 gene sequence variation is inaccurate and that the prevalence of A. tenuissima isolates in China was likely overestimated.

Introduction

Potato is the economically fourth most important food crop and one of the most important cash crops in the world. Global potato production increased from about 240 million tons in 1980 to 377 million tons in 2016 (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2017). But growing potatoes is challenging and marketable yield is threatened by many pests and diseases. Alternaria leaf blight is one of the major diseases in potato production, known as early blight and brown spot expressing similar symptoms in the early stage. Early blight is characterized by typical symptoms of concentric rings on leaves favored by high temperature and alternating periods of dry weather and high humidity [1]. The disease reduces yield, affects tuber size, and tuber quality [2]. Brown spot expresses small, irregular to circular lesions coalescing across large veins resulting in significant leaf damage [3].

The known Alternaria leaf blight pathogen is Alternaria solani, which was initially considered to be the causal agent of early blight in potato and other Solanaceae crops [4]. But various other Alternaria pathogens have also been identified. For example, A. alternata, A.tenuissima, A. dumosa, A. arborescens and A. infectoria have been reported in major potato growing regions in Iran [5]; A. protenta in Algeria [6]; A. alternata, A. arborescens, A. protenta, and A. grandis in Europe [7]; A. longipes in Pakistan [8]; A. arborescens, A. alternata, and A. arbusti in United States [9]; and A. tenuissima and A. alternata in China [10].

Morphologically, Alternaria species can be divided into large-spored and small-spored species. The primarily large-spored and small-spored pathogens are generally considered to be A. solani and A. alternata respectively, causing seriously threat in potato production although other species were reported recently [9,10]. Most Alternaria species of potato are small-spored; only A. solani and A. grandis are large-spored. Large-spored A. tomatophila was associated with early blight, but it is only weakly aggressive to potato [11].

Identification of Alternaria species is essential for disease management. Species can vary in fungicide sensitivity and in their ability to develop resistance to fungicides. For example, populations of A. solani and A. alternata differed in resistance to azoxystrobin in the Columbia Basin of Washington [12]. This phenomenon was also found in Colletotrichum complex [1315]. Fungicides could also have different intrinsic activity in species complex, i.e less activity of benomyl was found in C. acutatum compared to C. gloeosporioides [16,17]. Another reason of importance to identify species is toxins production in some species. For example, A. arborescens produced AAL-toxin [18], but A. infectoria does not.

The distinction between small-spored Alternaria species has not been an easy task but progress seemed to have been made in recent years. Zheng et al. (2015) reported that A.tenuissima was successfully distinguished from A. alternata and A. solani based on the partial coding sequence of the histone H3 gene [10]. The three species revealed PCR amplicons of 546 bp, 440 bp and 489 bp in length, respectively. We used this method to screen our collection of isolates from various potato production regions in China, but noticed discrepancies and irregularities in results. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the method in distinguishing species by comparing assay results with morphological and in depth analysis of nucleotide sequences of key genes commonly used for fungal species separation.

Material and methods

Origin and collection of Alternaria isolates

A total of 79 single-spore isolates were obtained from 8 provinces in China including Yunnan, Fujian, Hebei, Inner Mongolia, Hubei, Henan, Heilongjiang and Shanxi during the 2011 to 2013 potato growing seasons (Table 1). Symptomatic leaves of circular lesion with concentric rings were collected from potato (one per plant) and leaf tissue (0.5 cm x 0.5 cm) from the demarcation zone of healthy and diseased areas was obtained. The pieces of tissue were rinsed in 75% alcohol for 2 min, then washed with sterile distilled water twice and dried in a laminar flow hood. The dried tissue was placed onto potato dextrose agar (PDA, including 200 g/l potato, 20 g/l glucose and 20 g/l agar) amended with 50 μg/ml streptomycin (Amresco, USA), and incubated at 25°C. After 3 days, actively growing mycelium was transferred to fresh PDA in petri dishes and incubated at 25°C until conidia were produced. Those were spread on water agar in a suspension and after 20 hrs of incubation at room temperature, and a single germinated conidium was isolated.

thumbnail
Table 1. Origin and frequency of Alternaria species from potato leaves identified by H3-1a/1b primer set.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231961.t001

