Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Circulating resistin and follistatin levels in obese and non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Tahereh Raeisi,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran

  • Hossein Rezaie,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Software

    Affiliation Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Mina Darand,

    Roles Data curation, Software, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Akram Taheri,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

  • Nazila Garousi,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

  • Bahman Razi,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Hematology and Blood Banking, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran

  • Leonardo Roever,

    Roles Methodology, Software

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Research, Federal University of Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil

  • Reza Mohseni,

    Roles Validation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Shimels Hussien Mohammed,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences-International Campus (TUMS-IC), Tehran, Iran

  • Shahab Alizadeh

    Roles Supervision, Writing – original draft

    sh_alizadeh@razi.tums.ac.ir

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This meta-analysis was performed to resolve the inconsistencies regarding resistin and follistatin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) by pooling the available evidence. A systematic literature search using PubMed and Scopus was carried out through November 2020 to obtain all pertinent studies. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the strength of the association between the levels of resistin and follistatin with PCOS in the overall and stratified analysis by obesity status. A total of 47 publications, 38 for resistin (2424 cases; 1906 controls) and 9 studies for follistatin (815 cases; 328 controls), were included in the meta-analysis. Resistin levels were significantly higher in PCOS women compared with non-PCOS controls (WMD = 1.96 ng/ml; 95%CI = 1.25–2.67, P≤0.001) as well as in obese PCOS women vs. obese controls, and in non-obese PCOS women compared with non-obese controls, but not in obese PCOS vs. non-obese PCOS patients,. A significantly increased circulating follistatin was found in PCOS patients compared with the controls (WMD = 0.44 ng/ml; 95%CI = 0.30–0.58, P≤0.001) and in non-obese PCOS women compared with non-obese controls and in obese PCOS women vs. obese controls, but, no significant difference in follistatin level was observed in obese PCOS compared with non-obese PCOS women. Significant heterogeneity and publication bias was evident for some analyses. Circulating levels of resistin and follistatin, independent of obesity status, are higher in women with PCOS compared with controls, showing that these adipokines may contribute to the pathology of PCOS.

Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common heterogeneous endocrine disease affecting about 10% of reproductive-aged women [1], which is featured by clustering of biochemical and clinical hyperandrogenemia, hirsutism, acne, oligo-or anovulation and polycystic ovaries [2]. Besides causing infertility, PCOS is closely related to obesity, insulin resistance (IR), type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular diseases, hepatic steatosis, and endometrial cancer [35], consequently leading to an adverse effect on health-related quality of life in PCOS women and a remarkable burden on the healthcare system [6]. Thus, the concept of PCOS involves multiple systems in the body and goes beyond the endocrinal and gynecological definitions to cover a broad array of conditions.

Up to date, although the exact pathogenesis and etiology of PCOS remain not fully understood, the phenotypic expression of patients with this syndrome are differentiated with some women being obese, some being normal weight, and some women presenting IR and elevated adipokines production [7]. However IR is not necessarily needed for the PCOS diagnosis, it occurs in approximately 50–80% of patients with this syndrome [8], and is considered to play a significant role in its etiology [2]. Regardless of body mass index (BMI), excess adiposity and elevated secretion of adipokines from adipocytes might be a linkage between the IR and ovulation disturbances [9]. The adipokine resistin, a 12.5 kDa cysteine-rich protein secreted by adipocytes, is identified as a strong candidate linking IR to excess adiposity [10]. Circulating resistin concentrations are significantly elevated in insulin-resistant mice and genetically or diet-induced obese mice [10, 11]. Moreover, resistin expression is reported to be up-regulated by dehydroepiandrosterone [12], proposing that resistin and androgen synthesis, a common condition in PCOS [13], may be related. In line with these findings, Seow et al. [14] found that upregulation of resistin might be involved in the pathogenesis of PCOS. Another adipokine that might play an important role in metabolic and endocrine complications in PCOS is follistatin, a member of the transforming growth factor-b superfamily [15], which acts as a significant regulator of follicular development and has been identified as a candidate gene for PCOS [16]. It is also recognized that an increase in follistatin inhibits follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) production and might inhibit follicular development and increase the production of androgen by ovaries, both of which are fundamental in PCOS [17]. The authors still need to provide clear justification for selecting these resistin and follistatin particularly while there are many other important adipokines that have been studied in context of PCOS.

