Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Spatiotemporal characters and influence factors of hand, foot and mouth epidemic in Xinjiang, China

Abstract

Hand, foot and mouth (HFM) disease is a common childhood illness. The paper aims to capture the spatiotemporal characters, and investigate the influence factors of the HFM epidemic in 15 regions of Xinjiang province from 2008 to 2017, China. Descriptive statistical analysis shows that the children aged 0-5 years have a higher HFM incidence, mostly boys. The male-female ratio is 1.5:1. Through the scanning method, we obtain the first cluster high-risk areas. The cluster time is usually from May to August every year. A spatiotemporal model is proposed to analyze the impact of meteorological factors on HFM disease. Comparing with the spatial model, the model is more effective in terms of R2, AIC, deviation, and mean-square error. Among meteorological factors, the number of HFM cases generally increases with the intensity of rainfall. As the temperature increases, there are more HFM patients. Some regions are mostly influenced by wind speed. Further, another spatiotemporal model is introduced to investigate the relationship between HFM disease and socioeconomic factors. The results show that socioeconomic factors have significant influence on the disease. In most areas, the risk of HFM disease tends to rise with the increase of the gross domestic product, the ratios of urban population and tertiary industry. The incidence is closely related to the number of beds and population density in some regions. The higher the ratio of primary school, the lower the number of HFM cases. Based on the above analysis, it is the key measure to prevent and control the spread of the HFM epidemic in high-risk areas, and influence factors should not be ignored.

Introduction

Hand, foot and mouth (HFM) disease is an infectious disease with the features of high incidence and infectivity, caused by various human enteroviruses [1]. The main symptoms include fever, oral ulcers, maculopapular rashes, or vesicular sores on hands, feet, or mouths [2]. It can also cause aseptic meningitis, respiratory infections, myocarditis, and even the death of some critically ill patients [3]. HFM disease was classified as the class C notifiable infectious disease in China on 2 May 2008. It has attracted extensive attention from the medical and health institutions [4]. As of 2017, the total number of cases has exceeded 67,000, including more than 100 severe cases and 10 deaths in Xinjiang province [5]. Thus, it is very important to analyze the characteristics and influencing factors for preventing the spread of HFM disease in Xinjiang.

Studies show that the spread of HFM epidemic is related to many factors. Wang et al. [6, 7] found that the transmission of HFM disease had significant seasonal characteristic. Li et al. [8] indicated that the meteorological and socioeconomic factors were the main influencing factors. The meteorological factors mainly include temperature, rainfall, and wind speed [911]. The socioeconomic factors had the proportion of tertiary industry, the density of children, and the medical facilities [12]. There are considerable works on the study of HFM disease by summary, comparison, or spatiotemporal scanning method. The descriptive statistical analysis was generally used to describe the demographic, geographical, and temporal features [13]. The cluster time and regions can be obtained by the spatiotemporal scanning method [14, 15]. The statistical models were always proposed to analyze the effects between the disease and influencing factors, such as the generalized linear model, generalized additive model, and spatial regression model [1618]. However, some of them have not considered the influencing factors [15, 19]. Other studies determined the impact of various factors on the disease, but focused on one of time or space [18, 20]. In practice, the impact of meteorological and socioeconomic factors is not only related to space, but also time in the HFM epidemic [21]. Li et al. [8] provided a spatiotemporal mixture model to study the influence of meteorological factors on the disease, ignoring the socioeconomic factor and the interaction among regions. In our work, the geographically and temporally weighted Poisson regression (GTWPR) model is proposed to investigate the influence of meteorological and socioeconomic factors on the HFM epidemic including the interaction between regions.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Data sources, spatiotemporal cluster, and spatiotemporal model are introduced in materials and methods. The main results reflect the distributions of HFM disease, and provide the spatiotemporal cluster of 15 regions in Xinjiang from 2008 to 2017. Through the spatiotemporal models, we can get the influence of meteorological and socioeconomic factors on HFM disease. Finally, a brief conclusion is given.

