https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3418-1674
Figures
Abstract
Background and objectives
Bangladesh is experiencing a nutrition transition with an increase in the double burden of malnutrition and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This study sought to: 1) examine trends and differences in underweight, overweight/obesity, hypertension and diabetes by gender, area of residence, and wealth in Bangladesh from 2004 to 2018, 2) assess what factors contributed to changes in these outcomes.
Methods
We used data from five rounds of the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys (n = 76,758 women 15-49y and 10,900 men 18-95y in total). We calculated differences, slope index of inequality (SII) and concentration index (CIX) to examine trends over time and differences in outcomes by wealth and residence. We identified determinants and estimated drivers of changes in outcomes using regression-based decomposition.
Results
Between 2004 and 2018, underweight prevalence decreased in both women (33% to 12%) and men (26% to 18%), whereas overweight/obesity increased (17% to 49% in women and 21% to 34% in men). Hypertension also increased in both women (31% to 44%) and men (19% to 33%) while diabetes changed marginally (11% to 14%). In all years, underweight was concentrated in poorer and rural households while overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension were concentrated in wealthier and urban households. Wealth inequity decreased over time for underweight, changed little for overweight/obesity, and increased for hypertension and diabetes among men. Increases in wealth explained 35% to 50% of the reduction in underweight and 30% to 57% of the increase in overweight/obesity.
Citation: Nguyen PH, Tauseef S, Khuong LQ, Das Gupta R, Billah SM, Menon P, et al. (2022) Underweight, overweight or obesity, diabetes, and hypertension in Bangladesh, 2004 to 2018. PLoS ONE 17(9): e0275151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275151
Editor: Negar Rezaei, Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Received: May 7, 2022; Accepted: September 12, 2022; Published: September 30, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Nguyen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding: Funding for this research was provided by the Gates Foundation through Alive & Thrive, managed by FHI Solutions (grant numbers: OPP1170427). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, data interpretation, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aim to end all forms of malnutrition including undernutrition, overweight/ obesity, and diet-related noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) by 2030 [1]. Until the past decade, the focus has been on overweight/obesity in high income countries and undernutrition in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [2, 3]. While the prevalence of undernutrition remains high in many LMICs, especially in South Asia, trends in BMI suggest an emerging problem of overweight/obesity [2, 4]. Evidence from 126 LMICs with data from the 2010s suggests that 38% of these countries were facing a double burden of malnutrition (simultaneous undernutrition and overnutrition) based on a 20% overweight prevalence cutoff [3]. NCDs such hypertension and diabetes also disproportionately affect people living in LMICs [5].
Like many other LMICs, Bangladesh has been experiencing a nutrition transition in the past three decades alongside socio-economic development. Per capita income grew nearly three times between 1990s and 2010s, and the headcount measure of poverty fell from 49% in 2000 to 24% in 2016 [6]. Rising income and rapid urbanization were coupled with less physical activity, changing food systems and a shift from traditional diets to more unhealthy and processed foods [7, 8]. Overweight/obesity is also a leading risk factor of NCDs including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and diabetes [9, 10]. The increase in the double burden of malnutrition and concurrent NCDs are major concerns for the overall health status of the country’s population and for the health system [11]. The recent Global Burden of Diseases 2019 estimated that malnutrition, high blood pressure, high fasting plasma glucose and high body mass index are among the top 10 risk factors driving most death and disability in Bangladesh [12].
Recognizing the increase in overweight/obesity and NCDs as an emerging concern, some studies have examined trends in and risk factors of overweight/obesity or the double burden of underweight and overweight using multiple rounds of Bangladesh Demographic and Health surveys (BDHS) during 1996–2014 but have mainly focused on women [8, 13–17]. A few studies examined the prevalence of underweight, overweight/obesity in both women and men using a cross-sectional approach [18–20]. Studies using the 2017–2018 BDHS reported a double (underweight and overweight/obesity) and triple burden of NCDs (underweight, overweight/obesity and diabetes or hypertension) but did not link with previous survey rounds to capture trends and distributional patterns [9, 20–26]. Common factors associated with undernutrition or overnutrition in the literature include differences by residence (urban/rural) and wealth; however, there is no evidence on how these differences have changed over time. Understanding trends and patterns in malnutrition and NCDs is vital because it enables a better understanding of the geospatial and social distribution of these outcomes. Finally, there is limited information on which factors have contributed to the observed changes in undernutrition or overnutrition over time.
The present paper uses five rounds of BDHS data to: (1) examine changes in body mass index (BMI), underweight, overweight/obesity, diabetes, and hypertension among both women and men at national and subnational levels in Bangladesh from 2004 to 2018, (2) quantify changes in differences in outcomes by wealth and residence (urban/rural) over time, and (3) understand what factors (such as improvements in wealth and education) contributed to changes in nutrition outcomes.
