Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

The fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae suppresses innate immunity by modulating a host potassium channel

  • Xuetao Shi ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Xuetao Shi, Yu Long

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Yu Long ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Xuetao Shi, Yu Long

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

  • Feng He,

    Roles Data curation, Resources

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Chongyang Zhang,

    Roles Data curation, Resources

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Ruyi Wang,

    Roles Data curation, Resources

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Ting Zhang,

    Roles Data curation, Resources

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Wei Wu,

    Roles Data curation, Funding acquisition, Resources

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

  • Zeyun Hao,

    Roles Data curation, Resources

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Yi Wang ,

    Roles Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    yiwang@cau.edu.cn (YW); wang.620@osu.edu (GLW); ningyuese@caas.cn (YN)

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

  • Guo-Liang Wang ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    yiwang@cau.edu.cn (YW); wang.620@osu.edu (GLW); ningyuese@caas.cn (YN)

    Affiliations State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, Department of Plant Pathology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

  • Yuese Ning

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    yiwang@cau.edu.cn (YW); wang.620@osu.edu (GLW); ningyuese@caas.cn (YN)

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

Abstract

Potassium (K+) is required by plants for growth and development, and also contributes to immunity against pathogens. However, it has not been established whether pathogens modulate host K+ signaling pathways to enhance virulence and subvert host immunity. Here, we show that the effector protein AvrPiz-t from the rice blast pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae targets a K+ channel to subvert plant immunity. AvrPiz-t interacts with the rice plasma-membrane-localized K+ channel protein OsAKT1 and specifically suppresses the OsAKT1-mediated K+ currents. Genetic and phenotypic analyses show that loss of OsAKT1 leads to decreased K+ content and reduced resistance against M. oryzae. Strikingly, AvrPiz-t interferes with the association of OsAKT1 with its upstream regulator, the cytoplasmic kinase OsCIPK23, which also plays a positive role in K+ absorption and resistance to M. oryzae. Furthermore, we show a direct correlation between blast disease resistance and external K+ status in rice plants. Together, our data present a novel mechanism by which a pathogen suppresses plant host immunity by modulating a host K+ channel.

Author summary

Plant nutritional status can greatly influence plant immunity in response to pathogen invasion. Rice blast, a devastating rice disease caused by the hemibiotrophic fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, causes a significant reduction in yield and affects food security. In this study, we demonstrate that the M. oryzae secreted protein AvrPiz-t interacts with rice OsAKT1, a potassium (K+) channel protein, and suppresses OsAKT1-mediated inward K+ currents, possibly by competing with the OsAKT1 upstream regulator, OsCIPK23. We also show that both OsAKT1 and OsCIPK23 are required for K+ uptake and resistance against M. oryzae infection in rice. This study provides new insights into the molecular basis of pathogen-mediated perturbation of a plant nutrition pathway.

Introduction

Potassium (K+) plays important roles in many fundamental processes in plants, including enzyme activation, cellular homeostasis, membrane transport, osmoregulation and immunoreaction [1, 2]. The uptake and translocation of K+ in plants relies on a number of K+ channels and transporters. In the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the K+ channel AKT1 and the K+ transporter HAK5 have been reported to mediate most of the K+ absorption [3]. Similar to the regulation of AKT1 in Arabidopsis, the activity of its homolog in rice (Oryza sativa), OsAKT1, is regulated by a protein complex comprising OsCBL1 (calcineurin B-like protein 1) and the cytosolic protein kinase OsCIPK23 (CBL-interacting protein kinase 23) [4], while OsHAK5 is mainly regulated at the transcription level [5].

In agricultural production, the application of potassium fertilizer has been reported to decrease the incidence of plant diseases [2, 6]. For example, the foliar application of potassium chloride (KCl) reduces damage caused by Septoria tritici on wheat (Triticum aestivum) in field experiments [7], and the application of KCl to K-deficient soils increases rice resistance to stem rot and aggregate sheath spot [8]. Although previous studies have investigated the effect of K+ nutrition on disease development in plants [2], it is not known how host K+ nutrition reduces pathogen virulence and enhances host immunity.

Adapted plant pathogens secrete effectors into the apoplast of their host or deliver them inside the host cells to promote infection [9, 10]. These molecules can alter plant processes and target a wide range of host proteins, including important components in pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI), effector-triggered immunity (ETI), vesicle trafficking, autophagy, chloroplast and mitochondrial functions, sugar transport, phytoalexin production, etc. [1116]. The mechanisms underlying the effector-mediated suppression of host immunity have been extensively studied over the last two decades; however, to date no effector has been reported to manipulate K+ transport pathways in plants.

The hemibiotrophic fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae, causes rice blast disease in all rice-growing countries [1719] and also causes wheat blast in South America and Bangladesh [2022]. We previously identified an M. oryzae effector protein, AvrPiz-t, which functions as a virulence factor and increases blast susceptibility of rice in the absence of the blast resistance (R) protein Piz-t [23, 24]. Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening of a rice cDNA library revealed that AvrPiz-t interacted with 12 APIPs (AvrPiz-t interacting proteins) in rice [24]. Of these, APIP6 and APIP10, two RING-type E3 ligase proteins, have been shown to ubiquitinate and degrade AvrPiz-t, accompanied by the degradation of these two E3 ligases [24, 25]. APIP6 and APIP10 are positive regulators of PTI, while APIP10 acts as a negative regulator of Piz-t accumulation, thereby modulating ETI [24, 25]. Thus, the targeting of different rice E3 ligases by AvrPiz-t to suppress rice immunity involves a multilayered strategy [26]. Recently, we reported that the bZIP-type transcription factor, APIP5, can also be bound by AvrPiz-t [27]. AvrPiz-t suppresses the transcription and protein accumulation of APIP5 at the necrotrophic stage; however, APIP5 also interacts with the R protein Piz-t, thereby stabilizing APIP5 and preventing effector-triggered necrosis [27].

Here, we report that AvrPiz-t interacts with the rice K+ channel protein OsAKT1 and suppresses OsAKT1-mediated inward K+ current. AvrPiz-t competes with a cytoplasmic kinase, OsCIPK23, for binding to OsAKT1. Both OsAKT1 and OsCIPK23 serve dual functions on K+ absorption and blast disease resistance. In addition, we demonstrate the positive effect of K+ on rice blast resistance. Based on these results, we propose a working model wherein the M. oryzae effector AvrPiz-t suppresses rice immunity by interfering with K+ signaling components that are important for both K+ absorption and host resistance.

Results

The M. Oryzae effector AvrPiz-t interacts with the rice potassium channel protein OsAKT1

The rice OsAKT1 (APIP7) was one of the 12 APIPs identified in our previous study [24]. OsAKT1 has been identified as an inward-rectifying K+ channel and play important roles in K+ uptake [4, 28]. OsAKT1 is a typical Shaker family K+ channel protein with 6 transmembrane domains (TMs), a putative cyclic nucleotide binding domain (cNMP) and 5 ankyrin repeats (ANKs) in the intracellular domain (S1A Fig). The P-loop between the fifth and sixth TM domains contains a TxxTxGYG motif which is the hall-mark of K+-selective channels [29]. OsAKT1 also shares high similarities with its orthologs from other plant species [4].

In this study, we first confirmed the interaction between AvrPiz-t and OsAKT1 in yeast. In a Y2H assay, AvrPiz-t (without the signal peptide) interacted with a truncated OsAKT1-C1 fragment (corresponding to amino acids (aa) 607–935 of the full-length protein) derived from a rice cDNA library (Fig 1A). Although we did not detect an interaction between OsAKT1-C (aa 341–935, containing the full intracellular domain) and AvrPiz-t in yeast (S1A and S1B Fig), in vitro GST-pull down and in vivo luciferase complementation assays demonstrated that both OsAKT1-C1 and OsAKT1-C can bind to AvrPiz-t (Fig 1B and 1C). We then performed a co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay by transiently expressing OsAKT1-C-HA or OsAKT1-C1-HA with AvrPiz-t-DsRed in Nicotiana benthamiana expression system, and confirmed that OsAKT1-C and -C1 fragments interact with AvrPiz-t in planta (Fig 1D).

thumbnail
Fig 1. The effector AvrPiz-t from the rice blast pathogen M. oryzae targets the rice potassium channel protein OsAKT1.

