Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Effectiveness of orally-delivered double-stranded RNA on gene silencing in the stinkbug Plautia stali

  • Yudai Nishide ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    nishiyu0@affrc.go.jp (YN); t-fukatsu@aist.go.jp (TF)

    Affiliation National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Institute of Agrobiological Sciences Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Japan

  • Daisuke Kageyama,

    Roles Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Institute of Agrobiological Sciences Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Japan

  • Yoshiaki Tanaka,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Institute of Agrobiological Sciences Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Japan

  • Kakeru Yokoi,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Institute of Agrobiological Sciences Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Japan

  • Akiya Jouraku,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Institute of Agrobiological Sciences Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Japan

  • Ryo Futahashi,

    Roles Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan

  • Takema Fukatsu

    Roles Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    nishiyu0@affrc.go.jp (YN); t-fukatsu@aist.go.jp (TF)

    Affiliations National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan, Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Abstract

Development of a reliable method for RNA interference (RNAi) by orally-delivered double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is potentially promising for crop protection. Considering that RNAi efficiency considerably varies among different insect species, it is important to seek for the practical conditions under which dsRNA-mediated RNAi effectively works against each pest insect. Here we investigated RNAi efficiency in the brown-winged green stinkbug Plautia stali, which is notorious for infesting various fruits and crop plants. Microinjection of dsRNA into P. stali revealed high RNAi efficiency–injection of only 30 ng dsRNA into last-instar nymphs was sufficient to knockdown target genes as manifested by their phenotypes, and injection of 300 ng dsRNA suppressed the gene expression levels by 80% to 99.9%. Knockdown experiments by dsRNA injection showed that multicopper oxidase 2 (MCO2), vacuolar ATPase (vATPase), inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP), and vacuolar-sorting protein Snf7 are essential for survival of P. stali, as has been demonstrated in other insects. By contrast, P. stali exhibited very low RNAi efficiency when dsRNA was orally administered. When 1000 ng/μL of dsRNA solution was orally provided to first-instar nymphs, no obvious phenotypes were observed. Consistent with this, RT-qPCR showed that the gene expression levels were not affected. A higher concentration of dsRNA (5000 ng/μL) induced mortality in some cohorts, and the gene expression levels were reduced to nearly 50%. Simultaneous oral administration of dsRNA against potential RNAi blocker genes did not improve the RNAi efficiency of the target genes. In conclusion, P. stali shows high sensitivity to RNAi with injected dsRNA but, unlike the allied pest stinkbugs Halyomorpha halys and Nezara viridula, very low sensitivity to RNAi with orally-delivered dsRNA, which highlights the varied sensitivity to RNAi across different species and limits the applicability of the molecular tool for controlling this specific insect pest.

Introduction

Since its discovery at the end of the previous century, gene silencing mediated by administration of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), called RNA interference (RNAi), has been a powerful technique for unveiling gene functions. Following the discovery of RNAi in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans [1], high sensitivity to RNAi was found in coleopteran insects such as the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum [2, 3], the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata [4], and the western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera [5]. By contrast, lepidopteran, dipteran and Odonata insects were found to be less sensitive to RNAi [68]. Previous RNAi studies have uncovered a substantial amount of variability in RNAi sensitivity among different insect species and lineages, but it is obscure what relationship exists between RNAi sensitivity and insect taxa.

Conventionally, RNAi experiments have relied on dsRNA injection into insect bodies because of generally efficient gene silencing by this method. However, injection entails several problems including immune and wound stresses especially in small insects. By contrast, oral delivery of dsRNA is less traumatic and easier to perform because no special equipment is needed. Additionally, RNAi by feeding is practically applicable to crop protection [5, 9], which has become one of the promising techniques for pest management over the past decade. Here, a critical challenge in developing insect-specific molecular biopesticides is to find effective and reliable methods for delivery of dsRNA into pest insect bodies. Arming plants with dsRNA has been suggested [10], but all such methods hinge on the idea that crop is deployed with the corresponding dsRNA of essential insect genes. This approach could reduce our dependence on chemical insecticides and could combat insect resistance to chemical insecticides [11, 12]. An example of deploying dsRNA to plants is provided by transgenic maize to control the western corn rootworm D. virgifera [5, 13, 14]. RNAi by feeding mediated by transgenic rice that produces dsRNA was tested and successfully inhibited gene expression in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens, although lethal phenotypes were not observed [15, 16]. Because RNAi exhibits species specificity, fewer concerns arise for off-target effects, an important issue in crop protection [1719]. The efficiency of RNAi delivered by feeding varies considerably among different species including hemipterans [20].