Methods
Data sources, sampling design and sample size
We used data from five rounds of BDHS (2004, 2007, 2011, 2014 and 2018) [27–31]. BDHS data are representative at both national and division levels. The BDHS surveys used a two-stage stratified sampling strategy, and a sampling frame was obtained from the list of enumeration areas of the Population and Housing Census of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, provided by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics [32]. In the first stage, enumeration areas were selected with probability proportional to size. A complete household listing operation was then carried out in all selected enumeration areas to provide a sampling frame for the second-stage selection of households. In the second stage, a systematic random sample of 30 households on average per enumeration area was selected. Details of the survey protocol and sampling are provided in BDHS reports [27–31].
Height and weight were measured for women in all five rounds, however the data for men were only available in two rounds (2011 and 2018). Blood pressure and blood glucose testing were measured in women and men aged 18 and older in a subsample of one-third of the households in 2011 and one-fourth of the households in 2018. Datasets are publicly available and can be downloaded from the DHS website (https://www.dhsprogram.com/) after obtaining permission from the DHS program.
We included all non-pregnant women or men with anthropometric or diabetes and hypertension data in the analysis. The sample size for this study is presented in Table 1. In total, 74,798 households were surveyed across the five rounds, among them 76,758 non-pregnant women aged 15-49y and 10,900 men aged 18-95y having height and weight measurement data. The number of non-pregnant women and men aged 35-95y having data on NCDs were 7,333 and 6,821, respectively.
Variables
Underweight and overweight/obese.
In the DHS surveys, anthropometric measurements for women and men were obtained by trained field staff using standard procedures [33, 34]. Weight was measured twice with light clothing and without shoes using a calibrated Seca 878 digital scale. Height was assessed three times without shoes using measuring boards made by Shorr Productions. The average of the three measurements was used in the analysis. BMI was calculated by weight (kg)/ height (m)2. Underweight was defined as BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 and overweight/obese as BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2, according to the criteria for Asian populations [35].
Diabetes and hypertension.
Fasting blood glucose was tested with the HemoCue Glucose 201 analyzer (Teleflex Medical L.P., Markham, Canada) using a drop of capillary blood obtained from the middle or ring finger after respondents had fasted overnight. Fasting whole blood glucose measurements were then converted to fasting plasma glucose equivalent values [36]. Respondents were classified as diabetic if they had fasting plasma glucose level ≥ 7 mmol/L as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) [37] or if they reported currently taking prescribed medication for high blood glucose or diabetes.
Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were measured with the Life Source UA-767 Plus digital blood pressure monitor (A&D Medical, San Jose, USA). Blood pressure was measured three times, with an interval of approximately 10 minutes between measurements. The average value of the second and third measurements was used for our analyses. Respondents were considered as hypertensive if they had systolic blood pressure level ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure level ≥ 90 mmHg, or if they were currently taking antihypertensive medication [38].
Determinants of malnutrition, diabetes and hypertension.
We selected all relevant known determinants of undernutrition, overnutrition, diabetes and hypertension that were available in BDHS [39–41]. Individual level variables included age, education, working status, marital status, having children <5 years (for women) and exposure to mass media (defined as if the respondent reads the newspaper, listens to the radio, or watches TV at least once a week). Household level variables included household size, place of residence (rural/urban), improved latrine, access to improved drinking water, and wealth. A wealth index was constructed on pooled data from 2004 to 2018 using a principal component extracted from multiple variables including household ownership of different assets, livestock, house and land, and key housing characteristics [42]. The first component derived from the component scores was then used to categorize wealth into quintiles.
Data analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize sample characteristics, with percentages for categorical variables, and mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. All estimations were adjusted for the survey-specific sampling design using the “svy” Stata package.
Data were pooled from different survey rounds to estimate trends in both mean BMI and prevalence of overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension from 2004 to 2018. We used K-density plots to visualize the distribution of BMI, and locally weighted smoothing regression to examine differences in BMI by respondent age. We plotted prevalence of overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension by survey year and used maps to illustrate sub-national variability in the prevalence of outcomes for each survey rounds. We also calculated average annual rate change (AARC) based on a formula adapted from UNICEF [43] (S1 Table).
To examine differences in the prevalence of underweight, overweight/obesity, diabetes, and hypertension by population subgroup over time, we first used equity plots disaggregated by wealth quintile and residential area (rural/urban). We then examined absolute and relative differences for each health outcome by wealth quintile using the slope index of inequality (SII) and the concentration index (CIX). These two complex measures consider the entire distribution of outcomes over the five wealth quintiles and are weighted by the sample size of each quintile [44, 45]. Both SII and CIX range from -100 to +100, with positive values indicating that the outcome is more prevalent among the rich and negative values indicating that the outcome is more prevalent among the poor.
To estimate the contributions of changes in determinants to changes in health outcomes over time, we first used multivariable logistic regressions to examine associations between determinants and outcomes. We then applied a regression decomposition analysis to assess how changes in key determinants can predict changes in underweight and overweight/obesity from 2004 to 2018 for women, and from 2011 to 2018 for men. This regression decomposition combines the analysis of differences in means of the determinant variables over time and regression estimates of the coefficients associated with these variables from the regression model. For example, if a determinant has a large regression coefficient associated with outcome and a large change over time, then this determinant will play a large role in explaining changes in outcome over time. We did not conduct decomposition analysis for diabetes given the small changes in this outcome. All models controlled for the survey year, division fixed effects, cluster sampling design and sampling weights used in the survey. All analyses were conducted using Stata 17 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05.
