Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Risk factors associated with mortality in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. A prospective, longitudinal, unicenter study in Reus, Spain

  • Simona Iftimie,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain

  • Ana F. López-Azcona,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain

  • Manuel Vicente-Miralles,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain

  • Ramon Descarrega-Reina,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain

  • Anna Hernández-Aguilera,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Unitat de Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain, Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain

  • Francesc Riu,

    Roles Investigation, Resources

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain

  • Josep M. Simó,

    Roles Investigation, Resources

    Affiliation Laboratori de Referència del Camp de Tarragona i Terres de l’Ebre, Reus, Spain

  • Pedro Garrido,

    Roles Investigation, Resources

    Affiliation Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain

  • Jorge Joven,

    Roles Investigation, Resources

    Affiliation Unitat de Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain

  • Jordi Camps ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    jcamps@grupsagessa.com

    Affiliation Unitat de Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain

  • Antoni Castro

    Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain

Abstract

Spain is one of the countries that has suffered the most from the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the strain that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is a lack of information on the characteristics of this disease in the Spanish population. The objective of this study has been to characterize our patients from an epidemiological point of view and to identify the risk factors associated with mortality in our geographical area. We performed a prospective, longitudinal study on 188 hospitalized cases of SARS-Cov-2 infection in Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, in Reus, Spain, admitted between 15th March 2020 and 30th April 2020. We recorded demographic data, signs and symptoms and comorbidities. We also calculated the Charlson and McCabe indices. A total of 43 deaths occurred during the study period. Deceased patients were older than the survivors (77.7 ± 13.1 vs. 62.8 ± 18.4 years; p < 0.001). Logistic regression analyses showed that fever, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, diabetes mellitus and cancer were the variables that showed independent and statistically significant associations with mortality. The Charlson index was more efficient than the McCabe index in discriminating between deceased and survivors.

This is one of the first studies to describe the factors associated with mortality in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Spain, and one of the few in the Mediterranean area. We identified the main factors independently associated with mortality in our population. Further studies are needed to complete and confirm our findings.

Introduction

In January 2020, a new type of coronavirus was identified as the causative factor in a series of cases of severe pneumonia in the city of Wuhan, province of Hubei, in the People's Republic of China [1]. The World Health Organization gave the official name 'COVID-19' for this coronavirus disease, as well as the term 'severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2' (SARS-CoV-2) for the virus [2]. This virus is currently the cause of a global pandemic, producing hundreds of thousands of hospital admissions and deaths, with enormous effects on the health and life of the population and serious economic consequences for society. On 1st February, 2020, the first case of a SARS-CoV-2 positive patient in Spain was reported on the island of La Gomera [3] and, following that, the first cases diagnosed in the autonomous region of Catalonia date from 5th March [4]. The incubation period for SARS-CoV-2 ranges from 5 to 6 days on average, with cases being possible from 0 to 14 days [5]. The most common period of transmission of the virus begins 1–2 days before the onset of symptoms, and lasts for up to 5–6 days after the onset of symptoms [6]. The basic reproductive rate R (the average of new cases secondary to a primary case) in our country is, at the time of writing, estimated to be <1; globally, the R number ranges from 0 to 6 depending on various factors, in particular the political and public health measures imposed by the various governments that focus on complete cleaning of public spaces and a decrease in contact between individuals [7]. Identifying the epidemiological characteristics of this disease will help appropriate decisions to be made and thus to control the epidemic. Certain clinical symptoms of COVID-19 have been reported previously. The most frequent are: fever, dry cough, asthenia, expectoration, dyspnea, sore throat, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, chills, nausea or vomiting, nasal congestion, diarrhea, hemoptysis and conjunctival congestion (from highest to lowest frequency) [8,9]. Occasionally, symptoms of a different nature appear: neurological, such as altered consciousness or dizziness; cardiological, such as acute myocardial damage or heart failure; or ophthalmological, such as dry eye, blurred vision, foreign body sensation and conjunctival congestion [1013].