In this study, we tested the efficiency of RNAi by injection and feeding of dsRNA in the brown-winged green stinkbug Plautia stali (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Previous studies reported that dsRNA injection efficiently suppresses gene expression in this species [2123], and maternal RNAi also works effectively [24]. However, the effect of orally-delivered dsRNA is unknown. P. stali has attracted much attention in the field of microbiology and evolutionary biology regarding insect–symbiont interactions [2530]. Development of a reliable method for RNAi by feeding will accelerate the functional studies on symbiosis-related genes even in very tiny first-instar nymphs of P. stali, in which symbiont transmission and establishment occur [26, 30]. Furthermore, because P. stali is a notorious agricultural pest infesting various fruits and crop plants [31], RNAi by feeding would provide a useful method for control and management of P. stali and other pest stinkbugs.

Materials and methods

Insects

Adult insects of P. stali were collected at a forest edge in the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan, from which an inbred laboratory strain was established. A mass-reared colony of the strain was used as the source of experimental insects. The insects were reared in plastic containers (150 mm in diameter, 60 mm high) with raw peanuts, dry soybeans, and drinking water supplemented with 0.05% ascorbic acid at 25°C ± 1°C under a long-day regime of 16 h light and 8 h dark as previously described [29].

Target genes

RNAi efficiencies are often highly variable across different target genes [32, 33]. In this study, we selected four target genes: vacuolar ATPase (vATPase), inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP), multicopper oxidase 2 (MCO2), and vacuolar-sorting protein Snf7. vATPase and IAP were reported to cause high mortalities upon effective RNAi in several hemipteran insects [17, 3441], and therefore, they are regarded as promising targets for pest control. For vATPase gene, we performed RNAi using three distinct dsRNAs designed to target the subunits D, H, and E, respectively. RNAi suppression of MCO2 causes high mortality in nymphal insects of P. stali [24]. Snf7 is a well-known target gene for controlling the western corn rootworm D. virgifera [5, 13, 14].

Detection and sequencing of target genes

Total RNAs were extracted from the whole bodies of adult females approximately 5 days after ecdysis using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Complementary DNAs (cDNAs) were sequenced by Illumina HiSeq 2500 with paired-end 101 bp (Macrogen Japan Corp., Kyoto, Japan), and the generated raw reads (accession numbers DRR118506–DRR118507) were analyzed as previously described [23]. The assembled sequences were subjected to BLASTx database searches, by which multicopper oxidase 2 (PsMCO2; accession number LC495720), vacuolar ATPase (PsvATPase; accession numbers LC581883–LC581885), inhibitor of apoptosis (PsIAP; accession number LC581886), Snf7 (PsSnf7; accession number LC581887), dsRNase (PsdsRNase; accession number LC581888), and fatty acid synthase (Psfasn; accession number LC581889) were identified. On the basis of each predicted sequence, we designed primer pairs for quantitative RT-PCR and RNAi (S1 and S2 Tables).

dsRNA synthesis

Template preparation for dsRNA synthesis was performed by PCR using the designed primers (S2 Table) in combination with the T7 promoter sequence at the 5ʹ end. PCR was done by 35 cycles of 10 sec at 96°C, 30 sec at 55°C and 1 min at 72°C using Takara EX taq (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). PCR products were purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and subjected to transcription into dsRNA using RiboMAX Large Scale RNA Production Systems (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). pEGFP-L1 (Takara Bio) was used as template of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). The concentrations of dsRNA were estimated by Nanodrop Lite (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).

RNAi knockdown of target genes through injection

For suppression of the mRNA levels of target genes by injection, newly molted fifth (last) instar nymphs were injected with dsRNA solution (approximately 3 μL) into the ventral septum between the thoracic and abdominal segments.

RNAi knockdown of target genes through feeding

For RNAi by feeding, fifth-instar or first-instar nymphs were reared under the conditions similar to those for the stock colony as cited above, except for the drinking water ingredients. Newly molted fifth-instar nymphs were supplied with an absorbent cotton (3 × 3 cm; Iwatsuki, Tokyo, Japan) soaked with 6 mL of dsRNA solution (100 or 1000 ng/μL), and newly hatched first-instar nymphs were supplied with one-eighth cut absorbent cotton soaked with 800 μL of dsRNA solution (100, 1000, or 5000 ng/μL) in a plastic dish. During the experiments, the absorbent cotton soaked with dsRNA solution was kept being available for P. stali.

