Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The longitudinal impact of employment, retirement and disability status on depressive symptoms among men living with HIV in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study

  • Deanna Ware ,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    dpf38@georgetown.edu

    Affiliation Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America

  • Sergio Rueda,

    Roles Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Science, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

  • Michael Plankey ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ These authors are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America

  • Pamela Surkan,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America

  • Chukwuemeka N. Okafor,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Public Health, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, United States of America

  • Linda Teplin,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America

  • M. Reuel Friedman

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ These authors are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America

Abstract

Many persons living with HIV (PLWH) either reduced their employment capacity or stopped work completely due to disease progression. With the advent of effective antiretroviral therapy, some PLWH were able to return to the workforce and many are now transitioning into retirement. We examined the histories of employment, retirement and disability status on depression among 1,497 Participants living with HIV from 1997 to 2015 in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Data were collected on depressive symptoms, employment, retirement, disability status as well as HIV-related and sociodemographic characteristics. Employment, retirement and disability status were lagged 2 years to assess whether the risk of depression at a given observation were temporally predicted by each respective status, adjusting for prior depressive symptoms and covariates. Being employed (aOR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.71–0.82) had lower odds of depression risk two years later compared to those unemployed. There were higher odds of depression risk associated with disability (aOR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.32–1.54) versus those not on disability. Retirement status was not associated with the risk of depressive symptoms. These findings could help inform policies and employment programs to facilitate the return to work for PLWH who are willing and able to work.

Introduction

Prior to the advent of potent combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), persons living with HIV (PLWH) dealt with the consequences of an episodic illness that limit their ability to participate in the workforce [13]. Wunderlich et al reported an increase in disability benefit awards to individuals based to their HIV infection in the late 80s, supporting the notion that many PLWH were unable to work [4]. With advancements in the management of HIV, some PLWH were presented with the opportunity to return to the workforce and many now are beginning the transition into retirement [1, 3, 5].

Unemployment has been identified as an independent predictor of depression in general populations [68]. Conversely, a systematic review of longitudinal studies showed a beneficial effect of return to work on health in working-aged adults and in a variety of times and settings [9]. The health benefits associated with going back to work in general populations resulted from health improvements after reemployment or health declines associated with continued unemployment. Specifically, PLWH who are unable to work are at significantly increased risk for psychological distress, suicidal ideation, psychiatric symptoms, anxiety, and are more than twice as likely to be hospitalized or die [1013]. Benefits of employment and working conditions among PLWH have also been documented. Participation in employment has been associated with better physical and mental health among PLWH [14]. The quality of employmentor the presence of adverse psychosocial work conditions, such as job insecurity, high psychological demands, and lack of decision authorityalso matters to health and depressive symptoms, suggesting that “bad jobs” may not offer the same mental health advantages as “good jobs” [15, 16]. In a large-scale study of 2,864 PLWH, researchers found that those who were employed reported lower depression symptoms and increased social functioning than those who were not employed [17]. A similar study reported that employed PLWH better handled life difficulties, had lower psychological stress, and better managed their health than unemployed PLWH [18]. Despite the potential health advantages of employment, unemployment rates among PLWH remain higher than the general population [1922].

Previous literature has been inconsistent in regards to the impact of retirement on mental health. Mandel and Roe (2008) reported improved mental health of older individuals who are retired [23]. Another study reported lower levels of depression during an individual’s first year of retirement, and higher levels thereafter [24]. Retirement is correlated with decreased physical health, decreased mobility, and challenges with activities of daily living, which becoming increasing present with older age [25, 26]. Further, information regarding retirement and depression among PLHWA. Therefore, it is important to ascertain any potential impact of retirement on mental health among aging populations living with HIV.

While the relationship between employment, disability and retirement and depression has been established in the general population, information is limited among PLWH. Rueda [27] conducted the first US-based longitudinal study using data from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) to investigate the relationship between employment and health-related quality of life among PLWH. While they found employment to be associated with better physical and mental quality of life over time, the study was not designed to examine a time-lagged temporal effect between employment status and mental health [27] nor the relationship between retirement and depression risk. We sought to investigate the impact of employment, retirement and disability history on future risk of depression among participants living with HIV in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study from 1997 to 2015. We decided to conduct time-lagged analyses to allow for the potential effects of employment, disability, and retirement on health outcomes to become salient during the observation period, and we also wanted to consider the potential adaptation to the experience of retirement or disability [28]. We hypothesize that employed and retired participants will have a lower depression risk while those on disability will have a higher depression risk, after controlling for clinical and sociodemographic covariates.