Materials and methods

Xinjiang province is the largest district in China, including 5 regions (Altay, Tacheng, Kashgar, Aksu, and Khotan), 5 autonomous regions (Ili, Bortala, Changji, Kizilsu, and Bayingholin), and 5 cities (Urumqi, Karamay, Shihezi, Hami, and Turfan). It is located in north latitude 34°25′ to 49°10′ and east longitude 73°40′ to 96°23′. Fig 1 shows all regions and cities of Xinjiang. It has a temperate continental climate with large seasonal temperature difference (−50.2° ∼ 49.6°). Because of the unique geographical location, the annual average temperature is 10.6°C and annual average precipitation is 163.3 mm in Xinjiang. Tianshan mountain divides Xinjiang province into two parts: southern and northern areas. The northern has higher precipitation, and the southern has higher temperature.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Map of Xinjiang province, China.

It is generated by software ArcGIS 10.2 from http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254223.g001

Data sources

The data of HFM disease are obtained from Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. The diagnosis of HFM disease conforms to the clinical standards of national ministry of health [22].

There are 34 meteorological stations in Xinjiang province. The monthly average temperature (°C), precipitation (mm), and wind speed (m/s) can be obtained from China Meteorological Data Service Center (http://data.cma.cn/en). Through ArcGIS 10.2, the inverse distance weighting method is used to calculate the average monthly meteorological data in the studied area.

Socioeconomic factors include the population density (100,000 people/10,000 km2), the ratio of urban population (%), the per capita gross domestic product (yuan/people), the ratio of tertiary industry (%), the ratio of primary school (%) and the number of beds (set/1000 people). All annual data are from Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook [23].

Methods

Spatiotemporal scanning.

Based on a discrete Poisson model, spatiotemporal scan statistic is defined by a dynamically circular window to detect the possible spatiotemporal cluster. The difference of theoretical and actual cases is calculated by log-likelihood ratio (LLR) statistic [15] as follows where n is the observed number of cases within the scan window, N is the total number of cases, E(n) is the expected number of cases within the scan window, and I is an indicator. It is significant for the relative risk (RR) of scanning window if p < 0.01, where p-value can be obtained by Monte Carlo randomization. The scan window with the largest LLR value is selected as the first cluster, and other regions with p < 0.01 are defined as the second clusters. In this study, the SaTScan software is used to investigate the spatiotemporal clusters of the confirmed cases in the fifteen regions and cities of Xinjiang province.

Spatiotemporal model.

Fotheringham et al. [24] proposed a geographically weighted Poisson regression (GWPR) model to analyze the spatial non-stationary processes of discrete data. Suppose that Yi(i = 1, …, n) are the response variables. The density function is where a(⋅), b(⋅) and c(⋅, ⋅) are known functions, θi and ϕi are unknown parameters. Denote μi = E(Yi), and g(μi) = ln(μi) is a link function. Let Xij(i = 1, …, n, j = 1, …, p) be explanatory variables and βj(ui, vi) be unknown coefficients in the ith location (ui, vi) and the jth variable, respectively. The GWPR model is given by (1)

In recent years, the spatiotemporal data are often encountered in the geographic area. Comparing with the GWPR model, we propose a geographically and temporally weighted Poisson regression (GTWPR) model. Let Yik(i = 1, 2, …, n, k = 1, 2, …, T) be the response variable in the ith position and the kth time. The density function can be defined as follows where the parameters are similar to the above. Denote μik = E(Yik), and g(μik) = ln(μik). Let βjk(j = 1, 2, …, p, k = 1, 2, …, T) be unknown coefficients, and Xijk(i = 1, 2, …, nk) be the explanatory variables at the ith location (uik, vik) in the kth time. The GTWPR model can be established by (2)

All estimations of these two models can be obtained by weighted least square method and local linear geographical weighted regression. Define a spatiotemporal distance from the fixed point (u00, v00, t0) to (uik, vik, tk) as where λ and μ are space-time balance factors. The Gauss kernel function of these two points can be written by where hST, hS are the space-time and space bandwidths, τ = λ/μ is a spatiotemporal factor. The spatiotemporal weight matrix is W(u00, v00, t0) = diag{wik(u00, v00, t0)}. Especially, W(u00, v00, t0) becomes the spatial weight matrix W(u00, v00) when time is not considered.