To date, there is still a lack of information on the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection outside China. Spain is one of the Western European countries that has suffered the most from the impact of COVID-19 and this pandemic has had a great impact on our public health system. The present study reports the results of an analysis of all cases hospitalized in the Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, which is affiliated to the Universitat Rovira i Virgili, in Reus, Catalonia, Spain. The objective of the present study has been to characterize our patients' epidemiology and to identify the risk factors associated with mortality for this disease in our geographical area.

Materials and methods

Study design

This is a prospective longitudinal study conducted on all hospitalized cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, in Reus, Spain admitted between 15th March 2020 and 30th April 2020. This hospital has 392 beds provided for hospitalization and social health care and is part of the Hospital Network for Public Use in Catalonia. It acts as a general hospital for a population of over 175,000 inhabitants, including primary care centers and residences for the elderly in the area. It is a reference center for the specialities of Oncology and Radiotherapy for the whole of the Tarragona province, which has a population of 550,000 inhabitants. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using swab samples from the upper respiratory tract (nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal exudate), from the lower respiratory tract (sputum/endotracheal aspirate/bronchoalveolar lavage/bronchial aspirate) or from the lower digestive tract (rectal smear). Tests were carried out with the VIASURE SARS-CoV-2 Real Time PCR Detection Kit that detects ORF1ab and N genes (CerTest Biotec, Zaragoza, Spain). RNA was extracted in a QIAcube apparatus with RNeasy reagents (Qiagen N.V., Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and analyses were carried out in a 7500 Fast RT-PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA,USA). We recorded demographic data, comorbidities, and other acute or chronic infections. We also calculated the McCabe score as an index of clinical prognosis [14] and the Charlson index (abbreviated version) as a way of categorizing a patient's comorbidity [15]. The only inclusion criterion was to be a hospitalized patient with an analytical diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. We excluded hospitalized patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection but without laboratory confirmation, or patients who did not require hospitalization, with or without laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thirty-four patients required transfer to the Intensive Care Unit based on the attending specialist's criteria, and taking into account the CURB65 scale and the ATS/IDSA criteria [16,17]. This study was approved by the Comitè d’Ètica i Investigació en Medicaments (Institutional Review Board) of Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan (Resolution CEIM 040/2018, amended on 16 April 2020).

Statistical analyses

Data are shown as means and standard deviations or as numbers and percentages. Statistical comparisons between two groups were carried out with the Student’s t test (quantitative variables) or the χ-square test (categorical variables). Logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the combined effect of selected variables on mortality. The diagnostic accuracy of the McCabe and Charlson indices in predicting mortality was assessed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis [18]. Statistical significance was set at p ≤0.05. All calculations were made using the SPSS 25.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

The raw data for this article are shown as Supporting Information. During the study period, a total of 188 patients were hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The mean age was 66.4 ± 18.4 years (Range: 0–102) and a small majority were men (55.8 vs. 44.2%; p < 0.001). One hundred and eighteen patients were admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine, 34 to the Intensive Care Unit, and 36 to the Social Health Unit. Thirty-two patients were admitted to hospital due to causes unrelated to the suspicion of COVID-19 infection but gave a positive result in the RT-PCR. A total of 43 deaths occurred during the entire study period (Fig 1), so the case fatality rate was 22.9% based on the total number of COVID-19 hospitalized patients. Deceased patients were significantly older than the survivor patients (77.7 ± 13.1 vs. 62.8 ± 18.4 years; p < 0.001). Thirty-seven patients died of respiratory failure, 4 of multi-organ failure and 2 of cardiogenic shock. A total of 125 patients (66.5%) had chronic underlying diseases. Some seriously ill patients could not be admitted to the ICU due to their pathological history and/or comorbidities associated with their advanced age and who made aggressive treatments inadvisable.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Flow chart showing the distribution of hospitalized patients and the evolution of their disease.

