Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

Empowering patients with comorbid diabetes and hypertension through a multi-component intervention of mobile app, health coaching and shared decision-making: Protocol for an effectiveness-implementation of randomised controlled trial

  • Yu Heng Kwan ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Yu Heng Kwan, Sungwon Yoon

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Centre for Population Health Research and Implementation (CPHRI), SingHealth Regional Health System, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore, Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore, SingHealth Internal Medicine Residency Programme, Singapore, Singapore

  • Sungwon Yoon ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Yu Heng Kwan, Sungwon Yoon

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Centre for Population Health Research and Implementation (CPHRI), SingHealth Regional Health System, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore, Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

  • Bee Choo Tai,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore

  • Chuen Seng Tan,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore

  • Jie Kie Phang,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Centre for Population Health Research and Implementation (CPHRI), SingHealth Regional Health System, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore, Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

  • Wee Boon Tan,

    Roles Data curation, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore

  • Ngiap Chuan Tan,

    Roles Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore, SingHealth Duke-NUS Family Medicine Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

  • Cynthia Yan Ling Tan,

    Roles Data curation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore

  • David Koot,

    Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore

  • Yan Ling Quah,

    Roles Data curation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore

  • Hock Hai Teo,

    Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Software, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

  • Lian Leng Low

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    low.lian.leng@singhealth.com.sg

    Affiliations Centre for Population Health Research and Implementation (CPHRI), SingHealth Regional Health System, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore, SingHealth Duke-NUS Family Medicine Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore, Population Health & Integrated Care Office (PHICO), Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore, SingHealth Community Hospital, Singapore, Singapore, Department of Family Medicine & Continuing Care, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Abstract

Introduction

Diabetes and hypertension are prevalent and costly to the health system. We have developed a mobile app (EMPOWER app) which enables remote monitoring and education through personalised nudges. We aim to study the effectiveness of a multi-component intervention comprising the EMPOWER mobile app with health coaching and shared decision-making for diabetes and hypertension.

Methods

We will conduct a two-arm, open-label, pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT). Participants with comorbid diabetes and hypertension enrolled from public primary care clinics will be randomised to either intervention or control in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention group participants will have access to health coaching with shared decision-making interventions in addition to the EMPOWER app and their usual primary care. The control group participants will continue to receive usual primary care and will neither receive the EMPOWER app nor health coaching and shared decision-making interventions. Our primary outcome is change in HbA1c level over 9 months. Secondary outcomes include change in systolic blood pressure, quality of life, patient activation, medication adherence, physical activity level, diet, and healthcare cost (direct and indirect) over 9 months.

Discussion

Our trial will provide key insights into clinical- and cost-effectiveness of a multi-component intervention comprising EMPOWER mobile app, health coaching and shared decision-making in diabetes and hypertension management. This trial will also offer evidence on cost-effective and sustainable methods for promoting behavioural changes among patients with comorbid diabetes and hypertension.

Trial registration

This study was registered on clintrials.gov on August 3, 2022, with the trial registration number: NCT05486390.

Introduction

Diabetes and hypertension are prevalent chronic diseases worldwide, with 537 million adults having diabetes worldwide [1] and the age-standardised prevalence of hypertension being around 30% globally [2]. Moreover, these diabetic and hypertensive patients are at greater risk for microvascular and macrovascular complications [3], including elevated rates of cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction [4]. It is well-established that lifestyle improvements in dietary habits and physical activity are effective in improving outcomes of both diabetes [5] and hypertension [6, 7]. However, due to the time constraints [8, 9], promotion of healthier lifestyle changes in conventional healthcare settings is difficult [10].

Mobile health (mHealth) can be an effective solution to promote lifestyle modification among patients with comorbid diabetes and hypertension. Previous reviews have shown that mHealth interventions may be effective for improving patient outcomes among patients with diabetes or hypertension [11, 12]. However, limited evidence exists for effectiveness of mHealth intervention for patients with comorbid diabetes and hypertension [11, 13]. We have developed a novel mobile app (EMPOWER app) which enables remote monitoring and education of patients with diabetes through personalised nudges. The effectiveness and implementation of the EMPOWER app in improving diabetes self-management is being evaluated in an ongoing randomised controlled trial [14]. However, numerous trials have shown that patient self-monitoring alone may have a limited effect on improving blood pressure control for patients with comorbid conditions [1517]. To effectively combat the comorbid condition of inadequate blood pressure management [18, 19], it is important to develop an innovative care model that involves multiple components including mHealth solution, health coaching and shared decision making.