Recently, there has been an increasing interest in exploring the changes in circulating adipokines in PCOS patients; meta-analysis of changes in many important adipokines in context of PCOS such as omentin-1 [18], leptin [19, 20], interleukin-6(IL-6) [21], visfatin [22], tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) [23], adiponectin [24], and retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) [25] has been performed previously. But, in spite of the potentially important metabolic roles of resistin and follistatin in PCOS and contradictory results of the previous studies, there is no meta-analysis on these hormones yet, indicating the importance of pooling the available data in this regard. Besides, for patients with PCOS stratified by weight status (obese versus lean), the results of individual studies regarding circulating resistin and follistatin were also inconsistent. Thus, the primary aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to clarify the relation of circulating levels of resistin and follistatin to PCOS stratified by weight status. The secondary aim was to evaluate the changes in these adipokines in obese PCOS patients compared with non-obese PCOS patients.

Materials and methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [26].

Search strategy

A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed and Scopus to obtain all pertinent human studies published up to November 2020. Following medical subject heading (MeSh) terms and text words were used: (resistin or adipose tissue-specific secretory factor or C/EBP-epsilon-regulated myeloid-specific secreted cysteine-rich protein or ADSF or XCP1 or follistatin or activin-binding protein) and (PCOS or polycystic ovary syndrome). The search strategy was limited to articles published in English. Moreover, the reference lists of included studies and review articles were manually searched to obtain other possible relevant studies that may have been missed in the initial search. Two investigators (SHA and LR) independently searched the electronic databases and screened the titles/abstracts and full-text studies after excluding duplicated publications. Any disagreement in the screening process was resolved by involving a third reviewer.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies were eligible for the current meta-analysis if they met the following criteria: a) studies should be published in English; b) reported circulating levels of resistin or follistatin in women with PCOS compared with healthy female controls; c) reported body mass index (BMI) or weight status of the participants; d) reported the total means of resistin or follistatin and standard deviations (SDs) or sufficient information to calculate them; e) included an acceptable diagnosis of PCOS based on the Rotterdam criteria, the Androgen Excess and PCOS Society criteria, or National Institute of Health (NIH) criteria. Only the most informative or the newest study was included when multiple studies were published based on the same population. Studies were excluded if they enrolled participants with diseases other than PCOS or were reviews, editorials, case reports, conference abstracts, cell line studies, animal studies, letters to editors, and studies without controls. EndNote program was used to facilitate the screening process. Two independent authors (SHA and LR) screened the titles/abstracts of studies to find whether studies are eligible for inclusion. If the abstracts of articles seemed pertinent, then the full-text assessment was done and the screening forms were filled out to select the eligible studies based on the inclusion criteria. Any disagreements were discussed and resolved by consensus with a third reviewer.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Two investigators conducted data extraction and quality assessment of the included publications independently and dissimilarities were resolved by referring back to the original citations. The following information was extracted: first author’s last name, country, year of publication, study design, age, numbers of cases and controls, ethnicity, BMI or weight status, and circulating resistin and follistatin levels (means and standard deviations). Because of the variety of definitions for obesity among the studies, it was defined as BMI above 25 or 30 kg/m 2. For articles providing the standard errors of means, the standard deviations (SDs) were calculated by multiplying the standard errors by the square roots of the sample size [27]. For publications reporting the medians and the corresponding interquartile range, medians were considered as means while the SDs were estimated by dividing the widths of the interquartile ranges by 1.35 [2]. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale [28], which covers nine items, and scores range from 0 to 9. Studies with scores of ≤4, 5 to 6, and 7 or above are categorized as low-quality, medium-quality, and high-quality studies, respectively.

Statistical analysis

The summary weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95%CIs was estimated for circulating levels of resistin and follistatin in PCOS cases versus controls (or between obese and non-obese PCOS women). The I2 statistic and Cochrane Q statistic were applied to assess the statistical heterogeneity across studies. A p value<0.1 for Q-statistic or I2 larger than 50% was considered significant heterogeneity. When significant evidence for heterogeneity was detected, the random-effects model was used for analyses; otherwise, a fixed-effect model was applied. The sensitivity analysis was conducted by removing one study each time and recalculating WMD with a 95% confidence interval (CI) to find the effect of individual studies on the pooled effect sizes. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plot asymmetry and Egger’s linear regression method [29] and P values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were done with the use of Stata software (Version 13.0; StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Search result and study characteristics

The initial search strategy found 870 studies, of which 805 studies were excluded after screening by titles/ abstracts or duplicate publications, and 65 studies were eligible for full-text assessment. Finally, a total of 47 articles, 38 for resistin (2424 cases; 1906 controls) [7, 9, 11, 14, 3063] and 9 studies for follistatin (815 cases; 328 controls) [15, 17, 6470], were included in the present meta-analysis based on the inclusion criteria. The flowchart summarizing the screening process is reported in Fig 1. The included studies were published between 2001 and 2020. The included studies also had subpopulations based on obesity status, which were analyzed separately. For resistin, there were 20 studies comparing circulating resistin in healthy non-obese PCOS women vs. non-obese control, 12 studies on obese PCOS vs. obese healthy women, and 18 studies on obese PCOS vs. non-obese PCOS patients [7, 9, 30, 3234, 3639, 44, 51, 5355, 5961]. Moreover, for follistatin, there were 4 publications comparing circulating follistatin in non-obese PCOS women vs. non-obese healthy controls [15, 6567], 2 studies on obese PCOS vs. obese healthy women [17, 65], and 2 studies on obese PCOS vs. non-obese PCOS patients [65, 67]. The quality of studies was medium to high, with scores ranging from 4 to 8 (S1 Table).