DIM, Department of Internal Medicine; ICU, Intensive Care Unit; SHU, Social Health Unit.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234452.g001

The relationships between COVID-19 and the demographic and clinical variables are shown in Table 1 and Fig 2. Most of the cases and deaths were of patients between 70 and 89 years old (Fig 2A). The signs and symptoms present in more than 50% of the patients were, in descending order, fever (64.9%), dyspnea (58.0%), pneumonia (57.4%), and cough (51.6%) (Fig 2B). The most relevant comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases (50.5%), type 2 diabetes mellitus (26.0%), and chronic neurological diseases (19.1%) (Fig 2C). We also evaluated whether patients had had any behaviour that might be considered risky in the days prior to admission, and we observed that a high proportion of patients had attended another health center in the previous month or had been in contact with people infected with SARS-CoV-2 or with respiratory problems over the previous 14 days (Fig 2F). Five employees of our institution or the associated residences were hospitalized for COVID-19, although not requiring either intensive measures or ventilatory support.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Distribution of ages, clinical variables, and risk factors among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The numbers above the bars indicate the number of deceased patients. AKF, acute kidney failure; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CLD, chronic liver disease; CLUD, chronic lung disease; CND, chronic neurological disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; NFD, non-fatal disease; RFD, rapidly fatal disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; UFD, ultimately fatal disease.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234452.g002

thumbnail
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 infection.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234452.t001

Most of the patients presented low values on the Charlson and McCabe indices and, as expected, higher scores were associated with higher mortality (Fig 2D and 2E). When comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the ROC curves of these indices in their ability to discriminate between deceased patients and survivors, we found that Charlson index was more efficient, with higher values of the area under the curve (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) plots of Charlson and McCabe indices in COVID-19 patients and segregated with respect to mortality.

AUC, area under the curve.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234452.g003

Finally, since the different symptoms and comorbidities can be mutually interdependent and present cause-effect relationships between them, we wanted to identify which factors were independently associated with mortality. Logistic regression analyses showed that the presence of fever, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus and cancer were the only variables that showed an independent and statistically significant association with mortality when they were adjusted for differences in age, gender, smoking status and alcohol intake (Tables 2 and 3).

thumbnail
Table 2. Logistic regression analysis on the relationships of signs and symptoms with deaths for COVID-19a.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234452.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis on the relationships of comorbidities with deaths for COVID-19a.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234452.t003

One hundred and thirty-seven patients (72.9%) required one or more than one type of respiratory intervention, including noninvasive (face mask) or invasive (endotracheal tube) mechanical ventilation, high flow oxygen therapy (up to 60 L/min.) or conventional oxygen therapy (Table 4). No significant differences in mortality were observed in patients requiring globally analyzed respiratory intervention (25.5 vs. 17.6%, p = 0.173), but there was a non-significant trend towards higher mortality in the subgroup of patients receiving high flow oxygen therapy (38.9 vs. 21.8%, p = 0.094). Moreover, we did not find any significant difference in mortality in relation to whether patients were treated with anticoagulants or corticosteroids or not (Anticoagulants: 24.1 vs. 17.6%, p = 0.399; Corticosteroids: 26.0 vs. 21.8%, p = 0.318).

thumbnail
Table 4. Selected treatments in patients with COVID-19 infection.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234452.t004

Discussion

We carried out a RT-PCR determination for all the patients admitted to our center, regardless of the diagnosis. Thirty-two patients (17.0%) admitted for reasons other than suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection gave a positive result despite not presenting any symptoms. We believe that this is important since it highlights the need to perform diagnostic tests for this disease in all hospitalized patients, something which has not been given sufficient attention in the scientific literature.