DNA extraction

Isolates were grown on PDA at 25°C in the dark for 7 days. Mycelium (~100 mg) was scraped off the medium surface, placed in a sterile, 2 mL centrifuge tube and lyophilized with a vacuum freeze dryer (Alpha1-2, Christ, Germany). The lyophilized mycelium was ground to powder with a mixer mill (MM400, Retsch, Germany). Genomic DNA was extracted from mycelium using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [19]. Briefly, the mycelia powder was added to DNA extraction buffer (2% CTAB, 100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 20 mM EDTA [pH8.0], and 1.4 M NaCl) and incubated for 30 min at 65°C. After extraction with one volume of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1), DNA was precipitated with one volume of isopropyl alcohol for 10 min at room temperature (23 ± 1°C). The suspension was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min and the pellet was washed with 75% alcohol and then 100% alcohol. DNA was dried in a heat block (OSE-100C, Tiangen Biotech, Beijng) and suspended in Tris-EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 Mm EDTA, pH 8.0).

Identification of Alternaria species

All isolates were identified with H3-1a and H3-1b primers (S1 Table), which amplified partial coding sequences of histone H3 gene [10,20]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a volume of 25 μl containing 1× PCR mix, 50 ng of DNA and 0.4 μM each primer (TransGen Biotech Co., Beijing) in an 2720 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, USA). The PCR was programed with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 4 min; 32 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 40 s, extension at 72°C for 60s; and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. PCR products were separated in 2.0% agarose gel in 1× Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer (40 mM Tris acetate and 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). A previous study indicated that the primers generated 546 bp, 489 bp and 440 bp amplicons, each corresponding to A.tenuissima (A_ten), A. solani (A_sol) and A. alternata (A_alt), respectively [10]. Six amplicons of each size were confirmed by sequencing (Biosune Co., Shanghai) using primers H3-1a and H3-1b. The six isolates with a 440 bp amplicon (A1 to A6) presumed to be A. alternata (PresA_alt) are FJ1, FJ2, FJ3, HeB3, HeB8, and HeB10 and the six isolates with a 546 bp amplicon (T1 to T6) presumed to be A. tenuissima (PreA_ten) are HN5, NMG11, FJ7, HeB4, HeB6, and HeB11.

Morphological characterization of Alternaria species

The same twelve isolates of PresA_alt and PresA_ten were investigated for additional morphological and molecular characteristics. Morphological characters included colony color, growth rate, conidia size, number of septa, and number and shape of conidiophore. Isolates were grown on PDA medium in the dark for 7 d before colony color was recorded and growth rate/day was calculated. Morphology of conidia and conidiophore was observed using the sellotape technique. Briefly, the isolates were grown on synthetic low nutrient agar medium (SNA, including 1g/l KH2PO4, 1g/l KNO3, 0.5g/l KCl, 0.5g/l MgSO4·7H2O, 0.2g/l glucose, 0.2g/l sucrose and 15g/l agar) [21] in 12 h/12 h periods of light/dark. After 7 d incubation, conidia and conidiophore were adhered to sellotape, and observed under a microscope (Eclipse E100, NIKON). Conidia size and number of septa was averaged from 50 conidia.

Molecular genetic differentiation of Alternaria species

Internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) and partial sequences of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1), β-tubulin, plasma membrane ATPase (ATPase), and calmodulin were amplified to investigate variation among Alternaria isolates. PCR amplification was performed the same as the components for histone H3 gene except the primers. The primers for ITS and other 6 gene fragments are shown in S1 Table. All PCR amplifications were conducted in 32 cycle repeats with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 4 min and final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The program of 32 cycles for each amplification is shown in S2 Table.

Data analyses

Sequence alignments were performed using Muscle algorithm [22] implemented in MEGA5 [23]. Histone H3 sequences of PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates were compared to reference sequence Accession number XP_018380551.1.