Ethics statement
This study was a secondary data analysis of BDHS data, which was approved by the institutional review board at ICF and the Bangladesh Medical Research Council. All respondents in the BDHS undergo an informed consent process for participation in the survey. Specifically, the enumerators read a detailed informed consent statement to the respondents, informing about the survey, describing the procedure, and emphasizing the voluntary nature of participation. Respondents signed the consent form once they agreed to participate in the survey.
Results
Sample characteristics
On average across survey rounds, women were 30 years old, men were 42–45 years old and most (72–78%) lived in rural areas (Table 1). Over time, household size reduced from 5.6 to 5.1 members and wealth index increased from 2.1 to 6.1. Hygiene and sanitation also improved by 22 percentage points (pp). Average years of education increased for women (from 3.4 years in 2004 to 5.6 years in 2018) and men (4.6 years in 2011 to 5.6 years in 2018). Women participating in labor workforce also increased over time.
Trends in BMI, underweight, overweight/obesity, hypertension and diabetes
Mean BMI in women increased from 20.2 kg/m2 in 2004 to 23.1 kg/m2 in 2018, and in men from 20.5 kg/m2 in 2011 to 21.6 kg/m2 in 2018 (Fig 1A). The increase was faster in women (0.26 kg/m2 per year) than men (0.16 kg/m2 per year) between 2011 and 2018. Mean BMI increased with age in both women and men until the age of 35 years (Fig 1B). After 35 years, the BMI curve exhibited a slight downward trend in women and a stronger downward trend in men. Correspondingly, overall underweight gradually reduced among women and men under aged 35 years and increased when they get older (S1 Fig). Opposite trends were observed for overweight/obesity.
(A) Distributions of BMI by survey round. (B) Distributions of BMI by age and survey round. (C) Prevalence of underweight and overweight/obesity by survey round. 1Underweight was defined as BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 and overweight/obese as BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2, according to the criteria for Asian populations. Values in (A) and (B) are mean and 95% confidence interval bands. Values in (C) are mean and 95% confidence interval points.
While the prevalence of underweight among women steadily declined (from 33% in 2004 to 12% in 2018), the prevalence of overweight/obesity rose nearly three times (from 17% in 2004 to 49% in 2018) (Fig 1C). In 2018, overnutrition was four times as prevalent as undernutrition in women. A similar pattern of declining underweight and increasing overweight prevalence was observed for men, with 20% of men being underweight and 33% of men being overweight in 2018. The AARC in underweight was -6.8% for women and -4.9% for men, and the AARC in overweight/obesity was +7.8% for women and +7.4% for men (S1 Table).
Hypertension increased over time and with increasing age in both women and men (Fig 2A). The prevalence of hypertension increased by 12.7 pp and 14.6 pp from 2011 to 2018 among women and men, respectively, reaching 44% in women and 33% in men in 2018 (Fig 2C). Diabetes prevalence exhibited a slow upward trend, increasing from 11% to 14% in both men and women (Fig 2B). The AARC for hypertension was +5.0% for women and +8.6% for men, while the AARC for diabetes was +3.2% for women and +4.0% for men.
(A) Prevalence of hypertension by age and survey round. (B) Prevalence of diabetes by age and survey round. (C) Trends in hypertension and diabetes. Values in (A) and (B) are mean and 95% confidence interval bands. Values in (C) are mean and 95% confidence interval points.
Changes in underweight and overweight/obesity varied by division of the country (Fig 3A). Among women, between 2004 and 2018, the largest reductions in underweight occurred in Barisal (-25 pp) and Chittagong (-24 pp) while the largest increases in overweight/obesity occurred in Chittagong (+38 pp), Barisal and Dhaka (each +34 pp). Similar findings were observed for men between 2011 and 2018 (-14 pp for underweight in Barisal, +17 to +18 pp for overweight/obesity in Barisal, Chittagong and Dhaka).
(A) Women (15-49y): Underweight. (B) Women (15-49y): Overweight/obesity. (C) Men (18-95y): Underweight. (D) Men (18-95y): Overweight/obesity. Note: This map is created from the shapefile (an empty map) that is publicly available from http://gadm.org.
There was less divisional variation in change in diabetes, but Dhaka showed the largest increase in diabetes for both women (+8 pp) and men (+11 pp) (Fig 4). Hypertension showed largest increase in Barisal, and Sylhet Chittagong among women and men (+17 to +22 pp).
(A) Women (35-95y): Diabetes. (B) Women (35-95y): Hypertension. (C) Men (35-95y): Diabetes. (D) Men (35-95y): Hypertension. Note: This map is created from the shapefile (an empty map) that is publicly available from http://gadm.org.