Most of our patients were over 60 years old and mortality was very high (47.0%) among those over 80 years old. These results are consistent with those published so far, which show that age is one of the most important risk factors for COVID-19 [1922]. It is accepted that age is a risk factor for respiratory diseases [19,23,24] and impairment of immune function associated with age has been identified as a major cause of high mortality due to severe pneumonia [23]. We observed a higher mortality rate in patients treated with high flow oxygen therapy, but the observed differences did not reach statistical significance. The limited size of our sample prevents us from obtaining reliable conclusions in this regard. Among the signs and symptoms of the disease, we found that fever, pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome were the only factors independently associated with mortality when adjusted for age, smoking and alcohol intake. These factors are among those that have been most frequently found in patients with COVID-19 in most of the studies conducted in China [19,25,26]. We did not observe any independent relationship between cough, chills or gastrointestinal disturbances and mortality, despite being present in a relatively high proportion of subjects, something which differs from what has been published previously [19].

The comorbidities showing a significant relationship with mortality were type 2 diabetes mellitus and cancer. We did not find any independent association with any other chronic metabolic disease, such as cardiovascular disease or others. The univariate analysis showed a high number of patients with these chronic alterations and the logistic regression analysis identified diabetes as the most relevant. Indeed, all of these metabolic diseases are closely related. Diabetes is a causative factor of hypertension and metabolic syndrome and these, in turn, can cause heart, vascular, liver, neurological and kidney diseases. Our study therefore suggests that diabetes might be a triggering factor for these disorders and therefore is related to mortality in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus has also been reported to be one of the most important factors related with COVID-19 severity in previous investigations conducted in China, Israel and Italy [25,2729]. Indeed, the Italian study reported that 2/3 of the patients who died were diabetic [29]. Furthermore, diabetes is linked to a higher mortality in other viral infections, such as those caused by influenza A(H1N1), MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV viruses [30,31]. We also found a close relationship between cancer and COVID-19 mortality. One aspect that caught our attention is that, despite our hospital being the reference center for Oncology in our province, the number of cancer patients infected with COVID-19 was relatively low. It might be that the corticosteroids often prescribed for the treatment of these patients offered some protection, as some studies have suggested [32,33]. However, we did not observe any significant difference in mortality in relation to whether patients were treated with corticosteroids or not. An alternative explanation is that, perhaps, these patients were more careful than the general population during confinement, which unfortunately cannot be proven. Having said that, the relationship between cancer and the mortality of our patients was evident. Patients with cancer are often immunosuppressed and as a result they are more likely to worsen rapidly if infected by SARS-Cov-2. Wuhan studies report that the incidence of cancer is higher in COVID-19 patients than in the general population [34,35]. However, definitive conclusions on this issue are hampered by the small sample size, the retrospective nature of most studies, the limited follow-up duration, and the heterogeneity of the disease and treatment strategies [36,37].

The influence of smoking on COVID-19 is controversial. An unusually low prevalence of current smoking among infected patients was observed in China [38] and the plausibility of using medicinal nicotine to lower infection and mitigate disease severity has been proposed [39]. However, other studies indicate that smokers might be at higher risk because nicotine can directly impact the putative receptor for the virus (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) and lead to harmful signaling in lung epithelial cells [40]. In the present study, we have found no firm positive or negative relationship between tobacco use and mortality because only 9 patients (4.8%) were active smokers at the time of the study. That might be explained by their generally advanced age and because many of them were suffering from chronic ailments that had advised them to quit tobacco use.

A novel aspect of our study has been to investigate the usefulness of some frequently used clinical scores in the evaluation of infectious diseases. We found that the Charlson index, which categorizes comorbidity might be more useful than the McCabe index in predicting death in these patients. We chose these indices because they are easy to apply in all patients, both in the less severe, and in those receiving palliative treatment or admitted to the Social Health Unit. Other scores are difficult to apply in less severe patients. For example, the CURB 1 scale only applies to patients with pneumonia [41]. The quick SOFA index requires measurement of respiratory rate, a data not frequently collected in milder patients [42], and SOFA and SAPS-II require arterial blood gas analysis, which is difficult to justify in patients not admitted to the ICU [43]. A limitation of the present study is the small sample size. Ours is not a big hospital and covers a relatively small geographical area. However, we believe that the results obtained are relevant since they might be representative of many similar centers in Western Europe and in the Mediterranean area, and little information is yet available on this issue.

