Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

The landscape of alternative splicing in granulosa cells and a potential novel role of YAP1 in PCOS

  • Linlin Yang ,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft

    ‡ LY and JC are contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship.

    Affiliation Department of Reproductive Genetics, Key Laboratory of Reproduction Engineer of Shanxi Health Committee, Heping Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China

  • Jianhua Chen ,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    ‡ LY and JC are contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship.

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

  • Hui Miao,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Reproductive Genetics, Key Laboratory of Reproduction Engineer of Shanxi Health Committee, Heping Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China

  • Na Li,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Reproductive Genetics, Key Laboratory of Reproduction Engineer of Shanxi Health Committee, Heping Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China

  • Huilin Bi,

    Roles Visualization

    Affiliation Department of Reproductive Genetics, Key Laboratory of Reproduction Engineer of Shanxi Health Committee, Heping Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China

  • Ruizhi Feng ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

    ruizhifeng@njmu.edu.cn (RF); mcxms@163.com (CM)

    Affiliations State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China, Reproductive Medical Center of Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China, Innovation Center of Suzhou Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China

  • Congxiu Miao

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

    ruizhifeng@njmu.edu.cn (RF); mcxms@163.com (CM)

    Affiliation Department of Reproductive Genetics, Key Laboratory of Reproduction Engineer of Shanxi Health Committee, Heping Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a prevalent yet complex reproductive endocrine disorder affecting 11–13% of women worldwide. Its main symptoms include elevated androgen levels, irregular menstrual cycles, and long-term metabolic and offspring health implications. Despite the disease’s multifaceted nature involving genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors, the role of alternative splicing in ovarian granulosa cells remains relatively unexplored. This study aims to investigate the transcriptional and alternative splicing characteristics of granulosa cells in PCOS patients and to elucidate the potential functional consequences of these changes. Analysis of previous published transcriptome sequencing data identified 491 upregulated and 401 downregulated genes in granulosa cells of PCOS patients, significantly involved in immune-related processes. Additionally, 1250 differential splicing events, predominantly involving exon skipping and affecting 947 genes, were detected. These genes with alternative splicing patterns were found to be enriched in endoplasmic reticulum stress and protein post-translational modification processes, suggesting their role in PCOS pathology. Moreover, the study highlighted that the utilization of different splice isoforms of the YAP1 gene may impact its interaction in the Hippo signaling pathway, influencing the pathogenesis of PCOS. These findings underscore substantial alterations in alternative splicing in granulosa cells of PCOS patients, providing a novel viewpoint for comprehending the molecular underpinnings of PCOS and suggesting potential avenues for therapeutic intervention.

Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common reproductive endocrinological disease, influencing about 11–13% women worldwide [1], whose etiology has not been fully understood yet. According to the latest 2023 ASRM guidelines, the main symptoms of PCOS are hyperandrogenism and irregular cycles [2]. Previous studies mostly focused on the endocrine therapy together with treatment of assisted reproductive technology to solve the problem of potential subfertility of PCOS, more and more recent researchers paid attention to the long-term impact of this disease such as metabolic syndrome, higher risk of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease [35]. Transgenerational effects such as metabolic dysfunction [6], psychiatric and mild neurodevelopmental disorders [7] even in male offsprings have been reported, indicating a systemic transmitting implication [8]. Multiple factors contribute to the pathogenesis of PCOS, including genetic predisposition, epigenetic changes, gut microbiota, environmental impacts and life style [9], however there are still large fraction of its regulatory mechanisms to be fully uncovered.

The core symptom of PCOS is the dysfunction of hormone homeostasis, and the most significant part is the transition of androgen producing from thecal cells which wrap the whole follicle to estrogen, taking place in granulosa cells (GCs), the somatic cell around the oocyte [10]. The abnormality of ovarian granulosa cells is the major origin of the morphological change in PCOS showing polycystic ovary in ultrasonography scanning. It has been reported that in PCOS patients, the thecal cells showed hyperplasia and the granulosa cells exhibit thin layers [11], leading to infrequent ovulation. Evidence also showed abnormal cell proliferation, apoptosis and metabolism happened in GCs of PCOS patients [12], with involvement in mitochondrial function such as oxidative phosphorylation, ATP production and ROS clearance [13, 14]. The molecular mechanisms of PCOS pathology are complicated, involving the regulation of various levels, including DNA, epigenetic modifications, transcriptional and translational factors, metabolites and environmental issues [3, 1518].