Wealth and residential differences in underweight, overweight/obesity, hypertension and diabetes
Underweight was higher among the poor compared to the rich across gender and survey rounds (Fig 5 and S2 Table). The wealth gap in underweight was large for both men and women although the gap reduced in recent years; SII decreased from -36 pp in 2004 to -19 pp in 2018 for women, and from -37pp in 2011 to -26 pp in 2018 for men. The opposite story emerged for overweight/obesity which was higher among wealthier households. The wealth gap in overweight/obesity was large (SII: 44 to 56 pp for women and 50–52 pp for men) and changed minimally over time.
Hypertension and diabetes were also more prevalent in richer households. In women, the wealth gap in hypertension decreased (SII decreased from 22 to 14 pp), but the gap in diabetes increased (SII increased from 18 to 23 pp). In men, wealth gaps increased for both hypertension and diabetes (SII increased from 23 to 25 pp and 16 to 25 pp, respectively).
With respect to place of residence (Fig 5 and S3 Table), the prevalence of underweight was higher but overweight, hypertension and diabetes were lower in rural compared to urban areas. The rural-urban gaps reduced for all indicators over time, with a more prominent reduction in underweight compared to overweight.
Associations between selected determinants and health outcomes
Findings from bivariate analysis (S4 Table) and multivariable regression analysis (Table 2) using data pooled from all available survey rounds confirmed the association between household SES and outcomes for both women and men. Compared to those in poorest quintile, women in the highest quintile were 70% less likely to be underweight (adjusted odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.26–0.33), ~4 times more likely to be overweight, 2.6 times more likely to have diabetes, and 1.4 times more likely to have hypertension. Similar associations were observed for men. Rural residence predicted underweight and overweight among women but not men. Women and men with higher education had lower odds of being underweight and higher odds of overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension (except for hypertension among women).
Regression decomposition to identify drivers of changes in underweight and overweight/obesity
Findings from the regression models in Table 2 were then combined with the changes over time in determinants to estimate the extent to which changes in determinants contributed to changes in outcomes over time. The decomposition models explained 60% of the actual change in underweight and 73% change in overweight/obesity in women (Fig 6). The explained share in the reduction of underweight and increase in overweight for women was mostly accounted for by the improvement in wealth (50% and 57% of changes respectively), followed by the improvement in education (5% and 8% respectively). For men, the decomposition models explained 56% changes in underweight and 45% changes in overweight/obesity, with the two key contributions for the changes in underweight and overweight/obesity being improvement in wealth (35% and 30%, respectively) and education (10–12%). Decomposition analysis only explained 40% and 20% of the increase in hypertension in women and men, respectively, where the increase in overweight/obesity explained 30% of the increase in hypertension among women and 16% among men.
Other factors include hygiene and sanitation in men, and household size, hygiene and sanitation, age, working status, and having children under 5 year in women.
Discussion
Using data from multiple nationally representative health surveys spanning 14 years, we examined trends in underweight, overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension among both women and men between 2004 and 2018, and we identified some factors that have contributed to changes in outcomes over time. We found that prevalence of underweight in both women and men declined substantially between 2004 and 2018 but remains higher in the poorer and rural compared to richer and urban households. In contrast, the prevalence of overweight/obesity increased nearly three-fold among women and 1.5 times among men, affecting nearly half of women and a third of men in 2018. Hypertension also increased (by 13–15 pp) while diabetes changed marginally over time. Changes in outcomes also varied by subnational division. When examining differences in outcomes across the wealth spectrum, wealth gaps decreased over time for underweight, remained stable for overweight/obesity, and increased for diabetes and hypertension s among men. Increasing wealth was the key driver of change of the reduction in undernutrition and of increase in overweight/obesity.
Our findings of a decreasing trend in the prevalence of underweight and an increasing trend of overweight/obesity are well aligned with studies using previous rounds of BDHS data [8, 13–17, 46, 47]. Studies examining changes in BMI [13], overweight/obesity [15, 16] or the double burden of under- and overnutrition [8, 14, 17] mainly focus on women of reproductive age, showing that the rates of change varying across residential areas and wealth quintile stratum. Our study extends these analyses to the most recent BDHS round in 2017–2018 and examines changes in malnutrition and diabetes and hypertension in both men and women. We found a higher AARC for underweight among women than men (-7% vs. -5%), similar AARC for overweight/obese (+7%) and lower AARC for hypertension (+5% vs. +9%) and diabetes (+3% vs. +4%).
The changes in nutrition and health outcomes are congruent with rapid economic growth and poverty reduction in Bangladesh over the past two decades [48]. As observed in other similar developing LMICs [49], Bangladesh has been experiencing transitions in the food supply, household food expenditures, diets, and nutrition outcomes. Food supply per person increased between 2010 and 2019 for most food groups, including eggs (84%), vegetables (46%), vegetable oils (42%), pulses (36%), among others (S5 Table) (FAO Statistical Database on Food Balance, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS) [50]. Between 2010 and 2016, the monthly average household consumption increased 39% (from Tk. 11,000 to Tk. 15,240) [51]. While overall calorie intake per capita per day has remained approximately the same (2240 Kcal in 1996 and 2210 Kcal in 2016), there have been large increases in daily per capita consumption of animal source foods (chicken 4g to 17g; eggs 3g to 14g) and edible oil (10g to 27g) [51]. There has also been a rapid emergence of the fast-food industry, especially in urban areas [52–54]. Dietary changes have been accompanied by lifestyle changes. Nationally representative and internationally comparable data from 2010 (using Global Physical Activity Questionnaire Version 2) on physical activities in Bangladesh showed that more than one-third of adults had a low physical activity level; inactivity was higher in females than males (54% vs. 15%), and higher in urban compared to rural areas (38% vs. 32%) [55].