The characteristics of the included articles are reported in Table 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. The characteristics of the included studies in meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.t001

Quantitative synthesis of data

Resistin levels.

In the pooled analysis of all eligible studies (38 studies), circulating resistin levels were significantly higher in PCOS women compared with non-PCOS controls (random effects, WMD = 1.96 ng/ml; 95% CI = 1.25 to 2.67, P ≤0.001) (Fig 2 and Table 2), with a significant heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 96.9%; p = ≤0.001). Resistin levels were also significantly higher in obese PCOS women vs. obese controls (random effects, WMD = 1.36 ng/ml; 95% CI = 0.53 to 2.20, P = 0.001) (Fig 3 and Table 2), and in non-obese PCOS women compared with non-obese controls (random effects, WMD = 1.60 ng/ml; 95% CI = 0.57 to 2.63, P = 0.002) (Fig 4 and Table 2), but not in obese PCOS vs. non-obese PCOS patients (Fig 5 and Table 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Forest plot for the circulating resistin in PCOS women compared with healthy controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Forest plot for the circulating resistin in obese PCOS women vs. obese controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. Forest plot for the circulating resistin in non-obese PCOS women compared with non-obese controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.g004

thumbnail
Fig 5. Forest plot for the circulating resistin in obese PCOS vs. non-obese PCOS patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.g005

thumbnail
Table 2. Meta-analysis of circulating resistin and follistatin in patients with PCOS.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.t002

Follistatin levels.

When all eligible studies were pooled (8 studies), a significantly increased levels of circulating follistatin were found in PCOS patients compared with the controls (random effects, WMD = 0.44 ng/ml; 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.58, P ≤0.001) (Fig 6 and Table 2); although, a significant evidence for heterogeneity was detected (I2 = 99.2%; p = ≤0.001). Follistatin levels were also significantly higher in non-obese PCOS women compared with non-obese controls (random effects, WMD = 0.64 ng/ml; 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.94, P ≤0.001) (S1 Fig and Table 2) and in obese PCOS women vs. obese controls (WMD = 0.58 ng/ml; 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.80, P ≤0.001) (S2 Fig and Table 2). No significant difference in follistatin level was observed in obese PCOS compared with non-obese PCOS women (S3 Fig and Table 2).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Forest plot for the circulating follistatin in PCOS women compared with healthy controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.g006

Met-regression, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias.

Meta-regression analysis coefficients for serum resistin and follistatin levels in the examined group of studies showed that difference of mean age (Coefficient: 0.24, SE: 0.22, p = 0.30) and sample size (Coefficient: 0.003, SE: 0.003, p = 0.50) did not change the relation of resistin to PCOS. For follistatin, it was found that the relationship between follistatin and PCOS is modified by the difference of mean age between the PCOS patients and healthy controls (Coefficient: - 0.06, SE: 0.01, p = 0.007) so that by an increase in the difference of mean age between the PCOS patients and healthy controls, there was a significant reduction in the mean difference of follistatin between the groups (Fig 7). Sensitivity analysis was conducted by deleting the studies one by one in the meta-analysis each time to reflect the impact of the single studies on the pooled WMD. Finally, no single study considerably affected the pooled WMD for resistin (S2 Table) and follistatin (S3 Table), showing that the results of this meta-analysis were statistically robust. A significant evidence for publication bias was detected by Egger’s test for studies on resistin (t = 2.14, p = 0.03) (Fig 8 and Table 2).

thumbnail
Fig 7. Meta-regression analysis coefficients for serum follistatin levels in the examined group of studies based on the difference of mean age between the PCOS patients and healthy controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.g007

thumbnail
Fig 8.

Funnel plots for publication bias for resistin in PCOS vs. control (A), none-obese PCOS vs. none-obese control (B), obese PCOS vs. obese control (C), and obese PCOS vs. none-obese PCOS (D).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.g008

Discussion

Recently, changes in circulating levels of resistin and follistatin in women with PCOS have been investigated; although, the results of published studies are still inconclusive. Thus, this meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively analyze circulating levels of these adipokines in PCOS women compared with healthy women by considering weight status as an interacting factor. The results revealed that, overall, resistin and follistatin levels were significantly higher in PCOS women compared with healthy controls. The increased resistin and follistatin levels in PCOS patients were independent of obesity status.