Transcriptional regulation is the first step of genetic and epigenetic factors influencing the downstream biological process in biological organisms. Spatiotemporal gene expression is the fundamental element of life; however, it is not limited in the amount or location of a specific gene expressing, complicated forms of transcriptional regulation enrich the accuracy and fine tune the molecular process on the RNA level. Alternative splicing (AS) is one important but less well-studied approach of transcriptional regulation which contributing to numerous human disease such as cancer, neurological / autoimmune / endocrine system / digestive / cardiovascular diseases [19]. A large number of cis-elements such as enhancers and trans-elements such as relative RNA binding proteins are involved in this complicated process, resulting in different kinds of AS events. Among them, the alternative 5’/3’ splice site (A5SS or A3SS), retention intron (RI), mutually exclusive exon (MXE) and exon skipping (ES) are most commonly seen events that produce different RNA isoforms and usually different proteins. Certain AS events with a specific protein product may directly trigger or decide an essential biological trajectory [20], and global AS status can serve as a signature for diagnosis / prognosis [2123] or reflecting potential intrinsic characteristics of many diseases even future effective pharmaceutical target [19].

In the current study, we aim to generate a comprehensive landscape of alternative splicing in PCOS and investigate the potential key AS events that could possibly contribute to the etiology and pathology of this complicated disease. We reanalyzed the global expression of a previously published dataset with the RNA sequencing of granulosa cells in PCOS and control samples [24]. We found that there are significant transcriptional and alternative splicing differences in granulosa cells of PCOS patients, involving immune-related processes and endoplasmic reticulum stress. The main type of splicing event is skipping exons, especially the splicing changes of YAP1 gene may affects its role in the Hippo signaling pathway. Our findings provide a deeper understanding of the complexity of PCOS and may bring new insight into future basic research and potential therapy development.

Results

Transcriptional profiles of human PCOS and normal granulosa cells

We obtained transcriptome sequencing data of granulosa cells from both PCOS patients and normal donors from previous studies [24]. In brief, mature follicles free of any visible blood contamination were harvested from participants (PCOS and controls) aged 20–35 years who had undergone controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Granulosa cells were then isolated by centrifugation for transcriptomic analysis. After removing adapters and filtering out low-quality reads, we mapped the clean reads to the human genome and found that an average of 95% of reads were specifically mapped (S1A Fig). The results of principal component analysis (PCA) of FPKM matrix of all expressed genes revealed a clear distinction between the two groups (S1B Fig).

Next, we examined the differentially expressed genes (DEGs, |log2FoldChange| > 2 and adjusted p-value < 0.05) between the two groups. We plotted these genes on a volcano plot (Fig 1A) and identified 491 up-regulated genes and 401 down-regulated genes, out of which 352 and 171 genes were protein-encoded, respectively (see Fig 1B). When we conducted Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis on all the expressed genes (defined as those with at least one mapped read in any sample), we identified a total of 2618 entries in the biological process category. The most frequent cluster identified was related to RNA metabolism and splicing (Fig 1C). Additionally, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) showed a significant enrichment in immune-related terms, where the frequency of immune-related terms is notably higher than other categories (S2 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Characteristics and differences between human Normal and PCOS granulosa cell transcriptomes.

(A) A volcano plot depicting significantly up-regulated or down-regulated genes between the two groups. (B) Compared with the Normal group, 401 and 491 genes were up-regulated (shown in red) and down-regulated (shown in blue) in PCOS granulosa cells, respectively. Dark colors represent protein-coding genes and light colors represent non-coding genes. (C) The cluster of BP terms is enriched based on all expressed genes (defined as those with at least one mapped read in any sample). Enrichment terms were clustered based on semantic similarity, and a summary of the biological functions within each cluster was visualized as word clouds, which are attached to the right side of the similarity heatmap.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315750.g001

Dramatic changes in alternative splicing (AS) of human PCOS and granulosa cells

Alternative splicing contributes to protein diversity, and aberrant splicing events are often indicative of pathogenic outcomes. Given the strong correlation between RNA splicing and the terms for all gene enrichment described earlier, we first analyzed differential alternative splicing events (DASEs, |ΔIncLevel|>0.1 and FDR < 0.05) between the PCOS and normal groups using rMATS (replicate Multivariate Analysis of Transcript Splicing) program [25]. Five types of alternative splicing events can be identified by rMTAS, namely skipped exon (SE), alternative 5’ splice site (A5SS), alternative 3’ splice site (A3SS), mutually exclusive exons (MXE) and retained intron (RI). A total of 1250 differential splicing events were detected in 947 genes, suggesting that at least one differential splice event was present in each gene (see S1 Table). The upset plot revealed that a single gene could contain up to four different types of DASEs. Statistical analysis of the different splicing event types showed that SE events accounted for 49.2% of all splicing events, followed by MXE events, which comprised 19.68% (Fig 2A). Additionally, we identified 17 genes exhibiting more than three alternative splicing events, four of which were long non-coding RNAs (Fig 2B). SNHG5 had the highest number of splicing events, and it has been found to regulate follicle growth in PCOS, making it a potential therapeutic target [26]. The observed differential splicing events in PCOS suggest its potential involvement in PCOS development.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Changed differential alternative splicing events (DASEs) patterns between PCOS and Normal granulosa cells.