Main results

Distribution characteristics

Demographic, temporal, and geographical distributions are the important basis for understanding the features of a disease. Demographic distribution can explore the risk factors through grouping observational populations. The spread of HFM epidemic can be obtained by temporal distribution in different periods. The geographical distribution provides an important clue to analyze the severity degree of HFM disease in various regions. Matlab and ArcGIS are applied to visualize the distributions of HFM incidence and cases in Xinjiang province from 2008 to 2017.

Demographic distribution.

Table 1 provides the demographic distributions of HFM disease according to gender and age. There are more than 67,000 reported cases with a male-female ratio 1.5:1. The male has a higher incidence 3.50(1/100,00) than female. All cases are divided into 5 groups by age periods: (0; 5), [5; 10), [10; 15), [15; 20) and [20; 120]. The incidence of children aged 0–5 is higher than others, accounting for 77.5–83.6% of the total cases. Fig 2 shows the gender distribution of the confirmed cases for different ages from 2008 to 2017.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Gender distribution of the confirmed cases for different ages.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254223.g002

Temporal distribution.

Based on the monthly reported data, Fig 3 reveals that HFM epidemic has obvious seasonality characteristics from 2008 to 2017. Generally, the disease has one or two peaks every year. The annual peak of cases usually appears in June accounting for 31.29% among 10 years. The second smaller peak is often in October each year.

Spatial distribution.

The spatial features of incidences are shown in Fig 4. The top three regions are Karamay, Urumqi and Changji with the total incidence 12.73, 9.06 and 6.31(1/100.00), respectively. Moreover, Kizilsu 0.085(1/100.00), Kashgar 0.072(1/100.00) and Khotan 0.686(1/100.00) have relatively lower incidence.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Spatial distribution of the confirmed incidences.

It is generated by software ArcGIS 10.2 from http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254223.g004

Spatiotemporal cluster

The spatiotemporal scanning method is used to identify the risk regions and time periods of the HFM epidemic in Xinjiang from 2008 to 2017. Table 2 lists the yearly cluster regions and cities, cluster time, RR, LLR and p-value.

The first and second cluster areas are detected for each year, corresponding to the most and more likely to have occurred. We observe that Urumqi, Changji, Shihezi, Karamay and Tacheng always exist in the first cluster regions every year. The second cluster areas are only Aksu and Ili in 2008. Cluster time refers to the clustering time in the specified period. The main cluster time begins in April or May, and ends in August or November each year. Since RR = 29.99, 30.51, and LLR = 10357.01, 10023.10 in 2012 and 2016, it reflects that the spread of HFM epidemic is more serious than that in other years. Moreover, all clustering results have statistically significant because of p < 0.001.

Further investigation is conducted by scanning clusters, listed in the last two lines of Table 2. The first clustering areas are Urumqi, Changji, Shihezi, Karamay and Turfan. The second cluster areas are Aksu and Ili. The corresponding cluster times are from April 2012 to September 2016, and from April 2009 to June 2009, respectively.

Meteorological factors

Sattar et al. [25] and Kramer et al. [26] showed that the low-moderate humidity between temperatures 20°C and 33°C was more beneficial to the survival and reproduction of viruses on inanimate surfaces. In Xinjiang province, the monthly rainfall is 66.17± 57.40 mm, temperature is 10.38±20.8°C, and wind speed is 19.4± 24.31 m/s. Based on Figs 3 and 5, the HFM epidemic is affected by meteorological factors. Spearman correlation analysis is conducted between lagging meteorological factors and the confirmed cases (Table 3). Lag 0, lag 1, lag 2 and lag 3 represent the factors with lagging zero, one, two and three months, respectively. The results show that rainfall and temperature with lagging zero month and wind speed with lagging one month have a strongly correlated with HFM disease. Therefore, three lagging factors are selected as explanatory variables to establish GWPR and GTWPR models.