The phylogenetic analyses for individual and concatenated dataset of ITS region and 3 gene fragments including β-tubulin, ATPase and calmodulin were conducted using Bayesian inference (BI) implemented in MrBayes 3.2.5 [24] after nuleotide substitution saturation test by DAMEB [25]. Dataset of GPDH and TEF1 fragments were not used for phylogenetic analyses because they were all identical in 12 isolates. Concordance among datasets for concatenation was evaluated with the partition homogeneity test (PHT) implemented in PAUP 4.0b10 [26]. The best-fit model for each dataset was determined by JModeltest [27] which was K80 for ITS; HKY for β-tubulin and ATPase; HKY+I for calmodulin. Markov chains were run for 2,000,000 generations and sampled every 100 generations. Chain stationary and run parameter convergence were checked using TRACER 1.6 and the first 25% of the convergence runs were discarded as burn-in. The Bayesian consensus tree was generated with 50% majority rule and visualized in FigTree 1.4.3.

The association of molecular marker and Alternaria groups was evaluated by phylogeny–trait association analysis using BaTS 2.0 [28] in which association index (AI), parsimony score (PS), and maximum monophyletic clade (MC) were calculated. Statistical significance of trait association was determined by comparing the median posterior estimate for null distribution trees (n = 100, randomly generated) to that for observed values in which p values for all three statistics smaller than 0.05 were considered significant association.

Results

Identification of Alternaria species base on histone H3 gene

Based on a previously published method [10] to identify Alternaria species from potato, 11 and 68 of the 79 isolates from 8 provinces in China are likely to be A. alternata (PresA_alt) and A. tenuissima (PresA_ten), respectively. No isolates with amplicon corresponding to A. solani were observed (Table 1). PresA_ten isolates dominated in 7 out of 8 locations with one exception in Fujian province where PresA_alt isolates were more frequently observed. Six isolates of each PresA_alt and PresA_ten were randomly selected for further investigation (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Gel electrophoresis analysis of histone H3 gene amplicons from PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates with primers H3-1a and H3-1b.

M = GeneMarker 2 kb plus DNA ladder (Genstar); A1 to A6 are PresA_alt isolates of FJ1, FJ2, FJ3, HeB3, HeB8 and HeB10, respectively; T1 to T6 are PresA_ten isolates of HN5, NMG11, FJ7, HeB4, HeB6 and HeB11, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231961.g001

Histone H3 sequence comparison of PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates

The full length sequence of the histone H3 gene of our reference A. alternata isolate (Accession number: XP_018380551.1) was 473 bp in length and contained one intron 52 bp. The histone H3 gene sequence fragment amplified with primers H3-1a and H3-1b from six PresA_alt isolates was 440 bp in length and the sequence matched that of the reference isolates. The same fragment amplified from six PresA_ten isolates was 546 bp in length and contained two additional introns 54 bp and 52 bp in size (Fig 2). The deduced amino acid (AA) sequence was identical for all isolates, except for one AA change at position 10. At that position arginine (R) was found in all PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates instead of lysine (K) for the reference isolate (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Schematic of histone H3 gene in PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates.

Solid lines indicate introns, blank and gray rectangles indicate cloned and noncloned exons, respectively. Intron and noncloned exon sequences were inferred from Alternaria alternata isolate retrieved from GenBank (accession number: XP_018380551, Fig 2A). The vertical dotted line shows the estimated location of the amino acid variation identified in reference isolate, PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates. The difference in histone amplicon of PresA_ten isolates compared to PresA_alt isolates was showed in Fig 2C as first and third introns whose corresponding positions were indicated by the black triangle in Fig 2A and 2B.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231961.g002

Morphological characterization of PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates

The color of colonies on PDA medium varied both among PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates (Table 2 and S1 Fig). Growth rate for PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates were ranged from 0.56 to 0.94 and from 0.54 to 0.90, respectively, with no significant difference between those two groups. Similar conidia size and similar number of septa were also observed between PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates (Table 2). Conidia were obclavate or long ellipsoid in both PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates. Sporulation in branched chains were observed in four of each PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates (Table 2 and Fig 3). This was our first indication that the 12 isolates may belong to the same species and that differences in intron numbers in the histone H3 gene may just be natural genetic variation.

thumbnail
Fig 3.