(A) Statistics of detailed DASEs from rMATS. The upset plot illustrates the types of differential splicing events present in each gene. The height of the upper black bars in the upset plot corresponds to the number of gene sets with highlighted black dots in each column. The colored bars on the right indicate the number of genes associated with each differential splicing event type. The pie chart, on the other hand, shows the percentage of differential alternative splicing events. A3SS, alternative 3’ splicing site; A5SS, alternative 5’ splicing site; MXE, mutually exclusive exons; RI, retained intron; SE, skipped exon. (B) Genes with greater than 3 DASEs. Different colors represent different biological types of genes. (C) Cluster and GO enrichment of genes that contained differential alternative splicing. The K-means algorithm was used for clustering. To ensure the reproducibility of the results, we set the random seed to 2024 and determined the optimal number of clusters to be 5 based on the elbow method. As a result, the FPKM expression matrix of genes with differential splicing was subsequently clustered into 5 groups for further analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315750.g002

Genes with altered AS patterns are specifically associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress

To systematically summarize the impact of AS events alteration on gene products and function, we conducted K-means clustering of differentially spliced genes in rMATS based on their expression levels. Subsequently, we carried out GO enrichment analysis for each gene class. We identified a total of 5 categories, with 3 of them showing significant enrichment. Notably, class C2 comprised 187 genes enriched for endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) and protein post-translational modifications, while class C4 contained 210 genes enriched for pathways related to Wnt signaling and protein metabolism. The enrichments in C3 were largely related to RNA splicing regulation (Fig 2C). Multiple studies have demonstrated the involvement of ERS in the pathogenesis of PCOS. Furthermore, the use of ERS has been shown to improve various pathological manifestations of PCOS [3, 27]. We identified several target genes of PCOS, including USP25, YAP1, SIRT2, and SNRPN [18, 2830]. These findings suggest a close association between abnormal alternative splicing events and the occurrence of PCOS.

Consequence of isoform switch between Normal and PCOS granulosa cells

The rMATS method focuses on detecting systematic changes in alternative splicing under different conditions, yet struggles to elucidate the biological significance of these changes. To better understand the biological implications, we incorporated the isofomSwitchAnalyzeR package to predict alternative splicing events based on transcript usage. Upon comparing genes with differential alternative splicing changes identified by both methods, we found that only 260 genes (9.2%) were detected by both (Fig 3A). The FPKM value of the 260 genes can be found in S2 Table. The isoformSwitchAnalyzeR package suggests that isoform switching is driven by three biological mechanisms: alternative transcription start site (aTSS), alternative transcription termination site (aTTS), and alternative splicing (AS), with AS encompassing exon skipping (ES), intron retention (IR), alternative 5’ donor site (A5), alternative 3’ acceptor site (A3), multiple exon skipping (MES), and mutually exclusive exons (MEE). When comparing the isoform pairs that changed in the Normal and PCOS groups, we observed 1967 isoform switch pairs as AS events, with aTSS events showing the most pairs (Fig 3B). As shown in Fig 3C, we compared the enrichments of alternative splicing patterns between Normal and PCOS groups and found that all splicing patterns, except for IR and MEE, were statistically significant (FDR < 0.05, Fishers exact test). In the results obtained from isoformSwitchanalyzeR, both ES and MES refer to exon skipping events, with ES representing single-exon skips and MES representing multi-exon skips, which corresponds to SE (skipped exon) event type in rMATS. We observed that exon skipping events were the most prevalent in both software analyses. Furthermore, we identified that several isoform switch consequences were either enriched or depleted in the transition from Normal to PCOS samples (Fig 3D). For example, compared to the Normal group, NMD (nonsense-mediated mRNA decay) sensitivity was significantly more frequent PCOS samples (FDR < 0.05, proportion test).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Consequence of isoform switch between Normal and PCOS granulosa cells.

(A) Compare the genes that happened differential alternative splicing between rMATS and IsoformSwitchAnalyzeR. (B) The relationship among the isoform switch driven by three mechanisms, aTSS (alternative transcription start site), aTTS (alternative transcription termination site), and AS (alternative splicing). (C) Enrichment/depletion in alternative splicing between Normal and PCOS granulosa cells. The fraction (and 95% confidence interval) of isoform switches (x-axis) resulting in gain of a specific alternative splice event (indicated by y-axis) in the switch from normal to PCOS. Dashed line indicates no enrichment/depletion. Splicing abbreviation is listed below: ATSS, alternative transcription start site; MES, multiple exon skipping; IR, intron retention; ES, exon skipping; ATTS, alternative transcription termination site; A5, alternative 5’ donor site; A3, alternative 3’ acceptor site; MEE, mutually exclusive exons. (D) Enrichment/depletion in isoform switch consequences between Normal and PCOS granulosa cells. From isoform switches resulting in either gain/loss of a consequence, the x-axis shows the fraction (with 95% confidence interval) resulting in the consequence indicated by y-axis, in the switches from Normal to PCOS. Color indicate if FDR < 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315750.g003