In sap-sucking insects, RNAi efficiency has often been tested by plant-mediated dsRNA delivery [4143]. Notably, a previous study on the brown marmorated stinkbug Halyomorpha halys belonging to the Pentatomidae (the same family as P. stali) showed that nymphs fed with green bean pods immersed in dsRNA solution showed effective suppression of the target gene expression [44]. In this study, we prepared dsRNA-treated green bean pods according to the previous study with some modifications. Commercially available green bean pods (Phaseolus vulgaris) were washed with 0.2% sodium hypochlorite and then washed three times with water. The bean pods were trimmed from the calyx end to a total length of 7.5 cm and immersed in a 1.6 mL of 67 ng/μL dsRNA solution. The immersed green bean pods were fed to fifth-instar nymphs of P. stali. To minimize evaporation of the dsRNA solution, we sealed the gap between the bean pods and solution with parafilm (Bemis Company, Oshkosh, WI, USA). The bean pods were replaced every three days, on which the fifth-instar nymphs were reared until adult emergence.

Quantification of gene expression

To estimate RNAi efficiency, total RNA samples were extracted from the whole bodies of first- or fifth-instar nymphs and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Quantitative RT-PCR of the target genes was conducted using LightCycler 480 or LightCycler 96 with LightCycler 480 SYBR Green Master (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The gene expression levels were estimated by absolute quantification, and relative expression levels were calculated to ribosomal protein L32 (rpL32) gene. Standard curves were generated using 7 steps of ten-fold serial dilutions of each sequence inserted into the plasmid pGEM-T (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). We confirmed that melting curves in each gene showed similar patterns between samples. We also confirmed that Ct value of rpL32 was similar irrespective of samples/treatments. The mean expression level of the control treatment with dsRNA of EGFP was designated as 1.0, and all expression levels were normalized to the control level.

Results and discussion

Effects of dsRNA injection

RNAi of PsMCO2, PsvATPase, PsIAP, and PsSnf7 by injection with 300 ng dsRNA resulted in high mortality of the injected fifth-instar nymphs, although the mortality and the timing of death varied among the different genes. Nymphs injected with either PsMCO2 dsRNA or PsIAP dsRNA never reached adulthood (Fig 1A). Injection with PsvATPase dsRNA led to high mortality irrespective of the targeted subunits. As demonstrated in our previous study [24], the nymphs injected with PsMCO2 dsRNA died during molting without reaching adulthood. Similar to PsMCO2, RNAi of PsvATPase induced nymphal mortality during molting. By contrast, the nymphs injected with PsIAP dsRNA died 2 to 3 days after injection, and those injected with PsSnf7 dsRNA died 3 to 4 days after injection, with no relation to the molting events (Fig 1B).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Effects of RNAi knockdown on fifth-instar nymphs.

(A) Adult emergence rates of fifth-instar nymphs injected with dsRNA against each target gene. Newly molted fifth-instar nymphs were injected with 3 μL of dsRNA at a concentration of 100 ng/μL. Adult emergence rates among 5 nymphs were determined. The experiment was performed in three parallels and the mean adult emergence rates with standard deviations are shown. Numbers above bars show total sample sizes. Statistically significant differences compared with EGFP injection is shown by asterisks (t-test: P < 0.001). (B) Normal adult and typical carcasses due to RNAi of PsMCO2, PsvATPase subunit D, PsIAP and PsSnf7. Fifth-instar nymphs injected with dsRNA of PsMCO2 and PsvATPase died during molting, whereas nymphs injected with dsRNA of PsIAP and PsSnf7 died independent of the molting events. Scale bar shows 5 mm. (C) Silencing efficiency of RNAi by injection of 300 ng dsRNA into fifth-instar nymphs. RNA was extracted from nymphs 2 days after injection, and the expression level of each gene was quantified. The numbers in parenthesis are sample sizes. Statistically significant differences were evaluated by t-test. The mean expression level of the control treatment (EGFP) was designated as 1.0. (D) Effects of different concentrations of dsRNA on RNAi in fifth-instar nymphs, in which dsRNA targeting PsMCO2 or EGFP was injected. Newly molted fifth-instar nymphs were injected with 3 μL of dsRNA solution at different concentrations (100, 10, 1, 0.1, or 0.01 ng/μL). Nymphs injected with 30 ng or more dsRNA showed inhibition of cuticle sclerotization and pigmentation. Experiments were performed in three parallels, and the total numbers of sample sizes are shown above the bars. Statistically significant differences compared with EGFP injection is shown by asterisks (t-test: P < 0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245081.g001

Quantitative RT-PCR confirmed that RNAi by injection efficiently worked for the six genes. Even the least effective gene among the six, PsMCO2, exhibited over 80% reduction upon injection with PsMCO2 dsRNA compared with the control injected with EGFP dsRNA (Fig 1C). The other genes exhibited much higher reduction: 98.0% for PsvATPase subunit D, 98.8% for PsvATPase subunit H, 99.3% for PsvATPase subunit E, 95.9% for PsIAP, and 99.9% for PsSnf7. Taken together with the previous studies [23, 24], the silencing efficiency in P. stali is relatively high among hemipteran insects [33] and similar to the brown marmorated stinkbug H. halys [45].