Conidia morphology and branching sporulation of PresA_alt (A) and PresA_ten (B) isolates. The arrow showed the branching sporulation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231961.g003

thumbnail
Table 2. Phenotypic characteristics of PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231961.t002

Molecular genetic differentiation of PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates

The ITS region, GPDH, TEF1, β-tubulin, ATPase and calmodulin sequences were 544 bp, 597 bp, 257 bp, 492 bp, 1210 bp and 805 bp in length, respectively (Fig 4A). The sequences of GPDH and TEF1 were identical for all 12 PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates; two SNPs were found in both the ITS region and the β-tubulin gene but none was specific for either isolate group; 19 and 26 SNPs were found in the ATPase and the calmodulin genes, respectively, and again none of the mutations was specific for the two groups (Fig 4B and S3 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 4.

Amplicon size (A) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (B) in six DNA fragments. ITS, GPDH, TEF1, ATPase and Cal were represented internal transcribed spacer region, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, translation elongation factor 1-alpha, plasma membrane ATPase and calmodulin gene, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231961.g004

Phylogenetic analyses of PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates

GPDH and TEF1 gene sequences were not included in the phylogenetic analyses due to identical sequences for all 6 PresA_alt and 6 PresA_ten isolates. For the remaining five loci, all Iss (indicator of substitution saturation) were significantly smaller than Iss.c (the critical Iss values at which the sequences will begin to fail to recover the true tree) indicating little nucleotide substitution saturation (Table 3). PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates were not in separate clades based on the phylogenetic tree of ITS regions or any of the other four gene sequences. Only two PresA_alt isolates clustered together in the phylogenetic tree based on the ITS region (Fig 5A); PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates were intermixed based on β-tubulin, ATPase and calmodulin gene sequences (Fig 5B–5D). The PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates were also not separated when all four gene loci were combined (Fig 5E). The association of the two groups (i.e. Alternaria species) and phylogeny with each individual molecular marker or combined marker were all rejected with three statistic evaluations in which two at least were greater than 0.05 (AI > 0.05, PI > 0.05, MC > 0.05; Table 4).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree base on the DNA sequences in PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates.

The Bayesian posterior probabilities are showed at the nodes. White and black dot represent PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates, respectively. A-E was constructed on individual ITS (A), β-tubulin (B), ATPase (C) and calmodulin (D) sequence; E was constructed on combined sequences of above 4 sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231961.g005

thumbnail
Table 3. Saturation statistics of nucleotide substitution for all sites in four individual and one combined sequence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231961.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Test of Alternaria species and phylogeny association for four individual sequences and one combined sequence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231961.t004

Discussion

We erroneously identified two species in our collection of 79 isolates from major potato growing areas of China, based on a previously published method that uses histone H3 gene length for species distinction [10]. Our analysis of morphological features and various gene loci commonly used for fungal species distinction revealed that isolates presumed to A. alternata and A. tenuissima were indeed indistinguishable.

A.tenuissima can be distinguished from A. alternata based on key morphological features. A.tenuissima conidia are generally long and consist of unbranched chains whereas A. alternata produces distinct secondary conidiophores [29]. In our observation, PresA_ten isolates produced for this species atypical branched conidia chains (Fig 3), which indicated those isolates were not A. tenuissima but more likely A. alternata. In addition, no other differences in morphological features were found between the PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates from this study (Table 2).

Due to the difficulties of using morphological features for the identification of species, molecular techniques have been used widely to help dissect species. Neither of the six markers we used differentiated the PresA_alt from PresA_ten isolates. The GPDH and TEF1 genes are housekeeping genes that are generally preserved within species and were used to differentiate species of many genera [30,31]. For example, GPDH sequences were used to identify Alternaria species [32], Curvularia inaequalis and Bipolaris spicifera [33]. TEF1 sequences were used to identify Macrophomina phaseolina [34] or used together with other genes [35]. PresA_ten isolates did not cluster apart from PresA_alt isolates in phylogenetic trees based on ITS region, β-tubulin, ATPase or calmodulin genes. Although ribosomal ITS sequences proved difficult for use to separate the small-spored Alternaria species [7,10], it provided basic information for the identification of our species. In fact, only two PresA_alt and one PresA_ten isolates differed from all others based on a single SNP. In β-tubulin, the same two SNPS were found in each group (S3 Table). Although multiple SNPs and even some deletion were found in ATPase and calmodulin genes (Fig 5C and 5D), none were able to cluster the isolates. These molecular results revealed that the PresA_alt and PresA_ten isolates were not genetically distinguishable in key genes.