(A) Y2H analysis of the interaction between BD-AvrPiz-t (without the signal peptide) and AD-OsAKT1-C1. Cells were plated on SD/-Leu-Trp (SD/-L-W) medium. SD/-Leu-Trp-His (SD/-L-W-H) medium containing 35 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3AT) and X-gal solution were used to test the interaction. (B) GST pull-down assay to confirm the interaction between MBP-AvrPiz-t and GST-OsAKT1-C/C1. GST was used as a negative control. Protein extracts were examined by immunoblot analysis with anti-MBP or anti-GST antibody. Red arrows indicate the expected proteins. (C) Luciferase complementation assay was performed to test the interaction between AvrPiz-t and OsAKT1-C/C1 in N. benthamiana leaves. Leaf disks of N. benthamiana were used to measure the luminescence 36 h after the infiltration of Agrobacterium carrying indicated constructs. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. (n = 3). Student’s t-test (***P < 0.001). (D) Co-IP assay in N. benthamiana. AvrPiz-t-DsRed and OsAKT1-C/C1-HA plasmids were co-expressed in N. benthamiana leaves following agroinfiltration. The expressed proteins were immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA antibody. Proteins were detected by immunoblot analysis with anti-RFP and Anti-HA antibodies, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.g001

To identify the region of OsAKT1 responsible for the interaction, we performed a Y2H analysis with AvrPiz-t and various truncated versions of an OsAKT1 C-terminal protein fragment. This revealed that the third ANK domain was required for the interaction (S1A and S1B Fig). In addition, we tested the interaction between OsAKT1-C1 and a set of AvrPiz-t point mutants and found that the C70A mutant protein showed a weakened interaction with OsAKT1-C1 (S1C Fig). This point mutation is also important for the binding of AvrPiz-t to APIP5 [27], indicating the important role of this residue in AvrPiz-t’s interactions with rice targets. Collectively, these results demonstrate that AvrPiz-t directly interacts with the OsAKT1 intracellular domain both in vitro and in vivo.

AvrPiz-t suppresses OsAKT1-mediated inward K+ currents

OsAKT1 can mediate inward K+ currents in HEK293 cells [4, 28]. To determine whether AvrPiz-t can affect OsAKT1-mediated inward K+ currents, we co-expressed OsAKT1 as a fusion protein with green fluorescent protein (OsAKT1-GFP), together with AvrPiz-t in HEK293 cells. The full-length OsAKT1 CDS was fused to the N terminus of GFP under the control of the human cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate early promoter (S2A Fig). Because AvrPiz-t is a small effector protein (91aa, without the signal peptide) [23], we expressed it under the CMV promoter without adding a tag that might affect the biochemical function of AvrPiz-t. To monitor the transfection efficiency, we cloned the fragment of the red fluorescent protein (DsRed) in the same vector under the control of the eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1α (EF-1α) promoter (S2A Fig). The red fluorescent signals were used as a transfection marker in the electrophysiology assays. The protein expression of OsAKT1-GFP and DsRed in the HEK293 cells was determined with immunoblot analysis (S2B Fig).

The above assays showed that OsAKT1-GFP alone, or OsAKT1-GFP expressed with the DsRed mediated strong inward K+ currents (Fig 2A, left panel); however, the K+ currents were substantially suppressed by co-expression with AvrPiz-t or the full-length AvrPiz-t (FLAvrPiz-t) (Fig 2A, top two images of the right panel). In contrast, the combination of AvrPiz-t and DsRed, or FLAvrPiz-t and DsRed, did not mediate any K+ currents (Fig 2A, third and fourth images of the right panel). After co-transfection with AvrPiz-t or FLAvrPiz-t, the currents mediated by OsAKT1 decreased from -698±68 pA/pF to -146±14 pA/pF and -111±9 pA/pF, respectively, at -200 mV (Fig 2B). However, the AvrPiz-t and FLAvrPiz-t proteins only inhibited the conductance of OsAKT1, but not the voltage dependence of OsAKT1 (Fig 2C).

thumbnail
Fig 2. AvrPiz-t suppresses the OsAKT1-mediated inward K+ currents.

(A) Patch-clamp whole-cell recordings of inward K+ currents in HEK293 cells expressing indicated constructs. The voltage protocols, as well as time and current scale bars for the recordings are shown. (B) The I-V relationship of the steady state whole-cell inward K+ currents in HEK293 cells. The data are derived from the recordings as shown in (A) and presented as means ± s.e.m. (OsAKT1-GFP, n = 25; DsRed+OsAKT1-GFP, n = 19; AvrPiz-t+DsRed+OsAKT1-GFP, n = 41; FLAvrPiz-t+DsRed+OsAKT1-GFP, n = 47; AvrPiz-t+DsRed, n = 20; FLAvrPiz-t+DsRed, n = 20). (C) The G-V relationship of the steady state whole-cell inward K+ currents in HEK293 cells. The solid lines represented the best fits of conductance according to the Boltzmann function. The data are derived from the recordings as shown in (A) and presented as means ± s.e.m. (D) Relative steady state whole-cell inward K+ currents in HEK293 cells. The data are derived from the recordings as shown in (A) and S3B Fig. Student’s t-test (**P < 0.01) was used to analyze statistical significance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.g002

To confirm that AvrPiz-t specifically suppresses the OsAKT1-mediated inward K+ currents, we used AvrPii, another M. oryzae effector protein [30], which did not interact with OsAKT1-C1 or OsAKT1-C in Y2H analysis (S3A Fig), in the electrophysiology experiment. We co-expressed AvrPii (without the signal peptide) and the full-length AvrPii (FLAvrPii) with OsAKT1 in HEK293 cells (S2A and S2B Fig), and found neither AvrPii nor FLAvrPii significantly affected the OsAKT1-mediated inward K+ currents (Fig 2D, S3B and S3C Fig). These data suggest that AvrPiz-t specifically suppresses OsAKT1-mediated inward K+ currents and that this inhibition is dependent on the direct interaction between the two proteins.

K+ uptake is partially blocked in AvrPiz-t transgenic plants

A previous study showed that ectopic expression of AvrPiz-t in transgenic rice impairs blast resistance and PAMP induced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [24]. To investigate whether AvrPiz-t affects the K+ absorption in rice, we performed a K+-depletion assay and found that AvrPiz-t transgenic plants exhibited weaker K+ uptake than segregated wild-type (sWT) plants (S4A Fig). K+ content analysis showed that AvrPiz-t transgenic plants displayed reduced K+ level in 0.1 mM K+ solution compared to the sWT, while this difference was disappeared when the external K+ concentration was elevated to 1.0 mM, suggesting that AvrPiz-t inhibition effect could be restored by the increase of K+ supply (S4B Fig). We then measured the plant net K+ fluxes using non-invasive micro-test technology (NMT) in the primary root meristems. Compared with the sWT plants, the net K+ influx of AvrPiz-t transgenic seedlings was clearly lower through out of the 10-min interval measurement when supplied with 0.1 mM K+ (S4C Fig, upper panel). However, when the external K+ concentration was increased to 1.0 mM, no significant difference was detected (S4C Fig, bottom panel), which is consistent with the K+ content analysis. Taken together, these data indicate that AvrPiz-t can partially inhibit the K+ uptake in rice plants.

OsAKT1 is required for rice resistance against M. oryzae

OsAKT1 has been reported to play central roles in K+ uptake in rice [4]. To determine whether OsAKT1 contributes resistance to M. oryzae, we first analyzed its expression pattern in Nipponbare (NPB) plants that were infected by a compatible M. oryzae isolate. qRT-PCR analysis showed OsAKT1 expression was highly induced at 24-hour post inoculation (hpi) and continued to increase until at least 120 hpi (S5A Fig). To assess the potential role of OsAKT1 in rice blast resistance, we identified a T-DNA insertion knock-out mutant of OsAKT1 in the Dongjin (DJ) background (S5B and S5C Fig). K+ content analysis showed that the osakt1 mutant accumulated lower levels of K+ in roots and shoots compared with DJ plants (Fig 3A). We then punch-inoculated osakt1 and DJ plants with a compatible M. oryzae isolate. Ten days after inoculation, the osakt1 mutant plants showed larger disease lesions and more fungal biomass than DJ (Fig 3B and 3C).

thumbnail
Fig 3. OsAKT1 is required for blast resistance and K+ uptake in rice.