The knockdown of PsMCO2 resulted in physical defects in cuticle sclerotization and pigmentation. When different concentrations of dsRNA targeting PsMCO2 were injected, 300 and 30 ng of PsMCO2 dsRNA caused clear phenotypes in fifth-instar nymphs. Injection of 300 ng dsRNA killed all of the nymphs during molting, and injection of 30 ng dsRNA killed most of them during molting. The one nymph that reached adulthood remained soft and unpigmented, could not feed, and eventually died (Fig 1D). Nymphs injected with 3 ng or lower concentrations of dsRNA did not show any obvious phenotypes in cuticle sclerotization or pigmentation, although accidental death was sometimes observed. These results demonstrate that 30 ng of dsRNA may be a requisite dose to suppress gene expression in fifth-instar nymphs (body weight ~100 mg).

Effects of orally-delivered dsRNA on fifth-instar nymphs

When 100 or 1000 ng/μL of PsMCO2 dsRNA solution was supplied to fifth-instar nymphs instead of water, no nymphs showed obvious phenotypes (n = 17 for 100 ng/μL dsRNA solution; n = 18 for 1000 ng/μL dsRNA solution).

We next assessed the effectiveness of plant-mediated RNAi (Fig 2A). When fifth-instar nymphs were fed with green bean pods, around 60%–70% of the nymphs reached adulthood (Fig 2B and 2C). While the survival rates of P. stali on green bean pods were relatively low compared with stock colonies fed with raw peanuts and dried soybeans, the plant-mediated 67 ng/μL of dsRNA administration targeting PsvATPase and PsIAP exhibited little effects on survival of the insects. Quantitative RT-PCR suggested that the plant-mediated RNAi might be effective for PsvATPase (approximately 27% reduction; P = 0.01 by t-test) but not for PsIAP (Fig 2D). Compared with the previous study on H. halys [44], the plant-mediated RNAi showed lower effectiveness in P. stali, although the target genes are different between these studies. The previous study demonstrated that green bean pods immersed in 67 ng/μL of juvenile hormone acid O-methyltransferase (JHAMT) dsRNA solution reduced the corresponding gene expression in the insects by over 70% and green bean pods immersed in 17 ng/μL of vitellogenin dsRNA solution reduced the corresponding gene expression in the insects by over 50%, although no phenotypic descriptions were provided.

thumbnail
Fig 2. RNAi by feeding through green bean pods.

(A) Rearing devices with green bean pods. In each 1000 ml beaker, a bean pod was supported to stand with a small paper box and immersed in dsRNA solution with absorbent cotton, on which newly molted fifth-instar nymphs were reared. (B) A fifth-instar nymph feeding on a green bean pod. Red arrow indicates the stylet inserted into the pod. (C) Adult emergence rates of fifth-instar nymphs fed on green bean pods immersed in dsRNA solution. Mean adult emergence rates with standard deviations are shown. Adult emergence rates among 10 nymphs were determined. The experiment was performed in three parallels and the mean adult emergence rates with standard deviations are shown. Numbers above bars show total sample sizes. No statistically significant differences were observed (P > 0.05, t-test). (D) Gene silencing efficiency of orally-delivered dsRNA through green bean pods. Total RNAs were extracted 4 days after treatment of fifth-instar nymphs, and the relative expression level of PsvATPase subunit D or PsIAP to PsrpL32 was calculated by quantitative RT-PCR. The numbers in parentheses are sample sizes. Statistically significant differences were evaluated by t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245081.g002

Effects of orally-delivered dsRNA on first-instar nymphs

After hatching, all newborn first-instar nymphs of P. stali actively imbibed water without feeding, by which the nymphs became larger in size (Fig 3A), gained an additional body weight by around 0.43 mg (Fig 3B), and molted to second instar three or four days later. These observations indicate that the first-instar nymphs consistently ingest about 0.43 μL of water.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Effects of orally-delivered dsRNA on the first-instar nymphs.