The YAP1 protein in PCOS has a shorter ORF and an additional functional domain

YAP1 is among the 260 genes with different splice variants identified using two methods simultaneously and has long been known as a susceptibility gene for PCOS [3133]. In Fig 4A, four distinct transcripts of the YAP1 gene are displayed. The use of the ENST00000531439.5_1 transcript (YAP1_439) increases in PCOS patients, while the use of the ENST00000526343.5_1 transcript (YAP1_343) decreases. YAP1_439 contains an additional WW (X2) protein domain compared to YAP1_343. The WW domain is responsible for interacting with numerous proteins containing PPxY motifs in the Hippo pathway (where P is proline, x is any amino acid, and Y is tyrosine). The presence of a single WW or double WW domain may affect the affinity and specificity of YAP1 during interaction with these PPxY motifs [34, 35].

thumbnail
Fig 4. The isoform switch in YAP1 between Normal and PCOS granulosa cells.

This plot illustrates the gene structure of different YAP1 transcripts and their expression and usage. (A) The gene structure and functional domain of each transcript. (B) The gene expression level of YAP1. (C) The isoform expression and usage of each transcript in YAP1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315750.g004

The gene expression data in Fig 4B showed no difference in the gene expression of YAP1 between normal and PCOS groups, consistent with the DEG results obtained from DESeq2 (Fig 1A). However, a significant difference in the use of transcripts between the two groups was seen in Fig 4C. Taking into account, the alterations in transcript structure and usage, it can be inferred that YAP1_343 transcripts were predominantly utilized in the normal group, while in PCOS patients, the expression of YAP1_439 subtypes was substantially increased. This suggests the potential for YAP1 to interact with a new or different set of proteins in the PCOS environment.

Discussion

Transcriptional profile is the mainstream analysis of RNA sequencing data. In this study, we first identified the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) which were found to be significantly enriched in immune related Gene Ontology (GO) terms, including those associated with inflammatory, interleukin and immune response. It is important to note that the number of DEGs identified in our analysis differs from that reported in the original study, due to differences in the filtering criteria applied. This is to some extent in accordance with the viewpoint that PCOS is not only a reproductive endocrinological disease but also a systematic disorder accompanying with long-term chronic inflammation [36], through which serious additional illness could be triggered such as cardiovascular issues [37]. Numerous studies showed potentially potent therapeutic efficacy with several anti-oxidants such as resveratrol [38], melatonin [4], ginger and cinnamon [39]. The association of inflammation and PCOS is well recognized but how they interact with each other or how the systemic effect of inflammation contributed to the process of this disease is still an open question. Our results hint at the involvement of ovarian granulosa cells in the low-grade inflammation response in PCOS patients.

We found genes with differential AS patterns are specifically associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS). In previous researches, ERS is triggered by abnormal situations such as hypoxia or imbalanced metabolic status, resulting in the unfolded protein response (URP) to recover the cellular homeostasis. Long-lasting ERS have been reported to associated with pathological conditions including PCOS [40]. ERS has been demonstrated to play important roles in the development and function of the ovary, and it is believed that proper level of ERS could be helpful for oocyte maturation [41]. The hyperandrogenism follicular microenvironment in PCOS activates the ERS in ovarian GCs through NK-κB, Notch2 [42] and inflammasome signaling, which could lead to pyroptosis [43] or apoptosis [41] in GCs and chronic inflammation in the ovary. Our results could be a potential bridge to connect PCOS, inflammation and ERS. It is of great importance to further investigate the detailed relationship and potential interaction of them to the development of novel pharmaceutical strategy aiming at ERS or inflammation related molecules.

YAP1 (yes-associated protein 1) has been reported as a PCOS risk gene by GWAS studies [44] and a putative target of pharmaceutical treatment [45]. As a downstream member of Hippo pathway, YAP1 is involved in masses of biological process such as cell proliferation, cell differentiation, DNA repair and hormone regulation [46]. A recent study demonstrated a detailed cell proliferation regulation of MIGA2-Hippo/YAP1 pathway in ovarian granulosa cells [47]. The ovarian change in PCOS is reported to be similar in YAP1 activation phenotype [46]. We observed higher expression of the YAP1 protein’s long transcript (ENST00000531439.5_1) in PCOS patients compared to the short transcript (ENST00000526343.5_1). The long transcript possesses an additional double WW domain, influencing its binding affinity and specificity to PPxY motifs. Our finding of the isoform switch in YAP1 might provide a putative mechanism of PCOS occurrence and progress, which could also be related to the disease risk SNVs in YAP1 gene. Previous studies have demonstrated the ability to directly activate cellular phenotypes associated with disease progression, offering further support for this potential mechanism [20].