Therefore, we aim to study the effectiveness of the EMPOWER mobile app in conjunction with health coaching and shared decision-making in patients with comorbid diabetes and hypertension through a randomised controlled trial (RCT). The findings from this study may provide evidence for better management and care model for patients with comorbid diabetes and hypertension. This protocol paper details the study design and planned analyses, and is based on protocol version 2 dated 1 October 2022.

Methods

Study design

We will execute an open label, two-arm, parallel randomised pragmatic trial. The pragmatic study design is based on the Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary Framework-2 (PRECIS-2) criteria [20]. We will randomly allocate eligible and consented participants in a 1:1 ratio to either intervention or control group. The intervention participants will have access to (1) EMPOWER mobile app, (2) Fitbit tracker and Fitbit app, (3) health coaching, (4) shared decision making, and (5) usual primary care. The control group participants will get Fitbit tracker, Fitbit app and usual primary care only (Fig 1). This study protocol is written according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) reporting guidelines [21] (Fig 2 and S1 File: SPIRIT 2013 Checklist). Participant recruitment has commenced on 17 February 2023, but has not been completed at the time of manuscript submission and publication.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Trial work plan.

Follow- up will be performed at month 3, 6 and 9.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296338.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. SPIRIT figure for the schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments.

Abbreviation: EQ-5D-5L: EuroQoL-5 Dimensions; HbA1c: Haemoglobin A1c; PAM: Patient Activation Measure. * Only for participants randomized to intervention group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296338.g002

Ethics and dissemination

Ethics approval was granted (Reference number: 2022/2326) by the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board. In addition, the board oversees protocol amendment, adverse event reporting and review. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to study commencement. The informed consent document can be found in the S2 File: Consent form. Payment and compensation of injuries and illness to participants arising from participation in this study will be assessed by the study team, and will be covered as per guidelines under the National Clinical Trials Insurance policy that SingHealth subscribes to.

Study findings will be disseminated through presenting at international conferences as well as publishing in peer-reviewed journals. The authorship will be finalised by the overall principal investigator (Lian Leng Low) according to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines. The study team does not intend to engage professional writers for this study.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Patients are recruited from three polyclinics in Singapore, which are public healthcare centres providing subsidised primary care. The trial inclusion criteria at the time of recruitment are:

  1. (1) Aged 21 years and older,
  2. (2) Has a diagnosis of diabetes,
  3. (3) Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 7.0% (most recent result),
  4. (4) Systolic blood pressure≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg on two or more prior visits, physician-diagnosed hypertension, or on antihypertensive medication,
  5. (5) Able to exercise physically,
  6. (6) Literate in English.

We will exclude patients who at the time of recruitment:

  1. (1) Require aid with basic activities of daily living,
  2. (2) On bolus insulin,
  3. (3) Have upcoming major medical or surgical procedure during the trial,
  4. (4) Impaired cognitively [22].

Intervention

The EMPOWER app has been described in detail in an earlier paper (14). The key features and functionalities of the EMPOWER app include (1) Personalised nudges based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) learning of the participant’s behaviour, (2) Gamification, (3) Logging and report, (4) Educational resources, which are mapped to key domains and interventions in the Behavioural Change Wheel (BCW) (S3 File: EMPOWER app features) [23].

The intervention group participants will interact with health coach throughout the study duration. The health coach involved in this study will include a registered nurse under the telecare service unit in an acute hospital. The health coach will contact the intervention group participants via phone call, videocall and/ or text messages. In this study, the health coach will be responsible for the following roles [24]:

  1. (1) Goal setting and action plan: Health coach will discuss the goals of treatment, and the reason for these goals. The health coach will discuss lifestyle factors influencing response to treatment of diabetes, hypertension and/or hyperlipidemia (e.g., salt or carbohydrate intake, weight, and physical activity). The health coach will also discuss with the participants regarding their willingness to modify these lifestyle factors, and propose a customised action plan for each participant. The health coach will also prepare a tailored education program consisting of information about the risks of diabetes, hypertension and/or hyperlipidemia as well as the advantages of treatment and lifestyle changes.
  2. (2) After-visit summary: After consultation with physician, health coach will ask participants whether there is anything they would like to discuss. Health coach will generate an after-visit summary to recap the advice given by the physician during the visit, including behaviour changes plan, medication plan, and subsequent follow-up date. Health coach will also make sure that participants are able to navigate the health system to accomplish the agendas in the after-visit summary.