(A) First-instar nymphs before (left) and after (right) taking water. (B) The weights of the first-instar nymphs before and after taking water. Samples were taken from four separate egg masses. A statistically significant average weight gain of 0.43 mg was observed after the water intake (t-test; P < 0.001). (C) Survival rates of the first-instar nymphs. The first-instar nymphs were reared with dsRNA solutions at concentrations of 100, 1000, or 5000 ng/μL for each target gene. 20 nymphs were tested for each gene and the mean rates of molting to second instar were calculated. The experiments were performed in seven parallels for 100 or 1000 ng/μL of EGFP and three parallels for 5000 ng/μL of EGFP and any concentrations of the other genes. Numbers above bars show total sample sizes. (D) Silencing efficiency of orally-delivered dsRNA at 1000 ng/μL in the first-instar nymphs. Statistical analyses were performed by t-test with Bonferroni correction. (E) Silencing efficiency of orally-delivered dsRNA at 5000 ng/μL in the first-instar nymphs. RNAs were extracted from the insects 3 days after providing dsRNA solutions, and the expression level of each gene was quantified. The numbers in parentheses are sample sizes. Statistically significant differences were evaluated by t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245081.g003

The first-instar nymphs fed with dsRNA solution at concentrations of 100 or 1000 ng/μL (estimated dsRNA intake amounts were 43 and 430 ng, respectively) did not show obvious mortality for all the target genes when compared with the nymphs fed with EGFP dsRNA at the same concentrations (P > 0.05; t-test; Fig 3C). Considering that 30 ng of dsRNA is sufficient for suppressing the gene expression when injected into fifth-instar nymphs (Fig 1D), P. stali appears to exhibit very low sensitivity to orally-delivered dsRNA.

In the first-instar nymphs fed with 1000 ng/μL dsRNA solution, no significant differences were observed in the expression levels of any of the genes tested (t-test with Bonferroni correction; Fig 3D). At 5000 ng/μL, RNAi of PsIAP showed slightly higher mortality compared with the control (5000 ng/μL of EGFP dsRNA) (P = 0.08; t-test; Fig 3C), although RNAi of PsvATPase subunit D exhibited no obvious lethality. In agreement with this, the nymphs fed with 5000 ng/μL PsIAP dsRNA (estimated intake, 2,150 ng) showed an around 50% decrease in the gene expression but not in the case of PsvATPase subunit D (Fig 3E). The observations that RNAi of PsIAP was weakly effective at the dose of 5000 ng/μL but not at 1000 ng/μL indicate that the sensitivity to orally-delivered dsRNA for this target gene is very low in P. stali. Comparing with the previous study in the southern green stinkbug Nezara viridula, which showed that orally-administrated 3000 ng/μL dsRNA of vATPase suppresses gene expression and leads to high mortality [46], P. stali showed lower sensitivity to orally-delivered dsRNA. In the Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri, 50% reduction of IAP expression by RNAi was reported to cause high mortality [41], which may be attributable to different sensitivities between the insect species.

Previous studies have suggested the possibility that, in such hemipteran insects as A. pisum, Myzus persicae, Lygus lineolaris and Bemisia tabaci, dsRNase in the midgut or saliva may be responsible for the low sensitivity of these insects to RNAi by orally-delivered dsRNA [20, 4749]. In the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis, another blocker of RNAi, fasn, was identified [50]. In an attempt to improve the RNAi efficiency, we conducted RNAi experiments in which dsRNA against these potential RNAi blocker genes was simultaneously administrated orally with dsRNA against the target genes. When 1000 ng/μL dsRNA of either PsdsRNase or Psfasn was orally administrated to first-instar nymphs of P. stali together with 1000 ng/μL dsRNA of either PsvATPase subunit D or PsIAP, no effects on the insect mortality were detected (Fig 4). Possible explanations as to why no obvious effects of PsdsRNase RNAi were observed in P. stali are (1) low sensitivity to RNAi with orally-delivered dsRNA of PsdsRNase in P. stali, (2) degradation of PsdsRNase dsRNA by dsRNase in the intestine of P. stali before cellular uptake, or (3) possible effects of other nucleases present in the intestine of P. stali. In the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria, it was reported that RNAi of dsRNases did not improve the sensitivity to RNAi [51]. Fasn plays an important role in the loss of endocytic ability for dsRNA in B. dorsalis [50], but may not in P. stali. Other possible explanation causing the low sensitivity to feeding RNAi may be factors blocking cellular uptake and endosomal escape of dsRNA [52].

thumbnail
Fig 4. Effects of simultaneous feeding of dsRNA against potential RNAi blocker genes on RNAi efficiency of target genes.