Materials and methods

Population

Since 1984, the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) has enrolled successive observational cohorts of men who have sex with men (MSM) with and without HIV in four US sites: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania/Columbus, Ohio; Los Angeles, California; Chicago, Illinois; and Baltimore, Maryland /Washington, DC. Since its inception in 1984, a total of 7,352 participants have been enrolled in the study over 4 periods: 4,954 in 1984–1985; 668 in 1987–1991; 1350 in 2001–2003; 380 in 2011-current. MACS participants are seen at semiannual visits to undertake blood draws, physical exams, and behavioral and medical questionnaires. The MACS study design has been described elsewhere [29, 30]. Questionnaires are available at www.aidscohortstudy.org. Institutional review boards at John Hopkins University, Northwestern University, University of California Los Angeles and University of Pittsburgh approved the protocol, and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. The current analyses center on employment, disability, and retirement status and depressive symptomatology collected from 1,497 MACS participants living with HIV over an 18-year period, between October 1997—September 2015 (study visits 28 and 63).

Covariates

Sociodemographics.

Each participant reported race/ethnicity and date of birth at their enrollment visit. Age was calculated at each visit and categorized as 18–29; 30–39; 40–49; 50–59; 60–69; and 70 years or older. Self-reported educational attainment was represented at a given observation as 8th grade or less; some high school but no high school graduation or GED; high school graduate/GED; some college but no college degree; college degree; some graduate work and post graduate degree.

HIV status.

HIV status was assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with confirmatory Western blot on all MACS participants at their initial visit and at every visit for those HIV-negative. Participants living with HIV included all men who were identified as such at baseline and those who seroconverted during study observation.

Therapy.

Participants reported the type of antiretroviral therapy for their HIV infection used since last visit. The responses included no therapy, mono-therapy, combination therapy, and potent antiretroviral therapy (ART).

Viral load.

Plasma HIV RNA levels (viral load, copies/ml) were collected. Viral load was dichotomized into detectable and undetectable, based on the lower detection level of the assay used at visit.

Social support.

Participants were asked if they had someone to talk to or count on for social support. The responses were: 1) No, no one; 2) Yes, 1 person; 3) 2 or 3 people; 4) 4 or 5 people; and 5) 6 or more people. The variable was recoded into low (0–1 person), medium (2–3 people) and high (4 or more people) social support [31]. In this sample, higher social support was associated with lower levels of negative psychosocial health conditions, including depression [31]. Therefore, we adjusted the model in order to account for possible confounding effect of social support.

Depression risk.

Depressive symptoms were assessed at each study visit using self-administered questions derived from symptom checklist developed by the Center for Epidemiologic Study of Depression. The response values ranged from 0 to 3. Values were summed at each observation for all participants who completed the 20-question measure. The score ranged from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60. We created a dichotomous variable assessing whether participants had a score ≥16, a cut-off point associated with the risk of depression [32].

Employment, disability and retirement status.

Employment (“Employed”, “Not Employed”) was derived from self-reported responses on full time, part time and self-employment status. A participant was considered “employed” if they reported any current full-time, part-time or self-employment. If the participant did not report any full-time, part-time or self-employment, they were considered to be “not employed”. Missing values on full time, part time, and self-employment status were coded as missing. Disability and retirement status was self-reported by the participant. Employment, disability and retirement status were not mutually exclusive categories; therefore, each outcome was modeled separately. We explored potential overlap between participants reporting combinations of employment, disability and retirement status and found the prevalence of overlap across participant visits to be less than 6%, supporting our decision to model them separately.

Missing values.

Missing values were imputed by examining employment status in the prior visit and retaining the response from the prior observation. If employment status was not reported in the prior visit, we used the response from the following visit. If there were no values for employment status in the prior and following visit, then the employment status remained missing. Missing values on disability and retirement status were imputed in a similar manner.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics for the outcome variable and covariates were generated at the index (October 1997/Visit 28), last (September 2015/Visit 65), and across all visits using frequencies/percentages and medians/interquartile ranges (IQRs) where appropriate. To assess the temporal relationship between employment, retirement and disability status and depressive symptoms, we fit separate generalized linear mixed models with a repeated measures statement controlling for within-subject variance. We programmed a 2-year lag for employment, retirement and disability in order to assess if depression risk at a given observation was predicted by these predictor variables at earlier study visits because the potential effects of labor market participation on health takes time to develop [28]. Additionally, we lagged the risk depression 2 years to adjust for prior risk of depression while predicting the future risk of depression. Analyses were conducted using SAS PROC GLIMMIX (SAS version 9.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). We assessed separately whether the risk of depression (CES-D score ≥16) at a given observation were predicted respectively by employment, disability, and retirement, adjusting for time (study visit), age, race/ethnicity, education, social support, risk of depression 2 years prior, antiretroviral therapy and viral load detectability. We reported adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Population characteristics