Improvements in wealth and its associated changes have contributed to reductions in underweight in Bangladesh [8, 14, 56] and in other similar study contexts such as India [49]. However, improvements in wealth can be a “double edged sword” in the fight for nutrition and against NCDs since such improvements have been associated with increases in overweight, hypertension, and diabetes [49], as seen in the present study. In contrast to developed nations, overweight/obesity is more prevalent in higher-income groups than in lower-income groups in South Asia [57]. This is congruous with a global study on 36 LMICs which showed a consistent positive association between wealth index and BMI [58]. Higher-income households have increased purchasing power and access to food, and are less likely to face intra-household food allocation disparity [59]. However, the diet consists predominantly of carbohydrate-rich staples such as white rice [51, 60], the excess consumption of which has been shown to be associated with overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome [61, 62]. The 2016 Household Income and Expenditure Survey in Bangladesh revealed that poverty fell substantially between 2000 and 2016, shown as an increase in household monthly income, expenditure, and food consumption [6]. However, per capita per day intake of major food items (such as pulses, vegetables, fruits, meat, fish, eggs and milk) among poor households was much lower than in non-poor households; this pattern also held for edible oils (18.8 vs. 29.3 grams in non-poor and poor households, respectively) and sugar (2.7 vs. 8.2 grams) [6]. Higher income groups are also less likely to engage in physically demanding work [63].
Acknowledging the alarming increase in overweight/obesity and hypertension along with the steady reduction in underweight, the Government of Bangladesh seeks to address malnutrition in all forms per the National Plan of Action for Nutrition 2016–2025 [64]. The perils of the double burden of malnutrition have been acknowledged in the plan, with specified action areas, activities, and indicators proposed to monitor progress. A policy analysis in 2017 identified 51 policy documents in Bangladesh, which is aligned with the World Health Organization’s 2013–2020 Action Plan for the Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of NCDs [65]. There are at least 8 national policies, 12 laws, and 3 strategic plans which address the reduction of modifiable risk factors and promotion of a healthy environment [65]. Recently, the Government of Bangladesh has adopted a ‘Multisectoral Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2018–2025’ [66], which aims to reduce overweight and obesity through the promotion of physical activity and a healthy diet. However, the implementation of these policies and plans remains slow in progress. To our knowledge, there is no nationwide, multisectoral package of interventions to address the rise of overweight/obesity.
The present study has several strengths. It examines trends in underweight and overweight/obesity as well as diabetes and hypertension, using a large sample of adult women and men from five rounds of nationally representative survey spanning 14 years. Using advanced statistical methods, we describe changes and identify determinants of change over time across rural-urban residence and wealth quintiles disaggregated by gender. However, some limitations in the analysis warrant discussion. The identification of the key drivers of change of underweight, overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension are limited by the availability of variables in the DHS datasets. For example, more than 40% of the change in underweight for both genders and in overweight for men could not be explained by the variables considered in the regression analysis. Information on physical activities of individuals and dietary intake could have been vital in identifying the “unexplained” factors in this analysis. Decomposition analysis of drivers of change was also not possible for diabetes given that diabetes has increased by only 3–4 pp over time.
Conclusion
While Bangladesh observed remarkable progress on reducing underweight, differences across geography, residential and socioeconomic groups remain, and the increases in overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension are concerning. As a country with a strong record of growth and poverty reduction, Bangladesh is expected to continue to see increasing wealth, development, and urbanization. While these changes can bring benefits to living conditions, they are likely to continue to bring challenges such as increasing overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension. These changes could burden health systems and contribute to the overall burden of disease for the nation and for individuals. We also note the substantial lack of data on diets and physical activity, both critical immediate determinants of overweight and NCDs, and call for inclusion of these data in large-scale national surveys to strengthen such analyses. Double duty actions with multidisciplinary targeted interventions addressing the broad set of underlying factors should be explored to sustain the decrease in undernutrition and slow the increase in overweight/obesity and NCDs in Bangladesh.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Prevalance of underweight and overweight/obesity among women and men by age group, Bangladesh 2004–2018.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275151.s001
(DOCX)
S1 Table. Estimating average annual rate of change (AARC) in underweight, overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension in women (2004–2018) and men (2011–2018).