A report card summarising the lifestyle behaviour (including diet, physical activity and weight), goals and action plans will be made available in the app to facilitate shared decision making.

Control

The control group participants will get Fitbit tracker and the Fitbit app but will have no access to the EMPOWER app, health coach nor shared decision making. This will allow investigation of the effectiveness of the EMPOWER mobile app in conjunction with health coaching and shared decision making in patients with comorbid diabetes and hypertension.

Outcome measures

Our primary outcome is change in HbA1c level over 9 months (Table 2). The measurement of glycated haemoglobin using HbA1c is widely accepted as a standard index of glycaemic control of diabetic patients [25]. HbA1c will be measured using platforms available at the in-house laboratory at the study sites, and the platforms will be National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program-certified.

Our secondary outcomes will include change in systolic blood pressure, quality of life (QoL), patient activation, medication adherence, physical activity level, diet, and healthcare cost (direct and indirect) over 9 months. The outcome measures are listed in Table 1. We will extract healthcare cost from electronic medical records, and supplement with survey data on self-reported income, travel cost, and employment status.

thumbnail
Table 1. Outcome measures to evaluate clinical and cost-effectiveness.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296338.t001

Sample size and recruitment

We calculated the sample size based on our primary outcome of HbA1c which is evaluated at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months. We assume a mean difference of 0.36%, a standard deviation of 1.5% [29], and an auto-correlation of 0.375 [30] between the repeated HbA1c measurements. The standard deviation of 1.5% was derived from data from the SingHealth Diabetes Registry, which showed the standard deviation of HbA1c for patients from polyclinics, hospitals and national specialty centres ranging from 1.4–1.5 from 2013–2019 [29]. Conservatively, we postulated that effect size of a complex intervention involving health coach and mobile app would result in a mean difference of 0.36% in HbA1c levels between the intervention and control groups. A meta-analysis has shown that the mean reduction in HbA1c is 0.41% for high quality studies involving mobile applications for Type 2 diabetes [31]. The auto-correlation of 0.375 between the repeated HbA1c measurements was assumed as it provided the most conservative (i.e. maximum) estimate of the sample size based on a repeated measurement study design with one-pre and three-post intervention measurements [30].

Based on a repeated measures study design [30] with one pre- and three post-intervention measurements, a minimum sample size of 125 per group, or 250 in total would have an 80% power to detect the hypothesised difference at a two-sided alpha of 5%. A total of 320 participants will be required after accounting for 20% attrition.

We will be advertising the study through posters and banners placed at polyclinic sites to ensure adequate enrolment to reach the target sample size of 320.

Randomization and blinding process

Participants will be randomised to intervention or control group using a computer-generated randomization list provided by the trial biostatistician. We implemented stratified block randomization using randomly varying block sizes with recruitment site and duration of diabetes (<10 years or ≥10 years) as stratification factors based on a 1:1 allocation ratio. The cut-off of 10 years for duration of diabetes is supported by the data from previous studies [32, 33] and local SingHealth Diabetes Registry (mean disease duration ranging from 9.0–11.3 years from 2013 to 2019) [34].

Upon obtaining informed consent and enrolling a participant, the research coordinators at the polyclinic sites will contact a centralised research staff (who oversees the study progress but is not involved in patient recruitment) for the randomisation assignment.

The data analyst will be blinded to the assignment of interventions. It is not possible to blind study participants and care providers to the random assignment due to the nature of the intervention in this study.

Statistical analyses

We will summarise participant’s characteristics using median (interquartile range) for non-normally distributed or mean (standard deviation) for normally distributed continuous variables respectively, and count and percentage for categorical variables. We will analyse the primary outcome of change in HbA1c over the 9 months follow-up, using a linear mixed model with adjustment for baseline HbA1c. A further model will be considered to explore whether the treatment effect on HbA1c varies with time, by including the treatment by time interaction, and adjusting for baseline systolic blood pressure and other potential confounders as appropriate via the mixed model.