The combination of gene sequences for phylogenetic tree construction is often more informative compared to the comparison of individual genes. The use of concatenated datasets consisting of rDNA, TEF-α, RBP2 and β-tubulin has been recommended for the study of fungal taxa to improve traditional species concepts [36]. The multigene phylogeny has been applied widely in identification new species [37,38]. Our analysis shows no indication of isolate group separation between PresA_alt and PresA_ten regardless whether single gene sequences or concatenated gene sequences were analyzed (Fig 5E and Table 4).

In this study the molecular basis behind the different-sized histone H3 gene amplicon for PresA_ten and PresA_alt was explored. Two additional introns were observed in PresA_ten isolates resulting in larger amplicons; however, no difference in AA sequence was evident between any of the isolates used in this study to represent PresA_ten and PresA_alt. Therefore we conclude that the observed gene size differences due to intron insertions are simply part of intraspecies variations. Histone H3 variants are common in eukaryotic cells [3941]. Especially gains and losses of introns are widely observed both within and among species during the evolutionary process [4244]. The mechanism for intron gain and loss remains unknown, but diverse mechanisms for intron gain were proposed such as genomic duplication, transposable element insertion and mutations resulting in the creation of functional splicing sites and hence occurrence of new introns [4547]. The major mechanism for intron loss is thought to be recombination of a gene copy with a homologous transcribed RNA transcript [45].

Alignment of the histone H3 gene sequences identified in this study with sequences from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) verified that size differences are part of intraspecific variations. PresA_alt-type histone H3 sequence was found in A. alternata isolate ATCC 66892 (sequence number: AA2CTG00204) and PresA_ten-type histone H3 sequence was found in two other A. alternata isolates, ATCC 11680 and ATCC 66891 (sequence number: ATNCTG00656 and AATCTG00004, respectively). In addition, PresA_alt-type histone H3 sequence was found in A. tenuissima isolate ATCC 96828 (sequence number: AT2CTG00436). ATCC 66892, ATCC 66892 and ATCC 96828 were also identified by E.G. Simmons and designated EGS 34–016, EGS 34–039 and EGS 34–015, respectively [48].

We conclude that the histone H3 gene is not suitable to distinguish A. tenuissima from A. alternata and that the former species was likely overestimated in previous studies [10]. Morphological traits are still the most important basis in identifying Alternaria species in potato currently, and the presA_ten isolates identified by histone H3 gene were likely a differentiate genotype of A. alternata.

Supporting information

S2 Table. PCR settings of 32 cycles for amplification of the ITS region and six other gene fragments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231961.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Single nucleotide polymorsim (SNP) in ITS region, β-tubulin, plasma membrane ATPase (ATPase), and calmodulin.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231961.s003

(XLS)

S1 Fig.

Colony morphology of PresA_alt (A-C) and PresA_ten (D-F) isolates. A-C was the colony of A2, A5 and A6 isolate, respectively; D-F was the colony of T2, T5 and T6 isolate, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231961.s004

(JPG)