The following methods are adapted from UNICEF (42). When prevalence estimates are available for multiple years in a country, the AARC can be calculated using a regression analysis as follows: If the prevalence in a baseline year t0 is Y0 and four data points after t0 are available for trend analysis, then each of the four points can be written as: Yti = Y0*(1-b%) (ti -t0), so that, ln(Yti) = ln(Y0) + (ti -t0)*ln(1-b%) = ln(Y0) + ti *ln(1-b%)–t0*ln(1-b%) = β*ti + C0, Where β = ln(1-b%) and C0 = ln(Y0)–t0*ln(1+b%), a constant β, the coefficient of ti, in a simple linear regression of ln(Yi) against ti can then be translated into b%. The AARC = (EXP(β) *100)- 100.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275151.s002
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Socio-economic inequality in underweight, overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension among women and men by survey round, Bangladesh 2004–2018.
1Negative values mean that the burden is more concentrated in the poor and positive values mean that the burden is more concentrated in the wealthy. *,**,*** Significant difference for inequality between Q1 and Q5: *P<0.05, **P<0.01, *** P < 0.001; Q: quintile. SII: Slope Index of Inequality, CIX: Concentration Index.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275151.s003
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Residential inequality in underweight, overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension among women and men by survey round, Bangladesh 2004–2018.
1Negative values mean that the burden is more concentrated in the rural and positive values mean that the burden is more concentrated in the urban. *,**,*** Significant difference for inequality between rural and urban areas: *P<0.05, **P<0.01, *** P < 0.001; SII: Slope Index of Inequality, CIX: Concentration Index.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275151.s004
(DOCX)
S4 Table. Number and percentage of individuals with the outcomes, by selected factors.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275151.s005
(DOCX)
S5 Table. Supply of different food groups Bangladesh between 2010–2019 (kg/capita/year).
Source: FAOstat website: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275151.s006
(DOCX)
References
- 1.
Pirlea AF, Serajuddin U, Wadhwa D, Welch M, Whitby A. Atlas of the Sustainable Development Goals 2020: From World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://datatopics.worldbank.org/sdgatlas/. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO. 2020.
- 2. Biswas T, Magalhaes RJS, Townsend N, Das SK, Mamun A. Double Burden of Underweight and Overweight among Women in South and Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Adv Nutr. 2020;11(1):128–43. Epub 2019/10/22. pmid:31634389.
- 3. Popkin BM, Corvalan C, Grummer-Strawn LM. Dynamics of the double burden of malnutrition and the changing nutrition reality. Lancet. 2020;395(10217):65–74. Epub 2019/12/20. pmid:31852602.
- 4. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377–96. Epub 2016/04/27. pmid:27115820.
- 5.
WHO. Noncommunicable diseases. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases. Acessed August 29, 2021. 2020.
- 6.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Preliminary Report of Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) 2016. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Statistics and Informatics Division Ministry of Planning. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, 2017.
- 7. Hashan MR, Das Gupta R, Day B, Al Kibria GM. Differences in prevalence and associated factors of underweight and overweight/obesity according to rural-urban residence strata among women of reproductive age in Bangladesh: evidence from a cross-sectional national survey. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e034321. Epub 2020/02/07. pmid:32024791.
- 8. Hoque ME, Long KZ, Niessen LW, Mamun AA. Rapid shift toward overweight from double burden of underweight and overweight among Bangladeshi women: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Nutrition Reviews. 2015;73(7):438–47. pmid:26081454
- 9. Hossain MB, Khan JR, Das Gupta R. Role of hypertension in the association of overweight and obesity with diabetes among adults in Bangladesh: a population-based, cross-sectional nationally representative survey. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e050493. Epub 2021/08/01. pmid:34330863.
- 10. Ni Mhurchu C, Rodgers A, Pan WH, Gu DF, Woodward M, Asia Pacific Cohort Studies C. Body mass index and cardiovascular disease in the Asia-Pacific Region: an overview of 33 cohorts involving 310 000 participants. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33(4):751–8. Epub 2004/04/24. pmid:15105409.
- 11. Khan SH, Talukder SH. Nutrition transition in Bangladesh: is the country ready for this double burden. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:126–33. Epub 2013/10/10. pmid:24102686.
- 12. Collaborators GBDRF. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1223–49. pmid:33069327.
- 13. Biswas RK, Kabir E, Khan HTA. Socioeconomic transition and its influence on body mass index (BMI) pattern in Bangladesh. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019;25(1):130–41. Epub 2018/09/05. pmid:30178477.
- 14. Biswas RK, Rahman N, Khanam R, Baqui AH, Ahmed S. Double burden of underweight and overweight among women of reproductive age in Bangladesh. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(17):3163–74. Epub 2019/09/24. pmid:31544733.
- 15. Biswas T, Uddin MJ, Mamun AA, Pervin S, S PG. Increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in Bangladeshi women of reproductive age: Findings from 2004 to 2014. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0181080. Epub 2017/07/29. pmid:28753680.
- 16. Chowdhury MAB, Adnan MM, Hassan MZ. Trends, prevalence and risk factors of overweight and obesity among women of reproductive age in Bangladesh: a pooled analysis of five national cross-sectional surveys. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e018468. Epub 2018/07/22. pmid:30030307.