There were 1,497 participants living with HIV in the analysis. Characteristics of the population was reported at the index visit (28), last visit (63) and across all visits (28–63) (Table 1). The majority of participants identified as White, non-Hispanic (53.2%), was between 30 and 50 years old (69.3%) and had at least a high school diploma (92.0%) at their first visit. Across all visits, most reported using potent ART to treat their HIV infections (75.0%), maintained an undetectable viral load (73.2%), and had a medium (40.0%) or high (34.5%) level of social support. There were 3,026 participant-visits with missing employment status. After imputation procedures, there were 157 participant-visits with missing employment status. Risk of depression was seen in 27.5% of the participants. Participants reported employment, retirement and disability at 64.7%, 9.4% and 23.8% across all visits, respectively.

Employment, retirement and disability status on the risk of depression

After adjusting for race/ethnicity, age, education, prior risk of depression, social support, and viral load, being employed was associated with a 24% decrease in odds of depression risk compared to being unemployed (aOR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.68–0.78) (Table 2). Participants reporting disability had increased odds of depression risk (aOR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.32–1.54) (Table 3). Retirement was not statistically associated with depression risk (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 2. Longitudinal associations between employment and risk of depression (participant N = 1482; total observation N = 29970).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239291.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Longitudinal associations between disability and risk of depression (participant N = 1418; total observation N = 27367).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239291.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Longitudinal associations between retirement and risk of depression (participant N = 1389; total observation N = 24129).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239291.t004

Other factors associated with depression risk

Compared to MSM 70 years and older, younger participants had increased depression risk: 17–29 years (aOR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.41–3.37); 30–39 years (aOR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.54–3.35); 40–49 years (aOR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.62–3.47); 50–59 years (aOR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.46–3.11); 60–69 years (aOR: 0.81; 95% CI: 1.09–2.35);. Lower educational attainment was associated with higher odds of depression risk compared to having a post-graduate degree: 8th grade or less (aOR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.18–1.96); 9-11th grade (aOR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.55–2.19); 12th Grade (HS diploma) (aOR: 1.39; 95% CI 1.22–1.58); some college (aOR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.30–1.62); and college degree (aOR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.10–1.40). Compared to having a medium level of social support, having high social support had lower odds of depression risk (aOR: 0.62; 95% 0.57–0.68), while low social support was associated with higher odds of depression risk (aOR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.83–2.15). An undetectable viral load was protective against depression risk (aOR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.63–0.76) (Table 2). Covariates in the disability and retirement models were similar in magnitude and statistical significance and are detailed in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.

Discussion

This paper aims to improve our understanding of the complex link between work and health in men living with HIV by conducting time-lagged longitudinal analyses to account for the delayed effects of upstream determinants of health on health outcomes and the potential adaptations to the experiences of employment, retirement, and disability. Following a social determinants of health approach, these findings contribute to the study of the causation hypothesisemployment leads to better health among people with HIV. The selection hypothesis—health is a necessary condition for employmentwas outside the scope of this paper but cannot be discounted (although previous studies have suggested that the magnitude of the causation effect may be larger than the selection effect) [14, 33, 34]. Contemporary thinking on these competing hypotheses, however, has been moving away from such binary distinctions to examining how both processes work in tandem to shape health and illness trajectories over time.