We will use linear mixed model to account for within-individual correlation among measurements, and the sandwich estimator to obtain robust standard error estimates for secondary outcomes with repeated measurements (e.g., systolic blood pressure, quality of life, patient activation score). Pseudo maximum likelihood estimation method will be used for the parameter estimation. We will include intervention indicator and time factor as predictors, adjusting for the respective baseline covariates. For both the primary and secondary outcomes, alternative models such as mixed effect quantile regression may be considered if the model assumptions are violated.

All evaluations will be made using two-sided p-values at the 5% level of significance. Statistical analyses will be conducted based on the principle of intention-to-treat.

We will also conduct an economic evaluation from the health care system and societal perspectives. We will perform both cost-effectiveness analysis (i.e., cost of reduction in 1% in HbA1c) and cost-utility analysis (cost of reduction in 1 quality-adjusted life year saved).

Implementation

We will assess the impact and sustainability of interventions using the RE-AIM framework [35]. Data sources include qualitative focus groups and interviews with a purposive sample of participants and stakeholders, survey data, and electronic medical records. In addition, qualitative interviews will be conducted with a purposive sample of participants to collect their feedback on the EMPOWER app, health coaching and shared decision making interventions in promoting behavior change based on shared domains of the theoretical domain framework [36, 37] and social cognitive theory [38]. Specifically, we will focus on exploring knowledge, skills and reinforcement, self-efficacy, beliefs about consequences (outcome expectation), intention and goals, environmental context and social support/influences (S4 File: Sample interview questions for patients). These domains will assist in identifying cognitive, affective and social/environmental factors influencing behavioral change. In addition to patient interviews, interviews with healthcare professionals (clinician, health coach) and research coordinators will be conducted to elucidate implementation challenges and experiences (S5 File: Sample interview questions for other stakeholders). The details on data sources and parameters assessed for each RE-AIM dimension can be found in Table 2.

thumbnail
Table 2. Data sources and parameters assessed for RE-AIM dimensions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296338.t002

Data management

We will secure the hardcopy survey data in locked storage spaces at the respective recruitment sites. Research coordinators will enter data into a secure web application [39, 40]. We will secure the EMPOWER app data and Fitbit data on a password-protected cloud, where only study team members will have access. We will retrieve data from the electronic medical records upon participant’s consent. The principal investigator will oversee data entry, data monitoring and audit procedures. Only the principal investigator and site principal investigators approved by the institutional review board will have access to the final trial dataset. The authors have access to information that could identify individual participants during and after data collection.

Data monitoring

A data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) will ensure proper conduct of this trial and patient safety. At 6-month of completed follow up for 160 participants, the independent DSMB will conduct a planned monitoring of the unblinded effectiveness and safety data. All adverse events will be recorded.

Discussion

This study will be the first to report on the effectiveness and implementation of complex intervention including personalised nudges driven by AI, health coaching and shared decision-making informed by behaviour change theory [41] for comorbid diabetes and hypertension management. Our study is conducted in an Asian healthcare setting, which will add much needed evidence to prior mHealth studies on chronic disease self-management that have been conducted primarily in the context of Western healthcare settings [42, 43]. Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of cultural adaptations of healthcare interventions to their effectiveness [44, 45]. The implementation of digitalisation and automation of nudging via mobile application, health coaching and shared decision-making in this study has the potential to alleviate time and resource constraints in primary care [9, 46, 47].

Our hybrid implementation-effectiveness study will provide valuable insights into a novel care model comprising mHealth and health coaching in the management of chronic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension. The evaluation of interventions using the RE-AIM framework [35] as well as feedback on the multi-component intervention (comprising EMPOWER app, health coaching and shared decision making) in promoting behavior change based on shared domains of theoretical domain framework [36, 37] and social cognitive theory [38] will generate findings on both impact and sustainability. Clinicians, researchers and policy makers will glean insights as to how cost-effective mHealth, health coaching and shared decision-making interventions can be scaled up and sustained among patients with comorbid diabetes and hypertension for behavioural change.

Supporting information

S4 File. Sample interview questions for patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296338.s004

(DOCX)

S5 File. Sample interview questions for other stakeholders.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296338.s005

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Wei Yi TAY (Senior Consultant, Family Medicine & Continuing Care, Singapore General Hospital), A/Prof Liang SHEN (Head, Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore) and Dr Kai Zhen YAP (Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore) for serving on the DSMB for this study.