Materials and methods

Quality control and quantification of transcriptome sequencing data

We obtained raw RNA-Seq data of granulosa cells from PCOS patients and healthy donors from previous research [24]. The data can be accessed using the following accession number: GSE138518. After removing adaptors and filtering out low-quality sequences from the raw reads using fastp (version 0.23.4) [48], we mapped the remaining clean reads from each sample to the annotated human genome (GRCh37.primary.assembly.genome.fa downloaded from the GENCODE database) using STAR (version 2.5.3a) software [49] in two-pass mode with default parameters. Subsequently, we quantified gene expression and transcript expression using featureCounts (version 2.0.1) [50] and RSEM (version 1.3.1) [51] software with the output files from STAR, respectively. The featureCounts (version 2.0.1) software used the ‘Aligned.sortedByCoord.out.bam’ file of each sample for gene expression quantification with the following settings: featureCounts -t gene -f -O -s 2 -T 6 -F GTF -a gencode.v40lift37.annotation.gtf -o output.txt *Aligned.sortedByCoord.out.bam. Meanwhile, RSEM (version 1.3.1) software quantified transcript expression using the ‘Aligned.toTranscriptome.out.bam’ file of each sample with the following settings: rsem-calculate-expression–paired-end–alignments -p 5 -no-bam-output -q ${sample}Aligned.toTranscriptome.out.bam reference_name sample_name.

Differential expression analysis

The unnormalized counts from featureCounts were assembled into a count matrix with R (version 4.3.2) and served as an input for DESeq2 package (version 1.42.1) [52] to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Only the genes with |log2FoldChange| > 2 and adjusted p-value < 0.05 were considered as DEGs. The resulting DEGs were visualized by volcano plot. The annotations of gene type were obtained through the getBM function in the biomaRt package (version 2.58.2) [53].

Differential alternative splicing analysis

The classification of differentially alternatively spliced genes (DASGs) was analyzed using rMATS (replicate Multivariate Analysis of Transcript Splicing, version 4.1.2) [25] to compare PCOS and normal granulosa cells. rMATS is a computational tool that detects differential alternative splicing events (DASEs) from RNA-Seq data. It can automatically identify and analyze DASEs corresponding to all major types of alternative splicing patterns. rMATS can recognize five types of DASEs: skipped exon (SE), alternative 5’ splice site (A5SS), alternative 3’ splice site (A3SS), mutually exclusive exons (MXE) and retained intron (RI). rMATS employs the exon inclusion level to measure the extent of alternative splicing events occurring within a sample. The exon inclusion level indicates the proportion of isoforms that include a particular exon. A differential alternative splicing event (DASE) is recognized when the difference in exon inclusion levels between two groups surpasses 0.1 (|ΔIncLevel| > 0.1) and the false discovery rate (FDR) is below 0.05.

Differential transcript usage analysis

To facilitate the comparison of differences in the utilization and potential functional alterations of distinct transcripts from the same gene, we employed the isoformSwitchAnalyzeR package (version 2.2.0) [54] to conduct a comprehensive analysis of differential transcript usage (DTU). The transcript annotation file (gencode.v40lift37.transcript.fa) was retrieved from the GENCODE database to import RSEM quantification of transcripts. Subsequently, the isoformSwitchTestDEXSeq() function was utilized for DTU analysis, with the analyzeAlternativeSplicing() function employed to scrutinize alternative splicing events. Notably, the variance between isoforms involved in an isoform switch can arise from alterations in three distinct biological mechanisms: alternative transcription start site (aTSS), alternative transcription termination site (aTTS), and alternative splicing (AS). These mechanisms encompass six types of AS events: alternative 5’ donor site (A5), alternative 3’ donor site (A3), exon skipping (ES), multiple exon skipping (MES), mutually exclusive exons (MEE), and intron retention (IR). Furthermore, to explore the influence of these DTUs on protein function, we integrated additional information including functional domains (from the PFAM database) [55], signal peptides (assessed via SignalP 6.0 fast) [56], open reading frames, and protein-coding prediction (analyzed using CPAT version 1.2.4) [57] under the specified guidelines.

Gene function enrichment and network analysis

Gene Ontology (GO) categories were classified by the clusterProfiler R package (version 4.10.1) [58] for the annotation and enrichment of target genes. The Benjamini & Hochberg method was used to correct the p-value of GO terms enrichment, and we considered the p-value less than 0.05 and adjusted p-value less than 0.2 to be statistically significant. To reduce redundancy in the enrichment results, we employed the simplifyEnrichment R package (version 1.12.0) [59], which clusters GO terms based on their semantic similarity. Specifically, we applied the binary cut method from this package to cluster the similarity matrix of the enriched terms. For each cluster, we visualized a high-frequency word cloud.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Quality control of RNA-Seq data.