Conclusion

This is one of the first studies to describe the factors related with death in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Spain, and one of the few from the Mediterranean basin. Our results identify age, fever, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus and cancer as independent factors predicting lethality. Further studies are needed in similar centers to complete and confirm our findings.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to all the staff of the Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, doctors, nurses, assistants, cleaning and security personnel, and all the volunteer students, who with their enormous effort are managing to overcome this dramatic situation. Editorial assistance was provided by Phil Hoddy at the Service of Linguistic Resources of the Universitat Rovira i Virgili.

References

  1. 1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 727–733. pmid:31978945
  2. 2. World Health Organization. Naming the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the virus that causes it. Available at https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it. Accessed May 26, 2020.
  3. 3. Ballester-Arnal R, Gil-Llario MD. The virus that changed Spain: Impact of COVID-19 on people with HIV. AIDS Behav. 2020; 1–5.
  4. 4. Santamaria L, Hortal J. Chasing the ghost of infection past: identifying thresholds of change during the COVID-19 infection in Spain. MedRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.09.20059345.
  5. 5. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, hina, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382:1199–1207. pmid:31995857
  6. 6. Anderson RM, Heesterbeek H, Klinkenberg D, Hollingsworth TD. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Lancet. 2020; 395:931–934. pmid:32164834
  7. 7. Zhang S, Diao M, Yu W, Pei L, Lin Z, Chen D. Estimation of the reproductive number of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and the probable outbreak size on the Diamond Princess cruise ship: A data-driven analysis. Int J Infect Dis 2020; 93:201–204. pmid:32097725
  8. 8. Lovato A, de Filippis C. Clinical presentation of COVID-19: A systematic review focusing on upper airway symptoms. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020; Apr.13:145561320920762. [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32283980
  9. 9. Jin Y, Yang H, Ji W, Wu W, Chen S, Zhang W, et al. Virology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and control of COVID-19. Viruses, 2020; 12:pii: E372. pmid:32230900
  10. 10. Baig AM. Neurological manifestations in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2020; 26:499–501. pmid:32266761
  11. 11. Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY, Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020; 17:259–260. pmid:32139904
  12. 12. Wu P, Duan F, Luo C, Liu Q, Qu X, Liang L, et al. Characteristics of ocular findings of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei Province, China. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020: Mar 31. [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32232433
  13. 13. Chen L, Liu M, Zhang Z, Qiao K, Huang T, Chen M, et al. Ocular manifestations of a hospitalised patient with confirmed 2019 novel coronavirus disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020; pii:bjophthalmol-2020-316304. [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32265202
  14. 14. McCabe WR, Jackson JJ. Gram-negative bacteremia. I. Etiology and ecology. Arch Intern Med. 1962; 110:847–864.
  15. 15. Berkman LF, Leo-Summers L, Horwitz RI. Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction. A prospective, population-based study of the elderly. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 117: 1003–1009. pmid:1443968
  16. 16. Hai-yan L, Guo Q, Song W, Zhou Y, Li M, Chen X, et al. Modified IDSA/ATS minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia best predicted mortality. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94:e1474. pmid:26356705
  17. 17. Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, Boersma WG, Karalus N, Town GI, et al. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003; 58:377–382. pmid:12728155
  18. 18. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993; 39:561–577. pmid:8472349
  19. 19. Sun H, Ning R, Tao Y, Yu C, Deng X, Zhao C, et al. Risk factors for mortality in 244 older adults with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020; [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32383809
  20. 20. Leung C. Risk factors for predicting mortality in elderly patients with COVID-19: A review of clinical data in China. Mech Ageing Dev. 2020; 188:111255. pmid:32353398
  21. 21. Liu K, Chen Y, Lin R, Han K. Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: A comparison with young and middle-aged patients. J. Infect. 2020; pii: S0163-4453(20)30116-X. [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32171866