thumbnail
Fig 5. The monthly chart of meteorological factors in Xinjiang, 2008–2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254223.g005

thumbnail
Table 3. Spearman correlation between lagging factors and the confirmed cases.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254223.t003

The meteorological data is first standardized. The multiplex collinear test [27] is determined by the condition number , where λ is the eigenvalues of independent variable matrix. Since K = 1.97 < 15, there is no significant correlation between meteorological factors. Let μik be the number of cases, and Xi1k, Xi2k and Xi3k be the monthly average temperature, rainfall and wind speed in the kth month at the ith region. The GWPR model is formed by (3) for j = 1, 2, 3, i = 1, …, n and n = 15, where k is a fixed constant taken from {1, 2, …, m} and m = 120. The GTWPR model is established as follows (4) where other parameters are the same as above. The estimated coefficients and can be obtained by the weighted least square method and local linear geographical weighted regression. The performance of two models are investigated by the coefficient of determination R2, Akaike information criterion (AIC), deviation (D) and mean squared error (MSE) in Table 4. It reveals that R2 increases from 0.633 in the GWPR model to 0.915 in the GTWPR model. The values of AIC, D and MSE in GTWPR model are smaller than GWPR model. Thus, GTWPR model is more suitable and effective to analyze the spatiotemporal HFM disease than GWPR model.

According to the GTWPR model, Fig 6 shows the mean values and 95% confidence intervals of coefficient estimations. The mean values are represented by the dots. The 95% confidence interval is represented by the upper and lower lines. There is a significant spatiotemporal non-stationary between the climatic factors and HFM disease. With the increase of the rainfall, the number of HFM cases increases in Shihezi, Urumqi, Changji, Turfan, Hami, and Bayingholin, and decreases in Tacheng, Karamay, Bortala, Ili, Kashgar, and Kizilsu. The rise of temperature leads to an increase in the number of patients in Altay, Tacheng, Karamay, Bortala, Shihezi, and Changji. The spread of HFM disease is also affected by wind speed. High wind speed brings unfavorable influence to the incidence in Khotan, Bayingholin, and Aksu, and has different results in Tacheng, Karamay, Bortala, Ili, and Shihezi. Let be the mean value of at the kth times. Fig 7 visualizes the mean values of coefficient estimations in the GTWPR model. It reflects the relationship between HFM disease and these three factors in various regions. The rainfall has a positive effect on HFM disease in Bayingholin, Turfan, and Hami. The cases in the northern have increased more quickly than in the southern with a growing process of temperature. However, the wind speed has a bigger affect on the southern than the northern.

thumbnail
Fig 6. The mean values and 95% confidence intervals of coefficient estimations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254223.g006

thumbnail
Fig 7. The mean coefficient estimations of three meteorological factors.

It is generated by software ArcGIS 10.2 from http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254223.g007

Socioeconomic factors

Cao et al. [28] obtained that the HFM disease was closely associated with population density and mobility. Huang et al. [12] showed that the influence of the tertiary industry and children was greater than that of the primary industry and middle school students. Thus, we select six socioeconomic factors to study their impact on HFM disease. In Xinjiang province, the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita is 42.40± 86.51(1000 yuan/people), the population density (PD) is 32.00± 145.22(10 people/km2), the number of beds (NB) per thousand people is 58.83± 46.01(set/1000 people), the ratio of urban population (RUP) is 0.62± 0.38%, the ratio of primary school (RPS) is 0.55± 0.22% and the ratio of tertiary industry (RTI) is 0.39± 0.22% in 15 regions from 2008 to 2017 (See Fig 8).

thumbnail
Fig 8. Mean values of six socioeconomic factors in 15 regions of Xinjiang, 2008–2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254223.g008

We first implement the principal component analysis to six socioeconomic factors. Load factors are selected as the explanatory variables when the cumulative proportion is more than 80%. The first three loads can be taken as the main parts of six socioeconomic factors in Table 5. Since the condition number of multiplex collinear test is K = 1.143 < 15 between the first three load factors, there is no significant correlation among them.

thumbnail
Table 5. Loadings and cumulative proportion of the principal component analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254223.t005