(A) Unique mapped ratio of samples between Normal and PCOS. (B) Principal component analysis of samples between Normal and PCOS.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315750.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Similarity heatmap of BP terms.

The cluster of BP terms is enriched based on differentially expressed genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315750.s002

(TIF)

S1 Table. Differential alternative splicing events between human Normal and PCOS granulosa cells.

The results are evaluated by rMATS and the criteras for filtering differential alternative splicing events is |ΔIncLevel| > 0.1 and FDR < 0.05. A3SS, alternative 3’ splicing site; A5SS, alternative 5’ splicing site; MXE, mutually exclusive exons; RI, retained intron; SE, skipped exons.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315750.s003

(XLSX)

S2 Table. FPKM expression values of 260 differential spliced genes were detected by both rMATS and isoformSwitchAnalyzeR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315750.s004

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Stener-Victorin E, Teede H, Norman RJ, Legro R, Goodarzi MO, Dokras A, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024;10: 27. pmid:38637590
  2. 2. Teede HJ, Tay CT, Laven J, Dokras A, Moran LJ, Piltonen TT, et al. Recommendations from the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2023;120: 767–793. pmid:37589624
  3. 3. Bañuls C, Rovira-Llopis S, Martinez de Marañon A, Veses S, Jover A, Gomez M, et al. Metabolic syndrome enhances endoplasmic reticulum, oxidative stress and leukocyte-endothelium interactions in PCOS. Metabolism. 2017;71: 153–162. pmid:28521868
  4. 4. Ziaei S, Hasani M, Malekahmadi M, Daneshzad E, Kadkhodazadeh K, Heshmati J. Effect of melatonin supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors, oxidative stress and hormonal profile in PCOS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Ovarian Res. 2024;17: 138. pmid:38965577
  5. 5. Dobbie LJ, Pittam B, Zhao SS, Alam U, Hydes TJ, Barber TM, et al. Childhood, adolescent, and adulthood adiposity are associated with risk of PCOS: a Mendelian randomization study with meta-analysis. Human Reproduction. 2023; dead053. pmid:37015099
  6. 6. Risal S, Li C, Luo Q, Fornes R, Lu H, Eriksson G, et al. Transgenerational transmission of reproductive and metabolic dysfunction in the male progeny of polycystic ovary syndrome. Cell Rep Med. 2023;4: 101035. pmid:37148878
  7. 7. Chen X, Kong L, Piltonen TT, Gissler M, Lavebratt C. Association of polycystic ovary syndrome or anovulatory infertility with offspring psychiatric and mild neurodevelopmental disorders: a Finnish population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2020;35: 2336–2347. pmid:32866965
  8. 8. Picton HM, Balen AH. Transgenerational PCOS transmission. Nat Med. 2019;25: 1818–1820. pmid:31792458
  9. 9. Kulkarni S, Gupta K, Ratre P, Mishra PK, Singh Y, Biharee A, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome: Current scenario and future insights. Drug Discov Today. 2023;28: 103821. pmid:37935329
  10. 10. Xu Y, Zhang Z, Wang R, Xue S, Ying Q, Jin L. Roles of estrogen and its receptors in polycystic ovary syndrome. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024;12: 1395331. pmid:38961865
  11. 11. Chang RJ. The reproductive phenotype in polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3: 688–695. pmid:17893687
  12. 12. Zhang C-H, Liu X-Y, Wang J. Essential Role of Granulosa Cell Glucose and Lipid Metabolism on Oocytes and the Potential Metabolic Imbalance in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24: 16247. pmid:38003436
  13. 13. Siemers KM, Klein AK, Baack ML. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in PCOS: Insights into Reproductive Organ Pathophysiology. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24: 13123. pmid:37685928
  14. 14. Zeber-Lubecka N, Ciebiera M, Hennig EE. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Oxidative Stress-From Bench to Bedside. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24: 14126. pmid:37762427
  15. 15. Geng X, Zhao J, Huang J, Li S, Chu W, Wang W-S, et al. lnc-MAP3K13-7:1 Inhibits Ovarian GC Proliferation in PCOS via DNMT1 Downregulation-Mediated CDKN1A Promoter Hypomethylation. Mol Ther. 2021;29: 1279–1293. pmid:33212300
  16. 16. Li Q, Du J, Feng R, Xu Y, Wang H, Sang Q, et al. A possible new mechanism in the pathophysiology of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the discovery that leukocyte telomere length is strongly associated with PCOS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99: E234–240. pmid:24302747