In agreement with our findings, Pandis et al. [30] found that the resistin circulating levels were higher in patients with PCOS. They also found that subjects with a BMI≥25 kg/m2 compared with non-obese PCOS and non-obese healthy women have higher resistin levels. However, no difference in resistin levels was reported between patients with PCOS and a BMI<25 kg/m2 and healthy lean women [30], proposing that resistin may have a role in PCOS. Resistin has been reported as a potential link between insulin resistance and obesity [71]. The mRNA level of resistin has been revealed to be down-regulated by antidiabetic thiazolidinediones medicines, which bind to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-g (PPAR-g) in fat cells [10]. Resistin expression in adipocytes is increased in morbidly obese individuals compared with lean subjects [72]. In addition, in the adipocytes from women with PCOS, the mRNA level of resistin is 2-fold higher than that in healthy women [14]. It has been identified that there is a positive correlation between serum resistin and free testosterone levels [62]. Increased resistin concentration might increase ovarian androgen production in patients with PCOS [34]. Taken together, these data and our findings, show that resistin may contribute to PCOS and its clinical manifestations.

In line with our meta-analysis, previous studies have reported that circulating levels of follistatin are increased in PCOS independent of body mass index [64, 65], suggesting that obesity is not the explanatory factor for the increased levels of follistatin among women with PCOS. The source of circulating follistatin in women is unknown; nevertheless, this protein is released from ovarian granulosa cells in response to FSH stimulation [73]. An increase in the expression of follistatin is a possible mechanism in which follicular growth is inhibited [64]. These findings suggest that changes in the secretion of follistatin from the ovary or other organs might be involved in the pathophysiology of PCOS and describe the alteration in circulation levels of this protein. This is in line with this observation that PCOS is most closely related to areas adjacent to the follistatin gene in PCOS siblings [16]; however, later studies have identified the relationship to be much weaker than what previously thought [74]. Interestingly, in some studies, no significant difference in the level of follistatin was observed in the follicular fluid from the polycystic and healthy ovaries [75, 76]. The previous reports that failed to find any difference in the level of follistatin in the follicular fluids could be explained by thecal secretin of this adipokine and the rich blood supply in this region of the ovary resulting in rapid clearance of follistatin into the blood [64]. Moreover, these studies indicate the possibility of the extragonadal origin of the high circulating follistatin levels in women with PCOS. Since both resistin and follistatin are involved in clinical manifestations of PCOS, our findings are clinically important as they could be used as possible therapeutic targets in women with PCOS.

This meta-analysis resolved the inconsistency among the results of the previous studies; these findings are clinically important as an increase in resistin and follistatin observed in the present meta-analysis has been related to adverse metabolic consequences in individuals with PCOS. Higher levels of follistatin and resistin are associated with the lack of pre-ovular follicle development in PCOS or insulin resistance [64, 77]. Thus, the modulation of these hormones may be important therapeutic targets for new drugs in patients with PCOS. Based on the results of this study, follistatin and resistin could be studied in large cohort of PCOS patients to better understand the pathophysiology of this disease. Also, future clinical trials implement interventions to improve circulating/follicular concentrations of these hormones.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis summarizing available evidence to assess whether there is a relationship between circulating resistin and follistatin levels with PCOS. However, some limitations of the present meta-analysis should be acknowledged. First, the leading limitation of the current study is the remarkable heterogeneity across the included studies, which might decrease the reliability of our results. This heterogeneity may reflect clinical heterogeneity related to the differences in the accuracy and sensitivity of various methods applied to assess circulating levels of investigated adipokines, and differences in geographical regions, physical activity, diet, ethnicity of participants, and concomitant subclinical inflammatory diseases. Furthermore, some included studies had small sample sizes and the background of patients was different, which would lead to low statistical power and inconclusive conclusions among the studies. In the meta-regression analysis, we found that difference of mean age is a source of observed heterogeneity among the studies. Nevertheless, in each individual study, cases and controls were matched for age. Our meta-regression was an exploratory analysis to assess whether difference of mean age between the PCOS patients and healthy controls across different studies affects pooled effect sizes despite matching cases and controls for age within studies. We revealed that the relationship between follistatin and PCOS is modified by mean difference of age between the PCOS patients and healthy controls, suggesting that results of studies with larger difference of mean age between the PCOS patients and healthy controls should be interpreted cautiously. Second, the language restriction to English publications may increase the odds of publication bias. Third, the results were based on crude estimates without any adjustment for potential confounders, while a more accurate assessment should consider the confounding factors such as alcohol use, smoking status, dietary patterns, and environmental factors. It is noteworthy that cases and controls were matched for most important confounders such as age and BMI, but, similar to other epidemiological studies, residual confounding could not be ignored.