References

  1. 1. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2022;183:109119. pmid:34879977
  2. 2. Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, Riley LM, Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA, et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. The Lancet. 2021;398(10304):957–80. pmid:34450083
  3. 3. Long AN, Dagogo‐Jack S. Comorbidities of diabetes and hypertension: mechanisms and approach to target organ protection. The journal of clinical hypertension. 2011;13(4):244–51. pmid:21466619
  4. 4. Turner R, Holman R, Matthews D, Bassett P, Coster R, Stratton I, et al. Hypertension in Diabetes Study (HDS): II. Increased risk of cardiovascular complications in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. Journal of Hypertension. 1993;11(3).
  5. 5. Klein S, Sheard NF, Pi-Sunyer X, Daly A, Wylie-Rosett J, Kulkarni K, et al. Weight management through lifestyle modification for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: rationale and strategies. A statement of the American Diabetes Association, the North American Association for the Study of Obesity, and the American Society for Clinical Nutrition. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2004;80(2):257–63. pmid:15277143
  6. 6. Blumenthal JA, Hinderliter AL, Smith PJ, Mabe S, Watkins LL, Craighead L, et al. Effects of Lifestyle Modification on Patients With Resistant Hypertension: Results of the TRIUMPH Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2021;144(15):1212–26. pmid:34565172
  7. 7. Ritchey MD, Gillespie C, Wozniak G, Shay CM, Thompson-Paul AM, Loustalot F, et al. Potential need for expanded pharmacologic treatment and lifestyle modification services under the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guideline. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2018;20(10):1377–91. pmid:30194806
  8. 8. Tan ST, Quek RYC, Haldane V, Koh JJK, Han EKL, Ong SE, et al. The social determinants of chronic disease management: perspectives of elderly patients with hypertension from low socio-economic background in Singapore. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2019;18(1):1. pmid:30606218
  9. 9. Foo KM, Sundram M, Legido-Quigley H. Facilitators and barriers of managing patients with multiple chronic conditions in the community: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):273. pmid:32106838
  10. 10. Kardakis T, Weinehall L, Jerdén L, Nyström ME, Johansson H. Lifestyle interventions in primary health care: professional and organizational challenges. European Journal of Public Health. 2013;24(1):79–84. pmid:23722861
  11. 11. Liu K, Xie Z, Or CK. Effectiveness of mobile app-assisted self-care interventions for improving patient outcomes in type 2 diabetes and/or hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020;8(8):e15779. pmid:32459654
  12. 12. Donevant SB, Estrada RD, Culley JM, Habing B, Adams SA. Exploring app features with outcomes in mHealth studies involving chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes, and hypertension: a targeted exploration of the literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2018;25(10):1407–18. pmid:30137383
  13. 13. Choi W, Wang S, Lee Y, Oh H, Zheng Z. A systematic review of mobile health technologies to support self-management of concurrent diabetes and hypertension. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2020;27(6):939–45. pmid:32357368
  14. 14. Kwan YH, Yoon S, Tan CS, Tai BC, Tan WB, Phang JK, et al. EMPOWERing Patients With Diabetes Using Profiling and Targeted Feedbacks Delivered Through Smartphone App and Wearable (EMPOWER): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial on Effectiveness and Implementation. Frontiers in public health. 2022;10. pmid:35284389
  15. 15. Agarwal R, Bills JE, Hecht TJW, Light RP. Role of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Overcoming Therapeutic Inertia and Improving Hypertension Control. Hypertension. 2011;57(1):29–38.
  16. 16. Bray EP, Holder R, Mant J, McManus RJ. Does self-monitoring reduce blood pressure? Meta-analysis with meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Annals of Medicine. 2010;42(5):371–86. pmid:20504241
  17. 17. Morawski K, Ghazinouri R, Krumme A, Lauffenburger JC, Lu Z, Durfee E, et al. Association of a Smartphone Application With Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control: The MedISAFE-BP Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2018;178(6):802–9. pmid:29710289
  18. 18. Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2020;16(4):223–37. pmid:32024986
  19. 19. Ibrahim MM, Damasceno A. Hypertension in developing countries. The Lancet. 2012;380(9841):611–9. pmid:22883510
  20. 20. Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2015;350:h2147. pmid:25956159