Survival rates of first-instar nymphs. The first-instar nymphs were reared with dsRNA solutions in which dsRNA against each gene is present at a concentration of 1000 ng/μL. In comparison with the control treatment (EGFP), no statistically significant differences in survival rates were detected by t-test. 20 nymphs were tested for each gene and the mean rates of molting to second instar were calculated. The experiment was performed in three parallels. Numbers above bars show total sample sizes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245081.g004

Conclusions

As previously shown, the brown-winged green stinkbug P. stali exhibits high RNAi sensitivity to injected dsRNA. Here, we demonstrate by RNAi experiments that PsMCO2, PsvATPase, PsIAP, and PsSnf7 are essential for survival of P. stali, suggesting the possibility that these genes may potentially be useful for controlling the pest stinkbug. Meanwhile, P. stali shows very limited sensitivity to orally-delivered dsRNA, where only an extremely high concentration of dsRNA (5000 ng/μL) can induce weak phenotypes depending on the target gene. In the stinkbugs H. halys and N. viridula belonging to the same family Pentatomidae, by contrast, orally-delivered dsRNA effectively causes gene silencing. These results indicate that sensitivity to orally-delivered dsRNA may vary among closely-related species, which highlight the importance of optimizing dsRNA administration protocol for each pest insect species. Attempts to improve the efficiency of orally-delivered RNAi in P. stali by, for example, supplementation of cationic nanoparticles [53, 54] should be conducted in future studies.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primer sequences for quantitative RT-PCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245081.s001

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Masae Takashima for maintaining stinkbug colonies and technical assistance.