This longitudinal study found that employed men living with HIV had a lower likelihood of depression risk over time, after adjusting for key clinical and sociodemographic variables. This finding is in agreement with previous studies that have examined the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between employment and mental health in people with HIV, including depressive symptoms [14, 15, 35]. It also extends previous analyses conducted with MACS data by introducing a two-year lag between the measurement of employment status and the assessment of the mental health outcome. In this previous MACS paper we examined the impact of employment on physical and mental health quality of life while the present paper examines the effects of employment on depression risk, a more direct measure of mental health. The present time-lagged finding further supports the temporal sequence between change in employment status and the mental health outcome because the results of the previous longitudinal analysis incorporated both the between-subject effects (i.e., the difference between employed and unemployed individuals) and the within-subject effects (i.e., the within individual change in mental health due to change in employment status) [27]. Those regression coefficients estimated the difference in mental health scores for the overall population of employed people compared to the overall population of unemployed people. Such “pooling” of cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships made it impossible to isolate the relative contribution of each. However, the present analyses define a temporal sequence by introducing a time-lag between the measure of employment and the measure of depression risk, which offers some reassurances that the change in mental health is better characterized as a result of the employment transition. The importance of conducting time-lagged analyses is supported in part by set-point theories, which propose that people’s experiences to stressful events show a decline in well-being only to return to baseline over time. This observation that people may experience adaptations to stressful experiences has been documented in some studies but not consistently [3638].

Our study also found out that participants on disability had an increased odds of depression risk after controlling for prior depression and other covariates. In the United States, persons with depression may be eligible for social security disability income [39]. Therefore, the relationship between depression and disability status can be bidirectional: 1) depression as a criterion for disability; and 2) disability as the cause of depression. By including pre-existing depression, we were able to tease out a causal relationship of disability on depression risk.

Previous studies regarding the association between retirement and depressive symptoms in general populations have been equivocal and the study of the health effects of retirement on people with HIV has so far been neglected in the literature. Greenfield et al found that, during retirement, increased social activities correlated with decreased depressive symptoms [40]. Reitzes (1996) noted less depression in the first year of retirement, but increasing depression in subsequent years [24]. In a 10-year cross-aged analysis, Segel-Karpas examined the reciprocal effects of retirement and depression. They found that retirement increased the likelihood of depressive symptoms and depression symptoms increased the inclination to retire [28]. In our analysis, the relationship between retirement and depression risk was nonsignificant after adjusting for prior existence of depressive symptoms.

The strength of this study includes the longitudinal investigation of the depression risk associated with employment and disabilityand to our knowledge for the first time extends this work to the experience of retirementin a well characterized and large cohort of men who have sex with men and living with HIV. We also followed an analytical approach that included a time-lag to establish a temporal sequence between our predictors (employment, disability, and retirement) and depression risk, with a comprehensive adjustment for a range of potential confounders. This allowed us to take into account the potential delayed effects of upstream determinants of health and the experience of adaptation to different stressors such as unemployment, disability, and retirement. An important limitation of this study relates to residual confounding because we did not have data on important variables, especially those related to income, reasons for retirement and disability, length of time on disability or retirement, and other systemic barriers to employment, retirement and disability programs such as information on disability benefits, unemployment insurance, or work history. Our analyses however controlled for a number of important covariates related to the experience of living with HIV and labor force participation, including race/ethnicity, age, education, social support, antiretroviral therapy, and viral load.

In addition, our conceptual framework for the selection of the predictors and outcomes focused on the determinants of health and not on selection effects. It is entirely possible that experiencing higher depressive symptoms may interfere with participants’ ability to remain employed, increase the risk of going into disability, or precipitate early retirement. Future research should examine the relative contribution of causation versus selection effects and how they interact and reinforce each other as both have different clinical and policy implications. Due to limited sample size, we were unable to explore differences between participants who retired due to disability and those who retired without disability as this would have allowed us to examine important distinctions in the experience of retirement and its effects on subsequent health outcomes. Lastly, this study was restricted to MSM with HIV in four major metropolitan areas; therefore, results may not be generalizable to the general population of people living with HIV.

This research provided further evidence that employment leads to mental health benefits, and for the first time also suggests that retirement is also associated with better mental health outcomes, which suggests that policies that focus on improving employment opportunities and better retirement conditions may have a significant impact on the health of men living with HIV. It is well known that better disability policies may reduce some of the negative financial conditions people with HIV experience and the stress associated with maintaining employment, remaining on disability benefits, and a successful transition to retirement. However, this work in progress needs to be strengthened by further research to develop and support sensible clinical and policy recommendations to support people living with HIV. Policy research is needed to identify and address structural issues in the benefits and drug coverage programs that may be implicated in creating barriers for people with HIV to return to work or remained employed, provide additional supports while on disability (such as mental health treatment), and facilitate a successful transition to retirement when needed.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the participants of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study [MACS] Healthy Aging Study. The authors thank the staff at the four sites for implementation support John Welty, Montserrat Tarrago, and Katherine McGowan for data support of this study.