  17. 17. Shukla P, Melkani GC. Mitochondrial epigenetic modifications and nuclear-mitochondrial communication: A new dimension towards understanding and attenuating the pathogenesis in women with PCOS. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2023;24: 317–326. pmid:36705802
  18. 18. Liang A, Zhang W, Wang Q, Huang L, Zhang J, Ma D, et al. Resveratrol regulates insulin resistance to improve the glycolytic pathway by activating SIRT2 in PCOS granulosa cells. Front Nutr. 2022;9: 1019562. pmid:36742000
  19. 19. Tao Y, Zhang Q, Wang H, Yang X, Mu H. Alternative splicing and related RNA binding proteins in human health and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9: 26. pmid:38302461
  20. 20. Brown RL, Reinke LM, Damerow MS, Perez D, Chodosh LA, Yang J, et al. CD44 splice isoform switching in human and mouse epithelium is essential for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and breast cancer progression. J Clin Invest. 2011;121: 1064–1074. pmid:21393860
  21. 21. Song X, Tiek D, Miki S, Huang T, Lu M, Goenka A, et al. RNA splicing analysis deciphers developmental hierarchies and reveals therapeutic targets in adult glioma. J Clin Invest. 2024;134: e173789. pmid:38662454
  22. 22. Zhu N, Zhao Y, Yan W, Wei L, Sang Q, Li J, et al. Characterization of alternative splicing events and prognostic signatures in gastric cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2024;24: 167. pmid:38734676
  23. 23. Li N, Jia W, Wang J, Shao Q, Feng X, Li Z, et al. Clinically relevant immune subtypes based on alternative splicing landscape of immune-related genes for lung cancer advanced PPPM approach. EPMA J. 2024;15: 345–373. pmid:38841624
  24. 24. Mao Z, Li T, Zhao H, Qin Y, Wang X, Kang Y. Identification of epigenetic interactions between microRNA and DNA methylation associated with polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Hum Genet. 2021;66: 123–137. pmid:32759991
  25. 25. Shen S, Park JW, Lu Z, Lin L, Henry MD, Wu YN, et al. rMATS: robust and flexible detection of differential alternative splicing from replicate RNA-Seq data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111: E5593–5601. pmid:25480548
  26. 26. Yang Z, Pan J, Zhou C, Yu C, Zhou Z, Ding G, et al. LncRNA SNHG5 adversely governs follicular growth in PCOS via miR-92a-3p/CDKN1C axis. iScience. 2024;27: 108522. pmid:38313057
  27. 27. Jin J, Ma Y, Tong X, Yang W, Dai Y, Pan Y, et al. Metformin inhibits testosterone-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress in ovarian granulosa cells via inactivation of p38 MAPK. Hum Reprod. 2020;35: 1145–1158. pmid:32372097
  28. 28. Zhang P, Pan Y, Wu S, He Y, Wang J, Chen L, et al. n-3 PUFA Promotes Ferroptosis in PCOS GCs by Inhibiting YAP1 through Activation of the Hippo Pathway. Nutrients. 2023;15: 1927. pmid:37111146
  29. 29. Gao Y, Chen J, Ji R, Ding J, Zhang Y, Yang J. USP25 Regulates the Proliferation and Apoptosis of Ovarian Granulosa Cells in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome by Modulating the PI3K/AKT Pathway via Deubiquitinating PTEN. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9: 779718. pmid:34805185
  30. 30. Kuhtz J, Romero S, De Vos M, Smitz J, Haaf T, Anckaert E. Human in vitro oocyte maturation is not associated with increased imprinting error rates at LIT1, SNRPN, PEG3 and GTL2. Hum Reprod. 2014;29: 1995–2005. pmid:24963167
  31. 31. Jiang L-L, Xie J-K, Cui J-Q, Wei D, Yin B-L, Zhang Y-N, et al. Promoter methylation of yes-associated protein (YAP1) gene in polycystic ovary syndrome. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96: e5768. pmid:28079802
  32. 32. Li T, Zhao H, Zhao X, Zhang B, Cui L, Shi Y, et al. Identification of YAP1 as a novel susceptibility gene for polycystic ovary syndrome. J Med Genet. 2012;49: 254–257. pmid:22499345
  33. 33. Azumah R, Hummitzsch K, Anderson RA, Rodgers RJ. Genes in loci genetically associated with polycystic ovary syndrome are dynamically expressed in human fetal gonadal, metabolic and brain tissues. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14: 1149473. pmid:37223019
  34. 34. Guo Q, Quan M-Y, Xu L, Cai Y, Cai J-T, Li X, et al. Enhanced nuclear localization of YAP1-2 contributes to EGF-induced EMT in NSCLC. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2022;26: 1013–1023. pmid:35014181
  35. 35. Iglesias-Bexiga M, Castillo F, Cobos ES, Oka T, Sudol M, Luque I. WW domains of the yes-kinase-associated-protein (YAP) transcriptional regulator behave as independent units with different binding preferences for PPxY motif-containing ligands. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0113828. pmid:25607641