References

  1. 1. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1998;391: 806–811. pmid:9486653
  2. 2. Tomoyasu Y, Miller SC, Tomita S, Schoppmeier M, Grossmann D, Bucher G. Exploring systemic RNA interference in insects: a genome-wide survey for RNAi genes in Tribolium. Genome Biology. 2008;9: R10. pmid:18201385
  3. 3. Miller SC, Miyata K, Brown SJ, Tomoyasu Y. Dissecting Systemic RNA Interference in the Red Flour Beetle Tribolium castaneum: Parameters Affecting the Efficiency of RNAi. PLOS ONE. 2012;7: e47431. pmid:23133513
  4. 4. Zhu F, Xu J, Palli R, Ferguson J, Palli SR. Ingested RNA interference for managing the populations of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Pest Management Science. 2011;67: 175–182. pmid:21061270
  5. 5. Baum JA, Bogaert T, Clinton W, Heck GR, Feldmann P, Ilagan O, et al. Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference. Nature Biotechnology. 2007;25: 1322–1326. pmid:17982443
  6. 6. Terenius O, Papanicolaou A, Garbutt JS, Eleftherianos I, Huvenne H, Kanginakudru S, et al. RNA interference in Lepidoptera: An overview of successful and unsuccessful studies and implications for experimental design. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2011;57: 231–245. pmid:21078327
  7. 7. Miller SC, Brown SJ, Tomoyasu Y. Larval RNAi in Drosophila? Dev Genes Evol. 2008;218: 505–510. pmid:18663472
  8. 8. Okude G, Futahashi R, Kawahara-Miki R, Yoshitake K, Yajima S, Fukatsu T. Electroporation-mediated RNA interference reveals a role of the multicopper oxidase 2 gene in dragonfly cuticular pigmentation. Appl Entomol Zool. 2017;52: 379–387.
  9. 9. Gordon KHJ, Waterhouse PM. RNAi for insect-proof plants. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25: 1231–1232. pmid:17989682
  10. 10. Joga MR, Zotti MJ, Smagghe G, Christiaens O. RNAi Efficiency, Systemic Properties, and Novel Delivery Methods for Pest Insect Control: What We Know So Far. Front Physiol. 2016;7. pmid:27909411
  11. 11. Klümper W, Qaim M. A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops. PLOS ONE. 2014;9: e111629. pmid:25365303
  12. 12. Zhang J, Khan SA, Heckel DG, Bock R. Next-Generation Insect-Resistant Plants: RNAi-Mediated Crop Protection. Trends in Biotechnology. 2017;35: 871–882. pmid:28822479
  13. 13. Bolognesi R, Ramaseshadri P, Anderson J, Bachman P, Clinton W, Flannagan R, et al. Characterizing the Mechanism of Action of Double-Stranded RNA Activity against Western Corn Rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte). PLOS ONE. 2012;7: e47534. pmid:23071820
  14. 14. Khajuria C, Ivashuta S, Wiggins E, Flagel L, Moar W, Pleau M, et al. Development and characterization of the first dsRNA-resistant insect population from western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte. PLOS ONE. 2018;13: e0197059. pmid:29758046
  15. 15. Zha W, Peng X, Chen R, Du B, Zhu L, He G. Knockdown of Midgut Genes by dsRNA-Transgenic Plant-Mediated RNA Interference in the Hemipteran Insect Nilaparvata lugens. PLOS ONE. 2011;6: e20504. pmid:21655219
  16. 16. Yu R, Xu X, Liang Y, Tian H, Pan Z, Jin S, et al. The Insect Ecdysone Receptor is a Good Potential Target for RNAi-based Pest Control. Int J Biol Sci. 2014;10: 1171–1180. pmid:25516715
  17. 17. Whyard S, Singh AD, Wong S. Ingested double-stranded RNAs can act as species-specific insecticides. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2009;39: 824–832. pmid:19815067
  18. 18. Bachman PM, Huizinga KM, Jensen PD, Mueller G, Tan J, Uffman JP, et al. Ecological risk assessment for DvSnf7 RNA: A plant-incorporated protectant with targeted activity against western corn rootworm. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2016;81: 77–88. pmid:27494948
  19. 19. Petrick JS, Frierdich GE, Carleton SM, Kessenich CR, Silvanovich A, Zhang Y, et al. Corn rootworm-active RNA DvSnf7: Repeat dose oral toxicology assessment in support of human and mammalian safety. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2016;81: 57–68. pmid:27436086
  20. 20. Allen ML, Walker WB. Saliva of Lygus lineolaris digests double stranded ribonucleic acids. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2012;58: 391–396. pmid:22226823
  21. 21. Sugahara R, Jouraku A, Nakakura T, Minaba M, Yamamoto T, Shinohara Y, et al. Tissue-specific expression and silencing phenotypes of mitochondrial phosphate carrier paralogues in several insect species. Insect Molecular Biology. 2017;26: 332–342. pmid:28224717
  22. 22. Sugahara R, Minaba M, Jouraku A, Kotaki T, Yamamoto T, Shinohara Y, et al. Characterization of two adenine nucleotide translocase paralogues in the stink bug, Plautia stali. J Pestic Sci. 2016;41: 44–48. pmid:30363102
  23. 23. Nishide Y, Kageyama D, Yokoi K, Jouraku A, Tanaka H, Futahashi R, et al. Functional crosstalk across IMD and Toll pathways: insight into the evolution of incomplete immune cascades. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2019;286: 20182207. pmid:30963836
  24. 24. Nishide Y, Kageyama D, Hatakeyama M, Yokoi K, Jouraku A, Tanaka H, et al. Diversity and function of multicopper oxidase genes in the stinkbug Plautia stali. Scientific Reports. 2020;10: 1–9. pmid:32103072
  25. 25. Abe Y, Mishiro K, Takanashi M. Symbiont of brown-winged green bug, Plautia stali Scott. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology (Japan). 1995 [cited 15 Nov 2018]. Available: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=JP9601691
  26. 26. Hosokawa T, Ishii Y, Nikoh N, Fujie M, Satoh N, Fukatsu T. Obligate bacterial mutualists evolving from environmental bacteria in natural insect populations. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1: 1–7. pmid:27571756
  27. 27. Hosokawa T, Matsuura Y, Kikuchi Y, Fukatsu T. Recurrent evolution of gut symbiotic bacteria in pentatomid stinkbugs. Zoological Letters. 2016;2: 24. pmid:27980805