Let zijk(j = 1, 2, …, 6) be the six socioeconomic and ZiJk(J = 1, 2, 3) be three load factors at the ith (i = 1, …, 10) region in the kth (k = 1, …, 15) year, respectively. From Table 5, we have (5)

Suppose that ϑik is the annual number of cases. The link function is g(ϑik) = ηik = ln ϑik. The GWPR model given by (6) for i = 1, …, 15, where k is a fixed constant taken from {1, 2, …, 10}. The GTWPR model is established as follows (7) where αJ(uik, vik) and αJk(uik, vik, tk)(J = 1, 2, 3) are the coefficients of three load factors at the ith region in the kth year. In Table 6, we compare the performance of two models. The larger the coefficient of determination R2, the better fit model for the sample data. The values of AIC, D and MSE for GTWPR model are smaller than GWPR model. In view of this, GTWPR model are more suitable to investigate the influence of these three loads.

The estimated values of αJk can be obtained by the weighted least square method and local linear geographical weighted regression. The results are shown in Table 7. It reflects that the coefficient estimator has strong non-stationarity.

thumbnail
Table 7. Quantile and mean values of coefficient estimations and response variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254223.t007

Substituting (5) into (7), we get the fitted model below (8) for i = 1, …, 10; k = 1, …, 15; j = 0, 1, …, 6, which can be considered as the estimated coefficients of six socioeconomic factors zijk. Let be the mean value of at the kth times. Fig 9 describes the mean values and 95% confidence intervals of . The influence of six socioeconomic factors also varies with the change of spatiotemporal locations. There exists significant spatiotemporal non-stationary in Kashgar, Kizilsu, Knotan, Altay, and Hami regions for the six factors. The mean values of coefficient estimations are given in Fig 10. In most regions, the number of HFM cases increases with the growth of GDP, RUP, and RTI, and reduction of NB. Moreover, PD always leads to the increase of the confirmed cases in Turfan and Bayingholin, and has different results in Tacheng, Karamay, Kashgar, Kizilsu, and Khotan. Higher RPS can give rise to lower HFM cases, such as Bayingholin. For the high-risk areas, Urumqi, Changji, and Shihezi are mainly affected by GDP, RUP and RTI. RTI, NB and PD are the main factors affecting HFM disease in Karamay and Tacheng. These six socioeconomic factors bring a smaller influence on Ili than other regions.

thumbnail
Fig 9. The mean values and 95% confidence intervals of coefficient estimations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254223.g009

thumbnail
Fig 10. The average coefficient estimations for six socioeconomic factors.

It is generated by software ArcGIS 10.2 from http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254223.g010

Discussion

In this paper, we analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of the HFM epidemic in Xinjiang from 2008 to 2017. In terms of the descriptive analysis, the number of male patients is more than that of females, which corresponds to the studies conducted in China [6], Northern Thailand [29], and other countries [1, 30]. Momoki [31] also found that boys were more susceptible to enterovirus infections than girls. In Xinjiang, the male-female ratio is 1.5:1, close to China’s 1.56:1 from 2008 to 2009. Children aged 0–5 years have a higher risk of illness, accounting for more than 77% of the total cases. As revealed by the seroepidemiological analysis [32], more than 50% of children under the age of 5 lack the antibodies of HFM disease enterovirus. Zhang et al. [33] pointed out that Altay, Urumqi, Bayingholin, Changji, and Ili had a high incidence in 2016. Due to the use of vaccine EV71, the number of cases had significantly decreased in 2017. Thus, vaccination is an effective measure for children to prevent HFM disease at present. Since the epidemic is contagious during the incubation period, early detection, treatment and isolation are necessary to prevent the spread of the epidemic.

Through the temporal distribution, there are one or two peaks for each year in Xinjiang, 2008–2017. The first peak usually exists in June, and the second smaller peak generally appears in October. Liu et al. [34] had a similar conclusion, in which the number of reported cases was mainly concentrated in May to July, accounting for 69.35% of all cases in Xinjiang from 2011 to 2015. Another smaller peak occurred in October to November. For geographical distribution, the incidence of the northern is higher than the southern from 2008 to 2017, mainly in Karamay, Urumqi, and Changji. The incidences are relatively small in Kashgar, Khotan and Kizilsu. This conclusion can be confirmed in [35].