  36. 36. Torstensson S, Ascani A, Risal S, Lu H, Zhao A, Espinosa A, et al. Androgens Modulate the Immune Profile in a Mouse Model of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; e2401772. pmid:38767114
  37. 37. Gao L, Zhao Y, Wu H, Lin X, Guo F, Li J, et al. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Fuels Cardiovascular Inflammation and Aggravates Ischemic Cardiac Injury. Circulation. 2023;148: 1958–1973. pmid:37937441
  38. 38. Yan S, Gao Z, Ding J, Chen S, Wang Z, Jin W, et al. Nanocomposites based on nanoceria regulate the immune microenvironment for the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome. J Nanobiotechnology. 2023;21: 412. pmid:37936120
  39. 39. Novakovic S, Jakovljevic V, Jovic N, Andric K, Milinkovic M, Anicic T, et al. Exploring the Antioxidative Effects of Ginger and Cinnamon: A Comprehensive Review of Evidence and Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) and Other Oxidative Stress-Related Disorders. Antioxidants (Basel). 2024;13: 392. pmid:38671840
  40. 40. Koike H, Harada M, Kusamoto A, Xu Z, Tanaka T, Sakaguchi N, et al. Roles of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the pathophysiology of polycystic ovary syndrome. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14: 1124405. pmid:36875481
  41. 41. Harada M, Takahashi N, Azhary JM, Kunitomi C, Fujii T, Osuga Y. Endoplasmic reticulum stress: a key regulator of the follicular microenvironment in the ovary. Mol Hum Reprod. 2021;27: gaaa088. pmid:33543293
  42. 42. Koike H, Harada M, Kusamoto A, Kunitomi C, Xu Z, Tanaka T, et al. Notch Signaling Induced by Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Regulates Cumulus-Oocyte Complex Expansion in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Biomolecules. 2022;12: 1037. pmid:36008931
  43. 43. Xiang Y, Wang H, Ding H, Xu T, Liu X, Huang Z, et al. Hyperandrogenism drives ovarian inflammation and pyroptosis: A possible pathogenesis of PCOS follicular dysplasia. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;125: 111141. pmid:37918087
  44. 44. Louwers YV, Stolk L, Uitterlinden AG, Laven JSE. Cross-ethnic meta-analysis of genetic variants for polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98: E2006–2012. pmid:24106282
  45. 45. Kawamura K, Cheng Y, Suzuki N, Deguchi M, Sato Y, Takae S, et al. Hippo signaling disruption and Akt stimulation of ovarian follicles for infertility treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110: 17474–17479. pmid:24082083
  46. 46. Lv X, He C, Huang C, Wang H, Hua G, Wang Z, et al. Timely expression and activation of YAP1 in granulosa cells is essential for ovarian follicle development. FASEB J. 2019;33: 10049–10064. pmid:31199671
  47. 47. Yan M-Q, Zhu B-H, Liu X-H, Yang Y-M, Duan X-Y, Wang Y, et al. Mitoguardin 1 and 2 promote granulosa cell proliferation by activating AKT and regulating the Hippo-YAP1 signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14: 779. pmid:38012141
  48. 48. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34: i884–i890. pmid:30423086
  49. 49. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29: 15–21. pmid:23104886
  50. 50. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 923–930. pmid:24227677
  51. 51. Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12: 323. pmid:21816040
  52. 52. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15: 550. pmid:25516281
  53. 53. Durinck S, Spellman PT, Birney E, Huber W. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat Protoc. 2009;4: 1184–1191. pmid:19617889
  54. 54. Vitting-Seerup K, Sandelin A. IsoformSwitchAnalyzeR: analysis of changes in genome-wide patterns of alternative splicing and its functional consequences. Berger B, editor. Bioinformatics. 2019;35: 4469–4471. pmid:30989184
  55. 55. Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42: D222–D230. pmid:24288371
  56. 56. Teufel F, Almagro Armenteros JJ, Johansen AR, Gíslason MH, Pihl SI, Tsirigos KD, et al. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40: 1023–1025. pmid:34980915
  57. 57. Wang L, Park HJ, Dasari S, Wang S, Kocher J-P, Li W. CPAT: Coding-Potential Assessment Tool using an alignment-free logistic regression model. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41: e74. pmid:23335781
  58. 58. Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, Chen M, Guo P, Dai Z, et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (N Y). 2021;2: 100141. pmid:34557778
  59. 59. Gu Z, Hübschmann D. SimplifyEnrichment: A Bioconductor Package for Clustering and Visualizing Functional Enrichment Results. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics. 2023;21: 190–202. pmid:35680096