References

  1. 1. Dray-Spira R, Legeai C, Le Den M, Boué F, Lascoux-Combe C, Simon A, et al. Burden of HIV disease and comorbidities on the chances of maintaining employment in the era of sustained combined antiretoviral therapies use. AIDS (London, England). 2012 Jan;26(2):207.
  2. 2. Elzi L, Conen A, Patzen A, Fehr J, Cavassini M, Calmy A, et al, Swiss HIV Cohort Study Group. Ability to work and employment rates in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected individuals receiving combination antiretroviral therapy: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2016 Jan 1 (Vol. 3, No. 1, p. ofw022). pmid:26955645
  3. 3. Groß M, Herr A, Hower M, Kuhlmann A, Mahlich J, Stoll M. Unemployment, health, and education of HIV-infected males in Germany. Int. J. Public Health. 2016 Jun 1;61(5):593–602. pmid:26427862
  4. 4. Wunderlich GS, Rice DP, Amado NL. Dynamics of SSA's Disability Programs. In The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs 2002. National Academies Press (US).
  5. 5. Thirumurthy H, Galárraga O, Larson B, Rosen S. HIV treatment produces economic returns through increased work and education, and warrants continued US support. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jul;31(7):1470–7.
  6. 6. Dickey WC, Dew MA, Becker JT, Kingsley L. Combined effects of HIV-infection status and psychosocial vulnerability on mental health in homosexual men. SOC PSYCH EPID. 1999 Jan 1;34(1):4–11.
  7. 7. Iversen L, Andersen O, Andersen PK, Christoffersen K, Keiding N. Unemployment and mortality in Denmark, 1970–80. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Oct 10;295(6603):879–84
  8. 8. Jin RL, Shah CP, Svoboda TJ. The impact of unemployment on health: a review of the evidence. CMAJ. 1995 Sep 1;153(5):529–40. Erratum in: CMAJ. 1995 Dec 1;153(11):1567–8. pmid:7641151
  9. 9. Rueda S, Chambers L, Wilson M, Mustard C, Rourke SB, Bayoumi A, et al. Association of returning to work with better health in working-aged adults: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2012 Mar;102(3):541–56. Epub 2012 Jan 19 pmid:22390520
  10. 10. Albert SM, Marder K, Dooneief G, Bell K, Sano M, Todak G, et al. Neuropsychologic impairment in early HIV infection. A risk factor for work disability. Arch Neurol. 1995 May;52(5):525–30. pmid:7733849
  11. 11. Blank MB, Mandell DS, Aiken L, Hadley TR. Co-occurrence of HIV and serious mental illness among Medicaid recipients. PSYCHIAT SERV. 2002 Jul;53(7):868–73.
  12. 12. Bing EG, Burnam MA, Longshore D, Fleishman JA, Sherbourne CD, London AS, et al. Psychiatric disorders and drug use among human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;58(8):721–8. pmid:11483137
  13. 13. Dray-Spira R, Gueguen A, Persoz A, Deveau C, Lert F, Delfraissy JF, et al, PRIMO Cohort Study Group. Temporary employment, absence of stable partnership, and risk of hospitalization or death during the course of HIV infection. JAIDS. 2005 Oct 1;40(2):190–7. pmid:16186737
  14. 14. Rueda S, Raboud J, Rourke SB, Bekele T, Bayoumi A, Lavis J, et al. Influence of employment and job security on physical and mental health in adults living with HIV: cross-sectional analysis. Open Med. 2012 Oct 1;6(4):e118–26. pmid:23687526
  15. 15. Rueda S, Raboud J, Mustard C, Bayoumi A, Lavis JN, Rourke SB. Employment status is associated with both physical and mental health quality of life in people living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2011 Apr;23(4):435–43. pmid:21271396
  16. 16. Rueda S, Smith P, Bekele T, O'Brien K, Husbands W, Li A, et al; ECHO Study Team. Is any job better than no job? Labor market experiences and depressive symptoms in people living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2015;27(7):907–15. pmid:25738528
  17. 17. Bernell SL, Shinogle JA. The relationship between HAART use and employment for HIV-positive individuals: an empirical analysis and policy outlook. Health Policy. 2005 Feb;71(2):255–64. pmid:15607387
  18. 18. Fogarty AS, Zablotska I, Rawstorne P, Prestage G, Kippax SC. Factors distiguishing employed from unemployed people in the positive health study.