In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggested that resistin and follistatin levels, independent of obesity status, were higher in women with PCOS compared with those in healthy controls. Hence, resistin and follistatin might play important roles in the development of PCOS and may be useful biomarkers for the treatment of this disorder. Further well-designed studies with large sample sizes should be performed to examine the circulating levels of resistin and follistatin and their role in PCOS.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Forest plot for the circulating follistatin in non-obese PCOS women compared with non-obese controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Forest plot for the circulating follistatin in obese PCOS women vs. obese controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.s003

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. Forest plot for the circulating follistatin in obese PCOS compared with non-obese PCOS women.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.s004

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Quality assessment of studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.s005

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Sensitivity analysis by omitting single studies for studies investigating resistin levels in PCOS compared with healthy control women.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.s006

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Sensitivity analysis by omitting single studies for studies investigating follistatin levels in PCOS compared with healthy control women.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246200.s007

(DOCX)

References

  1. 1. Bozdag G, Mumusoglu S, Zengin D, Karabulut E, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction. 2016;31(12):2841–55. pmid:27664216
  2. 2. Cai X, Qiu S, Li L, Zuegel M, Steinacker JM, Schumann U. Circulating irisin in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis. Reproductive biomedicine online. 2018;36(2):172–80. pmid:29217128
  3. 3. Hardiman P, Pillay OS, Atiomo W. Polycystic ovary syndrome and endometrial carcinoma. The lancet. 2003;361(9371):1810–2. pmid:12781553
  4. 4. Homburg R. The management of infertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2003;1(1):109. pmid:14617367
  5. 5. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Piperi C, Argyrakopoulou G, Spina J, Papanastasiou L, Bergiele A, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome: the influence of environmental and genetic factors. HORMONES-ATHENS-. 2006;5(1):17. pmid:16728382
  6. 6. Barry JA, Kuczmierczyk AR, Hardiman PJ. Anxiety and depression in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction. 2011;26(9):2442–51. pmid:21725075
  7. 7. Olszanecka-Glinianowicz M, Kuglin D, Dąbkowska-Huć A, Skałba P. Serum adiponectin and resistin in relation to insulin resistance and markers of hyperandrogenism in lean and obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2011;154(1):51–6. pmid:20889251
  8. 8. Legro RS, Arslanian SA, Ehrmann DA, Hoeger KM, Murad MH, Pasquali R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2013;98(12):4565–92.
  9. 9. Wang Y, Xie X, Zhu W. Serum adiponectin and resistin levels in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome and their clinical implications. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]. 2010;30(5):638–42. pmid:21063848
  10. 10. Steppan CM, Bailey ST, Bhat S, Brown EJ, Banerjee RR, Wright CM, et al. The hormone resistin links obesity to diabetes. Nature. 2001;409(6818):307. pmid:11201732
  11. 11. Seow K-M, Juan C-C, Hsu Y-P, Ho L-T, Wang Y-Y, Hwang J-L. Serum and follicular resistin levels in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome during IVF-stimulated cycles. Human Reproduction. 2005;20(1):117–21. pmid:15513972
  12. 12. Kochan Z, Karbowska J. Dehydroepiandrosterone up-regulates resistin gene expression in white adipose tissue. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2004;218(1–2):57–64. pmid:15130511
  13. 13. Pasquali R, Stener‐Victorin E, Yildiz BO, Duleba AJ, Hoeger K, Mason H, et al. PCOS Forum: research in polycystic ovary syndrome today and tomorrow. Clinical endocrinology. 2011;74(4):424–33. pmid:21158892
  14. 14. Seow KM, Juan CC, Wu LY, Hsu YP, Yang WM, Tsai YL, et al. Serum and adipocyte resistin in polycystic ovary syndrome with insulin resistance. Human Reproduction. 2004;19(1):48–53. pmid:14688155
  15. 15. Chen M-J, Chen H-F, Chen S-U, Ho H-N, Yang Y-S, Yang W-S. The relationship between follistatin and chronic low-grade inflammation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertility and sterility. 2009;92(6):2041–4. pmid:19591997