- 17. Rahman MA, Rahman MM, Rahman MM, Jesmin SS. The double burden of under- and overnutrition among Bangladeshi women: Socioeconomic and community-level inequalities. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219968. Epub 2019/07/26. pmid:31344076.
- 18. Biswas T, Garnett SP, Pervin S, Rawal LB. The prevalence of underweight, overweight and obesity in Bangladeshi adults: Data from a national survey. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177395. Epub 2017/05/17. pmid:28510585.
- 19. Hoque ME, Hasan MT, Rahman M, Long KZ, Al Mamun A. Double burden of underweight and overweight among Bangladeshi adults differs between men and women: evidence from a nationally representative survey. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(12):2183–91. Epub 2017/06/22. pmid:28633684.
- 20. Gupta RD, Kibria GMA. Prevalence and associated factors of underweight, overweight, and obesity among Bangladeshi adults: An analysis of demographic and health survey 2017–18. Obesity Medicine. 2021;23(100342):
- 21. Al-Zubayer MA, Ahammed B, Sarder MA, Kundu S, Majumder UK, Islam SMS. Double and triple burden of non-communicable diseases and its determinants among adults in Bangladesh: Evidence from a recent demographic and health survey. Int J Clin Pract. 2021:e14613. Epub 2021/07/09. pmid:34235819.
- 22. Khanam M, Hasan E, Sarker AR. Prevalence and Factors of Hypertension Among Bangladeshi Adults. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2021;28(4):393–403. Epub 2021/05/22. pmid:34018151.
- 23. Rahman MA, Halder HR, Yadav UN, Mistry SK. Prevalence of and factors associated with hypertension according to JNC 7 and ACC/AHA 2017 guidelines in Bangladesh. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):15420. Epub 2021/07/31. pmid:34326418.
- 24. Khan JR, Gulshan J. Assessing the double burden of malnutrition among Bangladeshi reproductive-aged women: A comparison between unconditional and conditional quantile regression. Health Sci Rep. 2021;4(4):e391. Epub 2021/10/09. pmid:34622024.
- 25. Khan MN, Oldroyd JC, Chowdhury EK, Hossain MB, Rana J, Renzetti S, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in Bangladesh: Findings from National Demographic and Health Survey, 2017–2018. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021;23(10):1830–42. Epub 2021/09/08. pmid:34492733.
- 26. Gupta RD, Chakraborty PA, Hossain MB. Association of household wealth and education level with hypertension and diabetes among adults in Bangladesh: a propensity score-based analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 2021;26(9):1047–56. Epub 2021/05/16. pmid:33991034.
- 27.
NIPORT. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2004. Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. 2005.
- 28.
NIPORT. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2007. Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. 2009.
- 29.
NIPORT. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International, 2013.
- 30.
NIPORT. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International, 2016.
- 31.
NIPORT. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), and ICF. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18. Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT, and ICF. 2020.
- 32.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Bangladesh Population and Housing Census 2011. http://catalog.ihsn.org/index.php/catalog/4376. 2011.
- 33.
Gibson RS. Principles of nutritional assessment. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. xx, 908 p. p.
- 34.
Cogill B. Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development, Washington, D.C. 2003.
- 35. WHO. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363(9403):157–63. Epub 2004/01/17. pmid:14726171.
- 36. D’Orazio P, Burnett RW, Fogh-Andersen N, Jacobs E, Kuwa K, Kulpmann WR, et al. Approved IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose: International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Scientific Division, Working Group on Selective Electrodes and Point-of-Care Testing (IFCC-SD-WG-SEPOCT). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(12):1486–90. Epub 2006/12/14. pmid:17163827.
- 37.
WHO. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycemia: report of a WHO/IDF consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2006.
- 38. Whitworth JA, Chalmers J. World health organisation-international society of hypertension (WHO/ISH) hypertension guidelines. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2004;26(7–8):747–52. Epub 2005/02/11. pmid:15702630.
- 39. Hawkes C, Ruel MT, Salm L, Sinclair B, Branca F. Double-duty actions: seizing programme and policy opportunities to address malnutrition in all its forms. Lancet. 2020;395(10218):142–55. Epub 2019/12/20. pmid:31852603.
- 40.
WHO. The double burden of malnutrition. Policy Breif. WHO/NMH/NHD/17.3. Geneva, Switzeland: World Health Organization, 2017.
- 41. Wells JC, Sawaya AL, Wibaek R, Mwangome M, Poullas MS, Yajnik CS, et al. The double burden of malnutrition: aetiological pathways and consequences for health. Lancet. 2020;395(10217):75–88. Epub 2019/12/20. pmid:31852605.
- 42. Filmer D, Pritchett LH. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 2001;38(1):115–32. Epub 2001/03/03. pmid:11227840.
- 43.
UNICEF. Technical note: how to calculate average annual rate of reduction (AARR) of underweight prevalence. https://data.unicef.org/resources/technical-note-calculate-average-annual-rate-reduction-aarr-underweight-prevalence/. Accessed January 3, 2022. 2007.