  19. 19. Annequin M, Lert F, Spire B, Dray-Spira R; and the ANRS-Vespa2 Study Group. Increase in Unemployment over the 2000's: Comparison between People Living with HIV and the French General Population. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 4;11(11):e0165634. pmid:27814374
  20. 20. Burgoyne RW, Saunders DS. Quality of life among urban Canadian HIV/AIDS clinic outpatients. INT J STD AIDS. 2001 Aug 1;12(8):505–12. pmid:11487390
  21. 21. Ezzy D, De Visser R, Bartos M. Poverty, disease progression and employment among people living with HIV/AIDS in Australia. AIDS care. 1999 Aug 1;11(4):405–14. pmid:10533533
  22. 22. UNAIDS. People Living with HIV. 2014.
  23. 23. Mandal B, Roe B. Job loss, retirement and the mental health of older Americans. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008 Dec;11(4):167–76. pmid:19096091
  24. 24. Reitzes DC, Mutran EJ, Fernandez ME. Does retirement hurt well-being? Factors influencing self-esteem and depression among retirees and workers. Gerontologist. 1996 Oct;36(5):649–56. pmid:8942108
  25. 25. Dave D, Rashad I, Spasojevic J. The effects of retirement on physical and mental health outcomes. BER; 2006 Mar 27N.
  26. 26. Mein G, Martikainen P, Hemingway H, Stansfeld S, Marmot M. Is retirement good or bad for mental and physical health functioning? Whitehall II longitudinal study of civil servants. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Jan;57(1):46–9. pmid:12490648
  27. 27. Rueda S, Raboud J, Plankey M, Ostrow D, Mustard C, Rourke SB, et al. Labor force participation and health-related quality of life in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. AIDS Behav. 2012 Nov;16(8):2350–60. pmid:22814570
  28. 28. Segel-Karpas D, Ayalon L, Lachman ME. Retirement and depressive symptoms: A 10-year cross-lagged analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Nov;269:565–570. pmid:30199698
  29. 29. Detels R, Phair JP, Saah AJ, Rinaldo CR, Murioz A, Kaslow RA, et al. Recent scientific contributions to understanding HIV/AIDS from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1992;2(2sup):11–9.
  30. 30. Kaslow RA, Ostrow DG, Detels R, Phair JP, Polk BF, Rinaldo CR Jr. The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study: rationale, organization, and selected characteristics of the participants. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Aug;126(2):310–8. pmid:3300281
  31. 31. Friedman MR, Coulter RW, Silvestre AJ, Stall R, Teplin L, Shoptaw S, et al. Someone to count on: social support as an effect modifier of viral load suppression in a prospective cohort study. AIDS care. 2017 Apr 3;29(4):469–80. pmid:27456040
  32. 32. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied psychological measurement. 1977 Jun;1(3):385–401.
  33. 33. Bartley M. Unemployment and health: selection or causation‐a false antithesis?. Sociol Health Illn 1988 Mar;10(1):41–67.
  34. 34. Blane D, Smith GD, Bartley M. Social selection: what does it contribute to social class differences in health?. Sociol Health Illn. 1993 Jan;15(1):1–5.
  35. 35. Worthington C, Krentz HB. Socio-economic factors and health-related quality of life in adults living with HIV. Int J STD AIDS. 2005 Sep;16(9):608–14. pmid:16176627
  36. 36. Lucas RE, Clark AE, Georgellis Y, Diener E. Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction. Psychol Sci. 2004 Jan;15(1):8–13. pmid:14717825
  37. 37. Morrell S, Taylor R, Quine S, Kerr C, Western J. A cohort study of unemployment as a cause of psychological disturbance in Australian youth. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jun;38(11):1553–64. pmid:8036535
  38. 38. Warr P, Jackson P. Adapting to the unemployed role: A longitudinal investigation. Soc. Sci. Med. 1987 Jan 1;25(11):1219–24. pmid:3433123
  39. 39. Social Security Administration. Disability Evaluation Under Social Security. Washington: SSA, 2019, Web. 9 Dec 2019.
  40. 40. Greenfield EA, Marks NF. Continuous participation in voluntary groups as a protective factor for the psychological well-being of adults who develop functional limitations: evidence from the national survey of families and households. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jan 1;62(1):S60–8 pmid:17284568