(A) K+ levels in Dongjin (DJ) and the osakt1 mutant plants. Data represent the K+ weight in one gram of dry weight (DW) of plant tissues and are shown as means ± s.e.m. of three biological repeats. Student’s t-test (**P < 0.01). (B, C) Phenotypes of DJ and osakt1 mutant inoculated with the compatible M. oryzae isolate RO1-1. The leaves were photographed 12 days after inoculation (B) and were subjected to DNA extraction to quantify the fungal growth by qPCR [2[CT(OsUbq)-CT(MoPot2)]] (C). The data are shown as means ± s.e.m. (n = 9). Student’s t-test (***P < 0.001). (D, E) OsAKT1 expression (D) and K+ content (E) in OsAKT1 RNAi and sWT (NPB background) plants. The data are shown as means ± s.e.m. of three biological repeats. Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001). (F, G) Phenotypes of OsAKT1 RNAi lines inoculated with the compatible M. oryzae isolate RO1-1 (F) and the relative fungal growth, quantified by qPCR [2[CT(OsUbq)-CT(MoPot2)]/100] (G). The data are shown as means ± s.e.m. (n = 6). Student’s t-test (***P < 0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.g003

To confirm the increased susceptibility phenotype of the osakt1 mutant, we generated OsAKT1 RNA interference (RNAi) plants in NPB background. T1 plants with a single T-DNA insertion and significantly reduced OsAKT1 expression (Fig 3D) were selected for blast inoculation. Because OsAKT1 has a homologue (LOC_Os07g07910) in the rice genome that shares 70% identity with OsAKT1 [28], we tested the expression of this gene in the OsAKT1 RNAi lines to determine the silencing specificity. The qRT-PCR results indicated that the expression of LOC_Os07g07910 was not significantly affected in the OsAKT1 RNAi lines, indicating the specificity of the RNAi fragment (S6 Fig). Similar to the osakt1 mutant, the OsAKT1 RNAi lines showed a significant decrease in K+ content in roots and shoots (Fig 3E), as well as enhanced susceptibility to M. oryzae, with increased fungal biomass in the lesion area compared with the sWT plants (Fig 3F and 3G). Together, these results demonstrate that OsAKT1 plays a positive role in rice immunity to M. oryzae, likely by modulating K+ absorption.

AvrPiz-t competes with OsCIPK23 for binding to OsAKT1

AvrPiz-t can promote the degradation of its target proteins APIP6 and APIP10 [24, 25]. To investigate whether AvrPiz-t affects OsAKT1 protein stability, we co-expressed AvrPiz-t with OsAKT1 intracellular fragments or the full-length OsAKT1 in rice protoplasts. However, immunoblot analysis showed that AvrPiz-t did not obviously affect the stability of OsAKT1-C, OsAKT1-C1 and the full-length OsAKT1 proteins (S7A–S7C Fig), indicating a different regulation mechanism from APIP6 and APIP10.

OsAKT1-mediated K+ uptake is regulated by the OsCIPK23 complex [4]. Since a previous study showed that CBL10 can compete with CIPK23 for binding to AKT1 and thus negatively regulates AKT1 activity in Arabidopsis [31], we attempted to determine whether AvrPiz-t interferes with the association of OsAKT1 with OsCIPK23 in a similar manner. We first confirmed the interaction between OsAKT1 and OsCIPK23 by luciferase complementation and Co-IP assays in N. benthamiana. The assay showed that both OsAKT1-C and OsAKT1-C1 interacted with OsCIPK23 while AvrPiz-t did not (S8A and S8B Fig). To ascertain whether AvrPiz-t interferes with the OsAKT1-OsCIPK23 interaction, we included AvrPiz-t-DsRed in the luciferase complementation assay. Compared with the DsRed control combination, the relative luciferase activity significantly decreased when AvrPiz-t-DsRed was co-expressed with OsAKT1-C or -C1 and OsCIPK23 (Fig 4A, lanes 2 to 5). This result was further confirmed in a competitive Co-IP assay. We transiently co-expressed a same amount of OsAKT1-C-HA and CLuc-OsCIPK23 in N. benthamiana leaves with an increasing amount of AvrPiz-t-DsRed by adding different concentrations of Agrobacteria carrying AvrPiz-t-DsRed. Immunoblot analysis showed that, as AvrPiz-t levels were increased (Fig 4B, second panel from the bottom), the immunoprecipitated OsCIPK23 protein levels were decreased significantly (Fig 4B, third panel from the bottom). Next, we performed a pull-down assay to establish whether AvrPiz-t interferes with the OsCIPK23-OsAKT1 association in vitro. The results showed that GST-OsAKT1-C bound to both MBP-AvrPiz-t-HA and MBP-OsCIPK23-cMyc at the same time; however, with increasing amounts of MBP-AvrPiz-t-HA (Fig 4C, panels 2 and 5), the enrichment of MBP-OsCIPK23-cMyc gradually decreased to 20% compared with the control (Fig 4C, panel 1, lanes 2 to 6). As the controls, GST-OsAKT1-C did not pull down MBP-AvrPii-HA and increasing the amount of MBP-AvrPii-HA protein did not obviously affect the protein levels of retrieved MBP-OsCIPK23-cMyc compared with MBP-AvrPiz-t-HA (S9 Fig). These results demonstrate that AvrPiz-t specifically interferes with the OsAKT1-OsCIPK23 association both in vivo and in vitro.

thumbnail
Fig 4. AvrPiz-t competes with OsCIPK23 for binding to OsAKT1.

(A) AvrPiz-t attenuates the interaction between OsCIPK23 and OsAKT1 in N. benthamiana. The indicated NLuc and CLuc constructs were transiently co-expressed with DsRed or AvrPiz-t-DsRed in N. benthamiana leaves for the luciferase complementation assay. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. of three biological repeats. Student’s t-test (**P < 0.01). (B) AvrPiz-t decreases the association of OsAKT1 and OsCIPK23 in a competitive Co-IP assay. OsAKT1-C-HA and CLuc-OsCIPK23 were co-expressed with increasing amount of AvrPiz-t-DsRed. Agrobacteria carrying different constructs were adjusted to optical density 600 (OD600) = 0.2 (OsAKT1-C-HA), OD600 = 0.1 (CLuc-OsCIPK23) and OD600 = 0–0.4 (AvrPiz-t-DsRed). The expressed proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody. (C) The in vitro GST pull-down assay shows the dosage-dependent effect of AvrPiz-t on the OsCIPK23-OsAKT1 interaction. The MBP-OsCIPK23-cMyc proteins were incubated with GST or GST-OsAKT1-C along with increasing amounts of MBP-AvrPiz-t-HA in a pull-down assay. The amounts of proteins were detected by immunoblot analysis. The relative protein levels of retrieved MBP-OsCIPK23-cMyc were analyzed with Image J. Red arrow indicates the GST-OsAKT1-C protein. These experiments were repeated three times with similar results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.g004

Loss function of OsCIPK23 impairs resistance to M. oryzae

The interference of AvrPiz-t with the OsAKT1-OsCIPK23 interaction prompted us to investigate the function of OsCIPK23 in rice immunity. We measured the expression of OsCIPK23 during M. oryzae infection and found that its transcription increased at 72 hpi (S10A Fig). Then we identified a T-DNA insertion mutant of OsCIPK23 in the DJ background (S10B and S10C Fig). The K+ content of oscipk23 mutant roots and shoots was much lower than that in DJ plants (Fig 5A), which is similar to OsCIPK23 RNAi plants [4]. A punch inoculation experiment showed that oscipk23 mutant plants were more susceptible to a compatible M. oryzae isolate (Fig 5B), showing increased fungal growth in the lesion area compared with the DJ plants (Fig 5C).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Loss functions of OsCIPK23 impairs blast disease resistance and K+ absorption in rice.