- 44.
WHO. Handbook on health inequality monitoring with a special focus on low-and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
- 45. Barros AJ, Victora CG. Measuring coverage in MNCH: determining and interpreting inequalities in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions. PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001390. pmid:23667332.
- 46. Biswas T, Islam A, Rawal LB, Islam SM. Increasing prevalence of diabetes in Bangladesh: a scoping review. Public Health. 2016;138:4–11. Epub 2016/05/14. pmid:27169347.
- 47. Chowdhury MZI, Rahman M, Akter T, Akhter T, Ahmed A, Shovon MA, et al. Hypertension prevalence and its trend in Bangladesh: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Hypertens. 2020;26:10. Epub 2020/06/10. pmid:32514373.
- 48.
Ahmed A, Tauseef S. Climbing up the Ladder and Watching out for the Fall: Poverty Dynamics in rural Bangladesh. Discussion Paper 1791 International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC Available at SSRN: https://ssrncom/abstract=3324541. 2018.
- 49. Young MF, Nguyen P, Tran LM, Avula R, Menon P. A Double Edged Sword? Improvements in Economic Conditions over a Decade in India Led to Declines in Undernutrition as Well as Increases in Overweight among Adolescents and Women. J Nutr. 2020;150(2):364–72. Epub 2019/10/17. pmid:31618429.
- 50.
FAO. FAOSTAT Food Balances (2010). https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS. 2010.
- 51.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Preliminary Report on Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2016. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka. 2017.
- 52. Zaman S, Selim N, Joarder T. McDonaldization without a McDonald’s Food, Culture & Society. 2013;16(4):551–68.
- 53. Ashraf MA, Akhter S, Noor SI. Consumer Behavior in Fast Food Marketing in Bangladesh: A Case Study. Developing Country Studies. 2014;4(9):34–44.
- 54. Harun A, Ahmed F, Zaman M. Customer Hospitality:The Case of Fast Food Industry in Bangladesh. World Journal of Social Sciences. 2013;3(6):88–104.
- 55. Moniruzzaman M, Mostafa Zaman M, Islalm MS, Ahasan HA, Kabir H, Yasmin R. Physical activity levels in Bangladeshi adults: results from STEPS survey 2010. Public Health. 2016;137:131–8. Epub 2016/04/12. pmid:27063947.
- 56. Biswas T, Townsend N, Islam MS, Islam MR, Das Gupta R, Das SK, et al. Association between socioeconomic status and prevalence of non-communicable diseases risk factors and comorbidities in Bangladesh: findings from a nationwide cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e025538. Epub 2019/03/15. pmid:30867202.
- 57. Dinsa GD, Goryakin Y, Fumagalli E, Suhrcke M. Obesity and socioeconomic status in developing countries: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2012;13(11):1067–79. Epub 2012/07/07. pmid:22764734.
- 58. Neuman M, Finlay JE, Davey Smith G, Subramanian SV. The poor stay thinner: stable socioeconomic gradients in BMI among women in lower- and middle-income countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(5):1348–57. Epub 2011/10/14. pmid:21993437.
- 59. Harris-Fry H, Shrestha N, Costello A, Saville NM. Determinants of intra-household food allocation between adults in South Asia—a systematic review. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):107. Epub 2017/06/24. pmid:28637477.
- 60.
Ahmed A, Ghostlaw J. Diversifying rice-centric agriculture and diets: the Bangladesh experience. In: Fan S, Yosef S, Pandya-Lorch R, editors. Agriculture for improved nutrition: seizing the momentum. [Internet] Wallingford: CABI; 2019 [cited 2022 Mar 2]. p. 154–64. http://www.cabi.org/cabebooks/ebook/20193035307. 2019.
- 61. Bhavadharini B, Mohan V, Dehghan M, Rangarajan S, Swaminathan S, Rosengren A, et al. White Rice Intake and Incident Diabetes: A Study of 132,373 Participants in 21 Countries. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(11):2643–50. Epub 20200901. pmid:32873587.
- 62. Izadi V, Azadbakht L. Is there any association between rice consumption and some of the cardiovascular diseases risk factors? A systematic review. ARYA Atheroscler. 2015;11(Suppl 1):109–15. pmid:26261458.
- 63. Jayawardena R, Byrne NM, Soares MJ, Katulanda P, Hills AP. Prevalence, trends and associated socio-economic factors of obesity in South Asia. Obes Facts. 2013;6(5):405–14. Epub 2013/10/11. pmid:24107686.
- 64.
Government of Bangladesh. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. The Second National Plan of Action for Nutrition (NPAN-2) 2016–2025. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bangladesh National Nutrition Council 2017.
- 65. Biswas T, Pervin S, Tanim MIA, Niessen L, Islam A. Bangladesh policy on prevention and control of non-communicable diseases: a policy analysis. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):582. Epub 2017/06/21. pmid:28629430.
- 66.
Government of People’s Republic of Bangladesh. Multisectoral Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2018–2025. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Non-communicable Disease Control Programme, Directorate General of Health Services; 2018.