  21. 21. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of internal medicine. 2013;158(3):200–7. pmid:23295957
  22. 22. SAHADEVAN S, TAN NJL, TAN T, TAN S. Cognitive testing of elderly Chinese people in Singapore: influence of education and age on normative scores. Age and Ageing. 1997;26(6):481–6. pmid:9466300
  23. 23. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science. 2011;6(1):42. pmid:21513547
  24. 24. Bodenheimer T, Laing BY. The teamlet model of primary care. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2007;5(5):457–61. pmid:17893389
  25. 25. Control D, Group CTR. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New England journal of medicine. 1993;329(14):977–86. pmid:8366922
  26. 26. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health services research. 2004;39(4p1):1005–26. pmid:15230939
  27. 27. Voils CI, Maciejewski ML, Hoyle RH, Reeve BB, Gallagher P, Bryson CL, et al. Initial validation of a self-report measure of the extent of and reasons for medication nonadherence. Medical care. 2012;50(12):1013–9. pmid:22922431
  28. 28. Wang P, Luo N, Tai E, Thumboo J. The EQ-5D-5L is more discriminative than the EQ-5D-3L in patients with diabetes in Singapore. Value in health regional issues. 2016;9:57–62. pmid:27881260
  29. 29. Feng L, Lam A, Carmody D, Lim CW, Tan G, Goh S-Y, et al. Trends in cardiovascular risk factors and treatment goals in patients with diabetes in Singapore-analysis of the SingHealth Diabetes Registry. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(11):e0259157. pmid:34748574
  30. 30. Machin D, Fayers PM, Tai BC. Randomised clinical trials: design, practice and reporting: John Wiley & Sons; 2021.
  31. 31. Hou C, Carter B, Hewitt J, Francisa T, Mayor S. Do Mobile Phone Applications Improve Glycemic Control (HbA1c) in the Self-management of Diabetes? A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and GRADE of 14 Randomized Trials. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):2089–95. pmid:27926892
  32. 32. Benoit SR, Fleming R, Philis-Tsimikas A, Ji M. Predictors of glycemic control among patients with Type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study. BMC public health. 2005;5(1):1–9. pmid:15833140
  33. 33. Ji L-N, Lu J-M, Guo X-H, Yang W-Y, Weng J-P, Jia W-P, et al. Glycemic control among patients in China with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving oral drugs or injectables. BMC public health. 2013;13(1):1–8. pmid:23800082
  34. 34. SingHealth Diabetes Registry (SDR) Annual Report 2020. 2020.
  35. 35. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7. pmid:10474547
  36. 36. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2005;14(1):26–33. pmid:15692000
  37. 37. Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation science. 2012;7(1):1–17. pmid:22530986
  38. 38. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology. 2001;52(1):1–26. pmid:11148297
  39. 39. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2009;42(2):377–81. pmid:18929686
  40. 40. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2019;95:103208. pmid:31078660
  41. 41. Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The behaviour change wheel. A guide to designing interventions 1st ed Great Britain: Silverback Publishing. 2014:1003–10.
  42. 42. Goyal S, Lewis G, Yu C, Rotondi M, Seto E, Cafazzo JA. Evaluation of a behavioral mobile phone app intervention for the self-management of type 2 diabetes: randomized controlled trial protocol. JMIR research protocols. 2016;5(3):e5959. pmid:27542325
  43. 43. Aguilera A, Figueroa CA, Hernandez-Ramos R, Sarkar U, Cemballi A, Gomez-Pathak L, et al. mHealth app using machine learning to increase physical activity in diabetes and depression: clinical trial protocol for the DIAMANTE Study. BMJ open. 2020;10(8):e034723. pmid:32819981
  44. 44. Hall GCN, Ibaraki AY, Huang ER, Marti CN, Stice E. A meta-analysis of cultural adaptations of psychological interventions. Behavior therapy. 2016;47(6):993–1014. pmid:27993346
  45. 45. Liau YW, Cheow C, Leung KTY, Tan H, Low SF, Cheen HHM, et al. A cultural adaptation and validation study of a self-report measure of the extent of and reasons for medication nonadherence among patients with diabetes in Singapore. Patient preference and adherence. 2019;13:1241. pmid:31551654
  46. 46. Beaglehole R, Epping-Jordan J, Patel V, Chopra M, Ebrahim S, Kidd M, et al. Improving the prevention and management of chronic disease in low-income and middle-income countries: a priority for primary health care. The Lancet. 2008;372(9642):940–9. pmid:18790317
  47. 47. Østbye T, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? The Annals of Family Medicine. 2005;3(3):209–14. pmid:15928223