  16. 16. Urbanek M, Legro RS, Driscoll DA, Azziz R, Ehrmann DA, Norman RJ, et al. Thirty-seven candidate genes for polycystic ovary syndrome: strongest evidence for linkage is with follistatin. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 1999;96(15):8573–8. pmid:10411917
  17. 17. Teede H, Ng S, Hedger M, Moran L. Follistatin and activins in polycystic ovary syndrome: relationship to metabolic and hormonal markers. Metabolism. 2013;62(10):1394–400. pmid:23768911
  18. 18. Tang Y-L, Yu J, Zeng Z-G, Liu Y, Liu J-Y, Xu J-X. Circulating omentin-1 levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2017;33(3):244–9. pmid:27908216
  19. 19. Li L, Feng Q, Ye M, He Y, Yao A, Shi K. Metabolic effect of obesity on polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents: a meta-analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2017;37(8):1036–47. pmid:28657375
  20. 20. Zheng S-H, Du D-F, Li X-L. Leptin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Reproductive sciences. 2017;24(5):656–70. pmid:27798245
  21. 21. Peng Z, Sun Y, Lv X, Zhang H, Liu C, Dai S. Interleukin-6 levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148531. pmid:26849353
  22. 22. Sun Y, Wu Z, Wei L, Liu C, Zhu S, Tang S. High-visfatin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: evidence from a meta-analysis. Gynecological endocrinology. 2015;31(10):808–14. pmid:26422683
  23. 23. Gao L, Gu Y, Yin X. High serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis. PloS one. 2016;11(10):e0164021. pmid:27764100
  24. 24. Toulis KA, Goulis D, Farmakiotis D, Georgopoulos N, Katsikis I, Tarlatzis B, et al. Adiponectin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Human reproduction update. 2009;15(3):297–307. pmid:19261627
  25. 25. Jia J, Bai J, Liu Y, Yin J, Yang P, Yu S, et al. Association between retinol-binding protein 4 and polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis. Endocrine journal. 2014:EJ14-0186. pmid:25069671
  26. 26. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine. 2009;151(4):264–9. pmid:19622511
  27. 27. Rodrigo G, Rodrigo C, Burschtin O. A meta-analysis of the effects of ipratropium bromide in adults with acute asthma. The American journal of medicine. 1999;107(4):363–70. pmid:10527039
  28. 28. Wells G. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non randomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. 2001.
  29. 29. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj. 1997;315(7109):629–34. pmid:9310563
  30. 30. Panidis D, Koliakos G, Kourtis A, Farmakiotis D, Mouslech T, Rousso D. Serum resistin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertility and sterility. 2004;81(2):361–6. pmid:14967374
  31. 31. Xiu-e L, He-feng H, Mei-gen L, Yi-min Z, Yu-li Q, Min-yue D. Resistin levels of serum and follicular fluid in non-obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome during IVF cycles. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B. 2005;6(9):897–902. pmid:16130192
  32. 32. Escobar-Morreale H, Villuendas G, Botella-Carretero J, Alvarez-Blasco F, Sanchon R, Luque-Ramirez M, et al. Adiponectin and resistin in PCOS: a clinical, biochemical and molecular genetic study. Human Reproduction. 2006;21(9):2257–65. pmid:16675483
  33. 33. Bideci A, Çamurdan MO, Yeşilkaya E, Demirel F, Cinaz P. Serum ghrelin, leptin and resistin levels in adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2008;34(4):578–84. pmid:18937712
  34. 34. Yilmaz M, Bukan N, Demırcı H, Öztürk Ç, Kan E, Ayvaz G, et al. Serum resistin and adiponectin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2009;25(4):246–52. pmid:19408174
  35. 35. Arikan Ş, Bahceci M, Tuzcu A, Kale E, Gökalp D. Serum resistin and adiponectin levels in young non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2010;26(3):161–6. pmid:20148738
  36. 36. Olszanecka‐Glinianowicz M, Madej P, Nylec M, Owczarek A, Szanecki W, Skałba P, et al. Circulating apelin level in relation to nutritional status in polycystic ovary syndrome and its association with metabolic and hormonal disturbances. Clinical Endocrinology. 2013;79(2):238–42. pmid:23199261
  37. 37. Cassar S, Teede HJ, Harrison CL, Joham AE, Moran LJ, Stepto NK. Biomarkers and insulin sensitivity in women with P olycystic Ovary Syndrome: Characteristics and predictive capacity. Clinical endocrinology. 2015;83(1):50–8. pmid:25262763
  38. 38. Gul OO, Cander S, Gul B, Açıkgoz E, Sarandol E, Ersoy C. Evaluation of insulin resistance and plasma levels for visfatin and resistin in obese and non-obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. European cytokine network. 2015;26(4):73–8. pmid:26967765