References

  1. 1. Tsedaley B (2014) Review on early blight (Alternaria spp.) of potato disease and its management options. J Biol Agric Healthc 4: 191–198.
  2. 2. Stevenson WR, James RV, Inglis DA, Johnson DA, Schotzko RT, et al. (2007) Fungicide spray programs for defender, a new potato cultivar with resistance to late blight and early blight. Plant Dis 91: 1327–1336. pmid:30780516
  3. 3. Kirk W, Wharton P (2012) Brown leaf spot. Mich. Ext. Bull. E-3182. Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
  4. 4. Jones LR, Grout AJ (1997) Notes on two species of Alternaria. J Torrey Bot Soc 24: 254–258.
  5. 5. Ardestani ST, Sharifnabi B, Zare R, Moghadam AA (2010) New Alternaria species associated with potato leaf spot in various potato growing region of Iran. Iran J Plant Pathol 45: 83–86.
  6. 6. Ayad D, Leclerc S, Hamon B, Kedad A, Bouznad Z, et al. (2017) First report of early blight caused by Alternaria protenta on potato in Algeria. Plant Dis 101: 836–837.
  7. 7. Landschoot S, Vandecasteele M, De Baets B, Hofte M, Audenaert K, et al. (2017) Identification of A. arborescens, A. grandis, and A. protenta as new members of the European Alternaria population on potato. Fungal Biol 121: 172–188. pmid:28089048
  8. 8. Shoaib A, Akhtar N, Akhtar S, Hafeez R (2014) First report of Alternaria longipes causing leaf spot of potato cultivar sante in Pakistan. Plant Dis 98: 1742.
  9. 9. Tymon LS, Peever TL, Johnson DA (2016) Identification and enumeration of small-spored Alternaria species associated with potato in the US Northwest. Plant Dis 100: 465–472. pmid:30694153
  10. 10. Zheng HH, Zhao J, Wang TY, Wu XH (2015) Characterization of Alternaria species associated with potato foliar diseases in China. Plant Pathol 64: 425–433.
  11. 11. Gannibal PB, Orina AS, Mironenko NV, Levitin MM (2014) Differentiation of the closely related species, Alternaria solani and A. tomatophila, by molecular and morphological features and aggressiveness. Eur J Plant Pathol 139: 609–623.
  12. 12. Tymon L, Johnson DA (2014) Fungicide resistance of two species of Alternaria from potato in the Columbia basin of Washington. Plant Dis 98: 1648–1653. pmid:30703884
  13. 13. Rueda-Hernandez KR, Cardona AS, Cadavid-Restrepo GE, Benjumea CIS, Gutierrez GPC, et al. (2013) Differential organ distribution, pathogenicity and benomyl sensitivity of Colletotrichum spp. from blackberry plants in Northern Colombia. J Phytopathol 161: 246–253.
  14. 14. Chen SN, Luo CX, Hu MJ, Schnabel G (2016) Sensitivity of Colletotrichum species, including C. fioriniae and C. nymphaeae, from peach to demethylation inhibitor fungicides. Plant Dis 100: 2434–2441. pmid:30686167
  15. 15. Hu M-J, Grabke A, Dowling ME, Holstein HJ, Schnabel G (2015) Resistance in Colletotrichum siamense from peach and blueberry to thiophanate-methyl and azoxystrobin. Plant Dis 99: 806–814. pmid:30699530
  16. 16. Peres NAR, Souza NL, Zitko SE, Timmer LW (2002) Activity of benomyl for control of postbloom fruit drop of citrus caused by Colletotrichum acutatum. Plant Dis 86: 620–624. pmid:30823234
  17. 17. Ishii H, Zhen F, Hu M, Li X, Schnabel G (2016) Efficacy of SDHI fungicides, including benzovindiflupyr, against Colletotrichum species. Pest Manag Sci 72: 1844–1853. pmid:26732510
  18. 18. Thomma B (2003) Alternaria spp.: from general saprophyte to specific parasite. Mol Plant Pathol 4: 225–236. pmid:20569383
  19. 19. Chen FP, Fan JR, Zhou T, Liu XL, Liu JL, et al. (2012) Baseline sensitivity of Monilinia fructicola from China to the DMI fungicide SYP-Z048 and analysis of mutants. Plant Dis 96: 416–422. pmid:30727143
  20. 20. Glass NL, Donaldson GC (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol 61: 1323–1330. pmid:7747954
  21. 21. Nirenberg HI, Aoki T (1997) Fusarium nisikadoi, a new species from Japan. Mycoscience 38: 329–333.
  22. 22. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792–1797. pmid:15034147
  23. 23. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30: 2725–2729. pmid:24132122
  24. 24. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, et al. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61: 539–542. pmid:22357727