Besides, the spatiotemporal scanning method is used to determine the cluster area and time of HFM disease in Xinjiang. Urumqi, Changji, Shihezi, Karamay and Tacheng always belong to the first cluster areas. The cluster time usually begins in April or May, and ends in August to November every year. Then, the spatiotemporal cluster of all cases is scanned from 2008 to 2017. The first cluster areas include Changji, Urumqi, Shihezi, Turfan and Karamay from April 2012 to September 2017. The cluster regions are mainly located in the northern.

Previous studies [11, 36] have shown that there exists a spatial non-stationary between this disease and influence factors. Different from them, the GTWPR model is proposed to investigate the spatiotemporal non-stationary, and analyze the relationship of meteorological and socioeconomic factors on HFM disease in Xinjiang from 2008 to 2017. It has a better fitting than the GWPR model by R2, AIC, D and MSE. The result reveals that the influence of these factors has a spatiotemporal non-stationarity. Based on the meteorological factors, the HFM cases significantly increase in Turfan, Hami and Bayingholin, and decrease in Kashgar and Kizilsu as the rainfall is increased. With the temperature increasing, the HFM cases of the northern have increased more than that of the southern. However, the wind speed has a bigger impact on the southern than the northern. Kramer et al. [26] considered that the largest desert region and hotter summer were not beneficial for the survival of the virus. Moreover, Li et al. [8] indicated that the general association between wind speed with HFM disease might locally be weakened at high wind speed. Due to the unique terrain, the wind speed in the northern is much higher than in the southern. Although the increase of wind speed is conducive to the spread of the virus, they may stay in the air for a shorter time at a high wind speed [37].

The socioeconomic factors have significant spatiotemporal non-stationary on HFM disease. In most regions, the increase of GDP, RUP and RTI brings unfavorable influence to the disease. Furthermore, these three factors are important economic indicators for judging regional development. Huang et al. [12] indicated that the HFM cases were increased with the growth of GDP. Our results show that RUP and RTI also have similar effects. It reveals that the developed regions have a higher risk. NB is an indicator to describe the status of medical resources. The abundance of medical resources promotes the improvement of the health system, so that disease data can be recorded and reported in time [8]. Thus, the regions with high NB have more cases. The indicator RPS reflects the education level. The number of patients decreased with the increase of RPS. This means that people with higher education pay more attention to HFM disease. In addition, Cao et al. [28] pointed out that the higher PD made the virus easier to spread in urban areas. However, we find that the HFM epidemic has decreased with the increase of PD in Altay, Tacheng, Karamay, Kashgar, Kizilsu and Khotan. Therefore, spatiotemporal effects should not be ignored for controlling the HFM disease in the studied area.

Conclusions

This article aims to investigate spatiotemporal features and influence factors of the HFM epidemic in Xinjiang from 2008 to 2017. The descriptive statistical analysis reveals some interesting facts. The male-female ratio is 1.5:1, among which the majority are children over 1 and under 5 years old. Generally, there exists an annual peak in June. The second smaller peak appears in October. The spread of HFM disease in the northern is more serious than that in the southern. The cluster area and time are determined by the spatiotemporal scanning method. It can reflect the high incidence areas and periods of each year. Urumqi, Changji, Shihezi, Karamay, and Tacheng belong to the first cluster regions every year. The clustering time mainly begins in April or May, and ends from August to November. The GTWPR model is established to analyze the relationship between this disease and influence factors. There exist significant spatiotemporal non-stationarity between HFM disease, meteorological and socioeconomic factors.

Further work also exists in our study. The spatiotemporal autocorrelation should be considered in the GTWPR model. Besides, other potential confounding variables have not been currently studied. It is worthy to be further studied.