  39. 39. Nambiar V, Vijesh VV, Lakshmanan P, Sukumaran S, Suganthi R. Association of adiponectin and resistin gene polymorphisms in South Indian women with polycystic ovary syndrome. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2016;200:82–8. pmid:26995146
  40. 40. Chen Y-C, Tsai E-M, Chen H-S, Liu Y-H, Lee C-H, Chou F-H, et al. Serum resistin level is a predictor of ovarian response in in vitro fertilisation cycle. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2007;86(8):963–7. pmid:17653882
  41. 41. Chu Y, Cui Q, Feng G, Song Z, Jiang X. The expression of resistin in adipose tissues of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and insulin resistance. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]. 2009;29(5):642. pmid:19821101
  42. 42. Sarray S, Madan S, Saleh LR, Mahmoud N, Almawi WY. Validity of adiponectin-to-leptin and adiponectin-to-resistin ratios as predictors of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertility and sterility. 2015;104(2):460–6. pmid:26051098
  43. 43. NAWAZ Y, GHAZANVI S, RASHEED N, JAHAN S, ULLAH MI. Association of Serum Resistin Level and Resistin (RETN) Gene (-420 C> G) Polymorphism in Pakistani Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Turkish Journal of Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2020;24(1).
  44. 44. Pangaribuan B, Yusuf I, Mansyur M, Wijaya A. Serum adiponectin and resistin in relation to insulin resistance and markers of hyperandrogenism in lean and obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism. 2011;2(6):235–45. pmid:23148188
  45. 45. Erkan M, Albayrak M, Karatas A, Keskin F, Aydin Y, AK HY EM, et al. Are insulin resistance and serum resistin levels increased in women with idiopathic hirsutism. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(13):1889–95. pmid:25010619
  46. 46. Obirikorang C, Owiredu WK, Adu-Afram S, Acheampong E, Asamoah EA, Antwi-Boasiakoh EK, et al. Assessing the variability and predictability of adipokines (adiponectin, leptin, resistin and their ratios) in non-obese and obese women with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. BMC research notes. 2019;12(1):1–8. pmid:30602384
  47. 47. Spanos N, Tziomalos K, Macut D, Koiou E, Kandaraki EA, Delkos D, et al. Adipokines, insulin resistance and hyperandrogenemia in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: cross-sectional correlations and the effects of weight loss. Obesity facts. 2012;5(4):495–504. pmid:22854419
  48. 48. Baldani DP, Skrgatic L, Kasum M, Zlopasa G, Kralik Oguic S, Herman M. Altered leptin, adiponectin, resistin and ghrelin secretion may represent an intrinsic polycystic ovary syndrome abnormality. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2019;35(5):401–5. pmid:30623695
  49. 49. Ganie MA, Sahar T, Rashid A, Wani IA, Nisar S, Sathyapalan T, et al. Comparative evaluation of biomarkers of inflammation among Indian women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) consuming vegetarian vs. non-vegetarian diet. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2019;10:699. pmid:31781027
  50. 50. Daan NM, Koster MP, de Wilde MA, Dalmeijer GW, Evelein AM, Fauser BC, et al. Biomarker profiles in women with PCOS and PCOS offspring; a pilot study. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165033. pmid:27806063
  51. 51. Zwirska-Korczala K, Sodowski K, Konturek S, Kuka D, Kukla M, Brzozowski T, et al. Postprandial response of ghrelin and PYY and indices of low-grade chronic inflammation in lean young women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;59(Suppl 2):161–78. pmid:18812636
  52. 52. Shen S-H, Shen S-Y, Liou T-H, Hsu M-I, Chang Y-cI, Cheng C-Y, et al. Obesity and inflammatory biomarkers in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2015;192:66–71. pmid:26177495
  53. 53. Güven A, Özgen T, AliyazicioĞlu Y. Adiponectin and resistin concentrations after glucose load in adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2010;26(1):30–8. pmid:19639497
  54. 54. Behboudi-Gandevani S, Tehrani FR, Yarandi RB, Noroozzadeh M, Hedayati M, Azizi F. The association between polycystic ovary syndrome, obesity, and the serum concentration of adipokines. Journal of endocrinological investigation. 2017;40(8):859–66. pmid:28332170
  55. 55. Farshchian F, Tehrani FR, Amirrasouli H, Pour HR, Hedayati M, Kazerouni F, et al. Visfatin and resistin serum levels in normal-weight and obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. International journal of endocrinology and metabolism. 2014;12(3). pmid:25237319
  56. 56. Mahde A, Shaker M, Al-Mashhadani Z. Study of omentin1 and other adipokines and hormones in PCOS patients. Oman medical journal. 2009;24(2):108. pmid:22334855