  25. 25. Xia X (2017) DAMBE6: new tools for microbial genomics, phylogenetics, and molecular evolution. J Hered 108: 431–437. pmid:28379490
  26. 26. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates; Sunderland, MA.
  27. 27. Nylander JAA (2008) MrModeltest v2.3. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
  28. 28. Parker J, Rambaut A, Pybus OG (2008) Correlating viral phenotypes with phylogeny: accounting for phylogenetic uncertainty. Infect Genet Evol 8: 239–246. pmid:17921073
  29. 29. Simmons EG (2007) Alternaria: an identification manual. CBS Biodiversity Series. 6:1–775.
  30. 30. Kiss N, Homa M, Manikandan P, Mythili A, Krizsan K, et al. (2020) New species of the genus Curvularia: C. tamilnaduensis and C. coimbatorensis from fungal Keratitis cases in South India. Pathogens 9.
  31. 31. Heidari K, Mehrabi-Koushki M, Farokhinejad R (2018) Curvularia mosaddeghii sp nov., a novel species from the family Pleosporaceae. Mycosphere 9: 635–646.
  32. 32. Jaouani A, Neifar M, Prigione V, Ayari A, Sbissi I, et al. (2014) Diversity and enzymatic profiling of halotolerant micromycetes from Sebkha El Melah, a Saharan salt flat in Southern Tunisia. Biomed Res Int 2014: 439197. pmid:25136587
  33. 33. Amaradasa BS, Amundsen K (2014) First report of Curvularia inaequalis and Bipolaris spicifera causing leaf blight of buffalograss in Nebraska. Plant Dis 98: 279–279.
  34. 34. Sousa ES, Melo MP, Pires LL, Silva BA, Garcia MEM, et al. (2017) First report of Macrophomina phaseolina causing charcoal rot in lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) in Brazil. Plant Dis 101: 1551–1551.
  35. 35. de Hoog GS, Nishikaku AS, Fernandez-Zeppenfeldt G, Padin-Gonzalez C, Burger E, et al. (2007) Molecular analysis and pathogenicity of the Cladophialophora carrionii complex, with the description of a novel species. Stud Mycol 58: 219–234. pmid:18491001
  36. 36. Hyde KD, Hongsanan S, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, McKenzie EHC, et al. (2016) Fungal diversity notes 367–490: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers 80: 1–270.
  37. 37. Pem D, Hyde KD, Doilom M, Camporesi E, Hongsanan S, et al. (2019) Multigene phylogenetic analyses to establish new Valsaria species and taxonomic significance of spore ornamentation. PLoS ONE 14: e0217982. pmid:31242234
  38. 38. Kawai H, Akita S, Hashimoto K, Hanyuda T (2020) A multigene molecular phylogeny of Eisenia reveals evidence for a new species, Eisenia nipponica (Laminariales), from Japan. Eur J Phycol.
  39. 39. Tang MCW, Jacobs SA, Mattiske DM, Soh YM, Graham AN, et al. (2015) Contribution of the two genes encoding histone variant H3.3 to viability and fertility in mice. PLoS Genet 11.
  40. 40. Allis CD, Glover CV, Gorovsky MA (1979) Micronuclei of Tetrahymena contain two types of histone H3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 4857–4861. pmid:291904
  41. 41. Lee HR, Zhang WL, Langdon T, Jin WW, Yan HH, et al. (2005) Chromatin immunoprecipitation cloning reveals rapid evolutionary patterns of centromeric DNA in Oryza species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 11793–11798. pmid:16040802
  42. 42. Zhang L-Y, Yang Y-F, Niu D-K (2010) Evaluation of models of the mechanisms underlying intron loss and gain in Aspergillus fungi. J Mol Evol 71: 364–373. pmid:20862581
  43. 43. Milia G, Camiolo S, Avesani L, Porceddu A (2015) The dynamic loss and gain of introns during the evolution of the Brassicaceae. Plant J 82: 915–924. pmid:25899207
  44. 44. Croll D, McDonald BA (2012) Intron gains and losses in the evolution of Fusarium and Cryptococcus fungi. Genome Biol Evol 4: 1148–1161. pmid:23054310
  45. 45. Roy SW, Irimia M (2009) Mystery of intron gain: new data and new models. Trends Genet 25: 67–73. pmid:19070397
  46. 46. Roy SW (2009) Intronization, de-intronization and intron sliding are rare in Cryptococcus. BMC Evol Biol 9: 192. pmid:19664208
  47. 47. Koonin EV (2009) Intron-dominated genomes of early ancestors of eukaryotes. J Hered 100: 618–623. pmid:19617525
  48. 48. Dang HX, Pryor B, Peever T, Lawrence CB (2015) The Alternaria genomes database: a comprehensive resource for a fungal genus comprised of saprophytes, plant pathogens, and allergenic species. BMC Genomics 16.