  28. 28. Hayashi T, Hosokawa T, Meng X-Y, Koga R, Fukatsu T. Female-Specific Specialization of a Posterior End Region of the Midgut Symbiotic Organ in Plautia splendens and Allied Stinkbugs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81: 2603–2611. pmid:25636847
  29. 29. Nishide Y, Onodera NT, Tanahashi M, Moriyama M, Fukatsu T, Koga R. Aseptic rearing procedure for the stinkbug Plautia stali (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) by sterilizing food-derived bacterial contaminants. Appl Entomol Zool. 2017;52: 407–415.
  30. 30. Oishi S, Moriyama M, Koga R, Fukatsu T. Morphogenesis and development of midgut symbiotic organ of the stinkbug Plautia stali (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Zoological Letters. 2019;5: 16. pmid:31164991
  31. 31. Schaefer CW, Panizzi AR. Heteroptera of Economic Importance. CRC Press; 2000.
  32. 32. Christiaens O, Smagghe G. The challenge of RNAi-mediated control of hemipterans. Current Opinion in Insect Science. 2014;6: 15–21. pmid:32846663
  33. 33. Li J, Wang X-P, Wang M-Q, Ma W-H, Hua H-X. Advances in the use of the RNA interference technique in Hemiptera. Insect Science. 2013;20: 31–39. pmid:23955823
  34. 34. Wuriyanghan H, Falk BW. RNA Interference towards the Potato Psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli, Is Induced in Plants Infected with Recombinant Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV). PLOS ONE. 2013;8: e66050. pmid:23824081
  35. 35. Wuriyanghan H, Rosa C, Falk BW. Oral Delivery of Double-Stranded RNAs and siRNAs Induces RNAi Effects in the Potato/Tomato Psyllid, Bactericerca cockerelli. PLOS ONE. 2011;6: e27736. pmid:22110747
  36. 36. Thakur N, Upadhyay SK, Verma PC, Chandrashekar K, Tuli R, Singh PK. Enhanced Whitefly Resistance in Transgenic Tobacco Plants Expressing Double Stranded RNA of v-ATPase A Gene. PLOS ONE. 2014;9: e87235. pmid:24595215
  37. 37. Walker WB, Allen ML. RNA interference-mediated knockdown of IAP in Lygus lineolaris induces mortality in adult and pre-adult life stages. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 2011;138: 83–92.
  38. 38. Li J, Chen Q, Lin Y, Jiang T, Wu G, Hua H. RNA interference in Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae) based on dsRNA ingestion. Pest Management Science. 2011;67: 852–859. pmid:21370391
  39. 39. Upadhyay SK, Chandrashekar K, Thakur N, Verma PC, Borgio JF, Singh PK, et al. RNA interference for the control of whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci) by oral route. J Biosci. 2011;36: 153–161. pmid:21451256
  40. 40. Singh S, Gupta M, Pandher S, Kaur G, Rathore P, Palli SR. Selection of housekeeping genes and demonstration of RNAi in cotton leafhopper, Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida). PLOS ONE. 2018;13: e0191116. pmid:29329327
  41. 41. Galdeano DM, Breton MC, Lopes JRS, Falk BW, Machado MA. Oral delivery of double-stranded RNAs induces mortality in nymphs and adults of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. PLOS ONE. 2017;12: e0171847. pmid:28282380
  42. 42. Luan J-B, Ghanim M, Liu S-S, Czosnek H. Silencing the ecdysone synthesis and signaling pathway genes disrupts nymphal development in the whitefly. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2013;43: 740–746. pmid:23748027
  43. 43. Li H, Guan R, Guo H, Miao X. New insights into an RNAi approach for plant defence against piercing-sucking and stem-borer insect pests. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2015;38: 2277–2285. pmid:25828885
  44. 44. Ghosh SKB, Hunter WB, Park AL, Gundersen-Rindal DE. Double strand RNA delivery system for plant-sap-feeding insects. PLOS ONE. 2017;12: e0171861. pmid:28182760
  45. 45. Bansal R, Mittapelly P, Chen Y, Mamidala P, Zhao C, Michel A. Quantitative RT-PCR Gene Evaluation and RNA Interference in the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug. PLOS ONE. 2016;11: e0152730. pmid:27144586
  46. 46. Sharma R, Christiaens O, Taning CN, Smagghe G. RNAi-mediated mortality in southern green stinkbug Nezara viridula by oral delivery of dsRNA. Pest Management Science. n/a. pmid:32696565
  47. 47. Christiaens O, Swevers L, Smagghe G. DsRNA degradation in the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) associated with lack of response in RNAi feeding and injection assay. Peptides. 2014;53: 307–314. pmid:24394433
  48. 48. Luo Y, Chen Q, Luan J, Chung SH, Van Eck J, Turgeon R, et al. Towards an understanding of the molecular basis of effective RNAi against a global insect pest, the whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2017;88: 21–29. pmid:28736300
  49. 49. Ghodke AB, Good RT, Golz JF, Russell DA, Edwards O, Robin C. Extracellular endonucleases in the midgut of Myzus persicae may limit the efficacy of orally delivered RNAi. Scientific Reports. 2019;9: 11898. pmid:31417162
  50. 50. Dong X, Li X, Li Q, Jia H, Zhang H. The inducible blockage of RNAi reveals a role for polyunsaturated fatty acids in the regulation of dsRNA-endocytic capacity in Bactrocera dorsalis. Sci Rep. 2017;7: 1–11. pmid:28127051
  51. 51. Spit J, Philips A, Wynant N, Santos D, Plaetinck G, Vanden Broeck J. Knockdown of nuclease activity in the gut enhances RNAi efficiency in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, but not in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2017;81: 103–116. pmid:28093313
  52. 52. Kunte N, McGraw E, Bell S, Held D, Avila L-A. Prospects, challenges and current status of RNAi through insect feeding. Pest Management Science. 2020;76: 26–41. pmid:31419022
  53. 53. He B, Chu Y, Yin M, Müllen K, An C, Shen J. Fluorescent Nanoparticle Delivered dsRNA Toward Genetic Control of Insect Pests. Advanced Materials. 2013;25: 4580–4584. pmid:23794475
  54. 54. Thairu MW, Skidmore IH, Bansal R, Nováková E, Hansen TE, Li‐Byarlay H, et al. Efficacy of RNA interference knockdown using aerosolized short interfering RNAs bound to nanoparticles in three diverse aphid species. Insect Molecular Biology. 2017;26: 356–368. pmid:28314050