(A) K+ content in DJ and oscipk23 mutant plants. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. of three biological repeats. Student’s t-test (**P < 0.01). (B, C) Phenotype of oscipk23 mutant inoculated with the compatible M. oryzae isolate RO1-1 (B), and the relative fungal biomass was determined by qPCR [2[CT(OsUbq)-CT(MoPot2)]] (C). Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. (n = 9). Student’s t-test (***P < 0.001). (D) K+ depletion assay was performed to show the K+ uptake ability of DJ, osakt1 and oscipk23 plants. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. of three biological replicates. (E) Chitin-induced ROS accumulation in DJ, osakt1 and oscipk23 plants were determined with luminol-chemiluminescence assay with H2O treatment as negative control. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. of three biological replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.g005

To confirm the phenotype of oscipk23, we generated gene-editing plants of OsCIPK23 in the NPB background with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) and CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) system [32, 33]. We designed two single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) in one construct which targets two different sites followed with protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) in the first exon of OsCIPK23 (S11A Fig). Based on PCR and sequencing analysis, we selected three homozygous lines with different mutation types to test their resistance to M. oryzae (S11B Fig). Consistent with the T-DNA insertion mutant, the punch inoculation showed all these three lines displayed reduced resistance to the compatible M. oryzae isolate (S11C and S11D Fig).

Since AvrPiz-t weakens both K+ uptake (S4A Fig) and ROS accumulation in rice [24], we performed similar K+ depletion and PAMP-induced ROS detection assays using osakt1 and oscipk23 mutant plants. The results indicated that both osakt1 and oscipk23 mutant plants showed reduced K+ uptake and ROS burst after treatment with the PAMP chitin compared with DJ plants (Fig 5D and 5E). Taken together, these results suggest that, similar to OsAKT1, OsCIPK23 positively regulates immunity to M. oryzae and K+ absorption in rice.

High levels of K+ enhance M. oryzae resistance in rice

As shown above, loss function of OsAKT1 and OsCIPK23 has decreased rice resistance to M. oryzae, and ectopic expression of AvrPiz-t has impaired the K+ uptake and reduced blast resistance, indicating that K+ has a positive role in rice immunity against M. oryzae. To further investigate the effect of K+ on rice immunity, we used a compatible M. oryzae isolate to inoculate NPB seedlings which were grown in 1 mM or 5 mM K+ solution to mimic normal and high K+ levels [5, 34], respectively. Five days after inoculation, we observed a significant decrease in disease symptoms on the rice plants cultivated in 5 mM K+ compared with those grown in 1 mM K+ (Fig 6A and 6B). We measured the K+ content in the whole plants and found that the K+ content is ~ 20% higher in the 5 mM K+ plants than in the 1 mM K+ plants (Fig 6C). In addition, the basal H2O2 levels as well as two defense-related genes, OsPR1a and WRKY45, were elevated in the plants cultivated in the higher K+ conditions (Fig 6D and 6E). Furthermore, we observed increased dry weight and shoot lengths in the plants cultivated in the 5 mM K+ solution (Fig 6F and 6G), suggesting a positive function of K+ in regulating plant development.

thumbnail
Fig 6. High levels of K+ enhance rice blast disease resistance with increased plant biomass.

(A) Phenotypes of rice NPB plants cultivated in hydroponic solutions containing 1 mM or 5 mM K+ challenged with the compatible M. oryzae isolate RO1-1. (B) The disease symptoms in (A) were evaluated by counting the number of disease lesions on leaves. Data are represented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 15). Student’s t-test (***P < 0.001). (C-E) Detection of K+ content (C), basal H2O2 level (D) and relative expression level of defense-related marker genes (E) of plants cultivated in 1 mM or 5 mM K+ hydroponic solution. Data are represented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 3) Student’s t-test (**P < 0.01). (F, G) Higher K+ level increases plant biomass. Dry weight (F) as well as root and shoot length (G) are measured in NPB plants cultivated in 1 mM and 5 mM K+ solution. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. (n = 6) Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05). (H) A working model to illustrate the relationship between AvrPiz-t and OsAKT1-mediated K+ uptake in rice. In normal conditions, the OsCBL1-OsCIPK23-OsAKT1 complex modulate K+ signal transduction for plant growth and development, and disease resistance. To overcome this barrier, pathogens have evolved effectors (like AvrPiz-t) to suppress the activity of OsAKT1 and/or destroy the OsAKT1-OsCIPK23 complex to subvert K+ signal transduction to facilitate their infection and colonization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.g006

To test the direct effect of K+ on M. oryzae growth, we cultured two isolates on the complete medium that contained additional 40, 80, 120, 150 and 200 mM K+ according to the estimated K+ concentration in plant cytosol (ranged from 100–200 mM [35]). The colony diameters were measured 14 days after inoculation. The results showed that with increasing of K+ concentration, the fungus growth was gradually inhibited (S12A and S12B Fig). Taken together, these results indicate that relative high external K+ concentration promotes plant growth and blast resistance; however, the enriched K+ in plant cells may has a negative effect on fungal growth.

Discussion

AKT1 is one of the major K+ uptake components in Arabidopsis [36]. The electrophysiological activity of AKT1 is positively regulated by CBL1/9-CIPK23 complexes [36], but suppressed by the 2C-type protein phosphatase AIP1 [37], the Shaker family α-subunit AtKC1[38], and CBL10 [31]. The Arabidopsis AKT1 homolog in rice, OsAKT1, has also been characterized as an important potassium channel for K+ absorption [4]. However, the AKT1 gene in both plants has not previously been associated with immunity to pathogens. In this study, we show that the M. oryzae effector AvrPiz-t interacts with OsAKT1 and suppresses OsAKT1-mediated inward K+ currents (Figs 1 and 2), thereby likely interfering with the K+ signaling pathway. Genetic analysis showed that loss of OsAKT1 function led to reduced K+ content, K+ uptake and enhanced susceptibility to M. oryzae (Figs 3 and 5D). Consistently, we observed a decrease of K+ uptake and K+ content in the AvrPiz-t transgenic plants at lower K+ levels (S4 Fig). We also found that elevated K+ concentrations in rice tissues can enhance resistance against M. oryzae (Fig 6A–6C) and high K+ concentrations in culture medium can inhibit M. oryzae growth (S12 Fig), suggesting that rice may absorb more K+ for immune activations and fungal growth inhibition during M. oryzae infection. It has been reported that the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae overcomes rice defenses by regulating the redistribution of the micromutrient copper through activation of XA13, COPT1 and COPT5 [39]. Our study has revealed a new strategy by M. oryzae to interfere the OsAKT1 complex to modulate the uptake of the macronutrient K+ in favor of fungal pathogenesis in rice. However, it is still not fully clear how high K+ level in the host enhances immunity against M. oryzae.