  57. 57. Baranova A, Tran TP, Afendy A, Wang L, Shamsaddini A, Mehta R, et al. Molecular signature of adipose tissue in patients with both non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Journal of translational medicine. 2013;11(1):133.
  58. 58. Çapoğlu İ, Erdem F, Uyanık A, Turhan H. Serum levels of resistin and hsCRP in women with PCOS. Open Medicine. 2009;4(4):428–32.
  59. 59. Carmina E, Orio F, Palomba S, Cascella T, Longo R, Colao A, et al. Evidence for altered adipocyte function in polycystic ovary syndrome. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2005;152(3):389–94. pmid:15757855
  60. 60. Dikmen E, Tarkun I, ÖZTÜRK F, Arslan B, CANTÜRK Z. Plasma adiponectin and resistin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: relation to body mass index and insulin resistance. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2011;41(1):45–52.
  61. 61. WANG Y-x, ZHU W-j. Evaluation of adiponectin, resistin, IL-6, TNF-α in obese and non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Journal of Reproduction and Contraception. 2012;23(4):237–44.
  62. 62. Munir I, Yen H-W, Baruth T, Tarkowski R, Azziz R, Magoffin DA, et al. Resistin stimulation of 17α-hydroxylase activity in ovarian theca cells in vitro: relevance to polycystic ovary syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2005;90(8):4852–7.
  63. 63. Yılmaz M, Bukan N, Ersoy R, Karakoç A, Yetkin I, Ayvaz G, et al. Glucose intolerance, insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk factors in first degree relatives of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Human Reproduction. 2005;20(9):2414–20. pmid:15890734
  64. 64. Norman RJ, Milner CR, Groome NP, Robertson DM. Circulating follistatin concentrations are higher and activin concentrations are lower in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Human reproduction. 2001;16(4):668–72. pmid:11278215
  65. 65. Eldar-Geva T, Spitz I, Groome N, Margalioth E, Homburg R. Follistatin and activin A serum concentrations in obese and non-obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Human reproduction. 2001;16(12):2552–6. pmid:11726573
  66. 66. Shen Z, Chen X, Chen Y. Inhibin B, activin A, and follistatin and the pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2005;88(3):336–7.
  67. 67. Chen M-J, Han D-S, Yang J-H, Yang Y-S, Ho H-N, Yang W-S. Myostatin and its association with abdominal obesity, androgen and follistatin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Human reproduction. 2012;27(8):2476–83. pmid:22693174
  68. 68. Köninger A, Kampmeier A, Mach P, Schmidt B, Strowitzki T, Kimmig R, et al. Tight interplay in early pregnancy between follistatin and anti-mullerian hormone in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2018;297(5):1307–16. pmid:29453653
  69. 69. Kensara OA. Prevalence of hypovitaminosis D, and its association with hypoadiponectinemia and hyperfollistatinemia, in Saudi women with naïve polycystic ovary syndrome. Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology. 2018;12:20–5. pmid:29892563
  70. 70. Suganthi R, Manonayaki S, FATHIMA BJA. Follistatin concentrations in women from Kerala with polycystic ovary syndrome. 2010.
  71. 71. Zhang J, Zhou L, Tang L, Xu L. The plasma level and gene expression of resistin in polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2011;27(12):982–7. pmid:21557697
  72. 72. Savage DB, Sewter CP, Klenk ES, Segal DG, Vidal-Puig A, Considine RV, et al. Resistin/Fizz3 expression in relation to obesity and peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ action in humans. Diabetes. 2001;50(10):2199–202. pmid:11574398
  73. 73. Vale W, Hsueh A, Rivier C, Yu J. The inhibin/activin family of hormones and growth factors. Peptide growth factors and their receptors II: Springer; 1990. p. 211–48.
  74. 74. Liao W, Roy A, Ng S. Preliminary investigation of follistatin gene mutations in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Molecular human reproduction. 2000;6(7):587–90. pmid:10871644
  75. 75. Erickson GF, Chung D-G, Sit A, DePaolo LV, Shimasaki S, Ling N. Ovary: Follistatin concentrations in follicular fluid of normal and polycystic ovaries. Human Reproduction. 1995;10(8):2120–4. pmid:8567852
  76. 76. Lambert-Messerlian G, Taylor A, Leykin L, Isaacson K, Toth T, Chang Y, et al. Characterization of intrafollicular steroid hormones, inhibin, and follistatin in women with and without polycystic ovarian syndrome following gonadotropin hyperstimulation. Biology of reproduction. 1997;57(5):1211–6. pmid:9369189
  77. 77. Steppan CM, Lazar MA. Resistin and obesity-associated insulin resistance. Trends in endocrinology & Metabolism. 2002;13(1):18–23.