References

  1. 1. Podin Y, Gias EL, Ong F, Leong YW, Yee SF, Yusof MA, et al. Sentinel surveillance for human enterovirus 71 in Sarawak, Malaysia: Lessons from the first 7 years. BMC Public Health. 2006 6(1):180–192. pmid:16827926
  2. 2. Jiang M, Wei D, Ou WL, Li KX, Luo DZ, Li YQ, et al. Autopsy findings in children with hand, foot, and mouth disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012 367(1):91–92. pmid:22762340
  3. 3. Solomon T, Lewthwaite P, Perera D, Cardosa MJ, Mcminn P, Ooi MH. Virology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and control of enterovirus 71. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2010 10(11):778–790. pmid:20961813
  4. 4. Xu WB, Tan XJ. Hand, foot, and mouth disease: New challenge for the prevention and control of children infectious diseases in China. Disease Surveillance. 2009 24(9):649–651.
  5. 5. Huang YD, Deng H, Ayiguli Y, Fan XC, Wu HY, Zhu JJ, et al. Epidemiological analyses of hand, foot and mouth disease in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China during 2008-2017. Chinese Journal of Virology. 2019 35(1):85–89.
  6. 6. Wang Y, Feng Z, Yang Y, Self S, Gao Y, Longini IM, et al. Hand, foot, and mouth disease in China: Patterns of spread and transmissibility. Epidemiology. 2011 22(6):781–792. pmid:21968769
  7. 7. Wang JF, Guo YS, Christakos G, Yang WZ, Liao YL, Li ZJ, et al. Hand, foot and mouth disease: Spatiotemporal transmission and climate. International Journal of Health Geographics. 2011 10(25):1–10. pmid:21466689
  8. 8. Li LF, Qiu WY, Xu CD, Wang JF. A spatiotemporal mixed model to assess the influence of environmental and socioeconomic factors on the incidence of hand, foot and mouth disease. BMC Public Health. 2018 18(1):274–286. pmid:29463224
  9. 9. Onozuka D, Hashizume M. The influence of temperature and humidity on the incidence of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Japan. Science of the Total Environment. 2011 410:119–125. pmid:22014509
  10. 10. Hii YL, Rocklov J, Ng N. Short term effects of weather on hand, foot and mouth disease. Plos One. 2011 6(1):e16796. pmid:21347303
  11. 11. Ma E, Lam T, Wong C, Chuang SK. Is hand, foot and mouth disease associated with meteorological parameters? Epidemiology and Infection. 2010 138(12):1779–1788. pmid:20875200
  12. 12. Huang GX, Wang JF, Bo YC, Xu CD, Hu MG, Huang DC. Identification of health risks of hand, foot and mouth disease in China using the geographical detector technique. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014 11(3):3407–3423. pmid:24662999
  13. 13. Qi L, Tang WG, Zhao H, Ling H, Su K, Zhao H, et al. Epidemiological characteristics and spatial-temporal distribution of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Chongqing, China, 2009-2016. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018 15(2):270–282.
  14. 14. Kulldorff M, Feuer EJ, Miller BA, Freedman LS. Breast cancer clusters in the northeast United States: A geographic analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1997 146(2):161–170. pmid:9230778
  15. 15. Wu XR, Hu SX, Kwaku AB, Li Q, Lou KW, Zhou Y, et al. Spatio-temporal clustering analysis and its determinants of hand, foot and mouth disease in Hunan, China, 2009-2015. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2017 17(1):645–654. pmid:28946852
  16. 16. Bo YC, Song C, Wan JF, Li XW. Using an autologistic regression model to identify spatial risk factors and spatial risk patterns of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in Mainland China. BMC Public Health. 2014 14(1):358–371. pmid:24731248
  17. 17. Gou F, Liu X, He J, Liu DP, Cheng Y, Liu HX, et al. Different responses of weather factors on hand, foot and mouth disease in three different climate areas of Gansu, China. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2018 18(1):15–25. pmid:29310596
  18. 18. Huang Y, Deng T, Yu SC, Gu J, Huang CR, Xiao GX, et al. Effect of meteorological variables on the incidence of hand, foot, and mouth disease in children: A time-series analysis in Guangzhou, China. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2013 13(1):134–142. pmid:23497074