In Arabidopsis, CBL1/9 interacts with CIPK23 and recruits it to the plasma membrane, where CIPK23 phosphorylates and activates AKT1 to mediate K+ absorption [36, 40]. As CBL proteins act as Ca2+ sensors in plant cells, the activation of AKT1 by CBL1/CBL9-CIPK23 is reported to be in a Ca2+-dependent manner [40]. As a second messenger, the cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]cyt) is elevated upon PAMP (e.g. flg22, elf18 and chitin) treatments [3, 41, 42]. Although the elevated [Ca2+]cyt is accompanied with rapid membrane depolarization and K+ efflux at the earlier stage [43, 44], the activation of CBL proteins by accumulated [Ca2+]cyt may induce K+ acquisition at the late stage. The observation of induction of OsAKT1 and OsCIPK23 at the later stage of M. oryzae infection may further strengthen this hypothesis (S5A and S10A Figs). CIPK23 is not only a master regulator of AKT1, but also regulates the activity of the K+ transporter HAK5, the NO3- sensor CHL1 and the NH4+ transporters AMT1;1 and AMT1;2 [4547]. Thus, CBL1/9-CIPK23 cascade plays key roles in regulating the K+, NO3- and NH4+ homeostasis in Arabidopsis [47]. The activation of CIPKs relies on the direct interaction of the self-inhibitory NAF motif with a particular CBL protein [4851]. The rice OsAKT1 protein acting alone can mediate inward K+ currents in HEK293 cells, while OsCBL1 and OsCIPK23 further enhance the strength of the K+ currents [4]. Physiological analyses have demonstrated that both OsAKT1 and OsCIPK23 positively regulate K+ absorption [4], and here we show that AvrPiz-t competes with OsCIPK23 for binding to OsAKT1 (Fig 4). This may affect the stability of the OsAKT1-OsCIPK23 complex and decrease OsAKT1 activity. Although it has been reported that activation of AKT1 in Arabidopsis depends on the phosphorylation of CIPK23 [36, 40], we were not able to demonstrate that OsCIPK23 has kinase activity in vitro, even when incubated with OsCBL1 or deleted the self-inhibition NAF motif as indicated in Arabidopsis CIPK23 [36]. We speculate that OsCIPK23 kinase activity may require another unknown protein except OsCBL1. Consistent with the AvrPiz-t competition effect, the oscipk23 mutant showed significantly reduced K+ levels and enhanced susceptibility to M. oryzae (Fig 5A–5C). Moreover, the osakt1 and oscipk23 mutants showed impaired K+ uptake and ROS accumulation (Fig 5D and 5E), which provides further evidence for the importance of K+ in enhancing resistance to M. oryzae in rice. PexRD54, an effector protein secreted by the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans, also utilizes a competition mechanism to subvert host defense [12]. PexRD54 directly binds to ATG8CL and competes with the host cargo receptor Joka2 that causes Joka2 out of the ATG8CL autophagosomes, thereby promoting disease susceptibility [12]. PsAvh23, another effector from the soybean pathogen Phytophthora sojae, attacks ADA2 subunit of histone acetyltransferase SAGA to block the association of ADA2 with the catalytic subunit of GCN5, and thus to suppress H3K9 acetylation and increase plant susceptibility [52]. Those examples suggest that pathogen effectors may interfere the function of host protein complex by competitive binding.

In conclusion, our study reveals a novel function of AvrPiz-t, as well as the role of OsAKT1-OsCIPK23-mediated K+ signaling in rice innate immunity. We provide evidence of an intimate connection between plant nutrition status and disease resistance and propose a working model depicting the mechanism by which AvrPiz-t promotes the infection of the blast fungus via perturbing the function of the K+-associated OsAKT1-OsCIPK23 complex in rice (Fig 6H).

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

For hydroponic cultivation, the rice seeds were sown on wet filter paper and pre-germinated in an incubator for 3 days. The germinated seeds were transferred to nutrient solution containing 1 mM or 5 mM K+. The solution was replaced every 3 days. For the transgenic plants and T-DNA insertion mutants, seeds were germinated on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 50 mg/L hygromycin for 10 days and then transferred to soil. Seedlings were kept in a growth chamber at 26°C and 70% relative humidity with a 12-h light/dark photoperiod.

Blast fungus inoculation and disease symptom evaluation

The M. oryzae isolates RO1-1 and RB22 were cultivated on oat meal medium under weak light for 2 weeks to generate spores. For spray inoculation, three-week-old seedlings were sprayed with 1–1.5×105/mL spores of M. oryzae as previously described [53]. 5–7 days after inoculation, the typical susceptible lesion numbers in each seedling were counted to evaluate the infection level.

Four-six weeks old rice plants were tested with the punch inoculation method as previously described [24]. Different from spay inoculation, the concentration of spores is higher for punch inoculation (about 5×105/mL). The rice leaves were lightly punched with a mouse ear clip and a 10 μL volume of spore suspension was dropped on the punched sites of leaves. Then the spore suspension was hold by sealing with Scotch tape on both sides. Twelve days after inoculation, the inoculated leaves were photographed and the relative fungal biomass was calculated to determine the fungal growth in leaves. The calculation of the relative fungal biomass was performed as described before [24]. Briefly, 4 cm of rice leaf with lesion was cut for DNA extraction with classical cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) extraction protocol. Relative fungal biomass was measured with DNA-based quantitative PCR (qPCR) using the threshold cycle value (CT) of M. oryzae MoPot2 gene against the CT value of rice genomic Ubiquitin (OsUbq) gene according to the formula 2[CT(OsUbq)-CT(MoPot2)]. The qPCR was performed with 2×SYBR Green Mix (GeneStar) on ABI Prism 7500 PCR instrument. Primers used for analysis were listed in S1 Table.

Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) and GST pull-down analysis

The Y2H and GST pull-down assays were performed as previously described [27] with slight modifications. Briefly, the ProQuest Two-Hybrid System (Invitrogen) was used for the Y2H experiments. The AvrPiz-t coding region without the predicted signal peptide sequence [24] was cloned in-frame into the pDBleu vector as the bait. The sequences encoding the OsAKT1 intracellular C terminal fragments were cloned into the pPC86 vector as the prey. After co-transformation of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain Mav203) and screening on SD/-Leu-Trp plates, positive clones were selected to grow on SD/-Leu-Trp-His medium with different concentration of 3-Amino-1,2,4-Triazole (3AT), or tested with β-galactosidase (X-gal).

For the GST pull-down assay, ~10 μg GST fusion proteins were mixed with ~10 μg or the indicated amount of MBP fusion proteins. The mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 1 h with gentle shaking, and then 20 μL pre-rinsed glutathione sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) was added, followed by incubation at room temperature for another 1 h. The beads were then washed 5–7 times with 1× TBST buffer. Finally, 1× SDS sample-loading buffer was added to the beads, and the mixture boiled for 5 min, prior to SDS-PAGE analysis.

In vivo luciferase complementation and Co-IP assay in N. benthamiana

The luciferase complementation assay was conducted as previously described [54]. Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain EHA105) containing the desired constructs was used to infiltrate N. benthamiana leaves after adjusting the concentration of bacterial solution with MES buffer (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES, pH 5.6) to optical density 600 (OD600) of 0.5. At 36 h after infiltration, leaf discs were taken and incubated with 150 ng/ml D-luciferin potassium in a 96-well plate, and the relative LUC activity was detected with a GLOMAX 96 microplate luminometer (Promega).

For the Co-IP assays, proteins were extracted from infiltrated leaf tissues with native buffer (50 mM Tris-MES, pH 8.0, 0.5 M sucrose, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, and protease inhibitor cocktail) and were subjected to anti-HA immunoprecipitation. After incubation with HA antibody (Roche) for 4 h at 4°C, 20 μL pre-rinsed Protein G beads (Millipore) was added to the protein-antibody mixtures and incubated for another 3 h. The beads were then washed 3–5 times with 1× TBST buffer. 1× SDS loading buffer was added to the samples and boiled for 5 min to elute the proteins prior to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis.

Patch-clamp analysis of HEK293 cells

The patch-clamping experiments were performed as described previously [4]. Briefly, HEK293 cells (human embryonic kidney cell line 293) were purchased from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) and pre-cultured in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium with 4.5 g/L glucose and 10% fetal calf serum for 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. OsAKT1 full length CDS was cloned in-frame in the pEGFP-N1 vector (Clontech). DsRed was used to monitor the transfection efficiency and was added to the pBudCE4.1 vector (Invitrogen) to allow expression driven by the EF-1α promoter, while AvrPiz-t or AvrPii variants were cloned into another site in the vector under control of the CMV promoter. The constructs pEGFP-N1-OsAKT1 and pBudCE4.1-DsRed-AvrPiz-t/AvrPii were co-transfected into HEK293 cells and the transfected cells were collected by centrifugation at 160 g for 5 min. The cells with both GFP and RFP fluorescence were selected for whole-cell recording, which was conducted at 20°C in dim light with an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments). The pipette solution and batch solution were as previously described [4]. Primers used for vector constructions were listed in S1 Table.