  22. 22. Nikpouraghdam M, Jalali Farahani A, Alishiri G, Heydari S, Ebrahimnia M, Samadinia H, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in IRAN: A single center study. J Clin Virol. 2020; 127:104378. pmid:32353762
  23. 23. Chong CP, Street PR. Pneumonia in the elderly: A review of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, microbiology, and clinical features. South Med J. 2008; 101:1141–1145. pmid:19088525
  24. 24. Shu J Pneumonia in the elderly: understanding the characteristics. South Med J. 2008; 101:1086. pmid:19088511
  25. 25. Huang R, Zhu L, Xue L, Liu L, Yan X, Wang J, et al. Clinical findings of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Jiangsu province, China: A retrospective, multi-center study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020; 14:e0008280. [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32384078
  26. 26. Xu X, Yu C, Qu J, Zhang L, Jiang S, Huang D, et al. Imaging and clinical features of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Eur J Nucl Med. Mol Imaging 2020; 47:1275–1280. pmid:32107577
  27. 27. Itelman E, Wasserstrum Y, Segev A, Avaky C, Negru L, Cohen D, et al. Clinical characterization of 162 COVID-19 patients in Israel: Preliminary report from a large tertiary center. Isr Med Assoc J. 2020; 22:271–274. [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32378815
  28. 28. Penlioglou T, Papachristou S, Papanas N. COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus: May old anti-diabetic agents become the new philosopher's stone? Diabetes Ther. 2020; 1–3. [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32382358
  29. 29. Remuzzi A, Remuzzi G. COVID-19 and Italy: what next? Lancet. 2020; 395:1225–1228. pmid:32178769
  30. 30. Badawi A, Ryoo SG. Prevalence of diabetes in the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Public Health Res. 2016; 21:733. pmid:28083520
  31. 31. Yang JK, Feng Y, Yuan MY, Yuan SY, Fu HJ, Wu BY. Plasma glucose levels and diabetes are independent predictors for mortality and morbidity in patients with SARS. Diabet Med. 2006; 23:623–628. pmid:16759303
  32. 32. Veronese N, Demurtas J, Yang L, Tonelli R, Barbagallo M, Lopalco P. Use of corticosteroids in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia: A systematic review of the literature. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020; 7:170. pmid:32391369
  33. 33. Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson J, Mafham M, Bell J, Landary MJ. Effect of dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 –preliminary report. MedRxiv, June 22, 2020;
  34. 34. Yu J, Ouyang W, Chua MLK, Xie C. SARS-CoV-2 transmission in patients with cancer at a tertiary care hospital in Wuhan, China. JAMA Oncol. 2020; [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32211820
  35. 35. Zhang L, Zhu F, Xie L, Wang C, Wang J, Chen R. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19-infected cancer patients: a retrospective case study in three hospitals within Wuhan, China. Ann Oncol. 2020; pii: S0923-7534(20)36383-3. [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32224151
  36. 36. Xia Y, Jin R, Zhao J, Li W, Shen H. Risk of COVID-19 for patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21:e180. pmid:32142622
  37. 37. Sidaway P. COVID-19 and cancer: what we know so far. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020; [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32265531
  38. 38. Farsalinos K, Barbouni A, Niaura R. Systematic review of the prevalence of current smoking among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in China: could nicotine be a therapeutic option? Intern Emerg Med. 2020; [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32385628
  39. 39. Tindle HA, Newhouse PA, Freiberg MS. Beyond smoking cessation: Investigating medicinal nicotine to prevent and treat COVID-19. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020; pii: ntaa077. [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32383751
  40. 40. Olds JL, Kabbani N. Is nicotine exposure linked to cardiopulmonary vulnerability to COVID-19 in the general population? FEBS J. 2020; [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:32189428
  41. 41. Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, Boersma WG, Karalus N, Town GI, et al. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: An international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003; 58:377–382. pmid:12728155
  42. 42. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M; Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315:801–810. pmid:26903338
  43. 43. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A New Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) Based on a European/North American Multicenter Study. JAMA. 1993; 270:2957–2963. pmid:8254858