  19. 19. Chong CY, Chan KP, Shah VA, Ng WYM, Lau G, Teo TES, et al. Hand, foot and mouth disease in Singapore: A comparison of fatal and non-fatal cases. Acta Paediatrica. 2003 92(10):1163–1169. pmid:14632332
  20. 20. Nguyen HX, Chu C, Nguyen HLT, Nguyen HT, Do CM, Rutherford S, et al. Temporal and spatial analysis of hand, foot, and mouth disease in relation to climate factors: A study in the Mekong Delta region, Vietnam. Science of the Total Environment. 2017 581:766–772.
  21. 21. Liao J, Qin Z, Zuo Z, Yu S, Zhang J. Spatial-temporal mapping of hand foot and mouth disease and the long-term effects associated with climate and socioeconomic variables in sichuan province, china from 2009 to 2013. Science of the Total Environment. 2016 563:152–159. pmid:27135578
  22. 22. Zhu YM. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of hand, foot and mouth disease. Hunan Science and Technology Press. 2008.
  23. 23. Xinjiang uygur autonomous region bureau of statistics. Statistical yearbook of Xinjiang. China Statistics Press 2009-2018.
  24. 24. Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M. Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. New York, Wiley. 2002.
  25. 25. Sattar SA, Dimock KD, Ansari SA, Springthorpe VS. Spread of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis due to enterovirus-70: Effect of air temperature and relative humidity on virus survival on fomites. Journal of Medical Virology. 1988 25(3):289–96. pmid:2844979
  26. 26. Kramer A, Schwebke I, Kampf G. How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2006 6(12):130–138. pmid:16914034
  27. 27. Wu XZ. Complex data statistical methods application based on R. China Renmin University Press 2013.
  28. 28. Cao ZD, Zeng DJ, Wang QY, Zheng XL, Wang FY. An epidemiological analysis of the Beijing 2008 hand-foot-mouth epidemic. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2010 55(12):1142–1149.
  29. 29. Samphutthanon R, Tripathi N, Ninsawat S, Duboz R. Spatio-temporal distribution and hotspots of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in Northern Thailand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2013 11(1):312–336. pmid:24366049
  30. 30. Ang LW, Koh BK, Chan KP, Chua LT. Epidemiology and control of hand, foot and mouth disease in Singapore, 2001-2007. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore. 2009 38(2):106–112.
  31. 31. Momoki ST. Surveillance of enterovirus infections in Yokohama city from 2004 to 2008. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2009 62(6):471–473. pmid:19934543
  32. 32. Zhu Z, Zhu SL, Guo XB, Wang JT, Wang DY, Yan DM, et al. Retrospective seroepidemiology indicated that human enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 circulated wildly in central and southern China before large-scale outbreaks from 2008. Virology Journal. 2010 7(1):300–305. pmid:21050463
  33. 33. Zhang HY, Song ZG, Yu HJ, Zhang XL, Xu SS, Li Z, et al. Genome-wide linear B-cell epitopes of enterovirus 71 in a hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) population. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2018 105:41–48. pmid:29886372
  34. 34. Liu WL, Huang YD, Ma HL, Ayiguli YEHL, Deng H. Epidemiological characteristics of hand foot mouth disease in Xinjiang over 2011-2015 years. Journal of Xinjiang Medical University. 2018 41(3):357–362.
  35. 35. Zhang X, Deng H, Zheng YJ. Epidemiological analysis of hand-foot-mouth disease in Xinjiang from 2009 to 2012. Chinese Journal of Disease Control and Prevention. 2014 21(2):67–69.
  36. 36. Chen C, Lin H, Li X, Lang L, Xiao X, Ding P, et al. Short-term effects of meteorological factors on children hand, foot and mouth disease in Guangzhou, China. International Journal of Biometeorol. 2013 57(6):1–10. pmid:24258319
  37. 37. Group W, Sleigh A, Member P. Natural ventilation for infection control in health care settings. World Health Organization. 2009.