K+ content measurement and K+ depletion assay

The shoots and roots of three-week-old plants were collected, rinsed with deionized water and dried at 65°C to a constant weight (at least 3 days). The dry samples were weighed and then incinerated in a muffle furnace at 300°C for 1 h and 575°C for 7 h, as previously described [4]. After incineration, the ashes were dissolved in 0.1 N hydrochloric acid and diluted with water to a suitable K+ concentration (~100 mM) based on the K+ content of rice (~3%). The K+ concentrations were determined by microwave plasma emission spectrometry (Agilent 4100 MP-AES).

The K+ depletion assay was performed as previously described [4]. Rice seeds were germinated on half-strength MS medium at 28°C under full light. Seven days after germination, 7 seedlings (fresh weight ~0.8g) with the endosperm removed were pretreated with starvation solution (0.2 mM CaSO4, 5 mM MES, pH 5.75) for 18 h then transferred to depletion solution (0.25mM KNO3, 0.2 mM CaSO4, 5 mM MES, pH 5.75). The treatments were conducted at 28°C under full light on a shaking table and samples were collected at different time points.

Gene expression analysis

Rice leaf samples were collected from three-week-old seedlings for DNA or RNA isolation. DNA was isolated with CTAB buffer (2% CTAB, 100 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM EDTA, 1.4 M NaCl, 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol). Total RNA was isolated with Trizol regent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. First strand cDNA was synthesized with reverse transcriptase (Promega) after digestion of total RNA with DNase (TransGen). Genomic PCR and semi-quantitative PCR were performed with 2×TSINGKE Master Mix (TSINGKE). qPCR was performed with 2×SYBR Green Mix (GeneStar) on ABI Prism 7500 PCR instrument. Gene expression levels were calculated with the data from three technical repeats. Primers used for analysis were listed in S1 Table.

Net K+ flux analysis in rice root meristem with non-invasive micro-test technology (NMT)

Rice seeds were germinated on half-strength MS medium at 28°C under 12 h dark and 12 h light for 10 days. Seedlings were removed endosperm and placed in starvation solution for 2 days. The net K+ flux was measured at the Xuyue (Beijing) Biofunction Institute by using NMT (NMT100 series; YoungerUSA LLC, Amherst, MA01002, USA) and imFluxes V2.0 software (YoungerUSA LLC, Amherst, MA01002, USA). The roots of seedlings were first equilibrated in measuring buffer (0.1 mM CaCl2 and 0.2 mM MES, PH 6.0) and then transferred to a measuring chamber with measuring buffer containing either 0.1 mM or 1 mM K+. The ion-selective electrodes were calibrated with measuring buffer containing 0.05, 0.1, and 0.5 mM K+ before measurement. Net K+ fluxes were measured for 10 min under experimental conditions. At least 6 individual plants were measured in an independent experiment.

H2O2 content measurement and ROS kinetic analysis

To measure H2O2 levels in seedlings, we used a H2O2 detection ELISA kit (Kmaels DRE-P9104c). Seedlings (fresh weight ~200mg) were homogenized using a blender in 2 mL acetone and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min. The supernatant was assayed for H2O2 concentration. The standard samples and testing samples were added to the ELISA plate according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After the reaction, the optical density was detected at 450 nm (OD450) using a microtiter plate reader within 15 min. A standard curve was generated by plotting the average OD450 of the standard samples.

For the ROS kinetic analysis, leaf disks were cut from 6-week-old plants and preincubated in sterile distilled water for about 10 h. Three leaf disks were transferred to a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube (Axygen) containing 100 μL of luminol (Bio-Rad Immun-Star horseradish peroxidase substrate), 1 μL of horseradish peroxidase and also 8 nM chitin (hexa-N-acetyl-chitohexaose) or water. Luminescence was then immediately measured using a Glomax 20/20 luminometer. Three biological replicates were assayed for each sample.

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 software. Descriptions of the tests used are introduced in figure legends.

Accession numbers

Sequence data of rice genes can be found in the Rice Genome Annotation Project under following accession numbers: LOC_Os01g45990 for OsAKT1 and LOC_Os07g05620 for OsCIPK23. The gene sequences of M. oryzae can be found in the Gene Bank database with the following accession codes: EU837058 for AvrPiz-t and AB498874 for AvrPii.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Determination of the interaction region in OsAKT1 and AvrPiz-t.

(A) The schematic illustration of the fragments of OsAKT1 used in yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) analysis. (B) Y2H analysis of the interaction domain of OsAKT1 with AvrPiz-t. The truncated OsAKT1 intracellular C terminal regions (A) were co-transfected with AvrPiz-t into yeast cells and screened with SD/-Leu-Trp-His (SD/-L-W-H) medium containing 35 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3AT) and X-gal solution. (C) The interaction between AvrPiz-t(C70A) and OsAKT1-C1. TM, transmembrane domains; cNMP, cyclic nucleotide-monophosphate binding domain; ANK, ankyrin repeats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. The constructs used in the electrophysiology experiments and protein detection by western blot analysis.

(A) Schematic diagram showing the constructs used in the electrophysiology experiments. (B) Western blot analysis of the expression of proteins in the HEK293 cells. Proteins were extracted from the HEK293 cells transfected with indicated constructs and detected by western blot analysis with Anti-GFP and Anti-RFP antibodies, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. The effect of AvrPii to OsAKT1-mediated inward K+ currents.

(A) Y2H analysis of the interaction between OsAKT1 and AvrPii. The interactions of OsAKT1 intracellular C terminal fragments and AvrPii were tested by X-gal solution and SD/-L-W-H medium containing different concentrations of 3AT. Lower concentrations of 3AT were designed to determine possibly weak interaction. AvrPiz-t was used as the positive control. (B) Patch-clamp whole-cell recordings of inward K+ currents in HEK293 cells expressing OsAKT1-GFP, AvrPii+DsRed+OsAKT1-GFP, FLAvrPii+DsRed+OsAKT1-GFP. The voltage protocols, as well as time and current scale bars for the recordings, are shown. (C) The I-V relationship of the steady state whole-cell inward K+ currents in HEK293 cells. The data are derived from the recordings as shown in (B) and presented as means ± s.e.m. (OsAKT1-GFP, n = 36; AvrPii+DsRed+OsAKT1-GFP, n = 23; FLAvrPii+DsRed+OsAKT1-GFP, n = 19).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. K+ uptake is impaired in rice seedlings expressing AvrPiz-t.

(A) Comparison of K+ uptake ability of sWT and AvrPiz-t transgenic plants with K+-depletion assay. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. (n = 3). (B) K+ levels in the shoots of sWT and AvrPiz-t transgenic rice seedlings cultivated in 0.1 mM or 1 mM K+ hydroponic solution for 3 weeks. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. (n = 3). (C) Comparison of K+ fluxes in the primary root meristem of sWT and AvrPiz-t transgenic plants. The left panels indicate the net K+ fluxes supplied with 0.1 mM or 1mM K+ for 10 min. Data are means ± s.e.m. from 5 individual plants. The mean K+ fluxes over the 10 min were shown in the right column diagrams. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. (n = 10). Student’s t-test (**P < 0.01). ns, no significant difference.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. OsAKT1 expression pattern during M. oryzae infection and identification of the osakt1 mutant.

(A) Nipponbare (NPB) plants were sprayed with the compatible M. oryzae isolate RB22 or mock (without pathogen). The shoots samples were collected at indicated time points and subjected to RNA extraction. OsAKT1 specific primers are used to do the qRT-PCR. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. (n = 3). (B) The schematic illustration of the structure of the OsAKT1 gene and the T-DNA insertion site of the osakt1 mutant. The black boxes indicate exons and the lines represent introns. Sites of primers used for identification of the mutant are labeled with arrows. (C) Genomic and transcriptional identification of the osakt1 mutant. The Ubiquitin (Ubq) gene was used as internal control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig. The expression level of LOC_Os07g07910 in the OsAKT1 RNAi lines.

Relative gene expression of LOC_Os07g07910 was measured by qRT-PCR in the leaves of OsAKT1 RNAi lines. Values represent means ± s.e.m. (n = 3). ns, no significant difference.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.s006

(TIF)

S7 Fig. AvrPiz-t doesn’t affect the stability of OsAKT1 in rice protoplasts.

~5 μg OsAKT1-C-HA (A), OsAKT1-C1-HA (B) or OsAKT1-HA (C) construct was co-transfected with ~5 μg AvrPiz-t-GFP construct or empty vector (GFP) into NPB protoplasts. After 24 h incubation, the total proteins were extracted and analyzed by immunoblotting with Anti-HA or Anti-GFP antibody. The HSP protein (HSP 82) was used as a loading control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.s007

(TIF)

S8 Fig. OsAKT1-C/C1 interact with OsCIPK23.

(A) Luciferase complementation assay for the interaction of OsAKT1-C/C1 and OsCIPK23. The indicated constructs were transiently co-expressed in N. benthamiana leaves with AvrPiz-t as negative control. Leaf disks from the leaves were used for luminescence detection 36 h after infiltration. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. (n = 3). Student’s t-test (***P < 0.001). (B) Co-IP assay for OsAKT1-C/C1 and OsCIPK23 interaction. CLuc-OsCIPK23 was co-expressed with GUS-HA, OsAKT1-C or OsAKT1-C1 in N. benthamiana leaves. Total proteins were extracted 48 h after infiltration and subjected to immunoprecipitation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.s008

(TIF)

S9 Fig. Increasing of AvrPii protein levels doesn’t obviously affect the association of OsAKT1 and OsCIPK23 in vitro.

The MBP-OsCIPK23-cMyc proteins were incubated with GST or GST-OsAKT1-C along with increased MBP-AvrPii-HA proteins in a pull-down assay. The input or retrieved proteins were analyzed by immunoblot with Anti-cMyc, Anti-HA and Anti-GST antibodies, respectively. The MBP-AvrPiz-t-HA protein was used as a positive control. Red arrow indicates the GST-OsAKT1-C proteins.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.s009

(TIF)

S10 Fig. OsCIPK23 expression pattern during M. oryzae infection and identification of oscipk23 mutant.

(A) NPB plants were sprayed with the compatible M. oryzae isolate RB22 or mock, and the shoots samples were collected at indicated time points and subjected to RNA extraction. OsCIPK23 specific primers are used to do the qRT-PCR analysis. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. (n = 3). (B) The schematic illustration of the structure of the OsCIPK23 gene and the T-DNA insertion site of the oscipk23 mutant. The black boxes indicate exons and the lines represent introns. Sites of primers used for identification of the mutant are labeled with arrows. (C) Genomic and transcriptional identification of the oscipk23 mutant. The Ubq gene was used as an internal control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.s010

(TIF)

S11 Fig. Phenotypes of OsCIPK23 CRISPR/Cas9 edited plants against blast inoculation.

(A) Illustration of CRISPR/Cas9 vector targeted regions of OsCIPK23 CDS. The red color labeled nucleotides indicate the 2 target sequences by single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) in one construct. The underlined nucleotides indicate the protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs). (B) Mutation analysis based on PCR amplication and Sanger sequencing of the genomic DNA. (C) Blast inoculation with a compatible isolate RO1-1 and photographed at 12 dpi. (D) Relative fungal growth in (C) were quantified by qPCR [2[CT(OsUbq)-CT(MoPot2)]]. Data are shown as means ± s.e.m. (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.s011

(TIF)

S12 Fig. High K+ levels inhibit blast fungal growth on medium.

The M. oryzae isolates RB22 (A) and RO1-1 (B) were inoculated on the complete medium (CM) with increased K+ which was supplied by K2SO4. The basal CM medium contains about 18 mM K+. The colony diameters were measused and analyzed in the right pannel. Data are shown as means ± s.d. (n = 4). Different letters represent significant differences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878.s012

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Daoxin Xie (Tsinghua University) for useful suggestions to this work. We are grateful for Dr. Huanbin Zhou (Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences) for kindly providing CRISPR/Cas9 vectors.

References

  1. 1. Wang Y, Wu WH. Genetic approaches for improvement of the crop potassium acquisition and utilization efficiency. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015;25:46–52. pmid:25941764
  2. 2. Amtmann A, Troufflard S, Armengaud P. The effect of potassium nutrition on pest and disease resistance in plants. Physiol Plantarum. 2008;133(4):682–91.
  3. 3. Wang Y, Wu WH. Potassium transport and signaling in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64:451–76. pmid:23330792
  4. 4. Li J, Long Y, Qi GN, Li J, Xu ZJ, Wu WH, et al. The Os-AKT1 channel is critical for K+ uptake in rice roots and is modulated by the rice CBL1-CIPK23 complex. Plant Cell. 2014;26(8):3387–402. pmid:25096783
  5. 5. Yang T, Zhang S, Hu Y, Wu F, Hu Q, Chen G, et al. The role of a potassium transporter OsHAK5 in potassium acquisition and transport from roots to shoots in rice at low potassium supply levels. Plant Physiol. 2014;166(2):945–59. pmid:25157029
  6. 6. Wang M, Zheng QS, Shen QR, Guo SW. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(4):7370–90. pmid:23549270
  7. 7. Mann RL, Kettlewell PS, Jenkinson R. Effect of foliar-applied potassium chloride on septoria leaf blotch of winter wheat. Plant Pathol. 2004;53(5):653–9.
  8. 8. Williams BJ, Smith SG. Correcting potassium deficiency can reduce rice stem diseases. Better Crops with Plant Food. 2001;85:7–9.
  9. 9. Jones JD, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444(7117):323–9. pmid:17108957
  10. 10. Dangl JL, Horvath DM, Staskawicz BJ. Pivoting the plant immune system from dissection to deployment. Science. 2013;341(6147):746–51. pmid:23950531
  11. 11. Xin XF, He SY. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000: a model pathogen for probing disease susceptibility and hormone signaling in plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013;51:473–98. pmid:23725467
  12. 12. Dagdas YF, Belhaj K, Maqbool A, Chaparro-Garcia A, Pandey P, Petre B, et al. An effector of the Irish potato famine pathogen antagonizes a host autophagy cargo receptor. Elife. 2016;5:e10856. pmid:26765567
  13. 13. Rodriguez-Herva JJ, Gonzalez-Melendi P, Cuartas-Lanza R, Antunez-Lamas M, Rio-Alvarez I, Li Z, et al. A bacterial cysteine protease effector protein interferes with photosynthesis to suppress plant innate immune responses. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14(5):669–81. pmid:22233353
  14. 14. Block A, Guo M, Li G, Elowsky C, Clemente TE, Alfano JR. The Pseudomonas syringae type III effector HopG1 targets mitochondria, alters plant development and suppresses plant innate immunity. Cell Microbiol. 2010;12(3):318–30. pmid:19863557
  15. 15. Chen LQ, Hou BH, Lalonde S, Takanaga H, Hartung ML, Qu XQ, et al. Sugar transporters for intercellular exchange and nutrition of pathogens. Nature. 2010;468(7323):527–32. pmid:21107422
  16. 16. Zhou HB, Lin JA, Johnson A, Morgan RL, Zhong WW, Ma WB. Pseudomonas syringae Type III effector HopZ1 targets a host enzyme to suppress isoflavone biosynthesis and promote infection in soybean. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;9(3):177–86. pmid:21402357
  17. 17. Yan X, Talbot NJ. Investigating the cell biology of plant infection by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2016;34:147–53. pmid:27816794
  18. 18. Oliveira-Garcia E, Valent B. How eukaryotic filamentous pathogens evade plant recognition. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;26:92–101. pmid:26162502
  19. 19. Skamnioti P, Gurr SJ. Against the grain: safeguarding rice from rice blast disease. Trends Biotechnol. 2009;27(3):141–50. pmid:19187990
  20. 20. Wang GL, Valent B. Durable resistance to rice blast. Science. 2017;355(6328):906–7. pmid:28254898
  21. 21. Malaker PK, Banna NCD, Tiwari TP, Collis WJ, Duveiller E, Singh PK, et al. First report of wheat blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype triticum in Bangladesh. Plant Dis. 2016;100(11):2330-.
  22. 22. Islam MT, Croll D, Gladieux P, Soanes DM, Persoons A, Bhattacharjee P, et al. Emergence of wheat blast in Bangladesh was caused by a South American lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae. Bmc Biol. 2016;14(1):84. pmid:27716181
  23. 23. Li W, Wang BH, Wu J, Lu GD, Hu YJ, Zhang X, et al. The Magnaporthe oryzae avirulence gene AvrPiz-t encodes a predicted secreted protein that triggers the immunity in rice mediated by the blast resistance gene Piz-t. Mol Plant Microbe In. 2009;22(4):411–20.
  24. 24. Park CH, Chen S, Shirsekar G, Zhou B, Khang CH, Songkumarn P, et al. The Magnaporthe oryzae effector AvrPiz-t targets the RING E3 ubiquitin ligase APIP6 to suppress pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity in rice. Plant Cell. 2012;24(11):4748–62. pmid:23204406
  25. 25. Park CH, Shirsekar G, Bellizzi M, Chen S, Songkumarn P, Xie X, et al. The E3 ligase APIP10 connects the effector AvrPiz-t to the NLR receptor Piz-t in rice. Plos Pathog. 2016;12(3):e1005529. pmid:27031246
  26. 26. Ning Y, Wang R, Shi X, Zhou X, Wang GL. A layered defense strategy mediated by rice E3 ubiquitin ligases against diverse pathogens. Mol Plant. 2016;9(8):1096–8. pmid:27381441
  27. 27. Wang RY, Ning YS, Shi XT, He F, Zhang CY, Fan JB, et al. Immunity to rice blast disease by suppression of effector-triggered necrosis. Curr Biol. 2016;26(18):2399–411. pmid:27641772
  28. 28. Fuchs I, Stolzle S, Ivashikina N, Hedrich R. Rice K+ uptake channel OsAKT1 is sensitive to salt stress. Planta. 2005;221(2):212–21. pmid:15599592
  29. 29. Very AA, Sentenac H. Molecular mechanisms and regulation of K+ transport in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2003;54:575–603. pmid:14503004
  30. 30. Yoshida K, Saitoh H, Fujisawa S, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, Yoshida K, et al. Association genetics reveals three novel avirulence genes from the rice blast fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Cell. 2009;21(5):1573–91. pmid:19454732
  31. 31. Ren XL, Qi GN, Feng HQ, Zhao S, Zhao SS, Wang Y, et al. Calcineurin B-like protein CBL10 directly interacts with AKT1 and modulates K+ homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2013;74(2):258–66. pmid:23331977
  32. 32. Sander JD, Joung JK. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(4):347–55. pmid:24584096
  33. 33. Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell. 2014;157(6):1262–78. pmid:24906146
  34. 34. Chen G, Hu Q, Luo L, Yang T, Zhang S, Hu Y, et al. Rice potassium transporter OsHAK1 is essential for maintaining potassium-mediated growth and functions in salt tolerance over low and high potassium concentration ranges. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38(12):2747–65. pmid:26046301
  35. 35. Leigh RA, Jones RGW. A hypothesis relating critical potassium concentrations for growth and distribution and functions of this ion in the plant cell. New Phytol. 1984;97(1):1–13.
  36. 36. Xu J, Li HD, Chen LQ, Wang Y, Liu LL, He L, et al. A protein kinase, interacting with two calcineurin B-like proteins, regulates K+ transporter AKT1 in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2006;125(7):1347–60. pmid:16814720
  37. 37. Lee SC, Lan WZ, Kim BG, Li LG, Cheong YH, Pandey GK, et al. A protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation network regulates a plant potassium channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(40):15959–64. pmid:17898163
  38. 38. Wang Y, He L, Li HD, Xu JA, Wu WH. Potassium channel α-subunit AtKC1 negatively regulates AKT1-mediated K+ uptake in Arabidopsis roots under low-K+ stress. Cell Res. 2010;20(7):826–37. pmid:20514083
  39. 39. Yuan M, Chu Z, Li X, Xu C, Wang S. The bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae overcomes rice defenses by regulating host copper redistribution. Plant Cell. 2010;22(9):3164–76. pmid:20852017
  40. 40. Li LG, Kim BG, Cheong YH, Pandey GK, Luan S. A Ca2+ signaling pathway regulates a K+ channel for low-K response in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(33):12625–30. pmid:16895985
  41. 41. Hetherington AM, Brownlee C. The generation of Ca2+ signals in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2004;55:401–27. pmid:15377226
  42. 42. Kwaaitaal M, Huisman R, Maintz J, Reinstadler A, Panstruga R. Ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR)-like channels mediate MAMP-induced calcium influx in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem J. 2011;440(3):355–65. pmid:21848515
  43. 43. Jeworutzki E, Roelfsema MR, Anschutz U, Krol E, Elzenga JT, Felix G, et al. Early signaling through the Arabidopsis pattern recognition receptors FLS2 and EFR involves Ca2+-associated opening of plasma membrane anion channels. Plant J. 2010;62(3):367–78. pmid:20113440
  44. 44. Brauer EK, Ahsan N, Dale R, Kato N, Coluccio AE, Pineros MA, et al. The Raf-like kinase ILK1 and the high affinity K+ transporter HAK5 are required for innate immunity and abiotic stress response. Plant Physiol. 2016;171(2):1470–84. pmid:27208244
  45. 45. Ragel P, Rodenas R, Garcia-Martin E, Andres Z, Villalta I, Nieves-Cordones M, et al. The CBL-interacting protein kinase CIPK23 regulates HAK5-mediated high-affinity K+ uptake in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol. 2015;169(4):2863–73. pmid:26474642
  46. 46. Ho CH, Lin SH, Hu HC, Tsay YF. CHL1 functions as a nitrate sensor in plants. Cell. 2009;138(6):1184–94. pmid:19766570
  47. 47. Straub T, Ludewig U, Neuhauser B. The kinase CIPK23 inhibits ammonium transport in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2017;29(2):409–22. pmid:28188265
  48. 48. Guo Y, Halfter U, Ishitani M, Zhu JK. Molecular characterization of functional domains in the protein kinase SOS2 that is required for plant salt tolerance. Plant Cell. 2001;13(6):1383–99. pmid:11402167
  49. 49. Luan S, Kudla J, Rodriguez-Concepcion M, Yalovsky S, Gruissem W. Calmodulins and calcineurin B-like proteins: calcium sensors for specific signal response coupling in plants. Plant Cell. 2002;14:S389–S400. pmid:12045290
  50. 50. Sanchez-Barrena MJ, Fujii H, Angulo I, Martinez-Ripoll M, Zhu JK, Albert A. The structure of the C-terminal domain of the protein kinase AtSOS2 bound to the calcium sensor AtSOS3. Mol Cell. 2007;26(3):427–35. pmid:17499048
  51. 51. Chaves-Sanjuan A, Sanchez-Barrena MJ, Gonzalez-Rubio JM, Moreno M, Ragel P, Jimenez M, et al. Structural basis of the regulatory mechanism of the plant CIPK family of protein kinases controlling ion homeostasis and abiotic stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(42):E4532–E41. pmid:25288725
  52. 52. Kong L, Qiu XF, Kang JG, Wang Y, Chen H, Huang J, et al. A Phytophthora effector manipulates host Histone acetylation and reprograms defense gene expression to promote infection. Curr Biol. 2017;27(7):981–91. pmid:28318979
  53. 53. Ning Y, Shi X, Wang R, Fan J, Park CH, Zhang C, et al. OsELF3-2, an ortholog of Arabidopsis ELF3, interacts with the E3 Ligase APIP6 and negatively regulates immunity against Magnaporthe oryzae in rice. Mol Plant. 2015;8(11):1679–82. pmid:26296797
  54. 54. Chen HM, Zou Y, Shang YL, Lin HQ, Wang YJ, Cai R, et al. Firefly luciferase complementation imaging assay for protein-protein interactions in plants. Plant Physiol. 2008;146(2):368–76. pmid:18065554